#Supreme Court cases
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
यूपी के गुंडा एक्ट से हो रहा पुलिस और न्यायिक प्रक्रिया का दुरुपयोग, सुप्रीम ने की यह बड़ी टिप्पणी
Delhi News: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने बुधवार को कहा कि उत्तर प्रदेश का गुंडा और गैर सामाजिक गतिविधि रोकथाम कानून बहुत सख्त है। न्यायमूर्ति बीआर गवई और न्यायमूर्ति केवी विश्वनाथन की पीठ ने एक याचिका पर सुनवाई करते हुए ये बात कही। दरअसल इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने मई 2023 में गुंडा एक्ट के तहत लंबित कार्यवाही रोकने की मांग वाली एक याचिका खारिज कर दी थी। इस पर याचिकाकर्ता ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट का रुख किया था। अब…
#azad kashmir supreme court#caa in supreme court#delhi news#Gunda Act News#Supreme Court#supreme court cases#supreme court constitutional bench#supreme court constitutional bench dissolved#supreme court decisions#supreme court grap-4#supreme court judgment#supreme court news#supreme court of azad kashmir#supreme court of pakistan#supreme court on delhi air pollution#supreme court on delhi pollution#supreme court ruling#u.s. supreme court#US Supreme Court#uttar pradesh news
0 notes
Text
Murder vs. Culpable Homicide — Understanding the Key Differences
According to Sir William Blackstone, “When a person, of sound memory and discretion, unlawfully kills any reasonable creature in being and under the king’s peace, with malice aforethought, either express or implied.”
When a person deprives someone of his life, he may or may not be liable for murder but in a broader sense, he has committed culpable homicide. So we can say that “All murders are culpable homicides but all culpable homicides are not murders.” In this article, we will discuss the differences between the types of culpable homicides and murder.
Culpable Homicide
The term Homicide, in its broadest sense, is the act of causing the death of another person. It refers to the unlawful killing of a human being, excluding situations where the killing is justified or excused by law. Homicide is a criminal offense that is categorized into different degrees or classifications, such as justifiable homicide, accidental homicide, culpable homicide, and murder depending on the jurisdiction. Culpable homicide is divided into two categories including culpable homicide amounting to murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Section 299 of the Indian Penal Code deals with ‘Culpable Homicide’, it states that “Whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide.”
Murder
Murder is a type of homicide that is defined under Section 300 of the IPC, it states that “Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or-
Secondly — If it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused, or-
Thirdly — If it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or-
Fourthly — If the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid.”
Elements of Murder
The intention of causing death of another person is the primary element of murder.
The intention of causing bodily injury or physical injury that is likely to cause death of another person or result in serious injury to another person.
The same should be done with the knowledge that a particular action would result in the death of another person.
Click Here To Read The Full Article
Also Read: Capital punishment in IndiaConstitutional validity of Death Penalty or Capital punishment in India
#Legal Definitions#Homicide#Murder#Culpable Homicide#Indian Penal Code#Criminal Law#Elements of Murder#Defenses to Murder#Punishment for Murder#Supreme Court Cases#Law in India#Crime and Punishment#Legal Distinctions
0 notes
Text
Under the six-week ban, providers could not perform abortions if they detected fetal cardiac activity, which emerges at about six weeks into pregnancy. Many women, McBurney wrote, do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks.
“For these women, the liberty of privacy means that they alone should choose whether they serve as human incubators for the five months leading up to viability,” McBurney wrote. “It is not for a legislator, a judge, or a commander from The Handmaid’s Tale to tell these women what to do with their bodies during this period when the fetus cannot survive outside the womb any more so than society could – or should – force them to serve as a human tissue bank or to give up a kidney for the benefit of another.”
In a footnote, McBurney added: “There is an uncomfortable and usually unspoken subtext of involuntary servitude swirling about this debate, symbolically illustrated by the composition of the legal teams in this case. It is generally men who promote and defend laws like the Life Act, the effect of which is to require only women – and, given the socio-economic and demographic evidence presented at trial, primarily poor women, which means in Georgia primarily black and brown women – to engage in compulsory labor, ie, the carrying of a pregnancy to term at the government’s behest.”
