#It has exacerbated echo chambers

[purplealmonds]

🌳"Tree Rings" Theory

A common feature across Hyper and Shingi is the concentric circles upon both their foreheads. They resemble tree rings, and that got me thinking. What if they are signifiers of how many medicine sellers they have partnered and parted with in the past? 

The center circle represents themselves, and the rings surrounding that circle are the medicine sellers paired with them over the ages.

Like tree rings, the thickness and symmetry of each ring represents the strength, stability, and longevity of a Shingi’s bond with their medicine seller.

More in-depth thoughts below the cut!

Changing with the Generations

I believe a Shingi imprints upon their first medicine seller by heavily mirroring their physical appearance. For a god that has become something closer to human by entering into this bond, their physical body, clothing, and accessories they collect along the way are a significant part of their new identity.

Their first body becomes a template which adapts some but never all of the physical attributes of their future medicine sellers. The extent of the changes depends on how close the Shingi is with their current medicine seller and how much they still cling to their dead or retired ones. 

Give and Take

There are consequences on the spectrum between extreme attachment and detachment.

Shingi who has lost several medicine sellers and loved all of them equally fiercely may begin losing a sense of their “true” self because their physical appearance changes dramatically with each new partnership. 

It could be said it is a form of body dysphoria, which can be especially dangerous for a Shingi. Since their duty is to meet mononoke in combat, they must be in tune with their body. They are particularly vulnerable during the transitional periods where they need to relearn their new form.

On the flipside, a Shingi who went through the same loss but stays firmly attached to their first medicine seller may retain their sense of self through sheer willpower alone. However, this typically comes at the expense of weakening their bond with their current medicine seller. 

This weaker bond, which results in less spiritual resilience to the supernatural, can be fatal for the latter party.  Dying before forming meaningful bond with their emotionally closed-off Shingi only exacerbates the ever lowering “shelf life” of these unfortunate medicine sellers. 

Case Studies

With all this fabricated lore in mind, Ri is Hyper’s first medicine seller. Kon, on the other hand, is Shingi’s second medicine seller - which also explains the discrepancy in their physical features and garb.

Ri and Hyper’s relationship is quite healthy - a thick, evenly spaced ring encircling the circle. They have been together for a long time, and have a close bond spanning those eons. A metaphorical fire in the hearth which has been lovingly stoked. 

However, it also comes off as an artificially pristine relationship untested by true hardships. With how little differences Ri and Hyper have, an outsider may conclude they have more of an echo chamber than a real relationship. 

Shingi’s forehead rings are thick in some places and sickly-thin in others. It may represent a fraught relationship between his first and second medicine sellers of Kon. Such is the seismically unstable nature of the earth trigram. 

Compared to the relationship between the Ri trigram however, this relationship also feels more real. Each party of that relationship is a unique individual with different opinions. The strength of that bond comes from them working around those differences to come together stronger than ever. 

[theprologues]

Mini Journal Life Update

How is everyone doing? I'm sorry I have been MIA for awhile. As some of you know, I got married last year and it took up most of my bandwidth planning, organizing and then recovering (in a good way of course). I feel like I'm just starting to unpack Tortured Poets Department. It came out the week before I got married so I could just appreciate the music without doing a deep dive analysis for every song like I normally do. It's just so much packed into an album. There's a ton to uncover. Also, I'm writing a book. Yay! I've been trying to focus on that. It is hard for me to keep focus. I get bogged down by if it will turn into something or not versus just enjoying the writing journey and doing it because I enjoy it.

There's alot of PR behavior from the girls I don't understand. I think that is done on purpose. From what I deduce I think they are both hunkering down until the re-records are over which could be another two to three years. Probably re-assessing how/if they want to have a public reunion. I still believe the girls are happily together. None of that has changed for me. I miss the kaylor easter eggs. There used to be so many all the time. Now I think it takes some digging and dreaming to find the good references and then it's like we all automatically get the easy references right off the bat so we are an echo chamber of it. The general sentiment during and post Lover era by her fans was that the Easter Eggs were getting to be too much. Some people do too much. I think they just end up burning Taylor out and themselves by guessing when the next album is going to be or what she'll do next it's alot of advanced mind games. The fun thing about Taylor is how she surprises us. That's why I don't make predictions anymore with specifics.

I think Tiktok it kinda exacerbated the easter eggs with the gaylors and kaylors. Most of them weren't OGs and showing their faces to thousands of people everyday repeating things we had mentioned for years. Very nuanced things that wasn't always nuanced in expression. It will be interesting to see what happens now that Tiktok is gone from the US. (Sidenote: I love tiktok so much it's my favorite app. I'm really sad to see it go but hey at least I will get more time.)

I'm still positive the girls will come out into the sun one way or another. Not necessarily come out if that's not what they want -- what I specifically mean is they'll be seen in public together again in some form.

What do you think? Thoughts on traylor? Kaylor or Gaylor? Send me an ask let's chat!!

[silverskull]

Nobody asked me (i.e. the one Anon that has been going around asking EVERYONE "why Tim disrespected Lucy"), but yo. Show me you are emotionally immature, plotline inexperienced and have low critical thinking skills, without etc., etc.

Tiktok and IG are POISON. Like, neither of them are a community. Just rampant rumour mills and toxic takes. I miss the old days of boards and yahoo groups, where you had threads and categories and actual discussion.

I want the show to be popular. But the more people that have joined the fandom (however temporary they might be - and please, if you say you're going to go, then JUST. GO. I don't want you here.) the more awful the space has become. It's just anger, self centeredness and panic. And not even the fun kind.

I know I can mute and block, and I do - trust me. But it's not enough. The psychotic or infantile takes from one-line tiktok comments always makes its untraceable way back to my curated feed.

