#economic honours course

[schoolofeconomicsblog]

How is B.A. Economics Honours a Gateway to Rewarding Careers?

Economics is constantly growing in popularity due to its wide range of applications in various areas, including statistics, GDP, banking, finance, development, etc. It has led to Economics Honours becoming one of the most popular degrees among students and requiring dedication for over three years. In fact, many

BSc economics colleges in India have started to include more and more specializations in this field. A B.A. in Economics Honours course introduces students to market, finance, banking, and money concepts, as well as our economy's workings. They cover topics such as demand, supply, production, history of India, national income, economy, inflows and outflows of capital, international economics, loan operations, inflation and deflation of currencies, GDP, and statistics.

Additionally, the extensive knowledge of subjects included in the BA Economics program prepares you for the analysis of demonetization, Make in India, the annual budget, the introduction of goods and services, and taxes. Furthermore, since Economics involves large numbers and data, statistics are deeply incorporated into the course, making you a highly sought-after professional in the corporate world.

What Are The Top 3 Career Options After a B.A. in Economics?

A degree in economics today will have you well-positioned for a lucrative and successful career. An Economics graduate can pursue a range of professions, from public policy and development to marketing and data science, due to the interdisciplinary nature of a B.A. Economics degree.

Students who want to pursue a career in Economics Honours but need to figure out what career options they have after graduating with B.A. Economics Honours course should consider the following:

Policymaking

Economics graduates specialize in understanding the economy as a whole, which is why many prospective researchers and policymakers choose to study Economics at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels. The field of policymaking can lead you to become a country's finance minister, a central banker, or any other technical role.

Economist in a Corporate Sector Firm

Globally, corporate firms hire economists to research the macroeconomic environment in which they operate. Due to this, economists play a vital role in helping private companies navigate business cycles and policy changes. Furthermore, an economist conducts extensive research using statistical and econometric tools and makes recommendations based on their findings. If you choose this career path, you might work for a bank, a large e-commerce company, or even a technology giant like Google.

Finance

B.A. Economics courses provide students with the basic skills they need to specialize in finance. As a result, graduates of this program may pursue careers in investment banking, private banking, corporate banking, and investment/wealth/asset management. Another possibility is to specialize in corporate finance, which may lead one to become a Chief Financial Officer.

In conclusion, an economic honours course is a highly respected and sought-after qualification demonstrating a solid foundation in economic theories and principles. It can make individuals with this degree competitive candidates for various career opportunities.

In addition to the career options mentioned above, individuals with an economic honours degree may also pursue advanced degrees in economics or related fields, such as business or public policy. It can open up even more career opportunities and allow individuals to specialize in a particular area of interest.

FAQs

Q: How Much Math Is Involved in BA (Hons.) Economics?

A: Mathematics plays a vital role in Economics and Statistics.

Q: What are the core subjects of the course?

A: The course consists of these three core subjects!

Macro Economics: 

Generally, macroeconomics deals with the national and global economy as a whole. It is concerned with concepts such as the government budget, balance of payments, income, and employment.

Micro Economics:

A second major subject of the BA Economics program is Microeconomics, which deals with understanding economic concepts on an individual level, including price determination, demand and supply, and market types.

Statistics:

An integral part of the study of Economics is the study of statistics, as it prepares students for interpreting and implementing economic data effectively.

[mahendrareddy6595]

Career Paths with a BA in Economics: From Analyst to Consultant

Pursuing a Bachelor of Arts in Economics opens up a world of opportunities in various sectors. The degree equips students with essential analytical, quantitative, and problem-solving skills, making them valuable assets in the job market. This article explores the career paths available to graduates with a BA in Economics, emphasizing the comprehensive curriculum and opportunities provided by Alliance University.

 Understanding the BA Economics Program at Alliance University

Alliance University offers a robust BA Economics program designed to provide a deep understanding of economic theories, quantitative methods, and their practical applications. The program is structured to foster critical thinking and analytical skills, preparing students for diverse career paths.

 BA Economics Honours Syllabus

The BA Economics Honours syllabus at Alliance University is meticulously crafted to cover a broad range of economic concepts and real-world applications. Key subjects include:

- Microeconomics: Understanding individual and firm behavior in decision-making processes.

- Macroeconomics: Examining the overall economy's performance, structure, and behavior.

- Econometrics: Applying statistical methods to economic data to test hypotheses and forecast trends.

- Development Economics: Exploring economic development, poverty, and inequality in developing countries.

These subjects form the core of the program, ensuring students gain a comprehensive understanding of economic principles.

 BA Economics Course Details

The BA Economics course details at Alliance University include a blend of core and elective subjects. Core subjects provide a strong foundation in economics, while electives allow students to specialize in areas of interest. The curriculum is divided into semesters, each focusing on different aspects of economics.

 Career Paths with a BA in Economics

Graduates with a BA in Economics from Alliance University have a wide range of career options available to them. Here are some of the most popular career paths:

 1. Economic Analyst

Economic analysts are in high demand across various sectors, including finance, government, and research organizations. They are responsible for analyzing economic data, forecasting trends, and providing insights that inform policy decisions and business strategies.

 2. Financial Consultant

Financial consultants advise clients on investment strategies, financial planning, and risk management. They use their knowledge of economics to help clients make informed financial decisions and achieve their financial goals.

 3. Policy Analyst

Policy analysts work in government agencies, think tanks, and non-profit organizations. They analyze the impact of public policies, conduct research, and provide recommendations to policymakers. Their work is crucial in shaping effective and efficient policies.

 4. Market Research Analyst

Market research analysts study market conditions to identify potential sales opportunities for products and services. They gather and analyze data on consumers, competitors, and market trends, helping companies make informed marketing and business decisions.

 5. Data Analyst

Data analysts work with large datasets to identify trends, patterns, and insights. They use statistical and analytical tools to interpret data, helping organizations make data-driven decisions. This role is highly valued in sectors like finance, healthcare, and technology.

 6. Consultant

Consultants provide expert advice to businesses and organizations on various issues, including economic strategies, business operations, and market trends. Their analytical skills and economic knowledge enable them to offer valuable insights and solutions.

 7. Research Economist

Research economists work in academic institutions, research organizations, and government agencies. They conduct research on economic issues, publish findings, and contribute to the development of economic theories and policies.

 Why Choose Alliance University for BA Economics?

 Comprehensive Curriculum

Alliance University offers one of the best colleges for BA Economics in India, providing a comprehensive curriculum that covers essential economic theories and practical applications. The program's structure ensures students gain a deep understanding of economic principles.

 Experienced Faculty

The faculty at Alliance University comprises experienced professionals and academics who are experts in their fields. They provide valuable insights, mentorship, and support, helping students excel in their studies and career pursuits.

 Research Opportunities

Alliance University offers ample research opportunities for students. Engaging in research projects enhances students' analytical skills and provides practical experience that is highly valued in the job market.

 State-of-the-Art Facilities

The university provides state-of-the-art facilities, including well-equipped libraries, computer labs, and research centers. These resources support students in their academic and research endeavors.

 Holistic Development

The curriculum at Alliance University promotes holistic development. In addition to academic excellence, students are encouraged to participate in extracurricular activities, workshops, and seminars, fostering overall growth and development.

 Admission and Eligibility

 BA Economics Eligibility

To be eligible for the BA Economics program at Alliance University, candidates must have completed their higher secondary education with a strong academic record. Specific eligibility criteria may vary, so it is advisable to check the university's official website for detailed information.

 Application Process

The application process for the BA Economics program at Alliance University involves submitting an online application form, followed by an entrance examination and interview. The university provides detailed guidelines on its website to assist applicants through the process.

 Conclusion

A BA in Economics from Alliance University opens up numerous career opportunities in various sectors. The comprehensive curriculum, experienced faculty, research opportunities, and state-of-the-art facilities make Alliance University one of the best colleges for BA Economics in India. Whether you aspire to be an economic analyst, financial consultant, policy analyst, or pursue any other career path, the skills and knowledge gained from Alliance University's BA Economics program will set you on the path to success.

Choosing the right college is a crucial step in your academic journey. With its commitment to student success and holistic development, Alliance University stands out as a top choice for pursuing a BA in Economics. The degree equips you with the necessary skills and knowledge to tackle complex economic issues and contribute meaningfully to the field.

[akshayss]

Clinical Research Diploma and UG Courses

Get your Clinical Research Diploma and UG courses with the latest news, updates, and upcoming important dates on myeducationwire. Read in your preferred language and stay informed.

[grunge-mermaid]

why am I, at five o’clock am in the morning, being kept awake by the memory of when I TA’d a Canadian Economic History course and spent way too much time having to write “that’s Dutch Elm Disease not Dutch Disease” on the take-home exams

[amityranchi]

Amity University Ranchi has emerged as an eminent institution that offers a plethora of academic opportunities for students to carve their paths towards success. Among its array of programs, the B.A. Economics Honours course stands out as a beacon of excellence.

[aphrmoosun]

[No words]

NOMAE ; Two Shot!

• Pair.

Noa and Mae

• Movie.

Kingdom of the planet of the apes

• Tags.

NoaxMae, yes it is a ship, dont read if you dont ship them, smutt, au, future, humans and apes politics, ape and human relation, Noa is an inocent ape, twoshot, relationship, Interspecies, strong language, honour apes, writer is not English native speaker, if you see errors tell me, etc

• Other Nomae fic.

You and Me

• Part 1.

DO NOT COPY OR SHARE IT ELSEWHERE WITHOUT PERMISSION!

Yours [second part]

The ape and the human were forced to commit to each other. Not that they were really forced, since after their first physical encounter, both were in agreement that their lives were dedicated to each other.

Noa's father was the one who opposed it the most. It wasn't normal to see a formal wedding between an ape and a human, but the political pressure around him, along with his own son's, had been enough to convince him.

