#emphatically point
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Ishi was prattling on about something in their inn room, more than used to filling the silence and knowing Kizuna preferred it and was always listening. His presence was elsewhere, until it suddenly wasn't- heat radiating against her back like a low fire as she jumped at the touch. His forehead pressed against her shoulder, hands reaching before they twitched back to hover uncertainly around her. Ishi could feel the hotness of his breath as he exhaled a frustrated-sounding huff. "Kizuna....? What's wrong?" She asks, voice soft as she reaches back to pet his hair, soft and fluffy and still free from their recent visit to the hot spring. She can hear-feel the way his teeth grind together before another hot sigh seeps into her sweater, fluffy white ears pinning back in the corners of her vision. Ishi waits- ears swiveled back to listen while her eyes watched his hands. It took a while, Kizuna's hands moving wordlessly before they both synced up. His middle fingers come forward, hands flicking in her direction and back again before he clenched his hands (More uncertainty- not a sign-). Ishi can feel him lean against her a little further, the next sign more shy as he crooked one pointer finger a couple times.
[Touch.... can I?]
---
Kizuna has lots of trouble initiating touch himself, even well into their official relationship when Ishi touches him freely.
I actually really like writing sign, as difficult as it is sometimes. Kizuna is so expressive in his body language it's a much more accurate way for him to communicate as well as being more comfortable for him.
He also asks questions like this a lot, especially ones he's anxious about. It reads as rather "cute/shy" to me, since he just signs one word [TOUCH] and then indicates that he's [ASK]ing a question, the second sign always very small.
I do use brackets to indicate that [Kizuna is signing,] but its just in replacement of "someone is speaking," and I write it out as it would be translated as opposed to what he's actually signing. It's mostly for rp purposes to keep my thoughts organized, and to know if someone is using sign immediately rather than typing X signs, every time.
#ffxiv gpose#ffxiv kizuna#ffxiv ishi'li#hope you like my ramblings#i woke up at 6am because of snoring#lowkey dislike these screenshots but its only because i gotta like#emphatically point#BISEXUAL LIGHTING#THEYRE T4T#THIS IS NOT A STRAIGHT PERFUME COMMERCIAL SEXY POSE#idk like i said im tired#otherwise i do like these....
12 notes
¡
View notes
Text
Clown had some... pretty creepy ideas with beta Barnaby, I'll say that much, but one thing that really interests me about the beta is that though he seems to have always been the jokester of the Neighborhood, beta Barnaby was grumpy. He was melancholy. His (again, beta) color palette was very muted compared to the other neighbors. Goofing off in a depressed sort of way.
Meanwhile, the Barnaby we have in canon is vibrant, both in color palette and personality. He's boisterous, he's cheerful, and most of all, he's so chill to the point of being seemingly unflappable. I don't think we've ever seen canon Barnaby express genuine frustration or anger. When Frank tells him off or Julie gets riled up over a failed joke, it's water off a duck's back.
Canon Barnaby's role is as Wally's best friend, and he takes the job of supervisor and teacher quite seriously, but he also cares- in a roundabout way- for his other neighbors, like joke-loving Howdy and even Julie, who he (I think genuinely) wants to teach how to tell jokes. As long as he can tease his buddies and have a jazzed-to-the-nines hot dog at the end of the day, everything's hunky-dory.
To be clear, Clown has stated that beta Welcome Home art/concepts and everything off the WHRP website should NOT be considered canon. Still, I can't help but wonder- how long will Barnaby's chill last? He puts up a fun-loving front, but something's going to have to make him snap eventually.
And when he does, it's going to tear my heart open.
#i have my theories......#*points emphatically at julie*#welcome home theory#welcome home speculation#clown don't look#beta welcome home#barnaby b beagle#barnaby beagle#liz says hi!#welcome home#đž barnaby
29 notes
¡
View notes
Text
I'd Do Anything (... But I Won't Do That)
This started out kind of weird and petty but then turned into an actual thing about the relationship of Viren's character arc(s) to the Arc 2 "I'll do anything for you" theme, because that's actually pretty important for the context of how both Callum and Claudia will have to confront the same conflict.
