#I think the Oklahoma thing is actually organized crime?
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Today in 🍂✨October surprises✨🍂
• Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg and Secretary of Labor Julie Su quietly assisted in winning labor rights for dockworkers, ending a strike that could have had catastrophic economic consequences. (10-4-24)
• In Springfield, Ohio, where Haitian migrants have been blamed for the disappearance of local animals with Trump claiming “‘migrants are walking off’ with geese in the town” and “they’re eating the dogs” - a lie also promoted by JD Vance, Ohio’s own sitting Senator, with no evidence - it turns out that the missing geese were actually the victims of a 64-year-old white man who was hunting illegally. (10-3-24)
• A Trump-appointed federal judge blocked Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan again after another judge reinstated it earlier this week. (10-3-24)
• Republicans and crazy Facebook uncles everywhere have spent this week spreading disinformation about the FEMA response to Hurricane Helene, including AI photos of Trump standing in floodwater and wild claims that Biden is sending money to undocumented immigrants. In reality, the Biden-Harris administration has provided substantial emergency assistance and both Biden and Harris have visited the region. Meanwhile, it turns out that Trump was the one who redirected money from disaster relief to send to ICE during his presidency. Shocker. (10-4-24)
• Seriously, though, Trump is not who you want to call in an emergency. Before allowing disaster relief to reach victims of wildfires in California, then-president Trump forced aides to show him an electoral map to see if he had voters there. He evidently intended to withhold the aid if he found out it was going to mostly Democratic voters. This would be a career-ending scandal in any other political era but alas, we are living in this one. (10-3-24)
• Finally, far-right extremist and Oklahoma superintendent of schools Ryan Walters intends to put Bibles in public schools, which is already disturbing, but in a stunning display of corruption, the only ones that meet his specifications are the so-called “Trump Bibles” that include the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. They go for $60 apiece and Trump gets fees from each one. (10-4-24)
No, wait, I’m going to say that one again:
In Oklahoma, taxpayers’ money will be used to put Trump Bibles in public schools. Their money will go directly to Trump. Not a joke!!! Not an exaggeration!!!
…Surely the voters who are still undecided are lying, right?? Right?!
30 days until Election Day.
Go to vote.org for a sample ballot, early voting dates, and more. Seriously, we have to win.
#guys should I start a substack#joking but seriously. Pay Attention! It’s Time! lots happening and#remarkably little reporting on the wildfires thing and the julie su/pete buttigieg win!#I think the Oklahoma thing is actually organized crime?#he already has a rico case is he trying to get another one#us politics#mine#us news#kamala 2024#vote
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
Ellick Week Day Four (AU!)
@ellickweek
________________
‘How many potato chips can I eat without dying?’
As the question appears on Nick Torres’ screen, he makes a face. There’s no way anyone would really need to Google that question, right? He looks at one of his adjoining screens to see a slightly unflattering selfie-camera live view angle of a blonde woman with a dusting of crumbs on her top; she’s frowning as she scans the question’s search results.
Nick is the FBI agent who has just been assigned to keep covert tabs on former NSA agent Ellie Bishop, and he’s not sure what to make of his new task. He’s to pay attention to her internet usage, primarily, and watch her through her webcams as necessary. Someone far higher up the food chain than Nick thinks Bishop might be spilling state secrets.
The mere fact that she Googled her potato chip question five minutes into being watched makes Nick doubt the higher-up’s assessment entirely, but a job’s a job.
________________
Three weeks later, he hasn’t seen anything that makes him any more suspicious of her, but she’s made him raise his eyebrows at least a couple of times a day ever since that first potato chip.
On day three, she starts aggressively typing in Arabic so quickly that Nick’s translating software lags in trying to keep up. Before Nick can wonder what she’s writing about, though, the translator catches on… Bishop is merely making notes to herself on a recipe for Dolmeh-e-Kadoo, an Afghan dish consisting of stuffed squash. ‘Cook rice for two minutes longer than advised,’ Bishop types. ‘Fresh tarragon is preferable to dried.’
Someone really thinks this woman is a threat to national security?
On day nine, her biggest crime is using fifteen minutes at work to Google something called a Tater Tot Queen, clicking links that lead her to small Oklahoma newspaper websites. Nick checks into the background info he was given on her, and the Oklahoma thing starts to make sense. The Tater Tot Queen thing, though, remains a mildly endearing mystery.
Day eighteen brings drama. Ellie has her laptop open and facing the living room of her apartment, giving Nick just the view he needs to watch her fight with her husband.
“You could communicate if you wanted to, Jake! I’m not asking for classified details! I just want to know how your freaking day was!”
Her husband—who Nick decides quickly he doesn’t like at all—doesn’t respond kindly. “Hey, you’re the one who quit the NSA, Ellie. You’re the one who made it so we can’t talk about anything anymore. Surely your memory isn’t that short—you know damn well how strict the rules are about sharing information!”
Though Nick should really agree with Jake here—especially given the reason Ellie is being investigated—he finds that he can’t after Jake storms from the room, leaving Ellie on the verge of frustrated tears.
He wonders when he started thinking of her as Ellie.
________________
Four months into the assignment, Nick starts to strongly suspect that Jake is cheating on Ellie, and he does something stupid.
His department of the FBI has a number of highly secure servers that are untraceable. Anyone trying to pinpoint where an agent is working from will be bounced by a proxy from location to location all over the world at a speed human hackers just can’t match. That makes anonymity possible in a world where secrets are hard to keep, and Nick takes advantage. He just can’t help himself.
He sends Ellie a text masked by the servers. Don’t trust Jake. Trace his steps last week and you’ll find out why.
He watches through her cell’s front-facing camera as Ellie’s expression morphs into one of suspicion. Who is this? she replies.
Nick: A friend.
Ellie: Sorry, “friend”, but I think I’ll trust my husband over you.
Nick knows he has threatened his own life and livelihood enough as it is, so he doesn’t reply. He watches Ellie start to consider what he said, though, and the risk feels worth it.
When Ellie discovers a few weeks later that Nick was right and her marriage subsequently falls apart, Nick finds that watching her pain is almost unbearable. He sends one more text.
He never deserved you.
________________
Six months in, Nick watches in disbelief as Ellie eats her third junk food snack of the day… first, it was a honey bun. Then, it was hot Cheetos. Now, it’s half a sleeve of Thin Mint Girl Scout Cookies. How on Earth does she manage to stay so fit?
Though it’s a moronic thing to do, he reaches out to her again. Ellie, I’m concerned about your health. Don’t forget to eat real food in between snacks, woman.
She responds almost instantly, making Nick grin. Seriously, who is this?
Nick: I meant it when I said I was a friend.
Ellie: Friends don’t text friends creepy, cryptic messages.
Nick experiences a stroke of genius—he’ll just tell the truth. She’ll never believe him. Okay, you caught me. I’m the FBI agent assigned to watch you. ;)
He can see Ellie roll her eyes. Ha ha, very funny. Who are you really?
You can call me Nick.
Okay then, “Nick.” I’m blocking your number now. Bye.
For some reason, though, she doesn’t, and Nick feels absurdly like he’s won some sort of unexpected prize.
________________
Talking to Ellie becomes the highlight of his job. Though she continuously asks Nick who he is and gets frustrated when he never really answers, she never stops replying to him. Something in that analytical mind of hers seems to think that if he was anything other than a benign—if slightly eerie—mystery in her life, he would have acted against her already.
In the beginning, she puts a lot of effort into figuring out his identity. She traces the IP address and the spoofed phone number he uses to contact her. She Googles a variety of increasingly unlikely questions trying to find clues as to his identity. She even has one of her coworkers dig deeply into the servers he’s using, but the FBI is nothing if not thorough in covering its tracks.
Then one day, she seems to decide that she doesn’t really care who he is, and she starts to chat with him more casually.
Sometimes, they talk about whatever Nick has observed her doing, but sometimes, they just… talk. Nick eventually realizes that she’s become something of a confessional for him; she’s both intelligent and unbiased enough to give solid advice, and kind and funny enough to make him feel better about whatever he happens to be going through. It hardly matters that they’ve never met and that there’s a constant veil of secrecy between them… they’re friends, as ridiculous as that is.
________________
Nick has been assigned to watch her for an entire year before he starts to realize how much he hates doing this. Surveilling unaware people never really bothered him before, but he realizes that he doesn’t want to keep invading Ellie’s privacy like this. He wants to be a part of her life organically. He doesn’t see a single reason she’s being watched at all, and it feels increasingly wrong to target her when she hasn’t done anything wrong.
In his latest report to his superiors, he details the mundane things Ellie does in her spare time. At the end, he notes ‘suspect displays no suspicious behavior. Recommend terminating surveillance.’
Then he decides all at once that he’s done.
Officially done.
He types up a letter on his computer, prints it, and drops it in his boss’ mailbox. Then he takes his phone off of all the FBI servers and unspoofs his number to text Ellie one more time.
My name is Nick Torres. I told you I was an FBI agent assigned to monitor you, and I was telling the truth. I just quit my job. If you don’t believe me, or if you do and you want to talk, I’ll be at Sweet Science Coffee this afternoon. I’ll be the one with the muscles.
Then he stands up from his desk for the last time and says goodbye to the J. Edgar Hoover Building.
________________
She doesn’t show up.
Nick sits at the coffee shop in NoMa sipping Guatemalan dark roast for two hours before eventually concluding that Ellie has no interest in meeting him. He understands, honestly—he stole her privacy for twelve long months, and that has to be hard to look past.
Doesn’t mean her absence doesn’t suck.
As he leaves, though, he physically runs into her just outside the door. She stumbles and he reaches out automatically to steady her. “Sorry, I wasn’t watching where I—” she starts, and then cuts herself off. “Nick?”
He gives her a little grin; his heart is racing, and he’s not used to not being utterly confident around women. “The one and only,” he replies. “Nice to meet you in person, Ellie.”
She blinks at him. “Nice to meet you, too—I think?”
Nick chuckles, his hand rising up to scratch awkwardly at the back of his head. “I can understand the confusion. I wasn’t sure you’d come, actually. I waited for a while.”
Ellie gives him an incredulous look. “Well, that’s your own fault, isn’t it?”
Nick winces. “Yeah. I mean, I was just doing my job, but—”
“No, not that, you idiot. I mean that you texted you’d be here ‘this afternoon’. You never specified what time, and then you turned your stupid phone off!”
“I… Oops. Sorry, Ellie.”
She laughs, shaking her head. “Why did you want to meet me, anyway? I was too curious to stay away.”
Nick gives her a look. “Isn’t it obvious?”
“If it was obvious, would I have asked?”
Nick rolls his eyes to the high heavens. He adores her, but she has a unique ability to try his patience. “You must be blind. Here, I’ll spell it out for you—I think I’ve been in love with you ever since you Googled how many potato chips you had to eat before it was lethal.”
“Oh.” Her voice is suddenly very small, and her eyes are suddenly very wide.
Then she’s jumping at him and knocking him over as she presses her lips to his.
His last thought before he gets lost in the utter bliss that is her kiss is that he’s going to have to make sure they serve potato chips at their wedding.
#ellickweek#ncis#ncis fanfiction#ellick#ellie bishop#nick torres#this started silly and got sillier as i wrote lol#i love aus!
45 notes
·
View notes
Text
Just finished Tiger King...
...episode 7 (there’s another one right?), and I’m gonna write my fresh thoughts.
90+% of the entire thing was of course about Joe-Jeff-Carole-Antle-whatever craziness, and I’m not gonna get into what I think about that (exceptCarolekilledherhusband), but about the very last part of episode 7, where they actually talked about the animals, and their (questionable) welfare.
There were old clips of Joe where he spoke of how the animals didn’t belong in Oklahoma, and that people needed to “stop breeding them”. Don’t know what that was about, but I think it’s pretty clear that his attitude changed, and it’s not about the animals for any of these people.
Not for Joe, not for Jeff, not for Antle, and not for Carole. It’s all about them as cult figures, and the money.
Joe admitted to shooting five tigers. He says he “euthanized them”. That’s really not dug deeper into. What was the motivation? The circumstances? Did he kill healthy animals for the heck of it? Or were they really sick or injured? Why were they sick or injured?
Is it not legal to kill your own animal, even an exotic or endangered one? Say if you have (no idea what happened in this case, I’m painting up fiction now, as an example) a tiger or [insert exotic] which fell and broke its leg horribly, bones are sticking out, the animal is screaming and it’s obvious no surgery can fix it.
Do you then have to apply for a permit to put it down? Wait for a vet to come there, tranq it and euthanize it with a lethal injection? That can’t be right. It has to be legal for you to shoot the poor thing.
And furthermore, last I checked, “generic tigers” aren’t endangered. They don’t require the same permits as if you have, say, a pure Bengal tiger. Generic tigers are under different legislation. Can someone explain this further? How is it illegal to kill your own animal for whatever reason (unless there is evidence of undue suffering, which would make the crime “animal cruelty”, not “animal killing”), and were they generic tigers or not?
How is it illegal to sell tiger cubs? Was it just done without paperwork? Crossing state borders without permits? (I don’t know what’s required in tiger trade, but I know people still trade tigers legally.)
He admitted to depriving his chimps of being chimps. That they had sat in “cages next to each other for ten years”, and when he gave them away and they were let loose in a large enclosure, they immediately went and hugged each other.
Yeah, good that he admits to poor care and losing sight of the animals’ welfare. But that does not justify the conclusion I think many will make, that I think the film might have been implying - that because Joe mistreated his animals in some way - that means only sanctuaries should have them, or they should be in the wild. It was not overt, but I think that might have been the message.
One poor zoo does not make all zoos poor, just as one poor pet owner/breeder/whathaveyou (can be applied to any topic, not just animals) does not make them all bad, and does not make the thing itself wrong.
Zoos are now reminding people on social media that “we are not like them, we are REAL, accredited zoos! Bla bla AZA self-congratulation bla bla”, and I take time to remind them that there are also hundreds of responsible and caring PRIVATE OWNERS of big cats, who are not lunatics, crackpots, perverts, animal abusers or criminals.
And at the very end, the film faded out with a statement I’m incredibly sick of. They say there are “5000-10 000 tigers in America”.
That is a big, fat lie.
It’s an urban legend that keeps sweeping the internet. Everyone says it, everyone knows it, but the sources are just loose statements made by animal rights organizations, and exact numbers change every time you ask.
The Feline Conservation Federation made a thorough check of the real numbers some years ago, and came up with about ~2800 tigers in America.
The latest numbers from the WWF and Gobal Tiger Forum (2016) said that there were ~3900 tigers in the wild.
There are many species that are far more numerous in captivity than in the wild, but the tiger is the only one people keep repeating, because it’s “oh, shock and horror, not the tiger”. But there are not more tigers in the USA than in the wild. And even if there were, those tigers are not “missing” from the wild. They weren’t “stolen”. They are the ark.
The higher numbers, the better. Personally, I’d be thrilled if there were 10 000 tigers in America, as long as they’re being cared for and managed responsibly. That would mean the tiger is not as threatened as we thought.
But when people hear the urban legend “more tigers in American backyards than in the wild”, they think the tigers in America are the problem, not the lack of tigers in the wild, the poaching and habitat destruction.
This lie of “10 000 tigers in America” or “3000 tigers in Texas” was created by animal rights activists to fill people with revulsion and want to create bans on tigers. It is completely ludicrous, as the breeding and in-country trade of an endangered species should be made EASIER, not harder, if we wish to save it.
The animal rights people of course, don’t want to save it, as they hate captive breeding no matter what, and will fight it with all they have, survival of the species be damned.
That is why the “Big Cat Public Safety Act” is anti-tiger, anti-lion, anti all big cats and their survival into the future.
On this topic, I recommend the documentary American Tiger, and my article on tiger conservation.
#tiger king#tigers#tiger conservation#pet tiger#Carole killed her husband#American tiger#big cat public safety act#big cats#joe exotic
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
Should Your Child Watch TV News? Surprising Opinions of Top Anchors
More than ever, children witness innumerable, sometimes traumatizing, news events on TV. It seems that violent crime and bad news is unabating. Foreign wars, natural disasters, terrorism, murders, incidents of child abuse, and medical epidemics flood our newscasts daily. Not to mention the grim wave of recent school shootings.
All of this intrudes on the innocent world of children. If, as psychologists say, kids are like sponges and absorb everything that goes on around them, how profoundly does watching TV news actually affect them? How careful do parents need to be in monitoring the flow of news into the home, and how can they find an approach that works?
To answer these questions, we turned to a panel of seasoned anchors, Peter Jennings, Maria Shriver, Linda Ellerbee, and Jane Pauley--each having faced the complexities of raising their own vulnerable children in a news-saturated world.
Picture this: 6:30 p.m. After an exhausting day at the office, Mom is busy making dinner. She parks her 9-year-old daughter and 5-year-old son in front of the TV.
"Play Nintendo until dinner's ready," she instructs the little ones, who, instead, start flipping channels.
Tom Brokaw on "NBC News Tonight," announces that an Atlanta gunman has killed his wife, daughter and son, all three with a hammer, before going on a shooting rampage that leaves nine dead.
On "World News Tonight," Peter Jennings reports that a jumbo jetliner with more than 300 passengers crashed in a spinning metal fireball at a Hong Kong airport.
On CNN, there's a report about the earthquake in Turkey, with 2,000 people killed.
On the Discovery channel, there's a timely special on hurricanes and the terror they create in children. Hurricane Dennis has already struck, Floyd is coming.
Finally, they see a local news report about a roller coaster accident at a New Jersey amusement park that kills a mother and her eight-year-old daughter.
Nintendo was never this riveting. See here ข่าวไทย
"Dinner's ready!" shouts Mom, unaware that her children may be terrified by this menacing potpourri of TV news.
What's wrong with this picture?
"There's a LOT wrong with it, but it's not that easily fixable," notes Linda Ellerbee, the creator and host of "Nick News," the award-winning news program geared for kids ages 8-13, airing on Nickelodeon.
"Watching blood and gore on TV is NOT good for kids and it doesn't do much to enhance the lives of adults either," says the anchor, who strives to inform children about world events without terrorizing them. "We're into stretching kids' brains and there's nothing we wouldn't cover," including recent programs on euthanasia, the Kosovo crisis, prayer in schools, book- banning, the death penalty, and Sudan slaves.
But Ellerbee emphasizes the necessity of parental supervision, shielding children from unfounded fears. "During the Oklahoma City bombing, there were terrible images of children being hurt and killed," Ellerbee recalls. "Kids wanted to know if they were safe in their beds. In studies conducted by Nickelodeon, we found out that kids find the news the most frightening thing on TV.
"Whether it's the Gulf War, the Clinton scandal, a downed jetliner, or what happened in Littleton, you have to reassure your children, over and over again, that they're going to be OK--that the reason this story is news is that IT ALMOST NEVER HAPPENS. News is the exception...nobody goes on the air happily and reports how many planes landed safely!
