#Food Safety Testing Market Reports

[ananya5400]

The food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market is experiencing significant global growth due to growing concerns about food safety and its impact on consumer health. Stricter regulations and high-profile foodborne illness outbreaks have increased public awareness, driving the demand for advanced testing solutions.

[supriyab]

The food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market is estimated to be valued at USD 7.4 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 10.4 billion by 2028, at a CAGR of 7.1% from 2023 to 2028.

[foodagriculturenews]

The food pathogen testing market size is predicted to grow at a CAGR of 8.4% between 2023 and 2028, reaching a value of $22.7 billion by 2028 from a projection of $15.1 billion in 2023.

[mariacallous]

"I’m going to let him go wild on health,” former president Donald Trump said of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at his Madison Square Garden rally in New York City this past weekend. “I’m going to let him go wild on the food. I’m going to let him go wild on the medicines.”

Kennedy, a former Democrat, suspended his presidential campaign in August and endorsed Trump. He has since launched the Make America Healthy Again campaign, an initiative focused on tackling chronic diseases that Trump has seemingly embraced in recent weeks. Given Kennedy’s anti-vaccination stance and conspiratorial leanings, some policy experts and former government officials are concerned about how his views could shape the nation’s health agenda.

Kennedy has long made false statements about the safety of vaccines and has touted disproven treatments for Covid-19, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. On the campaign trail, he has railed against seed oils, blaming several chronic health conditions on their presence in processed foods.

How much influence Kennedy could have on national health policy will all depend on his role within a future Trump administration. Trump did not clarify his remarks at Sunday’s event, including what position he is considering Kennedy for. According to a CNN report that ran late Tuesday, Kennedy said Trump “promised him control of the public health agencies,” but in an email to WIRED on Wednesday, Steven Cheung, Trump’s campaign communications director, said that formal discussions of who will serve in a second Trump administration are premature.

Trump could be considering Kennedy to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, which has 80,000 federal employees, or one of the agencies within it, such as the Food and Drug Administration or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It would be a departure from his previous top health picks, who had lengthy government or public health careers. For instance, Alex Azar, Trump’s HHS secretary, was deputy HHS secretary under George W. Bush and an executive at drugmaker Eli Lilly. Scott Gottlieb, a physician and investor appointed as FDA commissioner under Trump, had previously worked for the FDA and had served on the boards of pharma and biotech companies.

When asked to elaborate on Kennedy’s health priorities, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, the former candidate’s campaign director and daughter-in-law, told WIRED: “Bobby aims to end conflicts and corruption at the agencies, ensure all testing is undertaken by scientists who have no financial interest in the outcome, and all results of all trials are released to the public. The free market will take care of it from there.” (The National Institutes of Health already requires results of clinical trials funded by the agency to be published to a government database.)

Jerome Adams, US surgeon general under Trump and current executive director of health equity initiatives at Purdue University, says that even if Kennedy were tapped to lead HHS, the FDA, or the CDC, it’s unlikely that he would ascend to one of those roles due to his lack of medical training and controversial views on public health issues. “Congressional approval is required for these positions, and his stances could be a barrier,” Adams says.

If Republicans control the Senate after next week’s election, though, that calculus could change. “The GOP has generally fallen into line in terms of supporting candidates that President Trump does,” says Genevieve Kanter, associate professor of public policy at the University of Southern California.

If chosen to be FDA commissioner, Kennedy would control the agency’s budget and priorities and could have a sizable impact by installing lower-level appointees who are sympathetic to his worldview. While the FDA commissioner does not single-handedly approve or authorize new drugs, Kantner says outside political pressure can certainly influence that process. Kennedy could also appoint members to FDA advisory committees, panels of outside experts that make recommendations to the agency on drug approvals and other regulatory matters. The FDA often follows the recommendations of advisory committees when making decisions on new drug approvals, but not always.

The FDA can also choose to not enforce some rules in certain circumstances—what’s known as enforcement discretion. Given his support for dubious and unproven therapies, such as stem cells and hyperbaric oxygen, an FDA under Kennedy, for instance, could choose to not go after companies that market unapproved treatments.

