#Wrongful Death Attorneys St Louis

[gogellawfirm]

Dedicated Personal Injury Attorneys Ensuring Justice and Compassion

In the St. Louis, when unfortunate incidents like automobile accidents occur, having a reliable advocate is paramount. Our team of dedicated Personal Injury Attorneys in St. Louis understands the complexities of such cases and is committed to ensuring justice for our clients. With a specialization in handling wrongful death claims, we empathize with the profound impact these tragedies have on families.

Navigating the aftermath of an automobile accident demands expertise, and our skilled Automobile Accident Attorneys in St. Louis stand ready to provide unwavering support. From thorough investigations to expert legal representation, we prioritize our clients' rights and strive to secure fair compensation for their losses. Our commitment extends beyond legal expertise – we genuinely care about the well-being of our clients and work tirelessly to alleviate the burdens they face during challenging times.

In St. Louis, our legal team stands as a beacon of support, guiding clients through the intricacies of personal injury and wrongful death claims with compassion and determination. When you choose our attorneys, you choose dedicated advocates who prioritize your rights and seek justice in the face of adversity.

Brand Name : The Gogel Law Firm

Contact at : (314) 775-3864

Address : 745 Old Ballas Road, St Louis, Missouri, 63141

[stlouiscaraccidentlawyer]

St. Louis Car Accident Lawyer Near Me

Car accidents are a common occurrence on the roads of St. Louis, Missouri. These accidents can lead to severe injuries, emotional trauma, and financial strain. If you or a loved one has been involved in a car accident, it is crucial to seek the assistance of a dedicated car accident lawyer who can help you get the maximum compensation you need and deserve.

At The Hoffmann Law Firm, L.L.C., we have 25 years of experience helping victims of car accidents in St. Louis. We have a proven track record of success in getting our clients the compensation they deserve for their injuries, medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

Immediate Steps to Take After a Car Accident

If you have been involved in a car accident, it is essential to take the following steps:

Seek Medical Attention

After a car accident, the first thing to do is seek medical attention, even if you do not feel injured. Some injuries may not be immediately apparent and could worsen over time. Delaying medical attention could also harm your chances of receiving compensation.

Call the Police

Call the police immediately after a car accident, even if it is minor. The police will create an accident report that will document the details of the accident. This report could be helpful when filing a compensation claim.

Avoid Discussing the Accident

It is essential to avoid discussing the accident with anyone except the police and your lawyer. Admitting fault or apologizing could be used against you later.

Obtain Information about the Accident

If you cannot do so yourself, have someone obtain information about the accident, including the name and contact information of the other driver(s), their insurance information, and any witness names and contact information.

Photograph the Scene

Take photographs of the accident scene, including the vehicle damage, any injuries sustained, and the surrounding area.

Take Notes

Write down your account of the accident, including the time, location, and weather conditions. Include any details you remember, no matter how small.

Do Not Accept Initial Insurance Offers

Insurance companies may offer you a quick settlement soon after the accident. Do not accept these offers without consulting a car accident lawyer. Insurance companies often try to pay out as little as possible, and their initial offer may not be enough to cover your medical bills, lost wages, and other expenses.

Contact a Car Accident Lawyer

Contact an experienced car accident lawyer near you as soon as possible. The longer you wait, the more challenging it may be to gather evidence and build a strong case.

Compensation for Car Accident Injuries

If you have been injured in a car accident, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries and other losses. Depending on the type and severity of the injury, you may be eligible for compensation for:

Medical bills

Lost wages

Lost earning potential

Pain and suffering

Long-term medical care and rehabilitation

However, insurance companies may try to minimize your compensation. Having an experienced car accident lawyer on your side can help ensure that you receive the compensation you need and deserve.

Why Choose The Hoffmann Law Firm, L.L.C.?

At The Hoffmann Law Firm, L.L.C., we have helped thousands of clients recover the compensation they deserve after a car accident. Our team of experienced car accident lawyers has the knowledge and skills to build a strong case and fight for your rights.

Our lawyers have extensive experience handling all types of car accident cases, including those involving:

Rear-end collisions

T-bone accidents

Head-on collisions

Rollover accidents

Hit-and-run accidents

Drunk driving accidents

Distracted driving accidents

Multi-vehicle accidents

We have a proven track record of success in obtaining compensation for our clients. We are not afraid to take on insurance companies and other powerful opponents on your behalf. We will fight tirelessly to protect your rights and ensure that you receive the full and fair compensation you deserve for your injuries and other losses.

We understand that car accidents can be traumatic, and we are committed to helping you through the legal process with compassion and understanding.

Don't wait - call (314) 361-4242 for a free case evaluation with a St. Louis car accident lawyer

[odinsblog]

The St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell, who had sought to have the conviction overturned, said, “This outcome did not serve the interests of justice.”

“Marcellus Williams should be alive today,” Bell said in a statement. “There were multiple points in the timeline when decisions could have been made that would have spared him the death penalty. If there is even the shadow of a doubt of innocence, the death penalty should never be an option.”

Earlier efforts to halt the execution were denied Monday by the Missouri Supreme Court and Republican Gov. Mike Parson. His execution is the third in Missouri this year, and among five taking place nationwide across a seven-day span if the remaining three are carried out on schedule, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson said they would have granted the request to halt the execution.

“Tonight, Missouri will execute an innocent man,” said attorney Tricia Rojo Bushnell of the Midwest Innocence Project in a statement after the Supreme Court ruling.

“...The victim's family opposes his execution. Jurors, who originally sentenced him to death, now oppose his execution. The prosecutor's office that convicted and sentenced him to death has now admitted they were wrong and zealously fought to undo the conviction and save Mr. Williams' life.”

“That is not justice. And we must all question any system that would allow this to occur,” Bushnell said.

—Missouri executes Marcellus Williams despite questions over evidence

[6marzipanology6]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by OOB (@operationolivebranch)

https://chng.it/bDvdzPkXpC

Almost 7 years after it was supposed to review new DNA evidence, the state of Missouri has once again scheduled Marcellus Williams to be executed on Sept. 24 for a crime that DNA proves he did not commit.

Please call 417-373-3400 now to hear instructions from the Innocence Project and then be connected with the Governor's office to ask them to stop Marcellus's execution.

The St. Louis County prosecuting attorney reviewed the DNA results and filed a motion to vacate Mr. Williams’ conviction because he believed the DNA results proved by clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Williams did not commit this crime.

The Missouri Supreme Court just denied a motion seeking to withdraw the September 24 execution date for Marcellus Williams, an innocent man on death row. Mr. Williams had moved the court to reconsider its order scheduling his execution after the St. Louis County Circuit Court set a hearing for August 21 on the county prosecuting attorney’s motion to vacate Mr. Williams’s wrongful conviction.

Although no court has ever considered the new exculpatory evidence, the Missouri Supreme Court is still going ahead with the execution date for Mr. Williams just one month after that hearing.

