#demographic jihad

[secular-jew]

Far-leftists are pitching about "zionists" being colonizer and genocidal. Meanwhile, Arabic conquered the entire MENA, eradicated entire ethnicities, and forced other ethnicities to take in their religion, languages, and cultures. Far-leftists said this is only in the past, yet many Arabic still committed genocide contemporarily like the Darfur and Yazidi, and Ba'athism is just an Arabic version of Nazism

100% true. The Caliphate (although not entirely unified) is alive and well, and waging demographic jihad, which is painstakingly playing out across the world. Islam, the devil's cult, is the fastest growing (so-called) religion on the planet and will surpass Christianity (in terms of numbers). Christianity is another proselytizing religion, fraught with deceit and a wildly supremacist history - which for 2 thousand years, also took no prisoners (and murdered millions of Jews in the process) as it spread, by force, throughout the world.

[navinsamachar]

मोदी सरकार के 100 दिन : अतिक्रमण, जनसांख्यिकी परिवर्तन, लैंड जिहाद, लव जिहाद, रोजगार-स्वरोजगार एवं यूसीसी पर बोले धामी

नवीन समाचार, देहरादून, 17 सितंबर 2024 (Dhami talk about Encroachment-Demographic Change)। केंद्र की मोदी सरकार के तीसरे कार्यकाल के 100 दिन पूरे होने पर मुख्यमंत्री पुष्कर सिंह धामी ने देहरादून में एक निजी कार्यक्रम के दौरान अपनी सरकार की उपलब्धियों को जनता के सामने रखा। मुख्यमंत्री धामी ने राज्य में अतिक्रमण, धर्मांतरण, और जनसांख्यिकी परिवर्तन जैसे मुद्दों पर सख्त रुख अपनाने की बात कही। उन्होंने…

[techramonic]

The insurgency of terrorism glorification on tiktok is quite disturbing to me. I've previously seen slideshows of jihadi john (mohammed emwazi) circulating again and I think that's crazy. This dude is a literal ISIS war criminal who beheaded christians on video for the public. Then again, terrorist groups are known to spread their agency online by making violence look appealing, even commercializing it.

But are we forgetting that these groups are the reason why many people in muslim communities suffer prejudice? They perpetuate stereotypes through rebranding concepts initially made for peace and re-introducing them as acts of hate, especially toward demographics like Americans who don't quite have the care to research about communities like islam.

Even those who aren't muslim but came from pre-dominantly muslim populated countries are also affected. jeez, I was even flat-out called a "terrorist" because I come from the UAE. During 6th grade, I couldn't count how many times my classmates would joke about terrorism, war, and bombings right in front of my face. It's always the "Allahuakbar!" shit. Do you even know what that means? That's a declaration of faith and thanksgiving, so tell me why you're saying it based on the context of violence?

I'm not even muslim, but at least I have the decency to be information literate and respect people. With your putrid substandard accent and lack of understanding beyond the context of mere violence because you do not have any care on researching about a community just because it does not concern you, your selfish agencies, and childish fun—better to just shut your mouth and never talk again.

Dude, even Jihad. That's the philosophy of struggling to defend Islam and achieve peace. The last resort is militaristic action, which is to PROTECT THEMSELVES. It's not about war. I hate how some see people like us who are from the Middle East, or are arab, or are muslim and immidiately relate us to war. We are not harbringers of destruction. That is merely a small fraction of a population that should not be confused as something that encapsulates and represents us as a whole. We're just like anyone else. We are normal people.

I hate how these terrorists destroy such a beautiful religion and the culture that comes with it and reason out by saying they're doing it to defend their beliefs. Really? Nah man, that's a distorted morbid reflection of your own ideologies at this point.

[sivavakkiyar]

Mayurkola has been in the news since July 28. Speaking to reporters that day, Asha Lakra, a Bharatiya Janata Party politician and member of the National Commission for Scheduled Tribes, listed it as one of the nine panchayats in Sahibganj where a total of ten Adivasi women elected representatives were married to “Bangladeshi infiltrators, Rohingya Muslims”.

While Lakra did not name any of the women, she did mention the posts they held – eight mukhiyas, including of Mayurkola, one panchayat samiti member and a zilla parishad chairperson.

Lakra was echoing what her party colleague and member of parliament, Nishikant Dubey, had said on the floor of the Lok Sabha. In his speech on July 25, Dubey had alleged that “Bangladeshi infiltrators” were marrying Adivasi women to grab their land and property, and to use them as proxies to gain power in the Santhal Pargana, the northeastern region of Jharkhand, traditionally home to the Santal Adivasi community. Dubey had claimed, without evidence, that 100 Adivasi women mukhiyas were married to Muslims.

His claims, meanwhile, echoed what Union Home Minister Amit Shah had said at a meeting of the BJP’s Jharkhand unit on July 20. Shah alleged that “thousands of infiltrators” were marrying Adivasi women to “obtain certificates and buy land”. Labelling this as “love jihad and land jihad”, the home minister claimed this was leading to changes in the demographic of the state.

Scroll travelled to Sahibganj to investigate the claims emanating from the highest rungs of India’s ruling party. Since Lakra was the only BJP leader who had cited specific evidence in support of her contentions, we used her list of nine panchayats as a starting point.

Scroll found that in four of the 10 cases, Lakra’s claims of Adivasi women being married to Muslim men were outright false. Three of the women had Adivasi husbands. The fourth, Kapra Tudu, had married outside the Adivasi community, but her husband, Nitin Saha, is Hindu, not Muslim.