“When we think of the kind of person we want to be head of HHS or be FDA commissioner, someone ‘going wild’ isn’t exactly the first trait that comes to mind,” Kanter says. “It wouldn’t ease the public’s concern that we would see more food safety incidents and adverse events from poorly regulated drugs and devices from a lax administration that is known for embracing unscientific theories.”

Kennedy wouldn’t have free rein though. Existing laws and regulations govern how the agency works, and a new FDA commissioner wouldn’t be able to get rid of those quickly. “If you’re dealing with regulatory issues that have been long-standing and have lots of precedent, it’s just not possible to turn some of those things around or dismiss them overnight,” says a past leader of the FDA, who requested anonymity so that they could speak freely.

Likewise, even in a leadership role at HHS or the CDC, Kennedy wouldn’t be able to easily affect vaccine policy. Vaccine recommendations are made by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which comprises outside medical and public health experts. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, says Kennedy could try to stack that advisory committee with people who are sympathetic to his views on vaccination, but those members are chosen through a rigorous nomination process.

“He could certainly change policy that way, but it takes a while and it won't be a secret. There are ways in which the public can push back, including taking a case to court,” he says.

Kennendy could have influence in other ways beyond direct control of a public health agency. Trump could potentially bring Kennedy on as a White House adviser, which wouldn’t require approval by the Senate.

“Without congressional vetting and oversight, there is potential for unchecked impact. RFK's views could shape health policies, raising concerns about misinformation and harm,” Adams says.

Karoline Leavitt, national press secretary for the Trump campaign, told WIRED in an email that if reelected, Trump will establish a “special Presidential Commission of independent minds and will charge them with investigating what is causing the decades-long increase in chronic illnesses.” She did not say whether Kennedy would be chosen for that task force.

Kennedy has also been sizing himself up for another position in a potential Trump cabinet: agriculture secretary. A longtime environmental activist, Kennedy has promised to take on big farms and feedlots, reduce pesticides, and fix what he presents as a food system captured by corporate interests. “When Donald Trump gets me inside,” Kennedy said in a video shot outside the Department of Agriculture headquarters in Washington, DC, “it won’t be that way any more.”

This platform is a continuation of Kennedy’s long history as an antagonist against the agriculture industry. In 2018, Kennedy and a team of attorneys won an initial $289 million settlement against Monsanto, representing a groundskeeper who developed cancer after being soaked with a herbicide made by the agrochemical firm. He also attempted to sue the pig farming company Smithfield because of its production of hog manure, although that case was thrown out by a federal judge.

Kennedy’s past makes him an unlikely candidate for agriculture secretary, according to Daniel Glickman, who served in the role during Bill Clinton’s presidency. “It’s hard for me to imagine, given Trump’s traditional base in the heartlands, that he would pick somebody who was an advocate for breaking up large farms and breaking consolidated agriculture,” says Glickman.

Like top posts at HHS, the USDA secretary position would need to be confirmed by a Senate vote. “I don’t think [Kennedy] is a slam dunk,” says Glickman.

Trump’s pick for USDA chief during his first term was Sonny Perdue, a former governor of Georgia and founder of an agricultural trading company. Most agriculture secretaries either have a background in the industry or politics—two crucial constituencies for the person who will be in charge of a department that employs nearly 100,000 and is made up of 29 agencies, including forestry, conservation, and nutrition programs. “The difference between Sonny Perdue and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is like night and day,” says Glickman.

If Kennedy were to be confirmed as agriculture secretary, he might struggle to enact the most radical parts of his program. He is an outspoken critic of pesticides, but the USDA is generally not in charge of regulating those, says Dan Blaustein-Rejto, director of agriculture policy and research at the Breakthrough Institute. Rather, the EPA regulates pesticides with public health uses.

Although he may not be able to directly influence pesticide regulations, Kennedy has said he would try to “weaponize” other agencies against “chemical agriculture” by commissioning scientific research into the effects of pesticides. The USDA Agricultural Research Service has a nearly $2 billion discretionary budget for research into crops, livestocks, nutrition, food safety, and natural resources conservation.

