#Prompt Engineering Online Training

[toppromptengineeringcourse]

Persona-Based AI Prompting: Crafting Smarter Interactions

Understanding Persona-Based AI Prompting

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, persona-based AI prompting has emerged as a powerful method for refining AI interactions. By designing prompts based on specific personas, businesses, and developers can achieve more precise, context-aware responses from AI models. Whether its customer support, content generation, or personalized recommendations, tailoring AI prompts to different personas leads to more meaningful interactions. Prompt Engineering Training in Bangalore

What is Persona-Based AI Prompting?

Persona-based AI prompting refers to structuring AI prompts according to specific user personas' characteristics, needs, and behaviours. A persona is a semi-fictional representation of a target audience, incorporating demographics, preferences, pain points, and communication styles. When AI systems receive prompts aligned with these personas, they generate more relevant and contextually appropriate responses.

For instance, a marketing professional might require AI-generated content tailored to a specific brand voice, while a software engineer might need technical explanations in a structured format. Persona-based AI prompting ensures that the AI adapts its tone, style, and depth of information based on the intended audience. Prompt Engineering Course

Benefits of Persona-Based AI Prompting

Enhancing AI Accuracy and Relevance

One of the primary benefits of persona-based AI prompting is its ability to improve the relevance and accuracy of AI-generated responses. Generic prompts often result in vague or inconsistent outputs, but by aligning prompts with defined personas, AI systems can better interpret user intent. This approach is particularly useful in customer service, where AI chatbots can provide more empathetic and effective support by recognizing different user personas, such as a first-time buyer versus a returning customer.

Furthermore, businesses using persona-based AI prompting can streamline content creation by training AI models to generate highly specific outputs. Whether crafting technical documentation for developers or persuasive marketing copy for consumers, persona-driven prompts enhance the AI’s ability to match audience expectations.

Boosting User Engagement and Satisfaction

Another advantage of persona-based AI prompting is its potential to increase user engagement. AI-driven platforms that tailor interactions based on personas can create more natural, conversational experiences. For example, an AI assistant for healthcare professionals may prioritize precise medical terminology, while an AI writing tool for students may simplify explanations and provide step-by-step guidance. Prompt Engineering Training in Bangalore

When AI understands and mirrors the communication style of different personas, users feel heard and understood. This leads to better user satisfaction and fosters trust in AI-powered solutions. Moreover, in e-commerce and digital marketing, persona-aligned AI prompts enable personalized product recommendations, driving higher conversion rates.

Implementing Persona-Based AI Prompting in AI Applications

Defining User Personas

To effectively implement persona-based AI prompting, it is essential to create detailed user personas. This process involves gathering data on the target audience through surveys, analytics, and market research. Key elements to consider when building personas include:

Demographics: Age, location, education level, and profession.

Interests and preferences: Topics of interest, preferred content formats, and interaction styles.

Challenges and pain points: Common problems users face and how AI can address them.

Communication tone: Formal vs. informal, technical vs. conversational, and concise vs. detailed. Prompt Engineering Course

Once personas are established, AI developers can design prompts that align with each persona’s unique attributes, ensuring optimized interactions.

Structuring AI Prompts for Different Personas

The effectiveness of persona-based AI prompting lies in prompt structuring. Here are some best practices for crafting prompts tailored to personas:

Use persona-specific language: If targeting a legal professional, include precise legal terminology. If addressing a general audience, simplify language for accessibility.

Provide contextual details: Clarify the persona’s background to guide AI in generating relevant responses. For example, a prompt for a data scientist might specify, “Explain machine learning algorithms for an advanced audience.”

Adjust response format: Different personas may prefer varied content structures. Developers can instruct AI to generate responses in bullet points, narratives, technical breakdowns, or FAQs, depending on the persona’s needs.

By following these practices, businesses and AI developers can maximize the effectiveness of persona-based AI prompting, ensuring tailored, meaningful, and highly functional AI-generated content.

Conclusion

Persona-based AI prompting is a game-changer in enhancing AI-driven interactions across industries. By crafting prompts based on user personas, businesses can improve response accuracy, boost engagement, and create more personalized experiences. As AI technology continues to advance, leveraging persona-based AI prompting will be essential for optimizing communication and ensuring AI-generated content aligns with audience expectations. Whether applied in customer service, content creation, or personalized recommendations, this approach empowers AI systems to deliver smarter, more context-aware interactions.

Visualpath is the Leading and Best Institute for learning in Hyderabad. We provide Prompt Engineering courses online. You will get the best course at an affordable cost.

Call on – +91-7032290546

Visit: https://www.visualpath.in/prompt-engineering-course.html

[trendingitcourses]

GenAI Training in Hyderabad | Generative AI Training

Master Generative AI Creativity with Gen AI Online Training: A Beginner’s Guide

Generative AI represents a ground breaking advancement in artificial intelligence, focusing on creating content such as text, images, audio, and even video. It leverages sophisticated machine learning models like GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformers) to produce human-like outputs. For beginners looking to delve into this exciting field, structured learning programs like GenAI Training are essential to build a solid foundation in this transformative technology.

Understanding Generative AI

At its core, Generative AI mimics human creativity by analyzing vast datasets and generating original content. Unlike traditional AI systems designed to recognize patterns or make decisions, Generative AI creates something entirely new. Examples include generating realistic human faces using GANs (Generative Adversarial Networks) or crafting conversational text with tools like ChatGPT. Through specialized programs such as a Generative AI Training Course, learners can explore the principles behind these innovations.

Professionals interested in hands-on knowledge often opt for a Generative AI Course in Hyderabad or GenAI Online Training, where they can gain expertise in deploying these models across industries. These courses cover essential concepts like neural networks, natural language processing (NLP), and multimodal AI.

Applications of Generative AI

Generative AI is revolutionizing various sectors:

Healthcare: AI-driven models assist in generating synthetic medical data for research.

Entertainment: It enables realistic animations and procedural game content.

Business: Generative AI tools optimize marketing with personalized content creation.

In Hyderabad, a technology hub, professionals are increasingly turning to Gen AI Training in Hyderabad to upskill and take advantage of the growing demand for AI expertise. Additionally, institutions offering a GenAI Course in Hyderabad provide a local and accessible way to master these cutting-edge skills.

Why Learn Generative AI?

Generative AI is not just a buzzword; it’s a skill set that opens doors to lucrative career opportunities. By enrolling in programs like Generative AI Training Course, learners can unlock the potential to innovate across domains. Whether you’re interested in text generation, image synthesis, or AI ethics, training programs provide the tools and knowledge to succeed.

Institutes offering Generative AI Online Training allow professionals to learn at their convenience, making this technology accessible globally. Meanwhile, city-specific programs such as Generative AI Course in Hyderabad cater to the growing AI community in bustling tech cities, equipping learners with practical, industry-relevant skills.

Conclusion

Generative AI is reshaping how we interact with technology, offering endless possibilities for innovation and creativity. Whether you’re an aspiring data scientist or a business professional, understanding Generative AI through programs like GenAI Training or Generative AI Training Course is crucial to staying competitive in this evolving field.

Visualpath is the Leading and Best Software Online Training Institute in Hyderabad. Avail complete Generative AI Online Training  Worldwide. You will get the best course at an affordable cost.

Attend Free Demo

Call on - +91-9989971070.

Visit Blog: https://visualpathblogs.com/

WhatsApp: https://www.whatsapp.com/catalog/919989971070

Visit   https://www.visualpath.in/online-gen-ai-training.html               

[promptengineeringcourse]

Prompt Engineering  Recorded Demo Video

Mode of Training: Online

Contact +91-9989971070

👉Watch Demo Video @ https://youtu.be/75nViETe51Y

👉 whatsApp: https://www.whatsapp.com/catalog/919989971070🌐Visit: https://www.visualpath.in/prompt-engineering-course.html

[bi-writes]

whats wrong with ai?? genuinely curious <3

okay let's break it down. i'm an engineer, so i'm going to come at you from a perspective that may be different than someone else's.

i don't hate ai in every aspect. in theory, there are a lot of instances where, in fact, ai can help us do things a lot better without. here's a few examples:

ai detecting cancer

ai sorting recycling

some practical housekeeping that gemini (google ai) can do

all of the above examples are ways in which ai works with humans to do things in parallel with us. it's not overstepping--it's sorting, using pixels at a micro-level to detect abnormalities that we as humans can not, fixing a list. these are all really small, helpful ways that ai can work with us.

everything else about ai works against us. in general, ai is a huge consumer of natural resources. every prompt that you put into character.ai, chatgpt? this wastes water + energy. it's not free. a machine somewhere in the world has to swallow your prompt, call on a model to feed data into it and process more data, and then has to generate an answer for you all in a relatively short amount of time.

