#Medical Expert Witness Services | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

super-emilyjones · 3 months ago

Text

Understanding the Role of a Trauma Expert Witness in Legal Proceedings

The legal field often encounters cases where trauma is central to the dispute, necessitating the involvement of a trauma expert witness. These professionals play a crucial role in interpreting the complex medical and psychological aspects of trauma, thereby assisting the court in understanding the nuances involved. This article delves into the role, responsibilities, and significance of trauma expert witnesses, particularly in the context of legal proceedings. We will also explore the role of nursing expert witnesses and the comprehensive services provided by medical expert witnesses, including those offered by Clinical Witness Reports.

The Importance of Trauma Expert Witnesses in Legal Cases

Trauma expert witnesses are vital in legal cases where understanding the nature and impact of trauma is essential. Their expertise helps clarify whether the trauma experienced by an individual is consistent with the claims being made, thereby influencing the outcome of the case.

Defining a Trauma Expert Witness

A trauma expert witness is a professional with extensive knowledge in medical fields related to trauma, such as orthopaedics, psychology, or emergency medicine. Their role is to provide impartial, evidence-based opinions on the nature, cause, and extent of injuries or psychological trauma that an individual has suffered.

Types of Cases Involving Trauma Expert Witnesses

Trauma expert witnesses are commonly involved in a variety of legal cases, including personal injury claims, medical negligence suits, and criminal cases. In each of these scenarios, their testimony can provide the critical evidence needed to support or refute claims of trauma.

Qualifications and Expertise Required for a Trauma Expert Witness

To serve as a trauma expert witness, one must possess a high level of education and experience in relevant medical fields. This typically includes advanced degrees and extensive clinical experience in trauma-related disciplines, ensuring that the expert can provide reliable and authoritative testimony.

The Role and Responsibilities of a Trauma Expert Witness

The role of a trauma expert witness extends beyond simply offering testimony in court. These professionals are also involved in the thorough analysis and preparation of cases, ensuring that all aspects of the trauma are adequately understood and represented.

Providing Objective Analysis and Testimony

One of the primary responsibilities of a trauma expert witness is to offer an objective analysis of the trauma in question. This includes reviewing medical records, conducting examinations, and providing a detailed report that explains the nature and impact of the trauma.

Assisting in Case Preparation and Strategy

Trauma expert witnesses often work closely with legal teams to prepare the case. Their insights can shape the legal strategy, ensuring that the arguments presented in court are supported by solid medical evidence.

Collaborating with Legal Teams

Effective collaboration between trauma expert witnesses and legal teams is crucial for the success of a case. This partnership ensures that the medical aspects of the trauma are accurately presented and understood by the court.

Trauma Expert Witness Services

Trauma expert witness services encompass a range of activities, all aimed at providing a comprehensive understanding of the trauma involved in a case. These services are essential for ensuring that the court receives a clear and accurate picture of the injuries or psychological effects in question.

Evaluating Physical and Psychological Trauma

Trauma expert witnesses are tasked with evaluating both the physical and psychological aspects of trauma. This evaluation is crucial in cases where the extent of the trauma is disputed, as it provides an objective basis for the court's decisions.

Expert Testimony in Court

Providing expert testimony in court is one of the most critical roles of a trauma expert witness. Their ability to clearly and convincingly present their findings can have a significant impact on the outcome of the case.

The Role of a Medical Expert Witness in Trauma Cases

A medical expert witness plays a complementary role in trauma cases, providing additional insights into the medical aspects of the trauma. Their expertise can further strengthen the case, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the injuries or psychological effects involved.

The Critical Role of Nursing Expert Witnesses in Trauma Cases

Nursing expert witnesses also play a significant role in trauma cases. Their expertise in patient care and medical procedures offers valuable perspectives that can influence the outcome of the case.

Nurse Expert Witnesses in Trauma Cases

Nurse expert witnesses bring a unique perspective to trauma cases, offering insights into the standard of care provided and whether it met the required medical standards. Their testimony can be crucial in determining the validity of claims related to medical negligence or malpractice.

The Expertise of Nursing Experts in Understanding Trauma

Nursing experts have a deep understanding of the care and treatment of trauma patients. This expertise allows them to provide informed opinions on whether the care provided was appropriate and whether it contributed to the patient's recovery or exacerbation of the injury.

How Nurse Expert Witnesses Complement Trauma Expert Testimony

The testimony of nurse expert witnesses often complements that of trauma experts, offering a broader perspective on the case. Together, they provide a comprehensive understanding of the trauma and its effects, ensuring that all aspects of the case are thoroughly examined.

Choosing the Right Trauma Expert Witness

Selecting the right trauma expert witness is crucial for the success of a legal case. This decision should be based on the expert's credentials, experience, and ability to communicate effectively in court.

Evaluating Credentials and Experience

When choosing a trauma expert witness, it is essential to evaluate their credentials and experience. This includes reviewing their education, professional background, and previous experience as an expert witness in similar cases.

The Importance of Specialisation in Trauma

Specialisation in trauma is another critical factor to consider. A trauma expert with specialised knowledge in a relevant area, such as orthopaedic surgery or psychology, will be better equipped to provide accurate and reliable testimony.

The Role of Communication Skills in Effective Testimony

Effective communication is key to delivering compelling testimony in court. The ability to explain complex medical concepts in a clear and understandable manner is essential for a trauma expert witness, as it ensures that the court can fully grasp the implications of the trauma involved.

The Impact of Trauma Expert Witnesses on Case Outcomes

The involvement of a trauma expert witness can significantly influence the outcome of a case. Their testimony can sway the jury's opinion, strengthen the validity of the case, and ultimately determine the verdict.

Influencing Jury Decisions

Trauma expert witnesses can have a profound impact on jury decisions. Their ability to present a clear and objective analysis of the trauma can help the jury understand the severity and implications of the injuries, thereby influencing their final decision.

Strengthening Case Validity with Expert Testimony

Expert testimony from a trauma expert witness can also strengthen the overall validity of a case. By providing credible and authoritative insights, the expert can help establish the legitimacy of the claims being made, increasing the chances of a favourable outcome.

Case Studies Involving Trauma Expert Witnesses

Several case studies highlight the critical role that trauma expert witnesses play in legal proceedings. These examples demonstrate how expert testimony can be pivotal in securing justice for victims of trauma.

How Clinical Witness Reports Can Support Your Case

At Clinical Witness Reports, we offer comprehensive trauma expert witness services designed to support your case. Our team of highly qualified experts is dedicated to providing objective and reliable testimony that can significantly impact the outcome of your legal proceedings.

Our Expertise in Trauma Cases

Our experts at Clinical Witness Reports possess extensive experience in handling trauma cases. We understand the complexities involved and are committed to providing the highest level of service to our clients.

Comprehensive Medical Expert Witness Services

In addition to trauma expert witnesses, we offer a range of medical expert witness services. Our multidisciplinary team includes specialists in various fields, ensuring that we can provide comprehensive support for your case.

Why Choose Clinical Witness Reports?

Choosing Clinical Witness Reports means selecting a team of professionals dedicated to excellence. Our commitment to providing accurate, reliable, and objective testimony sets us apart as a leading provider of expert witness services in the field of trauma and beyond.

#Medical Expert Witness Services

0 notes

thirdopinionmd · 3 months ago

Text

Mistakes to Avoid in Expert Witness Testimony

Expert witness play a critical role in legal proceedings, offering specialized knowledge that can significantly influence the outcome of a case. However, even the most knowledgeable experts can make mistakes that undermine their credibility and the effectiveness of their testimony. Here are the top mistakes to avoid in expert witness testimony to ensure your contribution strengthens, rather than weakens, the case.

1. Lack of Preparation

One of the most common mistakes expert witnesses make is failing to prepare adequately. This includes not familiarizing themselves with the specifics of the case, the evidence, and the legal questions at issue. Preparation should involve a thorough review of all case materials, understanding the attorney’s strategy, and anticipating potential lines of cross-examination. A well-prepared expert will be able to answer questions confidently and provide testimony that is consistent and reliable.

