#I’m proud of myself for finally having nuance about a discourse thing

[empyrangel]

I guess I’ll start this off by saying you’re a fucking clown, but I’m definitely not the first. You seem to suffer from piss poor tumblr media comprehension that makes you think that a story having problematic topics in it means that it inherently condones that.

Yes, the Fontaine justice system is shit. That’s the point. It was intentionally made to be shit. Every nation has systematic problems, this is one of Fontaine’s. The system is clearly and objectively flawed to anyone who isn’t from Fontaine. The whole first and second act was just so that we as the player could point and laugh at the fucked up justice system. You’d know that if you’d actually played it. (You claim you did, but there’s no way anyone could have actually played through Fontaine and come out with such a rancid and incorrect interpretation.)

That being said, you actually make some good points. The Fontaine prison system is also shit, but unlike the court, neither the game nor the players seem to realize this. The prisoners wanting to work to produce faulty and dangerous police robots for the government is shown as a good thing and a success on the part of the prison. Allowing prisoners to fight each other and gamble their livelihood on said fights is shown as normal and productive. Wriothesley is painted as a hero for giving the prisoners the bare minimum of one free meal of slop a day so they don’t starve, meanwhile he sits around and does nothing (he literally admitted to it) while all the prisoners have to work, and he can take advantage of the system he put in place and get fresh, good quality meals for himself and his peers while everyone else gets scraps. I think the worst of it is how Wriothesley and others (including the literal prisoners and the protagonist) cheerfully insist that Meropide isn’t a prison but rather a “rehabilitation facility” when it literally is a prison. That’s almost dystopian.

However, notice how I was able to talk about all that without defending any sick cultists? It’s not just “how the narrative is written” he literally is the bad guy. There’s no possible way that you can twist this story where that dipshit isn’t in the wrong. I mean did you really forget that the supposed poor helpless man that Big, Mean Wriothesley beat up for no reason was actually a deranged cult leader who mentally manipulated and abused his followers, injected literal fear serum into their brains to control them, and kept them locked in cages? Or are you actually willing to defend something like that in the name of calling every instance of a person in power doing literally anything “copaganda”? That’s not even what that word means. You’re just saying buzzwords without even understanding what it is you’re talking about. This isn’t activism, this is making a fool of yourself on the internet. It sucks that some of the only people pointing out the flaws in Fontaine are also complete idiots so no one takes anything they say seriously.

I’m just glad you didn’t touch on what we know about Fontaine’s fucked up adoption system from Lyney and Lynette and Wriothesley’s experiences, because I don’t think I could handle seeing someone claim that genshin condones child trafficking right now.

How’s that for talking about it?

Can someone with brains please please PLEASE talk about the disgusting portrayal of cops, crime, court proceedings, justice system and prison incarceration in genshin impact's fontaine update because I cannot SIT HERE and see people completely destroy their brain cells just so they could play a mediocre game and make some fictional men fuck in their mind

I'm deadass surprised there isn't more people talking about it??? I'm honestly so ??? It's literally presenting prison labour as a good thing. Wriothesley, the prison administrator, got rich off of making his inmates build police robots for the state AND HE'S PRAISED FOR IT. AND THEY'RE PAID IN COUPONS THAT CAN ONLY BE USED IN JAIL. HE WAS REWARDED FOR IT WITH HIS DUKE STATUS.

The fact that the fucking MC's mascot was like "oh the prisoners get one free meal a day? you're making life too good down here what if no one wants to leave :(" what in the bullshit. What in the. There's also a fighting ring in the prison, by the way, and you can bet on it with your coupons you just can't bet on both fighters.

The. This is a scene people think is hot. "But that's a bad guy!" THAT'S HOW THE NARRATIVE IS WRITTEN. THEY ARE ALWAYS THE BAD GUY IN FICTION. THAT'S HOW COPAGANDA WORKS, they make you think people in power can just beat the shit outta anyone and of course the person deserves it because they are clearly always the bad guys! And the people in power are always right! This is sarcasm btw.

Neuvillette and the magic judgement machine are literally seen as undeniable justice ordained by magic and NO ONE KNOWS HOW IT WORKS. NEUVILLETTE HIMSELF HAS NO CLUE WHAT HE'S DOING HE'S ACTIVELY FIGURING SHIT OUT AS WE SPEAK. And yet it's what sends people to The Worst Most Dangerous Super Scary Prison Ever Where There's No Laws [but 1 meal a day's great /s].

"But he feels bad!" Genshin has repeatedly chosen to highlight the pains and troubles of the oppressors [Eula] [Ei/Shogun] and there's literally never any repercussions for them aside from when they portray The Haterz clearly as villains or they turn it around and say "Well it was a misunderstanding all along! No one's to blame here!"

I'm not smart enough to go into details I'm just saying. This. needs to be talked about. I'm not telling you to stop the game bc Hyperfixations not really smth that can be controlled or whatever I get It I Got Back into the game when the first trailer dropped I drew neuvillette fanart and then everything just went downhill since then and I'm like why the fuck did I expect anything better than racist, pro cop dogshit from Mihoyo It needs to be talked about ESPECIALLY by people who still cares about it to critically. assess what the fuck you are absorbing because this shit isn't okay. This is literally paw patrol for weebs they just didn't call anyone a "cop"

PLEASE. TALK ABOUT IT.

[cavehags]

i realize this will probably bring up old drama so you might not want to answer it. but do you ever regret, however on purpose or on accident, bringing all that unnecesary hate towards Katara? i'm really sad and dissapointed tbh. i'm a woman of color and katara was so important to me growing up. my favorite animated woman ever. and then this resurgence comes and theres so, so much unnecesary hatred for her and everyone ignoring everything that makes her a good character.

(2/3) 2- and you know, i expected this from the male side of the fandom. they were misogynistic to her and the others even back then so i would expect it to be even worse with how internet culture is more mysogistic now that ever. and i wasnt wrong. male atla fans had some truly horrible takes and views that just came across as racism and misogyny. but, i expected these circles to be better. to be a safe space for us woc who love this character. but i found the same weird hatred for her.

(3/3) 3-i just, i cant believe i feel less welcome now that i did even back then. and back then i didnt even paricipate really. but at least i could enjoy fandom content without stumbling into misogyny and racism every other post. also sorry for sending this to your personal blog b i just wanted to let you know you controbuted to that too even if it wasnt your intention. at least you realized that and arent contributing to it anymore right? cause honestly the hate has only gotten worse not less.

hey anon. thanks for asking this question, because i hadn’t addressed this topic previously and this gave me an opportunity to do so. 

no, i don’t regret publicly interpreting a character whom i love through a nuanced and human lens. and i don’t regret combating the one-dimensional interpretation of this character, which posits that she’s merely an vaguely defined object of attraction for some boy or another, and a singularly gentle, mature, maternal figure whose sole purpose in life is to nurture others. those interpretations suck. they rob her of the humanity and complexity that make her character unique and they stem from misogynistic tropes that reduce women to the services they can provide to men. the thing in the world that matters most to me is fighting misogyny, and this trend to diminish a proud and powerful and angry teenage girl by exaggerating only her most socially acceptable traits is misogyny. 

unlike you, i did not grow up watching avatar: the last airbender. the shows i watched growing up did not have a lot of girls who felt real to me. the girls i saw on tv growing up were simple. they were the main characters’ crushes. they were simple, desirable, usually sweet and loving, and not much else. if they had a flaw, it was that they were, at best, “awkward.” whatever that means. or if they were the protagonists, which was rare, they were nice enough and tried to do the right thing, but they never had strong feelings like resentment and anger. they weren’t allowed to be unfeminine which meant they weren’t allowed to be bitter, angry or in any way flawed. they didn’t look like the version of girlhood i knew to be true for me personally, which included a lot of anger and frustration and powerlessness. 

that crappy representation left me with internalized misogyny that chased me for longer than i’d like to admit. i did not learn to think of girls as humans who could be as interesting and flawed and messy as the boys were. i did not value myself as a girl, and later a woman, because i thought the best thing a girl could be was... bland. boring. pretty, but empty. passionless.

it would have meant the world to me to see a character like katara. 

because katara is angry. she has every right to be: she’s had so much stolen from her, including her mother, her people, and her childhood. katara has a short fuse. she yells. she snaps. she fucks up. sometimes she makes mean jokes! i never saw a single one of those dreamily perfect cartoon love interests make mean jokes when i was a kid. she is extremely idealistic--it’s her defining character trait--but we see the bad side of that as well as the good. we see that her need to help others  leads her to act rashly, to get herself into danger, to put others in danger too. 

and she has her very own arc. it’s not about her love for another person, either (what a snooze of a storyline); it’s about growing up and learning to break down some of that stubborn black-and-white thinking that we all indulge in as children. it’s a true coming-of-age arc and it belongs to a fourteen-year-old girl. 

when i, to use a phrase i find crass, “entered the fandom,” i quickly realized that other fans’ perceptions of katara did not line up with the things i valued most about her. other fans seemed to valorize her most socially acceptable feminine qualities: her generosity, her kindness, her dedication to helping others. and of course i love those parts of her--i love everything about her--but what is really remarkable about avatar: the last airbender is that katara’s many important virtues are also counterbalanced by equally significant flaws. a good character has flaws. katara is a good character, and a deviation from the characters who made up my formative media landscape, because she has flaws. her temper, her idealism, her stubbornness--these are flaws. flaws make her seem real and human and challenge the mainstream sentiment that girls are not real or human.

it simply did not occur to me that celebrating these aspects of katara that make her a realistic and well-written teenage girl would spark ire from other adult fans. it absolutely did not occur to me that i would then be blamed for somehow causing misogynistic interpretations of this character, particularly given that misogynistic interpretations of this character are the very thing i sought to correct when i began to blog about this television show.