For Mae, her life was starting to sound different. No interested boy came near her again. In fact, no boy at all. Noa had promised his father that he wouldn't touch her until they were married, and Mae didn't agree with that at all.

After that night, with barely an hour together, she had already gotten used to his hands and the way he touched her. And he refused to do it. Mae always initiated the approach. First, silly kisses, then touches on his hairy chest, and when she tried to go lower, Noa would run away to the nearest bathroom.

But that had to end.

Their wedding was being prepared by professionals hired by their parents, with a formal and political theme that came with it, which meant that their wedding would take place within two months to give them time to prepare everything.

Mae was sure she could corrupt her fiancé. She just needed a moment alone with him, in an intimate setting, with no one around to listen.

To do that, she planned the ice cream plan. With the excuse of wanting him to try that human gastronomic wonder, Mae managed to convince him to let her visit him at his home.

She had already bought the ice cream, and her hand trembled with excitement as she knocked on Noa's door.

He was the one who received her with a tender look. Mae hugged him, leaving the ice cream aside. Although the ape only half-responded to the hug, she didn't let go.

"Come, let's go to the living room."

Mae observed the house with curiosity. Due to the clan leader being close to humans and having economic power, there was a lot of human technology in the house, from TVs to computers and even a roomba.

"Are we alone?" Mae tried not to sound too excited.

"Yes, my mom went shopping, and Dad is never home during the day."

Noa could be so innocent when he wanted to.

For a moment, she felt bad about her plan to seduce him, but then she thought that it wouldn't hurt him, she just wanted to do what engaged couples did.

Noa led her to the living room, offering her a seat next to him.

"Here, I brought two types of ice cream for us to eat together."

She handed him a chocolate ice cream and took a tutti-frutti one for herself.

She watched him sniffing the ice cream, analyzing it with his gaze, and that made her laugh.

"Go on, try it. It's good."

Noa took her advice, taking a spoonful to his mouth, and she imitated him with her ice cream.

That's when she started to put her plan into action.

She knew Noa loved to look at her, especially her eyes, and she would take advantage of that. She lowered her gaze to her ice cream and left the spoon in her mouth, playing with it with her tongue. She didn't need to look at him to know he was watching her.

"Mae..."

"Yes, Noa?"

She felt him move uncomfortably on the couch.

"Are you going to give me some of that?"

"Hmm, yes, of course."

She took another spoonful of ice cream and brought it close to the ape, but when he was about to try it, she dropped the spoon, making the contents spill all over Noa's chest and lap.

"Oh, sorry."

"Don't worry, it was nothing."

He was going to clean himself with his hands, but she stopped him, grabbing them.

"Let me help you, it was my fault."

The human didn't think twice. She bent down to reach the ape's chest and started licking the ice cream. She knew how hairy apes could be, but it didn't bother her; on the contrary, that act had given her the opportunity to get close to his nipple, licking it in the process.

"Mae!"

Noa got up from the couch, leaving her leaning forward over it.

"We can't do that."

She couldn't respond because the ape was already heading towards another room in the house.

She assumed it was the bathroom, since he always did that every time she suggested something sexual. Mae suspected he was hiding his erection from her or going to relieve himself alone.

She wasn't going to let him do that this time.

She followed him closely, seeing that the room was his bedroom, with a door that he had closed behind him.

Mae tried to open the door, but Noa had locked it. So, surrendering, she sat on the ape's bed and was able to observe the room more closely.

There were posters of sci-fi movies featuring apes and humans. Others were of music groups.

But her gaze fell on the TV. The ape had a TV with a DVD player in it. And then it came to her mind. Noa had learned to touch her by watching a porn movie, which she assumed the ape still had.

She searched through the drawers of the nightstand, didn't find it. But she saw a box next to the closet, so she decided to look there.

Among music discs and Blu-ray movies, she managed to see a very graphic cover.

Happy, she jumped up and put it in the player.

In the movie, two humans could be seen. A boy on top of a girl. He was kissing her breasts and touching her while penetrating her with two fingers.

Mae felt a tingling sensation in her crotch and sat on Noa's bed. His bed. It was soft and smelled like him. She lay down on the bed, feeling his scent.

The room was filled with the girl's moans from the movie. And Mae couldn't resist anymore. She put a hand under her pants, moving her underwear aside, and started touching her clitoris. She caressed herself softly, feeling the wetness in her parts already.

She moved her head, resting her nose on Noa's pillow, and breathed in his scent. The movie faded into the background, her mind going back to the moment when Noa watched that movie, thinking of her. He must have masturbated watching it, thinking of how he would do all that to her.

"Noa, Noa."

She closed her eyes, letting go. Her free hand went up her jersey and bra, leaving one breast out, which she started to massage and touch with the rhythm of her other hand.

She was about to come. Her fingers moved faster, imagining they were Noa's. And with him in her mind, she came violently on his bed.

"Noa!"

That scream tore through her throat, unable to keep quiet.

The orgasm tensed her body, making her arch her back and close her legs abruptly due to the tension.

After a few seconds, she tried to calm her breathing. And when she could open her eyes, she found Noa in front of her.

"Noa." -she whispered, taking her hand out of her pants and trying to lower her bra.-

The ape was faster, sitting next to her and grabbing her hands, placing them above her head.

"Did you enjoy it?" -he asked, to which Mae only nodded, unable to speak.- "More than when I touched you?"

Mae could have denied it perfectly with her head, but she thought of having fun since he had found her like that. After all, that's what she wanted. For him to touch her again.

"More than when you touched me." -she found her voice, speaking softly.-

The ape didn't respond. He just got on top of her, looking into her eyes.

"I don't enjoy anything. Every time I go to the bathroom, I come back worse than before. My hands are so useless that I don't reach climax. The last time I did was because of your small and soft hands around my faro, and that's killing me. And on top of that, you come and touch yourself in front of my nose."

Noa didn't stop talking, and his hands accompanied everything he said. He started undressing her, taking off her jersey and finishing with her bra. He also pulled down her pants to her ankles, the same place where he put her underwear.

"I only think of your hands touching me, and that leaves me unsatisfied because I can't touch you. My hands burn, I touched myself thinking of you, and I don't reach climax because in reality, you're not touching me."

The ape started touching her, caressing her clitoris, sensitive from her previous orgasm.

"You can touch me, and I can touch you." -Mae tried to touch him, but the ape stopped her.- "Please, Noa. I'm yours. My body is mine, but it only responds like that because of you, because it's a traitor. I can't contain it every time I have you near. Neither my father nor yours can stop this."

Mae moved her hips, bringing her wet entrance to the ape's hard faro, and he sighed.

"Mae. I-I can't. If I can't live after letting you touch me with your hands, I don't want to imagine my life after being inside you."

"Please, Noa. In body and soul, I'm yours. If you take me today, I know it will be forever, just like if it's in two months. It doesn't matter when, but it's going to happen, and it doesn't matter if today or in two months. But it will happen, and it doesn't matter if you take me or not, I'm already yours."

Noa seemed moved by those words. The ape's eyes never left the human's.

Mae felt the tip of his virility in her already wet and ready entrance.

"Noa." -she grabbed his strong shoulders, arching her back.-

"Mae, my god, Mae."

The ape's words in her ear were enough to awaken the fire inside her.

He had stopped after inserting a few centimeters, and she needed him inside her completely.

Her hips moved forward, making him penetrate her more.

"Mae, Mae."

The ape of the eagle clan, known for his singing, was singing in her ear. Or at least that's what it seemed to her. A sweet melody that she was ready to enjoy.

Noa sank completely into her, making her scream his name. The ape didn't hold back and started moving inside her.

"Very... tight." -she heard him whisper.- "Please, Mae. I'm not going to last long!"

That information almost sounded like a plea to her. He was asking her to come before him so that he could finish inside her satisfied.

"Noa, Noa."

She squeezed his shoulders, moving her hips. There was no need for him to beg, since the moment he penetrated her, her vagina had started to contract. Each time with more intensity.

"Noa!"

She screamed his name and felt that electricity that only he produced in her again. Her orgasm hit her hard.

"Ah, Mae!"

Noa didn't take long to come inside her a second after she did. Mae felt the warm liquid inside her sliding out when he pulled away.

Both enjoyed the silence while trying to catch their breath.

Mae looked for Noa's gaze, finding his eyes looking at her. She smiled widely, laughing and lying down next to him to see him better.

"Now you're mine too." -she said.-

Noa imitated her, lying down next to her to see her.

"I were already yours. Since the first moment our gazes met."

Mae felt very grateful because her feelings were reciprocated.

. END!

[haladriel]

On Sauron and the Subjective Experience of Love

One of the biggest topics I’ve seen in recent Rings of Power discourse is whether Sauron is capable of love. And it’s one hell of a thing to grapple. But I’ll give it a go.

Some have used Tolkien’s letters to argue that because Sauron is not ‘fully evil’ by Tolkien’s own definition, this indicates he is therefore capable of love. I argue it’s more complex than that, because Sauron is more complex than that. In two of Tolkien’s most relevant passages, ‘love’ is not mentioned, but a lot of other things are:

Some reviewers have called the whole thing [The Lord of the Rings] simple-minded, just a plain fight between Good and Evil, with all the good just good, and the bad just bad. Pardonable, perhaps (though at least Boromir has been overlooked) in people in a hurry, and with only a fragment to read, and, of course, without the earlier written but unpublished Elvish histories ... But in any case this is a tale about a war, and if war is allowed (at least as a topic and a setting) it is not much good complaining that all the people on one side are against those on the other. Not that I have made even this issue quite so simple: there are Saruman, and Denethor, and Boromir; and there are treacheries and strife even among the Orcs. — Letter 154

Similarly, good actions by those on the wrong side will not justify their cause. There may be deeds on the wrong side of heroic courage, or some of a higher moral level: deeds of mercy and forbearance. A judge may accord them honour and rejoice to see how some men can rise above the hate and anger of a conflict; even as he may deplore the evil deeds on the right side and be grieved to see how hatred once provoked can drag them down. But this will not alter his judgement as to which side was in the right, nor his assignment of the primary blame for all the evil that followed to the other side. In my story I do not deal in Absolute Evil. I do not think there is such a thing, since that is Zero. I do not think that at any rate any 'rational being' is wholly evil. Satan fell. In my myth Morgoth fell before Creation of the physical world. In my story Sauron represents as near an approach to the wholly evil will as is possible. He had gone the way of all tyrants: beginning well, at least on the level that while desiring to order all things according to his own wisdom he still at first considered the (economic) well-being of other inhabitants of the Earth. But he went further than human tyrants in pride and the lust for domination, being in origin an immortal (angelic) spirit. — Letter 183

What Tolkien gives in these letters is his perspective on is ‘good’ and ‘evil’, ‘right’ and ‘wrong’, and being on one (he argues, indisputably ‘good’) side or the other (indisputably ‘bad’). I would say that the internal experience of love has nothing to do with any of these things.

