#Weather Prediction Center
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Link
Forecasters are gaining confidence that an atmospheric river is coming to California.
0 notes
Text
"945 mb low pressure system continues to churn about 300 miles west of the Olympic Peninsula per the coordinated 00z (4 pm PST) surface analysis with @NWSOPC. Heavy rain, gusty winds, & mountain snow will continue across the NW through tomorrow as the system weakens."
NOAA Weather Prediction Center
#What NOAA Does#NOAA.gov#NOAA NWS#NWS Weather Prediction Center#Bomb Cyclone#Atmospheric River#Pacific Northwest weather
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
By Marcia Dunn
Updated 9:45 PM, 11 May 2024
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) — An unusually strong solar storm hitting Earth produced stunning displays of color in the skies across the Northern Hemisphere early Saturday, with no immediate reports of disruptions to power and communications.
The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a rare severe geomagnetic storm warning when a solar outburst reached Earth on Friday afternoon, hours sooner than anticipated.
The effects of the Northern Lights, which were prominently on display in Britain, were due to last through the weekend and possibly into next week.
Many in the U.K. shared phone snaps of the lights on social media early Saturday, with the phenomenon seen as far south as London and southern England.
"There were sightings from top to tail across the country,” said Chris Snell, a meteorologist at the Met Office, Britain’s weather agency.
He added that the office received photos and information from other European locations including Prague and Barcelona.
NOAA alerted operators of power plants and spacecraft in orbit, as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to take precautions.
“For most people here on planet Earth, they won’t have to do anything,” said Rob Steenburgh, a scientist with NOAA’s Space Weather Prediction Center.
The storm could produce northern lights as far south in the U.S. as Alabama and Northern California, NOAA said.
But it was hard to predict and experts stressed it would not be the dramatic curtains of color normally associated with the northern lights, but more like splashes of greenish hues.
“That’s really the gift from space weather: the aurora,” Steenburgh said.
He and his colleagues said the best aurora views may come from phone cameras, which are better at capturing light than the naked eye.
"Snap a picture of the sky and there might be actually a nice little treat there for you,” said Mike Bettwy, operations chief for the prediction center.
The most intense solar storm in recorded history — in 1859 — prompted auroras in central America and possibly even Hawaii.
“We are not anticipating that but it could come close," NOAA space weather forecaster Shawn Dahl said.
This storm poses a risk for high-voltage transmission lines for power grids, not the electrical lines ordinarily found in people’s homes, Dahl told reporters.
Satellites also could be affected, which in turn could disrupt navigation and communication services here on Earth.
An extreme geomagnetic storm in 2003, for example, took out power in Sweden and damaged power transformers in South Africa.
Even when the storm is over, signals between GPS satellites and ground receivers could be scrambled or lost, according to NOAA.
But there are so many navigation satellites that any outages should not last long, Steenburgh noted.
The sun has produced strong solar flares since Wednesday, resulting in at least seven outbursts of plasma.
Each eruption, known as a coronal mass ejection, can contain billions of tons of plasma and magnetic field from the sun’s outer atmosphere, or corona.
The flares seem to be associated with a sunspot that’s 16 times the diameter of Earth, NOAA said.
It is all part of the solar activity ramping up as the sun approaches the peak of its 11-year cycle.
NASA said the storm posed no serious threat to the seven astronauts aboard the International Space Station.
The biggest concern is the increased radiation levels, and the crew could move to a better shielded part of the station if necessary, according to Steenburgh.
Increased radiation also could threaten some of NASA’s science satellites.
Extremely sensitive instruments will be turned off, if necessary, to avoid damage, said Antti Pulkkinen, director of the space agency’s heliophysics science division.
Several sun-focused spacecraft are monitoring all the action.
“This is exactly the kinds of things we want to observe,” Pulkkinen said.
#Earth#solar storm#Northern Hemisphere#U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration#solar outburst#geomagnetic storm#Northern Lights#Federal Emergency Management Agency#Space Weather Prediction Center#NASA#solar flare#coronal mass ejection#plasma#magnetic field#corona#radiation levels#aurora borealis#aurora
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Best Regards
The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field
1- Preface
2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?
3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection
4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System
5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?
6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data
7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves
1- Preface
My theory tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field moreover there's NO gravitational field) – and because the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- this article uses the gravitational waves reflection as a method to prove my theory – that's why the article tile is (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field)
Let's refer to my theory before to prove by using the gravitational waves reflection
(i)
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies
Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion creates waves in the space – by that planet motion is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and- planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the sea- by that- the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-
(ii)
The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)
AND
In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total (where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit)
Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –
Shortly
The planets motions energies are unified into unified wave and this wave moves by velocity (205.8 km/s) – means- while the planets revolve around the sun, there's one unified wave revolves around the sun and moves by velocity 205.8 km/s
This unified wave is the gravitational waves
The question is
The scientists discovered waves in the space and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field but why?? because planet motion energy analysis proves the motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves- so the discovered waves are created by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field – also let's prove the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field to support my theory
(iii)
The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following
(a)
The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-
(b)
No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-
Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.
(c)
The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-
(d)
The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it
Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)
d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance
Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)
d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance
d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury
Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655
d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance
d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance
655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter
All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation
Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.
Notice
Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)
Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-
(e)
Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.
THE CONCLUSION
The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All
2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?
The solar system is created from one energy- and this energy is reflected on each other- for that reason- many planets data are reflected on each other- the energy reflection is seen in different data of planets – let's give 3 examples
Example No. (1)
Planet velocity definition proves planets velocities are reflected on each other –
(v1v2= constant = 322) (my 5th equation)
This equation proves the planets velocities are created in pairs and not individually- means each planet has its complementary – let's prove that
Mercury (47.4 km/s) x Uranus (6.8 km/s) = 322
Venus (35 km/s) x Pluto (4.7 km/s) x 2 = 322
The Earth (29.8 km/s) x Neptune (5.4 km/s) x 2 = 322
Mars (24.1 km/s) x Jupiter (13.1 km/s) = 322
Planet velocity is defined by many rules but our rule is the major one and all other rules depend on it
Clearly the rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are reflected on each other
Example No. (2)
The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – The Earth) tells
Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates Longer orbital distance
(I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus)
The original order was (Mercury – Mars - Venus – The Earth)
This order also tells the same rule (Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates longer orbital distance)
AND
The outer planets order (Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto) tells
Greater diameter necessitates Shorter orbital distance
Clearly the planets orders are reflected on each other
(Uranus diameter is greater than Neptune diameter but Neptune mass is greater – means – the order depends on the planets diameters and not masses)
Example No. (3)
Venus orbital inclination = 3.4 degrees and
Pluto orbital inclination = 17.2 degrees
But sin (3.4 degrees) = (1/17.2)
I try to show that the planets data is reflected on each other but we need to defines which planet data is reflected on which
3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection
Let's see the picture clearly
(a)
we see the planets data are reflected on each other – and we ask – how this data be reflected on each other?
(b)
The planets can't be reflected on each other – why?? because each planet is connected by its orbit- the planets are found in their orbits- the reflection of energy needs freedom in motion- we understand this meaning clearly
For example- I can use a mirror to reflect a light beam but I can NOT control the reflected light beam – the reflected energy moves free in space- here – if the planets are reflected on each other they will leave their orbits because they will be carried by the energy into the reflection direction-
I want to say- the motion in orbit is a feature of the planet – and the reflection is a feature of wave – planet motion can not support the reflection feature because the motion is done in orbit (defined position)
Shortly- the planets can not be reflected on each other
(c)
How can the planets data reflected on each other if the planets can't be reflected on each other? how can their data be reflected?
There are 2 steps to answer this question – I write them in (d) and (e)
(d)
The gravitational waves are reflected- in fact- the gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- please pay attention- we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system
The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn
The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter
The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars
The gravitational waves are reflected and this reflection causes to reflect the planets data on each other
(e)
Why does the gravitational waves reflection cause to reflect the planets data?
The solar planets and distances are created from one energy – means – one cycle of energy is found behind the solar group creation and motion
This is similar to the blood circulation in a creature- the planets are similar to this creature members- the blood moves to this creature liver, kidney, heart and brain each member is similar to a planet- the blood moves through all of them- if this blood is poisoned all of them will be dead- if the blood healthy the members will be strong-
Similar to that
The gravitational waves are reflected and pushes energy in defined direction- each planet data is defined by this energy –and because- some energy moves in direction opposite to other energy (because of the reflection of energy) for that some planets data be reflected on each other-
Please pay attention
We have one energy behind the solar system- the reflection of energy causes part of this energy to move in opposite direction to the other part that causes the data to be reflected on each other and for that some planets data be reflected on other planets data-
The major problem in this explanation is the matter definition- because- the physics book defines the planet as (Planet is a rigid body created independently from the space and the other planets)- this definition is the problem because based on it the data can never be reflected on each other even if the gravitational waves are reflected let's provide a new definition for matter and prove it
Matter Definition
I have discovered (Planet Diameter Is Created Based On A Mathematical Equation) let's see this equation
My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity
r = Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)
Example
Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8
89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
49528 km = Neptune diameter
9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity
5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination
The equation tells planet diameter is created based on its velocity –means- Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s
The Equation Concept
Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- the fact is that – The necessary requirement for planet safe motion is to create a function between this planet diameter and its orbital distance
BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- the function in this case can't be useful because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result
The designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but the function contains also more variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a planet changes its orbital distance- this planet diameter will not be changed but its rotation period, orbital period, and velocity will be changed and the diameter will be saved-
NOTICE-
Mars is the example for this theory because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one- after Migration Mars changed its motion data but Mars diameter is saved
NOTICE-
Planet diameter equation is very useful to analyze the energy reflection in the solar system because the equation shows the changes in data resulting from the energy reflection- for example- the equation produces the planet orbital inclination-but in Saturn equation- the equation produces the value (0.4) while we know Saturn orbital inclination is 2.5 degrees- the value (0.4) is produced because the energy is reflected in Saturn and that caused effect on the data by that the value (2.5) become (1/2.5)=0.4
Matter Definition (Deep Analysis)
What's The Matter And How Is Created?
The matter and space are created from the same one energy and both move with the motion of this energy from which they are created- but- the matter creates for itself a distinguish form and moves by different velocity from the space motion (notice the gravitational waves prove the space has motion and not static).
This is similar to the sea of water- the space is similar to the sea of water and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page-
The whirlpool (vortex) is created by the sea water and it's carried by the sea water motion- spite of that- the whirlpool is different in its form from the sea waves – also the whirlpool moves by different velocity from the sea waves motion velocity- this example gives explanation for the matter definition- the matter is similar perfectly to the whirlpool on the sea page- it's created by the sea water motion but it has a distinguish form and different velocity from the sea waves-
Also
The whirlpool dimensions depend on the sea water motion features- for example – we have a whirlpool its diameter is 2 meters, this diameter is formed by the sea water motion features (the water velocity- amount-pressure -……etc) that tells the whirlpool is found later after the sea creation- and the water motion is found before the whirlpool creation- this meaning is a fact for the matter creation and dimensions- the matter dimensions are created based on this matter motion- means- the motion is defined before the matter creation- this is proved strongly by my planet diameter equation- the equation tells (for example) Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s- the whirlpool idea explains how the planet matter data is defined based on its motion- because
The original energy was found in motion at first and the planet matter is created from this moving original energy and the planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after the planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data is created that's why the planet data is in full harmony with the planet motion features.
Also the idea shows the planet motion reason- as I proved before- no planet moves by the sun gravity- Newton is wrong- because the planet creation and motion are done by one force only otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it- here we see the planet motion reason- the planet moves with the original energy from which this planet is created
4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System
Please pay attention - we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system
The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn
The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter
The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars
The planets data is reflected according to this table – for that we need to define each reflection in details to see the reflected data between the two planets
5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?