[beardedmrbean]

ST. LOUIS — Christopher Dunn has spent 33 years in prison for a murder he has claimed from the outset that he didn’t commit. A hearing this week will determine if he should go free.

St. Louis prosecutors are now convinced Dunn is telling the truth, but lawyers for the Missouri Attorney General’s Office disagree and will argue for keeping him behind bars. Dunn, 52, is serving a sentence of life without parole at the state prison in Locking, Missouri, but is expected to attend the hearing before Judge Jason Sengheiser that begins Tuesday.

The hearing follows a motion filed in February By St. Louis Circuit Attorney Gabe Gore. A Missouri law adopted in 2021 allows prosecutors to request hearings in cases where they believe there is evidence of a wrongful conviction.

Dunn was convicted of first-degree murder in the death of 15-year-old Ricco Rogers in 1990, based largely on the testimony of two boys who said they witnessed the shooting. The witnesses, ages 12 and 14 at the time, later recanted, claiming they were coerced by police and prosecutors.

In May 2023, then-St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner filed a motion to vacate Dunn’s sentence. But Gardner resigned days later, and after his appointment by Gov. Mike Parson, Gore wanted to conduct his own investigation. Gore announced in February that he would seek to overturn the conviction.

Dunn, who is Black, was 18 when Rogers was shot to death on the night of May 18, 1990. No physical evidence linked Dunn to the crime but the two boys told police at the time that they saw Dunn standing in the gangway of the house next door, just minutes before shots rang out.

Rogers and the two boys ran when they heard the shots, but Roger was fatally struck, according to court records.

A judge has heard Dunn’s innocence case before.

At an evidentiary hearing in 2020, Judge William Hickle agreed that a jury would likely find Dunn not guilty based on new evidence. But Hickle declined to exonerate Dunn, citing a 2016 Missouri Supreme Court ruling that only death row inmates — not those like Dunn sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole — could make a “freestanding” claim of actual innocence.

The 2021 law has resulted in the the release of two men who both spent decades in prison.

In 2021, Kevin Strickland was freed after more than 40 years behind bars for three killings in Kansas City after a judge ruled that he had been wrongfully convicted in 1979.

Last February, a St. Louis judge overturned the conviction of Lamar Johnson, who spent nearly 28 years in prison for a killing he always said he didn’t commit. At a hearing in December 2022, another man testified that it was he — not Johnson — who joined a second man in the killing. A witness testified that police had “bullied” him into implicating Johnson. And Johnson’s girlfriend at the time had testified that they were together that night.

A hearing date is still pending in another case in which a Missouri murder conviction is being challenged for a man who was nearly executed for the crime.

St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell filed a motion in January to vacate the conviction of Marcellus Williams, who narrowly escaped lethal injection seven years ago for the fatal stabbing of Lisha Gayle in 1998. Bell’s motion said three experts have determined that Williams’ DNA was not on the handle of the butcher knife used in the killing.

[jkl-fff]

According to www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/marcellus-williams-execution-supreme-court-stay-denied/

"Tonight, Missouri will execute an innocent man," said attorney Tricia Rojo Bushnell of the Midwest Innocence Project in a statement after the Supreme Court ruling. "...The victim's family opposes his execution. Jurors, who originally sentenced him to death, now oppose his execution. The prosecutor's office that convicted and sentenced him to death has now admitted they were wrong and zealously fought to undo the conviction and save Mr. Williams' life ... That is not justice. And we must all question any system that would allow this to occur."

Williams' attorneys said DNA experts who reviewed the results determined that he was not the source of DNA found on the knife. Faced with the DNA evidence and other new information in Williams' case, prosecutor Wesley Bell sought to toss out the conviction on numerous grounds, including the results of the DNA testing and constitutional violations during the jury selection process. But the night before an evidentiary hearing was set to take place, Bell's office received new test results indicating DNA on the knife handle was consistent with that of a prosecutor who worked on Williams' case and a former investigator with the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.

In a statement following the execution, attorneys Laurence Komp and Laine Cardarella said, "It is hard to explain how admitted racial discrimination is ignored and never meaningfully addressed. It is hard to explain how a prosecutor can admit that he contaminated evidence his entire legal career, including for over a decade after the passage of a DNA statute designed to prevent the contamination of evidence, but nothing is done ... The hardest thing to explain, and what we cannot understand, is how rote application of a process to protect finality outweighs finding truth and achieving fairness."

Remember Khaliifah Marcellus Williams! A black Muslim man falsely accused. Remember that he's innocent. Remember that the governor of Missouri, mike Parson who had the opportunity to save this man's life, decided not to. Remember all but three supreme court justices decided his life wasn't worth saving either. Remember his face. Remember his Last words. And remember how fucked up this country is

Rest in peace Marcellus

[athena5898]

MISSOURI, SEPTEMBER 12 (The Innocence Project) — Today, the Circuit Court for St. Louis County, Missouri denied Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell’s motion to vacate Marcellus Williams’ conviction and death sentence.

Prosecuting Attorney Bell filed the motion based on new DNA testing conducted on forensic evidence collected at the crime scene that conclusively excluded Mr. Williams as the person who killed Felicia Gayle in 1998.

After considering the evidence of Mr. Williams’ innocence and other constitutional errors in his trial, the court nevertheless ruled that vacatur was not warranted under Missouri law.

The court’s ruling is available here (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H_8gEp_1LgUzEsUAEEXg1643UJw88rja/view?usp=sharing).

Mr. Williams is scheduled to be executed on September 24.

Marcellus’ attorney Tricia Rojo Bushnell said in a statement:

“The decision of a prosecutor to move to vacate a murder conviction and death sentence is not done lightly. Prosecuting Attorney Bell filed a motion because there is overwhelming evidence that Marcellus Williams’ trial was constitutionally unfair, including revelations that the State contaminated the most critical evidence in the case—the murder weapon. We will continue pursuing every possible option to prevent Mr. Williams’ wrongful execution. There is still time for the courts or Governor Parson to ensure that Missouri does not commit the irreparable injustice of executing an innocent person."

We now have to do everything in our power to help stop Marcellus’ impending execution on September 24.

Your voice could make a crucial difference in the fight for justice.

CALL TO ACTION:

Those in the US: Text “Marcellus” to 97016 to join his advocacy team

Stand against his execution by signing his petition: Here (https://innocenceproject.org/petitions/stop-the-execution-of-marcellus-williams-an-innocent-man/)

Share Marcellus’s story far and wide

Share this post on X: Here (https://x.com/innocence/status/1834256547427307867) Share from the web: Here (https://innocenceproject.org/court-denies-prosecutors-motion-to-vacate-marcellus-williams-conviction-and-death-sentence/)

[sa7abnews]

Despite Missouri AG’s Best Efforts, Man Condemned to Die Will Get Hearing On His Innocence Claim

New Post has been published on https://sa7ab.info/2024/08/06/despite-missouri-ags-best-efforts-man-condemned-to-die-will-get-hearing-on-his-innocence-claim/

Despite Missouri AG’s Best Efforts, Man Condemned to Die Will Get Hearing On His Innocence Claim

During his short tenure as Missouri’s attorney general, Andrew Bailey has spent a considerable amount of time fighting to cement dubious convictions — and, so far, he has been losing the battle.

