#Horizontal Development Framework
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
procurement-insights · 4 hours ago
Text
Gartner is finally starting to listen
Is Gartner finally starting to get it?
Well, Gartner is finally starting to listen (or trying to) – https://bit.ly/4efWxXn.Tagging my Gartner followers for their thoughts? Kaitlynn Sommers Olivia Montgomery Naveen Mahendra Ron Friedmann Marty Resnick Amenallah Reghimi Mike Boedeker Aditya Malhotra Mike Ciccolella David Hance Amy Irvine Gartner LinkedIn Post (November 26, 2024) Procurement Insights LinkedIn Post (November 7th,…
0 notes
hirocimacruiser · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Thorough comparison of JGTC vehicles
M・S war in the GT300 class
Mitsubishi and Subaru continue to engage in a fierce battle in the WRC, but there is a feeling that a new battle will take place at the JGTC, which has moved to the circuit. Cusco Racing entered the GT300 class a little earlier than last year with the Impreza, which has poured its know-how into building dirt trial class vehicles. On the other hand, Mitsubishi has started entering entries this season with FTOs made by Ralliart, with engines by HKS and chassis by Nova. Let's do a thorough comparison.
Photography: Shinji Takizawa/Takahito Naito/Satoshi Kamimura Interview cooperation: Cusco/Nova Engineering Photography cooperation: Fuji Speedway
The Mitsubishi/Subaru war breaks out even at JGTC, which is currently the most popular!
The most interesting race in Japan today is the GT Championship. In this year's GT
championship Mitsubishi and Subaru face off.
Noda. Subaru started accepting entries last year with the Cusco Subaru Impreza.
The vehicle uses a 2-door coupe body. Since Cusco (Carrosse) specializes in producing dirt track D vehicles (unlimited modification class), they utilize their D vehicle know-how and develop their own machines, although the engines are supplied by STI. Mitsubishi, on the other hand, is the Taeivon FTO, which has started entry from this year. Basic design by Mitsubishi modified by Ralliart. HKS, which has been working on Mitsubishi's motorsports engines for a ling time was in charge of the engine, and Nova Engineering, which has worked on race cars in all categories including top formulas, was in charge of the chassis. As you can see from this, the Cusco Impreza is a pure privateer, but the Taeivon FTO is a private car with factory support.
-The dark brown color is very strong.
Now, when I compare the construction of these two machines, I notice something interesting. Both have a normal FF or 4WD drive layout from factory. However, the drive layout chosen for each GT model is FF for the FTO and FR for the Impreza. If both had around 300 PS of horsepower, they would have chosen the lightweight and simple option over 4WD traction. However, since the FTO is a horizontally mounted engine, unless you choose 4WD, the only option is FF. How much is 300PS?
However, FF, where steering and drive transmission are handled by two wheels, and rear drive, where each wheel is separate, are at a considerable disadvantage in terms of tire wear.
However, knowing this, FTO chose FF. On the other hand, Subaru's horizontally opposed 4-cylinder FR engine is longitudinally installed, so it easily becomes an FR engine that is not found in production cars. Furthermore, the engine is compact and has a low center of gravity, so the layout clearly gives the Impreza an advantage in terms of balance.
As for the engine, both are 2L turbos.
FTO is handled by HKS, but basically WRC for group A. Since the Impreza is also supplied by STI, its performance is probably quite similar. By the way, the nominal values ​​from each team are 300 PS/40 kg-m for FTO and 320 PS or more/35 kg-m for Impreza.
However, when it comes to the chassis, both cars have been created using different approaches. As I wrote earlier, the Cusco Impreza was built using the know-how of dirt trial D-class vehicles. There are no restrictions on modification of D vehicles. At Cusco, we are using this unlimited know-how to run on dirt to create vehicles that fit within the framework of the GT Championship. The chassis is mainly reinforced with pipes. Rather than a monocoque frame, it is more appropriate to call it a pipe frame covered with a steel shell. The structure is such that all suspension input is received by the pipe. That's why there are pipes running along the floor.
On the other hand, the Taeivon FTO is naturally reinforced with pipes, but it is also connected to the normal monocoque with steel plates, making it a semi-monocoque, and adding carbon to increase body rigidity. This area is circuit racing, and it is unique to Nova, which handles formula racing.
Suspension is according to regulations
Although no changes are allowed, other modifications may be made.
You can call it freedom, and both cars have completely different suspension systems from the commercially available cars. In order to accommodate the huge 18-inch tires and to keep the vehicle height as low as possible, the wheel house was changed to something completely different, and the engine was mounted as low as possible at the rear. Naturally, the members are also original and produced. Therefore, the mounting position, or geometry, of the suspension arm can be changed freely, and It has been moved to a position suitable for running on the circuit, and of course the arms and uprights have also been made specifically for it.
Now, which of these two cars is faster? Looking at the first round of this season, Suzuka, the FTO showed a fast run that would be hard to believe in its debut race, and managed to finish in 3rd place (Round 2 at Fuji canceled). Objectively, FTO, which is participating in the race for the first time this season and can be called a works model, has an advantage.
Perhaps, but with Impreza's good balance and Cusco's vehicle manufacturing know-how, we can expect a heated battle in Future GT.
I can't take my eyes off the championship.
_____________________________________________
CUSCO SUBARU IMPREZA
ENGINE & DRIVE-TRAIN
①The huge aluminum core is arranged in two stages, with the intercooler on the top and the radiator on the bottom. The thickness of the radiator in particular is surprising when compared to the stock one. (2) The right-hand light serves as an air intake, and the air is guided through a duct to the turbine set in front of the engine. (3,4) If you look closely at the piping, you can see the aluminum pipe extending from the radiator to the bulkhead. This is led through the interior to the water-cooled transmission and differential oil cooler. Incidentally, the engine control unit is installed indoors together with the data logger. (5) the transmission is Hewland's sequential gearbox. Even though it doesn't have a bellhousing, it's very compact.
⑥ When you remove the rear suspension arm and brake, you'll see a reinforcement made of a lot of aluminum, and behind that you can see the differential.
AERO PARTS
① The front spoiler is the type that has recently become mainstream, with large side gills that generate downforce. The air intake has slits that distribute air to the radiator and intercooler, which have two upper and lower stages. ②The front hood is dominated by a huge air outlet. ③Equipped with a huge slitted wing on the rear that combines two wings. ④The rear bumper appears to be of normal shape, but you can see the aluminum vertical plate of the diffuser underneath.
SUSPENSION & BRAKE
①The front wheel house has a huge Brembo caliper and rotor that makes the suspension almost invisible. The arms are of course remade with pipes, and the links are rose joints. ② The rear is the same, but the shock and the parts that connect the shock and upright are compared to those on the market.
It looks like it's strangely sturdy. ③④ The front stabilizer is installed above and behind the engine (perhaps this is a measure to mount the engine low?), so the input from the suspension is via a long rod.
COCKPIT
① Increase body strength by creating a semi-pipe frame with a roll cage. Therefore, bars are not only strung above and along the sides, but are also set along the floor and welded at strategic points. ② The transmission is sequential and has a special lever (maybe the linkage has been removed due to maintenance?). ③Switches and indicators are arranged on the center console that protrudes according to the seat position. ④The seat is moved back considerably and fixed in a very low position. The instrument panel itself remains normal. ⑤ The meter is equipped with a digital type on the steering wheel column. The steering wheel and pedals are also selected to match the seat.
_____________________________________________
The Mitsubishi/Subaru war breaks out even at JGTC, which is currently the most popular!
The most interesting race in Japan today is the GT Championship. In this year's GT championship Mitsubishi and Subaru face off.
Noda. Subaru started accepting entries last year with the Cusco Subaru Impreza.
The vehicle uses a 2-door coupe body. Since Cusco (Carrosse) specializes in producing dirt track D vehicles (unlimited modification class), they utilize their D vehicle know-how and develop their own machines, although the engines are supplied by STI. Mitsubishi, on the other hand, is the Taeivon FTO, which has started entry from this year. Basic design by Mitsubishi modified by Ralliart. HKS, which has been working on Mitsubishi's motorsports engines for a ling time was in charge of the engine, and Nova Engineering, which has worked on race cars in all categories including top formulas, was in charge of the chassis. As you can see from this, the Cusco Impreza is a pure privateer, but the Taeivon FTO is a private car with factory support.
-The dark brown color is very strong.
Now, when I compare the construction of these two machines, I notice something interesting. Both have a normal FF or 4WD drive layout from factory. However, the drive layout chosen for each GT model is FF for the FTO and FR for the Impreza. If both had around 300 PS of horsepower, they would have chosen the lightweight and simple option over 4WD traction. However, since the FTO is a horizontally mounted engine, unless you choose 4WD, the only option is FF. How much is 300PS?