In six cases, where Adivasi women panchayat leaders were indeed married to Muslims, all of them told us they had married out of choice. “The Indian constitution gives us the freedom to marry whom we please,” one of them said.

Lakra’s claim that the men who married these women had done so to take over their land rings hollow in light of the fact that none of the women had inherited any familial land.

[mariacallous]

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s ill-fated decision to invade Ukraine is so unconscionable that his propagandists—including Russian Orthodox church that is tightly controlled by the government—are having to resort to increasingly outlandish methods to recruit more volunteers and comfort brokenhearted families of soldiers who perished in Ukraine.

From the beginning, Putin’s loyal mouthpieces like state TV host Vladimir Solovyov asserted that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is a “holy war,” predicting it would lead to a “global jihad” against the West. Deputy of the State Duma Vyacheslav Nikonov claimed that Russia is “the embodiment of the forces of good” and stated, “This is truly a holy war we're waging and we must win.” Major General Apti Alaudinov, the commander of Chechen forces, who is himself a Muslim, claimed that Russia’s war against Ukraine will lead to the second coming of Christ, describing Moscow’s troops as “the forerunners of Jesus forces.”

Apparently, these assurances are not sufficient to ensure a steady stream of volunteers, much less to calm down the families of fallen soldiers. This month, Archpriest of the Russian Orthodox Church Artemiy Vladimirov decided to up the ante and claimed that soldiers fighting on Russia’s side in Ukraine get resurrected after they get killed.

Ukraine’s Armed Forces estimate that the Russian military has suffered 451,730 casualties in the course of war, which includes deaths and injuries. Estimates by the U.S. and British intelligence conclude that Russian casualties exceed 300,000. This further exacerbates Russia’s growing demographic catastrophe and highlights the difficulties faced by the Kremlin in ensuring they have enough men willing to continue this devastating war.

Host of TV channel “Soyuz” Sergey Platonov told Vladimirov that he often speaks to soldiers serving in Ukraine and has been trying to convince them that there is no such thing as death. Describing one of his recent conversations with a Russian soldier, the host proudly said, “Maybe I’m boasting but I was successfully able to explain that death does not exist. He was encouraged by that!”

Vladimirov played along and replied, “In war, there are no unbelievers! When you are facing physical death, every fiber of your soul comes alive. Right now, there are many wonderful testimonies of Christ’s victory over death. My wife sends me many military testimonies and video clips. Before Lent, I watched a video about one Chinese man who participated in the special military operation. A bullet hit him in the stomach, destroying all of his insides. He died from this and then was resurrected.”

Vladimirov continued to spin the tale, claiming, “Saint Luke of Crimea appeared to him and completely healed him, his insides were fully restored. He was baptized along with his relatives, all of them are photographed together, dressed in white clothes, baptized into our Orthodox Church.”

The Archpriest added that this is not the only miraculous testimony that “Christ is visiting the soldiers who laid down their lives for their brethren, he is visiting them as his brothers, as blessed martyrs.”

Platonov said that Vladimirov’s tale of an alleged physical resurrection is an example of what should be a constant topic of conversation. He surmised, “All of us talk on the Internet, these stories should be constantly told. Death does not exist.”

Vladimirov wholeheartedly agreed, reminiscing about the Archpriest Dimitry Smirnov, describing him as one of the first clergymen who united the Russian Orthodox Church with the Defense Ministry. The thesis that “death does not exist” has already been incorporated into multiple state TV programs and even holiday specials, but is now being endowed with new outlandish specifics.

Vladimirov is no stranger to spreading idiosyncratic fibs. In 2019, he claimed to have communicated with Charles Darwin from beyond the grave and alleged that the scientist repented for his theory of evolution and renounced his own hypothesis about the origin of species.

[the-garbanzo-annex-jr]

by Ohad Merlin

Mutasher claimed that approximately 12 million citizens from different sects, religions and ethnic groups live in the historical Arabistan region, adding that there are also 6 million additional Persian Iranians in the area, whom he deems “settlers.” “The Iranian occupation, after it occupied the country, carried out a process of demographic change, so that masses of Ahwazis were transferred by force to the Persian interior to cities like Yazd and Kerman, while the Persian ‘settlers’ were transferred to Ahwazi cities. An example is the city of Izeh, which used to be a large Arab center in the area, but today is purely Persian.”

According to Mutasher, part of the Iranian interest in the area lies in its abundant natural resources. “The terrorist acts led by Iran which we witness today are caused with funding looted and plundered from its rightful Ahwazi owners to support international terrorist actors such as Hamas and the Islamic Jihad.  

Indeed, the overwhelming majority of the Islamic Republic’s main gas and oil fields are located within the historical area of Arabistan, with some of the main ones situated in the modern Khuzestan province itself. Mutasher added that the gold and agricultural industries in the Ahwaz area are also significantly developed. “Al-Ahwaz, if liberated, can potentially be the one of the richest countries in the world; but unfortunately, the terrorist regime of Tehran today loots and plunders all these riches to support their terrorist agendas,” he commented.

Nowadays Arab citizens in Khuzestan point a critical finger at the central government in Tehran for what they describe as discriminatory policies against the Arab minority in the country. “Following the military occupation, the phase of the ‘soft occupation’ began, with examples being changing the names of cities. For example, the city of Al-Muhammara became Khorramshahr and Al-Khafajiya became Susangerd, and more,” he said.

In this context, Mutasher added that Iranian authorities refuse to register some Arabic names for children, such as Omar for boys and Aisha for girls, forcing the usage of Persian names instead. Other prohibitions mentioned by Mutasher include wearing the traditional Arab Ahwazi attire, which resembles that of the other peoples of the Gulf. “Regardless of this oppression, during the last two years we were able to break this line and we began to see our youth unite and revive their cultural history despite the obstacles,” he said.

