#cinesaver
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
The Oscar Worthy Moment: The Green Book Movie Review
Mahershala Ali and Viggo Mortensen are no strangers to the Academy Awards, with both acting in a Best Picture winner along with multiple nominated pictures in the past. This is why it is no surprise that the academy nominated their latest film, The Green Book, for the best picture of the year. Do these Oscar veterans have what it takes to win the hearts of the academy, or was this film simply just Oscar bait?
The Plot
The Green Book takes place in the 1960s and tells the true story of a wisecracking bouncer from New York City named Tony Lip, who has fallen on hard times and is in desperate need of money. Tony's bodyguard experience makes him the ideal candidate to escort Dr. Don Shirley, an African American pianist, through the deep South for a concert tour that would last months.
The first thing that needs to be discussed in this film is that the writing and more specifically its humor is very strong. That is a comment that doesn’t often get said in regards to best picture nominations. That being said The Green Book provides consistent laughs that derive from its wit and never once falls back on cheap jokes, which makes this movie memorable.
The film decides to take a more subtle approach to racism in America. This may sound like it would diminish the point and moral of the film, when in reality it is this approach to the issue that makes the movie resonate. It allows you to really gauge what life was like in this time period by showing the simple rights and luxuries that were denied to people of color at that time.
I always say that every Oscar-worthy film has one moment that really cements it in the category. One scene that is so well done that it makes you sit back in your seat and say this is why it is up for an Oscar. The Green Book accomplishes this multiple times but there is one scene, in particular, I refer to which I won't spoil for those who haven't seen it. Trust me you will know when you see it.
The Cast
This film works as good as it does mostly because of its cast. Leading the film is Viggo Mortensen as Tony Lip. Mortensen shows his strength with each role by making it different than the last. This role proves that Viggo is about as dynamic as they come in Hollywood because it not only shows growth throughout the film dramatically but also a comedic timing that is second to none. A sentiment the Academy agrees with because he was nominated for best actor.
Nominated for best supporting actor is Mahershala Ali for his portrayal of Dr. Don Shirley. A nomination that does seem odd due to the fact that he is practically a lead. Once again, Ali provides a performance that is so suave, stylish, and likable that he simply can’t be ignored on screen. His chemistry with Mortensen is what sells the film, and might be the best combination of two actors this year. The interesting part of his role is that over the course of the film, we see his progression of the character just as much as Mortensen. This allows the audience to really fall for him as a character while relating to his struggle.
The Verdict
The Green book succeeds in telling the true story that most audiences are unaware of. It provides a light-hearted look at the issue while never sacrificing its message. The script provides an insane amount of wit with more laughs than most comedies this year. On top of all of this is two of the best performances of the entire year. The Green Book is a phenomenal film that I am not hesitant to say is in the running for my favorite of the year, which makes this film a recommendation at full price.
#the green book#viggo mortensen#mahershala ali#the oscar#best picture#best actor#best supporting actor#movies#film#movie review#film review#cinesaver
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
Plenty of Fish in the Sea: The Shape of Water Movie Review
Hispanic director Guillermo del Toro is the master of peculiar films such as Hellboy, Pans Labyrinth, and Crimson Peaks. His unique style can be spotted from a mile away, with its elaborate set designs and costumes. This time around Guillermo takes inspiration from monster films such as The Creature from the Black Lagoon and mixes it with classic Hollywood for his film The Shape of Water. Will this aquatic romance stick with audiences or will it have a tough time treading water?
The Plot
The Shape of Water tells the story of Elisa Esposito, a mute woman who works at a secret government facility as a cleaning lady. While cleaning a top secret room, Elisa finds and befriends an aquatic creature that resembles a man. The two slowly look past each other’s faults in this love story like no other.
If you couldn’t already tell this might be one of the strangest plots in recent years, and that might be a turn off to many people. The Shape of Water is best described using one word. Charming. Though its plot is peculiar the film never fails to charm audiences. Be it with the relationship the characters have or its clever scenes. This film is nothing if not unique. It simply covers many genres such as science fiction, cold war thriller, romance, and even has a dance number that is reminiscent of La La Land.
Something the film does well is dealing with the fact that the two lead characters are completely mute. They both mime and use body language to bring their thoughts to the fore front, but it also uses the supporting characters to progress the story. This makes the film even stronger because it places an importance on every single character.
At the core of the film is Guillermo, which is probably its biggest strength. This might be one of the best looking films of the year. The sets and designs are stylized to the point that you might find yourself looking at the background rather than the scene that’s unfolding. It’s as if the set design is an actor in itself. For example the design of Elisa’s apartment resembles that of a ship wreck and wall paper that looks like fish scales.
The story does tend to slow down at times depending on which subplot it is focusing on. This is most evident when the film is concentrating on building a struggle of Elisa’s friend, Giles, who is a gay man struggling with self-acceptance in the 50s. This story provides an interesting parallel to Elisa and the creature, but ultimately isn’t as interesting. Another minor gripe of the film is that at times there are details and scenes that may seem unnecessary and simply a bit too much, but that goes a long with the territory of a romance with a fish man.
The Cast and Characters
The Shape of Water owes a lot to its strong actors to really sell this idea to an audience. The ensemble cast is strong at every point starting with Sally Hawkins as Elisa. This performance is nothing less than spectacular and will probably be getting some Oscar buzz a couple of months down the road. Hawkins spends the whole movie with barely any words, which forces her to use facial and body expressions. This is something she does masterfully to the point where you almost forget she isn’t talking.
Playing her counterpart is Doug Jones as the aquatic creature. Jones has played many of Guillermo’s creatures throughout his film career such as the monster in Pan’s Labyrinth and the similar aquatic man in Hellboy. This makes him both comfortable and exceptional in the role. It never ceases to amaze the movement and positions Jones is able to form. To give a single gripe about the character, at times it feels that his character was too animal like to be thought of in a romantic way.
Playing the films villainous Richard Strickland is Michael Shannon. Shannon is completely comfortable in this villainous role, as he has played many by this point. Shannon does a good job keeping up with his dialogue heavy scenes that make for some of the most interesting points in the film. He resembles the thought process and style of the 1950’s in every shape and form, which creates the perfect base for a villain today.
The last actor to note her is Octavia Spencer, who gives a notable performance in the film because much of the story is told through her. Much like Shannon, this role is right in Octavia Spencer’s wheel house. The part is almost reminiscent to her role in Hidden Figures. She does provide a nice character to bounce of the miming of Elisa.
The Verdict
The Shape of Water is truly a peculiar movie and honestly is a departure for Del Toro. Unlike his other films The Shape of Water is not worried with scares or action scenes rather at the core of the film is a simple love story. It is a film with lots of symbolism and messages that can be talked about for hours. Complete with a twist that fans will love to debate. The acting in the film truly sells the idea that a woman could fall for someone truly different. The movie isn’t perfect with its somewhat slow plot and uncomfortable scenes. That being said its design and truly unique concepts make it easy to recommend at full price.
