#corporate disclosures
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
onlyasimp4nobody · 4 months ago
Note
hey here to make problms :) 🖤: Which character is not as morally good as everyone else seems to think? any fandom
JYX!! ML! Always make problems I love seeing it happen LMFAOO
Okay I'd say Leon. In RE6 during Leon's campaign he continuously makes reckless & immoral decisions for the sake of Ada. (who turned out to be Carla who yk. Was fucking evil and insane.)
link to ask game!
5 notes · View notes
samissomar · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
They've been laughing at you since the very beginning,Wake Up Now Humans !...Still,it's time for you to Stand Up in Unity Consciousness with your Sacred Mother Earth !...Dark Evil Forces have been hiding behind Goverments' Corporations !...They're really making fools of you whilst executing all the False Flags !..
© Samissomar © Samissomar
http://samissomarspace.wordpress.com
18 notes · View notes
thunderheadfred · 10 months ago
Text
I'm fine I'm just really really pissed off at this guy
Tumblr media
fuck you and your local meme billboard arms
5 notes · View notes
sunshades · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
as misfortune loves orphans, & as the iceberg loves the ship, & the passengers love the lifeboat
12 notes · View notes
3liza · 4 months ago
Text
yeah this has been thoroughly dug into already. it's a stack of venture capital nonsense , funds and acquisitions but it's real. it's on their job listing from last year
Tumblr media Tumblr media
dear god please kill whatever this shit is
38K notes · View notes
stephen-barry · 23 days ago
Text
Blowing the Whistle; The Drone Deluge - What's Really Going On?
The revelations from “Radar Guy” continue: “What gets me concerned, and why I had to make this post, is that something big is about to go down. I happen to know that there are additional ‘full lock out’ drills that are scheduled to take place between now and Christmas Eve. These operations involve the full turnover of all radio/radar and aircraft communications to the military for several hours at a time. In conjunction with that, there are also scheduled satellite launches ‘off the books’ which have been occurring since October. They are setting up some kind of big ‘show’ for the public very soon. CNN was even at our facility shooting ‘pre-roll’ footage for a future story. I don’t know exactly what is going on, but all I know is this: GET READY!”
Dr. Steven Greer told me that he had no idea where the drones are coming from, “but they are definitely not extraterrestrial. They are a diversion, part of a psychological warfare operation trying to capture the momentum of disclosure and turn it into an alien invasion scenario.”
0 notes
nationallawreview · 3 months ago
Text
DOJ Announces Changes to Guidance on Corporate Compliance Programs, Updates on Whistleblower Program
In an address this week to the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri of the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) Criminal Division, highlighted several updates relevant to corporate compliance programs, including the DOJ’s new whistleblower programs and incentives. Sufficient Compliance: Updated Areas to Consider The Evaluation of…
0 notes
grunge-mermaid · 4 months ago
Text
the city of Ottawa spent decades developing a company town out Downtown for an industry that has adapted and evolved to the new world order, leaving the city struggling to "revitalize" the neighbourhood to "help local* businesses"
are they increasing transit to make getting downtown easier? are they encouraging businesses to open more than 11am-3pm M-F? are they asking the tens of thousands of people who live in the neighbourhood what services/businesses they want/need and then incentivizing those businesses to open in the neighbourhood? are they encouraging businesses that offer activities beyond "eat overpriced mediocre food and get drunk on overpriced mediocre booze"? are they offering parking or transit passes to public servants?
nope.
they're cutting transit, pandering to the businesses who could not be fucked to adapt, and forcing the same number of workers into a fraction of the office space despite most of the data showing that WFH is just as or more productive than office work, and putting extra expenses on workers whose wages have not kept up with inflation who now have to pay for transportation and before/after school childcare on top of being expected to spend $20-$30 a day on burnt coffee, stale sandwiches, and soggy salads at businesses whose owners want you to torpedo your budget, work/life balance, and quality of life just to line their pockets
0 notes
touchaheartnews · 5 months ago
Text
Stock Exchange rates Fidelity Bank highest on corporate governance
Fidelity Bank Plc complies with the highest corporate governance standards as the leading commercial bank adheres promptly to all full disclosure requirements and global best practices. Fidelity Bank is awarded CG+, the highest rank under the Corporate Governance Rating System (CGRS), which screens quoted companies against prescribed best practices and standards. A review of the latest compliance…
0 notes
immaculatasknight · 8 months ago
Link
Michigan rising
1 note · View note
theglizzardwizard · 8 months ago
Text
One of Eve's plot relevant quirks is that she never speaks to, or in front of cogs. She initiates fights by whistling or throwing things at them on the street.