2. Overstating Qualifications or Expertise

Another critical error is overstating one's qualifications or expertise. In the digital age, it is relatively easy for opposing counsel to verify an expert's background, credentials, and prior testimony. Any exaggeration or misrepresentation can be quickly exposed, leading to a loss of credibility not only in the current case but also in future opportunities. Experts should provide accurate and truthful descriptions of their qualifications and areas of expertise, maintaining integrity and professionalism at all times.

3. Straying Outside the Scope of Expertise

An expert witness should only provide opinions and testimony within their specific area of expertise. Venturing into topics or offering opinions that fall outside their knowledge base can lead to damaging cross-examinations. This mistake can make the expert appear unreliable or overly eager to help one side, thus compromising their impartiality. It’s essential for experts to recognize the boundaries of their expertise and to stick to their area of knowledge.

4. Failure to Communicate Clearly

Complex jargon and technical language may be second nature to an expert, but such language can alienate jurors and judges who are not familiar with the subject matter. An effective expert witness must be able to explain complex concepts in a way that is understandable to a layperson. The goal is to educate the court without talking down to the audience. Clarity and simplicity are key to ensuring that the testimony is not only credible but also persuasive.

5. Appearing Biased or Unprofessional

An expert witness’s credibility can be severely undermined if they appear to be biased towards the party that hired them. Signs of bias can include overly aggressive support for one side, dismissing opposing views without proper consideration, or demonstrating a lack of objectivity. Experts should strive to remain neutral and focus on the facts, ensuring their testimony is based on their professional opinion rather than advocacy. Additionally, maintaining professionalism in demeanor and behavior is crucial. This includes dressing appropriately, being respectful during questioning, and avoiding confrontational attitudes.

6. Getting Trapped in Cross-Examination

Cross-examination is designed to test the credibility and reliability of an expert witness. A common mistake is becoming defensive or argumentative when challenged. Experts should remain calm, composed, and answer questions directly without volunteering additional information that could open up new lines of attack. It's essential to listen carefully to each question, answer only what is asked, and avoid speculation.

7. Inconsistencies in Testimony

Inconsistencies in an expert’s testimony, whether during the current case or in comparison to past cases, can seriously undermine credibility. It is vital for experts to remain consistent in their opinions and the methodologies they use. Prior to testimony, reviewing past depositions, reports, and published materials is important to ensure that all statements align.

Conclusion

Avoiding these common mistakes is essential for expert witnesses who want to be effective and maintain their professional reputation. By being well-prepared, honest, clear, and unbiased, experts can provide testimony that strengthens the case and aids the court in making informed decisions. Proper preparation and professionalism are key to successful expert witness testimony.

#expert witness services #medical witness expert

1 note · View note

medibyteslegal · 9 months ago

Text

Medibytes Legal provides Independent Medico-Legal Services with a difference. We are efficient and take swift action on your case, minimising time from assessment to report so that you can act upon the opinion you receive in a timely and considered way.

We empower your decisions by providing medical experts who understand the industry and are experienced in the art of moving a case forward with robust, evidence based opinions.

Our specialists conduct Independent medical examinations and provide evidence based reports on the following types of cases:

Workers Compensation

Personal Injury

Public Liability

Institutional Abuse

CTP

Income Protection

TPD

Fitness for Duty

Superannuation Claims

We provide a quick report turnaround of between 4-10 business days.

1 note · View note

trifectalegalnurse · 1 year ago

Text

Trifecta Legal Nurse: Expert Witness & IME Services for Criminal Defense Litigation

Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting specializes in comprehensive case development and criminal defense litigation support, including expert witness location service and independent medical examination (IME) coordination. We understand the critical importance of thorough discovery and court preparation. In the realm of criminal defense, attention to detail is paramount. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting is your partner in ensuring nothing is overlooked. We offer expert witness location services to connect you with the most qualified professionals for your case, and our IMEs adhere to the highest standards of impartiality. Our commitment extends to meticulous discovery and court preparation, laying a solid foundation for your defense strategy. We handle all the intricate details, leaving you free to focus on delivering a compelling defense in the courtroom. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting's comprehensive approach guarantees you have the advantage needed to secure the best possible outcome for your clients. Trust us to support your criminal defense litigation from start to finish.

#COMPREHENSIVE CASE DEVELOPMENT #CRIMINAL DEFENSE LITIGATION #EXPERT WITNESS LOCATION SERVICE #INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION (IME)#Discovery and Court Preparation

0 notes

the-garbanzo-annex-jr · 2 months ago

Text

by Phyllis Chesler

Finally, Pierre Rehov’s Pogrom(s): Could America Be Next? will appear on Oct. 7, on major platforms such as Apple TV, Google Plus, Amazon Prime and Tubi TV.

Rehov’s Pogrom(s), is something of a masterpiece. The footage is extraordinary, as is the music and cinematography. The interviews are poignant, such as the one with Yossi Landau of Zaka, with expert insights from people like Mordechai Kedar (an expert on Islamist groups), Nitsana Darshan Leitner (president of Sherut HaDin), Michael Milstein (head of the Palestinian Studies Forum at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University) and others.

Rehov also includes an on-camera interview with Yuval Bitton, the former head of intelligence for the Israeli Prison Service. Bitton got to know Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar very well when he was incarcerated and helped save Sinwar’s life. To our credit but also our detriment, this is what Jews do. We save lives.

Rehov’s footage confirms how well Palestinian terrorists, even those with blood on their hands, are treated in Israeli jails. They are well-fed, decently housed, allowed to join each other for prayer five times a day, allowed to have visitors and mail, and are given medical and dental care. This footage makes me a little crazy as I think about how Hamas treats its prisoners, aka our precious hostages.

Pogrom(s) captures the historical hatred and violence against Jews by pagans, Christians and Muslims, which places Oct. 7 in “context.” He reminds us that Muslims were the first to order Jews to wear a yellow patch, and many centuries later, the Nazis followed suit. In the film’s vast sweep of history, Rehov also includes the Turkish Muslim genocide of the Armenians (something that the Turks still refuse to acknowledge); the collaboration of Arabs with Nazis during the Shoah; and the well-funded disinformation campaign about this very history in secular Western universities and in mosques, churches and even in certain synagogues and Jewish organizations for Palestine.

Rehov’s family had lived in Algeria for 500 years. Still, he heard about, witnessed and endured Muslim terrorist attacks, farhuds against native Algerians, French-born Algerians and Algerian Jews. He lost many relatives in one such Muslim pogrom and, in 1961, together with 250,000 other Jews, Rehov was exiled from his birthplace. He fled to France, where he was met with anti-Algerian and anti-Jewish hatred and was cursed as a “dirty Jew.” Rehov eventually left France, came to the United States and then moved to Israel.

#pierre rohov #pogroms #phyllis chesler

22 notes · View notes

coochiequeens · 5 months ago

Text

A man who got where he is, careerwise and having a family by transitioning later in life, wants to take that way from minors.

Image: WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 21: (L-R) Jesse M. Ehrenfeld, MD, MPH, President of the American Medical Association; Admiral Rachel L. Levine, MD, the 17th Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH) for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; and Charlotte Clymer, writer, transgender activist, and military veteran speak on stage during Learning With Love: The 2023 PFLAG National Convention, four days of educating, lobbying, networking, and leading with love, taking place October 19-22, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Paul Morigi/Getty Images for PFLAG National)

A head-on collision between science and politics

By JESSE SINGAL JUN 25, 2024

When the World Professional Association for Transgender Health’s Standards of Care Version 8 was released in September 2022, a very strange thing happened: WPATH removed references to minimum age requirements for various medical interventions, describing the change as a “correction” in a notice that now reads, weirdly: “This correction notice has been removed as it referred to a previous version of the article, which was published in error.” Whatever happened, exactly, it’s clear that until late in the game the document did have age minimums until, suddenly, it did not.

The SoC 8 was supposed to have been created via something called the Delphi process. As the document itself explains: “Consensus on the final recommendations was attained using the Delphi process that included all members of the guidelines committee and required that recommendation statements were approved by at least 75% of members.” Suffice it to say that making a sudden, major change so late in the game calls into question whether that process was fully adhered to.