Pictured: Do NOT take a shot every time we get a callback to this line, you will die.
Basically, the petty part is that I think evaluating Viren's Arc 1 decisions through the "I will do anything for my family" lens is... disingenuous is too strong a word, but maybe simplistic? The "Viren doesn't reveal/offer the egg to save Harrow's life because he's too preoccupied with hanging on to his own power" take has never sat right with me because the real core problem of Viren is a lot more complex than just "he's lying (to himself)," it's a whole pattern of denying his own agency in doubling down on his mistakes. He'll make one bad/selfish decision, and it becomes a cascade of subsequent actions that he sees as being unavoidable, but that aren't necessarily even informed by the same reasoning or values as the initial decision. Like everything else in Viren's dream, Kpp'Ar's take that his choices are all oriented toward power is both accurate and not necessarily as literal as it seems.
Because, like... Viren's not actually a manipulator or even much of a plannerâhe's a very skilled opportunist. That's why all his choices wind up being based entirely on the context of past choices, and frequently make no sense when you look at them from a "hey buddy, where exactly do you think you're going with this" angle. It also contributes to why he's so desperate for control all the time, in that he acts primarily in a reactive way rather than proactively, which is always an inherently less secure position.
Pictured: The kind of statement that definitely always leads to things going super well.
Even taking the egg in the first place is a reactive decisionânot that he doesn't make a choice there, or that he doesn't choose power over the threat he believes the egg poses, but he did actually walk all the way up the Storm Spire, fight five or six Dragonguard, and get kicked down a flight of stairs with the intent of destroying it. He didn't argue with Harrow about destroying it while secretly planning to take it for himself. He only even thinks of it as a weapon because Tiadrin planted the idea in his mindâas an opportunist, the temptation to leave an avenue to power open rather than close it off is what he can't resist. He sat on Sarai's last breath for ten years waiting for a chance to weaponize it to maximum effect, he can sit (figuratively... or literally, I'm not gonna stop him) on the egg for as long as it takes for an appropriate use it to appear. Tiadrin even specifically encourages that he not "waste" it, both specifically by destroying it now, and implicitly by using it too quickly and foolishly.
Pictured: Smart mom, dumb ass.
Tiadrin's angle, of course, is that the longer Viren hangs on to the egg without actually using it, the higher the chance it can be recovered. She doesn't know that Viren will leave things in a state where the assumption is that the egg was destroyed, meaning no one will think to try recovering it, but that's not really her fault and it still pays off.
The gamble Viren makes, on the other hand, is that the opportunities the egg affords will be worth the risk of it somehow falling back into Xadian hands. If the egg returns to Xadia alive, he's back to square "his name will be vengeance" in the game of We Killed the Dragon King. So yeah, you could say Viren values keeping the egg over Harrow's life, but in doing that he's actually operating largely on the exact same values and beliefs that made him argue for destroying it in the first place. It's just that his prior choice of risking humanity's security for the sake of potentially world-altering power has backfired in the context of an immediate and direct threat to Harrow's life. Really, the entire rest of s1 and s2 are him doubling down specifically on keeping the egg from returning to Xadia while also milking the opportunities coming from that courseâe.g. the egg cannot go back to Xadia, therefore Callum and Ezran cannot return to Katolis either with or without it (knowing their goal is to return it to Xadia, which it will be difficult to stop them from doing once Ezran is king), and that means someone has to take the throne. If the egg can't be recovered, their only hope is a decisive first strike against Xadia, so someone has to mobilize the Pentarchy immediately. None of them are things he planned in the sense of "well, if Harrow dies then I can get his sons out of the way and make myself king, and then conquer Xadia." It's all reactive to the situation with the egg. You could argue that he'd do the same things if the egg wasn't a factor, like it's possible he's always been kind of lying in wait to push Harrow's sons aside and seize the throne... but if that was the case, he'd really do much better to make a bid for regent like any normal evil advisor would.
