#Saskatoon Criminal Attorney

[linhphareginalawyer]

Criminal Attorney Saskatoon

Skilled criminal attorney Saskatoon with extensive experience in defending clients against criminal charges. Providing expert legal counsel and representation for cases ranging from theft to serious offenses. Dedicated to protecting your rights and offering a strong defense strategy to secure the best possible results in court.

[saskatooncriminaldefenselawyer]

Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyer in Moose Jaw

Facing criminal expenses is a severe count that could affect your private and expert life. If you're in Moose Jaw, having a professional criminal legal professional through your aspect could make a big distinction. Criminal prison specialists cope with instances associated with costs like DUI, assault, Drug offenses, and theft, supporting customers navigate the complexities of the criminal device with expert guidance and illustration.

What Does the best Criminal Lawyer Do?

A crook legal professional affords defense and prison aid for people accused of criminal activities. They represent clients in the courtroom, negotiate plea deals, and work to minimize consequences or have prices dropped. The proper attorney will apprehend nearby legal guidelines and have an established track document in criminal defense.

Why You Need a Criminal Lawyer in Moose Jaw

Understanding Your Rights: Legal representation ensures that your rights are covered all through the procedure.

Expert Negotiation: Skilled crook attorneys can negotiate with prosecutors to secure plea bargains or decreased fees.

Court Representation: An experienced lawyer will guard your case in the court docket, aiming for the first-rate feasible outcome.

Key Qualities to Look for in a Criminal Lawyer

When selecting a criminal legal professional, don't forget factors like their enjoy, familiarity with neighborhood courts, and consumer testimonials. Lawyers who specialize in crook safety in Moose Jaw deliver treasured insights into neighborhood legal techniques, which may be super in building strong safety.

For expert legal support in criminal defense, consider reaching out to trusted professionals like those at Criminal lawyer in Moose jaw. With the right help, you’ll be better prepared to handle the legal challenges ahead.

[if-you-fan-a-fire]

"BOLD ATTEMPT AT A HOLD-UP ON C.N.R. TRAIN," The Morning Leader (Regina). October 7, 1912. Page 1 & 2. --- NEGRO SOUGHT TO CLEAN UP SLEEPING CARS NEAR LUMSDEN ---- GETS 10 YEARS IN PEN ---- AN AMAZING STORY OF THE HOLD UP AND ENSUING FIGHT ---- PRISONER A DANGEROUS MAN ---- Police Believe He is Man Wanted for Serious Crimes in the States

"I sentence you to penitentiary for five years on each count, the sentences to run consecutively"; these were the words which Magistrate Trant used at the police court on Saturday afternoon when Alfonso James, colored, was summoned for pointing a gun and robbing C.N.L. porter, and for attempting to rob another porter on a C.N.R. train between Chalk and Lumsden on Saturday morning.

Alfonso James, alias Paynton Washington, alias Walter Barnes, colored, is the man who will spend the next ten years of his life in penitentiary for one of the boldest attempts at robbery in the West.

The man James is a fugitive from justice, although he denied it stoutly and maintained his innocence on the stand.

"He is wanted in Kings County, Washington State, for a criminal offence, and has a record that will re-veal something interesting when it is looked up," said the police. What Started the Trouble On Friday afternoon, James, in company with some friends, got into a little game of poker at Saskatoon. He lost heavily, about $256, he claims, and his story is that he was trying to get some of his money back because he thought he had been cheated by a marked deck of cards.

James elected to be tried summarily by the magistrate instead of before a jury. Having consented to jurisdiction, he pleaded not guilty, and the first witness called by the prosecuting attorney, Mr. Frame, was a passenger, Gen. E. Curtis, of Norwalk, Conn. Curtis's evidence went to show that he was the occupant of the berth lower No. 2 on Porter Picket's car, the "Humboldt", from Saskatoon to Regina. During the journey, about three o'clock, he heard a noise in the smoking compartment, and he thought It was some of the train crew trying to pacify somebody who had been in a brawl.

The Porter's Story. Joseph H. Campbell, porter of car No. 2, was the next witness. Shortly after the train had left Saskatoon James came to him and asked for some money, offering some kind of phoney stuff. Campbell told James that he did not want to do anything of the kind, neither loan money nor offering. James went back to the car Humboldt, and Campbell sat down in his compartment. About two o'clock he noticed someone going through the car. This man wore an overcoat, and, following his instructions, Campbell followed him. The man went to the third sleeper towards the head of the train and shortly after came back. Campbell was dozing. When he woke up he noticed that the stranger in the car was going from berth to berth flashing a burglar's light. James, for he was the man, then coolly walked up to Campbell, turned the gun and the light on him and said with an oath. "I need some money: I'm going to do this train tonight." He took everything that was on Campbell, taking good care to keep the Colt revolver close to the face of the porter. He received about 33 dollars in money and two diamonds worth about $600, which belonged to Porter Picket of the sleeper Humboldt. He left Campbell 55 cents with which to buy meals.

Proceeds to Clean Up Train. James then told Campbell that he was going into the other car and if he secured some money he would give back to Campbell all that he had ta- ken from him. He was kind to Campbell, but kept the gun trained on him. He helped him to put on on his shoes, then marched him ahead, forcing Campbell to open the car. He walked him up to a grip that lay in the porter's room, and made him open that. When he could get nothing out of the grip, he told Campbell to wake up Picket, who was lying down in the smoking compartment.

Attempts to Rob Second Porter. Picket woke up and was told by Campbell: "Give this man your money or he will kill you." Pickett demurred a little, and stalled his assailant off for a short minute by talking to him, saying, "What the do you want to kill me for: I never did anything to you? Then James, who was getting impatient, ordered Campbell with another oath to go through Picket's pockets and give him all that was the porter. Picket still stalled art was leath to part with his coin, Campbell urged him to submit, as he would be killed, Campbell then turned around and put his hand on James Whoolder, saying: "Don't shoot. You know what will become of you and what they do to gunmen in this country James replied that he would rather be dead than in this condition and again cursed the men, saying: "Get that money and give it to me."

