#brad pitt is an abuser
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
feministfang · 2 months ago
Text
I will bully the piss out of anyone i see supporting that hideous Brad Pitt
90 notes · View notes
anthroxlove · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
13 notes · View notes
martian-astro10 · 7 months ago
Text
Okay, so, almost every actress that has a good looking husband has Saturn as the 7th lord or its In the 7th house or the darakaraka, which is..... surprising (Blake lively, Elsa pataky and Naomi Watts have this, I'm looking for more)
I personally don't think that Margot Robbie's husband is handsome but a lot of women do, so...she also has Saturn as her 7th lord
Priyanka Chopra has 7th lord conjunct Saturn
And as someone who has Venus as the 7th lord and Jupiter in Leo, I'M DISAPPOINTED 😭😭
69 notes · View notes
maaarine · 19 days ago
Text
The New York Times, 2022
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Daily Mail, 2025
Tumblr media
dragging him?
20 notes · View notes
akajustmerry · 1 month ago
Note
Wait who has brad pitt buried or launched an agenda against?
brad pitt has been trying to cover up his abuse of Angelina Jolie in the press since she filed for divorce in 2016. she filed for divorce after an incident during which he abused her and their children so badly that the FBI got involved. Pitt has launched several countersuits against her that are ongoing as we speak and is refusing to let the divorce happen. He's using the same PR that Harvey Weinstein and Johnny Depp used. Here's another good article about it:
25 notes · View notes
logansargey · 5 months ago
Text
I will not be watching the F1 movie bc I HATE Brad Pitt and will never watch anything that has him in it.
24 notes · View notes
always-rolling-my-eyes · 7 months ago
Text
I couldn’t care less about the Austin nepo boyfriend discourse or the drama about his break up with Vanessa, (the age gap between him and Kaia is icky imo but 🤷🏻‍♀️)
What I do care about is how he has praised two known ab*sers (P*tt and D*pp)
*That* is the issue people should be concerning themselves with
Tumblr media
20 notes · View notes
uwabbittuwabbit · 7 months ago
Text
the "f1" "movie" is genuinely the strangest initiative i've ever seen but aside from the fact that an actual abuser stars as the protagonist which is why u shouldn't watch it the most bizzare part about the campaign are the fake social media accounts they have set up. like why am i learning that nyck de vries driving their car is an ACTUAL PLOTLINE.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
17 notes · View notes
umgeorge · 6 months ago
Text
george russell on brad pitt, "yabba dabba doo" and his future at mercedes | spa grand prix 2024 [part 2/3] - july 26, 2024
8 notes · View notes
beechicory · 2 years ago
Text
Brad Pitt is a child-abusing piece of shit, and shouldn't be anywhere near F1 🙏
12 notes · View notes
anthroxlove · 4 months ago
Text
50 notes · View notes
kiri-cuts · 2 years ago
Text
The elephant in the room in “Babylon”
Tumblr media
In case you weren’t aware that Hollywood is a dirty, stinking business then Damien Chazelle makes it absolutely clear within the first few minutes of “Babylon” via a grand deluge of elephant shit. 
Those who have poured over the covered-up scandals to be found in Kenneth Anger’s “Hollywood Babylon,” or who have dedicated entire lost evenings to the delights of scrolling through blind items posted by anonymous tea-spillers like Blind Gossip and Deux Moi will be familiar of the salacious beat that Chazelle’s drum bangs during this film. On the one hand, “Babylon” is a celebration of cinema, and on the other, it’s a eulogy for it.
Among all the debauchery, corruption, and scandals, something vital is lost and the art becomes secondary. Hollywood, the film tells us, was built on bodies -- dead ones, sexy ones, expensive ones. Anyone with a beating heart becomes a transactional vessel and a sacrificial void. Even before they’re done with you, they’re wheeling out the next spectacle. “Art” isn’t even in the equation. 
For Manny Torres (Diego Calva) that spectacle begins with a dead teenager and an over-zealous fetishist still covered in her piss. The aforementioned elephant -- originally intended as a grand finale to end an STD-petri-dish of a party -- becomes the perfect distraction for sneaking a scandal out of the place, unnoticed.
The only problem is that nobody is entirely ready for this abrupt surprise. When the poor mammal comes out swinging his trunk and barking his trumpet, the party-goers scream in horror and run for cover. As it turns out, nobody cares to address the elephant in the room. And so it continues, at least in a metaphorical sense, for the rest of the movie: Corruption, scandal, debauchery, violence -- none of it is too big to hide. But like the elephant, the wise ones in the industry know well enough to run from it, regardless. 
Manny, a character with a twinkle in his eyes for the magic of Tinseltown, isn’t wise enough to know to run from such things until the film’s violent denouement. It turns out a lot of blood can be spilled over counterfeit bills –- and so too, Hollywood’s counterfeit promises. As a man who is terribly adept at solving the sort of insane problems that only Hollywood could conjure, Manny climbs his way up through the industry –- and all in the name of progress. 
When the studios need a Latina producer to help support their Spanish-language ambitions, he steps up. But over time, Manny finds himself actively hired to block progress in others: queerness, Blackness, and any identifying traits of the lower classes are all scrubbed into more palatable forms. Those who don’t assimilate are discarded.
