#THATLL show the misogynists!!

[davespwite]

this is what transandrophobes say to and about transmascs while arguing that *were* the misogynists.

if you want to stay safe from this person, block @.madeofvoid

[gunmetal-ring]

Thats partly why im absolutely baffled that ppl ship steve w eddie and/or billy bc like the boy could not be straighter and no there is absolutely NO internalized homophobia there, the reason he was homophobic in s1 is bc he was a homophobe (and also bc jonathan is so obviously bi) and now hes not homophobic bc thats character growth and the reason hes obsessed w trying to find love is bc hes desperately trying to get over nancy and he cant bc i think he genuinely does love her and want her to be the mother of his children bc he realizes that its ok not to have educational/work ambition, and also bc he has been abused and neglected by his parents and is determined to do better and also needs to feel loved

Anyway that digressed but if someone wants to explain to me their headcanon that Steve is bi/gay im happy to listen but i just cant imagine a world in which id actually be convinced. Also if you take that invitation as an opportunity to be a sociopathic jackass dont bother lmao hellcheer4lyfe

[ohwell-itsme-but-danganronpa]

Scamming Shuichi's Shitty Parents

Beez: shuichis parents can exist. for 2 seconds. bc i wanna see a scenario where they try to reconnect w shuichi for wtv reason. only for shuichi to hit em w a "do i know you"

Ves: now is he being genuine or is he fucking with them

Beez: idk what would be funnier. if he was expecting them to show up and did Not want to deal w them or have it be a sur- YEAH MY QUESTION TOO

Mauri: ok but consider kokichi answering the door kicks them in the shins and locks the door or just tearing them apart verbally

Ves: i do think it's INCREDIBLY funny for him to just be fucking with them because. we know who gave him those acting skills. him GENUINELY not knowing their faces anymore is more angsty to me kokichi is BANISHING them from his kingdom they are NOT welcome

Mauri: “oh ur my parents? what was my favorite color as a child”

Beez: shuichi, head in hands: i really dont want to face them after what they did to me, i basically dont know them kokichi: then do that shuichi: huh kokichi: pretend not to know them, thatll be fun shuichi: …..[evil red smiley emoji]

Hina: Shuichi and Tsumugi being siblings Just makes me think about this prompt more Shuichi chooses to leave for uncle Tsumugi has the option to. But their parents give her a good way to get into her dream career with the entertainment industry

Beez: i just want shuichi declaring that his uncle n aunt r his parents actually n them just having that slap in the face moment okayyyy

Ves: gesturing flatly to the 'saihara' on his door/nametag/whatever

Hina: I headcanon that their last name is Shirogane And his uncles is Saihara He left the last name

Ves: slots v well into my trans hc. he doesn't have either of the names they remember that's just a whole different guy

Consider - them not remembering his face and just assuming Kokichi is Shuichi because of that. They weren't there for the transition, okay? They have no idea what to expect. The last time they saw him he was shorter

Ves: mrs shirogane writing down T = purple ??? in her notebook

Apollo: Kokichi has a fucking field day when he realises they think he's their kid He like demands random shit from them to 'make up for never reaching out' He claims his lying is because of them 'abandoning' him after he moved

Mauri: "why are your eyes a completely different color" "i got pink eye in middle school :)"

He takes off his heterochromia coverimg contact and says "oh, those are just part of the aesthetic"

they ARE dating & living together. This IS the right adress. They DO meet the boyfriend & don't recognize him bc they think he's cis

people assuming the wrong person out of the two is trans because of stereotypes, like the height is already amusing to me & there's this kind of smugness to fooling the "we can tell" people, but the most comedic part is them talking to Shuichi as the boyfriend of their child, you bet they say some out of pocket shit to him when Kokichi is out of the room as a haha funny, unaware of how transphobic (and probably misogynistic) the joke was as he has to hold himself back not to blow their cover

[laundryandtaxes]

Me when I'm so stable and am reasonably upset at the obvious genocical intentions behind the idea that it should not be outright illegal for um...women to decide to only be among other women in certain instances where the sex of the people around them is immediately relevant to women's own safety and comfort

[kuiinncedes]

.

[antiloreolympus]

10 Anti LO Asks

(Note: All of these asks are before episode 206 (Season 2 finale) so some may be dated.) 1. lmao the episodes right before the mid season finale look way better than the current ones despite time off. how is that even possible.