A Free Fight Ensues. Picket then bent down while Campbell started to to through his pockets. He was watching to get the eve of the prisoner, and at the right moment grabbed the gun pointed at his head and turned it down at the same time giving James a well directed uppercut on the point of the jaw. This surprised James and sent him up in the air. He landed against the pane of glass of the compartment and broke it to pieces. Campbell and Picket were on their man in a second, and after scuffing with him for some minutes finally subdued him and took the gun away from him. During the scuffle James bit the two porters and tore their coats, covering them with blood from the wounds he had received and with blood which was flowing from his nose. Campbell then notified the conductor, who took charge of James.

Prisoner Proceeds to Bluff. Asked in court if he had any questions to ask, James, standing up in the face of the serious accusation of Campbell, said: "Judge, that man should be run out of the courtroom for lying the way he did in that box." Magistrate Trant reminded him he was to ask questions only, and then James began to implicate Campbell into a game of poker on the train and some liquor which seems to have been in evidence in Saskatoon. He asked Campbell about a certain poker game with a phoney deck of cards and all sorts of other questions but he could not shake Campbell.

Corroborates First Porter's Story Carl Picket, porter on the Humboldt, was the next witness. He had known James for three months and had seen him often in Saskatoon. He had a little game of poker with James while he was off duty. There was no card playing in the cars. When the train left Saskatoon about a half hour late he sold James lower berth number one in his car. They sat smoking for a while. James said that he wanted to get off at Lumsden. James then went to his berth and the next time Picket saw him was when he came in with Campbell who looked "scared to death." James was covering the movements of Campbell with a loaded revolver. Then he corroborated the evidence of Campbell as to what happened when the three of them were together in the car. Together they took back from James the stuff he had taken from Campbell.

The magistrate asked if James had made any other resistance than the first one, and Picket, with the broad accent, answered: "No yo' Onah, he had no chance after I popped him one."

James Makes Damaging Admissions. This concluded the evidence of Picket. Then James went into the witness box and gave the testimony that convicted him without the aid of that of Campbell and Picket. He admitted he had the gun, and several other admissions in the course of his evidence gave the impression he was out for some purpose, namely, to get back his money with a gun, taking for granted that everything he said was true. He said there was a game on the train and that he had been cheated; also that he had been given whiskey. He told the magistrate that he had been badly pummelled by the porters who tried a hold-up game on him because they knew he had a gun and tried to take it away from him.

The magistrate told James he wanted no better evidence than his own to convict him.

Constable Robson was called to give evidence of having arrested the man, acting upon information received from Constable Ross, of the C.P.R.

James' Past Record. In cross examination Attorney Frame asked some very pertinent questions of James. He asked him if he was not wanted on a charge of robbery. James said that he knew of none. Then Mr. Frame asked him of a certain woman named Weir with whom it was stated he had been living. James got excited and denied stoutly that he had anything to do with the woman who, he said, had a bad reputation. He was informed by the counsel that he was charged with robbing Mrs. Weir of a watch. This he admitted as having taken from her and turned to the magistrate asking what reference this had to the case, and to which Magistrate Trant replied: "It has to do a lot with the credulity to be placed in your statement."

After several denials James came down from the stand and was made aware that he had been found guilty whereupon he asked that sentence be not passed until tomorrow, Saturday. He was informed that this was Saturday and that it was not necessary to wait ten seconds for the sentence.

The magistrate then said: "You are found guilty of a bare-faced attempt at robbery and holding up the porters. If it had been the passengers I should have sentenced you to twenty years in the penitentiary. As it is I am inclined to give a little credulity to your story, but when a man parts with his money in a poker game he parts with it just the same as if he had sold it. He has nothing more to do with it. Now, on your evidence you admit that you had the gun, that you were engaged in a poker game, and I think that you were trying to get it back with that gun. I sentence you to five years on each count, the sentences to run consecutively."

James was found gulity on the first count, of having robbed Campbell. To the second charge of pointing a loaded revolver at Picket with intent to rob. he pleaded not guilty, but, when he found he had been convicted on the first charge he changed his plea and received his sentence.

James owns a restaurant in Saskatoon and is a well known character there. He has lived, it is alleged, for some time with a Mrs. Weir, colored, and to her, it is said, he made known the fact that he is wanted for a criminal offense in King's County, Washington State.

The Pinkertons have his photo on one of their monthly sheets of the rogue's gallery and, judging from his actions in court on Saturday, James has been in some scrape before this as he proved himself rather familiar with police court proceedings.

An Earlier Escapade. Another interesting escapade of Alfonso James was made known yesterday when Walter Fleming, a well known colored man from the city, gave utterance to his feelings in regard to the man who will spend the next ten years in the pen.

About two months ago Alfonso James came to the city and asked for his mail at the post office. He was given a letter addressed to A. James in which was enclosed a cheque for $135 as payment on some lots.

James presented the cheque at a local bank and was informed that he had to be identified. He then went and secured the signatures of Fleming and Cunningham, two of his friends in the city, and secured the money.

A little later the right A. James turned up and asked for his money.

The result was that Fleming and Cunningham had to make good the amount of the cheque. They notified the police at once of this action on the part of Alfonso James. The police got busy but James had gone from the city and no trace of him could be found.

[westoverlaw22]

Contested & Uncontested Divorce Nulaw

He has also performed with the Saskatoon-based organizations Cornerstone Theatre and Music for the Gut. During law faculty, Christine served as Vice President of Academics for the Law Students’ Association, co-managing editor of the Caveat Lector, and producer of the charity occasion divorce lawyer california, Legal Follies. Christine additionally volunteered with Pro Bono Students Canada on the Consent Project and completed the intensive medical program at CLASSIC .

While all stress related with these points might never be absolutely alleviated, it may be lowered with the compassionate support and skilled information of an skilled lawyer on your aspect. Forum Law’s devoted family and divorce lawyers have more than 60 years representing purchasers in numerous legal proceedings. While not everybody can afford a lawyer, each Albertan deserves entry to a good legal system. As a publicly funded, non-profit group divorce attorney, we offer reasonably priced authorized services in household law, home violence, baby welfare, immigration, and youth and grownup criminal defence. She has appeared successfully earlier than all levels of Court in Saskatchewan, including Provincial Court, Court of King’s Bench and the Court of Appeal. She has also been involved in responding to an utility for depart to enchantment to the Supreme Court of Canada.