Let's suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field as the physics book tells- the waves are reflected and caused changes for the planets data- as I prove in the next point- that means – the gravitational waves provides new energy for the planets which caused the planets data to be effected by the gravitational waves reflection- this will add new energy for these planets and the whole solar system-
This is similar to the rains on Earth- we know- the rains is vaporized water from the seas and rivers and this vaporized water is found in the clouds which cause the rains
Means- we don't imagine the water is found in the sky by itself – and we don't think the rains water is new water found in the sky without water vaporization from the seas and rivers- because- if the rain water is found in the sky by itself without vaporization for the seas water that will add new water on the Earth- and that will cause the whole Earth to be drown in water and no ground will be found because the rains add new water to the Earth-
Similar to that- if we suppose- the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field and these waves are reflected and cause effects on the planets data because these waves add new energy for the planets – this new energy will increase the solar system energy – this is a wrong idea- because
No source of energy can cause the continuous increase for the solar system energy
The solar system stability in motion proves no change in energy is found
The planets orbital periods are not changed prove the solar system energy is a stable value has no change
Shortly- the solar system energy is defined stable value of energy moves in a cycle (as the sea water and rains) –
This analysis proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and by that the gravitational waves effect on the planets data is a part of the energy cycle where these waves energy is produced by the planets motions and this energy has effects on these planets shows a complete cycle of energy.
Means
The solar system energy is stable- the reflection of energy causes to accumulate the energy in one point but the energy before the accumulation equal the energy after the accumulation- the reflection causes to accumulate the energy in one point only
The conclusion
The gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (even if found)
6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data
The Data Changes
The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data let's refer to these changes in following
What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.
What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection
The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.
The energy direction is changed by the reflection
The players of the rates of time are reflected also –
Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have seen - the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn– and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets -
These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the data analysis and comparison
Let's see how these changes have effects on the planets data in the next point no. (7)
7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves
Group Data No (I)
(1)
The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that
Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days
And
687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)
(2)
The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That
Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period4900 days
And
4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)
4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)
4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)
(3)
The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–
BUT
The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And
(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)
1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference
1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)
1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)
1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
Discussion
(1)
The data shows the following
The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods
(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)
The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods
The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference
This data proved my planet definition (the planets are geometrical points carried by the same one energy- or- the planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam- and the planets move with this light beam motion- and the planets are created depending on each other and No planet is independent from the others in its creation and motion) – means- the planets are similar to whirlpools (vortex) found on the sea water page- we can imagine many whirlpools (vortex) are found on the same one sea and they are near to each other- this picture is very similar to the planets nature- that explains how the reflection of energy for one time can define the orbital periods for three planets (or 4 planets) together-
Here we imagine there are 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and then one strong wave of water passed through these 4 whirlpools (vortex), and this water wave motion causes effects on the 4 whirlpools-
This information is so important because one motion only (one wave reflection) can cause to define three or four planets data that proves strongly the planets Can NOT be independent neither in Creation Nor in motion- the planets are created and moving depends on each other because all of them are created from the same one energy and they move with this same energy motion-
NOTICE Let's imagine we have 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and one strong water wave passes through these 4 whirlpools (vortex) - now – suppose we put some red color on this strong water wave- what would happen? The water color will be red and the red water will pass through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)
We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.
That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other – Now let's analyze each reflection individually
(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)
224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)
AND-
680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –
As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)
The orbital periods definition
687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)
We don't discuss the precession cycle here
(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)
The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)
It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.
The important notice here tells that- the gravitational wave reflection for one time defines 3 planets orbital periods – this fact is proved strongly by the data and it disproves the wrong idea tells (Planet is created independently from the other planets)
(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)
Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data
Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days
And
4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)
4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)
4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)
We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them
Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days
687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The period 4900 days
4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)
4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)
4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)
The comparison shows the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because
The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-
Notice - please note clearly – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-
It's one gravitational wave sent from Pluto to Neptune and reflected to Saturn then this same wave is sent from Saturn to Uranus and Uranus reflected the same wave to Jupiter and Jupiter sent the same wave to Venus and Venus reflected the same wave to Mars- One Gravitational Wave moves through all these planets
The Conclusion
The planets data is distributed in the reversed direction for the reflected energy- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter but the data is distributed from Jupiter to Uranus- there's a geometrical reason for this behavior we should discover later.
(3) The First Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Neptune To Saturn)
We still have another problem- let's remember this problem reason
The gravitational wave first reflection is done from Pluto to Neptune, supposing Neptune would send the energy to Uranus but Neptune didn't send the energy instead Neptune kept the energy inside its orbit and prevent it to move toward Uranus – also Uranus itself couldn't release the imprisoned energy from Neptune orbit – and that necessitated Saturn itself to create interaction with Neptune to release the imprisoned energy for that the energy is moved toward Saturn immediately by that this reflection of the wave is considered the first reflection because the energy is released from Neptune to Saturn directly – Shortly- the wave energy is sent from Pluto to Neptune and the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and this is the first reflection of the energy (the gravitational wave first reflection)
Let's see the data - The distance 1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) is still a distance And (1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)
1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference
1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)
1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)
1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
The data follows the rule (2π, 4π, 8π) perfectly as the other two reflections but the data shows 2 problems which are
1st problem
The data distribution is in the reversed direction of the energy motion direction- because the reflection is done from Neptune to Saturn but the data shows the orbital circumferences of (Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto) are defined by this reflection which supposes the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune and that's NOT Fact
This behavior is typical the behavior of the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter-
Means- this behavior is repeated in the two reflections of energy which tells that the behavior depends on a geometrical reason.
2nd problem
The distance is not changed into a period of time as the other reflections but stayed as a distance! How and why?? let's see deeply this data
If the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune, Saturn orbital circumference 9010 mkm should be changed into a period of time to be 9010 days and then
9010 days x 2π = 2 x 28244 days (28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference)
9010 days x 4π = 113223 days
9010 days x 6π = 169840 days
We see the data gives NO real values- means- this is not the direction of the data creation- Instead – the distance 1433 mkm or the circumference 9010 mkm is still distance and then
1433 mkm x 2π = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)
1433 mkm x 4π = 18048 mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)
1433 days x 8π = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)
And
1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference
We understand that, the data provides a distance (1433 mkm) and not a period of time then we have to ask again why this distance is not changed into a period of time?
We understand that the outer planets have 2 reflections (first reflection from Neptune to Saturn) and (the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter)- also we understand that the solar system needs one reflection only in the outer planets and one reflection only in the inner planets and also we know the outer planets have two reflections because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system- means if Neptune is removed from the solar system the outer planets would have one reflection only – for that- the designer caused the two reflections in the outer planets to be complementary one another – the reflection from Uranus to Jupiter defines the planets orbital periods and the reflection from Neptune to Saturn defines these same planets orbital circumferences
The designer caused to make the two reflections complementary one another and by that the two reflections can be unified into one reflection and based on that the machine will work by one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets- but how the energy motion produces the distances in place of the periods of time? this question is hard to answer because we don't see deeply how the reflection of energy can define each planet orbital period (or orbital circumference) by using the rates (2π, 4π, 6π) we just discovered the rule but more geometrical analysis is required to see how this rule works
NOTICE
In the third reflection (from Venus to Mars) – let's remember the data
Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days
687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)
687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8
687 days x 6π x 2 = 25920 years (The Precession Cycle)
We have asked- why Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate (0.8)?
Let's try to answer – let's see the data 10747 /9800 = 9800/9010 where
10747 days = Saturn orbital period and 9010 mkm = Saturn orbital circumference
9800 mkm = 2 x 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)
We know 4900 mkm and 4900 days is the player in the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter- means- Saturn has effect also in the second reflection for that the second reflection has effect on Saturn data and caused its orbital period to be produced under the effect of the rate (0.8) which is the reflection rate as we will see in the next data
Group Data No (II)
(1)
3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)
(2)
1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm
(3)
0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm
Discussion
We discuss the data no. (2) and (3) at first
DATA NO. (2)
1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm
(0.421 mkm = Uranus motion distance in its rotation period)
DATA NO. (3)
0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm
(0.3129 mkm = Neptune motion distance in its rotation period)
MORE DATA
0.5875 mkm (Uranus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.46688 mkm
(0.466884 mkm = Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period) And
0.46688 mkm (Neptune motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3736 mkm
(0.3736 mkm = Saturn motion distance in its rotation period) And
0.46688 mkm (Pluto motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3248 mkm
(i)
The rate (0.8) is created by the waves reflection and the planets velocities are defined based on each other by this rate as discussed in the planet velocity definition- here the data shows the rate (0.8) defines each planet motion distance based on the other planet motion distance (in the same one reflection) –
let's explain that in more details
(1st reflection From Neptune to Saturn) for that
Saturn motion distance per solar day (0.838 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Neptune motion distance in its rotation period 0.3129 million km
Also
Neptune motion distance per solar day (0.46688 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 million km
AND
(2nd reflection From Uranus to Jupiter) for that
Jupiter motion distance per solar day (1.1318 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Uranus motion distance in its rotation period 0.421 million km
Also
Uranus motion distance per solar day (0.5875 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period 0.46688 million km
AND
In the 3rd reflection we will see Mars motion distance per solar day is defined by Venus motion distance per solar day- follows the same rule
Notice
We note the data No. (2) and (3) show the data is distributed in the reversed direction for the energy motion because the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and from Uranus to Jupiter- But data is distributed in the reversed direction-
In the third reflection we will see the data moves in the same direction with the energy distribution
Also
In Venus data we will see that it uses the square value (0.8)^2 and we will explain why the rate is used in square value
(ii)
Why is the rate (1.0725) found in the data? because the gravitational wave moves by speed of light (300000 km/s) in Saturn orbit and in all planets orbits till Venus orbit-
Shortly
the wave velocity was 205.8 km/s through Pluto, Neptune and Uranus orbits BUT
The wave velocity is accelerated in Saturn orbit and its velocity be = speed of light =300000 km/s, for that reason the rate (1.0725) is created because this is (Lorentz length contraction effect rate) and it can be produced only by motion with speed=(99% speed of light =297000 km/s)- shortly- the wave velocity be equal=speed of light = 300000 km/s in Saturn orbit, for that the rate (1.0725) is produced in the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter as the data shows (and also in Venus data we will see it)
(iii)
The previous data shows the planets distances are rated by the rate (0.8) for the planets players in the same wave reflection- but- this picture is not complete yet – because the planets which aren't players in the same reflection shows equal distances also but this distances equality doesn't depend on the rate (0.8) let's give examples
Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period = Neptune motion distance per solar day =0.466884 million km
And
Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 mkm x π = Uranus motion distance per solar day 0.5875 mkm x 2
And
The Earth motion distance per solar day = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period = 2.574 million km
This distances equality must be produced also by the waves reflection but the rule is not clear yet- I want to say the effect of the rate (0.8) on the planets distances is part of greater rule explains how this distances equality is produced and the useful result of it –
Please note–I analyze this data in details in 2nd part of this 1st hypothesis explanation-
Now
Let's discuss the data No.(1)
DATA NO. (1)
3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm (The Earth motion distance per solar day) = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm
2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)
2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day= Pluto motion distance in its rotation period
Means
3.024 million km x (0.8)^2 x 1.0725 = 2.082 million km where
3.024 mkm =Venus motion distance per solar day
2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day
Notice
2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day
2.57 mkm = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm The moon motion distance per solar day
2.59 mkm = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period
The data tells Mars motion distance per solar day depends on Venus motion distance per solar day – here all distances are defined by the solar day-
In the third reflection- the wave is reflected from Venus to Mars- here also Venus motion distance per solar day (3.024 mkm) defines Mars motion distance per solar day (2.082 mkm)- but the definition depends on the squared value (0.8)^2
That shows Venus reflection follows the same rule used by the other reflections – where the sender planet motion distance per solar day defines the receiver planet motion distance
Perfectly the rule is followed BUT Why does Venus use the square value (0.8)^2??