On July 26, Bailey racked up another loss when the Missouri Supreme Court declined to scuttle a hearing in St. Louis County to determine whether Marcellus Williams was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to die in 2001. Bailey had implored the court to stop the August 21 hearing and to clear the way for Williams’s execution in September. While the Supreme Court has declined to delay Williams’s execution, it has at least rebuffed Bailey’s entreaty to grease the wheels.

Bailey’s defeat caps several weeks’ worth of legal volleying between the attorney general, Williams’s lawyers with the Midwest Innocence Project, and St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell, who is seeking to vacate Williams’s conviction because he believes it was wrongly obtained. In pushing back against Bailey’s efforts to block Williams’s innocence hearing, Bell and the Midwest Innocence Project argue that Bailey is attempting to rewrite Missouri law to give himself more power.

The flurry of legal activity also underscores Bailey’s apparent determination to fight off claims of wrongful conviction. In the last two months alone, he has not only tried to block Williams from airing his innocence claim at all, but has also sought to keep two recent exonerees, Christopher Dunn and Sandra Hemme, locked up despite court rulings concluding that they should be freed.

Bailey’s opposition to correcting miscarriages of justice is a feature of his tenure as attorney general, but his recent actions have earned new scrutiny and ire from activists, as well as from his rock-ribbed conservative opponent in the attorney general’s Republican primary race.

Speaking at the state Capitol on Thursday, death row exonerees with the nonprofit group Witness to Innocence called on Bailey to reverse course and support the vetting of innocence claims — starting with Williams’s case.

Bailey’s current position is that it is “acceptable to execute an innocent person,” said Herman Lindsey, the group’s executive director. “We’re here to ask for an honest search for the truth. That’s all.”

“This win-at-all-costs mentality does not serve the people of Missouri.”

Marcellus Williams has maintained his innocence throughout his decades on death row. Photo: Midwest Innocence Project

Shifting Narratives

Felicia Anne Gayle Picus, a beloved former reporter for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, was stabbed to death in her home in a gated community outside the city on August 11, 1998. When her husband Dan Picus found her, the murder weapon, a knife from the couple’s kitchen, was still lodged in her neck. The house was replete with potential forensic evidence, including bloody fingerprints on a wall and a trail of bloody shoeprints. The kitchen had been ransacked, and closets and drawers upstairs had been opened. Still, nothing of great value had been taken.

Despite extensive physical evidence, the investigation stalled. It wasn’t until months later, after her family posted a $10,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of her killer, that a jailhouse informant came forward with a story about his former cellmate, Marcellus Williams, whom he claimed had confessed to the crime. Police subsequently scored a second informant, Williams’s former girlfriend, who also claimed Williams was responsible.

There were ample reasons to distrust the informants’ accounts, including that both were facing prison time for unrelated crimes, and each had a history of ratting on others to save themselves. Many of the details they offered shifted across questioning and others simply did not match the murder. Nonetheless, Williams was tried and convicted in 2001 based primarily on their waffling and contradictory tales.

Related Crime Scene DNA Didn’t Match Marcellus Williams. Missouri May Fast-Track His Execution Anyway.

Williams has maintained his innocence and has twice come close to execution. His lawyers requested DNA testing of crime scene evidence prior to his trial, but the court denied it. It wasn’t until the eve of Williams’s execution in 2015 that the state Supreme Court issued a stay and ordered testing of the murder weapon, which ultimately revealed unknown male DNA and excluded Williams as a donor. Still, without considering what impact that evidence might have had on Williams’s conviction, the court reset his execution for August 2017. Again, the execution was halted, this time by then-Gov. Eric Greitens, a Republican, who issued an executive order triggering a little-used Missouri law that allows the governor to empanel a board of inquiry to review a case.

Passed in 1963, the law was designed to protect against wrongful executions. The board, made up of five retired judges, was not yet finished with its work the following year when Greitens left office amid scandal and Mike Parson assumed the job. Over the intervening years, the Midwest Innocence Project provided the board with a host of information to aid its inquiry. Then, in June 2023, Parson abruptly dissolved the board before it could report on the findings of its investigation, which by statute it was required to do. Parson said it was time to “move forward.”

The Midwest Innocence Project sued to block Parson from disbanding the board before it had fulfilled its statutory duty, yet the Missouri Supreme Court dismissed the suit earlier this summer. The court ruled on June 4 that the governor had the right to dissolve it as he saw fit.

St. Louis County Prosecutor Wesley Bell speaks during an interview in Clayton, Mo., on July 29, 2019. Photo: Jeff Roberson/AP

Sweeping Arguments

While the litigation over the board played out, St. Louis County elected prosecutor Wesley Bell availed himself in January of a relatively new Missouri law that empowers prosecutors to move to vacate a conviction they believe was wrongly obtained. “Public confidence in the justice system is restored, not undermined, when a prosecutor is accountable for a wrongful or constitutionally infirm conviction,” Bell wrote.

The statute directs a circuit judge to hold a hearing and determine whether there is “clear and convincing evidence” of a wrongful conviction. Notably, the law also allows — but does not require — the attorney general’s office to appear at the hearing and question witnesses. To date, three people have been exonerated under the statute, which was enacted in 2021. In each case, the state’s top prosecutor has taken an adversarial stance — and lost. In Williams’s case, Bailey filed a notice in early February that he would be opposing Bell’s motion.

Bell had asked the state Supreme Court to hold off on setting a new execution date until the circuit court has had the opportunity to consider the case. Instead, in June, the court set Williams’s execution for September 24. The attorney general waited until just after the Supreme Court set the execution date to file a motion urging the circuit court judge to dismiss Bell’s motion without a hearing.

Bailey argued that because the state Supreme Court has rejected all of Williams’s previous appeals and has set an execution date, the lower court can’t review the case at all. To do so would “challenge” the authority of the Supreme Court, whose decisions, according to the state constitution, “shall be controlling in all other courts.” Bailey continued, “this Court has no authority to reverse, overrule, or otherwise decline to follow” the high court’s previous rulings, concluding that Bell’s “futile” efforts should be dismissed.

Both Bell and the Midwest Innocence Project responded with briefs arguing that Bailey’s position is absurd. For starters, the law that allows Bell to seek to vacate Williams’s conviction operates separately from the normal appeals process. Importantly, it also doesn’t allow for the attorney general to jump in ahead of a hearing to try and block it from ever taking place. Bailey’s argument is merely an attempt to prevent a hearing before Williams’s execution date, Bell wrote —“an absurd and unnecessary position for the Attorney General to take under the circumstances as a representative of the State of Missouri with a duty as a ‘minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate.’”