I used to be a baby in a fandom of elders. I had stupid ideas and childish notions. But I wasn't in an echo chamber and I had to read through threads and the wiser opinions of adults who had life experience (of life, of shows, of relationships - just experience) and I listened. I threw tantrums ("ugh, she's got boyfriends other than the one I ship her with, she's A WHORE") that were SO. BAD. Like, of their time, but so bad. But I couldn't help encountering reasonable opinions all the time, because of the nature of the group/board. And it not only developed my critical thinking skills far better than almost any theory I was studying at school, it calmed me and educated me on plotlines AND real life.

One line comments in a race to the bottom on IG or TT will never compare to that, and it's exacerbating the eternal panic element that exists in large fandoms. Those platforms are NOT designed for discussion or interaction, only for gathering numbers. The worst things will always get to the top and more people will see them

And then we all live with this constant edge of worry or fear, because where did that one weird thing I heard about come from??? What if it's right? Why does this stupid thought have to live in my brain now and how do I stop the nosedive?

And you can't. You can't find the original post and add your considered opinion. There is no room for that. TT and IG do not want your opinion. They want high-view content, and reasoned fandom discussion is NOT that.

Also, these phrases are IRRITATING AS FUCK:

-called it/calling it now

-just as I predicted!

-(actor) told me...

-"terrible writing"

-[the show creators] didn't expect this kind of fan reaction!

-if not X then I'm leaving! (doesn't leave)

Okay, peace.

[lewisinho]

tbf what annoys me the most about the massa case, is not even the case itself (it doesn't have much to stand on in the first place), it's more about how it exacerbated the journalistic problem f1 has...no one seems to be asking the right questions nor are even willing to actively challenge what is being said; they have many opportunities to interview him (massa is practically begging to be heard) but they are not actually getting anything of value out of him nor willing to discuss and question what he is saying (they don't even need massa for that, they can go do some investigating themselves, check the regulations etc.); the pretext of not engaging due to confusing legalese doesn't apply either when it's the one and only thing the case can be argued upon (or rather entirely dismantled); buzzwords like 'manipulation' or 'justice' fall flat when they are not backed up with actual facts and journalism fails when it engages in pointless false-balancing and creates a farcical echo chamber in which nothing is being challenged; but then again, i guess that can be said for journalism in general these days

[wicofe]

The digital age has revolutionized how information is created, shared, and consumed, with crowdsourcing emerging as a powerful tool for problem-solving and knowledge dissemination. Crowdsourcing, which relies on collective intelligence and the active participation of individuals, has driven innovation in fields ranging from disaster response to product development. However, the rise of fake news—false or misleading information presented as fact—poses a significant threat to the integrity and reliability of crowdsourced data. The widespread dissemination of misinformation can erode trust, distort collective understanding, and undermine the very principles that make crowdsourcing effective.

One of the most profound effects of fake news on crowdsourced information is its ability to undermine trust and credibility.

Crowdsourcing depends on participants’ willingness to contribute accurate data, ideas, or solutions. However, in an environment where fake news is pervasive, participants may grow skeptical about the validity of the information shared. This skepticism can deter people from engaging with crowdsourced platforms, fearing their contributions will be misused or overshadowed by false narratives. In cases where misinformation infiltrates these systems, the credibility of the entire project is jeopardized. For example, during crises like natural disasters or public health emergencies, crowdsourced data is often used to coordinate responses or allocate resources. If fake news contaminates this data, it can lead to harmful delays or misdirected efforts, putting lives at risk.

The rapid and viral nature of fake news further exacerbates its impact on crowdsourcing. Open-access platforms, where contributions are often unverified, can unintentionally amplify misinformation. When users unknowingly or carelessly share inaccurate information, it can quickly become entrenched in the collective dataset. Algorithms and social media dynamics exacerbate this problem, as sensational or emotionally charged content tends to spread faster than accurate, measured information. A common example is crowdsourced reviews on platforms like Amazon or Yelp, where fake reviews can manipulate consumer perceptions, distort market competition, and mislead potential buyers. Similarly, in knowledge repositories like Wikipedia, misinformation introduced into articles can spread globally, perpetuating inaccuracies until detected and corrected.

Beyond misinforming the public, fake news can also deepen divisions and foster polarization. Crowdsourced platforms are designed to pool diverse perspectives and foster collaboration, but when misinformation infiltrates these spaces, it can create echo chambers where users reinforce biased narratives. This polarization undermines the collective wisdom that crowdsourcing aims to harness, as dialogue becomes fragmented and contentious rather than constructive. In politically or socially sensitive contexts, misinformation campaigns can turn collaborative platforms into battlegrounds, derailing efforts to solve pressing issues and driving participants further apart.

Despite these challenges, there are strategies to mitigate the impact of fake news on crowdsourced information. One essential approach is implementing robust verification mechanisms. Crowdsourced platforms can employ AI tools to detect and flag suspicious contributions or identify patterns indicative of misinformation. For instance, Wikipedia’s community-driven editorial model effectively maintains accuracy by engaging volunteers to verify edits and ensure that citations are reliable. These mechanisms not only enhance the quality of data but also rebuild trust in the system.

Educating contributors about media literacy is another critical safeguard. By equipping participants with the skills to evaluate sources critically and verify information before sharing, platforms can significantly reduce the likelihood of misinformation infiltrating their datasets. This education must go hand-in-hand with transparency. Platforms should clearly outline their processes for moderating content and correcting errors, as well as visibly acknowledge and address inaccuracies when they occur. Transparency fosters accountability and reassures users that the platform is committed to accuracy and reliability.