However, FF, where steering and drive transmission are handled by two wheels, and rear drive, where each wheel is separate, are at a considerable disadvantage in terms of tire wear.
However, knowing this, FTO chose FF. On the other hand, Subaru's horizontally opposed 4-cylinder FR engine is longitudinally installed, so it easily becomes an FR engine that is not found in production cars. Furthermore, the engine is compact and has a low center of gravity, so the layout clearly gives the Impreza an advantage in terms of balance.
As for the engine, both are 2L turbos.
FTO is handled by HKS, but basically WRC for group A. Since the Impreza is also supplied by STI, its performance is probably quite similar. By the way, the nominal values ​​from each team are 300 PS/40 kg-m for FTO and 320 PS or more/35 kg-m for Impreza.
However, when it comes to the chassis, both cars have been created using different approaches. As I wrote earlier, the Cusco Impreza was built using the know-how of dirt trial D-class vehicles. There are no restrictions on modification of D vehicles. At Cusco, we are using this unlimited know-how to run on dirt to create vehicles that fit within the framework of the GT Championship. The chassis is mainly reinforced with pipes. Rather than a monocoque frame, it is more appropriate to call it a pipe frame covered with a steel shell. The structure is such that all suspension input is received by the pipe. That's why there are pipes running along the floor.
On the other hand, the Taeivon FTO is naturally reinforced with pipes, but it is also connected to the normal monocoque with steel plates, making it a semi-monocoque, and adding carbon to increase body rigidity. This area is circuit racing, and it is unique to Nova, which handles formula racing.
Suspension is according to regulations
Although no changes are allowed, other modifications may be made.
You can call it freedom, and both cars have completely different suspension systems from the commercially available cars. In order to accommodate the huge 18-inch tires and to keep the vehicle height as low as possible, the wheel house was changed to something completely different, and the engine was mounted as low as possible at the rear. Naturally, the members are also original and produced. Therefore, the mounting position, or geometry, of the suspension arm can be changed freely, and It has been moved to a position suitable for running on the circuit, and of course the arms and uprights have also been made specifically for it.
Now, which of these two cars is faster? Looking at the first round of this season, Suzuka, the FTO showed a fast run that would be hard to believe in its debut race, and managed to finish in 3rd place (Round 2 at Fuji canceled). Objectively, FTO, which is participating in the race for the first time this season and can be called a works model, has an advantage.
Perhaps, but with Impreza's good balance and Cusco's vehicle manufacturing know-how, we can expect a heated battle in Future GT.
I can't take my eyes off the championship
_____________________________________________
TAEIVON TRAMPIO FTO
FISCO race information
I photographed these two cars on the practice day for the second round of the GT Championship, which was held at FISCO on May 3rd. By the way, the next big race to be held at FISCO is the third round of Formula Nippon on May 31st. This year's F Pon competition is fierce. Let's go to FISCO to watch the heated battle. Inquiries: Fuji Speedway ☎03-3409-2365
AERO PARTS
① The outer shell of the Taeivon FTO was designed by the designer of the commercial FTO car. The original FTO design was utilized, such as using the hole for the turn signal as an air intake for the brake, and the design was made more functional. ②The front hood outlet is also well designed. The opening is small, but it seems to come through easily. ③Although the rear wing is large, it looks like it could be attached to a production car as is. It will also be equipped with the Delta Wicker found on the Lan Evo. ④⑤ The underside of the body is covered with an all-carbon undercover, and the rear under spoiler finally functions as a diffuser to increase down force.
SUSPENSION & BRAKE
①②③The front and rear brakes are Brembo, which is standard for GT cars. Although it is a FF, the rear brake capacity is also quite large. The suspension is formally the same as normal, but the mounting position, arm shape, and upright are completely race-specific.The shock with reservoir tank is a double spring specification with a helper spring. (4,5) Inner Fender has been completely rebuilt to accommodate the huge tires. Also, the reinforcement near the strut upper, which is the apex, is like a semi-monocoque made of iron plates, and it seems to be extremely rigid.
ENGINE
(1) There have been some modifications such as cutting the flange, but a normal EX manifold with a heat shield is included. The turbine is also basically normal. This is because the engine itself has a displacement of 2026 cc, which is essentially a WRC Group A car engine. A wire mesh is placed over the right headlight, which serves as an intake to the turbine. Since the nose is low, the intake cooler and oil cooler are mounted horizontally. The engine control is surprisingly Motech. The unit is fixed near the footwell on the passenger side (right side). You can see the machined aluminum stay behind the piping to mount the engine, and the finish is very beautiful.
COCKPIT
① Although the roll cage has a large number of bars, different pipe diameters are used to prevent unnecessary weight increase. (2) However, for the part that needs to be strong, from the roof to the A-pillar, the roll cage and body are connected with a steel plate and made into a box shape to increase strength. ③ Since the vehicle height is low and there is an undercover, the thick exhaust pipe for the turbo has nowhere to go and is pushed up towards the floor. Nearby again! Car is equipped with ballast that takes into account weight balance. ④ Switches that match the receding seats are housed in the carbon center console, which also includes switches for the electric mirrors and power windows. (5) The carbon door has a normal lining...
24 notes · View notes
bfpnola · 2 years ago
Text
Hey! This is @reaux07 and I just wanted to re-introduce our org! I am the current executive director of Better Future Program (BFP), a 501(c)(3) youth-run nonprofit headquartered in Bulbancha on Chahta Yakni and Chitimacha land. We envision a future in which youth are not only empowered to challenge oppressive hierarchies each day, but to create new, innovative, and inclusive frameworks of community care and intersectional justice.
Since 2016, our team has been dedicated to educating the masses on various academic subjects, mental health, and most importantly, social injustices that affect today's youth. We even offer over 3,000 free novels, movies, podcasts, and more just to fulfill this goal.
Here's the catch though! Since BFP is youth-run, many of our volunteers are students. During both the holidays and the start of each semester, we always experience a dramatic drop in participation, often meaning our workshops go from being run by 65 people to just 3 or 4. Currently, this is unsustainable for both our organization and our individual mental health. That's where YOU come in.
We need more volunteers! We'd like to not only fill up all of our leadership roles but have more than enough participants to allow each person's responsibilities to be greatly lessened. This would mean we could continue serving marginalized communities, uninterrupted, internationally, while still allowing volunteers to take breaks! We are only human. And even more so, many of us are only teens or children! We need your help.
And guess what? We have a $5,000 grant as gifted by the American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana as well as nearly $600 in donations, all to go towards commissioning marginalized artists, mutual aid networks, and so on. Help us develop these plans further so we can service YOUR community today (e.g. we are currently sponsoring a chest binder drive for a local high school).
If you are interested in filling a leadership role, applying as a general volunteer (no specific responsibilities), or are simply interested in learning why we use a committee-based, horizontal organizational structure, tap here. There is something for everyone, promise!
And if you are interested in interacting with our community, our Discord server is linked here and our Linktr.ee below:
Please share to help support a Black-, woman-, queer-, disabled-, and youth-run organization!
187 notes · View notes
dailyanarchistposts · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Innovation and Cooptation
With Musk’s purchase of Twitter, we see the conclusion of a cycle of innovation and cooptation in the field of communications. In the late 20th century, the dominant political and technological models were monolithic and unidirectional: network television, mass-based political parties. In response, anarchists and other rebels experimented with independent media and underground networks, producing innovative horizontal and decentralized models like indymedia.org. Tech corporations eventually monetized these models as the participatory media of Web 2.0, such as Facebook. Yet from the turn of the century through the uprising of 2020, the lingering horizontal and participatory aspects of the internet in general and social media in particular continued to empower those who sought to achieve more self-determination—witness the “Thank you Facebook” graffiti in Tunisia after the so-called “Arab Spring” uprisings of 2010-2011.
Over the past decade, however, corporations and governments have introduced more and more online surveillance and control. Musk’s acquisition of Twitter is the latest stage in a reactionary clampdown with grim implications.
Musk and his colleagues see capitalism as a meritocracy in which the shrewdest and most hardworking competitors inexorably rise to the top. Hence, presumably, their own success.
Of course, if Musk wishes to prove that his success is not just the consequence of privilege and luck—of fortune and good fortune—he could demonstrate this easily enough by giving away his wealth, cutting his social ties, changing his name, and repeating his supposed rags-to-riches feats a second time. If he were able to climb the pyramid a second time without the benefit of growing up white in apartheid-era South Africa (setting aside the question of his father’s emerald investments for now), we might have to grant a hearing to his claims that the market has elevated him on account of his personal qualities—though that still would not show that capitalism rewards the efforts that are most beneficial for humanity.