1 note
·
View note
Text
Spike Lee’s Oscar Moment: The BlacKkKlansman Movie Review
Spike Lee has made some unforgettable films like Do The Right Thing and Malcolm X, but unfortunately, he has yet to truly get recognition at the Oscars. His latest film has received five nominations including best director, best supporting actor, and best picture. Does The BlacKkKlansman have what it takes to give Spike Lee the recognition he deserves, or should he just go back to the drawing board?
The Plot
The BlacKkKlansman tells the true story of the first African American detective in Colorado Springs. While he investigates the local Klan group, he finds that he must go undercover in order to stop a brewing terrorist plot. He does this by teaming up with his white surrogate partner to stand in for him in person, while he communicates with these men over the telephone.
The BlacKkKlansman is not only one of Spike Lee’s best films in years, but probably one of his best films period. This story simply lends itself to a director like Spike Lee, who is no stranger to a film with a message like this. That being said he creates a movie that is both extremely entertaining while never relenting on its point. I would certainly love to see Spike Lee get the award for best director for this film.
The BlacKkKlansman has an interesting style as it fully dedicates itself to the time period. This can be seen through its clothes, camera style, and even the score which sounds like an old 70s crime film. This allows the movie to form its own identity when its compared to the other films that are up for best picture.
The film does a good job providing parallels in its story that lead to very interesting scenes. What I mean by this is that the film is constantly presenting scenes of what the undercover agent is seeing as he attends local klan meetings and then jumping to what his partner sees at the local student-run activist group. This allows the audience to see what injustices were being committed and how groups were fighting it. All in all these scenes are the most memorable and well put together moments of the film.
The Cast and Characters
The films leading role is played by a relative newcomer in John David Washington, who is actually the son of Denzel Washington. John’s presence on screen sets himself apart from his fathers by showing a more comedic range, which never diminishes his serious moments. This is a great breakout performance that makes me want to see the actor more in the future.
The BlacKkKlansman is nominated for best supporting actor for Adam Driver for his portrayal of the white surrogate investigator. Driver once again gives a performance that continues to impress. The film allows him to really act like different characters. His actual persona and the persona given to him for the undercover investigation. Driver's character also gives a strong conflict for the film because his character is actually Jewish. This struggle allows the audience to truly feel the pain of denying his beliefs for the investigation. Though I don’t think he will win the award, I do believe this is a great film and performance he can add to his already impressive resume.
The Verdict
The BlacKkKlansman sets itself apart from the other films in the best picture category with its undeniable style, great performances, and a true story that seems so outrageous that it’s hard to believe it actually happened. The film has a strong message, complete with an ending that should truly resonate with a modern audience. I wouldn’t put money on this film winning best picture but I feel like it is time for the Academy to recognize Spike Lee. I would recommend you see this film at full price.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Oscar Favorite?: The Favourite Movie Review
Oscar-worthy films always use the best A-List talent, which of course explains why they are nominated. Every year the same actors will be seen nominated for roles in new films that push their already great abilities. In this case, Emma Stone returns to the awards with her supporting role in the period piece comedy titled The Favourite. Will this cast of regulars leave the Oscars with the award for best picture, or will it simply get lost behind other academy favorites?
The Plot
The Favourite centers on a power struggle that involves two workers and the queen of England in the early 18th century. The question of who really is in control is brought forth when the two workers scheme and plan for the right to be in the room with the Queen.
The Favourite is definitely a stranger film than the others up or best picture. It is unusual to see a period piece that focuses more on comedy than it does on drama. This makes The Favourite somewhat of a mixed bag because at times you can’t take it seriously, which then is a stark contrast to the moments that are overly serious. It’s as if the film struggles with what it wants to be.
The film does boast gorgeous visuals with its beautiful landscapes and locations. It must also be said that the films use of natural light and untraditional camera lenses make the shots pop and help immerse the audience in the film.
The film's comedy is, in lack of better terms, irreverent which isn't a problem for me but might alienate audiences. That being said I found myself laughing quite a bit at the absurdity of the situations created in this film. This, of course, is surprising because the Oscars aren't always known for their sense of humor.
A minor complaint about the story of the film is that it doesn't fully explain the time period or setting which would have been helpful when trying to understand the plot. The film does also provide an ending that does seem a tad out of place. It's as if the filmmakers simply didn't know how to end the film.
The Cast and Characters
The Favourite boasts ten nominations, which is only matched by Roma. This includes a nomination for best actress in a leading role for Olivia Colman in her role as the Queen. Colman provides a performance that shows her comedic timing and dedication to the role. She shows a range from intimidating to even childlike. Her presence pushes the film even when her character is aggravating.
Emma Stone and Rachel Weisz are both nominated for best-supporting actress for their roles of the characters competing for the Queen's attention. Stone and Weisz show sadistic chemistry that pushes the characters to the edge, which makes it hard for the audience to pick a side. Each performance is a good stepping stone that is out of their wheelhouse.
The Verdict
The Favourite is a step away from other Oscar-nominated films due to its somewhat strange and comedic story. The film excels in its production and acting, but simply can only do so much for a script that seems to be lacking. It seems the film almost has an identity crisis as it struggles to understand what type of film it would like to be. This complete with a strange and somewhat jarring conclusion makes The Favourite an odd nomination for the Oscar, especially when you look at the films that weren't included on the list. That being said this is still an impressive and entertaining film that I recommend you see this film at a discounted price.
#the oscars#emma stone#olivia colman#rachel weisz#thefavoritemovie#movies#movie review#film#award season#cinesaver
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Breaking The Mold: Spider-Man Into The Spider-Verse Movie Review
No franchise is more familiar with reboots, remakes, and sequels than that of Spider-Man which has six films and three reboots since the year 2002. The franchise has seemed a bit tapped out with a constant stream of stories being told around the same character, and yet audiences can't get enough of their favorite web-head. Sony, who still shares the rights to the character with Marvel Studios, hopes to revitalize the franchise with a different take on the character. Will Into the Spider-Verse resonate with audiences or will it be just another entry on the long list of superhero sequels?
The Plot and Design
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse takes place in a new dimension in which Peter Parker exists and is Spider-Man, but the difference is he is not the only one. The film focuses on a new Spider-Man whose alter ego is Miles Morales. Miles is forced to learn how to use his new abilities and save the world as his dimension collides with another.
It will be hard for audiences not to compare this film to others in the franchise. I even found myself asking the same question. How does it hold up to films I have loved for most of my life? The answer is this is the best Spider-Man movie since 2004’s Spider-Man 2.
The story here may be a little predictable, but at the same time, it manages to tell an origin story without being bogged down in the same origin we have seen countless times. The choice to introduce alternate Spider-heroes gives this film a breath of fresh air.