Community involvement is another powerful tool in maintaining the integrity of crowdsourced information. Trusted contributors or subject-matter experts can play an active role in moderating and validating user-generated content. Platforms like Reddit demonstrate the effectiveness of community-driven moderation in maintaining the quality and authenticity of discussions. Similarly, collaboration with independent fact-checking organizations can bolster the credibility of crowdsourced platforms. Fact-checkers provide third-party validation for contentious claims, ensuring that misinformation is identified and corrected swiftly.

Technology also offers solutions to the challenges posed by fake news. Advanced machine learning algorithms can analyze content for indicators of misinformation, such as a lack of credible sources or emotionally manipulative language. These tools can flag questionable contributions in real-time, preventing their spread before they become entrenched in the dataset. Combining these technologies with human oversight ensures a balanced approach to maintaining accuracy.

In conclusion, the rise of fake news presents significant challenges to the reliability of crowdsourced information in the digital age. Misinformation can erode trust, amplify inaccuracies, and polarize participants, threatening the effectiveness of crowdsourcing initiatives. However, by adopting proactive measures such as verification mechanisms, media literacy education, transparency, and community engagement, the integrity of crowdsourced platforms can be preserved. As digital technologies continue to evolve, fostering a culture of critical thinking and accountability will be essential to maintaining the power of collective intelligence. By addressing the impact of fake news head-on, crowdsourced information can remain a valuable tool for innovation, collaboration, and progress in the digital era.

[ngdrb]

The Political Polarization of Democracy: A Comprehensive Analysis

In contemporary democratic societies, political polarization has emerged as a critical issue influencing governance, public discourse, and societal cohesion. This essay seeks to explore the multifaceted nature of political polarization within democracies, examining its causes, manifestations, and consequences.

Understanding Political Polarization

Political polarization can be defined as the divergence of political attitudes to ideological extremes. Within democratic frameworks, polarization often manifests in heightened partisan conflicts, ideological rigidity, and a breakdown of consensus-building mechanisms. It fundamentally alters the dynamics of democratic governance by exacerbating divisions among citizens, politicians, and institutions.

Causes of Political Polarization

Several factors contribute to political polarization in democracies. Firstly, socio-economic disparities and inequality can amplify political divisions, as differing economic interests lead to contrasting policy preferences. Secondly, media fragmentation and the rise of digital platforms have facilitated echo chambers and filter bubbles, reinforcing pre-existing beliefs and reducing exposure to diverse viewpoints. Thirdly, identity politics, characterized by the mobilization of groups based on shared identities such as race, ethnicity, or religion, has intensified political cleavages.

Manifestations in Democratic Processes

Political polarization manifests prominently in democratic processes. It impedes legislative efficacy as partisan gridlock obstructs consensus on policy-making. Moreover, polarization influences electoral behavior, with voters increasingly aligning along ideological lines rather than evaluating candidates based on policy outcomes or qualifications. This trend erodes trust in democratic institutions and electoral integrity, thereby undermining the legitimacy of elected governments.

Consequences for Governance and Society

The consequences of political polarization are far-reaching. In governance, polarization hinders effective policymaking and compromises the ability of governments to address pressing societal challenges. It fosters a climate of hostility and distrust among political adversaries, limiting opportunities for bipartisan cooperation. Socially, polarization contributes to societal fragmentation, diminishing social cohesion and fostering animosity between different segments of the population. Furthermore, it can lead to the erosion of democratic norms and values, as political actors prioritize partisan interests over democratic principles.

Addressing Political Polarization

Addressing political polarization requires a concerted effort from various stakeholders. Firstly, promoting civic education and media literacy can equip citizens with critical thinking skills necessary to navigate diverse sources of information and engage in constructive dialogue. Secondly, fostering inclusive political discourse that emphasizes shared values and common goals can mitigate divisive rhetoric and promote mutual understanding. Additionally, electoral reforms aimed at reducing the influence of money in politics and enhancing transparency can mitigate polarization's impact on democratic processes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, political polarization poses significant challenges to the health and vitality of democracies worldwide. By understanding its causes, manifestations, and consequences, policymakers and citizens alike can work towards mitigating its adverse effects. Upholding democratic principles of tolerance, inclusivity, and deliberation remains essential in fostering a political climate conducive to consensus-building and effective governance. Ultimately, combating political polarization is integral to safeguarding the democratic ideals of representation, accountability, and the pursuit of the common good.

Polarization and Democracy:

Definition: Political polarization refers to the increasing divergence of political views and attitudes between different groups or individuals within a society.

Effects on Democracy:

Positive Aspects:

Vigorous Debate: Some level of polarization can lead to robust debates, diverse perspectives, and creative problem-solving.

Clear Choices: It helps voters differentiate between parties and candidates, making electoral choices more distinct.

Negative Aspects:

Gridlock: Extreme polarization can lead to legislative gridlock, hindering effective governance.

Erosion of Trust: When parties demonize each other, public trust in institutions declines.

Us vs. Them Mentality: Polarization fosters an “us vs. them” mentality, undermining cooperation.

Threats to Democratic Norms: Extreme polarization can weaken democratic norms, such as respect for the rule of law and peaceful transitions of power.

Mitigation Strategies:

Intergroup Contact: Encourage interactions between opposing groups to reduce prejudice.

Perspective Taking: Foster empathy by encouraging people to see issues from others’ viewpoints.

Superordinate Goals: Emphasize shared goals that transcend partisan divisions.

Ranked Choice Voting: Implement electoral reforms that encourage moderation and positive elections.

Media Literacy: Promote critical thinking and media literacy to combat misinformation.

Social Media Kindness: Encourage respectful online discourse and defuse hateful speech.

Institutional Reforms: Strengthen democratic institutions to withstand polarization12.

