#aaaH
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
4komiya · 3 days ago
Text
KMGOMG CHIIKAWAXTWISTEDWODNERLANDA AHAHSGHHHHH
Tumblr media
Heartslabyul chiikawa series!!! Might do other dorms too ‼‼
2K notes · View notes
hellohopie · 16 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
— billie eilish hand appreciation post for the freaks! (me)
82 notes · View notes
fiberfantasies · 9 months ago
Text
Fiber arts is just Math in sheep's clothing
21K notes · View notes
cannibalisticvampires · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
7K notes · View notes
9823678 · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Honolulu!
2K notes · View notes
bambiilooza · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
trying to figure out my apollo design (ft: free ibis paint background)
556 notes · View notes
swordsonnet-bardofwar · 2 months ago
Text
Touch-starved Logan x I have made it my personal mission to invade every bit of personal space you will ever have in you life Wade
370 notes · View notes
fsfghgee · 3 months ago
Text
OMG Liu Kang said that thing!
212 notes · View notes
0common0sense0 · 25 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
so abt that mouth wash game....
142 notes · View notes
multiplicityofmind · 6 months ago
Text
hey chat is this anything?
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
153 notes · View notes
simsdoll · 20 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
111 notes · View notes
wheeeee-dot-png · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
gonna be a busy bee for a couple hours but i had to draw @d0not-disturb 's emerald 2.0 design AAA H!! ! i didnt draw the wings because it didntfit on my canvas </3 nut i dont expect this will be the last time i draw this guy so i have plenty of time to remedy it LMAO. also i know its a wand and NOT a scepter i . hes pondering his orb ok ok trust . alt weapon . he can have both hes chill like that . OK IM DONE RAMBLING NOW BYE.
ALSO AU BY CHRISRIN BUT I DONT FEEL LIKE TAGGING HIM FOR A LITTLE DRAWING . YALL KNOW WHO HE IS ITS WTV
794 notes · View notes
majimalvr · 25 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
finally got my goods from @majimasleftasscheek and get to sport them at work :DD
soo happy ive been saving up for a whileee
69 notes · View notes
theeroticlover · 1 year ago
Text
Mhmmm!!! I Crave you like this....
Tumblr media
733 notes · View notes
catliker49 · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Ooh.. What a peculiar bug..
I think I prefer the sketch rather than the coloured version! But Frank is ever so Lovely to draw! (I’m going through all the Neighbours, I must draw them all properly!!!)
I’ve been busy with College work so I haven’t managed to draw much recently!! And also my friends keep distracting me.. EVIL I TELL YOU!! (I’m joking! I love them really!)
249 notes · View notes
metamatar · 26 days ago
Text
In disentangling decolonization from the impulse to make it a species of a larger struggle, Tuck and Yang differentiate between an “indigenous politics” (which would integrate land with life) and a “western doctrine of liberation” (instrumentalizing land for life). The prioritization of land, however, problematizes the efficacy of the distinction, for, as Jared Sexton (2014) addresses, regardless of the approach to land (Indigenous or otherwise), the issue for critics of settler colonialism remains primarily a “problem of the terms of occupation”:
> “This frames the question of land as a question of sovereignty, wherein native sovereignty is a precondition for or element of the maintenance or renaissance of native ways of relating to the land” (Sexton 2014:5).
The danger is that, while admitting “denial of sovereignty imperils native ways of relating,” the configuration of sovereignty as a positive claim to land “does not thereby guarantee this way will be followed” (Sexton 2014:5). Tuck and Yang’s argument subordinates this risk to a problem they see to be much more fundamental and abiding: that recognizing life (which becomes a stand-in for symbolization) may not materialize (and usually actively impedes) the repatriation of land.
To return to the problem of *via negativa*, Tuck and Yang cannot positively address what Indigenous approaches to land are, without complicating how land is the ground upon which decolonization hinges. In this way, they succumb to the seduction described by Katherine McKittrick in the epigraph—“the idea that space ‘just is’” (2006:xi). Their critique of metaphor serves as a counterfactual to what they see to be the central problem of (and solution to) settler colonialism—land—even as this single focus undercuts what might differentiate settler sovereignty from native sovereignty. By making metaphor “bad,” Tuck and Yang illustrate a reinvestment in sovereignty as an empty vessel, whose substantial difference from property orientations becomes indiscernible, except in the fleeting accelerationist fantasy later posed by Tuck and McKenzie that “decolonization may be something the land does on its own behalf, even if humans are too deluded or delayed to make their own needed changes.”
__
Garba, T. P., & Sorentino, S.-M. (2020). Slavery is a metaphor: A critical commentary on Eve Tuck and K. Wayne Yang’s “Decolonization is not a metaphor.” Antipode, 52(3), 764-782. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12615
55 notes · View notes