To argue the point of whether Sauron can love using these letters alone, a false equivalence has to be drawn between an ability to ‘love’ and being ‘morally good’; and, it follows, an inability to love with being ‘morally evil’. To indirectly quote the letters, ‘good’ in Tolkien isn’t defined by love between one another, but rather by how people share a set of ‘good’ values. One can do ‘good’ without loving the subject of that good deed. I could be ambivalent to the person living down the road, and might not ever talk to them, but still give them my coat when they are in need, because it’s the right thing to do. 

The opposite is also true; one can do ‘evil’, hold and act upon ‘evil’ values, and still feel love, as defined by one’s own experiences. Because love as an emotion (not a dictionary entry) is not one defined feeling or concept, but is subjective; informed by past events, and unique to the person. Taking societal judgement out of the equation, an individual will act in ‘evil’ ways while loving the person involved, or indeed another person elsewhere. That feeling, and even any associated actions, is ‘love’, for the individual; only when cross-examined by society and its values is it challengeable according to the widely understood definitions of what it means ‘to love’, and any double standards the person might be exhibiting.

So, when considering whether Sauron can or cannot love, it depends on your frame of reference.

Using Tolkien’s societal lens, which is fairly rigid in defining ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ based on how society judges someone's whole, once Sauron has ‘fallen’, by the moral standards of the society around him (which as it happens is a mirror for Tolkien’s), no, he does not appear to be able to ‘love’, not in the way many viewers and readers will understand the word. Not in the way that (for example) Melian, another Maia, loves Elwë— wholly, purely, and selflessly. But with a psychological lens, which allows a deeper look at him as a character: Sauron may believe he can love, and that love is a fitting word for what he experiences concerning Galadriel — just as he wants to ‘order all things according to his own wisdom’, he will interpret his feelings according to the terrain of his own experiences. Which are warped and scarred and wounded. His frame of reference is skewed; as much is shown in the confessions he makes to Celebrimbor, and the contradictory ways he treats him. But he is so far gone he is no longer aware of this difference. Because in another society (Morgoth’s), his definition of ‘love’, what he has been taught is love, might be the norm.

Putting oneself in Sauron’s shoes, as he invites Celebrimbor, is to imagine being a lesser god tortured at the hands of Morgoth. Potentially deceived, potentially manipulated; potentially groomed by someone more powerful than he; potentially abandoned by his creators, his parent figures. He is a character full of conflicts and self-delusions that (suggested through a combination of dialogue and action) originate in trauma. It follows that his is not a wholesome or simple love that one might be tempted to associate with ‘good’, because he has not been loved wholly, or simply.

Meanwhile, Galadriel, herself having been through the psychoemotional wars, arguably has found herself connecting with a Janus; a god with two (or indeed more) faces, who has no true sense of self (‘I have many names’); and is coming to terms with how much of that was her attraction (of any kind) to noble and humbled Halbrand, and how much was to passionate, clever, jaded Sauron; if the two can be separated at all. And with whether she herself has a coltishly reckless saviour complex, or, conversely, needs Halbrand to redeem her, or both.

All of this, for both Sauron and Galadriel, involves intense emotions. And when you’re encountering one another as a reflection on the surface of the water, it’s hard to know which feelings are which.

[fiaistired]

I want to figure out how old Elias Bouchard really is. When was he born?

In MAG 49 it’s said he joined the institute in 1991 and became head of the institute in 1996 after being body snatched by Jonah Magnus.

In MAG 192 Rosie says that “he seemed far too young for the role he had apparently found himself in” - referring to the head of the institute position.

How young is too young for a head of an institution position? Here’s a first not *exactly* evidence-based assumption - but let’s say it’s probably being below 40 years old. That is based solely on the experience of attending university, I’d say most institute heads at uni are at minimum 40 (also, not exactly related but all university institute heads have PhD’s). (I don’t want to get into too many details here, since I’m not a 100% sure how the higher education system works in the UK, but in my country at least, one must have at least a Habilitation, which is almost like a second PhD, or be a capital “P” Professor, which is the highest university rank, to become an institute head. To achieve these scientific titles, it usually takes a lot of time, so most people are over 40 when they get the position. Or even 50, when it comes to the Professor rank). 

One can assume then, that “Elias” is below 40-ish while he interviews Rosie. Unfortunately, we don’t know when exactly that happens. It could be anytime between 1996 and 2015. 

Some other information we do know about him is that he’s graduated collage with third class honours and has a PPE degree. According to google, students in the UK typically start university at the age of 18. Also, according to google, Oxford has never had a postgraduate degree course in PPE, so Elias has a bachelor’s degree in PPE (which btw stands for Philosophy, Politics and Economics), meaning he was either 21 or 22 when he finished uni. We do not hear anyone mention him finishing any other courses, so we can assume that’s all that he studied.

Another thing we don’t know is at what age he started working for the Magnus Institute. We do know it happened in 1991. The earliest he could have been recruited was at the age of 21 or 22, straight out of university. Making him 26/27 at the time he “got promoted” to the position of institute head, in 1996. As mentioned previously, at Rosie’s interview, where she found that he looked too young for his position, in between 1996 and 2015 (whenever that interview took place) he would’ve been between 26 and 45 years old (at the youngest) depending on the year the interview took place in. Taking my assumption from before, that during the interview he’d be 40 or lower, I’d assume that the interview probably took place anytime between 1996 and 2010 for the comment of him looking too young in his position to make sense. Of course, it could’ve been a few years after graduating uni when he got recruited, which would further push down the date of the Rosie interview. I think the oldest he could possibly be is in his late thirties during it. So, the eldest he could be in 1996, if that is when the interview took place, would be around 40 years old (which I also don’t think it did take place in 1996 since it would make Rosie work as his assistant for 20 years and I’m not certain that she could remain that oblivious to all the weird stuff going on for that long. But what do I know, maybe she’s got a gift for not noticing. I don’t know for sure).

So, in the year of his body being overtaken by Jonah Magnus, 1996, he’s between the ages of 26 and 40. 

We, the listeners, know him mostly from our time spent with him and the archives crew from 2015 onwards. Based on our established age range, in 2015 he would’ve been anywhere between 45 and 59 years old. Which would mean that last time we hear him speak is in 2018 in which he’s anywhere between 48 and 62 years old. 

I don’t know how old his va, Ben Meredith is exactly. I’m pretty sure he’s a millennial? Either way it doesn’t really matter how old his va is, though all we have to picture him by is his voice only, which at least in my opinion doesn’t really sound like the voice of a 62-year-old, but that is straight up just a subjective opinion. Maybe he’s a particularly young sounding 62-year-old?

Some additional information we supposedly get about “Elias” is that he was working as a filing clerk in 1972, which he says to Jonathan Sims in MAG 29, but that contradicts with the information gathered later by Jon and revealed in MAG 49 where he says that Elias joined the institute in 1991. All this might seem like just the lies of Jonah Magnus, but it presents an interesting point of having a conversation take place in 2016 with the reference to his being an institute employee in 1972. In 2016 he’s between the ages of 46 (which would make him 2 years old in 1972) and 60 (which would make him 16 in 1972), neither of which make sense, thought one would think that if he’s older and Jon doesn’t know how old he is exactly, it wouldn’t be that suspicious for him to have worked at the institute in 1972, though that seems like a stretch. Perhaps Jon just didn’t question or notice how it doesn’t really make sense for him to have worked there in that year, or maybe the writing-story-planning team didn’t put that much thought into this particular interaction/the implications of it, or maybe Elias looks older than he is. 

In conclusion, Elias Bouchard was born between the years of 1956 and 1970.

Also, fun fact I did a poll to see what age Tumblr users thought Elias was and they picked between 40 to 50, with 45 to 55 being a close second, so if anyone voted in that and picked anywhere between 45 and 59, I just want to let you know you’re right.

TLDR: Elias Bouchard is (most likely) anywhere between 45 and 59 at the start of the Magnus Archives.

[atithsinaiamonkar]

The Burden of a Battle

Extreme tensions permeated the battlefield as the Pandavas and Kauravas faced off on Kurukshetra, their armies poised for a violent clash that would forever alter the course of history. Even at the eleventh hour, Bhishma Pitamaha implored Duryodhana to reconsider his path of war, warning of the irreversible consequences that would befall the kingdom. However, his words fell on deaf ears as the seeds of animosity had taken root too deeply in the hearts of both sides. Their thirst for retribution had clouded their judgement, blinding them to reason and compassion. As the conch shells blared and the call to battle echoed across the plains, both armies raised their weapons, their eyes reflecting a fierce determination that would lead to the bloodiest war ever witnessed.

