#conventional action
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
aena-blue · 2 years ago
Text
Manifestation - Conventional Action
Hello everyone! This is another short post to cover a simple topic under the umbrella term manifestation to hopefully shed some light on the topic. My apologies for not posting for a couple of weeks but I have been sick and I’ll definitely write a post soon about manifestation & health!
Today I will talk briefly about conventional action when it comes to manifesting. Conventional action is ‘normal’ actions in the 3D realm. Say for example that you are wanting to manifest a specific job with a specific salary. Conventional action in this instance could be looking at and applying for jobs. But the question is, is conventional action needed to manifest an outcome?
My answer would be, yes & no. If you are a master at manifesting, I believe that you could sit in a locked room somewhere and your desire would simply show up on your doorstep one day knocking, without the need for you to lift a single finger, all you would need is to use your imagination to create the outcome. In fact, there are many of us out there that can attest to the fact that we have had manifestations come to us without the need for any action at all on our own part. In many other instances however, there has been some conventional action that has been part of the process. I think we can all agree that if you get an invitation to attend a job interview, most of us would attend it in order to secure that job. As we do exist in the 3D realm to some extent, interacting with it is unavoidable. As such, we all take conventional action on a day to day basis (we eat, we sleep, we go to work/school, we send text messages to people etc), so to me it feels natural that there is occasionally conventional action that is part of the process (bridge of incidents) towards a desired outcome. 
What I do want to say though, is that, to me personally, what I find to be important about conventional action is to not give it too much meaning, and thus not too much power. I don’t believe your (my) manifestations will stand and fall with one single action or inaction. Just as I believe that I can’t get it wrong and that I am always getting it right, even if the immediate result of an action might seem ‘bad’ or ‘undesired’. Such as sending a text to your specific person (SP) and being left on read.
What I like to remind myself of quite frequently is that even though I am the creator of my reality, the entire Universe is working with me to move circumstances, events and people around in order for me to receive my desired outcomes and that I could not possibly ever micro-manage all of that to get my desired outcome. So any action that I do take, I assume I was meant to take it, that I am always getting it right, and that it is all part of the bridge of incidents towards my desire, even the seemingly ‘bad’ as just mentioned.
Yeah, it totally sucks sometimes to be left on read and ‘ignored’ by an SP. But hell, while you are not hearing from them, who is to say that they are not deep in thought about how much they love you and are now realising how much you mean to them and that they DO want to be in a relationship with you?
Try not to overthink the action part, just go with the flow of what feels right on a day to day basis and remember that the world conforms to your assumptions and beliefs about it. So you decide what it all means. You didn’t get that one job? Means a better one is coming up, or could even mean they are about to realise they made a mistake, or the person they offered it to declines, so they are about to call you up and offer it to you! SP didn’t text you back? Means they are deep in their feelings about the situation and about you! 
So to summarise: Do you need to take conventional action? No. Do I believe it can help with the ‘belief’ part about something happening: Yes. Should you take conventional action? Only if it feels right and you feel good about it. Should you fret about any ‘negative’ outcome stemming from your conventional action? Never. You are the god and creator of your reality and it will always work out for you. Always.
Next post will be about inspired action. Very similar topic but somewhat different and as before, the next post will be published on Wednesday if you want to read about that :).
I now offer email coaching on my Etsy Shop for anyone who needs help, assistance, guidance or just a cheerleader for their manifestation journey.
You can email me or use the “ask me” function for anything that might be on your mind, or on your heart. I am here for you all, always. Please note that the Ask Me’s are only open for dream interpretation, general questions or advice at this time.
Please consider supporting my intention & affirmation art business in return for my time and energy by making a purchase or sharing my shop on any of your social media, every page click helps my business grow and I appreciate all of your support.
You can get a sticker for about $2 and if you make a purchase and send me an email to let me know what you bought I will happily give you a free 3 card reading for a question of your choice or 1 free email for manifestation coaching, regardless of the cost of your purchase! 🧡
If you'd like to donate to my channel/blog I gratefully receive energy donations via Paypal, every little helps! 🧡
For anyone that feels so inclined I do have an Etsy Shop for readings.
Much love and light to you all and to the universe 💛💜
~ Lady Blue 💙
4 notes · View notes
maddie-grove · 3 months ago
Text
Honestly I hate the “girlboss” criticisms of feminism more and more each day. A lot of people have rightfully pointed out that feminists had/have very practical reasons to fight for women’s rights in the workplace, but I feel like there’s still an idea that a woman is deluded or morally suspect if she enjoys or takes pride in her work. It’s not just about the money; it’s about not being barred from fully participating in society just because you’re a woman. That is an unfair and degrading thing to do to someone, even if they have other means of financial support.
