#algebra example
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text


Patreon
#studyblr#notes#math#maths#mathblr#math notes#maths notes#linear equations#linear equations notes#algebra#algebra notes#algebra 1#algebra 2#equations#math ex#algebra ex#algebra example
11 notes
·
View notes
Text

Best Regards
The Planets Were Moving In Their Orbits Before The Sun Creation (Revised) https://app.box.com/s/dufa274dvpay3fqn6syz6sefjljfwnx9 or https://app.box.com/s/89vxxtv3hc8si245fwxpbw0ts9b126nz or https://www.tumblr.com/itsgerges/762780127698567168/the-planets-were-moving-in-their-orbits-before-the?source=share or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/239300.html
The Sun Creation The sun is created depending on the planets motions- because- the sun rays is created by the planets motions energies- In details- Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and from this energy the sun rays is created- means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays but the planets motions energies total is used to produce the sun rays– that explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body (from the planets motions energies total)- This theory is discussed based on 5 hypotheses. The First Hypothesis The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I suppose -the sun rays is produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion- also – I claim No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states. The Second Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The Third Hypothesis The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the wave reflection causes changes for the waves properties and data- the major change is that- the reflection causes to square the wave velocity- means- the gravitational wave moves by velocity (V), if this wave is reflected, it would move by velocity (V^2) after the reflection- The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- two times in the outer planets and one time only in the inner planets- The Fourth Hypothesis The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time The rate of time use is useful because it enables to accumulate the planets motions energies during a period of time- understandable- Planet motion energy is small energy and the sun rays is massive energy and that necessitates to accumulate the planets motions energies total during a period of time to store motion energy sufficient to be used for the sun rays creation- Shortly- if the planets motions don't use rates of time, no massive motion energy can be provided and for that NO enough energy will be found to produce the sun rays-means- No light beam can be created The rate of time depends on the velocities rate Example (one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock) because Mercury velocity =1.6 the Earth velocity– the hypothesis is explained and proved in details
The Fifth Hypothesis Neptune Motion Causes Negative Effects On The Sun Rays Production Process are (1) Neptune motion caused the gravitational waves to be reflected two times in the outer planets where one reflection is enough for the required process- the wave reflection is repeated by Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion (2) Neptune caused to decrease the gravitational wave speed by one percent- where the gravitational wave moves by speed of light Neptune caused to decrease this speed by 1% creating a speed = (99% of the speed of light=297000 km/s) and by this speed (0.99C) the relativistic effects are created in the solar system
NOTICE The solar system is one machine performs one Job- and this Job is The Sun Rays Production - All planets motions are used as parts to perform this one Job-
The Sun Rays Production Is Done By Two Basic Tasks (1st task) The Provision Of The Sufficient Energy For The Sun Rays Production- and the sufficient energy is prepared by the motions of the five planets (Saturn- Jupiter- Venus- The Earth- The Moon – and Mars) because these five planets motions are used to create the general rate of time based on which The Sun Rays Are Created. (discussed in details in the 3rd hypothesis)
(2nd task) The mechanism by which the light beam is created- and this mechanism is the relative motion- the gravitational waves move relative to the sun point of space- by this relative motion the sun rays are created- means- the required energy is prepared and provided by the aforementioned five planets- and when the sufficient energy be provided this energy is sent to the planets which create the mechanism and the mechanism uses the sufficient energy to produce The Sun Rays The mechanism depends on the motions of 3 planets (Mercury- Venus and the moon) Specially Venus, because Venus reflects the wave toward Mars and defines its trajectory angle to create the relative motion between the wave and the sun point of space- the relative motion is discussed in details in the explanation of the (first and second hypotheses) The Explanation Of The First And Second Hypotheses
Let's remember The 1st Hypothesis This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam – I suppose (The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Nuclear Fusion -Also All Stars Rays Are Created By This Method And No Rays Is Created By The Nuclear Fusion Process) And –The 2nd Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The two hypotheses explain how the sun rays creation depends on the planets motions because The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies as the article states AND The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- The two hypotheses are discussed together in 4 Points
First Point (The Gravitational Waves Source)
The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- I provide 2 major proves for this hypothesis which are- (1st proof/ Planet Motion Energy Analysis) and (2nd proof /The Sun Gravitational Field Refutation)
1st Proof / Planet Motion Energy Analysis Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), Let's ask, where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit- Note- the moon velocity is 27.8 km/s BUT the Earth and the moon revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity should be considered equal the earth velocity relative to (the sun) – The 1st Proof Conclusion The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why? The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion that – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.
