#LLM ADMISSION

[cpjcollege]

Top Strategies to Secure IPU LLM Admission in 2024

The Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IPU) is a beacon for aspiring legal professionals, attracting students from across India. Its LLM program is particularly prestigious, offering specialized legal knowledge and excellent career prospects. However, securing a seat in this coveted program is no cakewalk. With the 2024 admission cycle approaching, you need to be well-prepared and strategic to stand out from the competition.

Here's your roadmap to success:

1. Academic Prowess is Key:

Stellar LLB Grades: A strong academic foundation is non-negotiable. Aim for a high CGPA in your LLB degree, as this is the primary criterion for IPU LLM admissions.

Entrance Exam Excellence: IPU conducts its own entrance exam for LLM admissions, known as IPU CET. Focus on strengthening your legal aptitude, analytical skills, and general awareness through rigorous preparation and mock tests.

2. Craft a Winning Application:

Showcase Your Passion: Your Statement of Purpose (SOP) should reflect your genuine interest in pursuing an LLM and your chosen specialization. Highlight relevant experiences, internships, or projects that demonstrate your commitment to the field.

Recommendations that Resonate: Choose referees who can speak to your academic abilities, research potential, and overall suitability for the program. Strong letters of recommendation can significantly boost your application.

3. Elevate Your Profile:

Legal Internships: Gaining practical experience through internships at law firms, NGOs, or legal departments of companies demonstrates your commitment to the legal profession. It provides valuable insights and strengthens your application.

Research and Publications: If you have the opportunity, engage in legal research, contribute to legal journals, or participate in conferences. These endeavors showcase your intellectual curiosity and dedication.

4. Master the Interview:

Prepare for the Unexpected: IPU's LLM interview panel will assess your legal knowledge, analytical abilities, communication skills, and overall personality. Brush up on current legal issues, and your chosen specialization, and be prepared to articulate your career goals.

Confidence and Clarity: Approach the interview with confidence, maintain a professional demeanor, and communicate your thoughts clearly and concisely.

5. Stay Informed and Organized:

Official Website is Your Guide: Regularly visit the official IPU website and the dedicated LLM admissions portal for the most up-to-date information on important dates, eligibility criteria, syllabus, and application procedures.

Organized Approach: Keep all your documents (academic transcripts, certificates, entrance exam scorecard) readily available and create a checklist to ensure a smooth application process.

Beyond the Strategies:

Network and Connect: Attend LLM-focused webinars, connect with IPU alumni, and engage in online forums to gather insights and tips from those who have successfully navigated the admission process.

Believe in Yourself: A positive mindset and self-belief are crucial. Stay focused, dedicated, and persistent in your efforts.

The journey to securing an IPU LLM seat requires diligent preparation, a strategic approach, and unwavering determination. By focusing on your strengths, meticulously crafting your application, and presenting your best self, you can significantly increase your chances of success in the 2024 admission cycle. Best of luck!

[klelawcollege1122]

Code of Ethics for Research and Prevention of Malpractice | KLE Society's Law College

Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical practice and is unacceptable. The purpose of these guidelines is to maintain integrity in research activity. The institution publishes KLE Law Journal and CHIGURU annually. To achieve the objectives stated above it has been made mandatory to the Authors, Editors, Reviewers & Publisher are adhere to the codes. The code envisages the following duties.

[admissionopenushamartinranchi]

LL.M. 2-Year Master’s Degree: Course Overview, Colleges, Fees, and Career Path

LL.M. Course Overview:

Those who already hold an LL.B. (Bachelor of Laws) degree and want to further their legal education can apply for the two-year Master of Law Degree (LL.M.). The LLM course has been extended to enable a more thorough examination of specialized fields like international law, criminal law, corporate law, human rights law, environmental law, and more. Students are better equipped to manage coursework, research, and internships because of the longer duration. The final dissertation or thesis, case studies, seminars, and lectures make up the curriculum. Pupils are encouraged to conduct independent legal research, frequently concentrating on intricate legal matters from a comparative or global standpoint. Professionals wishing to advance into more senior positions in law firms, government offices, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), academia, and other fields can benefit from this LL.M. program.