#us politics#reproductive rights#georgia#the ag there can (lbr he will) appeal the case to the state supreme court#and the state supreme court can (lbr they will) reinstate the 6 week ban
237 notes
·
View notes
Text
#trump#trump judges#corrupt court#presidential immunity#supreme court ruling#presidential powers#rule of law#us constitution#criminal charges#2020 election#judicial impact#executive authority#georgetown university#david super#democratic governance#trump legal cases
145 notes
·
View notes
Text
if you are in the US and are at risk of unwanted pregnancy, you should buy mifepristone immediately while it's still legal to mail so you can have it on hand just in case (it should keep for about 2 years). the future of this method of medication abortion is seriously at risk. it is very important that you are prepared for a worst case scenario
if this applies to you or a loved one go here and follow the instructions. it's $150 so if you are not at risk of unwanted pregnancy and are able, please consider helping others with the cost, or buying some to have on hand in case someone you know needs it in the future
edit: just wanted to add that I personally have already bought and received a provisional dose in case I know someone who needs one from this site so I can confirm that it is legit
#not trying to be super alarmist but this is especially important if you live in a state that is very hostile towards reproductive rights#please follow this court case as well. it is probable that the supreme court will make the situation even worse than the district courts#tell your friends and family#formerly ori/ons/belts#also i think if u just like. google the name of the site u will see other places reference that specific one#also this is currently legal in all 50 states BUT IT WILL NOT BE FOR LONG.#which is why i posted this lmfao
543 notes
·
View notes
Text
167 notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
"When the President does it, that means it is not illegal." -- Former President Richard Nixon, 1977 Also: the United States Supreme Court, 2024.
#History#SCOTUS#Supreme Court#Presidential Immunity#Trump Immunity Case#Frost/Nixon#Richard Nixon#President Nixon#Presidency#Youtube
80 notes
·
View notes
Text
source 1
source 2
source 3
#destiel meme news#destiel meme#news#united states#us news#us politics#united states supreme court#us supreme court#purdue#sackler family#big pharma#pharmaceutical company#pharmaceutical#purdue pharma#opioid epidemic#so if you hear someone talking about how they rejected the settlement understand WHY#it's so MORE people can sue purdue LATER#in case they haven't made a claim yet
57 notes
·
View notes
Text
By shear coincidence the pandemic falls within the Ace Attorney time skip since T&T + Investigations games take place in early 2019.
#trucy would have been adopted by phoenix for only a year when quarantine hits#ace attorney#phoenix wright#phoenix wright ace attorney#gyakuten saiban#pwaa#you could also retroactively apply the BLM protests; Supreme Court Bullshit; Trump's cases; and Jan 6th to the ''dark age of the law''#(even though the game was originally written set in japan and us politics matter little)#(and aj trilogy predates all this shit)
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
how this man managed to get through college without jumping off a roof as a dare is beyond me
#the boys in the boat#tbitb#bobby moch#luke slattery#salix's sideblog escapades#no wonder he had the confidence to present a case the supreme court gotdam
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
They are a friend group??? Totally stable and epic (this is what I do instead of properly planing a fanfic)
⬆️Honey needs to get herself some relationships that aren't just Tom Kenny 💔😔
⬇️Also mongoose Betty going crazy and tiny manticore smoking cause I saw that silly lil meme pop up on my feed
#betty grof#adventure time#magic betty#magic man#king man#tiny manticore#pruff post#pruff post at#ignore the supreme court case in the corner i use my sketch book for what ever#magic man adventure time#space politics
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
Just remember folks, the same Supreme Court that has openly and repeatedly declared that individual rights do not exist if they aren't explicitly spelled out in the Constitution and cannot be implied from the text just declared that the President has the right to be immune from prosecution because they inferred it from the text.
You really can't make this stuff up. The Supreme Court is willing to stretch the bounds of the law and the text of the Constitution as far as possible to protect the powerful, but isn't willing to grant even the slightest bit more than the letter of the law to the average person. That should tell you all you need to know about who they value.
#politics#us politics#scotus#individual rights#us supreme court#trump immunity case#presidential immunity#trump
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
So let me get this straight.
The Supreme Court of the United States just struck down anti-discrimination laws based on a case that was entirely theoretical.
Yes. You heard that right.
This ruling will affect all states, because it is a federal law. A web designer decided that in theory if she was asked to do same-sex weddings she wanted to be able to say no. The case was theoretical.