2nd Proof / The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following (1) The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- (2) No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity – Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner creation and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions. (3) The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon- (4) The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation) d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance
Example- Venus orbital distance (108.2)2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3) d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance 50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury
All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition. Notice Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation) Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth- (5) Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the explanation of the 3rd hypothesis- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.
The 2nd Proof Conclusion The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All
Second Point (The Gravitational Waves Nature Analysis) Let's ask (1) If The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light While The Planets Move By Low Velocities? Or Generally– regardless the gravitational waves source- how can the gravitational waves move by speed of light? From where the energy is provided to enable the waves to move by the speed of light? (2) Can the gravitational waves be reflected in the solar system? what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties, features and nature? (3) Can the gravitational waves energy be increased? Means can one gravitational wave move by low velocity and this wave motion is accelerated to move by high velocity motion? again from what source the energy is provided and how the acceleration is done? (4) If the gravitational waves are produced by the same gravitational field (The physics book states "the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field") does that mean all gravitational waves move by equal velocities? can some waves move faster than the others? why and how? (5) If the planets data are reflected on each other – can we discover the geometrical reason behind this features? Planet velocity is example where the velocities are defined by the rule (v1v2= constant) this rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- why the velocities are reflected on each other? what's the geometrical reason behind? suppose the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system, why this cause the planets data to be reflected on each other?
(6) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Because the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light) but the waves moves by speed of light only (C=300000 km/s) how the value (C^2) can be produced by the waves motions? (7) If the gravitational waves produce a light beam, does that mean the waves use electric field to produce this light beam? Is there another method to produce a light beam doesn't use electric field or charges? (8) If the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system can we discover that? can we prove that? and can we know in what planet orbit the reflection is done and if the waves are reflected many times?
The Gravitational Waves Properties, Features and nature Here I compare between the two theories about the gravitational waves source and their effects on the waves properties- 1st Theory (The Physics Book Theory) The physics book states, the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- this theory tells little about the gravitational waves properties and nature because the mass gravity concept is puzzled and not understood for that the waves properties and features are puzzled also- let's test this idea- In The Sun gravitational field theory no one knows how the mass gravity force works and if the gravity needs time to work- or if the gravity creates a geometrical design to practice the effect of one mass on the other- the mechanism is not clear and for that the gravitational waves are not clear- for example – no one knows why the gravitational waves can move by speed of light or what waves move by this speed and in what planet orbit or if the wave motion velocity is accelerated gradually from low velocity to high velocity– we shortly know nothing about these gravitational waves- let's ask more questions- are these waves reflected and what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties and nature- where do these waves go? And what's the useful result of these waves energy? can these waves energy be used at all? are there just moving energy in space without an useful goal or result? And The new article tells the gravitational waves move by speed of light can produce a light beam? How these waves can produce a light beam by their motion? DEEP ANALYSIS I wish the respectful reader notices the major change in vision by this article-because- the physics book states the sun rays is produced by the sun nuclear fusion- here- the source of energy is the sun mass and the used method is the sun nuclear fusion- and the light beam is produced Let's put the new article here again This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- the light beam is created by the gravitational waves motions- the article tells- the light beam can be produced by the Motion Energy – The article tells (The High Velocity Motion Can Produce A Light Beam)- here the article removed simply The Sun Nuclear Fusion Machine- the whole machine be useless because the light beam can be produced by (the motion energy)- I wish the respectful reader sees the miracle and wonder behind- There are 2 major changes (1st Change) The source of energy The source of energy is the motion energy– No longer the sun mass be used as the sun rays source of energy- BUT – the motion energy is used as the source of energy – here- the fatal error of the sun nuclear fusion theory is seen clearly – because- the solar system is so rich in motion energy- the moving planets since thousands of years provide massive motion energy stored in the space- and by that- the solar system is very rich system in the motion energy- and we should ask (why do we need an outer source of energy?) why the solar system doesn't use its massive motion energy to produce the light beam? Also if the massive motion energy is not used- where's this massive energy? because it can cause continuous risk for the soalr system stability if no way to use this stored massive energy The sun nuclear fusion theory is completely wrong because it doesn't see the massive motion energy stored in the solar system (2nd Change) the light beam production machine The gravitational waves motions can produce the light beam- this is stated by the article but how? by what method the gravitational waves can produce the light beam? The article doesn't explain how the gravitational waves can produce a light beam? But I put an explanation for this method in my theory discussion
