#cop27 climate summit

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil’s global balancing act is trickier than ever

“Brazil is back,” vowed president-elect Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to cheering crowds at the COP27 climate summit in Egypt two years ago. Having defeated his hard-right rival, Jair Bolsonaro, and won back power after more than a decade out of office, Lula wanted to flag not only his own comeback but his desire to return the South American giant to the global stage.

During Lula’s first two terms, and before corruption scandals tarnished his reputation, the former metal worker had been feted as an international star. At one of the first meetings in 2009 of the G20, a body that gave Brazil a rare seat at the top table, then US president Barack Obama dubbed him “the most popular politician on Earth”. That same year, Brazil also co-founded the Brics bloc of developing nations.

Now Brazil — and Lula — are back in the spotlight. On Monday, the president will host the G20 leaders in Rio de Janeiro, one in a series of high-profile international summits to come. Some time next year, Brazil will welcome the newly expanded Brics group of emerging countries, and in November 2025 will also host the annual UN climate conference in the Amazon port of Belém.

Lula’s return to centre stage says much about the shifting geopolitics of the era, as growing competition for influence between the US and China gradually overshadows a system of international institutions once dominated by Washington.

The new environment has opened up space for a group of middle-ranking powers, many of them not formally aligned — among them Brazil, Turkey, Indonesia and the Gulf states, as well as India, a potential future superpower. Many of these governments are trying to expand their international influence in part by playing off the US, China and in some cases Russia.

But Brazil’s efforts to take advantage of the changing geopolitical landscape are also facing challenges. Lula’s attempt to act as a regional power and mediate the political crisis in Venezuela has floundered. Brazil, which prides itself on its own transition from dictatorship to democracy, has been uncomfortable at Russia and China’s efforts to make the Brics group more openly anti-western. And the election of Donald Trump in the US is likely to complicate Lula’s plan to showcase its climate diplomacy.

The country, say analysts, now finds itself having to navigate a much more complicated international scenario, in which its traditional neutrality may come under pressure from all sides. “Brazil is hedging. It’s on the fence,” says Oliver Stuenkel, a foreign policy expert at Brazil’s Getulio Vargas Foundation, of its approach to China and the US.

“Brazil is seeking to implement now this strategy of multi-alignment in a very uncertain global environment,” he adds. “Its major source of power, the capacity to navigate multilateral fora . . . is under so much strain now that this strategy of multi-alignment will become more challenging and maybe more costly.”

Continue reading.

[notwiselybuttoowell]

Hundreds of lobbyists for industrial agriculture are attending the Cop29 climate summit in Baku, analysis shows.

They include representatives from some of the world’s largest agribusiness companies including the Brazilian meatpacker JBS, the animal pharmaceuticals company Elanco, and the food giant PepsiCo, as well as trade groups representing the food sector.

Overall, 204 agriculture delegates have accessed the talks this year, analysis by DeSmog and the Guardian reveals. While the total number has dropped compared with the record highs at Cop28, the figures show climate Cops remain a top priority for businesses working in agriculture, a sector that accounts for up to a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

Food sector lobbyists remain highly influential, and have travelled to Baku as part of country delegations from Brazil, Russia and Australia, among others. This year, nearly 40% of delegates travelled to the summit with country badges, giving them privileged access to diplomatic negotiations, up from 30% at Cop28, and just 5% at Cop27.

Delegates from the meat and dairy sector sent 52 delegates to the summit this year, with 20 travelling with Brazil’s government, the analysis found. They outnumbered the delegation of the Caribbean island of Barbados, which in July was devastated by Hurricane Beryl, a disaster linked to climate breakdown.

Meat and dairy producers are coming under greater scrutiny due to increasing pollution from cattle and sheep, which emit about a third of the global output of methane. Farming also relies on synthetic fertilisers that are both fossil fuel-based and emit greenhouse gases, and drive deforestation.

But while studies point to the need for a drastic drop in meat and dairy production and a shift to climate-friendly farming, the agribusiness industry has lobbied hard against tougher environmental laws, in the EU, the US and at climate summits.