that is crazy expensive. someone is paying for that, and if it isn't you with your own money, it's the strain on the power grid, the water that cools the computers, the A/C that cools the data centers. and you aren't the only person using ai. chatgpt alone gets millions of users every single day, with probably thousands of prompts per second, so multiply your personal consumption by millions, and you can start to see how the picture is becoming overwhelming.

that is energy consumption alone. we haven't even talked about how problematic ai is ethically. there is currently no regulation in the united states about how ai should be developed, deployed, or used.

what does this mean for you?

it means that anything you post online is subject to data mining by an ai model (because why would they need to ask if there's no laws to stop them? wtf does it matter what it means to you to some idiot software engineer in the back room of an office making 3x your salary?). oh, that little fic you posted to wattpad that got a lot of attention? well now it's being used to teach ai how to write. oh, that sketch you made using adobe that you want to sell? adobe didn't tell you that anything you save to the cloud is now subject to being used for their ai models, so now your art is being replicated to generate ai images in photoshop, without crediting you (they have since said they don't do this...but privacy policies were never made to be human-readable, and i can't imagine they are the only company to sneakily try this). oh, your apartment just installed a new system that will use facial recognition to let their residents inside? oh, they didn't train their model with anyone but white people, so now all the black people living in that apartment building can't get into their homes. oh, you want to apply for a new job? the ai model that scans resumes learned from historical data that more men work that role than women (so the model basically thinks men are better than women), so now your resume is getting thrown out because you're a woman.

ai learns from data. and data is flawed. data is human. and as humans, we are racist, homophobic, misogynistic, transphobic, divided. so the ai models we train will learn from this. ai learns from people's creative works--their personal and artistic property. and now it's scrambling them all up to spit out generated images and written works that no one would ever want to read (because it's no longer a labor of love), and they're using that to make money. they're profiting off of people, and there's no one to stop them. they're also using generated images as marketing tools, to trick idiots on facebook, to make it so hard to be media literate that we have to question every single thing we see because now we don't know what's real and what's not.

the problem with ai is that it's doing more harm than good. and we as a society aren't doing our due diligence to understand the unintended consequences of it all. we aren't angry enough. we're too scared of stifling innovation that we're letting it regulate itself (aka letting companies decide), which has never been a good idea. we see it do one cool thing, and somehow that makes up for all the rest of the bullshit?

[catherine-clover]

The longest list of anti-endo sources I've ever seen

While trying to find something else using Tumblr's infamous search engine, I came across this absolute gem:

NINE SOURCES!!! That's a record!! This is incredible!

@radpocalypse, listen. I am about to tear these to shreds, but before I do, I want you to know that you have my respect for not only compiling the longest list of sources I have ever seen an anti-endo provide, and not only doing so seemingly not directly prompted, but typing out every single link by hand, on mobile, without making a single mistake. Incredible work.

And also, to be completely honest, if I had nine sources supporting a belief, I almost certainly wouldn't look into them this closely. But, hey, that's what strangers on the internet with opposing views are for.

One more thing before the debunk: Endogenic systems do not claim to have DID etc. without trauma. They just don't. Whether it could be possible is often debated as an edge case, usually just to win an argument against someone of the opposing side, but really, it's irrelevant for 99% of the community. A good chunk are questioning OSDD based on later trauma, but as far as I am aware, no one on this website is claiming a completely endogenic plural disorder.

However, I don't want to dismiss entire pages based on this alone without further commentary, and it's a fun intellectual exercise regardless. So, whenever I use green text, I'm just playing Devil's Advocate under the premise of "If I was claiming to have DID without trauma (which neither I nor anyone else afaik is), would this source actually debunk that claim?" My syster will also occasionally pop in with purple, since she was cocon while I was writing this.

My dad just walked into my room and literally said "hey how it's going". You know, like. Like that one post. Amazing.

Anyway, civility established. Now come along with me on this long long journey of ten minutes of reading. Maybe put some music on in the background, if that will help you get through it. I had Near's Theme on while writing.

Here we go.

Link 1: McLean Hospital

Ok, main thing that caught my eye was

According to a 2010 Psychiatric Times article, only 5% of people with DID exhibit obvious switching between identity “states.”

Very interesting! Even with all of the "idk who's fronting" memes, 5% is really not that high. Though maybe online spaces like these help train the ability to identify it? The reference trail leads back to a book by Kluft but I don't really feel like going through dozens of pages for this. Definitely making a note of this though; I wonder if there have been any follow-up studies on this.

Not much to say here other than that. No mention of plurality outside DID.

DID is associated with long-term exposure to trauma, often chronic traumatic experiences during early childhood.

Dissociation—or disconnection from one’s sense of self or environment—can be a response to trauma.

Dissociative identity disorder—a type of dissociative disorder—most often develops during early childhood in kids who are experiencing long-term trauma. This typically involves emotional, physical, and/or sexual abuse; neglect; and highly unpredictable interactions with caregivers.

Why "associated", not "is caused by"? Why "can", not "is"? Why "most often", etc.?

Why such weak language?

Not that it couldn't be weaker.

I vaguely remember McLean getting into some hot water regarding a video they posted about DID, but didn't find anything concrete. Half-remembered anecdote aside, the author seems well-qualified.

C-tier debunk of this position. It's not nothing but it could be a lot better.

Link 2: Psych Central

It occurs in women 9 times more often than in men.

Very interesting statistic, but no citation provided.

Alters can show striking differences. For instance, one alter may speak with a different accent or have a softer way of speaking. They might have different opinions or a different gender identity, and even physical differences — like left- or right-handedness, or the need for a glasses prescription.

That's quite a stark difference here compared to the McLean article. What happened to "alters aren't that noticeable"?

But whatever, these are just interesting tidbits. None of this has anything to do with endogenic plurality. Nothing like "this is the only way to be multiple", no comment whatsoever.

DID is usually associated with adverse experiences in someone’s past and traumatic memories.

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is a mental health condition with strong links to trauma, especially trauma in childhood.

Bruh. This again?

In fact, the American Psychiatric Association reports that 90% of people with DID have a history of childhood abuse and neglect, based on research from the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Bruh. Seriously? 90%? You know what that leaves, right?

According to your own source, 10% of DID systems are endogenic.

But let's break this down. There's a big difference between the system being endogenic, and the DID being endogenic. This statistic is specifically referring to childhood trauma.

The wording's plenty vague though. This can absolutely be read as completely endogenic DID.

One review article from 2017 about the causes of DID noted that there was relatively little research on the condition to date.

The authors said researchers hadn’t yet investigated potential genetic and epigenetic factors. With epigenetic factors, the experiences and behaviors of your parents and ancestors can influence the function of the genes they pass down to you.

The authors of the review said scientists needed to do more research to investigate whether a person with DID might carry genes that can influence if they develop the condition or not.

This is particularly promising because studies have already shown that genes can influence dissociative disorders in general.

So you're telling me DID might be able to be passed down one or two generations? Wow. Again, this still has nothing to do with endogenic plurality, but I'm really glad I decided to play with this second angle, because it's so much more fun. We're certainly not at intentional self-inflicted DID here, but we are at this point a long way from certainly needing childhood trauma in all cases.

And also the reviewer is a military psychiatrist who specializes in ADHD. So uh. Not bringing our best here.

Link 3: Mayo Clinic

Gotta love an article that's nice and short. This is just a brief summary of a bunch of dissociative disorders. Again, nothing about endogenic plurality.

Starting to run out of things to say about this. This whole post could probably be a fifth the length if I didn't feel like playing on hard mode.

Formerly known as multiple personality disorder, this disorder involves "switching" to other identities. You may feel as if you have two or more people talking or living inside your head. You may feel like you're possessed by other identities.

Each identity may have a unique name, personal history and features. These identities sometimes include differences in voice, gender, mannerisms and even such physical qualities as the need for eyeglasses.

Hey, that reminds me of someone.

There also are differences in how familiar each identity is with the others. Dissociative identity disorder usually also includes bouts of amnesia and often includes times of confused wandering.

Again, McLean looking really odd with its declaration of DID's covertness against great detail like this. However, its author is so far the best qualified. This one just says "Mayo Clinic Staff". Can't even know which of them worked on this. Some of them are psychs, but if any of them specialize in dissociative disorders, it doesn't say so.

Dissociative disorders usually arise as a reaction to shocking, distressing or painful events and help push away difficult memories.

I won't bother quoting even more wishy-washy language because this post is already at an ungodly length (about 1300 words so far) and we're barely a third done. But yeah, suffice to say, no nail-in-the-coffin 100% link to trauma.

Link 4: Rethink

We are a trusted information creator and accredited by the Patient Information Forum (PIF).

