#bird taxonomy
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
T H I S T H I NG
this. This is the closest living relative to the elephant birds
You know, the biggest birb ever
I think
like what
Why are ratites like this
#ratite#ratite taxonomy#kiwi#kiwi bird#elephant bird#goober#dinosaur taxonomy#dinosaur#wtf#bird#bird taxonomy
331 notes
·
View notes
Text
BOTD: White-Necked Jacobin
^Image credit: Charles J. Sharp
White-Necked Jacobin (Florisuga mellivora)
The White-Necked Jacobin was first described in 1743 by the English naturalist George Edwards in A Natural History Of Uncommon Birds. He used the name 'white-belly'd huming bird'. It is typically seen high in trees, but flies lower at forest edges and clearings.
#white-necked jacobin#white necked jacobin#jacobin#hummingbirds#hummingbird#florisuga mellivora#birds of mexico#birds of central america#birds of brazil#birds of peru#birds of bolivia#tropical birds#bird taxonomy#birding#bird facts#bird fact#bird#birds#bird of the day#ornithology
83 notes
·
View notes
Text
Below the poll is a series of animal images labeled A through J. A is the least close to the birds we have today; J is the closest. If you encountered these animals in the wild, which would you call birds? If you pick a higher up option, then that means you consider all the below ones birds as well - so if you pick A, then BCDEFGHIJ are all birds. If you pick J, only J is a bird.
A:
B:
C:
D:
E:
F:
G:
H:
I:
J:
PLEASE REBLOG THIS SO IT CAN LEAVE PALAEOBLR. I NEED PEOPLE WHO DON'T RECOGNIZE THESE ANIMALS ON SIGHT TO VOTE.
I apologize to all of y'all with vision impairments for whom this poll is inaccessible. Alas, this is an experiment, and I cannot name the taxa. Thank you.
All alt text includes artist attribution; I did not make these pictures myself.
#palaeoblr#dinosaurs#birds#pterosaurs#prehistoric life#WHAT ARE BIRDS#bird political spectrum#taxonomy#classification#cladistics#phylogenetics
19K notes
·
View notes
Text
Big news for bird names: American Ornithological Society to replace eponyms
AOS intends to change all offensive and eponymous (named after people) common names of birds in the USA and Canada.
Renaming these species will be done with involvement of the public and overseen by a new committee made up of ornithologists, social scientists, and communications and taxonomy experts.
AOS will work with the ornithological societies of Central and South America determine who in these regions will maintain stewardship of common English names.
AOS announcement: https://americanornithology.org/about/english-bird-names-project/american-ornithological-society-council-statement-on-english-bird-names
More information under the cut.
How do bird names work? Scientific names (binomials like Zonotrichia albicollis) are set by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. These names are meant to be unique, unchanging, and universally recognized. Common names, on the other hand, are more fluid. The American Ornithological Society is the recognized authority on English-language common names for North American birds, published in their annual Checklist.
The larger context. Ornithologists name birds after people to commemorate those individuals, but this create problems. What do you do when a common name is racist, or when a bird is named after someone who, frankly, sucked? AOS has changed bird names for both of these reasons already.
In 2000 AOS changes the common name of Clangula hyemalis from a racist word for Native women to Long-tailed Duck (although at the time, they denied it was because of "political correctness")
2021: AOS changes the common name of Rhynchophanes mccownii from McCown's Longspur to Thick-billed Longspur. McCown was a Confederate. The push to rename this bird was a flashpoint in the #birdnames4birds movement.
Why not decide one-by-one? Sometimes it's obvious. For example, John James Audubon was a grave-robbing, slave-owning racist; birds such as Audubon's Oriole and Audubon's Shearwater are named after him. Although the National Audubon Society has voted to keep their name ("won't someone consider the branding"), many chapters have changed their names, e.g. the Chicaco Bird Alliance. Other individuals with birds named after them are less well-known or clear-cut in how much they did or did not suck. Removing all eponyms, rather than debating who sucks on a case-by-case basis, will cut down on the arguments.
How will this actually happen? It's not yet clear. Any free-for-all-poll might result in some Birdy McBirdFaces. No timeline either. But it sounds like this really is happening!
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
funny guys
#my art#digital art#queer artist#birds#sea birds#marine biology#animals#taxonomy#blue footed booby#avian#bird art
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Accipiter pecten oculi
#dracule mihawk#mihawk#one piece#op mihawk#akagami no shanks#accipiter in latin translates to hawk and that word is used quite a few times in the taxonomy of birds of prey which i think is neat#hawks can be found in the order Accipitriformes along with other diurnal birds of pray (there's even a genus called Accipiter)#random taxonomy yapping aside. theres also a hint of#mishanks#but like if you squint (or if you go into the keep reading thingy)
346 notes
·
View notes
Text
#inaturalist#naturalist#ecology#zoology#biology#orinthology#taxonomy#birdblr#birds#hawk#hawks#naturalism#nature#hawk tourism#bird
2K notes
·
View notes
Note
if you have time to explain like i'm five, why can birds not be meaningfully separated from reptiles? is it just to do with how they evolved, or are there cold-blooded scaly birds out there that i don't know about?
