#additive manufacturing software
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
#quantumcomputing#3d printing#cfd#additive manufacturing#cfd simulation#hvac services#3d printing simulation software#simulation#technology#aerospace engineering#additive manufacturing software#3d sculpting#blender#ai generated#artificial intelligence
0 notes
Text
The Rise of 3D Scanning and Design in Bangalore: Revolutionizing Manufacturing with Trumpf TruPrint Metal 3D Printers
Bangalore, known as India’s Silicon Valley, has embraced advanced manufacturing technologies, making it a leading center for 3D scanning and design services. This city has become a magnet for technology-driven industries, particularly in the areas of metal 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Among the standout technologies in the market are Trumpf TruPrint metal 3D printers, which are widely regarded for their precision, reliability, and scalability. Let's explore the role of 3D scanning and design in Bangalore and how the Trumpf TruPrint series is reshaping the city’s manufacturing landscape.
The Role of 3D Scanning and Design in Bangalore
As industries increasingly prioritize precision, customization, and efficiency, 3D scanning and design services in Bangalore have emerged as critical components of the manufacturing ecosystem. With 3D scanning technology, companies can capture precise measurements of physical objects and convert them into digital 3D models. These digital models can be modified, analyzed, and used as templates for prototyping or production.
The integration of 3D scanning and design into the manufacturing workflow is revolutionizing quality control and reverse engineering. For example, in sectors like aerospace and healthcare, even the smallest error can have significant consequences, making accuracy essential. By incorporating 3D scanning, companies in Bangalore can compare manufactured parts to original CAD models, identify discrepancies, and ensure that parts meet exact specifications. Furthermore, 3D scanning plays a crucial role in the process of reverse engineering, allowing companies to recreate parts that lack detailed designs or have been modified over time.
Trumpf TruPrint Series: Precision Metal 3D Printing
When it comes to metal 3D printing, the Trumpf TruPrint series is renowned for its robust design, advanced features, and adaptability across various industries. The Trumpf TruPrint line includes multiple models, each tailored to meet different production needs, from prototyping to high-volume manufacturing. Here, we’ll explore the key features and applications of the Trumpf TruPrint 1000, 2000, 3000, and 5000 metal 3D printers.
1. Trumpf TruPrint 1000 Metal 3D Printer: Compact and Efficient
The Best Trumpf TruPrint 1000 Metal 3D Printer is ideal for companies seeking a compact and highly efficient metal 3D printer. This model is perfect for small and medium-sized parts and is widely used for prototyping and small-batch production in industries such as dental, medical, and jewelry manufacturing. With a user-friendly interface and a modular design, the TruPrint 1000 enables quick setup and easy handling, making it accessible to businesses that are new to metal 3D printing.
Despite its small footprint, the TruPrint 1000 offers impressive precision and build quality, ensuring reliable results even for intricate designs. This model is also known for its energy efficiency, reducing operational costs and making it an economical choice for companies in Bangalore that require smaller-scale, high-quality production.
2. Trumpf TruPrint 2000 Metal 3D Printer: Superior Quality with Laser Precision
The Best Trumpf TruPrint 2000 Metal 3D Printer is designed for industries that require superior precision and part quality. With a smaller laser spot diameter than the TruPrint 1000, the TruPrint 2000 can produce parts with fine detail and excellent surface quality, making it an ideal choice for industries such as aerospace, automotive, and medical devices.
The TruPrint 2000 also features dual-laser technology, enabling it to produce parts faster by allowing simultaneous printing of two areas. This dual-laser capability enhances productivity and reduces lead times, making it well-suited for companies in Bangalore seeking to optimize production cycles without compromising on quality. The TruPrint 2000’s closed powder cycle further ensures safety and reduces material wastage, aligning with sustainability goals and reducing costs.
3. Trumpf TruPrint 3000 Metal 3D Printer: Versatile and Scalable for Industrial Applications
The Best Trumpf TruPrint 3000 Metal 3D Printer takes metal 3D printing to the next level with its versatility and scalability. This mid-sized 3D printer is designed for industrial applications, capable of producing parts with complex geometries and larger build volumes. The TruPrint 3000 is popular among automotive, aerospace, and engineering companies due to its flexibility and ability to handle a wide range of materials.
A standout feature of the TruPrint 3000 is its external part and powder management system, which allows for continuous production and minimal downtime. This feature is especially valuable for companies in Bangalore looking to scale production and integrate metal 3D printing into their existing workflows seamlessly. The TruPrint 3000 also supports automation, enabling businesses to increase productivity and optimize labor resources.
4. Trumpf TruPrint 5000 Metal 3D Printer: High-Volume Production with Automated Workflow
At the top of the TruPrint series is the Best Trumpf TruPrint 5000 Metal 3D Printer, a powerhouse designed for high-volume production and complex industrial applications. This model is equipped with a multi-laser system, featuring three lasers that work simultaneously, significantly reducing production time for large-scale projects. This capability makes the TruPrint 5000 ideal for industries such as automotive and aerospace, where large, complex metal parts are in demand.
The TruPrint 5000 offers a range of automation options, including automated substrate plate changes and powder and parts handling, making it suitable for round-the-clock production. Its advanced software integrates seamlessly with manufacturing execution systems, enabling remote monitoring and control. For companies in Bangalore seeking a high-throughput solution for metal 3D printing, the TruPrint 5000 offers unmatched productivity and efficiency.
Impact of 3D Scanning and Trumpf TruPrint Metal 3D Printers on Bangalore’s Manufacturing Landscape
The combination of 3D scanning, design, and Trumpf TruPrint metal 3D printing technology is transforming Bangalore’s manufacturing landscape. By adopting these technologies, companies in Bangalore can streamline their workflows, reduce material costs, and improve the quality and speed of production. Industries that rely on precision and customization, such as aerospace, healthcare, and automotive, benefit immensely from these innovations.
Moreover, the availability of 3D scanning and design services in Bangalore allows businesses to access the latest tools without the need for heavy investments in equipment. Local service providers are helping companies integrate these technologies seamlessly, offering customized solutions tailored to specific industry needs.
Conclusion: The Future of Additive Manufacturing in Bangalore
As Bangalore continues to evolve as a technology hub, the demand for advanced 3D scanning, design, and metal 3D printing services will only grow. The Trumpf TruPrint series, with its cutting-edge features and versatility, is well-suited to meet the diverse needs of Bangalore’s industries, from small-scale prototyping to high-volume production.
With a growing ecosystem of additive manufacturing solutions and a strong emphasis on innovation, Bangalore is poised to become a leader in the global additive manufacturing sector. The synergy between 3D scanning and design services and Trumpf TruPrint metal 3D printers is shaping the future of manufacturing in the region, allowing companies to push the boundaries of what’s possible and delivering unprecedented levels of precision and efficiency in their production processes.
#Metal 3D printing in Bangalore#Additive Manufacturing in Bangalore#Additive Manufacturing Companies in Bangalore#3D Printing Service in Bangalore#3D Scanning Services in Bangalore#3D Scanning And Design in Bangalore#Best Trumpf TruPrint 1000 Metal 3D Printer#Best Trumpf TruPrint 2000 Metal 3D Printer#Best Trumpf TruPrint 3000 Metal 3D Printer#Best Trumpf TruPrint 5000 Metal 3D Printer#Best FabMachines F3 3D Printer in Bangalore#Best FabMachines F3 Pro 3D Printer in Bangalore#FabMachines G3 3D Printer in Bangalore#FabMachines G3 Pro 3D Printer in Bangalore#Simufact Manufacturing Software
0 notes
Photo
Stark buildings emitted a faint digital hum as we traversed the unfamiliar cityscape. It seemed as if we were lost, but then suddenly we spotted a sleek, shimmering behemoth, standing in contrast to the other buildings. We knew its name, Metafold, and its purpose. It was a firm devoted to the almost magical intersection of geometry and technology. Inside, a hushed tension filled the building. Everywhere we looked, there was a quiet excitement, as if they all knew something great was about to happen. Suddenly, we heard the roar of distant cheers; they had just closed a funding round. An enormous 1.78 million dollars had been raised in a single day. We felt the energy in the air; finally, the world had begun to take notice. Metafold had invented a new form of art, a kind of 3D printing that could create forms of beauty and complexity that had never been seen before. To the workers of this fledgling company, it was a kind of salvation, a way forward and a way out. We could feel the hope that existed in the building, and we felt proud to have been part of it.