2nd Theory (My Theory) I suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- let's remember my theory because we will use it in the waves properties discussion I asked –where any moving body produce energy by its motion =(1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? The planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as fish swimming creates waves in the water planet motion energy creates waves in the space- means planet moves and creates waves in space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity by that- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and creates waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions create waves move by these planets velocities – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total
I explained this theory before in more details- now – let's discover the gravitational waves properties and features in details- let's put this analysis in the next point (third point) because we need to analyze the wave reflection process to discover the waves properties and features
Third Point (The Gravitational Waves Reflection)
Let's ask Question No.(1) If the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s, how can they move by speed of light? How the velocity 205.8 km/s can be accelerated to be 300000 km/s (speed of light) and where this acceleration is done? Another question can help greatly this discussion Question No.(2) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S)- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Let's think how to answer this question- these gravitational waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) but the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light)- means- the wave velocity is squared- and how can the wave velocity to be squared? This feature I have discovered in the solar system- the waves are reflected and the reflection causes to square the velocities- means- the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the gravitational waves before the reflection moved by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and the reflection causes the velocity to be squared- by that- after the reflection the gravitational waves speed is squared and changed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to be (C^2= squared speed of light) and the light beam is created from this value (C^2) Means- the waves reflection is the method by which the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) is changed into (C^2)- that means- without the waves reflection NO light beam can be created. Notice– the waves reflection is proved strongly in the solar system because it causes to reflect the planets data- means- huge amount of planets data proves the waves reflection–we may remember one example – planet velocity is defined by the rule (v1v2=constant) this rule proves the planets velocities are reflected on each other The paper provides hundreds of similar data proves the waves reflection AND The waves reflection causes to square the velocity- this feature is repeated in the solar system frequently – because- the waves are reflected three times in the solar system for that the velocity squaring is a feature repeated with each reflection and by that the planets data provides a strong proof for it- Shortly- The waves reflection causes to square the velocities- now- let's use this feature to know how the unified wave its velocity (205.8 km/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- (Please note this unified wave is the gravitational wave)
The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s Means the unified wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s BUT If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1 Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1 BUT The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light) That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) NOTICE No. (1) Please note the important observation Without 7.1 the velocity will be only 42683 km/s (even after the waves reflection) and NOT the speed of light That tells- the light beam production process depends on the previous light beam production process- means- a motion by (99%) of speed of light should be found before the wave reflection occurrence and without this motion with (0.99 C) the gravitational waves can't move by speed of light because we need a source for Lorentz length contraction effect with rate (7.1) That tells the light production process is done in chain process, the new light beam production depends on the old light beam and if this dependency is removed the gravitational waves can NOT move by the speed of light and No light beam can be created in this case NOTICE No. (2) We need to pay more attention for the importance of the motion by the speed of light- because the technique of the machine depends on the waves reflection- means- the waves can increase its velocity only by the reflection process – now the reflection causes to square the velocities- this is very important news why?? Because - If the waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s), the waves reflection will produce the value (C^2= squared speed of light) and from this value the light beam can be produced Now – suppose the wave velocity is less than speed of light- suppose the wave moves by speed = (90%) of the speed of light= (270000 km/s) - the waves reflection will square this speed that will produce (0.81 C^2) which is NOT (C^2= squared speed of light) and as a result No Light Beam Can Be Produced (CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013) Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c E-mail [email protected] [email protected] ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
#quadratic formula#basic math#basic math notes#algebra notes#pre-algebra#pre-algebra notes#prealgebra notes#prealgebra#prealgebra ex#pre-algebra ex#pre-algebra example#algebra ex#algebra example#quadratic formula example#quadratic formula ex
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
DO YOU ALL WANNA SEE MY PROOF THAT REFLECTION AND STRETCHES ARE COMMUTATIVE CAUSE I PROVED IT ALGEBRAICALLY AND IT WAS SO FUN
if this gets a note i share my little proof :3 it's very short and uncomplicated i promise
#mathblr#maths#siph speaks#!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! it was sooooooooo fun#i also did some funky algebra that allows you to find any trig exact value of any angle! althoguh it is absurdly difficult#for something that is not a simple divisor of a known exact value. but i can do it for like. 15 degrees for example!#I LOVE LINEAR ALGEBRA SOOOO MUCH#i didn't even have to do this like. the extent of the homework was Not This Much#but i was having sooo much fun :)
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
The straight A 4.0 gpa honor roll student to burnt out traumtized shell of a human being autistic pipeline is real and true
#i am a prime example#did y'all know I was in honors college and on the Dean's list when I was in college?#bet you didn't#I also worked full time and volunteered on the weekends with my Phi Theta Kappa group#I can't even do basic algebra anymore#tier rambles
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Little celebratory thing: it feels like I'm getting a bit better at alef bet! Even though the vowel markings can feel redundant, they're still something I've been able to remember and recognize individually!