But be cautious of lawyers whom family or pals describe as the ‘toughest in town’. The dedicated and skilled divorce lawyers at Merchant Law of Regina, SK are here to help. We’ll help Divorce lawyers you information your divorce motion to essentially the most favorable conclusion we can, defending your rights and your pursuits.

As for youngster custody, the courts prefer preparations that enable both mother and father to maintain a relationship with your children. Shared custody arrangements or joint custody preparations with liberal parenting time for both events are the commonest. Courts solely contemplate sole custody preparations when there's clear proof that one mother or father is a danger to the opposite. For most couples, it will mean residing “separate and apart” for at least one year. Thus, many divorcing couples have already had a preliminary go at deciding issues of kid access, division of property, and support. A formal separation agreement ensures these early negotiations are adopted to the letter, and will serve as an aid to future negotiations.

They have "Been there. Done that" and bring their considerable data and ability to assist every case they undertake. One of the issues that differentiates Top Lawyers from different directories is our exclusivity. As our name suggests, we solely list experienced lawyers that meet strict, minimal follow, experience and/or recognition necessities. Hear the dear feedback from somebody who has been there and back.

Mincher Koeman acknowledges that family law issues have the potential to turn out to be extraordinarily expensive and complicated and that this comes at a time when the family is often underneath excessive emotional and monetary stress. They also perceive that not all household matters are high-conflict. This process allows a household to easily create their very own written agreements that incorporate all points which are required to be addressed in Alberta, at a minimal cost. Contested divorces take longer to resolve than uncontested divorces, and might divorce lawyer shortly turn out to be expensive, relying on the number of outstanding issues and the way willing the parties are to barter and settle. If events are obtaining a divorce, likelihood is they have already got a separation settlement that addresses particulars corresponding to spousal assist, division of property, child assist, and parenting arrangements. However, this is not all the time the case, and divorces can get messy and complicated.

Whatever your grounds, a lawyer may help you determine what plan of action to take. If your spouse is abusive, for example, it is going to be in your finest interest to attempt to ask the court docket to dissolve the marriage. This can even allow you to defend your children and acquire custody extra easily. Hayward Sheppard is an experienced team of lawyers who are devoted to providing you with the very best high quality legal advice and illustration. In many circumstances you do not want a court hearing to break up order. If you each agree, you can get a divorce by submitting the required types at Supreme Court.

[toonpunk-game]

GMs only 1: Some Basic Characters

Psst! Hey, this post is for GMs only: specifically, it’s a bunch of advice on how to use the characters outlined in my previous post about characters. We’ll be posting these separately, so as not to ruin the surprise for our readers--who definitely exist, there are definitely more than 2 of, and are not at all figments of my imagination brought on by my desperate desire for acknowledgement by someone, literally anyone, who is not one of my parents.

BEING PAPA MALORN

Papa Malorn never wanted to be a mob boss. In fact, he wanted to be a police officer when he was younger. The bombing changed him forever: he spent his youth on a quest for revenge, and when it was over he was a hard man with an empire at his command. He started down the road to infamy on the day his parents’ killer was sentenced: his name was Bartosz Juspeczyk, and he was innocent.

Thomas knew William Hackerschmidt killed his parents: while in the hospital, Hackerschmidt visited him and revealed his affiliation with the Zamboni crime family—who, he claimed, had masterminded the Malorns’ deaths for refusing to enable the Zambonis’ black market shipping. While Hackerschmidt extended an offer of employment, Thomas rebuffed him harshly. Three days later, Juspeczyk was falsely sentenced to death; and Thomas was livid when the District attorney categorically refused to re-examine the case. That was when Thomas resolved to take justice into his own hands—and though it took him decades, he eventually earned it.

The specifics of his career need not be dwelt upon. What must be understood is that to him, crime was only ever a means of revenge: everything he did, he did to hurt the Zamboni family. He attacked their members and burned their businesses; he founded a gang of his own, and steadily grew it into an empire; and he even funded Ariel Levitt’s mayoral campaign.

Now, two years after destroying the family, he looks at his empire as more of a business than anything else. He does not really consider himself a mafioso, even though that is what he is. If asked, he will describe himself as an anarcho-capitalist: he provides services that the government cannot be relied upon for, and does well by doing good. His hatred and distrust of the established system is so great that he truthfully believes this: in his eyes, his augmentation smuggling is a perfectly reasonable alternative to expensive legitimate channels; and his protection rackets ensure safety that the police and fire departments can’t or won’t provide.

AS AN ALLY OF THE PLAYERS

Papa Malorn is a simple man with simple rules: “if you don’t interfere with my business, I don’t kill you.” Players will find him to be amicable and open-minded. While he fiercely defends his employees and those he is paid to protect, he is unusually moralistic for a mob boss—to the point that he has made several non-competitive decisions regarding other criminal organizations in Saskatoon for the sake of keeping his employees out of harm’s way. That being said, he is also a man of ambition—and he fully intends to run the city one day.

He is an ideal source of employment for players who are embroiled in the underworld, but not necessarily wicked people. Malorn might hire them to do something as morally grey as foil an arson attempt by a rival gang, or bust up a drug dealer who has been dealing to children. Perhaps he might even be called upon to provide manpower for the players’ heist, or discretely leverage his connection to Ariel Levitt to make key evidence against the players disappear.

AS AN ENEMY OF THE PLAYERS

As simple as he is to have as an ally, Malorn is even simpler to have as an enemy. There are several behaviors he considers worthy of enmity: specifically stealing from or bringing harm to his friends, employees, or protectorates. If someone interferes with his business then he will, quite simply, try to destroy them. He will not beat around the bush, and he will not take his time: as soon as he learns who has wronged him, and where they can be found, he’ll send a few lads over with pistols and pipes to stove their head in.

If the players should prove better than average at resisting his henchmen, Malorn has several other tricks up his sleeve: he will hire mercenaries or other toonpunks to dispatch them, and if all else fails he’ll show up and do some ass kicking himself.