Their bold, for once. That's an alarm-ringing corporate phrase if I've ever seen one. Also, first thing on the PIF's website is "balancing the risks and benefits of AI in the production of health information". So this article might've been written by GPT. Awesome. And yeah, a lot of this whole website looks to me like a bunch of interconnected pages with stupidly long articles written by stitching together LLM generations. Does pass GPT0's test though.

This one is so long. I'll take the ten minutes to read through every word, which I don't think @radpocalypse did, just to make sure there's nothing here, but one thing that does catch my eye scrolling down to near the bottom is that they misspelled their first citation.

A quick look at this Carolyn Spring shows a lot being sold and credentials nowhere in sight. Awesome.

So already I don't need to read this. The information here is not at a high level of trustworthiness. It's maybe better than nothing, but seriously, one can and should do better. But I'll read it anyway, just for bonus points. Thanks to AccelaReader for making this bearable.

Many people will experience dissociation at some point in their lives. Lots of different things can cause you to dissociate. For example, you might dissociate when you are very stressed, or after something traumatic has happened to you.

Some of the symptoms of dissociation include the following:

You may have clear multiple identities.

It‘s important to remember that you could have the symptoms of dissociation without a dissociative disorder.

So according to this, multiple identities can be caused by intense but non-traumatic stress, and might not necessarily be a disorder. So, while I admit this is a little bit of a stretch, we're four links in and this is the first mention of plurality in general, so I'll take it. One point for endogenic plurality. (And again, none of this really matters anyway because this is the worst source so far.)

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is sometimes called ‘Multiple Personality Disorder.

If you have DID you might seem to have 2 or more different identities, called ‘alternate identities.

Two missing closing quotes. Really not a good sign.

They suggest that DID is caused by experiencing severe trauma over a long time in childhood.

Aha! Finally, something concrete against endogenic DID! Too bad it's buried in the worst source yet. If we believed we had DID, we would absolutely not reconsider that based on a sketchy webpage with suboptimal syntax and no credentials.

Ugh, finally done with that one. What a slog.

Link 5: DID Research

Aha! The infamous psych student's blog! That's what Sophie said, anyway. Not taking her word for it though. Let's see what we can find here, independently.

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is the result of repeated or long-term childhood trauma

Why wasn't this first? First sentence, so crystal clear. No two ways about this, transDID destroyed right out of the gate.

DID cannot form after ages 6-9 because individuals older than these ages have an integrated self identity and history.

Why wasn't this first? It's so plain, so refreshing after four pages of strategic ambiguity. Nothing left here for green. But still no mention of non-disordered plurality.

The author is impressively credentialed but doesn't seem to specialize quite near this area. She's certainly better than most, high above any random Tumblr user talking out of their ass, but the good stuff would be to get a DID specialist to explicitly spell out that endogenic systems are not possible.

Also should make note of this big fat legal disclaimer:

While the author strives to make information on this website as complete, reliable, and accurate as possible, the author makes no claims, promises, guarantees, or warranties about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this site and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site.

If we did claim to have DID, this would rattle us a little but could ultimately be brushed aside.

Link 6: SANE

As usual, literally nothing about endogenic plurality. I'll just greenmode this.

The majority of people with DID have been through severe trauma in early childhood

And now back to our regularly scheduled nondefinitive language.

Fun fact: highlighting text on this website turns it invisible. Awesome.

A person needs to meet the following criteria to be diagnosed with DID:

- Two or more distinct identities or personality states, each with its own way of thinking and relating. - Amnesia and gaps in the recall of everyday events, personal information or traumatic events. - The experiences are not part of normal cultural or religious practice, or part of childhood imaginary play. For example, a child having an imaginary friend does not mean they have DID. - The symptoms are not because of substance abuse or other medical conditions.

Ah finally, a direct quote from the good ol' DSM. Notice the lack of a trauma requirement.

Funny enough, using only these criteria in isolation, we actually would count as having DID due to our grayout memory gaps when switching. DID is also listed in the dissociative disorders section of the DSM, not the trauma disorders section, so there is no implied criterion there either. However, there still remains the universal criterion of distress, which we do not fulfill. We are quite happy with ourselves.

DID is caused by severe childhood trauma, such as physical, verbal or sexual abuse.

Well, which is it?? Is it a majority association or a direct cause? Why the contradiction? Or is the emphasis on early childhood trauma?

Eh, whatever. Point is, green is once again shut down. But there is still no mention of endogenic plurality anywhere here!!

And no indication of who wrote this article, though the citation for direct cause is a dissociative disorder specialist. Does he actually say that in the cited paper, though?

Dissociative identity disorder (DID) is multifactorial in its etiology. Whereas psychosocial etiologies of DID include developmental traumatization and sociocognitive sequelae, biological factors include trauma-generated neurobiological responses. Biologically derived traits and epigenetic mechanisms are also likely to be at play. At this point, no direct examination of genetics has occurred in DID. However, it is likely to exist, given the genetic link to dissociation in general and in relation to childhood adversity in particular.

I hope you have a dictionary on hand. That sure is a lot of big words that aren't in Firefox's built-in spellchecker. Still, after making sure I got everything, it's clearly not so cut and dry here. And we're back on the "it could be genetic" point.

Tangentially related: I do like the dismissal of the iatrogenic model on the basis of the brain scans.

Neurobiological differences have been demonstrated between dissociative identities within patients with DID and between patients with DID and controls. Given the current evidence, DID as a diagnostic entity cannot be explained as a phenomenon created by iatrogenic influences, suggestibility, malingering, or social role-taking. On the contrary, DID is an empirically robust chronic psychiatric disorder based on neurobiological, cognitive, and interpersonal non-integration as a response to unbearable stress.

Anyway, we're not even on the original page anymore, so I'll call it here. No mention of endogenic plurality, and the citation that claims to dismiss endogenic DID doesn't.

Link 7: NAMI Michigan

While the causes [of DID] are unknown

I'm tired. Aren't you tired?

Treatment for DID consists primarily of psychotherapy with hypnosis.

Yeah I'm calling BS on this one

And no citations on this entire page, nor even the author's name.

Statistics show that DID occurs in 0.01 to 1 percent of the general population.

Research has shown that the average age for the initial development of alters is 5.9 years old.

No sources listed. This is definitely the worst link. Literally on the same level as a rambling Tumblr user in terms of credibility.

Doesn't matter that it says

This disorder is believed to be triggered by physical or sexual abuse in childhood

Couldn't even get this dogshit source to be firm.

This one gets an F.

Link 8: The Psychology Practice

Got scared for a moment there that it said ai. No, that's AL, a name. Also this was written in 2022, so we're definitely safe. Can't actually find any other info on this AL character, but at least we can look up the co-author.

Hm, can't find anything on her, either. Well, at least this is a step up from the previous link. Let's see what it has to say.

According to the Dissociative Identity Research Organisation (2018), DID is formed in childhood due to repeated trauma in early childhood (before age 10) before the personality is fully integrated.

I do like that these later links are direct with this. They don't seem to have a citation for that DIRO, though. Unless...

No. Oh no.

Ok, so this one was written by a couple of clowns who definitely didn't do their homework. Cool. I'm getting tired of humoring awful sources like this, so moving on to the grand finale.

Link 9: NAMI

Wait, this is the same group behind the zero-citation article from Michigan! But that was just Michigan. Maybe the main site can do better.

Ugh, it's just another list of dissociative disorders instead of DID specifically.

The symptoms of a dissociative disorder usually first develop as a response to a traumatic event,

Aren't you tired? Aren't you tired? Aren't you tired?

Often these identities may have unique names, characteristics, mannerisms and voices.

Often? Wow. Sure is a far cry from 5%.

Dissociative disorders are managed through various therapies including: - Psychotherapies such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) - Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) - Medications such as antidepressants can treat symptoms of related conditions

No mention of hypnosis, allegedly the primary method of treatment?? (/sarc)

and there was no mention of plurality being exclusive to dissociative disorders

Oh, and no listed authors either.

So, after three thousand words of analysis, all we've come up with are nothing burgers, dogshit, and dogshit nothing burgers. Out of nine links, only one briefly and indirectly touched on endogenic plurality, and it was in favor. Even the argument against the traumaless DID strawman is weak at best. These sources are bad, to put it lightly.

@radpocalypse, if you're reading this, firstly, thank you for powering through your ADHD and dyslexia to read thousands of words dunking on your masterpiece. Secondly, if you have any more sources that you think are backing you, feel free to send them my way. Just uh, maybe read them more closely next time?

And that goes for everyone here. If you think you have a better source, or if I made a mistake or missed something here, I am open to correction. I am open to the idea that I'm wrong and I have some unknown trauma to work through, but I certainly won't go digging unless I have good reason to believe it's there, and I haven't seen any good reason. And if you haven't either, maybe it's time to reconsider your position.

