#dracula the danse macabre

[starstrider-productions]

Why set Dracula: 2004 in 2004?

Earlier this week, we revealed that our next project will be Dracula: 2004, an exciting new adaptation of Bram Stoker’s Dracula set in the early Noughties. But the question is, why 2004? It can’t just be for Britney Spears, right?

Well, as much as I love Britney Spears, she’s not the only reason I chose the year 2004 as the setting for this version of Dracula. If you want to read a 1,500 word (!) essay on the advancement of technology, the themes of gothic literature, and why I love Dracula, then you’re in the right place. Buckle in for an outpouring of English-teacher-nerdery (yes, I really am an English teacher in real life!) and prepare to be lectured to.

The thing about Dracula is that it’s already been done to death (pun unintended) a thousand times. You’ve got the classic gore of Hammer Horror; the Ye Olde Copyright Issues of Nosferatu; the romance of Coppola’s remake; the odd (but strangely compelling) Van Helsing, starring Hugh Jackman; and more recently, Renfield and Last Voyage of the Demeter. And that’s not even broaching the world of audio fiction, with Murray Mysteries, RE. Dracula, Dracula: The Danse Macabre and The Holmwood Foundation, all of which came out (or are coming out soon) within the past five years. The point is, the market is absolutely swimming with vampires. We’ve got piles of absolutely fantastic vampire fiction coming out of our ears, even only focusing on Dracula content. So why the hell am I making more?

Well, firstly, I am personally of the belief that you can’t have too much of a good thing. I am a particular fan of the “two cakes” metaphor (pictured below) for the precise reason that there is almost certainly a nerd out there who, like me, will look at yet another Dracula audio drama out there and think “Two cakes!” If you are that person, then congratulations: you are my target audience!

(Image credit to Tumblr user @stuffman)

Secondly, most of the settings for Dracula adaptations appear to fit into one of two settings: original time period, or thereabouts (thinking of Danse Macabre here) or modern day (such as Murray Mysteries). To be absolutely clear, I adore these shows and am not in any way criticising them! But when I was rereading Dracula back in 2022, it occurred to me that there was an untapped market: 2000s nostalgia.

Ah, the smell of hair that has been aggressively hairsprayed and backcombed within an inch of its life! The sheer impracticality of wearing a dress over jeans, and doing it anyway just because it looked cool! The technological gleam of the Blackberry phone’s 5000 different keys, ready to incomprehensibly speed-text at a moment’s notice!

Most people are either old enough to remember this, or young enough to want to. The Noughties were an absolutely fascinating time period, one that many people look back on with a certain degree of fondness (especially considering the current state of the world). It also happens to bear a striking resemblance to the late 19th century, for reasons I am about to explain.

Bram Stoker first published his horror novel Dracula in 1897. At this point in history, Britain was a global powerhouse, having colonised half the world and with the British Empire at its height (and, many would argue, at its worst). Stoker explores one of the contemporary anxieties of the British public in great detail: the fear of the Other. While this is a common theme in most Gothic fiction, Stoker characterises the Other through the villainous Count Dracula, a man from the “uncivilised” Eastern Europe who (literally) drains dry the "honourable" people of Britain, taking advantage of their kindness and generosity. He even goes so far as to “invade” the very island, proceeding to torment and prey upon innocent women, and must be driven back and killed by the "noble" British (and Dutch/American) protagonists. Count Dracula could be said to represent the contemporary British fear that the people they had colonised and exploited would turn on them and thus invade their country.

In 2004, Britain was at war with both Afghanistan and Iraq. This involvement in global politics – particularly so soon after 9/11, in 2001 – resulted in public backlash from multiple directions. Immigration was a topical issue: many Brits rejected the notion of refugees seeking asylum in the UK after escaping these war zones, viewing it as an “invasion” (sadly, not much seems to have changed here). This same disconnect between cause and effect is present in both the public of 1897 and 2004, particularly in the treatment of Roma people (although we have taken a detour away from Stoker's more unpalatable views on this topic).

But British politics are not the only connections we can draw between these two time periods. One of the key Gothic themes is science and technology versus religion and belief, and this theme is very heavily explored throughout Dracula, particularly through the character of Van Helsing. Bram Stoker would have been alive to experience ground-breaking inventions such as the traffic light, the telephone, the lightbulb, the steam turbine and fingerprint classification, all before Dracula was even written. With scientists and engineers learning how to play God at every turn, was it any wonder that authors of Gothic literature were inspired to explore this contrast, in other works like Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, or Frankenstein?