An Lambrechts, a senior campaign strategist from Greenpeace International, said there was a clear “conflict of interest” between big agriculture’s presence at the talks and the need for climate action.

“We see the same conflict of interest with the fossil fuel industry and how they act to drive the world away from the scope of actions and solutions that are needed to fight climate change and address its impacts,” she said.

Brazil, the host of next year’s climate summit, was a major funnel for agricultural giants this year. That has sparked concerns over the sway agribusiness may hold over Cop30, which many see as an opportunity for ambitious food systems reform.

The Brazilian government brought in 35 agriculture lobbyists, including more than 20 representatives of the meat companies JBS, BRF and Marfrig, as well as powerful industry groups such as the Association of Brazilian Beef Exporters.

[donate4freeca]

Why is the COP27 important to charities?

Hi, and welcome to our blog about the significance of COP27 for Fundraising For Charity! As the world faces the repercussions of climate change, charities need to acknowledge and address these concerns. Nearly every aspect of charitable activity is impacted by climate change, including environmental preservation and humanitarian aid. The global summit COP27 presents a unique chance for charity to work together and change the world. This article will examine how COP27 could respond to these issues, provide instances of charitable organizations impacted by climate change, explain how readers could get involved, and highlight the advantages of supporting this crucial gathering.

Climate change's effects on humanitarian causes

The environment and philanthropic causes are both impacted by climate change. Think of companies that supply impoverished areas with safe water. Droughts become increasingly severe and frequent as a result of global warming, making it harder to get clean drinking water.

Wildfires, floods, and hurricanes further complicate the work of disaster relief organizations. Vulnerable communities are being destroyed and forced to relocate as a result of more frequent and severe natural disasters.

Global food security is also threatened by climate change. Hunger relief organizations have to contend with weather patterns that are shifting, which affects farming and leads to crop failures. Food shortages get worse as a result, and farmers suffer.

In addition to these direct repercussions, charities also suffer indirect ones due to climate change. Warming temperatures also contribute to the spread of infectious diseases like dengue fever and malaria, which presents extra issues for healthcare charities.

All sectors of charitable causes are impacted by climate change. Companies looking for future solutions and efforts must comprehend these ramifications. By acknowledging the challenges, charities can more effectively advocate for climate-friendly legislation at the COP27.

How the COP27 can handle problems pertaining to charitable work

Climate change is a significant challenge for charitable organizations. In vulnerable places, poverty, malnutrition, and displacement are made worse by climate change. In order to address these grave challenges, COP27 (Conference of Parties) needs to receive charitable attention.

At COP27, charities can collaborate with governments, legislators, and other stakeholders to find sustainable solutions. Talks and discourse at COP27 can lessen the impact of climate change on charitable giving. This entails promoting resilience-building in sensitive areas, renewable energy, and environmental conservation.

Let us illustrate how COP27 could assist charity in addressing climate change-related issues with a few real-world instances. Increasing sea levels damage livelihoods and increase community vulnerability, according to coastal organizations.

Hurricanes and droughts have damaged essential infrastructure or interfered with the supply of clean water in many poor nations where NGOs work.

Charities should go to workshops and seminars related to their activity during COP27. Through their practical knowledge and expertise, they can impact policy decisions in ways that benefit impacted communities throughout these discussions.

Giving to COP27 benefits nonprofit organizations and global sustainability initiatives. Funding for climate adaptation or global accords reducing greenhouse gas emissions could result from the meeting.

Some charitable organizations impacted by climate change

Globally, charities are being impacted by climate change. Numerous groups are adapting to novel concerns, ranging from poverty alleviation to environmental preservation.

A foundation that gives poor countries access to clean drinking water has been damaged by climate change. Water supplies dry up as droughts worsen, depriving populations of clean water. The company needs to make an investment in deeper wells or rainwater collection.

To save endangered species, a wildlife conservation organization battles habitat degradation brought on by rising temperatures and deforestation. Ecosystems are disrupted by climate change, putting fragile creatures in peril. To counteract these effects, the charity has stepped up its reforestation and support for environmental policies.