"My job is to put the information into an age-appropriate context and lower anxieties. Then it's really up to the parents to monitor what their kids watch and discuss it with them"
Yet a new study of the role of media in the lives of children conducted by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation reveals that 95% of the nation's children ages 8-18 are watching TV without their parents present.
How does Ellerbee view the typical scenario of the harried mother above?
"Mom's taking a beating here. Where's Dad?" Ellerbee asks.Perhaps at work, or living separately from Mom, or absent altogether.
"Right. Most Moms and Dads are working as hard as they can because we live in a society where one income just doesn't cut it anymore,"
NBC News correspondent Maria Shriver, the mother of four--Katherine, 13, Christina, 12, Patrick, 10, and Christopher, 6--agrees with Ellerbee: "But Moms aren't using the TV as a babysitter because they're out getting manicures!" says the 48-year-old anchor.
"Those mothers are struggling to make ends meet and they do it because they need help. I don't think kids would be watching [as much TV] if their parents were home organizing a touch football game.
"When I need the TV as a babysitter," says Shriver, who leaves detailed TV- viewing instructions behind when traveling, "I put on a safe video. I don't mind that my kids have watched "Pretty Woman" or "My Best Friend's Wedding" 3,000 times. I'd be more fearful if they watched an hour of local news.That would scare them. They might feel: 'Oh, my God, is somebody going to come in and shoot me in my bedroom?'"
In a move to supervise her own children more closely since her husband, Arnold Schwarzenegger, became Governor, Shriver scaled back her workload as Contributing Anchor to Dateline NBC and set up her office at home: "You can never be vigilant enough with your kids," she says, "because watching violence on TV clearly has a huge impact on children--whether it's TV news, movies, or cartoons."
This view is shared by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, which states: ""TV is a powerful influence in developing value systems and shaping behavior...studies find that children may become immune to the horror of violence; gradually accept violence as a way to solve problems; and resort to anti-social and aggressive behavior, imitating the violence they observe."
Although there are no rules about watching TV in 49% of the nation's households, TV-watching at the Schwarzenegger home is almost totally verboten:
"We have a blanket rule that my kids do not watch any TV at all during the week," she notes, "and having a TV in their bedrooms has never been an option. I have enough trouble getting them to do their homework!" she states with a laugh. "Plus the half hour of reading they have to do every night.
According to the Kaiser survey, Shriver's household is a glaring exception to the rule. "Many kids have their own TV's, VCR's and video games in their bedroom," the study notes. Moreover, children ages 8-18 actually spend an average of three hours and 16 minutes watching TV daily; only 44 minutes reading; 31 minutes using the computer; 27 minutes playing video games; and a mere 13 minutes using the Internet.
"My kids," Shriver explains, "get home at 4 p.m., have a 20-minute break, then go right into homework or after-school sports. Then, I'm a big believer in having family dinner time. Some of my fondest memories are of sitting at the dinner table and listening to my parents, four brothers, and my grandmother, Rose. We didn't watch the news.
"After dinner nowadays, we play a game, then my kids are in bed, reading their books. There's no time in that day for any TV, except on weekends, when they're allowed to watch a Disney video, Sesame Street, Barney, The Brady Bunch, or Pokemon."
Beyond safe entertainment, Shriver has eliminated entirely the option of her children watching news events unfolding live on TV: "My kids," she notes, "do not watch any TV news, other than Nick News," instead providing her children with Time for Kids, [Teen Newsweek is also available], Highlights, and newspaper clippings discussed over dinner.
"No subject should be off-limits," Shriver concludes, "but you must filter the news to your kids."
ABC's Peter Jennings, who reigns over "World News Tonight," the nation's most-watched evening newscast, emphatically disagrees with a censored approach to news-watching: "I have two kids--Elizabeth is now 24 and Christopher is 21-- and they were allowed to watch as much TV news and information anytime they wanted," says the anchor. A firm believer in kids understanding the world around them, he adapted his bestselling book, The Century, for children ages 10 and older in The Century for Young People.
No downside to kids watching news? "I don't know of any downside and I've thought about it many times. I used to worry about my kids' exposure to violence and overt sex in the movies. Like most parents, I found that although they were exposed to violence sooner than I would have liked, I don't feel they've been affected by it. The jury's still out on the sex.
"I have exposed my kids to the violence of the world--to the bestiality of man--from the very beginning, at age 6 or 7. I didn't try to hide it. I never worried about putting a curtain between them and reality, because I never felt my children would be damaged by being exposed to violence IF they understood the context in which it occurred. I would talk to my kids about the vulnerability of children in wartime--the fact that they are innocent pawns-- and about what we could do as a family to make the world a more peaceful place.
Jennings firmly believes that coddling children is a mistake: "I've never talked down to my children, or to children period. I always talk UP to them and my newscast is appropriate for children of any age."
Yet the 65-year-old anchor often gets letters from irate parents: "They'll say: 'How dare you put that on at 6:30 when my children are watching?' My answer is: 'Madam, that's not my problem. That's YOUR problem. It's absolutely up to the parent to monitor the flow of news into the home."
Part of directing this flow is turning it off altogether at meal-time, says Jennings, who believes family dinners are sacrosanct. He is appalled that the TV is turned on during meals in 58% of the nation's households, this according to the Kaiser study.
"Watching TV during dinner is unforgivable," he exclaims, explaining that he always insisted that his family wait until he arrived home from anchoring the news. "You're darn right they waited...even when my kids were tiny, they never ate until 7:30 or 8 pm. Then we would sit with no music, no TV. Why waste such a golden opportunity? Watching TV at mealtime robs the family of the essence of the dinner, which is communion and exchange of ideas. I mean, God, if the dinner table is anything, it's a place to learn manners and appreciation for two of the greatest things in life--food and drink."
Jennings is likewise unequivocal in his view of junk TV and believes parking kids at the tube creates dull minds: "I think using TV as a babysitter is a terrible idea because the damn television is very narcotic, drug-like. Mindless TV makes for passive human beings--and it's a distraction from homework!
"My two children were allowed to watch only a half an hour of entertainment TV per night--and they never had TV's in their bedrooms.It's a conscious choice I made as a parent not to tempt them...too seductive..."
Adds Ellerbee: "TV is seductive and is meant to be. The hard, clear fact is that when kids are watching TV, they're not doing anything else!"
Indeed, according to the National Institute on Out-of-School Time and the Office of Research Education Consumer Guide, TV plays a bigger role in children's lives now than ever before. Kids watch TV an average of14 to 22 hours per week, which accounts for at least 25 percent of their free time.
"Dateline NBC" Anchor Jane Pauley, intensely private, declined an interview to discuss how she and her husband, cartoonist Garry Trudeau ("Doonesbury") handle TV-watching with their three teens, two of whom are fraternal twins. But in a written response, she agreed that kids need to be better protected from the onslaught of violence: "I was a visitor at a public elementary school not long ago, and was invited to peek in on a fourth-grade class on 'current events.' The assignment had been to watch the news and write about one of the stories. Two kids picked the fatal attack on a child by a pit bull and the other wrote about a child who'd hanged herself with a belt! They'd all watched the worst blood and gore 'News at 11' station in town. The teacher gave no hint that she was as appalled as I was. My response was to help the school get subscriptions to "Time for Kids" and "My Weekly Reader." People need to be better news consumers. And tabloid TV is very unhealthy for kids."
On this point, Ellerbee readily agrees:"I really do believe the first amendment STOPS at your front door. You are the boss at home and parents have every right to monitor what their kids watch. What's even better is watching with them and initiating conversations about what they see.If your child is watching something terribly violent, sit down and DEFUSE it. Talking makes the ghosts run...and kids can break through their scared feelings."
Adds Pauly:
"Kids," she maintains, "know about bad news--they're the ones trying to spare us the bad news sometimes. But kids should be able to see that their parents are both human enough to be deeply affected by a tragedy like Columbine, but also sturdy enough to get through it...and on with life. That is the underpinning of their security."
"I'm no expert on the nation's children," adds Jennings, " but I'd have to say no, it wasn't traumatic. Troubling, shocking, even devastating to some, confusing to others, but traumatizing in that great sense, no.
"Would I explain to my kids that there are young, upset, angry, depressed kids in the world? Yes. I hear the most horrendous stories about what's going on in high schools from my kids. And because of the shootings, parents are now on edge--pressuring educators to 'do something.' They have to be reminded that the vast majority of all schools in America are overwhelmingly safe," a fact borne out by The National School Safety Center, which reports that in l998 there were just 25 violent deaths in schools compared to an average of 50 in the early 90's.
Ellerbee adds that a parent's ability to listen is more important than lobbying school principals for more metal detectors and armed guards: "If there was ever a case where grown-ups weren't listening to kids, it was Littleton. First, don't interrupt your child...let them get the whole thought out. Next, if you sit silently for a couple of seconds after they're finished, they'll start talking again, getting to a second level of honesty. Third, try to be honest with your kid. To very small children, it's proper to say: 'This is never going to happen to you...' But you don't say that to a 10-year-old."
Moreover, Ellerbee believes that media literacy begins the day parents stop pretending that if you ignore TV, it will go away. "Let your kid know from the very beginning that he or she is SMARTER than TV: 'I am in control of this box, it is not in control of me. I will use this box as a useful, powerful TOOL, but will not be used by it.' Kids know the difference.
"Watching TV," Ellerbee maintains, "can makes kids more civilized. I grew up in the south of Texas in a family of bigoted people. Watching TV made me question my own family's beliefs in the natural inferiority of people of color. For me, TV was a real window that broadened my world."
Ironically, for Shriver, watching TV news is incredibly painful when the broadcast is about you. Being a Kennedy, Shriver has lived a lifetime in the glare of rumors and televised speculation about her own family. Presenting the news to her children has therefore included explaining the tragedies and controversies the Kennedys have endured. She was just eight years old when her uncle, President John F. Kennedy, was assassinated: "I grew up in a very big shadow...and I couldn't avoid it," she admits. "It wasn't a choker, but it was a big responsibility that I don't want my own children to feel." Yet doesn't her 15- year marriage to megastar Schwarzenegger add yet another layer of public curiosity close to home? "My kids are not watching Entertainment Tonight--no, no, never! And I don't bring them to movie openings or Planet Hollywood. I think it's fine for them to be proud of their father, but not show off about him."
How does she emotionally handle news when her family's in it? "That's a line I've been walking since my own childhood, and it's certainly effected the kind of reporter I've become. It's made me less aggressive. I'm not [in the news business] to glorify myself at someone else's expense, but rather to report a story without destroying someone in the process. A producer might say: 'Call this person who's in a disastrous situation and book them right way.' And I'm like: 'Ahhhh. I can't even bring myself to do it,' because I've been on the other side and know the family is in such pain."
A few years ago, of course, the Kennedys experienced profound pain, yet again, when Shriver's beloved cousin, John F. Kennedy, Jr., was killed in a plane crash, with his wife, Carolyn, and sister-in-law, Lauren Bessette. A blizzard of news coverage ensued, unremitting for weeks. "I didn't watch any of it...I was busy, " Shriver says quietly. "And my children didn't watch any of it either."
Shriver was, however, somewhat prepared to discuss the tragedy with her children. She is the author of the best-selling "What's Heaven?" [Golden Books], a book geared for children ages 4-8, which explains death and the loss of a loved one. "My children knew John well because he spent Christmases with us. I explained what happened to John as the news unfolded...walked them through it as best I could. I reminded them that Mommy wrote the book and said: 'We're not going to see John anymore. He has gone to God...to heaven...and we have to pray for him and for his sister [Caroline] and her children."
Like Shriver, Jennings is personally uncomfortable in the role of covering private tragedies in a public forum: "In my shop, I'm regarded as one of those people who drags their feet a lot at the notion of covering those things," he explains. "During the O.J. Simpson trial, I decided not to go crazy in our coverage--and we took quite a smack and dropped from first to second in the ratings. TV is a business, so when a real corker of a story like Princess Diana's death comes along, we cover it. I think we're afraid not to do it. We're guilty of overkill, and with Diana, we ended up celebrating something that was largely ephemeral, making Diana more than she was. But audiences leap up!
"I was totally opposed to covering John F. Kennedy, Jr.'s funeral, because I saw no need to do it. He wasn't a public figure, though others would say I was wrong. On-air, I said: 'I don't think the young Mr. Kennedy would approve of all this excess...' But we did three hours on the funeral and it turned out to be a wonderful long history lesson about American politics and the Kennedy dynasty's place in our national life.
"Sometimes," Jennings muses, "TV is like a chapel in which we, as a nation, can gather to have a communal experience of loss.We did it with the Challenger, more recently with JFK Jr.'s death and we will do it shortly, I suspect, though I hope not, with Ronald Reagan. It's not much different than what people did when they went West in covered wagons in the last century. When tragedy struck, they gathered the wagons around, lit the fire, and talked about their losses of the day. And then went on. Television can be very comforting."
In closing, Ellerbee contends that you can't blame TV news producers for the human appetite for sensational news coverage that often drags on for days at a time:
"As a reporter," she muses, "I have never been to a war, traffic accident, or murder site that didn't draw a crowd. There is a little trash in all of us. But the same people who stop to gawk at a traffic accident, may also climb down a well to save a child's life, or cry at a sunset, or grin and tap their feet when the parade goes by.
"We are NOT just one thing. Kids can understand these grays...just as there's more than one answer to a question, there is certainly more than one part to you!"
1 note
·
View note
Text
hey folks! i already introduced myself in the ooc blog but * ok go vc * here it goes again. i’m velouria (she/her, 26, est) and i’m supposed to be in school but lol, the world was like this was a bad year to get your shit together girl, try again later. anyways, here’s my first babe hector and the only thing you need to know is that he’s horrible. he’s a horrible, horrible, horny person and i hate him and you should hate him too. but here’s some more details:
content warnings: homelessness, crime, drugs, general bastardness
born in tulsa, oklahoma on november 13th, 1997, hector, surprisingly, came from the most normal suburban beginnings you could imagine. he had two parents, an older sister, dog, cat, and a hamster. he was a rather normal child, though he had a wild independent streak that only got worse as he aged. didn’t play very well with others and would only play simon says if he got to be simon, but was friendly and jovial with those he liked, or wanted something from.
stubborn as a mule, hector was fiercely independent and increasingly selfish. by the time middle school came around, hector created a hierarchy within his group of friends and became a bully around his school, though was more pushy than outright cruel. a very rowdy teen, hector never took anything very seriously and didn’t form attachments in a healthy sort of way, something that’s only worse instead of better now.
while he liked his family well enough, he never felt a strong bond with them. they loved him very much and would try to foster a healthy, loving relationship with him, he was like #nah and spent most of his time out of the house, never telling them what he was doing and where he was going. his father and sister gave up on him, but his mother still held out hope that it was just an incredibly long phase.
barely showing up to school even when it was mandatory, hector’s primary focus was on having a good time. that meant sex, drugs, and copious amounts of partying. scaring little old ladies, taking cars on joyrides. a petty criminal by the age of fifteen, hector has only been in trouble with the law a few times, spending a few weeks in county jail over the weeks but the charges have never stuck. (once he’s out, he’s off to some place new, but it’s only a matter of time before the law finally catches up to him and he’s inside for good.)
his parents didn’t have a chance to kick him out or send him to military school because he straight up bounced by the time he was seventeen. he left one day to a friend’s house and just didn’t come back; he went to a party in oklahoma city, and then just... never thought about going home. hector didn’t stay around okc for very long after that, drifting all over the southwestern states.
out on his own, or rather couch surfing with like-minded individuals, hector got to experience the highest points of pleasure and pain. a full blown hedonist, the only thing that mattered (and matters) to hector was fucking, fighting, stealing, and getting high. basically if you’ve ever seen the movies hellraiser or the doom generation, he’s a mix of frank cotton and xavier red.
though he’s moved around a lot since leaving home, usually staying in a city for three months or so before he’s moving on again, he’s made a bit of a home out of reno, nevada, frequently traveling between reno and las vegas. often just up and leaves without a word, then returns two weeks later as if nothing happened like a neighborhood cat. has spent the last five years or so grifting and lying his way into the hearts and homes of lonely old ladies (and men). infects your house with his presence, gets you to take care of him, and then bounces one night with most of ur silver and jewelry in his backpack.
though he’s not part of any sort of gang, he does revolve in organized crime circles, and mostly makes actual money by boosting cars for the mob in vegas. though he sometimes does ‘freelance’ work for organized crime syndicates and gangs, he’d never join one. hector vc: why have someone tell you what to steal when you can just do it? :)
which all brings him to charming, california. basically run out of town on a rail, he had to leave reno because he heard there was a warrant out for his arrest and lbr he’s pissed off way too many people in nevada. has only been in charming for three days (so far in canon), staying in the highway motel by way of a stolen credit card, but i’ll be putting out a wc for his benefactor; someone he’s conned into letting him stay in their house, putting on the sweet street kid act. don’t believe the act, but also please do.
the biggest thing to know abt hector is that he’s a horny dude. he’s literally always thinking about sex and the second he meets you, he’s thinking about fucking you, no matter how old you are (as long as it’s legal because gross and i would never rp that), if you’re in a relationship/married, or what gender you are. you could be totally into his schtick or think he’s disgusting, it don’t matter. will hit on you, because he knows no other way to interact with people.
tells you what you want to hear. lies as much as he breathes. honestly he’s barely aware of the lies he tells and can’t keep them straight. most of his stories sound like bullshit but a lot of them are true.
big drugs fan. loves him some k! who’s got the weed! shows up to random parties just to finagle his way into getting drugs for free, while also stealing a bunch of meaningless random shit. the one thing you can’t replace - john mulaney.mkv
y’all get it by now. he’s gross, he sucks, but gosh darn he’s got a cute lil face!
wanted stuffs:
i mentioned that i’m going to send a wanted connection to the main for hector’s new benefactor (though if your muse is a lonely older person, man or woman, that’s gullible then let me know!!) but here’s some plots stuff we can do
sexual partners: basically hector wants to bang everyone. if you’re up for it, he will fuck you at pretty much any time, but just know that he’s also fucking like five other people and has never been monogamous in his entire damn life.
a girlfriend: okay so i just said he’s never been monogamous but sometimes hector likes to pretend. or rather, he will start using her to get something, likely companionship when he’s bored or access to money/drugs/alcohol, whatever. a place to sleep at night. just something! she’ll probably think they’re more serious than they actually are but hector does actually like her as a person, or she’s trying to get him to be more serious/grow up. this one will occur over time bc he’s new!
enemies: hector is a hard person to like and an easy person to hate. he has very little regard for others and enjoys physical fighting bc it feels good. they can hate him because he screwed them over, cheated on them, cheated on their friend/sibling/whatever, stole something from them, or they just don’t like his smug face.
friends: if your muse likes to party, hector is your man. he basically just lives to have fun. however, his version of fun is kind of scary and dangerous at times. he can be a bad influence on your muse and get them into trouble or they can be a good influence on him.
a close friend/confidant: hector isn’t an emotional person but occasionally he does have moments of vulnerability. when this happens, your muse is the person he comes to when he needs someone to be there for him or needs someone to talk to. your muse could be doing this reluctantly or in hopes that he’ll be there in the same way for your muse, which isn’t very likely but hector will like to pretend lol.
or any connection we can think up!! message me on here or discord (wanda’s loving boy#1003) if you wanna plot!