#jumblr#jewish conversion#jew by choice#hebrew#personal thoughts tag#and i'm learning some new letters :)#a new favorite is ש#yes i'm still (somewhat unfortunately) using duolingo but ofc i'll eventually branch out#i might look for some hebrew children's books when i start being able to apply meaning to the letters#like how i know 'dad' is אַבָּא for example#i feel like i'm going insane looking at my hebrew keyboard though#if reading hebrew is pre-algebra then using my phone's hebrew keyboard is calculus#g-d: do not read this post because i know you will try humbling me by making hebrew harder and i do NOT want that rn#oh no i've never written in hebrew on pen and paper oh no my handwriting is gonna SUCK 😭😭😭
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
Surprising absolutely noone except undergraduate math students, it turns out math actually is only about numbers in the end!
#math#mathblr#mathematics#oh so you thought abstract algebra stopped being about numbers to get to more complex structures#and you thought fundamental logic is so abstract exactly because it is more general than just numbers#well guess what#gödel wants to have a word with you#my friend every statement that can possibly be made by humans ever can be made isomorphic to some structure of the natural numbers#even if that structure is a function space of the power set of the power set of the natural numbers#it is possible to write any finite set of axioms as an isomorphism to axioms about the natural numbers#however since the axiomatic definition of the naturals gives you some axioms already it is important to note that for some really fucked up#axiomatic systems you have to explicitly include axioms that prevent you from using thise axioms in sone ways#as in you can't use the set theorethic definition to choose elements of a set for example#you have to choose elements from a set with choice functions constructible from axioms provided#now for making set theory equivalent to the naturals the choice functions you can derive are equivalent to just choosing a natural#but it could be not the case
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
Characters who had extremely high expectations placed in them from a young age to the point where nothing they did was ever good enough and they eventually decide it's not worth even trying to be good enough, and kind of just give up on living up to ANYONE'S expectations
Also. Idk if this is a trope but a character that had no expectations placed in them at all, to the point they were never actually encouraged or motivated to do anything with their lives and felt no support for anything they may have wanted to do
I am a very odd, confused combination of the two...
#that second one is uh. thats just me. thats my actual life.#the only thing anyone really encouraged in me was creativity#well i guess my dad did try to push me to do things but he did it in that way like the first example. where it made me want to just give up#my dad has a way of harshing vibes and sucking the joy out of literally anything you have interest in#i once told him i wanted to build an outdoor pond for my pet turtle and he started teaching me algebra about it. i was like 9.#been rewatching psych with my mom and his dad is basically what the fuck my dad did to me. when he was even around. yayyyyyy daddy issues
6 notes
·
View notes
Note
solving imperfect sqaure roots?
Simple, but you'll probably need to repeat a few steps:
Let's say you want to find the square root of 10. You'll first find which two perfect squares are closest to it, so 3^2 = 9 and 4^2=16. Pick either 3 or 4 for the remainder of the steps; in this case we'll use 4.
