#Johnny Depp Case Verdict

[pronoun-fucker]

(Open letter linked below)

“More than 130 people, including Gloria Steinem, and organizations in the field of women’s rights advocacy and domestic violence and sexual assault awareness have signed an open letter to support Amber Heard, who lost a defamation suit this year brought by her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, for an op-ed in which she said she was a “public figure representing domestic abuse.”

The letter, which was exclusively shared with NBC News ahead of its public release Wednesday, was signed by groups like the National Organization for Women, the National Women’s Law Center, Equality Now and the Women’s March Foundation. It was written by a group of people who identify as domestic violence survivors and supporters of Heard.

Heard filed a brief last month laying the groundwork to appeal a seven-person jury’s decision in Virginia’s Fairfax County Circuit Court to award Depp $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages in June. Heard, who had countersued, was awarded $2 million in compensatory damages but nothing in punitive damages.

Although The Washington Post essay never mentioned Depp by name, Depp’s attorneys said it indirectly referred to allegations Heard made against him during their 2016 divorce. During the trial, she testified in graphic terms about a sexual assault she alleged, as well as allegations of incidents of physical abuse. Depp denied all allegations of abuse.

The letter, which denounces the “rising misuse” of defamation lawsuits to silence people who report domestic and sexual abuse, is one of the biggest public shows of support for Heard after months of silence from many groups after the verdict.

Representatives for both Depp and Heard declined to comment.

The jury’s decision was a legal vindication for Depp, who lost a libel case in the United Kingdom two years ago over claims that he had physically abused Heard. Justice Andrew Nicol ruled against Depp in 2020, saying a British tabloid had presented substantial evidence to show that Depp was violent against Heard on at least 12 of 14 occasions.

After the June verdict, activists called out other groups, like Time’s Up, asking why an organization that had championed victims at the height of the #MeToo movement was now silent. Many who did speak out in support of Heard, including the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, were met with ferocious backlash from Depp’s supporters online.

A spokesperson for the group behind the letter, who asked to remain anonymous because of the online harassment she has faced for posting in support of Heard, said she believes that after the trial “individuals were afraid to speak out because they saw what was happening to the few who had.”

The letter says the “ongoing online harassment” of Heard and her supporters was “fueled by disinformation, misogyny, biphobia, and a monetized social media environment where a woman’s allegations of domestic violence and sexual assault were mocked for entertainment.”

The vilification and harassment of Heard and her supporters were “unprecedented in both vitriol and scale,” the letter says.

Kathy Spillar, the executive director of the Feminist Majority Foundation, said her organization signed the letter after it observed what she called a “growing backlash” against women who speak out against perpetrators of sexual assault, domestic violence and intimate partner violence.

“If this can happen to Amber Heard, it will discourage other women from speaking up and even filing reports about domestic violence and sexual assault,” Spillar said.

The letter says the verdict and the online response to Heard “indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of intimate partner and sexual violence and how survivors respond to it.”

In addition to two dozen feminist organizations, more than 90 domestic violence experts and survivors’ advocates from around the world signed the letter to “condemn the public shaming of Amber Heard and join in support of her.” They include doctors, lawyers, professors, authors and activists.

Others who signed the letter echoed their concerns that reaction to the trial on social media was harmful to everyday victims of domestic violence.

“They see the environment that this has created, and they feel even less safe than before to come forward and speak out about the abuse they suffered,” said Elizabeth Tang, the senior counsel for education and workplace justice at the National Women’s Law Center.

Tang said abusers can use defamation suits to “silence their victims” or as retaliation against their victims for speaking out.

Tang said that among the “reasons we felt it was very important to join this letter” are that “when courts do not dismiss these defamation suits in early stages, it creates a lot of trauma for victims to have to go through a very long, drawn-out and invasive process just to prove that the things they said are true or that they did not defame the person they reported.”

Christian F. Nunes, the national president of the National Organization for Women, said she hopes the letter is a reminder that the court system should never be used to strong-arm victims to recant statements about their abuse.

“We cannot silence victims by using courts and lawsuits as a way to retraumatize them, because this is what’s happening,” Nunes said. She said she hopes the letter raises awareness of new tactics some abusers use against their victims, such as social media campaigns.

Since the trial, there has been more public support for Heard on social media, the spokesperson for the group behind the letter said. She and other anonymous Heard supporters had been “working to combat disinformation for months” when they joined for the open letter initiative.

Experts said they had a unanimous message they hoped to send to survivors who read the letter.

“It is also a way to speak to all survivors and tell them, ‘You are not alone,’” Tang said.”

Article Link | Archived Article Link

Open Letter Link | Archived Open Letter Link

[justiceamberheard]

Don't miss to watch documentary TONIGHT on @France5tv which will analyze the treatment of the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard trial on social media and how the propaganda spread by alt-right misogynists swayed public opinion as well as the verdict of the jury.

a thread of the interview regarding Amber/Depp case.

[catatonicreality]

Anti woman society

The creator I'm currently completely obsessed with is Medusone, who made long detailed, well elaborated videos on the Depp v Heard case. Today (20th Sept 2023) she posted on her YT channel a new, "shorter" but no less pointed video about the newly unsealed court documents. I call the unsealing of the court documents by the Johnny Depp stans an ongoing public harassment of Heard aided by the silence of content creators that jumped on the band wagon last year and failed to follow up. After the verdict was read many just moved on, despite new developments in the case, case in point post verdict settlement prompted by Amber's appeal.

Now we have a new band wagon, the accusations against Russell Brand. The knee jerk reaction on so many sides is "trial by media" and "why come out to the media and not report it to the police?".

Amber tried to go about this quietly. As Medusone points out in her video, they literally forced her to re-live her SA on the stand while her testimony was broadcast. Amber was against cameras in the court room. Amber didn't want any of her suffering to be publicized and broadcast, Johnny Depp did. His lawyers wanted the cameras in the courtroom,...to humiliate her. Amber never sought out publicity about her divorce, she followed the NDA after the divorce. She obtained a restraining order against him. She went to the police, she did what she knew how to do, best to her abilities and mental state and taking in account that he's an insanely well known person and she's virtually a nobody in comparison. So all I can say about the public's reaction to the Brand accusations is: fuck all y'all who expect victims to act a certain way after being abused and letting abusers off the hook because the victim wasn't perfect. Do you know how insane that is?!

The four women approached the media because they instinctively knew all this, yet here we fuckung are. No matter how much evidence is produced nothing will be enough for most of society short of a gruesome video of the assault and even then many would find a way to put this on the, in these cases female victims.

This society hates women, plain and simple.

[may-the-gayforce-be-with-you]

johnny depp or amber heard?? just curious.....

My opinion doesn't matter anymore bcus the court gave its verdict on the case so baat khatm.chewing gum ki tarah people are still milking this case.