According to the Silicon Valley narrative, platforms like Twitter are the inventions of individual entrepreneurs, propelled into being by the finance capital of canny investors.
But Twitter did not simply spring, fully formed like Athena, from the head of company co-founder Jack Dorsey. In fact, it was a modest refinement of a model already demonstrated by TXTmob, the SMS text messaging program developed by the Institute for Applied Autonomy for protests at the 2004 Democratic and Republican National Conventions.[1] Blaine Cook and Evan Henshaw-Plath, anarchist developers who worked alongside Dorsey at his previous company Odeo, helped refine TXTmob and later took the model with them into the conversations with Dorsey that gave rise to Twitter.[2]
If the unrelenting urgency of social media in general and Twitter in particular can be exhausting, that’s to be expected—the infrastructure of Twitter was originally designed for street communications during high-stakes mass mobilizations in which information must go out immediately, boiled down to its bare essentials. It’s not a coincidence that, despite its shortcomings, the platform has continued to be useful to street activists and conflict journalists.
The point here is that innovative models do not necessarily emerge from the commercial entrepreneurism of the Great Men of history and economics. More often, they emerge in the course of collective efforts to solve one of the problems created by the capitalist order. Resistance is the motor of history. Afterwards, opportunists like Musk use the outsize economic leverage that a profit-driven market grants them to buy up new technologies and turn them definitively against the movements and milieux that originally produced them.
We can identify two stages in the capitalist appropriation of the TXTmob model. In the first phase, a framework that was originally designed by volunteers for the use of ordinary protesters was transformed into a publicly traded corporation, around the same time that the open spaces of the early internet were being colonized by the for-profit surveillance systems of Web 2.0. In the second phase, this publicly traded corporation has been transformed into the private plaything of a single entitled tycoon—with consequences that remain to be seen.
Musk claims that his goal is to open up the platform for a wider range of speech. In practice, there is no such thing as “free speech” in its pure form—every decision that can shape the conditions of dialogue inevitably has implications regarding who can participate, who can be heard, and what can be said. For all we might say against them, the previous content moderators of Twitter did not prevent the platform from serving grassroots movements. We have yet to see whether Musk will intentionally target activists and organizers or simply permit reactionaries to do so on a crowdsourced basis, but it would be extremely naïve to take him at his word that his goal is to make Twitter more open.
7 notes · View notes
digicode1 · 2 months ago
Text
Cloud Agnostic: Achieving Flexibility and Independence in Cloud Management
As businesses increasingly migrate to the cloud, they face a critical decision: which cloud provider to choose? While AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud offer powerful platforms, the concept of "cloud agnostic" is gaining traction. Cloud agnosticism refers to a strategy where businesses avoid vendor lock-in by designing applications and infrastructure that work across multiple cloud providers. This approach provides flexibility, independence, and resilience, allowing organizations to adapt to changing needs and avoid reliance on a single provider.
Tumblr media
What Does It Mean to Be Cloud Agnostic?
Being cloud agnostic means creating and managing systems, applications, and services that can run on any cloud platform. Instead of committing to a single cloud provider, businesses design their architecture to function seamlessly across multiple platforms. This flexibility is achieved by using open standards, containerization technologies like Docker, and orchestration tools such as Kubernetes.
Key features of a cloud agnostic approach include:
Interoperability: Applications must be able to operate across different cloud environments.
Portability: The ability to migrate workloads between different providers without significant reconfiguration.
Standardization: Using common frameworks, APIs, and languages that work universally across platforms.
Benefits of Cloud Agnostic Strategies
Avoiding Vendor Lock-InThe primary benefit of being cloud agnostic is avoiding vendor lock-in. Once a business builds its entire infrastructure around a single cloud provider, it can be challenging to switch or expand to other platforms. This could lead to increased costs and limited innovation. With a cloud agnostic strategy, businesses can choose the best services from multiple providers, optimizing both performance and costs.
Cost OptimizationCloud agnosticism allows companies to choose the most cost-effective solutions across providers. As cloud pricing models are complex and vary by region and usage, a cloud agnostic system enables businesses to leverage competitive pricing and minimize expenses by shifting workloads to different providers when necessary.
Greater Resilience and UptimeBy operating across multiple cloud platforms, organizations reduce the risk of downtime. If one provider experiences an outage, the business can shift workloads to another platform, ensuring continuous service availability. This redundancy builds resilience, ensuring high availability in critical systems.
Flexibility and ScalabilityA cloud agnostic approach gives companies the freedom to adjust resources based on current business needs. This means scaling applications horizontally or vertically across different providers without being restricted by the limits or offerings of a single cloud vendor.
Global ReachDifferent cloud providers have varying levels of presence across geographic regions. With a cloud agnostic approach, businesses can leverage the strengths of various providers in different areas, ensuring better latency, performance, and compliance with local regulations.
Challenges of Cloud Agnosticism
Despite the advantages, adopting a cloud agnostic approach comes with its own set of challenges:
Increased ComplexityManaging and orchestrating services across multiple cloud providers is more complex than relying on a single vendor. Businesses need robust management tools, monitoring systems, and teams with expertise in multiple cloud environments to ensure smooth operations.
Higher Initial CostsThe upfront costs of designing a cloud agnostic architecture can be higher than those of a single-provider system. Developing portable applications and investing in technologies like Kubernetes or Terraform requires significant time and resources.
Limited Use of Provider-Specific ServicesCloud providers often offer unique, advanced services—such as machine learning tools, proprietary databases, and analytics platforms—that may not be easily portable to other clouds. Being cloud agnostic could mean missing out on some of these specialized services, which may limit innovation in certain areas.
Tools and Technologies for Cloud Agnostic Strategies
Several tools and technologies make cloud agnosticism more accessible for businesses:
Containerization: Docker and similar containerization tools allow businesses to encapsulate applications in lightweight, portable containers that run consistently across various environments.
Orchestration: Kubernetes is a leading tool for orchestrating containers across multiple cloud platforms. It ensures scalability, load balancing, and failover capabilities, regardless of the underlying cloud infrastructure.
Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Tools like Terraform and Ansible enable businesses to define cloud infrastructure using code. This makes it easier to manage, replicate, and migrate infrastructure across different providers.
APIs and Abstraction Layers: Using APIs and abstraction layers helps standardize interactions between applications and different cloud platforms, enabling smooth interoperability.
When Should You Consider a Cloud Agnostic Approach?
A cloud agnostic approach is not always necessary for every business. Here are a few scenarios where adopting cloud agnosticism makes sense:
Businesses operating in regulated industries that need to maintain compliance across multiple regions.
Companies require high availability and fault tolerance across different cloud platforms for mission-critical applications.
Organizations with global operations that need to optimize performance and cost across multiple cloud regions.
Businesses aim to avoid long-term vendor lock-in and maintain flexibility for future growth and scaling needs.
Conclusion
Adopting a cloud agnostic strategy offers businesses unparalleled flexibility, independence, and resilience in cloud management. While the approach comes with challenges such as increased complexity and higher upfront costs, the long-term benefits of avoiding vendor lock-in, optimizing costs, and enhancing scalability are significant. By leveraging the right tools and technologies, businesses can achieve a truly cloud-agnostic architecture that supports innovation and growth in a competitive landscape.
Embrace the cloud agnostic approach to future-proof your business operations and stay ahead in the ever-evolving digital world.
2 notes · View notes
germanpostwarmodern · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
As Aldo van Eyck’s biographer Francis Strauven probably is the most competent exegete of the architect’s oeuvre. In his most recent book “Pastoor van Ars Church The Hague – A Timeless Sacral Space by Aldo van Eyck”, recently published by Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther und Franz König, Strauven focuses on the Pastoor van Arskerk in Den Haag, one of only two religious buildings Van Eyck realized during his career: But while the Maranathakerk (1986-92) is rarely ever mentioned, the Pastoor van Arskerk in Den Haag has already, and justly, been recognized as an ingenious piece of church architecture by an architect unaffiliated with any religion. This circumstance, as Strauven explains in his meticulous workup of the church’s history, initially represented quite a hurdle as only Catholic architects were permitted to build Catholic churches, a problem the parish and Van Eyck bypassed by involving the (Catholic) architect as well as a liturgical advisor.
The church was projected for a rather small plot in a development area but Van Eyck nevertheless sought to accommodate the wishes and aspirations of the parish as effectively as possible: in line with the ideas of the New Theology he harked back to early Christian building and along a basilican scheme devised an outwardly closed building lit by light domes. Its backbone is a via sacra that although seeming straightforward is polyvalent and offers a range of perspectives on different liturgical elements of the church. At the same time the character of the church is decisively determined by Van Eyck’s philosophy of the „twin phenomenon“ represented by the high vertical transept and the low horizontal nave that the architect connects through the stepped linking of their portal pillars.