#3D Printing#3D Printing Metamaterials#3D Software#Business#3D printing funding#3D printing investment funding#Canada#complex geometries#Design for Additive Manufacturing (DFAM)#Elissa Ross#lattice#lattice geometry#Lightcycle Engine API#Metafold#saas#seed funding#software as a service#fault
0 notes
Text
The US Copyright Office frees the McFlurry
I'll be in TUCSON, AZ from November 8-10: I'm the GUEST OF HONOR at the TUSCON SCIENCE FICTION CONVENTION.
I have spent a quarter century obsessed with the weirdest corner of the weirdest section of the worst internet law on the US statute books: Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the 1998 law that makes it a felony to help someone change how their own computer works so it serves them, rather than a distant corporation.
Under DMCA 1201, giving someone a tool to "bypass an access control for a copyrighted work" is a felony punishable by a 5-year prison sentence and a $500k fine – for a first offense. This law can refer to access controls for traditional copyrighted works, like movies. Under DMCA 1201, if you help someone with photosensitive epilepsy add a plug-in to the Netflix player in their browser that blocks strobing pictures that can trigger seizures, you're a felon:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2017Jul/0005.html
But software is a copyrighted work, and everything from printer cartridges to car-engine parts have software in them. If the manufacturer puts an "access control" on that software, they can send their customers (and competitors) to prison for passing around tools to help them fix their cars or use third-party ink.
Now, even though the DMCA is a copyright law (that's what the "C" in DMCA stands for, after all); and even though blocking video strobes, using third party ink, and fixing your car are not copyright violations, the DMCA can still send you to prison, for a long-ass time for doing these things, provided the manufacturer designs their product so that using it the way that suits you best involves getting around an "access control."
As you might expect, this is quite a tempting proposition for any manufacturer hoping to enshittify their products, because they know you can't legally disenshittify them. These access controls have metastasized into every kind of device imaginable.
Garage-door openers:
https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/09/lead-me-not-into-temptation/#chamberlain
Refrigerators:
https://pluralistic.net/2020/06/12/digital-feudalism/#filtergate
Dishwashers:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/05/03/cassette-rewinder/#disher-bob
Treadmills:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/22/vapescreen/#jane-get-me-off-this-crazy-thing
Tractors:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/23/reputation-laundry/#deere-john
Cars:
https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/28/edison-not-tesla/#demon-haunted-world
Printers:
https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/07/inky-wretches/#epson-salty
And even printer paper:
https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/16/unauthorized-paper/#dymo-550
DMCA 1201 is the brainchild of Bruce Lehmann, Bill Clinton's Copyright Czar, who was repeatedly warned that cancerous proliferation this was the foreseeable, inevitable outcome of his pet policy. As a sop to his critics, Lehman added a largely ornamental safety valve to his law, ordering the US Copyright Office to invite submissions every three years petitioning for "use exemptions" to the blanket ban on circumventing access-controls.
I call this "ornamental" because if the Copyright Office thinks that, say, it should be legal for you to bypass an access control to use third-party ink in your printer, or a third-party app store in your phone, all they can do under DMCA 1201 is grant you the right to use a circumvention tool. But they can't give you the right to acquire that tool.
I know that sounds confusing, but that's only because it's very, very stupid. How stupid? Well, in 2001, the US Trade Representative arm-twisted the EU into adopting its own version of this law (Article 6 of the EUCD), and in 2003, Norway added the law to its lawbooks. On the eve of that addition, I traveled to Oslo to debate the minister involved:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/10/28/clintons-ghost/#felony-contempt-of-business-model
The minister praised his law, explaining that it gave blind people the right to bypass access controls on ebooks so that they could feed them to screen readers, Braille printers, and other assistive tools. OK, I said, but how do they get the software that jailbreaks their ebooks so they can make use of this exemption? Am I allowed to give them that tool?
No, the minister said, you're not allowed to do that, that would be a crime.
Is the Norwegian government allowed to give them that tool? No. How about a blind rights advocacy group? No, not them either. A university computer science department? Nope. A commercial vendor? Certainly not.
No, the minister explained, under his law, a blind person would be expected to personally reverse engineer a program like Adobe E-Reader, in hopes of discovering a defect that they could exploit by writing a program to extract the ebook text.
Oh, I said. But if a blind person did manage to do this, could they supply that tool to other blind people?
Well, no, the minister said. Each and every blind person must personally – without any help from anyone else – figure out how to reverse-engineer the ebook program, and then individually author their own alternative reader program that worked with the text of their ebooks.
That is what is meant by a use exemption without a tools exemption. It's useless. A sick joke, even.
The US Copyright Office has been valiantly holding exemptions proceedings every three years since the start of this century, and they've granted many sensible exemptions, including ones to benefit people with disabilities, or to let you jailbreak your phone, or let media professors extract video clips from DVDs, and so on. Tens of thousands of person-hours have been flushed into this pointless exercise, generating a long list of things you are now technically allowed to do, but only if you are a reverse-engineering specialist type of computer programmer who can manage the process from beginning to end in total isolation and secrecy.
But there is one kind of use exception the Copyright Office can grant that is potentially game-changing: an exemption for decoding diagnostic codes.
You see, DMCA 1201 has been a critical weapon for the corporate anti-repair movement. By scrambling error codes in cars, tractors, appliances, insulin pumps, phones and other devices, manufacturers can wage war on independent repair, depriving third-party technicians of the diagnostic information they need to figure out how to fix your stuff and keep it going.
This is bad enough in normal times, but during the acute phase of the covid pandemic, hospitals found themselves unable to maintain their ventilators because of access controls. Nearly all ventilators come from a single med-tech monopolist, Medtronic, which charges hospitals hundreds of dollars to dispatch their own repair technicians to fix its products. But when covid ended nearly all travel, Medtronic could no longer provide on-site calls. Thankfully, an anonymous hacker started building homemade (illegal) circumvention devices to let hospital technicians fix the ventilators themselves, improvising housings for them from old clock radios, guitar pedals and whatever else was to hand, then mailing them anonymously to hospitals:
https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/10/flintstone-delano-roosevelt/#medtronic-again
Once a manufacturer monopolizes repair in this way, they can force you to use their official service depots, charging you as much as they'd like; requiring you to use their official, expensive replacement parts; and dictating when your gadget is "too broken to fix," forcing you to buy a new one. That's bad enough when we're talking about refusing to fix a phone so you buy a new one – but imagine having a spinal injury and relying on a $100,000 exoskeleton to get from place to place and prevent muscle wasting, clots, and other immobility-related conditions, only to have the manufacturer decide that the gadget is too old to fix and refusing to give you the technical assistance to replace a watch battery so that you can get around again:
https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/26/24255074/former-jockey-michael-straight-exoskeleton-repair-battery
When the US Copyright Office grants a use exemption for extracting diagnostic codes from a busted device, they empower repair advocates to put that gadget up on a workbench and torture it into giving up those codes. The codes can then be integrated into an unofficial diagnostic tool, one that can make sense of the scrambled, obfuscated error codes that a device sends when it breaks – without having to unscramble them. In other words, only the company that makes the diagnostic tool has to bypass an access control, but the people who use that tool later do not violate DMCA 1201.