Williams’s lawyers took aim at Bailey’s attempt to nullify the statute so that it doesn’t apply to people who have appealed their capital conviction and have been denied (which, practically speaking, is most death row defendants) and have subsequently had an execution date set. “The AG’s arguments are as surprising as they are sweeping,” the Midwest Innocence Project argued in court filings.

If accepted, Bailey’s argument could allow the attorney general to seek an execution date as soon as possible after an appeal is denied, foreclosing any potential future relief from a wrongful conviction.

On July 2, St. Louis County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Hilton declined to take up Bailey’s motion to dismiss the case and instead set the hearing for August 21. Bailey asked the Supreme Court to intervene; it too declined.

“Shock to the Conscience”

Bailey took over as attorney general in 2023, when his predecessor, Eric Schmitt, was elected to the U.S. Senate. Since then, Bailey has aggressively sought to block prosecutors — and judges — from taking action to right wrongful convictions.

He is far from the first top prosecutor in Missouri to try to block a potential exoneration; for at least 30 years the reflexive position of the attorney general’s office has been to oppose innocence claims. And after the law giving the state’s elected prosecutors the right to seek to throw out a tainted conviction passed in 2021, Schmitt was seemingly all-too-eager to oppose the process. Still, as Bailey has been running in a hotly contested Republican primary seeking to secure his first full term in office, he has put those efforts into overdrive.

Sandra Hemme spent 43 years in prison for a murder she did not commit before a state judge in June vacated her conviction and cleared her for release. In response, Bailey launched a monthlong campaign to keep her locked up — including by having an underling call the Department of Corrections and tell the prison warden not to release her, all in violation of a court order. Hemme was finally released on July 19, after Judge Ryan Horsman said that if she was not freed within hours Bailey would have to personally appear in court or face a charge of contempt.

Related Missouri’s Attorney General Is Waging War to Keep the Wrongly Convicted Locked Up

In May, a pair of lawyers from Bailey’s office fought St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Gabriel Gore’s efforts to exonerate Christopher Dunn for a 1990 murder he has long sworn he did not commit. The attorney general’s office lost the fight, and the circuit judge vacated Dunn’s conviction last month. Bailey then deployed the same tactics he had in Hemme’s case — including calling the DOC — in an effort to keep Dunn from being released from prison. After the Missouri Supreme Court’s intervention, Dunn was finally released on July 30.

Bailey’s decision to make opposing innocence claims a feature of his office is a bold, if not questionable, choice. Advocates across the state have decried his actions. Peter Joy, a law professor at the Washington University School of Law in St. Louis, told CBS News that Bailey’s efforts to keep Hemme locked up were “a shock to the conscience of any decent human being.”

And it appears that Bailey’s stance is also confounding to fellow conservative MAGA Republican Will Scharf, Bailey’s opponent in the state’s GOP primary on August 6. Practically speaking, there isn’t much daylight between Bailey and Scharf. Still, Scharf — a former federal prosecutor who was part of the team representing Donald Trump in his immunity case before the U.S. Supreme Court — told St. Louis’s Spectrum News that he wouldn’t try to block the release of a person who’d demonstrated their innocence in court. “It’s a clear and convincing evidence standard for someone to essentially prove that they’ve been wrongly convicted,” Scharf said. “I think that’s an appropriately high bar.” The post Despite Missouri AG’s Best Efforts, Man Condemned to Die Will Get Hearing On His Innocence Claim .

[personalinjurylawyerstlouis]

Injured by Others? Get the Compensation You Deserve With Thompson Law Firm

Our lives are not solely determined by our actions. At times, the actions of others can significantly impact us, either positively or negatively, and even alter the course of our lives. For instance, imagine being involved in a car accident. The recovery process may take several months, and it may take a lot of time for you to return to your daily life. This illustrates how the actions of others can have a significant impact on our lives. However, if you feel the person who caused your accident, must provide compensation, it is possible with Tort law. 

If you want to apply for a tort lawsuit, the first thing you should do is find a personal injury lawyer. That’s where Thompson Law Firm comes in. Tyler is a Leading Personal Injury Lawyer in St. Louis, with more than 10 years of experience with tort law cases, he can handle your case and fight for the problems you have faced. 

Various Tort Law Cases Thompson Law Can Handle: 

Car Accidents: 

Meeting with an accident is indeed a life-altering situation. Piling up medical bills, applying for insurance claims, focusing on recovery, etc. It’s one of the times you’ll face both mental stress and pain. As a leading personal injury attorney in St. Louis, Thompson Law can appear on your behalf for your tort lawsuit. 

Slip And Falls 

The property owner has to maintain their property properly. If you have to withstand an injury due to the property, it also comes under tort law. As a top personal injury lawyer in St. Louis, Thompson Law Firm can handle cases for slip and fall claims including, lack of security, insufficient lighting, insufficient signage, lack of warnings, open holes or gaps, slippery or wet floors, ice patches, and much more. 

Wrongful Death

Losing a loved one is like losing a part of ourselves. If you have lost your family or someone dear to you, due to another person's negligence or medical facility, Tyler can provide the support and fight for your wrong death claims. We can apply for tort law for the following wrongful deaths: Motorcycle accidents: 

Car accidents

Truck accidents

Construction accidents

Medical malpractice

Defective products

Dangerous drugs

Nursing home abuse

With the listed above services, Tyler also handles various tort law cases including workplace injuries, medical malpractice, and other injuries. Apply for a Tort lawsuit and let the Best Personal Injury Lawyer in St. Louis handle your case. Contact Thompson Law Firm today.

[injurylawyers-stlouis]

Missouri Injury Law Firm

St. Louis Personal Injury Lawyer Near Me - Leading The Way To Recovering Maximum Financial Compensation For Personal Injury Victims

Personal injury law is relevant to those impacted by accidents resulting from someone else's wrongful activities or mistake.

This legal area deals with a variety of incidents, from car, motorcycle, and semi-truck crashes to wrongful death cases to workplace mishaps to slips and falls and dog bites. Each case brings its specific challenges and also the potential for major physical, emotional, and economic repercussions.

That is why anybody who has suffered an accident or has a relative affected by such an incident needs to have a well-informed personal injury attorney. Such a qualified professional acts as an advocate and adviser, adeptly navigating the legal landscape for you.

Personal injury attorneys play a pivotal part in clarifying the ins and outs of a certain situation, assessing possible reparation avenues, and carefully managing the case’s progression. Their competence is especially valuable in ensuring victims or their families get maximum financial compensation to cover clinical fees, lost income, and other types of injury-related fees, as well as pain and suffering, added medical costs, long-term life care planning, and permanent disabling injuries or disfigurement.

About Us Missouri Injury Law Firm is one of the leading personal injury law firms in the greater St. Louis area and throughout the great state of Missouri, led by its owner and senior attorney Gene S. Hou and his vastly seasoned personal injury legal team.