As these brief examples demonstrate Strauven really dissects the building’s architecture as well as its genesis. Through extensive archival research he showcases the gradual development of the building and ties it to Van Eyck’s design philosophy as well as his rich intellectual framework. A wonderful, complex little book that showcases how modern architecture can be made talk!
27 notes · View notes
heliopausephysics · 2 years ago
Text
2.5 Projectile Motion
Projectile motion is the special case wherein a projected [thrown, in layman's terms] object follows a curved path of motion acted solely upon by the influence of the Earth's gravity.
To find two basic formulae, we do the following:
Tumblr media
A thrown object's velocity vector can be broken down into its horizontal and vertical components, which in this case are Vx and Vy. We know from vector laws that the trigonometric functions of cosine and sine can be used to calculate both, respectively.
To find the position of the object, we can use the velocity vector components and simply multiply them by a time t - the time units cancel out [one in the denominator of the velocity -> distance / time; and one in the time t itself] and we add the distance travelled in the relevant axis to its original position at 0,0. This works for the horizontal component as it is independent of the vertical component and is not opposed by external forces [neglecting air resistance]. However, the vertical component is inevitably affected by the Earth's gravity. A different set of more complex mathematical equations tells us the term that is used to subtract from the y position is (gt²)/2.
Using these formulae, we can solve a variety of problems of which an example is given below:
Tumblr media
Say Newton throws the apple with an underarm throw, releasing it exactly as his hand touches the ground, sending it forwards at an angle of 45° with a speed of 10 m/s. When will the apple hit the ground? By using the y-position equation in the previous image, we can figure this out. Substituting y for 0 as the ground is at y=0 will allow us to rearrange and solve for t, as is shown above. The answer that is found is 1.4 seconds [neglecting air resistance]!
Here, Newton's equations were in fact a development of Galileo's existing descriptions of projectile motion! This is one of the basics of the Newtonian mechanics framework, and we will go on to discuss its more broad applications to cosmology and astrophysics. We get one step closer to understanding how this transformed into Einstein's beautiful theory of relativity! See you then!
12 notes · View notes
afiliatevasu · 1 year ago
Text
What is Solr – Comparing Apache Solr vs. Elasticsearch
Tumblr media
In the world of search engines and data retrieval systems, Apache Solr and Elasticsearch are two prominent contenders, each with its strengths and unique capabilities. These open-source, distributed search platforms play a crucial role in empowering organizations to harness the power of big data and deliver relevant search results efficiently. In this blog, we will delve into the fundamentals of Solr and Elasticsearch, highlighting their key features and comparing their functionalities. Whether you're a developer, data analyst, or IT professional, understanding the differences between Solr and Elasticsearch will help you make informed decisions to meet your specific search and data management needs.
Overview of Apache Solr
Apache Solr is a search platform built on top of the Apache Lucene library, known for its robust indexing and full-text search capabilities. It is written in Java and designed to handle large-scale search and data retrieval tasks. Solr follows a RESTful API approach, making it easy to integrate with different programming languages and frameworks. It offers a rich set of features, including faceted search, hit highlighting, spell checking, and geospatial search, making it a versatile solution for various use cases.
Overview of Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch, also based on Apache Lucene, is a distributed search engine that stands out for its real-time data indexing and analytics capabilities. It is known for its scalability and speed, making it an ideal choice for applications that require near-instantaneous search results. Elasticsearch provides a simple RESTful API, enabling developers to perform complex searches effortlessly. Moreover, it offers support for data visualization through its integration with Kibana, making it a popular choice for log analysis, application monitoring, and other data-driven use cases.
Comparing Solr and Elasticsearch
Data Handling and Indexing
Both Solr and Elasticsearch are proficient at handling large volumes of data and offer excellent indexing capabilities. Solr uses XML and JSON formats for data indexing, while Elasticsearch relies on JSON, which is generally considered more human-readable and easier to work with. Elasticsearch's dynamic mapping feature allows it to automatically infer data types during indexing, streamlining the process further.
Querying and Searching
Both platforms support complex search queries, but Elasticsearch is often regarded as more developer-friendly due to its clean and straightforward API. Elasticsearch's support for nested queries and aggregations simplifies the process of retrieving and analyzing data. On the other hand, Solr provides a range of query parsers, allowing developers to choose between traditional and advanced syntax options based on their preference and familiarity.
Scalability and Performance
Elasticsearch is designed with scalability in mind from the ground up, making it relatively easier to scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. It excels in real-time search and analytics scenarios, making it a top choice for applications with dynamic data streams. Solr, while also scalable, may require more effort for horizontal scaling compared to Elasticsearch.
Community and Ecosystem
Both Solr and Elasticsearch boast active and vibrant open-source communities. Solr has been around longer and, therefore, has a more extensive user base and established ecosystem. Elasticsearch, however, has gained significant momentum over the years, supported by the Elastic Stack, which includes Kibana for data visualization and Beats for data shipping.
Document-Based vs. Schema-Free
Solr follows a document-based approach, where data is organized into fields and requires a predefined schema. While this provides better control over data, it may become restrictive when dealing with dynamic or constantly evolving data structures. Elasticsearch, being schema-free, allows for more flexible data handling, making it more suitable for projects with varying data structures.
Conclusion
In summary, Apache Solr and Elasticsearch are both powerful search platforms, each excelling in specific scenarios. Solr's robustness and established ecosystem make it a reliable choice for traditional search applications, while Elasticsearch's real-time capabilities and seamless integration with the Elastic Stack are perfect for modern data-driven projects. Choosing between the two depends on your specific requirements, data complexity, and preferred development style. Regardless of your decision, both Solr and Elasticsearch can supercharge your search and analytics endeavors, bringing efficiency and relevance to your data retrieval processes.
Whether you opt for Solr, Elasticsearch, or a combination of both, the future of search and data exploration remains bright, with technology continually evolving to meet the needs of next-generation applications.
2 notes · View notes
meeranjaz · 12 hours ago
Text
Effective Database Strategies in Full Stack Python Development
Tumblr media
Database management is a critical component of Full Stack Python development. Choosing the right database, optimizing queries, and ensuring data integrity are key aspects of building robust and scalable applications. This blog will explore the strategies you can adopt to effectively manage databases in your Full Stack Python development  projects.
1. Understanding Database Management in Full Stack Python Development
In any web application, the database is where data is stored, accessed, and manipulated. As a Full Stack Python development understanding how to manage databases efficiently is crucial for ensuring that your application runs smoothly. The choice between SQL (relational) and NoSQL (non-relational) databases depends on the requirements of your project, including data structure, scalability, and query complexity.
SQL Databases: Relational databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQLite are widely used in Python projects due to their support for complex queries, data integrity, and transactional consistency.
NoSQL Databases: Non-relational databases like MongoDB, Cassandra, and Redis are used for handling unstructured data, large volumes of information, and applications requiring horizontal scaling.
2. Choosing the Right Database for Your Full Stack Python Application
Selecting the appropriate database is one of the most important decisions in Full Stack Python development  Your choice should depend on the specific needs of your application, such as the type of data you need to store, how you will access it, and the scalability requirements.
A. Relational Databases (SQL)
If your application requires structured data with relationships between different entities, an SQL database might be the best choice. Relational databases organize data into tables with rows and columns and support complex queries with joins.
PostgreSQL: Known for its scalability, rich feature set, and support for advanced SQL queries.
MySQL: Widely used and known for speed and reliability.
SQLite: A lightweight, file-based SQL database often used for smaller applications or testing environments.
B. Non-relational Databases (NoSQL)
If your application requires flexibility in the data schema, high availability, or fast read and write operations, a NoSQL database might be more suitable. NoSQL databases can store data in various formats, such as key-value pairs, documents, or graphs.
MongoDB: A document-oriented database, ideal for applications that store data in JSON-like structures.
Cassandra: A highly scalable NoSQL database designed for handling large volumes of data across distributed systems.
Redis: A key-value store used for caching, message brokering, and real-time applications.
3. Database Models and Schema Design in Full Stack Python Development
Once you've chosen a database, you need to design the data model. A well-designed schema can improve the performance of your application and make it easier to manage data in the long run.
A. Normalization vs. Denormalization
Normalization: In relational databases, normalization refers to the process of organizing data to reduce redundancy and improve data integrity. It involves dividing data into smaller tables and establishing relationships between them. This approach is particularly useful when your application requires complex queries or operations on multiple tables.
Denormalization: Sometimes, especially in NoSQL databases, you may choose to denormalize the data by storing redundant copies of data. This approach can speed up query performance at the expense of storage efficiency and data integrity.