Anyway, all of that does still undermine the statement that he'd do "anything" for his family (which includes Harrow), and it is ultimately because of that initial choice he made to take the opportunity of power over the certainty of securing humanity's future. It's just not as simple as, "Viren says he would do anything for his family, but he won't sacrifice his own power and ambition." In the wake of his critical failure to prioritize humanity in destroying the egg, he's making choices that do prioritize humanity (from within his worldview that Xadia is an existential threat barely held at bay)... but they're still bad choices because they're all reactive to that original bad choice. It's not that he's working at cross-purposes to what he says his goals are, it's that he genuinely thinks digging his hole deeper will somehow work out positively, or at least better than the alternative would.
Pictured: Another statement that for sure indicates you're doing totally great.
Really though, I don't think you can (or are supposed to) look at the trifecta of self-individuals-world and point to one that Virenâor really any character outside of Callum, Rayla, and Claudiaâputs at the top. Part of the whole point here is that elevating one of those at the expense of the others is never going to be the right choice all of the time. Obviously always putting yourself first is shitty, but we get multiple examples of over-prioritizing one of the other two as being self-destructive and dangerous. Consistency isn't supposed to be positive, hereâa core part of this arc is likely to be Callum grappling with that, and that's without even looking at what's going on with Claudia.
The other thing is that "I will do anything for my family"-Viren is actually on some level a different character than Arc 1 Viren, such that evaluating one based on the context of the other doesn't actually make sense. We don't get even a hint of the "I would do anything for my family" in the series until s4, after Viren has died and been revived. Yeah, we had it earlier in the novels, but in there it's really about Claudia and her relationship with Viren, not Viren's values or actions. Arc 1 Viren and Arc 2 Viren inform each other as characters, but most of the point is the ways they aren't the same. And while Arc 2 Viren is understandably preoccupied with the concept of sacrificing for familyâgiven that he's been stripped of everything that was in his life except Claudia, who went to terrible lengths on his behalfâArc 1 Viren is actually quite consistent with how he's laid out in his Tales of Xadia character sheet:
Like, check out those Liberty and Glory statementsânot even close to the same ballpark as Callum's "I value those close to me more than anyone or anything" Devotion and "I'm beholden to my inner circle, not some silly kingdom" Liberty, but quite accurate as the through-line on his s1-s3 actions. There's nothing in there about family, because Arc 1 Viren isn't actually meant to be associated with "I will do anything for my family," and he's not lying to himself by not acting consistently with it in Arc 1.
Arc 2 Viren is then a kind of emotional reboot back to a particular point earlier in his lifeânot necessarily the point before he first did any dark magic at all, but before he did his ill-defined "anything" to save Soren, which is implied in multiple places to be the point where he started in on a spiral that had tangible and fairly rapid effects on his personality and outlook. That's further emphasized by the contents of his dream in s5âseeing him behave in a genuinely loving and joyful way with Soren is shocking, and immediately raises the question of what the fuck happened and why.
Pictured: Healthy coping mechanisms.
Part of what still distinguishes Viren's "I will do anything for my family; however dangerous, however vile" from Callum's developing "I would do anything for you" is that Viren is always deliberately addressing the "things that are so unforgivable, you will never forgive yourself" facet while Callum leaves it implicit because he doesn't really understand and/or want to acknowledge that yet (and also Rayla would probably twist his nose again, which fucking hurts). In how Viren describes it to Terry, he is using that up-front acknowledgement to then essentially abdicate any emotional responsibility for... well, anything at all. The entire "however dangerous, however vile" mantra is another way of denying his own agency, because if he'll do anything, then he doesn't actually have to go through the difficult emotional process of making those decisions and dealing with the aftermath.