Because of the reflections order – let's explain that
The two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and by that they are unified and can be considered as One Unified Reflection in the outer planets
Means- there is one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets and these are two reflections- means – Venus reflection should be considered the second reflection that causes to square the value (0.8)- that explains why Venus uses the squared Value (0.8)^2
Notice
This is a proof for my theory that (one gravitational wave is reflected three times)- means- this wave is reflected before and effected by the rate (0.8) and this same wave is reflected again for that the rate (0.8) be in its squared value (0.8)^2
The Conclusion
The gravitational waves reflection causes the sender planet motion distance to define the receiver planet motion distance as seen in the data- the definition depends on the rate (0.8) – here we see one rule proves the receiver planet motion depends on the sender planet motion-
Group Data No (III)
(1)
5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)
(2)
21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6
(3)
(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days
And
π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)
Discussion
Data No. (1)
5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)
568 x 10^24 kg = Saturn Mass
102 x 10^24 kg = Neptune Mass
59800 days = Neptune orbital period
10747 days = Saturn orbital period
In the first reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Neptune to Saturn
This behavior shows second rule– for the planets in the same reflection- we see the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate and this behavior is used by the other two reflections- means- the gravitational wave reflection between two planets cause these two planets masses rate to define their orbital periods rate – let's see the rest data
Data No. (2)
21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6 (notice1407.6π =4331 error 2%)
1898 x 10^24 kg = Jupiter Mass
86.8 x 10^24 kg = Uranus Mass
30589 days = Uranus orbital period
4331 days = Jupiter orbital period
In second reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter
It's the same rule and behavior, the planets masses rates defines their orbital periods
Just Jupiter orbital period 4331 is divided by (π) – no any other change in the rule proves that the rule is a fact and used with the planets of the same reflection
Data No. (3)
(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days
4.87 x 10^24 kg = Venus Mass and 0.642 x 10^24 kg= Mars Mass
224.7 days = Venus orbital period and 687 days= Mars orbital period
In the third reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Venus to Mars
Here also we see the planets use the same rule and the same behavior – the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate-But the rate is squared! Why?
Venus Mass = 7.6 Mars Mass but the data uses the squared rate (7.6)^2 –
We should pay attention for this rate because the other planets used their masses rate but NOT squared value – Why does Venus use the squared value (7.6)^2?
We have solved this question in the distances discussion when Venus used (0.8)^2 and the other planets use (0.8) only- here also is similar to that- let's remember the reason
We agreed that the two wave reflections in the outer planets are complementary one another and by that they are unified together into one unified reflection and by that the outer planets has one unified reflection and the inner planets has one single reflection and these are considered as two reflections and for that Venus reflection is considered the second one in the solar system (and the final one) for that Venus uses the squared Value – where we know the wave reflection causes to square the value
Notice - 5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747) = (10/1.8) =9010/1622 where 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination and 10 =4 x 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) and -9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference and 1622 mkm = Neptune Uranus Distance
Notice π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%) – this data is discussed in the next point
The Conclusion The Wave Reflection Causes The Sender And Receiver Planets Masses Rate To Define Their Orbital Periods Rate.
Group Data No (IV)
(1)
12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5
(2)
142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 =5.56/2
(3)
378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6
Discussion
Notice
π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)
This data shows the rates (5.56) and (7.6) are found based on the value (π^3=31) I try to prove that it's one energy (one value π^3=31) and the different rates as (5.56 and 7.6) are found depending on (this one value π^3=31) by geometrical reasons – that proves it's one energy (one wave) is reflected three times in the solar system – the value (π^3 = 31 =) is very important because all rates depend on it
The group data shows the planets diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 =31)- let's examine it in following
Data No. (1)
12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5
3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination
1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination
The data shows the two planets diameters are rated with rate equal their orbital inclination and this rate equal π^0.5
Notice
177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) x 93.4
90+ 3.4 = 93.4 deg
Data No. (2)
142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 = 5.56
We remember 31 = (5.56)^2
Data No. (3)
378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6
Also we remember 31/4 = 7.75 (and the difference between 7.75 and 7.6 is 2%)
The data shows the diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 = 31 =) as the masses do
Means- the planets masses and diameters are created rated to one another based on this same value (π^3 = 31 =)
I try to prove that – one energy is found behind all this data- the value (π^3 = 31 =) refers to one energy and this energy is effected by different geometrical reasons and that causes this energy (π^3 = 31 =) to show different rates as (5.56) and (7.6)
Shortly – we deal with one energy reflected three times in the solar system and the planets data are defined by the effect of this energy on them
Please note- we can imagine one river of water moves through different cities and each city deals with the river based on its own data- one city has great soil and this uses the river water to plant vegetables and fruits- another city its ground has many holes and caves the river water will cause all these holes to be filled of water and that will create many moors in this city and that will not be useful for it –
We have here the same picture- One energy moves through the solar system and reflected three times in it and this reflection causes changes for the planets data for that the different rates (5.56 and 7.6) are created from this one energy (π^3 = 31 =) by geometrical reasons have effects on it.
Group Data No (V)
(1) 243 mkm = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days
(2) 17.2 km = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds
(3) 16.1 km = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds
Discussion
We discuss data No. (2) and (3) at first
Data No. (2)
17.2 km = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds
13.1 km /s = Jupiter velocity
1.13129 = (5.25/4) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56
17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period
Data No. (3)
16.1 km = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds
9.7 km /s = Saturn velocity
1.65 = (5.25/π) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56
16.1 hours = Neptune rotation period
The data shows each planet rotation period depends on the other planet velocity based on the rate (5.56) where (31=5.56^2)- that shows Uranus rotation period is connected with Jupiter velocity and Neptune rotation period is connected with Saturn velocity proves that a deep connection is found between each two planets as a result for the wave reflection between them
Data No. (1)
243 mkm = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days
243 days = Venus rotation period
2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day and 116.75 days = Venus day period
We see also here – Venus rotation period is related to Mars velocity- and this similar to the other planets behavior as we have discussed before
Notice
Venus (35 km/s) moves in 10747 seconds a distance = 378675 km
Where
378675 km = Saturn circumference
10747 days = Saturn orbital period
We know that- No direct reflection is found between Venus and Saturn- but the data shows deep interaction is found between them
I want to say
I provide different data to prove my hypothesis tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and the waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity) for that I put different data trying to prove this hypothesis
But- the real design is much complex than this small hypothesis- because this hypothesis refers to one rule found in the design but the design is consisted of hundreds of rules and by that I provide very narrow vision for the whole truth-
Imagine we examine the artery connected between the human liver and his heart- it's one artery – it's fact and real piece of the human body but it's just one artery of many others- I want to say- the real vision of the solar system is so wide than this one I provide here- that's why the rules are not complete- but I provide strong data can prove my hypothesis and can show a piece of truth about the solar system real design.
Group Data No (VI)
(1)
177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2
(2)
97.8 degrees = 31 x 3.1 degrees
(3)
28.3 degrees (Neptune axial tilt) = 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) x 1.0725
Discussion
Data No. (1)
177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2
177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt
25.2 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt BUT 25.2 +90 = 115.2 degrees
Please note
(12104 km Venus diameter / 6792 km Mars diameter) = 3.4/1.9 = π^0.5
(3.4 deg and 1.9 deg are the orbital inclinations of Venus and Mars respectively)
And
(177.4 deg Venus axial tilt / 115.2 degrees) = π/2
We see clearly the data depend on the value (π^3) and different geometrical reasons have effect on this value to produce these rates (π^0.5 and π/2)
Data No. (2)
97.8 degrees = 31 x 3.1 degrees
97.8 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt
3.1 degrees = Mars Axial Tilt
The data still depends on this same value (π^3= 31)
Group Data No (VII)
The distance 1433 million km
This distance should prove the energy is transported and the waves are reflected in the solar system because this distance is used frequently in the solar system and no explanation for such using better than the reflection of energy – let’s see its data
1433 million km = Mars Orbital Circumference
1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance
1433 million km = Uranus Saturn Distance
2 x 1433 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance
π x 1433 million km = Neptune Orbital Distance
(π+1) x 1433 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance
1410 million km = Pluto Neptune Distance (with 1433 mkm error 1.7%)
Also
1433 days = 2π x 224.7 days (Venus Orbital Period)
Logically there's a geometrical reason to cause all these distances to be equal and rated to each other based on this same root (1433)- and the wave reflection can be this geometrical reason by which this data is created.
The Explanation Of The Wave Reflection Effect On The Solar System Design
The gravitational waves reflection has great effect on the solar system design- let's refer to this effect in following
The Planets Distribution
The three outer planets (Pluto- Neptune- Uranus) have great orbits- why?
Because the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s in these orbits and the planets motions energies are stored in these orbits as waves move by this velocity 205.8 km/s – means – great and massive motion energy is stored in these orbit where the waves move by 205.8 km/s that needed great areas to store so massive amount of energy
BUT
The Waves Velocity Is Accelerated In Saturn Orbit
This is the important point- because- the interaction between the outer planets caused to reflect the wave in Saturn orbit firstly and this reflection causes to square the velocity and then the velocity is squared and be equal the speed of light – means- the gravitational waves move by speed of light starting from Saturn orbit and continues with this speed till Venus and the other inner planets-
This is very important picture because
The low velocity 205.8 km/s needed great areas that causes the orbits or Pluto, Neptune and Uranus to be so great areas – BUT
The high speed motion (speed of light) doesn't need great areas – that's why the planets orbits from Saturn to Mercury are small orbits and the inner has very small orbits because the energy doesn't depend on the number of waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s but the energy depends on the motion by speed of light by that the energy of 1461 waves move by 205.8 km/s be equal the energy of one wave moves by speed of light – that causes the orbits to be small orbits – and that explains the distribution of the planets from the sun to Pluto.
And for that
When the massive reflected energy reached to Venus- it doesn't destroy the small inner planets and their orbits because the energy is used immediately to produce the sun rays means no need for storing the energy and for that no places for the energy storing instead the energy is used immediately- I try to show that- the planets distribution depends on the gravitational waves velocity in different orbits and by that the planets create their orbits in harmony with the moving energy
The Planets Masses Distribution
The outer planets have great masses but the inner planets have very small masses- why? because the rates of masses enable to accelerate the wave velocity in Saturn orbit-this idea is explained clearly in (Mass definition) in my paper definitions
The mass is used as a rate of time and the rates between the great and small masses aim to create the required rates of time and by these rates of time the wave velocity is accelerated
Thanks
Please read my paper
The Sun Can NOT Be Created Before The Planets Creation
or
or
or
And
A Great Gap Between The Physics Book And The Solar System Facts
or
And
The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field
or
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow
Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c
E-mail [email protected], [email protected]
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
PUBLICATIONS
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
#Earth#solar storm#Northern Hemisphere#U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration#solar outburst#geomagnetic storm#Northern Lights#Federal Emergency Management Agency#Space Weather Prediction Center#NASA#solar flare#coronal mass ejection#plasma#magnetic field#corona#radiation levels#aurora borealis#aurora
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Super quick, Republicans are trying to rebrand Project 2025 as Agenda 47. THEY ARE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THING, so both horrible. They will keep changing the name/rebranding it until it succeeds or until everyone who supports it just stops (supporting it or existing).
John Oliver had a segment on weather a few years ago that is still fairly relevant (like most of his segments). It aired during the Trump administration and focuses on privatizing weather reports and I hope they get a chance to talk about it again.
youtube
Also here's a recent article about what's actually happening since the video is from 2019 (I miss 2019)
Reminder: the companies and political entities pushing Project 2025 have addresses and go out to lunch a lot and should never eat a spitless meal for the rest of their lives.
Practice bagpipes outside their secure compounds.
Follow them around ringing a bell wherever they go.
If they are going to be farcically evil, be Animaniacally good. Be the definition of chaotic justice.
Also, vote. It might just kick the ball down the road a bit, but that gives people more time to organize a concerted resistance (in no way on any social media platform) to the fascist creep happening in America. It is possible to take this country from the bastards who control it, it will take work, effort, and occasionally going offline and talking to humans though.
