I've talked about this before I think but I think "art theft culture" is actually what makes scenarios like this worse... and I Know because I've mentioned that it happened to me before, where a few years ago I was heavily inspired by an artist for a couple of style study drawings without acknowledging them as inspiration, they contacted me after their friends notifed the similarities, and it was resolved as I explained that I had no "plans" for long term theft or passing off as my own, I was just passing by and figuring out what I liked about the style. But I should have just mentioned them!
And that's the point I'm trying to get at here, I feel for a lot of people there's still either shame in using references (I took the upper half of a pose for a recent comm from one of the first memorable google image results for it... How embarrassing!), and there's similar in openly admitting that somebody is currently directly inspiring you, or that you liked something someone made so much you're making your own spin on it.
This is probably because you don't know how people (your audience or the original creator, or THEIR audience) are going to react with regards to """theft""" (which I also feel varies. Like everyone I've seen trying to emulate my style has never gotten close. Which is how it works! Its a good thing! Absorb it into your own! Thats what I do!
But I've also had someone lift every aspect of my art identity and basically try to replicate exact pieces, poses, and dialogue of mine with their characters like oh ok nvm this is kinda weird.) so I get it, because it's scary! It happened to Me, I was a perpetrator LOL and that's that it was style inspiration and not direct copying so I get it... I feel it all the time too, but I wish it wasn't like this in General ykwim. Wish it didn't feel so humiliating to admit influence
EDIT: THIS IS ALSO NOT ME SAYING "you need to list off all your inspirations every single time you post a drawing"
Its more like oh this person is using my exact brushes and exact colors and exact half traced poses and my handwriting and exact dialogue and personal symbols to the point where they're pretending my autobiographic doodles happened to them while pretending they've never seen my stuff in their life, or even shit talking me. Some of these individual aspects are okay (I've literally shared all my brushes with everyone, for example, who cares. My colors are awesome...who cares. 4 petal flower shapes don't belong to anyone, I don't care.) But all of them in combination is what's weird. Ykwim. Like that level of "hey man what the fuck"
I'm about to answer an ask going more into depth about this but I also need to explain that it's hard being on the other end of this too because it really isn't that serious ykwim... I see ppl on twitter get clowned on every day because "you can't steal a style" and that's mostly true. Me and some mutuals "steal" aspects from each other all the time without "crediting" because it's obvious, or we know each other, as well as the "stolen" stuff being something we already made our own thing, so I promise this isn't about that. Art is meant to be shared and inspire and influence.
I'd never point fingers unless it got severe over a long period of time (not adapting it into your own style), with someone who wouldn't talk it out with me but sometimes I wish I could show some of these specific examples, like I promise I'm not blowing up because someone """stole""" uhhhh the little squiggles I add to my commissions. I myself "stole" that from deco sticker sheets. Who gives a shit.
23 notes
·
View notes
"You'll not always be motivated so you have to be disciplined."
day 29+30+31/50 productivity challenge - condensing 3 days into 1 post cuz of 2 all nighters in a row i- dw tho cuz i did sleep a couple of hours in between here & there.. still genuinely dunno how i survived. learn from my mistakes & don't procrastinate cuz that's the only reason i was stuck in this mess
23rd September 2024, Monday
[almost nobody from my class actually went to school (& i'm not an exception) cuz tuesday's a study break & wednesday's our chem exam]
💤: 8 hrs - i mean ig at least that's one plus side of sleeping in?