There are other levers that an agriculture secretary could pull, says Blaustein-Rejto. The USDA is investing $3 billion through the partnership for climate-smart commodities—a scheme that’s supposed to make US agriculture more climate-friendly. A USDA chief might be able to put their thumb on their scale by influencing the selection criteria for these kinds of programs. The USDA also oversees the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), which has a $5 billion fund that it uses to support farm incomes and conservation programs, and to assist farmers hit by natural disasters. It’s possible that a USDA chief could influence how these CCC funds are distributed by the agency.

Kennedy has also argued that corporate interests have captured the US’s dietary guidelines, and he pledged to remove conflicts of interest from USDA groups that come up with dietary guidelines. US dietary guidelines are developed jointly by the USDA and HHS and are updated every five years, giving the agriculture secretary limited opportunities to influence any recommendations.

“If RFK is in a high-level policy role, I expect to see a lot more talk about ultra-processed foods, but I’m not sure what that would actually entail when it comes to the dietary guidelines,” says Blaustein-Rejto.

The experts WIRED spoke with largely think Kennedy’s more extreme positions will likely be constrained by bureaucracy. But the message that elevating a vocal vaccine skeptic and conspiracy theorist would send remains a serious concern ahead of a potential second Trump administration.

[killed-by-choice]

“Sadie Roe,” 24 (USA 2013)

“Sadie” died after undergoing a chemical abortion. Her death was counted in the FDA Adverse Event Summary for the mifepristone/misoprostol abortion regimen, but despite investigation, it is still unknown which of her complications caused her death.

Sadie was 24 and had no known health problems. On or about August 15, 2013, she underwent the abortion. She began to feel sick afterwards and went to a doctor, who prescribed an antibiotic. It is unknown what kind of infection the doctor had diagnosed.

On August 20, someone found Sadie’s dead body. An autopsy was conducted to try to find out how a young woman went from healthy to dead in five days.

The autopsy results came back with a mystery. Although traces of cannabinoids and ibuprofen (most likely Sadie’s attempt to treat her pain) were detected, both were so inconsequential that the toxicology report cleared her as negative. Neither drug was in a concentration that could have killed her. Many people had already died of sepsis caused by Clostridium bacteria, so tissue samples were sent to the CDC for testing. The samples came back negative for the species tested.

However, several life-threatening problems were found at Sadie’s autopsy. She had retained part of the placenta from the abortion, which is a serious complication that risks infection. Her organs were damaged; she suffered “acute visceral and pulmonary congestion and edema.” Microbiology testing had come back negative for the Clostridium strain that had been investigated, but after less than a day the cultures grew streptococcus viridans.

So which of these killed Sadie? The coroner initially listed “unspecified natural causes,” but the CDC analyzed her case and tried to determine what the cause of death was. They finally concluded that the cause of death was undetermined, but included her in the count of pregnant people who died after chemical abortion.

Years later, six doctors reviewed Sadie’s case. They found the confirmation of retained placenta, her symptoms and the Streptococcal species in her lab cultures to be indicative of sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Viridans group streptococci can cause life-threatening infections and had been reported to have antibiotic-resistant strains, so this is also consistent with the Azithromycin prescription.

While we still do not have a definite answer on the precise cause of Sadie’s death (and sadly, we may never be sure), it can be assumed beyond reasonable doubt that side effects of the abortion played a highly significant role.

Individual Case Safety Report number 9587011-03-00-01, Danco Laboratories, LLC. Office of Post-marketing Drug Risk Assessment, Food and Drug Administration.

https://www.fda.gov/media/154941/download

[meret118]

Tainted CPAP machines and ventilators went to children, the elderly and at least 700,000 veterans despite internal warnings. Company insiders said the devices posed an “unacceptable” risk.

The first complaints landed at the offices of Philips Respironics in 2010, soon after the company made a fateful decision to redesign its bestselling breathing machines used in homes and hospitals around the world.To silence the irritating rattle that kept users awake at night, Philips packed the devices with an industrial foam — the same kind used in sofas and mattresses. It quickly became clear that something had gone terribly wrong.

The reports coming into Philips described “black particles” or “dirt and dust” inside machines that pump air to those who struggle to breathe. One noted an “oily-like” substance. Others simply warned of “contamination.”