[beardedmrbean]

Real question why do y'all americans think latinos can't be white supremacists? Being from Latin America doesn't mean we can't be white, and doesn't we can't be racist. Especially in countries that have a long history of institutional racism against black and ingenuous people like Brazil (the one I was born and still live in, and I've seen some serious shit irl, on tv and online). And those types don't care that the real nazis wouldn't consider them white, they want other races gone and that's it

It's not so much that people don't think that anyone is incapable of being a white supremacist, I've encountered self loathing black people that could be classified as white supremacists anyone can do it.

My issue is everything being labeled white supremacy based off of things like (as odd as it might sound to say) nazi iconography

we gonna label hamass a white supremacist group, maybe add in hezbolah, islamic jihad

No we're not doing that, because that would be silly.

You can be a Antisemitic boil on the ass of society and fly that symbol of evil there or any of the others that they destroyed the meaning of and not be a white supremacist.

So what I would like is when they see the guy has a SS lightning bolt tattoo maybe they just shut up about it until they can determine where the person stood some instead of instantly branding them a white supremacist.

People can have hate in their hearts towards other groups without white people being involved in the slightest or it having anything to do with them.

And yes I am also very aware of the populations of Latin America and the countries that colonized them so there's all kinds of mix and match genetics there.

Again, I'd like to know if the culprit is a white supremacist or if maybe they did it because they follow the whole nazi ideology but have replaced "aryan" (dumbass hitler didn't know what that meant, aryan's are turkic) with whatever they happen to me, Mestizo or whatever.

every demographic has the capacity for evil, please stop just pinning it on the one because problems don't get solved that way

(General statement for the world there at the end, no specific group or person)

[springcrafter]

I cannot believe I have to ask this of people (nobody here that I know of, otherwise you'd be contacted personally, but I've seen enough). Please don't trivialize this war by bringing fandom attitudes into them.

This is serious. I can speak for the Jewish Israeli side of things, that the foundations of everything everyone here ever believed are being tested in a degree unseen in our country's entire existence. I cannot tell you what I believe and what I don't anymore - this is existential to degrees I cannot compare to any event other than 9/11 and many of you are too young to remember that. Life as we knew it doesn't exist anymore. I will not pretend to speak for the Palestinian people because I'm not Palestinian, but I know them to be facing horrors beyond most people's understanding, particularly in Gaza.

This is no joke, and no talking point. This is an ongoing conflict that radically challenges the status quo for every involved side; too many of the chips have yet to fall, and personally I don't believe anything I'm told beyond the barest irrefutable facts. Misinformation and propaganda are rampant on both sides, and that's an insult to the truth and each and every victim. It gets worse when people with zero stakes in the matter get involved and turn our suffering into yet another point of debate to virtue-signal and boost their ego and pretend they're better than the person they're talking to.

I've had to see people with my own two eyes treat this as a shipping war or as another partisan issue to fight with your uncle over on Christmas dinner. Attempts to "pick" aside or to "help me convince [relative]" or "how can I rebuke [point]?", basically twisting reality into knots to make it fit your Western little heads.

Major yikes. It's bizarre and invasive and borderline appropriative, to think of our issues on your terms, and try to shape cherry-pick these narratives to suit your set of morals. These are Middle Eastern peoples (check Israeli demographics and my Ashkie DNA if you think I'm pulling that out of my ass) with our own cultures and sets of beliefs, and a conflict with an incredibly unique history and reason to be.

(For example, something I wish people understood is how diametrically opposed the notions of pikuach nefesh and jihad are. Pikuach Nefesh is Judaism's most important tenet - human life comes before everything and anything and it is our duty to do whatever it takes to save a life. Jihad is, as explained to me by several Muslim people, is a pillar of Islam and encompasses the idea of martyrdom, or basically that there are things worth dying for, and things one must die for. These principles factor on how both sides deal with warfare and it's a fascinating thing to talk about - but you'd never know if you only care about this war to boost your ego).

So what I'm about to say below goes tenfold if you're from the wealthy Anglosphere or the seat of a former European empire, because the state of the Middle East is your leadership's fault and you, yes you, have been doing absolutely nothing to hold your elected officials accountable. You also benefit directly from the instability in the region your countries caused (by keeping us powerless, yours are more powerful) and you have the privilege to sleep safe and sound and know war never will come to you. So here it goes:

Bringing selfish and trivial attitudes into a very real issue that affects real people that isn't you is a complete moral wrong. If you don't have a direct stake in the issue (ie. Israeli, Palestinian, or descendent of either) and have the absolute privilege of not having experienced war yourself (ie. lived in an active war zone for real personally in unequivocal terms) please take several steps back and a goddamn seat. This is not about you, your need to virtue-signal, and your feelings.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Published: May 14, 2024

In our inaugural piece for the Restoration Project, I laid out Yuri Bezmenov’s theory of Soviet subversion and how I believe that theory can help explain today’s discontents. The West’s enemies – though no longer masterminded by the Soviet apparatus – have successfully learned, adapted, and applied the secrets of subversion to great effect. As a result, the countries of the West are subject to relentless subversive activities. We are in now in a demoralized state in the key areas Bezmenov outlined. There is a whiff of destabilization in the air as well.

There are two channels through which modern subversion advances, one imported from abroad, the other raised domestically. These are, respectively, the rising tide of Islamism, and the resurgence of communism through its various woke avatars. These two forces have been so successful because they ruthlessly exploit time, discontented demographics, technology, and Western constitutional and legal frameworks. What is more, even though these two forces seem ideologically polarized, they collude in their stated objective to deconstruct the ideas and structures of Western societies. Green and red, hand in hand, against a mutual enemy.

