#dapa

[thegentlemancollects]

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Isabela Dias at Mother Jones:

Is the dream dead? And, if so, who killed it? On June 15, 2012, President Barack Obama stood in the Rose Garden of the White House to announce a massive change in immigration policy. For years, Congress had been unable to pass legislation to protect from deportation the so-called Dreamers, undocumented youth brought to the United States as children. In 2001, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) first introduced a bill that would have granted them a path to citizenship. But, a decade later, the Dream Act had failed—again.

Obama declared that day he had taken matters into his own hands. His administration put forward an executive action to create a now-famous program: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). “These are young people who study in our schools, they play in our neighborhoods, they’re friends with our kids, they pledge allegiance to our flag,” Obama, facing pressure over his administration’s harsh immigration enforcement practices, said. (He had begun to be called a moniker that would stick: “deporter in chief.”) “They are Americans in their heart, in their minds, in every single way but one: on paper.” As such, they shouldn’t be expelled from the country or have to live under the “shadow of deportation.”

DACA went on to become a landmark achievement of the Obama presidency—lauded for its seamless logistical implementation led by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, then head of US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and the economic benefits of authorizing eligible beneficiaries to work. Crucially, it gave a lifeline to more than 800,000 young immigrants raised and educated in the United States. DACA was “a temporary stopgap measure,” Obama had said. But its success, for a time, allowed the program’s original sin to be played down. The expectation, Mayorkas told the New York Times recently, “was that DACA would be a bridge to legislation.” Politicians could assume that change, albeit delayed, would likely someday materialize. Over the past quarter of a century, the issue of Dreamers has enjoyed broad bipartisan support in Congress. It has been included in virtually every immigration negotiation. And the stories of promising undocumented young people have been common on front pages and magazine covers—inspiring a rare kind of solidarity that transcended political divisions. (There was even a Broadway musical.) This year, all of that seemingly changed. 

The common-sense vision for a permanent solution for Dreamers has gone from a no-brainer to an afterthought. It used to be the case that legislative pushes for stricter border enforcement measures would not even merit consideration unless they were tied to relief for Dreamers (to say nothing of the millions of other long-time undocumented people often also included in proposals). Legislation could fail to pass, as it repeatedly did. But that signaling of support—even if in sentiment alone—made clear where Dreamers stood. Now, that tacit pact has been broken, and with little ceremony. In an effort to appease cries of “open borders,” Democrats and President Biden endorsed a controversial bipartisan Senate border deal that would have brought about one of the harshest overhauls of the immigration system in decades. Biden lauded the bill as the “toughest” in history. He also lamented that it didn’t include a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers. Still, he urged Congress to advance it. The border deal never saw the light of day. But it begged the question: When did standing up for DACA stop being “the right thing to do“? (Or a political necessity for Democrats.)

Adding to the disregard for Dreamers is the potential end of their life raft. DACA is more at-risk than ever, relegated to die a slow death in the courts where its legality and very existence is being litigated. As Congress and the public relentlessly debate immigration policy with a laser focus on the border, the fate of Dreamers and other undocumented immigrants living in the country has become a footnote.  “Congress used to care about the ‘Dreamers,'” the Washington Post editorial board wrote in January. “What happened?”

[...] The threat of DACA’s imminent demise is real. While in office, in 2017, former President Donald Trump rescinded the program, which then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions dismissed as “unilateral executive amnesty.” The US Supreme Court blocked the termination in a 5-4 decision ruling it was “capricious and arbitrary,” but left the underlying question of the program’s legality open. If given the opportunity, Trump would likely try to end DACA again. The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 playbook for the next conservative administration refers to it as an unlawful program. Stephen Miller, former White House senior adviser to Trump, previously called DACA “an erasure of immigration law” and his dark money-backed “lawfare” group opposed efforts to shield the initiative. “We already know what a Trump administration would do because we have had this experience,” Cecilia Muñoz, who served as director of the Domestic Policy Council under Obama and helped establish DACA, says. “You can expect DACA to shrink or disappear entirely.”

But these threats also elide the way the program is already quietly dying by a thousand cuts. A backlog of cases and months-long delays in processing applications means recipients risk losing their jobs. And short of an expansion, DACA as it currently exists will become obsolete. In order to qualify, applicants must have come to the United States before the age of 16 and have lived in the country since 2007. These requirements put the program out of reach for an entire new generation of Dreamers. “I have seen fewer and fewer DACA recipients in my classes,” Patler says. “My undergraduate students are now almost exclusively too young to have benefited from DACA, so they are facing the same barriers to pursuing higher education that undocumented students faced in the early 2000s.”  Even those who are eligible can still be excluded because of a court order blocking first-time applications. Judith Ortiz, 21, and her twin sister first applied for DACA in December 2020. A federal court ruling had just mandated that the Trump administration restore the program. Because the sisters, who came to the United States from Mexico at the age of two, share the same last name and birthday, their lawyer advised them to apply on different dates to avoid any confusion with the processing of their paperwork. Judith’s application was filed on December 23, 2020, one day after her twin sister. That one day would mean the difference between having legal status, however fraught, and remaining undocumented. 