Disaster relief organizations face more obstacles as the frequency of catastrophic weather disasters rises. Worldwide populations suffer from increasingly frequent and severe hurricanes, floods, and wildfires. These organizations need to make resilience investments and modifications to their disaster response plans.

Charities' options for participating in COP27

As charities tackle both social and environmental issues, their participation in COP27 is essential. Charities can take part in these activities:

1. Spread awareness: Nonprofits can educate local communities about vulnerable groups and climate change. They can arrange webinars, workshops, or open events to increase awareness of the need of taking action.

2. Affect policy changes: Charities can support solutions to climate change and sustainable development for underserved communities. To put successful plans into action, they might collaborate with national and international policymakers.

3. Work together with other groups: Charities can make a bigger difference by partnering with other nonprofits that champion related causes. They can work together to accomplish goals by exchanging resources, knowledge, and best practices.

4. Promote sustainable behaviors: Motivate supporters and employees to adopt eco-friendly activities. This could be recycling, utilizing renewable energy, or encouraging environmentally friendly transportation.

5. Fundraising: Since charities rely on donations, COP27-related initiatives are a great way to raise money and spread awareness of the issue of climate change.

Participation by charities in COP27 events such as these will contribute to the creation of a sustainable future and enhance their standing as agents of change.

Benefits of COP27 support for nonprofit organizations and the global community

1. worldwide Impact: By aiding COP27, charities can combat climate change on a worldwide scale. At this global conference, charities can have an impact on environmental policy and actions that will help the environment and further their own causes.

2. Higher income Opportunities: Funding for environmental conservation and sustainability initiatives is increasing as the impact of climate change increases. Charities connected to the COP27 can take use of these funding opportunities to grow and assist more people.

3. Better Cooperation: COP27 brings together individuals, companies, NGOs, and governments. Through participation in this convention, charities can establish contacts with other like-minded groups. Cooperation fosters advocacy, resource sharing, and knowledge sharing, all of which can boost influence.

4. Adaptation Strategies: Organizations that provide healthcare and disaster relief in places that are vulnerable to climate change confront unique challenges. At COP27, charities can pick up innovative adaptation strategies from international experts and incorporate them into their operations.

5. Sustainability: Charities are encouraged to create sustainable practices by supporting COP27. Carbon emissions could be decreased by energy-efficient infrastructure upgrades or fieldworkers using eco-friendly transportation.

6. Environmental Education: COP27 assists organizations in educating beneficiaries and supporters about the issues of climate change. Through outreach and education initiatives related to the conference's main themes, charities encourage environmental protection on a personal and local level.

In summary:

The fight against climate change requires charities. We've found that charitable initiatives are impacted by climate change. Organizations assist the most vulnerable during natural disasters, food and water shortages, and other emergencies.

Through Ways To Fundraise For Charity participation in COP27, these issues can be resolved. On this global platform, they might collaborate with governments, legislators, scientists, and other interested parties to develop sustainable policies and initiatives.

During COP27, charities can draw attention to their concerns over climate change. They can back programs that tackle these problems and encourage sustainability in their business practices.

Charities can extend their impact and reach beyond specific projects or programs by providing financial or collaborative support for COP27 activities. They send a strong message that everyone in society must work together to save the environment by supporting this global climate action effort.

[jordanianroyals]

12 November 2024: Deputising for King Abdullah II, Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah II participated in the UN Climate Change Conference (COP29) hosted by Azerbaijan in Baku.

Crown Prince Hussein delivered Jordan’s address at COP29, which is held with the participation of heads of state from around the world, as well as heads of delegation and representatives of international and economic organisations.

“In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful,

On behalf of Jordan, I thank His Excellency President Ilham Aliyev and the people and government of Azerbaijan for hosting this important summit.

We have gathered here under the banner of solidarity: The family of nations joining as one to protect the planet we share.

We all know that without common action, we are destined to fall short.

Yet, we meet at a moment when faith in our ability to stand together is broken. When global norms, including the UN Charter and the Geneva Conventions, are being flouted with impunity.When trust in the international community to stand up for its own values has collapsed. When humanitarian violations are broadcast daily, for the whole world to see, yet continue to be ignored and dismissed without consequence. 