This film constantly surprised me. By this, I don't mean it’s shocking with its plot twists. Rather it surprised me with its willingness to be daring. The film chooses an interesting story that is willing to take chances, a quality that seems to be lacking in the franchises more recent endeavors. I won't go into detail about what the risks are, but rest assured it pays off big time.
This is the first film in the franchise that is animated, which might be a turn off to many mature audience members. This thought process would do the film an injustice because the animation and design presented in the film are unique and incredibly engrossing. The animation style resembles that of a comic book which creates a unique look and sets it apart from any other animated film.
The Cast and Characters
Into The Spider-Verse excels in regards to its characters. The film has a stacked cast which features the likes of Mahershala Ali, John Mulaney, Jake Johnson, Hailee Steinfeld, Chris Pine, and even Nick Cage. Starring in the lead role is Shameik Moore as Miles. His style, origin, and overall demeanor is a refreshing take on the character. Moore gives a performance that is charismatic, humorous, and believable. Simply put, Miles personality gives the film its identity and style.
The irony about the film is that Jake Johnson, who plays the role of Peter Parker, steals the show. I say that because the whole selling point of the film is that it provides a look at all new Spider-heroes, and yet its original character is still the most engrossing. It is in this film we see a Peter Parker that is older, more damaged, and more conflicted than he has seemed in years. Jake Johnson, of New Girl fame, gives the role the perfect amount of humor and sincerity that is to be expected in the role.
The only minor complaint about the film is that the other Spider-Hero characters are so interesting in their origins, design, and presence that you wish they could be on the screen more than they actually are. Most notably being the fan favorite character called Spider-Gwen, which is played by Hailee Steinfeld. This character provides a much needed female presence that is so strong it makes you ask when she will be given her own film. The others presented are a tad more gimmicky, but the film realizes this and uses each sparingly.
The Verdict
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse proves that creative angles, willingness to takes chances, and a great cast can bring life back to an overused franchise. The film's style and animation will leave you breathless. Its story will push you to see what a comic book film can really be. And simply put this film will win the Oscar for the best animated film. That is why I strongly encourage you to see this film at full price.
#spiderman#into the spider verse#marvel#jake johnson#john mulaney#spider gwen#superheores#comics#movie review#cinesaver#nick cage#mahershala ali
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Creative Perspectives Can Make All The Difference: Vice Movie Review
How does an actor get nominated for an Oscar? Is it his or her emotional depth? Or perhaps their demanding presences on screen? A recent trend within the past two years is a physical transformation that makes the A-list actor almost unrecognizable as the portray a real-life character. Last year's winner, Gary Oldman for The Darkest Hour, perfected this technique. Now Christian Bale hopes to do the same for his latest film. Will Bale’s dedication to the role be enough for Vice to win big, or will the film leave the Oscars empty-handed?
The Plot
Vice tells the life story of Dick Cheney. The film spans from his start in politics and moving all the way through the Bush presidency. Along the way it tackles the real events he dealt with and shows how he made his mark on history.
The first real star of the film is its director and writer Adam Mckay. The feat he accomplishes with Vice is the same he did in The Big Short. He successfully explains complex and intricate concepts and situations in unique and clever ways. This makes somewhat mundane topics fun and interesting to an audience.
Vice stands out from other movies due to its unique perspective and story structure. The film is giving an insanely interesting viewpoint due to its narrator. This allows a new and third-person perspective to a story about Dick Cheney, rather than having Dick tell the story himself. The complexities that come from this give the film the added punch it needed separating itself from other Oscar films of the past that depict true stories, much like The Post which was nominated last year.
Vice is a surprisingly self-aware film, which is surprising when you think that it's depicting a true story. What I mean by this is that it breaks the fourth wall for the sake of comedy multiple times throughout the film. Usually doing this to successfully prove a point or simply explain boring legal jargon in a light-hearted manner.
The Cast and Characters
Just about everybody was talking about Christian Bale’s performance ever since the trailer for this film dropped before Christmas. His transformation is so drastic that talks of Oscar nominations appeared even before the film was released. Bale's physical performance is uncanny from his look to his mannerisms. That being said this isn't my favorite performance of the year, though I think it's likely he will receive the Oscar. I say this mostly because there isn't a scene in the film that lets bale have his Oscar-worthy moment. The true moment for Bale is his dedication to his craft by showing the lengths he will go for a role.
Amy Adams one again makes the cast list for another best picture nomination in the role of Lynne Cheney. Adams provides charisma and soul that plays off Dick’s cold demeanor very well. That being said this isn’t a role that will be taking home any Oscars but her presence on screen is undeniable.
Lastly, Sam Rockwell plays a role that he seemed to be born to play. George W. Bush. Rockwell doesn't play the character as you see in old SNL skits, which has become the stereotype. Rather we see a character that is simply taken advantage of by politicians working below him. Yes, the film does have fun at his expense, but this film isn't just about bashing his presidency. It's about showing his role in Dick Cheney’s life.
The Verdict
Vice will surely be remembered for its dramatic transformations of A-list actors to these real-life characters, but I would argue that the real award-winning performance here is from writer and director Adam Mckay. Simply put, a film about Dick Cheney shouldn’t be as creative, fun, and interesting as this one is. His unique story structure and script allow for this film to really stand out. This is why I recommend you see this film at full price.
#vice#dick cheney#amy adams#christain bale#steve carell#sam rockwell#george bush#oscars#award season#movie review#movies#cinesaver
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Classics Never Die: A Star is Born Movie Review
Fans of classic films constantly tell themselves that Hollywood is smart enough to not ruin a good thing. That their favorite movies are perfect on their own and simply touching it would tarnish the stories that they hold near and dear to their hearts, but sometimes there comes a story that is so timeless that updating it every couple of decades simply makes sense. A Star is Born is the directorial debut for Bradley Cooper and he hopes to bring new life to an old story. Does A Star is Born have what it takes to differentiate itself from the other films of the same name, or will it simply fall suit with many other reboots?
The Plot
The story of A Star is Born centers around a Southern rock artist named Jackson Maine who meets and eventually falls for an up and coming artist named Ally. Their relationship and careers become intertwined as they learn the struggle of keeping a strong home life while also pursuing a music career.
This is the fourth time A Star is Born has been made with its original counterpart releasing in the year 1937. This makes it hard to keep the movie fresh because the story has been told multiple times. That being said the latest iteration of this classic love story succeeds in just about every category. The first being in the writing and updating of the story. The direction and viewpoint this film takes makes it extremely relevant for a modern audience, and truly shows a sign of the times.
One of the true selling points of the film is its soundtrack which needs to be remembered because it is almost entirely written and sung by both Lady GaGa and Bradley Cooper, both of which do an exceptional job. It’s hard to believe that Cooper can really hold his own in regards to his singing ability. The story provides meaning to each and every song, which makes the music more impactful. It’s also interesting to see the progression of the two artists and how their music changes over the years.