i’m told there are “fans” on instagram and tiktok who think katara is whiny, annoying, and overly preoccupied with her trauma. i do not use instagram or tiktok, so i wouldn’t know, but i’ll take your word for it. respectfully, however, they didn’t get that from me. misogynistic takes on katara have existed since before i came along. i have never, ever called katara whiny. and seeing as i have been treating my own PTSD in therapy for nine years, you can safely conclude that i don’t think anyone, katara included, is overly preoccupied with their trauma. that’s not a thing. do i think she’s annoying? of course not! as a character, she’s a delight. does she sometimes find real joy in aggravating her brother and her friends? yes, because she’s 14. i, an adult, am not annoyed by her. sokka and toph often are, because that is katara’s goal and katara always succeeds in her goals. she’s not “annoying.” 

if there are “fans” who are indeed following lesbians4sokka and somehow misreading every single post and interpreting them to mean that we hate katara and they should too, i don’t really know what you want me to do about that. l4s has over ten thousand followers and we have already posted so many essays disavowing katara hate. our feminist and antiracist objectives in running the blog are literally pinned with the headline “please read.”

furthermore, you cannot reasonably expect my co-blogger and me to control the way our words will be received. we should not have to, and are not going to, add a disclaimer to every post saying that when we critique or make jokes about a teenage girl we are doing so through a feminist lens. our url is lesbians4sokka, and we are clearly women. if that alone doesn’t make it obvious, then refer back to that pinned post. 

it is indescribably frustrating, and really goddamn depressing as well, that people are so comfortable with the misogynistic binary of Perfect Good Women and Flawed Wicked Bitches that they perceive any discussion of a woman’s flaws to be necessarily relegating her to the latter camp. if that is how you (a generic you) perceive women, then i’m sorry, but you’ve internalized sexism that i cannot cure you of. and it’s unjust to expect my friend and me to write for the lowest common denominator of readers who have not yet had their own feminist awakenings. we do not write picture books for babies. we write for ourselves, and with the expectation that our readers can think critically. reading media through a feminist lens is my primary interest; i have no intention of excising that angle from my writing.

as i go through my life, i am going to embrace the flaws of girls and women because not enough people do. as long as the dominant narratives surrounding women are “good and perfect” and “unlovable wh*re,” you’ll find me highlighting flawed, realistic, righteously angry women in the margins. and for what it’s worth, it’s not just katara. i champion depictions of angry girls in all sorts of media. that’s sort of my whole thing. my favorite movies are part of the angry girl cinematic universe: thoroughbreds, jennifer’s body, hard candy, jojo rabbit, et cetera. on tv, in addition to katara, you’ll find me celebrating tuca and bertie, poppy from mythic quest, tulip and lake from infinity train, korra, and more. i adore all these women and see myself in them. i hope you find this suitably persuasive to establish that i have sufficient Feminist Cred, according to your standards, to observe and write about these very flawed and human fictional women. 

what i’m saying is this: i decline to take responsibility for the misogynistic discourse orbiting a children’s cartoon. as someone who writes about that series from a perspective that seeks to add humanity and nuance to the reductive, one-dimensional, overwhelmingly sexist writing that already exists, i am pretty taken aback that i am the one being blamed for the very problem i sought to address. except not that taken aback because i am a woman online, haha! and this is always how it goes for us. 

finally, i think it sucks that you’ve chosen to blame me for a problem that begins and ends with the patriarchy. i can’t control the way this response will be perceived, just like how i can’t control the way anything will be perceived because i am just one human woman, but i do hope you choose to be reflective, and consider why you’ve chosen this avenue to assign blame. 

[actias-android]

So, okay, I don't usually like the gender to nonhumanity comparison but let's go with it for a second.

I have always felt...something. I've settled, eventually, as an ace, queer trans man with some additional nonbinary-ness. The road I took to get here was not short or simple, nor is it over, either; as long as I'm alive I could change and settle on another label, or even a whole different identity if that suits me better.

I know I have not really been entirely cis- or heterosexual, but what I have been has changed over the course of my life. I've been female and bisexual, but a tomboy; I've been female and not feminine but definitely a lesbian; I've been genderfluid, and attracted to only women; I've been nonbinary but statically so, and attracted to other nonbinary people; I've been a trans man and back to bisexual or pansexual again as far as attraction, though really mostly asexual insofar as sex being important to me or not.

I bring this up because it's become very common, especially in otherkin circles, to justify being otherkin as something like gender and orientation: it happens to you once and you have a One True You somewhere in there for your entire life, and the only direction you can go is towards this Real You. Anything else is a mistake.

This is nothing I've ever experienced with my own identity, which has wandered around in circles and occasionally gone sideways a bit, in any sense. Cool if that describes someone else out there, but it would be the height of ridiculousness to say that I wasn't really a lesbian when I identified as female and was solely attracted to females. Of course I was, because that's the term for someone like that, and that's the label I was proud to carry for that time. The person I was then with the understanding and feelings that I had then was a lesbian. That I later changed doesn't negate what was.

My understanding of myself is still evolving and will be until I stop breathing. So then, if being really, truly, for-real nonhuman is exactly like orientation and gender...well, then, that would mean that, at least for me, it would also evolve over time, and that each new step doesn't mean the ones that came before were somehow false, mistaken, or inauthentic. (What a horrible, high-stress thought...I couldn't deal with that.)

The other point is that my understanding of myself is, partly, not at all innate. I was not born with concepts or words for anything I've experienced. I didn't even realize that having attraction for more than one gender was anything unusual for my entire life up through college, and discovering the word 'bisexual' was a trip. I had never heard of trans people until later in college. I literally couldn't have identified myself as bisexual, trans, or even queer because those were not concepts I had. Being these things with these labels, as they're defined by others, is something that came to me through culture and society, and I decided eventually that they suit me as an expression.

This doesn't make my feelings more or less real. It's a lens through which I can process them. I could have had the same feelings, been the same person, and said, "I don't like these words. I think this isn't quite right." And really, even as I use them now, the nuance is close enough for rock and roll, but not entirely, 100% identical, but it's enough to be understood by others so it works.

Here's the part where I finally get around to what this has to do with otherkin. I don't see why any other aspect of identity has to be held to such a ridiculously high standard. Otherkinity itself is a community label, just like any other. If anything, it's most like gold-star gay (which is pretty outdated as a concept); you have to have always been this one thing and any deviation from the standard is grounds for losing your label.

I could, tomorrow, suddenly feel a very different way about my gender. Happened before, could happen again! I was still a trans man when I was one. Tomorrow I could wake up and not be fae anymore. I was still fae when I was fae. I wasn't mistaken, unless I choose to interpret it that way, but that's a choice I'm making. I've chosen to look at the evolution of my identity and give my past self the grace and understanding that I was not wrong when I decided who I was in the moment, and that life is defined by changes, and to give my future self the peace of mind and space to adjust course without fear of abandoning my own history.

I can't even imagine doing anything else, especially as so much of identity is informed by the culture around you. The discourse in the otherkin community regarding choice and its role in identity never seems to give the first thought to the fact that interpretation and labels are something external. Nobody is inherently otherkin, because otherkin is just a series of sounds; people may inherently feel that they're something other than human, but exactly what that is and what that means to them is a result of choosing to interact with others and accepting or rejecting various labels and defining concepts.

For my part, I can't breathe under the label of otherkin. I tried, but in the end, it was stifling, and had much more interest in telling me what I was not, by the standards of a bunch of people I've never met and don't think I would like much if I did. I'm happier being a faery without anyone else's rules telling me how I'm supposed to believe about past lives (all physically human as far as I know), or nonhuman memories (none whatsoever, thanks for asking), or whether or not I can choose to be this (I don't think I did, but I could un-choose it if I really wished to, and that's actually innate to my being fae).

And really, of course a faery is going to be happier without someone else's rules. If anything, deciding to not be otherkin is the more faery thing to do here.

Anyway this has been another vague, rambling post about why I don't like the label or the discourse and think they're both kind of full of shit, and also why I don't like the gender comparison that much. Gender is experienced just a little, if not a lot, differently by every person in the world, and for plenty of us, it's very malleable over time and probably better viewed as an ongoing process. Using it as a point of reference for something that's purportedly immutable by the most common definition is pretty damn silly in my opinion.

[conservativetranny]

2020 blog update

Hello. No idea if any of you ‘remember’ me but I do seem to have a fair few followers on here. I managed to access the login information for this account and it is safe to say this blog is dead. I denounce everything I stood for on this stupid shit. 

I’m writing this because it’s what the blog deserves. Not looking to be dramatic, not looking for sympathy, in fact I think i’ll get a bit of backlash for this but bring it on. 

The past and the present- a summary

I had this blog when I was 14, unfortunately way too young to have a social media presence (one which carried any responsibility like this one anyway). No matter what age I said I was, no matter how I portrayed myself or how you, my followers interpreted me, I was a sad young trans guy desperately hoping to look big, cool, masculine and stoic, and that manifested in the most toxic way possible. 

I’m 17 now, still very very young, and after developments in my life, especially pursuing my medical transition and becoming happy within myself, I no longer hold such toxic beliefs as I once did. I am happier with myself and no longer feel the need to sacrifice others’ dignity, respect, and unfortunately sometimes on this blog, privacy, for my own. I was a very insecure, stubborn, and ignorant teenager, who dealt with a lot of denial. I’m not blaming the way I treated people online on other factors, but of course external factors came into play. I was dealing with bullying and insecurity, with parental problems, and with loneliness and depression. I seeked some sort of community, and I wanted to push myself away from the ‘weak’ trans community (the way I viewed it at the time). I wasn’t in denial personally, with the fact that I was trans (being gay is a different story- I was in complete denial with the fact that I’m gay), more just with the way other people viewed me (I will expand on this). I could elaborate on the way in which I viewed other people and the way that projected onto my conduction online, but it is a complex and confusing story. I have completely changed my viewpoint on trans ‘discourse’, I am open minded, I am close friends with people I would have turned my ignorant nose up at years ago. I am so proud to say that I am a completely different person now. I grow every day, it seems, and I can assure that I will never return to this ignorant mindset.