480 notes · View notes
grimmoriun · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
love that part in mouthwash where they were sailing those moons
128 notes · View notes
metanarrates · 1 month ago
Text
literally love that yjh and kdj's method of communication is beating the shit out of each other. the secret hidden way to overcome The Wall is actually to just fucking hit each other until you come to an understanding
58 notes · View notes
tarabyte3 · 7 months ago
Text
My Con purchases: Shadowgast, Dorym, and Essek stickers. (Link to the artist)
Tumblr media
And him 😍🫠🥺 Paz, my beloved.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
97 notes · View notes
mizgnomer · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
David Tennant’s acrobatic left eyebrow - Part 14
Other parts of this photo-set:  [ Eyebrow Action Tag ]
401 notes · View notes
muppet-facts · 1 year ago
Text
Muppet Fact #801
Walter has said in an interview that he owns all of the Palisades Toys Muppet figurines except for the Dr. Teeth Variant Action Figure, which was a Wizard World East convention exclusive in 2002.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Sources:
Dr. Teeth Variant Action Figure. Muppet Wiki.
"Walter Palisades." MuppetWiki. YouTube. February 8, 2023.
200 notes · View notes
scarlet--wiccan · 6 months ago
Text
btw the big Marvel logo banner at SDCC includes visibly brown Wanda from Rivals instead of Olsen
25 notes · View notes
news4dzhozhar · 9 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
32 notes · View notes
that-rackin-frackin-varmint · 10 months ago
Text
Looney Tunes: Back in Action: - Removed Content
Tumblr media
this part kills me.
Kate "We'll replace Daffy with a hot girl"
Bugs "I wouldn't want to hurt a girl"
Kate "Ok but we'll make you guys enemies-to-lovers"
Bugs (completely skipping the insinuation of romancing the girl) "Usually I'm the girl in the relationship"
42 notes · View notes
pippin-pippout · 6 months ago
Text
Just confirming we don't officially know what the D stands for right?
Dream? Danger? Demon? Disaster?
24 notes · View notes
prolibytherium · 6 months ago
Text
The extent of possessiveness some people have on art that they post on the internet is crazy to me like, I'm seeing someone on art fight all caps serious business warning not to save image files of their characters UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Like Oh no your character ref png is on another computer!!!!!! Who cares
21 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 10 months ago
Text
"[Elizabeth Woodville's] piety as queen seems to have been broadly conventional for a fifteenth-century royal, encompassing pilgrimages, membership of various fraternities, a particular devotion to her name saint, notable generosity to the Carthusians, and the foundation of a chantry at Westminster after her son was born there. ['On other occasions she supported planned religious foundations in London, […] made generous gifts to Eton College, and petitioned the pope to extend the circumstances in which indulgences could be acquired by observing the feast of the Visitation']. One possible indicator of a more personal, and more sophisticated, thread in her piety is a book of Hours of the Guardian Angel which Sutton and Visser-Fuchs have argued was commissioned for her, very possibly at her request."
-J.L. Laynesmith, "Elizabeth Woodville: The Knight's Widow", Later Plantagenet and Wars of the Roses Consorts: Power, Influence, Dynasty
#historicwomendaily#elizabeth woodville#my post#friendly reminder that there's nothing indicating that Elizabeth was exceptionally pious or that her piety was 'beyond purely conventional'#(something first claimed by Anne Crawford who simultaneously claimed that Elizabeth was 'grasping and totally lacking in scruple' so...)#EW's piety as queen may have stood out compared to former 15th century predecessors and definitely stood out compared to her husband#but her actions in themselves were not especially novel or 'beyond normal' and by themselves don't indicate unusual piety on her part#As Laynesmith's more recent research observes they seem to have been 'broadly conventional'#A conclusion arrived at Derek Neal as well who also points out that in general queens and elite noblewomen simply had wider means#of 'visible material expression of [their] personal devotion' - and also emphasizes how we should look at their wider circumstances#to understand their actions (eg: the death of Elizabeth's son George in 1479 as a motivating factor)#It's nice that we know a bit about Elizabeth's more personal piety - for eg she seems to have developed an attachment to Westminster Abbey#It's possible her (outward) piety increased across her queenship - she undertook most of her religious projects in later years#But again - none of them indicate the *level* of her piety (ie: they don't indicate that she was beyond conventionally pious)#By 1475 it seems that contemporaries identified Cecily Neville as the most personally devout from the Yorkist family#(though Elizabeth and even Cecily's sons were far greater patrons)#I think people also assume this because of her retirement to Westminster post 1485#which doesn't work because 1) we don't actually know when she retired? as Laynesmith says there is no actual evidence for the traditional#date of 12 February 1487#2) she had very secular reasons for retiring (grief over the death of her children? her lack of dower lands or estates which most other#widows had? her options were very limited; choosing to reside in the abbey is not particularly surprising. it's a massive and unneeded jump#to claim that it was motivated solely by piety (especially because it wasn't a complete 'retirement' in the way people assume it was)#I think historians have a habit of using her piety as a GOTCHA!' point against her vilification - which is a flawed and stupid argument#Elizabeth could be the most pious individual in the world and still be the pantomime villain Ricardians/Yorkists claim she was#They're not mutually exclusive; this line of thinking is useless#I think this also stems from the fact that we simply know very little about Elizabeth as an individual (ie: her hobbies/interests)#certainly far less than we do for other prominent women Margaret of Anjou; Elizabeth of York;; Cecily Neville or Margaret Beaufort#and I think rather than emphasizing that gap of knowledge her historians merely try to fill it up with 'she was pious!'#which is ... an incredibly lackluster take. I think it's better to just acknowledge that we don't know much about this historical figure#ie: I do wish that her piety and patronage was emphasized more yes. but it shouldn't flip too far to the other side either.