#charming.intro#hold your horses honey. i’ve got coupons for the pringles. ( ooc. )#this is long as shit i'm sorry
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Used to Be Overlooked. Chapter 13.
Summary: Steve Rogers was walking down the streets of Brooklyn after finishing a mission. The goal was just to take some time to clear his mind along the city streets, but when he runs into a gorgeous young lady that looks extremely familiar… How can he go about moving on? Who is she? What does he know her from? Was that memory even from this decade?
Pairing: Steve Rogers x Reader (Rosalyn Ember/ Y/N ?)
Word Count: 4900+
A/N: oooo, I like this chapter. Also, last night in Oklahoma we had horrible storms. This morning we woke up to flooded roads, so I’m posting earlier than I thought I would since I can’t go into work for an hour or so. ANYWAY! Enjoy this chapter, I had a blast writing this one;) Let me know what you think! Feedback is everything!!!
Series Masterlist
Chapter 13:
The next day went by a little slower considering how in your own head you were. The whole ‘spilling all your secrets out to one of the main people you hid it from’ in a span of 5 hours was exhausting and troubling to say the least.
What if Steve just reported you, and you did become a lab experiment? It had happened before when you let it slip a couple of decades back. You never made that mistake again. Or what if he was disgusted with you for doing this, and he never wanted to talk again? Or maybe he was going to pretend to be your friend, and then dump you when he got all the information he needed?
No, that wasn’t Steve. If there was one thing you knew, and learned about him from Peggy, or even the news on him, it was that he could be trusted. He was an honest, trusting, respectable, and protective man. He wouldn't it do any of those things.
At least you hoped.
Once again, another week went by. No word from Steve or the Avengers in that time. You just guessed that it had something to do with missions. A lot of crime had erupted in the past few days, so it wasn’t that big of a shock.
You ended up coming back to work, no problem, a day after your conversation with Steve. Just like planned, they cleaned everything up, and the corporation was back on track with all bumps in the road averted.
Thanks to the neighboring labs taking you in in the time of crisis, the progress on the virus’s cure was close to being perfected.
You were sitting in your office going over some blood work, when your phone rang showing Claire was calling.
“Yes?” you asked hitting the button, but still looking at the samples in front of you.
“Miss. Sue Tran is here to speak with you,” Claire answered.
Sue Tran? Sue Tran? Oh right! One of your top interns. One you were hoping to actually hire after her internship was up.
“Thank you. She can come right in,” you said pushing the button.
“Ok. You can go in,” you heard Claire say in a more hushed tone.
The door opened and in walked Sue. She had almond shaped brown eyes, olive skin, ash colored hair that was pulled back in a bun, and bangs covering her forehead. The new gray hair color trend for this past year, and honestly you were kinda into it surprisingly given of how old styled you were.
“Miss. Tran, what can I do for you today?” you said smiling and motioning to the chair in front of you.
She nodded in thanks and took a seat. She had a file in hand that she was clutching close to her chest. You can see the nerves vibrating off of her just from being in the office with you. Thanks to your mature manner and high level of knowledge, a lot of people were intimidated by you. No matter the age difference. Of course, you didn’t mean to come off this way, but at least it helped people to respect you more even if you were ‘young’ for your job.
“I actually wanted to bring you some news,” she said making eye contact finally and with a blush tone on her cheeks.
“What about?” you smiled sweetly hoping to help her relax a little, and like hoped, some tension in her shoulders went down.
“As you know, I was paired with the group that was testing the C4N2 fever/flu that broke out within the last year,” she explained.
“Yes, the one that was transferred to the other labs during the shutdown?” you said intrigued, and leaning into your desk more.
“Yes,” she smiled. “While we were there, one of the other workers from that branch looked over our progress. They spotted something that I believe we just didn’t think about, or completely overlooked. You know how it goes when you look over that same problem for too long,” she shrugged.
“It all starts to blur together and you can’t find the flaws,” you finished for her. “Yes, and…” you nodded excited where she was leading with this.
“Well, the individual suggested something to try, and we went ahead a gave it a go.” She grabbed the file, and started sifting through the papers before pulling out a stapled bunch, and handing it to you. “This is what we came up with.”
You skimmed over the front seeing the equations and elements they used. It was definitely something that was could have easily not been considered, but thank the man that had suggested it. You flipped the next page, and saw the lab results after being put use on some lab rats and DNA samples.
You straightened in your seat as you realized what you were reading.
“Sue, all these reports say success and positive” you said in a breathy voice from shock.
“Hmmm mmm,” she hummed through her smile.
You flipped the pages a few more times to make sure your eyes weren’t deceiving you.
“Theoretically, we weren’t planning on having a cure on this for another year. Sue… This is it. This is the vaccine,” you smiled finally looking up. “It’s done!”
“I know! We did double and triple checks if you look on the last couple of pages. We wanted to make sure that it was truly right,” she said looking at the papers while on the edge of her seat.
“Sue, this is- I don’t even- Oh my God,” you laughed in joy as you stood and came around the desk. She stood to meet your height. “You did it! They did it!” you said gripping the papers and slightly jumping in your heels.
“I know! But give yourself some credit,” she said motioning to you. “We wouldn’t have made the progress we did if you hadn’t proofread and caught our mistakes in the beginning. We would be set back even further.”
“Oh, I lent just as much of a hand as all of you did. This is a group effort!” you waved off. “But it’s done! This was the biggest project we had going and it’s done!” you jumped again. “Oh, we have to celebrate!”
“Really? You don’t seem like the celebrating type?” she laughed, and you sent her a smirk as you went around the desk back to the phone. “Oh, I’m sorry. I didn’t mean to offend you, it’s just that you’re always at-”
“Work? Yeah, I know,” you laughed pressing the call button. “I’m not offended at all Sue. You’re right, I need to get out more.”
“Yes, Miss. Ember?” Claire said on the other end of the phone.
“The staff that was working on the C4N2 virus?”
“Yes?”
“Bring them to my office please,” you smiled at Sue.
“On it,” she hung up.
“What are you going to tell them?” Sue asked.
“That you guys can have the rest of the day off to celebrate, and that you can also have tomorrow off,” you smiled organizing the papers on your desk.
“Really? We don’t have to-”
“Miss. Tran. Rule number one if you are going to work here. Listen to your boss, and never say no to taking a day off,” you winked.
“Yes ma’am.”
You let the team know they could go out and enjoy a day off tomorrow as well as the half day off today. They were ecstatic considering they had been working so hard on this, and haven’t really had time to rest between it. They asked you to join, but you kindly declined making an excuse that you were the boss that needed to do paperwork on it and all. They tried persuading you, but eventually gave up on your stubbornness.
As you sat in your office, only about 30 minutes before you usually leave to go home, you looked at the work in front of you. It was all done. They met all the requirements needed, and now it was just needing to be passed on to the next process group. This is why you stayed in this field. Vaccines for something as simple of a fever that can pop up are now being made, and less and less people will get sick or even die.
You sighed happy with yourself, and looked up at your computer that had been playing the news. Yesterday's news overflowing into todays because of how big a deal it was.
Right in front of you was Tony talking to a reporter.
“Yes, yes. We have been chasing and tracking these individuals the past week or so and finally got a hold of them. There will no longer be any problems with them thanks to The Avengers!” he shouted throwing his arms up in victory. Cocky millionaire.
He was still in the suit, and had the mask lifted to where you could see some dirt and smudges on it. In the background you could see a few of the other Avengers like Clint and Nat watching in the background and rolling their eyes at him. You giggled at the relationship that you now knew they all shared.
“Is there anything else we should be careful of Mr. Stark? Any other terrorist groups that are targeting New York as of right now?” the reporter asked.
You thought you had heard something about a terrorist group that was infiltrating major banks and parts of the government. Of course, wanting to take it down and were threatening lives of thousands. Then again, they never got around to the threat because those damn Avengers caught them every time.
“Uh, as of right now I think we are going to give ourselves a much deserved break. A few of us have been awake for over 36 hours and are really looking forward to passing out on our beds,” he said turning to now Bucky and Steve saluting them. Steve was in his full stealth outfit and had his shield thrown on his back. He looked good. Really good. He threw Tony a look and crossed his arms over his chest before turning to Bucky who was grinning, and laughing at Steve’s reaction.
“He does not like the cameras,” you laughed looking at Steve the rest of the interview.
“Thanks again Mr. Stark. For everything.” the reported gushed.
“Anytime for the people of earth,” he winked. “I’ll see you all next time the world needs some saving.”
The screen cut back to other news and you just laughed at the whole thing. Then an idea came to your head. You grabbed your finished work putting it in a pile on the side, and the stuff that needed to be reviewed, was left on the opposite side. You grabbed your things to headed out for the night in a hurry and stopped at Claire's desk.
“Hey Claire. I think I’m going to call in sick tomorrow,” you smiled as you came to the front.
“What? Sick? You’ve never called in sick,” she said shocked. “Now that I think about it, I don’t think I’ve ever seen you cough or sniffle let alone be sick.” she said thinking back.
“There’s a first for everything,” you shrugged and winked.
“You know what? I think you deserve to have a day off. Sick or not, but if anyone ask, sick it is,” she smiled.
“See you after the weekend Claire,” you waved headed to the elevator.
“Get well soon,” she said sending you wink as you turned and laughed.
_
You went home and changed out of your work clothes into something more casual, but still somewhat formal considering where you were going.
Your hair had been down all day, so you pulled it half way up, and let the curls do their thing. You gave yourself a once over in the mirror, and were content with it all. Business like, but casual as well.
Once you arrived, Happy was the first to greet you.
“What are you doing here?” he asked as you parked your car out front of the tower, and started walking up the steps meeting him halfway.
“I-uh, I need to talk to Mr. Stark and Dr. Banner. Are they here by chance?” you said looking behind him at the compound.
“Yeah actually. They just got in. They all got home from a long mission just yesterday so they’ve been in and out today resting,” he looked back where you were staring, and realized you were nervous about going in. “Do you want me to show you where they are? I think I just saw a few of them in the kitchen. I’m sure they can show you where Tony and Bruce are.”
“Oh, I don’t want to be a bother. It looked like you were going somewhere. You don’t have to stop just to help-”
“Nonsense. You are one of the few people I like on this planet. I will gladly escort you in,” he smiled offering his arm.
“You’re too kind to me Mr. Hogan,” you smiled squeezing his bicep just barely as you started walking up.
“Anything for a lady like yourself,” he smirked.
You both walked into the kitchen finding Sam and Bucky eating sandwiches, at the table.
“I’m just saying, the only reason she gave her number to you and not me, was because she didn’t see me,” Buck said confidently as he took a bite of his sandwich.
“Didn’t see you? You were right next to me! Of course she saw you! She just preferred me over you,” Sam said getting worked up.
“Sure…” Bucky said smugly.
“Dude! You aren’t really the face that people want to jump to. I don’t know if you remember, but you kinda were a well known assassin that people were terrified of.”
“Now wait one second! No one ever really saw my face when I was like that! I-” Bucky said sitting up straighter and went to pointing fingers, but was cut off by Happy clearing his throat.
“Excuse me boys, but we have a guest.” he said with a stern voice making the men snap their head your direction.
“Rosalyn?” Bucky said with furrowed eyebrows before they changed to widened eyes. He immediately jumped from his chair and turned to face you. Sam following after. “What-uh, what are you doing here?”
“I came to talk to Mr. Stark and Dr. Banner about a project I’m working on,” you answered with a smiled, trying to hide the fact you were regretting this whole thing. You fixed the strap of your purse from falling off of your shoulder, therefore taking your arm out of Happy’s.
“I have to get going, but I’m sure these two-” he turned to the men who were gawking at you. “Idiots, can help you,” Happy frowned before smiling and waving to you, headed to leave.
“Thanks again Happy!” you shouted his direction turning to watch him leave.
Once he was out of sight, you let out a sigh wondering if it was too late to ditch. You hastily turned on your heels, and saw the two men still taking in your presence. It was more of a shocked look than anything else, but Sam noticed Bucky not blinking and hit him in the back of the head to snap him out of it.
“Ow! What the hell?” Bucky said holding his head and turning to Sam.
“You’re staring,” he said before rolling his eyes, and going over to the fridge.
“I was not-” Bucky started, but Sam cut him off.
“Can I get you anything to drink Rose? Water, juice, wine?” he said looking in the fridge.
“I’m fine Sam. Thank you,” you politely waved walking more into the kitchen. “If Stark and Banner aren’t here, I can go. I figured there was a small chance of them actually being here, so really it’s no-”
“No, no!” Bucky said moving to get closer. “They, um, they’re here. I think they were in the lab last I heard. Something about repairing the suite and other things,” he said with a smile.
“Oh, ok,” you said with a soft smile back. He was staring again. “Can you, um, take me to them, or-”
“Right! Right!” Bucky said. He was acting weird… or maybe it was normal. You didn’t really know Bucky much other than that one night you were here. You didn’t see much of him back in the day either. Once he was recruited for Steve’s team, you were holed up in the lab a majority of the time. You only heard his name once or twice in all the chaos of the war. “Uh, Sam, can you call Tony and double check to see if that’s where they are?” he said shooting Sam another weird look.
“Why do I have to-” Sam started confused.
“Sam. Please,” Bucky said nodding toward the door.
Ah shit. What was going on?
“Fine. God,” Sam said grabbing his phone and pressing a number before looking back at Bucky who was giving you both weird vibes.
Once he was out of the room Bucky turned to you.
“So, you didn’t come to see Steve?” he said bluntly.
Your eyes widened. Are you kidding me right now? Steve told Bucky. He had to have. You decided to play it off because you didn’t want to jump to conclusions.
“Why would I come to see just Steve?” you asked, trying to seem as calm as possible when truly your heart was actually going the speed of a hummingbirds.
“No reason. Just the fact that I know he went to your house the other week,” he said with a smirk as he went back to the table.
“Shit,” you mumbled under your breath before you followed and stood by him at the table. “What did he say?” you said sternly shifting to boss mode.
Bucky noticed the change in mood, and realized he messed up.
“Nothing. He just told me he went over there to ask you on a date,” he answered.
“Bucky,” you said with a death glare.
He was honestly scared. He had fought aliens, monsters, criminals, and all the bad things in the world, but that glare? That was sending a different type of chill through his body.
“Honestly, Rose! He didn’t tell me anything. Trust me I tried getting it out of him, but he didn’t budge,” he said holding up his hands with a sandwich in one. You let out a relieved sigh, and crossed your arms looking at the ground trying to decide if you believed him. “But now with how you’re acting,” he said looking down at you, and slowly turning his frown into a grin as you looked at him nervous again. “I figure something happened…”
“Nothing happened Bucky. Nothing for you to worry about,” you said taking a seat.
“Then why were you so defensive about it? I mean he was over there for quite a few hours,” he said shrugging his eyebrows up and down at you.
“Bucky,” you said in a calm voice. “I suggest you leave it alone before that arm isn’t the only prosthetic you have,” you said with an evil grin that made his grin immediately fall and fear took over his face once again. You crossed your legs, and sat straight before looking at your nails showing you were unbothered by his boyish banter.
“O-Ok,” he stuttered taking a seat, but making sure to leave a space between you.
“Finally, someone who can actually put him in his place,” Sam said walking in. “I was wondering if someone like that even existed.” he laughed looking at Bucky who shot him a glare. “You really need to start coming around here more often Rose. I like you,” he smiled leaning over the chair in between you two.
“Did they answer?” you asked wanting to get this visit over with.
“Oh, yeah. They were in the lab like suspected. I told him you were here, and Tony said he would come up and meet you then take you back down there himself.”
“Thank you Sam.”
“Anything for a woman that scares the shit out of the Winter Soldier,” he laughed taking a seat between you two. “So, what do you need to talk to them about? Is it business?”
“Something along the lines of that. I have a project that I’m looking into, and need their insight on it,” you smiled.
“Cool. How is the science world going?” Sam said sweetly just trying to make small talk. You gladly took the turn in conversation, wanting to steer clear of everything that Bucky was mentioning.
“Really well actually. We just finished a vaccine for that flu that broke out last year. We only have a few more steps to go before we can release it to the public and hopefully stop it from hurting anyone else,” you said with a proud grin.
“Wow! That’s amazing! So you’re out there saving the world.” he beamed sitting back in his chair more.
“Nothing compares to you guys-”
“Oh, give yourself some credit Ember!” Tony’s voice said loudly as he entered. “Clearly you are just saving the world from a different standpoint, but saving it nonetheless.”
“Mr. Stark,” you said through a very business like smile while you stood.
“Well, would you look at you?” he said throwing his hands out as he scanned you. “You remind me of Pepper. Even your ‘casual’ clothes are captivating to the eye.”
“Thank you, but I came here to talk about-”
“About a project. Yes, Happy told me. Called about two seconds after he left, and then Sam called shortly after.” he said crossing his arms once he was right in front of you. “What do you need to fill me in on?”
“Actually if we could speak in private-”
“You just missed her put Barnes here in his place. It was game changing. I wish I had it on video,” Sam interrupted smacking Bucky on the shoulder, and getting yet another glare from him.
“Is that so? Only person I know can do that is-”
“Me,” a deep voice said at the entrance of the room. All heads turned to see Steve in a long sleeve dry fit shirt, and sweatpants. Probably just got done working out or taking a shower from the slight dampness on his hair.
“Steve,” you said in a hushed tone.
“Even I struggle putting the punk down. Glad someone else can do it,” he smirked as he leaned against the door frame on his shoulder while his arms crossed his broad chest.
“Oh captain, my captain,” Tony said turning to him as he walked into the room, but Steve never broke eye contact with you.
“What are you doing here Rose?” he said ignoring Tony once he was in front of you.
“I needed to talk to Banner and Stark, but seeing that you’re here now.” you sighed pulling some papers out of your bag. “I think we should all talk.”
Steve looked down at the manila folder you were holding. Whatever was in it was important since it had the big red words CONFIDENTIAL stamped on it.
“Well, things just got interesting,” Tony hummed looking at the folder. “Rogers, why don’t you lead Miss. Ember here to the lab where Banner is. I’m going to grab a drink and quick treat and meet you two there.” Tony said patting him on the shoulder before moving to the fridge.
Steve looked up from the folder you were holding and sent you a look that basically asked if what he thought you were doing, was what you were really doing.
“Sure,” he said staring at you. “Right this way.” He moved to the side motioning for you to head a certain way before he followed behind you.
Bucky caught his arm before he got too far.
“Dude, first off, she is terrifying. Second off, what the hell is going on?” Bucky whispered.