Historical Impact:

19th Century: The 19th century witnessed transformative changes in democracy. Industrialization, abolitionism, and women’s suffrage contributed to expanding democratic ideals3.

Renaissance Humanism: The Renaissance shifted focus from monarchs and the Church to individual potential, laying the groundwork for democratic development4.

Recent Examples:

United States: A resurgence of civil society movements impacted democratic attitudes. Even failed movements leave enduring effects on participants and bystanders5.

Global Spread: Polarization affects democracies worldwide, from Brazil and India to Poland and Turkey6.

Long-Term Effects of Social Movements:

Case Study: China’s democracy movement.

Findings: Exposure to the movement during college led to significant attitudinal differences, especially among alumni of universities closely connected to the movement7.

In summary, while polarization can have both positive and negative effects, addressing it through informed strategies is crucial for maintaining healthy democracies.

[unguidedgentleman]

The Orwellian Nightmare: How Modern Media Contributes to the New World Order**

George Orwell's works, particularly "1984" and "Animal Farm," have become almost prophetic in describing the potential dangers of unchecked governmental power and the erasure of individual freedoms. Today, his cautionary tales resonate more than ever as the convergence of media, technology, and governance increasingly resembles the dystopian visions he warned us about. The pervasive influence of contemporary media may not just mirror Orwell's warnings but exacerbate a push towards a one-world totalitarian government.

In "Animal Farm," Orwell illustrates how propaganda can manipulate and control a population. The pigs on the farm, who gradually assume totalitarian control, use constant propaganda to justify their actions and maintain power. In the current era, traditional media and social platforms have a similar power. News outlets often present information in a manner designed to generate specific emotional responses, leading to polarized populations that are more easily manipulated.

The line between news and propaganda has blurred, making it challenging for individuals to discern objective truths from manipulative narratives. The omnipresent nature of media ensures that particular ideologies reach mass audiences swiftly, influencing public opinion and shaping societal norms. When critical analysis is replaced with echo chambers and bias confirmation, societies drift closer to the totalitarian control described in Orwell’s works.

Orwell's "1984" introduces us to Big Brother, the omnipresent surveillance state that monitors every facet of individual life. Today, tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Amazon collect vast amounts of data on every user. While marketed as tools for convenience and connectivity, these technologies also enable unprecedented levels of surveillance.

Every click, search, and location is logged, creating detailed profiles that can be used for targeted advertising, but also potentially for social control. Governments can and do access these troves of data, ostensibly for national security purposes. The merging of government oversight with corporate data collection creates a surveillance state far more sophisticated and intrusive than Orwell could have anticipated. This relentless monitoring facilitates control over populations, ensuring compliance and limiting dissent.

In Orwell's dystopian world, the past is constantly rewritten to serve the present narrative. This manipulation of history is complemented by stringent censorship. Today, the control of information is often more subtle but no less effective. Algorithms on social media platforms can suppress or promote content, subtly shaping what information is seen and what is hidden. Governments and corporations can collaborate to remove or censor undesirable information, often under the guise of combatting "fake news" or protecting public safety.

Moreover, the rise of "cancel culture" acts as a societal enforcement mechanism, where individuals are ostracized and silenced for expressing contrarian views. This peer-enforced censorship ensures that only a narrow range of acceptable opinions is publicly shared, pushing societies towards homogenized thought and Orwellian conformity.

Orwell’s warnings about power coalescing into an omnipotent state resonate with contemporary movements toward global governance. Organizations like the United Nations and the World Economic Forum are increasingly influential in shaping international policy, transcending national sovereignty. While global cooperation can address transnational issues like climate change and pandemics, it also risks concentrating power in unaccountable bureaucratic entities.

When media, technology, and governance intertwine at a global level, the risk of creating a one-world totalitarian government becomes palpable. Centralized control over information, coupled with global surveillance networks, could lead to a scenario where dissent is virtually impossible, echoing the most terrifying aspects of Orwell's dystopias.

Orwell's texts are not just stories but warnings. It is time we recognize and react to the signs of creeping totalitarianism in modern media and governance. The balance between security and freedom, between global cooperation and local autonomy, must be vigilantly maintained. Individuals must demand transparency, accountability, and the protection of individual liberties in the face of ever-expanding state and corporate power.

The Orwellian nightmare need not become our reality, but avoiding it requires awareness, critical thinking, and active resistance to the seductive allure of total control. By understanding the parallels between Orwell’s world and our own, we can strive to safeguard the freedoms that are easily lost but so difficult to reclaim.

[engagepro-social]

The Dark Side of Social Media: Unveiling the Dangers of Homophily

In today's digital age, social media platforms have become integral parts of our lives, connecting us with others around the world. However, amidst the allure of connectivity, there lies a darker side to social media—one that perpetuates homophily, or the tendency for individuals to associate with others who share similar traits or interests. In this blog post, we'll explore the negative aspects of homophily in social media and its potential risks.

Factors Contributing to Homophily:

Homophily, the phenomenon where individuals with similar characteristics are drawn to one another, has long been a subject of study in social network research. As McPherson, Smith-Lovin, and Cook (2001) elucidate, "the idea that similarity breeds connection has been a major theme in research on social networks, both formally and informally, for almost half a century."

The Role of Social Network Services:

In their analysis of social network services, Lee and Ahn (2012) dive into the homophily effect, noting that "individuals with similar characteristics tend to be attracted to one another and form connections." This underscores the pervasive nature of homophily in shaping social interactions online.

Risks of Homophily in Social Media:

While homophily may seem innocuous at first glance, it can exacerbate existing societal divisions and perpetuate echo chambers, where individuals are only exposed to viewpoints that mirror their own. This can lead to polarization, as individuals become increasingly isolated within their ideological bubbles.

