#Richard Pollard
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
dcbinges · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
The New Teen Titans #36 (1983) by Keith Pollard & Marv Wolfman
43 notes · View notes
marvelousmrm · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Fantastic Four #201 (Wolfman/Pollard, Dec 1978). The fam moves back into the Baxter Building.
43 notes · View notes
brevoorthistoryofcomics · 5 months ago
Text
GH: GREEN LANTERN #162
Green Lantern had been my second-favorite super hero going back to my youth, when I found him occupying the back pages of THE FLASH. Once he got his own series again, I followed it regularly right from the jump. And I was particularly enamored of Marv Wolfman’s run on the character which had wrapped up not long before this. But still, all of this was not enough to prevent me from adding GREEN…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
11 notes · View notes
nevenkebla · 6 months ago
Text
Los cuatro juntos
Tumblr media
Fantastic Four (1961) #199 Marv Wolfman (Escritor), Keith Pollard (Dibujante)
— Reed Richards: Tienes razón, Ben… ¡Los 4 Fantásticos vuelven a vivir! — Ben Grimm: Y no es solo una forma de hablar. — Johnny Storm: ¡Tú lo has dicho! ¡Llamas a mí! — Susan Storm: Con los cuatro juntos otra vez… ¡Nada podrá detenernos!
10 notes · View notes
letterboxd-loggd · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Scrooged (1988) Richard Donner
December 20th 2023
27 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 7 months ago
Text
"The feast of the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist being appointed as the day upon which the coronation of the king [Edward V] would take place without fail, all both hoped for and expected a season of prosperity for the kingdom."
-Excerpt from the Croyland Continuator / David Horspool, Richard III: A Ruler and Reputation
Even though Edward IV’s death was unexpected, after twelve years of peace there need not have been too much of a sense of foreboding about the succession. The great dynastic wound from which the Wars of the Roses had grown had not so much been healed as cauterized by the extinction of the House of Lancaster. There was no rush for London, as had happened in earlier, disputed successions. The royal party didn’t set out from Ludlow for ten days after hearing the news of Edward IV’s death, while Richard took his time, too. And the new king had [his mother the dowager queen and] two uncles to support him: his mother’s brother, the sophisticated, cultured, highly experienced Earl Rivers; and his father’s, the loyal and reliable Duke of Gloucester, to whom Edward IV had entrusted unprecedented power and vital military command.
... [Richard of Gloucester] had achieved his goal by a mixture of luck and ruthlessness, and if he made it appear, or even believed himself, that destiny played a part, this only made him a man in step with his times. Modern historians have no time for destiny, but sometimes the more ‘structuralist’ interpretations of the events surrounding the usurpation can come close to it. When we read that ‘the chances of preserving an unchallenged succession were . . . weakened by the estrangement of many of the rank-and-file nobility from . . . high politics, which was partly a consequence of the Wars of the Roses and partly of Edward IV’s own policies’, it is hard not to conclude that an unforeseeable turn of events is being recast as a predictable one. But without one overriding factor – the actions of Richard, Duke of Gloucester after he took the decision to make himself King Richard III – none of this could have happened. That is, when the same author concedes ‘Nor can we discount Richard’s own forceful character’, he is pitching it rather low*.
Edward IV had not left behind a factional fault line waiting to be shaken apart. Richard of Gloucester’s decision to usurp was a political earthquake that could not have been forecast on 9 April, when Edward died. After all, Simon Stallworth did not even anticipate it on 21 June, the day before Richard went public. We should be wary of allowing hindsight to give us more clairvoyance than the well-informed contemporary who had no idea ‘what schall happyne’. This is not to argue that Richard’s will alone allowed him to take the Crown. Clearly, the circumstances of a minority, the existence of powerful magnates with access to private forces, and the reasonably recent examples of resorts to violence and deposition of kings, made Richard’s path a more conceivable one. But Richard’s own tactics, his arrest of Rivers, Vaughan and Grey, the rounding up of Hastings and the bishops, relied on surprise. If men as close as these to the workings of high politics at a delicate juncture had no inkling of what might happen, the least historians can do is to reflect that uncertainty [...].