“Don’t worry about it right now. I’ll explain when I can,” Steve said as everyone in the room watched him.
“Does it have to do with…” he paused hoping Steve was catching on.
“Not sure. Like I said. I’ll tell you when I can,” he nodded walking to catch up with you.
Everyone in the room watched as you both left, and never looked away until you were out of sight for a good 15 seconds.
“Anyone else feel a weird vibe from that whole… thing?” Sam said.
“Yep,” Bucky replied.
“Hopefully I won’t be out of the loop too long.” Tony said grabbing a water bottle.
__
“Wanna explain to me why Barnes was interrogating me about you coming over to my house the other night?” you said looking forward as you walked to the lab. Though you didn't necessarily know where you were going, you were running on anger of him spilling your secret, and just wanted to get this whole disastrous plan over with.
“He what?” Steve asked trying to catch up to your fast pace, and finally getting to a point to where he could see your frustrated expression.
“Oh, don’t play coy Rogers!” you said loudly stopping in your tracks and turning to him with your fist in balls at your side. “Bucky knows. I could tell by the stuff he was asking. He tried covering it up, but the man doesn’t have the best poker face for someone who's a spy!” you said in a more hushed tone realizing you weren’t too far from the kitchen and you may have been a tad loud the first time.
“I have no idea what he was talking about Y/N, but I swear I didn’t say anything.” Steve said putting his hands up in defense as he looked you in the eyes.
“Really? Then why was he asking about-”
“He knew I left that night. He was the reason I left actually,” he said rubbing a hand over the back of his neck. “I wanted to go talk to you, ask you on that date, but I almost talked myself out of it.”
You straightened and the tension in your body dissipated some.
“He told me to take the chance since I’ve never showed interest in a girl like this besides Peggy, and well....” he blushed looking at the ground now. You started blushing too realizing that you blew up on him before knowing the whole story. He liked you like Peggy? Wow, that’s a big thing. “Long story short, he got me out of the house and over to yours. He waited up for me thinking it would be an hour to two tops, but when I didn’t show up until 5 hours later he kinda got in my business.”
“But you didn’t tell him my secret,” you stated sighing, realizing what an idiot of yourself you just made.
“No, God no!” Steve said jumping in and looking back to you then the hallway to make sure no one was listening. “It’s not my secret to tell, remember? I haven’t told anyone.”
“Thank you for that.” you said softly. “I-uh, I guess I just kinda jumped to the shark even though I shouldn’t have.”
“It’s ok.”
“No, it’s really not. I should have trusted you more… It’s just…” you sighed as you adjusted the papers you were clutching into your hands. “This is big. I haven’t told a soul in years, and me being here right now is still shocking to me.”
“So, that is what this is about?” Steve said sending you empathetic eyes.
“Yes. As much as I’m regretting it every second, I think it will be for the better. At least I hope it is,” you dry laughed. “Sorry, I’m a bit nervous.”
“Hey, it’s fine. I’ll be right here to back you up if you need it,” he said putting his hands on both of your shoulders to bring your eyes to him.
“Thank you,” you blushed a smile. He grinned happy that he caused that.
“How about we get to the lab before Tony catches up and starts making up a story about finding us in the hallway?”
“That sounds like a good plan,” you laughed looking down the hallway to check if he was coming, and when you turned back to Steve, he had his arm extended to you. “Did you teach all the guys to do this here? I feel like everyone has ushered me this way.”
“They may have picked up on some of my 40’s charm. I try to influence them in manners when I can,” he said in a cocky tone, but joking still.
“Well if you ask me, the world needs to bring back some of these manners. I miss being treated like a lady instead of a piece of meat,” you said accepting his gesture as you both made a way to the lab. “Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t love being treated like I was supposed to be a housewife and nothing more from those times, but this? This I miss. Chivalry is dying now and days.”
“Guess we need to find that happy median then, huh?” he smiled looking down at you.
“Guess so,” you smiled back sending shivers over his body.
Chapter 14
Used to be Overlooked Tag:
@xa-dia @losersunitetonight @fashionlive15 @star-spangled-man-with-a-plan@steverogersxreader @laneygthememequeen @lauravic @shreddedparchment @iheartsebastianstan @almostelegantfire@manymaria111 @carol-damn-vers @angelkurenai @squirrelgirl67 @stevieboyharrington @deaniebeanieandsammywammy @demon-doggo @badassbeckettswan @blueenemy24
Other Tags:
@shamelesslydean @sleepless-sin @sandlee44 @gripmetight-raisemefromperdition @spnwoman@ravengirl94 @carryonmywaywardcaptain@ezilyamuzed @thosekidswhohuntmonsters@purpleskiesandcherrypies @anise-d-castle6 @tailsoflightning @spookycowz @eve05glee@snffbeebee @deans-baby-momma @natura1phenomenon @tftumblin @gh0stgurl@screechingartisancashbailiff @kersumgen @herscrunchiehairtie @dreaminemz@monkeymcpoopoo@a-girl-who-loves-disney @andthatsmyworld @greenarrowhead @savio-the-depressed-moose @awesome-badass-cafeteria-sauce @greyeyedsmile14 @sundownridge @adoptdontshop-blog @casper57 @twentyonesupernaturalartist @rainflowermoonlibrary @traceyaudette @luciathewinchestergirl @almostelegantfire@thefaithfulwriter @deansgirl-1968
If I tagged you and you aren’t normally on my tag list, I thought you would enjoy the story. Fair warning, it is a slow burn so we will get to the bottom of the issue later, but the burn is what makes it soooooo sweet. I’m really excited for this series, and would love your feedback:) Thank you!
If you want removed let me know. After 3 chapters I will only tag those that I normally do, or those that ask:)
#marvel#marvel fanfiction#steve rogers#steve rogers x reader#steve rogers series#steve rogers x reader series#steve rogers fanfiction#captain america#captain america x reader series#captain america x reader#captain america series#justkending#series#captain america fanfiction#mcu#mcu series
108 notes
·
View notes
Text
Should Your Child Watch TV News? Surprising Opinions of Top Anchors
KIDS AND THE NEWS
More than ever, children witness innumerable, sometimes traumatizing, news events on TV. It seems that violent crime and bad news is unabating. Foreign wars, natural disasters, terrorism, murders, incidents of child abuse, and medical epidemics flood our newscasts daily. Not to mention the grim wave of recent school shootings.
All of this intrudes on the innocent world of children. If, as psychologists say, kids are like sponges and absorb everything that goes on around them, how profoundly does watching TV news actually affect them? How careful do parents need to be in monitoring the flow of news into the home, and how can they find an approach that works?
To answer these questions, we turned to a panel of seasoned anchors, Peter Jennings, Maria Shriver, Linda Ellerbee, and Jane Pauley--each having faced the complexities of raising their own vulnerable children in a news-saturated world.
Picture this: 6:30 p.m. After an exhausting day at the office, Mom is busy making dinner. She parks her 9-year-old daughter and 5-year-old son in front of the TV.
"Play Nintendo until dinner's ready," she instructs the little ones, who, instead, start flipping channels.
Tom Brokaw on "NBC News Tonight," announces that an Atlanta gunman has killed his wife, daughter and son, all three with a hammer, before going on a shooting rampage that leaves nine dead.
On "World News Tonight," Peter Jennings reports that a jumbo jetliner with more than 300 passengers crashed in a spinning metal fireball at a Hong Kong airport.
On CNN, there's a report about the earthquake in Turkey, with 2,000 people killed.
On the Discovery channel, there's a timely special on hurricanes and the terror they create in children. Hurricane Dennis has already struck, Floyd is coming.
Finally, they see a local news report about a roller coaster accident at a New Jersey amusement park that kills a mother and her eight-year-old daughter.
Nintendo was never this riveting.
"Dinner's ready!" shouts Mom, unaware that her children may be terrified by this menacing potpourri of TV news.
What's wrong with this picture?
"There's a LOT wrong with it, but it's not that easily fixable," notes Linda Ellerbee, the creator and host of "Nick News," the award-winning news program geared for kids ages 8-13, airing on Nickelodeon.
"Watching blood and gore on TV is NOT good for kids and it doesn't do much to enhance the lives of adults either," says the anchor, who strives to inform children about world events without terrorizing them. "We're into stretching kids' brains and there's nothing we wouldn't cover," including recent programs on euthanasia, the Kosovo crisis, prayer in schools, book- banning, the death penalty, and Sudan slaves.
But Ellerbee emphasizes the necessity of parental supervision, shielding children from unfounded fears. "During the Oklahoma City bombing, there were terrible images of children being hurt and killed," Ellerbee recalls. "Kids wanted to know if they were safe in their beds. In studies conducted by Nickelodeon, we found out that kids find the news the most frightening thing on TV.
"Whether it's the Gulf War, the Clinton scandal, a downed jetliner, or what happened in Littleton, you have to reassure your children, over and over again, that they're going to be OK--that the reason this story is news is that IT ALMOST NEVER HAPPENS. News is the exception...nobody goes on the air happily and reports how many planes landed safely!
"My job is to put the information into an age-appropriate context and lower anxieties. Then it's really up to the parents to monitor what their kids watch and discuss it with them"
Yet a new study of the role of media in the lives of children conducted by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation reveals that 95% of the nation's children ages 8-18 are watching TV without their parents present.
How does Ellerbee view the typical scenario of the harried mother above?
"Mom's taking a beating here. Where's Dad?" Ellerbee asks.Perhaps at work, or living separately from Mom, or absent altogether.
"Right. Most Moms and Dads are working as hard as they can because we live in a society where one income just doesn't cut it anymore,"
NBC News correspondent Maria Shriver, the mother of four--Katherine, 13, Christina, 12, Patrick, 10, and Christopher, 6--agrees with Ellerbee: "But Moms aren't using the TV as a babysitter because they're out getting manicures!" says the 48-year-old anchor.
"Those mothers are struggling to make ends meet and they do it because they need help. I don't think kids would be watching [as much TV] if their parents were home organizing a touch football game.
"When I need the TV as a babysitter," says Shriver, who leaves detailed TV- viewing instructions behind when traveling, "I put on a safe video. I don't mind that my kids have watched "Pretty Woman" or "My Best Friend's Wedding" 3,000 times. I'd be more fearful if they watched an hour of local news.That would scare them. They might feel: 'Oh, my God, is somebody going to come in and shoot me in my bedroom?'"
In a move to supervise her own children more closely since her husband, Arnold Schwarzenegger, became Governor, Shriver scaled back her workload as Contributing Anchor to Dateline NBC and set up her office at home: "You can never be vigilant enough with your kids," she says, "because watching violence on TV clearly has a huge impact on children--whether it's TV news, movies, or cartoons."
This view is shared by the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, which states: ""TV is a powerful influence in developing value systems and shaping behavior...studies find that children may become immune to the horror of violence; gradually accept violence as a way to solve problems; and resort to anti-social and aggressive behavior, imitating the violence they observe."
Although there are no rules about watching TV in 49% of the nation's households, TV-watching at the Schwarzenegger home is almost totally verboten:
"We have a blanket rule that my kids do not watch any TV at all during the week," she notes, "and having a TV in their bedrooms has never been an option. I have enough trouble getting them to do their homework!" she states with a laugh. "Plus the half hour of reading they have to do every night.
According to the Kaiser survey, Shriver's household is a glaring exception to the rule. "Many kids have their own TV's, VCR's and video games in their bedroom," the study notes. Moreover, children ages 8-18 actually spend an average of three hours and 16 minutes watching TV daily; only 44 minutes reading; 31 minutes using the computer; 27 minutes playing video games; and a mere 13 minutes using the Internet.
"My kids," Shriver explains, "get home at 4 p.m., have a 20-minute break, then go right into homework or after-school sports. Then, I'm a big believer in having family dinner time. Some of my fondest memories are of sitting at the dinner table and listening to my parents, four brothers, and my grandmother, Rose. We didn't watch the news.
"After dinner nowadays, we play a game, then my kids are in bed, reading their books. There's no time in that day for any TV, except on weekends, when they're allowed to watch a Disney video, Sesame Street, Barney, The Brady Bunch, or Pokemon."
Beyond safe entertainment, Shriver has eliminated entirely the option of her children watching news events unfolding live on TV: "My kids," she notes, "do not watch any TV news, other than Nick News," instead providing her children with Time for Kids, [Teen Newsweek is also available], Highlights, and newspaper clippings discussed over dinner.
"No subject should be off-limits," Shriver concludes, "but you must filter the news to your kids."
ABC's Peter Jennings, who reigns over "World News Tonight," the nation's most-watched evening newscast, emphatically disagrees with a censored approach to news-watching: "I have two kids--Elizabeth is now 24 and Christopher is 21-- and they were allowed to watch as much TV news and information anytime they wanted," says the anchor. A firm believer in kids understanding the world around them, he adapted his bestselling book, The Century, for children ages 10 and older in The Century for Young People.
No downside to kids watching news? "I don't know of any downside and I've thought about it many times. I used to worry about my kids' exposure to violence and overt sex in the movies. Like most parents, I found that although they were exposed to violence sooner than I would have liked, I don't feel they've been affected by it. The jury's still out on the sex.
"I have exposed my kids to the violence of the world--to the bestiality of man--from the very beginning, at age 6 or 7. I didn't try to hide it. I never worried about putting a curtain between them and reality, because I never felt my children would be damaged by being exposed to violence IF they understood the context in which it occurred. I would talk to my kids about the vulnerability of children in wartime--the fact that they are innocent pawns-- and about what we could do as a family to make the world a more peaceful place.
Jennings firmly believes that coddling children is a mistake: "I've never talked down to my children, or to children period. I always talk UP to them and my newscast is appropriate for children of any age."
Yet the 65-year-old anchor often gets letters from irate parents: "They'll say: 'How dare you put that on at 6:30 when my children are watching?' My answer is: 'Madam, that's not my problem. That's YOUR problem. It's absolutely up to the parent to monitor the flow of news into the home."
Part of directing this flow is turning it off altogether at meal-time, says Jennings, who believes family dinners are sacrosanct. He is appalled that the TV is turned on during meals in 58% of the nation's households, this according to the Kaiser study.
"Watching TV during dinner is unforgivable," he exclaims, explaining that he always insisted that his family wait until he arrived home from anchoring the news. "You're darn right they waited...even when my kids were tiny, they never ate until 7:30 or 8 pm. Then we would sit with no music, no TV. Why waste such a golden opportunity? Watching TV at mealtime robs the family of the essence of the dinner, which is communion and exchange of ideas. I mean, God, if the dinner table is anything, it's a place to learn manners and appreciation for two of the greatest things in life--food and drink."
Jennings is likewise unequivocal in his view of junk TV and believes parking kids at the tube creates dull minds: "I think using TV as a babysitter is a terrible idea because the damn television is very narcotic, drug-like. Mindless TV makes for passive human beings--and it's a distraction from homework!
"My two children were allowed to watch only a half an hour of entertainment TV per night--and they never had TV's in their bedrooms.It's a conscious choice I made as a parent not to tempt them...too seductive..."
Adds Ellerbee: "TV is seductive and is meant to be. The hard, clear fact is that when kids are watching TV, they're not doing anything else!"
Indeed, according to the National Institute on Out-of-School Time and the Office of Research Education Consumer Guide, TV plays a bigger role in children's lives now than ever before. Kids watch TV an average of14 to 22 hours per week, which accounts for at least 25 percent of their free time.
"Dateline NBC" Anchor Jane Pauley, intensely private, declined an interview to discuss how she and her husband, cartoonist Garry Trudeau ("Doonesbury") handle TV-watching with their three teens, two of whom are fraternal twins. But in a written response, she agreed that kids need to be better protected from the onslaught of violence: "I was a visitor at a public elementary school not long ago, and was invited to peek in on a fourth-grade class on 'current events.' The assignment had been to watch the news and write about one of the stories. Two kids picked the fatal attack on a child by a pit bull and the other wrote about a child who'd hanged herself with a belt! They'd all watched the worst blood and gore 'News at 11' station in town. The teacher gave no hint that she was as appalled as I was. My response was to help the school get subscriptions to "Time for Kids" and "My Weekly Reader." People need to be better news consumers. And tabloid TV is very unhealthy for kids."
On this point, Ellerbee readily agrees:"I really do believe the first amendment STOPS at your front door. You are the boss at home and parents have every right to monitor what their kids watch. What's even better is watching with them and initiating conversations about what they see.If your child is watching something terribly violent, sit down and DEFUSE it. Talking makes the ghosts run...and kids can break through their scared feelings."
Adds Pauly:
"Kids," she maintains, "know about bad news--they're the ones trying to spare us the bad news sometimes. But kids should be able to see that their parents are both human enough to be deeply affected by a tragedy like Columbine, but also sturdy enough to get through it...and on with life. That is the underpinning of their security."
"I'm no expert on the nation's children," adds Jennings, " but I'd have to say no, it wasn't traumatic. Troubling, shocking, even devastating to some, confusing to others, but traumatizing in that great sense, no.
"Would I explain to my kids that there are young, upset, angry, depressed kids in the world? Yes. I hear the most horrendous stories about what's going on in high schools from my kids. And because of the shootings, parents are now on edge--pressuring educators to 'do something.' They have to be reminded that the vast majority of all schools in America are overwhelmingly safe," a fact borne out by The National School Safety Center, which reports that in l998 there were just 25 violent deaths in schools compared to an average of 50 in the early 90's.
Ellerbee adds that a parent's ability to listen is more important than lobbying school principals for more metal detectors and armed guards: "If there was ever a case where grown-ups weren't listening to kids, it was Littleton. First, don't interrupt your child...let them get the whole thought out. Next, if you sit silently for a couple of seconds after they're finished, they'll start talking again, getting to a second level of honesty. Third, try to be honest with your kid. To very small children, it's proper to say: 'This is never going to happen to you...' But you don't say that to a 10-year-old."
Moreover, Ellerbee believes that media literacy begins the day parents stop pretending that if you ignore TV, it will go away. "Let your kid know from the very beginning that he or she is SMARTER than TV: 'I am in control of this box, it is not in control of me. I will use this box as a useful, powerful TOOL, but will not be used by it.' Kids know the difference.
"Watching TV," Ellerbee maintains, "can makes kids more civilized. I grew up in the south of Texas in a family of bigoted people. Watching TV made me question my own family's beliefs in the natural inferiority of people of color. For me, TV was a real window that broadened my world."
Ironically, for Shriver, watching TV news is incredibly painful when the broadcast is about you. Being a Kennedy, Shriver has lived a lifetime in the glare of rumors and televised speculation about her own family. Presenting the news to her children has therefore included explaining the tragedies and controversies the Kennedys have endured. She was just eight years old when her uncle, President John F. Kennedy, was assassinated: "I grew up in a very big shadow...and I couldn't avoid it," she admits. "It wasn't a choker, but it was a big responsibility that I don't want my own children to feel." Yet doesn't her 15- year marriage to megastar Schwarzenegger add yet another layer of public curiosity close to home? "My kids are not watching Entertainment Tonight--no, no, never! And I don't bring them to movie openings or Planet Hollywood. I think it's fine for them to be proud of their father, but not show off about him."