Yet Philips withheld the vast majority of the warnings from the Food and Drug Administration, even as their numbers grew from dozens to hundreds to thousands and became more alarming each year.

. . .

Instead, as the complaints continued to pile up in company files, Philips waged aggressive global marketing campaigns to sell more machines, including new models fitted with the hazardous foam.The sales pitch worked: The devices went to infants, the elderly and at least 700,000 veterans. The company also promoted machines meant for some of the sickest people in the country, rolling out a new ventilator filled with the foam in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

. . .

All the while, people using Philips machines were suffering from illnesses that no one could explain: vomiting, dizziness and headaches, along with newly diagnosed cancers of the lungs, throat, sinuses and esophagus. One man in Philadelphia coughed so hard that he broke his ribs, and a Florida woman with a hacking cough was hospitalized for days and placed on oxygen.

. . .

Studies published in scholarly journals showed the foam broke apart in heat and moisture. The company used it anyway, even though the machines send air for hours at a time into the lungs of users.

. . .

As news of the problem spread, customers and others stepped forward by the thousands, describing emergency room visits and sudden illnesses in reports submitted to Philips and the government. The reports detailed nearly 2,000 cases of cancer, 600 liver and kidney illnesses and 17,000 respiratory ailments.

. . .

The company acknowledges that the foam tested positive for genotoxicity — its own experts described “uncontrolled cellular replication” — but said that a third-party assessment still concluded the machines are unlikely to cause harm.

The three experts consulted by the news organizations said that’s not possible. While safety thresholds for chemical emissions vary and findings can be open to interpretation, genotoxicity means that one or more chemicals are changing cells, the building blocks of the human body.

“You can’t make the argument that it’s safe. That’s bad science,” said the engineer familiar with the Philips testing. “It’s a real-life failure that shows you have a problem. There’s no ambiguity. There is unacceptable risk. Full stop.”

The company’s ventilators also tested positive for genotoxicity; Philips said the devices are still being assessed.

. . .

More details about the health risks are expected to emerge through the ongoing federal lawsuits in Pittsburgh. Earlier this month, the company reached a settlement in one of the cases, agreeing to pay at least $479 million to reimburse customers and others for the costs of the defective machines.

Other legal challenges are still ongoing, including more than 600 personal injury claims and a class-action suit seeking ongoing medical monitoring and research on the dangers posed by the devices.

------

They knew the foam would break down when they decided to use it. Tests within the company after complaints came in showed how dangerous the devices were, but they refused to even change the design for new sales, much less recall the old ones. For every official complaint, how many more people were harmed that weren't reported?

They didn't recall them until 3,700 official complaints had been made. Until after they sold over 5 million life-threatening machines. There's no way to know how many people they killed.

If they think the products are so great, then they won't mind being forced to use them.

Companies will keep doing this until the financial cost of hurting people is greater than the profits from doing so.

Trigger warning for disturbing medical details, descriptions of suffering, and an image of a permanent feeding tube, in the article.

[spooniestrong]

Why you should avoid kava and 9 other risky dietary supplements

One-third of Americans say they believe supplements have been tested by the Food and Drug Administration for safety, according to a 2022 nationally representative survey by Consumer Reports of 3,070 adults in the United States. But the FDA doesn’t approve or test the safety or effectiveness of any supplement before it enters the U.S. market.

After consulting with a panel of doctors and researchers, Consumer Reports says you should avoid these 10 risky supplements. In general, risk increases the larger the dosage and the longer the supplement is taken. Also beware of illegal or unapproved drug ingredients, such as tianeptine, methylsynephrine and phenibut.

Chaparral

Also called: creosote bush, greasewood, Larrea divaricata, Larrea tridentata, larreastat

Claimed benefits: weight loss; eases inflammation; treats colds, infections, rashes, cancers

Potential harms: kidney problems, liver damage

Coltsfoot

Also called: coughwort, Farfarae folium leaf, foalswort, Tussilago farfara

Claimed benefits: relieves cough, sore throat, laryngitis, bronchitis, asthma

Potential harms: liver damage, possible carcinogen

Comfrey

Also called: blackwort, bruisewort, slippery root, Symphytum officinale

Claimed benefits: relieves cough, heavy menstrual periods, stomach problems, chest pain; treats cancer