(*The author who Horspool is referencing and disagreeing with is Charles Ross)
#wars of the roses#edward v#richard iii#edward iv#my post#I'm writing a post on this topic but I have no idea when I'll finish it so I figured I should post Horspool's epic analysis#or should I say epic takedown? <3#friendly reminder that Richard's usurpation happened primarily and decidedly because of Richard's own decisions and actions#we need to stop downplaying his singular agency and accountability by casting the blame on others#most of all Elizabeth Woodville and her family but also the bizarre interpretation of historians like Ross and Pollard (et al)#who somehow hold Edward more responsible (through a 'structuralist' view as Horspool says) even though that literally makes no sense#also friendly reminder that actual contemporaries did not view Edward V's minority as a sign of worry and potential discontent#quite the opposite - they expected him to have a prosperous reign. which made sense since Edward IV left his son a far more stable#country than any former minor king (and most other adult kings tbh). The irony is that it was his son's usurper who benefitted from it.#also I added Elizabeth Woodville to the list because Edward V himself specifically said that he trusted the governance of the country#'to the peers of the realm and the queen' as quoted by Mancini (likely relayed to him by John Argentine)#and this is supported by evidence. After Edward's death the Croyland Continuator substitutes Elizabeth's role in the council#for that of the King: 'the counsellors of the king now deceased were present with the queen'#we know Elizabeth presided over all the council's decisions and initiated proposals (the size of her son's military escort) on her own#She was clearly the one with the most authority in the council (who were described as being present with *her* not anyone else)#Hastings made demands but he couldn't enforce them at all (and was in fact worried). It was clearly Elizabeth who had that power.#She was likely going to play a very prominent role during her son's minority and imo it's problematic to assume otherwise#(Lynda Pidgeon assumes otherwise but she's based her assumption on objectively false information so I don't think we should take her#seriously)(see: she claims that EW lacked influence compared to her male relatives in royal councils when EW HERSELF WAS IN ROYAL COUNCILS)#That's not to go too far the other direction and claim EW tried to dominate and tactlessly exclude others - we know she didn't#The impression we get by this first council and by Richard's own actions indicates that she Richard and Anthony would likely#work *together* when it came to governing the realm#I do find it frustrating when people disregard the fact that based on the impression we have she would've had a very visible#and powerful role
11 notes · View notes
mildmayfoxe · 25 days ago
Text
anybody watching house of villains. richard hatch AND teresa giudice ????
2 notes · View notes
richmond-rex · 1 year ago
Text
It's always worth pointing out that monarchs didn't reform laws in a vacuum, or else we risk assigning anachronistically progressive roles to them. As A. J. Pollard said in his bio of Richard III, 'The normal course of legislation was for it to be introduced in bills presented individually by members or collectively by the house. A meeting of parliament, whoever the king, whatever the political circumstance, was always an opportunity for routine amendment of the law. The king assented (and could veto), but he rarely initiated such legislation'. In the same way that it's incredibly crass to call Richard III a 'social justice king' (as Matt Lewis so often does) because he passed some laws regulating the administration of justice — when 'there was nothing necessarily exceptional about the public acts of 1484' — it would be equally wrong to assign to Henry VII's legislation on rape/abduction any 'feminist' leanings by ignoring the crown's medieval model of patriarchal responsibility to women.
10 notes · View notes
jazzplusplus · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
Birdland Stars of '57 - Masonic Temple - Detroit : Billy Eckstine, Count Basie and his Orchestra featuring Joe Williams, Sarah Vaughan, Bud Powell Trio, Phineas Newborn jr. Quartet, Chet Baker, Lester Young, Zoot Sims, Jimmy Jones, Roy Haynes, Richard Davis, Terry Gibbs Quartet featuring Terry Pollard, Seldon Powell, Rolf Kühn
19 notes · View notes
faustuszero · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
A battle between two titans, Reed Richards vs Doctor Doom. From Fantastic Four #200 (1978)
23 notes · View notes
badmovieihave · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Bad movie I have Along for the Ride 2000 aka Forever Lulu
2 notes · View notes
dcbinges · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Vigilante #3 (1984) by Keith Pollard & Marv Wolfman
23 notes · View notes