Most universities offer a two-year LL.M. program that combines coursework with a focus on research. This guarantees that students acquire not only theoretical understanding but also participate in real-world implementations of legal concepts. The dissertation component often requires students to critically assess legal regulations, policies, or practices, making this program ideal for those who are looking to delve into academic research or pursue a career in legal policy.

LL.M. Course Eligibility Criteria:

To enroll in the 2-year LL.M. course, candidates generally need to meet the following criteria at Usha Martin University, Jharkhand:

Applicants must have held an LL.B. degree from a recognized university.

They should have a minimum of 50% marks.

This is the basic eligibility criteria for LLM admission at Usha Martin University.

LL.M. Master Degree Course Fee Structure:

The total fee for a two-year LLM course at Usha Martin University is INR 1,53,000.

Career Opportunities After the LL.M. Master Degree –

There are countless career options available to those with an LL.M., both inside and outside of traditional legal practice. Graduates can contribute to international relations, policy advice, and legal reform by taking on more senior positions in specialized legal fields.

Corporate Lawyer: LL.M. graduates can become in-house legal counsel for large corporations or work for corporate law firms. One can improve their chances in the business world by specializing in corporate law, mergers and acquisitions, or intellectual property rights.

Judge or Legal Consultant: A lot of people with an LL.M. go on to become judges or legal consultants, offering legal advice on public policy, regulatory compliance, and legal issues to both public and private agencies.

Academics and Research: For LL.M. graduates who wish to teach, write legal textbooks, or participate in scholarly research, the academic world is a popular choice. For those who are interested in furthering legal theory, careers as lecturers, professors, or legal researchers are typical choices.

Human Rights Advocacy: An LL.M. provides the means for individuals who are committed to environmental law, social justice, or human rights to collaborate with non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and global institutions such as the World Trade Organization, United Nations, or World Bank.

International Law: Professionals with expertise in arbitration, global governance, or international trade law can work for governments or international organizations to influence international treaties and legal policies.

Policy Advisor: LL.M. graduates have the potential to be extremely valuable as policy advisors to public or private organizations, helping to shape legal frameworks and offering counsel on issues pertaining to public law and constitutional law.

Read More: Know All About The Importance of Law Courses in India

Top 10 Skills Required for Success in LL.M. Degree –

The LL.M. program demands a broad range of skills for success. The top ten abilities that students can really benefit from are as follows:

Critical Thinking

Research Skills

Legal Writing

Negotiation Skills

Analytical Abilities

Communication Skills

Attention to Detail

Ethical Judgment

Time Management

Adaptability

These abilities guarantee that LL.M. holders are capable of navigating intricate legal systems, carrying out in-depth research, and effectively articulating arguments in both academic and professional contexts.

Why Choose a 2-Year LL.M. Course at UMU?

Usha Martin University’s two-year LL.M. program is more flexible and comprehensive than its one-year counterpart. It enables students to take on longer research projects, manage internships and coursework, and gain a deeper comprehension of the legal specialization they have chosen. Because of the longer timeframe and increased opportunities for independent study and interaction with legal issues, this format is especially helpful for individuals who wish to pursue careers in academia or research.

Extensive Curriculum: Usha Martin University’s two-year LL.M. program provides a comprehensive curriculum covering a range of legal specializations. In order to prepare them for specialized legal roles, students acquire a thorough understanding of advanced legal principles and the most recent advancements in the field.

Highly Qualified Faculty: Proficient instructors with extensive academic and professional backgrounds teach the program. Their knowledge ensures a comprehensive learning experience by assisting students in bridging the gap between abstract ideas and practical legal practice.

Prioritize Innovation and Research: Usha Martin University places a strong emphasis on research-based education. Students are urged to write dissertations and conduct legal research on cutting-edge legal topics in order to develop their analytical and critical thinking abilities, which are crucial for success in both the classroom and the workplace.

Modern Infrastructure: The university has digital libraries, legal databases, and mock courts among its state-of-the-art amenities. These tools give students practical learning experiences that mimic actual court cases and improve their practical knowledge.