BEING WALKER STONE

Being Walker Stone is a very simple thing: be hardnosed, be unyielding, and be singularly devoted to the greater good. Despite his past as a villain, he means what he says about his motivations and his intentions: he opposes crime and wrongdoing. Do not mistake him for a Javert, however: his only goal is to ensure the health and well-being of as many people as possible, and he sees the law as the most efficient way to do it. It is nothing but a tool to him, and if it stops being the best way to ensure safety in Saskatoon, he will bend or even break it.

It is this fact that has placed several skeletons deep in his closet for the enterprising player to find. He has broken several major regulations during his time as commissioner, and he keeps these secrets buried deep—though perhaps not deep enough to evade keen-eyed investigators. First and foremost, he has cheated his continuity test: by recording the answers he gives on the test and leaving them as a coded note to himself in his journal, he has been able to successfully create the illusion of being identical between incarnations, regardless of how each one changes over time—an illusion that has allowed him to maintain his office even between deaths.

His second great secret—though this one is far less actionable—is that he has a very low opinion of Mayor Levitt, and considers him a mere pawn in his plans for the city: a smiling face and trustworthy image to which he can affix himself, and nothing more. Unbeknownst to him, Levitt thinks much the same—and is in fact a secret criminal kingpin, who cleverly uses Walker to further his own nefarious designs. A clever GM can leverage this dynamic numerous ways.

As a character, Walker is quiet and thoughtful—he likes to have as much information as possible before committing to any action, no matter how minor. When he speaks, he will be to-the-point and blunt, perhaps even standoffish; he does not like to repeat himself, because he is secretly ashamed of his lilting Southern drawl. Bear this in mind when writing dialogue for the character.

AS A FRIEND OF THE PLAYERS

Walker Stone, even though he is a stubborn police officer, is more likely to be a friend of the players than the Mayor. Despite running on the same anti-crime platform, he is not above cutting corners in the name of justice: he will tolerate vigilantes, spies, or thieves working in the common interest (but never admit so, obviously). If the players are particularly outspoken against organized crime, or even a particularly immoral corporation, Stone might even contract them for work the police cannot legally handle—though he will no doubt insist that the operation remain bloodless, and that the player characters minimize collateral damage.

He might be a valuable asset to player characters who work for justice, even if they use slightly illegal methods. As a GM, you might have him deprioritize ongoing investigations into the players’ capers, or deliberately slow police response times to their crime scenes. However, it is easy to lose his loyalty, and difficult to maintain it: if the players begin killing police officers, Stone will turn on them in a heartbeat; and it is entirely possible that a nefarious enemy might uncover his connection to the players and take measures to have Stone ousted from his position.

AS AN ENEMY OF THE PLAYERS

For murderous or chaotic players, Walker Stone is a dangerous foe. He does not abide killers, anarchists, or rabble-rousers. He does not despise their crimes per se, but rather what they represent: criminals like these are a threat to his vision of a safer Saskatoon. He does not take his work personally, but nevertheless pursues it with the compulsive obsession of a perfectionist. If the players earn his ire, they will find him to be ruthless, and utterly implacable: they can expect the police to shoot on sight, and shoot to kill. No matter how many times they kill him he will keep returning to command, more determined than before. Killing him will prove borderline impossible—removing him from power will be much easier for your players to attempt, in that it will merely be very difficult.

[linhphareginalawyer]

Are You in Need of a Skilled Criminal Defense Lawyer?

When facing criminal charges, having a reliable Criminal defense lawyer on your side can make all the difference. Our firm prides itself on providing top-notch legal representation to clients in need of defense against criminal accusations. With a commitment to excellence and a track record of success, we are here to support you every step of the way.

[ericfruits]

"Which Wife Beater [Is] Next?" Workplace Behavior Draws Suspension

An attorney's abuse of co-workers and others drew 30-day suspension from the Law Society of Saskatchewan.

Saskatoon StarPhoenix  reported on the bar matter and notes that he is no longer Director of Legal Services. 

As to his Legal Services clients

When the Member entered the waiting room he asked clients involved in cases of domestic violence "which wife beater was next". This comment was made in front of other clients and employees in the workplace.

During the interview with domestic violence accused clients, the Member did ask a client 1) "Are they a keeper or a good fuck" in reference to the victim; 2) would ask a male client whether the female victim was fat; 3) would ask the male client whether the female victim is ugly and if the accused responded that they were not, the Member indicated that he would see them in Court and decide if they were ugly.

The Member states that he used such language in order to ease his relationship with the clients. He accepts that these comments were inappropriate and unprofessional. He also recognizes that the clients were in a vulnerable position in that they were requiring Legal Aid services and that there was a power imbalance in his relationship with them; however, the Member provided adequate and effective representation of his clients despite language that was unprofessional.

Many of the victims were his co-workers

 Member was the Director of Legal Services for Saskatoon Criminal Office of the Saskatchewan Legal Aid Commission. His duties, in that position, included managing the unionized staff of the office in assigning work and office structural units. The Member was not responsible for hiring or dismissing the unionized staff as those functions fell under the purview of Legal Aid's General Office. At all material times, he was in a position of leadership and control over the employees referred to in these charges.

 L.S. was a unionized employee in the Saskatoon Criminal Office working under the direction, control and management of the Member.

The Member entered into a consensual sexual relationship with L.S. in March 2013. Despite the ending of the relationship, LS. agreed to be friends with the Member. She felt pressured into this friendship given that she remained under the control, direction and management of the Member.

Despite the fact that L.S. felt pressured by the situation those feeling were never communicated to the member. The Member admits he should not have entered into the relationship with L.S because of the power imbalance between them and how that imbalance was perceived by L.S. after other employees became aware of the prior sexual relationship. Nevertheless the Member did not convey the impression or communicate, in any manner, that L.S.'s work situation, assignments, hours of work, leave granted, or any other aspect of her work would be affected by not maintaining the friendship.

 L.S. observed the Member referring to herself and other employees as "dumber than a sack of hammers", "a bunch of idiots" and "lazy" in front of other employees.

The friendship with the Member was ended by L.S. in December 2013 when other employees became aware of the previous sexual relationship.