One last thing before I go.

Have you ever actually seen a pro-endo carrd, let alone one cited in standalone? I haven't.

Here's a much longer list of much better sources than yours supporting endogenic plurality compiled by the traumagenic Guardians System. I don't expect you to read anywhere near the whole thing; just pick a few links at random. And yes, while many of them are peer-reviewed papers, some of them are Tumblr posts, but those Tumblr posts cite peer-reviewed papers, so it's all good.

Thanks for reading.

[saphronethaleph]

Rushing the boomer

“How long?” Palpatine asked.

“Do not strain yourself, lord,” one of the cultists said. “Your attempt to possess the Snoke body will have weakened you-”

“I am well aware of my limitations,” Palpatine snapped, then turned to the Final Order engineer. “How long, commander?”

“That depends, my lord,” the engineer replied, his voice firm. “For the whole fleet… fourteen years. A single ship could be completed in eight. One ship coming online at a time in sequence, the first ship will be finished in nine years and the whole fleet in sixteen.”

Palpatine frowned.

“The whole fleet, then,” he said. “The might of the Final Order will blaze a path across the galaxy, and all will obey the Sith or perish.”

“It is as you command, my lord,” the engineer said, saluting.

Palpatine waved him away, then gestured, and a hologram of the Star Destroyers currently under construction formed in the air above him.

They were vast ships, for line vessels, and the Sith Eternal were building one thousand and eighty of them.

One thousand and eighty!

Never again would rebels exploit a single point of failure and destroy his most powerful and only superweapon… a fate he had experienced twice, now, and each one burned like a canker in his heart, the fury suffusing him and lending him strength.

At his insistence, Palpatine’s spies in the wider galaxy, outside Exegol, had found for him the names of every single person who had been directly involved in the attack on both Death Stars.

Han Solo, Chewbacca, Leia Organa Solo, Evaan Verlaine… all of those names were of people he hated. And Palpatine would see them destroyed, one way or another.

But there were four names for which the Dark Lord of the Sith reserved his greatest hatred. The true, simmering passion that Palpatine held for those who had truly thwarted his plans.

Landonis Balthazar Calrissian. Nien Nunb. Wedge Antilles… and, more than anyone else, Luke Skywalker.

If there was anyone who Palpatine wanted to destroy, it was Luke Skywalker… not merely to see him dead, but to humiliate him. To tear him down. To reduce all his triumphs to smouldering ruins.

Break the New Republic. Destroy the New Jedi Order. Turn his own family against him. Shatter his will.

That was what Palpatine would do, to Luke Skywalker.

And then – and only then – would the galaxy burn, worlds submitting to the rule of the Sith or being destroyed.

Thinking such pleasant thoughts, it took a moment for Palpatine to notice the flashing red alert on the side of the holodisplay.

“What is the meaning of this?” he demanded. “Explain it!”

“We’ve picked up ships, incoming,” an officer said, looking up from his displays on the other side of the room. “Lots of them – Rebel ship classes!”

Palpatine’s hand waved, and the holodisplay reconfigured to show the Red Honeycomb Zone and the tactical displays.

Sure enough, ships were coming through. Two Mon Cal star cruisers, first, then frigates and cruiser class vessels, disgorging a cloud of snubfighters from their hangar bays.

Sith Eternal TIE Fighters were already taking off, but Palpatine could see the difference between the two forces – the Sith Eternal was a secret military and had never actually fought in battle, and it had been aiming for a projected readiness date over a decade in the future.

The New Republic fighter corps was no such easy target. Even without their shields, their skill and training were clearly superior, and the first pass saw a dozen Sith fighters go down in blazing, burning wrecks. A dogfight was already beginning, but it was a dogfight that could only go one way.

But how had this happened? Exegol was secret! With the hyperspace anomalies protecting it, the only way to visit the planet would be to not only know where it was but be shown…

...unless, that was, someone had a Sith wayfinder.

Suddenly gripped by a cold rush of fear that prompted a surge of utter hatred, Palpatine reached out with his mind towards the New Republic strike force as it became haloed in laserfire and explosions.

He could sense a Sith Wayfinder. HIS Sith Wayfinder! The one that had been in his throne room during the Battle of Endor.

Pushing harder, Palpatine located the dancing spark of the wayfinder, alongside a sickeningly familiar presence – a presence ducking and dodging and rolling, as it locked onto and destroyed one TIE Fighter after another.

“Skywalker!” Palpatine shouted, then coughed. “SKYWALKER!”

“Watch out, there’s another fighter flight taking off from the hangar system to port,” Nien Nunb said, pointing.

“Got it, keying them in,” Lando agreed, his gaze flicking between the displays of the Raddus flag bridge. “Hey, Wedge, you want to take those fighters and the battleline will kill the hangar for you?”

“Copy that, General,” Wedge agreed. “Red leader to Red Alpha flight, follow me in!”

Six X-wings rolled to follow Wedge in, and Lando checked over the displays again.

“Well, I’m no expert but I think we caught them with their pants down, Admiral,” he said, glancing back at Leia. “No more than one in fifty of the capital ship turbolasers are working, and most of them seem to still be under construction.”

He whistled. “It’s a damn good thing we caught them when we did, though, I’m reading over six hundred ships in states of construction and there’s hundreds more building slips.”

The Raddus jolted as a volley of turbolasers hit, then the radio crackled.

“Gold leader here,” Verlaine called in. “Princess, I’ve got eyes on where that fire’s coming from, looks like a turbolaser testing facility with some working cannon. My boys and girls will fix that little problem.”

Nien made the adjustment before Lando got to it, and a double volley of proton torpedoes blasted the facility to pieces.

“It’s certainly a damn good thing we found them before they finished,” Leia agreed. “How did you do it?”

“Well, our lead ran out on Kijimi,” Lando said. “Then I realized nobody had actually checked the wreckage of the Second Death Star, and unlike the first the second’s armour wasn’t in place to contain the explosion. I thought it was likely some of it had come down intact, so Luke and I went over to find it and that’s how we got here.”

“I’m picking something up-” Nien reported, then they all looked out the window at once as a flare of lightning crackled up from a hole in the ground. It gripped a New Republic corvette, lightning crawling over the surface and ripping chunks out of it, and when the bolts stopped the engines had been disabled and most of the CR90 crashed seconds later.

“Skywalker here, I’m on it,” Luke said, his X-Wing shooting past and shooting down one of the last enemy TIEs. The Jedi Master’s snubfighter kept going, rolling into a complex manoeuvre and spitting laserbolts down the chasm, then the lightning came back up again – and Luke’s ship absorbed it, glowing bright white as the energy was corralled and neutralized.

“I don’t know about you, but that looks like the main event as far as I’m concerned,” Lando noted.

[ozzgin]

hope this doesn't come off as rude, but do you condone the usage of ai art? because I noticed you use ai art for quite a few of your post headers ^^;

No worries, it's a reasonable question, although a rather complex one! There are multiple layers that I would like to go through when answering you.

Do I condone the use of AI as a replacement for actual art? Obviously not. I enjoy drawing, and I enjoy collecting art. This won't change regardless of technology. The reality, however, is that generative AI will continue to develop, whether we like it or not. So, you know, instead of denying its existence, I would prefer to openly discuss it and have it regulated by laws and ethical conducts. For example, laws that would protect artists from being laid off in favor of one single AI engineer. Or laws that would limit the profit companies can make using undisclosed AI. Basically, making sure that this new technology serves the people instead or rendering them useless.

Do I condone the use of AI for individual use? Depends. My opinion is that non-profit, entertainment purposes are not the root of the problem. Someone generating a funny image of a cat is not the equivalent of someone generating hundreds of images a day. Those terrible environmental statistics you see online are mostly targeted at this kind of business usage. If you were to go on Instagram, for example, you would find a lot of accounts who publish vast amounts of AI works, often omitting this fact. Some sell merch, advice, or - if they are honest about their methods - courses and books on prompts and AI imagery. It's an actual thing. Does it take visibility away from actual artists? Absolutely. Even worse, it leads to a lot of doubt, where artists must prove themselves against accusatory claims. Again, I believe the solution is not to ignore progress or demand it stops, but to find concrete measures and implement them.

I use AI images for story headers, strictly for decorative purposes. If I want to express something visually, I will draw it myself. I do not have the time nor resources to draw every single picture I want to use on my hobby blog. Whoever disagrees with it is free to pay me a full employee salary. Mind you, on that note, I've seen a lot of people mentioning Pinterest and similar as open sources for pictures. They are not free repositories to just grab whatever you want. That photograph of a foggy forest was taken by someone and requires crediting. That unspecified manga panel was drawn by someone and requires crediting. 90% of the images I see here have no source or credit. I find it terribly hypocritical to parade as a supporter of human arts while conveniently ignoring every case where said human art is stolen, modified or uncredited.