Exposure to Industry and Internships: Usha Martin University provides a wide range of internship opportunities with NGOs, corporate legal departments, and top law firms. Students who are exposed to this industry are able to develop networks and practical insights that are essential for career advancement.

Flexible Specialization Options: Students enrolled in the LL.M. program have the option to select from a number of specializations, including corporate law, criminal law, international law, and constitutional law. Students can better match their educational objectives with their interests and career aspirations thanks to this flexibility.

Reasonable Fees with Scholarships: Usha Martin University makes high-quality education accessible by providing an LL.M. program with a reasonable fee structure. In order to guarantee financial support for students who achieve academic excellence, the university also awards scholarships to deserving applicants.

Usha Martin University’s two-year LL.M. program is highly recommended due to its combination of rigorous academics, real-world experience, and reasonably priced tuition.

Conclusion

For recent graduates looking to advance their legal careers and broaden their knowledge, pursuing a two-year LL.M. degree at Usha Martin University is a significant step. The program provides a multitude of options for specialization and career growth, with opportunities in corporate law, international law, academia, and policy advisory. An LL.M. from a reputable law school will give you the abilities and credentials you need to succeed, whether your career goals are to work as a judge, policy advisor, expert in law, professor, or other role. So, what are you waiting for? Your future is waiting for you. Just make the correct choice to make your life better. The two-year llm course admission is open at UMU. Apply Now!

[sageuniversitybpl]

Grab endless Possibilities in the Legal Arena

Step into the world of law with SAGE School of Law & Legal Studies!

Admissions are open for BA LLB (Hons), BBA LLB (Hons), LLB, and LLM for the 2024-25 session. Ready to take the next step in your legal career?

Join us for the SAGE Entrance Exam on August 23rd & 24th, 2024. Seize your opportunity to shine in the legal field!

Apply Now: https://admission.sageuniversity.edu.in/

[niilmuniversity]

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Even if you think AI search could be good, it won’t be good

TONIGHT (May 15), I'm in NORTH HOLLYWOOD for a screening of STEPHANIE KELTON'S FINDING THE MONEY; FRIDAY (May 17), I'm at the INTERNET ARCHIVE in SAN FRANCISCO to keynote the 10th anniversary of the AUTHORS ALLIANCE.

The big news in search this week is that Google is continuing its transition to "AI search" – instead of typing in search terms and getting links to websites, you'll ask Google a question and an AI will compose an answer based on things it finds on the web:

https://blog.google/products/search/generative-ai-google-search-may-2024/

Google bills this as "let Google do the googling for you." Rather than searching the web yourself, you'll delegate this task to Google. Hidden in this pitch is a tacit admission that Google is no longer a convenient or reliable way to retrieve information, drowning as it is in AI-generated spam, poorly labeled ads, and SEO garbage:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/03/keyword-swarming/#site-reputation-abuse

Googling used to be easy: type in a query, get back a screen of highly relevant results. Today, clicking the top links will take you to sites that paid for placement at the top of the screen (rather than the sites that best match your query). Clicking further down will get you scams, AI slop, or bulk-produced SEO nonsense.

AI-powered search promises to fix this, not by making Google search results better, but by having a bot sort through the search results and discard the nonsense that Google will continue to serve up, and summarize the high quality results.

Now, there are plenty of obvious objections to this plan. For starters, why wouldn't Google just make its search results better? Rather than building a LLM for the sole purpose of sorting through the garbage Google is either paid or tricked into serving up, why not just stop serving up garbage? We know that's possible, because other search engines serve really good results by paying for access to Google's back-end and then filtering the results:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/04/teach-me-how-to-shruggie/#kagi

Another obvious objection: why would anyone write the web if the only purpose for doing so is to feed a bot that will summarize what you've written without sending anyone to your webpage? Whether you're a commercial publisher hoping to make money from advertising or subscriptions, or – like me – an open access publisher hoping to change people's minds, why would you invite Google to summarize your work without ever showing it to internet users? Nevermind how unfair that is, think about how implausible it is: if this is the way Google will work in the future, why wouldn't every publisher just block Google's crawler?