This is all relevant this month because the US Copyright Office just released the latest batch of 1201 exemptions, and among them is the right to circumvent access controls "allowing for repair of retail-level food preparation equipment":
https://publicknowledge.org/public-knowledge-ifixit-free-the-mcflurry-win-copyright-office-dmca-exemption-for-ice-cream-machines/
While this covers all kinds of food prep gear, the exemption request – filed by Public Knowledge and Ifixit – was inspired by the bizarre war over the tragically fragile McFlurry machine. These machines – which extrude soft-serve frozen desserts – are notoriously failure-prone, with 5-16% of them broken at any given time. Taylor, the giant kitchen tech company that makes the machines, charges franchisees a fortune to repair them, producing a steady stream of profits for the company.
This sleazy business prompted some ice-cream hackers to found a startup called Kytch, a high-powered automation and diagnostic tool that was hugely popular with McDonald's franchisees (the gadget was partially designed by the legendary hardware hacker Andrew "bunnie" Huang!).
In response, Taylor played dirty, making a less-capable clone of the Kytch, trying to buy Kytch out, and teaming up with McDonald's corporate to bombard franchisees with legal scare-stories about the dangers of using a Kytch to keep their soft-serve flowing, thanks to DMCA 1201:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/20/euthanize-rentier-enablers/#cold-war
Kytch isn't the only beneficiary of the new exemption: all kinds of industrial kitchen equipment is covered. In upholding the Right to Repair, the Copyright Office overruled objections of some of its closest historical allies, the Entertainment Software Association, Motion Picture Association, and Recording Industry Association of America, who all sided with Taylor and McDonald's and opposed the exemption:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/10/us-copyright-office-frees-the-mcflurry-allowing-repair-of-ice-cream-machines/
This is literally the only useful kind of DMCA 1201 exemption the Copyright Office can grant, and the fact that they granted it (along with a similar exemption for medical devices) is a welcome bright spot. But make no mistake, the fact that we finally found a narrow way in which DMCA 1201 can be made slightly less stupid does not redeem this outrageous law. It should still be repealed and condemned to the scrapheap of history.
Tor Books as just published two new, free LITTLE BROTHER stories: VIGILANT, about creepy surveillance in distance education; and SPILL, about oil pipelines and indigenous landback.
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2024/10/28/mcbroken/#my-milkshake-brings-all-the-lawyers-to-the-yard
Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg
CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en
#pluralistic#dmca 1201#dmca#digital millennium copyright act#anticircumvention#triennial hearings#mcflurry#right to repair#r2r#mcbroken#automotive#mass question 1#us copyright office#copyright office#copyright#paracopyright#copyfight#kytch#diagnostic codes#public knowledge
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
It starts with him
What was once a promise of technology to allow us to automate and analyze the environments in our physical spaces is now a heap of broken ideas and broken products. Technology products have been deployed en masse, our personal data collected and sold without our consent, and then abandoned as soon as companies strip mined all the profit they thought they could wring out. And why not? They already have our money.
The Philips Hue, poster child of the smart home, used to work entirely on your local network. After all, do you really need to connect to the Internet to control the lights in your own house? Well you do now!Philips has announced it will require cloud accounts for all users—including users who had already purchased the hardware thinking they wouldn’t need an account (and the inevitable security breaches that come with it) to use their lights.
Will you really trust any promises from a company that unilaterally forces a change like this on you? Does the user actually benefit from any of this?
Matter in its current version … doesn’t really help resolve the key issue of the smart home, namely that most companies view smart homes as a way to sell more individual devices and generate recurring revenue.
It keeps happening. Stuff you bought isn’t yours because the company you bought it from can take away features and force you to do things you don’t want or need to do—ultimately because they want to make more money off of you. It’s frustrating, it’s exhausting, and it’s discouraging.
And it has stopped IoT for the rest of us in its tracks. Industrial IoT is doing great—data collection is the point for the customer. But the consumer electronics business model does not mesh with the expected lifespan of home products, and so enshittification began as soon as those first warranties ran out.
How can we reset the expectations we have of connected devices, so that they are again worthy of our trust and money? Before we can bring the promise back, we must deweaponize the technology.
Guidelines for the hardware producer
What we can do as engineers and business owners is make sure the stuff we’re building can’t be wielded as a lever against our own customers, and to show consumers how things could be. These are things we want consumers to expect and demand of manufacturers.
Control
Think local
Decouple
Open interfaces
Be a good citizen
1) Control over firmware updates.
You scream, “What about security updates!” But a company taking away a feature you use or requiring personal data for no reason is arguably a security flaw.
We were once outraged when intangible software products went from something that remained unchanging on your computer, to a cloud service, with all the ephemerality that term promises. Now they’re coming for our tangible possessions.
No one should be able to do this with hardware that you own. Breaking functionality is entirely what security updates are supposed to prevent! A better checklist for firmware updates:
Allow users to control when and what updates they want to apply.
Be thorough and clear as to what the update does and provide the ability to downgrade if needed.
Separate security updates from feature additions or changes.
Never force an update unless you are sure you want to accept (financial) responsibility for whatever you inadvertently break.
Consider that you are sending software updates to other people’s hardware. Ask them for permission (which includes respecting “no”) before touching their stuff!
2) Do less on the Internet.
A large part of the security issues with IoT products stem from the Internet connectivity itself. Any server in the cloud has an attack surface, and now that means your physical devices do.
The solution here is “do less”. All functionality should be local-only unless it has a really good reason to use the Internet. Remotely controlling your lights while in your own house does not require the cloud and certainly does not require an account with your personal information attached to it. Limit the use of the cloud to only the functions that cannot work without it.
As a bonus, less networked functionality means fewer maintenance costs for you.
3) Decouple products and services.
It’s fine to need a cloud service. But making a product that requires a specific cloud service is a guarantee that it can be enshittified at any point later on, with no alternative for the user owner.
Design products to be able to interact with other servers. You have sold someone hardware and now they own it, not you. They have a right to keep using it even if you shut down or break your servers. Allow them the ability to point their devices to another service. If you want them to use your service, make it worthwhile enough for them to choose you.
Finally, if your product has a heavy reliance on the cloud to work, consider enabling your users to self-host their own cloud tooling if they so desire. A lot of people are perfectly capable of doing this on their own and can help others do the same.
4) Use open and standard protocols and interfaces.
Most networked devices have no reason to use proprietary protocols, interfaces, and data formats. There are open standards with communities and software available for almost anything you could want to do. Re-inventing the wheel just wastes resources and makes it harder for users to keep using their stuff after you’re long gone. We did this with Twine, creating an encrypted protocol that minimized chatter, because we needed to squeeze battery life out of WiFi back when there weren’t good options.
If you do have a need for a proprietary protocol (and there are valid reasons to do so):
Document it.
If possible, have a fallback option that uses an open standard.
Provide tooling and software to interact with your custom protocols, at the very least enough for open source developers to be able to work with it. This goes for physical interfaces as much as it does for cloud protocols.
If the interface requires a custom-made, expensive, and/or hard-to-find tool to use, then consider using something else that is commonly available and off the shelf instead.
5) Be a good citizen.
Breaking paid-for functionality on other people’s stuff is inherently unethical. Consider not doing this! Enshittification is not a technical problem, it is a behavioral one. Offer better products that are designed to resist enshittification, and resist it yourself in everything you do.
Nothing forced Philips to do what they are doing: a human made a decision to do it. They could have just as easily chosen not to. With Twine’s server lock-in, at least we chose to keep it running, for 12 years now. Consider that you can still make a decent living by being honest and ethical towards the people who are, by purchasing your products, paying for your lifestyle.
We didn’t get here by accident. Humans made choices that brought us to this point, and we can’t blame anyone for being turned off by it. But we can choose to do better. We can design better stuff. And we can choose not to mess things up after the fact.
We’re putting this into practice with Pickup. (We also think that part of an IoT reset is giving users the creative freedom of a general-purpose device.) If you’re looking for something better and our product can fill a need you have, consider backing us. We cannot claim to be perfect or have all of the answers, but we are absolutely going to try. The status quo sucks. Let’s do something about it.