Imagine you’re a duck. It’s good, right? Here’s some noodles. Pretend they’re worms. Okay, no, stop trying to put the noodles up your nose. Attention here, look, papa’s trying to explain something. Can you listen? If you listen you’ll get more noodles. Okay? Okay.
So you’re a duck (*quack* yes good). But I’m a dinosaur. Yup. Waiiit. You have to be a duck for the story to make sense. Okay. I’m a dinosaur and you’re a duck. You’re descended from me. So you’re actually a dinosaur too! I know right‽ that’s because children (descendants) of one group are still members of that group. You never stop being a dinosaur, no matter how different you look, because you’re descended from dinosaurs. Even though you’re a duck (*quack* yes exactly)
You remember your aunty? Let’s say she’s a crocodile. Yeah, she looks like a crocodile sometimes, doesn’t she? Okay. If she’s a crocodile, and we’re dinosaurs, then what are your grandparents? That’s right, they’re a group that somehow gave rise to both dinosaurs and crocodilians. That group is called Archosauria. So your grandma is a great big archosaur (don’t tell her I said that).
Now, we call archosaurs reptiles. Crocodiles are reptiles, and dinosaurs are reptiles too. And if dinosaurs are reptiles, then birds are reptiles, because you can’t just cut the family tree. No it’s not a literal tree. You can’t cut it. No, not even with scissors. Like I just said, you never stop being what your forebears were. No, forebears, not four bears. Bears are not reptiles. Ducks are. Okay. You get it? Good talk. Here’s some more noodles.
#am I doing this right?#explain like I’m five#more like#explain like I’m three#can you tell I spend a lot of time talking with a 1.5 year old and never with five year olds?#taxonomy#evolution#birds#dinosaurs#reptiles#Answers by Mark#is this scicomm??
896 notes
·
View notes
Text
Sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) can be found across much of North America and part of northeast Siberia. Most populations migrate south for the winter, forming flocks of upwards of 10,000 birds.
#id in alt#sandhill crane#birds#animal art#digital art#oops originally i did what i rarely now do and just copy+pasted the species name from the wiki blurb w/out checking it elsewhere#without reading it at all apparently bc i came back later and#did a double take because surely i would have remembered the genus being Antigone. SURELY#i don't know what's going down in taxonomy world but it has been changed to Grus which is what iucn fws etc have listed#as i should have known/remembered in the first place with as much as ive read about them lately
182 notes
·
View notes
Text
Here's another bird chart! This time for the commonly sighted birds found in the urban areas and suburbs of Singapore.
#taxonomy#nature#wildlife#sgwildlife#birds#birding#birdwatching#illustration#singaporewildlife#birdblr
58 notes
·
View notes
Text
Spotted crake or Porzana porzana
The spotted crake is a small waterbird of the family Rallidae. The scientific name is derived from Venetian terms for small rails. These birds probe with their bill in mud or shallow water, also picking up food by sight. They mainly eat insects and aquatic animals.
Available now on Society6 or Redbubble
#vintagrafica#vintage#redbubble#society6#nature#bird#birds#cottagecore#cottage aesthetic#birdwatching#taxonomy#scientist#biodiversity#biology#water birds#educational#education#ornithology#animals#1900s
133 notes
·
View notes
Text
Owls are so funny
Like they split off into two families
Family one is strigidae, the true owls
They are diverse, many genuses each unique
And then theirs tytonidae
And it’s mostly the genus tyto and they’re just
39 notes
·
View notes
Text
BOTD: Ural Owl
^Image credit: Jyrki Salmi
Ural Owl (Strix uralensis)
The Ural Owl was given its scientific and common names by Peter Simon Pallas in 1771, due to the type specimen having been collected in the Ural Mountains of Russia. It is referred to in various languages by various names, some of which translate to "attacking owl", "long tailed owl", and "goshawk-owl". They are thought to be closely related to Tawny Owls.
#bird of the day#ural owl#birds of europe#birds of russia#birdwatching#birding#owls#owl#ural owls#strix uralensis#birds of prey#bird of prey#bird facts#ornithology#bird behaviour#bird names#bird taxonomy#birds#bird
98 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hi! If you have the time, could you please explain what makes a word either colloquial or scientific?
(Because you've been single-handedly dealing with a bad faith "debate team" all week - this question isn't a "gotcha", it's just to help me avoid accidentally repeating their mistakes.)