We provide professional legal representation for victims of vehicle, semi-truck, and motorcycle accidents, wrongful death cases, and dog attack cases. We also have vast expertise of the insurance field and insurance law, traffic laws, and a track record of successfully taking care of all types of personal injury and wrongful death cases, including worker's compensation cases for work injuries. Missouri Injury Law Firm also stands for customers in traffic law defense cases, including DWI/DUI defense and speeding ticket defense.

Our group performs at the highest level of advocacy and delivers the highest financial compensation for our customers and their loved ones. We get absolutely no fee unless we recover reparation for you. You will never write us a check. We pay you when we recover compensation for your accident case.

We offer you the competitive advantage that other personal injury law firms simply do not offer. Our attorneys previously worked for a big national insurance company, training their adjusters, handling all of their complex injury cases, overseeing their attorneys and law firms in Missouri and all across the United States, and providing the insurance company with solid legal guidance on complicated issues. Our lawyers have more than 70 years of combined legal experience in insurance and personal injury legislation. Our highly skilled personal injury attorneys and legal team work diligently and compassionately on your case to obtain the highest financial compensation you should have.

Why Choose Missouri Injury Law Firm in St. Louis?

Skilled Legal Team: Our team of lawyers has extensive knowledge in personal injury legislation, ensuring that customers receive knowledgeable and proficient representation. Client-Centered Approach: We focus on the demands and well-being of our clients, delivering individualized legal strategies suited to each specific case. Strong Track Record: We have a solid record of securing desirable and large financial settlements and verdicts, showing our dedication to getting the best feasible results for our clients. Comprehensive Case Handling: From comprehensive examination to aggressive negotiation or litigation, we handle all aspects of your case, minimizing your stress and concerns. No Payment Unless You Win: We operate on a contingency fee basis, meaning clients pay no attorney fees unless we successfully get financial compensation on your behalf.

St Louis Car Accident Lawyer In the emotionally upsetting aftermath of a car accident, specifically when it results in injury or, sadly, death, the assistance of a knowledgeable car accident lawyer becomes important.

Such an attorney plays a crucial part in navigating the challenging legal and insurance system. They provide expertise in assessing the crash's details, ensuring that all relevant proof is gathered and given to the correct authorities.

For those wounded, a car accident lawyer is instrumental in ensuring fair settlement for healthcare expenses, lost salaries, strain and suffering, often negotiating with insurance companies who might be inclined to pay the minimum payouts.

In fatal accidents, the attorney becomes a vital advocate for the bereaved relatives. They provide compassionate, solid legal support, helping to secure financial compensation for damages related to the sudden loss.

By entrusting these legal complexities to a professional car accident attorney, victims and their family members can concentrate on recovery and healing, confident that their legal rights and interests are being strongly protected. If you are searching for a "St Louis car accident lawyer near me," call Missouri Injury Law Firm today.

St Louis Truck Accident Lawyer In a truck accident, where the large size and weight of the truck can bring about critical traumas or death, a truck accident lawyer is an important ally.

These specialized legal representatives have knowledge of the unique difficulties that accidents with big vehicles involve, as well as specific laws and industry standards.

When a person gets hurt in a truck collision, a lawyer can thoroughly review the crash, frequently involving evaluation of trucking company methods, driver logs, and truck service records. They are adept at navigating insurance and legal hurdles to secure sufficient payment for health-related costs, lost income, and pain and suffering.

For those searching for a "St Louis truck accident lawyer near me," reach out to Missouri Injury Law Firm now! Our abilities will bring monetary relief and help hold responsible parties liable, providing a measure of justice to those affected by the truck crash.

St. Louis Wrongful Death Lawyer Losing a loved one is a very difficult experience, but losing a loved one as a result of the irresponsible, careless, or reckless actions of another can be completely devastating. Commonly the relatives of the deceased person is burdened with big medical debts and funeral costs along with the emotional strain of sorrow. The wrongful death of a member of the family due to the acts of another person triggers confusion and rage, especially when the death is caused by a trusted professional, like a medical caregiver who has caused a nursing home death, or caused by the mindless acts of a reckless semi-truck driver or drunk driver.

By contacting a wrongful death lawyer, the family of a person whose death was caused by neglect or recklessness might have the right to monetary payment through a wrongful death claim. At Missouri Injury Law Firm, we know that no amount of money can replace the loss of your loved one, however through caring representation, we try to alleviate economic burdens. We will fight to make sure that the wrongful death of your loved one is met with justice and will try to obtain the maximum recovery to help with financial strains. St. Louis Workers Compensation Lawyer Missouri law dictates that employers with 5 or more employees provide workers' compensation insurance, covering not just physical traumas but also illnesses and particular mental or stress-related health issues. This insurance operates on a no-fault basis, meaning employees don't need to prove employer fault to claim benefits.

A workers' compensation attorney is invaluable if you're harmed on duty or suffer a work-related health problem. They make sure that you apply for and receive the benefits you're entitled to, including treatment and payment for lost salaries. In fatal workplace accidents, these legal professionals assist families in getting due benefits.

With its competence in workers' compensation claims, Missouri Injury Law Firm provides diligent representation against insurance companies that may well prolong or oppose to the rightful claims. They advocate for your legal rights, ensuring you or your loved ones receive the pay-out deserved for work injuries or health problems. So, if you are tired of browsing online for "St. Louis workers compensation attorney near me," call us today.

Dog Bite Lawyer Missouri Dogs are our beloved family pets, but they can act unpredictably occasionally. The legislation in Missouri enables sufferers of unprovoked dog attacks to get a settlement, particularly when the owner's carelessness is a factor.

A lawyer specializing in dog bite cases can adeptly direct you through receiving financial compensation for healthcare fees, injury, and any other relevant fees. This legal assistance is certainly important in severe situations involving serious traumas or, tragically, deaths.

The experience of a local law expert in navigating these insurance claims ensures that victims or their families are given the necessary assistance and financial compensation to help in recovery and dealing with the aftermath of such a distressing incident like a dog bite.

No more tedious online searches for "dog bite lawyer Missouri near me." Reach out to Missouri Injury Law Firm in St. Louis now.

[gogellawfirm]

Personal Injury Attorneys St.Louis The Gogel Law Firm

Are you in need of personal injury attorneys in St. Louis? Look no further! Our team of dedicated legal professionals specializes in personal injury cases. With years of experience, we understand the complexities of the legal system and will fight tirelessly to protect your rights. Whether you've been injured in a car accident, slip and fall, or any other incident, we are here to help. Contact our Personal Injury Attorneys In St. Louis today for a free consultation and let us advocate for the compensation you deserve. Contact Us:(314) 775-3864 Visit Our Location:745 Old Ballas Road, St Louis, Missouri, 63141 Our Services:

Automobile Accident Attorney St Louis

Wrongful Death Attorney St Louis

Auto Accident Lawyer St. Louis

Truck Accident Lawyer St Louis

[beardedmrbean]

Marcellus “Khaliifah” Williams, whose stay of execution was lifted last summer, will have his case heard after prosecutors announced they will use a Missouri law allowing them to intervene in wrongful convictions.