How does she emotionally handle news when her family's in it? "That's a line I've been walking since my own childhood, and it's certainly effected the kind of reporter I've become. It's made me less aggressive. I'm not [in the news business] to glorify myself at someone else's expense, but rather to report a story without destroying someone in the process. A producer might say: 'Call this person who's in a disastrous situation and book them right way.' And I'm like: 'Ahhhh. I can't even bring myself to do it,' because I've been on the other side and know the family is in such pain." Read more here ข่าวไอที
A few years ago, of course, the Kennedys experienced profound pain, yet again, when Shriver's beloved cousin, John F. Kennedy, Jr., was killed in a plane crash, with his wife, Carolyn, and sister-in-law, Lauren Bessette. A blizzard of news coverage ensued, unremitting for weeks. "I didn't watch any of it...I was busy, " Shriver says quietly. "And my children didn't watch any of it either."
Shriver was, however, somewhat prepared to discuss the tragedy with her children. She is the author of the best-selling "What's Heaven?" [Golden Books], a book geared for children ages 4-8, which explains death and the loss of a loved one. "My children knew John well because he spent Christmases with us. I explained what happened to John as the news unfolded...walked them through it as best I could. I reminded them that Mommy wrote the book and said: 'We're not going to see John anymore. He has gone to God...to heaven...and we have to pray for him and for his sister [Caroline] and her children."
Like Shriver, Jennings is personally uncomfortable in the role of covering private tragedies in a public forum: "In my shop, I'm regarded as one of those people who drags their feet a lot at the notion of covering those things," he explains. "During the O.J. Simpson trial, I decided not to go crazy in our coverage--and we took quite a smack and dropped from first to second in the ratings. TV is a business, so when a real corker of a story like Princess Diana's death comes along, we cover it. I think we're afraid not to do it. We're guilty of overkill, and with Diana, we ended up celebrating something that was largely ephemeral, making Diana more than she was. But audiences leap up!
"I was totally opposed to covering John F. Kennedy, Jr.'s funeral, because I saw no need to do it. He wasn't a public figure, though others would say I was wrong. On-air, I said: 'I don't think the young Mr. Kennedy would approve of all this excess...' But we did three hours on the funeral and it turned out to be a wonderful long history lesson about American politics and the Kennedy dynasty's place in our national life.
"Sometimes," Jennings muses, "TV is like a chapel in which we, as a nation, can gather to have a communal experience of loss.We did it with the Challenger, more recently with JFK Jr.'s death and we will do it shortly, I suspect, though I hope not, with Ronald Reagan. It's not much different than what people did when they went West in covered wagons in the last century. When tragedy struck, they gathered the wagons around, lit the fire, and talked about their losses of the day. And then went on. Television can be very comforting."
In closing, Ellerbee contends that you can't blame TV news producers for the human appetite for sensational news coverage that often drags on for days at a time:
"As a reporter," she muses, "I have never been to a war, traffic accident, or murder site that didn't draw a crowd. There is a little trash in all of us. But the same people who stop to gawk at a traffic accident, may also climb down a well to save a child's life, or cry at a sunset, or grin and tap their feet when the parade goes by.
"We are NOT just one thing. Kids can understand these grays...just as there's more than one answer to a question, there is certainly more than one part to you!
1 note
·
View note
Text
8.12
It looked like Andy was going to let them have their rooms for another night, even if Friday was still in the lobby bartering to make it happen. Harry Digby had paid them in several bushels of apples, instead of real coin, so Friday was giving Andy the hard sell. She’d sent Val to his room with the promise that they weren’t going to be evicted, and the instruction not to waste too much of the water, so she could wash up after. Well, that wouldn’t be a problem. Val was too exhausted to bathe, or to do much more than drag himself down the hall and crawl into bed.
Unfortunately for Val, there was a woman in his room.
It was the woman who had been at the hotel bar last night, Val was almost certain, though he hadn’t seen her face to face until now. She had shiny black hair tied in a loose ponytail, and her shirt was untucked, like she’d been on the way to sleep, herself. She was sitting on Val’s bed like she owned it, legs crossed, one foot bouncing gently against the opposite leg.
“Finally,” she said, as Val opened the door. “I thought I was going to have to wait all night for you to get back. You’re a priest, aren’t you? I saw your shirt hanging up to dry, with the collar.”
“Uh, yes,” Val said, shutting the door behind him, and toeing off his shoes. Maybe he should have been afraid, to find a stranger in his room, but if the woman was looking for a priest...well, she probably didn’t mean much harm. Oklahoma City didn’t seem to have a church of any kind, so it made a certain amount of sense that she had come to him. “How can I help you, miss…?”
“Ueno,” the woman said. “I came to confess, actually, if you have the time. I could use some…” She hummed, thoughtfully. “Let’s say spiritual guidance, with something I’ve been dealing with lately.”
“I have the time,” Val said, though he didn’t, not strictly. But he could always make time to hear a confession, he told himself. Especially for someone who’d professed to be looking for guidance.
“Great,” Ueno said, and made the sign of the cross. “In the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. My last confession was...oh, probably ten years ago. I don’t know.”
Val raised his eyebrows. “You’ve lapsed.”
“I’ve been busy,” she corrected him smoothly. “And it’s hard to find a priest who will take you when you’re upper management of an organized crime conglomerate. Which is confession number one, by the way, if you’d like to keep count.”
Val felt his eyebrows creep farther up his forehead, and a deep sense of exhaustion washed over him, even deeper than the one he’d felt while trudging towards his room. Apparently this night was going to be without end. He exhaled heavily and sat down on the floor, unwilling to get his muddy clothes on the bedsheets. Judging by the way Ueno’s lips quirked upwards at the corners, it amused her.
“Are you tired of me already?” she asked.
“No,” Val said. “It’s been an especially tiring night. Go on, please.”
“Well, I like to think that my organization runs like a well-oiled machine. I barely do anything besides sit at a desk and sign papers and give marching orders over the phone, but enough people respect my name and position that they take orders without question. It gets the job done. You see, I don’t really like to get my hands dirty, and I especially don’t like to get my hands dirty when it comes to fixing other people’s mistakes. Usually, I don’t have to.” Ueno sighed, flicking a loose lock of hair out of her face. “Unfortunately, we’re in the middle of the biggest fiasco we’ve had to deal with in ages; I’m down ten thousand silver, one of my gang members has gone utterly off the deep end, and it’s beginning to look very much like I need to get my hands dirty. I mean, he nearly burnt down Vegas, for Christ’s sake.” She paused, her eyes flicking to Val. “No disrespect intended, of course.”
Val massaged his temples. A feeling of unfortunate familiarity had been stirring in his gut since Ueno had mentioned a fiasco, and by the time she’d got around to mentioning Vegas, he was certain she was talking about the Dead-Eyes and their pursuit of Cody. The woman who managed the Dead-Eyes was sitting in his hotel room, and Val couldn’t repeat what she was saying to anyone, not even Friday, because this was a formal confession, and he couldn’t violate the seal of the confessional. Val had never felt quite so distinctly that the Lord was testing him.
“None taken,” he said, finally remembering he owed Ueno a response. “I’m sorry - like I said, it’s been a long night. Do you have more to confess?”
“Oh, yes,” she said. “As you might have guessed, I’m not terribly fond of the gang that’s making all this trouble. First Vegas, now they’re off causing problems in Texas - in my hometown, believe it or not. You’d think they would know better.”
“Gangs rarely know better, I’ve found,” Val said, idly rubbing the fingers of one hand over the burn scars on the palm of the other. So John and Cody were in Texas, then. Or they’d passed through Texas recently, and now the Dead-Eyes were tearing it up in search of them. Another important detail he couldn’t tell Friday. He could use the information, of course, but he couldn’t say why, or even insinuate that Ueno had told him in confessional, which was apt to drive both him and Friday up a wall.
Ueno laughed. “Usually when it comes to me, they do.”
“They must afford you a fair amount of respect, then,” Val said. “Or fear.”
“A little of both, I would say.” Ueno shrugged. “But it gets the job done. And I’d very much like to keep things that way, which I don’t foresee happening if I allow that problem gang to keep burning and pillaging its way across the States. There are too many people who would love nothing more than to take my position away from me, and I’m not going to let it slip through my fingers.”
“So what are you going to do?” Val asked, getting the feeling that Ueno had come here to ask that very question - that she wasn’t completely sure of the answer, herself.
“Well, that’s just the thing,” she said, with a sigh. “I have to kill him, don’t I? The head of the gang? I don’t think he’s going to stop unless someone makes him stop. It’s the only way to solve this mess and keep my position, from where I’m sitting.”
“It’s not going to get you that ten thousand silver back,” Val said, somewhat pointedly.
“No, it’s not,” Ueno said, frowning in thought. “I’ll just have to go after the boy he loaned the silver to. But more subtly. No burning down any more cities, obviously, or I won’t have an organization to come back to. Come to think of it, I might not even have to get my hands dirty at all…” She trailed off, then glanced to Val. “What do you think? Killing the gang leader is the only way out of this for me, isn’t it? If I want to keep my people’s respect?”
“I can’t advocate murder. You know that,” Val said. Murder was a sin, even if Ethan was fairly high on the list of people whose death might not move him in the slightest. Though maybe that was the exhaustion talking. “Besides, murder seems a little rash, just to punish someone who’s already making a fool of himself. I’m not sure his actions reflect on you as much as you think they do.”
“You don’t know my line of work,” Ueno countered. “People see a gang member in my organization making a fool of himself, they think I don’t know how to control my assets.”
“So kick him out of his gang. Turn him in to the authorities, anonymously. There’s plenty of solutions beyond murder,” Val said, somewhat stiffly. “You could even detain him somewhere and make him disappear to the public eye, though I’m not sure that’s any better.”
“You might have a talent for this, Father,” Ueno said, with a chuckle. “But as much as I’d love to do any of those things, they’d be like a slap on the wrist compared to what he’s gone and done. I’ve got displaced Vegas gangs breathing down my neck looking for reparations, and a group in Texas complaining about a botched parlay where the Dead-Eyes didn’t play by the rules. My organization has those rules for a reason, and if I can’t make everyone afraid to break them, no one’s going to follow them. As much as I hate to be the bad guy, that’s just the way things are.”
Val eyed Ueno. So she was going to kill Ethan, regardless of what he said, and find a different way to go after John and Cody for the money Cody owed. The thought made his stomach turn, and he got to his feet suddenly, practically looming over Ueno.
“If you’ll pardon my saying so, Miss Ueno, it sounds like you’ve already made up your mind about what you’re going to do. My advice to you is that you think on it a little longer before you go and do it,” he said. His voice was flat and rasping with exhaustion, and he could barely bring himself to care that he was being short with a woman who could very likely kill him in his sleep, if she chose to. “Now. Give thanks to the Lord, for He is good.”
Ueno’s eyes narrowed for just a moment, though it was a long enough moment for Val to regret being so curt with her. Then, she chuckled and got to her feet as well, stepping towards the door. She paused to eye him - she wasn’t nearly as tall as he was, though still tall enough to look him in the eye.
“For his mercy endures forever,” she said, lips still curled in a smile. “Goodnight, Father. You’ve given me a lot to think about.”
She left, the door swinging shut behind her. As soon as the sound of her heels clicking against the floorboards receded into silence, Val sat down heavily on the bed.
“Lord,” he said under his breath, struggling almost violently out of his belt and pants, “I hope you don’t begrudge me for my foul language, but I’d sure like to know what the fuck just happened here.”
He began undoing the buttons of his shirt, but a knock at his door made him pause. Val glanced down at his pants, now around his ankles, and debated putting them back on before deciding it wasn’t worth it. Even if it was Ueno again.
“Come in,” he said.
Friday pushed open the door, glanced over him, and arched her eyebrows.
“You look like shit, preacher,” she said.
Val snorted. “I’m tired.”
“Yeah, well, ain’t we all,” she said. “We got the rooms for another night, by the way. I’m on my way to wash up, and you can have the bathroom after, if you’re still awake.”
“I probably won’t be,” Val said, though the encounter with Ueno had left him with a sudden surplus of nervous energy. He fidgeted with one of his shirt buttons, trying to work some of it off. “Listen, I want to leave first thing tomorrow morning. Early. I think we can make the Mississippi in a day and a half, if we both take shifts driving and don’t stop for much besides meals and sleep.”
Friday gave him a curious look. “Why the rush?”
“I’m worried about John and Cody,” Val said, and it wasn’t technically a lie. He was worried, both about what Ueno might do to them, and what Ethan might do, if he was feeling trapped and desperate. “I think we should pick up the pace. Try to meet up with them as soon as possible.”
“Well, I’m with you there,” Friday said, with a nod. “Tell you what, if you promise to drive first thing in the morning, we’ll leave first thing in the morning. I’ll take the afternoon shift, after lunch.”
Val sighed with relief. “Thank you.”
“I’m worried about them too, you know,” she said. “Anyway, I’m going to get clean. Get some rest, preacher.”
“I’ll certainly try,” Val muttered, and returned to his shirt buttons as Friday shut the door again.
8.11 || 8.13
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Why El Paso and other recent attacks in the US are modern-day lynchings
https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/17/us/lynchings-racism-new-era-blake/index.html
If you don't read anything else today READ THIS😭😭😭
Why El Paso and other recent attacks in the US are modern-day lynchings
By John Blake | Published August 19, 2019 | CNN | Posted August 19, 2019 |
(CNN) - Carol Anderson was scanning Twitter recently when she saw something that brought back a chilling memory.
Someone asked Latina women if they had changed the way they acted in public after a white man allegedly targeting Mexicans was arrested for gunning down 22 people in an El Paso Walmart. One woman said she no longer speaks Spanish when out alone, checks store exits and now feels like a marked person when among whites.
"The hate feels like a ball in my stomach, and a rope around my neck," the woman said.
For Anderson, the allusion to lynching wasn't just a metaphor. It was personal. She had an uncle who was almost lynched in the early 20th century for standing up to a white man in an Oklahoma store. She also is a historian who wrote about the lynching era in her book, "White Rage."
She says the white men who are driving a surge in white supremacist violence in places like El Paso today are sending the same message to nonwhite Americans that their counterparts did in the lynching era: You will never be safe wherever you go.
"The thing about the lynching era was the capriciousness of it -- no space was safe," says Anderson, an African-American studies professor at Emory University in Atlanta.
"Folks of color were never at ease.
You're looking all the time. You're wondering. Is this a place I can go? You could be walking down the street or in a store or you could be sitting on your front porch and you could get killed."
The term lynching evokes images of a bygone era: black men dangling grotesquely from trees, Southern whites posing proudly by charred bodies, Billie Holiday singing "Strange Fruit."
But Anderson and others warn that many of the same elements that spawned the lynching era are stirring once again in America. One commentator even described the El Paso shooter as "a lynch mob of one."
The result, Anderson says, is that more Americans -- Latinos, blacks, Muslims, Jews, anyone not seen as white enough -- are now experiencing the same fear of being murdered at random in public that their relatives faced during the lynching era.
"It is tiring. It is ridiculous. It is infuriating," she says.
Here are three parallels between the white supremacists of the lynching era -- roughly the late 19th century through the 1960s -- and today:
Both are driven by the same fear
There's a perception that lynch mobs were motivated by mindless violence. But they were primarily driven by fear.
White supremacists were afraid of losing their dominance and being replaced by blacks in positions of power throughout the South.
"It's a weapon of terror to say to the people you're attacking that you don't belong in the mainstream of our society, and we want you to stay back," says Gibson Stroupe, co-author of "Passionate for Justice: Ida B. Wells as Prophet for Our Time," a biography of the most famous anti-lynching crusader.
"You shouldn't have political rights, make demands on white people, and shouldn't have the same rights in courts."
One of the biggest fears of the lynching era revolved around sex -- white paranoia about black men doing to white women what white men had been doing to black women for years. White supremacists were obsessed with being replaced on a biological level and fixated on the notion of black men raping white women and creating a ''mongrel race."
Modern-day racists are also voicing fears about being replaced.
The white supremacists marching in Charlottesville in 2017 chanted, "You will not replace us,"and "Jews will not replace us." The Texas man suspected in the EL Paso shooting posted a document online saying he was "defending my country from cultural and ethnic replacement."
Conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh was recently criticized for saying Central America immigrants would "dilute and eventually eliminate or erase" what's distinct about American culture.
And the white supremacists of the lynching era were actually starting to be replaced -- at least briefly -- on a political level.
A dizzying set of reforms, called Reconstruction, briefly transformed the South after the Civil War. Newly freed slaves gained the right to vote, own property, and get elected to offices once reserved for white men. Two African-Americans were elected to the Senate in the late 19th century, and over 600 served in state legislatures and as judges and sheriffs.
Random racial terror was one of the ways white supremacists seized power.
White supremacists often went after people who were political leaders in a community: ministers, union organizers and people with wealth and property who could inspire others to demand their civil and economic rights, according to a report from the Equal Justice Initiative, a nonprofit group behind the recent opening of the National Memorial for Peace and Justice, which is dedicated to the victims of lynching.
"Each lynching sent messages to blacks: Do not register to vote. Do not apply for a white man's job, according to one essay on the Jim Crow era.
It was racial politics by other means -- like today, Anderson says.
When elected leaders suppress votes, engage in partisan gerrymandering or decimate unions, they are doing what white supremacists did during the lynching era: trying to keep nonwhites in a subordinate position, Anderson says.
"Most of the lynchings were about black people who didn't know 'their place,' '' Anderson says. "They didn't get off the sidewalk when a white person was walking toward them. They looked directly at a white person instead of (at) their feet. They didn't show the proper level of deference -- 'place' was absolutely essential."
Both use the same language to dehumanize their victims
Dylann Roof, the white supremacist who murdered nine people in 2015 in a Charleston, South Carolina church, said he did it because blacks are prone to violence and white people were "being murdered daily in the streets."
This is a common theme of white supremacy -- reducing nonwhites to a subhuman level through language.
It's why critics point out the dangers of commentators and politicians referring to an "invasion" by Central American immigrants. It's why people criticized President Trump for calling some Mexican immigrants "rapists." USA Today recently published a story examining the language Trump uses to describe immigrants -- terms like "predator," "killer," and "animal" -- at his rallies.
The white supremacists of the lynching era used similar language to describe blacks. But they also went after other victims: Latinos were lynched, as were Chinese laborers and Jews.
Black men were a fixation, though. They were described as brutes, animalistic, rapists. One writer described the typical black man as "a monstrous beast, crazed with lust."
An estimated 4,700 people were murdered by lynching between 1882 and 1968, according to the NAACP.
They weren't only hanged. They were also shot, tortured, burned alive or beaten to death by mobs.
Random racial terror is what defined lynchings -- not a noose.