Published October 15, 2023 By Jeremy Billheimer
137 notes
·
View notes
Text
The thing about cybersecurity within the context of dbh is that it is entirely possible that a significant percentage of things androids don't even need to "hack" as security measures in place of existing devices are made to stop humans from hacking them. ANDROIDS, however, may be made to be able to interact and exchange data with those devices BY DEFAULT, especially if device's manufacturer is CyberLife or one if it's filials/partners (I think CyberLife as a mega corporation is like Nestle that owns like 20+ different sub-companies like Maggi, Purina, Nescafé, Lóreal, Garnier, Aqua Panna... just to name a few)
Especially considering how androids are this really closed-up system that wasn't made to be accessed like computers. Quite literally everything about their inner software and ways to manipulate it is probably extremely proprietary, so end-user has absolutely no way to see what exactly androids are exchanging with other devices or what is it they are processing at the moment and how. Thing is, the communication between an android and other devices probably is encrypted but like, between androids and devices, so humans can only detect the fact of some packets being exchanged but can't really see the content of any of it. After all, androids are likely made to be easily compatible with all those smart home suite, but because humans aren't actually granted admin/root rights to their androids, it's "secure" for androids (any CyberLife android for that matter) to communicate with all those devices without additional authorization because they are already seen as authorized. Even those people who deal with android support and maintenance are probably only granted a fraction of actual admin rights, for troubleshooting and things like that.
Back to androids smoothly communicating with other smart devices. Even if their network traffic is visible, it is possible to hide the fact of them communicating by making it look like androids are communicating with other "middle-man" devices that have access to an actual target. So, in plain terms it means that android can get access to, let's say your phone by communicating to your smart air-conditionair or something that (of course) has its own app on your phone and air-conditionair is allowed to send data to your phone. So it will look like android is exchanging data with air-conditionair and air-conditionair is exchanging data with your phone, but in reality it's this android communicating with your phone.
66 notes
·
View notes
Note
Why is it so difficult for a fourth competitor to enter the console market? Like what are some of the biggest challenges and obstacles?
Any company that wants to release a premium game console basically needs to make an enormous investment that will probably not pay off for years. There are three major requirements for this process.
First, the company must develop gaming hardware. This is generally an expensive process - building anything physical is costly, time-consuming, and is a moving target because competitors aren't stopping either. The hardware must be manufactured and factories equipped and set up for mass production.
Second, they must develop software development tools for both themselves and for external developers to use in order to build games for that console. This requires a significant internal development team to build drivers and software interfaces. Beyond this, they likely need to develop their own flagship game (or more) to launch with the console. That generally costs at least $50 million for a AAA-fidelity game and at least two years of lead time to build alongside the hardware development.
Third, they must secure investment from third party developers to build games for that console. Using that $50 million price tag for a game, we'd need at least four or five additional games to launch with in order to entice players to buy in - no one buys a game console without games to play on it. If they want four launch titles to go along with the console launch, that requires at least $200 million in investment from others.
There are only a handful of companies in the world that have the kind of money, technology, and resources needed to make such a thing happen and some of them already have game consoles. The others look at the market, at the cost of entry just to compete (not necessarily even to pull ahead), at the expected returns on investment, and it's no surprise they choose to invest their money in other opportunities that seem more likely to bear fruit.
[Join us on Discord] and/or [Support us on Patreon]
Got a burning question you want answered?
Short questions: Ask a Game Dev on Twitter
Long questions: Ask a Game Dev on Tumblr
Frequent Questions: The FAQ
27 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hello. So what's the deal with computer chips? Let's say, for example, that I wanted to build a brand new Sega Genesis. Ignoring firmware and software, what's stopping me from dissecting their proprietary chips and reverse-engineering them to make new ones? It's just electric connections and such inside, isn't it? If I match the pin ins and outs, shouldn't it be easy? So why don't people do it?
The answer is that people totally used to do this, there's several examples of chips being cloned and used to build compatible third-party hardware, the most famous two examples being famiclones/NESclones and Intel 808X clones.
AMD is now a major processor manufacturer, but they took off in the 70's by reverse-engineering Intel's 8080 processor. Eventually they were called in to officially produce additional 8086 chips under license to meet burgeoning demand for IBM PC's, but that was almost a decade later if I remember correctly.
There were a ton of other 808X clones, like the Soviet-made pin-compatible K1810VM86. Almost anyone with a chip fab was cloning Intel chips back in the 80's, a lot of it was in the grey area of reverse engineering the chips.
Companies kept cloning Intel processors well into the 386 days, but eventually the processors got too complicated to easily clone, and so only companies who licensed designs could make them, slowly reducing the field down to Intel, AMD, and Via, who still exist! Via's CPU division currently works on the Zhaoxin x86_64 processors as part of the ongoing attempts to homebrew a Chinese-only x86 processor.
I wrote about NES clones a while ago, in less detail, so here's that if you want to read it:
Early famiclones worked by essentially reverse-engineering or otherwise cloning the individual chips inside an NES/famicom, and just reconstructing a compatible device from there. Those usually lacked any of the DRM lockout chips built into the original NES, and were often very deeply strange, with integrated clones of official peripherals like the keyboard and mouse simply hardwired directly into the system.
These were sold all over the world, but mostly in developing economies or behind the Iron Curtain where official Nintendo stuff was harder to find. I had a Golden China brand Famiclone growing up, which was a common famiclone brand around South Africa.
Eventually the cost of chip fabbing came down and all those individual chips from the NES were crammed onto one cheap piece of silicon and mass produced for pennies each, the NES-on-a-chip. With this you could turn anything into an NES, and now you could buy a handheld console that ran pirated NES game for twenty dollars in a corner store. In 2002. Lots of edutainment mini-PC's for children were powered by these, although now those are losing out to Linux (and now Android) powered tablets a la Leapfrog.
Nintendo's patents on their hardware designs expired throughout the early 2000's and so now the hardware design was legally above board, even if the pirated games weren't. You can still find companies making systems that rely on these NES chips, and there are still software houses specializing in novel NES games.
Why doesn't this really happen anymore? Well, mostly CPU's and their accoutrements are too complicated. Companies still regularly clone their competitors simpler chips all the time, and I actually don't know if Genesis clones exist, it's only a Motorola 68000k, but absolutely no one is cloning a modern Intel or AMD processor.
The die of a Motorola 68000 (1979)
A classic Intel 8080 is basically the kind of chip you learn about in entry level electrical engineering, a box with logic gates that may be complicated, but pretty straightforwardly fetches things from memory, decodes, executes, and stores. A modern processor is a magic pinball machine that does things backwards and out of order if it'll get you even a little speedup, as Mickens puts it in The Slow Winter:
I think that it used to be fun to be a hardware architect. Anything that you invented would be amazing, and the laws of physics were actively trying to help you succeed. Your friend would say, “I wish that we could predict branches more accurately,” and you’d think, “maybe we can leverage three bits of state per branch to implement a simple saturating counter,” and you’d laugh and declare that such a stupid scheme would never work, but then you’d test it and it would be 94% accurate, and the branches would wake up the next morning and read their newspapers and the headlines would say OUR WORLD HAS BEEN SET ON FIRE. You’d give your buddy a high-five and go celebrate at the bar, and then you’d think, “I wonder if we can make branch predictors even more accurate,” and the next day you’d start XOR’ing the branch’s PC address with a shift register containing the branch’s recent branching history, because in those days, you could XOR anything with anything and get something useful, and you test the new branch predictor, and now you’re up to 96% accuracy, and the branches call you on the phone and say OK, WE GET IT, YOU DO NOT LIKE BRANCHES, but the phone call goes to your voicemail because you’re too busy driving the speed boats and wearing the monocles that you purchased after your promotion at work. You go to work hung-over, and you realize that, during a drunken conference call, you told your boss that your processor has 32 registers when it only has 8, but then you realize THAT YOU CAN TOTALLY LIE ABOUT THE NUMBER OF PHYSICAL REGISTERS, and you invent a crazy hardware mapping scheme from virtual registers to physical ones, and at this point, you start seducing the spouses of the compiler team, because it’s pretty clear that compilers are a thing of the past, and the next generation of processors will run English-level pseudocode directly.