[lookmyskinisfallingoff]

Johnny Depp Vs. Amber Heard Settlement Agreement 2022.

On December 19, 2022, a settlement agreement was agreed on from Amber Heard’s team. Her insurance (still in legal suit against another insurance co. Amber had) has agreed to pay Depp $1 Million, finally settling the long, tedious legal battle that finally came ahead during 2022 this summer in Virginia.

 Both Amber Heard, her team and Johnny Depp and his legal team have dismissed their appeals after the settlement agreement. I saw a lot of twitter threads and articles for some reason marketing this as a win for Amber Heard, that the verdict was thrown out because of the settlement and that Amber is free to speak the same defamatory statements she’s made on Johnny in the 2018 OP from The Washington Post and it’s clear that people are purposefully lying to their followers and readers on the facts of this announcement for the settlement, what it means for this case and the current and final verdict for the defamation trial that took place this year in Viriginia.   

For those that still believe Amber and are still for some reason thinking she actually won the trial, she didn’t. This case cannot be re-tried, and the current verdict stands that Amber defamed her abuse victim, Johnny Depp and did so with malice. She cannot repeat any defaming statement she’s made on Depp in the past, if she does then she’s opening herself to another lawsuit for another defamation trial, so if she repeats her false statements in the press, on social media, in literature, in interviews, etc then she can and will be sued again. Freedom of speech does not mean free from consequences; it does not cover you when you purposefully lie on someone publicly and in doing so ruining someone’s reputation. She lost her defamation case due to actually defaming her victim and doing so with malice.  

Her paying out the settlement that her insurance agreed to does not vacate the verdict in Virginia, so please do not believe fake attorney’s and fan pages that can’t take 5 minutes to google what a verdict is and how settlements work or what they mean to the winning party. 

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf

[hbcsource]

All Helena essentially said was

1. Rowling doesn't deserve harassment for having an opinion

2. Depp, her friend of 15+ years, who she knows better than teenage morons on the internet and WHO WON HIS GODDAMN COURT CASE - was taken advantage of by a grifter/clout chaser. (Don't hop in the comments and whine about "muh UK verdict" either - The judge had a bunch of connections to her lawyers and The Sun. ALSO: THE SUN IS LITERALLY A TABLOID RAG. THEY ARE HATED BY AN ENTIRE COUNTY BECAUSE OF THE LIES THEY SPREAD ABOUT HILLSBOROUGH)

What were you actually expecting? Helena has been friends with Johnny throughout his whole ordeal. She said he was "still a friend" even when he was getting shat on back in 2018.

And surely you didn't expect her to be okay with Rowling getting de@th and r@ pe threats because of an opinion? She didn't even say she agreed with her opinion ffs.

[medjoul]

Helena Bonham Carter has spoken out in defence of her former collaborators JK Rowling and Johnny Depp.

Speaking to The Times in a new interview, Bonham Carter said: “It’s horrendous, a load of bollocks. I think [Rowling] has been hounded. It’s been taken to the extreme, the judgmentalism of people. She’s allowed her opinion, particularly if she’s suffered abuse. Everybody carries their own history of trauma and forms their opinions from that trauma and you have to respect where people come from and their pain. You don’t all have to agree on everything – that would be insane and boring. She’s not meaning it aggressively, she’s just saying something out of her own experience.”

Bonham Carter also claimed that the court verdict had vindicated Depp, who is also godfather to her children, Billy Ray, 18, and Nell, 14.

“Oh, I think he’s completely vindicated,” she said. “I think he’s fine now. Totally fine.”

Asked if the libel case was the “pendulum of #MeToo swinging back: “My view is that [Heard] got on that pendulum. That’s the problem with these things – that people will jump on the bandwagon because it’s the trend and to be the poster girl for it.”

A British court had previously ruled in favour of The Sun after the paper described Depp as a “wife-beater”, ruling that the description was “substantially true”. [x]

[havithreatendub4]

#article link #settlement #AH supporter #tweet

She settled 😆

#Confidentiality on #settlement of the #Appeal

#AH withdrew her #Appeal of the #Virginia verdict

[munstysmind]

I posted 5,175 times in 2022

That's 4,261 more posts than 2021!

375 posts created (7%)

4,800 posts reblogged (93%)

Blogs I reblogged the most:

@chickensarentcheap

@secretaryunpaid

@aussieez

@pixie88

@nuggsmum

I tagged 886 of my posts in 2022

#munstysmind - 335 posts

#maddison original series - 134 posts

#inbox - 79 posts

#writing prompts - 73 posts

#chris evans - 52 posts

#ask away - 42 posts

#munstysmind responds - 40 posts

#maddison inspiration - 33 posts

#your weakness series - 33 posts

#writing tips - 31 posts

Longest Tag: 79 characters

#respect must be given to those older that you regardless of if it’s been earned

My Top Posts in 2022:

#5

Ever since the verdict I’ve been seeing pathetic headlines like this!!

The media does not care that Johnny Depp is a Domestic Violence and Abuse Victim, they never have. They’re using this verdict to push the narrative that a man getting the justice he’s owed is an attack on women. It’s not.

This is NOT an attack on women. Womens rights haven’t been affected by this. The Me Too movement isn’t dead. Feminism hasn’t been set back a decade like some ignorant anon told me. Johnny didn’t win just because he’s a man.

What this actually is is a wake up call to the world about the sexist and misogynistic views on Domestic Violence and Abuse.

1 in 3 Domestic Violence and Abuse victims are men, and that’s just the REPORTED cases

How many male victims don’t report??

How many male victims are laughed out of police stations when they do try to report??

How many male victims are serving time in prison for the actions of their abusers??

How many male victims have lost everything??

People scream about wanting equality but conveniently forget what that actually means when someone other than a woman is the victim.

People are angry about the verdict because of x, y or z. They’re angry at Johnny because how dare he prove to the world that he didn’t do what this vile woman told the world he did.

If you want to be angry at someone, be angry at Amber.

She’s the reason all this happened.

She used her gender to destroy a man’s life.

She used the Me Too movement and sympathy of victims to her advantage.

She used the trauma every single victim has gone through for her own personal gain.

“Tell the world Johnny, tell them, ‘Johnny Depp, I, a man, I’m a victim too of domestic violence’ and see how many people believe or side with you” - Amber Heard

Well, he told the world and the whole world listened… to him, the victim, not the abuser. She destroyed a man’s life with lies and hers was destroyed with the truth.

84 notes - Posted June 4, 2022

#4

G'day mate!

Got some prompts for you! 😁

https://aussieez.tumblr.com/post/673663229453615104

#29, 43, 48 for whoever you choose in Maddison, though I think we know who 😜

💜 Ez

@aussieez you’ve been rooting, every pun intended, for this for god knows how long…

I didn’t get #48 “I hate being so far away” in but I know there’ll be no complaints.