The 55 year old has been on Missouri’s death row for 24 years.

DNA testing concluded he was not a match to evidence found on the knife that killed Felicia Gayle, a woman who was murdered in 1998 in St. Louis County.

As a result of the DNA evidence, former Gov. Eric Greitens halted Williams’ 2017 execution date and convened a board of inquiry tasked with making a recommendation on the case.

But in June, Gov. Mike Parson lifted the stay and dissolved the board with little explanation.

The Missouri Attorney General’s Office immediately requested the Missouri Supreme Court set an execution date.

Williams’ legal team filed a lawsuit in late August contending that going forward with an execution would violate his constitutional rights to due process. They also argued Parson did not have authority to disband the board without a recommendation. The lawsuit remains ongoing in the Circuit Court of Cole County.

Earlier this month, the St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office’s conviction and integrity review unit sent a letter to the court asking for a delay of six months while the office investigates Williams’ innocence claim.

Prosecutors are using a state law that went into effect in August 2021, allowing them to file a motion to vacate a conviction if they have information that a prisoner might be innocent or “erroneously convicted.” A hearing before a judge is then scheduled.

The law was first used by Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker in Kevin Strickland’s case. He was released from prison in November 2021 after serving 43 years for a triple murder he did not commit.

[msclaritea]

"On Tuesday, it was reported by NBC News that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell continues to recover at a rehabilitation center after his fall at a restaurant in Washington earlier this month. McConnell spoke with fellow Republican Senators over the phone from the facility and “sounded like Mitch,” according to Senate Minority Whip John Thune.

The news brought to mind McConnell’s exceptional instincts as a political calculator, and in particular his past cynical and perhaps prescient deliberations concerning his own health. In 2020, amid reports that McConnell had visited Johns Hopkins in Baltimore after concerning photos were published showing intense bruising on one of his hands, the Kentucky Republican began a campaign to pressure the GOP-controlled Kentucky Legislature to change that state’s law to remove from the governor—who is a Democrat—the authority to select a candidate to fill the unexpired term of a departing U.S. senator. The ability of the governor to appoint a nominee to fill the unexpired term of a senator without restrictions is the law in 35 states.

But McConnell urged, and the Kentucky Legislature took the step of changing that state’s law—overriding the veto of the governor to do so—in a way that assured that Republicans would maintain control of McConnell’s seat should it become vacant.

This effort—to remove powers from elected representatives who are Democrats—has become the new method of disenfranchising voters and maintaining perpetual Republican political power. And it is being undertaken with alarming frequency and speed across the country. This may be the most dangerous and efficient structural attack on our democracy. Its threat, and pernicious ingenuity, lies in its ability to make voting itself irrelevant. Voters may turn out in high numbers and elect their candidates of choice, but if the official is not one whose views align with those of the Republican Party, they may find that their powers of office are removed by antagonistic GOP-controlled legislatures.

We have seen this phenomenon most readily applied to so-called progressive prosecutors who have run successfully on platforms of criminal justice reform across the country. Progressive prosecutors have refused to prosecute low-level marijuana possession crimes, have embraced diversion programs, have opened conviction integrity units to review prior prosecutions for violations of law, and have prosecuted police officers for brutality. For embracing these and other reforms, progressive prosecutors have been confronted with an array of efforts to remove their power. Prosecutors who prosecute or investigate the wrong kinds of criminal suspects in the eyes of Republican legislators have also received this treatment.

Aramis Ayala became the first Black elected prosecutor in the state of Florida when she was elected in 2016 as state’s attorney for Orange and Osceola counties. One of her early announcements was that she would no longer pursue death sentences in capital cases. She argued that seeking the death penalty in homicide cases was draining the coffers of the county, in addition to many other flaws. Indeed, one study found that Osceola County had more prisoners on death row than over 99 percent of U.S. counties. The Republican attorney general of Florida and, subsequently, Republican Gov. Rick Scott and then Gov. Ron DeSantis removed from Ayala all first-degree murder cases and transferred them to a prosecutor in a different circuit.

St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, who won reelection with 70 percent of the vote in 2020, meanwhile, has faced down efforts by the Missouri attorney general, several judges, and the Legislature to remove her power to prosecute felony crimes and to render ineffective her conviction integrity unit. She first entered the crosshairs of opponents when she aggressively sought to investigate and prosecute a Republican former governor for sexual misconduct, allegations that a bipartisan investigative committee found highly credible. Gardner has admitted to making errors in her investigation and was admonished by the bar. Then, after doggedly and ultimately successfully investigating and then advocating for the release of an innocent man prosecuted by a prior circuit attorney, Gardner generated even greater opposition from the Republican attorney general. Now a bill in the Republican-dominated Legislature would remove all serious criminal cases from Gardner’s authority, and the attorney general has filed a petition to remove her from office.

Other prosecutors have faced similar efforts. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, not widely regarded as a reform prosecutor, made the presumably unpardonable decision to convene a grand jury to investigate the effort of Donald Trump to compel Georgia officials to fraudulently award him votes he did not win in the 2020 election. In the wake of what were reported to be “imminent” indictments resulting from Willis’ investigations, the Georgia Legislature passed a legally dubious bill that would create commissions empowered to remove elected prosecutors from office.

Indeed, bills have been filed in more than a dozen states to remove power from reform-minded prosecutors from Polk County, Iowa, to Mississippi. Black women prosecutors have been the high-profile face of the targets of these challenges. But other reform-minded prosecutors have also faced well-financed recall or Republican legislative impeachment efforts since 2020.

This attack on the authority of prosecutors is a rule-of-law crisis, to be sure. Indeed, the virtual silence of organizations like the National Association of District Attorneys in the wake of these attacks reflects a concerning inertia within the profession. But it would be a mistake to see this purely as an attack on prosecutors. It is part of a larger anti-democratic power grab that threatens our democracy by ensuring one-party rule, no matter the outcome of elections.

In Wisconsin in 2018, former Republican Gov. Scott Walker used the lame duck session to sign bills stripping power from the newly elected Democratic governor to change policies around health care, welfare, and economic development, and to allow one of the most gerrymandered Republican-controlled legislatures in the country the right to intervene in certain cases challenging state laws. Walker may have copied this move from the outgoing Republican governor of North Carolina, who, as he departed office in 2016, signed bills—again passed by a heavily gerrymandered Republican-controlled Legislature—limiting incoming Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s cabinet appointment power, and ensured that the state elections board would remain under the control of Republicans.