In this piece, I will focus solely on the threat of political Islam or “Islamism.” Though I’m sure what follows will be deliberately misinterpreted by naysayers, I want to issue the by now familiar disclaimer that not all Muslims are Islamist. I refer purely to the threat posed by those Muslims who subscribe to the political agenda of Islamism: A theocratic agenda that seeks to replace our existing liberal, secular order with an alternative one based on Islamic law.

Time

Islamists are playing the long game. Through the process of conversion or missionary work and the gradual Islamization of institutions, the Islamist is committed to the transformation of Western society. How long does he hope it will take him to get Sharia established in Europe and North America? The answer to this question differs from Islamist to the next.

In the past, Islamists sought to physically and psychologically harm the West through acts of terrorism. They beheaded civilians, attacked crowds of people, and in their most visible act, flew planes full of passengers into buildings, hoping to strike fear into the heart of Western democracy. These attacks continue to have a huge impact on the psyche of the West. Countries like the U.K. and the United States sacrificed significant personal liberties for a degree of security; liberties which they have yet to recuperate.

It is important to recognize that by and large this tradeoff (of liberty for security) has worked. The United States resolved to never let something like the attacks of September 11th, 2001 happen again, and so far, they haven’t. Western omnipresence in the Middle East combined with pervasive surveillance networks at home ensured that Islamic terrorists never came anywhere close. Though smaller attacks persisted for some time, the threat of Islamic terrorism has mostly faded into the background, along with some of the fear. In the 2016 Presidential election, terrorism was the second biggest concern for Americans, only four percent behind the economy. In 2024, Islamic terrorism doesn’t even register in polling.

It would be a shortsighted mistake to say we defeated Muslim terrorists, however. Given the sustained and withering military operations the West inflicted upon them, I think it is more realistic to say that the Islamists who argued for gradualism and the methods of subversion defeated those who sought to fast track the imposition of Islamic law on the West through Jihad or coercion. In other words, the prevailing Islamists have simply altered their methods in favor of domestic subversion.

What 9/11 made clear is that the terrorists successfully built up a massive network of operators within the U.S. who were hard at work gradually radicalizing vulnerable targets. What is most interesting about this form of subversion is that it no longer requires direct contact between a source and a target. The perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombing, for example, had no clear links to a terrorist cell but were radicalized by osmosis, including through their mosque and through Islamist social media. These agents of radicalization are now telling their audiences to work within and through the system. Convert one person at a time; bring sharia law to one community at a time. Win one election at a time. Change and capture one institution at a time; and do so legally, without firing a single shot. Large, spectacular attacks weren’t the most efficient way. Perhaps this is.

Islamists have successfully implanted themselves within mosques, activist groups, educational institutions, and social media such that they can flood the ambient environment with pro-Islamist content. The effect has been to gradually subvert Americans and immigrants alike to support Islamist political objectives. The most obvious example of this is the seismic shift in public opinion on Israel among the youngest generations. No other issue in our time has seen so big a shift so quickly.

The rise and spread of Political Islam must be seen within the bigger picture of Western decline. Islamist ideas can only flourish in a society that is too feeble to defend itself. As I mentioned previously, Islamists have been able to exploit several assets to their advantage. The first is time. Like the Soviets, Islamists have learned that the attention span of American democracy is very short. We suffer from the myth that our domestic problems can be resolved in the next election with a reshuffling of the White House. Subversives know that weakening a nation is a generational prospect.

Migration

The second asset is discontented demographics, by which I mean the swaths of disaffected people, mostly young men, who are ripe for radicalization. These can be either the domestic population who feel largely alienated from their communities, or immigrants from developing countries who struggle to assimilate. The friction these groups feel with the rest of the society makes them prime candidates. In rich societies with welfare states, immigrants are put in the position where they are dependent on welfare and are not incentivized to participate even in the economy. Simultaneously, it is becoming more difficult to bring families, such that the immigrant population is heavily skewed towards young men. In Canada, for example, the population ratio between men and women ages 25 to 44 is widening, fueled entirely by immigration. Among the 20-24 year old age bracket, there are now 110 men for every 100 women, a disparity approaching China’s own much-reported male surplus.

Whereas the alienated domestic population might find meaning in wokeness or other para-religious movements, young immigrant men – alienated, angry, idle, and bored – enter the mosques and become radicalized. Sometimes these disparate groups interact, such as when we saw “Queers for Palestine” banners march to the tune of “from the river to the sea,” up until an avowed Islamist would confront them and knock them down. This is a recipe for disaffection. Such a society has sown the seeds of its own destruction. As for wokism: it is a pointless pseudo-religion and the Islamist knows this very well. Many converts to Islam first went woke and, when predictably they come out spiritually and morally empty, the Islamist is there inviting them into the warm embrace of the Muslim Umma.

Leaders in open societies have overlooked the fact that the advanced economies of the West have little-to-no socio-economic and socio-cultural mechanisms for assimilating large numbers of immigrant men with barely a high school diploma from developing or broken societies. These regions of the world, often tribal, do not have the same institutions, culture, or morals of the West. It is irresponsible to assume that all immigrants to the West will fully adapt to our way of life because they come here voluntarily. True, that was the case when large numbers of people fled European wars and economic stagnation in the 19th and early 20th Centuries. In a matter of one or two generations they were fully assimilated. Even though it took a little longer, the same can be said about immigrants from Asia, Latin America, and even parts of Africa.