The annals of history are replete with examples of how the unyielding quest for retribution ignites barbarous conflicts, fuels wars, and leaves a trail of devastation and suffering. This insatiable desire often arises from perceived injustices or the need to restore honour. Such emotions overshadow reason, compassion, and the fundamental principles of peaceful coexistence. From the Kurukshetra War to the ongoing unrest in the Middle East, tensions are rooted in deep hatred and vengeance, exemplifying how powerful emotions can become the genesis of discord, perpetuating cycles of violence and hindering the pursuit of lasting harmony loss of lives of countless humans and animals, the destruction of nature, and severe economic setbacks that can affect generations.

The world is exponentially vast and diverse, teeming with billions of individuals with unique perspectives, beliefs and desires. Disagreements and confrontations will inevitably arise in such a complex and interconnected environment. However, these disputes must be resolved peacefully and amicably at the right times avoiding the destructive path of violence and retribution. A vengeful culture having roots in hatred can lead to severe repercussions, making reconciliation impossible and perpetuating cycles of suffering. Instead, we must strive to find common ground, foster understanding and seek constructive solutions to our differences. Doing so can create a world where disputes are resolved constructively and the potential for peace and cooperation is maximised.

The insidious nature of conflict lies in its propensity to perpetuate a vicious cycle of retribution quickly. When one party inflicts harm upon another, the aggrieved party often seeks to avenge the wrong, igniting a retaliatory response that can quickly escalate into a destructive spiral. This dangerous cycle, reminiscent of the biblical adage "a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye," erodes trust to such an extent that reconciliation becomes all but impossible. The deep-seated desire for retribution, coupled with a sense of victimhood, has cultivated a toxic environment where aggression breeds more aggression. As a result, both sides find themselves trapped in a seemingly inescapable cycle of aggression, unable to break free from the destructive grip of their vengeful impulses.

Today, unresolved disputes have left many nations divided and many families torn apart. Like a wildfire raging through dry hay, these contestations consume everything in their path. Yet, with timely intervention and judicious action, these destructive fires can be extinguished before they cause damage. Unfortunately, many conflicts are allowed to fester, providing a convenient platform for outsiders to exploit. In an age of increasing voyeurism and sadism, people are more inclined to watch the misfortunes of others than to address their shortcomings. Frays and strife between two parties often become a source of morbid fascination for the rest, offering a perverse form of entertainment while simultaneously benefiting those who seek to capitalize on the chaos.

The pursuit of conflict often blinds nations and individuals to the far-reaching consequences of their actions, leading to short-sighted decisions that can have long-lasting effects on millions of innocent civilians. In their desperate haste to inflict punishment on one another, they may overlook the broader implications of their choices, inadvertently fuelling further instability, hostilities and unwarranted suffering. Discords and warfare are always known to leave behind wounds and scars that are difficult to heal. History has repeatedly demonstrated that squabbles can leave behind deep-seated wounds that can not only be difficult to heal but can also be passed down from one generation to another, intensifying the disputes and making reconciliation increasingly challenging.

Disputes should never be perpetuated at the expense of innocent bystanders. While it is essential to stand up for your principles and refuse to bow down to injustice, it is also important to consider the broader consequences of your actions. If a conflict is not directly affecting you, it may be worthwhile to reconsider whether it is worth pursuing. Just because you can afford the fight, it may come at the expense of the peace and well-being of others who were never involved in the dispute. In such situations, it is crucial to weigh the pros and cons carefully, considering the potential impact on yourself and others before making a decision. Ultimately, the goal should be to find a resolution that minimizes suffering and promotes a more non-violent and harmonious society.

As an avid reader, I am reminded of two compelling books that explore the complex motivations of terrorists and the destructive cycle of violence they perpetuate. "Kasab: The Face of 26/11" by Rommel Rodrigues and "Headley and I" by S. Hussain Zaidi delve into the lives of two dreaded people who carried out acts of terrorism, revealing the underlying factors that shaped their radical ideologies and lives. Both books highlight the powerful influence of hatred, systematic brainwashing, distorted facts and a passively cultivated sense of vengeance that have been passed down through generations. This destructive cycle, fuelled by the embers of past grievances, is perpetuated through a baton of hatred that is passed from one generation to the next, refusing to extinguish and die forever.

When parties are hell-bent on finishing one another, they become unwilling to compromise or engage in constructive dialogue, viewing any concessions as a sign of weakness or a betrayal of their principles. In such situations, outsiders should refrain from interfering and intensifying the conflicts and instead focus on facilitating a peaceful resolution. Restoring concord is a noble endeavour. While figures like Lord Krishna and Bhishma Pitamaha in the Mahabharata sought to prevent war, the modern world seems devoid of such noble individuals who can bridge divides and foster amity. In the absence of external mediators, the onus falls on the parties to the battles to demonstrate maturity, nobility and a willingness to come together and compromise to achieve a tranquil and equitable resolution.

It is common for one party to seek peace while the other remains stubbornly resistant. India has repeatedly extended olive branches to Pakistan which has been met with unwavering hostility and betrayal. Pakistan's relentless support for terrorism against India and its harbouring of wanted criminals has demonstrated a complete disregard for amicable coexistence and reconciliation. In such circumstances, a policy of silence becomes necessary. Following the 26/11 attacks, India's decision to suspend all ties with Pakistan until justice is served was a clear and persistent response to such blatant aggression. Offering a handshake to those who spit in your face is an exercise in futility. A dignified silence is the only appropriate response to such blatant disregard for peace and decency.

The aftermath of the Kurukshetra War was a bitter pill for King Dhritarashtra to swallow. The loss of his hundred sons was a devastating blow that left him consumed by grief and remorse. The once-thriving court of Hastinapur was now a lonely place, devoid of the powerful warriors and wise men who had once graced its halls. The Pandavas, while victorious, were burdened by the guilt of shedding the blood of their own family. Their subsequent rule over Hastinapur was a heavy burden, haunted by the endless curses of those who had lost loved ones in the war. Although victory in a war is often celebrated it comes at a tremendous price. If we remain blind to the importance of peace today, we may one day yearn for its return, only to regretfully find that it has been lost forever.

[scotianostra]

Happy Birthday the Scottish actor Peter Mullan born 2 November 1959 in Peterhead. I love Peter’s work and rate him as highly as Brian Cox and If ever there was a story of rags to riches it is Peter Mullan, born in Peterhead the family later moved to Mosspark in Glasgow. Mullans father was a drunken violent man but despite this Peter did well at school, at least till the age of 14 when the climate at home forced him out onto the streets and into a gang, spending less and less time at school. In his own words he was aggressively lobotomising himself but admitted he kept up his reading on the sly “You couldnae tell the gang you were reading Carl Jung.” he said. I’m not sure his heart was in the gang culture as he says he was “kicked out” after a couple of years, he returned to school and sailed through his Highers and started at Glasgow University at 17. His dad died of lung cancer on his first day. Mullan studied economic history and drama and despite suffering a nervous breakdown in his final year still managed to graduate. He went on to teach drama at Borstals, prisons and community centres while becoming involved in the left-wing theatre movement that flourished in Scotland in the 1980s. In 1987 he made his professional acting debut with the Wildcat theatre company in a political pantomime. Bit parts in Scottish films and TV series followed, The Steamie, Taggart, of course, and Rab C Nesbitt, as well as The Big Man and in Braveheart, he uttered the words, “We didn’t come here to fight for the” Danny Boyle, Shallow Grave and Trainspotting were another two films that Mullan served his apprenticeship in. The breakthrough came when Ken Loach chose him in the title role of “My Name is Joe” he gave a brilliant portrayal Jekyll-and-Hyde character , a recovering alcoholic whose humanity and warmth masked a frightening capacity for brutality. He won his first award at Cannes as Best Actor for the role. Around the same time Mullan was starting to get into directing, three surreal comic dramas set in the Glaswegian working-class world and then his first full length film, he not only directed but wrote the excellent Orphans an odyssey of four working-class siblings roving round Glasgow in the 24 hours after their mother dies. Channel Four, who funded the film chose not to distribute it as they didn’t think it would attract a large commercial audience. The film however was shown at Film festivals around Europe and won numerous awards, in interviews, Mullan has said that once Orphans started winning awards Channel Four apologised and asked if they could distribute it, an offer he refused. Since then Peter Mullan has not looked back, directing and penning The Magdalene Sisters and Neds as well as starring in amongst others, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, War Horse, Hector and Tommy’s Honour, on the small screen he was one of the main characters in ITV series The Fixer, The BBC Two drama Top of the Lake, and in the excellent drama series Gunpowder. More up to date Peter has appeared as Jacob Snell in the first two seasons of the Netflix series Ozark, all three series of the BBC Two sitcom Mum and a recurring role in the popular TV reboot of Westworld. He has also starred in the Netflix fantasy drama Cursed. We will next see Mullan alongside Colin Farrell and Tom Courtney in the BBC series The North Water. Peter was also one of the participants of the National Theatre of Scotland’s Scenes For Survival project, which featured talents from the country’s arts industry making lockdown-related short films as a response to the country’s theatres having to close during the coronavirus pandemic.

Mullan has been busy in the past few years, appearing in TV shows Liaison, Payback, After the Party and LOTR: Rings of Power, as well as the film, Baghead a Horror film which has average reviews on IMDb. Outlander fans look out for him in the spin off series Outlander: Blood of My Blood, a prequel to the popular Starz show, it follows the parents of both protagonists from the original series. Tony Curran is also cast as a younger Lord Lovatt. It is follows the parents of both protagonists from the original series it is expected to premiere in 2025 on Starz. He has a few oter projects on the go, the most hard hitting will no doubt be an ITV mini series called Lockerbie which will focus on the investigation into the crash on both sides of the Atlantic and the devastating effect it had on the small town and the families who lost loved ones.

[roxannepolice]

Rant 3/phantom pains of Schrödinger's lore in ChibnallWho/"the history between" doesn't mean much to the author. that is, it does. but it doesn't. but it does. but not really. but./can someone in the group chat please read my time sensitive questions I posted 25 hours ago?