#politics#national oceanic and atmospheric administration#noaa#national weather service#nws#storm prediction center#spc#national hurricane center#nhc#national severe storms labratory#nssl#please vote#vote#vote please#register to vote#voting#important#so important#government#oops another political post#sorry gang#Youtube
35K notes
·
View notes
Text
Aurora – the biggest display of lights on Earth
#aurora#aurora polaris#Extreme Weather Taranaki#folklore#FOOD VIEWS from around the world#indigenous#introduction offer#New Zealand#NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center#northern lights#solar cycle#solar flares#southern lights#Sun
0 notes
Text
Channeled Message- The Time of New Earth (Tone: 300)
The New Earth is here! Stay focused on heart-centered creation as the shift continues. #NewEarth #SpiritualAwakening
Posted on October 8th, 2024 by @iamsarahshook ABOUT THIS VIDEO: The video discusses the ongoing transition towards a “New Earth,” where spiritual awakening and the convergence of timelines are central themes. It addresses the role of dark entities trying to maintain control through manipulation and resource depletion, while lightworkers are urged to stay focused on creating the New Earth. The…
View On WordPress
#Atlantis#awakening journey#coastal events#controlled weather#dark entities#dark forces#dimensional shift#East Coast weather#energy manipulation#energy vampires#global conflict#heart-centered consciousness#higher consciousness#lightworkers#narcissistic dynamics#New Earth#resource depletion#resource protection#sacred land#Spiritual Awakening#spiritual growth#spiritual resilience#spiritual warfare#timeline convergence#West Coast prediction
0 notes
Text
Monsoon Arrives in Jharkhand, Bringing Relief from Heat
Weather department predicts good rainfall across 24 districts in coming days Temperature drop expected as southwest monsoon advances through the state. RANCHI – The southwest monsoon has officially entered Jharkhand, including the Kolhan region, on Friday, according to Dr. Abhishek Anand, meteorologist at the Ranchi center. "We expect the monsoon to expand further in the coming days, with good…
View On WordPress
#राज्य#Bay of Bengal weather system#Dr. Abhishek Anand meteorologist#Jamshedpur weather update#Jharkhand agriculture monsoon impact#Jharkhand district rainfall predictions#Jharkhand monsoon arrival#Jharkhand temperature drop#Kolhan region rainfall#Ranchi weather center forecast#southwest monsoon advance India#STATA
1 note
·
View note
Text
Tornado Quest Top Science Links For December 30, 2023 - January 6, 2024 #science #weather #tornado #climate #climatechange #wintersafety #windchill #droughtmonitor #astronomy
Happy New Year everyone and thanks for stopping by. This week, we’ll continue our look at winter weather safety and the latest US Drought Monitor. There are several other interesting reads for the new year, so let’s get started. On 8 April 2024, a solar eclipse will take place that, for many parts of North America, will be like nothing you’ve ever seen before. While on the topic of astronomy,…
View On WordPress
#2023#accuweather#astronomy#climate#climate change#climatology#drought monitor#environment#forecast model#hail#high winds#meteorology#NOAA#science#severe weather#solar eclipse#spc#storm prediction center#tornado#tornado activity#tornado climatology#tornado patterns#us drought monitor#weather#weather forecasting#wind chill#wind chill chart#wind chill safety#winter safety#winter weather safety
1 note
·
View note
Text
Solar Storm Expected to Make Northern Lights Visible in 17 States
An Aurora Borealis, also known as the northern lights, is seen in the night sky in the early morning hours of Monday, April 24, 2023, near Washtucna, Washington. A solar storm forecast for Thursday, July 13, is expected to give skygazers in more than a dozen American states a chance to glimpse the Northern Lights. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
— Associated Press | Saturday July 8, 2023
A Solar Storm forecast for Thursday is expected to give skygazers in 17 American states a chance to glimpse the Northern Lights, the colorful sky show that happens when solar wind hits the atmosphere.
Northern Lights, also known as Aurora Borealis, are most often seen in Alaska, Canada and Scandinavia, but an 11-year solar cycle that’s expected to peak in 2024 is making the lights visible in places farther to the south. Three months ago, the light displays were visible in Arizona, marking the third severe geomagnetic storm since the current solar cycle began in 2019.
The Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska at Fairbanks has forecast auroral activity on Thursday in Alaska, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, Indiana, Maine and Maryland.
Auroral activity also has been forecast for Canada, including Vancouver.
Light displays are expected to be visible overhead in Milwaukee, Minneapolis and Helena, Montana, and low on the horizon in Salem, Oregon.; Boise, Idaho; Cheyenne, Wyoming; Annapolis, Maryland; and Indianapolis, according to the institute.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Space Weather Prediction Center said people wanting to experience an aurora should get away from city lights and that the best viewing times are between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. local time.
Northern Lights occur when a magnetic solar wind slams into the Earth’s magnetic field and causes atoms in the upper atmosphere to glow. The lights appear suddenly and the intensity varies.
A geomagnetic index known as Kp ranks auroral activity on a scale from zero to nine, with zero being not very active and nine being bright and active. The Geophysical Institute has forecast Kp 6 for Thursday’s storm.
#Northern Lights#Aurora Borealis#Solar Storm#NewsNation#The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Space Weather Prediction Center
0 notes
Text
#Ohio#Turkey#Syria#Oklahoma#Texas#Weather#Thunderstorm#Severe Thunderstorm#Severe Thunderstorm Watch#National Weather Service#Storm Prediction Center#NWS#SPC#Elizabeth Leitman#Liz Leitman#Earthquake#Destruction#Turkey Earthquake#Syria Earthquake#Month in Review#Apollo Thoughts#Substack#Newsletter#East Palestine#Train#Freight Train#Hazardous Chemicals#Vinyl Chloride#Derailment#Ohio Derailment
0 notes
Note
Differnt anon but i love the swimsuit top falling off imagine, can we see it with Cater, Vil, Rook, Malleus and Lilia please?
Cater Diamond:
Cater had been mid beach selfie, striking a cute pose when he heard your cry of shock. His head whipped around and he became pink up to his ears, whipping his head the other way just to meet the prying eyes of others on the beach. He’s struggling to come up with a plan but finally points in a direction and gasps, yelling out a random influencers name and hoping their follower count was legit enough that they’d be known by the general public. It worked well enough that you were no longer the center of attention, an excited crowd forming and looking for the rare celebrity sighting while Cater rushed over to you. The crisis had been averted as you found your top, mumbling you’d just be lounging on the blanket the rest of the time. Later, when he’s sorting through his photos, he’s reminded of the moment as he caught the exact moment your top fell off, his face growing red as he hurriedly deleted the picture.
Lilia Vanrouge:
Lilia is no stranger to accidental nudity, these old eyes have seen some things in his many years on this planet, and it doesn’t leave him feeling any specific type of way. He can see that you don’t share the philosophy of ‘oh well’ when something embarrassing happens and does his best to save you, summoning a sudden wave that crashes onto shore and almost washes away some of the beach gear the gawkers had left unattended while ogling. He walked up to you with your top in hand, humming as he did; he held up a towel to cover you while you put your top back on, chuckling as he commented he knew the day would be interesting when you asked to spend it together.
Malleus Draconia:
The storm clouds that appear just as you’re kneeling on the ground, desperately searching for your top before others start pointing you out, was a blessing in disguise. Most beach-goers are too shocked by the sudden change of weather to pay you any mind and it leaves you with plenty of time to find your top, which Malleus casually stepped over to help you with. You feel embarrassed again because a prince of all people was witnessing you in such a state, but Malleus paid it no mind, seeming more protective than judgmental in the moment. You don’t catch any hint that he was the cause behind the storm, the clouds clearing away as he helped you tie your top back on and asked if you were ready to continue your stroll in a more secluded place along the beach.
Rook Hunt:
Rook had seen the unraveling as it begun, but you had not heeded his warnings of the top not being tied securely as every time you tugged it seemed to stay in place. He kept a diligent eye on you, not like there was anything else as striking as you on this beach regardless, but he does find himself failing in his duty when you point out a group of dolphins frolicking close to shore. When he hears your gasp he already knew what happened, his brain calculating in mere seconds that the disastrous future he had predicted had come to be. With a swift movement he removes the towel from your bag he’d been carrying, holding it over your chest and requesting just a moment to allow him to find the harbinger of chaos that was your swimsuit top.
Vil Schoenheit:
This was the issue with fashion these days. There was no practicality even in swimsuits, and while Vil lacked a real opinion on most beach outfits, he found yours seemed flimsier than most. It wasn’t quite a warning but he was unsurprised to see the top had pulled loose and left you in the middle of the beach, covering your chest and frantically looking around for your top before your humiliation limit was reached. He knew you’d rather be buried in the sand but he snapped his fingers to draw your attention, telling you to stay calm as it would attract less attention that way. He walked around you and finally found it half-buried in the sand, scolding you as your panic had nearly buried the only thing that would stop the staring. He suggested a nice cover-up next time, just to have a back-up plan should a swimsuit fail you again.
#Twisted Wonderland#TWST#Twisted Wonderland Imagines#Twisted Wonderland x Reader#TWST Imagines#TWST x Reader#Vil Schoenheit#Rook Hunt#Malleus Draconia#Lilia Vanrouge#Cater Diamond#Vil Schoenheit x Reader#Rook Hunt x Reader#Malleus Draconia x Reader#Lilia Vanrouge x Reader#Cater Diamond x Reader
738 notes
·
View notes
Text
#WeatherAware:"Tornado potential will continue into the evening as additional storms do appear probable…. A new #tornadowatch will be needed."
NOAA NWS Storm Prediction Center
#NWS#NWS Storm Prediction Center#Mesoscale Discussion#Tornado Weather#spc.noaa.gov#Severe Weather Outlook
1 note
·
View note
Text
do you think we'd be together in every life?
volume one: everyday life; leviathan
in which you and your lover are brought together over and over again no matter the timeline, no matter the circumstances
"Levi, do you think we'd be together in every life?" You asked him.
"You'd pick me every time? If you'll have me, yes." He responded.
…
When you arrived at the coffee shop you always did your work at that morning, things were as usual. You entered, ordered your usual drink and pastry, and sat at your favorite table outside. The weather was perfect for sitting outside. Crisp, but not too windy, and sunny, but not blinding. You set up your laptop and dug out all your supplies. But before you began working, you planned to enjoy your food and enjoy the scenery.
When you’d first moved the area, you’d gotten lost easily four times a day, even if you’d planned out your route. It always came back to you having to use the maps app on your phone, and even that wasn’t perfect. Sometimes, it tried to take you through areas you couldn’t go through, such as construction sites or blocked off areas. Sometimes, it tried to get you to do the physically impossible, like walk across rivers or through walls. And sometimes, it didn't even take you to the right place, even after triple checking that the address you'd entered was correct.
After talking to locals, who soon became your friends, they told you that everyone seemed to have this issue. Something about the area and maps just didn't agree. While there were maps plastered on every corner, those passing through ignored them. They thought they knew where they were going since they had their phone. This would work everywhere but where you lived.
It was safe to say you understood the plight of those who were in the position that you were not too long ago. So, when an anime convention popped up in town, you just knew you’d encounter a variety of lost conversation goers. Your coffee shop, and apartment, were pretty far from the convention center, though, so you weren’t too sure what to expect.
As you munched on your breakfast, you people watched. You’d likely be spending the rest of the day staring at your screen, so you wanted to do something other than that while you could. It was a beautiful morning anyways. A couple people you saw walk by almost everyday passed by. People on their way to work, presumably. You'd never stopped to ask them, but you'd miss them if they stopped walking by one day.
However, halfway through a bite of croissant, someone new walked by. He had a shock of blue-indigo hair, and was in some sort of armor. A small backpack was slung over one of his shoulders, and was decorated with all sorts of pins that reflected in the light. He was looking between his phone and the area around him, confusion painted all over his face. You could quickly tell he must've been bound for the convention, but had gotten lost on the way there just as you had predicted people might be.
The armor wearing stranger took a seat on the sidewalk across the road from you, still looking puzzled. You didn't want to embarrass him, so you decided to pretend not to notice him. But, the longer he sat there, the more guilty you felt for not helping. So, you began yelling at him, trying your best not to sound crazy.
"Hey! Knight with the blue hair! Come over here!" You waved one of your hands in the air. He looked like a deer in headlights. Despite being the only other person on the street, he still pointed to himself as if there was a chance you could be talking to another blue haired knight. After you nodded, he finally stood up and walked closer to you.
"I'm guessing you aren't from around here." You dusted your hands off, and turned to face him.
"No..." He sounded very forlorn.
"I could tell. Not your fault though. Just something about this area causes maps apps to misbehave. That's what I'm assuming happened, right?" His eyebrows shot into his hairline.
