#This is not hate

[yourfavecharacterisqueer]

something i don’t get is how the merlin creators were gonna drop katie mcgrath if she or colin morgan didn’t learn an english accent because they couldn’t have two people with irish (ish) accents, and yet two years later they casted eoin macken (who is irish!) as gwaine… kinda hypocritical if you ask me.

[gale-gentlepenguin]

Vi: The enforcers killed my parents, and top side’s control and neglect has resulted in my home constantly at war with eachother. Corrupt cops Locked me away for years. I have zero reason to EVER work with them.

Caitlyn: Hi, I’m a nepo baby with a lot of mommy issues. Want to help me investigate stuff until eventually you join the enforcers and actually make things worse for them. But we get to make out.

Vi: (already in the enforcer uniform) where do I sign?

[formulaheart]

happy halloween to the the aston martin team, the scariest guys around. lawrence stroll, the disney villain. fernando alonso, the dinosaur track terrorist. and lance stroll, mr. "im gonna drive like there's nobody else on the track".

[midnightmah07]

Idk why I get kinda ☹️ when I see people calling Fellow "Ernesto"💀💀 like they have their choice they're living their lives but idk it just. Ugh. I feel like I got so angry at the name change that seeing people call him that makes me kinda icky idk why

[carnalsaturn]

Something that keeps me going is that there is like 5,000 supernatural actors and NONE OF THEM ARE NORMAL I mean we live in a world where Chad Lindberg from a few episodes of season 2 tried to plan a Destiel weeding while simultaneously Samantha Ferris also from season 2 had an anti-Destiel rant 💀 AND THIS THING WITH JIM THAT JUST HAPPENED THIS IS HOW ITS SUPPOSED TO BE, THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER LEAVE THIS FANDOM, HOW CAN I?!?!?! (let me confirm this is NO HATE TO JIM OR JARED OR JENSEN OR MISHA AS WELL AS THE OWNER OF THE ORIGINAL TWEET I just think this is funny as hell I only tagged them to get this traction and cause I tag them in everything anyways) 🫶💕

[kimkhimhant]

I don't understand why so many people equate a single aspect of a character's personality to their sexual preferences. like pointing to Kim's apparent enjoyment of violence and being like obviously he's a violent dom top.

it feels like toxic masculinity and disturbing stereotyping to say a character who has violent tendencies can't possibly be gentle in romantic and sexual relationships, or someone who has a lot of anger can't possibly bottom or submit to the person they love.

because Kim can kill people means he would want to aggressively dom Chay and would never want to give Chay any power in their sexual relationship? it doesn't make sense to me and it honestly feels like an insult to Kim's character. I don't have a problem with Kim domming or topping. i have a problem with people making that his whole personality when it's Not. the biggest move he makes on Chay is a very innocent cheek kiss, when he absolutely could have done more. to say that the violence he commits to protect Chay= violent sexual dominance is weird!

to say that because he is ambitious & hardened & willing to threaten & kill people who endanger his loved ones, he could never willingly submit to someone - what kind of claim is that? doesn't that make it all the more impactful when he Does submit?

claiming so confidently (and rudely) that there's nothing submissive about him, and that it's out of character to write him as anything but an aggressive and violent dom top really does feel so narrow-minded and insulting. his actions in canon are very much open to interpretation.

the club scene, he momentarily loses control of his emotions: he finds out chay skipped his audition, is at a club, and is being offered drugs. he freaks out and drags chay away, but when chay stands up to him he stands down. he leaves. he doesn't continue to force chay. we can interpret this interaction either as a momentarily loss of control, or as proof that he's capable of force, but again, neither option is explicitly confirmed by canon.

the song, it's implied that he started writing it while he and chay were still together, rather than a post-breakup manipulation tactic. we see him alone in his apartment writing a song while thinking about chay's love song and smiling. it was a love song, written in response to chay's love song, but they broke up before kim finished it.

kim is absolutely capable of violence and force. boundaries are a little blurry for him, especially when he's trying to accomplish something. he looks into chay's phone, breaks into his room, bypasses his being blocked by messaging from a different number. chay also walks right over kim's boundaries. he insists that kim stays to listen to his song (repeatedly), get's kim's address from his friend and shows up at his place, etc. they are pretty well matched in that sense – their concept of boundaries and attachment are both unhealthy.

there is really nothing in canon that dictates whatever romantic or sexual dynamics they will have. i'm frustrated when people act like there are. the image someone presents in public has nothing to do with their sexual preferences.