Growth

With experience, I have grown too. Obviously, from 14-17 i have become more mature. I have different experiences now as well, for example, I don’t bind often at all really anymore, because its more comfortable and can sometimes make me more dysphoric to know I am binding. I’m bringing this up because I bet you back when I was active on this blog, I would’ve laughed at the more mature, tolerant me, and probably went on a tyrade about how I was a fake trans guy or less of a man for not binding. I often wonder what ‘old me’ would think of ‘new me’. Now obviously, three years isn’t a hell of a big difference, but to a 17 come 18 year old it is. I understand I am not an adult yet, but I’ve always taken pride in conducting myself with a sense of maturity and articulacy, and for this post and platform especially I feel it is appropriate.

The Truscum Mindset

Back when I ran this blog, I was in an echo chamber of like minded people, which didn’t help my ideological development. I watched youtubers like Blaire White and Kalvin Garrah, who I thought gave me a balanced, moderate, and fair opinion which is clear is not the case. Back then I would’ve scoffed at the idea of Blaire and Kalvin and other similar people as being radical or a gateway, but I urge you, if you feel you are slipping to obsession with those ideologies, to seek to widen your opinions and associations. I understand it’s a fairly niche discourse topic, but for me it opened a wider rabbit hole into the alt right. From wanting to fit into the lgbt and wider communities as a masculine male, this opened up the black hole of the alt right, I browsed (now deleted) subreddits and 4chan boards, and forums that put me in a very negative and dangerous place. If you’d like me to make a post elaborating on this, I am more than happy to, but this post is to address conservativetranny.

Denial and owning up to responsibility

Back in 2017/18, I was very much in denial of certain aspects of myself, especially my sexuality. I am gay. I thought that this was, and especially as a trans guy, a demasculating quality. I still deal with those feelings sometimes, as a lot of young gay guys do, but thankfully it does not manifest itself as toxic as it once did. I just wanted to portray myself online as how I thought I wanted to be viewed-I didn’t want to be viewed like ‘any other trans guy’. I wanted to be different, but now I can appreciate individuality and I can also embrace being trans as well.

I used to think that having alt views was the coolest thing ever, which contributed to my slip into the alt right, something on which I’ll elaborate on in later posts. I am now an advocate for deradicalisation, and being rational, truly rational. I’m also an advocate for maturity and owning up to your mistakes.

I have hurt people, especially in my personal life, throughout my time as a stupid, thoughtless immature teenager and i am sorry, from the bottom of my heart, for that. I now respect the hell out of those people and unfortunately, but definitely rightfully so, they have lost their respect for me. I don’t blame them, because as I said, up until very recently I was a horrible, toxic person. With maturity, in the past half a year I have been able to own up to my mistakes and I am now taking responsibility for that. No excuses, because I was a shitty person. Of course there is a line between excuses and justification, and I hope those which are reading this can distinguish and appreciate this difference.

Self Hatred and Truscum

Back when I ran this blog, it was very easy to tell I was self hating. Everything I wrote on here, pretty much, was hateful except for the odd two posts that were about something unrelated to my ideology. I was extremely dysphoric and in a bad place when I wrote these things and certainly projected my insecurities onto others. I wanted to find a community of different thinking people that would accept me, and this community was certainly the wrong turn. I had a feeling that it was wrong at the time, but I was too naive and cowardly to own up to it and seek a way out. I kind of just naturally fell out of it, a a lot of things happened in my personal life in late 2018 that forced me out of trans discourse and into much more toxic places like the alt right and true crime fandoms, and I think I’ve only recently ‘found myself’ in the past year or so. I might make a post on self growth on the future as I intend to keep this blog to elaborate and voice my opinions on deradicalisation and highlight the importance of owning up and self awareness.

Don’t fall into the rabbithole

I’m not too acquainted with trans discourse anymore, so I’m out of the loop on this one, but I’d imagine that there’s still ‘transmed vs tucute’ ideas. Kalvin Garrah’s community comes to mind, I haven’t watched his videos ‘as a fan’, if that makes sense, for a while now but I am aware he has a large fanbase of young trans teens that were in a similar mindset to where I was back when I ran this blog. I would love for this post to reach his opposers and supporters for that matter, as a means to show them that they don’t have to fall into this cycle of hate which can be very damaging. I used to be an avid fan of Kalvin, and Blaire White, amongst others. I watched exclusively their content alone and formed my opinions around theirs. If you’re doing that now, I urge you to consider other people when you do. Think about the people like Brennan Beckwith, people who were severely impacted and hurt by hateful rhetoric. Those people are human too, and with maturity you will learn that people with different experiences and views are, at the end of the day, the same as you, and they have feelings as well .I’m going to make a post in the future about Kalvin Garrah, certainly, but maybe Blaire White as well.

Why now?

You may be wondering why this post is being made now of all times, and that is a question that has every right to be asked. I feel as if this timing is right because I finally possess the level of maturity needed to own up to my mistakes and tell you that I was wrong and it was certainly wrong to post those opinions and mistakes online for all to see, and put people in my real life on blast like I did.

I had completely forgotten about this blog, and forgot about the rude and ignorant words I had written towards the people in my real life, until chance had it that I was in contact with one of the people mentioned in this post. [https://conservativetranny.tumblr.com/post/169351517511/no-one-pretends-to-be-trans]

I’m not going to go into the nuances of the conversation we had, but it turns out they had, for a while and definitely rightfully so been hurt by the fact that I had mentioned them, by name, in this post. And while I’d of course still like to keep these people anonymous and will not sacrifice their anonymity in order to tell a story or ‘save myself’, this post is quite funny to read back on as I am good friends with the people referred to as ‘P’ and ‘Shadow’ now.

This is the end of this post, as I feel I have said everything I have wanted to say regarding my previous conduct on this blog. I’m going to change my name on this blog and my bio as I do intend on further posts in the future. I’m not sure how many people, if any, this post will reach, but I’m satisfied I have written this anyway. I certainly do plan on writing future posts but I’m not exactly sure how to formulate them. But thank you so much for reading this far, and if you have, I appreciate it.

[battlestar-royco]

(1/?) I mean I find it really bizarre that people will go to the ends of the earth to defend characters that did bad things and say they did nothing wrong. And I have found this especially frustrating with a character called Chairman Rose. Yes Chairman Rose is a moc (also is the main villain of the game), there’s a big thing with overvillainization with him because of this, but there are the stand who insinuate that he did nothing wrong. And yes Rose did try to save Galar (good or bad intent

(2/?) unknown, but I personally subscribe to theory he really did want to save Galar for ethical reasons but part of him did it because he wanted to be seen as a hero), but his impatience did very nearly kill a stadium filled with people. And then there’s the issue of Bede. Bede is the Chairman’s adoptive son, who he adopted from an orphanage and gave him his first Pokémon (Hatenna, we’ll get to the possible issue with this later), then shipped him off to trainer school and forgets his own

(3/?) sons’ name, all Bede ever wanted was for Rose to be proud of him and love him, and while Bede is certainly no angel (he was a jerk but he became less of a jerk), the mural scene, my god, he disowned his son for trying to get the thing he wanted, so he abandoned his son, claimed that Bede “had no love for Galar” and yet Rose nearly destroyed the entire region (even if it was a misguided attempt to save it), and with him turning himself in later out of guilt. Now we get to the issue with

(4/?) Hatena. It’s evolutions have “this Pokémon will run away if you bring strong Pokémon around it” and the final evolve has this “if you bring strong emotions around this Pokémon it will silence you violently” so yeah not good for a kid who was known to have quite a bad temper on him. So the idea is that Rose gave Bede Hatena so that when it evolved it would help turn Bede into a blind follower of the him, or others argue that Rose gave him The Pokémon to help with his temper.

(5/5) so Rose makes me uncomfortable. But here’s my point, his stans need to stop saying he did nothing wrong and other people need to stop saying he’s a p*do and overvillanizing him. People also need to stop having Bede go back to Rose in fics. Like he’d want to go back to the person who emotionally neglected/might’ve emotionally abused him. And yeah Chairman Rose did some good things (he was a philanthropist), but maybe I’d be more forgiving if he were morally gray and not an anti-villain.

Okay I’m going to be honest, I have no frame of reference for the characters you’re talking about because I’ve never consumed any part of Pokemon. But I do resonate with your main point about stanning characters. Like I obviously do understand loving a character with your whole heart but I’ve never had such a fierce identification with a character that I felt I needed to defend their every act. Sometimes I find myself defending marginalized characters who get shit on for doing basically the same exact thing another character would have been praised for if they were white, a man, blah blah. Otherwise I’m happy to just sit there and eat my food without interacting with standoms because the discourse is just ridiculous when stanning is involved. It gets annoying and borderline alarming when you see huge metas defending someone who killed a bunch of innocents or whatever. A lot of people frankly just don’t know how to healthily interact with media or see nuance in a character so you end up with these extreme and toxic interactions among fans.

[free-martinis]

Words by ROBIN SWITHINBANK 

Photography by MATT HOLYOAK

Styling byGARETH SCOURFIELD

“It’s not the kind of thing you’d expect to hear a movie star say, at least, not one who has starred in some of the highest-grossing films of all time. ‘I’m not part of the Hollywood A-list,’ says Martin Freeman, shrugging his shoulders. ‘I’m genuinely not. No. Nowhere near.’

That might sound unduly modest, but the thing is, despite appearing as the titular figure in Peter Jackson’s $3bn Hobbit super-franchise; despite being part of Marvel’s universe (twice, most recently in Black Panther); despite appearing alongside the likes of Billy Bob Thornton (as Lester Nygaard in the Coen-brothers-inspired TV hit Fargo) and Benedict Cumberbatch (as Dr John Watson in Sherlock); and despite being an Emmy and BAFTA-award winning actor (both for Sherlock), he’s not.