2. nah but its funny rachel was like wait i cant have him send demeter's a baby shower gift and cut minthe off financially thatll make him look bad! but instead adding him being AWARE shes 19 and still chasing after her "tiny pink body" and "ass shaped like an upside down heart" and having him brag about owning countless slaves makes him look better? the logic is flawless here /sarcasm

3. I mean even beyond the fact the citizens dont like him nor do the old underworld gods, how does rachel expect us to buy hades causing economical collapse in ALL the realms and causing shit with the other kings over ONE PERSON HE KNEW A MONTH doesn't make him look like an thin-skinned, oppressive dictator? why should anyone support this? he's raging out like trump when he lost the 2020 election. just because rachel keeps insisting hes in the right doesnt actually mean he is.

4. Fp- is the joke with the fur supposed to be funny? Cause it wasn't. It just shows 1 AGAIN(after buying stuff while complaining about capitalism) that Perse is a hypocrite, she knows it & doesn't care 2 Hades doesn't really care about animals beside his dogs, it's just adding to him being horrible person. If the fur was artificial she wouldn't feel bad about wearing it & it would be mentioned. Also feelings since 4th day? Creepy. Definitely that girl understands you the most after 4 days...

5. how could olympus and the underworld turn into a shitshow after persephone left? literally tho, she should have been a nobody. all the citizens should only know is that 1) hades ripped a guys eye out for her and 2) she killed humans and didn't report it to zeus. if anything, the citizens should've believed persephone deserved to be punished, and that hades is an immature manchild for what he pulled in the court,,,

6. Why doesn’t Cerberus have three heads. I’m sure this has been asked before but how you gonna write Cerberus without three heads—the one defining trait this dog has. Where are the other heads. Where are they

7. this is such a minor thing but WHY ARE NONE OF THE EYES IN LO LINED UP PROPERLY. I have a lazy eye and if I don't focus on it long enough it can go out of focus/look elsewhere, but I don't think that's what happening?? Why are their eyes always looking in different directions 😭

8. what I don't think Rachel gets this, but having Persephone and Hades cling to someone they barely know from a decade+ ago shows a huge lack of mental and emotional maturity on their ends. I realize it's a bit more complicated because we do know they end up together, but that's why placing it before they even start dating is just a bad idea. This isnt a case of lovers/spouses longing to see each other again, it's two grown adults with the emotional maturity of 15 year olds.

9. Rachel don't draw women with heart shaped faces, hourglass bodies, and huge eyes challenge (impossible for her specifically difficulty)

10. why would hebe even want to be like her mom anyway? hera was emotionally and mentally neglectful of her, abandoned her so zeus presumably raised her himself, and hera is a hypocritical, racist jerk who cheats on her husband, is misogynistic to other women, openly married zeus for power, told others about persephone's assault without her consent, mistreats her own "friend", and abuses her power of everyone else. rachel really wants us to buy she's a ~complicated woman~ over just being an asshole.

[johnnymundano]

What Have You Done To Solange? (Cosa Avete Fatto a Solange?) (1972)

AKA: The Secret of the Green Pins, The School That Couldn't Scream, and Who's Next?

Directed by Massimo Dallamano

Written by Bruno Di Geronimo, Massimo Dallamano

Music by Ennio Morricone

Country: Italy, West Germany

Language: Italian, English

Running Time: 103 minutes

CAST

Fabio Testi as Enrico "Henry" Rosseni

Karin Baal as Herta Rosseni

Joachim Fuchsberger as Inspektor Barth

Günther Stoll as Professor Bascombe

Claudia Butenuth as Brenda Pilchard

Camille Keaton as Solange Beauregard

Cristina Galbó as Elizabeth Seccles (as Christine Galbo)

Maria Monti as Mrs. Erickson

Giancarlo Badessi as Mr. Erickson

Antonio Casale as Mr. Newton

What Have You Done To Solange? is a giallo. What’s a “giallo”? I’m glad you asked; they are 20th Century Italian thrillers with a marked emphasis on sex, violence and style over narrative coherence. Other, more precise definitions may apply but that’ll do for now. It’s not a great example of a giallo because it has a much more sedate visual approach than that of, say,  giallo king Dario Argento, but on the other (black-gloved) hand it compensates with plenty of creepy salaciousness and unpleasantly misogynistic murders. Unlike Argento or Mario Bava (the genre’s progenitor) Dallamano directs as though he’s making an orthodox murder mystery for the most part, with straightforward sets ups and a lack of the dreamlike delirium the more outré giallo entries possess. What Have You Done To Solange? could easily be mistaken for a mainstream ‘70s thriller except for the grubby sexuality capering like a satyr alongside the Sunday afternoon movie elements. But that weird synchronised existence of the uptight alongside the immoral is what the movie seems to be about; the way socially repressed sexuality results in perversion, sometimes of the murderous persuasion. Or maybe it was just the ‘70s; that flasher-in-the-park of a decade that makes everything that bit more rank and vile.