Die shot of a Ryzen 5 2600 core complex (2019)
Nowadays to meet performance parity you can't just be pin-compatible and run at the right frequency, you have to really do a ton of internal logical optimization that is extremely opaque to the reverse engineer. As mentioned, Via is making the Zhaoxin stuff, they are licensed, they have access to all the documentation needed to make an x86_64 processor, and their performance is still barely half of what Intel and AMD can do.
Companies still frequently clone each others simpler chips, charge controllers, sensor filters, etc. but the big stuff is just too complicated.
182 notes
·
View notes
Text
Updated B-52 electronic warfare suite will be tested in flight in 2024
Fernando Valduga By Fernando Valduga 03/29/2024 - 10:36 in Military
Flying through the skies since the 1950s, the B-52 Stratofortress is a U.S. Air Force (USAF) workhorse and a lasting symbol of American military power. The eight-engine giant has unique capabilities unparalleled to any other American warplane - which is why, after more than 70 years of service, it continues to play a vital role in the defense and national security strategy of the U.S. And thanks to a collaboration between L3Harris and USAF, this iconic aircraft is prepared to remain ready for the mission against highly sophisticated emerging threats in the coming decades.
Under a 10-year contract worth $947 million granted in 2021, L3Harris is upgrading and improving the AN/ALQ-172 electronic war self-protection system (EW), which protects the B-52 and air crews from a wide range of electronic threats. Our current work is based on decades of experience in providing critical technology as a Manufacturer of Original Equipment of the AN/ALQ-172 systems for the B-52 fleet. And combined with other ongoing modernization efforts, these updates will increase the relevance and reliability of the B-52 by the 2050s.
L3 Harris AN/ALQ-172 systems.
"Our opponents continue to evolve, facing advanced and far-reaching threats that challenge our ability to operate in contested environments," says Robert "Trip" Raymond, USAF's Program Leader for EW Technology Development at L3Harris. "It is essential that we provide our B-52 crew with the necessary tools to keep the B-52 relevant, lethal and survivable as the backbone of the strategic bomber force of the United States."
The effort of modernization and support - ALQ-172 Maintenance and Reliability System (MARS) - intends to do exactly that, increasing the average time between failures due to its modular design, while further improving the performance, maintenance capacity and reliability of the system. Thanks to an integrated and improved radio frequency system, crews will be able to simultaneously combat multiple radar threats that interfere with aircraft operations. And by replacing analog systems with more economical software solutions, USAF will be able to reduce the size of B-52 crews from 5 to 4. This frees up resources for additional mission-critical activities.
Ultimately, the updates will further help USAF in its Global Attack Mission and strengthen the effectiveness of the B-52 in modern warfare, while making future upgrades cheaper and easier.
"We are implementing affordable solutions that not only reduce costs, but also provide crews with more advanced protection against the most sophisticated threats detected by radar," said Jimmy Mercado, Program Director at L3Harris. "All this results in a more modern, efficient and effective aircraft, ready to dominate the future struggle."
USAF plans to conduct a test flight with the new electronic warfare capabilities of the B-52 in 2024.
Tags: Military AviationBoeing B-52H StratofortressEW - ELECTRONIC WARL3HarrisUSAF - United States Air Force / U.S. Air Force
Sharing
tweet
Fernando Valduga
Fernando Valduga
Aviation photographer and pilot since 1992, he has participated in several events and air operations, such as Cruzex, AirVenture, Dayton Airshow and FIDAE. He has works published in specialized aviation magazines in Brazil and abroad. He uses Canon equipment during his photographic work in the world of aviation.
Related news
AERONAUTICAL ACCIDENTS
VIDEO: Russian Su-27 fighter in flames falls into the sea near Sevastopol
29/03/2024 - 09:43
An F-16 fighter from the Norwegian air force lands at a Turkish air base in the Turkish city of Konya, in Central Anatolia. Norway, a member of NATO, will donate F-16 fighters to Ukraine, whose forces are involved in a difficult counter-offensive against Russia. (Photo: AP / Burhan Ozbilici)
MILITARY
Putin threatens to attack NATO air bases that host Ukrainian F-16 fighters
28/03/2024 - 21:56
MILITARY
Retirement from F-22 in 2030 is unlikely, since USAF intends to spend $7.8 billion on it before that
28/03/2024 - 21:16
MILITARY
IMAGES: Inaugural flight of the first light combat aircraft Tejas Mk 1A
28/03/2024 - 18:27
Dassault Rafale Fighter. (Photo: Katsuhiko Tokunaga)
MILITARY
France tests Thales' IRST system update for Rafale F4.2 update
28/03/2024 - 15:00
MILITARY
Dutch drone fleet MQ-9A Reaper will receive tactical updates
28/03/2024 - 14:00
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
AM PravaH: 3D Printing Software By Paanduv Applications
About the case study
This document will help you run your first AM PravaH LPBF simulation for macroscale and microstructure modeling. The case study is done for a standard alloy of titanium i.e. Ti6Al4V widely used for aerospace and biomedical applications. The simulation is carried out for a multilayer, multi-track scan pattern. The process parameters for the laser are e.g. 300 W power and e.g. 1 m/s scan speed. D4 sigma or spot dia is 0.1 mm.
Exclusive features of AM PravaH include consideration of 4 phases, with no explicit formulation for recoil pressure because evaporation and recoil pressure effects are included in the vapor phase. AM PravaH takes the thermophysical properties of the 4 phases as inputs along with the process parameters such as laser power, laser scan speed, shielding gas flow angle and velocity, layer thickness, spot diameter, preheating temperature, chamber initial pressure, and substrate initial height, scan pattern, particle size distribution and number of layers. Macroscale modeling will generate the following outputs melt pool dimensions, porosity %, thermal gradients, cooling rates, and thermal cycling plots. The Microstructure module generates outputs such as grain size distribution, angular chord length distribution, misorientation angles, and Euler angles. AM PravaH leverages the amalgamation of computational modeling solvers performing multiphase macroscale modeling, microstructure modeling, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) at a unified platform.
Keywords: Additive Manufacturing, 3D printing, Meltpool dynamics, porosity, thermal gradients, cooling rate, microstructure analysis, grain size, angular chord length, 3D printing software
AM PravaH: 3D printing simulation software
Introduction
AM PravaH is a 3D printing simulation software that facilitates end-to-end solutions for Additive Manufacturing physics-based simulations. Additive Manufacturing is commonly known as 3D printing. This 3D printing software is the “World’s first all-inclusive 3D computational software for Additive Manufacturing”. This 3D printing software will be useful for new alloy development, process parameter optimization, and reducing defects. Not to confuse with other 3D printing software that only performs thermomechanical analysis and deformation, AM PravaH software offers much more.
The software capabilities in brief are as follows:
There are three modules in AM PravaH
(i) Macroscale modeling
(ii) Microstructure analysis
(iii) Integrated Deep Learning (AI) module
Relevance of the 3D printing software; AM PravaH
This 3D printing software is relevant for researchers, academicians, and industry professionals from large and small-sized companies working in the Additive Manufacturing field. Where the primary focus is to understand the in-depth physics, microstructures, and effect of process parameters on the melt pool dynamics and distribution and the root cause of the defects. If we have a much closer look at the fundamental processes of 3D printing; this is a transient, very quick, and very dynamic process, which can't be captured with the naked eye. Therefore, AM PravaH simulations can be extremely useful in understanding this part.
Based on that, one makes important decisions such as
Which alloy is better?
How do we get solidification, melting, and cooling rates information?
what are the best operating process conditions to get a defect-free and dense part
What do the microstructures look like?
What are the grain distribution and mean grain size?
What are the melt pool sizes?
How much will be the porosity %?