Lastly, do I condone the use of AI by artists? This is an interesting topic, and a recent case immediately comes to mind: a well-established artist I've been following for over a decade has alluded to potentially training AI to replicate their art in the future. It's their way of easing their workload. Is it any different from comic artists using filtered photos to skip drawing backgrounds, for example? Is it any different from commission artists pre-drawing body parts and objects as brushes and stamps, so they can skip a lot of the drawing process? I am not a professional artist, nor do I require the use of this sort of assistance, but I cannot help but wonder: how many of the individuals who had a meltdown over this suggestion have actually paid or tipped an artist in their life? How many of them regularly call out stolen content? How many are mindful about the content they share/distribute/save, making sure it involves given permissions and fulfills ethical standards? I'm not necessarily calling people out; rather, I'm saying that the outrage is misdirected and untargeted.

I don't have a concrete conclusion to the last paragraph. It's a novel dilemma, a gray area with a lot of factors involved. At least to me. I wanted to include it in the conversation to show that generative AI and its implications are rapidly changing and expanding, so it's difficult to encapsulate it all in one definite opinion. All I can tell you is that my appreciation for human art has not changed, and I will continue to support it. :)

[frances-kafka]

Cause-and-Adjacency: a new techno-occultic social logic

"Cause-and-Adjacency" means that association is cause.

Cause-and-Adjacency is the dominant logic of this part of the 21st century, with a "latent space" aspect to it.

Cause-and-Effect: Things happen because of causative agents and are downstream of sequences of causative agents. Analytical people using C&E logic understand that things can have multiple causative agents and multiple types of outcomes, but relatively less analytical or informed people might think "something has only one causative agent, and if that statement is wrong, then ALL cause and effect logic is wrong."

Many things are stuck with Cause-and-Effect as their dominant framework. Cause-and-Adjacency logic doesn't apply when you have to deal with the physical world and its laws. Adjacency is primarily a social logic, and the physical world often isn't governed by social logic.

Cause-and-Adjacency: Things happen because of their adjacency to other things or because they share a latent space.

Cause-and-Adjacency is actually the logic of algorithmic sorting, prompt engineering, etc.

For example, in Cause-and-Effect, something being associated does not mean that thing is responsible.

A simple example of Cause-and-Effect:  I'll use a dumb example.

Let's say that Neo-Victorians like trains, train engineers like trains, New Urbanists like trains, WWII Nazis liked trains, and many autistic kids like trains. In standard Cause-and-Effect logic - and in more 20th century social logic, but NOT modern social logic - this does not mean that train engineers, Neo-Victorians, New Urbanists, Nazis, and autistic kids are part of the same social subgroup. They're just five different groups that are non-causally associated with trains. If you are examining this via Cause-and-Effect, you don’t equate “liking trains” to “is a train engineer, Neo-Victorian, New Urbanist, Nazi, or autistic.” Sharing an intersection doesn’t mean sharing probable cause. These things are not synonymous with each other.

But if you’re applying Cause-and-Adjacency:

In Cause-and-Adjacency logic, adjacency is causation even if the two things have nothing to do with each other. Guilt by sharing a common latent space.

You avoid anything that shares an intersection. This may actually be necessary online, in terms of SEO stuff. If you’re a particularly Twitterbrained [1] Firstian who doesn’t “know how the sausage is made” and your social experience – including your education in social logic - is dominantly shaped by your interactions with a post-Web 2 social media space, then all you know is that whenever you activate a particular intersection, all of the fellow travelers come along for the ride. Here's why: Post about trains, and you’ll get stuff from or related to train engineers AND WWII Nazis (ok, probably not) AND New Urbanists AND autistic kids. Providing more context won't help because you're still going to be optimizing your posts to all of those groups or topics. You may need to actually use much more specified language - or avoid the topic altogether. If you’re on Twitter, then your posting about trains made you hypervisible to ALL of them. Interacting with ANYONE posting about trains made you hypervisible as well.

In Cause-and-Adjacency Logic, the entire cloud of associations is held as a causative agent, especially since the people using this logic often are completely mystified as to how trains, Nazis, Victorians, and autistic kids are all connected.

According to the social logic of Web 2 and onward, you would avoid the entire “thing cloud” if you want to avoid even one of the things in that cloud. Firstians move through clouds of association.

Another strategy:

You invent a secret code word for "trains" to confine the context you are referring to (such as when tech people overly use the term "qualia" when they mean "soul") and avoid the Victorians, Nazis, and autists. This is social media algorithm and SEO logic. Marketers understand this better than many programmers do.

If you’re part of particular tech subcultures – like Rationalists/EA – you might make up your own term for “train” in order to throttle your engagement specifically to other people within your circle. This is what they are doing with the very subculture-specific language they use.

This is why I NEVER say "tr*gg*r" and ALWAYS say “the Vapors” when referring to the overzealous use of the word "tr*gg*r." It’s also why I am asterisking out that word for that matter! It’s algospeak.

I’m saying “the Vapors” because – in the context I’m using this – I don’t actually want to engage with either the people who overzealously use the term or those who attack them. “The Vapors” gives me a way to talk about this within the specific context in which I'm using it, while lowering engagement from the people not involved in that context.

In many ways, this kind of algospeak is like reverse prompt engineering. Instead of building a big LLM prompt or doing SEO tagging that strengthens the signal to a broader group, you’re throttling engagement down to what is only understood by your in-group, or even to a frame you control (which is the beauty of always using your own language and framing for things wherever possible; it filters out the people who don’t actually want to engage).

All of this may point out, very much, to how Firstian society is evolving downstream of its foundational technologies.

[1] Being Twitterbrained may actually be a functional mode of operation if you’re on Twitter.

[lorewriter]

Aizawa/Oboro first date prompt please!

Hope you like it!!

It was raining the day Oboro had asked him out. He’d been holding an umbrella over a box of abandoned kittens when Oboro had come up behind him with an umbrella of his own. It was sky blue, like his hair. He’d looked up at the other, the only sound around them being the small mewls of the kittens and the soft beat of the rain against their umbrellas.

“Go out with me.”

It was so sudden that Shota had needed to do a double take before simply replying; “Sure.”

He’d never seen Oboro smile so bright as he did that day. Of course Hizashi was ecstatic, hopping up and down repeatedly as he asked for details in school the next day. Oboro had told him to let him do all the planning and to just be ready this upcoming Saturday for their first date.

He’d sighed as Hizashi’s patience seemed to completely diminish causing the boy to all but tackle him for answers. He explained what happened, but his mind still drifted off to what he’d need to prepare. Just what exactly was etiquette for someone’s first date. Finishing off the school day, Aizawa headed home to his one bedroom apartment, his parents having long since abandoned him to live on his own, but they at least sent him an allowance every few months.

He began with what he wanted to wear, looking through his closet in hopes of finding something suitable for his first date. Upon finding nothing but his UA uniform and a few cat sweaters, he decided a trip to a local clothing store would be needed. Next he checked his hair, did he need to style it? How dressed up did he need to be?

Deciding he was getting nowhere with his lack of knowledge, Shota turns to the internet to solve his problem.

SEARCH ENGINE:

“What does one wear on a first date?”

“Do I need to style my hair?”

“What topics would be good to bring up on your first date?”

“Funny cat video compilation.”

*

Hizashi ended up being his savior as his previous online search led him nowhere. The excitable blonde rushed him around Musutafu mall, grabbing whatever he could force onto Shota before finally stopping at a small cafe for some coffee.

“Is all of this really necessary?” Shota spoke, fidgeting with his now styled hair.

“Of course, you need to look your absolute best to woo him. Who knows, he might even ask you out again the moment he sees you.” Hizashi replied, laughing to himself as he did.

“You’re ridiculous.”

*

Soon Saturday was upon him and his nerves had ended up keeping him awake all night. He’d been told to meet Oboro at their normal crossroad where they met to head to school together. He’d picked out a plain black t-shirt along with a long gray jacket that went down to his knees. His hair had been half way tied up, leaving only a few strands left to shadow his face.

With one final glance into his bathroom mirror, he decided he was prepared enough and set off.

Walking up to their meeting spot, Shota could already see a fidgeting Oboro messing with his fingers. His hair was the same as always with those clunky goggles pushing up his bangs. He wore a brown jacket over a navy blue shirt with black pants.

“Beautiful.”