The Cast
The previous films boast huge names like Barbra Streisand, Judy Garland, and Kris Kristofferson which makes it crucial that the casting is just right in the two lead roles. Cooper not only directs but stars in one of the lead roles and once again fully immerses himself. His accent in the film is so drastic from his actual voice that it’s hard to believe it’s really him. He exudes character in his presence and mannerisms as he gives a performance that will undoubtedly be talked about come Oscar season.
Lady Gaga proves that her talent spans different entertainment mediums as she gives a performance that is so raw that you would think she has been acting for years. Her musical background gives her believability in the role and simply makes her the perfect choice. Gaga really shows a progression, both musically and from a character viewpoint, that makes the character very engaging.
The Verdict
The latest retelling of A Star is Born proves that updating a classic film can be done successfully if enough care is put into it. Cooper shows that he is a jack of all trades as he directs, sings, and acts at a high level. While Lady Gaga simply reinforces the fact that she is one of the best music artist around while also revealing her exceptional acting ability. Both of these actors step out of their comfort zone to meet the level of talent of each other. Cooper has created something truly special that will surely be nominated for an Oscar. If you didn’t already guess you should see this film at full price.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Anime Conundrum: Alita Battle Angel Movie Review
Live action adaptations of anime and manga face a double bladed sword from the moment they begin development. Do they accept their stylistic roots, or do they conform to a more western style? Both of which has its pros and cons. You lose the dedicated fans if you stray too far from the source material, but you might also lose a new audience if you delve too much into the lore and style. What is a filmmaker to do? Can this stylized entertainment medium transfer to the screen and be a success at the box office? James Cameron and Robert Rodriguez hope to create the first adaptation that satisfies fans of the source material while also creating new fans. Does Alita Battle Angel succeed in its endeavor, or does it further prove the point that this style just doesn’t transfer well?
The Plot and Design
Alita Battle Angel tells the story of a mechanic who finds the broken parts of an old cyborg left rotting in a garbage dump. This cyborg, also known as Alita, has trouble remembering her life before she was awoken. As organized crime begins to take over their city, it is up to Alita to solve the mystery of her past to better understand the future of all mankind.
Alita Battle Angel delves deep into its anime and manga roots, which makes this a very stylized adaptation. That being said the design and creation of the world is the films strongest suit. The world in which Alita lives in is a beautiful post-apocalyptic wasteland that you will never grow tired of looking at. That being said, there are moments in the film in which the characters or so stylized in their design that it looks a little wonky on screen.
Where the film needed more help is in its story. The first major gripe of the film is that, at times, it is more interested in setting up sequels that it fails to finish the story presented. I understand that the filmmakers want to play some of their cards close in order to have shocking reveals in its sequels, but the movie refuses to explain almost everything in order to get you to come out again. Alita Battle Angel is a gamble to begin with, which makes me worry if a sequel will ever come to fruition. This makes Alita’s first outing seem somewhat incomplete on its own.
The script also tends to have some pacing and dialogue issues. There are long portions of the film that aimlessly wander around until it meets a revelation, which makes the film dull at times. That on top of clunky writing makes for a script that needed to be fine-tuned.
The Cast and Characters
The title role of Alita is played by Rosa Salazar, who relies heavily on motion capture technology to give the character her exaggerated features. This can make the character look somewhat alienating when compared to the other characters, but Salazar truly sells this performance by creating a powerful character that still obtains just enough innocence. Many were skeptical when trailers first showed her design, but rest assured the performance is well done and her exaggerated design makes sense in the context of the film. Not to mention you almost forget you're looking at a CGI character as the film progresses.
Many of the actors in the film provide a boost to a somewhat lackluster script. The same cannot be said about Keean Johnson, who plays the love interest named Hugo. This storyline simply doesn’t work from the beginning. It is here that the flaws in writing and acting are truly seen. I simply never felt a real connection between Hugo and Alita which made the conclusion of the film all the less impactful.
The supporting performances coming from A-List actors made me hopeful for this film. This includes the likes of Christoph Waltz, Jennifer Connelly, and Mahershala Ali. Waltz does a good job grounding the film and always shines on screen, but Connelly and Ali are simply underused. Their characters are interesting and I wish the film would explore them more, but they simply aren’t given enough to do.
The Verdict
Live action anime and manga adaptations seem to be a tough sell at the box office, which isn't helped by their less than reputable track record. Alita Battle Angel doesn't really break that stereotype but does push this genre forward just a bit. It is as if this film is simply another step in the right direction, but simply could reach its aspirations. This is a beautiful film to look at complete with mind-blowing action sequences but fails due to its unsatisfying plot, clunky writing, and some one-dimensional characters. That being said there is enough here to keep you entertained and that's why I would recommend you see this film at a discounted price on Tuesdays.
1 note
·
View note
Text
No Longer the Butt of the Joke: Aquaman Movie Review
Aquaman has always been the butt of many jokes thrown around the local comic shop because his somewhat comical skill set and costume design have never allowed him to rise above the status of a B list character. Now that we live in a comic book film renaissance, it is time to dust off that trident and really give Aquaman the film treatment he deserves. Does the new Aquaman film have what it takes to change the public's opinion, or should he just return to the depths from which he came?
The Plot
Aquaman tells the origin story for Arthur Curry, the son of a lighthouse operator and the Queen of Atlantis, who tries to avoid his duty on the throne of Atlantis. It is up to Arthur to intervene when a corrupt family member not only takes the throne but threatens to wage war with the humans who live on land.
The first thing that needs to be said about this film is that it fully realizes how ridiculous and comic booky its source material is. The film really plays into the cheesy action movie vibe that is all too familiar with any classic 80's flick. This self-aware quality gives the movie personality and simply makes it more light-hearted than the other films before it.
That being considered there are parts of this film that look so out of this world that it can be somewhat jarring to watch on screen. There are multiple scenes in which the characters ride giant seahorses, talk to giant sea monsters, or just float in water that can give you a laugh. That being said it creates a fun yet ridiculous time at the movies.
The plot for Aquaman does a pretty impressive juggling act as it attempts to keep all of its storylines together. At times it may seem as if the movie is trying to do too much in its attempt to flash back to its origin story while also bringing you up to speed with what's happening in the present. Rest assured audiences won't ever be lost throughout the film, but it should be noted that it can be somewhat all over the place.
The director, James Wan, creates some of the most elaborate and fun action sequences of the year in this film. The action scenes seem as if they are taken in as few cuts as possible. The camera will follow characters through demolished buildings, underwater civilizations, and exotic locals in a way that shows off the films impressive choreography.
Many were skeptical about the films ability to pull off long sequences that take place underwater. I can say without a doubt that the visual effects in the film are some of the best of the year. The city of Atlantis uses just about every color on the pallet while giving it a distinct look that hasn’t been seen on screen.