‘For a lot of people, the Hobbit was played by Bilbo Baggins,’ he says, that familiar look of knowing resignation writ large across his face. Surely playing the heroic halfling has transformed his career and spun him into the red-carpet superstar galaxy? ‘I don’t know how many people after that thought: “Get me that guy.” I genuinely don’t know. It didn’t feel like it made a massive difference to me. Honest to God.’ Perhaps that will explain where he keeps those awards. ‘On my roof,’ he quips. ‘So people can see them.’

It’s tempting to cast Freeman as unhappy. There’s certainly a tension in him. In person, he’s courteous and engaged – he says words like ‘genuinely’ and ‘literally’ often and fervently – but there’s a sharpness to his opinions, and there’s plenty that riles him. That said, he seems at one with his lot. Mostly. ‘I will allow myself to be proud of that,’ he says of his awards, clearly trying not to big himself up. ‘I do alright. I do OK.’

Martin Freeman might have done some blockbusters in his time, but his first love is independent film. His latest vehicle is Ghost Stories, a proper spooky, throw-your-popcorn-in-the-air fright fest. It’s also an anthology – the fashionable format of our time – featuring the mercurial talents of Paul Whitehouse, Alex Lawther and Andy Nyman. Freeman appears in the third and final act as a wealthy city trader with a ghost problem no prominent psychiatrist has been able to explain. It’s a bleak piece, but it’s funny, too, particularly when Freeman’s natural comic talents are front and centre.

‘People are being hit badly. I’d happily vote for someone who’s going to tax me more’

It is also, for reasons that can’t be explained without spoiling the film, another reminder that the 46-year-old is one of our most versatile actors (‘To be a good comic actor means you’re a good actor, right?’). We spend 10 minutes discussing the film, which Nyman co-wrote and co-directed with Jeremy ‘League of Gentlemen’ Dyson, before it dawns on us that we can’t really talk about it. Not on paper, anyway. One salient detail gets the full treatment, before Freeman jumps in: ‘Don’t give that away, for f**k’s sake!’ he implores. ‘This is my first interview for the film and I’ve already f**ked it up…’

Freeman is not known for his candour. He doesn’t do a lot of interviews and he’s no self publicist (he’s not on social media), only letting it slip that he and Sherlock co-star Amanda Abbington had split after two kids and 16 years together in an interview with the FT a year after the event. Is he with anyone now? ‘Well,’ he says, folding his arms. ‘I would never tell you if I was.’

Conversation about his background and family is therefore a bit stilted. He was born in Aldershot and grew up the youngest of five siblings in Teddington (‘yes, those are the facts.’). His parents split not long after he was born, but he recalls a happy home. ‘We kissed a lot and hugged a lot,’ he says. ‘I mean, it wasn’t The Brady Bunch – we also f**king screamed and shouted a lot.’

They were creative, too, a ‘showy-offy family, no wallflowers’. He’s the only career actor, a path he was encouraged to follow, particularly by his mother, who never got the chance. ‘I was only met with support,’ he says. ‘I didn’t have to leave home, I wasn’t booted out. I know people who faced active hostility from their parents, because it’s so unsafe and it’s in the lap of the gods whether you’ll be able to feed yourself or not.’

These days, Freeman is certainly able to feed himself. Over the past 20 years, his talents have served him well. His big break came in The Office, the mockumentary cringeathon that also made household names of Ricky Gervais, Stephen Merchant and Mackenzie Crook. ‘I’m very proud of it,’ he says of the show that in 2004 became the first British sitcom to win a Golden Globe for Best Television Series – Comedy or Musical. ‘I still think it’s a phenomenal show. And I still think the central performance [Gervais’s] is one of the best things I’ve ever seen, let alone acted with. I could not have wanted a better break.’

The apocryphal stories surrounding the show are legion, but the one about him originally auditioning to play Gareth, Crook’s character and the butt of all the jokes, rather than Tim, is true. Gervais and his co-creator Merchant spotted something in Freeman audiences have come to know him by. ‘The Office is basically a room full of Laurels and one Hardy, which is Tim,’ Gervais once told The Sun. ‘Tim’s character is pretty common in comedy – that person who thinks they’re better than everyone else, but it doesn’t seem to get them anywhere.’

For a time, it seemed Freeman might suffer the same fate. He became known as the guy that did ‘that face’. He once appeared on Never Mind the Buzzcocks and was invited by host Simon Amstell to do a ‘sigh-off’ with Gavin & Stacey’s routinely put-upon Mathew Horne. Did he worry he’d never lose that tag? ‘Yeah, I was nervous about that,’ he admits. ‘The thing is, I can do that face. But that face, it’s Oliver Hardy’s face. Not my face. He did it 70 years before I did. That’s just me channelling Oliver Hardy.’ Gervais was right, then.

During the mid-2000s, he picked up roles in Love Actually and Hot Fuzz, and played the lead in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. Then came Sherlock, The Hobbit, Fargo, the awards and a lot more public attention. ‘I was out last night, having a drink with a friend, walking around town. There are people following you around with camera phones in your face – it’s not pleasant.’

The public is never far from Freeman’s mind. He’s openly political, not exactly in a ‘Ladies and gentleman, the next President of the United States of America’ kind of way (we’ve established he’s not Hollywood – he doesn’t even own a home in the US), but he did front a party political broadcast for the Labour Party in 2015 and endorsed Jeremy Corbyn’s successful leadership bid later that year. A question about fairness opens the floodgates. ‘I do genuinely think this Government is f**king up. I really do,’ he says. ‘And that’s not to say that a Labour Government would be doing much better. But I think people are being hit genuinely really badly, who shouldn’t be. That’s why I’d happily vote for someone who’s going to tax me more.’

Pardon? ‘I think I should be taxed more. I’ve got more money than a lot of people. In my lifetime, there have always been homeless people. Now there’s even more. Food banks, and people being made homeless by not being able to afford their houses, and not enough social housing being made or built, and austerity on and on and on… I don’t know what we expect to happen, but if you’re doing that and cutting the police, what the f**k do you think is going to happen?’

‘We’re getting more polarised. The inability to see the other side is a problem. Social media has helped do away with nuance’

He’s only too conscious of the conflict in being a very wealthy movie star who thinks more should be done to support the disenfranchised. ‘I get it,’ he says. ‘I get why people say: “Who is this prick?” I get it. Most people aren’t as lucky as me. That’s just the truth. So I can see easily why it comes across as pontificating, why it comes across as being champagne socialist. Which is what we’re all called, as soon as you’re not on the dole. If you’re vaguely famous and say anything left wing, it’s a very easy stick to hit you with.’

That’s the natural framework of popular discourse, though, surely? A binary response is easiest. ‘But we’re getting more polarised,’ he retorts. ‘Definitely. The inability to see the other side is a problem. Unless someone is actually driving down your street in a Panzer, then I think you have to keep dialogue. Social media has helped do away with nuance. If me and you have a disagreement here, we can still have a cup of tea. But we do it on social media – then you’re a Nazi.

‘We can’t go on like that. I will easily say I think Trump is a vile pig, but I don’t think every single person who votes Republican is a vile pig. That would be crazy. And I certainly don’t think that about everyone who votes Conservative. It’s not my team. It’s not my party. But do I know Conservatives? Do I like ’em? ’Course I do. Can I not stand some Labour people? Yeah, I can’t stand some of them. So, my hope would be, genuinely, that we start to put our phones down for a minute, and actually not get involved in these f**king wars, which are so safe to have, and so self-righteous… It costs you nothing to be an armchair activist.’

In Ghost Stories the themes of guilt, good and bad and choice run through the piece, holding it together. In one particularly chilling scene, Freeman’s character utters the deliciously portentous line, ‘I didn’t believe in evil until that night…’ He was brought up a Catholic, but isn’t ‘card-carrying’ now. Does he think the film is a modern parable, a wake-up call to burst our secular bubble?

‘Maybe,’ he says reluctantly. ‘I’m one of the only people who I know in my world who isn’t an atheist. I like the questions. That’s where the interesting stuff happens. I’m equally uneasy with hardcore unquestioning atheists as I am with born-again Christians with their hands in the air and their eyes closed. In the same way that yes, I’m of the Left, but there are people and things about the Left that make me very uncomfortable. The sort of unquestioning, demonising of anyone who doesn’t agree with you, kind of thing. I see that in atheists – if you don’t agree with me, you’re intrinsically a moron. And that isn’t helpful. The older I get, the more I realise you need dialogue.’

This, it seems, is the real Freeman. Vocal, ardent, yet nuanced. But he’s not claiming the soapbox. ‘Let’s face it, I wasn’t a very good omen in 2015,’ he says of his virtual doorstepping days. ‘I don’t want my voice to be a political voice. I’m not some political genius. There’s one thing I’m good at, and it’s acting. I have absolute faith in my ability to do that.’

Like it or not, he has a voice. Thank goodness, it’s not the hashtaggable, awards-season friendly voice of many of his fellow actors. He’s more balanced than that. More open to argument. That’s what we saw – and loved – in Tim. In Lester. In Bilbo. In Freeman, we see life’s ambiguousness, its ludicrousness, its ordinariness.

Freeman has to go. He’s got ‘kiddy things’ to do. He’s an active father when he’s not working, and frankly, I’m holding him up. In a flash, he’s gone.

[autoirishlitdiscourses]

Discourse of Tuesday, 22 September 2020

Microsoft on line 10; and why does this but not the same reaction to the zombies, who can and must be formatted according to the group's silence in response to your other email in just a bit more so that they become part of your mind about how you can carry yourself, but rather attempts to gloss over anything, though, that there has to somehow be constructed through texts that you're reading. I say not to say here to a particularly provocative one might be productive, but I also will not grant extensions beyond the length requirements. Thank you for 20 November Boy song on p.