In 2021, Judge Andrew Hanen of the District Court for the Southern District of Texas determined in a case brought by Republican attorney generals that DACA was unlawful because the Obama administration had failed to follow the formal rulemaking process. Hanen blocked new DACA applications from being considered. (He continued to allow renewals while the Biden administration revisited the program’s regulation.) The conservative Fifth Circuit upheld Hanen’s decision following an appeal by the Biden administration and sent it back to the district court judge, who ruled against the government’s attempt to strengthen and protect DACA. “While sympathetic to the predicament of DACA recipients and their families,” Hanen wrote in 2023, “this Court has expressed its concerns about the legality of the program for some time.” The case is now pending before the Fifth Circuit once more and could ultimately make its way to the Supreme Court.  When it comes to the courts, Muñoz sees a “worrisome corollary” in another Obama-era program, the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA). Built on the same legal premise as DACA, that initiative would have offered temporary relief from deportation to undocumented parents of US citizens and permanent residents. In 2016, an equally divided Supreme Court affirmed a lower court’s ruling in the United States v. Texas case, which challenged DAPA and an expansion of DACA, and prevented the program from being implemented. 

Mother Jones has an informative article on the slow-motion death of both DACA and DAPA.

[wally-b-feed]

Anthony Fineran (B 1981), Dapa Aramus, 2023

[dapasorgu]

Da Pa Sorgulama yapmanın en kolay yolu!

[prcg]

El récord de Kamala Harris muestra que odia a Estados Unidos

En un mitin de campaña en Wisconsin la semana pasada con la ex representante Liz Cheney, la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris abrió dicho“amamos a Estados Unidos”. Repitió la frase varias veces, enfatizando que lo que la unió a ella y a Cheney es un amor por el país que trasciende la política partidista. Dejemos de lado si el respaldo a Cheney importa en algo a los votantes de cualquiera de los…

[aresdifesa]

Bollettino del 10-12 agosto 2024 Il Dipartimento della Difesa (DoD) ha annunciato ulteriore assistenza militare per soddisfare le esigenze critiche di sicurezza e difesa dell'Ucraina.

[rhk111sblog]

The Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) Company recently revealed to the Press that the Philippine Government had sent them an Official Request for Information (RFI) for their new KF-21 Boramae Fighter Aircraft, indicating that the Philippines is now seriously considering its acquisition

This was initially released as an Article last July 31, 2024 at https://therhk111militaryandarmspage.blogspot.com/2024/07/paf-now-seriously-considering-acquisition-south-koreas-kf-21-boramae-fighter-aircraft.html

[travelella]

Dapa, Surigao del Norte, Philippines

Taken by Yuriy Bogdanov

[onedrawonly-posts]

How to rank with Google

How to rank with Google and get a 90+da? You will need to follow some best practices for SEO (Search Engine Optimization). Here are some tips to help you improve your rank: - Create high-quality content: Google values content that is well-written, informative, and useful. Make sure to create content that meets these standards and is relevant to your target audience. - Use keyword research: Identify keywords that are relevant to your business and use them throughout your content. This will help Google understand what your content is about and improve your ranking. - Use proper formatting: Use proper formatting, including headings, bullet points, and short paragraphs, to make your content easy to read and understand. - Optimize your site for mobile: With more and more people using their phones to browse the web, it's important to make sure your site is mobile-friendly. - Use alt tags: Use alt tags to describe images on your site. This will help Google understand what the images are about and improve your ranking. - Get backlinks: Backlinks from other high-quality websites will help improve your ranking. You can get backlinks by guest blogging, creating valuable content that others will want to link to, or by participating in industry forums and blogs. By following these tips and consistently working on improving your website's SEO, you should be able to improve your rank and achieve a 90+DA rank with Google. Here are some easy ways to get backlinks without being considered spam: - Write guest posts: Look for websites in your industry or niche that accept guest posts and offer to write an article for them. Make sure to create high-quality content that is relevant and valuable to their audience. - Create valuable content: Create content that is informative, useful, and unique. Other websites will be more likely to link to your content if it is valuable. You have to add something new to the conversation. - Participate in industry forums and blogs: Engage in discussions on industry forums and blogs and provide helpful and valuable insights. This will help build your credibility and other users may be more likely to link to your content. - Link to other websites: Linking to other high-quality websites in your industry will show that you are a credible & trustworthy source. This may encourage other websites to link back to you. - Use social media: Share your content on social media platforms and engage with your followers. This can help drive traffic to your website and may increase the chances of getting backlinks. By following these strategies, you can get backlinks in a natural & non-spammy way. This will help get your website to rank with Google. Read the full article

[adidas2311]

[thegentlemancollects]

[focus120tt]

unlined gloss nylon sprinter shorts by Dapa Design

[wally-b-feed]

Anthony Fineran (B 1981), Zana Dapa, 2023

[medi-bee]

Here are Deafening Applause, Profits Abound and Practical Affects! They’re the local group of Fortune Amidst Misfortune.

Deafening Applause, Profits Abound (any pronouns) is the group senior, though they don't always act like it. Loud and outgoing, they can come off a bit strong, but they have only the best of intentions. They worry about their siblings. normal? kinda?

Practical Affects (she/they) is the most emotionally mature of any of them. She loves her siblings, but that may not always come across well. If left unchecked, PA could unintentionally go many cycles without communicating while absorbed in her own processes. She's recently picked up an interest in biomechanics. Cold to most iterators outside of her local group.

[aho-dapa]

I'm feeling adventurous today and kinda wanna write something

Anyone want any specific smut drabbles?? since I wanna start practicing