"Yes." He affirmed your prediction.
"So, I'm guessing you're headed to the convention then. What made you pick to stay so far away?" You asked, curious.
"Well... it was cheaper. I figured that if I saved that money, I could spend it on something else." He nervously shuffled his feet, and stared at the ground.
"No need to feel ashamed. I would do the same thing. Do you want help getting to the convention center?" You extended your help to him.
"Really? Are you actually offering me help?" He looked at you like you were his saving grace, probably because you were.
"You could use it, right? Besides, I'm not too busy right now. My work day doesn't begin for another hour and a half." You always arrived early so you'd have time to settle into working and enjoy your morning.
"Are you sure you don't mind?" He asked one more time just to be sure, as if you might take it all back.
"Not at all." You nodded.
"Thank you so much! I owe you my life." He exclaimed, and threw his arms around you. He almost immediately realized his mistake, and began to profusely began to apologize. You laughed it off, and began to pack up your things to walk this stranger to the convention center. Talking to him about the convention was the only way to get him to say more than a couple words at a time, so you did just that.
"I like your cosplay. I don't think I've said that yet. It suits you." You didn't know him, or his name, but it was oddly fitting.
"You're too kind to me. It took me forever to make. I figured I had to cosplay him because we looked so similar." You could tell just how excited he was about that fact.
"You did a great job then. So, did you dye your hair for the occasion?" You gestured to his hair.
"No, actually. That's the natural color. Really weird, I know. You don't need to tell me." He looked away from you.
"I like it. It's a pretty color." He whipped his head back around, allowing you to get the first good look at his eyes since you'd met. You hadn't gotten the chance to study them because eye contact seemed to make him nervous. They were a striking orange, with hues that matches his hair pooling at the bottom. He didn't have a response, but his face quickly gained a bright pink color. You couldn't help but giggle at his response to your compliment.
The two of you got along like a house on fire. You quickly discovered you liked a couple of the same animes. Your time together passed much too quickly for your liking. By the time you were in front of the convention center, he'd really come out of his shell.
"So, what's your name, Knight with the blue hair?" You asked.
"Levithan. But, my brothers call me Levi." He let out a breath he'd been holding.
"Nice to meet you, Levi. I'm Mc." You smiled at him. Levi looked like he had something to say, but closed his mouth. "Have a great time at the convention." You took a couple steps back and waved. He lifted his arm and watched you as you left.
You walked back to the cafe you'd started at, but you couldn't stop thinking about Levi. You assumed you'd never see him again, so you tried not to linger on thoughts of him. The map had taken him to you randomly, and if he tried to do it again tomorrow, or later than evening, there was no way it would take him back to you again.
So, you went back to work. You hung out a little longer than you usually would, maybe because you hoped you'd see him again. After that, you headed home, and repeated the same thing the next morning. You ordered your usual, and sat down at the same table.
At around the same time as a the previous day, Levi showed up again. He walked right up to you, and it seemed like, just like yesterday, he had something to say.
"It's you again! How was yesterday? Fun?" You grinned at him, happy to see him again.
"Thank you." He blutered out. It caught you by surpirse. When he noitced your face, he explained. "I forgot to say it yesterday. I actually didn't forget, I was afraid. But, I came back to tell you that."
"You're welcome. It was no big deal." The fact that he found you just to say thank you was touching.
"I want to get to know you better." He started turning that same shade of pink again.
"I couldn't stop thinking about you." You admitted. He slapped a hand over his mouth, seemingly concealing a grin.
"Do you have time to come to the convention with me today? I thought of you when I saw some of the booths." He wrung his hands together, seemingly like he was ready to run if you said no.
"I do, actually. I don't have a cosplay like you do, but that still sounds fun. Is it possible for me to get a ticket this late?" You began to riffle through your bag, searching for money.
"I bought a VIP pass, and it came with a guest pass. But, I came alone." Levi told you.
"You're so sweet." You gave him a smile that came from within, and you were almost certain you blinded him with it. But, regardless of that, he outstretched his hand to you. You got the feeling you'd get to know him well.
#gn reader#do you think we'd be together in every life?#volume one: everyday life#obey me#obey me!#obey me x reader#obey me shall we date#obey me! shall we date#obey me! shall we date?#obey me leviathan#obey me levi
99 notes
·
View notes
Text
Best Regards
A Great Gap Between The Physics Book And The Solar System Facts
The article proves there's a great gap between the physics book and the solar system facts- the article explains and proves that in the following items
1- Preface (my 5 equations)
2- The Research Question (Where's Planet Motion Energy?)
3- The Research Argument (The Physicist Vision Contradicts The Nature System)
4- The Research Methodology (the moon motion theory+ Mars migration theory)
5-The Research Discovery
(the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field moreover NO gravitational field is found)
6- The Research Hypothesis
(the sun is Not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays but the rays are produced by the gravitational waves motions energies)
7-The Solar System Description Refutation
(The Sun Is The Result Of The Planets Motions But The Description Supposes It’s The Planets Motions Reason)
8- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies
9-Space Creation
10- Planet Creation and Motion
11- The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
12- The Solar System History And Neptune Orbit Creation
(1) Preface (my 5 equations)
My research proves planet creation and motion data depends on geometrical rules and mathematical equations- my five equations prove this fact – I provide here only three equations (1st, 4th and 5th equation)- let's discuss them in following
Planet orbital distance equation (My 1st equation)
d^2= 4do (d-do)
where d= planet orbital distance and do= its previous neighbor distance
Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)
d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance
d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance
50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury
Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655
d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance
d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance
655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter
The equation depends on the planets order, just 2 neighbor planets can be used
The equation exceptions are, Earth depends on Mercury Not Venus – and Mars depends on Venus Not Earth And Pluto depends on Uranus Not Neptune
The Equation Concept support
let's suppose–There's a right triangle by the 3 points The Sun, Mercury and Venus)- by that - Venus angle is (61 degrees) because Venus orbital distance (108.2 mkm) x cos (61) = Venus Mercury distance (50.3 mkm) – and
Earth angle is (51 degrees) because Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) x cos (51) = Earth Mercury distance (91.7 mkm) – and
Mars angle is (41.7 degrees) because Mars orbital distance (227.9mkm) x cos (41.7)= Mars Mercury distance (170 mkm)- and
Jupiter angle is (22.2 degrees) because Jupiter orbital distance (778.6 mkm) x cos (22.2)= Jupiter Mercury distance (721 mkm)
Similar to that – Saturn angle is 16.5, Uranus angle is 11.6 deg, Neptune angle is 9.2 deg and Pluto angle is 8 deg- these angles follow the same system
for example -Pluto angle is (8 degrees) because Pluto orbital distance (5906 mkm) x cos (8)= Pluto Mercury distance (5848 mkm) –
NOTICE No. (1) the right angle and its triangle is (a hypothesis) – but we can prove it's a fact because (v1/v2) = (θ1/ θ2) -means – these angles are rated with their planets velocities – for example (Neptune velocity 5.4/ Pluto velocity 4.7) = (9.2 deg /8 deg)
NOTICE No. (2) these angles are complementary one another for that
940 = 61 x 2 x 8 = 51 x 2 x 9.2 = 41.7 x 22.2 where (61 degrees) is Venus angle and (51 degrees) is The Earth angle and (41.7 degrees) is Mars angle and (8 degrees) is Pluto angle and (9.2 degrees) is Neptune angle and (22.2 degrees) is Jupiter angle
DISCUSSION
The equation and angles system data prove the following
(1)
The planets orbital distances are defined based on their neighbors and NO mass is required to define it- Newton is wrong- planet orbital distance is Not defined based on this planet mass (also planet motion doesn't depend on its mass)
Shortly- the mass is not related for the distance definition at all
(2)
The gravitation equation is wrong because it contradicts the planets order- for example (Mercury- Venus – the Earth) this order tells more mass needs more orbital distance while the gravitation equation tells more mass needs shorter distance- clearly the equation contradicts the planets order- also Jupiter the greatest mass is not the more near planet to the sun – when we asked the physicist he told this is happened because of the planets initial conditions- my equation proves no initial conditions have effects on any distance – all distances are defined by the same one rule and the angles system supports the equation concept proves that (the planets orbital distances are defined based on each other and no mass is required in this definition)
Planet diameter equation (My 4th equation)
My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I
v = Planet Velocity
r = Planet Diameter
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet
The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error
Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity
Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity
Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity
Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity
Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)
Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity
Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)
Example Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8
89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period
9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and 5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity
49528 km = Neptune diameter
1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination
59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)
All planets diameters follow this equation perfectly
The Equation Concept Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result- the designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if A Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter would be saved
DISCUSSION
(1)
The big bang theory tells- Planet is created by random creation – that means
for example- Jupiter diameter and mass are created with unknown values for us- and during the history Jupiter is collided many times and these collisions decreased Jupiter diameter and mass- As a result Jupiter current diameter (142984 km) is a value found by random process because of the historical events- means- Planets diameters and masses are found without any rule or geometrical reason-
(2)
The big bang theory is wrong in 2 principle points – First- planet diameter is created based on a geometrical rule and a mathematical equation as proved by my equation that disproves the big bang imaginary idea- shortly- Jupiter diameter is created by its value 142984 km and it's not changed since creation- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation- Second the big bang theory is wrong also because it supposes planet diameter change doesn't cause change for its motion- means- planet motion depends on its data and if this planet diameter is changed its motion must be changed accordingly- here- we reach to basic default in the physics book
The problem here is that –the physicist created the theory to explain a planet motion regardless this planet data- shortly let's ask (what changes can be happened for the moon motion if the moon diameter is changed from its value 3475 km to be 6000 km?) in answer for this question- shortly- NO Change- the physicist theory about the moon motion has no change when the moon diameter 3475 km will be 6000 km because the physicist theory doesn't take into account this diameter at all – here is the problem- that gives the big bang the chance to create its imaginary idea
Please note- the big bang didn't tell us how is the matter created? means- the historical ideas cant reach to the matter origin nor can define the matter nature
(3)
My planet diameter equation gives a new definition for matter nature and creation- Why?? because it tells (Planet diameter is created based on it velocity?) means planet motion is defined before this planet creation! this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation but how that can be possible?
(4)
Matter definition
Matter and space are created from the same one energy and both move with the motion of this energy from which they are created- but- the matter creates for itself a distinguish form and moves by different velocity from the space motion (notice the gravitational waves prove the space has motion and not static).
This is similar to the sea of water- the space is similar to the sea of water and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page-
The whirlpool (vortex) is created by the sea water and it's carried by the sea water motion- spite of that- the whirlpool is different in its form from the sea waves – also the whirlpool moves by different velocity from the sea waves motion velocity- this example gives explanation for the matter definition- the matter is similar perfectly to the whirlpool on the sea page- it's created by the sea water motion but it has a distinguish form and different velocity from the sea waves-
Also
The whirlpool dimensions depend on the sea water motion features- for example – we have a whirlpool its diameter is 2 meters, this diameter is formed by the sea water motion features (the water velocity- amount-pressure -……etc) that tells the whirlpool is found later after the sea creation- and the water motion is found before the whirlpool creation- this meaning is a fact for the matter creation and dimensions- the matter dimensions are created based on this matter motion- means- the motion is defined before the matter creation- this is proved by my planet diameter equation- the equation tells (for example) Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s- the whirlpool idea explains how the planet matter data is defined based on its motion- because- the original energy was found in motion at first and the planet matter is created from this moving original energy and the planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after the planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data is created that's why the planet data is in full harmony with the planet motion features- also the idea shows planet motion reason- again-No planet moves by the sun gravity- Newton is wrong- because planet creation and motion are done by one force only otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it- here we see the planet motion reason- the planet moves with the original energy from which this planet is created
Planet velocity equation (My 5th equation)
Planet velocity definition is important point of study because many planet data is defined based on its velocity- specifically
Planet diameter is defined by the rate (v1/v2) by my planet diameter equation –and
Planet orbital distance is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^2 –and
Planet orbital period is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^3
Please note – Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and it's fact proved by the planets data – but Newton stated Planet motion depends on its mass- this is NOT Fact and Planet velocity is defined without any effect of its mass as the data shows
Let's ask - How Is Planet Velocity Defined?