See the full post

86 notes - Posted January 24, 2022

#3

MENACE - CHRIS EVANS - MADDISON

WARNING/S: Semi public sex, P in V

DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT GIVE PERMISSION FOR MY WORK TO BE USED IN ANY CAPACITY

Divider by @firefly-graphics

MAIN MASTERLIST

MADDISON MASTERLIST

MADDISON SHORTS AND EXTRAS MASTERLIST

MADDISON PROMPTS AND ASKS MASTERLIST

please let me know if you would like to be added to a tag list

See the full post

89 notes - Posted June 16, 2022

#2

And this is what happens when you don’t stay true to the source material like you promised you would. Your lead makes good on his word to leave as soon as you start fucking with it. You have to recast the role and give it to, in my opinion mediocre actor who’s trying to be like his phenomenal brother. You piss off millions of fans worldwide because of your incompetence and definitely tank your viewings numbers past season three. Not to mention it makes the man who made your show the success it is out to be the bad guy because days before this he announced he’s repressing a role he probably wouldn’t have even considered if he wasn’t unhappy in his current role. And all because Netflix decided to do what it does best, fuck around and ruin everything 😒

229 notes - Posted October 29, 2022

My #1 post of 2022

Prompt person: Henry Cavill

Prompt: “I don’t care how good it feels, you’d better not cum until I tell you to.”

YOUR OWN FAULT - HENRY CAVILL

WARNING/S: SMUT, NSFW - MINORS, DNI. P in V, unprotected sex, restraints, ??female dominant??

DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT GIVE PERMISSION FOR MY WORK TO BE USED IN ANY CAPACITY

Divider by @firefly-graphics

MAIN MASTERLIST

please let me know if you would like to be added to a tag list

See the full post

709 notes - Posted July 16, 2022

Get your Tumblr 2022 Year in Review →

[buzzblend]

Lies, and money, and a history of (no) violence! Oh my!

Believe all women? Please don’t. Especially not a woman by the name of Jo Natauri.

If the recent verdict in the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard case taught us anything, it’s this: Women are just as likely as men to lie, manipulate, and mislead. If anything, some of them are more likely to. After all, for years now, we have been encouraged, loudly and repeatedly, to believe all women, even the ones lacking a shred of evidence. As we saw in that Virginia courtroom, the jury determined that some women exploited this.

The following story plays out as Amber Heard, ironically, warned in her Washington Post op-ed against abuse where, drawing an analogy to the Titanic, people will “patch holes” to protect a powerful man accused of abuse – not because they care about him – but because they have a vested interest in his enterprise staying afloat. What happens if the woman is the powerful enterprise? This reality, a brutal one, is full of false allegations, cover-ups, unconscionable lies, and more than a few uncomfortable truths. It involves attempts by powerful people to destroy a good man’s name to keep Jo Natauri afloat.

The man’s name is Tiku Natauri.

Before going any further, it’s important to make the following clear: Everything you read here is backed up by facts – in other words, actual evidence. Before writing this piece, my investigation reviewed a number of illuminating email and text exchanges, documents, video footage, and audio recordings (including the police recordings embedded below). Now, you may find yourself asking the following: Why am I reading the story here, and not somewhere more, shall we say, prestigious? Good question. Well, the answer is quite simple.

The editors I reached out to were terrified by the idea of being hit with SLAPP suits. For the uninitiated, these suits are intended to intimidate and silence critics. They are frighteningly effective. This is America, after all, a place where slapping someone with a lawsuit has become a national hobby, a recreational activity, just something people do to pass the time. Americans sue for fun. This is why you’re reading the story here (thank you, by the way). It’s not because other outlets didn’t want to run the story. They did. However, the costs involved – or more specifically, the perceived costs – of being sued by someone, who has already spent millions on attorneys, gave outlets the chills.

The final question many will ask is this: Why are you writing it, and why should I read it? Like the Amber Heard affair, this is a public interest story: The number of articles referencing #MeToo and #BelieveWomen have exploded in recent weeks, and here seems to be another prominent #MeToo ambassador falsely alleging domestic violence.

Journalism that actually serves the interests of the public is at a premium. It’s also under threat. This story matters to anyone in possession of a conscience.

Background

Now, back to the actual story. The similarities to the Amber Heard trial are striking. Jo styles herself as a spokesperson against abuse, but four years ago, at the height of the #MeToo movement, she falsely accused Tiku of abuse to start the divorce. Ms. Natauri’s key witness is her sister, Sameera Gadiyaram. Last year, Jo falsely accused him of abuse again. This was only a few months after she publicly acknowledged in an acceptance speech that she has been personally “touched by” domestic violence. She did not name Tiku, but she referenced being “in this situation with someone you love” and “you have children. You are co-dependent financially.” Jo and Tiku have been together since 1996.

While there are two gag orders pending against Tiku, he stated “this has to end.” What follows is not “his” truth. It’s the truth.

Recordings reveal both sets of allegations are false along with evidence to corroborate his other claims. The same, however, cannot be said for the claims made by Jo.

Alleged Judicial Conflicts

Before delving into the damaging claims that have upended Mr. Natauri’s life, it’s important to establish a little context, most of which was reported in an October 2021 Air Mail article “Inside Teitler & Teitler, Goldman Sachs's Go-To Divorce Firm.” Tiku and Jo met in 1995 and started dating the following year before deciding to tie the knot in 2007. In 2018, Jo filed for divorce; their children were 8, 5, and 4 at the time. The Teitler firm seems to represent a vast majority of Goldman Sachs employees, including Jo, in divorce proceedings. The article reported conflicts between the judge handling their divorce, Lori Sattler, and the Teitler firm including campaign donation conflicts and how Judge Sattler hired Alexandra White, the sister of Jo’s lawyer Elizabeth White, within the first year of this case and without disclosure.

A September 2017 New York Post article “Democrats turn on judge nominee over controversial abortion case,” reported that current New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was the Public Advocate at the time, co-signed this letter from the National Organization for Women NY that Lori Sattler was “unfit to be elevated to a permanent status on the State Supreme court.”

In December 2021, Tiku filed a motion. He noted a number of additional conflicts involving Judge Sattler, Judge Sattler’s appointees Karen Rosenthal and Rodrigo Pizarro, and the Teitler firm. His key allegations:

Judge Sattler and the Teitler firm have not disclosed the hiring of Alexandra White in any affected cases

Judge Sattler, Karen Rosenthal, and Susan Bender are close personal friends, who regularly socialize together, which is not being disclosed

Karen Rosenthal and Rodrigo Pizarro work together in a separate entity, which is not being disclosed

Karen Rosenthal made personal contributions to causes sponsored by the Teitler attorneys, which is not being disclosed

The operative words, in case you missed them, are “not being disclosed.” The judicial system is predicated upon freedom from bias, and New York has refined it further stating that a judge must always avoid even the appearance of impropriety. One of Tiku’s former attorneys, concerning the lack of disclosure regarding the White sisters, expressed it best: The “deliberate silence only underscores the fact that there is a serious conflict of interest here.”