Pictured: H-healthy coping mechanisms?
Terry correctly pegs this questionable excuse for philosophy as "not having feelings," and generally not the best approach, because it will do things like lead to a default state of emotional unavailability to your childrenâoh, wait. I think it's not unlikely that Viren's emotional distancing from what "I will do anything for my family" meant contributed a lot to the degradation of it as his core value and his ensuing Arc 1 state. A lot of what's going on in his s5 dream is that he's being confronted with the consequences of "I will do anything for my family," specifically. He's being forced through an emotional speedrun of what it has cost him and everyone around him, and what has he got to show for it? Claudia, corrupted beyond recognition, proudly repeating his own words back to him.
Pictured: Whatever the opposite of daddy issues is.
Because the whole point of Viren's "I will do anything for my family" in Arc 2 is the challenge of whether he would/will do it all again. If he holds to that value the same way he did before, he'll do whatever it takes to save Claudiaâhowever dangerous, however vile. Most of Viren's moral and emotional stuff has been based on his self-serving resignation to having "no choice." He's so tragically trapped in a chain of spiraling consequences he can never break... except oh wait, he totally can. S5 is all about Viren recognizing the dark magic feedback loop and that he has the agency to break it, and his best and only chance to avoid doing further harm to Claudia is to not be willing to destroy himself that way again, even it it means his death will cause her terrible emotional pain.
We'll see how that works out. Because let's be real: Claudia's gonna Claudia, regardless. However it goes, there's an important narrative precedent being set for both breaking free from dark magic/Aaravos and evaluating the "I will do anything for you" impulse in a more nuanced way.
#the dragon prince#viren#thanks for coming to my petty TED talk#also like... do not even pretend that handing over the egg would have worked#or even more emphatically that VIREN would ever have considered handing over the egg as something that would work#the entire point of the cycle-breaking narrative is that the new generation has broader and more compassionate vision#while the old generation is stuck in The Cycle(tm) and therefore incapable of making OR accepting that offer#it would not just be wildly out of character but literally antithetical to the narrative itself for Viren to think it's a viable possibilit#kradogsmeta
61 notes
¡
View notes
Note
idk whats funnier: Ribbons not realizing she's in love until she evolves into a Sylveon, or evolving into a Sylveon and still not figuring it out for like a week
too busy being fae and stealing humus
HEEEEELP. TOO BUSY LEADING POKEMON INTO HER MUSHROOM CIRCLE WHERE THEY WAKE UP AT 4AM WITH IRON DEFICIENCY. She can figure out her qp feelings towards Aimilios LATER. She needs to steal peopleâs IDENTITIES.
#asks#HER STILL BEING OBLIVIOUS AT THAT POINT IS SO FUNNY THOUGH.#at that point Dusknoir would put an emphatic hand on Aimiliosâs shoulder and tell him itâs time to find another (as a joke)
26 notes
¡
View notes
Note
Sorry to be stupid but which band did Joe almost get "sold" to?? (I was thinking about it for so long and couldn't figure it out)
omg LOL no anon you're not stupid i will freely admit that 1. it was not a very good joke on my part and 2. i was coming at it from a weird angle anywayđ i was mostly thinking convolutedly ab like. joe in relation to 2010 the damned things :')
#i say joe in particular and not andy cus by all accounts it seems andy would have been good to go like pretty much whenever maybe#whereas joe has said many times he was reticent ab doing fob again#idk hes said it himself just the fact of tdt's success gave him room to grow + self confidence + therefore potential to forge his own way#tbh kinda seems like he was digging his heels in if he had to get prompted by josh newton lol#like ok obviously i have NOO IDEA what it was like to be joe in that era lmao at the end of the day all we can do is glean but idk#sometimes i just wonder what if joe had rlly genuinely found a groove either with tdt or not#(and idt it wouldve been w tdt entirely just cus obv the other members do other things. but u get it like SOME endeavour after)#like. what would fob/fob history look like.#i mean. they do insist it was never a split#and i'd love to believe it's 4 or nothing 4ever since the band is emphatically founded on friendship..#so maybe just longer hiatus. idk but u know. just đđđ#however idk i do think the other side of the coin of his reticence#and he does admit this himself in saying he eventually started making stipulations to return#was just simply wanting to be wanted back. just wanting room for him#if the sheer extent to which The Call w patrick affected him is anything to go by#to this DAY he rmmbrs that fuckass 3 hour phone call with such fondness like LOL girl what the hell went down. and THANK GOD !!!!!!!!!!#so i guess also maybe it was always going to turn out the way it did.<3#oh no. well. sorry for incoherently overthinking and being embarrassing all over ur question anonđ#honestly tho. it's just astounding the certain points of fob history that hinge on joe ?! lmao#asks
7 notes
¡
View notes
Text
Rewatch of ST:TNG Season 4 Episode 6 "Legacy"
Spoilers ahoy!