Subsequent to the breakup, the Member continued to invite L.S. to the theatre. She felt she had no option but to attend. Despite L.S. believing she had no option but to attend the Member did not pressure her, compel her or make any threats to her concerning her employment and the Member in his communications left the option to her to attend.

After the friendship ended with the Member, L.S. found herself powerless and isolated in the workplace. She felt she was unable to seek the support of her coworkers; however, the member did not say or do anything other than having been in a relationship with L.S., which would have affected L.S.'s relationship with her coworkers.

As a consequence of the personal relationship with the Member, L.S. took stress leave from work and found her relationship with her coworkers to be detrimentally affected by her relationship with the Member on an ongoing basis.

Another

 The Member entered a consensual non-intimate relationship with K.Z., a part-time unionized employee in the Saskatoon Criminal Office who was under the direction, control and management of the Member. The relationship began gradually with meals and progressed on a consensual basis. The relationship was non-intimate in nature and involved a trip with each other paid for by the Member.

During the relationship the Member talked in a rude and derogatory manner about some of K.Z.'s coworkers.

K.Z. ended the relationship after a weekend out of country, but continued to remain friends, to the Members' knowledge until at least October 2013. K.Z. felt uncomfortable due to the power imbalance in the office with the Member given her status as a part-time employee. Despite K.Z.'s feelings, the Member did not convey or communicate, in any manner, that K.Z.'s work situation, assignments, hours of work, leave granted, or any other aspect of her work would be affected by the ending of the relationship.

K.Z. heard the Member refer to other employees as "dumber than a sack of hammers" and "stupid".

The Member admits he should not have entered into the relationship with K.Z. because of the power imbalance between them and how that imbalance was perceived by K.Z. and other staff which resulted in an unprofessional and stressful work environment.

And non-intimate bad behavior in the workplace

J.K. was a unionized term contract employee in the Saskatoon Criminal Office under the direction, control and management of the Member. The retention of J.K. as an employee of the Saskatoon Criminal Office was the responsibility of the Head Office.

J.K. felt uncomfortable with the Member because she held a contract position and was under probationary review by the Member. However, the Member did not have the authority to release or renew the contract of J.K.

 J.K. found the Member to be rude and insulting to her and her coworkers. The Member admits that he made inappropriate comments about her appearance, choice of apparel and physical characteristics. He also made rude and inappropriate comments on her intelligence. More specifically, he referred to her as "stupid" in front of other employees.

The Member, when asked by the Head Office to speak to J.K. about excessive work hours recorded, spoke to her in a rude, condescending and insulting manner.

J.K. never heard the Member speak to male members of the office in the same manner.

The Member admits such conduct was offensive and unprofessional.

And

C.H. was a unionized Member in the Saskatoon office and witnessed the Member say to her, "What did you fuck up today?" Some paralegal staff took such comments, as intended by the Member, to be a joke and lodged no complaint. However, C.H. took those comments as offensive and derogatory.

The Member admits that his conduct towards C.H. and the other paralegal staff was inappropriate and has reconciled himself to the fact that his comments hurt C.H. and caused her to question her effectiveness and intelligence.

 C.H. heard the Member refer to employees as "dumber than a sack of hammers" in front of other employees.

The Member admits his conduct toward C.H. also caused her to question her advancement in the office and caused a strained work environment.

 The Member admits such conduct was offensive and unprofessional.

And

 C.B. was a unionized Member in the Saskatoon office. At all times material hereto, the Member was in a position of leadership and control over C.B. as she directly reported to him.

The Member referred to C.B. as a "witch" and asked her "Where is your broom?". These comments were made between 2012 and 2014.

C.B. heard the Member refer to employees as “’dumber than a sack of hammers". These comments were characterized to one of the coworkers who was very vulnerable and had been struggling with personal health issues. The Member criticized C.B. about her work hours, office attendance, and unprofessional conduct but did so in a manner which was dictatorial and authoritative.

And

The Member admits he made comments on the appearance of M.L.R. in front of coworkers and clients. He referred to her as a "church lady" and "dumber than a sack of hammers". M.L.R. confronted the Member on his comments and informed him that his comments on her appearance were affecting her self-esteem. The Member apologized and the comments decreased. The Member admits that his attempts at humour were wrong and furthermore were derogatory and offensive...

  The Member called L.R. "psycho" in front of students. The Member admits that his attempted joke was inappropriate and unprofessional in front of students. The Member claims that he apologized but L.R. has no recollection of such occurring.

L.R. states the Member repeated the "psycho" statement before L.R.'s mother — he does not recall the event but apologizes for any embarrassment it may have caused L.R. whether in jest or not. The Member acknowledges his behavior regarding this incident was unprofessional and uncalled for.

L.H. heard the Member refer to other employees as "dumber than a sack of hammers" in front of other employees.

Similarly to J.K., the Member commented on the appearance of L.R. and again admits that such behavior was offensive and unprofessional.

Sanction

The oral submissions of counsel also touched on the circumstances related to the complaints in this case. In particular, counsel for the Member outlined the personal circumstances that might help to explain, although not to justify, the somewhat authoritarian and disrespectful conduct that the Member had conceded was inappropriate.

(Mike Frisch)

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2019/10/an-attorneys-abuse-of-co-workers-and-others-drew-30-day-suspension-from-the-law-society-of-saskatchewan.html

https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/legal_profession/2019/10/an-attorneys-abuse-of-co-workers-and-others-drew-30-day-suspension-from-the-law-society-of-saskatchewan.html

[insanethrottlebikernews]

Informant who served as Vice President of club associated with Hells Angels Motorcycle club kicked out of witness protection

Informant who served as Vice President of club associated with Hells Angels Motorcycle club kicked out of witness protection

Subscribe for Free to the #1 Biker Channel on YouTube. Get access to our video archive and shows like Biker Angle Biker News and Motorcycle Madhouse Shorts

Jason Warick

The federal Attorney General says a Saskatoon man who helped convict 20 criminals was kicked out of the Witness Protection Program earlier this year for several reasons, including using drugs and failing to answer phone calls and…

[if-you-fan-a-fire]

“HUNT PLEADS GUILTY TO MARKHAM HOLD-UP,” Toronto Star. February 27, 1933. Page 2.  ---- Remanded Until March 13 in $2.780 Bank Robbery ---- Elroy Hunt, 26, pleaded guilty to robbing the Canadian Bank of Commerce branch at Markham of $2,788 on Jan. 30 last and was remanded until March 13 by Magistrate Keith. Hunt was represented by Austin Ross. M. A. Mackenzie, branch manager, swore Hunt and Frank West tied the staff up, attempted to lock them in the vault and left the bank on the afternoon of the hold-up, being lost night of on Yonge St. at Elgin Mills. The manager told of the chase which he and a customer made after the two men. 