Saving our planet must start from the premise that all lives are worth saving.

The solidarity we need depends on embracing that truth.

Yet, over the past 13 months, the world has stood by as thousands of Palestinians have been killed in Gaza—the majority women and children.

How can we work together for our shared future, when some are deemed unworthy of one?

The ongoing violence in my region undermines peace and security beyond its borders. In the end, this will benefit no one.

My part of the world is already exposed to the harsh realities of climate change—to heat, to drought, to loss of biodiversity.

The war is compounding environmental challenges, for Gaza and beyond.

A recent United Nations Environment Programme study highlighted contamination of land, water, and air. Sewage and waste management systems have been destroyed. Entire communities are now graveyards of debris.

Another study found that rebuilding Gaza will result in total emissions higher than the annual emissions of more than 135 countries.

An inclusive, just approach to the climate challenge requires that we address the links between climate, peace, and security.

Nowhere is this clearer than among global refugee communities and their hosts, who are some of the most vulnerable to climate change.

During COP27, His Majesty King Abdullah II launched the global Climate-Refugee Nexus Initiative. Fifty-eight countries have signed on to date—and we invite others to join.

One in every three people living in Jordan is a refugee, and our infrastructure is feeling the strain. We face rising demand on stressed resources and services, including water, health, and education.

And while we in Jordan have made significant strides in clean energy, water conservation, and climate-smart agriculture, these efforts are not enough.

We need to rally communities around climate action and secure a better future for our youth and generations to come.

In my country, we are implementing climate policies while grappling with the impacts of conflict, yet we cannot solve these twinned crises alone.

As our Summit works toward a New Collective Quantified Goal, we must prioritize refugee-hosting countries, especially those in climate hotspots, and ensure that global climate financing mechanisms uphold accountability and transparency for all.

Just as urgently, we must rebuild trust in the international community itself, and acknowledge past failures. Our inability to collectively do what is right is turning us into passive observers… fully aware, yet unwilling to act.

As His Majesty King Abdullah II has said, no one is a bystander in the fight for life on Earth.

That means fighting against climate change, fighting for peace, and fighting to alleviate human suffering together.

Because every life is worth fighting for.

Thank you.”

The Jordanian delegation to COP29 included Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi, Environment Minister Muawieh Radaideh, Planning Minister Zeina Toukan, Director of the Office of the Crown Prince Zaid Baqain, and Jordan’s Ambassador to Azerbaijan Omar Nahar.

[tsmom1219]

One big loophole threatens the global energy transition

Read the full story at Semafor. Asia is now responsible for the majority of global greenhouse gas emissions, and decarbonizing the continent is critical for the world to keep temperature increases below 1.5°C. But one major loophole isn’t just holding back progress — it could doom global net zero goals. Following the COP27 climate summit in 2022, G7 nations unveiled plans to help countries…

[thxnews]

Global Summit: Methane Reduction Sparks Change

  A Pivotal Call to Action

In a groundbreaking move, the United States, the People’s Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates joined forces in a Summit aimed at accelerating global efforts to combat climate change. Furthermore, the focus on methane and non-CO2 greenhouse gases is recognized as the swiftest means to curb near-term warming and achieve the crucial goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.   Ambitious Commitments and Unprecedented Funding At the heart of the Summit, the United Arab Emirates issued a resounding call to all Paris Agreement signatories. Urging them to submit comprehensive 2035 nationally determined contributions encompassing all greenhouse gases, this bold move aligns with the G20 Leaders Statement and resonates with commitments made by the U.S. and PRC in the Sunnylands Statement Governments, philanthropies, and the private sector united to announce an extraordinary $1 billion in new grant funding for methane reduction. This groundbreaking initiative, mobilized since COP27 triples the current annual grant funding and is set to leverage billions in project investment. Additionally, governments reaffirmed their commitment to the largest-ever replenishment of the Montreal Multilateral Fund, injecting $965 million to support the Kigali Amendment implementation and energy efficiency.  