marvelousmrm · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Fantastic Four #204 (Wolfman/Pollard, Mar 1979). An intergalactic distress call leads most of the fam off-world, seemingly into the origins of Nova. Meanwhile Johnny is manipulated into re-enrolling in college. In a particularly sweet moment of dismay, he sky-writes a message summoning Pete to their “usual” spot atop the Statue of Liberty’s torch. Unfortunately Pete’s busy tangoing with Man-Wolf…
15 notes · View notes
gallifreywhere · 1 year ago
Text
I feel like The Doomwood Curse could have been novelised and published as the 6th Doctor story in the current range of fairytales/mythology books
5 notes · View notes
nevenkebla · 7 months ago
Text
Reflejos
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Fantastic Four #200 Marv Wolfman (Escritor), Keith Pollard (Dibujante)
— Doctor Doom: ¿Qué has hecho? ¿QUÉ HAS HECHO? ¡Has destruido mi capacidad de lucha! Pero aún no me has detenido. ¡Mi plan supremo triunfará igualmente! Solo tengo que alcanzar los controles… — Reed Richards: Jamás Doom… ¡No lo permitiré! Estás loco… ¡Solo un loco llegaría tan lejos para conseguir lo imposible! ¿No te das cuenta de que jamás podrás lograrlo? Toda tu vida has estado buscando vengarte de un mundo que creías que te había despreciado… Aún hay tiempo, Doom… ¡Únete a nosotros! ¡Tu genio puede beneficiar a la misma gente que crees que te odia! — Doctor Doom: ¡Necio insufrible! ¿Crees que Doom es tan mezquino que solo busca venganza? ¡Patán ignorante! ¡Quiero el poder porque es mío por derecho! Es un derecho de nacimiento que heredé de mi madre… ¡Una mujer asesinada por un puñado de paletos asustadizos e ignorantes que eran demasiado idiotas como para ver la verdad! Yo siempre he buscado obtener lo que es mío por derecho. — Reed Richards: ¿Qué estás haciendo? — Doctor Doom: Has inutilizado mi armadura… ¡Pero aún dispongo de suficiente energía de emergencia almacenada como para activar los controles de refrigeración! Cuando nos conocimos, Richards, te consideré un estudiante inteligente que prometía bastante. ¡Quizás tu intelecto científico crecería, pero tu conocimiento de las motivaciones humanas es increíblemente limitado! ¿Venganza? ¡Bah! Doom está por encima de algo tan vulgar. ¡Pero basta! Debo ocuparme de mi estatua. ¡Hay que activar sus controles!
— Johnny Storm: No hemos tardado mucho en liquidar a los secuaces de Doom. — Susan Storm: Los delegados parecen seguir en estado de shock. — Ben Grimm: Esto aún no ha terminado. ¡Mirad! ¡La estatua está empezando a brillar como un crío con acné en su primera cita! — Susan Storm: ¡Johnny! ¡Ben! Está emitiendo una especie de rayo… ¿Significa eso que Reed no ha podido detener a Doom? — Johnny Storm: ¡Mirad, vienen hacia nosotros! ¿Qué hacemos? — Ben Grimm: ¡Leches! ¡No podemos machacarles! ¡La vida te da sorpresas! — Susan Storm: ¡Decidamos lo que decidamos, hagámoslo ya! No hay tiempo que perder.
— Doctor Doom: ¡Éxito al fin! ¡Aun con todos los presentes problemas, mi plan ha triunfado! Mi estatua tuvo que ser entrada por la fuerza en la asamblea de la ONU… Pero ya está allí… ¡Y funciona tal y como la diseñé! ¡Ahora ya nada me impedirá alcanzar el objetivo que he perseguido todos estos años! ¡El mundo será de Doom! ¡DE DOOM! — Reed Richards: De eso nada, Doom… Aún no has conseguido nada… ¡No mientras yo viva! — Doctor Doom: ¡NO! ¡NO! ¡TÚ OTRA VEZ NO! ¡¿Es que no hay modo de matarte?! — Reed Richards: La próxima vez haz tus trampas de hielo completamente sólidas… antes de que me congelara del todo a mi alrededor, pude formar unos respiraderos… que también sirvieron para debilitar el bloque.
— Doctor Doom: Richards… Normalmente aborrezco los encuentros físicos… Pero tú no me dejas opción. ¡Te has burlado demasiadas veces de mis planes! Pero se acabó… ¡Se acabó! ¡Debo destruirte de una vez por todas! No soy el simple patán que siempre me has considerado, Richards. ¡Aun sin mi energía, mi armadura compensa de sobras ese ridículo poder elástico tuyo! ¡Y eso me convierte en tu superior, Richards! ¿Me has oído? ¡En tu superior! ¡Dilo, Richards! ¡Dilo de una vez! ¡Doctor Doom es tu superior! — Reed Richards: J-Jamás… — Doctor Doom: Oh, muy pronto suplicarás que te deje pronunciar esas palabras… porque quizás me conmuevan como para ofrecerte un pequeño rayo de esperanza. ¡Una esperanza representada por una muerte rápida en vez de un final lento y doloroso! Pero exijo hacerte pagar por todos estos años de frustración… De saber en todo momento que había alguien igual de fuerte… Igual de poderoso… Alguien que podría incluso ser super… ¿Qué? ¿He estado a punto de decir superior a Doom? ¡JA! Siempre he sido mejor que tú. Admítelo, Richards… ¡Siempre! ¡Admite que manipulaste la máquina que destrozó mi rostro! Fuiste tú… ¡Tuviste que ser tú! Dime que envidiabas mi talento… Dime la verdad… Dímela, maldito seas… ¡Dímela y puede que acabe con tu sufrimiento en este mismo instante! ¡Has de decírmela!