It is obvious, however that immigrants who are predominantly Muslim struggle to fit in. Even when they flourish economically, as they have done in America, they are confronted with the insurmountable cultural differences between Islam and the West. Of course, many Muslims do manage to find a way of balancing their faith with their citizenship. But it is harder, and, unfortunately, a growing number of American, British, French, and other Western Muslims choose to turn to the Islamists instead.

Tech

Their third asset is technological. Here, the Islamists have deployed the techniques of subversion with much success. The earliest and most obvious example was the use of communications and social media to isolate and radicalize individuals, often for violent terrorist action. With the rise of mass social media consumption on sites like TikTok, Islamists have been able to inspire large swathes of young TikTokers to flirt with Islamism. As I mentioned previously, the most notable example of this is found in the rapid shift of opinion against the state of Israel among young people. Concurrently, we also see the stunning resurgence of antisemitism among the same population and the compulsory urge to attribute everything wrong in the world to Western action, and particularly the U.S. Just the other day, The Free Press obtained video of activists at the Teamsters Union headquarters being taught to chant “death to Israel” and “death to America” in Farsi. Yes, in Farsi.

It is important to call out what is happening on social media for what it is: It is reinforcing indoctrination that has happened at school or in the mosque. Maybe, these young people do not understand what they are saying or that they are being used. Maybe, they go along with whatever they are told to believe because it is exciting, or maybe it gives them a sense of belonging to a movement that fights for justice. Few  of them can properly describe how what is going on in Gaza constitutes a genocide, as my friend Douglas Murray recently teased out of an Eyewitness News anchor. Technology provides the most effective means for priming the masses yet devised, and we are rapidly losing the next generation to subversion.

Law

The fourth and final asset, paradoxically, is Western constitutional and legal frameworks. This gets to what I said in our inaugural piece about the West being too tolerant of intolerance. Islamists have been able to wield legal institutions against their enemies. All they have to do in many cases is claim Islamophobia and any obstacles to their objectives clear themselves away. The fear of a discrimination lawsuit is enough to send nearly any person or organization running for the hills. For example, American universities are terrified of reprimanding Muslim students who antagonize other students and faculty. Just last week, pro-Palestine protesters disrupted a dinner for UC Berkeley law students hosted in the backyard of a leftist Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and his wife, Professor Catherine Fisk. Chemerinsky and Fisk are extreme progressives, but those credentials seemed not to override the fact that they were Jewish. When Fisk went to confront one dinner-guest-turned-protester, physically gripping her mic, the protester invoked Islamophobia and her First Amendment rights.

Anyone who knows even the most basic facts about the First Amendment knows that it doesn’t cover screaming at people in their own homes. Nonetheless, that didn’t stop this law student from doing so. The Bay Area chapter of the Palestinian Youth Movement even went so far as to call Fisk’s actions “assault,” and credited them to “Islamophobia, anti-Palestinian racism, and religious discrimination.” This incident also harkens back to Bezmenov’s description of subversion’s “death wish.” It doesn’t matter that Dean Chemerinsky and his wife are leftists or that they have no power over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It doesn’t matter that protesting them in their own home violates the law. All action is justified under the principles of subversion.

Berkeley hasn’t announced any disciplinary measures against the students yet. I’m doubtful they will, but I’ll be pleasantly surprised if they do. If measures are announced, the students will just lawyer up, and in the morally bankrupt California legal system they might even avoid punishment. What makes the concept of Islamophobia so dangerous is that the very effort to explore this question is deemed Islamophobic. There is no ability to probe the bounds of what counts as Islamophobia. Just the accusation is a death sentence in some circles.

France has embarked on an effort to insulate its legal structures from subversive Islamist influence. French President Emmanuel Macron, for example, recently announced an “uncompromising” campaign to ban abayas  — the black full-body dress worn by Muslim women — in schools across the country. This move is part and parcel of a broader campaign to tamp down on the Islamist threat within the country and promote assimilation. In 2017, France enacted a sweeping anti-terrorism law which, among other things, allowed police to shut down mosques or other places of worship if preachers are found to be promoting radicalism. And in 2011, France also banned the niqab face covering, the first ban of its type in Europe. Granted, these actions fit into the language of the pre-existing concept of Laïcité, otherwise known as the constitutional principle of secularism in the public square. Countries like the United States have no sweeping legacy of secularism, instead granting maximal deference to the principles of religious freedom. However, even with France I fear this effort is too little too late. Islamization through demographic change will outpace any top-down campaigns to halt it.

In sum, we can see the outlines of the Islamist strategy for subversion. Absurdly high levels of open immigration have allowed Islamists to establish beachheads within Western societies with almost no filtering from immigration authorities. The conditions in the host country are such that assimilation can be avoided, while disaffected young men are gradually Islamized in their communities and through technology. The same process occurs for the young domestic population, which is indoctrinated through similar channels. Islamists infiltrate every institution and organization, cloaking themselves in the language and legacy of historic civil rights movements. Whenever they are confronted with objections to their activities, they are able to effectively wield the law against the host country.

I fear the window to address the Islamist threat is getting worryingly narrow. Many European countries are moving in a direction that would make vocal dissent either highly discouraged or formally outlawed. Most of Europe now has some system of censorship on the books. Scotland, a country known internationally for its free spirit, just joined the ranks of such countries, enacting a new hate crime law that aims to tackle “hatred and prejudice,” two notoriously unclear and ambiguous concepts. In Canada, Justin Trudeau has just introduced what journalist Matt Taibbi has described as a “blueprint for dystopia in a horrific speech bill.” This so-called “Online Harms Act” would allow administrative panels, not judges bound by rules of evidence, to fine or imprison citizens for internet posts they made in the past – in some cases, for life.