A blush rose to Oboro’s face, matching his own as he realized he’d said that out loud. Not wanting to make the situation any more awkward, Shota coughed a little before asking where they’d be going. Seeing the Oboro’s eyes light up like starlight, Shota knew he was in for a day full of surprises. And surprised he was as Oboro dragged him around Musutafu. Their first stop had been a small hole in the wall bookstore that held his favorite author's new book, which he’d thought had already been sold out. Next was a hero exhibit on his favorite underground hero Smoke-Eater. He’d been wanting to go see it for a while now but hadn’t had the time due to all of their training at UA.

Next came a small lunch at his favorite ramen shop followed by their final stop at his favorite cat cafe.

The day had been perfect but from the beginning Shota had had a knot in his stomach, a feeling he couldn’t help but focus on as Oboro returned with their coffees in hand. Sipping his coffee, Shota finally gained the courage to ask the question he’d been replaying in his head all week. “Why do you like me? Don’t get me wrong, today was perfect. This was honestly the best day I’ve ever had in my entire life, but, why? Why me?” He asked quietly, eyes firmly fixed on his coffee in hopes of not meeting the others' eyes.

“Well that’s simple, it’s because I like you. I’ve liked you since I saw you fighting your hardest in the sports festival. You’re incredible, you face odds that most of us don’t have to and you still come out stronger. You fight for what you want, I admire you for that. But you’re also kind, you look after others in your own way and that makes me want to work harder to be a hero just like you.” Oboro responded, shattering Shota’s view of himself so completely that all he could now was gape.

“I’m glad to have met you Aizawa Shota, and if you’ll have me, I’d very much like to be your boyfriend.”

Gold eyes met red and for a moment, Shota felt like he could do anything, if only Shirakumo Oboro was by his side.

*

“So, did Nemuri get to you too?” Oboro asked, walking him back to his apartment at the blue haired boy’s insistence.

“Huh? No, but Hizashi helped me prepare for today. Told me I needed to look my best so we just spent a day at the mall picking out an outfit and getting my hair done.” He responded, feeling more relaxed as the knot in his stomach had disappeared.

“Wha? Lucky, Nemuri was like a wild animal, she spent this past week drilling me on what to wear, how to act and what to say.” Oboro replied, a small whine in his tone as he lamented on his past hell week with Nemuri.

Laughing quietly, Shota thought; there’s nowhere he’d rather be, than by Oboro’s side. And he hoped they’d stay together forever.

Lore: Thanks for reading, hope you enjoyed.

[mariacallous]

Some Fortune 500 companies have begun testing software that can spot a deepfake of a real person in a live video call, following a spate of scams involving fraudulent job seekers who take a signing bonus and run.

The detection technology comes courtesy of GetReal Labs, a new company founded by Hany Farid, a UC-Berkeley professor and renowned authority on deepfakes and image and video manipulation.

GetReal Labs has developed a suite of tools for spotting images, audio, and video that are generated or manipulated either with artificial intelligence or manual methods. The company’s software can analyze the face in a video call and spot clues that may indicate it has been artificially generated and swapped onto the body of a real person.

“These aren’t hypothetical attacks, we’ve been hearing about it more and more,” Farid says. “In some cases, it seems they're trying to get intellectual property, infiltrating the company. In other cases, it seems purely financial, they just take the signing bonus.”

The FBI issued a warning in 2022 about deepfake job hunters who assume a real person’s identity during video calls. UK-based design and engineering firm Arup lost $25 million to a deepfake scammer posing as the company’s CFO. Romance scammers have also adopted the technology, swindling unsuspecting victims out of their savings.

Impersonating a real person on a live video feed is just one example of the kind of reality-melting trickery now possible thanks to AI. Large language models can convincingly mimic a real person in online chat, while short videos can be generated by tools like OpenAI’s Sora. Impressive AI advances in recent years have made deepfakery more convincing and more accessible. Free software makes it easy to hone deepfakery skills, and easily accessible AI tools can turn text prompts into realistic-looking photographs and videos.

But impersonating a person in a live video is a relatively new frontier. Creating this type of a deepfake typically involves using a mix of machine learning and face-tracking algorithms to seamlessly stitch a fake face onto a real one, allowing an interloper to control what an illicit likeness appears to say and do on screen.

Farid gave WIRED a demo of GetReal Labs’ technology. When shown a photograph of a corporate boardroom, the software analyzes the metadata associated with the image for signs that it has been modified. Several major AI companies including OpenAI, Google, and Meta now add digital signatures to AI-generated images, providing a solid way to confirm their inauthenticity. However, not all tools provide such stamps, and open source image generators can be configured not to. Metadata can also be easily manipulated.

GetReal Labs also uses several AI models, trained to distinguish between real and fake images and video, to flag likely forgeries. Other tools, a mix of AI and traditional forensics, help a user scrutinize an image for visual and physical discrepancies, for example highlighting shadows that point in different directions despite having the same light source, or that do not appear to match the object that cast them.

Lines drawn on different objects shown in perspective will also reveal if they converge on a common vanishing point, as would be the case in a real image.

Other startups that promise to flag deepfakes rely heavily on AI, but Farid says manual forensic analysis will also be crucial to flagging media manipulation. “Anybody who tells you that the solution to this problem is to just train an AI model is either a fool or a liar,” he says.

The need for a reality check extends beyond Fortune 500 firms. Deepfakes and manipulated media are already a major problem in the world of politics, an area Farid hopes his company’s technology could do real good. The WIRED Elections Project is tracking deepfakes used to boost or trash political candidates in elections in India, Indonesia, South Africa, and elsewhere. In the United States, a fake Joe Biden robocall was deployed last January in an effort to dissuade people from turning out to vote in the New Hampshire Presidential primary. Election-related “cheapfake” videos, edited in misleading ways, have gone viral of late, while a Russian disinformation unit has promoted an AI-manipulated clip disparaging Joe Biden.

Vincent Conitzer, a computer scientist at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh and coauthor of the book Moral AI, expects AI fakery to become more pervasive and more pernicious. That means, he says, there will be growing demand for tools designed to counter them.

“It is an arms race,” Conitzer says. “Even if you have something that right now is very effective at catching deepfakes, there's no guarantee that it will be effective at catching the next generation. A successful detector might even be used to train the next generation of deepfakes to evade that detector.”

GetReal Labs agrees it will be a constant battle to keep up with deepfakery. Ted Schlein, a cofounder of GetReal Labs and a veteran of the computer security industry, says it may not be long before everyone is confronted with some form of deepfake deception, as cybercrooks become more conversant with the technology and dream up ingenious new scams. He adds that manipulated media is a top topic of concern for many chief security officers. “Disinformation is the new malware,” Schlein says.

With significant potential to poison political discourse, Farid notes that media manipulation can be considered a more challenging problem. “I can reset my computer or buy a new one,” he says. “But the poisoning of the human mind is an existential threat to our democracy.”

[darkmaga-returns]

By Kit Klarenberg / The Grayzone

Emails and internal documents reviewed by The Grayzone reveal details of a cabal of British military and intelligence veterans which plotted to escalate and prolong the Ukraine proxy war “at all costs.” Convened under the direction of the British Ministry of Defense in the immediate aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the cell referred to itself as Project Alchemy. As British leadership sabotaged peace talks between Kiev and Moscow, the cell put forward an array of plans “to keep Ukraine fighting” by imposing “strategic dilemmas, costs and frictions upon Russia.”

The leaks obtained by The Grayzone expose a hidden hand behind Britain’s policy in Ukraine, showing in unusually granular detail how it aimed to engineer a long, grinding war through covert operations that stretched the bounds of legality.

Project Alchemy’s proposed schemes spanned every conceivable field of warfare, from cyber attacks to “discreet operations” to outright terrorism. The secret cell even put forward a plan to “aggressively pursue” and “dismantle” independent media outlets – including The Grayzone – through an aggressive campaign of legal harassment and online censorship, so they “would be forced to close.” The incendiary blueprints were fed to the highest levels of the British state and national security structure, where they were apparently well-received.

Founded by a senior British Ministry of Defence official, Project Alchemy is composed of veteran military and intelligence operatives united by a desire for all-out war between the West and Russia. Some have trained Ukrainian forces in clandestine sabotage tactics. 

Members of the national security cabal tacitly acknowledged that their proposed operations stretched the bounds of British law. Thus they suggested that London should be “prepared to creatively use the law” to meet its goals, and even be willing to erase “legal restrictions on UK deniable ops” against Russia. 

Some of Project Alchemy’s most extreme recommendations have already been implemented, often with calamitous results. These include the cell’s proposal to strike Crimea’s Kerch Bridge, which prompted a Russian escalation that saw punishing attacks on Ukraine’s electricity infrastructure. Alchemy also envisioned the construction of a secret, Gladio-style army of Ukrainian partisan fighters to carry out assassination, sabotage, and terror missions behind enemy lines. 