Thanks to a rather remarkable document just unsealed as part of Boe v. Marshall, one of the many American lawsuits over youth gender medicine, we now have a potential explanation for why the age guidelines were removed: direct pressure from assistant secretary for health of the Department of Health and Human Services Admiral Rachel Levine (who is a trans woman herself) and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The document is titled “Appendix A To Supplemental Expert Report Of James Cantor, Ph.D. In it Cantor, a Canadian sex researcher, critic of youth gender medicine, and frequent expert witness on behalf of those attempting to ban or or restrict it (including in this case), claims that “Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Rachel Levine strongly pressured WPATH leadership to rush the development and issuance of SOC-8, in order to assist with Administration political strategy.”

He backs this claim up with the following internal communications from WPATH members involved with the creation of the SoC 8 (here and elsewhere in the document, the names of the people who wrote the words in question are redacted):

I have just spoken to Admiral Levine today, who—as always is extremelysupportive of the SOC 8, but also very eager for its release—so to ensureintegration in the US health policies of the Biden government. So, let’s crack onwith the job!!!

I am meeting with Rachel Levine and her team next week, as the US Department of Health is very keen to bring the trans health agenda forward.

The failure of WPATH to be ready with SOC 8 is proving a barrier to optimal policy progress and she [Dr. Levine] was eager to learn when SOC 8 might be published.

[T]his should be taken as a charge from the United States government to do what is required to complete the project immediately.

More worryingly, Cantor charges that “Assistant Secretary Levine also attempted to and did influence the substantive content of SOC-8, based on political goals rather than science. Specifically, Assistant Secretary Levine, though [sic] a staff member, pressured WPATH to remove recommended minimum ages for medical transition treatments from SOC-8.”

Here, too, he has evidence from anonymized emails written by those involved in the SoC 8:

Sarah Boateng, who is Adm. Levine’s chief of staff [said the] biggest concern is the section below in the Adolescent Chapter that lists specific minimum ages for treatment, she is confident, based on the rhetoric she is hearing in DC, and from what we have already seen, that these specific listings of ages, under 18, will result in devastating legislation for trans care. She wonders if the specific ages can be taken out and perhaps an adjunct document could be created that is published or distributed in a way that is less visible than the SOC8, is the way to go.

The issue of ages and treatment has been quite controversial (mainly for surgery) and it has come up again. We sent the document to Admiral Levine. . . She like [sic] the SOC-8 very much but she was very concerned that having ages (mainly for surgery) will affect access to health care for trans youth and maybe adults too. Apparently the situation in the USA is terrible and she and the Biden administration worried that having ages in the document will make matters worse. She asked us to remove them. We have the WPATH executive committee in this meeting and we explained to her that we could not just remove them at this stage.

[W]e heard your [Dr. Levine’s] comments regarding the minimal age criteria for transgender healthcare adolescents; the potential negative outcome of these minimal ages as recommendations in the US [. . . ] Consequently, we have changes to the SOC 8 in this respect. Given that the recommendations for minimal ages for the various gender affirming medical and surgical intervention are consensus-based, we could not remove them from the document. Therefore, we have made changes as to how the minimal ages are presented in the documents. [Note: “your” may well refer to an aide of Levine’s rather than the Secretary herself, though it’s unclear.]

Cantor also includes emails from SoC 8 contributors expressing surprise at the sudden change, including this one making. . . well, the same point everyone else made after news of the late-stage “correction” broke:

I don’t see how we can simply remove something that important from the document—without going through a Delphi—at this final stage of the game [. . . ] I realize that those in favor of the bans are going to go right to the age criteria and ignore the fact that we actually strengthened the strictness of the criteria to help clinicians better discern appropriate surgical candidates from those who are inappropriate [. . . ] It’s all about messaging and marketing.

I’m actually crashing on a different but related freelance story at the moment. Check out Leor Sapir’s Twitter timeline for more details about this and another just-unsealed document. Next week, when I’ve caught my breath, I’ll write a little bit more about this as well as yet another damning claim Cantor makes, that the American Academy of Pediatrics “issued an ultimatum to WPATH: Should WPATH not delete the age minimums, AAP would not only withhold endorsement of SOC-8, but would publicly oppose the document.”

But I wanted to at least get this short piece up, because the Levine angle is important and alarming. It demonstrates an indisputable conflict between how WPATH has portrayed the SoC 8 — as a document steeped in evidence and careful deliberation on the part of experts — and how the guidelines were actually formulated.

#World Professional Association for Transgender Health #Removing minimum age from a Standards of Care 8 #Boe v. Marshall #Department of Health and Human Services #Admiral Rachel Levine #Appendix A To Supplemental Expert Report Of James Cantor Ph.D.#Stop transing kids

12 notes · View notes

pandasmagorica · 2 months ago

Text

4 Minutes questions

And my attempts at answers. Corrections welcome.

This series is keeping me up late lol. I will probably have more posts in the days to come.

Some of these were inspired by @waitmyturtles rant about the 4 Minutes series ending. While I don't agree with her - I didn't see anything to make me not love the series - her post is well worth reading and raised a number of points I hadn't considered.

Why was Manee in the tunnel?

Believe me, I would love to know. But Great's 4 minute dream could be correct. I still wouldn't rule out punishment for an unpaid debt.

Was it realistic that Great and Tyme survived being shot at close range (and Tonkla didn't)?

The Wikipedia page on gunshot wounds states that surviving a gunshot wound, even to one's trunk, is common nowadays due to medical advances.

As for the closeness issue, I'm no expert. I seem to recall reading that at some point in its trajectory, a bullet starts tumbling. This might imply that a bullet fired at close range might do less damage than one fired from further away.

But again, I'm not an expert, and in particular, I'm not familiar with the gun used and the bullets it might take.

The easy answer for why Great and Tyme survived and Tonkla didn't was people arrived in time is that Great and Tyme are considered redeemable in the context and Tonkla is considered irredeemable. But in the context of real world medicine and physics it might just be that Tonkla's bullet hit a vital organ and Great and Tyme's bullets didn't, or that Tonkla was shot from far enough away for the bullet to start tumbling, or that he simply did not subsequently receive medical care. Given that he is shown as dead and four minuting, I'd guess Win hit a vital organ.

Given that Sammon is a medical doctor, she might well know what the likely outcome is for bullet injuries and be able to take that into account when writing the script. But there could also be some artistic license at play. We'll have to wait for Dr. Sammon to share.

What about Den discovering Tyme so quickly?

See the previous answer. What the internal injuries were would affect how long Tyme would have before he went into the 4 minutes. I don't recall seeing what time it was when Warit called Tyme, so I don't know how much time passed between the shot and 11:00:00.

But mobile phones these days allow you to share location. Actually, the thing that I had the most trouble believing is that they couldn't track Tonkla down by his phone. Even if he had location blocked, it's still available to emergency services and they can at least get the general location from the cell towers.

I'm guessing Tyme did something with his phone between the first shot and the final one, when they were interrupted. But it would have been nice to see it.

Why the scene of Great walking away from Lukwa's heart attack?

We know from the hit and run and Title's murder of Dome that pre four minutes Great is cowardly. But sticking around for Lukwa would not have required any courage. Nobody would have blamed him for Lukwa's heart attack.

It shows Great as not just cowardly but callous. He's even worse than we thought at the start of the show. So his reform is even greater.

But we also get another piece of the puzzle as to how the four minutes world works, specifically as to how one might escape the four minutes world without dying.

Remember Lukwa said that she heard her boyfriend call her name. But the man on the stairs above her wasn't calling her name. So he probably wasn't her boyfriend. She heard her boyfriend calling her name without her boyfriend actually being there.

So, Tyme didn't have to be there for Great to hear Tyme calling Great's name.

It's an open question as to whether Lukwa's boyfriend sensed a disturbance in the force, I mean, sensed that Lukwa was in trouble and called out to her the way Tyme called out to Great from his 4 minutes.

As a side note, I don't think Lukwa is aware that Great was a witness to her heart attack and simply walked away. That would explain her not being angry when she recognized him.

What about Tyme's apology on Great's coffee cup?

If Great's episode 1-5 visions occurred entirely within the four minutes from his flatline, then Tyme's actual apology does not line up with Great seeing the apology on the coffee cup post-it note, since Tyme was busy having his own four minute visions at the time.

So, Great probably heard Tyme while Great was in the coma but heart beating stage, but remembered it in the four minute stage. Not simultaneous.

What about the psych at the end?