Between bracing myself to finally open the advisors reviewed thesis, waiting for anyone at work to give a newbie a hint, and reading a fairly good criticism of the political stance in ChibnallWho, I guess it's a good time to let go off some steam about this era. Now, an important clarification for tumblr: when I criticize the show, I am not in any way bashing on people who enjoy it! Good for you, and that's why I try to tag these appropriately.

But yeah, this is going to go deep into what I mean when I say the writing in this era is just bad, something even its defenders sometimes concede. This often turns into dicussions of political/social messaging in seasons 11-13, which is as fair criticism as any. Yes, it often veered into confusing to downright appalling. But for me, that's not what "bad writing" means. You can make an excellent story about a likeable rapist and murderer. You can make compelling propaganda of pretty much any economic stance (well, maybe except for "the solution to problems with Amazon is to blow up their trucks so now everything has to be delivered on foot I guess", that's something straight from Monty Python). And of course, the "too woke" "criticisms" aren't anything valid like at all.

No, for me the bad writing in ChibnallWho lies in the general sense of confusion as to who exactly is the target audience here: someone who's very well acquaintanced with the lore(s), or someone who's completely new to the show. Now, this is also inspired by some criticisms of RTD2 is that it is too expository, leading into the show-within-a-show theorizing. And of course, exposition can be done well or not-so-well, and there's good argument some parts of exposition in s14 were on the nose. But the thing about a television series, especially one as long as Doctor Who, is that any episode can be someone's first - and the writer's job is to make it so it won't be their last. What this means is that the audience needs to be provided the information necessary to grasp at least the emotional level of the story, if not every bit of earlier lore logic. In the case of Doctor Who there's also a part of establishing which part of the lore is valid to the story at hand, considering that both within the show itself, but also the huge multimedia lore, there are bound to be contradictions. And that's ok! You have a good story idea that will require a retcon for a better pay off, go for it! Like, if you really think the Doctor should get to save Gallifrey for their 50th birthday, then go ahead, just reduce the Time War to a local conflict between Time Lords and Daleks instead of underlining just how widespread across time and space it was, and logistically impossible to contain by removing one party (this is one of the many cases of "I don't like what Moffat did, but I agree the execution is functional").

Basically, Lancelot having an affair with Guinevre isn't relevant to him storming a wedding and killing mortally wounding giving a fleshwound to the bride's father.

So, essentially my issue with ChibnallWho writing is simultaneously trying to cut itself off from lore/earlier seasons, while relying on it for any emotional pay off. To give a counterexample from this very era's one of best written episodes: when the Doctor goes on about what being turned into a Cyberman means and that she won't lose anyone else to that, that's bloody powerful! And it's powerful regardless of whether you know it's specifically about Bill, or just go on the information provided within the episode - that the Doctor lost someone to this. Unfortunately, The Haunting of Villa Diodati is an honourable exception in this and many other aspects.

So, to start from the beginning. There's a frequent criticism that team TARDIS was overcrowded in seasons 11 and 12 with three companions, to which an immediate defense is that it's not the first time there were three companions at once. Fine. But combine this with the following: it's not just three companions introduced at once, it's three companions introduced at once, plus a brand new Doctor, plus a brand new sonic, plus a brand new TARDIS interior (that's absent for nearly full two first episodes). So you're basically left with four strangers and no point of reference in your getting to know them. And by no point of reference, I mean something that I haven't noticed anyone else pointing out: Thirteen is literally the first Doctor since One to have no established elements in their first season, at all (barring the TARDIS and sonic, again, completely redesigned).

It's a bit hard to discuss One to Two regeneration relying only on stills and audio, but Polly and Ben are there to act as audience proxies for this Beatle-hairstyled guy with a recorder being the old man he was a moment ago. Three's first season all revolves around UNIT, established in Two's era. Four inherits UNIT and Sarah Jane. Five inherits Adric, Nyssa, Tegan and the Master for his welcome. Six has Peri. Seven has Mel, the Master and the Rani. Eight's movie is all about the Master. Even the reboot for Nine has the Nastene consciousness as a hello and the whole season revolving around the Daleks. Ten gets Rose and Tylers, and Cybermen, and Daleks, and Sarah Jane, and K-9. Eleven gets the previously established River Song and a Classic Who villain reunion in the season finale. Twelve gets Clara. Thirteen gets.... Twelve's suit that she should have stayed in and Daleks, nearly three months from her first episode.

And the thing is, I understand how this would have appeared to be a good idea on paper! Complaints about the show getting lost up it's own self-referential ass have been around for years by this point, and even Moffat tried to go for a soft reboot in s10. Chibs literally asking him to set the TARDIS on fire is as symbolic a new beginning as they get. A bold, intriguing idea. As is trying to explore Titanic with nothing but a snorkel.

Because in practice it had two fundamental flaws, one more general and one specific to the story as it unfolded. The general one has been hinted at: this is basically why there's the sense of overcrowding on the TARDIS, while also leaving the audience feeling they don't really know anyone on board. Are we getting to know the new Doctor from the companions' perspective? The companions from the Doctor's? The new villain (and a really unfamiliar one, Toothboy isn't a familiar threat like plastic pollution metaphor or pshysically inevitable end of the world) from an alien's or humans' perspective? The new worlds from all of theirs? We sort of end up relating most to Grace, except she dies in the first episode. The thing is, it is in confrontation with the established that we learn most about the characters. Nothing characterizes Nine more than his interactions with the Daleks, going from torturing one to deciding he can't commit another planetary destruction to stop them. Basically, between a kind straight Black navy officer and a White lesbian strangling her wife in a jealous rage, you're likelier to recognize Othello in the latter. Something tells me this is why RTD had Fifteen interact with another Doctor, Donna, Mel, Kate, UNIT, the Toymaker and even toothied Master before sending him on his own merry way.

The second problem has more to do with the direction the story actually went in. Because just from the above, and indeed after s11 it was a frequent praise of the era, it would look like Chibs is going for something easily accessible to new audiences. Great. But then comes s12 and basically all of the emotional pay off comes from the audience's attitude to the the lore! Or, maybe I'll put it this way: all charitable interpretations of it are rooted in not only lore literacy, but specific readings of established lore. And not only is the lore hardly established for the newcomers, but it's also not established which parts are to be cherry picked for the returning audience. Nowhere is it better visible than in Fugitive!Doctor's TARDIS being a police box. This was clearly meant to tell the audience yes, this is indeed the Doctor's TARDIS, but if you know how much of a deal pre-Hartnell Doctors would be, you'd also know the TARDIS doesn't just look like a police box, it was stuck looking like one in 1963. And so we end up with secret third Doctor theories between classic series 6 and 7.

And this is the fundamental problem with the timeless child. It shakes the lore to the core, but without establishing what this lore is, and how the audience is supposed to feel about it. Oh, you can go for post-colonial criticisms, but that relies on you reading the Time Lords as the british empire, a reading not clear to all of the audience, as exhibited by an actual academic article (because yes, I spent my hard earned money on a collection of academic articles about ChibnallWho and no I absolutely won't share a pdf should anyone dm me) written by an author more rooted in feminist than post-colonial critical theories seeing the new origin of Time Lords as replacing a masculine creatio ex nihilo ethos by that of a feminine explorer-scientist [appreciative]. You're basically supposed to get a phantom pain of a lore that's both alive and dead until observed, the presumed intention being that you will have a positive or negative feelings about the cat, without considering most people will be either abstractly impressed by the metaphor, or equally abstractly disturbed by animal abuse. It's criticising the roman empire by debunking it being founded by Mars's children raised by a she-wolf.

And this is also visible in the Doctor's own reaction to the revelation, which I guess you might argue is complex, but I would say it's more shifting from establishing moment to establishing moment. She goes from being shocked by it (again, no part of the text informed me I shouldn't cherry pick her characterization as including calling Time Lords the most rotten civilization in the universe, also is it even established that's the second time Gallifrey was destroyed?), to describing it as empowering, to apparently not thinking about it for 100 years, to having an identity crisis, to stating her identity is about what she does, to bemoaning the could-have-beens, to deciding she doesn't want to know, to her deepest desire being wanting to know it after all (the vision of ttc in potd). Like, come on, not finding your glasses means your room is messy, not complex. The effect is infantilizing more than anything else, I mean it's been what, three months since the last time a villain informed a heroine she has an epic origin that's also very horrible in The rise of Skywalker? Which impression is amplified by the only clue as to the Doctor's personal, not performed, attitude being that she apparently finds the cliche chosen one story of a boy abused by his adoptive family turning out to be a wizard, and a special wizard at that, comforting. Probably not the intended reading that wouldn't even be available if Rowling got cancelled earlier, but there as things are.

And of course, this has a lot of bearing on how thoschei dynamic is executed. On the one hand we have the entire emotional pay off rooted in the "history between them", on the other vague references to Classic Who and expanded universe, on the third characterization of the Master that is rooted more in fanon Freud-for-dummies woobification than anything this character's motivations have ever been established as. Like, between the charitable reading "Thirteen is hostile to the Master because of the events of s10" and the anti-charitable reading of "Missy's development was retconned in the Master's hostility", the answer is, it doesn't bloody matter to the story at hand, or else it's the writer's job to point to it as meaningful (again, as Maxine Alderton did with cybermenification in THOVD). Another case of "I don't agree with Moffat, but I agree the execution was functional", but you can juxtapose this with the way Simm!Master was presented in s10 - yeah, he got cured and kicked out of Gallifrey; that's really all you need to know, because his role in this story is being an unrepentant asshole and no amount of gifs slowing down John Simm turning his eyes down before saying "Eh, you wouldn't understand" will change that. The same goes for "see, the Master didn't destroy Gallifrey over everything that's been done to them, but over Theta being hurt uwu" interpretation - neither the reading this was the motivation, nor anything relating to the Master suffering from the Time Lords have been established in the text, neither as it unfolded nor as a pay off reveal! This basically relies on the attitude that the most charitable reading is by default the intended one, which is how you end up with "op means that Taylor Swift being gay shouldn't make you ignore all other gay women musicians".