It appears the British premier, Keir Starmer, fell under the influence of the Project Alchemy cabal soon after his election in July, when he eagerly embraced the role of “wartime prime minister.” After pledging to support Ukraine “as long as it takes,” however, Starmer is quietly backing away from the maximalist policy. In Kiev, Ukrainians are left to ponder how their “friends” in London got them into this mess, and why they can not, or will not get them out of it.

[toppromptengineeringcourse]

Effective Prompt Crafting: Key to Better AI Responses

In the ever-evolving world of artificial intelligence (AI), crafting effective prompts is crucial for obtaining high-quality responses. Effective Prompt Crafting is not just about asking the right questions but also about understanding how to communicate with AI models in a way that produces the best results. By mastering this skill, you can unlock the full potential of AI tools, whether you're working with generative models, chatbots, or other AI-driven applications. Prompt Engineering Course

What is Effective Prompt Crafting?

Effective prompt crafting refers to the art and science of designing inputs that elicit precise, relevant, and high-quality outputs from an AI system. Effective Prompt Crafting is an essential skill for anyone looking to maximize the value they get from AI technologies, particularly for those working in fields like data analysis, content creation, and customer support. Prompt Engineering Training

Unlike traditional search engines that rely on keyword-based queries, AI models understand context, nuance, and intention. This makes the prompt crafting process a bit more complex. Well-crafted prompts can guide AI to provide responses that are clear, concise, and tailored to specific needs.

Why is Effective Prompt Crafting Important?

The importance of Effective Prompt Crafting cannot be overstated, especially when working with sophisticated AI systems like GPT-based models or advanced NLP tools. Poorly structured prompts can lead to irrelevant or nonsensical responses, wasting valuable time and resources. On the other hand, well-crafted prompts ensure that the AI generates responses that are not only accurate but also aligned with your objectives. Prompt Engineering Course

Additionally, when Effective Prompt Crafting is applied, AI becomes a powerful tool for automating tasks, answering questions, generating creative content, and much more. By refining the art of prompt crafting, you can ensure that AI supports your goals in a meaningful way.

Key Principles of Effective Prompt Crafting

To make your prompts as effective as possible, consider the following principles: Prompt Engineering Training

1. Be Specific and Clear

The more specific your prompt is, the better the AI will be at understanding your request. Effective Prompt Crafting requires a clear and detailed explanation of what you want from the AI. Avoid vague or overly broad questions, as these can lead to generalized answers. For instance, instead of asking, "Tell me about AI," you could ask, "How does prompt crafting influence the quality of responses generated by AI?"

2. Provide Context

Providing context helps the AI understand the nuances of your request. This is especially important when dealing with complex queries or tasks. Effective Prompt Crafting involves framing your prompt with sufficient background information so the AI can tailor its response accordingly. The more context you provide, the more likely the AI will be able to generate a relevant response.

For example, if you want the AI to help you with content creation, specifying the tone, style, and target audience in the prompt will significantly improve the quality of the output.

3. Use Constraints When Necessary

Sometimes, Effective Prompt Crafting involves setting boundaries within which the AI should operate. If you need a specific word count, format, or style, including these constraints in your prompt will guide the AI in generating an answer that fits your needs.

For example, you could say, "Write a 200-word summary of the latest trends in AI," or "Generate a formal response to this customer query." Constraints like these help ensure that the response matches your desired outcome.

4. Iterate and Refine Your Prompts

One of the keys to mastering Effective Prompt Crafting is the iterative process. AI models often require multiple rounds of refinement to generate the ideal response. You may need to adjust your prompt based on the AI's initial response, guiding it with additional instructions or clarifications.

It is essential to continuously fine-tune your prompts to get closer to the desired result. This iterative approach allows you to learn more about how the AI interprets different inputs, which can improve your ability to craft effective prompts over time. FREE DEMO

5. Keep it Concise

While context and specificity are crucial, brevity also plays an important role in Effective Prompt Crafting. Long-winded or overly complicated prompts can confuse the AI and may lead to less accurate results. Strive for a balance between providing enough detail and keeping the prompt straightforward and easy to understand.

6. Test and Experiment

Testing and experimenting with different prompt formulations is a powerful way to discover what works best. Effective Prompt Crafting often involves trial and error. Through testing, you’ll gain insights into how the AI responds to various instructions, which will help you refine your approach over time. Don’t be afraid to experiment with different variations until you find the most effective one.

Benefits of Effective Prompt Crafting

By focusing on Effective Prompt Crafting, you can unlock a variety of benefits, including:

1. Higher-Quality AI Responses

When your prompts are carefully crafted, the AI is more likely to produce accurate and relevant responses. This improves the overall user experience, saving time and increasing productivity.

2. Enhanced Efficiency

Effective Prompt Crafting allows you to quickly get the information or result you need without needing to sort through irrelevant data or responses. This increases the efficiency of tasks such as content generation, customer support, and data analysis.

3. Cost Savings

By maximizing the potential of AI through effective prompt crafting, you reduce the need for human intervention, which can be costly. Well-crafted prompts can automate tasks that would otherwise require significant time and resources.

Common Mistakes in Prompt Crafting

Even the most experienced AI users can make mistakes when it comes to prompt crafting. Some of the most common errors include:

1. Vague Prompts

Vague prompts tend to yield generic answers. This can be avoided by being specific in your requests and ensuring that the AI understands exactly what you're asking.

2. Overloading Prompts with Information

While context is important, overloading the AI with unnecessary information can dilute the quality of the response. Keep your prompts focused and to the point.

3. Ignoring Constraints

Neglecting to include constraints can lead to responses that don't meet your expectations. Always specify the desired format, length, and style of the output.

Conclusion

Mastering the art of Effective Prompt Crafting is essential for anyone who wants to get the most out of AI. By being clear, specific, and context-rich in your prompts, you can ensure that AI systems generate responses that are aligned with your goals. Testing and refining your prompts will enhance your ability to communicate effectively with AI, ultimately boosting your productivity and success in using AI tools. With practice, Effective Prompt Crafting will become second nature, empowering you to navigate the complexities of AI and harness its full potential.

Visualpath is the Leading and Best Institute for learning in Hyderabad. We provide Prompt Engineering courses online. You will get the best course at an affordable cost. CLICK HERE

[practically-an-x-man]

what does a typical day for Jasper and Kyle look like? :)

Oooh thank you!! So there's kinda three stages to this, based on where they are in their lives, so I'm going to answer this in three parts

(under the cut cause it got a little longer than expected)

College Era: Jasper's up at seven, either off to classes or racking up their nursing service hours. Kyle wakes up a little later, since he didn't schedule any 8 AM classes, and goes off to his own classes for the day. If Jasper's busy with nursing, he'll usually swing by to bring them a quick lunch, since they don't always get a break to grab their own. After classes, they'll usually meet up and study together in one of their dorm rooms (even if they're working on completely different subjects and are listening to music, it's nice to have that parallel play). On Tuesday nights, Jasper has their roller derby bouts, and Kyle is almost always there to cheer them on. On other nights they'll grab dinner (either together, or with their respective friend groups) and hang out in the evenings for a little while. Sometimes they're too busy to spend a lot of time together, but they try to meet up most days if they can (even if it's just meeting up for a meal or playing Minecraft together for an hour)

With the Witches: Much simpler. Jasper is now focused on finishing up their nursing degree and getting the rest of that clinic experience, and Kyle's main focus is on recovery (died and came back, it's a process). His days are mainly spent relearning speech and coordination, plus other tasks, until Jasper gets back. They're usually both tired by that point, and most days will lay down together for a nap once Jasper gets home. Jasper sometimes goes out with their friends in the evenings, but mostly spends time at the coven house since Kyle isn't comfortable leaving yet and they don't want him to feel alone. Jasper still has bouts on Tuesdays, though it takes Kyle a while to get confident enough to go attend them again.

Post-Witches: Jasper and Kyle have their own place, and Jasper has finished their degree. They're up early to head to the clinic, though Kyle gets in the habit of setting an earlier alarm so they have a few minutes to cuddle before Jasper has to leave. Kyle works from home (first finishing his civil engineering degree online and then doing remote engineering work) and takes care of their pets. When Jasper gets home, they hop in the shower and get comfy. The two of them cook dinner together (or occasionally go out, though money's a little tight), then either watch some TV or keep working on their Minecraft world. It's definitely the most settled, comfortable stage of their life. Jasper has since joined a different derby league since they're no longer in college, but they're still active in roller derby. Kyle's bounced around with hobbies, trying to get himself comfortable with leaving the house and finding a friend group again, and eventually finds a strength training group and a DnD campaign to participate in.