The Cast and Characters
The true selling point for this film is its cast. Jason Momoa, from Game of Thrones fame, lends the film an insane amount of personality and charisma to really sell this character. Momoa finds a nice balance between humor and seriousness that really drives the film. His physical appearance and mastery of the choreography simply add to the character and his on-screen presence. This is a take on the character that most audiences have never seen before and will be sure to love.
Another notable performance is by Amber Heard, who plays Aquaman’s love interest named Mera. Much like Momoa, Heard gives this role an incredible amount of personality and charisma which makes it hard not to love her on screen. It is also nice to see a love interest in a superhero film that is as strong, if not stronger, than the hero.
The Verdict
Aquaman has come a long way from his comic book roots. His latest film outing reimagines the character in a way that is both fun and likable. Jason Momoa and Amber Heard provide the film with much-needed personality, while its director creates an interesting world for them to inhabit. That being said the plot of the film does have some moments that can be laughable and it does juggle too much at times. This is a step in the right direction for the DC cinematic universe but just falls short of being as impressive as Man of Steel and Wonder Woman. It’s characters and their world still make this a film to see on the big screen but perhaps on a discount day at the theater.
#aquaman#dc comics#superhero#jason momoa#amber heard#movies#films#movie review#film review#cinesaver
1 note
·
View note
Text
Staying True to the Material: Ocean’s 8 Movie Review
It’s been a while since we have last caught up with Danny Ocean and his elaborate heists, with the last Ocean’s film hitting theaters back in 2007. These star studded casts and well thought out schemes have always been a big hit at the box office. Studios hope to revitalize the franchise by casting an all women cast this time around, a tactic that doomed Ghostbusters only a few years back. Will Ocean’s 8 resonate with audiences or will it isolate longtime fans?
The Plot
Ocean’s 8 tells the story of Danny Ocean’s sister named Debbie, who has spent the last five years in prison. While there she concocts an elaborate plan to get rich quick by stealing priceless jewels from the Met Gala. This of course leads her to search for a group and execute the elaborate heist one step at a time.
The first thing that Ocean’s 8 gets right is the feel of the rest of the franchise. This is the only time I will compare it to the latest Ghostbusters film, which is odd to say because these films are pretty unrelated. Though Ocean’s 8 cast an entirely new list of characters, it never forgets what it is. And that is an Ocean’s film. The writing, characters, and even the story feels like it should.
The film is a direct sequel to the others which in some respects works because it doesn’t disregard what came before it. The problem is that you don’t really see any of these past characters make an appearance. The film also totally dedicates itself to the fate of George Clooney’s Character, Danny Ocean, which might rub some fans the wrong way.
The heist itself is new and refreshing for not only the franchise, but also the genre. It provides an interesting backdrop for the story, while also adding an undeniable style that is always interesting to look at. The heist is extremely well thought out, with every piece falling into place. This keeps the audience guessing when all of the evidence is expertly placed before them. That being said every Ocean’s movie has a moment where it reveals the big twist in the heist that brings the whole thing together. This film does that as well but the twist can seem a little underwhelming by comparison to the rest of the film.
The other weak aspect of the film is that not every character is given as much screen time in the film. All of the women in this movie have interesting characters, and are uniquely distinct. That being said with such a large cast it can be difficult to juggle each any every character. It just would have been nice to see more of some of these new characters.
The Cast and Characters
Leading the film is Sandra Bullock in the title character. Bullock’s style and presence can be felt throughout the film and does a good job as its lead. It should be commended that Bullock makes this character feel like more than just a female version of Danny. This allows the movie to be a sequel and yet seem new.
One of the highlights of the film is Lou played by Cate Blanchett. Her rough exterior provides a nice dynamic with Bullock. Blanchett is given more screen time than most other women on the team, which allows her character time to grow.
The last acting highlight is the fashion designer named Rose played by Helena Bonham Carter. This character stands out from the bunch due to Carters eccentric nature and her extravagant look. Carter also provides some comic relief throughout the film, which she pulls off expertly. This is a character Carter could play in her sleep, and one we have seen multiple times. That being said her character never grows stale and is always refreshing on screen.
The Verdict
Ocean’s 8 gives a new spin on the fan favorite franchise and proves that new characters can be casted while still capturing what made these stories fun. Each and every women provides something interesting and different and for the most part gives a good performance. Rihanna’s performance leaves little to be desired, but her role doesn’t take away from the film. This film makes bold choices most of which pay off. There are a couple of underwhelming aspects including the films twist and how it handled the fate of George Clooney’s character, but this is a fun film that I recommend you see at a discount price on Tuesday.
#oceans 8#rihanna#sandra bullock#cate blanchett#movie review#Film Review#films#movies#heist film#helena bonham carter#anne hathaway#summer movies#cinesaver
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
More of the Same: Deadpool 2 Movie Review
Fan favorite character, Deadpool, turned the superhero genre on its head back in 2016 with his vulgar humor and graphic violence. Big budget studios were hesitant to create an R rated superhero film up until this point. Deadpool proved that not only was there an audience for this kind of film, but it was exactly what fans have been asking for. Will Deadpool 2 continue to push the genre or will this sequel give us more of the same?
The Plot
Deadpool 2 finds our title character stuck in the middle of a time travel plot as the mysterious Cable travels from the future to kill a new mutant for reasons unknown. Deadpool vows to protect this young mutant in an attempt to become a better man and hero.
The plot of Deadpool 2 is a bit strange in respect to the struggle that it provides for the title character. This is a film with dark humor and themes that seem out of place at times. Seeing a superhero attempting to kill themselves for various reasons throughout the film does leave the audience kind of conflicted. This also leads to strange scenes of Deadpool experiencing the afterlife. It is here that the film wants you to truly care for its characters, but this isn’t accomplished because its characters have never been seen as anything more than funny.
Deadpool has always been kind of an enigma to me because his character isn’t inherently interesting. As far as comic book characters go he is pretty standard. His super powers aren’t anything we haven’t seen before, and even his appearance looks similar to a handful of characters. This is fixed by simply adding humor to allow the audience to connect with him. This could be forgiven if the humor was a little more clever rather than relying on cock and butt jokes. That being said this film does provide some laugh out loud moments when it truly tries to set up funny scenes, but beyond that it simply provides the same jokes we have seen in the first film.
One of the highlights of the first film was its fast and over the top action. Deadpool 2 is no exception. There are multiple standouts including a prison break out, elaborate car chase, and some super hero smack downs.
The Cast and Characters
It doesn’t matter if you like the character of not, Ryan Reynolds is the perfect actor for the role. His charisma, comedic timing, and his dedication to the role really sell this character. He is simply the reason Deadpool works as well as it does. It never gets old to see the actor poke fun at his past super hero roles such as Green Lantern or another iteration of Deadpool. If you want to see the merc with a mouth on screen, it simply won’t get any better than with Ryan Reynolds.