Planet velocity is defined by Five Rules let's see them in following
(i) First Rule
v1v2 = constant= 322 (my 5th equation)
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Mercury velocity) =322
35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 =322
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 =322
24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) =322 (Max error 2%)
The rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are defined in pairs and not individually, each planet velocity has its own complementary- the rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- the reflection of energy and data is discussed later.
In this rule we interest for the constant (322)- let's ask- why the constant = 322?
The constant 322 depends on the speed 1.16 million km per second because
(1160000 seconds = 322 hours) - Means
Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km and
Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance = 1.16 million km
Shortly -we realize that the constant 322 is produced based on the speed 1.16 million km per second- means- the planets velocities are complementary each other because they are defined as functions in this same speed 1.16 million km per second
(This is similar to electron and positron are produced from Gamma ray, The two particles depend on Gamma energy in their masses)
Based On This Data
I concluded there's a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second and from this light beam energy the solar system is created- and the planets velocities are defined as functions in this speed 1.16 million km per second and that causes the velocities to be complementary each other-
(Note the speed 1.16 million km per second is proved strongly in my paper)
(ii) Second Rule
v1v2 = 1
The velocity here uses the solar day (86400 seconds) – let's prove that-
Mercury moves per solar day = 4.095 million km
Venus moves per solar day = 3.024 million km
The Earth moves per solar day = 2.574 million km
The Moon moves per solar day = 2.4 million km
Mars moves per solar day = 2.082 million km
Jupiter moves per solar day = 1.1318 million km
Saturn moves per solar day = 0.838 million km
Uranus moves per solar day = 0.5875 million km
Neptune moves per solar day = 0.4665 million km
Pluto moves per solar day = 0.406 million km
AND
0.406 (Pluto velocity) x 2.4 (the moon velocity) = 1 (error 2.5%)
0.4665 (Neptune velocity) x 2.082 (Mars velocity) = 1 (error 2.5%)
0.5875 (Uranus velocity) x 3.024 (Venus velocity)/1.772 = 1 (error 2.5%)
0.838 (Saturn velocity) x 1.1318 (Jupiter velocity) = 1 (error 5%)
(1.772 = π^1/2)
The second rule tells very similar meaning (v1v2= constant= 1)
The data uses the velocities per solar day for that the constant is changed from 322 into 1 but the rule is the same- (v1v2= Constant)
I want to say- the rule (v1v2 = Constant) tells that (The Velocities Are Reflected On Each Other) this conclusion is simple one (A x 1/A= constant=1)
The rule proves the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection has effect on the planets data and for that the planets velocities are defined by this energy reflection and the velocities are produced complementary each other as a result.
Notice the second rule causes confusion because the complementary player is changed- for example Pluto is complementary with Venus (in the first rule 35 x 4.7 x 2 = 322) but Pluto is complementary with the Earth moon in the second rule (0.406 x 2.4 = 1) that tells the players are changed which is illogical idea- how can we solve this problem? The third rule solves it – let's see this rule in following
(iii) Third Rule
v1/v2 = 0.8 (based on the planets order)
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 (35 km/s = Venus velocity error 7.25%)
35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 (The moon velocity)
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 (Mars velocity) (error 1%)
24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 0.8 = 2 x 9.7 (Saturn velocity)
13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8 = 2 x 5.4 (Neptune velocity) (error 3%)
6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 0.8 = 5.4 (Neptune velocity)
5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8 = 4.3 (Pluto velocity 4.7 the error 7.25%)
Please note
The error 7.25 is found by the rate 1.0725 – that means
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 = 1.0725 x 35 km/s (Venus velocity)
5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8 = 4.3= 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) / 1.0725
29.8 km/s (Earth velocity) = 27.78 km/s (The moon velocity) x 1.0725
We know the rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length contraction effect- and we know this rate has effect on around 40% of all planets data – that's why we see this rate has effect on the planets velocities definition-
Let's remember the question-
In the rule (v1v2=322) we found that Pluto is complementary with Venus because
4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 2 = 322
But in the rule (v1v2 =1) we found Pluto is complementary with the moon because
0.406 mkm (Pluto Velocity Daily) x 2.4 mkm (The Moon Velocity Daily) = 1
The question asked – if the planets velocities are defined in pairs complementary each other and not individually how can the players be changed?
The answer tells – the planets velocities are rated by (0.8) based on the planets order means – the moon velocity daily 2.4 mkm = Venus velocity daily 3.024 mkm x 0.8
The rate (0.8) defines all planets velocities depend on each other by order-
Now let's see Planet velocity final definition– because- the definition uses three planets velocities together and not only two – let's put that clearly in following-
(iv) The Planet Velocity Final Definition
(A)
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 km/s (Venus velocity 35 km/s)
Venus moves per solar day 3.024 million km -But
1/3.024 = 0.3307 million km = Uranus moves per solar day 0.5875 million km /1.77
(note 1.77 = π^1/2) and (38 = 35 x 1.0725)
For that
47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 322
(B)
35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 km/s (The Moon velocity)
The moon moves per solar day 2.4 million km -But
1/2.4 = 0.406 million km = Pluto moves per solar day 0.406 million km
For that
35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 = 322
(C)
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)
Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km -But
1/2.082 = 0.4665 million km = Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km
For that
29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 = 322
(D)
13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8= 2 x 5.24km/s (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s error 3%)
Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km - But
1/0.4665 = 2.082 million km = Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km
For that
13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) = 322
Shortly
Three planets velocities are defined in each equation- that tells the planet velocity definition is a process more complex than the simple equation (v1v2= constant)
Notice
The 9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s – if we add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) the total will be 205.8 km/s
The planets velocities are complementary also for this velocity 205.8 km/s – let's see
205.8 km/s = Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) x Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) / 1.0725
205.8 km/s = Venus velocity (35 km/s) x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 1.0725
205.8 km/s = Earth velocity (29.8 km/s) x Uranus velocity (6.8 km/s)
205.8 km/s = Jupiter velocity (13.1 km/s) x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 3
Mercury velocity = 2 Mars velocity by that Pluto will be used for Mars also
Max error (3%)
Please Note- Saturn is exceptional because
205.8 km/s = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 21.4
Where 21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 hours (Saturn rotation period) -Means- the distance is passed by all planets motions in one hour equal the distance is passed by Saturn in 2 rotation periods (21.4 hours) that tells more analysis is required for Saturn velocity- as we should do later.
A QUESTION
(Why Is The Rate (0.8) Used To Define Each Planet Velocity Based On Its neighbor?) Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and
My planet orbital distance equation proves each planet orbit is defined based on its neighbor – means- my equation uses only 2 neighbor planets orbital distances
Here also-Planet velocity is defined based on its neighbor – means- this connection enabled Kepler to conclude his statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity)
But Why The Rate (0.8)??
The rate (0.8) is found by the energy reflection effect on Planets velocities definition, for that we analyze the energy reflection process deeply in the paper discussion
(v) Fourth Rule
5.9 x 0.8 = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) BUT (5.9)^2 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity)
And
6.8 x 0.8 = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) BUT (6.8)^2 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity)
And
8.5 x 0.8 = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) BUT (8.5)^2 = 2 x 35 km/s
And
12.12 x 0.8 = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) BUT (12.12)^2 = 3 x 47.4 km/s And
16.4 x 0.8 = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) BUT (16.4)^2 = 9 x 29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)
Discussion
The data shows, the inner planets velocities are defined based on the outer planets velocities- that explains how the rules (v1v2=constant) is created
The data is produced by the reflection of energy and that shows why the planets velocities are reflected on each other-
(vi) Fifth Rule (Pluto Velocity Analysis)
DATA
4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity) = 3/2 (π) km /s
And
5.4 km /s (Neptune velocity) x 4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity) = 8π
And
π x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 4 x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity)
And
4 x (4.7)^2 = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)
And
(4.7)^3 = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 2 = (205.8/2)
205.8 = the 9 planets velocities total + the Earth moon velocity
Discussion
The data shows a real puzzle- because- Pluto velocity can't be defined simply by some simple rules –even the previous 4 rules can't define this velocity-
The data shows- The planet velocity is defined by very complex rule more strong than the previous 4 rules (Specifically Pluto velocity)
I want to say- the designer has a reason to define Pluto velocity by some complex system- the planets motions interactions causes this complex system-
The next data can explain better this meaning
More Data
13.1 km/s x 29.8 km/s x 142984 = 47.4 km/s x 9.7 km/s x 120536
13.1 km/s x 9.7 km/s x 142984 = 5.4 km/s x 27.8 km/s x 120536
9.7 km/s x 5.4 km/s x 142984 = 4.7 km/s x 13.1 km/s x 120536
13.1, 29.8, 47.4 km/s are the velocities of Jupiter, The Earth, Mercury respectively
9.7, 5.4, 27.8 km/s are the velocities of Saturn, Neptune, The Moon respectively
4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity
142984 km = Jupiter diameter and 120536 km = Saturn diameter
The data tells the planets velocities are defined by real complex system
(vii) Planet Orbital Inclination Definition
DATA
(Mercury velocity 47.4 km/s) = (Uranus velocity 6.8 km/s) x 7
(Mercury orbital inclination = 7 degrees)
(The Moon velocity 27.8 km/s) = (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s) x 5.1
(The Moon orbital inclination = 5.1 degrees)
(Mars velocity 24.1 km/s) = (Saturn velocity 9.7 km/s) x 2.5
(Saturn orbital inclination = 2.5 degrees)
(Mars velocity 24.1 km/s) = (Jupiter velocity 13.1 km/s) x 1.9
(Mars orbital inclination = 1.9 degrees)
(Venus velocity 35 km/s) = (Jupiter velocity 13.1 km/s) x 1.3 x 2
(Jupiter orbital inclination = 1.3 degrees)
(Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s) = (Uranus velocity 6.8 km/s) x 0.8
(Uranus orbital inclination = 0.8 degrees)
(Saturn velocity 9.7 km/s) = (Neptune velocity 6.8 km/s) x 1.8
(Neptune orbital inclination = 1.8 degrees)
Discussion The data shows that the planet orbital inclination is defined as a rate between two velocities- but- not no clear rule which planet velocity is used- for example Mercury uses the rule (v1v2=constant because 47.4 x 6.8 = 322 and v1/v2= 47.4/6.8 = 7)
this rule is used almost for the inner planets- but- the outer planets orbital inclinations don't follow this rule- because Neptune is complementary with the Earth but Neptune velocity is used with Uranus and Saturn to define Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations- means- the rule (v1/v2 = inclination) is used for the inner planets but the outer planets use another rate and almost their orbital inclinations are created based on the rate (v1/v2) defined by my planet diameter equation-
(viii) The Sun Is Created After All Planets Creation And Motion
Let's remember the rule (v1v2= constant =322)
322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity)
322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 (error 2%)
322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2
322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) (error 2%)
322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity)
We realize the planets velocities are created in (pairs) and not in single-
Now let's ask (Can We Add One More Planet In The Solar Group?)
Let's imagine we create a new planet and put it after Pluto
(1)
The New Planet Supposed Orbital Distance Is =7000 million km
What's this new planet velocity? we define it by kepler law, its velocity is 4.3 km/s
This planet motion distance per solar day =0.373 million km and its orbital period is 116300 solar days –
Now– what's its complementary planet by of the rule (v1v2= constant =322),
(322 =4.3 x 75), means, the planet complementary velocity is 75 km/s
Where can we find a planet its velocity 75 km/s? this planet must be in the distance between the Sun and Mercury –
This planet orbital distance would be 23.2 million km where
(57.9/23.2) = (75/47.4)^2 where
(57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance) and (47.4 km/s = Mercury velocity)
Shortly – to add one more planet after Pluto that forces us to put a complementary planet between Mercury and the Sun- clearly this is a complex process because the distance between the Sun and Mercury is short and no planet can be added in it!