(The Minecraft thing started off of a silly prompt a friend gave me, but honestly I can really see them having a longtime survival world together that's just all tricked-out with elaborate builds bc of how long they've at it.)

[faaun]

i want to be a machine learning engineer but some of u guys r making it embarrassing actually. long but IMO important explanation below. We have bigger issues to deal w and better things to focus on.

like our planet is dying and the commercialisation of massive AI models and training the models themselves releases like hundreds of thousands of tonnes of carbon emissions. and this includes very "nonessential" models that don't tend to contribute much to society (re: new fancy image generation toy). but u have decided your new career path is "AI artist" (glorified prompt-writer?) .

and just as bad, some of you have decided the biggest issue w AI is those people, the glorified prompt writers!! you draw more attention to it instead of focusing on the real problems behind AI and the ethics of training models! about the harm it causes to the planet, about web-scraping limitations basically not existing (stolen art falls under this domain), copyright laws to do with AI, the way facial recognition deals with race, about the boundaries between letting AI learn and develop in an "unbiased" way vs preventing sociopolitical damage at the cost of (potentially) further progress.

conversely, there is nowhere NEAR enough focus about how AI can help us overcome some of our fundamental problems. i love machine learning bc i find it - specifically the maths behind it - fascinating and i believe one day it could help us make very cool advancements, as it already has. i think the mathematical architectures and processes behind creating new deep learning models are beautiful. i also know the damage capitalists will inevitably do - they always wield powerful, beautiful new tools as weapons.

AND HERE YOU ARE FALLING FOR IT! it's very frustrating to watch!! if you're angry on behalf of artists, i'm begging you to protect the rights of artists and be mad at greedy companies instead of villanising a tool that can help us immensely! learn about AI ethics, learn about how it is present in our lives, what we should try to stop, what we should promote.

if you "boycott AI" as a whole with no desire to gain more literacy on the topic other than "steals art therefore bad", you will have to be against your translate app, your search engine, your email spam filter, almost everything on your phone that categorises anything (i.e. pretty much all of your search functions), NPC enemies in games, your medical diagnostic tools, your phone's face unlock, your maps app, online banking, accessibility tools that help blind and deaf people, new advancements in genetic sequencing and protein folding and treating cancer and modelling new solutions in physics and so on and so on.

the issue isn't all AI as a whole. the issue is A) how companies are using it and B) how a lot of you guys are getting mad at the concept of AI instead of responding to A.

[lisapauldiary]

Dental Check-up in Barnet: A Comprehensive Guide to Finding the Best Dentist in Barnet

When it comes to maintaining your oral health, finding a reliable dentist is paramount. If you're in Barnet, you're in luck, as there are numerous dental professionals ready to provide you with top-notch care. In this blog post, we'll explore the importance of regular dental check-ups and guide you on how to find the best dentist in Barnet.

The Importance of Dental Check-ups

Regular dental check-ups are essential for maintaining good oral hygiene and preventing dental issues. Here are some compelling reasons why you should prioritize your dental health:

Early Detection of Problems Routine check-ups allow your dentist to identify dental issues in their early stages. Whether it's a small cavity or the initial signs of gum disease, catching problems early can prevent them from becoming more severe and costly to treat.

Preventing Tooth Decay Regular cleanings by a dentist can remove plaque and tartar buildup, reducing the risk of tooth decay and cavities. Your dentist will also offer guidance on proper brushing and flossing techniques to help you maintain a healthy smile.

Gum Disease Prevention Gum disease, if left untreated, can lead to tooth loss and other health problems. Your dentist will check for signs of gum disease during your check-up and provide advice on how to prevent it.

Oral Cancer Screening Oral cancer is a serious condition that can be life-threatening if not detected early. Dentists are trained to recognize the signs of oral cancer, and regular check-ups include screenings to ensure early detection and prompt treatment.

Maintaining Overall Health Believe it or not, your oral health is closely connected to your overall health. Poor oral hygiene has been linked to various health issues, including heart disease and diabetes. Regular dental check-ups can help you maintain not only a beautiful smile but also your overall well-being.

Finding the Best Dentist in Barnet

Now that you understand the importance of regular dental check-ups, let's explore how to find the best dentist in Barnet who can provide you with exceptional care.

Ask for Recommendations Start your search by asking friends, family, and colleagues for recommendations. Personal referrals can be invaluable in finding a dentist you can trust. Ask about their experiences and whether they were satisfied with the services they received from their Barnet dentist.

Online Reviews and Ratings In today's digital age, it's easy to find information online. Search for "Dentist in Barnet" on search engines or review platforms like Google and Yelp. Read through patient reviews and ratings to get an idea of the quality of care provided by different dental practices in Barnet.

Check Qualifications and Specializations Ensure that the dentist you choose is properly qualified and licensed. Look for certifications and memberships in professional dental associations. Some dentists may also specialize in specific areas such as cosmetic dentistry, orthodontics, or pediatric dentistry, so consider your specific needs when making your choice.

Location and Accessibility Consider the location and accessibility of the dental practice. Choose a dentist in Barnet who is conveniently located for you, whether it's close to your home or workplace. Accessibility is especially important if you have mobility issues or rely on public transportation.

Technology and Equipment Modern dental practices are equipped with the latest technology and equipment, which can enhance your dental experience and the quality of care you receive. Inquire about the dental technology used in the clinic and how it can benefit your treatment.

Insurance and Payment Options If you have dental insurance, check whether the dentist in Barnet you're considering accepts your insurance plan. Additionally, inquire about their payment options and whether they offer financing plans if you require extensive dental work.

Schedule a Consultation Once you've narrowed down your choices, schedule a consultation with your selected dentists. This will give you the opportunity to meet them in person, ask questions, and assess their communication skills and bedside manner. A good dentist should be approachable and willing to address your concerns.

Discuss Treatment Plans During your consultation, discuss your oral health goals and any specific concerns you have. A reputable dentist will create a personalized treatment plan tailored to your needs and preferences. They should also provide transparent information about the estimated costs and duration of treatments.

Emergency Services Find out if the dental practice offers emergency dental services. Dental emergencies can happen at any time, and it's reassuring to know that your dentist in Barnet is available to provide urgent care when needed.

Dentist in Barnet: Your Partner in Oral Health

Your dentist in Barnet is more than just a healthcare provider; they are your partner in maintaining optimal oral health. Regular check-ups and preventive care can help you enjoy a lifetime of healthy smiles. Don't delay in finding the right dentist for you, as early intervention and consistent care are key to preventing dental problems.

Remember, the best dentist in Barnet is one who understands your unique needs and concerns, uses the latest technology, and provides a comfortable and welcoming environment. By following the steps outlined in this guide, you can make an informed decision and ensure that your oral health is in capable hands.

In conclusion, prioritizing your dental health through regular check-ups is a wise choice. The key to a beautiful and healthy smile starts with finding the best dentist in Barnet who will partner with you in achieving and maintaining your oral health goals. Don't wait—take the first step towards a lifetime of confident smiles by scheduling your next dental check-up today. Your smile will thank you, and so will your overall well-being.

[your-resident-boat-person]

I got asked "You see a boat filled with people. It has not sunk, but when you look again you don’t see a single person on the boat. Why?" some riddle bs about people being married right?

If the boat is a military vessel, the protocol for taking cover during an attack that sastifes the condition of this prompt is the "General Quarters" (GQ) protocol,

let's assume it's a small patrol boat used by a coastal defense force

Our hypotyical boat is called "Sea Hawk," and its crew consists of ten sailors who are responsible for monitoring and protecting a stretch of coastline from potential threats right (edited)

During patrol, the crew of Sea Hawk detects a group of hostile vessels approaching their location in which case they can use GQ

From my online research GQ includes the following steps

]"1. All crew members take cover inside the boat's armored compartments or designated safe areas.

The boat's weapons systems are activated and manned by trained personnel.

The boat's engines are powered up and the boat is maneuvered to a defensive position.

The crew communicates with their base and nearby friendly vessels to coordinate a response.

The crew maintains radio silence to avoid giving away their position to the enemy."

So then]to the outside obsever. aka you]you look and see not a single person on the ship

because the crew of Sea Hawk took cover inside the ship to protect themselves from potential attack right therefor the boat appears empty to an outside observer, as all crew members are hidden from view https://www.imo.org/ source You're also a boat enjoyer thoughts on my answer?

My area of expertise is Ocean Liners. While they were used during war as Armed Merchant Cruisers, Troop Ships, and Hospital Ships, I can't really speak with authority on non-ocean liners.

I've seen this riddle before. While your answer definitely isn't the answer they were looking for, it does seem to meet the criteria the riddle sets out.