it feels like a projection of misogyny & toxic masculinity & honest to God homophobia to say that because Chay is sunny & soft, he can only ever be a submissive bottom, & bc Kim is cold & raised to be violent, he can only ever be a violent, dominant top.

again, as a disclaimer, i'm not opposed to domtop kim. i think it's an entirely valid portrayal of him! i support those who write those dynamics! but it's not canon, because there is no canon sexual dynamic for kimchay. sub bottom kim isn't canon either! because there is no canon sexual dynamic for kimchay.

we almost never see kim with his defenses down. he's always on guard and putting on a brave face, except for just a few scenes, like when he's alone writing music and finding chay's polaroid.

i think it's important to recognize the fact that sexual dynamics cannot be predicted by looking at how someone looks and acts in public, and that no interpretations are confirmed by canon and all interpretations are therefore equally valid

[thatboleyngirl77]

When did Valentino die?

They say he died in the 1970s.

When did Angel Dust die?

They say he died in 1947.

WHAT HAPPENED IN THOSE 23 YEARS!?

[julieloveswbb]

i hope claire knows how lucky she is because😣

[matthewliberatore]

i hate following the tag "mlb" bc in MY mind its "major league baseball" but then i'll get posts on my dash like "mlb season 4 spoilers" and i'll say "when did we start counting them?? i thought we used the year??" then i realize they're talking abt a kids tv show

[stranger-rants]

Unpopular Steve Opinion Maybe

It’s ridiculous to expect a teenage boy who just a few seasons before was using misogynistic and queerphobic language to be a mouthpiece for social justice and/or “the voice of reason” at all times when it realistically can take years for someone to process and unpack all of their biases and bigotry and the drive to make Steve the most socially conscious character ignores the privileges he has as a white upper class man. By contrast, using Billy as a mascot for bigotry in all its forms and pitting Steve against him in this way is classist especially when Billy is assumed to be homophobic despite there being no evidence of this and despite being the victim of homophobic violence and Steve is awarded not only Ally Status because of his proximity to a queer character but his canon queerphobia is swept under the rug despite there being no on screen evidence that he’s truly unlearned that simply because Steve can buy anyone’s forgiveness while Billy can’t. It is realistic for Steve to mess up and be insensitive especially when his privileges protect him from social consequences. And it’s okay for him to be clumsy about unlearning bigotry. It doesn’t make him an unforgivable character, though I think acknowledging this is hard for people who want Steve to be objectively good and Billy to be objectively bad.

[ventisslut]

IS IT just me, or is lunaasmr's recent venti video too high-pitched voice wise? Like, i just can't picture Venti while listening it's just too high-pitched. It sounds like he's on helium.

[mintedwitcher]

Okay look I will openly admit to not being a Martha fan (it's a whole thing, I'm still dissecting it) but like. Guys. Why do you think its 'unfair' that she doesn't get her own Doctor double?

Her arc ends with her realising that she doesn't need him. More than that, that her relationship with him is unhealthy. Why would she need her own version of him, and moreover, why would she want one?

Donna and Rose expressed similar wishes throughout their run, wanting to travel with the Doctor forever, but (as far as I can remember) Martha didn't share that wish. She loved travelling with him, but when she realised that there was more that she could do on Earth than in the TARDIS, she willingly walked away from it, twice.

I get that it's a funny joke, and maybe I'm overanalysing and spoiling the fun, but I just. I'm really honestly trying to figure out why Martha would want a double or a duplicate of the Doctor when - last we saw - she was settled and happy with Mickey.

[darkhairgolddragon]

The only Alicent ship i can stomach is her with her brother what is wrong with me

[medusatarian-a]

Listen, I LOVE the conjuring franchise, but what the fuck was The Nun 2.

Saint Lucy and the Pagans? Peak Christian propaganda

The info dump as if expecting everyone to totally forget the last film?

Father died of fucking cholera?

The weird telling us Valak was an Angel then nothing else?

Satan goat?? Zombie cockroach lady?

The fucking. Save the day by just praying, which didn't work in the film before, and retconning Maurice's exorcism?

BUT Sophie opening the door to the Warren's corridor was iconic, the flipping magazines and how she was laying like the crucifixion after? Very good.

[heartz4shauna]

why has everyone suddenly gone insane about dinner in america or whatever it’s called where did this movie come from who are these people