Back in Kentucky, Gov. Andy Beshear has also seen the Republican-controlled general assembly pass bills that strip additional powers long held by governors. The new laws would prevent anyone but the state attorney general (currently Republican Daniel Cameron) from using public funds to challenge the constitutionality of laws passed by the general assembly. Another new law would remove the power of the governor to approve contracts and tax-incentive agreements entered into by the executive branch. Still another, filed on the day Beshear won election, strips away the governor’s ability to select his own secretary of transportation.

Which brings us back to McConnell, who indeed may have patented the modern version of this viral form of voter suppression. It was McConnell who, in essence, removed the power of a sitting president to fill an open seat on the United States Supreme Court when he refused to allow hearings and consideration of President Obama’s nominee, then-Judge Merrick Garland. In essence, the Republicans declared that a Democratic president would be denied the constitutional power to appoint justices to the Supreme Court as long as the GOP controlled the Senate.

One final and important point: We have seen this particular tactic before, in the late 1980s, when a wave of successful voting rights cases resulted in the election of some of the first Black officials in local offices in the South. One such place was Etowah County, Alabama, where for the first time a Black person was elected to serve on the County Commission. Traditionally each county commissioner in Etowah had full power and authority over construction, roads, equipment, and contracts in their commission district. But after the election of the first Black commissioner, the majority-white commission voted that such powers would now be held by the full commission, ensuring that the new Black commissioner could exercise authority only if approved by the majority white commission.

Now this practice of power reallocation, as with all voter-suppression techniques first workshopped on Black communities in the South, has metastasized into a national phenomenon. Unchecked, it will make the act of voting a Potemkin exercise and upend the very concept of representative government. This is an efficiently sinister effort to solidify one-party rule. Its geographic breadth and reach to offices both high and low requires a national legislative response. With Republicans in control of the House of Representatives, the prospects are dim. But this should be powerful motivation for congressional Democrats—and, indeed, for all Americans who wish to live in a democracy—to turn out and vote this year and next, in essence to save the framework of democracy while there’s still time. It should be clear now that for the foreseeable future, democracy remains on the ballot."

I told people years ago that allowing the Southerners to do what they want, leave them be, let them continue screwing over the black population would just lead to them pulling their shit all over the country. All of the criminal behavior has been allowed to spread. I want to also say for the record that D.L. Hughley and any other black performer making jokes about, "Stay out of the South!" are paid off, piece of shit sellouts. Why are people so stupid to not realize you're being subtly encouraged not to care or interfere. If it's happening inside this country, you damn well should. It's your duty. We don't live in bubbles. We are connected.

[personal-injury-lawyer-st-louis]

St. Louis Wrongful Death Attorneys

It is normal for anybody to feel worried or overpowered when they lost a dear individual from their loved ones. During such circumstance, the individual alone can't manage the guaranteeing system. As of now, unfair passing lawyer can assist you with getting the monetary pay, get equity and diminish a portion of your weight. An unjust passing case is brought against somebody who is liable for the demise. Normally this guarantee is documented to assist the family with low pay and to pay for memorial service installments,  St. Louis Wrongful Death Attorneys however, it can likewise be professed to rebuff the other party for their carelessness.

There are a few motivations to recruit an unfair demise lawyer. The following are not many things to be considered under the watchful eye of employing the legal advisor:

• With the experience of comparative cases, the family legal counselor could possibly manage such case, yet it is smarter to go for an accomplished attorney around here of regulation.

• Don't bother paying the expenses on the off chance that you don't get the equity. With an expense understanding of possibility, you don't need to pay legal counselor's charges except if they get you equity or cash. This would do their absolute best with them extraordinary incitement to.

• Saves your time. After a demise in your family, you might need to do a ton and make due. Employing a legal counselor can save your time and remove your pressure as they deal with everyday undertakings of your case.

• An accomplished lawyer works with family regulation lawyers and property lawyers to decently partition the got settlement.

• Demise can prompt bitterness, culpability, outrage, and a horde of feelings, which can overcome your judgment. Lawyers might help you in prevailing with your case and furthermore in a method of good choices in the case.

• Lawyers will work with specialists. Assuming that you are confronting inconvenience in giving data about the individual who is liable for your cherished one's demise, they will help you by recruiting agents or scientific trained professionals.

• These kind of cases include a few complex lawful issues, for that reason it is essential to employ an unjust passing lawyer with the effective history and involvement with taking care of such cases, which are like your case.

[dixoninjuryfirmmo]

The Dixon Injury Firm

9666 Olive Blvd #202 St. Louis MO 63132 USA (314) 208-2808 https://www.dixoninjuryfirm.com/ leads@dixoninjuryfirm.com

Based in St. Louis, Missouri, The Dixon Injury Firm represents clients in a wide range of legal matters: motor vehicle (e.g., car, truck, taxi, Uber, Lyft, bus, bicycle, motorcycle, etc.) or pedestrian accidents, brain injury, workers’ compensation, slip-and-fall, dog bite, burn injury, as well as wrongful death. Since 2009, their award-winning team is driven by a passion for justice and a commitment to standing up against negligent and wrongful conduct. The Dixon Injury Firm offers free initial consultations and contingency fees, meaning clients do not owe any attorneys’ fees unless the firm wins their case. They are available 24/7. Call today to schedule a free initial case evaluation!

[creepingsharia]

Illinois: Grandson of honor-killing, terror-linked ‘Palestinian’ Muslim running for Congress

Rashad “Rush” Darwish’s platform: support for sanctuary cities, amnesty for illegals, and taking guns from law-abiding Americans.

via Ballotpedia:

Rush Darwish (Democratic Party) is running for election to the U.S. House to represent Illinois' 3rd Congressional District. He is on the ballot in the Democratic primary on March 17, 2020.

via Chicago-Sun Times: Chicago-area congressional candidate’s remarks about Jews, Israel spark questions

Rashad “Rush” Darwish, 42, runs a television and photography production business in Pilsen. He said in the interview he adopted the less ethnic-sounding name of Rush in 2001 — before the 9-11 attacks — when he was hired for an on-air TV news job in Tyler, Texas. He later switched careers and returned to the Chicago area.

His parents, now Lemont residents, were born in the West Bank village of Beitin. At age 6, his family moved from Stone Park back to Beitin for two years to live with his maternal grandmother. At that kickoff event this summer, Darwish said, “The very foundation of who I am, the values I learned growing up in Palestine, is embedded in me.”

Darwish is on the executive board of AMVOTE, the American Middle East Voters Alliance PAC, a state-level political action committee.

As he seeks to make history, Darwish’s newfound political muscle is bringing attention to comments he made this summer and years ago.

At a campaign kickoff event in June, Darwish in a speech incorrectly said Lipinski got $15,000 from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel influential lobbying group. However, AIPAC is not a political action committee, does not endorse and does not donate to campaigns. AIPAC members and allies, like anyone, can contribute as individuals and use their personal networks to raise money for candidates.

Darwish provided no details to back up his $15,000 assertion when the Sun-Times asked him about it, saying “what I can do at this stage” is “take a closer look. … So if I technically said it wrong, then, I would have to look into that.”