The cruelty is still hard to comprehend. Lynch mobs mutilated bodies and collected body parts as souvenirs -- all while taking pictures of the corpses and sending them as postcards to friends.
Stroupe, though, understands some of that hatred. He once absorbed some of it. He grew in a white family in segregated Arkansas during the lynching era. Today he is a civil rights activist who leads anti-racism workshops and previously led an interracial church that was recognized by Time magazine and the Christian Science Monitor for its work against racism.
But he remembers how he was taught when he was young to think of nonwhites.
"My earlier memory was that people of dark skin were not human beings like us," he says. "I was inculcated with it. We felt like lynching was like killing a dog. I hate to say it that way. It wasn't like we thought we were killing another human being. I never participated in it but I understood that black people had to be put and kept in their place because they couldn't do life like we could."
Both are encouraged by the same type of political leaders
He was a racist in the White House whose words empowered white supremacists and enraged civil rights leaders.
We're talking, of course, about Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of the United States.
Wilson helped revive the Ku Klux Klan by praising one of the most racist movies ever made, "The Birth of a Nation." The film portrayed black lawmakers who came to power in the late 19th-century South as buffoonish, dim-witted men lusting after white women. The KKK was depicted as heroes.
"It's like writing history with lightning," he reportedly said of the film. "My only regret is that it is all so terribly true."
In celebrating the film Wilson endorsed its message "that black people were not able to have political power and needed white people to put them in their place," Stroupe says. "Like the President we have now, he sort of encouraged white supremacy."
Other politicians weren't much better. The NAACP and other groups spent decades urging federal lawmakers to pass anti-lynching laws. Congress debated more than 200 anti-lynching bills in the first half of the 20th century without passing any. Opponents of the bills often described them as an infringement on states' rights.
The Senate finally passed a law making lynching a federal crime -- last year.
Politicians then and now "feigned helplessness" when asked to stop white-supremacist violence or changed the subject, Anderson says.
"You had this crazy kind of both-siderism," she says. "So that when anti-lynching bills were coming through Congress, you would have Southern Democrats like James Byrnes out of South Carolina saying things like, 'Yeah what about murders in New York City? What about the violence in the North?' Stop me if this sounds familiar."
Today many Republican leaders have been criticized by those who say they enable white supremacist violence by refusing to confront race-based domestic terrorism or condemn Trump for his racist statements.
These white politicians are as morally bankrupt as overt racists because they know better but do nothing, Stroupe says.
"It's why Trump doesn't do it now -- that's where the votes are," he says. "Even if they didn't believe in white supremacy, they weren't going to lose votes over it."
The kind of America people want?
It's hard to imagine the random racial terror from the lynching era ever becoming routine again. But maybe it already has.
One former white nationalist told The Atlantic he is shocked to see the impact of racist thinking on American popular culture. And he said the worst is yet to come.
"I never thought we would have a social and political climate that really kind of brought it to the foreground," Christian Picciolini told an interviewer. "Because it's starting to seem less like a fringe ideology and more like a mainstream ideology."
In the past two years white supremacists have killed Muslim students in a North Carolina apartment, Jewish worshippers in a Pittsburgh synagogue and a South Asian man in a Kansas bar. And, of course, there's the recent shooting in El Paso. It's getting hard to keep up.
Anderson believes such violence will keep happening if Trump is re-elected.
"If he gets in power again it sends the signal that this is the kind of America that people wanted," she says.
If that kind of America sounds far-fetched, consider another tweet that showed up on the thread Anderson noticed. When a Latina woman was asked how her life changed after El Paso, she responded with two words: "Mississippi, Goddamn."
That's the name of a fiery protest song written during the lynching era by the black singer Nina Simone.
She sang:
Can't you see it
Can't you feel it
It's all in the air
I can't stand the pressure much longer...
Lord have mercy on this land of mine
We all gonna get it in due time
I don't belong here.
I don't belong there.
I've even stopped believing in prayer.
Simone wrote that song in part to protest the murder of four black girls by white supremacists in a Birmingham, Alabama, church. She wrote it in 1964, near the end of the lynching era.
Yet for many Americans who hear those words today, here is an awful thought:
She could have written that song yesterday.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Copied this post from Facebook, original source here.
I want to share, particularly because of the way he explains things. As a veteran and a gun owner, he knows much more about guns than I do. Hopefully his arguments and information can help any of my friends trying to sway people on gun control laws.
“Completely agree with the sentiment here, Mom. However, in order to make educated arguments for gun control, it's important to actually know what you're proposing and use the right language. Otherwise, you'll just get completely shut down as "not knowing anything about guns" to people you're trying to convince. And if you don't know anything about guns, you can't really advocate for responsible gun policy.
AR15s are not the problem alone. Yes, it's the most popular military-style rifle, and it is designed to kill people effectively. But banning one model of weapon will just make people switch to other, equally effective killing machines. If you banned the Toyota Camry, would people stop buying midsize sedans? No, you'd just end up with more Honda Accords on the road. If you want to fix the problem, you have to ban all semi-automatic rifles. Semi-automatic means the weapon is loaded with a magazine (or belt in some cases) with multiple rounds; and for every trigger squeeze, one bullet is discharged. There is no real need for these weapons in civilian use. They aren't necessary for hunting, where the point is to kill the animal with one shot. It is only useful for killing a lot of things in a short amount of time or having fun at a gun range. I think our children's lives are more important than a fraction of the population's fun shooting a bunch of rounds quickly at a range. They'll cope.
Handguns are far more responsible for gun deaths in America than semi-auto rifles. You mentioned the kid who brought a gun to school as only having a "handgun, not a semi-automatic." Well, almost all handguns are semi-automatic. They have magazines and one bullet per trigger squeeze. Though most handgun rounds aren't as deadly as rifle rounds, it's inconsequential at short range. And handguns are far easier to conceal than a rifle. With the exception of maybe revolvers (which have 5-6 round max before reloading), I believe handguns should be outlawed. The Virginia Tech massacre, the most deadly school shooting in American history, was accomplished with handguns only. Don't underestimate their lethality. I think military style rifles only account for about 2% of gun deaths each year. If you want to solve the problem, semi-auto handguns have to go, as well.
If we really want to make a difference in gun deaths, we need to do WAY more than universal background checks and better mental health screening. Banning all semi-automatic weapons would make that difference. Keeping shotguns, revolvers, and bolt-action rifles legal accomplish all the typical, common uses of guns. (Bolt-action rifles are typical hunting rifles that you have to reload between shots.) With these types of firearms legal, you can still hunt, defend your home, and compete in sport shooting.
Combine the following with the semi-auto ban.
Government buy-back program of all semi-automatic weapons. Once a grace period for turn-ins ends, possession will be a felony without a special (and rare) license for Federally approved dealers and collectors.
Gun licenses for all who want to continue to own approved firearms. Licenses will be granted by completing a comprehensive background check, psych evaluation, safety training, marksmanship training, and meeting strict storage requirements. Storage requirements would include safes, weapons unloaded, with ammo stored separately. Licenses expire after a certain number of years and all the requirements must be completed again for license renewal.
Registration of all firearms.
Insurance for all firearms. If your gun is used in a crime or if there's a accident with your gun, your insurance company is liable for damages. Let the insurance market set rates based on their analysis of risk. Then, people can decide if it's financially worth it to own a gun.
Finally, here's your counterarguments for the most common pro-gun arguments:
Pro-gun argument - assault weapons aren't an actual thing. Banning them won't make a difference.
Counterargument - none. This is true. Classifying a gun as an "assault weapon" is something people who know nothing about guns do. Having a bayonet stud (a place to mount a bayonet) used to be one way to classify a gun as an assault weapon. Last I checked, we don't have a bayonet problem in this country. Talk about banning semi-auto guns instead of made-up things like "assault weapons."
Pro-gun argument - 2nd Amendment guarantees my right to bear arms!
Counterargument - sure, it does, but there can be limitations. And in case anyone needs a history lesson, the individual right to bear arms has only existed since 2008. From the adoption of the Constitution until the DC v. Heller decision in 2008, the 2nd Amendment had never been interpreted to mean private citizens have a right to own guns. (Thanks, Scalia.) But that decision is now the law of the land and precedent for future court decisions. Nevertheless, even in Scalia's majority opinion, he asserts that there are limitations to the 2nd Amendment. Weapons allowed should be those in common use at the time. And limitations should be made on "dangerous and unusual" weapons, per previous precedent in United States v. Miller. I argue that semi-auto firearms should now be considered "dangerous and unusual," given their lethality.
Pro-gun argument - if law-abiding citizens get rid of their guns, criminals won't follow the law, and we'll be in more danger.
Counterargument - this is an argument against having laws. Since criminals don't follow the law, there should be no limits on anything. Also, when we do outlaw things, it can work. Purchases of large quantities of ammonium nitrate fertilizer was restricted after the Oklahoma City bombing, and there hasn't been a similar bombing since. We outlawed fully automatic weapons, grenades, rocket launchers, etc. in the 20th century, and what has happened? We don't see violence with those types of weapons. Most weapons used to commit crimes are purchased lawfully. If we change the laws, it will work to reduce gun deaths.
Pro-gun argument - if we ban guns, people will just use knives or baseball bats
Counterargument - there are plenty of incidents around the world of mass stabbings or clubbings, etc. Show me one that is as lethal as a mass shooting.
Pro-gun argument - we need armed security guards in every school
Counterargument - do you trust the security guard won't become a mass shooter? The Texas church shooter was an Air Force veteran. The Pulse nightclub shooter was a security guard. Further, it's relatively easy to get the drop on a security guard. Shoot him first when he's not expecting, then keep going. That's what the Pulse nightclub shooter did. It's not difficult if you draw first. Columbine had armed security, too. Adding more guns to schools adds more risk, it doesn't reduce it.
Pro-gun argument - it's a mental health issue, not a gun issue *or* guns don't kill people, people kill people
Counterargument - The United States has the same rates of mental illness as other developed Western countries, but we're the only ones with this type of violence. The mentally ill are actually less likely to commit crime than those who aren't mentally ill, which many find surprising. Also, those who are mentally ill are more likely to become the victim of a crime than those who don't have mental illness. It's a common refrain to hear "anyone who would do that must be crazy." That's not true. Being a murderer doesn't actually mean you are mentally ill, which is why you hardly ever see successful insanity defenses in trials. And if "people kill people," then we really should stop giving all these people guns, right? We don't allow private F-22s or nuclear weapons, do we? Why? Because people would use them to kill other people. People use people-killing machines to kill people. Go figure.
Pro-gun argument - We, as a society, have turned our backs on God. This is why crime is getting worse. We need God/Jesus to heal people's hearts, not get rid of law-abiding citizens' guns.
Counterargument - Crime has actually decreased overall in recent decades. Things are getting better, not worse. Murder rates and violent crime overall have trended down as we've advanced as a society. Mass shootings have remained steady, though, because angry people have easy access to guns.
Pro-gun argument - we need guns to fight against the government in case it becomes tyrannical.
Counterargument - I doubt semi-automatic weapons will defeat a tyrannical government with fighter jets, bombers, tanks, artillery, drones, advanced cyber capabilities, and nuclear weapons.
Pro-gun argument - gun registrations will make it easier for the government to disarm us
Counterargument - The registration is necessary to keep track of deadly weapons in case they are used in a crime, or in case a law-abiding citizen commits a crime that revokes their right to guns. There's over 300 million privately owned guns in America. If the government wanted to take everyone's guns, they'd do it the same way they would if there wasn't a registry: by going door to door and searching everyone.
I truly believe we need to do far more than anything advocated by most mainstream gun control organizations like Everytown and Moms Demand Action. We need to follow the lead of countries like the UK, Australia, and Canada. They've figured it out. Why can't we?”
95 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Facebook post made by Callista Kline on February 16, 2018 at 6:05 pm
My brother’s response to my mom’s email about the recent shooting. I want to share, particularly because of the way he explains things. As a veteran and a gun owner, he knows much more about guns than I do. Hopefully his arguments and information can help any of my friends trying to sway people on gun control laws.
“Completely agree with the sentiment here, Mom. However, in order to make educated arguments for gun control, it’s important to actually know what you’re proposing and use the right language. Otherwise, you’ll just get completely shut down as “not knowing anything about guns” to people you’re trying to convince. And if you don’t know anything about guns, you can’t really advocate for responsible gun policy.
AR15s are not the problem alone. Yes, it’s the most popular military-style rifle, and it is designed to kill people effectively. But banning one model of weapon will just make people switch to other, equally effective killing machines. If you banned the Toyota Camry, would people stop buying midsize sedans? No, you’d just end up with more Honda Accords on the road. If you want to fix the problem, you have to ban all semi-automatic rifles. Semi-automatic means the weapon is loaded with a magazine (or belt in some cases) with multiple rounds; and for every trigger squeeze, one bullet is discharged. There is no real need for these weapons in civilian use. They aren’t necessary for hunting, where the point is to kill the animal with one shot. It is only useful for killing a lot of things in a short amount of time or having fun at a gun range. I think our children’s lives are more important than a fraction of the population’s fun shooting a bunch of rounds quickly at a range. They’ll cope.
Handguns are far more responsible for gun deaths in America than semi-auto rifles. You mentioned the kid who brought a gun to school as only having a “handgun, not a semi-automatic.” Well, almost all handguns are semi-automatic. They have magazines and one bullet per trigger squeeze. Though most handgun rounds aren’t as deadly as rifle rounds, it’s inconsequential at short range. And handguns are far easier to conceal than a rifle. With the exception of maybe revolvers (which have 5-6 rounds max before reloading), I believe handguns should be outlawed. The Virginia Tech massacre, the most deadly school shooting in American history, was accomplished with handguns only. Don’t underestimate their lethality. I think military-style rifles only account for about 2% of gun deaths each year. If you want to solve the problem, semi-auto handguns have to go, as well.
If we really want to make a difference in gun deaths, we have to do WAY more than universal background checks and better mental health screening. Banning all semi-automatic weapons would make that difference. Keeping shotguns, revolvers, and bolt-action rifles legal accomplish all the typical, common uses of guns. (Bolt-action rifles are typical hunting rifles that you have to reload between shots.) With these types of firearms legal, you can still hunt, defend your home, and compete in sport shooting.
Combine the following with the semi-auto ban.
1. Government buy back program of all semi-automatic weapons. Once a grace period for turn-ins ends, possession will be a felony without a special (and rare) license for Federally approved dealers and collectors.
2. Gun licenses for all who want to continue to own approved firearms. Licenses will be granted by completing a comprehensive background check, psych evaluation, safety training, marksmanship training, and meeting strict storage requirements.
3. Storage requirements would include safes, weapons unloaded, with ammo stored separately. Licenses expire after a certain number of years and all the requirements must be completed again for license renewal.
4. Registration of all firearms.
5. Insurance for all firearms. If your gun is used in a crime or if there’s a accident with your gun, your insurance company is liable for damages. Let the insurance market set rates based on their analysis of risk. Then, people can decide if it’s financially worth it to own a gun.
Finally, here’s your counterarguments for the most common pro-gun arguments:
A. Pro-gun argument – assault weapons aren’t an actual thing. Banning them won’t make a difference. Counterargument – none. This is true. Classifying a gun as an “assault weapon” is something people who know nothing about guns do. Having a bayonet stud (a place to mount a bayonet) used to be one way to classify a gun as an assault weapon. Last I checked, we don’t have a bayonet problem in this country. Talk about banning semi-auto guns instead of made up things like “assault weapons.”
B. Pro-gun argument – 2nd Amendment guarantees my right to bear arms! Counterargument – sure, it does, but there can be limitations. And in case anyone needs a history lesson, the individual right to bear arms has only existed since 2008. From the adoption of the Constitution until the DC v. Heller decision in 2008, the 2nd Amendment had never been interpreted to mean private citizens have a right to own guns. (Thanks, Scalia.) But that decision is now the law of the land and precedent for future court decisions. Nevertheless, even in Scalia’s majority opinion, he asserts that there are limits to the 2nd Amendment. Weapons allowed should be those in common use at the time. And limitations should be made on “dangerous and unusual” weapons, per previous precedent in United States v. Miller. I argue that semi-auto firearms should now be considered “dangerous and unusual,” given their lethality.
C. Pro-gun argument – if law-abiding citizens get rid of their guns, criminals won’t follow the law, and we’ll be in more danger. Counterargument – this is an argument against having laws. Since criminals don’t follow the law, there should be no limits on anything. Also, when we do outlaw things, it can work. Purchases of large quantities of ammonium nitrate fertilizer was restricted after the Oklahoma City bombing, and there hasn’t been a similar bombing since. We outlawed fully automatic weapons, grenades, rocket launchers, etc. in the 20th century, and what has happened? We don’t see violence with those types of weapons. Most weapons used to commit crimes are purchased lawfully. If we change the laws, it will work to reduce gun deaths.
D. Pro-gun argument – if we ban guns, people will just use knives or baseball bats Counterargument – there are plenty of incidents around the world of mass stabbings or clubbings, etc. Show me one that is as lethal as a mass shooting.
E. Pro-gun argument – we need armed security guards in every school Counterargument – do you trust the security guard won’t become a mass shooter? The Texas church shooter was an Air Force veteran. The Pulse nightclub shooter was a security guard. Further, it’s relatively easy to get the drop on a security guard. Shoot him first when he’s not expecting, then keep going. That’s what the Pulse nightclub shooter did. It’s not difficult if you draw first. Columbine had armed security, too. Adding more guns to schools adds more risk, it doesn’t reduce it.
F. Pro-gun argument – it’s a mental health issue, not a gun issue *or* guns don’t kill people, people kill people Counterargument – The United States has the same rates of mental illness as other developed Western countries, but we’re the only ones with this type of violence. The mentally ill are actually less likely to commit crime than those who aren’t mentally ill, which many find surprising. Also, those who are mentally ill are more likely to become the victim of a crime than those who don’t have mental illness. It’s a common refrain to hear “anyone who would do that must be crazy.” That’s not true. Being a murderer doesn’t actually mean you are mentally ill, which is why you hardly ever see successful insanity defenses in trials. And if “people kill people,” then we really should stop giving all these people guns, right? We don’t allow private F-22s or nuclear weapons, do we? Why? Because people would use them to kill other people. People use people-killing machines to kill people. Go figure.
G. Pro-gun argument – We, as a society, have turned our backs on God. This is why crime is getting worse. We need God/Jesus to heal people’s hearts, not get rid of law-abiding citizens’ guns. Counterargument – Crime has actually decreased overall in recent decades. Things are getting better, not worse. Murder rates and violent crime overall have trended down as we’ve advanced as a society. Mass shootings have remained steady, though, because angry people have easy access to guns.
H. Pro-gun argument – we need guns to fight against the government in case it becomes tyrannical. Counterargument – I doubt semi-automatic weapons will defeat a tyrannical government with fighter jets, bombers, tanks, artillery, drones, advanced cyber capabilities, and nuclear weapons.