Shortly after Tiku filed this motion, change rippled through the New York City matrimonial circuit. Records reveal that a new judge, Kathleen Waterman-Marshall, took at least 300 cases from Judge Sattler, who according to the New York courts website is no longer sitting in the matrimonial part. Alexandra White left the employ of the court system. Karen Rosenthal’s law firm, Bender Rosenthal, seems to have closed its doors. Concerned? You should be.

The New York Chapter of AFCC now lists Ms. Rosenthal as a Past Co-President, and Dr. Pizarro’s name is nowhere to be seen, but Ms. Rosenthal and Dr. Pizarro were listed as Co-President and board member, respectively, as recently as November 2021. This is important, because, according to Tiku, he asked both Karen and Rodrigo in 2018 if they had any conflicts or relationships with others in this case: Both disclosed nothing. My research uncovered tax filings showing Ms. Rosenthal listed as Co-President as far back as 2014, and Dr. Pizarro listed as Vice President as far back as 2016. If this all seems a little odd, to you the reader, there’s a reason why. What occurred was, for lack of a better word, suspicious.

The Natauri Family

Then again, what occurred shouldn’t really come as a surprise. Jo Natauri is, after all, a very powerful woman. She is a partner at Goldman Sachs, the most coveted position on Wall Street. Ms. Natauri is “the lead investor for Launch with GS,” a Goldman investment initiative overseeing $1 billion “designed to narrow the gender gap in investing.” According to my research, Ms. Natauri earned more than $10 million last year, which is consistent with CNBC’s reporting that Goldman partners make anywhere between $12 to $15 million dollars per year.

Somewhat hilariously, Jo is a board member of Safe Horizon, the nation’s leading victim assistance non-profit whose mission is “to provide support, prevent violence and promote justice for victims of crime and abuse, their families and communities.”

Over their two decades together, Tiku shares stories of laughter and love but also unpredictable tension. He struggled with Jo’s forgetfulness, mood swings, and demands. He never came to grips with her ability to lie so effortlessly. Their marriage drifted between lower highs and even lower lows with an increasing frequency of make-up to break-up. These two text messages from March 2018, separated by just one week, showcase how quickly they moved from divorce to madly in love.

In June 2018, Jo gave Tiku a Father’s Day card that was effusive in its praise of him as husband and father:

"I am really finding myself falling in love with you again – sometimes for the same reasons as before – your kindness, humor and love but the new things like your sense of responsibility for your family, your love and involvement with the kids, your understanding of my ADD – it has just made what I feel for you deeper somehow … I cannot image a better DAD."

The lower lows continued. In July 2018, Tiku told Jo that he wanted a divorce. According to Tiku, Jo almost immediately set wheels in motion to destroy him. She met with the Teitler firm. She reached out to Michelle Szeremeta, who reached out to Caitlin Elise Brown, both ex-caregivers who were caught covering up an abusive punishment meted out on one of the Natauri children (this was captured in a recording also submitted to court). Jo procured a burner cell phone number. Jo spent hours, now individually, with the couple’s former marriage therapists. It seems Jo met with Harold Koplewicz, the founder of the Child Mind Institute (this is important later).

This is all happening with Jo in New York City while Tiku and the three children are in Charlotte for the summer.

In hindsight, Tiku shares, “she was laying the foundation for her upcoming emergency court filing.” Tiku goes on, “Jo needed corroboration and witnesses, and she did whatever it took to get them. Michelle was receiving more than $200,000 annualized, on the books, after being rehired for working around 20 hours per week.”

Violence Allegation #1: Ms. Natauri’s Emergency Filing

The following month, and without warning, Sameera served Tiku with an ex parte emergency motion with lurid tales of child abuse, kidnapping, and allegations of a domestic violence incident on August 9, 2018, so savage that Jo was “sobbing and terrified” having painted a picture of Tiku trying to get to her ultimately fighting over a bedroom door, where it seems she overpowers him, immediately locks the bedroom door and then locks herself into the bathroom leaving a further impression that Tiku is so enraged that he is capable of breaking down doors.

Documents reveal two other women – Goldman partner Elizabeth Cogan Fascitelli and Jo’s sister Sameera Gadiyaram, who had recently left Goldman to work for one of Earvin “Magic” Johnson’s firms – corroborated Jo’s tale. Sameera reported that Jo “was scared and locked herself in the bedroom and further locked herself in the bathroom” and that she asked Jo if the police should be called. Ms. Fascitelli provides a more thorough account:

The allegation is most certainly one of a physical nature. This will be very important later in this story. Slightly over a month separated this narrative from that loving Father’s Day card where Jo expressed that she was “so happy you [Tiku] are my partner,” and how she is “truly in awe of you [Tiku] as a parent and a father.”

At the emergency hearing, Mr. Natauri produced an audio recording showing Jo’s allegation was entirely fabricated. The recording reveals nothing close to the accounts reported by the three Goldman women. There is no fight, struggle, or violence.

Rather oddly, Jo, the “sobbing and terrified” victim, waited four months before claiming that the recording was incomplete, implying the incident happened before the start of the audio recording. An exasperated Tiku then produced a video recording that still showed no incident. Jo, presumably desperate to contradict reality, then alleged the recordings were edited, a claim that was refuted by a media forensic expert, who confirmed the recordings are “authentic and unedited” and true to August 9th. Tiku shares, “only then did Jo, through her attorneys, indicate that she misremembered, which is absurd given her three attempts to manufacture a domestic violence incident that she knows never existed.”

Fabrication and omission appear to be something Ms. Natauri excels at.

The Air Mail article referenced a rather interesting document, one that seems to demonstrate Jo’s fondness for fabricating false narratives. My research reveals this particular document was the product of surveying Jo’s Goldman colleagues as part of an executive coaching review to address concerns. Out of 15 directives, the first is for Jo to be “fully transparent” in her communications and “avoid misleading communications.” Please, it begs further, “avoid misleading by omission.” State the facts clearly, it adds. In other words, it asks her to stop lying. This, along with the next two requests – be “less absolute and demanding” and avoid “doing whatever it takes” – paints a picture of someone. All of the above is white-collar speak. It’s clear that Jo’s coworkers are describing deceit, self-centeredness, and a lack of remorse.

Nevertheless, there’s not a single acknowledgment or reference on the record of Jo’s multiple lies regarding August 9th from anyone other than Tiku. He shares, “everyone has my recordings and my affidavits; everyone saw Jo lie over those four months in a desperate attempt to salvage her credibility, but everyone is also silent.”