B. Managing Relationships
In relational databases, you’ll often need to model relationships between different entities, such as one-to-many, many-to-many, or one-to-one relationships. This can be done through foreign keys, join tables, and normalization techniques.
For Full Stack Python development , frameworks like Django ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) provide tools for defining relationships in Python, allowing you to interact with the database using Python objects.
4. Optimizing Database Queries for Performance
Once your schema is designed, it's important to optimize database queries for performance. Slow queries can degrade the performance of your application and impact the user experience.
A. Indexing
Indexes help speed up the retrieval of data by creating quick lookup paths to the data. In relational databases, creating indexes on columns that are frequently queried can drastically improve performance.
Example: If your application frequently searches for users by their email addresses, creating an index on the email column in the users table will speed up query execution.
B. Query Optimization
Complex queries can lead to slow performance, especially as the database grows. Some techniques for optimizing queries include:
Using SELECT only for necessary columns: Avoid using SELECT * and instead specify only the columns you need.
Using LIMIT and OFFSET: When querying large datasets, use LIMIT and OFFSET to paginate results instead of fetching all records at once.
Avoiding N+1 Queries: In ORM frameworks like Django ORM, use methods like select_related() and prefetch_related() to optimize database access and avoid the "N+1 query problem."
C. Caching
Caching frequently accessed data can significantly reduce the load on your database and improve application performance. Redis is often used as a caching layer in Full Stack Python development 
In-memory caching: By caching the results of expensive database queries in memory, you can reduce response times and improve user experience.
Query caching: Cache the results of common queries so they don't have to be executed every time.
5. Database Transactions and Data Integrity
Maintaining data integrity is essential for ensuring that your application functions correctly and doesn't encounter data corruption. Database transactions allow you to group multiple queries into a single unit, ensuring that either all of them succeed or none of them are applied if an error occurs.
ACID Properties: Ensure your relational database supports ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties to guarantee reliable transactions.
Atomic Operations: Use transactions in your Python code to execute multiple queries together, ensuring that either all queries succeed, or none are executed in case of an error.
6. Database Scaling Strategies
As your Full Stack Python development application grows, you’ll need to consider database scaling strategies to handle increasing traffic and data volumes.
A. Vertical Scaling
Vertical scaling involves upgrading the hardware resources of your database server (e.g., increasing CPU, RAM, or disk space). This approach is suitable for smaller applications that don't require massive scaling.
B. Horizontal Scaling
Horizontal scaling involves distributing data across multiple servers to spread the load. This is particularly important for applications with high traffic or large data sets.
Sharding: Split large datasets across multiple databases to improve performance and scalability.
Replication: Create copies of your database across multiple servers to improve data availability and fault tolerance.
7. Conclusion
Effective database management is key to building a successful Full Stack Python development application. By choosing the right database, optimizing queries, ensuring data integrity, and planning for scalability, you can create a robust and high-performing application that can handle growing traffic and data requirements.
Remember that the database is the heart of any data-driven application, so investing time in database design, optimization, and scalability will pay off in the long run.
0 notes
mtsuhail · 1 day ago
Text
How to Build Scalable Web Applications with Java Full Stack Development
Tumblr media
Scalability is one of the most crucial aspects of building modern web applications. As the number of users and data grows, it’s important to ensure that the application can handle the increased load efficiently. Java full-stack development with its robust set of tools and frameworks, is ideal for building scalable web applications. In this blog, we’ll explore how you can leverage Java Full Stack technologies to build applications that scale effectively.
What is Scalability in Web Applications?
Scalability refers to the ability of a web application to handle an increasing amount of workload or users without compromising performance. A scalable application can grow as the demand for its services increases, either by upgrading existing infrastructure (vertical scaling) or by adding more resources (horizontal scaling).
In the context of Java full-stack development, scalability involves both the back-end (server-side) and the front-end (client-side) of the application. Let’s explore how you can achieve scalability using Java technologies.
1. Building a Scalable Back-End with Spring Boot
The back-end of your application is responsible for handling requests, processing data, and interacting with databases. Spring Boot is an excellent choice for building a scalable back-end due to its simplicity, flexibility, and integration with various cloud-based tools. Here’s how you can ensure scalability with Spring Boot:
- Microservices Architecture
To build a scalable back-end, consider using a microservices architecture. Microservices allow you to break down a monolithic application into smaller, independent services that can be developed, deployed, and scaled independently. Spring Boot, combined with Spring Cloud, provides powerful tools for building and managing microservices.
Using microservices, each service can be scaled individually based on demand. For instance, if one service experiences high traffic, it can be scaled up without affecting the other services.
- Asynchronous Processing
Scalable applications often need to handle a large number of concurrent requests without slowing down. By leveraging asynchronous processing in Spring Boot, you can ensure that tasks like database queries or external API calls do not block the main thread, allowing the application to handle more requests efficiently. Technologies like Spring WebFlux provide asynchronous processing out of the box.
- Load Balancing
In a scalable system, it's essential to distribute incoming traffic across multiple instances of your application. Spring Cloud Netflix Ribbon and Eureka offer client-side load balancing and service discovery features, which enable you to route requests to the best-performing server instance, ensuring that your application can handle more traffic efficiently.
2. Front-End Scalability with React or Angular
The front-end of your application also needs to be scalable. React and Angular are two popular JavaScript frameworks that can help you build highly scalable user interfaces.
- Component-Based Architecture
Both React and Angular follow a component-based architecture, where the application is divided into smaller, reusable components. This modular approach makes it easier to scale the front-end by adding new features and components without affecting the entire application.
Additionally, React’s virtual DOM ensures that only the necessary components are re-rendered when data changes, improving performance even as the application grows in size.
- Single-Page Applications (SPA)
Modern web applications often use a Single-Page Application (SPA) approach, where the entire application is loaded once, and subsequent interactions with the server are handled asynchronously. SPAs reduce the number of full-page reloads, leading to a faster and more scalable user experience. Both React and Angular excel in building SPAs.
- Efficient State Management
As your application scales, managing the state (i.e., the data used by the components) becomes increasingly complex. Both React (with Redux) and Angular (with NgRx) offer state management solutions that allow you to handle large amounts of data more efficiently. These tools help maintain consistency across the application and improve performance.
3. Database Scalability
Databases are central to the scalability of a web application. Java Full Stack development provides several options for managing databases in a scalable manner.
- NoSQL Databases
For applications that need to handle unstructured or semi-structured data at scale, NoSQL databases (like MongoDB or Cassandra) can be a better choice than traditional relational databases. Java has strong support for NoSQL databases through libraries like Spring Data MongoDB, making it easy to interact with and scale these databases.
- Sharding and Replication
For relational databases, you can achieve scalability through sharding and replication. Sharding involves splitting the database into smaller chunks, which can be distributed across multiple servers, while replication ensures that data is copied across multiple databases for high availability and fault tolerance. Java frameworks like Spring Data JPA and Hibernate can be configured to support these features, allowing you to scale your database as needed.
- Caching
To further improve the scalability of your application, you can implement caching mechanisms that reduce the load on the database. Redis and Memcached are popular caching solutions that can store frequently accessed data in memory, reducing database queries and improving response times. Java has excellent support for integrating caching systems like Redis using Spring Cache.
4. Cloud Deployment for Scalability
One of the best ways to achieve scalability for your Java full-stack development application is by deploying it in the cloud. Cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud offer flexible, on-demand resources that make it easy to scale your application as needed.
- Auto-Scaling
Cloud platforms provide auto-scaling features that automatically increase or decrease the number of instances based on traffic. This allows you to scale your application up during peak times and scale it down when traffic decreases, ensuring efficient resource usage and cost management.
- Containers and Kubernetes
Containers (such as Docker) and container orchestration systems (like Kubernetes) are widely used in scalable applications. Containers provide a lightweight, consistent environment for running microservices, while Kubernetes automates the deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. Spring Boot applications can be easily containerized and deployed to Kubernetes clusters, providing a robust solution for scaling.
5. Monitoring and Optimizing Performance
Finally, it’s essential to continuously monitor and optimize the performance of your scalable web application. Tools like Spring Boot Actuator and Prometheus can help you track performance metrics, identify bottlenecks, and ensure that your application is operating efficiently.
You can also implement load testing using tools like Apache JMeter to simulate high traffic and ensure that your application can handle the desired number of concurrent users. Regular performance testing and optimization are key to maintaining a scalable application.
Conclusion
Building a scalable web application requires careful consideration of both the front-end and back-end components. With Java full-stack development, you can leverage powerful frameworks and tools like Spring Boot, React, Angular, and cloud technologies to create applications that can scale efficiently with increasing demand.
By embracing microservices, optimizing databases, implementing caching, and utilizing cloud-based solutions, you can ensure that your Java Full Stack application remains performant, reliable, and scalable as it grows.