🕒 1 p.m.- *sigh*
afternoon morning skincare
duolingo
practiced playing keyboard
did some college-related research
gradblr intro post
took bath
studied + made notes chemistry ch: structure of atom (not fully)
did so much planning fml (not good, not good at all, i procrastinated a lot!!)
did an exercise video
🚰: 4 glasses
24th September 2024, Tuesday
[study break day]
🕒 6:30 a.m. - my "night" is over & the day has begun
morning skincare
revised chemistry ch: some basic concepts of chemistry
🕒 12 - 3 p.m. - napped
duolingo
had a mental breakdown, pathetically cried, felt like a failure, etc
studied chemistry ch: structure of atom
took bath
night skincare
packed bag for tmr
🕒 10 p.m. - 12 a.m. - napped
🚰: 3 glasses
25th September 2024, Wednesday
[chem exam]
studied chemistry ch: classification of elements and periodicity in properties
studied chemistry ch: chemical bonding and molecular structure
morning skincare
quickly wrote down all formulae + important values
🕒 8 a.m. - left for school sleep deprived asf but caffeinated & motivated to get through the terrible exam
chemistry exam: i will be in deep shit when results come out *sigh* obviously i'm not happy when my friends do bad but only one comfort is that we're in shit together (they're literally the only 2 ppl i talk to in school). i NEED to do well on all my other exams, like somehow make an extraordinary improvement to show that i'm good with the other subjects and will just prioritize studying chem in the future. also made a deal with my mom that if i get above 83% overall then i'll finally get my own tab and headphones. we've been meaning to buy it for some time now, and my mom agreed only because my first tests' marks was at 64% (cuz i didn't study..). not exactly an "academic weapon" just yet.. only yet hopefully..
🕒 1-5 p.m. - came back home & slept like a log (no one's surprised)
(re) planned my day
took bath
ate my first meal of the day (how did i survive till here with just a coffee before school??)
played chess online (lost once, won once)
planned week after dussehra break
night skincare
decided to take a break today & wake up early tmr to start anew; i.e. operation proper sleep every night is green!
🕒 12 a.m. - went to bed finally
🚰: 4 glasses
🎧: a beautiful ravenclaw-themed playlist on youtube
20 notes
·
View notes
I am curious I was just having this argument with a bts fan and how she was crying because someone from bts got flirty with Olivia Rodrigo idk and she said She had a mental breakdown and this is the same psychotic shit that happens with Sebastian stan and Chris evans and any famous celebrity that’s hot, the “fans” somehow think that they have a chance with them or some delusion they have fed themselves, this is actually a mental illness it’s a way of coping with trauma by obsessively obsessing over a stranger that does not have any slightest clue that they exist and they likely will never even be in the same room as them, I think they need psychological help.
I thinking loving a celebrity platonically or sexually is okay and normal and fine but it’s also healthy to know that you are definitely only a fan and you should be happy with them getting a partner and being happy and you should also know that you are not “in love” with them because you cannot be in love with someone you haven’t met.
(Not at all a dig at you just something I was talking about with my friends and I though people should know and understand this)
And I am sorry if the last ask makes you uncomfortable you can absolutely ignore it, I have no intentions of making anyone uncomfortable. Anyhow I was the one who you replied to as “you don’t post any personal anything of him”, and I really love that. 💟
so i'm not the biggest fan of diagnosing ppl like this, especially on social media where exaggeration and being over the top is kind of the language of choice. i don't know if you knew this person prior and know that this isn't how they normally act, or if you stumbled upon their post because of this issue, but i'm guessing they meant for their audience to just be their self-imposed panopticon of mutuals that would so true bestie them until the cows came home, and it wasn't any deeper than that.
emotions aren't logical, and there's a difference between knowing it and actually feeling it. depending on where you live you probably have a higher chance of dating your fave than winning the powerball, but it's not at all weird to be disappointed that you didn't win, you know? it's fine to feel illogical feelings as long as you don't make it anyone else's problem.