A third obvious objection: AI is bad. Not morally bad (though maybe morally bad, too!), but technically bad. It "hallucinates" nonsense answers, including dangerous nonsense. It's a supremely confident liar that can get you killed:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/01/mushroom-pickers-urged-to-avoid-foraging-books-on-amazon-that-appear-to-be-written-by-ai

The promises of AI are grossly oversold, including the promises Google makes, like its claim that its AI had discovered millions of useful new materials. In reality, the number of useful new materials Deepmind had discovered was zero:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/23/maximal-plausibility/#reverse-centaurs

This is true of all of AI's most impressive demos. Often, "AI" turns out to be low-waged human workers in a distant call-center pretending to be robots:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/31/neural-interface-beta-tester/#tailfins

Sometimes, the AI robot dancing on stage turns out to literally be just a person in a robot suit pretending to be a robot:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/29/pay-no-attention/#to-the-little-man-behind-the-curtain

The AI video demos that represent "an existential threat to Hollywood filmmaking" turn out to be so cumbersome as to be practically useless (and vastly inferior to existing production techniques):

https://www.wheresyoured.at/expectations-versus-reality/

But let's take Google at its word. Let's stipulate that:

a) It can't fix search, only add a slop-filtering AI layer on top of it; and

b) The rest of the world will continue to let Google index its pages even if they derive no benefit from doing so; and

c) Google will shortly fix its AI, and all the lies about AI capabilities will be revealed to be premature truths that are finally realized.

AI search is still a bad idea. Because beyond all the obvious reasons that AI search is a terrible idea, there's a subtle – and incurable – defect in this plan: AI search – even excellent AI search – makes it far too easy for Google to cheat us, and Google can't stop cheating us.

Remember: enshittification isn't the result of worse people running tech companies today than in the years when tech services were good and useful. Rather, enshittification is rooted in the collapse of constraints that used to prevent those same people from making their services worse in service to increasing their profit margins:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/26/glitchbread/#electronic-shelf-tags

These companies always had the capacity to siphon value away from business customers (like publishers) and end-users (like searchers). That comes with the territory: digital businesses can alter their "business logic" from instant to instant, and for each user, allowing them to change payouts, prices and ranking. I call this "twiddling": turning the knobs on the system's back-end to make sure the house always wins:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/19/twiddler/

What changed wasn't the character of the leaders of these businesses, nor their capacity to cheat us. What changed was the consequences for cheating. When the tech companies merged to monopoly, they ceased to fear losing your business to a competitor.

Google's 90% search market share was attained by bribing everyone who operates a service or platform where you might encounter a search box to connect that box to Google. Spending tens of billions of dollars every year to make sure no one ever encounters a non-Google search is a cheaper way to retain your business than making sure Google is the very best search engine:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/21/im-feeling-unlucky/#not-up-to-the-task

Competition was once a threat to Google; for years, its mantra was "competition is a click away." Today, competition is all but nonexistent.

Then the surveillance business consolidated into a small number of firms. Two companies dominate the commercial surveillance industry: Google and Meta, and they collude to rig the market:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedi_Blue

That consolidation inevitably leads to regulatory capture: shorn of competitive pressure, the companies that dominate the sector can converge on a single message to policymakers and use their monopoly profits to turn that message into policy:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/05/regulatory-capture/

This is why Google doesn't have to worry about privacy laws. They've successfully prevented the passage of a US federal consumer privacy law. The last time the US passed a federal consumer privacy law was in 1988. It's a law that bans video store clerks from telling the newspapers which VHS cassettes you rented:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Privacy_Protection_Act

In Europe, Google's vast profits lets it fly an Irish flag of convenience, thus taking advantage of Ireland's tolerance for tax evasion and violations of European privacy law:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/15/finnegans-snooze/#dirty-old-town

Google doesn't fear competition, it doesn't fear regulation, and it also doesn't fear rival technologies. Google and its fellow Big Tech cartel members have expanded IP law to allow it to prevent third parties from reverse-engineer, hacking, or scraping its services. Google doesn't have to worry about ad-blocking, tracker blocking, or scrapers that filter out Google's lucrative, low-quality results:

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

Google doesn't fear competition, it doesn't fear regulation, it doesn't fear rival technology and it doesn't fear its workers. Google's workforce once enjoyed enormous sway over the company's direction, thanks to their scarcity and market power. But Google has outgrown its dependence on its workers, and lays them off in vast numbers, even as it increases its profits and pisses away tens of billions on stock buybacks:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/25/moral-injury/#enshittification

Google is fearless. It doesn't fear losing your business, or being punished by regulators, or being mired in guerrilla warfare with rival engineers. It certainly doesn't fear its workers.