--So Data is having Feelings for Tasha's sister Ishara
--and she betrays the crew in the penultimate act,
--and in the scene afterward I *love* Worf's refusal to even talk to her, he just points to where she should stand on the bridge,
--and then Picard has Data walk her to the transporter room
--kudos to Counselor Troi for not outright saying "I TOLD YOU SO, WHY DOES NO ONE LISTEN TO ME WHEN ANOTHER SET OF BOOBS ARE ON THE BRIDGE."
--and Ishara goes "you haven't said one word to me" in that "I'm a weak little woman, pity me" voice that I am So Glad I won't have to listen to anymore in about 5 minutes
--and Stone Cold Data is like "What do you wish to talk about." like dammmmmmn
--and then Ishara starts Pouting and says "I did what I had to do. I'm sorry if I hurt you in the process," implying that Shouldn't Exceptions Be Made with the Poor Traitorous Me angle.
--and Data's like "I am an android. It is not possible for me to be injured in that fashion," because reasons, leading to Horrible Awkward Silence and then
-- O'Brien interjects with the awkward, off-camera "Whenever you're ready."
just makes me laugh out loud every time, I know it's supposed to be a serious moment but I NEED a comic made of this whole exchange, and the silent panels showing O'Brien just standing there, this woman pouting, trying to sway Data and *chef kiss*
I find it comforting, that little slice of awkward reality. Peak Star Trek, really.
#note to self#star trek#star trek tng#data soong#season 4 episode 6#Miles Edward O'Brien#Ishara Yar#Worf with the emphatic pointing#deanna troi#legacy#star trek the next generation#chef kiss#peak star trek#Data is my favorite#anybody want to draw this because it's beautiful
10 notes
¡
View notes
Text
my favorite ygo characters........ kissing.................... !!