4 notes
·
View notes
The sun and moon symbolism was used so well in LMK
I love how it wasn't used as a way to tell us about their personalities but instead as a way to reflect their beliefs, their places in the world and how their relationship with it can vary
When you think about sun and moon characters, the first things that comes to mind are "extrovert and introvert", "loud and quiet", "optimistic and realistic (or straight up pessimist)", etc. You think of two labels that are used, to put it simply, as a way to tell us that oh, this character is bright and nice and this other character is quiet and follows them anywhere. And depending on what you think about Shadowpeach, this might suit them! But if we're talking about canon, then it's just... not them
Macaque isn't a shy, timid guy who while he's smart and clever, he doesn't stand up for himself. SWK isn't a happy and cheerful but also dumb guy who tends to be the one to defend Mac when he doesn't do it himself
Here, the sun and moon symbolism is used to explain the nature of their relationship, not their personalities. It's used to give us a simple explanation of why they're that way without showing us a 20 minute backstory scene to make us understand what the fuck happened (though that wouldn't be unwelcome)
The sun shines brightly and gives us its warmth, but in the end, he'll always be alone; no one can get close to her without burning. The moon's brightness comes only from the sun, and she's most noticed when it's night, while the shadows cover the earth
The moon needs the sun to shine, but the sun wouldn't change at all if he wasn't there; Macaque needs SWK to be there for his character to be important. but Sun Wukong's story would have remained almost the same if Macaque had never been his friend. If you want a story where they never knew each other, just read JTTW!
However, while the sun doesn't need the moon at all in real life, these two characters are supposed to be actual people, not a rock and a ball of gas in space. Macaque can be his own person without Sun Wukong being there, and Wukong is strong enough to not need someone fighting by his side but still wants it anyway
They're not soulmates, at least not in the way the wind and the sea are. Sun Wukong's love for Liu'er Mihou isn't a thing destiny wrote. It's not heaven's, not space's, not faith's: it's his. And his love for Macaque is what makes him need him by his side
69 notes
·
View notes
It's been rolling around in my brain the last few days for some reason, but I still hate the family backstory reveals for Sophie and Eliot. I've seen some of the meta for it, but quite frankly, it still makes no sense. If it had been something actually thought of and intentional in the original, I think it could have been so fascinating. I mean, Sophie's willing abandonment of Astrid to contrast with Nate's loss of Sam or Eliot's adoption in contrast with Hardison's and Parker's? Could have been excellent! But they came out of nowhere in Redemption and don't work with these characters.
Sophie was still actively using the fucking alias that she met Astrid under! She met with someone from her past on the show! Like. Quite frankly, that one is unequivocally bullshit that they made up and threw in and pretended could fit with the established canon. (And I'm sorry, but the idea of Sophie abandoning Astrid and never telling Nate about her just... So much of Nate's trauma was rooted in the loss of Sam, and I think that introducing this element after he's gone and unable to respond to it taints Sophie and Nate's relationship in a way bc I'm not exactly sure how Nate would've responded to learning about this but I think that it's something he'd have needed to know. I don't know how to fully express my thoughts on that but yeah.)
As for Eliot, I don't like the adoption aspect literally at all. The way that he would interact with his family and the memory of his family would be different, and I think that it's flat out ridiculous to think that he'd have never mentioned it to the team in the original show, especially when dealing with the kid cases. (I also dislike the biracial adoption as its own element because if Eliot was actually raised by Black parents in the... idk what 80s/90s? That just. doesn't feel congruent with how they write Eliot interacting with PoC, not necessarily in a bad way, but babe, he's written like a white southern man raised in a specific kind of culture that does not jell with that. It also makes Eliot look... really bad that he was apparently raised with the knowledge of how fucked up the military was and his parents' history and made the choices that he did.) Like the show may not have explicitly stated it but the implication of that relationship was vastly fucking different throughout the original show.
Just. These were not backstories that were congruent with their depiction and characters in the original show, and they're also just moves that I don't particularly like or find interesting directions for those characters. There's also something to be said about how it was apparently unacceptable for a woman to not have kids or someone not reconciling with their biological family when that was something that the original show handled a lot better. Out of all the directions to take Sophie and Eliot's stories, that's just not really one that I think was a good idea.
10 notes
·
View notes