This concludes the blog on "How to Build Scalable Web Applications with Java full-stack development". Let me know if you’d like to proceed with another topic!
0 notes
procurement-insights · 21 days ago
Text
Horizontal Stacking Versus Intelligent Vertical Integration
When it comes to ProcureTech development what is the difference between "Horizontal Stacking" and "Intelligent Vertical" integration solutions?
“I am dividing the frontend functional solutions from the AI operating system providers – the two categories of solution providers emerging after the 2025 shake-up.” – Procurement Insights An Example of A Frontend Functional Solution Provider Last month, I posted the article Globality Demo > The Road to the ProcureTech Cup: Episode 25-06, where I provided a fair assessment. Here is the link to…
0 notes
shrutijadhav2139 · 2 days ago
Text
Ropeless Elevator Market Overview and Forecast: Exploring Key Factors, Dynamics, and Competitive Landscape
The ropeless elevator market is gaining significant traction in the vertical transportation industry due to its potential to revolutionize traditional elevator systems. Ropeless elevators, also known as magnetic or cable-less elevators, utilize advanced magnetic levitation or linear motor technology to move the elevator cabin within the shaft. This innovative approach eliminates the need for cables or ropes, which are typically used in conventional elevator systems, offering a host of benefits such as increased space efficiency, faster travel times, and reduced maintenance costs. This article delves into the key factors driving the growth of the ropeless elevator market, explores market dynamics, and provides a comprehensive analysis of the competitive landscape.
Tumblr media
Key Factors Driving Market Growth
Several factors are contributing to the growth of the ropeless elevator market, with technological advancements being at the forefront. The primary driver is the increasing demand for more efficient and eco-friendly transportation solutions. Traditional elevators are limited by mechanical components such as cables and pulleys, which can be prone to wear and tear, leading to higher maintenance costs. Ropeless elevators, however, use electromagnetic systems that require less maintenance and offer higher reliability.
Additionally, ropeless elevators are ideal for high-rise buildings and modern architectural designs. They provide more flexibility in building design as they do not require the vertical shaft space needed for conventional elevator cables. This feature is particularly valuable in skyscrapers, where space optimization is crucial. Furthermore, the ability to move both vertically and horizontally makes these elevators suitable for applications beyond traditional buildings, including multi-story parking structures, hospitals, and airports.
Another significant factor contributing to the market’s growth is the push for sustainable construction. With urbanization on the rise and the global focus on reducing energy consumption, ropeless elevators offer a greener alternative. The use of magnetic propulsion systems not only reduces the energy consumed compared to traditional elevators but also lowers carbon footprints, making them an attractive option for environmentally conscious developers and building owners.
Market Dynamics
The ropeless elevator market is influenced by several dynamics, including technological innovation, regulatory frameworks, and evolving consumer preferences. As manufacturers continue to refine the technology, we can expect even more efficient and cost-effective ropeless elevators in the coming years. However, the high initial installation cost and the complexity of retrofitting existing buildings with this advanced technology may pose challenges to market adoption, particularly in cost-sensitive regions.
Moreover, regulatory standards concerning building safety and elevator operations are crucial for the market's growth. Governments worldwide are increasingly focusing on setting standards for energy efficiency and building safety, and as these standards evolve, they may create both challenges and opportunities for the ropeless elevator market.
Competitive Landscape
The competitive landscape of the ropeless elevator market is shaped by a few key players that are leading the charge in technological innovation. Notable companies such as Thyssenkrupp, Mitsubishi Electric, and Otis Elevator Company are pioneering advancements in ropeless elevator systems. Thyssenkrupp, in particular, made a significant impact with its MULTI system, which is the world’s first ropeless, multi-directional elevator system, capable of traveling horizontally and vertically.
These industry leaders are focusing on enhancing product offerings through continuous research and development, strategic partnerships, and regional expansions. Smaller players and startups are also entering the market, looking to capitalize on niche segments or develop cost-effective solutions for less demanding applications.
In conclusion, the ropeless elevator market is poised for substantial growth as demand for more efficient, eco-friendly, and space-optimized solutions rises. While challenges such as high initial costs and retrofitting obstacles remain, the benefits offered by this technology, particularly in high-rise buildings and sustainable infrastructure projects, make it a promising sector for future investment. The competitive landscape continues to evolve, with established players and newcomers innovating to meet the demands of a rapidly changing market. As the technology matures, the ropeless elevator market is expected to expand significantly, reshaping the future of vertical transportation.
Get Free Sample and ToC : https://www.pristinemarketinsights.com/get-free-sample-and-toc?rprtdtid=NTIy&RD=Ropeless-Elevator-Market-Report
0 notes
subb01 · 2 days ago
Text
How to Build Your First Application on AWS
Amazon Web Services (AWS) provides a robust platform for building, deploying, and scaling applications. Whether you're a developer or a beginner in cloud computing, AWS offers tools and services to simplify the process. This guide will walk you through building your first application on AWS step by step.
Tumblr media
Why Build Applications on AWS?
Scalability: Handle traffic spikes effortlessly.
Cost-Efficiency: Pay only for what you use.
Reliability: AWS ensures uptime with its global infrastructure.
Ease of Use: User-friendly services like Elastic Beanstalk and Lightsail simplify development.
Step 1: Set Up Your AWS Account
Before you begin, create an AWS account if you don’t already have one.
Go to AWS Signup Page.
Enter your email, set up your password, and provide payment details (the Free Tier allows free usage for many services).
Enable MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) for added security.
Step 2: Choose Your Application Type
Define the type of application you want to build:
Web Application: A dynamic website or backend for mobile apps.
API: Create RESTful APIs using AWS Lambda or API Gateway.
Static Website: Host HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files.
Step 3: Select the Right AWS Services
AWS offers numerous services, but for a basic application, these are the essentials:
1. Compute Service (EC2 or Elastic Beanstalk):
Amazon EC2: Virtual machines for full control over deployment.
Elastic Beanstalk: Managed service to deploy web apps quickly.
2. Storage Service (S3):
Use Amazon S3 to store application assets, such as images and data files.
3. Database Service (RDS or DynamoDB):
RDS: For relational databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL.
DynamoDB: For NoSQL databases.
4. Networking (Route 53):
Manage DNS and custom domains for your app.
Step 4: Develop Locally
Build the initial version of your application on your local machine:
Tech Stack Suggestions:
Frontend: HTML, CSS, JavaScript, or frameworks like React and Angular.
Backend: Node.js, Python (Django/Flask), or Java (Spring Boot).
Database: SQLite for development, migrate to RDS or DynamoDB for production.
Step 5: Deploy Your Application
Once your app is ready, deploy it to AWS. Here's how:
Option 1: Using Elastic Beanstalk (Easiest Method):
Log in to the AWS Management Console.
Navigate to Elastic Beanstalk.
Create a new application, upload your app’s code (ZIP file), and launch it.
AWS automatically provisions EC2 instances, sets up a load balancer, and configures scaling.
Option 2: Using Amazon EC2 (Manual Method):
Launch an EC2 instance from the AWS Console.
SSH into the instance and install necessary dependencies (e.g., Node.js or Python).
Deploy your application files to the server.
Configure a web server like Nginx or Apache to serve your application.
Option 3: Using AWS Lightsail (For Beginners):
Navigate to AWS Lightsail.
Create a new instance with pre-configured blueprints like Node.js or WordPress.
Upload and run your application files.
Step 6: Connect Your Domain
Point your domain name to your application using Route 53:
Purchase or transfer a domain to AWS Route 53.
Set up an A record to point to your application’s public IP or load balancer.
Step 7: Test Your Application
Before going live, thoroughly test your application:
Functionality Testing: Ensure all features work as intended.
Load Testing: Simulate high traffic using tools like AWS CloudWatch or Locust.
Security Testing: Check for vulnerabilities using AWS Inspector.
Step 8: Monitor and Optimize
AWS provides tools to monitor performance and optimize your application:
AWS CloudWatch: Monitor app performance and resource usage.
AWS Trusted Advisor: Optimize costs, improve performance, and ensure security.
Auto Scaling: Scale resources automatically based on traffic.
Step 9: Scale and Grow
As your application gains users, AWS makes it easy to scale:
Horizontal Scaling: Add more servers via load balancers.
Vertical Scaling: Upgrade server specifications.
Global Distribution: Use AWS CloudFront to serve content globally with low latency.
Start your AWS journey today! Watch this step-by-step YouTube Live Session on AWS Application Development for detailed guidance and live demonstrations.