30 notes · View notes
boarcide · 1 year ago
Text
There is something so good about Akutagawa--a very much feared, boogeyman like figure (even amongst his own men) in Yokohama because of his violence, bloodlust, and steadfast loyalty to a violent criminal organization such as the Port Mafia--given biblical angel symbolism
I don't know, something something about someone whose beauty is so incomprehensible and terrifying to most. He's not physically ugly, he's not--he's beautiful, the type of beautiful that almost feel as if he's not a real person, like he's a mirage, or a painting. But he's beautiful not like those renaissance cherubs and lovely looking maidens for angels, but more like the biblical angels with their beauty beyond mortal grasp, the beauty that brings fear and revulsion towards whoever sees them because they cannot comprehend it. Coming across him makes you understand why angels say, "Be not afraid" when they reveal themselves to mortals. An incomprehensible beauty that very few can keep looking at. A dangerous feat, literally and metaphorically.
(This isn't only with his physical appearance either--for someone who is constantly beaten down both by canon and by the fandom for being "simple", he is a terrifying bundle of different aspects that contradict each other. Like a super machine you open up and you see the intricate criss crossing of wires and bolts that hold it together. He's a mess of nerves and feelings and experiences so profound, so horrific, that you don't know where to start with him. To uncoil him and see him truly bare is almost impossible. Where does he end and the roots that connect him to the earth begin?)
Something about Akutagawa being an angel, a being created entirely to follow the will of "God", obey their every word. Unwavering loyalty to their master while singing praise. Acting entirely on the order of their master--wing always dipped in blood for his sake. A weapon of "heaven' that brings destruction to those who oppose "God" and be one of the many upon which "God" rests upon.
(Almost everything Akutagawa does is for the sake of the Port Mafia, taking orders from the "master" (boss) himself. Willingness and obedience and loyalty repeatedly exploited and used, everything he has done as one of the high ranking leaders handling most of the Mafia's dirty work playing a part so Mori's throne stays high.)
Something about comparing Akutagawa to a certain archangel, finding repulsion in "God"'s cherished creation, the inferiority that came with being "less" to "mankind", and the painful fall from grace to the deepest pits of despair when he confronts the being that created him, molded him, and then condemn him. And to his humiliation, mankind, for centuries, condemns him too.
(He can't be compared to Lucifer, God's most beloved angel. Maybe Dazai did value him, but it doesn't matter, does it? because the difference between the two is that one was cherished and one never was. However, you can compare the rage and humiliation Akutagawa felt towards Atsushi--for obtaining Dazai's approval and affection with no effort, no proper control over his skill or any seemingly differentiating quality-- to Lucifer's refusal to bow down to humanity--a creation inherently imperfect and lackluster, with not the qualities of angels. And as a result? Disgraced. Both by the creator and by ones that held their creator's favor. )
Something about Akutagawa being an angel--someone whose presence means nothing pleasant to those he appears before. A reaper of sorts, responsible for taking life and for souls to see the afterlife (killing both as an order and an act of mercy, for he despises torture and meaningless suffering). A guardian angel watching over "mankind" from afar, where he is not aware and saving him from certain death at his own expense.
There's just something so appealing about depicting Akutagawa--a fearsome, ruthless, and bloodthirsty mafioso, a boogeyman to his own men--as an angel, be it of death, of mercy, a destroying angel-- whatever anyone wants to see him as and use him for.
61 notes · View notes
littlespoonevan · 1 year ago
Text
the thing about romcoms is just- it's never meant to be 'is it believable?' but instead 'do you believe it?' do you believe these two characters are actually falling in love with each other??? do you believe their chemistry??? do you believe whatever obstacle is thrown in their way is legitimately something that might keep them apart for a time and not something that could be solved with one conversation?? do you believe that they believe they need to fake date for this very specific reason??? do you believe the reason why they're 'enemies' at the start, no matter how silly a misunderstanding it may be??? do you believe the grand romantic gesture fits the characters and is actually how one character would show their love to the other?? like!!!! it's about empathy and authenticity and feeling what the characters feel so strongly that even if it's a trope or a cliché it doesn't matter because you believe it
93 notes · View notes
jasperthejester · 7 months ago
Text
fuck you watchtower i wish hell was real so you could burn in it
17 notes · View notes