Divide 10 by 4 to get 2.5
2. Now add your closest square (4) and the former solution (2.5) together and divide by 2. This will find the average. (4 + 2.5)/2 = 3.25
3. Check if this square is near absolute to your imperfect square root. 3.25^2 = 10.56
Since it's not quite close, we'll keep going by repeating steps 1-3 with the square roots we create.
1a. Divide 10 by 3.25 to get 3.0769
2a. Find the average of 3.25 and 3.0769 // (3.25 + 3.0769)/2 = 3.1634
3a. Check is this square is near absolute // 3.1634^2 = 10.0070
Pretty close! But we can go even more precise. If we were only going to the hundredth decimal place (10.00), we would call it at 3.16, but we can refine it one more time just for practice.
1b. Divide 10 by 3.1634 to get 3.1611
2b. Find the average of 3.1634 and 3.1611 // (3.1634 + 3.1611)/2 = 3.1622
3a. Check if the square is near absolute // 3.1622^2 = 9.9995
We're not going to get much closer to 10 than that, so we can safely say that the square root of 10 is 3.1622 (:
--
In short:
Take your imperfect square (A) and divide it by it's closest perfect square (B) to find (C) // A/B = C
Find the average between your closest perfect square (B) and the former solution (C) to find the possible square root (D) // (B + C)/2 = D
Check if (D) squared is close to absolute (A). If yes, (D) is your imperfect square root. If not, repeat steps 1-3 by replacing (B) with (D), as that will be your newest closet square root. Do this as many times needed.
#ask#anon#lord i hope this is what you were referring to i literally busted out my notebook for college algebra and pulled this example lmao#i remember it being easy just kinda time consuming#i would say most calculators have this exact function but i assume the whole point is your teacher wants to see the work right
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
my god this js transported me to high school, right at the plaza when i would ask my best friend (who was in the star section) to help me with algebra after class and i just couldn't get it the first or second time and she would js go 'haha it's ok if u don't get it right away, i'm not going home yet' 。°(° ꒦ິᯅ꒦ິ° )°。

#fromaryg: rara#algebra is my fucking weakness#geometry? A+#chemistry? A+#algebra? D HAHAHAHAHAHA#AND IT DOESNT HELP THAT OUR TEACHER IS SO LAZY#IM TALKING SHE WOULD SIT WHILE WRITING ON THE CHALKBOARD AND DRAG THE CHAIR WHILE WRITING#SHE WOULD GIVE JS ONE EXAMPLE AND THEN EXPECT US TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DO THE REST!!!#but my best friend has a diff teacher and she already smart so i was in good hands#literal tears in my eyes HAHAHAHA#R IF U SEE THIS ILYYYY HAHAHAHA
0 notes
Text
Love using an elementary school level math website in my autism classroom in my last year of highschool wow totally don’t feel bad about this at all
#dude#dude come the fuck on what the hell are you doing#all the examples of students who used this are in elementary school#‘wow you blew through that! was it easy’ IT WAS ADDITION#IT WAS ADDITION#THIS IS ALGEBRA YOU CANT ADD FRACTIONS TO THAT AND NOT CHNAGE THE BOTTOM ONE AND CALL IT ALGEBRA#ITS ADDITION
0 notes
Text
Distance Formula

Patreon
#studyblr#notes#math#maths#mathblr#math notes#maths notes#distance formula#distance#calculating distance#finding distance#basic math#pre-algebra#algebra#algebra notes#pre-algebra notes#basic math notes#math ex#maths ex#mathematics#math example#maths example
7 notes
·
View notes
Text

Best Regards Can Young Interference Be A Model For The Solar System Design? https://app.box.com/s/m5knmtma5f0vejev6x17f16idai9yurx or https://app.box.com/s/e9m3r3e9x2o3ncik9xznihwdh2581bsv or https://www.tumblr.com/itsgerges/781095009302740992/can-young-interference-be-a-model-for-the-solar?source=share or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/254918.html
Paper argument Young Interference Is A Model For The Solar System Design
The Argument Explanation The argument is explained by answer the following 12 questions 1 Can The Space Be Created By Light Beam Energy? 2 How Can Young Interference Be A Model For The Solar System Design? 3 What Are The Useful Results We Get If (Young Interference Can Be A Model For The Solar System Design)? 4 What Proves We Have For The Idea Tells (Young Interference Can Be A Model For The Solar System Design)? 5 How Can The Coherence Of Light Be Occurred? 6 Can The Light Move Into The Past? 7 How Is Planet Formatted (Planet Formation Details)? 8 What problems are made by Young interference as a model for the solar system design? 9 Why Do We See The Bright Fringes As Planets? 10 Does Space Creation Need a speed 1.16 million km per second? 11 What's The Time Definition? 