Similarly, 2004 was a time of exciting innovation, particularly relating to communication (a major motif in Dracula!). Not only was it in the thick of the early digital age, where internet access was fast-becoming universal and most people could now afford to carry a mobile phone, but it also signified the beginning of the social media era: Facebook was in development that year, and Myspace was gaining more users by the day. If you could go back in time and explain to your younger self the sheer scope of impact that social media would one day have on the world, would they believe you?

The sheer, terrifying enormity of change that occurred in both of these eras simply cannot be understated. In my opinion, there’s a reason that Buffy was so popular in the 90s and why Twilight burst into life only a few years later: change brings fear of modernity, fear of modernity brings a craving for tradition, and a craving for tradition needs monsters to feed it. I have altered some of the religions of the core cast in order to better reflect a more diverse modern society (there’s a whole different essay to be written on that choice alone) but the principle stays the same: with light comes shadows.

But wait, there’s more! One key reason why I selected 2004, of all the years, as a setting relates sharply to the social issues of Stoker’s time that I felt could not be adequately explored in a more modern Britain. In 1895, Stoker’s contemporary and acquaintance Oscar Wilde was imprisoned for gross indecency (relating to homosexuality), and one month later, Stoker began to write Dracula. Stoker – possibly to protect his own public image – condemned Wilde and ceased contact with him, but it’s plausible that Wilde’s influence remains within the character of Count Dracula.

Certainly, despite Stoker portraying the Count as a villain, who takes advantage of poor Jonathan Harker, he also writes the strangely possessive line “This man belongs to me!” when the three female vampires attempt to seduce Jonathan (and drain him). Count Dracula is both a man to be feared and repelled by… but also attracted to, a conundrum that Stoker (who many theorise to have been a closeted queer man) would have been intimately familiar with.

This brings us back to 2004, the year after Section 28 was repealed. For those of you who don’t know, Section 28 was first implemented by the UK’s Conservative government in 1988, and prohibited the promotion of homosexuality by local authorities. This meant, for example, that teachers weren’t allowed to teach children that being gay was normal and acceptable – they could acknowledge that queer people existed, but were not allowed to frame it positively. While it wasn’t illegal to be gay – and after 2003, it was even legal to promote it – it was still highly stigmatised in the UK, and many people were forced to remain closeted, similar to Wilde and his friends. Sexual repression is a substantial theme of Gothic literature and one that I very much wanted to explore in this adaptation, so I chose this era to reflect the concentrated and systemic efforts to suppress the presence of queer and trans people in the UK.

TLDR: To summarise, I chose the year 2004 as the setting for Dracula: 2004 because I felt that this era poetically reflected Stoker’s own – especially in the areas of global politics, technological innovation and societal repression of homosexuality – and felt that this would be the perfect era to explore some of Gothic literature’s most exciting themes: fear of the Other, science vs religion, and sexual repression. Additionally, 90s/00s music is FIRE and I also really wanted to get a Buffy reference in there. So sue me.

Dracula: 2004 will begin crowdfunding in April 2025! Keep your eyes on our social media for updates.

Care to take a bite?

[lazy-bones-stuff]

Dracula: The Danse Macabre, Episode 3 - Experimental Purposes, from @draculathedansemacabre

Oh boy, this episode shook me to my core.

The atmosphere, the tension, the horror-just chef's kiss. I had to create something for it, so here's my little tribute to this incredible podcast.

Enjoy the macabre madness!

[morrithal]

One thing about Gabriel Urbina is that he's gonna look at this tense negotiation/torture scene and say hm. Can we make it. Kinda sexy

[rinasaurusrex]

every time the number 214 comes up in a Gabriel Urbina script

[castingpods]

Dracula: the danse macabre but it’s just Mina being in sapphic love with Lucy

[sadmushroomgoblin]

My costume designs for Mina Harker in Dracula: The Danse Macabre

Right to Left: School Teacher; Waiting for News; Vampire Hunter; The Voice In Her Head.

School Teacher: Based on the typical outfits seen in photographs from the late 1880s early 1890s. The silhouette is similar to that of the 1880s but with a small vertical shoulder puff.

A full length black dress, flat boots, a white cotton blouse underneath. The lack of a bustle is expected by the mid 1890s and the puffs on the sleeves are small for the era but practical for a teacher. This is before the widespread introduction of the straight-front corset and so Mina has a high collar and collar stays with a long line bodice. This isn't the height of fashion but not rocking the boat.

I kept Mina's school teacher design simple and conventional with a simple but practical bun and white gloves. She is restrained by the expectations of her gender and position and dresses to conform.