0 notes
softwarecompany909809 · 2 days ago
Text
The Benefits of Using MEAN Stack for Scalable Web Development
Tumblr media
Web development has evolved significantly in recent years, and with the increasing demand for dynamic, high-performance, and scalable applications, selecting the right technology stack has become more critical than ever. Among the various technology stacks available, the MEAN stack has emerged as a popular choice for building scalable and high-performance web applications.
In this blog post, we'll dive deep into the MEAN stack—comprising MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js—and explore its numerous benefits, particularly in scalable web development.
1. Understanding the MEAN Stack
Before we delve into the benefits, let's take a closer look at the individual components of the MEAN stack:
MongoDB: A NoSQL database that stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, making it an ideal solution for handling large amounts of unstructured or semi-structured data. MongoDB is designed to scale horizontally, which is essential for large applications requiring high availability and quick data access.
Express.js: A lightweight web application framework for Node.js, Express simplifies the server-side development of web applications by offering a robust set of features for building both simple and complex applications. It acts as the middle layer between the database and the front-end.
Angular: A front-end web application framework developed by Google. Angular provides developers with a powerful set of tools to build dynamic, single-page applications (SPAs) with a rich user interface. Its two-way data binding feature and component-based architecture make it ideal for building scalable, high-performance front-end applications.
Node.js: A server-side JavaScript runtime environment built on Chrome’s V8 JavaScript engine. Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model, making it highly efficient and suitable for applications that require scalability and performance, such as real-time applications and APIs.
Together, these four technologies form the MEAN stack, which allows developers to build end-to-end JavaScript-based applications.
2. Scalability with MongoDB
Scalability is often one of the primary concerns when developing web applications. As your application grows in terms of user base, data volume, and traffic, your database must be able to scale efficiently.
MongoDB, as a NoSQL database, is designed to handle massive amounts of unstructured and semi-structured data, which is common in modern web applications. Unlike relational databases that rely on tables and rows, MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents, allowing for more flexibility in how data is stored and queried.
Key scalability features of MongoDB include:
Horizontal Scaling: MongoDB is designed for horizontal scaling, meaning it can distribute data across multiple machines using a process called sharding. This allows MongoDB to handle massive datasets and high-throughput applications without performance degradation.
Replication: MongoDB uses replica sets, which allow data to be replicated across multiple servers. This enhances data availability and ensures that your application remains operational even in case of server failures, contributing to overall scalability.
Flexibility and Performance: MongoDB's flexible schema allows developers to quickly adapt to changing requirements and scale applications without worrying about database schema changes. This performance efficiency, coupled with scalability, makes MongoDB an ideal choice for modern web applications.
3. High Performance with Node.js
Node.js is built on an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model, which makes it extremely lightweight and efficient. This architecture is well-suited for building scalable applications that require high performance, such as real-time chat applications, social networks, and online gaming platforms.
Here’s how Node.js contributes to the scalability of web applications:
Non-blocking I/O: Node.js processes requests asynchronously, meaning it doesn’t block or wait for one request to complete before moving on to the next. This enables Node.js to handle many requests simultaneously without becoming slow or unresponsive.
Event-Driven Architecture: The event-driven nature of Node.js means that it can handle a large number of concurrent requests with minimal resource consumption. This makes Node.js a fantastic choice for building applications that need to scale quickly and handle multiple simultaneous users.
Single-Threaded Model: Unlike traditional server architectures that use multiple threads to handle incoming requests, Node.js operates on a single thread using an event loop to manage concurrent requests. This design allows for more efficient use of system resources, making it well-suited for applications with high concurrency requirements.
NPM Ecosystem: Node.js also benefits from a vast ecosystem of open-source libraries and modules available through the Node Package Manager (NPM). These libraries make it easier for developers to integrate various functionalities, reducing development time and allowing for faster scalability.
4. Real-Time Applications with Angular
In today’s competitive landscape, businesses require applications that can deliver real-time user interactions. Angular, as a front-end framework, plays a pivotal role in ensuring that web applications provide a smooth, dynamic, and engaging user experience.
Key benefits of Angular for real-time applications:
Two-Way Data Binding: One of Angular’s standout features is its two-way data binding, which ensures that any changes made in the user interface are automatically reflected in the data model, and vice versa. This reduces the amount of boilerplate code developers need to write, improving development speed and performance.
Component-Based Architecture: Angular uses a component-based architecture, where the user interface is broken down into reusable and self-contained components. This structure makes it easier to scale the application as new features can be added by simply creating new components.
Dependency Injection: Angular’s built-in dependency injection system makes it easier to manage and scale large applications by handling the creation and management of services and dependencies. This improves performance and scalability by ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently.
Optimized for Single-Page Applications (SPAs): Angular is optimized for building SPAs, where the entire application is loaded as a single page and dynamically updates based on user interactions. SPAs are more scalable because they load faster and provide a more seamless user experience compared to traditional multi-page applications.
5. Full JavaScript Development Environment
One of the most significant advantages of the MEAN stack is that it provides a full-stack JavaScript development environment. This means that both the front-end and back-end of the application are written in JavaScript, allowing for a more streamlined development process.
Here are the key benefits of a full JavaScript environment:
Unified Language: Developers can use a single programming language (JavaScript) across both the client and server sides, which reduces the cognitive load when switching between different languages. This uniformity also makes it easier to share code between the front-end and back-end, improving productivity and reducing redundancy.
Code Reusability: JavaScript code written for the back-end (Node.js) can be reused on the front-end (Angular), which increases efficiency and speeds up the development cycle.
Faster Development Cycle: Since both sides of the application are developed in the same language, development time is reduced. This leads to faster deployment and quicker iteration, essential for scalable projects that need to evolve rapidly.
Lower Learning Curve: Developers who are already familiar with JavaScript can quickly transition to full-stack development using the MEAN stack, reducing the time spent learning multiple programming languages.
6. Seamless Integration and Maintenance
The MEAN stack is designed to work together seamlessly, making it easier for developers to integrate the various components of the stack. The result is a cohesive architecture that simplifies both the development and maintenance processes.
Here’s how MEAN stack facilitates integration and maintenance:
Consistent Architecture: Since all components of the stack (MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js) use JavaScript, the application architecture remains consistent. This reduces the complexity of the codebase and makes maintenance easier.
Efficient Data Flow: MEAN stack’s full-stack approach ensures a smooth flow of data between the front-end, server-side, and database. Data is passed in JSON format, which is easy to parse and manage across the entire stack.
Faster Bug Fixes and Updates: With a single technology stack, developers can quickly identify and fix issues, implement updates, and maintain the application without dealing with language mismatches or integration problems.
7. Community Support and Resources
Another major benefit of the MEAN stack is its strong community support. Each of the technologies—MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js—has a large and active community of developers who continuously contribute to the ecosystem by building tools, libraries, and documentation.
The community support provides several advantages:
Open Source and Free Tools: All components of the MEAN stack are open-source, which means developers can leverage free tools, libraries, and resources to enhance their applications.
Continuous Improvements: The constant updates and improvements from the community ensure that the MEAN stack remains up-to-date with the latest trends and security patches.
Large Knowledge Base: With a large community, developers can easily find tutorials, forums, and other learning resources to help solve problems and improve their skills.
8. Cost Efficiency for Scalable Development
For businesses, scalability isn’t just about performance; it’s also about being cost-effective. The MEAN stack offers a cost-efficient way to build scalable applications for several reasons:
Open-Source Technologies: All the components of the MEAN stack are open-source, meaning there are no licensing fees associated with using these technologies. This can significantly reduce development costs.
Faster Development: The ability to use a single language across the entire stack reduces development time and costs, making it a more affordable solution for building scalable applications.
Reduced Infrastructure Costs: MongoDB’s horizontal scaling and Node.js’s efficient resource usage reduce the need for high-powered servers, which can further lower infrastructure costs.
9. Case Studies and Success Stories
Several successful companies and startups have leveraged the MEAN stack to build scalable, high-performance web applications. These case studies demonstrate the real-world benefits of using the MEAN stack for scalability:
Uber: Uber uses Node.js in its tech stack to handle millions of real-time requests from users. The non-blocking I/O model of Node.js allows Uber to process a large number of requests with minimal latency.
LinkedIn: LinkedIn migrated to Node.js for its mobile app's back-end, achieving faster performance and better scalability.
Netflix: Netflix uses Node.js for server-side rendering and delivering high-performance content to users worldwide.
Conclusion
The MEAN stack development offers a powerful combination of technologies that are perfect for building scalable, high-performance web applications. With its focus on flexibility, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, the MEAN stack is an ideal choice for businesses looking to develop applications that can grow and scale over time. Whether you're developing real-time applications, APIs, or dynamic single-page apps, the MEAN stack provides all the tools you need to succeed in today’s fast-paced digital world.
By embracing the MEAN stack, businesses can ensure they are equipped to handle the demands of modern web development, while also benefiting from faster development cycles, lower costs, and a highly scalable infrastructure.