The Urgency of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases

Methane and other non-CO2 greenhouse gases, often overshadowed, are responsible for over 50% of current warming. Despite this, they receive less than half of the global climate attention. These potent gases, including methane, hydrofluorocarbons, nitrous oxide, and tropospheric ozone, are significantly more impactful than carbon dioxide.   Immediate Action Required To maintain the 1.5-degree goal and mitigate near-term risks, urgent action on non-CO2 greenhouse gases is imperative. They play a pivotal role in the energy transition and the fight against deforestation. While CO2 shapes our long-term climate, non-CO2 gases exert a disproportionate impact on short-term temperatures. Accelerated cuts to methane and non-CO2 gases could prevent up to 0.5 degrees of warming by 2050, offering a triple solution—advancing global climate, health, and food security objectives simultaneously.  

Major Announcements to Combat Greenhouse Gases

The Summit unveiled major announcements targeting methane, hydrofluorocarbons, and cooling. Methane, the Swift Solution: Responsible for 30% of current warming, reducing methane emissions by at least 30% by 2030, in line with the Global Methane Pledge, could cool global temperatures by over 0.2 degrees Celsius by 2050. The U.S. finalized standards for a nearly 80% reduction in methane emissions from the oil and gas sector, a move expected to prevent 1.5 gigatons of CO2 emissions over the next 15 years. Kazakhstan Joins the Pledge: Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Angola, Kenya, and Romania joined the Global Methane Pledge, signaling a global commitment to tackle methane emissions. Kazakhstan further announced a collaboration with the United States to develop national standards, accelerating methane mitigation. Brazil's Commitment: Brazil announced plans for guidelines on methane reduction in the oil and gas sector by the end of 2024, with regulations to be finalized by 2025. Nigeria, a Global Methane Pledge Champion, showcased projects estimated to capture over half of all gas flaring volumes.  

Addressing Hydrofluorocarbons and Cooling

The HFC Challenge: Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), used in cooling, cause hundreds to thousands of times more warming than CO2. Action to reduce HFCs and enhance cooling efficiency could mitigate 0.1 degrees of warming by 2050 and avoid up to 0.5 degrees Celsius of global temperature rise by 2100. UAE's Pledge on HFCs: The United Arab Emirates announced its intention to ratify the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, addressing HFCs. Global Cooling Pledge: Governments welcomed the imminent launch of the Global Cooling Pledge, a landmark COP28 initiative. This initiative aims to reduce global cooling-related emissions across all sectors and substantially increase access to sustainable cooling by 2030.   Conclusion The Summit on Methane and Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases marked a historic stride toward a sustainable future. Moreover, with ambitious commitments, unprecedented funding, and collaborative global efforts, nations have set the stage for a decisive battle against climate change. The urgent call for action resonates, reminding us emphatically that the time to act is now.   Sources: THX News & US Department of State. Read the full article

[freequizbank]

Australia set to face heat at COP28 climate summit _ FreeQuizBank.com - Free Exam Practice Questions for LANTITE Numeracy, Mathematical Reasoning - OC, Selective and Scholarship Tests @acereduau #NSWeducation #AusEdu @AusGovEducation @ServiceNSW

[vprogresseducation]

Australia set to face heat at COP28 climate summit _ FreeQuizBank.com - Free Exam Practice Questions for LANTITE Numeracy, Mathematical Reasoning - OC, Selective and Scholarship Tests @acereduau #NSWeducation #AusEdu @AusGovEducation @ServiceNSW

[cipriannicolaepopa]

Millets: the climate-smart crops for a changing world

I really enjoyed this article, published by Dr. Sonali Mookerjee (a PhD researcher in the USA with over 7 years of experience in crop research) on Science ABC, so I took the liberty of providing a brief summary with interesting information for you: Climate change is a reality. The recent climate change summit (COP27) concluded that the world is in a critical state, and unless global greenhouse…

[oceansoulmatesblog]

G20 energy ministers fail to agree on fossil fuels roadmap

AFP , Saturday 22 Jul 2023 Energy ministers from the group of 20 nations meeting in India Saturday failed to agree on a roadmap to phase down the use of fossil fuels in the global energy mix. File photo: A demonstrator holds a sign reading fossil fuels kill at the COP27 U.N. Climate Summit, Wednesday, Nov. 16, 2022, in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt.  AP A final statement after the meeting did not…

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Investors pile into Brazil’s first sustainable bond

Also in today’s newsletter, private capital struggles to rise to the global climate challenge

“Brazil is back,” then president-elect Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva told a crowd at the COP27 climate summit this time last year, signalling a break with the environmental backsliding under his predecessor Jair Bolsonaro.