Preventing the Negative Effects:

To mitigate the negative effects of homophily, it's crucial to actively seek out diverse perspectives, engage in respectful dialogue with those who hold different viewpoints, and critically evaluate the information we encounter online. By cultivating a sense of curiosity and open-mindedness, we can combat the harmful consequences of homophily in social media.

In conclusion, while social media has the power to connect us in unprecedented ways, we must be cognizant of its potential pitfalls. By understanding and addressing the negative aspects of homophily, we can foster a more inclusive and diverse online community.

References:

Lee, E., & Ahn, J. (2012). An analysis of homophily effect on social network service. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7235, 245-252.

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444.

[phanchester]

Congrats, Biden wins the election. What are you doing next to ensure trump 2.0 doesn't win? Voting harder? The Democratic Party has a responsibility to elect a reasonable candidate that they think can win. If Biden is truly electable, he'll win! He'll adopt policies that will be popular, and people will respond. If he isn't, then people regardless of whatever the fuck is happening with Republicans have a right to voice their discontent. That's how politics works, whether you think that's pragmatic or not.

The primaries literally just ended. It's June. Bodies are actively dropping in Palestine. It's not that leftists think they're better than you, you're just acting wildly unempathetic to try to draw the conversation to Voting when people are DYING!!! Like actively being bombed and having their bodies blown apart while you talk about elections.

And like, it's almost ironic because literal US citizens are dying in Palestine! You realize Palestinian and American are not two seperate paths that can't intersect right? People who could exercise their holy right to vote in Palestine are dying because American bombs are dropping on them.

Anyways this is a long rant to say maybe just don't be an asshole? Cause you and 22,000 thousand people who reblogged that weird post sound like massive fucking assholes. And xenophobic with the annoying ass Russian bot myth. Surprise!!! there's commies in America, how terrifying. Born and bred in the US of A.

look - i'm australian so all the american election content i am consuming is purely from that perspective. however, here's my general understanding of what's happening -

both trump and biden are going to have the same foreign policy. this is not only because of voting but because of lobby groups and international relations. i know this from an australian perspective because our prime minister was once upon a time very pro-palestinian - he even started a "friends of palestine" group - but that all went out the window when he became prime minister simply because of the grip international relations (particularly with you guys, the us) has on us. realistically, no one is going to rise to power and change the general us foreign policy perspective. however - i do think trump will further exacerbate it and not work under the guise of a ceasefire

trump has significantly worse domestic policies. i know biden hasn't done a lot either, but trump will 100% make worse things happen even faster. trump will take steps to make transitioning harder and even illegal for minors, he will only recognise two genders, he will keep trans women out of sports, he will deport non-white citizens based on their 'ideology' or parents, and he will completely surround himself with an echo chamber in the white house. why do i care? america is the hegemony. every government looks at you guys.

i'm not a biden supporter at all - from an australian pov, most people i talk to, even the hardcore liberal party members (liberal party is our right wing party) think the choices you have for this election is ridiculous. honestly i don't completely know what i would do in your position, and i am also not in a position to dictate anything.

but right now everyone i know thinks that trump will win. most people i talk to are certain of it. yes, both are or will be assisting a genocide. america is inherently pro-israel and every candidate the democratic party will choose will be funding a genocide. it's horrific, but realistic.

i think you shouldn't minimise the us election by comparing to the genocide in palestine. us is still the hegemony - china is the only competitor, and it is has nowhere near the amount of pull that the us has. every country has its eyes on the us. when a domestic policy is passed, the world reacts. discussion about the election should be held - not in replacement of, but beside discussion and awareness of the atrocities in palestine.

i don't have the certainty or the position to tell others to vote for biden. because i truly get it - i think people have the right to be upset, and that will be reflected in the elections this year. but only one is an openly white supremacist climate denier convincted felon who has committed sexual assault - and that is why the rest of the world is scared

[mentalmindsetmatters]

Depression's Impact on Medical Conditions

In a society where the dialogue about health often segregates mental and physical well-being into distinct categories, there lies a profound, yet often unspoken life thread between depression and chronic medical conditions. Understanding and addressing this intersection is not only crucial for the individual's holistic health but is also at the forefront of a revolution in healthcare — one that redefines 'health' to include emotional, psychological, and social components.

The Harmonic Discord of Depression and Disease

Depression manifests more than just the intangible feelings of sadness or detachment. It has a profound bi-directional relationship with several chronic medical ailments, serving both as a precursor and a consequence of conditions that can mar one's health for life. The science behind this harmony, though unsettling, is necessary for deeper comprehension and effective care provision.

Cardiotoxic Cocktails

There's a rhythm to heart health that depression disrupts. Studies have long established that individuals with depression have a higher risk of developing heart disease and are more likely to experience a heart attack. It’s a cocktail of stress hormones, inflammation, and lifestyle factors, which in tandem with a depleted psychological state, set the stage for cardiovascular disorders.

Diabetes: The Bitter Aftertaste of Depression

Depression and diabetes often coexist, each exacerbating the other's symptoms. The psychological toll of managing a life-altering condition like diabetes can give rise to or worsen existing depressive episodes. In the shadows of this complex health web, self-care can become a casualty, leading to poor glycemic control.

Chronic Pain: The Echo Chamber of Depression

For those fighting chronic pain conditions, each day can seem like an unending battle. What amplifies this fight is the shadow of depression, a condition that often shares neural pathways with the perception of pain. Managing one without addressing the other is a futile exercise, and the patient pays the price.

Raising the Mental Health Banner in Healthcare

An essential armament in the fight against the paired foes of depression and disease is to raise the banner of mental health awareness high. This initiative is not just for the benefit of individuals but for the collective consciousness, laying the groundwork for comprehensive healthcare reform.