0 notes
alewaanewspaper1960 · 10 months ago
Text
دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة الإفصاح الاختياري - دراسة تطبيقية على الشركات الصناعية العاملة في قطاع غزة
دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة الإفصاح الاختياري – دراسة تطبيقية على الشركات الصناعية العاملة في قطاع غزة   دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة الإفصاح الاختياري – دراسة تطبيقية على الشركات الصناعية العاملة في قطاع غزة الكاتب : Baraka Kamel الملخص: هدفت هذه الدراسةُ إلى معرفة دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة مستوى الإفصاح الاختياري ، ولتحقيق أهداف الدراسة تم تصميم استبانة تتناسب مع هذا الغرض وزعت على…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
amereid1960 · 10 months ago
Text
دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة الإفصاح الاختياري - دراسة تطبيقية على الشركات الصناعية العاملة في قطاع غزة
دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة الإفصاح الاختياري – دراسة تطبيقية على الشركات الصناعية العاملة في قطاع غزة   دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة الإفصاح الاختياري – دراسة تطبيقية على الشركات الصناعية العاملة في قطاع غزة الكاتب : Baraka Kamel الملخص: هدفت هذه الدراسةُ إلى معرفة دور نظام حوكمة الشركات في زيادة مستوى الإفصاح الاختياري ، ولتحقيق أهداف الدراسة تم تصميم استبانة تتناسب مع هذا الغرض وزعت على…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
aurorasulphur · 2 years ago
Text
The difference is, they expected and accounted for the North American numbers to dip at the end of year three/beginning of year four (November 2022), in large part due to the initial D23 three year promo deal that expired in November 2022. They have been very up front since the streaming service was first announced that it will not pay for itself or turn a profit until after the conclusion of year 5. (So, November 2025.) Until that time, it will be buoyed along by the income from all their other business segments.
The pandemic, and the closure of all the parks/resorts for a significant amount of time, fucked up that income, as did the supply chain disruptions and the lack of cinema releases. Furthermore, RIGHT before the parks shut down, they sold their ENTIRE publishing backcatalog (minus IP and some specific top performers like Rick Riordan Presents) to Little, Brown, so they no longer even had that supplementary income stream.
Even so, they managed to overperform (globally) from their initial five year plan in years one and two. That was some cushioning, but not enough to mitigate the loss of cricket streaming rights. So while they’re not where they expected to be at this point, they’re within a margin of error of their initial 2018 estimates on the global metrics, which is damn impressive.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
53K notes · View notes
mostlysignssomeportents · 2 years ago
Text
Good riddance to the Open Gaming License
Tumblr media
Last week, Gizmodo’s Linda Codega caught a fantastic scoop — a leaked report of Hasbro’s plan to revoke the decades-old Open Gaming License, which subsidiary Wizards Of the Coast promulgated as an allegedly open sandbox for people seeking to extend, remix or improve Dungeons and Dragons:
https://gizmodo.com/dnd-wizards-of-the-coast-ogl-1-1-open-gaming-license-1849950634
The report set off a shitstorm among D&D fans and the broader TTRPG community — not just because it was evidence of yet more enshittification of D&D by a faceless corporate monopolist, but because Hasbro was seemingly poised to take back the commons that RPG players and designers had built over decades, having taken WOTC and the OGL at their word.
Gamers were right to be worried. Giant companies love to rugpull their fans, tempting them into a commons with lofty promises of a system that we will all have a stake in, using the fans for unpaid creative labor, then enclosing the fans’ work and selling it back to them. It’s a tale as old as CDDB and Disgracenote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDDB#History
(Disclosure: I am a long-serving volunteer board-member for MetaBrainz, which maintains MusicBrainz, a free, open, community-managed and transparent alternative to Gracenote, explicitly designed to resist the kind of commons-stealing enclosure that led to the CDDB debacle.)
https://musicbrainz.org/
Free/open licenses were invented specifically to prevent this kind of fuckery. First there was the GPL and its successor software licenses, then Creative Commons and its own successors. One important factor in these licenses: they contain the word “irrevocable.” That means that if you build on licensed content, you don’t have to worry about having the license yanked out from under you later. It’s rugproof.