#points. look at them. points emphatically#yugioh rafael#yugioh amelda#yugioh alister#they dont have a ship name bht im the CEO of it.#myart#yugioh
10 notes
¡
View notes
Text
Alastor: If violence isn't solving all of your problems, then you simply aren't using enough of it
#Charlie: Alastor no-!#Alastor: ALASTOR YES#Niffty: *maniacal laughter* ALASTOR YES#NIFFTY: đŞ NIFFTY YES#borrowed from starwarslostclone#honestly anyone in the gang would say this#but only Alastor would give it as advice#Vaggie actually agrees#incorrect hazbin hotel#but not really#sort of correct Hazbin hotel#alastor and niffty#Hazbin hotel#Lucifer in the corner just mouthing âviolent maniacsâ emphatically#hazbin alastor#alastor#niffty hazbin hotel#niffty#Alastor: reason number two- look what I can do#Charlie: what does that have to do with-#Vaggie: babe wait- heâs got a point#Charlie: *losing her goddamn mind*#husk and Angel and pentious just like: I donât want to agree with him BUT#Spot Conlon would also say this#so would any of the newsies lol#incorrect hazbin hotel quotes
51 notes
¡
View notes
Text
Been watching The Spectacular Failure of the Star Wars Hotel and hats off to Jenny Nicholson, you have a new forever fan. I am in awe you are a filmmaker like no other
#jenny nicholson#the spectacular failure of the Star Wars hotel#an emphatic eff you to Disney#if youâre not using that access to give an honest review#whatâs the point of being there at all#HAVE YOU NO SENSE OF INTEGRITY#burned into my brain#a true light in this capitalist hellscape#Jenny I mean#NOT Disney#star wars
27 notes
¡
View notes
Text
WE BEAT THE TACO BELL CURSE BABYYYY
9 notes
¡
View notes
Text
So I've heard people give other etymologies for the name "Maugrim" in LWW, but to me it seems clear that it's derived from Managarm, the wolf who eats the moon in Norse mythology. My reasons for this are (a) Lewis was a noted Norse mythology enjoyer and also friends with Beowulf translator JRR Tolkien and (b) he had the name changed to Fenris Ulf in the American version.
Fenris Ulf is the name of Managarm's much more famous brother/father (?) in Norse mythology. So my theory is that this is basically a Philosopher's Stone situation in which Jack didn't think his American readers would get his obscure Norse mythology reference and thus replaced it with a more mainstream one. I am not an expert and could very easily be wrong about this, but as far as I am aware from reading Lewis's letters and stuff, no one can disprove me.
#pointing emphatically to my conspiracy board#a quick google has someone else claiming that maugrim is a portmanteau of âmawâ + âgrimâ and I think my thing makes a lot more sense#this from the man who gave us Pulverulentus Siccus. Managarm is just his speed#also for the record i as a child insisted on calling him Fenris Ulf bc ThATs WHaT JacK WAnTEd and was mad at both#the publishers for changing it back and the Disney movies for using Maugrim#i have a book where i actually crossed out Maugrim and wrote in Fenris Ulf except that I was like nine so i misspelled it#so now you know#animated lww all the way#narnia#pontifications and creations#jack
52 notes
¡
View notes
Text
being a huge fan of tlou but also like. thinking that certain stories are built for certain mediums. like the entire theme of tlou2 is grounded and fresh because itâs a railroad/story video game that still affords you mechanical choices in how you navigate the world. i just donât have a lot of confidence that presenting that story in a tv show with the minimal adjustments that they did in s1 will be fulfilling or compelling in any comparable way. because with tlou1 some of the like. beauty of that story was simply that it was such an emotive story contained in the medium of video games. and some of that was retained just by hitting similar or expanded emotional beats in the show, like the episodes that expanded on the life of the characters and the realities of that world. but truly so much of tlou2 emotional depth and âwhy does this story matterâ rests in the fact thatâs itâs your hands on the controller, continually choosing to go forward in the story and have hope that it will work out in your-as-ellie-or-abby-or-somehow-boothâs favour. and you simply cannot get that in a non-interactive medium like television. like i do think tlou2 is a good story but itâs a good story because of the investment required by the player to keep pressing buttons and keep returning and to feel the adrenaline like responses of high intensity moments and be jarringly shifted into backstories that only increase the frustration. in general iâve been thinking a lot about cross-medium adaptation and on the one hand i am glad that season 1 makes the story of the last of us more accessible to people who wouldnât pick up a video game but itâs also like. maybe instead we can destigmatize video games as this inaccessible and dangerous medium a bit more instead of just . implicitly agreeing . like no maybe your mom wonât pick up a video game controller and play the last of us . but maybe you can play the game in the living room. sometimes the mediums that stories are told in arenât just important but are actually foundational parts of how the information of a story is conveyed and thatâs not only okay but is fucking fantastic. we should be happy actually that there are so many ways to collect a bunch of themes and ideas and put them together and hold them out to someone else and say âwonât you consider this with me. wonât you feel these emotions and care about these characters with me.â