I know that any technical terms for a clade, or animals in a clade, count as scientific. So Dinosauria and Bovidae, as well as dinosaur and bovid, are always scientific words.
But common names are a lot harder for me.
Canis lupus includes domestic dogs, but does that mean all dogs are wolves, or that "dog" and "wolf" are colloquial terms that are just meant to describe our relationships with them? Or does it depend on the context?
Or when people argue about what counts as a "bird of prey", is there an actual right answer like with "are birds dinosaurs", or is it up for interpretation like with "what actually is a bird"?
Anyway, whether you get to answer this or not, thank you for teaching me enough to even ask the question - hopefully it'll mean one less mole for you to whack in the future.
well, common names *aren't* scientific by definition, which is the problem
dinosaurs don't have common names, which is why I can confidently say the term "dinosaur" means a specific evolutionary group that is still around
but words that are common, like bird, dog, wolf, etc. are up for debate and are defined colloquially, because that's their purpose; so yeah, its dependent on context and frame of reference
hope that helps
337 notes
·
View notes
Text
I don't have a stance on the hyphen wars (Black-crowned Night Heron or Black-crowned Night-Heron?) but I need everybody to figure that shit out because it's making it really hard to pull data
59 notes
·
View notes
Text
something that's super underrated in fic is Damian having a life in the League of Assassins. It's not just training 24/7 and mind games between a boy and his grandfather. It's not just Damian getting put through the child abuse simulator so that Bruce or Tim or Jason or Dick or whoever can rescue him. Damian is a character that experiences slow growth. He goes through the "no killing" rule, but there's storylines where you can tell he's only sticking to it for Bruce and Dick. He follows their lead because he needs their validation and affection, to prove himself - not because he genuinely believes in what they're trying to do (at least not yet).
For a child to be stuck in such a mindset, tells me two things; obviously the indoctrination runs deep because he was raised in the League. He doesn't understand his family because their lives are alien to him. But also that the League shouldn't just be a place of misery and despair. It needs to be full of people who praise his actions, people who try and value him.
They are teaching Damian that the Earth is something to be cherished, that he kills to honor his family and one day lead the revolution. It's something very overlooked; the League doesn't believe that they are evil. They are a fringe organization with the fervor to save the Earth. They worship Ras al Ghul, of course, but that's because they believes he embodies what the planet needs - rejuvenation, redemption, the care for endangered and extinct animals, the dismantling of rich billionaires and corrupt governments and exploitative companies. If they have to kill and turn the oceans red with blood to ensure that the Earth exists for a thousand more years - then so be it - Ras will take us there.
Damian internalizes this. He lives in this League day in, day out. He may not always appreciate the teachers his grandfather gives him, but he learns. He absorbs. He watches the initiates being sworn in shadows. He observes the cultists and their rabid worship, gets pulled in and placed high above the clouds as a piece of god. He lives his life every day surrounded by the Shadow assassins, spies, information specialists. He is waited on by League staff who are happy to serve them. He has handmaidens he's known since he was an infant, who pamper and spoil him. Bodyguards who have died to save him. Cooks and doctors and researchers and farmers and innocents living their own lives. They come from all over the world. They have families and friends. They have lineages as far back when Ras first founded the League. They treat him like a son, like a little brother, like an older brother, like a friend, like a student, like a messiah, like a child and like an equal.
And when he leaves the League...he loses those connections. The handmaiden who took care of his hair, leaving him to slather on hair gel in an effort to maintain an image. The boy who was being trained a Shadow and befriended him, one whose deathly image he can never shake when talking to anyone his age. The teacher that taught him meditation, an inner peace he yearns to return to. The woman who taught him how to hack computers and he never look at Barbara without remembering her. The man who taught him boxing, his first experience with the life of a performer. The thief who gave him lockpicks and pilfered sweets, whose detached demeanor always remind him of Selina. The actress who taught him to manipulate his voice, a talent he will never get to show her again. The bodyguard who treated him like a little brother, whose sacrifice screams in his mind when interacting with any of the Waynes. Damian can never return to those days. He can create new memories in America, but his heart forever lies in the city amidst the mountains.
#2 for 2 on random Damian thoughts#but I'm currently writing a fic set during/after batman 658 that leads up to resurrection of ras and CHIROPTERA#and from Damians POV its so fulfilling to be able to flesh out the League beyond the bad that he experienced#there has to be good there too there has to be quiet moments of introspection and interactions that aren't transactional or abusive#there needs to be a reason for Damian to be firm in his League mindset for so long and more to his life prior to Gotham#btw a lot of those League examples are ocs that you will meet in that fic#damian wayne#dc#taxonomy!verse#a painted bird named tamer#dc meta
67 notes
·
View notes