Casting Light on Mental Health

To fight a battle, we must first know the enemy, and establishing a public understanding of the intricate links between mental and physical health is paramount. Public health campaigns, educational programs, and open dialogues serve not only to inform but to destigmatize, making the path to care less daunting.

Building a Community of Support

No man or woman is an island, and when mental illness thrums in the heart of another condition, the need for support is undeniable. Communities that cater to individuals navigating the dual challenges of depression and a chronic disease can be an invaluable lifeline, offering empathy, shared experiences, and practical help.

Insights for the Guardians of Health

From the seasoned physician to the zealous intern, insights into recognizing and addressing depression in patients grappling with medical conditions are crucial. Only with such awareness can healthcare providers become pragmatic guardians of their patients' complete health.

Recognizing the Silent Screams

The signs of depression are often subtle, hidden beneath the more apparent symptoms of a chronic medical condition. But by listening to patients, by being attuned to the nuances of their language, healthcare providers can discern the silent screams for help that depression carries.

Integrative Care: A Model for the Future

Medical care models of the future must be integrative, merging the diverse disciplines of mental health and medicine into a seamless approach to patient care. By doing so, healthcare providers can serve their patients more effectively, holistically, and humanely.

The United States Frontlines of Awareness

In the United States, the battleground for holistic healthcare rages on, with various initiatives seeking to increase awareness and support for those grappling with depression and medical ailments. It's a multifaceted campaign that touches every level of society, from individual efforts to governmental policies.

Legislated Liberation

Legal frameworks that ensure mental health parity in insurance coverage and healthcare accessibility are crucial cornerstones of the United States' campaign against the conjoined twins of malaise. By legislating support, the country takes a significant step toward recognizing the vital link between mental and physical health.

Public Campaigns and Awareness Events

From local support groups to nationwide campaigns, the United States is a variegated canvas of efforts to elevate mental health to its rightful position within our health discourse. National awareness events such as Mental Health Awareness Month and public campaigns shed light on the profound impact of depression on physical well-being.

Mind over Malady: A Treatment Paradigm

In conclusion, the narrative of depression must no longer be an aside in the script of medical conditions. By recognizing its pervasive impact on chronic diseases and cultivating integrated care approaches, we can reshape the treatment paradigm to be more comprehensive, compassionate, and ultimately more caring. When we start addressing the mind, not as an auxiliary to our physical health but as a critical organ in tandem, we take a step closer to achieving true well-being.

[phx-stf07]

NEGATIVE EFFECTS Of SOCIAL MEDIA ON SOCIETY

Social media has become an essential part of everyday life, changing the way that people communicate, network, and share information. But below the surface is a region characterized by several detrimental effects on society. Social media has a significant and wide-ranging impact on our communities, ranging from addiction and poor mental health outcomes to spreading false information and cyberbullying. This blog post examines the intricate web of harmful consequences that social media can have and draws attention to the difficulties we encounter when using the internet.

Furthermore, social media serves as a fertile ground for the rapid dissemination of misinformation and fake news, exacerbating societal distrust and sowing discord among individuals. The unchecked spread of false information can have far-reaching consequences, undermining public confidence in institutions, distorting public discourse, and even posing risks to public health and safety. Additionally, the anonymity and detachment offered by social media platforms often embolden individuals to engage in harmful behaviors such as cyberbullying, perpetuating harm and contributing to mental health issues such as depression and low self-esteem among victims.

Overall, social media has brought many benefits to society, such as increased connectivity and access to information. However, it has also brought several negative effects that cannot be ignored. These negative effects include cyberbullying, the spread of misinformation, addiction, the decline in face-to-face communication, self-esteem issues, social isolation, polarization, and echo chambers, cyber stalking and harassment, a decrease in privacy, and comparison and envy. It is essential to understand these negative effects and take steps to mitigate them, ensuring a healthier and more balanced use of social media. We should strive to use social media positively, promoting mental health and well-being, and creating a safe and healthy society.

[suomeen]

Chapter 5: Finnishing the Year

As the year was coming to an end, we finally moved into our new apartment in a 5-story municipal building. The house is rather simple, though it has all one might need, with a storage space outside and a laundry room in the basement. There are Finns living there but a lot of the apartments are owned by the city to house refugees or immigrants so there are a lot of Ukrainians, as well as people from Arabic countries and South East Asia.

The apartment is spacious, has 2 bedrooms and a larger living room. When we first arrived, there was basically nothing in it. Just beds and closets and a starter kit of cheap cutlery, plastic plate and glass, and a few pans. A bit later we also got a few chairs and bedside tables, as well as a kitchen table. The beds are very uncomfortable but it’s better than sleeping in the corridor and waking up from explosions. It was almost strange to feel so safe.

Sharing a tiny room with your mother in your 30s is not exactly ideal. Having my own room is probably what I miss the most. In a situation like that, you soon realize that privacy is a luxury. The inherent lack of privacy was exacerbated by the fact that without much furniture, carpets or curtains, the acoustics were way too good. You couldn’t make a sound without the whole apartment knowing. The bathroom is a fucking echo chamber. To make a private call, people go outside. You can always see someone hanging out in the yard with their phones. And its not great when it’s cold as fuck outside.

The city itself has a population of just 60k. But then Finland is not a big country with only 5 million people overall. So, a city of over 50k is sizeable. It’s not exactly small in terms of area either, as most of the houses have just 1 floor and the buildings are rather sparse. It looks like a forest anywhere you go. The problem is our block is quite far from the city center so to get literally anywhere you need to walk at least 40 minutes. You can take the bus but it costs 3e and doesn’t go everywhere and only at certain hours. No buses after 6 pm and on Sundays. The city is designed for cars. Or, at the very least, bikes. If you walk to a shop through an industrial zone, you’re probably not gonna meet a single person for miles. At least our house has a big supermarket right next to it.