Inspector Albert Boyd and Det.-Sergt. George Tuft told of going to Chicago and arresting Hunt. In his statement Hunt said that he and West "decided to steal a car and get some money," the officers said.. The two men, according to the state- ment, drank some wine and on passing the bank in a car which they stole from Dundas and Yonge Sts., Teronto, decided suddenly to hold it up. 

After the crime they drove Aurora where they abandoned the car on a back street,

Crime Not Premeditated "I did not premeditate robbing the bank or stealing the car," Hunt's statement, said. Counsel pointed out that before the crime Hunt, who was unemployed, had been living at Wellington House. Inspector Boyd said about $20 of the money was recovered. 

Both officers said Hunt was very truthful, giving them full details of the hold-up.

Hunt's previous record included a month for theft of a blanket in the west in 1927, a five-dollar fine for vagrancy at Moose Jaw in 1928 and 30 days in 1929 on a theft charge at Saskatoon. 

Magistrate Keith decided to defer sentencing Hunt until the charge against Frank West, laid by city police, had been disposed of. Both his worship and Crown Attorney C. Frank Moore commended the excellent work of Inspector Boyd and Detective-Sergt. Tuft. 

When aged Arthur O'Kell told Norman Smith that he could not oblige him with any money, Smith rolled him down an embankment at Preston Rd., tore out one of his teeth and threatened to "shoot him" if he didn't "give up his roll," O'Kell testified in charging Smith with assault. 

P.C. Williams of York township police, who picked Smith up on Dufferin St., said that he jumped from the motorcycle sidecar as the officer was starting the machine and was caught only after a chase across a plowed field. 

Smith claimed that he was drunk, and remembered nothing of assaulting either O'Kell or Joseph Watts, a returned soldier and cripple, who claimed that Smith "rushed" him and knocked him down. Smith gave as a reason for his attempted escape from the officer the fact that "I thought he was going to pick me up for a drunk." He was found guilty on both charges and remanded until Friday next for sentence. 

Fined $200 for Still George McFarlane, 21, facing a charge of criminal negligence arising out of the death of Murray Richardson, was remanded until March 21 on bail of $2,000. McFarlane is alleged to have driven the car which struck down Richardson Danforth Ave. early Sunday morning. 

Mike McGee was fined $200 or 6 months and one month for being in illegal possession of a still. R. C. M. P. officers told of finding a complete still, with 25 gallons of mash, in the basement of McGee's home. Mike had never made a cent out of his opposition to the "big distillery companies of Canada." his counsel, Paul Hinds, told the court. McGee, who said he was a teetotaler, declared a "friend" named Jack had persuaded him to go "into the business." 

Remanded for Sentence. Antonio and Armand Prisi and Fidel George, York township youths, were remanded till Friday for sentence on a charge of breaking into a hardware store on Pritchard Ave. and stealing a shotgun, ammunition, flashlight batteries and bulbs, fishing outfits and cash. Most of the goods were recovered in a hay loft on a farm and under the floor of one of the lad's homes, the court was told. 

On three charges of housebreaking, Richard Garner, 16, and a juvenile were remanded for a week and allowed out on their own bail. They are alleged to have broken into York Memorial collegiate, Vaughan Rd, collegiate and a store, police saying jewelry and $8 in cash were stolen from one school and chocolates and other articles from the store.

[flawrofsaskatoon-blog]

Family Law Attorney - Their Services

This is a branch of the law that deal with domestic relations and family matters like marriage, adoption, child abuse, child abduction, property settlements, child support and visitation, and more. It is also referred to as matrimonial law. In many jurisdictions, family courts are the ones with the most-crowded court dockets. The attorney who handles these types of cases is called a family law attorney or lawyer. The main two issues that this lawyer would handle are legal separations and divorce. During these issues, the attorney would attempt to dive marital property, advocate the amount that should be paid for alimony and child support, settle child custody issues, and set visitation rights. In divorce and separation cases, each party will have their own family law attorney. If no settlement can be reached for any issues they could be taken into the court and they judge would usually issue the final order on the issues. Adoption is another field that a family law attorney handles. The attorney will help the couple through the many steps that has to be taken in order to make the adoption legal. In every jurisdiction, the laws are different and may vary according to how old the child is. In some locations the birth parents will always retain some rights while in other jurisdictions, all of their legal parental rights have been given up completely. Another duty that a family law attorney does is create documents to help prevent foreseeable future issues. One example is creating a prenuptial agreement that will set forth how the assets would be divided if the couple were to divorce. It could also be a post-nuptial agreement that not only how assets would be divided but also how child visitation, custody, and support should be arranged. They may also set up a trust fund in the name of children or a spouse if they have that level of expertise.  If you liked this posting and you would like to obtain more information concerning spousal support payments Saskatoon kindly take a look at our own webpage. In some situations, a family law attorney may have to handle criminal issues. The attorney could specialize in specific areas like domestic violence or juvenile law. A family law attorney can work in a law firm or open their own offices. To become an attorney you will have to attend law school and then pass an exam in order to become a practicing attorney. Before going on to law school, you will have to have a high school diploma or the equivalent as long as it is jurisdiction accepted. While in college, you need to earn a Bachelor's Degree in any major but it is helpful for preparing for a law career if it is a business major, law-related, or in political science. To help gain some experience work as a clerk or intern in a law firm that specializes in family law.  

[saskatoon-criminal-lawyers]

Find Drug Possession Charges Saskatoon law advice, including distribution and manufacture. Call our experienced attorney at Wardell Gillis at +1-306-700-2766 to schedule a free consultation.