0 notes
steelbuildingss · 3 days ago
Text
Multi-Storey Building Plan - Steelbuildings.in
A multi-storey building plan, as outlined on SteelBuildings.in, emphasizes the use of steel as the primary structural material due to its strength, durability, and flexibility. These buildings are designed to support several floors, with steel providing the necessary support for vertical and horizontal loads, ensuring stability and safety. The plan includes considerations for efficient space usage, foundation design, and structural integrity, while also incorporating features such as elevators, accessibility, and aesthetic facades. Steel’s quick construction timeline and cost efficiency, combined with its environmental benefits, make it an ideal choice for modern urban developments, from commercial offices to residential complexes.
In today's rapidly developing urban landscapes, the demand for multi-storey buildings has surged. These structures are essential for meeting the growing need for residential, commercial, and mixed-use spaces in cities worldwide. Multi-storey steel buildings, in particular, offer a range of advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness, speed of construction, and structural integrity. This article explores the concept of multi-storey steel buildings, their design and planning, and the benefits that make them a preferred choice in modern construction.
Multi-Storey Steel Buildings
A multi-storey steel building is a structure that typically consists of several floors supported by a framework of steel. Steel is used for the structural skeleton due to its strength, flexibility, and durability. The construction of such buildings involves careful planning and precise engineering to ensure that the building can withstand the stresses and strains of daily use while offering a safe and comfortable environment for occupants.
In a multi-storey building plan, engineers and architects must consider various factors such as the load-bearing capacity, foundation type, structural connections, fire safety, and accessibility, among others. The planning process requires an understanding of both the architectural vision and the technical requirements for ensuring the building's long-term stability.
Design Considerations for Multi-Storey Steel Buildings
When planning a multi-storey steel building, several critical design considerations come into play:
1. Structural Design and Load Distribution
The design of the building structure must account for the distribution of weight across the various floors. Steel's high tensile strength allows for greater heights and larger spans without compromising the stability of the building. The vertical and horizontal loads must be evenly distributed, and the structural framework must ensure that the building is resistant to both static and dynamic forces, including wind and seismic loads.
2. Foundation Design
The foundation is one of the most critical elements in the construction of multi-storey buildings. Steel buildings, depending on the size and purpose, may require deep foundations such as piles or a raft foundation that can support the load of several floors. The foundation must also be designed to mitigate the effects of soil conditions, water levels, and other environmental factors.
3. Elevators and Accessibility
In multi-storey buildings, elevators and staircases are essential for providing easy access between floors. The design of these elements must follow safety and comfort standards while ensuring that they are efficiently placed within the building’s overall layout. Accessibility features such as ramps for people with disabilities are also a key consideration in multi-storey building plans.
4. Facade and Aesthetic Design
The exterior design of a multi-storey steel building is important for visual appeal, especially in commercial and residential settings. Steel buildings can be finished with various materials such as glass, cladding, or paint, allowing architects to create aesthetically pleasing designs. The design should also take into account the building’s energy efficiency, particularly in terms of heat insulation and lighting.
Advantages of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings
1. Faster Construction Timeline
One of the most significant advantages of using steel in multi-storey building construction is the speed at which the building can be erected. Steel components are pre-fabricated off-site, allowing for quicker assembly on-site. This reduces construction time compared to traditional concrete structures, which typically take longer due to on-site curing and drying processes.
2. Durability and Strength
Steel offers superior strength and durability, allowing multi-storey buildings to withstand harsh weather conditions, including high winds, earthquakes, and other natural calamities. Additionally, steel buildings are less prone to deterioration, such as corrosion, compared to wood or concrete structures.
3. Flexibility in Design
Steel is a highly flexible material, which means that it can be adapted to meet specific design requirements. For multi-storey buildings, steel allows for large open spaces without the need for excessive internal columns, creating more usable floor area. This is especially important in commercial buildings, where open-plan layouts are often preferred.
4. Cost Efficiency
Though the initial cost of steel may be higher than that of other materials, the long-term benefits make it a more cost-effective option. Reduced construction time, lower maintenance costs, and the ability to recycle steel reduce the overall expense of building and maintaining a multi-storey structure.
5. Sustainability and Environmentally Friendly
Steel is 100% recyclable, making it an environmentally friendly building material. Steel structures can be easily disassembled and the components reused, which reduces waste and the demand for new raw materials. Moreover, steel’s energy efficiency, especially when combined with modern insulation techniques, contributes to sustainable building practices.
Key Features of Multi-Storey Steel Buildings
High Load-Bearing Capacity: Steel’s ability to bear heavy loads makes it ideal for multi-storey buildings, ensuring that the structure remains stable over time.
Modular Construction: Multi-storey steel buildings can be constructed using modular components, allowing for quick expansion or modification if necessary.
Fire Resistance: Steel has inherent fire-resistant properties, and when combined with fire-resistant coatings or cladding, it can significantly reduce the risk of fire damage.
Design Versatility: From residential towers to industrial complexes, multi-storey steel buildings offer immense design flexibility. This versatility allows architects to create buildings that meet both functional and aesthetic demands.
Conclusion
The multi-storey steel building is a robust and innovative solution to modern construction challenges. From its strength and flexibility to its environmental benefits, steel remains a top choice for constructing high-rise buildings. By combining advanced engineering with modern materials, architects and engineers can design buildings that not only meet the needs of today’s urban environments but also stand the test of time. The planning and execution of such buildings require careful consideration of structural, aesthetic, and safety factors, but the benefits far outweigh the challenges, making multi-storey steel buildings a preferred option in the world of contemporary architecture and construction.
0 notes
techcronus · 13 days ago
Text
Node.js Development: Everything You Need to Know in 2025
In 2025, Node.js development continues to be a powerful tool for building efficient, scalable, and real-time applications. This backend JavaScript framework has become a go-to technology for backend development, favoured by developers for its speed, flexibility, and vast ecosystem. Here’s everything you need to know about Node.js development trends, advantages, and key considerations in 2025.
Why Node.js Remains Popular in 2025
Node.js has gained a strong foothold in web and app development due to its high performance and ability to handle large volumes of simultaneous requests, making it ideal for data-intensive applications. Its non-blocking, event-driven architecture allows developers to build scalable web applications that can easily support thousands of concurrent users.
Key Node.js Trends to Watch in 2025
Serverless Architecture: Serverless is growing in popularity, and Node.js serverless applications fit perfectly with this trend. In a serverless environment, developers don’t need to manage server infrastructure; they focus instead on writing code. This approach can reduce development costs and improve scalability, making Node.js a key player in the serverless computing market.
Edge Computing: As demand for faster data processing rises, Node.js for edge computing is becoming crucial. By enabling data processing closer to the data source, Node.js helps reduce latency and improve application performance, particularly in real-time applications.
Microservices Architecture: Microservices are essential for large-scale, modular applications. Node.js, with its lightweight nature, is perfect for Node.js microservices architecture, allowing developers to build small, independent services that can be deployed and scaled individually.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) Integration: In 2025, integrating AI and ML models into applications is a significant trend. Node.js with AI and ML is compatible with powerful machine-learning libraries, making it an attractive choice for developers looking to create intelligent applications.
Benefits of Using Node.js in 2025
High Performance: Node.js uses the V8 engine, offering impressive speed and efficient execution of JavaScript. This makes it suitable for applications requiring fast response times, such as real-time applications, chat applications, and IoT devices.
Rich Ecosystem: The Node.js ecosystem, including npm (Node Package Manager), gives developers access to a wide range of reusable modules and libraries. This Node.js ecosystem reduces development time and helps accelerate project timelines.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Node.js Development cross-platform applications work well across different platforms, making it easier for developers to build applications that run seamlessly on various operating systems.
Scalability: The non-blocking, asynchronous architecture of Node.js for scalable applications makes it easy to scale horizontally, supporting increased workloads as businesses grow.
Best Practices for Node.js Development in 2025
Leverage TypeScript: Using TypeScript with Node.js enhances code quality and reduces bugs, making it a valuable addition to any development project.
Prioritize Security: Security is a primary concern for developers, particularly in 2025, as cyber threats grow more sophisticated. Implementing Node.js security best practices, like input validation and rate limiting, is essential for protecting applications.
Adopt CI/CD Pipelines: Continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines streamline development and ensure faster, more reliable Node.js deployments.
Conclusion
Node.js continues to be a versatile and high-performance choice for backend development in 2025. Its adaptability to trends like serverless architecture, microservices, and AI integration makes it a prime technology for building future-ready applications. By leveraging the power of Node.js developers, businesses can develop scalable, efficient, and intelligent solutions to stay ahead in the digital landscape.
0 notes