#Video Input

[caraudioexpertaustralia0]

Headunit With Carplay For HONDA CRV | 2002 | 9INCH

[aurosoulart]

I put a little deer inside the lamp to be its light source... his name is Lightbringer and he acts as a guide through even the darkest of forests. ☀🦌

(ps: if you have Figmin XR, you can download this and put it in your own home here!)

[vigilskeep]

the veilguard character creator has 47 eyelash shapes

[evilyunia]

HI EVERYONE I NEED YOUR HELP

my financial situation was kinda tough but pretty manageable.

but now either my PC (probably a graphics card) or my monitor are screwed.

It just doesn't work.

This problem won't affect commissions since i can use my old laptop but all of my drawings (some even aren't posted yet) are on PC.

Either way it will affect my financial situation and i don't have enough money for either monitor either graphics card.

If you want to support me

PayPal: yuniahor@gmail.com

Or you can also commission an artwork

Please help and share.

Also if you have any advices i will listen. +There's gonna be updates to keep you all in touch.

PS. my monitor glitched and turned off from time to time (usually it went black screen for every 2 to 5 minutes before working again) but after i tried to change HDMI cable it just started to show an error "no video input" with both new cable and an old one. I tried to use sister's laptop with this monitor and it works but with same issues my PC previously had before changing cables.

[deebrisbyfish]

I contend that when one is feeling creatively empty, a good way to fill the tank is by switching from OUTput to INput. Play a game, get out of the house, read a book. That said, I am UTTERLY TERRIBLE at devoting any time to anything that ISN'T producing something. My brain starts eating itself that I'm going to vanish in a cloud of irrelevancy the second I stop producing... ugh... "content". That said, a thousand "Whose Line" points to anyone who can guess what game I'm playing from that panel alone. (Yes, there is a correct answer) lol

[pigeon-butch]

I certainly have my own concerns about the treatment of moo deng but um. well i think some of you may just be racist

[frameconfessions]

I want to play games with Amir but he takes it easy on me since I can't read the games as fast as him.

[tragicallycrispygirl]

yeah i meant to do that this is a very common goldlewis bnb

[devilsainz]

carlos just wants to teach something to charles 🥹 x

[caraudioexpertaustralia0]

Headunit With Carplay For HONDA 2002 FIT/CITY/JAZZ | 9INCH, RHD

[friedfriedchicken]

Nnnnnobody talk to me- I'm playing with my toys

[aerithisms]

sorry this is just me being a hater but i started watching hbomberguy's video about the doctor who 2017 christmas special bc of that post and omg his takes are incomprehensible to anyone who's actually seen this show i have no idea how they became so widely accepted (except i do and it's that the people who accepted them didn't actually watch capaldi era but anyway). i was talking in the tags of that post about how i think it's ridiculous that he complains in the sherlock video that the series 8 character arcs are written in a way where questions about the characters brought up in one episode take several episodes to reach resolution rather than being resolved in that same episode, but it gets worse! in his dedicated doctor who video he contradicts himself by complaining that the characters AREN'T allowed to grow across the season because moffat clearly personally wrote scenes into other guest writer's episodes about the series arc. supposedly this removes the time that could have been dedicated to character growth, except the series arc in question is nothing BUT character growth. that is what those scenes moffat inserted are. like imagine if kill the moon didn't have the big blow out argument at the end, because apparently that's the world hbomberguy wants to live in and thinks would make for better character writing?? the mind boggles.

[kaityslangblr]

🇯🇵🎮Let's learn Japanese with Shashingo! EP02 - Beginner Japanese Comprehension

[rigelmejo]

Has anyone studied a language with the method of automatic language growth (ALG)?

ComprehensibleThai on youtube appears to have some amazing lessons specifically for ALG study. I found them when looking for various comprehensible input youtube channels. I am still looking into what ALG is more, and the subreddit I found that defined it has quite specific guidelines you should follow when studying, and I'm very curious. I am still hunting down more information on ALG before I draw any big conclusions.

I'm seeing information like: the idea is to watch videos/teachers in lessons (and eventually real life situations if you're in a place it's spoken, or shows in the language with various situations) and focus on grasping what is going on. Not trying to translate in your head, not trying to make conclusions conciously of "they said dui and nodded so maybe it means yes" - but instead just trying to understand as if you were a toddler learning your first language: just recognizing "they communicated Agreement" or when people say words as objects increase maybe they're counting, or when people say words and point to themselves maybe it's about them. The idea is similar to studying Comprehensible Input (like TPRS or Francais par le Methode Nature etc) except that there are many Comprehensible Input studiers who simply watch what they can comprehend, even if comprehension is due to cognates and guessing based on what they already know about the language explicitly. For example: when I watch a spanish video, I can use spanish subtitles on and guess what some stuff means based on French that I know - I don't necessarily HAVE to rely on visually watching the situation going on and drawing conclusions for that situation/experiencing it. With ALG, it seems the idea is to primarily NOT analyze the unknown and guess, but instead to mainly focus on the VISUAL information to follow what's going on... with (from what I am getting the impression of) the assumption you will pick up the language over time from hearing it in situations you could understand from visuals/body language.