A little bit of an aside, but people remember O was an actual person the Doctor met in unknown circumstances, not just a creation of the Master from the beginning, right? Like, this is taken into account in all "he's so desperate to be friends again uwu" readings, right?

So this is why "if the history between means anything" quote falls flat to me. The meaning is rooted in lore that's brushed aside in the same breath. The author relies on it being meaningful for the audience, while providing only the bare bones of "we were friends, but took completely different paths" background, and that by the end of the first act. Just as he relies on the audience having an emotional attachment to the lore without doing anything to create that attachment.

[schoolofeconomicsblog]

How a Master's Degree in Economics Can Help You Achieve Your Career Goals and Beyond

Graduates with a Master's degree in Economics may also pursue careers in research and academia. They can work as independent researchers or as part of larger research teams, conducting economic research and publishing findings in academic journals. They may also pursue careers as university professors, teaching and mentoring the next generation of economists.Research and Academia Data Analyst Data analysts use their skills in statistics and economics to analyze and interpret large sets of data to inform decisions and solve problems in various industries, including healthcare, finance, and marketing.Earning a Master's degree in Economics is a great way to advance your career and achieve your professional goals. Whether you are just starting or looking to make a change, a Master's degree in Economics can provide you with the knowledge and skills you need to succeed in today's competitive job market.

Why Pursue a Master's Degree in Economics?

A Master's degree in Economics is a highly specialized and in-demand field, offering numerous benefits for individuals seeking to advance their careers. Some of the key advantages of pursuing a Master's degree in Economics include the following:

Increased Earning Potential: Individuals with a Master's degree in Economics typically earn higher salaries than those with only a Bachelor's degree. 

Improved Job Opportunities: A Master's degree in Economics can open doors to a wide range of career opportunities, including positions in government, finance, consulting, and academia.

Advanced Knowledge and Skills: A Master's degree in Economics provides students with a deep understanding of economic theories and methods and hands-on experience using these tools to solve real-world problems.

What You Can Expect from a Master's Degree in Economics

A Master's degree in Economics is a highly interdisciplinary program that combines elements of economics, mathematics, and statistics. Students can expect to take courses in micro and macroeconomic theory, econometrics, and applied economics, among other subjects.

In addition to coursework, students may also be required to complete a research project or thesis, which provides an opportunity to demonstrate their mastery of economic concepts and methods. Many programs also offer opportunities for students to engage in real-world projects and gain practical experience through internships or other forms of experiential learning.

Career Paths for Graduates of a Master's Degree in Economics

Graduates with a Master's degree in Economics are well-equipped for various private, public, and nonprofit careers. Some of the most common career paths for graduates of a Master's degree in Economics include:

Economist - Economists use their knowledge of economic theories and methods to inform decisions and solve problems in various settings, including government agencies, businesses, and international organizations.

Financial Analyst - Financial analysts use their understanding of economic trends and market conditions to help companies make informed investment decisions.

Data Analyst - Data analysts use their skills in statistics and economics to analyze and interpret large sets of data to inform decisions and solve problems in various industries, including healthcare, finance, and marketing.

Management Consultants - They use their understanding of economic principles and market trends to advise companies on strategy and improvement. They often work with organizations to develop and implement business plans and make recommendations for growth and success.

Research and Academia - Graduates with a Master's degree in Economics may also pursue careers in research and academia. They can work as independent researchers or as part of larger research teams, conducting economic research and publishing findings in academic journals. They may also pursue careers as university professors, teaching and mentoring the next generation of economists.

Conclusion

A Master's degree in Economics is a valuable investment that can help you achieve your career goals and open up a wide range of opportunities for advancement. With its combination of economic theory, practical skills, and real-world experience, a Master's degree in Economics or economics honours course can provide you with the knowledge and expertise you need to succeed in today's competitive job market. 

Whether you are just starting or looking to make a change, a Master's degree in Economics is an excellent choice for those seeking to further their careers in economics and related fields. 

For those looking to start their education in economics, many BSc economics colleges in India offer quality programs that can provide a strong foundation in economics and prepare students for future success.

[see-the-fandom-imagines]

What’s in it for me?

Chapter 3/?

Chapter 1 Masterlist

Pairing: Kyouya Ootori x Reader Author: see-the-fandom-imagines  Warnings: None at all.  Word Count: 3224 A/N: Next chapter! As explained before I didn’t 100% follow the anime, I also got inspiration from the live action and/or just made up a few things. Hope you still like it~ Let me know if you want to be tagged in the upcoming parts!

The next day you entered the club and the first thing you noticed was that Renge was already there. You groaned and rolled your eyes, you really didn’t feel like putting up with her. Immediately, you started to feel a little bad. She hadn’t done anything to you and yet here you were thinking so negatively about her. Maybe you should give her another chance. “Hey”, you greeted Haruhi and she greeted back. “What did I miss?” “Not much”, she said, “I also just got in, but I feel like they’re up to something.” She pointed at the other hosts standing in a bulk, whispering, and now you saw it, too. Oh-oh. And indeed, it didn’t take long until Tamaki got swept away again, raising his voice loud enough that you could hear him from your position. “So, if Haruhi has a girlfriend around, it could bring out the female within her. Renge's girlish air of tenderness might be able to stimulate Haruhi's own sense of femininity!”, you heard him yell. Haruhi exhaled exasperatedly next to you. “Now is our chance to help Haruhi get in touch with her feminine side! This is an important project, men. She doesn't have any friends in class right now except for these two shady twins. That's no good for her." “Hey, what about me?” You had stepped closer to them and put your hands on your hips. The slight feeling of jealousy was back and your decision to give Renge another chance began to falter. But the hosts barely reacted to your protest. “Well, you’re not really girly either”, Hikaru claimed, shrugging, turning back to the rest of the hosts. “Hey!” Now you were really upset. “You can’t just replace me like that!” Immediately, everybody stared at you, surprised about your emotional outburst, so you quickly talked on, trying to make the whole situation less awkward. “Haruhi has a girlfriend and it doesn’t matter if we play sports or bake cookies, it…” “Yes!”, Renge suddenly exclaimed. “I would like to make some sweets for Kyoya-sama.” Oh no, you had given her ideas. Without missing a beat Kyouya, who had kept in the background until this moment, stepped forward, happy about being able to stop the other hosts scheming and clapped his hands together, giving her a sweet smile. “What an honour that is for me!” He then turned around almost seamlessly, his smile vanished as he was looking at Haruhi and you and his usual serious self protruded. “Isn’t that right, Haruhi? (Y/n)?” You smiled back just as sweetly fake as he had before, but Haruhi stepped past you. “But we’ll have to get permission to use the home economics room, borrow the key…” Haruhi was just as motivated to do this as you were. At least you weren’t alone, but of course, that didn’t stop Kyouya. He stepped between you, placing a hand on Haruhi’s shoulder, talking in a low voice and facing you directly, so that Renge couldn’t see his expression. “I have the key”, he whispered. “What?”, Haruhi exclaimed, while you tried to figure out what this guy wasn’t capable of. “I thought something like this might happen, so I made a copy of every key in the school.” With these words and a superior smile, he pulled out a key ring full of keys out of his pocket. Your eyes widened and for a second you forgot that you were mad at him. This guy was truly something. “Cool”, you whispered, but cleared your throat immediately, not ready to give Kyouya that satisfaction, although you were almost sure he had heard you. Haruhi didn’t seem so happy about it.

Soon, you, Renge and Haruhi stood in the home economics room, wearing aprons and trying to teach Renge how to bake cookies. Still sulking, you kneaded your dough, still mad at the girl from France, who kept burning everything she touched. You knew you should have helped Haruhi saving Renge from her own mistakes, but somehow you weren’t in the mood. Suddenly, a movement caught your eye. Right there in the door you spotted all the hosts, given, minus Kyoya, fawning over the view. What did they think they were doing? You approached the door and no one seemed to notice you, except for Mori, who immediately hid behind the door, but it was too late, you already stood in front of them, raising an eyebrow. You cleared your throat and they all looked up at you at the same time. “I am going to close the door now” you said in cold voice, shutting it in their face to finish baking the cookies in peace. The audacity these guys had inbetween.

An excruciating hour later you walked back into the club, carrying your cookies. Renge went first, then Haruhi and you followed silently, still sulking. You would give these to your aunt later you thought. She deserved a treat. Tamaki was on one of his rants but got stopped immediately by Renge waltzing through. “You’re talking too much, Fake King", she said coldly, without even looking at Tamaki. In every other situation you would have smiled, but that feeling quickly disappeared, when she made her way directly over to Kyouya with her cookies, holding them out to him. “Kyouya-sama”, she caught his attention. You grumbled and placed down your cookies on a table, refusing to watch him suck up to her. “Haruhi-kun and (y/n) have shown me how to make commoners’ cookies.” “How marvelous”, he exclaimed happily. “How marvelous”, you mimicked him, making the twins chuckle. Kyouya acted like he hadn’t heard it, but you noticed his eyebrow twitch ever so slightly. You decided to see this as a win.