Back in 2015, as a provocative radio talk show host, Darwish excoriated a guest, Ray Hanania — who, among other things, comments on and writes about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Darwish told Hanania he sounded “like you are praising the Israeli people and the Jewish civilization as if they are great people.”

Darwish told the Sun-Times, “I’ll be honest with you. I may have misspoke if I said the word Jews. That was a mistake on my part. Usually I think I’m pretty good at knowing on the show not to use the word Jews because Jews are not, that’s not the problem.” His problem, he said is with a “pro-Israeli government agenda.”

--------------------------------

A quick look at Darwish’s webpage and he is open about not only his platform in support of illegal aliens but his ongoing personal support to illegal aliens. Excerpts from his platform below:

In my personal time, I have been connecting undocumented families I know with pro-bono immigration attorneys to assist them in gaining legal status...what we need as a country is comprehensive and fair immigration reform to put these families on a path to citizenship...

As your Congressman I would:

Support sanctuary cities and asylum seekers...

Support comprehensive and fair immigration reform to make our immigration system simpler, more accessible, particularly for non-native english speakers

Expand my work personally to create and market a large network of pro-bono immigration attorneys to assist undocumented families in gaining legal status.

Darwish is also anti-Second Amendment and an open gun grabber. Again from his platform site:

Taking assault rifles, high capacity magazine clips, and other weapons of war completely off our streets...

Rush believes Congress should immediately pass a national ban on the importation and sale of all assault rifles and high capacity magazine clips.  These weapons should only be utilized by our Armed forces and at certain times by local law enforcement.

--------------------------------

Darwish focuses on preventing some law-abiding Americans from even purchasing guns, specifically, what he refers to as “white nationalist” and Trump supporters. There is no mention of his co-religionists and their jihad.

But Darwish is not only an open border, sanctuary city supporting, amnesty for illegals, gun grabbing socialist, Darwish is the grandson of one of the first known Muslim honor killers in the United States.

Twitter user @kristintweeted engaged Rashad, aka Rush, about this on her Facebook page. Shortly thereafter he blocked her. Screen shots here.

Darwish’s father is Amir Darwish, President of “The Coalition of Palestinian-American Organizations.”

In this 1991 St. Louis Post Dispatch article on the 1991 honor killing of Tina Issa, Rush Darwish’s father defended his father in law who was convicted in the Islamic honor killing of his own daughter. via Parents guilty in murder of daughter:

A St. Louis Circuit Court jury deliberated less than four hours Friday before finding Zein Isa and his wife, Maria, guilty of first-degree murder in the stabbing of their youngest daughter.

The prosecutor, Assistant Circuit Attorney Dee Joyce-Hayes, said she was pleased but added she had been concerned that jurors might have found Maria Isa guilty of the less serious crime of second-degree murder.

Her lawyer, Charles M. Shaw, had contended that Maria sided with Tina in a growing family rift. The mother tried to protect Tina when Zein Isa plunged a knife into the girl's chest on Nov. 6, 1989, at the family's South Side apartment, Shaw said.

Amir Darwish of Chicago, a son-in-law of Zein Isa, said he was distressed by the convictions.

''I think all the facts were not on the table for the jury in this case, '' he said.

The prosecution's most important evidence was a secretly made tape- recording of the murder. Seven minutes of it was filled with Tina's shrieks as she was being stabbed. Some jurors cried when the tape was played for them on Wednesday.

But they asked to hear the tape Friday for a second time, and sat grim-faced and alone in the locked courtroom, listening to the tape over headphones.

In her final argument to the jury, Joyce-Hayes said, ''I can't think of any other way to describe this incident other than as a blood sacrifice.''

She said the Isas believed the only way to ''cleanse'' the family was through Tina's blood. ''They assassinated her,'' the prosecutor said.

The prosecutor could not bring herself to call the heinous crime what it really was. An honor killing. And she even went so far as to claim it had nothing to do with Islam.

A 1993 Chicago Tribune article, A FAMILY TRAGEDY OR TERRORISTS' SCHEME?, uncovered the terrorist ties in the honor killing.

Again, this is the family of Rush Darwish - now running for a seat in the Unitied States Congress.

"Quiet, little one! Die quickly, my daughter, die!" Zein Isa said in Arabic. He stabbed her six times while his wife, Maria, held her by the hair.

"Mother! Please, help me!" Tina pleaded.

"What help?" Maria Isa replied.

As Tina lay dying, her father put his foot on her mouth to muffle the cries.

Jurors heard it all. An FBI bug picked up the parents' words and the daughter's screams. Zein Isa, the bureau explained, was suspected of working for the Palestine Liberation Organization, which at that time had not publicly disavowed terrorism.

Jurors were told that he, his wife and Tina's older sisters believed she had dishonored the family, going against Muslim tradition by having a boyfriend.

She dishonored the family. Her penalty was to be honor killed. But the FBI suggested she knew too much about her father’s involvement in an Islamic terror group for which he was later indicted.

The organization, a violent and nihilistic 1974 offshoot of the PLO, was labeled by the State Department in 1989 as the world's most dangerous terrorist group. It is responsible for more than 90 terrorist attacks in 20 countries, according to the department's annual assessment of terrorism.

A federal grand jury in April indicted Zein Isa, 61, already on Death Row for his daughter's murder; Saif Nijmeh, 33, of St. Louis; Luie Nijmeh, 29, of Miamisburg, Ohio; and Tawfiq Musa, 43, of Racine, Wis. All are in Missouri prisons awaiting trial.

The four are accused of a variety of acts under federal RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) statutes: obtaining illegal weapons, such as a rocket-propelled grenade launcher; procuring and using bogus passports; illegally transferring money overseas; and conspiring to murder Tina Isa.

...

But reviews of tape-recorded conversations between Zein Isa and his daughters and their husbands also show that killing her to preserve the family honor was being discussed as early as August 1989.

-------------------------------

While Rashad “Rush” Darwish was not involved in the honor killing of his aunt, he doesn’t stray far from his ‘Palestinian’ roots. He is adamantly anti-Israel, pro BDS, and he has the support of Hamas-linked CAIR.

Darwish has also campaigned with another name-changing ‘Palestinian’ grandson of an Islamic terrorist whom we posted on two days ago: Ammar Campa-Najjar.

When “Rush” still went by the name Rashad, he was a member of the notorious Hamas-funding Bridgeview Mosque.

The mosque hosted al-Qaeda’s spiritual leader and it’s terror ties were so well known that a bank shut the mosque’s account and refused to do business with them. The mosque was also linked to the largest terror-financing conviction in U.S. history.

What other skeletons are in Rush Darwish’s closet? The media won’t investigate.

Do Illinois voters really want to find out the hard way? Was the lesson of Barrack Hussein “Barry Soetero” Obama not enough? 

In less than ten days we’ll find out.

--------------------------------------------------

Update 1: Rashad Darwish lost, and Lost Big