The ruling says that, essentially, anti-discrimination laws are a violation of 1st amendment rights. This will affect more than just queer people. This will harm every person that could possibly be harmed.
#scotus#supreme court#us#politics#lgbtqia+#queer rights#human rights#imagine living in a country ruled by 9 monarchs who vote on your every single right#even if there is no real case they can just make one up and re-write laws#these monarchs serve until death
89 notes
·
View notes
Text
the fix is in!!
#Supreme Court corruption#judicial integrity#legal ethics#accountability#justice system reform#transparency#judicial independence#public trust#legal oversight#ethical standards#judicial misconduct#Supreme Court accountability#judicial power#political thuggery#institutional limits#checks and balances#public pressure#media coverage#judicial reform#democratic principles#constitutional interpretation#judicial impartiality#judicial appointments#separation of powers#government accountability#supreme court ruling#presidential immunity case#Trump legal arguments#congressional impeachment power#criminal charges
146 notes
·
View notes
Text
the girlbossification of ruth bader ginsburg has to be one of the most just plain annoying aspects of white liberal feminism. like it's not as actively harmful as a lot of other shit obviously. but it is soooooo annoying. if I never see another notorious rbg tote bag as long as I live it will be too soon
#her opinions and amicus' in many cases were iconic! not denying that certainly. she is absolutely AMONG the better justices in us history#HOWEVER her record on policing/the carceral system is very bad! genuinely bad!#and she just would not hold the conservative justices accountable. her and kagan are way too placating#and then she refused to retire in 2009 when there was a sitting democratic president and a fucking DEMOCRATIC SUPER MAJORITY#saying basically that no one else could do the job as well as her which is insane because sotomayor and KBJ literally are better :/#its also unbelievably conceited and just incredibly fucking selfish to knowingly doom the country because you think youre hot shit#started ranting abt this at work bc literally any talk even adjacent to the supreme court will set me off abt all of us court history#and my coworker was like 'well i dont think its very fair that she had to have that much riding on her decision to retire'#it literally is fair because that is the fucking job that she signed up for. this has literally always been how it fucking works#its a lifetime appointment. you either die unexpectedly or retire strategically#she accepted a position in which the entire country would depend on her but its not fair for the entire country to depend on her???#bullshit#im not fucking buying it. she did this knowing roe would likely be struck down as a result#she should absolutely be held accountable for that lmfao. you can know that she had a hand in a lot of great decisions for this country#while also knowing that she did a fucked up and extremely selfish thing
83 notes
·
View notes
Text
Okay so as a legal scholar I cannot be quiet about the recent SCOTUS decision because frankly: WHAT THE FUCK AMERICA???
How the hell did the country of "democracy, liberty and justice" that the US always claims to be end up with the highest court ruling, that the president is literally above the law? This right there is the beginning of the end of democracy. SCOTUS basically handed the president dictatorial powers and it is only a question of time until a president makes use of these powers. I can‘t understand how the conservative judges on SCOTUS can’t see that they just turned themselves into a laughingstock for any serious legal scholar or judge in the entire western world. Hell probably even judges in actual dictatorships are laughing about the absolute stupidity and law bending this ruling presents.
But this is also fully the fault of the way the US judicial system is structured. Judges hold way too much power due to the anglo-saxon case law system that persists from colonial times and only got created because English judges wanted more power so they gave it to themselves. This leads to a supreme court that has no rules for what cases it can and cannot rule on, no enforceable rules on when a member can rule on something or has to recuse themselves and the power to basically add to the constitution without being elected.
Having only 9 judges on a Supreme Court for a country as large as the US is absolute madness! Germany has less than half the amount of inhabitants yet our Supreme Court is made up of two senates with eight judges each and if one senate wants to differ from the other’s past rulings all 16 judges have to rule on a case together. And these judges aren’t even appointed for life!! Not to mention that they can only rule on very specific cases that have a direct relation to the constitution.
I fear for all my American friends and my partners who live in the US because this new ruling gives a future president the ability to commit atrocities against minorities without any fear of persecution! This November will be the most important election in US history and as a German who has studied how fascism used the law and the courts to rise to power before I urge all of you: Vote! Vote against Trump or this will be the last time you will be voting at all.
13 notes
·
View notes