In Germany, Marie-Thérèse Kaiser, a politician in the Alternative for Germany Party, cited the government’s own statistics in an argument against resettling yet more Afghan nationals in Germany. Afghans in Germany commit rape at very high rates. Along with other migrants from places like Turkey and Syria, they commit half of gang rapes – despite being collectively only 14% of the population.  She did not make up these numbers. They are, again, the government’s own. Yet, under German hate-speech laws, she has now been twice found guilty and fined thousands of Euros. It boggles the mind that you can get a criminal record in Germany for citing government-produced facts.

Forces in the United States hope to do so as well, though that remains a more distant threat for the moment. Still, the direction of travel is unmistakable: the Islamists are here, and they are winning.

-

Future articles will further detail specific events that illustrate the creeping threat of Political Islamism. In a later article, I will address the resurgence of communism, its kindred spirits, and show how it too is copying the subversive playbook to great effect. Yet, in the war for restoration, not all hope is lost. The West has its own unique set of assets that we too can deploy, if we have the will to do so. More on that too to come.

[hero-israel]

I don’t want annexation of the West Bank for the reasons you said and others, but how can you say doing so is not in accordance to Zionism? One of its points, on multiple parts of the spectrum, is that Jews should live (and the state of Israel should be in) all parts of Jewish ancestral land, which includes the West Bank, as many settlers point out. I think it’s more trouble than it’s worth, both disrupting the people living there and giving too much fuel to Israeli expansionism, but I don’t think we can say it’s not Zionist. Also, the way you described the Abraham Accords sounds a bit like Darth Vader’s “I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter any further.” Not really the modus operandi I’d like to take, but that’s obviously a gross simplification. And a strenuous peace with occasional conflicts is leagues better than multinational genocidal warfare.

Annexing the WB is anti-Zionist because it will either immediately add 3 million former Palestinians to the Israeli population or it will add 3 million "nobodies" as powerless serfs while the whole world watches in broad daylight. The former would be a death spiral for Jewish demographic and political sovereignty, rapidly turning the country into Lebanon; the latter really would be apartheid and I think there would be severe consequences, many of them imposed by disgusted Israelis themselves. Both steps are totally unnecessary, nothing at all has changed on the ground in decades.

And yes, the beauty of the Abraham Accords was that the whole world agreed the status quo is acceptable. Israel got immense diplomatic and financial gains in exchange for no concessions at all. Any Israeli politician throwing away a platinum-coated victory like that is a greater threat to the country than Islamic Jihad.

[mightyflamethrower]

What are the mobs in Washington defiling iconic federal statues with impunity and pelting police men really protesting?

What are the students at Stanford University vandalizing the president’s office really demonstrating against?

What are the throngs in London brazenly swarming parks and rampaging in the streets really angry about?

Occupations?

They could care less that the Islamist Turkish government still stations 40,000 troops in occupied Cyprus. No one is protesting against the Chinese takeover of a once-independent Tibet or the threatened absorption of an autonomous Taiwan.

Refugees?

None of these mobs are agitating on behalf of the nearly 1 million Jews ethnically cleansed since 1947 from the major capitals of the Middle East. Some 200,000 Cypriots displaced by Turks earn not a murmur. Nor does the ethnic cleansing of 99% of Nagorno-Karabakh’s ancient Armenian population just last year.

Civilian casualties?

The global protestors are not furious over the 1 million Uighurs brutalized by the communist Chinese government. Neither are they concerned about the Turkish government’s indiscriminate war against the Kurds or its serial threats to attack Armenians and Greeks.

The new woke jihadi movement is instead focused only on Israel and “Palestine.” It is oblivious to the modern gruesome Muslim-on-Muslim exterminations of Bashar el-Assad and Saddam Hussein, the Black September massacres of Palestinians by Jordanian forces, and the 1982 erasure of thousands in Hama, Syria.

So woke jihadism is not an ecumenical concern for the oppressed, the occupied, the collateral damage of war, or the fate of refugees. Instead, it is a romanticized and repackaged anti-Western, anti-Israel, and anti-Semitic jihadism that supports the murder of civilians, mass rape, torture, and hostage-taking.

But what makes it now so insidious is its new tripartite constituency?

First, the old romantic pro-Palestine cause was rebooted in the West by millions of Arab and Muslim immigrants who have flocked to Europe and the U.S. in the last half-century.

Billions of dollars in oil sheikdom “grant” monies swarmed Western universities to found “Middle Eastern Studies” departments. These are not so much centers for historical or linguistic scholarship as political megaphones focused on “Zionism” and “the Jews.”

Moreover, there may be well over a half-million affluent Middle Eastern students in Western universities. Given that they pay full tuition, imbibe ideology from endowed Middle Eastern studies faculty, and are growing in number, they logically feel that they can do anything with impunity on Western streets and campuses.

Second, the Diversity/Equity/Inclusion movement empowers the new woke jihadis. Claiming to be non-white victims of white Jewish colonialism, they pose as natural kindred victims to blacks, Latinos, and any Westerner now claiming oppressed status.

Black radicalism, from Al Sharpton to Louis Farrakhan to Black Lives Matter, has had a long, documented history of anti-Semitism. It is no wonder that its elite eagerly embraced the anti-Israeli Palestine movement as fellow travelers.

The third leg of woke jihadism is mostly affluent white leftist students at Western universities.