I ask Tiku, why would they do this? Tiku shares, “the headline, Multiple Goldman Sachs women caught fabricating abuse, at the height of #MeToo would have been devastating for Goldman’s image. I now know that Judge Sattler and the Teitler firm, aka the Goldman Sachs lawyers, are inappropriately close. So, unknown to me, the fix was in. Less than a month after Jo files for divorce, Goldman provides the first of many lines of credit – $1 million – which she needed to afford Teitler to bury what she did.” Mr. Natauri shares further, “and it worked.”

Mr. Natauri continues, “Teitler began obfuscating, delaying, and hindering everything, and Sattler let it play out. For example, Jo failed to produce a single credit card statement for financial discovery. Teitler tells Sattler that Jo no longer uses credit cards, so there’s no statements to produce. This madness is accepted by Sattler. Things like this continued. I was not allowed to testify about August 9th or the recordings during the custody trial. Teitler frequently objected, which Sattler sustained, during my direct testimony. This blew the mind of my attorney, who called this out for being a one-sided proceeding.” To think that this occurs in modern day America should shock any reader with a conscience. Then again, it really shouldn’t.

Rodrigo Pizarro, Judge Sattler’s appointed forensic custody evaluator, certainly has a way with words. Like Ms. Natauri, he appears to enjoy playing hard and fast with definitions – and the truth. Unlike Tiku, Dr. Pizarro was allowed to testify about August 9th, and it seems Dr. Pizarro took creative license with the “truth.” His testimony regarding August 9th is extremely brief (below) and lacks any mention of the original false allegation from Jo and her Goldman witnesses or the two follow-on lies by Jo to salvage the original allegation. Recall the statements from Ms. Gadiyaram and Ms. Fascitelli plus Jo’s sworn summary that “Tiku terrified me on my arrival in Charlotte last week, following me through the house and up the stairs to my separate bedroom and forcibly tried to prevent me from closing and locking the door” with what seems to be a Rochester garbage plate of double-speak from Dr. Pizarro to avoid plainly stating that Jo lied to the court multiple times:

"So even though it's true that there was no hitting or no physical violence, for me the context, which is his view that the mother isn't safe and his view that the mother has ADHD and [h]is view that the children shouldn't spend time alone with the mother, which is happening just in the days before, his view that somehow the mother's request to spend time by herself with the children during the weekend is unfair to him, and his insistence on trying to kind of split the weekend and his refusal to accept her no, for me they're all abusive from a psychological perspective, even though there was no physical violence."

At least, he correctly states there was no physical violence (he had no choice; the recordings are immutable), but the allegation was most certainly physical. How does one psychologically assault a door? According to Mr. Natauri, “the only psychological abuse is having the supposedly neutral forensic expert omit real evidence, in one swift stroke, to whitewash Jo’s false allegations of domestic violence into my being abusive. He also refused to accept the Goldman Sachs executive coaching report that outs Jo as a liar once I told him what it said about her.”

The Goldman Sachs Family

Mr. Natauri told me that this is one of many examples where “Jo, her effectively Goldman Sachs funded lawyers, seven engaged at last count, and Officers of the Court manipulated the divorce.” He reports “Teitler has been paid probably $3.5 to $4 million for their services, which is coincidentally about how much Goldman has loaned Jo.” Most recently, it seems Goldman Sachs has provided a minimum of a $10 million line of credit to Ms. Natauri. Multiple people and organizations, all seemingly connected to Goldman, have also enabled Jo to destroy a good man’s name.

At some point in 2018, Ms. Natauri started seeing Dr. Seth Aidinoff, a psychiatrist, who according to Tiku represented that Jo presents as someone who has suffered domestic abuse. It seems Dr. Aidinoff may have worked for Goldman Sachs briefly after college, but Dr. Aidinoff’s father was certainly important to Goldman Sachs: He was a board member of Goldman’s Philanthropy Fund.

Ms. Natauri used the Child Mind Institute (cue the earlier reference to meeting with Mr. Koplewicz) to disavow a prior mental health concern, but why use a center that self-describes itself as focused on children’s mental health? It turns out many of Jo’s key Goldman colleagues, including Ms. Fascitelli, are also key leaders for this institute as noted in a November 2018 Bloomberg article “Goldman's Varadhan Gives Thanksgiving Homily at Child Gala.” The article reported that almost $7 million was raised at the annual event that was attended by a who’s who of Goldman executives, some of which including the gala’s honoree and others used the Teitler firm in their respective divorces. This gala is happening less than two months after Tiku provided the audio recording to everyone but before Jo alleged the recording was incomplete.

In May 2021, Ms. Natauri, who was already a Safe Horizon board member, became one of the leading advocates for victims of abuse by being honored by Safe Horizon at their annual gala alongside Ashley Judd, who is widely recognized as being pivotal for the #MeToo movement. Documents reveal that Goldman Sachs along with its executives, including Jo and fellow Safe Horizon board member and Goldman partner Luke Sarsfield, were the largest financial sponsors of this annual gala having donated almost $700,000. Jo became more vocal about her own non-profit, the Sita Foundation, which is building a hidden recording device for victims of violence.

The irony is overwhelming.

Another non-profit, Children & Parents United (CPU), reached out twice to Safe Horizon detailing the history of Jo’s false accusations. While Safe Horizon did not respond to CPU, Mr. Sarsfield forwarded one of the communications to Jo, who used it as the basis for the second gag order pending against Tiku. While Ms. Natauri, who in her Safe Horizon acceptance speech, seems to advocate for bringing domestic violence out of the shadows, she has moved for multiple gag orders against Tiku.

I asked Tiku, why would they want to silence you? “Because they don’t want the public to see what’s happening to me. Once gagged, I can be arrested for speaking out. And, according to Pizarro, I’m the abuser so let’s be honest, the ACLU isn’t coming to my rescue, no one is coming to protect an alleged abuser’s right to free speech. But once September 9th happened, they never wanted that cat out of the bag. It exposes Jo as a fraud and others’ complicity in helping her cover it up.”

Violence Allegation #2: Ms. Natauri & The Police

The second whitewashing of false domestic violence allegations happened in relation to September 9, 2021, when Jo effectively represented to the police that the children were missing and in danger. It appears that Judge Waterman-Marshall without evidence or a trial and with conflicting affidavits from Tiku and Jo somehow concluded there was only a single call to the police.

To be clear, there were two phone calls with the police on September 9th. These recordings are being shared here for the first time.

While I have included these two recordings with this article, I feel compelled to address the recordings in this case. First, the two police recordings: They might not be as sensational as the recording of Amy Cooper feigning hysteria while falsely reporting that a Black birdwatcher was trying to assault her, but I am troubled by the calm, almost eerie serenity, in Ms. Natauri’s voice on the second call. Surely, any reasonable person knows that alleging a parent is mentally unwell with the status of the children unknown will lead the police to a certain conclusion.