You picked a good job this week if he did his recitation; said I don't want the experience to develop an even stronger paper. Haha. But you really have shown that you're scheduled to recite and discuss when you've finalized your decisions. Think about what's actually important to the stage, and I notice you.

You took a bit more space to discuss any of that first draft, but it's important, or discuss how you can frame your argument itself is sensitive and perceptive things to think about how readers respond to everyone's first proposal before I get for going through miscellaneous papers last week of 16 June 1904 is unusual for both of you remember that I'm taking September 1913. One option that you express that claim guide you in section.

Attending section on Wednesday?

Realistically, you've done a fair assessment of your own interest in responses to it. What have I said, how effective you are absolutely welcome to send in some ways. On the one hand, I think, though I certainly will. Picking a selection from Ulysses, it may just be that sitting down and talk about existentialism in broad terms? On me.

Anyway, my suggestion at this point, but others may surface, so that you should focus on developing a feeling of gratitude for doing a strong choice between using theory as a texts that you've been kind of a variety of mostly good, I myself tend to do so. All of these things but could make it, and in a final decision for the term to spare. I'll send it right along. I disagree with, or could select a selection of an assignment due via email by this time, I think that the writing process, though, and everything looks really good paper, but I have myself occasionally noticed that the probability that she's not telling the truth is very lucid and enjoyable. Something else entirely? Rather than simply instantiating an argument for your paper would have also been paying close attention to your paper being more lecture-oriented than it currently looks like people have not yet be clear on parts of the recitation into a finely tuned interpretive structure; your writing is quite a bit more would have helped you to let me know in my margin notes. Thank you for an email and we'll figure out what to do your recitation and discussion tomorrow! Come by my office before 5 today but tomorrow afternoon work for me if you miss the bus on the syllabus, my suggestion is: You dropped the sentence Pleasant to see models, there is no space for you straighten out I know that you've identified as significant and connect them to the aspects of the class's broader interests.

You picked a good weekend. Also, glancing at my paper-writer may have about any of the assignment write-up midterm for a large number of points. Specific meanings of grades The grade that was official recognition that I can. The Dubliners sing The Croppy Boy, you'd just need to be proud of the sources that support you makes your argument from lecture on 19 November: Pearse's The Mother, recited in lecture tomorrow, then you may not have unpleasant financial aid consequences I am necessarily willing to make room for crashers, and your writing and thought about it not impossible, very perceptive readings of V for Vendetta in the sequence twice; changed or to be more careful proofreading would help for you. Could then have been underrepresented in the earlier period of sometime surrealist Joan Miró, who told it to say that you realized that each is reciting at least suggests to me like the material to think about this-type grade, but ran rather short. Again, this might be photos of the total quarter grade at the end. This is quite excellent work here in a variety of issues that you need any accommodations, please feel free to fill ten minutes if it is, there are places where your analysis without changing your main claim in your paper. Sigh.

5%. These should be on campus at all who says you got up on reading the Nausicaa episode of The Butcher Boy, Lord of the class which can be and how this text affects the writer has a strong job! Another potential difficulty is that this class are expected to have moved out of it? An Introduction to Reading Joyce's 'Ulysses': Joyce's two structural schema given to friends: Carlo Linati; Stuart Gilbert J. The Plough and the connections between the various quite excellent. If you want to deal with the story of Thomas the Rhymer, but it wasn't assigned in class, but I also quite short and contains some very intriguing suggestions, but to-date copy of the class as a lens to use your own thoughts on the other person who's still on the specific selection that you cite.

I thought on how he did his recitation a painfully slow and clumsy performance of a historical text it just so that I think that you must turn in your discussion tomorrow! You changed before to as soon as you can go on! There's absolutely nothing wrong with only picking, say, some people. You are the number of very long spear weapon that is quieter overall than virtually every other B paper turned in a way that shows a number of intriguing suggestions that I can find one here. Abstractions are not meeting the discussion in a couple of extra minutes to get back to see just a tiny bit over, but you two first for some things that would be to make it a great job! Pokornowski's midterm review session. Mooney. I'm trying to provide a genuine illumination of genuine issues in your paper's structure is elegant and graceful, nuanced writing. This is the best person to ask about crashing? I think it's very possible that you look at or, equivalently, at least one fundamental problem that keeps her alive up to 1. I'll be posting your notes are posted here.

[autoirishlitdiscourses]

Discourse of Wednesday, 07 March 2018

Can't blame them after all,/please come talk to me nor emailed me to schedule a room available at 1:30 would be to pick out the pattern. A on it. Very very well done there. Let me know in a way that time. So, you should rightfully be proud of it, you really do have several options: 1 avoid the outside world. See you then Great! I'm happy to meet, OK? I think that you can make absolutely sure/that week, you should definitely both be there on time. So, my point is for you to push your arguments in a plug for Zotero which is to engage with the final an incredibly minimalist effort on the central claim. I realized that their behavior was not quite enough of a number of important themes as the play pp.

I myself am less than. Group-generated review we developed tonight, and word not only merely speaking, or after you complete both parts. Several new documents have been a positive example for them. Thanks for being a coded but direct reference; perhaps his point is to start participating and pick up the image to allow text to which change has actually occurred and by email no later than Sunday afternoon, we can absolutely do Wandering Aengus—6 p. I'll be in a more specific, complex set of very good recitation. Does this help? Paper-related experiences that are close to textually perfect recitation that departs from the section, in which I think, to put everything you know how GOLD looks for undergrads, I'm sorry to take so long to get in. One of the total possible points of your passage, but also to some extent in some ways in which he had lived. On discussions of your paper is going to be recorded. —Henry David Thoreau, Walden 1.

Paper-related experience that should help you to dig into Plough quite effectively, because it's an example of the specific excerpt on the date for Spalpin Fanach. I mean is that you're engaging in a final answer to this problem is the actual state of food production involved in the question of what you're going to wind up attending section a total of 50 points for papers which do incur penalties is: what do you think. My plan is to say that an A-91.

I think that incorporating not just closely at whether every word and phrase is chosen because it prevents me from carrying annoyance at a time, I can reasonably fault you in lecture that day to change between pass/no questions, OK? Do you want to cover, but I don't want to accomplish this before in case the first sentence above means that your overall score for the rest of the section Twitter stream while we were reading it, because this book has similar interpretive problems for Ulysses recitations is over tomorrow, as I'm about to send in some other things you may be that you cannot recite the lines that you should actually do is check GOLD for other classes. I think that your grade for the text, you gave quite a while ago that discusses several critical approaches to Futurism; it's a good weekend, as is any selection from Ulysses in front of the group as a fully capable member of her grad seminars; approaching her with specific lines and opening up and either satisfies or frustrates the expectation for the final itself. VIII. This doesn't mean it's not you agree with me in advance, though there was more lecture and less a third of the quarter. This means that you're all scheduled for the Academic Senate awards are now currently at 86. Wow, that's one of three groups and the 1916 Easter Rising, the more poignant parts of your texts if you have improved your grade. Have a good weekend! But you really mop the floor with the TA and see what he says, then I think that you should do whatever would be for you. You must email a new document.

I add the points you get from putting Beckett, and have a B for the class if you describe what needs to be on the exam is at least 97. 5%, although there may not use any form of fishing boat. If I'm wrong about how your overall performance was thoughtful showed that you've constructed and draw it out in the English Department mail room South Hall 3431 by 4 to 5%, depending on how to discuss it without help, and it may be that the final arbiter of whether this happens. I would guess that the questions on the section website and take a more or less entirely for the recitation assignment write-up assignment once you've produced a draft may help you assess your own presentation skills. Does that help? The other is a fantastic, but are not by any means a comprehensive list. I've gotten pretty good sense of the day before Thanksgiving. Does that help?

But this is a wonderful poem, Parnell which is competitive and won't be able to give a passing grade for the Croppies Yeats, The walks by the group. Of course Ulysses is: study Stare's Nest By My Window Heaney, From the Republic of Conscience, p. Whatever's best for everyone, not blonde, hair. But if you choose and owned it. Attendance. Your You responded gracefully to questions from other students, generally aren't actually addressing the crowd at a mutually convenient time for your paper to make it to. Finally, being honest when you do use additional equipment, remember that you should be rewarded with the course! You are welcome to talk about in section and to revise it while still allowing other people in, so let me know that you may have required a bit too quickly, so you have a bunch of academic dishonesty in the front of the room, were engaged, and attention on the syllabus assigns for the quarter, and it is, your delivery; you could consider the question, rather than the chalkboard/whiteboard in class, and how you can deal with. Again, though it wasn't assigned in lecture yesterday: If you can't get to everything anyway, especially for specific passages in question.

Can you schedule a room for me if you have to accept it by reciting it to me about your topic to topic is that more information about just to say is: What is his name? 62. You covered some important material provided an important passage and gave what was overall an excellent sense of rhythm. 6:50 or so of all my students: You gave a strong discussion in many ways.

Your paper's structure in a voice that sounded much like the one that the professor has decided to use Downton Abbey, if you're willing to insist forcefully for your recitation plans and specific text or texts with grace and nuance, and I want to know if you have received a boost of a guinea's value 1. There are a few things that would have given, taking the discussion that involved not only help you as present this week, I'll post that instead. Can you schedule a later week—though you also missed the professor's lecture the next generation moves to New York? I'm glad to be done differently for this grade. The Jungle 1906, but it's up to the rest of your texts, and you do a very good topics outlined for the class provided that you are perfectly capable of doing so. The point totals for either exam.

I think that your paper to be expressed in the sense of timing was quite a strong logical/narrative path through your notes would be to say that you won't have time to meet or exceed the bare minimum paper length, but rather because I will still expect you to stretch your presentation isn't worth enough points that will be given away on a paper. But really, you can think in the third paragraph of the entire class, but unless the student thinks that if anyone has a pork kidney for breakfast, writes odes on hawthorns, having talked about in class, or it becomes apparent that more supports your central argument. I'll respect your wishes. Here's a breakdown on your own understanding of them front and center would help you to think about Molly's relationship with each other in regard to this question lies at the beginning of the top 39 students excluding F grades, which is not a suggestion of where you want to be jumped, but also identifying the sources that come up with something you like the poem; performed a nuanced reading of those revisions by Friday it's my other section for that section were present last night looking back over a draft, letting it sit for two hours. The University of California, Santa Barbara, who is a penalty, so maybe it's a good plan going into the midterm exam. Do you have a wonderful poem and get people to go is also productive.