Loyal comic fans know that Deadpool is often teamed up with the time traveling cyborg named Cable. The character is introduced in this sequel and is played by Josh Brolin. Brolin seems like he kind of phones it in for the part by playing it exactly how you would expect. His presence is always welcomed on screen, but at the same time you will never be missing him if he isn’t there. His back story can seem somewhat convoluted along with a superpower that isn’t really defined. It just would have been beneficial to know more about the character. The movie doesn’t even address the fact that he is a cyborg. Seems like something that an audience would like to know.
Stealing every scene she is in is Zazie Beetz in the role of Domino. This hero provides what the movie definitely needs and that’s originality. Domino’s super power isn’t that she can fly or has super strength. Rather she is just super lucky. On paper this doesn’t seem like anything that would be fun to watch, but the film finds interesting ways to present this to an audience. This is something we haven’t seen before, and will be exciting to see more of in the future.
The Verdict
Deadpool 2 provides fans what they wanted, but doesn’t really push the envelope in regards to its characters or story. This is a pretty forgettable superhero film that gives some big action, humor, and countless references. The movie is in no way bad but Deadpool 2 gets lost in a world that is flooded with movies in the genre. The acting from Ryan Reynolds sells the film and its title character, but Brolin seems to be pretty uninspired in the role of Cable. If you enjoyed the first film then this sequel will be up your ally, that’s why I recommend you see Deadpool 2 at a discounted price on Tuesday.
#marvel#deadpool#cablepool#comic books#comic book movies#ryan reynolds#josh brolin#film#movies#summer movies#movie review#film reviews#cinesaver
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
What Did I Just Watch?: Sorry to Bother You Movie Review
Last year Jordan Peele’s breakout hit, Get Out, reached critical praise to the point that it actually was nominated for an Oscar. The beauty of the film is that it uses horror and science fiction elements to exaggerate common issues in our society today. First time director, Boots Riley, hopes to catch that same lightning in the bottle with his film Sorry to Bother You. Will the film expertly weave horror elements with the issues that plague us today, or should audiences turn to other movies that have succeed in this attempt?
The Plot
Trying to describe the plot of this film without spoiling any of its twists in turns is next to impossible. I will give you a short basic idea. The film tells the story of a telemarketer named Cassius Green, who discovers he can sell more of his product over the phone if he uses a voice that sounds like a white man. This strategy works so well that he becomes promoted, but then learns what his company is actually selling.
Sorry to Bother You is without a doubt the strangest movie I have seen in sometime. I, along with fellow audience members, didn’t know what to make of it as I exited the theater. The movie frequently pushes the envelope with its plot, which is something the director could be commended for because the film is definitely unlike anything I have ever seen. That being said, just because it is different does not mean it’s good.
The film does reach moments that are very shocking, and honestly you wouldn’t even believe that these scenes made it into the film if I were to touch on it. These outrageous scenes make the rest of the film seem very mundane. It’s as if there are two drastically different stories being told here. Since the first half is so drastically different, it makes the second hour seem even more jarring. I will say this film can be very disturbing. Honestly, I would avoid it if your get queasy or uneasy in horror films.
The biggest redeeming qualities of the film are its cast and the way its shot. Sorry to Bother You does give some interesting scene set up. For example rather than watching Cassius on the phone for long periods of time, we see that his desk is literally dropped into the room he is calling. This makes for not only an interesting scene, but one that can have some good comedic timing.
Sorry to Bother You attempts to make a point with this outrageous story. I think the biggest issue with the movie is that it doesn’t choose one point to make. Rather it does a shot gun approach and tries to give commentary on so much that it’s almost overwhelming. It’s as if that the writers and director had too many ideas and not all of them fit in the film. This is an artsy movie that will alienate audiences by beating them over the head with statements on race, the workforce, politics, business, and how all of that affects our road to success.
This is a dark and somewhat shocking comedy. The humor of the film tries to draw from just how absurd the story and twists really are. That being said it is taken with such a serious tone at times that it doesn’t come off as humorous, which then leaves the audience with a strange mix of emotions.
The Cast and Characters
Sorry to Bother You does boast a pretty stacked cast for a limited release film. Lakeith Stanfield, known for his role in Get Out, plays Cassius. Stanfield does a good job keeping this strange tale together while providing a conflicted character. We do get to see how success changes someone, and Stanfield does show growth as the story unfolds. It is also impressive to see how Stanfield reacts and lip-syncs to the words in his white voice because those lines are given by actor David Cross.
Oscar nominated actor Arnie Hammer once again brings audiences a movie that goes against the norm for actors like him. His charisma on screen has always subjected him to being a leading man or hero, but as of recent he has stared in art house films such as this or Call Me By Your Name. Hammer does provide an equally shocking performance in this film, which does give it more credibility but at the same time will leave audiences thinking why he accepted the role in the first place.
The Verdict
Sorry to Bother You is a shocking, artsy, dark comedy that will surely divide audiences. The film uses science fiction and horror to provide commentary on issues today, but does so in such a jarring way that it ruins the interesting set up. This movie left me feeling disgusting just for watching it, and honestly is a pretty tough sell for a standard audience. The way it is advertised is very different from the final product. The film has too many concepts and points to make that it feels like the filmmakers are just throwing things at you to see what sticks. It tries to reach the same heights as Get Out but lacks the focus, storytelling ability, and simply as interesting a concept. This will be an unpopular opinion with many, but I feel that audiences should save their money avoid the film.
#sorry to bother you#get out#arnie hammer#lakeith stanfield#boots riley#films#movies#film review#movie review#science fiction#horror#cinesaver
1 note
·
View note
Text
A Galaxy Filled with Scoundrels: Solo: A Star Wars Story Movie Review
Disney bought Lucasfilm Studios back in the year 2012, and since has created four different Star Wars films reaching successes from critics and audiences alike. Their plan is to not only make a new trilogy that takes place after its predecessors, but also to release anthology films that tell stories set throughout the Star Wars universe. Its latest entry into the franchise, Solo: A Star Wars Story has been plagued with issues behind the camera. This has led to directorial changes and the hiring of acting coaches to salvage this sinking ship. This news has obviously made its fan base skeptical. Will these notoriously critical fans accept the latest entry or will their greatest fears be seen on the big screen?
The Plot
Solo: A Star Wars Story takes place between episodes three and four. This origin story shows a young Han Solo trying to make his way in the galaxy by any means necessary. It is here that Han learns of a job with a payoff so big that he could quit this lifestyle before he is really dedicated to it.
Solo: A Star Wars Story is a different type of Star Wars film due to its tone and plot. The film isn’t as heavy as the rest of the franchise. What it does lack in depth though it gains back in thrills. This film feels like a summer blockbuster that is simply fun. It’s not the best Star Wars movie ever made, but it isn’t trying to be. It proves that there can be different types of Star Wars movies and stories, which is a good thing considering the amount of films Disney is pushing out.