The conclusion– No New Planet Can Be Added In The Solar System
But how the found planets are added? Shortly- The Sun is created after all planets creation and motion- means – after all planets be on their orbits the Sun is created- means- technically- the Sun existence prevents to add any more planet to the solar system and also the sun prevents any planet to change its orbit – that proves the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
Notice- Mars original orbit was between Venus and Mercury and Mars had migrated to its current orbit behind the Earth (before the sun creation), but, because of the sun existence Mars couldn't return to its original orbit- that proves- Mars is found before the sun creation- and that supports the conclusion tells (the sun is created after all planets creation and motion) Mars Migration is proved in point no. (**)
(ix) Can A Motion By Speed Of Light Be Found In The Solar System?
300000 = (205.8)^2 x 7.1 where
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s and I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s the total be 205.8 km/s - the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) proves the fact.
7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect produced by speed 99% of speed of light-
Shortly
The unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) is defined as a function in the speed of light (300000 km/s) and that explains how the unified wave moves by this speed because the unified wave velocity is 205.8 km/s and the reflection of energy causes to square the velocity to be (205.8 km/s)^2 and by Lorentz length contraction effect (7.1) the velocity be equal 300000 km/s (speed of light) explaining that the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) is defined as a function in the speed of light
ALSO
The previous data refers to the use of the rates of time- where
The unified wave (205.8 km/s) moves in 1461 seconds a distance 300000 km while One Second of The Sun Clock = 1461 Seconds of The Wave Clock
Means- The unified wave passes 300000 km in 1461 seconds but the Sun clock sees this period (1461seconds) as (one second only) and by that the sun sees a distance 300000 km is passed in one second producing speed = 300000 km/s (speed of light)
That explains how the gravitational wave can move by speed of light in the solar system.
PLANET VELOCITY GENERAL DISCUSSION
Planet velocity is defined by many rules but all of them tell two basic information
(1) NO planet mass is used to define any planet velocity or motion
(2) Planet velocity is defined based on the rule (v1v2=Constant) means each planet velocity is defined complementary to another planet velocity- means- the planets velocities are defined in pairs and not individual which proves (Planet Motion Can NOT Be Independent From The Other Planets Motions)
(3) Planet velocity proves the energy is reflected in the solar system and because of that the planets data is reflected on each other and that causes the planets velocities to be reflected on each other
(2) The Research Question
How can we define Planet motion energy? the question asks simply (Where's Planet Motion Energy?)- this is a difficult question for the physicist and disproves many basic theories in the physics book - let's show that in following
Where's Planet Motion Energy?
Any moving body produces motion energy (1/2 mv^2), means, planet motion also produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this motion energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-
This analysis creates three major difficulties for the physics book – let's see them
First Difficulty
This analysis tells the space has moving waves are produced by planets motions – But- the scientists discovered the gravitational waves and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field- I prove the sun doesn’t produce a gravitational field and has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity – But- here we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?) because planet motion energy has no place to store in except the space -means- the waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field- shortly- even if there's no gravitational field at all- there's a reason to find waves in the space and these waves are produced by the planet motions energies
that put the question (from what source the gravitational waves are produced?)
I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field (even if found)
Second Difficulty
The analysis tells planet motion energy is stored in the space as moving waves- and the planets move since long periods of time and their motions energies are stored during these long periods of time- means- the planets motions energies total during these long periods must cause to store massive motion energy in the space- now let's ask-where's this stored massive energy? also the energy can NOT be stored in the space forever-so what's happening for this massive stored energy? I prove the sun rays are created from this massive stored energy but regardless my theory in all cases we should find how this massive stored energy be used because it can cause a risk for the solar system stability and in fact can cause an explosion in the solar system
The problem here is that- massive motion energy is stored in the space but no one knows where's this energy and how is it used?
Third Difficulty - Newton Mass gravity definition is wrong- let's explain why
Suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity and we know the moon motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) now let's ask- from what source the moon motion energy is provided? What's the moon motion reason? The mass gravity- means- the mass should provide the motion energy- that means – if The moon moves by the Earth mass gravity that necessitates to decrease the masses of the Earth and the moon by the motion energy- here's the problem- Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass- this decrease is done because of the motion energy
The analysis tells us–the physicist supposes planet motion produces NO energy this is the only one solution for the problems created by the physicist neglect to observe planet motion energy- NOTICE Mass gravity is a fact- it's a bond between two masses – for example- the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity – so if some force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with The Earth- in this case the force causes the Earth to move will provide its motion energy and the moon motion energy also - shortly – Mass gravity can't cause any motion-
(3) The Research Argument
The physicist vision contradicts the nature system let's prove that
The Physicist Vision
The physicist supposes there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the mass (for example) as wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and for that the physicist searched for this (unit) because it's (the building unit)
As a result the physicist divided the matter into particles then the particle is divided into Molecules then the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc
The physicist searches for the building unit- for that - the physicist divides (any thing) to see its contents till reach to the unit which can be used as the building unit.
The Nature System Vision
The Nature designer aims to create integration- as the marriage – male and female- the relationship will cause to give birth for a child- INTEGRATION this is the word inside the designer Mind- No building unit- the marriage answers- because in marriage both (male and female) are required and no one is better– both work together and give equal effects on the same one process and give together one result- I explain the idea by the marriage because it's easy to understand- I want to put the word (Integration) as the basic concept in the designer mind- AND - I want to explain how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method while the physicist divides the elements one after one (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which the physicist considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process- Shortly- the physicist sees a universe (never be created by the designer)- while the designer created the integration is a goal and created tools to perform this goal (the integration) the physicist destroyed the tools and removed the integration tools while he searched for the building unit which is not found at all – that explains why the physics book is filled with imaginary ideas
NOTICE Another point shows the physicist wrong vision is (The Planet Motion)
While the solar planets move as gears in one machine and all planets motions are unified into one unified general motion- means- all planets motions are unified and produce one result only (one unified motion)- the physicist supposed each planet motion is independent-by that- in place of one machine of gears moves and produces one unified motion (one result) the physicist told us each planet motion is independent and no unification can be done for the planets motions –here – one more time the physicist sees very different picture from the real one- in place of one hand has five fingers the physicist sees five independent moving fingers
(4) The Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the planets creation and motion facts–
In details- I try to discover how the planet get its data- for example – why Jupiter diameter is 142984 km? why Neptune axel tilt is 28.3 deg? why Pluto orbital period is 90560 days? This method helps greatly to discover the solar system facts let's provide two examples to explain how this method works
Example No. (1)
Why Is The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 Km?
The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 days (the moon day period) the displacements total be = 2.598 million km = 2π x 413600 km
The data tells us the moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km and also it tells, because the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is so long, the moon should revolve around the Earth through this apogee orbit its radius (413600 km) only and can't revolve around the Earth through any more near orbit…
Not Facts
The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km only and the moon revolves around the Earth through near orbits and can reach to perigee radius (363000 km).
How Can The Moon Do That?
The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level by that the real displacement (L) through the orbit be less than (88000 km) because it be (L = 88000 km cos θ), as a result the total displacements be less than (2.598 million km) and that makes the moon orbital apogee radius to be decreased from 413600 km to 406000 km.
We should pay attention for the angle (θ), because this angle controls the moon motion features – where- with the angle (θ) increasing the real displacement (L) be shorter and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits – but –with the angle (θ) deceasing the real displacement (L) be longer and that pushes the moon far from the Earth to more far orbits- The moon orbital motion depends on this angle (θ) it tells θ1 = θ0 +1.7 where (θ1) = today angle and (θ0) =yesterday angle
1.7 degrees be used as the moon daily motion degrees for the equation
Example No. (2)
Can Mars Itself Cause The Earth Moon Creation?
Giant-impact hypothesis tells (NO) – but let's see the planets data analysis
I Suppose - Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus
The order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows correct order in planets diameters, and orbital distances (and masses)- BUT – Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) to its current one (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with the Earth in its migration motion – and Mars itself has caused the Earth moon creation- My Mars Migration Theory answers many left questions by Giant-Impact Hypothesis – for example -
Why Does Venus Have No Moon? Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) – and moved to its current orbit (227.9 million km) – BUT- Mars had moved by a force – and then Mars had collided with Venus –and Mars had pushed ALL DEBRIS with it in its Motion Direction because of its strong motion - Venus had found no debris around and for that Venus couldn't create its moon –But – The Earth mass is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum for that the Earth could attracted some debris and created its moon-Mars has 2 moons and this fact supports my theory because Mars with small mass could attract two moons because the debris were around it while Venus has greater mass but couldn't create its own moon because the debris are moved with Mars motion- the rest debris are attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt
(5) The Research Discovery
The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field – moreover there's no gravitational field – let's prove that
5-1 Planet Motion Energy Analysis (revision)
5-2 Planet Motion Energy Trajectory
5-3 The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field
5-4 The Gravitational Waves Reflection
5-5 The Gravitational Waves Can Move By speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
5-6 The Solar System Has Relativistic Effects Proving The High Speed Motion Existence In It
5-1 Planet Motion Energy Analysis (revision)
Let's remember this analysis in following
Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-
5-2 Planet Motion Energy Trajectory
The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)
AND
In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total (where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit)
Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) – Means
The planets motions energies are unified into unified wave and this wave moves by velocity (205.8 km/s) - Shortly- while the planets revolve around the sun, there's one unified wave revolves around the sun and moves by velocity 205.8 km/s
This unified wave is the gravitational waves
The question is
The scientists discovered waves in the space and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field but why?? because planet motion energy analysis proves the motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves- so the discovered waves are created by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field – also let's prove the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field to support my theory
5-3 The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field
The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following
(i)
The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-
(ii)
No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-
Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the discussions.
(iii)
The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-
(iv)
The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- we have studied this equation before (planet orbital distance equation – my 1st equation)
(v)
Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- planet velocity definition is done by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in planet velocity definition
5-4 The Gravitational Waves Reflection
(1)
The gravitational waves reflection is proved by many powerful proves- one of them is (Planets data reflection on one another) as we have seen in planet velocity definition (v1v2=constant) this rule proves the planets velocities are reflected on one another
In fact- the waves reflection prove the waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field because the wave reflection causes to reflect the planets data on one another-this fact is important to be understood-
The planets can't be reflected on each other because The reflection is a feature of waves and not planets– spite of that- Planets data is reflected on each other – how can that be possible? This dilemma is solved by the waves reflection- because – the waves reflection causes to reflect the energy and that causes to reflect the planet data for that the planets data analysis proves strongly the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field
This fact is proved strongly and crucially by planets data analysis in item no. (**)
(2)
The waves reflection cause to square the wave velocity- this fact also is important because by this method the waves (the gravitational waves) can move by speed of light- the next point explains that
5-5 The Gravitational Waves Can Move By speed of light (C=300000 km/s)
This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83
This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam-
I claim the gravitational waves are the unified wave moves by velocity (205.8 km/s), but the waves reflection causes to square the gravitational waves velocity and by that the gravitational waves can move by speed of light, means, the gravitational waves velocity is 205.8 km/s but this velocity is accelerated to be equal the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) as a result for the wave reflection- let's see how can that be possible
300000 km =7.1 x (205.8)^2
Where - 205.8 km/s = the unified wave velocity – And - 7.1 is Lorentz Length Contraction Effect (for a velocity 297000 km/s = 0.99 speed of light)
The unified wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity – means- the unified wave velocity is (205.8 km/s) and the wave reflection causes to square this velocity and produce the value (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 BUT - Lorentz length contraction effect with rate (7.1) causes to increase the distance 42683 km to be (7.1 x42683 = 300000 km) and by that- the wave velocity (205.8km/s) is accelerated and be equal the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) by the wave reflection effect
The rate (7.1) increases the distance in place of the contraction because the wave reflection cause to reflect of the geometrical effects- more proves in item no. (**)
5-6 The Solar System Has Relativistic Effects Prove The High Speed Motion
The velocity 297000 km (=99% of speed of light) causes Lorentz length contraction effect with a rate (7.1)- BUT- this rate is used with modification
(7.1/100) + 1 = 1.0725 - this is the rate proves the relativistic effects- because
This rate controls more than 40% Of All Data in the solar system – as the following data proves- no explanation for it except Lorentz length contraction effect-
DATA No. (1)
(243/224.7) = (29.53/27.3) = (27.3/25.4)= 1.0725 –where
243 days = Venus Rotation Period
224.7 days = Venus Orbital Period
27.3 days = The Moon Orbital Period
29.53 days = The Moon Day Period
25.4 days = The Sun Rotation Period (At Equator)
The data shows the consistency between Venus and the moon cycles periods
DATA No. (2)
(778.6/721)= (721/670)= (670/629)=(1433/1325)=(1284/1205)= (2872/2644)= 1.0725
These are distances measured in millions km – let's define them
778.6, 721, 670 and 629 are the distances between Jupiter and the sun, Mercury, Venus and the Earth respectively.