Of course where there were cookies, there was Honey. Sweetly he made his way over to Renge. “Can I have a bite?”, he asked with big eyes and looked at the cookies. Immediately, his smile faltered. They were absolutely burnt. “Yours look better”, Kaoru noticed, sitting down next to you and taking one from you. Hikaru took one, as well, placing it into your mouth, before raising your chin with his hand, and biting off the other half. “You still have some crumbles on your face”, Kaoru added, carefully licking off the crumbles of your face. You turned slightly red at the proximity, but couldn’t react, because you heard Kyouya clear his throat, making the twins grin up at him. Why did this feel like a plan? He stepped over to your little group. “Please, don’t forget how important her family relations are to me”, he said, looking at all three in a reprimanding fashion. You rolled your eyes. He raised an eyebrow. “Are you sure that’s what’s bothering you”, Hikaru said, slipping off the couch and stepping in front of Kyouya. “Or is it…”, Kaoru started, also getting up, but couldn’t finish his sentence, as he was interrupted by Renge’s loud voice. “You are all too tepid!” The entire host club stopped in their movement. “Every single one of you! Except for Kyouya, all of your characters are lukewarm!” Everybody just stared at her for a while, unsure about how to handle the situation. Your eyes flickered to Kyouya. “Each of you needs to have some sort of dark side, you understand? Girls are vulnerable to handsome young men who are troubled! If you keep carrying on like this it's only a matter of time before the girls get tired of you and stop coming altogether! Are you trying to ruin my precious Kyouya’s business?!” “Business?”, Mori’s dark voice rang out and you shot him a surprised glance. You could hear the hurt in his voice as she suggested that the club was nothing more than a business to him. Mori caught your glance and you tried to tell him with your eyes that you understood. He smiled weakly, and for a second you two bonded without words over the ridiculousness of the situation. But Renge didn’t even care. “As your manager it's my duty to change your character backgrounds! Let’s start with you!” She pointed to Honey. One by one, she went through the hosts. And you felt really bad for them. Whatever movie she was in, she needed to get back to reality. Sighing you leant back in your seat, waiting for her to finish. At least she wouldn’t talk about - “You!” You pointed at your face. “Me?” “You’re the Cinderella of the club!” “The what now?” Confused you looked around the room, but everybody was busy accepting their own new role. “You work hard, every day, being mistreated by the members, when all you want is a rich knight in shining armour.” You took a deep breath, trying not to yell at her, shooting Kyouya a glance that said “if I murder her, it’s her own fault.” You could see a smile appear on his face. A real smile. Not the fake one he had worn the entire time since that girl had appeared. Your eyes widened a little in surprise and your heart beat a little faster. He noticed your sudden surprise and his expression changed to confusion. But you didn't have time or the will to react to this, so instead you tried to collect your thoughts and put your attention on the person in the room you were actually mad at. “So I am the shallow rival?”, you asked almost sarcastically, raising an eyebrow at her, but again she didn’t even listen to you. “A rival in a dramatic love triangle!” Renge continued, grabbing your arm and pulling you next to Kyouya. “You fell in love with my beloved Kyouya, cause how could it be different!” A dark blush crept onto your face. Out of anger or embarrassment you didn’t know. “I’d never –“ you tried to stop her, but she was waltzing over you. “Kyouya-sama, however, has only eyes for his fiancé. Me. Meanwhile, Mori…”, now she grabbed his arm, pulling him on your other side, “…is deeply in love with you.” “That’s not how a love triangle works”, you chimed in, trying one last time to stop her, but she ignored you. “That’s right”, the twins appeared on your sides again. “Now if she would like me”, Hikaru started, tilting your chin up to his face, “but I would be in love with her”, Kaoru tilted your head towards him. Your noses were almost touching. “That would be a love triangle.” “Oh yes!”, Renge shouted, “that is genius!” “Why would you give her ideas?”, you sighed and saw that the twins at least also were embarrassed. They had backed off a bit, but both kept an arm dangling over your shoulders. “We don’t know.”

A few minutes later, Renge had not necessarily calmed down, but at least she was busy making some phone calls to whoever, so you got a bit of peace. You had sat back down at the table you had placed your cookies on to get a bit of rest after that whole ordeal. It was almost time for you to go home, anyways. Carefully, you began wrapping them, when Kyouya stepped next to you, but you didn’t even give him the time to lecture you. “Do I really have to be a part of this?”, you sighed instead.   He eyed Renge from the corners of his eyes, while he grabbed on of your cookies. “Hey!” You wanted to protest, but there was no use. “Do I need to remind you …”, he began speaking, that fake smile back on his face, he wore whenever she was looking at him. You rolled your eyes and didn't even let him finish his sentence. “Fine”, you interrupted him, “I’ll do it”, you said, focusing on wrapping your cookies. “But can you stop acting like that, then, please?” Surprised, Kyouya dropped his smile. “Like what?” He tried to keep his composure. “All those fake smiles and such when you’re talking to me.” You avoided his gaze and focused on your cookies. “That’s not you and I am not one of the girls you need to impress.” You looked up, but couldn’t look him in the eye. “I like you more, when you’re yourself.” With these words you got up and left the room. Kyouya looked after you, thinking, biting off a piece of the cookie he had taken from you earlier.

---

Mori stood in front of you. Your gaze went over to Kyouya who stood behind the camera. “Don't be ridiculous, Takashi”, you sneered. “In comparison to everybody else here your family business earns mere peanuts.” You hated yourself for saying these words. Who had written this dialogue again? “You are nothing but the watchdog for…”, you kept on talking, when you suddenly felt Mori’s strong arms around you, pressing you tightly against his chest. Good for the twins, bad for you, Renge had decided that the twins were better off on their own so here you were now. You stiffened, according to the script, waiting for the hug to end. You did feel a little safer in his embrace, though, at least this way you could ignore the three cameras pointed at you. Mori always had something calming about him and you allowed yourself to relax for a second, before whispering “sorry” in a hushed voice that only he would be able to hear, before you pushed him away rather harshly. “You’re nothing to me. I could never love you.” Gosh, this was so not you. Why were you part of this again? But then your gaze found Haruhi behind the camera, who was talking to Tamaki, and you remembered. Ah, right. You focused back on the scene and on Mori who now knelt before you. He actually seemed a little hurt by your words. He was definitely a good actor that much you had to give him. When he spoke his voice was dark and soft as usual. “I can make you happy.” For some reason these words let your heart beat a bit faster, as you looked at the older host and you started to stammer. “Cut, cut, cut!”, Renge yelled, and you shook your head. “Sorry”, you apologized, more to Mori than to her. “I think I just need a break.”

You stepped over to Kyoya, who was scribbling something in his notebook again. “And? Happy with what you’re seeing?” He stopped writing for a second, not seeming to understand what you were saying. “I don’t know what you mean.” He avoided eye contact. Did he think … “Oh!”, you quickly exclaimed, “not that scene. No… I just assumed you are mostly accepting this behaviour because you need new material for your photo books.” He smirked and began to write again. “I really have underestimated you”, he said and you weren’t sure if you should feel insulted or happy about the compliment. You were just about to reply something, when Renge called you over for take two.

-----

You ran towards the commotion, worried about your friend. The twins had run over to you and told you what had happened and you immediately followed them back to the schene. When you arrived, Tamaki was looking at your friend intently, making sure she was fine. You sighed relieved. That guy really was alright. You stepped next to him, looking down at your friend. “Are you okay, Haru-chan?” Haruhi nodded. Now fully relieved, you exhaled deeply, when Renge’s voice made you tense up again. “Other than Haruhi's contact falling out that was an ideal final scene!” , she exclaimed happily and now you really had enough. Even with the risk of Kyouya murdering you afterwards, you couldn't just let this continue. “Hey”, you yelled at her, “my friend got hurt!” But she ignored you. You swore by god if she’d now make it all about … “All it needs now is a moving narration by my sweet Kyouya!” You had opened your mouth again, ready to give her a bit of your opinion, when a loud crashing sound interrupted your anger. Surprised you looked up to see Kyouya in front of you, having destroyed the camera lense with a big stone in one swift movement. You watched him in awe and you felt your pulse quicken. “I'm terribly sorry”, Kyouya started, ignoring the cries of the camera men, “but I cannot allow there to be any record of a club member engaging in violence. I think you've caused enough trouble around here Renge.” And then he said the one sentence you could have kissed him for on the spot. “Please stop being such a pest.” Took him long enough. You lowered your head, trying to hide your smile at these words. Finally, he was back to normal. Well, whatever normal was for him. And Renge definitely had needed a reality check. Your happiness was short-lived, though, because not a second later, tears started to fall from her eyes. Unsure about what to do you looked her. “A pest?” You reached out a hand to pat her shoulder, and she looked up at you with tear-stained eyes, before she turned back to Kyouya. “But you're supposed to pat me on the head and tell me not to worry! You're supposed to be kind and affectionate Kyouya! Why are you acting so differently now? Tell me why!” “Because that is not the real Kyouya”, Tamaki simply said into the silence. You smiled slightly. He could be really insightful if he wanted. As annoying as he was sometimes, his heart was certainly in the right place. You let your hand sink back to your side and your gaze wandered over to Kyouya. “Thank god it isn’t”, you said teasingly, and he caught your smirk, stepping next to you, while Haruhi confronted Renge. “What are you implying?” “I saw you be nice for two entire days, and it freaked me out, to be honest.” He chuckled. “Well, I told you, her family relations meant a lot to me. Why do you think I allowed all this to happen in the first place? Ignoring the fact that now I will have to pay for the camera lense, too. Should I add that to Haruhi’s debt?” You looked up at him. Somehow you were really relieved he had stopped this madness and was back to his usual, even if slightly scary, self. You knew he had allowed all of this for a reason as usual, but he had also stopped it eventually. He said for the sake of the club, but something told you that this wasn't the full truth. You smiled slightly. He really was intriguing. “Don’t act like the video material hadn’t been saved digitally. I’m sure you’ll recover financially.” And with these words you left his side, to walk over to Haruhi who was actually comforting Renge. Maybe, you should give her another chance. Or at least save Haruhi from the situation.

Again, Kyouya looked after her, a smirk appearing on his face. He watched her kneel down next to Haruhi and Renge, talking and trying to calm down the latter. He scoffed and looked at the stone he was still holding in his hand, throwing it up and down a few times. Getting you into the club had been certainly the most interesting thing that had happened in a long time. 