The issue on everyone’s mind is the directorial change from Phil Lord and Christopher Miller to Ron Howard due to creative differences. The film doesn’t seem to suffer for this change because the tone and direction seems to be pretty consistent throughout.
The main issue with the anthology films is that they can be predictable. Those who know the franchise well could tell you what this movie is about and where it will lead to. This was a factor that plagued the last anthology film Rogue One. That being said Solo does provide a couple of plot twists that will surprise and shock fans, which is an impressive feat for a movie like this.
Solo: A Star Wars Story does rely on the other films pretty heavily, but at the same time it seems that this story could be watched by audiences who have never seen a Star Wars film. That being said a lot of the fun of this film is seeing how everything plays out, and how characters initially meet.
What Solo gives audiences that the other films may lack is some incredibly interesting world building scenes. This film shows us what it feels like to live under the reign of the Empire and what that would look like in regard to its slums, war, and even propaganda.
The Characters and Cast
Star Wars has always had good characters, and Solo is no different when it comes to this regard. The cast is perfect in their roles, which is impressive because they were made famous by other actors.
Playing the lead role of Han Solo is Alden Ehrenreich, who has stared in films like Hail, Caesar! and Beautiful Creatures. Ehrenreich plays the part with just enough familiarity that it seems like the Han we know and love but at the same time makes the part his own. This allows us to see where Han has come from and what he was like at this point in his life. The film gets the character of Han right by showing that he is a scoundrel, but at the same time he is caring and compassionate.
The film does a great job introducing and planting the seeds for relationships that last throughout the entire franchise. This is especially true for Han and Chewbacca, which is probably the strongest character dynamic in the film.
Donald Glover keeps up his hot streak by playing the role of Lando Calrissian, which was made famous by Billy Dee Williams. Glover simply steals almost every scene he is in with a character that is spot on to the original. His suave and smooth character provides an interesting dynamic with Han and the rest of the crew, which makes for some interesting scenes and exchanges.
The weakest point of the movie is its villain, Dryden Vos, played by Paul Bettany. The role is acted well and it seems like something interesting could have been done with the character, but the film never allows him enough screen time to be something truly special.
Woody Harrelson gets his Star Wars debut with the character named Beckett. Harrelson gives another notable performance with a role that he could play in his sleep. This type of part is his bread and butter. He feels very at home in the story and the universe.
The Verdict
Solo: A Star Wars Story gives audiences the origins of their favorite smuggler. The film changes the pace of the franchise by creating a story that doesn’t seem as heavy as the others in the series. It simply is a fun summer movie filled with great action set pieces. The cast of the film does a good job recreating these characters without seeming like cheap imitations. The film could have used a little more help in regards to its villain, but most Star Wars fans will be pleased to finally see famous scenes that are only mentioned in the other films. The issues behind the camera, that has plagued this movie, can’t be seen on screen. This is why Solo: A Star Wars Story is an enjoyable film at full price.
#star wars#solo a star wars story#han solo#lando#donald glover#childish gambino#woody harrelson#paul bettany#chewbacca#movies#summer movies#movie review#film review#cinephile#disney#cinesaver
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
A Blast from the Past: Ready Player One Movie Review
The 1980s are more relevant than ever amongst all mediums of pop culture. Be it through music, storytelling, or even just plain references. It shows that audiences like feeling nostalgic about franchises and stories that are near and dear to their hearts. Just within the past year we have seen movies and shows like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, Baby Driver, and even Stranger Things that tap into this nostalgic void. Steven Spielberg’s latest film, Ready Player One, hopes to channel the kid in all of us by bringing more references than you can imagine from across all of pop culture. Will Ready Player One live up to the legacy of the films it relies on, or should audiences just stick with the movies they know and love?
The Plot and Design
Ready Player One tells of a not so distant future where everyone is obsessed with a virtual reality game called Oasis. This virtual world allows people to become whatever they want and simply escape their bleak existence. Hidden in this world is an Easter egg hunt that leads to a fortune left by the games creator. The story follows Wade Watts and his friends who work to solve the games puzzles before this fortune falls into the wrong hands.
Ready Player One is based off the novel of the same name. Ernest Clines extremely successful book screams to be made on screen, but the adaptation does differ substantially. This is a good thing when considering that much of the book would never have transferred well on screen. The script also updates the references from obscure movies and games to relevant block buster hits that all audiences will understand. This is a rare book to film adaptation where the movie actually out does the novel. This is something I rarely say, but have seen twice in the last month due to Annihilation.
This film proves that Spielberg is at the top of his game. The action scenes presented in Ready Player One throws a lot at audiences. This film could have been an overcrowded mess if anyone else was behind the driver’s seat. That being said this film bolsters one of the most exciting car chase sequences I have seen in a while. This on top of a battle scene with just about every character imaginable makes for an enjoyable ride.
The story does suffer sometimes due to its predictability and somewhat silly plot. Just like the films it references Ready Player One is meant to be enjoyable rather than completely engaging. The fun of this film isn’t about what it creates. It’s about what it allows audiences to relive. I would be lying if I said I didn’t have a smile on my face when I saw the Delorean or the Iron Giant back on the big screen.
The Cast and Characters
Playing Wade Watts in the film is Ty Sheridan, who does a suitable job playing the protagonist. The film does provide an interesting performance for each character due to the fact that half of the film is completely CGI. Sheridan keeps his character consistent both in the real and virtual world.
Playing opposite of Sheridan is Olivia Cooke in the role of Samantha. Cooke excels at playing a character that is self-conscious about her appearance in the real world, yet completely outgoing in that of the Oasis. Her character does play to the idea that we are different people online than we are in the real world. The only aspect of her character, and this applies to all of the characters, is that they aren’t as unattractive as they keep saying. It sometimes is hard to take seriously when attractive characters complain about their appearance.
The Verdict
Ready Player One will undoubtedly find something for everyone in the audience. It’s the type of film that you want to watch at home just so you can pause and catch each and every reference. Once again there is a book to film adaptation in theaters that out does its source material. At times the story can be a little silly and characters can be unbelievable, but this shouldn’t detract you from this fun ride. If anything you get to see one wicked car chase scene. That is why I would say that Ready Player One is an enjoyable ride at full price.
#ready player one#ernest cline#steven spielberg#ty sheridan#back to the future#delorean#iron giant#movies#films#movie review#film review#1980s#books to movies#easter eggs#reference#parzival#art3mis#cinesaver
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Wizarding World of….. Los Angeles? : Bright Movie Review
Last week Netflix released their surprise film The Cloverfield Paradox, which left many to wonder about the process of creating original films for the streaming service. The production value isn’t bad, but one has to question why the script isn’t on the same level. The film is simply subpar which explains why Netflix is a viable option for its creation. They simply aren’t worried about their movies quality. Rather creative ad campaigns get people to watch their films. After watching The Cloverfield Paradox I took it upon myself to do some further investigating and watch the original film Bright, which oddly enough premiered its trailer at the previous Super Bowl. Will Bright stand out as Netflix’s gem, or will it follow the trend of their other films?