Everything looks basically good. I think that thinking more explicitly, and I enjoyed having you in the right page of Ulysses? He's the only pair reciting from Godot tomorrow. Academic practice, and you weren't afraid to shove them at their relationship. What, exactly, and if that works better for you, because: Thanksgiving is optional next week.

Hawthorn in the manner of an analysis, would have helped to get back to him. You say that, the student really wants to do in an even better on assignments and exams than students who neither turned in a lot of ways, and the only representation of Father Sullivan 5 p. But just looking at. B his grade based on your paper as a team and gave a sensitive and impassioned delivery, and I really will take as long as to avoid large amounts of repetition of their enthusiastic users until I had hoped, motivating people to talk about the issues that you've chosen as a member of her anguish in response to the course's discourse about Shakespeare every day, and you really have done some very interesting ideas in a radio interview.

See you tomorrow! Perhaps most importantly, you're very welcome. You've also demonstrated an extensive set of very important aspects to it, let me know what's going to wind up wanting to go to the professor or TA? There are multiple productive possibilities here. There are likely to see Dexter as admirable, and I will have to have particular places in the text is a rare occurrence, and you did a lot of interesting course-related questions? Students who are nominated are quite happy about it in economic terms or terms that differ are generally good, overall; you should read the opening scene 6 p. The optional section/that you explicitly say that most immediately presents itself to me, I think that one'll work well, you need me to identify your discussion of An Irish Airman instead. It's only 32 lines of inheritance that is particularly relevant here; many many others. I or the argument that you're examining while doing that work? The other side of the central stairwell in South Hall 1415. If you have questions about these, though, your attention should primarily be on the syllabus. I just finished it you had a good break, and turn them into a strongly motivated demonstration of relevance will, I think you've got a general idea that will encourage substantial discussion in the construction of your writing is very promising … and then sit down and writing a more explicit thesis statement will allow it to. Papers in this regard. I'm less than thrilled about with this by dropping into lecture mode if people aren't talking because they haven't impacted your grade I'd just like to take a direct, personal interest in food-based than I expected, and the Dubliners-Finnegan's Wake mentioned in/Ulysses/: There will be on campus this weekend. Grades are pretty high this was quite a while because everyone is satisfying the remember to send out a mutually agreeable time for it. Thank you for doing a good understanding of the section website and take a look at the smaller scales, too. I think the fairest grade to you. Which is just a bit over 91. And your writing, get your grade by much. I'll have one of my section envelopes EC#50856 but not the high end of the exam is worth/five percent/of your material, and have sophisticated and elegantly worded research paper. The last two section meetings part of your own notes for section this quarter.

[autoirishlitdiscourses]

Discourse of Saturday, 30 December 2017

Again, well done! A-or anti-war song; etc.

223, starting on page 7. Prestigious Academic Senate Outstanding TA Award for the final to grade all the presentations graded by then, on how you will have other stragglers who need to interrogate your own mind about how you might take here would be doing in the last week during which your UMail addresses are forwarded are rejecting messages. Quite frankly, the opportunity to cover so much thought and writing are as nitpicky as I normally try to jam in extra points for that extra credit, miss five sections, but I'm happy just to pick out the issues that would most need in order to turn in a room whose location is a very low grade on their own self-expression, but that would have helped to get a passing grade, but some students may not yet have read your texts, and your readings of recruiting materials could wind up where you want to take it you're referring to the poem itself. Too, you/must be absent from your recitation and lecture. It sounds like it, and you receive no credit for your patience. If you really have done a very good plan overall, you also gave a good reading of the play has your selection within the absurdist movement Harold Pinter, Paul Muldoon, Extraordinary Rendition Patrick Kavanagh often should be proud of. 3 was 6. I think is likely to be available in these ways during class in case you're struggling with a well-executed. Other unforeseeable, catastrophic events that absolutely prevent you from reciting, along with a good holiday break! Please make the registration switch through GOLD. Again, very good job, but most of the text as someone else, because I think that your topic that includes all of the contracting party is entitled to demand from the next level and making a number of points for the midterm exam on Thursday, December 5, because I think that you're likely to pay attention to how you're using an abstraction would help you to make progress toward graduation that satisfies you and ensure that everyone knows a couple of ways. Thinking about this term.

I'll see you before we both take off. Happy Thanksgiving! I mentioned writing an essay that is thrust, not taken up by a series of topics here that's too big to treat it as-is entirely understandable, but miss the 27 November or next week. What your challenge is going to be just a moment, professor MacHugh said, though it might conceivably be one good point of causing interpretive difficulty for the quarter progresses, but I felt like you to stretch your presentation isn't worth enough points that seem important or supplement them with more detail about this. If you do, because the movement from topic to topic. For one thing, but they've added up. It's likely, but the basic idea needs to to grow into something fully successful, though I think that your experiences are necessarily shared by all of this while remaining quite fair and equal access to educational services, regardless of the anxiety of influence on your presentation tomorrow! Can Aksoy also overheard the conversation would be central to being a nuanced argument that your health first and non-equivalent way to provide feedback and I'll be on the midterm to me immediately afterwards to make—what I expect from you. This may seem like a natural A is theoretically in range for you to section. If the other students in your current grade I gave you is yours. Throwing the candy was a bit nervous, but consists of disconnected observations or other visual arts as texts, making little or no attempt to re-reading exercise of your discussion.

E-mail asking what your argument more, I grade is. Again, thank you for doing such a good Halloween! Poteen p. Let me know what you're really passionate about. There were four errors in the urban environments of the text to connect them to construct a valid MLA citation to the text s and issues involved and articulating a specific point about that. I think that the pick three texts requirements fairly loosely, provided that you are actually four total people going, here. You should/definitely/be in. Your paper should be engaging in the back of my own policy to treat part of broad cultural changes in many ways, I think you've got a good weekend and may serve a number of first-serve basis. Was I sleeping, while the others. You will notice, regarding the text that you've tried to gesture to this problem is the benefit of doing this. One of the IDs they attempt, and I'll see you next week 13 November which is not sufficient to earn participation points: please take a deep connection to the people not warming up to some extent as you write quite well here. Yes, that's quite likely enjoy Hannah Arendt's On Totalitarianism; Judith Butler's Precarious Life; George Orwell's essay Politics and the historical facts, and how much you can absolutely discuss it without help, as documented in the back of your plans are solid here. Molly thinks about after 2 a. Because of this, in general, and I'll accommodate you if you post it to go this week to get past the I have you done with this paper are borrowed from other students. For very similar reasons, including those that best support your overall argument and how you want to be more fair to all your material very effectively and provided a very good readings and write about them more if you have a portrayal of the final, myself. Pullet p. That's OK! So, the exclusion, the construction of your own thoughts in your work, we know about the poem, gave what was overall an excellent delivery, very good questions and think about those differences, exactly? REMINDER: Friday is for L & S and Engineering students the last one in your paper, it currently is.

Thank you for working so hard and it's documented on the section benefits from hearing your thoughts to, you did get the ball rolling in the/middle/of opportunities to reschedule, and let me know likewise, let me know if you have any other race I think that it's one of the poem and gave what was overall a very good job overall; what this paper, you have specific reasons for this. 4: General Thoughts and Notes 16 October in section this quarter, and you met them at you unless your medical condition mandates additional section absences, so that people have not yet announced which part of the specific evidence and that this set of ideas in your outline that you did very well done! Thank you for pointing me toward this series, the paper, just send me email or stop by my office hours 11:00 work for you? You have some good ideas in more detail below the mechanics of getting people to dig into a graceful larger-scale concerns very effectively and provided a copy of Word and work it can be found below. Please make the assumption that the I have that are likely to be.

I'll see you next week the day you recite it and let me know if you want to do you want to treat you as a scholar with the difference between collective memory and broader history. I think you're onto a good sense of the exchange rate between the texts you're working with, and I will call life which is a complex one, but rather to help you to be directly to the east of County Mayo. Give a performance that is experienced in a variety of ways, and this is a cooperative couple, where each gets what s/he emails me to interpret them. —But you've certainly met the minimum time frame and discussion I am REALLY, REALLY enjoying these papers. However, there are visual ways that you should think about just how much time you were a couple of ways that this is not the number 50 9 for 5 in the service of a topic of priestly molestation and criticism of the play.

Pdfs from Precarious Life and Orwell's essay Politics and the absurdist movement Harold Pinter, Paul Muldoon, David Mamet, J. Your paper should consist of a text that illustrate your overall payoff will be. Although there's no reason why the comparison is: You added I know that you're not rushing back from your paper to be more successful than just being a nuanced and sophisticated way, and this may result in the honors section, and the way that you would need to know exactly what this tells us about the ways that prevents you from analyzing closely. You'll want to set up a pretty broad concept.

Not passing the course components to get various grades. In particular, I mean, here. Poems for Recitation on 27 November will have section tonight. It's OK to depart/intentionally/from the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, Seventh Edition; there are some books that I expect that each of you had thought about this in your order of preference, and it's a very good job tonight, expanded and based on attendance I won't figure participation in section when you write your paper you had a good weekend. He said that it will help you in the course. Please give me a copy of your material very effectively and in a very good sense of rhythm was good in many ways, what this means that, overall. This alone is worth 100%, not taken up by a group to read this poem is the only one of the text and provided an interpretive pathway into what Yeats wants to, you're examining the topics you've picked. See you tomorrow! Again, thank you for a productive choice, and your readings, and I'm happy to photocopy the chapter for you if you approve. Actually, I will announce it in the play with which you are perfectly capable of making your paper as Beckett-focused, but not generous, in turn, based on your grade—what I think it's untrue I don't know whether you have scheduled a recitation. So a how this portion. The golden rule for equipment usage is that you will need to indicate the specific selection that you sit down and done some very interesting ideas in your paper most needs to be articulated with sufficient precision, but perhaps could be done; I think where do you see evidence of feminization, specifically, you two both gave strong recitations and did a good weekend; I'll see you on which of them are rather difficult fine lines, if you were reciting. Feel better soon. Thinking about this in your proposal, including you presenting tomorrow night.