Potential harms: liver damage, cancer

Germander

Also called: Teucrium chamaedrys, Teucrium viscidum

Claimed benefits: weight loss; alleviates fever, arthritis, gout, stomach problems

Potential harms: liver damage, hepatitis

Greater celandine

Also called: celandine, Chelidonium majus

Claimed benefits: alleviates stomach ache

Potential harms: liver damage

Kava

Also called: ava pepper, kava kava, Piper methysticum

Claimed benefits: eases anxiety, helps sleep

Potential harms: liver damage, exacerbates Parkinson’s disease and depression, impairs driving

Lobelia

Also called: asthma weed, Lobelia inflata, vomit wort, wild tobacco

Claimed benefits: helps respiratory problems, smoking cessation

Potential harms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, tremors, rapid heartbeat, confusion, seizures, hypothermia, coma

Pennyroyal oil

Also called: Hedeoma pulegioides, Mentha pulegium

Claimed benefits: improves breathing problems, digestive disorders

Potential harms: liver and kidney failure, nerve damage, convulsions

Usnic acid

Also called: beard moss, tree moss, usnea

Claimed benefits: weight loss, pain relief

Potential harms: liver injury

Yohimbe

Also called: Johimbi, Pausinystalia yohimbe, yohimbine, Corynanthe johimbi

Claimed benefits: treats low libido and erectile dysfunction, depression, obesity

Potential harms: raises blood pressure; causes rapid heart rate, headaches, seizures, liver and kidney problems, heart problems, panic attacks

Source: Consumer Reports Inc.

Consumer Reports is an independent, nonprofit organization that works side by side with consumers to create a fairer, safer, and healthier world. CR does not endorse products or services, and does not accept advertising. Read more at ConsumerReports.org.

[ausetkmt]

Food Poisoning Bulletin: Consumer Reports Finds Lead and Cadmium in Dark Chocolate

Food Poisoning Bulletin: Consumer Reports Finds Lead and Cadmium in Dark Chocolate.

Consumer Reports has found high levels of lead and cadmium in some dark chocolate candy brands. A study conducted by As You Sow found that many popular brands contain alarming levels of those heavy metals.

Consumer Reports Finds Lead and Cadmium in Dark Chocolate

Most people believe that dark chocolate is healthier than milk chocolate. And it may improve heart health. But this information may make some people rethink that assumption. Lead can cause significant health problems, including cancer, and it can reduce IQ and cause learning disabilities in children. Cadmium causes damage to reproductive organs, and can also damage the liver, kidneys, and bones.

As You Sow has filed legal notices with more than 20 companies that make these dark chocolate candies, including Hershey’s, Trader Joe’s, Lindt, Whole Foods, Kroger, Godiva, See’s Candies, Mars, Equal Exchange, Ghirardelli, Chocolove, and Kroger.

Consumer Reports found heavy metals in all 28 dark chocolate bars that they tested. For 23 of those chocolate bars, eating just one ounce a day would put an adult over a level that public health officials say could be harmful. Five of the bars were above the levels for both radium and lead.

The problem is that cacao plants take up cadmium from the soil when they grow. Lead contaminates the cocoa beans after they are harvested. When the beans were picked and removed from pods, the lead levels decreased, but when they were dried in the sun, they were re-contaminated.

Tunde Akinleye, the Consumer Reports food safety researcher who led this testing project said inn a statement, “While most people don’t eat chocolate every day, 15 percent do, according to the market research firm Mintel. Even if you aren’t a frequent consumer of chocolate, lead and cadmium can still be a concern.” Akinleye adds that because some companies can make bars without those high levels of heavy metals, they can do more of it.

The chocolate bars that were high in both lead and cadmium were Trader Joe’s The Dark Chocolate Lover’s Chocolate with 85% Cacao, Theo Organic Pure Dark 70% Cocoa, Theo Organic Extra Dark Pure Dark Chocolate 85% Cocoa, Lily’s Extremely Dark Chocolate 85% Cocoa, and Green & Black’s Organic Dark Chocolate 70% Cacao.

