#condition precedent

[ariela-wagner-me]

A Contractor’s, Subcontractor’s & Supplier's Step-By-Step Guide to Getting Paid - Missouri

In this webinar, learn in detail about the key steps that will help how contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers in Missouri ensure that they get paid for the work and materials they provide for a project.

[blood-starved-beast]

A lot of mariadeline fics have Adeline be the one to die first. Which yeah, makes sense that Maria would kill herself after major tether to this Earth perishes. But consider!! The tragedy of Maria killing herself before Adeline dies.

Lady Maria always prioritizes herself (and how own issues/faults) to the detriment to her understanding of others. I'd argue this is why she never notices Gehrman's mania despite it being pretty obvious (I doubt the Doll was the first time he pulled such an act.) I wouldn't be surprised, therefore, that she in her overwhelming guilt and shame over her own actions, she forgets the connections she does have on Earth and the people who would miss her when she's gone.

Idk, this was inspired by how in the Hunter's Nightmare, when you first encounter Saint Adeline she asks if you were Maria, but climbing the Clocktower Maria is currently dead (until she is Not). More likely, the fics are right but again, it's a fun tragic fanfic concept to explore.

[ithoughtiwasthegayone]

just bc a trans person does something bad doesn't mean you get to misgender them

[nebula-nonhuman]

Life is so hard and painful (in the literal sense) that I can't help but think I must have done something really awful and that the Universe/God/Some-other-higher-power is punishing me by making me live in a human body.

I'm just so sick and tired.

[widowshill]

65 / 62 / 71

[majjiktricks]

thinking about how in the knot cities, people probably arent allowed to live alone. especially older individuals or people with serious health complications.

someone home alone dies? they might not find the body until its too late.

[erotetica]

I usually think of tolkien elfs as socially androgynous bc. I’m tired BUT elfsogyny is interesting in 2 ways:

a) rule 63 maedhros/fingon au where where another way feanor is ‘heretical’ is he’s a bad girl-dad. Like. He married a freewheeling bra-burner & he lets his 7 daughters do whatever. Finwe doesn’t sign executive orders 2 let his other kids do whatever so for public favor/their political careers, the nolofinwions r living more conformist. Fingon’s introduction to princessing is gendered in a way she does not like. Haus Feanor, as always, likes to eat nettles for fun and profit so r63 maedhros is still just. A senator. Fingon thinks she’s soo feminist until she doesnt. It’s just The Rise and Fall of Girlboss Culture: the fic

b) rule 63 au where celegorm is the only daughter of feanor, is raised essentially as miriel 2, & bc following Orome is a masculine pursuit she is apprenticed to Vaire. Bc celegorm is the butch version of hannibal lecter all the time, and bc spiders also weave, she discovers an ungoliant cult in the avathar. Something something she helps Luthien escape from nargothrond. Something something she makes Luthien’s magic jacket Because They’re Friends, but she weaves dark magic into it because she like, can. Something something the spiders in nan dungortheb eat beren and luthien. Gender Roles Have Far-Reaching Bad Outcomes For Everyone: the fic

[alientitty]

fr once u know the difference between idealism and materialism (in philosophy) ur entire world opens

[nabilfekir]

AND YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE frankly i don’t wanna hear it anymore about psg ruining the transfer market. actually can’t take anyone who says that shit seriously anymore. not while one prem club can run fucking riot spending more than all leagues combined in one fucking winter window never mind nottingham fucking forest buying like 20 players in the summer fuck right off with ur p$g bullkaka and get with the times

[system-of-a-feather]

Hey, by the way, its never your business to ask the partner of someone with disabilities about if / when / how they were doing returning back to a non-disabled life style.

Don't care if you are family, you aren't entitled to know that assuming the basis of the inquiry was not inherently rude and ableist in the first place

[artemisbarnowl]

Im autistic and im a fucking human. Having you say "being autistic makes me inhuman" is ridiculously rude, and makes it clear you have some growth and acceptance to do in regards to the big old spectrum of the human experience. Yeah yeah slippery slope argument yeah but where does this end? If people feel othered and say "oh its because the human experience is the perfect blonde ablebodied white one so i must be something else" that runs directly counter to the idea that diversity and inclusion are GOOD and NECESSARY for society.

You say its your identity and it doesnt affect others but you've just gone on a public platform to say "i dont think im human because i have autism" which normalises every idiot under the sun continuing to say we're weird freaks, aliens, changelings, inhuman. Take a fucking day off from blaming neurodivergence and making all our lives worse when you could either do actual work in improving the lives of autistic people by advocating for our inclusion and access to all parts of society, or just say you're going through some miserable stuff and you need everyone else to dehumanise you so you never have to think about how to get better and accept yourself.