Now, the OGL does not contain the word “irrevocable.” Rather, the OGL is “perpetual.” To a layperson, these two terms may seem interchangeable, but this is one of those fine lawerly distinctions that trip up normies all the time. In lawyerspeak, a “perpetual” license is one whose revocation doesn’t come automatically after a certain time (unlike, say, a one-year car-lease, which automatically terminates at the end of the year). Unless a license is “irrevocable,” the licensor can terminate it whenever they want to.
This is exactly the kind of thing that trips up people who roll their own licenses, and people who trust those licenses. The OGL predates the Creative Commons licenses, but it neatly illustrates the problem with letting corporate lawyers — rather than public-interest nonprofits — unleash “open” licenses on an unsuspecting, legally unsophisticated audience.
The perpetual/irrevocable switcheroo is the least of the problems with the OGL. As Rob Bodine— an actual lawyer, as well as a dice lawyer — wrote back in 2019, the OGL is a grossly defective instrument that is significantly worse than useless.
https://gsllcblog.com/2019/08/26/part3ogl/
The issue lies with what the OGL actually licenses. Decades of copyright maximalism has convinced millions of people that anything you can imagine is “intellectual property,” and that this is indistinguishable from real property, which means that no one can use it without your permission.
The copyrightpilling of the world sets people up for all kinds of scams, because copyright just doesn’t work like that. This wholly erroneous view of copyright grooms normies to be suckers for every sharp grifter who comes along promising that everything imaginable is property-in-waiting (remember SpiceDAO?):
https://onezero.medium.com/crypto-copyright-bdf24f48bf99
Copyright is a lot more complex than “anything you can imagine is your property and that means no one else can use it.” For starters, copyright draws a fundamental distinction between ideas and expression. Copyright does not apply to ideas — the idea, say, of elves and dwarves and such running around a dungeon, killing monsters. That is emphatically not copyrightable.
Copyright also doesn’t cover abstract systems or methods — like, say, a game whose dice-tables follow well-established mathematical formulae to create a “balanced” system for combat and adventuring. Anyone can make one of these, including by copying, improving or modifying an existing one that someone else made. That’s what “uncopyrightable” means.
Finally, there are the exceptions and limitations to copyright — things that you are allowed to do with copyrighted work, without first seeking permission from the creator or copyright’s proprietor. The best-known exception is US law is fair use, a complex doctrine that is often incorrectly characterized as turning on “four factors” that determine whether a use is fair or not.
In reality, the four factors are a starting point that courts are allowed and encouraged to consider when determining the fairness of a use, but some of the most consequential fair use cases in Supreme Court history flunk one, several, or even all of the four factors (for example, the Betamax decision that legalized VCRs in 1984, which fails all four).
Beyond fair use, there are other exceptions and limitations, like the di minimis exemption that allows for incidental uses of tiny fragments of copyrighted work without permission, even if those uses are not fair use. Copyright, in other words, is “fact-intensive,” and there are many ways you can legally use a copyrighted work without a license.
Which brings me back to the OGL, and what, specifically, it licenses. The OGL is a license that only grants you permission to use the things that WOTC can’t copyright — “the game mechanic [including] the methods, procedures, processes and routines.” In other words, the OGL gives you permission to use things you don’t need permission to use.
But maybe the OGL grants you permission to use more things, beyond those things you’re allowed to use anyway? Nope. The OGL specifically exempts:
Product and product line names, logos and identifying marks including trade dress; artifacts; creatures characters; stories, storylines, plots, thematic elements, dialogue, incidents, language, artwork, symbols, designs, depictions, likenesses, formats, poses, concepts, themes and graphic, photographic and other visual or audio representations; names and descriptions of characters, spells, enchantments, personalities, teams, personas, likenesses and special abilities; places, locations, environments, creatures, equipment, magical or supernatural abilities or effects, logos, symbols, or graphic designs; and any other trademark or registered trademark…
Now, there are places where the uncopyrightable parts of D&D mingle with the copyrightable parts, and there’s a legal term for this: merger. Merger came up for gamers in 2018, when the provocateur Robert Hovden got the US Copyright Office to certify copyright in a Magic: The Gathering deck:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/14/angels-and-demons/#owning-culture
If you want to learn more about merger, you need to study up on Kregos and Eckes, which are beautifully explained in the “Open Intellectual Property Casebook,” a free resource created by Jennifer Jenkins and James Boyle:
https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/openip/#q01
Jenkins and Boyle explicitly created their open casebook as an answer to another act of enclosure: a greedy textbook publisher cornered the market on IP textbook and charged every law student — and everyone curious about the law — $200 to learn about merger and other doctrines.
As EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kit Walsh writes in her must-read analysis of the OGL, this means “the only benefit that OGL offers, legally, is that you can copy verbatim some descriptions of some elements that otherwise might arguably rise to the level of copyrightability.”
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/01/beware-gifts-dragons-how-dds-open-gaming-license-may-have-become-trap-creators
But like I said, it’s not just that the OGL fails to give you rights — it actually takes away rights you already have to D&D. That’s because — as Walsh points out — fair use and the other copyright limitations and exceptions give you rights to use D&D content, but the OGL is a contract whereby you surrender those rights, promising only to use D&D stuff according to WOTC’s explicit wishes.
“For example, absent this agreement, you have a legal right to create a work using noncopyrightable elements of D&D or making fair use of copyrightable elements and to say that that work is compatible with Dungeons and Dragons. In many contexts you also have the right to use the logo to name the game (something called “nominative fair use” in trademark law). You can certainly use some of the language, concepts, themes, descriptions, and so forth. Accepting this license almost certainly means signing away rights to use these elements. Like Sauron’s rings of power, the gift of the OGL came with strings attached.”
And here’s where it starts to get interesting. Since the OGL launched in 2000, a huge proportion of game designers have agreed to its terms, tricked into signing away their rights. If Hasbro does go through with canceling the OGL, it will release those game designers from the shitty, deceptive OGL.
According to the leaks, the new OGL is even worse than the original versions — but you don’t have to take those terms! Notwithstanding the fact that the OGL says that “using…Open Game Content” means that you accede to the license terms, that is just not how contracts work.
Walsh: “Contracts require an offer, acceptance, and some kind of value in exchange, called ‘consideration.’ If you sell a game, you are inviting the reader to play it, full stop. Any additional obligations require more than a rote assertion.”
“For someone who wants to make a game that is similar mechanically to Dungeons and Dragons, and even announce that the game is compatible with Dungeons and Dragons, it has always been more advantageous as a matter of law to ignore the OGL.”
Walsh finishes her analysis by pointing to some good licenses, like the GPL and Creative Commons, “written to serve the interests of creative communities, rather than a corporation.” Many open communities — like the programmers who created GNU/Linux, or the music fans who created Musicbrainz, were formed after outrageous acts of enclosure by greedy corporations.
If you’re a game designer who was pissed off because the OGL was getting ganked — and if you’re even more pissed off now that you’ve discovered that the OGL was a piece of shit all along — there’s a lesson there. The OGL tricked a generation of designers into thinking they were building on a commons. They weren’t — but they could.
This is a great moment to start — or contribute to — real open gaming content, licensed under standard, universal licenses like Creative Commons. Rolling your own license has always been a bad idea, comparable to rolling your own encryption in the annals of ways-to-fuck-up-your-own-life-and-the-lives-of-many-others. There is an opportunity here — Hasbro unintentionally proved that gamers want to collaborate on shared gaming systems.
That’s the true lesson here: if you want a commons, you’re not alone. You’ve got company, like Kit Walsh herself, who happens to be a brilliant game-designer who won a Nebula Award for her game “Thirsty Sword Lesbians”:
https://evilhat.com/product/thirsty-sword-lesbians/
[Image ID: A remixed version of David Trampier's 'Eye of Moloch,' the cover of the first edition of the AD&D Player's Handbook. It has been altered so the title reads 'Advanced Copyright Fuckery. Unclear on the Concept. That's Just Not How Licenses Work. No, Seriously.' The eyes of the idol have been replaced by D20s displaying a critical fail '1.' Its chest bears another D20 whose showing face is a copyright symbol.]
8K notes · View notes
nationallawreview · 5 months ago
Text
DOJ Implements New Whistleblower Reward Program
Companies who submit healthcare claims to private payors, provide financial services to customers, interact with domestic or foreign public officials, or otherwise operate in highly regulated industries should take note that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has taken another significant step in its ongoing effort to encourage new whistleblowers with information about potential corporate criminal…
0 notes