1433, 1325, 1284, 1025 are the distances between Saturn and the sun, Venus, the Earth and Mars respectively.
2872 and 2644 are the distances between Uranus and the sun and Mars respectively.
Around (40%) of all distances in the solar system are rated with the rate (1.0725)
DATA No. (3)
629 million km (The Earth Jupiter distance)= (1.0725)^2 x 551 million km (Jupiter Mars Distance)
4495.1 million km (Neptune Orbital Distance) =1.0725 x 2 x 2094 million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)
5906 million km (Pluto Orbital Distance) = (1.0725)^2 x 5127 million km (Jupiter Pluto Distance)
5127 million km (Jupiter Pluto Distance)= (1.0725)^2 x 4437 million km (Mercury Neptune Distance)
2.574 million km (Earth motion distance daily) = 1.0725 x 2.4 million km (TheMoon Orbital Circumference)
DATA No. (4)
(28.3/26.7)=(26.7/25.2)= (25.2/23.4)=(122.5/113.4)=(97.8/91.3)= 1.0725
The values (28.3 degrees, 26.7 degrees, 25.2 degrees, 23.4 degrees) are the axial tilts of (Neptune, Saturn, Mars and the Earth) respectively – The values (122.5 degrees, 97.8 degrees) are the axial tilts of Pluto and Uranus-113.4 degrees =90 deg +23.4 deg and 91.3 deg =90 deg+ 1.3 deg (Jupiter orbital inclination)
(6) The Research Hypothesis
The Sun Is NOT Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- Instead - The Planets Motions Energies Total Is Used To Produce The Sun Rays- That's Why The Sun Can Not Be Created Before The Planets Creation And Motion
In Fact- The Sun Is A Phenomenon- created by the planets motions- means- The Planets were created and moving in their orbits before the sun creation- the planets were revolving around a point in space for a long period of time before the sun creation and the sun is created and put on this point around which the planets revolve-
NOW Let's Ask How can that be possible?
This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83
This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I suppose the sun rays is created by this method
Means- the sun is Not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays but the sun rays is created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states - AND
I proved the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field- that shows the sun rays are created by the planets motions energies which are stored in the space in moving waves (gravitational waves)
6-1 How Can Planet Motion Energy (Small Energy) Be Used To Produce The Sun Rays?
The planets motions use different rates of time- for example
(One Solar Day Of The Sun Clock=365.25 Solar Days Of The Earth Clock) why?
Because by this rate, the Earth motion energy total for one compete year can be used by the sun in one solar day only-
In fact all planets motions energies total in 365.25 days can be used in one solar day by the sun- by this method the planets small motions energies can be accumulated and stored to be massive energy sufficient to produce the sun rays
Please note- this is a small rate of time- the greater one is
(One Solar Day Of The Sun Clock=1461 Solar Days Of The Wave Clock)
We know the unified wave velocity 205.8 km/s and in 1461 seconds the wave moves 300000 km but the sun clock doesn't see the period (1461 seconds) instead it sees only (one second) by that the wave moves by (speed of light relative to the sun point of space)
Also please note- this rate (1 =1461) enables the wave to move by speed of light relative to the sun but can NOT produce a light beam- the light beam production needs the rate (1=1461^2) –let's explain why in the next point
6-2 If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light – How Can It Produce A Light Beam?
It's simple question to answer
The unified wave (gravitational wave) moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)– but- the light beam can be produced by the value (C^2= squared speed of light)-
Now- we know the gravitational waves are reflected and the reflection causes to square the wave velocity - Here we see what's happening
The unified wave (gravitational wave) moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)– and it's reflected that causes to square the wave velocity means the speed of light is squared and produced the value (C^2= squared speed of light)- and from this value the light beam is created –
In fact – The Light Beam Can Not Be Created Without The Wave Reflection-
Means if the waves are not reflected in the solar system the sun can Never be Created
6-3 Why Is The Sun Nuclear Fusion Theory Wrong?
Let's remember
This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83
This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I suppose the sun rays is created by this method
Here we see major changes in the sun rays production visions – let's compare them
(i)
The sun nuclear fusion theory tells – the source of energy is the sun mass and the light production method is the nuclear fusion process – but the theory can't solve the problem of the sun corona temperature (5 million Kelvin) while the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin only – if the energy is produced by the sun mass how the outer energy can be so higher than the inner energy?
(ii)
My theory tells- the source of energy is the gravitational waves motions energies and the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- means- the sun rays is created from the planets motions energies total – this is the source of energy
And
The light beam production method is The Relative Motion- means- the gravitational waves move relative to the sun point of space by different velocity = speed of light =C=300000 km/s and this wave is reflected which caused to square its speed and produced the value (C^2= squared speed of light) as different velocity between the sun point and the unified wave motions- means- the relative motion is the method by which the sun rays is created –
Please note- the article tells this fact-because it tells the gravitational waves can produce a light beam–by what method? By the gravitational waves motions- Shortly- the sun is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun point for that the gravitational waves move by speed of light relative to the sun point and when the wave is reflected and its speed is squared this is done for the different velocity between this wave and the sun motions by that the different velocity be (C^2= squared speed of light) that's why the light beam is created in the sun (in the sun corona and that causes the energy out of the sun to be so greater than the energy inside the sun because the energy comes from out of the sun and not from the sun body)
(7) The Solar System Description Refutation
The solar system general description is wrong in major facts which are
(1)
The sun is created by the planets motions BUT the solar system general description supposed the sun caused the planets motions
(2)
The planets motions are unified into one unified motion- means- the solar planets motions are unified and produces one unified motion (one result) BUT the solar system general description supposes each planet motion is independent from the other planets motions (means in place of one machine of gears produce one motion the physicist sees the planets motions are independent and different from each other)
(3)
The solar system is created from one energy which caused the creation and motion of all planets and their distances BUT the solar system general description supposes each planet creation is independent from the others
(4)
The matter is created depending on its motion- means- the motion is defined before the matter creation- and the matter data is defined based on this motion BUT the solar system general description supposes the matter is found regardless any motion because it's the basic of the universe
(5)
The major point here is that-the motion is the universe cornerstone BUT the solar system general description supposes the matter (mass) is the universe cornerstone
(8) The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies (CONT)
Please read my paper
The Sun Can NOT Be Created Before The Planets Creation
or
or
or
and
A Great Gap Between The Physics Book And The Solar System Facts
or
thanks
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow
Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c
E-mail [email protected], [email protected]
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
PUBLICATIONS
box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis
#Earth#solar storm#Northern Hemisphere#U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration#solar outburst#geomagnetic storm#Northern Lights#Federal Emergency Management Agency#Space Weather Prediction Center#NASA#solar flare#coronal mass ejection#plasma#magnetic field#corona#radiation levels#aurora borealis#aurora
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Cartoon depictions of the homeless increasingly reflect the hostility of today’s political leaders toward people on the streets. We’ve gone from images of charming hobos with bindles to zombies taking over cities. If you consume any news at all, you’ve probably noticed that the United States is pathologically cruel to its homeless citizens. This May, the brutal killing of Jordan Neely—who was strangled to death, at the age of 30, simply because he was unhoused and shouting on the Manhattan subway—captured the national spotlight, but it was just one of many such cases of unprovoked violence. In January, two cops reportedly kidnapped a homeless man in Hialeah, Florida, drove him to an “isolated and dark location,” and beat him unconscious. That same month, art dealer Shannon Collier Gwin faced battery charges after he sprayed a homeless woman with a hose outside his San Francisco gallery, barking “Move! Move!” at her. (Predictably, Gwin got a lenient plea deal of just 35 hours of community service.) Elsewhere in the city, homeless San Franciscans have been attacked with chemical bear spray on at least eight occasions. Other assaults have been more impersonal but no less vicious. On July 14, the city of Houston abruptly closed its only public cooling center in the downtown area, potentially condemning anyone without shelter to suffer heatstroke in 90-degree weather. Among the property-owning class, the phenomenon of hostile architecture—sidewalks with spikes that stab anyone who tries to sleep, benches with iron bars, and the like—has become de rigueur. The widespread callousness and lack of compassion are both infuriating and hard to comprehend. How on Earth, we might ask, did things get this bad? [...]
Looking back at older cartoons, one of the things that stands out immediately is the absence of negative attitudes toward the homeless. In fact, during the Golden Age of animation, creators seemed to have had a real affinity for the poor and unhoused, often placing their most iconic characters in that role. There’s a wonderful 1948 Warner Bros. short called “Riff Raffy Daffy,” in which Daffy Duck is looking for a place to sleep—first on a park bench, then a trash can, and finally a furniture display in a shop window—and has to dodge the harassment of the police, as represented by Porky Pig in a little blue uniform. (Literally, the cop is a pig!) Or, in the 1950 cartoon “Homeless Hare,” Bugs Bunny’s rabbit hole is destroyed by a new construction project, leading him to unleash his usual slapstick mayhem against the developers until they put it back. In these cartoons, homelessness is something inflicted on people by outside forces—gentrification and the real estate business, in Bugs’ case—and something which can be successfully resisted. Even Disney cast a homeless dog as a romantic lead in 1955’s Lady and the Tramp, contrasting Lady’s sheltered naivety with Tramp’s superior knowledge of the world. The title invokes the memory of Charlie Chaplin’s “Tramp” films, which similarly brought dignity and humanity to the role of a homeless man. (Bugs Bunny, too, takes inspiration from Chaplin, and multiple Warner animators have drawn him as the Tramp.) In 1961, Hanna-Barbera’s profoundly underrated Top Cat followed the adventures of a gang of wisecracking Manhattan alley cats, who, like Daffy, are always outwitting a meddling policeman. At worst, classic cartoons may trivialize the suffering and danger associated with homelessness—there’s a certain recurring image of the carefree hobo carrying a bindle, which paints the whole subject in a romanticized light—but the homeless themselves are rarely disparaged or made the butt of the joke. Quite the opposite.
It took a few years, but cartoons caught up to the Reaganite turn. In episodes from the ’90s and early 2000s, there’s a palpable shift in the way homeless characters appear compared to earlier decades. The perspective is different: we’re now seeing them through the eyes of comfortably housed characters, rather than their own. Often they don’t even get proper names. [...] This trajectory leads us, perhaps inevitably, to SpongeBob SquarePants. [..] Squidward gets accused of stealing a dime by his comically greedy boss, Mr. Krabs, and quits his job in a fit of outrage. We then flash forward to see Squidward, now bedraggled and unshaven, living in a cardboard box on the street and begging for change. [...] Mercifully, the ever-cheerful SpongeBob gives Squidward a place to stay—but the moment he’s safely off the street, Squidward turns from a sympathetic victim of circumstance into a lazy, entitled freeloader, straight out of a Reagan speech. He makes no effort to find work and loafs around SpongeBob’s house for ages. [...] Eventually, an exasperated SpongeBob writes “GET A JOB” in his alphabet soup, before shoving him (bed and all) back to work at the Krusty Krab. [...] Worst of all, though, the episode suggests that homelessness can be solved on an individual basis if the people in question simply stop being lazy and “GET A JOB.” This is the biggest myth of all. In 2021, a statistical analysis by the University of Chicago found that 53 percent of people in homeless shelters, and 40.4 percent of unsheltered people, do have jobs. The problem is that their wages are too low, and rents are too high. According to statistics from the same year, it’s impossible for someone working a full-time, minimum-wage job to afford a single-bedroom apartment in 93 percent of U.S. counties, and there are no states in which someone can rent a two-bedroom space on the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. In other words, homelessness has little or nothing to do with personal responsibility, or lack thereof. It’s a consequence of large-scale economic decisions made by landlords and bosses. [...]
— Alex Skopic
847 notes
·
View notes