Waiting for News: Masculine styles were becoming more integrated into women's fashion and as Mina starts failing to conform as much and fights to protect Lucy, while also maintaining her place in society, I tried to give her an outfit that speaks to that duality. Her hair is based on portraits from the era and is a little fancier than her School Teacher bun. She wears white gloves and boots and a blouse with a high collar. The dress was specifically designed after the dress Gertrude wears in the 1895 Punch cartoon on the Bicycle Suit. Mina, despite her private frustrations, still isn't letting herself drop conformation. She is playing the role of Mina Harker and it's taking its toll. There are the puffed sleeves and expected silhouette. However, her colour pallette plays with the typical vampiric colours with the hints of red in her clothing. Her clothing here is her shield as she tries to play the role society expects of the wife waiting for news of her husband.

The Vampire Hunter: This outfit is a Victorian Cycling outfit with the split skirt and cycling jacket. Mina is on her mission to capture Dracula and thus needs to travel and move often. Her hair is braided up and she probably isn't changing her outfits often, focussed on her mission. The design in simple and practical and follows the "Rational Dress Movement" trends. She isn't wearing gloves and is getting her hands dirty.

The Voice In Her Head: here, Mina is embracing her Van Helsing heritage and the voice of Dracula in her head. This outfit is based on a 1898 style travelling outfit with a fashionable cape and hat. The cape is red with black lace patterning and the lace patterning around her collar of reminiscent of the traditional Vampire bite marks. The gap in the cape over her heart reveals her blouse which is white, showing that Mina hasn't let Dracula corrupt her fully, even as she is now integrated with the monster. Conversely, her skirt it white but with a red lining as she has Dracula's blood inside. The diagonal design on her skirt is fashionable for the time but is also reminiscent of the Christian cross which abjures vampires. Her cape's black lace also mimics the epaulette style as seen in her Waiting For News Design but also pauldrons as seen in armour. Her hat includes a red ribbon and a veil with red detailing as she is concealing the part of herself that contains Dracula from the rest of the world. Tucked into the ribbon are garlic flowers as used by Van Helsing in Dracula (Stoker).

I hope you liked these and go listen to @draculathedansemacabre

(Please forgive my lack of design skills and knowledge of historical dress)

[yetwesleep]

*listening to dracula the danse macabre* huh, this is really good but mina and jonathan’s relationship is all wrong, if it continues like this i don’t know if i’ll be able to-

[trinitea-fics]

Need to put it out there before it's officially announced, but if Zach Libresco plays Dracula in Gabriel Urbina's new podcast that would be extremely funny

[jenijro]

I’m sorry, HOLY SHIT.

I was NOT expecting that.

(This about Dracula: The Danse Macabre)

If you like dracula stuff you should definitely go listen to it.

[colonelmajorkepler]

the way my jaw dropped by the end of the FIRST EPISODE of dracula the danse macabre?!?!? like it’s already such a unique take on a classic i was soo not expecting it but i love it

[toastercertified]

So we can all agree that Mina Harker is utterly and unquestionably (whether queerplatonically or romantically) in love with Lucy right?

[lazy-bones-stuff]

Couldn't stop drawing these two last night ✍️💀

Dracula: The Danse Macabre has completely stolen my heart. 🖤

[draculathedansemacabre]

Happy Wednesday, everyone! Dracula: The Danse Macabre debuted a week ago today. Our little show is one week old!

To celebrate the occasion, series creator and Episode 1 writer/director Gabriel Urbina is doing a Creator Commentary for The Happiness You Bring over on his Patreon! He'll be listening through the whole episode and talking about the making of, including various adaptation choices from the book and the various hidden details that are peppered throughout this first installment.

He'll be doing that as a livestream at 8:00 PM Eastern tonight, and it will also be available to watch after the fact! (And if you're interested but not sure if you want to sign up for a recurring donation, there's a free trial option! So you can tune into this without needing to commit!)

See you all tonight - bring the red wine! And tune back in next week for Episode 2, A Stranger in a Strange Land! Here's another little preview of what's coming:

[rinasaurusrex]

happy holidays everyone

[kingmakerpod]

Dracula: The Danse Macabre is shaping up to be an excellent series! It's a great chaser after the end of Dracula Daily. (And their Dracula sounds a lot like Willem Dafoe in Shadow of the Vampire, so you know Meg's on board.)

[claudiashealthyappatite]

So I tried the first episode of @draculathedansemacabre tonight while cooking dinner and the loudest What!!! I let out at those last few minutes scared my dog lol. Absolutely not what I expected but I’m optimistic and intrigued for the next few episodes!