Sensing that their faculties are anti-Israel, their administrations are anti-Israel (although more covertly) and the most politically active among the student body are anti-Israel, European and American students find authenticity in virtue-signaling their solidarity with Hamas, Hezbollah, and radical Islamists in general.

Given the recent abandonment of standardized tests for admission to universities, the watering-down of curricula, and rampant grade inflation, thousands of students at elite campuses feel that they have successfully redefined their universities to suit their own politics, constituencies and demographics.

Insecure about their preparation for college and mostly ignorant of the politics of the Middle East, usefully idiotic students find resonance by screaming anti-Semitic chants and wearing keffiyehs.

Nurtured in grade school on the Marxist binary of bad, oppressive whites versus good, oppressed nonwhites, they can cheaply shed their boutique guilt by joining the mobs.

The result is a bizarre new anti-Semitism and overt support for the gruesome terrorists of Hamas by those who usually preach to the middle class about their own exalted morality.

Still, woke jihadism would never have found resonance had Western leaders—vote-conscious heads of state, timid university presidents, and radicalized big-city mayors and police chiefs—not ignored blatant violations of laws against illegal immigration, vandalism, assault, illegal occupation, and rioting.

Finally, woke jihadism is fueling a radical Western turn to the right, partly due to open borders and the huge influx into the West from non-Western illiberal regimes.

Partly the reaction is due to the ingratitude shown their hosts by indulged Middle-Eastern guest students and green card holders.

Partly, the public is sick of the sense of entitlement shown by pampered, sanctimonious protestors.

And partly the revulsion arises against left-wing governments and universities that will not enforce basic criminal and immigration statutes in fear of offending this strange new blend of wokism and jihadism.

Yet the more violent campuses and streets become, the more clueless the mobs seem about the cascading public antipathy to what they do and what they represent.

[secular-jew]

What a shame. I think Europe is over. It will eventually be absorbed by the demographic jihad.

[angrybell]

Its become a truism for those on the Left to say that Israel’s attack into Gaza is just creating more terrorists. Its what they said about American soldiers in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.

Now, maybe there is some truth to the idea that military action will encourage the people who are on the receiving end of it, rightly or wrongly, to harden their position and turn to terrorism or resistance. In the case of Gaza, it would be hard to argue that this is the case.

ElderofZiyon, once again, has marshaled some of the information in article he published recently.

Basically, Hamas has controlled the schools in Gaza. Whether they are the UNWRA schools or the ones that are directly the responsibility of Hamas, the teaching curriculum is centered around two things:

1) Jews are evil.

2) Martyrdom to reclaim “Palestine” is the highest virtue to be aspired to.

Gaza’s population is skewed demographically. 70% of the population is under 30. Hamas has had control over the territory since 2006. The textbooks were only slightly less inflammatory under the PA.

But basically, for 16 years Hamas has had the unfettered ability to preach hate and indoctrinate in their youth these idea that martyrdom and genocide are duties they should want to accept. Those who are deemed to be “fighting age”, have spent their entire life in this. Their younger siblings are likewise indoctrinated in this cult.

How can there be peace with people like this? It is not that they are subhuman, its that they are humans who have been deliberately, calculatingly programmed to hate and refuse to accept that there is a third alternative to martyrdom by the Jews and genocide of the Jews.

So when the UN puts out something like this on X (fka Twitter)

or

It makes me scream. Because the UN, through UNWRA runs most of the schools in Gaza. And the books they use are the ones support Hamas’ (and frankly the PA’s since they have similar textbook problems in the PA territories) evil vision. They are complicit in this programming of an entire people into the belief that they should sacrifice themselves and their children, rather than find some way to coexist.

At some point - in my opinion it happened in 1975 although some could say it happened in the 1960s when it tried to solve Africa’s wars of independence by using Its “peacekeepers” to achieve the UN’s desired outcome - the UN crossed the moral event horizon and embraced evil. The UN loves to beat up on Israel without ever acknowledging that it is the policies and the actions of the UN that have prolonged the Arab-Israeli conflict.

So, with the UN and Hamas programming the next generations to prefer to commit murder than coexistence, what is Israel supposed to do? Who are the people interested in peace other than the Israelis?

When the US confronted this problem in WWII with the Japanese, there was only one solution: to kill them until it became so horrible that even the Japanese leadership, the Emperor in his secluded, pampered existence, recognized to continue this was national suicide. Israel doesn’t have that option. So what is the solution to this hatred?

[eleemosynecdoche]

So, here's the thing- these cross-border raids, evaluated as a "material attempt at liberation", which I will assume a definition of: "a pure effort to impose a state of affairs where Palestinians are out from under the power of the government of Israel on the state of Israel without Israel having any capacity to choose whether to accept or reject that state of affairs"- evaluated under those terms, these raids would be a total and dismal failure.

They could not seize and occupy any ground outside of the defined borders of Gaza, they couldn't compel Israel to stop bombing Gaza, they haven't noticeably degraded Israel's military capabilities, and even in the grossest material terms, they didn't kill enough Israelis to be demographically significant. It stretches credibility to believe that they could be repeated indefinitely to the same effect until they achieve one or more of those goals, or that they're Hamas just warming up.

But if you allow the possibility of violence as a method of communication, it's possible for them to be a message, and possible for that message to then be successfully communicated. The difficulty is that this then opens up the message to being criticized in terms of its form and its content, and this is inevitable. So the "western leftists" being sneered at in this screenshot are, frankly, attempting to find a redemptive understanding of these events, where it's still possible for the Palestinian cause to be achieved. To contrast, the anonymous person is seemingly relying on what I can't help but think of as sportsmanship ideology- it doesn't matter whether Palestinians achieve liberation or not, what matters is that they tried! Or perhaps simply doesn't have the tools necessary to grasp the material relationships there.