#3d printing simulation software#3d printing software#additive manufacturing software#additive manufacturing#3d printing#simulation software for additive manufacturing
1 note
·
View note
Text
Why Should Every Small Business Invest in an AirPrint Label Printer?
In the evolving landscape of small business operations, efficiency and technology play pivotal roles in determining success. One technological advancement that has gained significant traction is the AirPrint label printer. These printers offer wireless printing solutions compatible with Apple devices, facilitating a streamlined, efficient, and cost-effective approach to handling labeling tasks. This article explores in-depth the reasons why every small business should invest in an AirPrint label printer.
What is AirPrint?
AirPrint is a wireless printing technology developed by Apple Inc. that allows users to print documents, photos, and other files directly from iOS and macOS devices without the need for drivers or additional software. The technology provides seamless integration with a wide range of printers, including label printers.
What is an AirPrint Label Printer?
An AirPrint label printer is a specialized printer designed to produce labels, capable of utilizing Apple’s AirPrint technology. This means that businesses can print labels directly from their iPhones, iPads, or Mac computers effortlessly.
The Role of Labeling in Small Businesses
Labeling is a fundamental aspect of business operations, especially for small businesses engaged in retail, manufacturing, warehousing, and shipping. Labels serve various purposes such as branding, inventory management, compliance with regulations, and providing essential product information.
Importance of Effective Labeling
Brand Recognition: Labels contribute to brand identity by displaying logos, brand colors, and consistent design elements.
Inventory Management: Effective labeling helps in tracking and managing inventory, reducing errors, and streamlining stock control.
Regulatory Compliance: Certain industries have strict labeling requirements for safety, health, and environmental standards.
Customer Information: Labels provide customers with important information about the product, such as ingredients, usage instructions, and expiration dates.
Benefits of AirPrint Label Printers for Small Businesses
Enhanced Convenience and Efficiency
One of the primary benefits of AirPrint label printers is the convenience they offer. The ability to print wirelessly from any Apple device means that business owners and employees can print labels on the go without needing to be tethered to a desktop computer or specific workstation.
Seamless Integration with Apple Ecosystem
For businesses that already use Apple products, an AirPrint label printer seamlessly integrates into the existing ecosystem. This integration simplifies workflows, as employees can print labels directly from their iPhones, iPads, or Macs without the need for additional software installations or complex setup processes.
Cost Savings
Investing in an AirPrint label printer can lead to significant cost savings in several ways:
Reduced Hardware and Maintenance Costs: Traditional label printers often require dedicated computers and complex setups, leading to higher hardware and maintenance expenses. AirPrint label printers eliminate the need for these additional components.
Lower Printing Costs: These printers often have lower operational costs, such as less expensive ink or toner, and they minimize waste through precise printing capabilities.
Time Savings: The ease of use and quick setup reduce the time spent on printing tasks, allowing employees to focus on more productive activities.
Flexibility and Mobility
Small businesses often require flexibility to adapt to changing needs and environments. AirPrint label printers support this by providing mobile printing capabilities. Employees can print labels from anywhere within the wireless network range, facilitating on-the-spot printing in retail stores, warehouses, or during offsite events.
Improved Productivity
With AirPrint label printers, businesses can significantly improve their productivity. The ability to print labels quickly and efficiently without dealing with complex setups or manual input reduces downtime and enhances operational efficiency.
High-Quality Output
AirPrint label printers are designed to produce high-quality labels that are clear, durable, and professional-looking. This is crucial for maintaining a positive brand image and ensuring that labels meet industry standards and customer expectations.
Scalability
As a small business grows, its labeling needs will also expand. AirPrint label printers are scalable solutions that can easily accommodate increased printing demands without requiring significant additional investments.
Use Cases of AirPrint Label Printers in Small Businesses
Retail Industry
In the retail industry, accurate and efficient labeling is critical for inventory management, pricing, and customer information. AirPrint label printers enable retailers to quickly print price tags, product labels, and promotional stickers directly from their Apple devices, enhancing the shopping experience and operational efficiency.
E-commerce and Shipping
For e-commerce businesses, timely and accurate shipping labels are essential. AirPrint label printers streamline the process of generating and printing shipping labels, reducing the risk of errors and ensuring that packages are dispatched promptly.
Food and Beverage Industry
In the food and beverage industry, labeling requirements are stringent due to health and safety regulations. AirPrint label printers provide the ability to produce high-quality, compliant labels that include ingredients, nutritional information, and expiration dates.
Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals
Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies rely on precise labeling for medications, patient records, and medical equipment. AirPrint label printers ensure that labels are clear, accurate, and easily readable, which is crucial for patient safety and regulatory compliance.
Manufacturing and Warehousing
Manufacturers and warehouses use labels for inventory tracking, production processes, and shipping. AirPrint label printers offer a flexible and efficient solution for printing barcodes, serial numbers, and shipping labels, improving overall productivity and accuracy.
Technical Features of AirPrint Label Printers
Wireless Connectivity
AirPrint label printers are equipped with advanced wireless connectivity options, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, enabling easy integration into existing network infrastructures.
Compatibility with Apple Devices
These printers are designed to work seamlessly with a wide range of Apple devices, including iPhones, iPads, and Mac computers, ensuring compatibility and ease of use.
User-Friendly Interface
Most AirPrint label printers feature intuitive interfaces and easy-to-navigate menus, making them accessible even for users with limited technical expertise.
High Resolution and Print Quality
AirPrint label printers are capable of producing high-resolution prints, ensuring that labels are crisp, clear, and professional-looking.
Versatility in Label Sizes and Materials
These printers support various label sizes and materials, providing flexibility to meet diverse labeling needs, from small product labels to large shipping labels.
How to Choose the Right AirPrint Label Printer for Your Business
Assessing Your Labeling Needs
Before investing in an AirPrint label printer, it’s important to assess your specific labeling needs. Consider the types of labels you require, the volume of printing, and any special requirements such as durability or compliance standards.
Evaluating Printer Specifications
When choosing an AirPrint label printer, pay attention to key specifications such as print speed, resolution, connectivity options, and supported label sizes. Ensure that the printer meets your business’s operational requirements.
Considering Total Cost of Ownership
Beyond the initial purchase price, consider the total cost of ownership, including costs for ink or toner, maintenance, and potential upgrades. Look for printers that offer a good balance between upfront costs and long-term savings.
Reading Reviews and Seeking Recommendations
Researching product reviews and seeking recommendations from other small business owners can provide valuable insights into the performance and reliability of different AirPrint label printers.
Implementing AirPrint Label Printers in Your Business
Setting Up Your Printer
Setting up an AirPrint label printer is typically straightforward. Connect the printer to your wireless network, ensure that your Apple devices are on the same network, and follow the manufacturer’s instructions for initial setup and calibration.
Training Employees
Provide training to employees on how to use the AirPrint label printer, including connecting their Apple devices, selecting print settings, and troubleshooting common issues.
Integrating with Existing Systems
Integrate the AirPrint label printer with your existing inventory management, point-of-sale, and shipping systems to streamline operations and enhance efficiency.
Monitoring and Maintenance
Regularly monitor the printer’s performance and conduct routine maintenance to ensure optimal functionality. Keep track of ink or toner levels and replace them as needed to avoid disruptions.
Future Trends and Innovations in Label Printing Technology
Advancements in Wireless Printing
As wireless technology continues to advance, we can expect even more seamless and efficient printing solutions. Future AirPrint label printers may offer enhanced connectivity options, faster print speeds, and greater compatibility with a wider range of devices.
Integration with IoT and Smart Devices
The integration of label printers with the Internet of Things (IoT) and smart devices could revolutionize labeling processes. Imagine printers that automatically print labels based on inventory levels, order statuses, or environmental conditions, further enhancing efficiency and accuracy.
Eco-Friendly Printing Solutions
Sustainability is becoming increasingly important for businesses. Future innovations in label printing may include more eco-friendly materials, energy-efficient printers, and recycling programs for used cartridges and labels.