When we arrived to settle in, there was already another dweller. A young woman named Lina who took the other bedroom. She was a German teacher, polite but sociable. We hit it off surprisingly well.  Our first order of business was to try and make this place feel at least a little bit like home the best we could and navigate this wondrous new territory.

The NY eve was wild. Sure, we used to have fireworks in Kyiv, but they went off at midnight and only lasted for about 5 minutes. We don’t have them since the war started. Fireworks sound just like explosions, you know.  Here, the fireworks began at 6 PM and went on till after midnight. There were hundreds of them going off all around us. they never stopped. It was insane. As the day wrapped up, the 3 of us sat down in the kitchen. We didn’t even have proper drinks because we learned too late that you can’t just buy alcohol in Finland. The supermarkets don’t sell anything over 5%. For that you have to go to one of the Alko shops and there are just 4 of them in town. Besides, the alcohol is also very expensive. We drank a few cans of cheap beer and called it a night.

[reflections-in-a-critical-eye]

Don't know if you ever felt like this but once you leave the online sphere for a while and then come back here... the way people talk about things on the internet feels so silly, like everyone takes the smallest things so seriously and everything is so performative, specially in the fanbase like wow ya'll can't be real speaking like this. 'Stanning spaces' are so odd, and the whole idea of stanning is so weird too, just feels very unhealthy to have this person you've never met have this much control over you

The fact that not too long ago I also let small things bother me like everything was a personal attack, the internet is a weird place and nowadays I'm just glad I've been able to sort of understand how damaging it is to see everyting through the lens of overwhelming virtual acceptance instead of actual self fulfillment

Yes, anon, I have felt this way and I'm trying to understand how we've ended up in this situation. Which is quite complex, but among the reasons behind it is this dependency we have on the online medium that is growing stronger by the day.

Lately there's talk again about the lack of third spaces and how we feel more and more alienated. It's even worse when the home and working spaces become one and we're trapped in one environment and our connection to the outside world is connected to more consumption than leisure or social activities. In turn, we spend time on our phone and I think that on one hand, we become desensitized (because our contact with other people is artificial, the lack of face to face conversation, we don't care about the person's feelings because we don't see the effects), and on the other hand, our echo chambers that we all inhabit to some degree, are able to turn every minor issue into a bigger problem. Of course, since we inhabit virtual spaces that have a singular focus. For example, the more time we spend in one fandom and it occupies a significant part of our free time during the day, the more we believe that any inconvenience is important. We exacerbate what would usually be brushed off. And it's even more dangerous because it's usually focused in fandoms surrounding real life people that end up being worshipped.

There's not a lot going on in people's lives sometimes. We've also been through a global pandemic (still ongoing actually) that contributed to our isolation. We consume products and content. It's a contemporary curse and as much as it has to do with individual choice, it is also generational, societal and a result of late stage capitalism.

[insertsyscoursehere]

Leveret has spent enough of his life doing his best to avoid manipulating people.

His BPD program, known as STEPPS, made it clear from the outset that one of the important factors in recovery was a friend group or safety net of family and friends to call him out when he’s being dysfunctional.

He was not saying that people don’t have a right to say no. He was saying that his experience with BPD was exacerbated by his lack of an entire social network, that his system had to come out of dormancy to at as one in lieu of physical people, and that because of that, he knows how miserable and painful isolation is.

That he wouldn’t wish isolation on his worst enemy.

But apparently being honest about his experience with BPD and how what was said online has adverse effects on those who went through extreme isolation is “manipulative”. Is a suicidal person telling someone “hey please don’t tell me to kys” manipulation as well?

As for the people watching this blog just to tattle on us like children— get a goddamn life. You and your “patron goddess” sent our host into a tailspin and now I’m handling the fallout. Go back to your cult and enjoy the echo chamber of stupidity.

— Peregrine

[sajidamit]

Effective CVE Initiatives for Bangladesh: Building Resilience Against Extremism

Bangladesh, a vibrant democracy with a rich history and diverse population, faces a growing challenge: Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). The complex interplay of socio-economic factors, political polarization, and online radicalization necessitates a nuanced and multi-pronged approach to preventing violent extremism from taking root. This blog post explores effective CVE initiatives for Bangladesh, drawing upon best practices and local context to outline a comprehensive roadmap for success.

Understanding the Landscape

Before diving into specific initiatives, understanding the drivers of extremism in Bangladesh is crucial. Factors like poverty, inequality, lack of social mobility, and religious misuse fuel resentment and vulnerability to radical ideologies. Additionally, the rise of online propaganda and echo chambers further exacerbate the problem, making it essential to address both offline and online environments.

Building Upon Existing Initiatives

Bangladesh has already made strides in developing CVE initiatives. The National Action Plan to Prevent and Counter Violent Extremism (NAPCVE) provides a valuable framework. Building upon existing efforts, such as community policing initiatives, religious dialogue forums, and youth engagement programs, is key to amplifying their impact.

Governmental Efforts and Policies

The government plays a pivotal role in combating extremism. This section examines existing policies and initiatives, evaluating their effectiveness and suggesting potential improvements to enhance their impact.

Community Engagement in CVE

Community involvement is key to successful CVE strategies. Highlighting the importance of grassroots initiatives, this section showcases success stories of communities actively countering extremism.

Role of Technology in Countering Extremism

In the digital age, technology can be a powerful tool in the fight against extremism. From early detection mechanisms to understanding the influence of social media, this section explores the role of technology in CVE efforts.