#iâve been thinking about this both for academic and personal reasons#where like. my thesis literally includes discussion of tlou2 and itâs profundity because of the players position as in control but without#real decision making power in the story#and itâs like. youâre the person animating these two ptsd ridden women who subject themselves to be puppets to their#own grief . and thereâs something particularly resonant about the fact that you canât change the Story. you can only play it.#and like . iâve talked with my mom a lot about the last of us#since i played it the first time and it really just rocked my shit. and i remember walking out my bedroom after iâd finished tlou2#feeling that odd mixture of empty and completely fulfilled by a good story with tears in my eyes#and a few years later when i visited home and had happened to bring my ps4 along with me and i was having a rough time#my mom asked if iâd want to show her tlou. because she knew i loved it and because iâve told her it has tropes sheâd enjoy#but the only games sheâll ever play are point and click because sheâs stubborn and some physicality stuff#but like i remember sitting on the couch just. playing this game and it wasnât the exact same as her playing it herself . but sometimes her#commentary was like it was.#i just. idk man. tlou lover wants to be hyped but seeing the exact same visuals from the game just in tv show format is like#. whatâs the point. why are you distilling the themes by removing the active (non)agency of the player and#replacing it with the passive role of ��watcherâ in a story so emphatically about having an active role in the action#anyway#tagging this#tlou#for blog organization but this isnât discourse or whatever just me thinkin my thoughts on my blog
11 notes
¡
View notes
Text
everyone needs an insightful friend, i say, while grumbling to myself about an insightful friend who had a really good point about a decision I'm avoiding
#he had a *very* good point#It wasn't so much a point#As much as a VERY expressive Victor borge emphatic punctuation#made the point though uggghhh#simultaneously 'LOL' and 'cut it out!'
3 notes
¡
View notes
Text
if we assume that the story takes place in 2019 then from oldest to youngest we have:
Holy - fucking uhhhhhh 1990 idk
Michiko - January 27, 1999
Momo - September 28, 2001
Randa - December 11, 2001
Matama - April 8, 2004
Haruka - April 30, 2004
Nemo - June 23, 2004
Kiwi - July 6, 2004
Kaoruko - August 17, 2004
Sayo - September 1, 2004
Utena - November 14, 2004
Korisu - February 8, 2010
#mahoako#points emphatically at michiko. i keep telling you we're tied by fate#holy remains pure speculation but her being around 30 makes sense to me
14 notes
¡
View notes
Text
I remember seeing someone say that Stan(ley) broke the cycle of abuse and i was so fucking confused. Like, are we talking about the same character? The same show even??
Like don't get me wrong i like stan he's a good character, all that, but i feel like sometimes i'm the only one who remembers him literally hitting dipper?? On multiple occasions???
Stan is not a good uncle, he's not a good guardian, it doesn't matter that he does actually care for dipper or that his horrible treatment of him is explained in 'dreamscapers', none of that justifies his shitty actions.
#gravity falls#stanley pines#like i want to emphatize that i dont hate stan and im not bashing him. im literally just acknowleding his actual canon actions#like sorry not sorry but when i see a grown fucking man hitting a child under his care i'm not filled with fuzzy family feelings???#(s1 e2 00:48 & s1 e19 12:19)#sorry i just. im so tired of always seeing characters get praised for good parenting and feeling insane bc i can literally point to moments#of them HITTING THEIR KIDS???#i have to constantly check if those moments actually happened (triggering af btw) bc i actually feel like im losing my mind
15 notes
¡
View notes
Text
Eggnog exists because someone looked at a bowl of custard and thought "Ok, but what if I could just drink that through a straw"
#shitpost#shitposting#eggnog#not that you would#but that you could is the point#i am emphatically not an eggnog fan tbh#but if your custard smoothie is making you happy#then I'm happy for you
15 notes
¡
View notes