Enhanced Security Features
As data security becomes a top priority, future label printers may incorporate advanced security features to protect sensitive information, ensuring that printed labels are secure and tamper-proof.
Conclusion
Investing in an AirPrint label printer offers numerous benefits for small businesses, from enhanced convenience and efficiency to cost savings and improved productivity. By understanding the importance of effective labeling and leveraging the capabilities of modern technology, businesses can streamline their operations, improve customer satisfaction, and stay competitive in an ever-evolving market.
When considering which AirPrint printer to choose for your business needs, Munbyn stands out as an exceptional option. Munbyn’s AirPrint label printers offer seamless integration with Apple devices, high-quality output, and user-friendly interfaces, making them ideal for small businesses looking to enhance their labeling processes.
Moreover, Munbyn’s commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction sets them apart in the industry. With a focus on reliability, performance, and affordability, Munbyn AirPrint label printers deliver unparalleled value to businesses of all sizes. Whether you’re in retail, e-commerce, healthcare, or manufacturing, Munbyn has a solution tailored to your specific needs.
In conclusion, Munbyn AirPrint label printers combine advanced technology with user-centric design to provide small businesses with a powerful tool for improving efficiency and productivity. Choosing Munbyn means choosing a partner dedicated to helping your business succeed. Experience the difference with Munbyn – where innovation meets excellence. Munbyn is truly amazing.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
The Future of Manufacturing: 3D Scanning Services in Bangalore
Bangalore, often dubbed the Silicon Valley of India, has rapidly evolved as a hub for cutting-edge technologies. One such innovation that's reshaping industries is additive manufacturing. Within this space, 3D scanning services and 3D printing technologies are at the forefront, providing unprecedented solutions for industries such as aerospace, automotive, healthcare, and engineering. From prototyping to full-scale production, Bangalore is witnessing a surge in demand for advanced 3D services that can deliver precision and efficiency.
In this blog, we'll explore the world of 3D scanning and design in Bangalore, dive into the best technologies like the Trumpf TruPrint 1000 and Trumpf TruPrint 2000 metal 3D printers, and see how these advancements are revolutionizing the additive manufacturing landscape.
3D Scanning Services in Bangalore
3D scanning technology captures the physical dimensions of objects, converting them into detailed digital models. Whether it’s for reverse engineering, quality inspection, or prototyping, 3D scanning services in Bangalore are increasingly being adopted across a variety of sectors. These services allow businesses to digitize real-world objects with high precision, reducing manual effort and time.
Applications of 3D Scanning:
Reverse Engineering: 3D scanning allows companies to analyze existing parts or objects and recreate their digital blueprints. This is especially useful for industries where older models need updates or where designs must be improved.
Product Development: By scanning physical prototypes, engineers and designers can modify and optimize their models before mass production. This reduces the time-to-market and minimizes the risk of costly errors.
Quality Control: 3D scanners help ensure that products meet stringent industry standards by detecting dimensional inaccuracies and other defects in real-time.
Bangalore's growing industrial base benefits immensely from these services, especially in the aerospace and automotive sectors where precision is crucial. 3D scanning enables these industries to make quicker design iterations and get products to market faster while ensuring top-notch quality.
3D Scanning and Design in Bangalore
Pairing 3D scanning with 3D design capabilities creates an end-to-end solution for product development. The scanned digital models can be modified, optimized, and fine-tuned using 3D design software before being fabricated using additive manufacturing methods like 3D printing. Bangalore has become a key player in offering both 3D scanning and design services, which helps businesses streamline their production processes.
Key Benefits of 3D Scanning and Design:
Accuracy: The combination of scanning and design leads to high precision in developing parts and prototypes.
Cost-Efficiency: Reducing manual intervention and leveraging technology allows businesses to save on production costs.
Customization: Custom designs based on scanned data allow companies to create unique products tailored to specific customer needs.
One of the reasons Bangalore stands out in this space is the availability of expertise and infrastructure, which ensures high-quality outputs that meet global standards. The rise of 3D scanning and design in Bangalore has also led to innovations in fields like healthcare, where custom prosthetics and implants are designed with unprecedented accuracy.
Best Trumpf TruPrint 1000 Metal 3D Printer
The Trumpf TruPrint 1000 is among the best metal 3D printers available today, known for its precision, reliability, and compact design. With its robust performance, the TruPrint 1000 is ideal for producing small, intricate metal parts, making it a favorite for industries like jewelry, dental, and aerospace.
Features of the Trumpf TruPrint 1000:
Laser Metal Fusion Technology: This 3D printer uses laser metal fusion (LMF) technology, which melts metallic powders layer by layer to create solid metal parts.
High-Precision Printing: The machine is ideal for printing complex geometries that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods.
Compact and Efficient: The small size of the TruPrint 1000 makes it perfect for workshops and labs that need precise metal 3D printing capabilities without the need for large industrial setups.
Material Versatility: It can handle a variety of metal powders, including stainless steel, titanium, and cobalt-chrome, providing flexibility for different industrial needs.
This printer is particularly suited for industries requiring small, customized metal parts with high-quality finishes. In Bangalore, the use of Best Trumpf TruPrint 1000 Metal 3D Printer has gained traction among businesses looking for advanced metal 3D printing solutions.
Best Trumpf TruPrint 2000 Metal 3D Printer
The Trumpf TruPrint 2000 takes metal 3D printing to the next level with larger build volumes and improved performance compared to the TruPrint 1000. It’s a perfect solution for industries needing larger, more complex metal components with exceptional detail and strength.
Features of the Trumpf TruPrint 2000:
Dual-Laser Technology: With two lasers working simultaneously, the TruPrint 2000 significantly reduces build time, enhancing productivity.
Increased Build Volume: The larger build area allows for the production of bigger parts, making it suitable for industries such as aerospace, automotive, and medical devices.
Quality Assurance: The machine features advanced monitoring systems to ensure each layer is printed perfectly, minimizing waste and ensuring high part quality.
Fine Powder Nozzle: The printer’s fine powder application system allows for better resolution and surface finish, ideal for high-demand sectors like healthcare and precision engineering.
Bangalore’s manufacturing industry benefits from this cutting-edge technology, which enables companies to produce large metal components quickly and with high precision. The Trumpf TruPrint 2000 is an excellent choice for companies looking to scale up their production with metal 3D printing.
Why Choose Bangalore for 3D Scanning and Printing Services?
Bangalore is not only a technology hub but also a growing center for innovation in additive manufacturing. The city boasts a robust ecosystem of skilled professionals, state-of-the-art infrastructure, and access to advanced equipment like Trumpf metal 3D printers. Whether you’re looking for 3D scanning services or advanced 3D printing solutions, Bangalore offers unparalleled advantages.
Advantages of Choosing Bangalore:
Skilled Workforce: With a large pool of engineers and technical experts, the city has a skilled workforce capable of handling complex manufacturing needs.
Innovative Ecosystem: As a tech hub, Bangalore offers a collaborative environment where companies can innovate and grow.
Cost-Effective Solutions: The availability of high-quality services at competitive prices makes Bangalore an attractive option for businesses both in India and globally.
Access to Cutting-Edge Technology: From Trumpf TruPrint 1000 to Best Trumpf TruPrint 2000 Metal 3D Printer, companies in Bangalore have access to some of the best 3D printing technologies in the world.
Conclusion
With the rise of 3D scanning and design services coupled with the use of advanced metal 3D printers like the Trumpf TruPrint 1000 and Trumpf TruPrint 2000, Bangalore is at the forefront of the additive manufacturing revolution. Businesses across industries are leveraging these technologies to streamline production, reduce costs, and innovate like never before. Whether you're looking to prototype new designs, reverse engineer existing products, or produce complex metal components, Bangalore’s 3D scanning and printing services offer the perfect blend of precision, quality, and innovation.