[saskatooncriminallaw]

Charged with Drug Possession Charges? Contact Saskatoon Criminal Law firm to hire our expert attorney by your side. Talk with our expert lawyers call us at +1-306-988-2050 now.

[marilynngmesalo]

Mulroney memoirs tell different story about interference with AG on Milgaard case

Mulroney memoirs tell different story about interference with AG on Milgaard case Mulroney memoirs tell different story about interference with AG on Milgaard case https://ift.tt/2WzyXgz

OTTAWA — Jody Wilson-Raybould approvingly points to Brian Mulroney as a prime minister who knew better than to politically interfere with the judgment of his attorney general when it comes to criminal prosecutions.

But the former justice minister evidently didn’t read Mulroney’s memoirs, in which the former Conservative leader proudly recounts how he ordered his attorney general to refer a controversial murder case to the Supreme Court of Canada.

That attorney general was Kim Campbell who, according to Mulroney, did as she was told in the case of David Milgaard, who was wrongly imprisoned for 23 years for a murder he did not commit. She went on to become prime minister.

Mulroney’s memoirs flatly contradict the version of events cited by Campbell in her own memoirs and repeated by Wilson-Raybould in a written submission last week to the House of Commons justice committee. The submission was intended to bolster her contention that she faced inappropriate pressure last fall from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his top aides and others to stop the criminal prosecution of Montreal engineering giant SNC-Lavalin.

As part of her submission, Wilson-Raybould included transcripts of text messages she exchanged with her chief of staff, Jessica Prince, following a Dec. 18 meeting with Trudeau’s chief of staff, Katie Telford, and principal secretary Gerald Butts.

View this document on Scribd

Prince relates that the duo tried to persuade her that Wilson-Raybould should seek advice from a retired Supreme Court justice as to whether she could review a decision by the director of public prosecutions, who had refused to negotiate a remediation agreement with SNC-Lavalin rather than pursue prosecution on bribery charges related to contracts in Libya. Prince says she repeatedly told Telford and Butts that would amount to “interference.”

In the course of that discussion, Prince says Butts raised the Milgaard case.

“Gerry told some story about how Mulroney met with David Milgaard’s mom, walked into the cab(inet) room and told Kim Campbell she had to fix it. She gave him all these AG reasons why she couldn’t interfere but then she ultimately did what Mulroney wanted and was right,” Prince says.

After asking for more details about the reference to Milgaard, Wilson-Raybould then asks Prince to send her Campbell’s cell phone number, commenting “Good grief — this is absurd.”

Wilson-Raybould met with Campbell the following day at a Vancouver coffee shop.

FUREY: Wilson-Raybould's credibility skyrockets with damning audio

Wrongfully convicted man’s case sat on Wilson-Raybould’s desk for months

LEDREW: PM can salvage some honour, but first, drop the arrogance

“Needless to say, she categorically denied what Mr. Butts had said and was quite offended and outraged by the comments. She adamantly denied the characterization not only of her as the attorney general but of her former boss, Prime Minister Mulroney,” Wilson-Raybould wrote in her submission.

“She further reflected — as she did in her memoirs (1996) — that Brian Mulroney ‘was much too good a lawyer to intervene improperly in the matter. He never breathed a word about the Milgaard case to his AG, nor did anyone in his office ever attempt to influence her handling of the case.”‘

Wilson-Raybould did not mention that Campbell also wrote in her memoirs that Mulroney had “blindsided” her by meeting with Milgaard’s mother, Joyce, in 1991. She wrote that she was assured the two discussed only Milgaard’s living conditions in prison and not his application for a review of his conviction for the 1969 rape and murder of a Saskatoon nursing student, which Campbell had rejected.

David Milgaard with his mother Joyce at the 14th annual Gemini Awards in this file photo taken in November 1999. (Todd Gillis/Postmedia Network files)

Nevertheless, Campbell termed it an “inappropriate intervention” and suggested it was politically motivated. She wrote that Mulroney’s chief of staff, Hugh Segal, told the British Columbia Conservative caucus that the prime minister’s meeting with Joyce Milgaard was “brilliant” and the kind of thing he needed to do more to burnish his image in the run-up to the 1993 election.

Nor did Wilson-Raybould mention, or appear aware of the fact, that Mulroney completely contradicted Campbell’s version of events in his own memoirs, published in 2007.

He recounted how he was “disturbed” by the way in which Campbell had “brushed off” Joyce Milgaard, having told her during a public encounter: “Madam, if you wish to have your son’s case dealt with fairly, please do not approach me.” He was “privately furious with her” for rejecting Milgaard’s application for a review of his case.

//<![CDATA[ ( function() { pnLoadVideo( "videos", "J6L0Vg0vfeI", "pn_video_414384", "", "", {"controls":1,"autoplay":0,"is_mobile":""} ); } )(); //]]>

Mulroney provided a condensed transcript of his meeting in Winnipeg with Joyce Milgaard, during which he said he was “extremely prudent” in his choice of words because he knew they were being recorded. At one point, he told her that Campbell is going to look at “new information that’s come in” and that he’s going to be talking to her when he gets back to Ottawa about her son’s case.

When he got back, Mulroney wrote, he had Campbell summoned to his parliamentary office where, “because of the sensitivity of the matter, I met with her alone.”

“‘The matter has been reviewed by the department and I have conveyed our decision,’ she told me.

“‘Kim,’ I answered, ‘that is not acceptable to me. The law provides for a reference to the Supreme Court and it is my intention to ensure that this case is in fact referred to the Supreme Court.’

“My tone was firm and my words unequivocal. She understood and changed her tack quickly.

“‘Prime Minister,’ she answered, ‘If this is the case, may I make the announcement myself?”‘

The top court ultimately recommended Milgaard’s conviction be set aside. Campbell ordered a new trial but the government of Saskatchewan refused to do so, issued a stay of proceedings and freed Milgaard in 1992. Five years later, DNA evidence from the victim’s clothes cleared Milgaard and led to the arrest and eventual conviction of serial rapist Larry Fisher.

Butts and the top public servant, Michael Wernick, have testified that no improper pressure was exerted on Wilson-Raybould over the SNC-Lavalin case. They have maintained they only wanted her to get a second opinion on the advisability of overriding the public prosecutor’s decision, as allowed by law.