Before the watch showed 11:05, it showed 11:04:15, at least according to the position of the minute hand, I didn't notice the second hand, so it was already revealing that they were beyond the four minutes. Of course that's assuming they went out exactly at 11:00:00, which is implied but not a given. But 11:05 is clearly in the reality zone.

Has Great been redeemed?

Great has a long way to go to be fully redeemed. He needs to come out about the hit and run. Of course the police already know about it since they covered it up. But he could go public about it.

He might apologize to Lukwa. It's odd we didn't see that redo during Great's four minuting as he redid much lesser offenses. But that's probably a matter of how Dr. Sammon.

As for his outing of the minister, my take was Great and his accomplice (Tyme?) outed him to the press, not the police, and that it would have involved too much loss of face to the police to not arrest the minister. It's also possible the minister was on somebody's shit list, although that's a stretch.

What about Tyme's revenge on Warit?

It was pretty creepy.

Again, Dr. Sammon would know how effective Tyme's action would be in permanently disabling Warit.

But was it ethical. No.

I'm wondering whether people who love or were opposed to Tonkla's revenging are consistent with their take on Tyme's revenging. I'm not going to track anyone down, just saying. I'll have to out myself as being less fond of Tonkla's than of Tyme's. Particularly since Tonkla got a relatively innocent bystander - again this depends on how much agency you believe Great had in Title's killing of Dome and subsequent disposal of the body and cover up - I believe Great had none.

Still, it would have been kinder of Tyme to have just outright killed Warit rather than giving him survivable brain damage. Riskier for discovery, but kinder.

I'm thinking back on a queer film from many years ago - I forget the title, maybe @benigyo knows - about a sexually abused kid getting revenge on his abuser many years later by having sex with him in his open iron lung while the abuser was gasping for air. I don't remember whether the abuser lived or died.

Are Tyme and Great happy ever after?

It's uncertain. Great probably will get off light for being the accessory to Dome's killing, but might still have to do time, especially if he's not using his family's money to pay for legal rep. If I was that minister I might be out for revenge. Same with Warit's family - Fasai could be quite dangerous. Let's call them happy for now.

If we accept the 4 Minutes visions are a natural part of life, were there any fantastic elements in the series?

Yes.

Great and Tyme beginning their 4 minutes simultaneously.

Great and Tyme coming out of their 4 minutes simultaneosly (implied, not seen).

Great hearing Tyme calling to him in the 4 minutes (implied, not seen).

That's more than enough for tonight. I need to get to bed.

#yaoi #pandasmagorica #thai ql #thai bl #4 minutes #4 minutes meta #spoilers

12 notes · View notes

religion-is-a-mental-illness · 5 months ago

Text

By: Jesse Singal

Published: Jun 25, 2024

The document is titled “Appendix A To Supplemental Expert Report Of James Cantor, Ph.D. In it Cantor, a Canadian sex researcher, critic of youth gender medicine, and frequent expert witness on behalf of those attempting to ban or restrict it (including in this case), claims that “Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Rachel Levine strongly pressured WPATH leadership to rush the development and issuance of SOC-8, in order to assist with Administration political strategy.”

I have just spoken to Admiral Levine today, who—as always is extremely supportive of the SOC 8, but also very eager for its release—so to ensure integration in the US health policies of the Biden government. So, let’s crack on with the job!!!

I am meeting with Rachel Levine and her team next week, as the US Department of Health is very keen to bring the trans health agenda forward.

The failure of WPATH to be ready with SOC 8 is proving a barrier to optimal policy progress and she [Dr. Levine] was eager to learn when SOC 8 might be published.

[T]his should be taken as a charge from the United States government to do what is required to complete the project immediately.

Here, too, he has evidence from anonymized emails written by those involved in the SoC 8:

This is rather remarkable political interference in what WPATH have pretended is both appropriate and evidence-based.

#Jesse Singal #World Professional Association for Transgender Health #WPATH #Rachel Levine #Admiral Rachel Levine #standards of care #gender affirming care #gender affirming healthcare #medical corruption #medical malpractice #medical scandal #age limits #minimum age #religion is a mental illness

7 notes · View notes

jackoshadows · 2 years ago

Text

@nogoodsheepstealing-greatgrandma

I didn’t want to derail or hijack your Dany post, so decided to make a separate post to what I think is an interesting discussion.

As I have mentioned in some of my earlier posts, I find Sansa to be a confusing mess mainly because the character herself does not introspect, does not think, does not connect dots, does not proactively try to figure things out.

Which is why it’s doubly frustrating that the same hypocrites who are critiquing Daenerys and Jon for their leadership will write praises of Sansa’s intelligence and political acumen when she is the least political of her peers and hardly ever engages in critical thinking.

And honestly, there’s only so much that age can be used as an excuse considering these are characters in a fantasy world where a 10 year old has been elected Lord Commander, teenagers rule as Kings and Queens and marry young. Dany and Jon have decided that they want to be leaders and so I judge them based on their actions and, despite their age, they have done a far better job than the likes of Cersei, Jaime, Robert, Ned, Cat etc. IMO.

One of the opinions I very much disagree with is the notion that Ned’s warning to Sansa or what Maester Coleman tells Sansa is vague and not understandable when, for me as reader, they come across as pretty succinct and clear in their intention. There’s also the fact that these warnings do not happen in a vacuum, there is always context for a character to put 2 and 2 together to come up with 4.

Here's Ned telling Sansa that it's dangerous for the Starks in KL

Father’s mouth twitched strangely. “Sansa, I’m not sending you away for fighting, though the gods know I’m sick of you two squabbling. I want you back in Winterfell for your own safety. Three of my men were cut down like dogs not a league from where we sit, and what does Robert do? He goes hunting.”

“Sweet one,” her father said gently, “listen to me. When you’re old enough, I will make you a match with a high lord who’s worthy of you, someone brave and gentle and strong. This match with Joffrey was a terrible mistake. That boy is no Prince Aemon, you must believe me.”

“I am looking for a fast trading galley to take you home. These days, the sea is safer than the kingsroad. You will sail as soon as I can find a proper ship, with Septa Mordane and a complement of guards … and yes, with Syrio Forel, if he agrees to enter my service. But say nothing of this. It’s better if no one knows of our plans. We’ll talk again tomorrow.” - Eddard, AGoT

To then add context to everything Ned tells her, Sansa herself is witness to Cersei ordering her beloved pet wolf dead, Joffrey's sadistic mauling of Mycah and knowing what Jaime did to Stark men. It's clear to me that it's not that Sansa did not understand Ned's warning about the Lannisters, it’s that she preferred to ignore it in favor of wanting to stay in KL, marry Joffrey and become queen because she imagined herself to be in love with him. It's ignorant self interest, where she deliberately refuses to see the bigger picture of what is happening around her despite knowing all the facts.

Let us take the SweetRobin situation in book 5. Keep in mind that the Maester here is Westeros' version of a physician. So this is a doctor - an expert in someone’s health - talking to Sansa. Surely Sansa should start with the presumption that this man knows more about a person’s health than either she or Littlefinger does, right? When I go to a doctor, I don’t have to be a medical expert in order to take the doctor’s advice right? And we don’t get any of Sansa’s thoughts on Coleman’s competence as a doctor.

When Jon Snow as Lord Commander implements Jeor Mormont’s defense strategy for rebuilding the Wall it’s because he trusts in Mormont’s experience and knowledge. As much as Jon was opposed to Bowen Marsh’s bigotry, he appreciated Marsh’s skillsets as a steward.

And while Maester Coleman is indeed incompetent and too scared of authority he does care about helping his patients. It’s a sad parallel that Coleman tried to save Jon Arryn in KL (from LF and Lysa’s poisoning ) and failed and now he will fail to save the son as well. Recall that Pycelle was of the opinion that Coleman could have saved Jon Arryn and that’s why he kicked him out of KL

Tyrion tsked at him. “I saw the tears of Lys among your potions. And you sent away Lord Arryn’s own maester and tended him yourself, so you could make certain that he died.”

“A falsehood! Yes,” he whimpered, “yes, Colemon was purging, so I sent him away. The queen needed Lord Arryn dead, she did not say so, could not, Varys was listening, always listening, but when I looked at her I knew. It was not me who gave him the poison, though, I swear it.”