Chocolates such as Dove Promises Deeper Dark Chocolate 70% Cocoa were high in cadmium, while Godiva Signature Dark Chocolate 72% Cocoa was high in lead. You can see all of the tested chocolates and the results on the Consumer Reports site.

The safer choices include Mast Organic Dark Chocolate 80% Cocoa, Ghirardelli Intense Dark Chocolate 86% Cacao, and Valrhona Abinao Dark Chocolate 85% Cacao, among others.

[best-testing-lab-uae]

Top Migration Testing Labs in the UAE: Key Features and Services | +971 554747210

The UAE has established itself as a global trade hub, with food exports playing a vital role in its economy. Ensuring the safety and compliance of food packaging is crucial, and this is where migration testing labs step in. These labs ensure that packaging materials meet international standards by testing for the migration of harmful substances into food.

This blog highlights the top migration testing lab in the UAE, their key features, and the comprehensive services they offer to meet the growing demands of safety and compliance.

Why Migration Testing is Crucial

Migration testing ensures that food packaging materials are safe and compliant with local and international regulations. The primary objectives include:

Protecting Consumer Health: Preventing harmful chemicals like BPA, phthalates, and heavy metals from leaching into food.

Meeting Regulatory Standards: Ensuring compliance with global safety standards, such as those set by the EU, FDA, and ISO.

Facilitating Market Access: Allowing UAE exporters to tap into international markets without regulatory barriers.

Criteria for Top Migration Testing Labs

Before diving into the list of top labs, it’s essential to understand the key features that define a leading migration testing lab:

Accreditations: ISO 17025 accreditation ensures the lab adheres to global testing standards.

Advanced Equipment: State-of-the-art analytical tools, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), ensure accurate results.

Regulatory Expertise: Knowledge of international food packaging regulations like EU Regulation 10/2011, FDA standards, and others.

Custom Testing Solutions: Ability to test diverse packaging materials and simulate various real-world conditions.

Sustainability Focus: Expertise in testing sustainable and eco-friendly packaging materials.

Top Migration Testing Labs in the UAE

1. METS Laboratories

METS Laboratories is one of the leading names in migration testing in the UAE, offering a comprehensive range of services to food packaging manufacturers and exporters.

Key Features:

ISO 17025 Accredited: Ensures reliability and compliance with international standards.

Cutting-Edge Technology: Equipped with advanced instruments like GC-MS and LC-MS for precise chemical analysis.

Industry Expertise: Specialized in testing a wide variety of materials, including plastics, metals, and multilayer composites.

Services:

Migration testing for plastic, glass, and metal packaging

Specific migration testing for heavy metals and phthalates

Compliance testing for EU, FDA, and GCC standards

2. Dubai Central Laboratory (DCL)

The Dubai Central Laboratory, under the Dubai Municipality, is a trusted name in material testing, including migration testing.

Key Features:

Government-Backed Facility: Ensures credibility and adherence to UAE-specific regulations.

Sustainability Focus: Offers testing for eco-friendly and recyclable materials.

Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed analysis and compliance certificates.

Services:

Migration testing for food-contact materials

Shelf-life analysis under UAE’s climatic conditions

Testing of adhesives, coatings, and printing inks

3. Emirates Industrial Laboratory (EIL)

EIL provides specialized testing services for various industries, including food packaging.

Key Features:

Multi-Industry Expertise: Serves the food, pharmaceutical, and construction sectors.

Tailored Solutions: Customizable testing services to meet client-specific needs.

High-Throughput Capacity: Can handle bulk testing for large-scale manufacturers.

Services:

Overall and specific migration testing

Thermal stability testing for packaging under extreme temperatures

Toxicological risk assessments

4. Eurofins Middle East

Part of the global Eurofins network, this lab offers world-class migration testing services in the UAE.

Key Features:

Global Presence: Access to a vast database of regulatory requirements across countries.

Innovative Techniques: Employs non-destructive testing methods to preserve sample integrity.

Regulatory Expertise: Specializes in EU and US FDA compliance testing.

Services:

Migration testing for plastics, paper, and biodegradable materials

Testing for packaging used in acidic, fatty, and aqueous food environments

Migration simulation studies

5. TÜV SÜD Middle East

TÜV SÜD is a globally recognized certification body offering reliable migration testing services in the UAE.