Wilson-Raybould’s written submission, released Friday, supplements her nearly four hours of oral testimony last month. She believes she was moved out of her dual role as justice minister and attorney general to Veterans affairs in a mid-January cabinet shuffle as punishment for refusing to intervene in the SNC case. She resigned from cabinet a month later.

//<![CDATA[ ( function() { pnLoadVideo( "videos", "xBOS-BPos0Y", "pn_video_118034", "", "", {"controls":1,"autoplay":0,"is_mobile":""} ); } )(); //]]> Click for update news Bangla news https://ift.tt/2CKokjG world news

[thewebofslime]

San Diego physician whose firm was hired as a medical examiner in Texas has been accused in a lawsuit of harvesting body parts from deceased children not for medical reasons, but to boost his research prospects. The lawsuit accuses Dr. Evan Matshes of practicing medicine in the state of Texas without a license. It also says he and his company, NAAG Pathology Labs PC of San Diego, terminated employees who complained about the practices. Matshes declined to discuss the allegations in the litigation. His company issued statements that rejected all assertions that Matshes, the firm or its chief medical examiner, Dr. Sam Andrews, did anything improper. The company said the lawsuit is being driven by former employees and others who lack medical expertise. “We strongly deny that either NAAG Pathology Labs or Dr. Andrews have acted in any manner that is contrary to the best interest of the public,” the statement said. “We are confident that we will be exonerated of all claims of wrongdoing.”” The Texas Rangers state police are investigating the allegations leveled in the lawsuit filed by Tita Senee Graves, a Lubbock County prosecutor said. Graves is a career medical technician who landed a job with the Lubbock County Medical Examiner’s Office in 2015, after working for decades as an X-ray technician at a private laboratory. She was fired Jan. 17 after she and others in the medical examiner’s office questioned what Matshes was doing with the bodies of deceased children, according to the lawsuit. She filed suit Feb. 20 in the 72nd District Court in Lubbock County. “Ms. Graves and the other staff were disturbed by the autopsies of the infants,” the suit states. “The unnecessary harvesting of body parts for a pathologist’s personal research interests seemed wrong.” NAAG Pathology Labs (Jeff McDonald/U-T) NAAG Pathology Labs is a private company based in Sorrento Valley, and most of its Texas work is performed by about 10 employees in Lubbock County. It performs autopsies and other medical-examiner services across the United States and other countries. The company said it does not perform any medical research. Matshes has a second firm called the National Autopsy Assay Group that provides independent tissue and organ analyses. In Lubbock County, medical examiner services have been farmed out to private contractors for years. NAAG Pathology Labs took over the department on an interim basis in August after a former medical examiner vacated the post, the lawsuit states. The agreement was rewritten in October, and Andrews was named chief medical examiner. Within weeks, the complaint says, NAAG began harvesting more human tissue during autopsies than was needed to determine causes of death. “Dr. Matshes stated that he wanted to collect more tissues from those autopsies than had been done in the past because he needed the tissue for his ‘research’,” the suit states. “... The new protocol required the removal of the children’s brain, eyes, spinal cord, posterior neck, including vertebra, and the heart and lungs.” Matshes, who lives in San Diego and travels to Lubbock County for work, performed two procedures in front of his employees, even though he was not qualified to do so in the state of Texas, the suit said. “Dr. Matshes stated that he was acting as a ‘tech’, not a doctor, since he was not licensed to practice medicine in Texas,” the complaint states. “Dr. Matshes made the incisions and removed the organs himself, while Dr. Andrews observed along with the staff.” The company said there is nothing improper about removing organs from the bodies of decedents whose deaths are under criminal investigation. It also said that the procedure does not require a medical license. “Dr. Matshes did not practice medicine during the procedure mentioned in the lawsuit,” the statement said. NAAG Pathology Labs said the lawsuit and related complaints to the Texas Rangers and state medical board are the result of people’s lack of expertise. “It is clear that some of the employees, who were not physicians or pathologists, didn’t understand the thorough process necessary for an autopsy that may be later challenged in court,” the company said. “Dr. Andrews ships some items to the San Diego lab because some specific expertise is not available in Lubbock.” According to letters Matshes and Andrews each sent to Lubbock County Judge Curtis Parrish before the lawsuit was filed, the allegations are politically motivated by a newly elected county commissioner who is opposed to the changes that NAAG Pathology Labs implemented to professionalize the department. “It is a fundamental expectation that I, as a forensic pathologist in the role of your appointed Chief Medical Examiner, be free of political influence, which includes being free from fear for my personal safety, the safety of my staff and free from the fear of all forms of retaliation,” Andrews wrote. Barron Slack, of the Lubbock County District Attorney’s Office, declined to comment on the lawsuit. He said his office will wait for results from the Texas Rangers’ criminal investigation into the allegations before deciding on the next actions. Matshes received his medical degree from the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada, in 2004. He was licensed by the California Medical Board in May 2017 and licensed in Texas prior to 2013. His application for a new license there is pending. Andrews holds a valid Texas Medical Board license. Matshes had performance issues in Canada, where he also worked as a medical examiner prior to establishing NAAG Pathology Labs. According to a 2012 news release from the Alberta Ministry of Justice and Solicitor General, work performed by Matshes at the Alberta Medical Examiner’s Office did not meet professional standards. “The panel found the conclusions reached by Dr. Matshes to be unreasonable regarding either the cause of death, manner of death and/or other opinions,” the release said. Matshes disputed those findings and sued for up to $30 million in damages to his reputation. The case is ongoing in an Alberta court. In the Lubbock County lawsuit, Austin, Texas, attorney Kevin Glasheen said his client, Graves, was extremely disturbed by the new protocols imposed by NAAG Pathology Labs, once it took over the medical examiner’s office. Lubbock County, which also provides pathology services to about 20 other rural counties across West Texas, has a troubled history associated with its medical examiner’s office. In the early 1990s, then-Dr. Ralph Erdmann was accused of falsifying records, botching blood samplings, losing some body parts and performing “made-to-order” autopsies that would favor versions of events put forward by police. He pleaded no contest to seven felonies and received a 10-year probation sentence and agreed to surrender his medical license.