None of the film’s main characters survive the degrading gauntlet of the industry. Nellie LaRoy (Margot Robbie) begs to be a star on her own terms but finds all of her truest qualities getting junked in favor of politeness, straightness, and neutrality –- all the while, her cocaine habit, and gambling addiction remain intact. Sidney Palmer (Johan Adepo) enters the industry elite only to find himself treated like a curiosity object for the bourgeoise –- his Blackness reduced to a number on the PANTONE colour chart. 
Meanwhile, Jack Crawford (Brad Pitt) is a sad, middle-aged white man who faces no real obstacles -- even while exhibiting the same behavior that LaRoy is condemned for. Regardless, he despairs when the introduction of the talking picture renders his talent obsolete. So, of course, his only backup plan demands death -- because you can’t cash in an ego if you don’t have the receipts. 
And then there is the other elephant in this particular room.
In this role, Brad Pitt is well cast as a relic desperately clinging onto his fame and a persona that has long since hit its expiry date. Watching his performance in “Babylon,” it’s difficult to ignore the accusations raised by his ex-wife, Angelina Jolie, that he had been physically and emotionally abusive towards herself and their children during a 2016 plane journey. Nor the fact that during the promotion of “Babylon,” his PR team appeared to do a great deal of heavy lifting in ensuring that every goddamn presenter and winner at the Golden Globe awards excitedly gave him a shout out just to remind the world that everyone loves him. So, he could never. Right?
Ironically, the very same antique industry cogs discussed in “Babylon” are still greased up and operating behind the scenes of the film too. 
It makes sense that there’s a modern element to how “Babylon” looks and feels. Chazelle is seemingly unconcerned with maintaining any historical accuracy -- and it works for the story he wants to tell. In as much as things progress, they also stay the same. Be it marginalized individuals exploited as part of a superficial grasp for growth; women celebrated for their beauty but condemned for displaying any frailty or subversion; and powerful white men being protected from the consequences of their own actions. As much as things progress, they also stay the same. 
The true elephant in the room is that for better or for worse, we all love a spectacle -- even at the expense of people, places, and even art. The industry can jerk itself off about progress -- technological, social, systemic -- but behind the scenes, someone is still getting covered in shit to make it happen. And that was as true then as it is now. 
11 notes · View notes
starswheeledoverhead · 2 years ago
Note
OJ was an abuser and terrible person. But it’s sad you won’t even bother to watch the actual trial and would rather believe biased and slanted projects like OJ: Made in America and The People v. OJ which just reinforce the black brute narrative, give genocidal racist Mark Fuhrman a pass, misrepresent and lie about the trial evidence, and insult the jury’s intelligence. The Court TV docuseries OJ25 is the only truthful account of what actually happened in the trial. Maybe if you and the other people on Twitter bothered to watch it, you guys wouldn’t keep insisting the verdict is the worst criminal injustice of all time. Robert Blake recently died and none of you have the same outrage for him or his verdict.
I don’t think this was the worst criminal verdict of all time, I do believe Fuhrman is a racist monster, I also believe Robert Blake murdered his wife so what are we doing here
3 notes · View notes
umgeorge · 6 months ago
Text
george russell on brad pitt, "yabba dabba doo" and his future at mercedes | spa grand prix 2024 [part 3/3] - july 26, 2024
8 notes · View notes
vivianbernadetteaurora · 6 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Some abuser in Hollywood could be about 209948447 parts
0 notes
questioningespecialy · 1 year ago
Text
The descriptions of abuse on the private flight came in a cross-complaint Jolie filed in the couple’s dispute over a French home and winery they co-owned that is separate from their ongoing divorce, which she sought soon after. (...) A judge gave Pitt 50-50 custody of the children after a closed-door trial in which the allegations were aired. But an appeals court subsequently disqualified the private judge for not disclosing possible conflicts of interest after a motion from Jolie, nullifying the decision. The New York Times first reported the court filing. The filing says that on Sept. 14, 2016, Jolie, Pitt and their six children were traveling from the winery, Chateau Miraval, to Los Angeles. “Pitt’s aggressive behavior started even before the family got to the airport, with Pitt having a confrontation with one of the children. After the flight took off, Jolie approached Pitt and asked him what was wrong,” the filing says. “Pitt accused her of being too deferential to the children and verbally attacked her.” Later, it says, “He pulled her into the bathroom and began yelling at her. Pitt grabbed Jolie by the head and shook her, and then grabbed her shoulders and shook her again before pushing her into the bathroom wall.” One of the children, who were between 8 and 15 years old at the time, verbally defended Jolie, the countersuit says, and Pitt lashed out. “Pitt lunged at his own child and Jolie grabbed him from behind to stop him. To get Jolie off his back, Pitt threw himself backwards into the airplane’s seats injuring Jolie’s back and elbow,” the filing says. “The children rushed in and all bravely tried to protect each other. Before it was over, Pitt choked one of the children and struck another in the face.” The document says he subsequently poured beer on Jolie and poured beer and red wine on the children. (...) They had been romantic partners for a decade when they married in 2014. Jolie filed for divorce in 2016, and a judge declared them single in 2019, but the divorce case has not been finalized with custody and financial issues still in dispute.
—Andrew Dalton (with Anthony McCartney contributions) | published 3:06 AM UTC, October 5, 2022
0 notes