Making search worse is good for Google. Reducing search quality increases the number of queries, and thus ads, that each user must make to find their answers:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/04/24/naming-names/#prabhakar-raghavan

If Google can make things worse for searchers without losing their business, it can make more money for itself. Without the discipline of markets, regulators, tech or workers, it has no impediment to transferring value from searchers and publishers to itself.

Which brings me back to AI search. When Google substitutes its own summaries for links to pages, it creates innumerable opportunities to charge publishers for preferential placement in those summaries.

This is true of any algorithmic feed: while such feeds are important – even vital – for making sense of huge amounts of information, they can also be used to play a high-speed shell-game that makes suckers out of the rest of us:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/11/for-you/#the-algorithm-tm

When you trust someone to summarize the truth for you, you become terribly vulnerable to their self-serving lies. In an ideal world, these intermediaries would be "fiduciaries," with a solemn (and legally binding) duty to put your interests ahead of their own:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/07/treacherous-computing/#rewilding-the-internet

But Google is clear that its first duty is to its shareholders: not to publishers, not to searchers, not to "partners" or employees.

AI search makes cheating so easy, and Google cheats so much. Indeed, the defects in AI give Google a readymade excuse for any apparent self-dealing: "we didn't tell you a lie because someone paid us to (for example, to recommend a product, or a hotel room, or a political point of view). Sure, they did pay us, but that was just an AI 'hallucination.'"

The existence of well-known AI hallucinations creates a zone of plausible deniability for even more enshittification of Google search. As Madeleine Clare Elish writes, AI serves as a "moral crumple zone":

https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/260

That's why, even if you're willing to believe that Google could make a great AI-based search, we can nevertheless be certain that they won't.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/15/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks/#ai-search

Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

--

djhughman https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Modular_synthesizer_-_%22Control_Voltage%22_electronic_music_shop_in_Portland_OR_-_School_Photos_PCC_%282015-05-23_12.43.01_by_djhughman%29.jpg

CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en

[ushamartinuniversity]

The Faculty of Law at Usha Martin University (UMU) is time tested legal institution of par excellence is promoting academic excellence, intellectual discipline and professional leadership. In the context of professional legal education, Usha Martin University is the best University in Ranchi has carved a niche for itself in the academic circuit and groom students to become the unified face of the Indian legal fraternity.

[ralfmaximus]

Meta has acknowledged that all text and photos that adult Facebook and Instagram users have publicly published since 2007 have been fed into its artificial intelligence models. Australia’s ABC News reports that Meta’s global privacy director, Melinda Claybaugh, initially rejected claims about user data from 2007 being leveraged for AI training during a local government inquiry about AI adoption before relenting after additional questioning.

That's called lying, Melinda Claybaugh.

Anyway, in an admission surprising absolutely nobody, your facebook & insta posts were scraped to train Meta's LLM. And there's nothing you can do about it.

[klelawcollege1122]

Knowledge Hub | Bba llb admissions in bangalore

Explore the Knowledge Hub at KLE Law College, one of the best law colleges in India, offering valuable resources and insights to enhance your legal education and career.

[solarpunkpresentspodcast]

Scrape

I want to talk about the recent news of Tumblr and Wordpress parent company Automattic being in talks to sell user content to AI companies OpenAI and Midjourney to train their models on. All that we know is currently in that sentence, by the way; the talks are still in progress and the company’s not super transparent about it, which makes sense to me.