Key Features:

Trusted Brand: Known for its rigorous testing protocols.

Quality Assurance: Provides end-to-end testing and certification services.

Eco-Friendly Solutions: Supports businesses adopting sustainable packaging.

Services:

Overall migration testing for polymers and coatings

Evaluation of packaging under high-temperature conditions

Safety testing for innovative materials like edible films

Comprehensive Services Offered by UAE Migration Testing Labs

1. Overall and Specific Migration Testing

Detects the migration of total substances or specific harmful chemicals into food.

Essential for compliance with EU Regulation 10/2011 and other global standards.

2. Material Compatibility Testing

Evaluates the interaction between food and packaging under various storage and transportation conditions.

3. Chemical Risk Assessment

Identifies potential health risks associated with the packaging material.

Offers recommendations for safer alternatives.

4. Shelf-Life Testing

Simulates long-term storage conditions to predict packaging performance over time.

5. Sustainable Packaging Testing

Focuses on eco-friendly materials like biodegradable plastics and recycled paper.

The Role of Migration Testing Labs in the UAE’s Food Industry

Migration testing labs in the UAE play a pivotal role in the food export industry by:

Ensuring Food Safety: Protecting consumers from harmful substances.

Boosting Trade Opportunities: Enabling compliance with diverse international standards.

Supporting Sustainability Goals: Encouraging the use of environmentally friendly packaging materials.

Enhancing Brand Trust: Certifying that products meet the highest safety and quality standards.

Future Trends in Migration Testing

The migration testing industry in the UAE is evolving to meet the demands of a dynamic global market. Key trends include:

Digital Transformation: Adoption of AI-driven tools for faster and more accurate testing.

Focus on Circular Economy: Testing labs are supporting initiatives for reusable and recyclable packaging materials.

Regulatory Updates: Labs are staying ahead of changing global regulations to ensure compliance.

Conclusion

As the UAE strengthens its position as a global food export leader, migration testing labs are instrumental in maintaining product safety and compliance. From METS Laboratories to TÜV SÜD Middle East, these labs offer state-of-the-art services to meet the diverse needs of food packaging manufacturers and exporters.

Investing in reliable migration testing not only ensures compliance with international standards but also protects consumer health and enhances the reputation of UAE-made food products in the global market. Choose a trusted migration testing lab today to ensure your packaging meets the highest safety standards and unlocks opportunities for international success.

[ananya5400]

Food Pathogen Safety Testing Equipment and Supplies Market Growth by Emerging Trends, Analysis, & Forecast

The food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market is estimated to be valued at USD 7.4 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 10.4 billion by 2028, at a CAGR of 7.1% from 2023 to 2028. The food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market is experiencing significant global growth due to growing concerns about food safety and its impact on consumer health. Stricter regulations and high-profile foodborne illness outbreaks have increased public awareness, driving the demand for advanced testing solutions. The European region's food industry, known for its strict food safety regulations, demands robust testing procedures to maintain the integrity of its food supply chain. As the food industry expands, the risk of contamination increases, prompting food manufacturers and suppliers to invest in advanced testing technologies. Advancements in testing technology, such as PCR and NGS, have revolutionized the field of food pathogen safety testing, enabling rapid and accurate detection of pathogens. Consumer awareness and demand for safe food products are driving market growth in Europe, with consumers willing to pay a premium for products with higher safety standards. Supportive government initiatives, financial backing, and infrastructure upgrades encourage businesses to adopt modern testing methodologies, leading to market expansion.

Download PDF Brochure:  https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/pdfdownloadNew.asp?id=211750412

Based on food tested, the meat & poultry sub-segment is estimated to account for the largest market share of the food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market.

The meat & poultry segment has established its dominance in the food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market. This prominent position can be attributed to the unique characteristics of meat and poultry products, which make them highly susceptible to pathogen contamination. Their high protein content and moisture levels create an optimal environment for microbial growth, necessitating stringent testing measures to ensure consumer safety.