The Plot
Bright takes place in a world where magic and fantasy characters exist. Much like Harry Potter except it’s dark, gritty and takes place on the streets of Los Angeles. The Plot follows Officer Daryl Ward, who is paired with the first Orc police officer named Nick Jakoby. When a typical case leads to an all-powerful wand, it’s up to Ward and Jakoby to make sure that it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands.
The first thing that needs to be said about this film is that it’s absolutely frustrating. Not only is it bad, but the ideas are there for this to be a half way decent blockbuster. The world that Bright creates can be interesting at times. That being said it will certainly leave you laughing. The smallest things like seeing a centaur dressed in police riot gear can look so silly that it literally takes you out of the scene. Characters like this are seen all throughout the film. The look of Jakoby is pretty interesting, but the design for the Elves and gangster Orcs are just plain silly.
The writing of this film is absolutely ridiculous, to the point where it makes you question how this script was ever green lit in the first place. Just like the visuals, there are scenes where lines are said that just make you laugh, which once again takes you right out of the scene. Watching police shootouts and hearing officers yell “We got to protect the wand,” simply doesn’t sell this idea.
The movie does actually start out pretty strong with its high concept and interesting sound track, but for whatever reason couldn’t sustain itself throughout the whole film. The plot nose dives when the story line involving the wand kicks in.
The film also doesn’t try to make its symbolism subtle. Its message of race simply beats you over the head to the point that you hear lines like “Orc lives matter.” The comparison to real world issues is an interesting concept, but the execution simply falls flat.
The Cast and Characters
An obvious selling point for the film is the fact that the blockbuster star Will Smith is playing its lead role. You can tell that Smith is doing his best to hype up and really add something to this film, but at the end of the day his one liners are just awful, even resorting to Shrek jokes at one point. Watching Bright will make you reminisce about classic Smith movies like Men in Black which does what this movie is trying to do but simply better. That being said the dynamic of the two leads is the highest point of the film. Something special could have been created if a little more care was taken for the story revolving around these characters.
Underneath all of the monster make up is Joel Edgerton in the role of Jakoby. Now Edgerton might actually be the stand out of this film due to the fact that he is sincere and simply has a struggle he must overcome. Not to mention everyone, including Smith’s character, is an absolute jerk to him. Jakoby’s back story and character is probably the best part of the film.
The rest of the acting throughout the film is garbage be it from the villain, to the other cops on the force, or even the elf that palls around with Ward and Jakoby for a majority of the film. A lot of the time, especially with the other officers on the force, it seems like the actors are playing caricatures and stereotypes. This mixed with some predictable and lazy writing makes for a potent combination.
The Verdict
Bright is a down right awful film, which is disappointing when looking at the fact that it had an extreme amount of potential. This mix of Harry Potter and Lethal Weapon squanders what it has with its lazy and downright boring script. At times the movie makes you laugh when it shouldn’t. Smith and Edgerton are likable as these characters, but are given a story that will leave you saying so what. This might be one of the worst blockbuster films I have seen in a while, and should be avoided.
#bright#netflix#movies#film#joel edgerton#will smith#max landis#david ayer#movie review#movie recommendation#film review#cinesaver
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Slice of Life: Call Me by Your Name Movie Review
Often time’s movies can reflect the society we live in. Their messages show a specific place and time. This makes movies interesting to look back to a couple of years down to road to see how our culture and cinema has changed. Call Me by Your Name promises to offer a different kind of love story. Anticipation for this film grew as audiences wanted to see a realistic love between two characters of the same gender. It has since gained a fan base and multiple nominations. Will Call Me by Your Name deliver on its promises or will audiences be disappointed?
The Plot
Call Me by Your Name tells the story of a teenage boy who lives in Italy named Elio. As he spends his summer relaxing a young intern named Oliver moves into his house to study under Elio’s father, who is a college history professor. As the two fall for each other they are forced to face the fact that this love is temporary.
Call Me by Your Name isn’t your typical story structure for movies like this. Rather than giving the characters more conflict it simply portrays the two doing everyday things. This does provide a very slice of life feel, but also gives the movie one of its biggest flaws which is that it is slow and boring. There are multiple story lines that are presented and often are given unsatisfying conclusions. A majority of the film is spent watching long shots of people swimming, smoking, and for some odd reason using the bathroom. The idea behind the film is commendable, but creates a picture that audiences wouldn’t watch a second time.
At the core of this film is the relationship between the two lead characters. In any great love story the audience needs to believe and root for the love between the two. Call Me by Your Name falls in this regard as well. The film sacrifices its core relationship for this slice of life feeling. It needed to develop its characters more so that the relationship between the two seemed more believable. The lack of character development makes the motives and resolutions of each character somewhat unclear and will leave audiences asking why that happened.
The character development scenes show the two doing nothing more than riding bikes and swimming rather than digging deeper into who they are. In fact the character of Oliver isn’t really giving much more in the way of back story than just being an intern. We aren’t even given what it is he is studying in Italy, which may seem like a minor detail but in the scheme of things would add a lot to the character.
It is also somewhat jarring the amount of sex scenes in this film. As a love story, this is to be expected and absolutely should be shown. The issue with it in this film is that there is so much time of the movie spent doing this. It got to the point where the film just seemed a tad bit excessive.
The Cast and Characters
The two leads share a lot of screen time in the film, but the definite lead is Elio who is played by Timothée Chalamet. He does a suitable job, but simply didn’t have enough charisma and characterization to play off of Arnie Hammer. He is given more of a background with his interest in books and music, but his character simply isn’t that interesting.
Playing opposite of Chalamet is Arnie Hammer in the role of Oliver. The first thing that needs to be said about this performance is that there is a pretty jarring age difference between the two actors in the film, which could further lead to disconnect for the audience. The characters are supposed 17 and 24 years old. The issue is that Chalamet looks a little younger but roughly that age, while Hammer looks like he could be pushing 35. It can seem somewhat odd seeing Hammer interact and form an intimate relationship with high school kids. That being said, just like in his other films, Hammer is suave and charming. He does provide some star power for the film, but his character simply isn’t given much to do. It must also be said that his characters resolution is unsatisfying at best.
The Verdict
Call Me by Your Name attempts to tell a realistic love story for this generation. The problem is it gets caught up in all the things it can do while forgetting to do what it should. By this I mean the film fails to set up characters, provide interesting resolutions, and simply be entertaining. This is a long film that seems to drag on for an eternity. As far as the films subject matter, audiences have seen this done just last year with the best picture winner Moonlight. The difference between the two is that Moonlight handles its characters and topic better by giving it more conflict. All of this considered I would say to not waste your time with this film, when other films have done this just much better.
#call me by your name#the oscars#movies#film#movie review#film review#arnie hammer#cinema#cinephile#award show#cinesaver
2 notes
·
View notes