— Reed Richards: No hice nada… Traté de ayudarte con los cálculos… equivocados… — Doctor Doom: ¿Aun a punto de morir sigues mintiendo? ¡Sé que tú fuiste el responsable! ¡Yo soy incapaz de cometer errores! Yo… ¿Qué? ¿Pretendes desenmascararme? ¿Así que ese es tu ridículo plan? ¿Tratar de enfurecerme mientras me arrancas la máscara? ¡Pero eres un idiota! Solo mi anillo oculto puede… ¿Qué? ¡Se abrió! ¿Pero cómo…? — Reed Richards: Cuando tu fuente de energía entró en cortocircuito, el mecanismo de cierre se debilitó… — Doctor Doom: ¡Estúpido imbécil! ¡¿Es que no sabes lo que has hecho?! ¡Sin las lentes protectoras de mi máscara, los reflejos intensificados del Solartrón pueden volverme loco! ¡MI ROSTRO! ¡MI ROSTRO! ¡MILLONES DE GROTESCOS REFLEJOS DE MI ROSTRO! ¡NOOO!
17 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 7 months ago
Text
A.J Pollard’s biography on Edward IV was so cringe lol (generic; minor but frustrating inaccuracies; intensely judgmental at times and oddly dismissive at others while never considering the broader context; entirely diminished and trivialized Elizabeth Woodville as both queen and wife of his main subject in the name of "defending" her; created a false dichotomy between Edward and Henry VII’s styles of ruling and lauded the latter at the former’s expense even though Henry literally followed Edward’s example for the very things Pollard was criticizing Edward for; had a downright nonsensical and thoroughly misleading conclusion about Edward’s legacy & Richard’s usurpation that was based entirely on hindsight, Pollard's own assumptions, and the complete downplaying Richard’s agency and actions to emphasize what Pollard wrongly and misleadingly claimed were Edward's so-called 'failings', etc, etc)
I wanted to buy his book on Henry V but after reading this shitshow and the synopsis of that book, im guessing it's going to be 10x worse, so...no thanks
#history media#this was written months ago im posting it to get it out of my drafts#it wasn't necessarily BAD. it was generic and readable. but it was very disappointing and misleading and its conclusion was just nonsense#listen I have no patience for the dumbfuck idea that edward somehow had the ultimate responsibility for his own son's deposition because#of his 'policies' during his reign. like I said it's based fully on hindsight and entirely devoid of actual context. it's bafflingly stupid#literally everyone expected Edward V to succeed his father and 'both hoped for and expected' (Croyland's own words) a successful reign#Edward V's deposition was richard and solely Richard's fault lol this should not be difficult to understand#the reason Richard's usurpation was possible in the first place was bcause everyone expected E5 to succeed and didn't expect Richard#do to what he did. nothing would have happened without his initiative and decisions. it had nothing to do with Edward's 'policies'#Edward's policies were fine. henry vii - who pollard vaunts to no end - literally *followed* them#and claiming that he failed to unite England under the Yorkist dynasty is just plain stupid#buddy if he truly failed at that then neither Richard III nor Henry VII would have thrones lol. both emphasized continuity with#him when aiming for the throne. like the whole point of 1483-85 was that it was a conflict WITHIN the 'Yorkist' dynasty#it was not an external threat against it.#'his legacy failed' his legacy didn't fail his brother destroyed it (while also presenting himself as his heir because logic what's logic?)#henry's victory was very much the triumph of his legacy (a claimant chosen by his supporters as the husband of his daughter)#like this is really not my interpretation it is literally what happened#i'm not trying to glorify e4 but his son did inherit the throne in a more advantageous circumstances than any other minor king of england#and frankly than most other adult kings. dumping blame on Edward's literal corpse rather than acknowledge Richard's agency is so tasteless#the problem isn't that edward made a mistake in trusting his brother. many other kings including Henry V also trusted theirs.#the problem is that his brother was willing to break that trust in a way that was unprecedented and broke all political norms of that age#ie: Richard's usurpation occurred because of Richard who re-ignited conflict to make himself king. please drill this into your head#also btw this illogical 'interpretation' is based entirely on Charles Ross' hatred and derision towards Elizabeth Woodville and her family#if you agree with this inteterpretation you agree with his vilification of them 🤷🏻‍♀️#anyway if you want a better interpretation that's actually analytical and looks a relevant rather than a flawed retrospective perspective#i would recommend rosemary horrox's 'richard iii: a study of service' and david horspool's 'richard iii: a ruler and his reputation'#anyway one last time: STOP downplaying Richard's agency and actions. historians who do this are stupid and embarrassing. bye.#(i should really post horspool's glorious takedown of ross and Pollard huh? it was very entertaining to read)
9 notes · View notes