Chapter 4

[akshayss]

Emergence and growth of IIITs in India

Learn more about the emergence and growth of IIITs in India through our related posts. Stay updated with the latest news and upcoming events on MyEducationWire.

[kcenvs3000f24]

Blog Post #10: Describe your personal ethic as you develop as a nature interpreter. What beliefs do you bring? What responsibilities do you have? What approaches are most suitable for you as an individual?

As I journeyed through this course and deepened my understanding of nature interpretation, I found myself progressively reflecting on the personal ethic that guided my approach. What beliefs do I bring to this work? What responsibilities do I have? How do I translate my unique personality and insights into a meaningful experience for others? These are questions that have shaped my learning and will continue to shape my practice as a nature interpreter.

At the core of my personal ethic lies the belief that nature interpretation is more than just educating or entertaining, it’s about fostering a connection between people and the natural world. As emphasized in Chapter 1, interpreters “enrich experiences by expanding awareness and understanding” (Beck et al., 2018). This resonates deeply with me, as I view interpretation as a bridge, a way to connect the visible wonders of the environment, like a towering oak tree or a meandering stream, with the intangible meanings they hold, such as resilience, interconnection, and history. This belief aligns with Freeman Tilden’s first principle of interpretation: connecting what is being described to something within the personality or experience of the visitor (Beck et al., 2018). For me, this means finding ways to make nature relatable. Whether it’s through a story about a bird’s migration or a hands-on activity that uncovers patterns in nature, I aim to create moments of revelation that inspire awe and curiosity.

As a nature interpreter, my role is to share knowledge in a way that is both captivating and easy to understand, while remaining true to the facts. This responsibility extends to ensuring that my interpretations are inclusive, acknowledging the diverse ways people experience and relate to nature. The concept of the “invisible backpack” mentioned in Unit 03 reminds me to be mindful of privilege and how it shapes access to natural spaces. For instance, not everyone has the same ability to engage with the outdoors due to historical, social, or economic barriers. Recognizing this as an interpreter involves crafting experiences that are inclusive and equitable for all. Furthermore, I am committed to ethical storytelling. This includes honoring the voices of Indigenous communities and other stakeholders whose histories and relationships with the land might differ from my own. Interpretation must be rooted in authenticity and a high regard for truth (Beck et al., 2018). For me, this means not only sharing the stories of the land but also questioning whose stories are being told and whose are being left out.

Given my learning style as a visual learner after completing the Unit 02 activity, “What’s Your Learning Style”, my approach to interpretation would gravitate towards using visual aids like diagrams, charts, and demonstrations. These tools not only help me process information but also allow me to cater to others who share this preference. However, I recognize the importance of adapting to different learning styles. Whether my audience consists of active learners who thrive on hands-on activities or reflective learners who prefer quiet contemplation, I aim to create a flexible interpretive experience. The constructivist approach described in Beck et al., (2018) informs much of my methodology. This approach emphasizes building new knowledge on visitors’ prior experiences, allowing them to construct their own meaning. For instance, while leading a guided hike, I might invite participants to share their observations and interpretations of the environment before offering further context. This approach honours their perspectives and fosters a sense of personal connection to their learning journey.

One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned in this course is the importance of sense-making. Interpretation is not about delivering a lecture; it’s about creating opportunities for visitors to connect with the material in their own way. As stated in Chapter 1, “interpretive professionals are in the business of creating and managing opportunities for enjoyment” (Beck et al., 2018). This requires a deep understanding of my audience and a willingness to adapt based on their needs and interests. In practice, this means blending information with art and emotion. Unit 07 brought to my attention that music, for instance, offers a unique gateway to nature. The rhythms of a song can mirror the flow of a river, while the call of a loon can evoke a sense of solitude and wilderness. Drawing on these connections can make interpretation more memorable and impactful. Technology also plays a role in reaching larger audiences. Unit 08 emphasizes that while tools like apps and social media can enhance interpretation, they must be used thoughtfully to avoid detracting from the experience. For example, a guided tour might incorporate augmented reality to visualize historical changes in the landscape, but it should also encourage participants to engage directly with their surroundings.

Ethics in interpretation goes beyond the content I present; it shapes how I engage with others and the environment. Unit 03 mentions the precautionary principle, which inspires me to embrace a thoughtful and deliberate approach to interpretation, specifically when exploring sensitive subjects such as climate change or endangered species.These are areas where scientific uncertainty might tempt us to simplify or exaggerate information. Instead, I strive to present balanced narratives that empower visitors to think critically and act responsibly. Moreover, I see interpretation as a form of stewardship. By helping visitors develop a deeper appreciation for nature, I hope to inspire them to become advocates for its protection. The ultimate goal of interpretation is to cultivate well-informed stewards of cultural and natural heritage (Beck et al., 2018).

As I continue to develop as a nature interpreter, I recognize the need for ongoing reflection and growth. Kolb’s experiential learning cycle, explored in Unit 09, serves as a guiding compass, illuminating my strengths while uncovering opportunities to grow and evolve. For instance, I’ve realized the importance of integrating risk management into my practice, as illustrated by the “Lemon Theory” in Unit 04. By anticipating potential challenges and preparing accordingly, I can create safer and more rewarding experiences for my audience. I am also inspired by the work of citizen science initiatives, as highlighted in the article by Merenlender et al., (2016). Through these programs, we witness the transformative power of collective action and how interpretation inspires a deeper commitment to environmental stewardship. Incorporating elements of citizen science into my practice could provide visitors with a sense of agency and a tangible connection to conservation efforts.

Overall, developing a personal ethic as a nature interpreter is a continuous journey, enriched by the wisdom I gather from this course and my own encounters with nature. My ethic is rooted in the belief that interpretation is about connection, connecting people to nature, to each other, and to their own sense of wonder. It is about creating opportunities for discovery, reflection, and action. As I move forward, I will continue to draw on the principles and practices I’ve learned, adapting them to suit my audience and the contexts in which I work. Whether through storytelling, visual aids, music, or technology, I aim to share my passion for the natural world in ways that inspire and empower others. After all, “interpretation opens minds to wonder and new ways of perceiving the world” (Beck et al., 2018). And what greater responsibility and privilege could there be than that?

References

Beck, L., Cable, T.T., & Knudson, D.M. (2018). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Heritage for a Better World. Sagamore Publishing.

Merenlender, A. M., Crall, A. W., Drill, S., Prysby, M., & Ballard, H. (2016). Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12737

[amityranchi]

Exploring B.A. Economics Honours at Amity University Ranchi

Amity University Ranchi has emerged as an eminent institution that offers a plethora of academic opportunities for students to carve their paths towards success. Among its array of programs, the B.A. Economics Honours course stands out as a beacon of excellence, attracting individuals with a passion for commerce and a drive to understand the complexities of the modern economic landscape. Let us delve into the key aspects of the B.A. Hons. Economics course at Amity University Ranchi, including its eligibility criteria, curriculum, and the unique advantages it offers to aspiring economists.

B.A. Hons. Economics Course Overview

The B.A. Hons. Economics course at Amity University Ranchi is sketched out to furnish students with a deep understanding of economic theories, principles, and their real-world applications. This curriculum serves as a launchpad for students who aspire to pursue careers in economics, finance, policy-making, research, and more. By compiling theoretical knowledge with practical insights, the B.A. Hons. Economics course enables learners with the analytical skills and critical thinking necessary to comprehend dynamics.

Curriculum Highlights & Eligibility Criteria for B.A. Economics Honours

The B.A. Economics Honours Eligibility at Amity University Ranchi ensure that individuals with a genuine interest in economics can embark on this enriching academic journey. To be eligible for the program, candidates must have completed their 10+2 education from a recognized board. The eligibility criteria thus focus on nurturing a diverse student body, encouraging individuals from various educational backgrounds to explore the captivating world of economics.

The B.A. Hons. Economics course is thoughtfully crafted to offer a thorough understanding of economic concepts, microeconomics, macroeconomics, international economics, and more. The curriculum encompasses a blend of core economics courses, elective subjects, and practical projects, enabling students to tailor their learning experience. Enabled with multidisciplinary flexible choice-based credit system, the university focuses on leveraging the talent and innovative capabilities of its learners and making them industry ready.

Moreover, the curriculum emphasizes experiential learning, enabling students to engage with case studies, simulations, and research projects that mirror real-world economic scenarios. This hands-on approach nurtures practical skills alongside theoretical knowledge, fostering a holistic learning experience.

Advantages of Choosing B.A. Hons. In Economics at Amity

Distinguished Faculty: The B.A. Hons. Economics program at Amity University Ranchi is guided by a faculty team comprising experienced academicians and industry experts. The mentorship program ensures that students receive a versatile education that combines academic rigor with real-world insights.

State of the Art Resources: The university provides access to ultra-modern infrastructure, including globally agile classrooms, advanced research facilities, and libraries stocked with an extensive array of literature. These resources create an environment conducive to academic excellence and growth for the learners.

Holistic Development: Amity University Ranchi places equal importance on integrated development, offering students opportunities to engage in extracurricular activities, workshops, seminars, and internships that enhance their interpersonal skills and overall personality.

Networking Opportunities: The university fosters a vibrant community of students, faculty, and alumni. This network provides invaluable opportunities for students to interact with industry professionals, guest speakers, and alumni who have excelled in the field of economics.

In conclusion, the B.A. Hons in Economics at Amity Ranchi is a gateway to a promising career in economics. With its inclusive eligibility criteria, comprehensive curriculum, experienced faculty, and emphasis on practical learning, the program equips students with the skills and knowledge needed to thrive in various economic domains. Aspiring economists looking for a dynamic learning environment need not look further than Amity University Ranchi to realize their academic and professional aspirations. For more info visit https://amity.edu/ranchi/ 

Source : https://sites.google.com/view/ba-hons-economics-course/home?authuser=1