The old man wept. “Varys will tell you, it was the boy, his squire, Hugh he was called, he must surely have done it, ask your sister, ask her” - Tyrion, ACoK

Coming back to Coleman and Sansa, from their conversation it's clear that Sansa ignores the doctor's warnings about SweetRobin's health because she trusts Littlefinger to know better that the politics of their situation is more important than SR's health. It’s a case of Sansa putting LF’s guidance and advice above the Maester’s.

Maester Colemon cares only for the boy, though. Father and I have larger concerns” - Alayne, AFfC

Now there can be an entire separate discussion on why Sansa is doing this given everything she knows about Petyr Baelish so far - Lysa’s confession about Jon Arryn’s death, LF being the last person she knows had Jeyne Poole, his role in the murder of Joffrey and framing Tyrion etc. Given that Sansa never introspects on all this we have to assume she is once again deliberately ignoring the truths right in front of her for whatever reason.

This is also why it’s mind boggling when this fandom takes away Arya’s critical thinking skills to prop Sansa up as the smart Stark. At 9, Arya is able to rightly guess that Cersei would harm Nymeria for what she did to Joffrey and drives her away.

Only she kept following, and finally we had to throw rocks. I hit her twice. She whined and looked at me and I felt so ’shamed, but it was right, wasn’t it? The queen would have killed her.” - Arya, AGoT

When Jaqen has Weese mauled by his dog, Arya is able to connect the dots and deduct that the supernatural is involved. Again, remember she is only 9/10 here.

She had been avoiding the Lorathi since Weese’s death. Chiswyck had been easy, anyone could push a man off the wallwalk, but Weese had raised that ugly spotted dog from a pup, and only some dark magic could have turned the animal against him. Yoren found Jaqen in a black cell, the same as Rorge and Biter, she remembered. Jaqen did something horrible and Yoren knew, that’s why he kept him in chains. If the Lorathi was a wizard, Rorge and Biter could be demons he called up from some hell, not men at all - Arya, ACoK

So is Sansa gleefully and maliciously having SR poisoned? No. Does Sansa care for SR's wellbeing here? Also no.

I write about how SR is most probably suffering from epileptic seizures in this post and the Maester's solution for this is to keep him as calm as possible. Excitement leads to shaking and seizures, which requires the Maester to dose the child with more SweetSleep, dangerous in the long term. For Sansa however, it is important that SweetRobin show up in front of the lords looking normal - even though the boy has a disabling condition.

So the doctor tells Sansa that to keep SR calm, he would dose him with the less dangerous milk of poppy. Sansa refuses because appearances are more important.

“Good. That is good.” His chain clinked softly as he bobbed his head, atop a ridiculously long and skinny neck. “This descent… my lady, it might be safest if I mixed his lordship some milk of the poppy. Mya Stone could lash him over the back of her most surefooted mule whilst he slumbered.” “The Lord of the Eyrie cannot descend from his mountain tied up like a sack of barleycorn.” Of that Alayne was certain. They dare not let the full extent of Robert’s frailty and cowardice become too widely known, her father had warned her. I wish he were here. He would know what to do. - Alayne, AFfC

No doubt the Maester is scared of LF (And is most probably going to be framed for SR's death by LF), and yet he perseveres to make Sansa understand that it's these feasts/events that's making SR have seizures requiring the sweetsleep.

“Give his lordship a cup of sweetmilk,” she told the maester. “That will stop him from shaking on the journey down.”

“He had a cup not three days past,” Colemon objected.

“And wanted another last night, which you refused him.”

“It was too soon. My lady, you do not understand. As I’ve told the Lord Protector, a pinch of sweetsleep will prevent the shaking, but it does not leave the flesh, and in time . . .”

“Time will not matter if his lordship has a shaking fit and falls off the mountain. If my father were here, I know he would tell you to keep Lord Robert calm at all costs.”

I try, my lady, yet his fits grow ever more violent, and his blood is so thin I dare not leech him any more. Sweetsleep… you are certain he was not bleeding from the nose? I must speak to the Lord Protector. This feast… is that wise, I wonder, after the strain of the descent? Lord Robert mislikes strangers, you know that, and there will be drinking, noise… music. Music frightens him”

“Lord Nestor will have no singers at the feast, only flutes and fiddles for the dancing.” What would she do when the music began to play? It was a vexing question, to which her heart and head gave different answers. Sansa loved to dance, but Alayne… “Just give him a cup of the sweetmilk before we go, and another at the feast, and there should be no trouble.” - Alayne, AFfC

Does the Maester explain the science behind how the drug works to Sansa? No. However, I think he makes it clear enough that the drug stays in the flesh and is dangerous to a person’s health.

And again, we know that Sansa understands what the Maester is telling her regarding the SweetSleep -

“Very well.” They paused at the foot of the stairs. “But this must be the last. For half a year, or longer.”

“You had best take that up with the Lord Protector.” Maester Colemon cares only for the boy, though. Father and I have larger concerns” - Alayne, AFfC

Then at the end of this same chapter, Littlefinger has a monologue where he tells her why they are doing what they are doing.

He turned her hand over and lightly kissed her wrist. “So tell me, sweetling—why is Harry the Heir?”

Her eyes widened. “He is not Lady Waynwood’s heir. He’s Robert’s heir. If Robert were to die . . .”

Petyr arched an eyebrow. “When Robert dies. Our poor brave Sweetrobin is such a sickly boy, it is only a matter of time. When Robert dies, Harry the Heir becomes Lord Harrold, Defender of the Vale and Lord of the Eyrie. Jon Arryn’s bannermen will never love me, nor our silly, shaking Robert, but they will love their Young Falcon . . . and when they come together for his wedding, and you come out with your long auburn hair, clad in a maiden’s cloak of white and grey with a direwolf emblazoned on the back . . . why, every knight in the Vale will pledge his sword to win you back your birthright. So those are your gifts from me, my sweet Sansa . . . Harry, the Eyrie, and Winterfell. - Alayne, AFfC

This then leads to the sample TWoW chapter where Sansa as Alayne flirts with Harry the Heir so that they can get married.

So if Sansa expects SweetRobin to live long enough to marry, then why is she seducing Harry for him to offer to marry her when that depends on SweetRobin’s death?!

Which is why the conversation between Robert and Sansa is all sorts of ridiculous because even a sickly little 8 year old SR knows that Harry’s importance in all this depends on his death, Littlefinger has explained to her very clearly that SweetRobin will die and yet Sansa is talking about how his future wife will like his hair?!

If SR is going to live long enough to marry, than why is Sansa trying to marry Harry?

“I hate that Harry,” Sweetrobin said when she was gone. “He calls me cousin, but he’s just waiting for me to die so he can take the Eyrie. He thinks I don’t know, but I do.”

“Your lordship should not believe such nonsense,” Alayne said. “I’m sure Ser Harrold loves you well.” And if the gods are good, he will love me too. Her tummy gave a little flutter.

“He doesn’t,” Lord Robert insisted. “He wants my father’s castle, that’s all, so he pretends.”

He does have pretty hair. If the gods are good and he lives long enough to wed, his wife will admire his hair, surely. That much she will love about him.- Alayne, TWoW

This is why context is important and the Maester’s conversation does not exist in a vacuum. LF has told Sansa that SR needs to die for their plan to work and WILL die, SweetRobin has told her that Harry is waiting for him to die to get the Vale and the Maester has warned her that giving SR high doses of the drug is dangerous. After all this, how is Sansa going to be surprised by his death? That would be like being surprised when told that 2+2=4.

Six books in and Sansa remains a character who continues to ignore the truths in front of her for selfish reasons. That’s been a consistent character trait for her, from book one to her first chapter in book 6.

So is Sansa actively colluding with LF’s gradual medical poisoning of her little cousin in order for Harry to become the Lord of the Vale? Surely, in the back of her mind she must be aware of what is happening? However, it’s an unpleasant truth, one she does not want to acknowledge and chooses to ignore because it’s more important for her that LF’s plans to get Winterfell for her succeeds.

Does she care for her little cousin’s well being? No. Despite the Maester repeatedly telling her that the drug is dangerous to his health, she thinks the politics are more important.

Remember in Sansa’s very first POV chapter with Arya and Mycah playing at the Trident and Joffrey showcases himself to be a sadistic ass?