Second, my investigation reviewed other recordings, but I did not include those with this reporting. I reviewed a video where Jo and Michelle are barricading a child into a room. I reviewed a video of Michelle purposefully “catapulting” a child off a bean bag a few feet into the air, and the child starts to cry uncontrollably after crashing down onto the hardwood floor. I reviewed a recording where Michelle, Michelle’s husband Matt Szeremeta, and Caitlin Brown are laughing about a punishment that was subjected upon one of the children (the recording does not reveal if Caitlin’s fiancé, Alex Amirsaleh, is part of the conversation). I reviewed a recording where Caitlin and Michelle are together and one of them seems to mimic and mock a Jewish accent while discussing Goldberg’s Deli in the Hamptons. These recordings have been previously submitted to the court, but just like the recordings of the alleged domestic violence incident from August 2018, there’s little to no acknowledgement of them by anyone other than Tiku.

Now, back to September 9, 2021. As background, Jo, her attorneys, and Tiku are parties to an email from September 3rd, where Tiku rejected Jo’s demand for him to drop off the children early on September 9th. Jo replies again, so there’s no question that she is aware of his position. Over the following week, Tiku does not hear further from the Teitler firm or Jo. Based on this email exchange alone, there was no reason to involve the police that day. Jo and her attorneys know that the children will not be dropped off early on September 9th.

Nevertheless, Ms. Natauri visits the Tribeca Precinct in person and falsely leads the police to believe that Tiku is mentally unhinged, unresponsive, and the children are missing. She claims the children were supposed to be dropped off early that morning. She files paperwork indicating that Tiku has ���strangled her in the past” and is capable of killing her or the children. According to Tiku, there are no prior allegations of him choking Jo or any physical harm beyond her emergency allegation concerning August 9, 2018. He also shares that this is the first time that he has been accused of being able to kill someone.

This results in a two-minute call between Tiku, Jo, and Officer Lindo, the latter two are together at the police station. Officer Lindo confirms the 6:00pm exchange of the children. The recording reveals that Jo omitted telling the police about the email exchange and then lies to Officer Lindo, who asks her directly on the call. Jo states she is “unaware of those emails.”

First call with the police

Jo leaves the Tribeca Precinct, walks a few blocks away, and places a second call directly to 911. The recording reveals Jo repeating the same false allegations: Tiku has mental issues, he is not responding to anyone, and she does not know when the children will be returned. Except, as you hear in the first phone call, Tiku just spoke with Jo and the police, who also explicitly confirmed the 6:00pm exchange that evening.

Second call with the police (redacted to remove identifying information)

Not only was there no reason to involve the police on September 9th due to the prior email exchange, but there was no reason to call 911 minutes after the first phone call.

911 immediately dispatches police to Tiku’s home.

She was, according to Tiku, “weaponizing the police hoping that I would be hurt or killed. She fully loaded her allegations so the police would fear that I was dangerous and up to something horrible. All because I said no to her early drop-off demand.”

Jo misled the police to believe that children might be in harm’s way. Of course, the police officers who rocked up at Tiku’s door didn't know this. To be clear, stressed Tiku, although “the responding officers were professional,” the initial few minutes were very tense. They were “understandably aggressive and concerned thinking children were in danger. By the end of the visit, the officers were very apologetic since they realized that Jo had tried to use the police, in their words, as a wedge in a divorce.”

In any western country, an emergency police visit, under false pretenses, is at risk of ending in disaster. In the US, however, the risk of disaster is particularly high.

On that inauspicious day, “had the police arrived minutes earlier,” said Tiku, “they would have heard a child’s screams exiting the elevator. Had they then decided to enter by force, they would have immediately seen an allegedly unstable father turn towards them with a knife in one hand with red covered things strewn on the kitchen counter with those same screams still penetrating the air.” Tiku was in the middle of making pizza for lunch. One child was playing video games at the dining room table.

Alleged Judicial Abuses

My investigation reveals that both judges and the Teitler firm hindered more than ten separate attempts by Tiku to obtain the evidence from the police. Judge Sattler refused to sign a subpoena. Judge Waterman-Marshall moved from questionable argument to argument – stating that falsifying a police action is “not a provision of the penal code,” that Tiku could not “rely on the police department” to make his case, and that there was a single call – before dismissing all fact-finding. In other words, Tiku would never be able to obtain the evidence to prove that Jo knowingly misled the police.

Somewhat miraculously, the records were acquired, proving that Jo had provided false statements and reports to the police and court.

Mr. Natauri shares, “this is why proof of two calls – not one as Jo and Judge Waterman repeatedly cite – is key to my allegations of misconduct. Like Pizarro’s testimony, Waterman removed the existence of the second call from the record. They were whitewashing the police incident just as they did Jo’s original domestic violence incident. It’s telling that after a single very brief hearing, Family Court, free from conflict, was willing to do what Sattler and Waterman refused to do for eight months.”

Tiku shares further, “while obstructing the police evidence might be the worst of Waterman’s actions, there’s a pattern. She is fearless in manipulating the record. She has a style of mischaracterizing what you say to suit her agenda and then berates you when you attempt to correct the record. This leaves her misrepresentation as the only version on file. Other times, she just openly disregards black and white facts.”

There seem to be a few examples supporting Tiku’s point.

Judge Waterman-Marshall stated that she has “no proof that there was any failure to disclose” Judge Sattler’s hiring of Alexandra White, but this conflicts with multiple independent sources.

Jo alleged that Tiku had hidden over $500,000 in an undisclosed account. Tiku showed that these funds were related to Jo’s NYC apartment, so Jo walked back her allegation. Judge Waterman-Marshall still imputed this as income to Tiku.

Tiku filed a contempt motion highlighting significant lies allegedly made by Jo throughout the proceeding concerning cancer, miscarriage, and finances. Judge Waterman-Marshall declined to sign the motion.

On the first day of the financial trial, Jo produced almost 1,000 pages of never-before-seen financial documents from Goldman Sachs related to the couple’s investments. Despite Tiku’s objection and the Teitler firm’s refusal to provide proof of the email that they claim was used to provide these documents to Tiku, the judge allows them into trial. “Jo had $50 million reasons to keep those documents out of reach,” Tiku shares, “because Goldman controls all our marital investments. I have not received a single statement since 2018, even after subpoenas, leaving me with no way to prove the size of our estate.”

Mr. Natauri’s Concussion

Despite all these abuses, what Mr. Natauri has suffered through with his physical health is nothing short of heartbreaking. Plagued by headaches, insomnia, fatigue, ringing in his ears, and sadness, his life is torture. One needn’t be religious to believe in Hell. Mr. Natauri currently resides there.

On March 10, 2022, Mr. Natauri fell down the Columbus Circle subway stairs hitting the back of his head and briefly losing consciousness. He was evaluated by EMTs, who transported him to the Weill Cornell Medical Center emergency room. He was diagnosed with a closed head injury/concussion.