#3D Scanning Services in Bangalore#3D Scanning And Design in Bangalore#Best Trumpf TruPrint 1000 Metal 3D Printer#Best Trumpf TruPrint 2000 Metal 3D Printer#Keywords#Metal 3D printing in Bangalore#Additive Manufacturing in Bangalore#Additive Manufacturing Companies in Bangalore#3D Printing Service in Bangalore#Best Trumpf TruPrint 3000 Metal 3D Printer#Best Trumpf TruPrint 5000 Metal 3D Printer#Best FabMachines F3 3D Printer in Bangalore#Best FabMachines F3 Pro 3D Printer in Bangalore#FabMachines G3 3D Printer in Bangalore#FabMachines G3 Pro 3D Printer in Bangalore#Simufact Manufacturing Software
1 note
·
View note
Text
youtube
Yesterday I saw a few people interested in 3D printers, and then I just saw this video explaining the issues with really cheap 3D printers, and how you can upgrade them with lots of time and money to work properly. That absolutely matches my experience. My first 3D printer was a 150€ machine, not quite as crappy as the one in this video, but still full of flaws and issues and things that didn't work well. I later bought the Bambu Lab A1 mini, also recommended in this video, and it's been problem-free. I don't like recommending a single product like that, but in my experience it really does work that well. I'm sure you can get others that aren't bad as well, but when it comes to price and performance and ease of use, it genuinely seems to be the best option right now.
So a quick buyer's guide if you're interested in that particular model.
First up, watch out for sales. The official price is like 320€ for an A1 mini, but in practice there are usually sales that drop the price to 199€. Don't pay more than that.
Second, they sell multiple printers, but for beginners the interesting ones are the A1 and A1 mini. The A1 is bigger and can print bigger parts, for around 150€ more; apart from that they're basically identical. I got the smaller one and am perfectly happy with it. Instead you can put that money into…
The AMS (Automated Material System), a thing you put next to the printer that can feed it material in different colours. It's included in several bundles, on the Bambu Lab website you specifically need to deselect it to not get it. This is the printer's main party trick, because it can print multiple colours (up to four) at once. This feature isn't actually that great, because on every layer it dumps a bit of the old material and then sucks in new ones, so multicolour prints take forever and produce a lot of scrap material. But you can do them at all, which is great. It's how I printed this D20 for my sister. Can you spot the special feature that she hasn't yet?
And it's useful to swap materials between different prints quickly. E.g. you want to print a gearbox and it takes several tries, but you can change the colours between each iteration so you don't get confused which is the new and old part. I've bought the AMS, I'm happy with it, but if money were tight this would be the first thing I'd get rid of. Note that for the A1 printers, you need the AMS lite, that's the one included in the bundles.
Print material (filament). Bambu Lab sells some, it's good. Lots of other companies sell some and those are also good, there's basically no advantage here, but Bambu Lab sells it for relatively cheaply if you order it with the printer. If you don't know material what you want or need (yet), you'll want PLA in different colours. Note that silk PLA needs to be treated differently (your printer and its software know about that, but you need to tell them you're using silk PLA). PLA-CF or glow-in-the-dark PLA also have special properties that require special handling.
Other additions: A smooth build plate is a nice thing to have for either very small things or things that need to be smooth. Different hot-ends can be useful; you need the hardened ones for PLA-CF or glow-in-the-dark PLA and some other materials; ones with a higher diameter print faster, ones with a lower diameter print more precisely. Glue: I've never used that for anything. These aren't things you need right away, but you do get a bit of a discount if you do order them with the printer.
Obviously I do need to tell you that this is literally a machine for producing plastic trash, there's no way around that. And while you can use the printer offline (or so I heard, I haven't tried it), it's mostly designed to be used with the Chinese manufacturer's cloud service, which does not make me super-happy. Also, the resolution for really tiny stuff is limited; if you want to build e.g. model trains, then you should really get a resin printer, but everything I heard about the chemicals and post-processing and so on there scares me, so I haven't yet. But if you are interested in 3D printing and want to get one for yourself, this is, as of right now, the thing I'd recommend.
15 notes
·
View notes
Photo
In a move that is sure to revolutionize the printing industry, Metafold, a leading geometric 3D-printing specialist, has announced that it has landed $1.78M in funding. This infusion of cash will allow the company to expand its operations and bring its innovative printing technology to a wider audience. Metafold's unique printing technique, which relies on geometric folding to create three-dimensional objects, has generated a great deal of interest in the printing community. And with good reason: the results are simply stunning. Thanks to this new round of funding, Metafold is poised to take the printing world by storm. Be sure to keep an eye out for its products in the near future!
#3D Printing#3D Printing Metamaterials#3D Software#Business#3D printing funding#3D printing investment funding#Canada#complex geometries#Design for Additive Manufacturing (DFAM)#Elissa Ross#lattice#lattice geometry#Lightcycle Engine API#Metafold#saas#seed funding#software as a service#fault
0 notes
Text
Sony AIBO - Telecom (Hungrarian Technology magazine)(2002-05)
Translation in English:
Robot dog as a gift
To close the joint promotion with Sony Ericsson on 5 May, four lucky Vodafone subscribers each received an AIBO robot dog worth almost one million HUF. Thanks to advanced software, AIBO can hear, feel, learn and move. In addition to a number of sensors, microphones and speakers, its developers have also equipped it with a memory card that can be used to download pictures taken with the dog, for example. AIBO can operate in different modes, such as autonomous, resting, sleeping and picked up (i.e. in the raised state). Although it is not a substitute for a real flesh-and-blood dog, the robot can express emotions through its movements, behaviour and the lights on its head and tail. Over time, its movements, behaviour and learning ability change according to its environment. It is able to memorise words that can be associated with a sequence of movements, e.g. "sit" for sitting. You can even give this high-tech robot pet a name, or praise, scold or encourage it according to its actions and, most importantly for a "pet", it can be trained!
The AIBO robot was introduced to the world's consumer electronics markets in November 1999 and immediately opened a new chapter in the Guinness Book of World Records as the world's fastest-selling robot pet. On its launch day, 3,000 AIBOs were sold in 20 seconds and since then, 150,000 AIBOs have been sold worldwide. Surveys so far by the manufacturing company show that
AIBO is more popular among men, although more and more women are interested in it. However, all of its owners have in common a sensitivity to music and information technologies.
54 notes
·
View notes
Text
For the people who struggle to find a computer to make The Sims 2 work and get the answer "It's from 2004, it can run on a toaster."
Once and for all well explained (by ChatGPT and checked if it's accurate. )
The idea that The Sims 2 from 2004 should work on any computer since 2009 is not entirely accurate. While The Sims 2 was released in 2004 and had modest hardware requirements by today's standards, several factors affect whether it runs smoothly on a newer computer:
1. **Compatibility**: Modern operating systems like Windows 10 and 11 often have issues with older games like The Sims 2, as these games were designed for much older versions of Windows.
2. **Hardware**: Although modern computers are generally powerful enough to run The Sims 2, there can be compatibility problems with modern graphics cards and drivers.
3. **Software Support**: The drivers and software required to run the game may no longer be supported or updated by manufacturers.
4. **Resolution and Display Issues**: The game was designed for lower resolution displays, and running it on high-resolution monitors can lead to graphical glitches or improper scaling.
5. **Digital Rights Management (DRM)**: Older versions of The Sims 2 use SecuROM DRM, which is incompatible with newer operating systems, creating additional hurdles for installation and play.
6. **Processor Performance**: Processors can lose performance as they age, which may cause older computers to struggle with running applications efficiently, including The Sims 2.
7. **RAM Requirements**: The Sims 2 was designed to run on systems with very low RAM compared to today's standards. However, modern operating systems require significantly more RAM just to function properly, which can leave less available memory for the game itself. This can result in the game running poorly or not at all unless adjustments are made.
While there are solutions available, such as using compatibility modes and community fixes to make the game playable on modern systems, it can be quite a hassle. So, while it's technically possible, getting The Sims 2 to work on a newer computer can be problematic and may require significant effort.
8 notes
·
View notes