I. Pro-gun argument – gun registrations will make it easier for the government to disarm us Counterargument – The registration is necessary to keep track of deadly weapons in case they are used in a crime, or in case a law-abiding citizen commits a crime that revokes their right to guns. There’s over 300 million privately owned guns in America. If the government wanted to take everyone’s guns, they’d do it the same way they would if there wasn’t a registry: by going door to door and searching everyone.
I truly believe we need to do far more than anything advocated by most mainstream gun control organizations like Everytown and Moms Demand Action. We need to follow the lead of countries like the UK, Australia, and Canada. They’ve figured it out. Why can’t we?
43 notes
·
View notes
Text
Elise Cooper interviews Kristin Hannah
The Four Winds by Kristin Hannah will give the famous novel The Grapes of Wrath a run for its money. As with her other books, this one also portrays a woman who overcomes something in her life and turns out stronger in the end. It is a complex, intricate journey where the main protagonist comes into her own, overcoming the large number of obstacles thrown her way.
Set during the Dust Bowl, the Great Depression, and the mid-west migration to California the book emphasizes the crime of inhumanity to one’s fellow citizen. It shows how nature, literally and figuratively, can be so cruel. Elsa’s story really begins after meeting Rafe. She feels unwanted and unloved by her rich family and decides one night to go on the town in a red dress. Unfortunately, she mistakes his lust for love, becomes pregnant, and is disowned by her family. Rafe’s family takes her in and forces him to marry her. These new parents become the family she never really had. But hard times hit this farming family, and instead of stepping up to the plate, Rafe leaves them.
Now 1934, her youngest son Anthony has “dust pneumonia,” a then-common ailment of the Great Plains. Because of this, Elsa decides to leave her home in Lonesome Tree Texas and move to the fresh air of California. Ending up in the San Joaquin Valley, Elsa, her daughter, Loreda, and her son, trade one set of terrible circumstances for another. Work is scarce, and the locals are prejudiced against “Okies,” as migrants were known regardless of where they are from. The family settles into a camp riddled with filth on the banks of an irrigation ditch. Eventually they end up in the town of Welty, named after the owner of a large farm. She meets Jack, an idealist union organizer who wants the migrants to unite for better wages and working conditions. Falling in love with him, Elsa becomes the migrants’ spokesperson, understanding that she has a voice of power.
This novel will tear at the reader’s heart strings. Whether the scenes during the Dust Bowl, the struggle to survive the Depression, or the challenges the migrant workers faced, people will take a journey with this compelling family. The story is about motherhood, resilience, and the strength of the human spirit. Once again Hannah has hit a home run.
Elise Cooper: Were you influenced by the Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck?
Kristin Hannah: Obviously I read it and loved the story. I would not say it particularly influenced me except to open me up to that era and experience. I looked at the Dust Bowl, the Depression, and the Mid-West migration to California through a woman’s eyes. As with Steinbeck’s story so much of what we know about that era is that women many times were not in the picture.
EC: Your books focus on a women’s perspective?
KH: I have been on this journey ever since my books Winter Garden and Home Front. I like telling stories that we think we know and eras we think we know but from the female outlook. So often, what is learned about in history is from the male perspective with women stories lost, marginalized, and deemed less important. I wanted to show how important women are and put in this book quote by Elsa, “It was always about the men. They seem to think it meant nothing to cook and clean and bear children. But we worked from sunup to sundown too, toiled on wheat farms…we came to find a better life, to feed our children. We aren’t lazy or shiftless. We don’t want to live the way we do.”
EC: What about this particular novel?
KH: As I traveled around talking to readers about the book, Nightingale, that dealt with the French resistance during WWII, I began to understand how much that book meant to people and the powerful emotions it invoked. Maybe because it is the story that we should have known all along, but many of us didn’t. I wanted to show female courage, heroism, and bravery in the face of difficult and dangerous odds. As time went on, I knew I wanted to write a novel that was just as powerful, emotional, and as important that was an American story. I wanted to look at our own history and country. For whatever reason it led me to the Dust Bowl, the Great Depression, and the migration to the west. Women throughout history have done a lot of amazing stuff.
EC: Readers can see a lot of comparisons to today, especially with a quote in the prologue?
KH: You must be referring to this one, “My American dream was turned into a nightmare by poverty and hardship and greed. These past few years have been a time of things lost: Jobs. Homes. Food.” I started this book four years ago and had no idea that it would turn out as relevant for today. There is this sense of being a time lost. I think there is a very strong correlation to be made now. I think history can teach us something. It’s a good reminder now. After reading a story like this, people can relate to how the human spirit has strength and durability with the power of family. Looking back, it’s important to recall that we have been through hard times before in America and not only survived but thrived. If we pull together and look towards the future, we can thrive again. The message of America is to be brave, have courage without fear, and to be a survivor. I think it has been this way for all of our history.
EC: There is also a message about divisiveness?
KH: I am certainly well aware how it is in our country now. For me, it helps to look at the history, what it was like in the 30s, late 60s, and 70s. These were all times of great change in America, which does not come easily when we focus on what divides us instead of what unites us. It is important in history to see how some things continually repeat. We should listen to the past and learn from it. There is a discussion in the book where Elsa faces discrimination, being called “your kind.” Elsa responds, “Our kind are hardworking Americans who have hit hard times, which meant poverty, no jobs, and nowhere to turn.” After arriving in California people would not rent to her because anyone from Oklahoma, Texas, and Arkansas were looked down upon. Nothing is really that simple, cut and dry. It was the depression and people were flooding into California who did not have jobs, money, or a place to live.
EC: The antagonist, Walty, is pure evil?
KH: He is the villain of the novel. He represents big industry that cares more about profits than workers. Ultimately, he never saw how important those workers were to him and to his economic future.
EC: In the movie “Oklahoma” there is a song where a line is relevant to your story: “I don't say I'm no better than anybody else, But I'll be damned if I ain't jist as good!” Farmers versus city folk?
KH: I mostly focused on the idea of how people label other as “the other.” People who live in the city don’t understand the farmers’ plight, which can be seen throughout the novel. The whole book is about farmers, people who make their living from the land. They are at the hands of mother nature. As they feed the whole world, they struggle through difficult times.
EC: Women characters are the essence of your story? Let’s begin by talking about Rose, her mother-in-law.
KH: She represents the idealization of the farm wife who can do it all, working from sunup to sundown. She believes in her land and family, focusing on who she is feeding and loving. She is always there for her family in a pinch.
EC: What about Elsa?
KH: After writing 24 novels, Elsa is my favorite character ever. In the beginning she was an outsider and lonely. She had a journey from an insecure woman who believed she had no self-worth and will never be loved, to gaining enough strength to be a warrior. She finds her independent and powerful voice to help others. For me, this was so moving. No matter how many times she was knocked down she got back up and tried again.
EC: How did her early upbringing affect her personality including having rheumatic fever?
KH: Her illness was the reason her family clipped her wings, keeping her expectations low. She had to let go of it. She never defined herself from her illness. Elsa says in the beginning of the book her real problem was not her illness, but that her family found her lacking because she was not pretty enough. In the end, she decided to take risks to improve her life, instead of sitting back and letting it happen.
EC: What about the daughter, Loreda?
KH: She represented the next generation who saw the world as a different place. In the beginning of the story, she was an ordinary, spoiled adolescent girl going through a difficult time. She was a romantic idealist who was very passionate. I would compare her to the Isabelle character from The Nightingale in the sense it is easier to take big risks when not responsible for anyone else’s life.
EC: What about Elsa’s husband, Rafe, versus her lover, Jack?
KH: After meeting her future husband Rafe it seemed like the worst thing that could happen to Elsa, but it was actually the best thing that happened to her. She became a wife, a mother, and part of a loving family. Her love for Rafe was defined by a lack of love for herself. He was a weak man and a dreamer at a point when the world had no place for someone without the strength to stand up.
Jack became the great love of Elsa’s life. He showed her the power of passion, both physically and ideologically. He helped her to unlock something within herself. With his unfettered idealism he looked through a lens of what he wanted the world to be and lost focus on how dangerous the real world was. Elsa knew this from the moment she chose to be with Jack.
EC: It is a story of motherhood?
KH: Yes, how women find themselves and stand up for each other during really hard times. The strength from Rose allowed Elsa to become the woman she became. Elsa and then Loreda went through what we all go through, leaving behind girlhood and discovering who they were as people. I love this line in the story, “You are the daughter I always wanted. Elsa replied And you are my mother. You saved me.”
EC: The quotes at the beginning of each section?
KH: I chose Wendell Berry because he was a poet I happen to love. He writes about nature and the land, so I thought the quote chosen was a good connection to the Dust Bowl section. The FDR quote was chosen because of what he did during the Great Depression, trying to pull the country together. Cesar Chavez’s quote was perfect about workers in California.
EC: What about your next projects?
KH: The Nightingale might come out on the big screen but is due out in December 2021. Firefly Lane will be out on Netflix on February 3rd. I am very happy with the production of both. The cast of both are wonderful. I did read the scripts and talked to the producers throughout. I love seeing these big women stories on screen.
THANK YOU!!
0 notes
Text
Is a Higher Education Important for a Correctional Officer?
You've probably been asking yourself if pursuing a higher education would be the ideal thing for you, but how much would it really help you in a new profession?
Advanced education is important in any career field, and for people who are considering becoming correctional officers, it can prove quite valuable in improving your career in corrections.
When you start your career in corrections, most the entry level positions only require that you've graduated from high school or have completed an equivalency educational program, such as General Educational Development, any GED.
Most, if not all correctional officer entry-level tasks require no particular experience background or more education to begin, but they do anticipate prospective applicants to possess a specific set of skills to have the ability to succeed in their job.
Some places that you might like to improve on if you feel that you will be lacking in a specific place that directly relevant to some correctional officers jobs and job description include Some of the following:
Good Communication Skill, Both Written and Oral
Be able to Read and Comprehend Information and Follow Directions
Be in a position to perform easy Arithmetic
Should Have Good Interpersonal Skills
Be attentive to the various Rules & Regulations that match your position
Initially, the majority of these areas would be addressed in the basic academy training normally provided by the hiring firm, but in this type of environment it usually is not the principal focus as it may be in a dedicated course or course.
So you are probable perusing this and thinking, I do not really require a higher education to do some of this, and for the most part you would be suitable. So where does the requirement for higher education really enter play? Promotion!
Promotion and career advancement are the principal drivers for only a correctional officer pursuing a much better education. Having a campaign come higher wages, higher benefits, and increased accountability. Some organizations actually pose incentive bonuses to those who have finished an Affiliates, Bachelors, or Masters Diploma program.
There are lots of degree programs you can pursue in hopes to have the ability to advance their careers, but one level generally appears to stick out among other because top choice in picking a degree that's related to the area, and this is sometimes a degree in Criminal Justice. Individuals that select this level can get down it in which road when notions of career advancement and marketing start in order to surface.
Arts Education Important to Oklahoma City Schools
Did you know that students who engage in the arts - music, drama, voice, and visual arts like sculpture or painting, are a step ahead of their peers who don't? Well, it is true! Pupils attending Oklahoma City schools are no exception.
It's been proven again and again that the benefits of getting an arts education are numerous. Art students in Oklahoma City public schools are 4 times more likely to stick out in their academic research; they're often recognized for academic achievement, find they succeed in getting elected to class office, and are more inclined to participate in a math or science fair. These same children are also more likely to earn recognition for good attendance, to win an award for writing, and frequently become peer mentors to other students with similar interests.
Music Fights Crime in Oklahoma City Schools
Arts students in the Oklahoma City schools are also known to take part in community service jobs more frequently than their non-art peers. Being involved in the arts for a substantial portion of every week also helps reduce delinquent behavior like truancy. Kids that are busy at group practice, or competing in an art contests, simply are not out on the road with only trouble to enter. Not focusing on their artistic field makes it possible that these pupils of Oklahoma City schools will lose out on their artwork opportunities altogether. Once they have had a taste of a good arts education, few pupils attending Oklahoma City schools are eager to put that chance at risk by doing something dumb.
Children in Oklahoma City Schools Hop on the Bandwagon!
It is important that community and business leaders support arts education for Oklahoma City schools' pupils also. Some of them are that having a fantastic background in the arts helps build a school climate of high expectations. Additionally, it helps students improve their problem-solving and critical thinking skills. When working on their artwork, pupils in Oklahoma City schools create a sense of craftsmanship; they wish to perfect their art and discuss it with others. Learning about the arts enables students in Oklahoma City schools develop a greater appreciation and comprehension of the world around them, and in addition, it helps them develop a positive work ethic and pride in their work.
Furthermore, a solid arts education program will get fans of Oklahoma City schools more involved with what the colleges want to do. By participating in a unique grant program funded by the Arts in Education Fund, Oklahoma City schools are all set to boost their art curriculum and increase their music programs. Since there's actually no other way for a large school system to buy all they need in relation to musical instruments, getting this grant is a blessing for Oklahoma City schools.
0 notes
Note
14; 16; 17; 28; 29
14. Were they involved at school? Sports? Clubs? Debate? Were they unconnected?
Joe was very involved in school! He did theater all throughout and majored in it in college. He’s been obsessed with Grease since he was little, and played Danny Zucko at summer camp two years in a row, then in high school, then in college. He was on the cheerleading squad (”because Lisa made me”), the soccer team and the floor hockey team, and was voted class treasurer one year and vice president the next. He was heavily involved in charity clubs (organizing card signing for sick students, orchestrating Day Without Hate) and became known as a bit of a teacher’s pet. He headed anti-drug campaigns and was involved in an after school program where high schoolers tutored elementary school students. He was a peer counselor. He sang in the choir, and sometimes played piano for them and various school concerts. He was student director of the spring musical in his junior year. French club, Spanish club, ping-pong club… He tried to join Forensics but threw up the first time they watched slides of crime scenes. He was a member of the 4H club. Played saxophone in band for a few years. Joe was very much over-involved in high school, to keep himself busy.
16. What does your character do for a living? How do they see their profession? What do they like about it? Dislike?
Joe is an actor a porn star. After his mission work ended, he was cast in Orgazmo, which accidentally became an overnight success, somehow bridging the gap between adult film and mainstream media. He’s obviously embarrassed about it, and thinks it’s pretty immoral and exploitative at first, but the camaraderie of the cast and the great friends he makes shifts his mindset; if the people doing it like what they’re doing, then who is he to judge?
He still finds a lot of it pretty gross, like DVDA, but it’s all become a lot less taboo. He doesn’t like how controlling and entitled some of the industry professionals are (i.e. Maxxx Orbison and A-Cup) and now that he and Dave own the Orgazmo franchise together, he does his best to make their set a safe space where everyone has the freedom to have a say in how they are treated and what they will and won’t do.
Lately, he has been developing a penchant for photography. Down the road, he will go to school to become a counselor.
17. Did they travel? Where? Why? When?
Joe grew up in Salt Lake City, but he went to summer camp in Tulsa, Oklahoma every year from third grade until he graduated high school. He’s also visited his sister Kimmy in New York City, which he found to be overstimulating. He took a class trip to Spain his senior year with his Spanish class. His other sister, Alma, lives in Provo, Utah, and he visits her every now and again. Basically he has family all over Utah, Idaho and… almost the entire country.
He went to Los Angeles for his mission work, and has lived there ever since.
28. Who is your character’s mate? How do they relate to him or her? How did they make their choice?
Joe started dating Lisa when he was sixteen years old. She’d been courting him since they met in the church choir in middle school; their families are close and Joe’s parents always urged him to pursue her, because she’s a nice looking girl and a devout Mormon. They also considered that his best shot at getting over his same-sex attraction, which they were suspicious of from a young age.
They bonded over singing and in response to extreme pressure from his family, he proposed to her just after graduating from BYU, right before his mission. Joe loves her, and she often joined the same clubs as him in high school. He’s always thought she has a kind heart and excitable nature, which didn’t go unappreciated… but he’s not in love with her.
For years, he tried to force himself to be. A hopeless romantic, he’s always known what love is supposed to feel like (via love songs and poems and books) and when those feelings didn’t arise with Lisa, he assumed they must just be exaggerated descriptions and that it was okay he just loved her like a friend. He hoped maybe one day those feelings would just come, because his family wanted it to work so badly and he never wanted to let them down. But he could just never relate to her—she was always quick to point out when he was acting strange, or tell him to stop joking around, or get angry when he would take things too seriously. He’d accepted that maybe that’s just what love was.
However, when he left Utah and went to Los Angeles for his missionary trip after graduating from BYU, Joe met Kevin Price.
All the love songs, all the sappy poems—it finally made sense to him and he didn’t even know he could feel that way about someone. It scared the living daylights out of him, mostly because Kevin was not a girl and Joe had done everything in his power by that point to deny the notion that he’s gay.
He would go out of his way to make Kevin laugh (because the sound of it and the way Kevin’s face scrunches up gives Joe heart palpitations) and they confided in each other everything about their families the pressures of being Mormon.
They’re a real yin and yang pair. Kevin can be uptight and pessimistic, and Joe would level him out with his goofy nature and ever-loving belief that the world is an inherently good place. Kevin would tell him about Uganda, and how he questioned Mormonism (and God in general) as a whole, which planted seeds of doubt in Joe as well, paving the long and winding road he would eventually take to letting go of his suffocating ideals. Joe tried to get Kevin to see the good in everyone. Kevin helped Joe to see the world more for what it actually is, and tried his darndest to help Joe understand that everything he’s been taught isn’t the only way to live, that he can actually be happy, and not just fake Good Mormon Hetero Joe happy. They really balanced each other out, and taught each other a lot about themselves. Kevin opened up Joe to a whole other world, like he held up a mirror in front of him and Joe saw himself for the first time in his life.
They grew up a lot together in that year and a half. They smoked weed for the first time (with their ‘investigator’ and neighbor, Dave—not the lighting guy) they had their first drink together, they broke rules and made up what came to be known as inventifakers. Every day was a blast. They were constantly laughing and smiling, which was a stark contrast to the first day they met, when they experienced some violent and graphic food poisoning via a sketchy taco truck on the corner near their apartment.
Joe felt an overwhelming desire to care for and protect Kevin. He was the first person Joe ever told that he was gay, though it wasn’t really necessary to say out loud after the first night they pushed their beds together and fell asleep tangled in each other’s arms.
They lived in what @elderxprice and I refer to as their ‘gay bubble’ for the majority of their mission, until the last few weeks when Joe started to panic about having to return to their normal lives as Good Hetero Mormons. Kevin’s mission ended a good six months before his, and about three weeks before it did, Joe had a mental breakdown and broke up with him. The guilt of cheating on Lisa, of sinning against Heavenly Father, and lying to his parents got the best of him, and the fear of living a life so wildly different than the one he had planned pushed him over the edge.
They didn’t see each other again until Joe was in town in Provo house sitting for his cousin, and while it took a little while to break the ice, the ended up breaking in his cousin’s couch. Joe had to secretly buy her a new one.