Within an hour of being discharged from the emergency room, Tiku was ordered to appear for a virtual hearing, which Tiku reports was thirty minutes of absolute hell. “Waterman and Teitler started manipulating the facts to invalidate my injury. All I wanted to do was rest.” Judge Waterman-Marshall stated on the record that his emergency room discharge paperwork “doesn't have any diagnosis.” Yet, “head injuries, initial encounter” is clearly denoted under a bold “Diagnosis” caption on the first page. “More of the same,” Tiku shares, “they would argue the sky is red, if needed.”

These actions from the judge and Jo’s attorneys continued that evening and into the next day. Instead of rest, Tiku shares, he was under immense stress having to keep addressing repeated attempts to invalidate his injury.

He is now diagnosed with post concussive syndrome due to not being able to rest immediately following his concussion. It is hard for him to talk about this with me. It brings him to tears. Despite being evaluated by multiple doctors including a neurologist, who noted his inability to resume even normal activities, both Judge Sattler and Judge Waterman-Marshall concluded matters without him.

The financial trial, which he attended for two days prior to suffering a concussion, resumed for two days without him or anyone representing his interests: the defendant’s chair was empty. “Another one-sided proceeding,” Tiku states. Judge Sattler and Judge Waterman-Marshall now claim his medical paperwork lacks “competent medical proof,” but neither has defined what this means. Both judges did previously accept similar medical documentation when adjourning earlier items.

Conclusion

Mr. Natauri could have lost his life on September 9th due to Jo’s actions with the police. Starting on March 10th, Tiku lost, hopefully temporarily, some semblance of normalcy while he struggles with post-concussive syndrome due to the insensitive and vile actions from Jo and Officers of the Court. Does anyone care?

I know some that do – Mr. Natauri’s three children that love him dearly. Much like the Father’s Day card from 2018, there are numerous cards, letters, and emails from Jo, each one praising his genuine love for his children, and in turn, praising his importance to the lives of his children. This man is not a monster.

When I first heard of Mr. Natauri’s story, I was prepared for shocking claims. The Amber Heard defamation trial prepared me. I was not prepared for the layers: The Goldman connected law firm and its connection to the judge, the Goldman witnesses, the Goldman loans, a Goldman connected therapist, and the Goldman connected non-profit organizations. I realized I had not asked the obvious question: Why? Why is Jo doing this to the father of her three children and someone, according to her own actions and words, she loved until that moment in July 2018 when Tiku said he wanted a divorce.

I asked Mr. Natauri.

“Everyone asks,” he shares. “There’s no skeleton in the closet. Remember, her emergency papers were full of crazy accusations some going back a decade, so if I kicked her puppy or had an affair, it would be there. She’s used to winning and being in control. You don’t become a partner at Goldman, one of the youngest at the time, as a minority woman in a sea of white men without being ruthless, a killer.”

Mr. Natauri continues, “so, in July, we had another argument, probably the fourth breakup cycle in just a few weeks. We’re in separate bedrooms. She comes to my room in the middle of the night, wakes me up, and asks to reconcile one more time. This time, I say no. Not rude, lovingly. I say it’s clear we’re no longer in love with each other, and we are tearing each other apart. I think it’s time we go our separate ways. From that moment, I’ve never seen the Jo I used to know. I think the switch flipped. Even though she was just as unhappy, I guess I took away control by being the one to say no. I think from then, this divorce became just another transaction to her, something to win.”

Will Ms. Natauri pay a price? Probably not. She has the full force of Goldman, one of the most powerful firms in the world, behind her. They have invested heavily in her, and the company appears willing to cover for her. Where is the justice for Tiku? A good man has had his reputation dragged through the mud. At the same time, the real aggressor continues to be rewarded with fame and fortune.

Today, noted Tiku, “the #MeToo movement is under scrutiny due to the Johnny Depp trial.” Do we still believe all women? he asked, somewhat rhetorically. “Why does it have to be all or nothing?” It doesn’t. There is a distinct difference between taking a woman’s (or a man's) claims seriously and believing them without a shred of evidence. The former is understandable, even commendable; the latter is unconscionable. Jo Natauri appears to be an opportunistic, remorseless soul. She is, according to her own employer, a liar willing to do whatever it takes. She has gone to great lengths to destroy an innocent man’s name. After reading his story, I hope that the following is clear – men can be victims too. Mr. Natauri is just one of those many victims.

Remember how I opened by noting the similarities to the Amber Heard defamation lawsuit. There are also key differences. Unlike that trial, Mr. Natauri was able to produce recordings directly refuting both sets of domestic violence allegations against him. Unlike that trial, Tiku does not need to prove by proxy that Jo is a liar, since her Goldman Sachs colleagues already did this for him. In that trial, Judge Penney Azcarate gave each of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard equal time to try their respective cases. In the Natauri matter, Judge Sattler provided Jo with 7 days while directing Tiku could have only 2.5 days.

During Safe Horizon's 25th Annual Champion Awards broadcast (which can still be viewed on YouTube), John F. W. Rogers, Goldman Sachs’ Chief of Staff and Secretary to the Board of Directors described Jo as “a woman of great courage, character, and integrity … a shining thread in the tapestry of our great firm.” On April 11, 2022, the Teitler firm, in response to Tiku notifying them that the police records have been obtained, stated that “Ms. Natauri stands by her actions on September 9th.”

I wonder if Mr. Rogers and Ms. Natauri still feel the same way now that we really see what happened on that day. I’m not sure if we’ll ever know.

Outreach

I reached out to Jo, the Teitler & Teitler law firm, Caitlin Brown, Michelle Szeremeta, Karen Rosenthal, Rodrigo Pizarro, and Jeffrey Brodsky and Michael Slocum – the current and former Chair of the board with Safe Horizon – providing almost 24 hours for comment.

After 12 hours and receiving only one response, I contacted Goldman Sachs directly – John Rogers along with Andrea Williams, the head of media relations. Ms. Williams responded to my email by asking where this would be published. She then asked for a delay in publishing, as she was catching a transatlantic flight and wouldn't have enough time to address the “multiple inaccuracies.” I declined her request.

“I represented the Children and as such will continue to refrain from engaging in any publicity regarding them which ultimately is who this story will impact,” responded Ms. Rosenthal.

To be clear, this piece is not about the Natauri children. My reporting centers around what seems to be false police actions by a noted spokesperson against domestic violence and the context, i.e., people patching holes in Ms. Natauri’s Titanic, for why Tiku finds himself trapped in a never-ending cycle of injustice – all coincident with the conclusion of a nationally televised defamation trial along similar lines.

It seems others may have started to hedge their bets.

As of this publication, Ms. Natauri, still listed as a Safe Horizon board member, is conspicuously absent from the list of Safe Horizon Champion Award Honorees. Her co-honoree Ashley Judd is still noted.