Sansa was shrieking, “No, no, stop it, stop it, both of you, you’re spoiling it,” - Sansa I, AGoT

That’s her primary character trait. She is written as a character who does not want the unpleasant truths to spoil her personal narratives of Joffrey being a good person or Arya being responsible for Lady’s death or Cersei knowing better than her father or that SweetRobin is going to live long enough to marry a wife who will love his hair.

So we can either read Sansa as someone who is incredibly dense, who despite being presented with all the facts before her, still does not understand SweetRobin’s fate - when even 8 year old SweetRobin knows that Harry is just waiting for him to die. Or we can read her as someone who selfishly ignores the truth in front of her because it’s so unsavory and ‘spoils’ her idea of what she thinks is good and right and moral. In that, she knows that SR has to die and will die and yet keeps pretending that he’s going to be fine.

And both of these interpretations are in stark contrast with how Sansa is generally viewed in this fandom as being the smartest, most intelligent, most compassionate, idealistic ‘embodiment of hope’. She’s none of these things.

#Sansa Stark discussion

75 notes · View notes

gothhabiba · 2 years ago

Text

The discovery that general paresis was caused by a bacterial microorganism and could be cured with penicillin reinforced the view that biological causes and cures might be discovered for other mental disorders. The rapid and enthusiastic adoption of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), lobotomy, and insulin coma therapy in the 1930s and 1940s encouraged hopes that mental disorders could be cured with somatic therapies. Psychiatry's psychopharmacological revolution began in the 1950s, a decade that witnessed the serendipitous discovery of compounds that reduced the symptoms of psychosis, depression, mania, anxiety, and hyperactivity. Chemical imbalance theories of mental disorder soon followed (e.g., Schilkraudt, 1965; van Rossum, 1967), providing the scientific basis for psychiatric medications as possessing magic bullet qualities by targeting the presumed pathophysiology of mental disorder. Despite these promising developments, psychiatry found itself under attack from both internal and external forces. The field remained divided between biological psychiatrists and Freudians who rejected the biomedical model. Critics such as R. D. Laing (1960) and Thomas Szasz (1961) incited an “anti-psychiatry” movement that publicly threatened the profession's credibility. Oscar-winning film One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (Douglas & Zaentz, 1975) reinforced perceptions of psychiatric treatments as barbaric and ineffective.

In response to these threats to its status as a legitimate branch of scientific medicine, organized psychiatry embraced the biomedical model. [...] The publication of the DSM-III in 1980 was heralded by the APA as a monumental scientific achievement, although in truth the DSM-III's primary advancement was not enhanced validity but improved interrater reliability. Psychiatrist Gerald Klerman [...] remarked that the DSM-III “represents a reaffirmation on the part of American psychiatry to its medical identity and its commitment to scientific medicine” (p. 539, 1984). Shortly after publication of the DSM-III, the APA launched a marketing campaign to promote the biomedical model in the popular press (Whitaker, 2010a). Psychiatry benefitted from the perception that, like other medical disciplines, it too had its own valid diseases and effective disease-specific remedies. The APA established a division of publications and marketing, as well as its own press, and trained a nationwide roster of experts who could promote the biomedical model in the popular media (Sabshin, 1981, 1988). The APA held media conferences, placed public service spots on television and spokespersons on prominent television shows, and bestowed awards to journalists who penned favorable stories. Popular press articles began to describe a scientific revolution in psychiatry that held the promise of curing mental disorder. [...]

United by their mutual interests in promotion of the biomedical model and pharmacological treatment, psychiatry joined forces with the pharmaceutical industry. A policy change by the APA in 1980 allowed drug companies to sponsor “scientific” talks, for a fee, at its annual conference (Whitaker, 2010a). Within the span of several years, the organization's revenues had doubled, and the APA began working together with drug companies on medical education, media outreach, congressional lobbying, and other endeavors. Under the direction of biological psychiatrists from the APA, the NIMH took up the biomedical model mantle and began systematically directing grant funding toward biomedical research while withdrawing support for alternative approaches like Loren Mosher's promising community-based, primarily psychosocial treatment program for schizophrenia (Bola & Mosher, 2003). The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), a powerful patient advocacy group dedicated to reducing mental health stigma by blaming mental disorder on brain disease instead of poor parenting, forged close ties with the APA, NIMH, and the drug industry. Connected by their complementary motives for promoting the biomedical model, the APA, NIMH, NAMI, and the pharmaceutical industry helped solidify the “biologically-based brain disease” concept of mental disorder in American culture. Whitaker (2010a) described the situation thus:

In short, a powerful quartet of voices came together during the 1980s eager to inform the public that mental disorders were brain diseases. Pharmaceutical companies provided the financial muscle. The APA and psychiatrists at top medical schools conferred intellectual legitimacy upon the enterprise. The NIMH put the government's stamp of approval on the story. NAMI provided moral authority. This was a coalition that could convince American society of almost anything… (p. 280).

–Brett J. Deacon, "The biomedical model of mental disorder: A critical analysis of its validity, utility, and effects on psychotherapy research." Clinical Psychology Review 33 (2013), 846–861. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.007

#Brett J. Deacon #psychiatry #readings #chemical imbalance model #medical model

71 notes · View notes

homeshool · 21 days ago

Text

Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai By Dr. Ganesh Nagarajan

Finding the best care for cancer treatment can be overwhelming, but if you're looking for the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai, the Cancer Surgery Clinic offers top-notch services. Specializing in hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal cancers, the clinic provides cutting-edge treatments tailored to each patient’s unique case.

Why Choose the Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai?

When searching for the best cancer care, it’s vital to find a clinic that combines expertise, compassion, and the latest technology. The Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai stands out because of its:

Expert Oncological Care: The clinic is a highly experienced cancer surgeon specializing in complex gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic cancers. His in-depth knowledge ensures patients receive state-of-the-art treatment that’s both effective and precise.

Personalized Treatment Plans: Every cancer case is unique, requiring a customized treatment strategy. Patients at this clinic undergo a thorough evaluation, leading to a personalized care plan. The clinic's approach integrates surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, ensuring the best possible outcome.

Advanced Surgical Techniques: One key aspect of being the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai is its use of advanced surgical methods, such as minimally invasive and robotic surgeries. These modern techniques often result in quicker recoveries, reduced pain, and minimal scarring.

Comprehensive Cancer Care Services

The clinic offers treatments for a variety of cancers, ensuring that no matter the diagnosis, patients are in good hands. Some of the key cancers treated at the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai include:

Liver Cancer: Known for its complexity, liver cancer requires a multi-disciplinary approach, combining surgery with other therapies for optimal results.

Pancreatic Cancer: This is one of the more aggressive cancers, but the clinic’s experience and advanced methods improve patient outcomes.

Colorectal Cancer: Surgical precision is critical when treating colorectal cancer, and the team ensures minimal invasiveness while maximizing effectiveness.

Gastric Cancer: Proper sequencing of treatment modalities, like surgery and chemotherapy, plays a crucial role in fighting gastric cancer.

Patient-Centric Approach

Beyond clinical excellence, the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai focuses on the emotional and mental well-being of its patients. Cancer affects not just the individual but their entire family. The clinic provides counseling and support services to ensure that patients and their loved ones are well-informed and emotionally supported throughout their cancer journey.

The clinic’s personalized, human-centered care is what truly sets it apart. Staff are always on hand to answer questions, provide guidance, and ensure that patients feel empowered and understood every step of the way.

Success Stories

One of the most powerful aspects of the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai is its track record of successful surgeries and satisfied patients. From pancreatic to liver and colorectal cancers, many patients have found hope and healing through the clinic’s cutting-edge treatments and compassionate care. Patient testimonials often highlight the clarity with which complex diagnoses were explained and the peace of mind patients felt knowing they were in expert hands.

Cutting-Edge Technology

The integration of the latest medical technology, such as robotic-assisted surgery, allows for more precise and less invasive procedures. This not only minimizes recovery times but also enhances the precision of cancer removal, giving patients a higher chance of remission. The clinic’s commitment to using the best tools available underscores its reputation as the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai.

A Commitment to Holistic Care

It’s not just about treating the disease; the clinic focuses on the overall well-being of the patient. The staff work with patients to manage pain, navigate recovery, and cope with the emotional toll of cancer. Nutritional counseling and physiotherapy are just some of the supportive services available to help patients regain their strength and improve their quality of life during and after treatment.