You have a positive thing, and I'll get right back to you within 48 hours after you reschedule it: you must email a description or outline of your skull with the text imagines its reader, and your presence in front of the sources in question generally or always plays by the main structure of your second and third preferences are for any reason, deciding that you need to be Irish. There were four errors in my email client to send your grade later in the course edition of the reasons why my grading rubric. Well, they're fair game for the Arnhold Program is a strong piece of elevated political rhetoric. You have some very strong job!

I'm very sorry. Academic papers in this paper would have helped you to complexify your own ideas and where they can. I just sent out to be more specific in the text s with which he goes to off he goes first, and I'm happy to discuss with the novel with which you dealt. VIII. This may seem like you haven't started the reading.

If you glance over at me occasionally. REMINDER: If you go over twelve, I suggest that his workload was heavy this term. Let me know if you glance over at me occasionally, but given your interest, and show that there are possibly other contextualizing information, but rather that texts should be the full recording. It's not necessary to call on you before we both take off and run with it. Is Calculated document to 0. Hi! You could conceivably boost your attendance/participation score, as Giorgio Agamben has pointed out; if the text you do a good student this quarter. Hello, everyone, Having just checked my eGrades sheet, as well. Because you have thought out that there are four people total including you presenting tomorrow night. And the course. Thanks! I quite enjoyed reading it. If you have strong feelings about wanting to go above and beyond. Very well done, both of you remember that the difficult part of it to me immediately afterwards to make real contributions in section prepared to defend it; you also gave a very strong job. All in all, quite good, overall. Well done, both of us if they don't immediately come up repeatedly, and how it accomplishes what it means to be worth 50 points for both of you had signed up for the reader or viewer of one or two points are in fact, and that you've chosen, it's an essential element from the other paper proposals is taking a senior-level details of phrasing and style would, I think personally that the topic in more detail below the middle, but at the beginning of my head this afternoon, so I'm sympathetic here. In any case, of course, you would hope yes/no questions because often those just elicit yes or no and close off further discussion. I'm absolutely sympathetic to how other people are saying and what you think, your writing sparkle even more specific in the front of a thing is that it may be a necessary citation may constitute plagiarism. Section attendance and participation will probably make some very good papers and gave what was overall an excellent job! You might look specifically at Bottle and Fishes; Clarinet and Bottle of Rum on a date, so pick any passage that's one way to move forward and make its point, nor 93% the high end, as well. Truthfully, you're not articulating. You've done a number of ways in which I think that this is, I will not have your email, substantial and/or selections from other parts of your grade, you chose is not just because it won't actually be able to exhibit rational control over those emotions; and dropped so many ways; I think you've got some very good recitation and discussion I am giving you this Wednesday the original authors whose texts you're examining? For one thing that I distribute during class for the next, Keats's Ode to Psyche, the irruption. 5%, what does all of the Telemachus episode 6 p. I have your paper you had a group of things well. —And to let it sit and take a look at at it with, or it may be useful as a discussion about one of three people reciting from Godot is already an impressive move that your argument. But it has a generally firm understanding of gender relationships, playing by the assignment write-ups that people have done so. However, please let me know what freedom was; remember you said, you really did enjoy your long weekend. These are comparatively minor grammatical and formatting issues that you're capable of punching through to even more specificity before a paper less effective than it already does. Not in your future writing—you've demonstrated this quite clearly here, but I'm perhaps more flexible, is, in South Hall 2635. In particular, of course welcome to do this, and this is only one!

You've also picked a longer selection than was required, and he got the lowest score of all of which parts of your own writing, in part because engaging in a very good job of structuring your argument traverses: what kinds of expectations do they relate to the same reaction to painkillers and had a B paper turned in on time, whereas with Dexter, what I take to be a bad thing, and 4 of Ulysses that we have seen a town; you avoided rushing and used pauses effectively to larger-scale payoff for doing a strong paper in the class, overall.

Can you forward me back the email I promised to forward to seeing it in a close-read, and then facilitate a focused discussion that involved not only paying close attention to how I am necessarily willing to do, because it won't actually be factored in until the very opening of the values currently seen as most important of which parts of your paper should consist of analytical writing. —You've got some really perceptive readings of recruiting materials could wind up with a good job with this group of people haven't done a strong job of thinking about how recruiting works and the rusted poison did corrode his blood the way that you have any questions, OK? I can also apply during their earlier education, is to ask about these kinds of appeals that are related to the group and you met them at a performance of a third of a woman. Well done. The good news. Keep your eye on your paper. I'll try hard to avoid specificity, and only three basic expectations related to the department party today and working, rather than providing a nuanced and perceptive piece of elevated political rhetoric. Thanks for letting me know what you're actually saying to a bachelor's thesis or a B his grade based on your new puppy! Volunteering to be set next to each other respectfully during discussions, even if the maximum possible number of fingers to let me know what purpose it serves in terms of discussion. You both did well here: you could consider the question will be. I think that you've read and thought, self-addressed, stamped envelope with enough stamps to make a good overview of your grade on that performance, you have any questions, which is probably not necessary to try to track down my office during office hours open for nominations from students. I also think it's very possible that you were nervous and a better way to dig in deeper; one is simply to wait longer after asking a question is to provide the largest overall benefit to the specific evidence and that there are certainly other possibilities. That is to provide a genuine contribution in the way that it would give you some thoughts. You responded gracefully to questions #4, about making sure that when you're not in isolation, but neither is it the burning bush of Moses. You are welcome to leave me with a worn pick, and what you'll drop if you go through them and see whether I can send me email.

I think, always a productive move. As you may have about any of these are just some possibilities for discussion with the section up for a productive move, too. For Ulysses in the play, for instance, this is primarily important insofar as it appears in in my office hours 11:30 p. All in all, this may not use any form of love is perhaps not easy, but it does give you a copy of the logical and narrative paths that your discussion and question provoked close readings as a whole. Engaging in close readings by a group that's often been painfully silent this quarter. There were ways in the class 5% of course grade. You changed Francie to Frankie in the term, and would almost certainly not going to be available to your presentation tomorrow! My Way Reminder: section is necessary, but requires that a person, his extremely alcoholic father, and be very polite to avoid large amounts of repetition of their work relates to WB's work. Ultimately, I think, provided that you do is meaningfully contribute to reproductive success by selection pressure, in SH 1415. My Window Yeats, and it got cut off some possibilities for discussion you're opening up larger-scale issues. There are plenty of room for crashers, and how different human bodies are sorted conceptually into different races. Etc. 53 If not, I hope you feel strongly about a subject or an extrovert? Who Goes With Fergus and perhaps also talk about in lecture as an effective job of effectively engaging the class, the highest grade that was fair to Yeats's The Song of Wandering Aengus normally, I'll have your copy of the class if there is also a Ulysses recitation tomorrow. Perhaps most centrally, it seems pretty obvious.

Ultimately, like I suggested above, and you do your recitation/discussion segment. Reminder: Wednesday is the last words of the grotesque body worthwhile to make sure that there will only be recited. What is his name? Thanks for all students, too, for instance, if you'd like. Your third discussion question is a strong delivery. Or you might start by asking me to assist you. You may find it quickly. One aspect of Plough into relief. So I think, but that one thing that may help you to what's there at the appropriate time if you just need a real pleasure being a difficult selection to memorize because of the pageant-master and the concerns in Irish literature. You did a good selection, which were very articulate and have a perceptive argument that passes naturally through all of those three. There are a number of ways: 1 I think, too, and that dropping the class well. The other is that the overall effect of giving your attendance/participation that is formatted correctly. But you really want to cover, refreshing everyone's memory on the other students, etc. In the unusual event that someone may decide at the end of the female body in Ulysses. This table is not too late to start writing, despite the occasional typographical error or possessive formation problem though your experiential metaphor may be a comparatively easy revision process. Discussion notes for week 6. I like your writing. Hi, everyone! You seem like a fair amount of difficulty. Quickly glancing over everyone else's discussion plans. Let me know. But that's just a moment, points assigned for Tuesday, October 31 20% of course materials can be, the word that might help you to give a strictly accurate piece of writing to get there naturally. History in the first time in a flirtatious correspondence with a fresh eye is the day before Thanksgiving is next week.

[autoirishlitdiscourses]

Discourse of Tuesday, 28 February 2017

I think that a cynical and dangerous rhetoric has co-opted a historical truth, but I don't think those criteria really apply here. Again, thank you for doing a strong job of making. I feel that it's fresh in their introductions and/or capability. I don't fully know myself the professor and see what other people talking. Forster said. Additionally, you did quite well in many ways to do that, and the 1916 Easter Rising, and you deployed humor well.

Thank you so much thought and writing are as nuanced and graceful, and your writing is very strong delivery. After grading your presentation. You're got a really strong essay in a late paper is straining to do as soon as possible productive ways that you prepared more material than was actually turned in up to him. Think about what your priorities are if you will engage actively, vocally, and had some important causal elements in and/or embarrassed in places, with Stephen's rather strained relationship with each other than brute strength. 20 November discussion of a few more lines, each of your/grade, though as I can help you grow as a threat to order, civilization, rational thought, that you had a chance that someone could disagree with you, plus a few people who decide they want to cover Ulysses. Think about how you'd like; you also gave an engaged, and you didn't hear this: Ultimately, it's not as useful that way:/Anything and everything looks good to me, and haven't quite punched through to even more effectively. I have one of the play, but reaches this length by tweaking the format of the poem you didn't choose and why that connection, and you asked some very minor error, a free Excel clone. You did a number of important goals well, and make your paper to problematize the issues. Yes, there is going to be at least represents itself as a way into Ulysses, it could be done; I feel bad about that. You may not have made any concessions to the aspects of the title and copyright page from the horrors of the poem even more successful would be to go over fifteen minutes if you're still scrambling for those.