My own opinion is that these raids are far more compelled by the needs of domestic politics in Gaza than actions taken totally of choice by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Hamas cannot do nothing when Israel engages in some outrage against Palestinians outside of Gaza, and furthermore, must escalate in response to Israeli rhetorical escalation, and then a canned message goes out, Hamas's actions are condemned internationally (because they cannot respond proportionally given their circumstances), and the aggregate situation isn't strongly affected.

It's bleak, of course. Rationally, I can't really blame anyone for wanting Palestinian liberation to be something that could be achieved by Palestinians alone without compromise with the oppressive forces which act upon them. But then again, believe in oneself as a rational subject is always incorrect, so that apparent sympathy must, inevitably, be a product of my material circumstances (USAmerican, AmeriKKKan, however you want to put it) and so wallowing in performative irrational hatred of anyone who wants to believe in that possibility is preferential to the delusion of myself as a heroic subject.

[daaft-prick-69]

Muslim Invasion - The writing is on the wall

History tells us that Muslims follow a similar pattern when they emigrate from their countries of origin in Dar al-Islam (the Islamic world) to infidel lands such as those in the West.

First, a fairly small number go to the U.K. and establish a presence, a beachhead or colony if you will. Because they are small in number, they take pains not to cause trouble or attract attention.

Over time, as their numbers grow and an Islamic diaspora is formed, they begin making relatively modest demands, such as the serving of halal foods, the provision of special times/places for daily prayer, and so on.

As their numbers trend into the double-digits as a percentage of the population, Muslims begin becoming more assertive, even aggressive, in their demands. In the vernacular, they start flexing their muscles demographically. Muslims-only areas near major cities begin to form, and within them, sharia law is enacted and enforced by “sharia patrols” and the like.

It is around this time that attacks upon infidels ~ especially infidel women and children ~ begin to ramp up, both in duration and intensity. Mobs of Muslim youths begin setting fire to cars en mass, vandalizing churches and synagogues, or committing acts of rape and other forms of assault. Officials pass these acts off as more-or-less random acts of crime, but in reality, they are the beginnings of a campaign of jihad.

As the Islamic presence grows further, their increasing numbers embolden the trouble-makers, who begin to wage acts of low-intensity warfare upon surrounding society.

We see this in places like Sweden, where police stations have had to fortify themselves against small arms fire and grenade attacks. Or in the Islamic ghettos outside of Paris, France ~ which are so violent and dangerous that emergency fire and medical personnel will only enter with an armed escort.

By this time, the Muslims are quite open about their control of certain sectors of major cities. When several hundred of them decide it is time for prayer and roll out their prayer mat en-mass and pray towards Mecca, there isn’t a whole lot the authorities can do about it, even though the “migrants” have closed down a major traffic thoroughfare in the process!

These are signs of domination, of rule over the kafir or infidel. And the Muslims know it… just as they also know they are doing as their prophet commanded.

The tipping point into generalized civil unrest occurs somewhere in between this stage and the time during which the believers attain numbers sufficient to allow them to wage irregular warfare against others whom they deem targets.

Using such events in Africa as a guide, this can occur with 20-30% of the population being Muslim, sometimes more, depending on local circumstances and other variables. If the government is pro-Muslim, as it was in the Sudan during the 1990s Darfur crisis, serious trouble can erupt quite early on.

Of course, no civilized person wishes for any of this mayhem, chaos, or violence to occur, but ordinary people often have no say in the matter and therefore must take prudent steps to protect themselves and their loved ones.

@ImtiazMadmood

[everything-is-crab]

Idk why some Hindu women fall for the lies of Hindu men.

I mean I get why because like I said I have been there and I was so far gone I literally believed in "love jihad".

What surprised me even more was that this lady is a radfem.

Radfems more than anyone should understand male dominance in all communities.

Just because you see radicalized Muslim men committing atrocities against Hindu women doesn't mean that Islam is the only shit religion but Hinduism somehow is not or that Hindu men don't do the same shit to Muslim women.

People here need to realize this issue is very complex due to our history and demographics (Muslim people are the minority but they literally ruled over us centuries ago).

This isn't an issue like racism in the US where white people are undeniably the oppressors.

This is a religious conflict that has been alive for a long long time and its condition hasn't remained constant but changed throughout history during all phases- when the Muslims ruled over us, when the British colonized us and post independence.

This is what happens when people become too involved in just Western politics. You assume things to look similar everywhere else.

Anyways, Hinduism isn't a great religion for women. Especially today it isn't. Look at the Hindu men around you. Look at these politicians. Do you think these men have their best interests in their hearts for you?

Men always consider women and children collateral damage. Even the ones with whose politics you agree with look like these. And men will show you only the atrocities committed by the "enemy" men on you.

Ms-hells-bells talked about it in a much better way than me.

When you ignore issues like these it ends up affecting women most.

You're convinced Muslim men are the problem and a threat. The government passed CAA. Are you happy about that?

Because this is gonna affect Muslim women more. According to Hindu nationalists, Islam is a horrible religion that is brutal to its own women. So they passed CAA. Now migrants from this religion won't be able to seek shelter because they aren't persecuted anywhere apparently (search up about Rohingya Muslims to know this is a lie). But who's it gonna affect? Muslim female migrants who suffer greatly under the patriarchy. From countries like Afghanistan.

But please insist on how much of a feminist you are while shitting on one religion but defending your own.

I wish people would know that "tradwives" don't involve just white Christian women but also women like these who may seem progressive if you don't know the politics of the place she comes from.