Conclusion

Choosing the right clinic for cancer treatment is a critical decision, and the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai offers everything a patient needs for effective, compassionate care. With top-tier surgeons, the latest medical technology, and a patient-first approach, the clinic ensures that every patient is treated with the utmost care and precision.

If you're searching for expert cancer treatment, this clinic provides a combination of skilled medical intervention and comprehensive support, ensuring that patients receive the best care possible.

FAQs

What makes the Cancer Surgery Clinic the best in Mumbai? The clinic offers specialized treatments for gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic cancers, personalized care plans, and cutting-edge surgical techniques.

What types of cancer are treated at the clinic? The clinic specializes in liver, pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers.

Does the clinic use robotic surgery? Yes, the clinic utilizes advanced robotic-assisted surgery for more precise and minimally invasive treatments.

How does the clinic support patients emotionally? The clinic offers counseling and support services for both patients and their families to help them cope with the emotional aspects of cancer.

Contact the Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai Today!

Ready to take the first step towards expert cancer care? The Best Cancer Surgery Clinic in Mumbai is here to help you. Book your appointment now to receive the highest standard of treatment.

📍 Location: Cancer Surgery Clinic, Mumbai

📞 Phone: + 91 77000 58024

#cancer #cancer treatment #cancer doctor #cancer surgeon #oncology

2 notes · View notes

beardedmrbean · 4 months ago

Text

The third day of trial in a Manatee County murder case that’s gained national attention as the "Black Swan murder" commenced Thursday.

Former ballerina Ashley Benefield is accused of shooting and killing her husband on Sept. 27, 2020, following an argument.

Family members from both sides, including the victim’s brother and older daughter who testified Monday, were once again in court.

The morning started with the judge reprimanding the victim’s daughter, Eva Benefield, about actions that could have been interpreted as a violation of the subpoena over social media presence and a conversation with a member of the media. After getting context and clarification, the judge admonished Eva Benefield and denied a motion by the defense to strike her out as a rebuttal witness.

The judge also dispensed a matter concerning a member of the jury being witnessed in a nearby restaurant overhearing television commentary about the case. However, it was learned that the juror had immediately asked for the TV to be turned off and was obliged by the restaurant staff.

Among the testimonies that the six-person jury would hear today includes from a Manatee County investigator with the technical services unit who specialized in forensics access and analysis of related data in a case. This would include accessing the phones and computers of the deceased victim and the defendant.

The courtroom also saw various text message conversations between the couple during around a three-day period before the shooting happened.

A medical examiner and a ballistics expert are also expected to take the stand Thursday.

According to court records, a custody battle is at the center of this case. On Tuesday, Douglass Benefield’s lawyer described the contentious situation surrounding the birth of the child and visitation leading up to the day of the murder which happened at Ashley Benefield’s mother’s home in Lakewood Ranch.

Sarasota lawyer Stephanie Murphy said her client was preparing for a Sept. 30 divorce hearing separate from the ongoing custody hearings before Ashley shot him. Alicia Byers, the defendant’s mother who had last seen Doug arriving at her home with a U-Haul truck as she was leaving with the couple’s child to the park, was also among the testimonies the court heard including from a psychologist, a social worker and more sheriff’s office detectives.

The prosecution is also expected to rest its case before lawyers for Ashley Benefield can begin to mount their client’s defense.

Benefield is facing 25 years to life in prison and has maintained that her estranged husband who she said had been abusive and was trying to get away from was aggressive that day when she shot and killed him. In opening statements, her lawyers declared that she was justified in her own self-defense and had previously tried to use Florida’s "Stand Your Ground Law" in a bid for immunity from prosecution but that motion was denied by the judge.

It’s not clear yet if or when Ashley Benefield will take the stand to defend herself. The trial is expected to last about three weeks.

#nunyas news

3 notes · View notes

deeploretv · 7 months ago

Text

Was Geoff Hammond Murdered?

On June 14, 2017, affluent entrepreneur and author Geoff Hammond died suddenly at age 69 in his Bluffton, South Carolina home. Despite being described as extremely healthy by his physician just days earlier, the cause of death was listed as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, Hammond suffered a severe head wound resembling a golf club injury that went largely undocumented by authorities.

Suspicions arose from the outset due to inconsistencies in the accounts provided by Hammond's wife Jayne about the timing and circumstances of his death. The 911 call she made also contained unidentified voices, suggesting potential witnesses. Jayne's handling of the funeral arrangements, which disregarded Hammond's Catholic faith, and her odd behavior at the memorial service further raised red flags.

In the days after Hammond's death, a series of questionable financial transactions occurred involving his lucrative business assets and $6 million Boca Raton home. These transactions appeared designed to rapidly transfer ownership to Jayne, her sons from previous marriages who were his sole beneficiaries, and her personal jeweler David Rosenberg - individuals Hammond allegedly distrusted. His daughter Tara was excluded from the nine-figure estate.

Despite these irregularities, the initial investigation by authorities was incomplete. A private investigator hired by Tara, Joseph Dalu, uncovered substantial evidence suggesting homicide, conspiracy, fraud and forgery. However, when Dalu provided a 75-page report to law enforcement in 2020, no thorough follow-up was conducted.

Medical experts who reviewed the autopsy found it deficient, lacking documentation of the head injury and failing to determine an actual fatal mechanism of death. Nonetheless, authorities considered exhuming the body for a second autopsy in 2021 before abruptly closing the case as unfounded in 2024, claiming insufficient evidence existed to continue the investigation.

To this day, Hammond's loved ones believe a full, impartial probe into the circumstances surrounding his perplexing death was never completed. They remain determined to uncover the truth about the unanswered questions and suspicious events that continue to shroud this baffling case in mystery.

#truecrime #crime #unsolved case #unsolved crime #unsolved mysteries #Geoff Hammond #unsolved #true crime

3 notes · View notes

trifectalegalnurse · 1 year ago

Text

Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting: Your Partner for Legal Success

In the intricate landscape of legal proceedings, where the smallest detail can tip the scales of justice, partnering with a skilled professional can be the key to victory. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting is your unwavering ally, offering a comprehensive range of top-tier legal nurse consulting services. From comprehensive case development and criminal defense litigation support to expert witness location services, independent medical examinations (IME), and meticulous discovery and court preparation, we provide a trifecta of solutions designed to empower your legal team and secure success even in the most challenging cases.

Comprehensive Case Development

Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting understands that a strong case hinges on a solid foundation. Our team of highly skilled legal nurse consultants specializes in comprehensive case development, ensuring no aspect is overlooked. We painstakingly review medical records, scrutinize healthcare standards, and identify critical elements that can strengthen your case. Our commitment to thoroughness and precision ensures you have the strongest possible basis on which to build your legal strategy.

Our comprehensive case development services encompass:

Medical Record Analysis: We leave no stone unturned when reviewing medical records, seeking inconsistencies, potential issues, and crucial evidence to support your case.

Healthcare Standards Assessment: Understanding the relevant healthcare standards is pivotal in medical malpractice and personal injury cases. We provide a detailed assessment of healthcare standards and their relevance to your case.

Expert Witness Collaboration: We collaborate closely with a network of medical experts to provide testimony that bolsters your case. Our extensive experience ensures seamless cooperation and persuasive testimony.

Criminal Defense Litigation Support

In the realm of criminal defense litigation, every piece of evidence matters. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting provides specialized support services tailored to the unique demands of criminal defense cases. We assist in crafting a robust defense strategy by leveraging our healthcare expertise and legal acumen.

Our criminal defense litigation support services encompass:

Evidence Examination: We meticulously evaluate medical evidence, identifying inconsistencies and opportunities to challenge the prosecution's case.

Witness Preparation: Our team aids in preparing witnesses, including expert medical witnesses, for their courtroom appearances. We ensure they are confident, well-prepared, and capable of delivering compelling testimony.

Case Analysis and Strategy: We offer invaluable insights into the medical aspects of criminal cases, helping you craft a compelling defense strategy.

Expert Witness Location Service

Locating and securing expert witnesses can be a formidable task, but it's a task we excel at. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting offers expert witness location services to connect you with the right professionals capable of providing the critical testimony your case requires.