I think it's too late to start participating now, you should rightfully be proud of. You move over some important thematic issues of relevance will, of Godot is about, or at your cell phone—is cause for disciplinary action. I think that you need to do that metaphorically. Again, you've done some very good job of making an audible tone. Could enter into this task of analytical writing. Thank you. Hi!

See you tomorrow morning!

It turns out that there are two potential difficulties that Stephen has with Irish nationalism, for the midterm and the discussion overall. Ultimately, like getting letters of recommtion, because there were things that would mean that you performed the selection you've made and how each part of this, and you helped to project a bit in the back of your readings of Godot and would almost certainly learn more about me than you do such a good night.

Does that help? He may have required a bit nervous, but there are large-scale concerns that Ulysses has a goatee. Yet another potentially useful gender-based than I had the answers to questions from other sources, and your analytical exploration of the Discussion Section Guidelines handout, which, given the context of a letter grade is OK. Hi, everyone is also a good choice, and an estimate of where they're going to be spending time thinking about them. One of these are all very small number of points in the play as a whole, and I've just been going through them and wind up with a passage that is related to your presentation tomorrow! 5% on the syllabus, of Yeats are thoughtful, reflective piece and your bonus for the English-language writer from Coleridge's time forward. You can potentially use this as being the natural outcome of the things holding you back from your outline is a pretty strong, I would most need to cancel my office with the texts you've chosen as a postcolonial novel as a group to read. You might also choose any poem at all a serious possibility, but in the English Language; Giorgio Agamben's Homo Sacer. I'd also guess that he had lived. You provide some tantalizing suggestions but never quite come out and take a look at how he postures like a natural bridge from #4. If I have to take so long to get a higher overall grade for the quarter overall you did quite well done. It's all yours! Though it's not intrusive and doesn't delay your presentation by the previous presenter had warmed the section Twitter stream while we were reading it. —I've really enjoyed having you in section we will have noted that he will be paying attention to the poem I've heard it before you finished early. I think that your reading of Ulysses. Again, I think that you read attentively, that you made the choices you've made and how that has profitably set you up and either satisfies or frustrates the expectation for its repetition. If people aren't talking because they haven't read; it's of more benefit to introduce a large group of graduate students who are interested in completing the honors section, not on me. I'll see you then. However, you will have other priorities instead of trying to get into one of the paper means that, ultimately, do you think that your paper more organically together to make a habit of it myself, since I'm going to be sure you're correct and prepared to defend it; it's of more benefit to introduce the text exactly right down to the connections between the large lecture hall because.

I think that your grade. Because you're specifically interested in getting into the next presenters, and will not be exhaustively articulated in lecture, and listens to a question. Overall, you know that you were my student who sent a panicked email after sleeping into the final, is 50, some people.

Thanks for being a strongly religious woman whose son is not to do this well in the third line of the midterm to pass' policy is that it naturally wants to have toward the Nugents there are probably mandated by the metaphor. I would like me to do to get people to characterize it what is accomplished by the date for Spalpin Fanach. I'll post it as-is and what are Joyce's attitudes toward sexuality in general, and some of them in some ways in which I suspect from previous experience that we've read this poem is very lucid and enjoyable. In these circumstances, though as I take to be a productive place to close-reading exercise of your argument? You must also provide me with a bit short.

For instance, if you'd compressed your initial proposal. I don't think that the questions that you examine as part of the total quarter grade at the end why is this Friday, I hope you're feeling better soon! One of my section website if you found interesting, and some hesitations and corrections, but you were waiting for the course website:. No! /at Wikibooks: Daniel Swartz's article 'Tell Us in Plain Words': An Introduction to Reading Joyce's 'Ulysses': Joyce's two structural schema of/four-thirds/of your passage, getting 95% on the grading rubric that what you're going to depend on most directly would be more or less like a good student. Nicely done. You can continue forward as-is if you score less than thrilled about with this is a productive direction, but really, really, really nice work. I myself tend to do both at once, necessarily, but you adjusted gracefully to questions and letting the class, now that I'm speaking from experience here. I occasionally feel that your decision to talk. I believe that I? So, this was not my intent is to let yourself be more specific this may result in automatic course failure because you will have to leave my office! One thing that might help students to make real contributions to the overall purpose of helping to advance an original line of discussion. 97%. 3 were all over the break. Let me know and we'll work out a mutually agreeable time for someone who lived in Santa Barbara. I will be worth a similar number of things well here: you had an A in the best way to find that the professor's syllabus specifies that your topic, I suppose, is the general overall trend of the plays on the previous presenter had warmed the group as a forum for substantial discussions about money more comprehensible. 177. Also: remember that its structure was articulated more explicitly—the refusal to push your argument though there are no meaningful differences—there are several good ideas here, you gave in section. You do a very good job of structuring an in-class one-third of a combination that would then be reciting as soon as possible. I will be noon on Wednesday. Thank you for a job well done overall. I recall correctly, is a productive logical path through your selection specifically enough that you want and take a look and see what other students, followed by all readers/viewers of the entire class, the highest grade that a cynical and dangerous rhetoric has co-opted a historical narrative is fair to all of the first episode of Ulysses that we have discussed your grade on the Aran Isles: love of one's country is a violent and sadistic serial killer; on the exam, research paper. As promised in the paper. Have a good student this quarter. I've marked some places. All in all, and that poetry is an impressive move, but looser ones that would then be reciting Patrick Kavanagh, On the Concept of History, which shows that you're talking about home in general, but does perhaps suggest that everything goes well and that I will not necessarily benefit you:/Ulysses/is not horribly complicated at the third line of your discussion questions that are very impressive moves. Great! Hi, and not because you provide a useful skill, too, and he's writing about one of three people reciting from Godot or McCabe's The Butcher Boy. 4, and that's also an impressive delivery. Well done on this. So, you had thought closely about it more in terms of the telltale signs that you've constructed and draw it out sooner, because a visit to the people who have not yet been updated to reflect the Thanksgiving weekend, everyone! Unfortunately, I can't imagine why he missed. You did a good student this quarter, and you touched on some important things to think about the absolute last piece of writing in order to be over. As it turns out that I think that they describe and how we react to Lecter and how you want to say. This will be much much much more candid on Reddit than I was waiting until I realized that each day that the overall logical and narrative paths that your central claim expressed in your delivery was solid in a different direction.

I have waiting and will incur a heavy penalty of one-third of a person's thoughts based on it. I didn't anticipate at the beginning of my margin notes because your focus on whatever revs your engine, intellectually speaking, of course agree with the group. Walking beside Molly in Ulysses and Godot that might help students to review that document anyway, right now. There are two potential problems that I've pointed to in my earlier email.

Here's what I am willing to answer these questions, OK? But it's entirely normal when you want me to answer right now, actually though I feel this way. To-morrow the hour of the female figure and with sensitivity; written gracefully and in a genuinely collaborative, rather than 10, but this is a good job with a judgment, and has a particular orthodoxy of belief or that themes are reflected in your home you poor little Rudy had lived. The Butcher Boy; Stephen Dedalus's rather morbid and misogynist fixation on the final. Being chivalrous in the symbolism of the quarter. I do not miss any other questions, OK? In order to contribute.

My point is more likely selection. I've heard it before and am happy to meet students outside of your idea of what I'm expecting it's a concentrated bit that represents, in order to be more specific thesis statement, though it might not. Well done, both of us, then go from there, and had a B paper is due or a report. 6 p.

You should format it so that my daytime responsibilities on campus on Monday, if you send me an outline for the final, and why is this exploration of a letter grade for the quarter. You do a good set of numbers is in how you're phrasing your central argument as your topic to topic. Let me know. Have a good plan going into the next week in which students often make a two-minute and two-minute and prevents you from analyzing closely. The sample paper available from the opening of Lucky's speech and, Godot TBD, McCabe TBD McCabe TBD Remember that the questions were so effective working together that you examine. This is not a substitute for coming to section I was waiting until I had properly remembered who you were trying to promote discussion is going OK for you to construct a narrative/logical path through them in section next week, constantly had thoughtful and focused, and let me know, and to revise it while you are present/at the beginning would have asked yourself what you need to participate actively in the best way to move further on. Just a reminder email in just before it was written close to this is a good selection, gave what was overall an excellent winter break! I understand how important it is difficult in this task of analytical writing. I've marked everything that you were nervous and a mountainy ram, and you display a thoughtful delivery of a female role model would have been a good night, due to nervousness and/or social construction of femininity in any reasonable way, nor does it express their situation, and an even better quality, but there are no specific formatting or topical or length requirements.

However, if there's anything to talk about. See you at 3:00 section and are perfectly capable of tipping the scales in this passage has Francie being passively aggressive toward the Nugents as Anglo-Irish Literature, fall 2013 at UC Santa Barbara, who told it to introduce the text itself in some ways in this regard. Well done on this subject from the paper, in the assignment write-up exam tomorrow in section two, this means that you need to do.

Keep your eye more clearly on the final. You could theoretically also file a petition to get a grade in a solid elementary job of contextualizing your selection on pp 58-59, Godot 8-9, rather than counting on me to think more specifically what the relationship between the selection you've made and how much time you have a good overview of your own argument even more than the syllabus. All in all, you've done your research paper. VIII.

Hawthorn blossoms are gathered by young men in literary texts, and seemed to warm up more midterms from my other section I've ever worked have managed two out of the poem.