Please share this story.

Mr. Natauri is a good man. More importantly, while he’s never claimed to be a perfect husband or father, he’s innocent of perpetuating the abuse and violence as Jo Natauri has alleged.

[iinfosurge]

Lies, and money, and a history of (no) violence! Oh my!

Believe all women? Please don’t. Especially not a woman by the name of Jo Natauri.

If the recent verdict in the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard case taught us anything, it’s this: Women are just as likely as men to lie, manipulate, and mislead. If anything, some of them are more likely to. After all, for years now, we have been encouraged, loudly and repeatedly, to believe all women, even the ones lacking a shred of evidence. As we saw in that Virginia courtroom, the jury determined that some women exploited this.

The following story plays out as Amber Heard, ironically, warned in her Washington Post op-ed against abuse where, drawing an analogy to the Titanic, people will “patch holes” to protect a powerful man accused of abuse – not because they care about him – but because they have a vested interest in his enterprise staying afloat. What happens if the woman is the powerful enterprise? This reality, a brutal one, is full of false allegations, cover-ups, unconscionable lies, and more than a few uncomfortable truths. It involves attempts by powerful people to destroy a good man’s name to keep Jo Natauri afloat.

The man’s name is Tiku Natauri.

Before going any further, it’s important to make the following clear: Everything you read here is backed up by facts – in other words, actual evidence. Before writing this piece, my investigation reviewed a number of illuminating email and text exchanges, documents, video footage, and audio recordings (including the police recordings embedded below). Now, you may find yourself asking the following: Why am I reading the story here, on Substack, and not somewhere more, shall we say, prestigious? Good question. Well, the answer is quite simple.

The editors I reached out to were terrified by the idea of being hit with SLAPP suits. For the uninitiated, these suits are intended to intimidate and silence critics. They are frighteningly effective. This is America, after all, a place where slapping someone with a lawsuit has become a national hobby, a recreational activity, just something people do to pass the time. Americans sue for fun. This is why you’re reading the story here (thank you, by the way). It’s not because other outlets didn’t want to run the story. They did. However, the costs involved – or more specifically, the perceived costs – of being sued by someone, who has already spent millions on attorneys, gave outlets the chills.

The final question many will ask is this: Why are you writing it, and why should I read it? Like the Amber Heard affair, this is a public interest story: The number of articles referencing #MeToo and #BelieveWomen have exploded in recent weeks, and here seems to be another prominent #MeToo ambassador falsely alleging domestic violence.

Journalism that actually serves the interests of the public is at a premium. It’s also under threat. This story matters to anyone in possession of a conscience.

[osoba99publiczna]

Amber Heard settles defamation suit with Johnny Depp, explains: I cannot afford…

Amber Heard will pay Johnny Depp $1 million to settle their long-running legal battle, in which each accused the other of domestic violence. The sum is a significant reduction from the $8.35 million she was ordered to pay after a six-week trial in Virginia earlier this year. The payment is expected to come from her insurance carrier. In a statement, Depp’s attorneys said that he would donate the money to charity. His attorneys have previously said that the case was “never about the money” for Depp. In her own statement, Heard said she had “lost faith in the American legal system.” She also said that the settlement spares her the ordeal of further litigation and allows her to finally “emancipate” herself from their marriage. Depp originally filed a $50 million defamation claim against Heard in March 2019 after she published an op-ed in the Washington Post in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” At the trial in Fairfax, Va., each actor testified for several days, revealing lurid details of drug abuse and screaming matches. Their testimony was streamed live on YouTube and remixed endlessly on TikTok and Facebook. Heard alleged that Depp repeatedly assaulted her, choked her and once raped her with a liquor bottle. She often broke down in sobs during her testimony. Depp, meanwhile, alleged that Heard was the aggressor in the relationship, and that he would try to retreat whenever she became violent. The couple had made audio recordings of their arguments during their marriage, and each side played clips they had selected to try to corroborate their accounts. The seven-person jury ruled in Depp’s favor on three separate claims of defamation, awarding him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. The latter sum was knocked down to $350,000 to comply with a statutory cap. In a small consolation to Heard, the jury also found in her favor on one of her three counterclaims, finding Depp liable for a statement made by his attorney in which Heard was accused of perpetrating a “hoax.” Depp was ordered to pay Heard $2 million, leaving a net judgment of $8.35 million in Depp’s favor. The following month, Heard filed a notice of appeal, with her attorney citing “errors” made by the court. However, the “Aquaman” actor has now agreed to withdraw her appeal. In a statement posted on Instagram announcing the decision, Heard made clear that “There are no restrictions or gags with respect to my voice moving forward” and blasted the U.S. legal system for turning her testimony into “entertainment and social media fodder.” She also compared her experience of the U.S. legal system to the U.K., where Depp sued British tabloid The Sun in 2020 for calling him a “wife beater” in an article. Heard was a chief witness for The Sun. In that case, the judge called the allegations “substantially true” and found in favor of The Sun. In a statement, representatives for Depp said they were pleased with the outcome, and emphasized that the jury’s verdicts still stands. Read the full article

[lakannada]

Amber Heard Absolutely Can Not Afford $10+ Million Judgment (According To Her Own Lawyer), So What Happens Next? - Celebrity Net Worth

Amber Heard Absolutely Can Not Afford $10+ Million Judgment (According To Her Own Lawyer), So What Happens Next? – Celebrity Net Worth

As you’ve undoubtedly already heard by now, the verdict in the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard defamation case is in, and the final tally shakes out to Heard owing Depp a bit more than $10 million for defamation of character. To make matters worse for Ms. Heard, the actress does not have the financial wherewithal to cover this debt if it’s enforced.Speaking with Savannah Guthrie on a Thursday morning…

[nkonson]

General News : ‘She’s going to lose’: Megyn Kelly on Amber Heard’s Johnny Depp verdict appeal

[usaitbari]

Amber Heard believes Johnny Depp win in libel case will negatively impact women

Amber Heard believes Johnny Depp win in libel case will negatively impact women

Amber Heard believes the verdict of the highly publicised defamation case in favour of Johnny Depp has a “chilling effect” on women. The Aquaman actor said in her appeal that if “allowed to stand” the holding will not be a positive outcome for abused women willing to speak against “powerful men.” The court documents obtained by People Magazine read, “The trial court also erred in overruling…

[ghanaplug]

Amber Heard files appeal against $10m defamation verdict

Amber Heard and her team has filed an appeal for the reversal of the jury’s $10 million verdict against her, or an entirely new trial. She was asked to pay the amount to her ex-husband Johnny Depp following a defamation trial held earlier this year. Less than a month after Johnny Depp appealed against Amber Heard being awarded $2 million in their high-profile defamation case, Amber’s lawyers have…