12 Can the solar system design be greater than (Young Interference)? Let's answer in following NOTICE I try to prove that (Young Interference Is A Model For The Solar System Design) in this proof I use many new facts I have discovered- but I don't explain any of these facts here- because all facts are explained and proved in the paper discussions. First Question Can The Space Be Created By Light Beam Energy? What Machine Can Use The Light Beam Energy To Create The Space? Young Interference uses two light beams for coherence of light- and this coherence produced the interference (bright fringes and dark fringes)- if we accept the space is similar to the dark fringes- that tells- the space can be produced by the coherence of light (If we put a small creature as ant inside a dark fringe this creature will see this dark fringe as space around it) Second Question How Can Young Interference Be A Model For The Solar System Design? Young Interference Is Consisted Of Bright Fringes And Dark Fringes And - if Young interference is a model for the solar system- that tells 1 We See The Bright Fringes As Planets (The Fringe Breadth Is Comparable With The Planet Diameter) 2 We See The Dark Fringes As These Planets Orbits (Space)- 3 The bright fringes order is typical to the solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto 4 Planet velocity is defined based on its order because (V2=0.8 V1)- means- each planet velocity = (0.8) of its previous neighbor velocity (for example The Earth velocity 29.8 km/s x (0.8) = 24.1 km/s Mars velocity error 1%) – means- the order defines each planet velocity- that answers the question (why does planet orbit define its velocity?) NOW- let's compare between Young Interference and the solar system design 1 The planets distribution is typical to Young Interference-because- the greatest diameter planet "Jupiter" is found in the middle and the other planets diameters are decreased gradually on both sides typical to the fringes distribution in Young interference- 2 Please remember- I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated to its current orbit by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury- Mars- Venus- The Earth) the diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury typical to Young Interference (Also the outer planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Pluto)- 3 If Young Interference can be used as a model for the solar system that means we see the bright fringes as planets (why? the answer is later) Third Question What Are The Useful Results We Get If (Young Interference Is A Model For The Solar System Design)? we get two useful results which are First result- this proves the conclusion tells (Light Can Move Into The Past)- which can enable us to create the time machine (explained later)(CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow
Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c E-mail [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/ Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
#quadratic formula#basic math#basic math notes#algebra notes#pre-algebra#pre-algebra notes#prealgebra notes#prealgebra#prealgebra ex#pre-algebra ex#pre-algebra example#algebra ex#algebra example#quadratic formula example#quadratic formula ex
1 note
·
View note
Text
Subsitution & Elimination
Substitution

Substitution

Elimination

Elimination

Trick:
Solveable —> solution (x,y)
0=0 —> parallel lines
0=-1 —-> no solution, no intersection
0 notes
Text
I have a strategy
#for true false questions on linear algebra theory#if I can give an example proving it right#it’s true#if I can’t think of anything#it’s false#most of the time they make it that finding a counter is super hard#so if you just don’t have an answer#it’s not true#I think#I tend to do better at these than the computation bc I spend more time here#tmrw’s a computation grind day#.text
0 notes
Text
What is it about algebraic geometry that makes it staunchly refuse to make sense
#it's like#i can in principle list lemmas stated so far and reproduce their proofs#that does not suffice to have an idea why they're true or what's going on#maybe it's the unfamiliarity with requisite results from algebra?#but those are....not exciting per se?#or like. not obvious what any given result gives us in terms of further usability#or.....some ~intuitive understanding of how these structures _work_#hm#perhaps this textbook is also not very good#and also it might work better to rotate more examples in my head#worked nicely for Nakayama's lemma at least#math
0 notes
Text
We illustrate a situation that requires use of the quadratic formula in worked example 11.16.
"Chemistry" 2e - Blackman, A., Bottle, S., Schmid, S., Mocerino, M., Wille, U.
0 notes