We hear a lot about misogyny these days which is good, or it’s better at least; because in the ‘70s you didn’t hear about it, you lived in it. And What Have You Done To Solange? captures that feeling of misogyny being in the tap water and the air itself perfectly. Our hero, Enrico Rossini (Fabio Testi), is a teacher (a position of authority) but he’s knocking off one of his pupils, Brenda Pilchard (that name, tho! Pilchard!) (Claudia Butenuth),  (so there goes his Ofsted rating) and their initial tryst is interrupted by a did-I-didn’t-I witnessing of a brutal sex murder (both the uncertainty of the witness and the sexual violence are more giallo staples). This puts the teacher in a bit of a pickle when the body is discovered and his pen is found near the scene; the police and his wife being unlikely to see it as a bit of “cheeky fun” unlike his fellow teacher. And he’s set up his schoolgirl fancy in a love pad that has posters of topless ladies adorning the walls, which is a new level of piggishness. In order to clear his name Enrico and his wife, Herta (Karen Ball), investigate, but only after Ms Pilchard is murdered which reunites the estranged couple because, well, life goes on, right? Well, not for Brenda Pilchard, but never mind. The crux of the matter, and the key to proving Enrico’s innocence, will not only be what has been done to Solange, but who did it and why? And who is Solange anyway? 

While the inescapable moral turpitude on show tends to distract from it, Dallamano has, I think, made a daring decision to face head-on some of the sexual horrors of the time. It would have been easy to make the whole thing more palatable by recasting the events as metaphoric horror tomfoolery, perhaps involving a coven and some kind of ritual gone wrong, but What Have You Done To Solange? uses its seediness  to call attention to the often traumatic repercussions of society reducing a medical procedure to a criminal enterprise. Things were tough for chicks during the dirty mac decade, is what it’s saying. Baby.

So if you want to watch a movie where a sex creep is the hero and the awful things that happen to women when misogyny becomes institutionalised are challenged via the mechanism of a whodunit set in a ‘70s London where everyone inexplicably speaks Italian, What Have You Done To Solange? is for you.  However if you want to see a sleazily prurient and intermittently violent movie set in a ‘70s London where everyone inexplicably speaks Italian with a sex creep as the hero, What Have You Done To Solange? is also for you. Either way the guy’s a sex creep.

[babypadawan]

Thx for answering my q! 😘 quick follow up: I'm psycho analysis hoe and i wanna bounce my theory off someone else. I'm a freak. I wonder how much of this is tied to me having few romances + craving love/male approval. Almost like a man who rlly wants to attract women so he teaches himself to be very affectionate. Would any of us be as* freaky if it weren't such a strong draw for men or if we weren't used for sex regularly OR if romantic relationships were easier to come by?

lmao as a fellow psychoanalysis hoe i love this q! i’ve been thinking up an answer for forever haha so here’s what i’ve come up with.

I think we all learn very early that you can be good or bad at sex, most of us from when we learn about sex in the first place. thinking of the media we are exposed to (like all the nasty 90s r&b), we’re taught that pleasure is given and taken during sex. in our misogynist society, the male orgasm and male pleasure is given the most attention. most of the sexual media I can recall growing up was male dominated. like it was always guys nutting or their pursuit of a nut and barely about making the lady nut. and freaky girls just made guys nut harder. so if anything I think we’re like trained to be freaky by exposure.

but, on the flip side, freakiness is subjective. (i don’t eat ass so does that make me not a freak? are there shades of freak?? is there a sex act all freaks have to do in order to be a freak???) and I’ve discovered the freakiest parts of myself while being in a romantic relationship. I like to sit on faces, which is a sex act that basically serves myself, should I decide not to grace my partner with reciprocation. so in that vein, maybe other freaky things serve only to get us to climax faster, and it’s just more of men thinking the world revolves around their dick? and also sooo many girls say they don’t have orgasms and never have??? maybe being a freak solves all of that? personally, me letting my freak show has never been a strong draw or lock for dudes so even though I prob did it wrong I dont think freakiness keep a dude. and also thinking of how a lot of guys say that their partners just lie there or they only do missionary/cowgirl and they don’t like it and talk shit about those girls put it in memes and shame them like thatll prob pressure some girls to step out the box. idk it’s all very nature vs nurture and lets not even talk about religious people who are taught to repress their sexuality cause it’s a sin like who really knows??

soo in conclusion; yeah, probably, a little. but like freakiness often means good sex so fuck it.