International Collaborations in CVE

Learning from global experiences is crucial. By examining international collaborations and successful models, Bangladesh can benefit from shared knowledge and strategies in the ongoing battle against extremism.

Education as a Preventive Measure

Integrating CVE into the education system is a proactive approach. This section discusses the impact of educational initiatives and awareness programs in preventing radicalization.

Evaluating the Effectiveness of CVE Programs

Measuring the success of CVE programs is challenging but essential. This section explores metrics for assessing effectiveness and discusses the inherent difficulties in quantifying the impact of such initiatives.

Youth Empowerment and Involvement

Empowering the youth is pivotal in building resilience against extremism. This section delves into strategies for engaging young individuals positively and creating opportunities for their active involvement.

Addressing Root Causes of Extremism

To create lasting change, it’s crucial to address the root causes of extremism. This section explores socio-economic factors contributing to radicalization and suggests strategies for tackling these issues effectively.

Public-Private Partnerships in CVE

Collaboration between the government and the private sector is explored in this section. Additionally, the role of corporate social responsibility in CVE initiatives is highlighted.

Challenges and Roadblocks

Identifying and understanding challenges is the first step towards overcoming them. This section examines common obstacles to effective CVE and proposes strategies for navigating these roadblocks.

Adapting to Evolving Threats

Extremist tactics continually evolve, requiring a dynamic response. This section emphasizes the need for flexibility in CVE strategies to adapt to emerging threats effectively.

Building Trust and Cooperation

Strengthening relationships between stakeholders is vital for successful CVE efforts. Fostering trust between the government and communities is explored in this section as a foundation for collaborative action.

Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

Implementing effective CVE initiatives requires overcoming multiple challenges. Ensuring sustainable funding, fostering collaboration between diverse stakeholders, and navigating sensitive religious and political contexts are some key hurdles. However, these challenges also present opportunities for innovation and collaboration. Engaging with civil society organizations, international partners, and academic institutions can bring valuable expertise and resources to the table.

Must Read Blog: Effective CVE Initiatives for Bangladesh

Conclusion

Countering violent extremism in Bangladesh requires a comprehensive and long-term strategy. By prioritizing community-driven approaches, promoting critical thinking, supporting alternative narratives, and leveraging technology responsibly, a more resilient society can be built. This requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders — government, civil society, religious leaders, and the public — to create a Bangladesh where tolerance, respect, and peaceful dialogue prevail.

[briannamwood]

Week 3: Social Media, Privacy, & Internet Business Model

Welcome back readers!

In our increasingly digitalized world, the impact of big data and algorithms cannot be overstated. The rapid growth of technology has transformed the way we live, work, and connect with others. After watching the lecture and the Netflix documentary "The Social Dilemma," it's important to reflect on the immense power exerted by these tools and the potential dangers they pose. In this blog post, I will explore the reasons why big data and algorithms are powerful and delve into the associated risks. Additionally, I will discuss strategies to address these issues on personal, professional, and societal levels.

The Power of Big Data and Algorithms

Big data and algorithms have become formidable tools due to their capacity to process and analyze vast amounts of information efficiently. Their strength lies in their ability to identify patterns, make predictions, and optimize outcomes. Here's why they are so powerful:

Data-Driven Decision Making: Businesses, governments, and organizations use big data and algorithms to make informed decisions. These tools can analyze consumer behavior, market trends, and even predict disease outbreaks, leading to more effective planning and resource allocation.

Personalization: Algorithms are responsible for the highly tailored content and advertisements you encounter online. They analyze your preferences and behaviors, aiming to enhance user experience and increase engagement.

Efficiency and Automation: Automation, driven by algorithms, has improved productivity in various sectors. This includes self-driving cars, recommendation engines, and smart manufacturing.

Scale and Speed: Big data and algorithms can process information at an unprecedented scale and speed, offering insights and solutions in real-time.

The Dangers of Their Use and Abuse

Privacy Invasion: The collection of vast amounts of personal data raises concerns about privacy. The documentary "The Social Dilemma" shed light on how user data is harvested and monetized by social media platforms, potentially undermining individuals' privacy.

Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers: Algorithms that prioritize personalized content can trap individuals in filter bubbles, reinforcing their existing beliefs and limiting exposure to diverse perspectives.

Manipulation and Misinformation: Big data and algorithms can be weaponized to spread misinformation and propaganda.

Bias and Discrimination: Algorithms can perpetuate and even exacerbate societal biases, leading to discrimination in various aspects.

Addiction and Mental Health Concerns: The addictive nature of social media platforms, driven by algorithmic recommendations, has raised concerns about their impact on mental health and well-being.

Addressing the Issues

1. Personal Level:

Educate yourself about data privacy and digital literacy to protect your personal information.

Limit your screen time and be mindful of your online consumption.

Diversify your information sources to break free from filter bubbles.

2. Professional Level:

Emphasize ethical AI and data use in the workplace. Develop guidelines and policies that promote fairness, transparency, and accountability.

Invest in employee training to ensure awareness and responsible use of data and algorithms.

3. Societal Level:

Advocate for stricter regulations and policies governing data collection and algorithm use.

Hold tech companies accountable for ethical practices and demand transparency in their algorithms.

Promote digital literacy in schools and communities to empower individuals to navigate the digital landscape effectively.

In conclusion, big data and algorithms are undoubtedly powerful tools with the potential to revolutionize industries and improve our lives. However, they also pose significant dangers when misused or abused. To strike a balance, we must address these challenges on personal, professional, and societal levels to ensure that the digital age benefits all of humanity without violating fundamental rights and values. It's a journey that requires collective efforts and continuous observation.

Until next time,

Brianna W.