Since then he and his officials have been repeating that message to anyone who will listen — including sustainable bond investors who, as I write below, gave it a pretty enthusiastic reception.

Also today, in the run-up to intense debates on this subject at COP28, we look at how far the private capital sector is — or is not — rising to the green finance challenge.

Continue reading.

[notwiselybuttoowell]

Though the prime minister is always keen to regale audiences with how his young daughters are champions for the environment, he is certainly not one. When he was chancellor, ministers in the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the Foreign Office frequently described him as a “block” on funding for climate and nature, and said that at the cabinet table he argued for trade deals with countries that had lower environmental standards, rather than using Britain’s power on the world stage to push for change.

Critics are keen to point out Sunak refused to sign a foreword to the Dasgupta report, a review of the value of biodiversity. This review, by the respected professor Sir Partha Dasgupta, was welcomed across the board, even by the former chancellor Sajid Javid, despite Sunak appearing unimpressed by its findings.

Still, people can learn, and in his role as prime minister Sunak has had access to all the best experts and evidence available on climate. He was given a major opportunity to stand on the world stage as the UK’s new prime minister at the UN’s Cop27 climate summit last year, but he flip-flopped on attending, and only flew out to Egypt at the last minute, giving the audience a policy-free speech about how his children care about the environment.

Since then, things have gone downhill. His government failed to include environmental protections in the retained EU law bill, which will scrap many EU regulations that protect the environment in the UK. Sunak’s government has also committed to extracting more polluting fossil fuels, from the Cumbria coalmine to the Rosebank oilfield.

And under his leadership, the energy department has spent far more time attacking the Labour party for taking donations from a funder of the protest group Just Stop Oil than it has championing the net zero by 2050 target enshrined in law by Sunak’s predecessors.

[fashionlandscapeblog]

The problem with the organizations targeting key historical artworks to protest climate change is that they chose to aim precisely the wrong crowd. The folks who value art are not exactly of the thoughtless variety who don't care about the planet and future generations, on the contrary. That's EXACTLY why these actions are absolutely senseless. In a human world full of ugliness, of hopelessness, art counters this by enriching it with beauty and hope. That's how art saves the world, even if an artwork is not meant to protest injustice, that doesn't mean it's meaningless. Art is one of the only evidences of our humanity, of our heart, of our organic nature, of our connection to other living beings, of our capability of achieving great things and THAT is important for future generations TOO. It's humanity's source of spirituality. What we do to our planet is wrong, but so is this. 2 wrongs don't make one right. To think that the end justifies the means is what the most atrocious people in history have agreed on. If you are capable of spray painting something that came out of someone's soul, something that GIVES our world soul, I highly doubt you are a good person, even if you don't damage it. If you want to raise awareness, I beg you to find more creative and less lazy ways to do it.

[ceevee5]

“So here we are, after 50 years of engineered failure, with not one of the 40 markers of climate action on track to meet the targets governments have agreed. In the first nine months of this year, the seven biggest private sector oil companies made around $150bn in profits. Yet governments continue to supplement this loot by granting oil and gas companies $64bn a year in public subsidies. There are no longer any feasible means of preventing more than 1.5C of global heating if new oil and gas fields are developed. Yet fossil-fuel companies, with the encouragement of the governments that either own or license them, are planning a major investment surge between 2023 and 2025. The biggest planned expansions, by a long way, are in the US. The soft facts – the vague and unsecured promises at Sharm el-Sheikh about curbing consumption – count for nothing against the hard facts of extending production.”