Also having autism doesnt make you queer! It just means you have autism. Which, like being gay or bi, is just a normal way to be a whole human person. UNLIKE being gay or bi, no one has been calling you a dyke or a queer for acting strangly, theyve been using other different derogatory terms like retard. Feel free to attempt to reclaim that instead i guess but really can we stop with "everyone who is marginalised in any way shape or form is part of the lgbt+ unbrella/queer". That too, runs directly counter to the idea that diversity and inclusion are GOOD and NECESSARY.

i fucking HATE when people have a moral objection to it/its pronouns and refuse to use them based on principle

"oh but it's dehumanizing!" THATS THE POINT. that's literally the fucking point. i personally use it/its pronouns because as a neurodivergent person i feel a disconnect to other neurotypical people. i don't feel quite human, and not in a bad way, just in a "im not quite human" way. some people straight up just don't identify as human, and thats fine too. it's their business.

"it makes me uncomfortable" ok. and?? that's not my problem. if my queer identity - that does not fucking affect you - makes you uncomfortable; that's a YOU problem. can you imagine if we gave every transphobe a pass on misgendering because using the correct pronouns "made them uncomfortable"?? i see a lot of fellow queer folk using this excuse to not use it/its pronouns as if its not the exact same talking points used by bigots.

not everything that makes you uncomfortable is automatically evil and bad. i feel uncomfortable wearing lots of colour, does that make it morally bad for other people who do like colourful clothes to wear what they like? no! that would be insane. people are gonna do stuff that personally makes you uncomfortable, that doesn't make it automatically bad. if someone peacefully existing and using it/its pronouns makes you uncomfortable then that seems like something you have to work on to get over, because people are not gonna stop existing in the way they feel most comfortable with just because you dont like it.

TLDR; get over yourself. you are not the center of the universe and someone else using it/its pronouns DOES NOT AFFECT YOU.

[latestnews69]

Dartitis: The condition where you try to throw a dart - but can't

Read more click here

[dravidious]

You're more amazing than removal

The cards I made that inspired that post: Kitty commits extreme violence!

[widowshill]

78 / 96

[tomanto-the-friendly-nb]

There are literal Nazis out there who claim that they cannot be Nazis because "The 1940s are over", completely ignoring that it is the disgusting ideologies + the systemic oppression and systematic dehumanization of any people you can somehow group together which make someone a Nazi.

On another note, there are countless studies on how descendants of enslaved people still carry the generational trauma of their forebears which they are affected by. This is a fact.

So. Do you honestly believe the centuries—the MILENNIA—of Europeans dehumanizating, slaughtering, colonizing and killing whole civilizations had NO effect on white people's psyche/minds, bodies and souls?? Do you think COLONIALISM had NO EFFECT on the COLONIZERS?

Please.

[seemabhatnagar]

A Story of Legal Battles and Marital Discord

The Beginning:

Sudeep Chatterjee and his wife were on the verge of divorce. The once-loving relationship had deteriorated into a conflict marked by distrust and discord. Amidst this turmoil, Sudeep was confronted with a complaint filed by his wife, accusing him of cruelty and demanding dowry. Fearing imminent arrest, he sought pre-arrest bail from the court. His pre-arrest bail application was dismissed by the Sessions Court, Katihar.

Sudip Chatterjee v. The State of Bihar and Another

Crl Appeal 2011/2024

Before The Supreme Court of India

Heard by the Bench of Hon'ble Mr. Justice C T Ravikumar J & Hon'ble Mr.Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra J

High Court's Improbable Condition:

Sudeep's quest for bail led him to the High Court, which granted him provisional pre-arrest bail but with conditions that seemed almost impossible to fulfill. The court required Sudeep to file a joint affidavit with his wife, stating their agreement to live together and his commitment to take care of all her physical and financial needs. Additionally, the court mandated that there should be no interference from Sudeep's family members. This arrangement was to last for only four weeks, after which the couple was expected to withdraw the divorce case.

"How is this possible when there is matrimonial discord?" the condition seemed impractical and improbable, given the existing strain in their relationship. It felt like an imposition that could further sour their already fragile relationship.

A Husband's Struggle:

Sudeep was caught in a dilemma. On one hand, he wanted to avoid arrest; on the other, the conditions set by the High Court appeared to dominate him and undermine his sense of fairness. The conditions suggested a forced reunion, which seemed unlikely to heal the deep-seated issues between him and his wife.

Moreover, the conditions risked giving his wife a sense of dominance, further complicating the possibility of reconciliation. Sudeep and his wife had shown a mild willingness to rethink their relationship, but these unrealistic conditions threatened to extinguish any remaining hope of a reunion.

Supreme Court's Intervention:

Realizing the impracticality of the High Court's conditions, Sudeep approached the Supreme Court by way of Criminal Apeal. The apex court granted leave to hear the case.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.T. Ravikumar J, presiding over the case, noted a fundamental legal principle: 'Lex non cogit ad impossibilia' – the law does not compel a person to do what they cannot possibly perform. The Supreme Court emphasized that conditions for bail should not be so burdensome that they effectively deny the relief sought.

The Final Judgment:

After careful consideration, the Supreme Court set aside the impractical conditions imposed by the High Court. The court recognized that expecting a couple on the brink of divorce to live together harmoniously under such constraints was unrealistic and counterproductive.

The Supreme Court made the provisional bail granted by the High Court absolute, subject to standard conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Meaning thereby that Sudeep could avoid arrest without the undue burden of improbable conditions, allowing the legal process to proceed fairly.

Seema Bhatnagar