For a while, they kept in touch, Joe trying to convince himself to call off his wedding, until ultimately, he couldn’t bring himself to, and he stopped contacting Kevin as the nuptials drew close.
That was the next time they saw each other: the wedding. Joe thought Kevin hadn’t been invited, but a sneaky Lisa sent him an invitation to the reception. Joe crumbled into pieces during a brief hug and confessed his morbid depression concerning the entire affair—the wedding, his life with Lisa, etc. and Kevin sat on his hands to keep from pulling his hair out while he watched the love of his life have his first dance with his new wife. Joe’s sister Kimmy bought them some time alone, and though it was clear that they were both very unhappy and very, very much still in love, they parted ways yet again.
Kevin is Joe’s mate. For life. For every lifetime. He loves him to the ends of the earth, and it takes roughly three more years of heartache and turmoil until Kevin shows up during his spring break, unannounced, to see Joe.
Lisa is away on a weekend intensive training session with her singing coach (or, a weekend sex marathon, as Joe later finds out) and Kevin is roped into doing a last minute fill in for Choda Boy in Orgazmo 3: It’s Not Gay If It’s In A Threeway.
On that day, Joe reaches an epiphany that forces him to realize he can’t live in utter misery any longer—if he doesn’t make things right with Kevin, he won’t make it through another day. Bonus: Choda Boy and Orgazmo share a beautiful, magical on-screen kiss that has literal fireworks in the background. Everyone on set is floored.
Joe figures if he can become the real life Orgazmo and beat up a gang of thugs, he can be an openly gay Mormon. #kjoeforever
29. What is your character’s weaknesses? Hubris? Pride? Controlling?
Joe is a people pleaser, and extremely gullible and optimistic to a fault. He often gets roped into uncomfortable situations due to his meek nature. He has trouble communicating his true feelings sometimes, but Kevin brings them out.
He relies heavily on planning to prevent anxiety, and has countless lists for his life plan and likes to schedule his days down to the minute. If something goes awry, he becomes scatterbrained. Sometimes the slightest inconvenience can deter him from taking action. Like a door being locked or a restaurant being closed.
He often times puts others needs before his own, which causes him to feel unfulfilled and ultimately depressed.
Though he takes his life seriously, he can be a huge goofball sometimes, and Lisa used to get angry with him a lot for not taking things seriously or making jokes at inappropriate times.
He also sticks to his britches a little too harshly sometimes (i.e. breaking up with the love of his life because his family is counting on him to marry Lisa).
#headcanon ✅💭; how would christ benefit from me putting my tongue in someone's mouth?#kevin 👬🍞; mormons aren’t supposed to do a lot of things#kjoe#ask#elderxprice
4 notes
·
View notes
Note
199 chars, I got cites. I'll stick to actions and militia/cult behavior. The sniper attack on power station citation is you missing my point. Antifa has no weapon stockpiles or military training. The groups law enforcement see as a threat are the militias: "Law Enforcement Assessment of the Violent Extremist Threat". PBS: "armed militia groups surging across nation" Cult stuff: Business Insider:"right-wing-militias-recruit-young-soldiers-on-4chan-2017-5" psychologytoday:"the mind the militias".
Firstoff, pastebin.com is definitely the go-to for things like this -there’s no way anyone can make a cohesive argument in that tiny askbox. Just say “pastebin: and it’ll get you past that “no URLs”filter tumblr imposes. But I can answer these points/sources here:
Have you heard of the John Brown club? They’rean antifa group - the usual insane anarchists - and they’re showingup at protests carrying loaded weapons. The Phoenix group inthat article made a video of themselves doingrange practice. I believe that qualifies as training, youknow, with those weapons you say they don’t have.What fucking training do you think the right-wingmilitias have besides target shooting and playing paintball in thewoods? In other words, exactly what these people are doing?
And what the fuck do you mean stockpiles? Bro,I don’t know if you’re aware, but we live in America - you know,that free country? If you want a gun, are over 21,and don’t have a felony conviction on your record, you can walkinto any store, do 5 minutes of paperwork, wait for them to call theFBI background-check database and walk out with a new long gun. It’sthat fuckin simple. And they’re not that expensive either, you canget a decentAR-15 pattern rifle for under $500, easily. Same for ammo -you can easily buy bulk, online. The only state where both of thoseare harder is California, and I imagine that suits the huge mobs ofclub-armed antifa cunts just fine, because semi-auto firearms with large reloadable magazines are the best way to counter thugs that badly outnumber you. Stockpiles? That crazy fuck that shot the hell out of a US Representative and two Capitol police officers was using an SKS, a fucking WWII era Soviet rifle that loads from the top with fucking stripper clips. And look how much damage he did - it’s only pure dumb luck that nobody was killed or mortally wounded.
... stockpiles? Just how much do you know about guns? Here’s what I found in literally five goddamned seconds on ammoseek.com - you got $290, a credit card, and a shipping address? There you go, a thousand goddamned rounds of .223 Remington. Want two thousand? Three? Change the number in the “quantity” box.
Stockpiles?
Anyway, I’m not surprised that PBS and pals are back at their fake news, doing their damnedest to gin up right-wing militias as the real threat even as they reply to attack after violent attack by radical Islamists with hey - not all Muslims! Yes, that is the trend; witness this Atlantic article trying to justify it. But that’s beside the point. For starters, if you haven’t read my 6,500 word post on left wing vs right wing violence and violent rhetoric, I go into some depth with the whole militia thing there. For all their LARPing in the woods, swaggering and shit-talking, there hasn’t been any significant violence committed by right-wing militias since... forever, considering that Timothy McVeigh was never really part of one - and his attack was twenty-two years ago. Moreover, I cover how his attack - and the attention it drew to the militia movement - sent anywhere from “2/3rds” to “80%” (according to two different militia-affiliated folks being interviewed) scrambling away from them at high speed. Protip - actual terrorist organizations tend to attract attention when they manage huge, spectacular attacks - you know, like how Black Lives Matter is still going strong after multiple ambush attacks on cops? Gee.
And that brings us to the essential point - if these militias are really dangerous, and not just a bunch of shit-talking LARPers playing soldier in the woods - then where’s the violence? Again, as I document in that post, the only “cells” they find are a few shitheads talking shit in a bar too close to an FBI informant that eggs them on - one of them even gave them free automatic rifles to shoot, to get them all excited.
As for this study, it’s a start, but this paper freely and breezily equates “anti-government extremism” with “right-wing extremism,” and that’s a false equivalency - because Antifa are anarcho-communists. Just read their handy-dandy guide to setting up an antifa group, where they call the state their enemy multiple times - as well as cops. Shit, they have a whole section on “state repression.” Also note the bit under “political orientation,” where they openly state - in case there was any doubt - that the majority of their membership in the US are anarchists. In case you weren’t aware, anarchists are, by definition, anti-government extremists. The list on page 4 covers “anti-capitalist violent extremism,” but considering that antifa are anarchists and anti-capitalists - where do they fall in the reporting? Did every agency report them the same? In light of antifa’s own literature (again, that guide) advocating strongly that they not even name their groups and keep their identities secret as long as possible, how accurate is each agencies accounting? Hell, where do right-wing terrorist groups fall on this scale, considering there’s several anti-immigration militias that focus on finding and reporting illegal immigrants? Doesn’t that qualify as racist? Or are they anti-government, considering that anti-government sentiments tend to run pretty strong in groups like that, especially with a black Democrat in office who personally did as much as he could to hamper border control efforts?
Shit, by their own admission on page 4, they defined “Al-Qaeda inspired violent extremism” as “violent extremism inspired by the radical Islamist ideas advocated by al-Qaeda and other like-minded extremist groups,” and every other category with one general example; “violent extremism motivated by any other political, social, or religious concerns, including, but not limited to, anti-government, racist, radical, environmentalist, or anti-capitalist views. Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber (Ted Kaczynski,) and the Sikh temple shooter, Wade Michael Page, are examples of ‘other violent extremists.” So they only define one category well, loosely define the others, and then they start standing around characterizing the results with terminology (right wing, left wing) they didn’t even use in the fucking survey? When all those other categories were lumped together into “other violent extremism” in other categories?
And then there’s other data-sets - one just adds up every every crime committed by “groups or individuals with far-right associations,” (which would include every skinhead robbing a gas station, which they do a lot, because skinheads are dime-store hoods almost by definition,) and the well defined report - focusing on premeditated plots by individuals or groups that rise to the level of attempted or actual domestic terrorism,” has a whopping total of... 34 incidents listed in 14 years, and is published by the Anti-Defamation League, which is a fucking activist group, not academics, or law enforcement. Wew lad. The Global Terrorism database is better - more data, and a good definition of qualifying incidents - but it’s only being compared to Islamic extremist terrorist attacks in the US, not left wing domestic terrorism, which is what we’re discussing here.
Bruh, this is some pretty rough shit, here - all twelve pages of it. Especially that bit at the end where they make a claim about how law enforcement agencies see “right wing terrorism” (a phrase used nowhere in their survey to said law enforcement agencies) as a bigger threat in the city than in rural areas. Yeah, dense urban areas, which overwhelmingly vote Democrat, as anyone who’s seen a county-by-county electoral map can tell you, are the hotbeds of right-wing militias?
Bruh. Bruh.
But, listen, you’re actually doing your fucking homework here, which is more than most assholes can say, so lemme help you. The FBI is a great resource here - not only do they publicly publish huge annual reports on all sorts of categories of violence, (law enforcement officers killed and assaulted, general crime stats, hate crime stats, etc,) but they watch fucking everyone. There is no group too big or too small for them to not worry about - they’re basically a domestic surveillance agency. That’s why you have agents going out of their way to hand out automatic rifles to a trio of knuckle-dragging rednecks to egg them on till they can arrest them - these guys have time and resources to spare, apparently. They watch everyone - and they cover them, too, with published reports. I’ve read their reports on motorcycle gangs, and in researching that big post on violence, I found (and used) their public information on the “Sovereign Citizen” movement, which is definitely right-wing. While we’re at it, here’s their page on anarchist extremism. Note that page is out of date, though:
For today’s generation of American anarchist extremists, the rioting that disrupted the 1999 World Trade Organization meetings in Seattle is the standard by which they measure “success”—it resulted in millions of dollars in property damage and economic loss and injuries to hundreds of law enforcement officers and bystanders. But fortunately, they haven’t been able to duplicate what happened in Seattle…
LOL HAMBURG. But you get my point - the FBI watches everyone, even esoteric groups like anti/pro abortion “activists” that get a little out of hand. So the FBI is an excellent primary source to go to - certainly better than another PBS hit piece which is also regurgitating data from the “Anti-Defamation League” and making claims of “thousands” of people flooding to the Sovereign Citizen movement, without citing any source at all. Especially when they started in on how dangerous sovereign citizens are! As I noted in my big effortpost (see that for the links,) Sovereign Citizens managed to kill six police officers since the year 2000 - but twenty officers have been ambushed and murdered in 2016 alone, with multiple attacks committed by black people acting on black separatist/revolutionary rhetoric, including the Dallas shooting (killing five and wounding nine) and the Baton Rouge shooting nobody seems to have heard about (killing three and wounding three.) The latest ambush murder of a police officer in New York was similarly motivated - I haven’t even counted the ambush killings of cops in 2017 yet. But yeah, man, the fuckin right wing millitias are the real threat! Hooooo boy, how fucking hard can they shill?
Anyway, here’s the FBI’s resources page, complete with all their copious reports in .pdf format, including several on terrorism related topics. I’ll bet $5 you can make a better argument than fuckin PBS with just what you find here. I’d also track down the sources cited in that 12 page “paper” you linked and read them yourself, see what you can get out of them. That should be a good start, at least.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Melvin Feller Discusses Ways for Landlords to Become Better Organized.
Melvin Feller Discusses Ways for Landlords to Become Better Organized.
Melvin Feller Business Ministries Group in Burkburnett and Dallas Texas and Lawton Oklahoma. Our mission is to call and equip a generation of Christian entrepreneurs to do business as ministry. We provide workshops and resources that help companies discover how to do business God’s way. When the heart of a business is service rather than self it can be transformed into a fruitful business ministry earning a profit and being of service to the community and their customers. Melvin Feller is currently pursuing another graduate degree in business organizations.
Owning rental property can be a great source of secondary income but it can also be an extreme headache if not approached correctly. Many people jump right into the investing game with little background or education on how the game actually works, and often find themselves up the creek without a paddle. There are tips and tricks that you can implement to help minimize your headaches and maximize your return on investment. Although it is impossible to plan for all circumstances, you can absolutely minimize your risks by following a few of these tips to help avoid the rental nightmares.
Solid Application Process
Having a strict application process can immediately weed out potential tenants that you would not want to rent to. You can learn a lot about a potential tenant from the information they provide. You can access information about their references, employment history, whether or not they are smokers, have they ever been convicted of a crime, etc. Charge an application fee to cover the costs of running a credit and criminal background check. If an applicant can't afford to pay the $20 application fee, how can you expect them to pay the $900 a month rent payment? Running a credit report and criminal background check is necessary. Accessing this type of information allows you to get a good idea of the individual’s debt vs. income ratio, how timely they have been on past payments, etc.
Security Deposit
Collecting a security deposit is an absolute must. Do not rent to someone without collecting a deposit. Period. You need to be aware of and follow any state laws and regulations regarding the amount you can legally collect for a deposit. Most commonly, a deposit can be equal to one month's rent. No matter what the law might be, you must collect a deposit of some sort. Deposits will save you future headaches and help you avoid paying out of pocket for damage your tenants are responsible for paying.
Leases
Have everything in writing, always have some sort of documentation, and keep copies on file. I do not care if you are renting to your cousin, brother, sister, or mother; have a lease of some sort! It is often a good idea to have your lawyer or attorney review or even write your lease so that you have some assurance of its strength and legality.
Responsiveness
Responding to your tenants' complaints and issues appropriately is very important. If you are timely in completing repairs your tenants will be appreciative and be more apt to pay rent on time. Promptly dealing with repairs is the best way to build a solid relationship with your tenants.
Relationships
It is important to establish a professional relationship with all of your tenants. Showing your tenants that you genuinely care about their living conditions makes for a much better tenancy - you may even be able to turn bad tenants in to good tenants! That being said, it is always important to make the distinction between being friendly and being friends; you must create a policy and stick to it.
Continuing Education
Education is the key to success, and knowing the ins and outs of how rental property and investments work will make you a better off landlord. You should constantly be updating your knowledge on local laws and regulations, including tenant and landlord rights, fire and safety code, and many others.
Property Management
If you are using a property management company, be sure to do your homework. Check references, interview the individuals and get a good feel for the people who will be working for you. Always monitor your monthly statements and make sure the work being done is professional and by someone licensed and bonded.
Not a 9 to 5 Job
In case you did not already know, being a landlord is NOT a 9-to-5 job. You never know what issues are going to arise, but when they do, they always seem to happen at the most inconvenient times. If you are currently a landlord or thinking of becoming one, there are some key skills you must possess and perfect.
Time Management
A s I said, you never know what issues will come up, but when they do, you have to set aside time to figure out a plan of attack and fix the issue quickly. Far too often, I see landlords who do not have quality time management skills and their lack of skill affects the entire building. First, the lawn is not mowed and the grass becomes overgrown. Next, the paint begins to peel. Then garbage begins to pile up around the building. Before you know it, you have lost your "curb appeal." Because there is no "curb appeal”, you have a hard time finding quality renters and become desperate. Finally, you find someone who seems to have their act together and you think, "I'll just rent to these guys. I don't have time to perform a credit and background check or call their references." Because you "didn't have the time" to properly vet your new tenants, they now are not paying their rent and you have to file for eviction, which costs you a couple thousand dollars in lost rent and court/attorney fees. You are now left with a unit that has been abused in every way possible and you need to repair/repaint walls, deeply clean everything, etc., etc., etc. Everyone knows someone like this - someone that just has so much going on that they cannot seem to find the time to do the necessary things needed to maintain their rental property.
Organization
A huge part of time management is organization. If you are organized then everything just goes more smoothly. As a landlord, a big part of being organized is developing a detailed filing system. When you are organized, you will not spend your time looking for lost things like that heating bill, or that maintenance request, or the telephone number to the contractor who is supposed to come and repair your kitchen floor, because you will know exactly where it all is.
Things you absolutely need to file are:
Bills
Maintenance requests and tenant complaints
Rental applications, must be kept for at least 1 year because applicants have a year to appeal if they feel they were discriminated against
Vendor W-9s Rental receipts Prior tax returns Leases
Any notices you have ever given to a tenant
Communication
Another key to being a good landlord is developing your active listening skills. When your tenants feel that you actually care about the issue at hand, things seem to go a little smoother. Take time to listen to what the tenant has to say and after they are done, reiterate what they have said back to them to make sure you have the details down. This will tell the tenant you have been listening and will give them confidence that you will handle the issue at hand.
Answer your phone and/or return calls within a reasonable amount of time. When a tenant calls you with an issue, do not wait a week to call them back. What kind of message do you think that sends?
Budgeting
A lot of issues landlords face are directly related to money in one way or another. The best way to avoid issues with money is to create a budget and monitor it! I review all of my budgets once a month. This will allow you to see where your money is going and develop a plan to increase your income and decrease your expenses. With a budget, you can also set money aside every month to make necessary repairs and develop a "slush fund" for those unpredictable events such as frozen pipes, appliance failure, and code violations.
Finally, Treat Landlording as a Business Not a Hobby!!
Yes, owning rental property is a business. If it were not, you wouldn't be paying taxes! When things need to be done, it is always better to do them ASAP rather than dragging your heels. Landlords have the amazing job of providing people with a place to live that is comfortable and enjoyable. However, things do not always go as planned and hard decisions need to be made. I like to say that there is a very fine line between being "friends" with tenants and being "friendly" towards tenants.
Melvin Feller Business Consultants Ministries Group in Texas and Oklahoma. Melvin Feller founded Melvin Feller Business Consultants Group Ministries in the 1970s to help individuals and organizations achieve their specific Victory. Victory as defined by the individual or organization are achieving strategic objectives, exceeding goals, getting results or desired outcomes. He has extensive experience assisting businesses achieve top and bottom line results. He has broad practical experience creating WINNERS in many organizations and industries. He has hands-on experience in executive leadership, operations, logistics, sales, program management, organizational development, training and customer service. He has coached teams to achieve results in strategic planning, business development, organizational design, sales, and customer response and business process improvement. He has prepared and presented many workshops nationally and
Melvin Feller Business Organization Graduate internationally.
Candidate, Business Owner and Business Coach
#landlord#organized landlord#land lord#buying rental properties#investing in real estate#real estate investor#investment#investor#buying house#buy#buy rental property#buy real estate#real estate#realtor#rentals#rent#melvin feller#melvin feller business ministries group#business Group of Melvin Feller#Melvin feller in texas#melvin feller in Oklahoma
0 notes