What doesn’t make sense to me is the fact that a lot of Internet users seem to think this is outrageous, or new, or somehow strange behaviour for a large company, or that it is just starting. It seems obvious, given AI companies’ proclivities to go ahead and then ask forgiveness, not permission to do the thing, that Tumblr/Wordpress users’ public data has already been hoovered up into the gaping maw of the LLM training sets and this is a mea-culpa gesture; not so much a business proposal as a sheepish admission of guilt and monetary compensation. One wonders what would have happened had they not been called out.

When I was in publishing school back in the early twenty-teens, it was drilled into us that any blog content could be considered published and therefore disqualified from any submission to a publication unless they were specifically asking for previously published pieces. There was at that time a dawning awareness that whatever you had put on the internet (or continued to put out there) was not going to go away. Are you familiar with how Facebook saves everything that you type, even if you don’t post it? That was the big buzz, back then. Twitter was on the rise, and so was Tumblr, and in that context, it seemed a bit naïve to assume that anything written online would ever be private again (if it ever was in the first place…). It was de rigeur for me to go into my privacy settings on Facebook and adjust them in line with updates every few months.

So, for example, this little post of mine here wouldn’t really count as submittable material unless I substantially added to or changed it in some way before approaching a publisher with it. (The definition of “substantially” is up to said publisher, of course.) This might have changed with time (and depending on location), but my brain latched on to it and I find it safest to proceed from this assumption. For the record, I don’t think it’s foolish or naive for internet users to have the opposite assumption, and trust that the companies whose platforms they are using will handle their content in a respectful way and guard their privacy. That should be the baseline. It is a right and correct impulse, taken egregious advantage of by the morally bankrupt.

In any case, I at first have interpreted this whole debacle as …slightly empowering to users, in a way, as now there are opt-out procedures that Tumblr users can take to put the kibosh on a process that is already happening, and now this scraping of data will be monitored by the parent site, instead of operating according to a don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy. I have to wonder if the same will be extended to Reddit users, or the commenters on CNN or Fox news. And whether my first impression will bear up under any weight of scrutiny whatsoever.

On social media, I assume that everything I post will always and forever be accessible to anyone with enough skills (or money) to want to access it. Same with email, anything in “the cloud” that is not hosted on a double-encrypted server, my search engine preferences, and really any site that I have a login for. My saving grace thus far has been that I am a boring person with neither fame nor wealth nor enemies with a reason to go after me. Facebook got big when I was in my undergraduate years; given that social media was extremely nascent back then, I put a lot of stuff up that I shouldn’t have. Data that I care about. Things I would like to keep secret, keep safe. But I’ve long made my peace with the fact that the internet has known everything about everything I was willing to put up about me for my entire adult life and continues to grasp for more and more. At least on Tumblr, I can say “no”, and then get righteously indignant when that “no” is inevitably ignored and my rights violated.

I hate this state of affairs. But I also want to be able to talk to my family, connect with other solarpunks, do research, communicate with my colleagues … to live in a society, one might say. I try not to let it bother me much. However, I DO sign anything and everything that comes my way from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization dedicated to legislating the shit out of these corporations that have given us free tickets to unlimited knowledge and communication for the price of our personal data, and effectively excommunicated anyone who does not agree to their TOS. The EFF is US-based, but given that most of the social media and AI giants on the internet are also US-based, I feel like it’s relevant.

In my solarpunk future, the internet does still exist, and we can access and use it as much or as little as we like. But it is tightly controlled so that the reckless appropriation and use of art, writing, content, personal data, cannot happen and is not the fee charged for participation in the world wide web. I want to live in a world where my personal data is my own but I can still reach out to my friends and family whenever I’d like, about whatever I want; isn’t that a nice thought?

[sageuniversitybpl]

Admissions open for Law Courses at SAGE University Bhopal

Discover your Legal prowess with structured training programs at SAGE School of Law & Legal Studies. Our holistic curriculum sets the stage for your forthcoming achievements in the field Admission open now for the session 2024-25.

Programs Offered

1- BA LLB [Hons] 2- BBA LLB [Hons] 3- LLB [Hons] 4- LLM 5- PhD

To join, apply for #SEE today!

🌐: https://sageuniversity.edu.in/bhopal-admission/

[niilmuniversity]

Career in Corporate Law. #law #careeropportunities #LLB #llm #lawyers #advocate #careerinlaw