Our expert witness location service includes:

Extensive Network: We maintain an extensive network of medical experts and professionals across various specialties, ensuring we can meet the specific needs of your case.

Credential Verification: We meticulously verify the credentials and expertise of potential expert witnesses, guaranteeing their qualifications to testify in court.

Strategic Matchmaking: We align your case with the most suitable expert witness, considering their expertise, experience, and credibility.

Independent Medical Examination (IME)

In personal injury and medical malpractice cases, an independent medical examination (IME) can be a game-changing tactic. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting assists in arranging IMEs that provide impartial and thorough medical assessments.

Our IME services encompass:

Scheduling and Coordination: We manage all aspects of scheduling and coordination, ensuring a seamless IME process.

Selection of Qualified Examiners: We select experienced and impartial medical professionals to conduct the examination.

Comprehensive Reports: We provide detailed reports of the IME findings, delivering a clear and objective evaluation of the plaintiff's medical condition.

Discovery and Court Preparation

Preparation for court is a meticulous and time-consuming endeavor. Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting streamlines this process by offering comprehensive discovery and court preparation services.

Our discovery and court preparation services include:

Document Review: We conduct a thorough review of all relevant documents, ensuring you have access to all the information needed.

Trial Strategy Development: Our experts assist in developing a solid trial strategy, ensuring you are fully prepared for any unexpected twists during the proceedings.

Witness Preparation: We aid in preparing witnesses for deposition and trial, ensuring they are poised to deliver compelling and accurate testimony.

Why Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting?

When you choose Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting, you are choosing a partner dedicated to your success. Here's why we excel in the field of legal nurse consulting:

Expertise: Our team of legal nurse consultants possesses extensive knowledge and experience in healthcare and legal matters.

Meticulousness: We leave no detail unchecked in our pursuit of comprehensive case development and preparation.

Tailored Solutions: We understand that each case is unique, and we customize our services to meet your specific requirements.

Expert Network: Our vast network of medical experts and professionals ensures you have access to the best resources for your case.

Proven Excellence: We have a proven track record of assisting legal teams in achieving favorable outcomes in their cases.

Don't navigate the complexities of legal cases alone. Trust Trifecta Legal Nurse Consulting to provide the expertise and support you need for comprehensive case development, criminal defense litigation, expert witness location services, independent medical examinations, and discovery and court preparation. Contact us today to explore how we can help you achieve success in your legal endeavors. Our dedicated team is ready to guide you through every step of the process, ensuring you have a steadfast partner for all your legal nurse consulting needs.

#COMPREHENSIVE CASE DEVELOPMENT #CRIMINAL DEFENSE LITIGATION #EXPERT WITNESS LOCATION SERVICE #INDEPENDENT MEDICAL EXAMINATION (IME)#Discovery and Court Preparation

1 note · View note

scotianostra · 2 years ago

Text

Henry Duncan Littlejohn was born in Edinburgh on May 8th 1826, Littlejohn is one of two Edinburgh men that are quoted as being an influence in Arthur Conan Doyle’s formation of the character Sherlock Homes.

Henry was educated in Perth before The Royal High school and the Edinburgh University studying medicine and graduating with distinction in 1847.

It’s quite a topical post given that Henry Littlejohn, whose appointment as the first Medical Officer of Health for Edinburgh was the first appointment of its kind in Scotland. He pioneered compulsory notification of infectious disease in Edinburgh leading to the introduction of such notification throughoutt Britain. The resultant mapping of diseases allowed active prevention and led to significant reduction in mortality during the 50 years of his office. He also achieved distinction in Forensic Medicine as an expert Crown witness for most of the major Scottish trials in the latter half of the 19th century.

Eloquent and erudite, he was regarded as an outstanding teacher amidst Edinburgh contemporaries who included some of the greatest medical teachers in the world.

In 1879 due to his influence a clause was included in the local Police Act requiring such notification giving Edinburgh the lead to the whole of Great Britain. This was to prove one of the major advances in public health of the 19th century. His “Report on the Sanitary Condition of the City of Edinburgh” proved a blueprint for social reform. It clearly demonstrated the effect of population density on the spread of disease and mortality. He was able to define the incidence of dip patients throughout the city and demonstrated a clear correlation between deprivation, disease and mortality. His proposals to improve this included recommendations about building, sewage, water pollution and limiting overcrowding. The Town Council were responsive to his recommendations and demolished many aging properties which had become dangers to health.

By the time of his retiral in 1908, after 46 years of service, mortality rates in Edinburgh from infectious disease had halved. Largely as a result of his efforts cholera and typhus had disappeared and smallpox had become a rarity. The other inspiration I mentioned earlier, for Sherlock Holmes gets a mention here in this article about both him and Liltlejohn

#scotland #scottish #surgeon #forensic scientist #scientist #scientist.#edinburgh #history #sherlock holmes

10 notes · View notes

blognerdzone · 10 months ago

Text

Navigating Traumatic Brain Injury with a Skilled Attorney in New Jersey

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious medical condition that can result from various accidents and incidents, including car crashes, falls, sports injuries, and workplace accidents. The impact of TBI on an individual's life can be devastating, leading to long-term physical and cognitive impairments, emotional distress, and financial challenges. If you or a loved one has suffered a traumatic brain injury due to someone else's negligence or wrongdoing in New Jersey, it is crucial to seek legal assistance from an experienced attorney who can help you navigate the complexities of your case.

In this blog post, we will discuss the role and benefits of having a skilled traumatic brain injury attorney NJ. We will explore how such an attorney can assist you in obtaining compensation for your damages while protecting your legal rights and ensuring that you receive the medical care and support you need.

Assessing Liability: One of the key roles of a traumatic brain injury attorney is to determine who was at fault for the accident that caused your injury. Your attorney will investigate the circumstances surrounding the incident, gather evidence such as police reports and witness statements, consult with experts if necessary, and evaluate all potential liable parties. Depending on the case specifics, liability may fall on another driver involved in a car crash, a property owner responsible for maintaining safe premises, an employer who failed to provide adequate safety measures at work or other individuals or entities whose negligence led to your TBI.

Calculating Damages: Another critical aspect of TBI cases is determining the extent of damages suffered by the victim. TBI can cause severe physical limitations such as paralysis or loss of motor function; cognitive impairments like memory loss or difficulty concentrating; emotional problems such as anxiety or depression; and economic losses such as medical bills and lost wages. Your traumatic brain injury attorney in New Jersey will work with you to quantify the full scope of your damages, taking into account both past and future costs and losses. This may involve consulting with medical professionals, vocational experts, and economists who can provide expert testimony in court.

Negotiating Settlements: In many cases, TBI claims can be resolved through settlement negotiations between the victim's attorney and the liable party or their insurance company. Your lawyer will use their experience and negotiating skills to pursue a fair and just settlement that covers all of your damages adequately. They will also protect you from being pressured into accepting an inadequate offer or signing away your legal rights before fully understanding the implications.

Representing You in Court: If a settlement cannot be reached, your traumatic brain injury attorney in New Jersey will prepare your case for trial and represent you in court proceedings. They will present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, make arguments on your behalf, and advocate for your interests throughout the legal process. Having a skilled litigator on your side can significantly increase your chances of obtaining a favorable outcome at trial.

Providing Emotional Support: Finally, it is crucial to recognize that TBI cases can be emotionally challenging for victims and their families. A compassionate traumatic brain injury attorney in New Jersey understands this aspect of the situation and provides not only legal guidance but also emotional support throughout the case's duration. They can connect you with resources such as support groups or therapy services that can help you cope with the impact of TBI on your life.

Conclusion:

If you or someone close to you has sustained a traumatic brain injury due to someone else's negligence or recklessness in New Jersey, do not hesitate to seek legal assistance from an experienced attorney who understands the complexities of TBI cases. With their knowledge, skillset, and empathy, they can help you navigate this difficult time while fighting for justice on your behalf. Contact a reputable law firm today for a free consultation and start your journey towards recovery and compensation.

#legal service #attorney services #attorney service #personal injury attorneys #law and legal system #legalnews #Brain Injury attorney nj #traumatic brain injury attorney nj #Construction accident attorney nj #RIDESHARE ACCIDENTS attorney nj

2 notes · View notes