So with ALG, I also saw that you generally don't speak for around 1000 hours, basically until it feels natural like your native language to say a given phrase. If it feels natural to say a given phrase or word then say it, if it feels like you must think hard and figure out what to say then don't say it yet. So sort of how as babies, we made sounds and practiced, but perhaps only said mama when we wanted something for several months. Then eventually we said baba or bottle, then "want bottle."

Although... I'd say ALG sounds like it'd prefer you not to speak until the pronunciation feels natural... whereas with actual babies, they usually have bad pronunciation in their own native language until 2-4. They speak anyway, with the bad pronunciation, because kids have stuff they need to tell us lol! Like "hungry" "water" "tired" "play" "want that" "help." I couldn't say letters like L or T or S until I was like 4 in my native language, but I was saying full sentences of "I want X with Y" by age 2. Just with letters missing, as toddlers do, but understandable enough their parents know what they're talking about. I remember my nieces, as toddlers from 2-4, ranting for many minutes over what happened to them that day, just telling me, and I could understand them because I babysat them a lot but to a stranger a lot of my niece's words were hard to understand. Maybe ALG has you not speak full words until you feel they're easy to say, since you're an adult, so you can afford to postpone speaking in the language (and get help/your needs met in your native language or with gestures until then), and since as an adult you can potentially make a variety of sounds quicker than a baby? I'm not sure. That is an interesting thing to consider mm.

Anyway. I have seen in some of the ALG stuff I'm reading that suggests if you Deviate from the expected ALG study model, then you may develop some ingrained language usage mistakes. That may well be true, I don't know nearly enough about ALG or ingrained mistakes to draw any educated conclusion.

I personally don't care much if I do ingrain some usage mistakes, or accent mistakes though. So it's not a big worry for me. And it makes me curious: for people who have studied both using ALG methods and other methods, what was your experience? Did ALG work better in some areas of improvement, in all? Did ALG work worse for you in any areas?

I would expect ALG works a bit better for eventually having good OUTPUT skills, compared to Mass Immersion Approach/Comprehensible Input combined with anki study or purposeful vocabulary word-lookup study. Just based on my own experience, that method of "consume material you can follow the main idea of" and "look up key words you don't know so you understand more over time" is what I did A LOT of. And for me, it improved passive vocabulary amazingly well! I got good at reading FAST, which was my primary goal, so that was great. I got good at understanding the language in videos with visual clues fairly quick as well (a bit lagging behind reading skill), and listening to it (no visuals) also improved fairly good (at a noticeable lag behind reading skill). In terms of passive vocabulary, it eventually didn't make a difference if I learned a word through comprehensible input to me, or through looking up the word, because I'd run into words again and again in reading/shows that I'd eventually simply 'understand it immediately' just like my native language. There's a bit of a lag, where lets say if I know 5000 words and am studying 200 new words in a new book, I will recognize those 5000 words immediately whenever I encounter them... but the new 200 words I've only seen a little bit will still require time and effort for me to recall when I see them or hear them again. Then later, after enough exposure, those 200 new words will be easy to recall, and I'll be learning Newer words that are harder to recall. Overall, learning with the "look new words up, while consuming content in the language" works well for building a big passive vocabulary fast.

But active vocabulary remains very small, unless I use the language actively by speaking and writing - so if ALG suggests learning through experiences and situations, it also seems to me that ACTIVE vocabulary you can use without putting in a LOT of effort to recall also seems to develop faster the more it's in experiences you have. So ALG style lessons may help develop that active vocabulary better, because ALG lessons primarily SHOW you situations and SHOW you how people communicate in them. However, since I haven't studied ALG type lessons for 1000 hours... I am not sure if it runs into the same issues as MIA/comprehensible input With word-lookup, when it comes to active vocabulary. That issue with comprehensible input/word-lookup study is: after 1-2 years engaging in content (reading, listening), the learner still has not spoke or written yet, and finds it quite difficult to start and must look up Many things when starting to speak/write. That is the position I am in for the languages I study: I understand a lot, but cannot say much (grammatically incorrect or not). For ALG, perhaps their grammar will be better when they start speaking/writing as they internalized the language more naturally and unconsciously. But I am not sure if they'll actually have an easier time outputting the language, or like the other input heavy study methods, they'll struggle to build their active vocabulary. I'm curious about the ALG process for developing active vocabulary, and I'm going to look into more learner experiences where they shared that part of the process. I'm curious if that part of the process goes smoother for ALG learners.

Anyway... just a language learning method I am mulling over. If you're studying Thai in particular, ComprehensibleThai on youtube is an excellent resource to start studying using the ALG method. Dreaming Spanish, I think, was also designed to ideally be used like an ALG course so the creator does have some explanations of how to study it in an ALG way (rather than in the way where you look up key words along with watching comprehensible stuff - which is what I did, and a lot of 'comprehensible input' general studiers tend to do).

[emeraldblonde]

I tried to mod something and the good news is, it didn't crash the game. 🥳 The bad news is, not what I was looking for lmao.

Like, don't get me wrong. I've seen way worse (the stuff of nightmares) on a modding channel I've been teaching myself this stuff lately, so. It's not like I completely fucked this thing up or anything like that.

It's just... I still gotta ask though.

What went wrong here?

[grimrester]

not watcher making their content exclusively subscription model while their fellow buzzfeed graduates the try guys have increasingly made their content diverse and accessible