Due to the significant contribution of meat and poultry to the global food industry and the substantial consumption volumes, the demand for specialized equipment and supplies for pathogen testing remains consistently high. Stringent food safety regulations and the increasing focus of consumers on the quality and safety of food products further bolster the need for thorough testing in this segment. Regular pathogen testing not only prevents potential outbreaks and foodborne illnesses but also protects the reputation of food producers and maintains consumer confidence in the safety of meat and poultry products.

Based on site, the outsourcing facilities sub-segment is anticipated to dominate as well as grow at the highest CAGR in the food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market.

Food producers are increasingly requesting rapid testing technology to speed up results and speed up supply chain operations. Additionally, compared to conventional technology, quick procedures have improved accuracy, sensitivity, and the capacity to test a wide range of pollutants while concurrently generating accurate results. For instance, a new technology that can create and instantly dispense culture media for use in microbiological food testing was introduced by Millipore Sigma, a US, and Canadian-based Life Science business unit of the chemical corporation Merck KGaA, in April 2022. The newly developed technology, known as the ReadyStream system, offers producers increased testing effectiveness and does away with the standard microbiological testing process' five steps.

Request Sample Pages: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/requestsampleNew.asp?id=211750412

Asia Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR in the food pathogen safety testing equipment and supplies market.

With the region’s vast population, rapid urbanization, and increasing disposable incomes, there is a growing demand for safe and high-quality food products, prompting the food industry to invest in advanced pathogen safety testing equipment to comply with stringent regulations and ensure consumer trust. Additionally, Asia Pacific countries have been actively working to strengthen their food safety standards, fostering the adoption of advanced testing technologies. The thriving food and beverage industry in the region further fuels the demand for efficient testing methods to monitor and control potential contaminants. Technological advancements and international collaborations have also facilitated the development and dissemination of innovative and cost-effective testing solutions in the region.

[health-views-updates]

Mass Spectrometry Market Trends, Growth & Forecast to 2032

The global Mass Spectrometry Market Revenue is anticipated to experience significant growth from 2024 to 2032, driven by technological advancements, increasing demand in healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors, and expanding applications across diverse industries. This growth underscores the importance of mass spectrometry as a key analytical tool for accurate molecular analysis, enabling innovations in drug discovery, proteomics, and environmental testing.

Mass spectrometry has emerged as a versatile technology, finding widespread adoption in healthcare, biotechnology, and environmental sciences. Its ability to provide precise and comprehensive molecular data has enhanced its utility in diagnosing diseases, quality control in pharmaceutical production, and monitoring pollutants. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning is expected to boost the accuracy and efficiency of mass spectrometry systems, further expanding its potential applications.

Market growth is also fueled by strategic collaborations and investments in research and development. Governments and private organizations are increasingly recognizing the role of mass spectrometry in addressing global challenges, such as combating antimicrobial resistance and ensuring food safety. Furthermore, miniaturized and portable mass spectrometry devices are gaining traction, offering real-time analysis capabilities in remote and field settings.

Get Free Sample Report @ https://www.snsinsider.com/sample-request/3835

Key factors contributing to the market's growth include rising demand for high-throughput analytical techniques, advancements in instrumentation, and the increasing importance of personalized medicine. As the need for reliable, high-resolution analytical tools intensifies, the mass spectrometry market is set to witness sustained momentum over the forecast period.

Report Highlights:

Market Size and Trends: Detailed insights into market dynamics, including emerging trends and growth opportunities across various regions.

Technological Advancements: Analysis of cutting-edge innovations transforming mass spectrometry, such as hybrid systems and enhanced data interpretation algorithms.

Applications: A deep dive into the expanding uses of mass spectrometry in healthcare, forensics, food safety, and environmental monitoring.

Competitive Landscape: Comprehensive evaluation of key players and their strategies to maintain market dominance.

Regional Insights

The report highlights regional growth trends, with North America and Europe leading due to strong R&D investments and established pharmaceutical sectors. Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region is anticipated to witness rapid growth, driven by burgeoning biotechnology industries and increasing healthcare expenditures in emerging economies.

About Us

SNS Insider is one of the leading market research and consulting agencies that dominates the market research industry globally. Our company's aim is to give clients the knowledge they require in order to function in changing circumstances. In order to give you current, accurate market data, consumer insights, and opinions so that you can make decisions with confidence, we employ a variety of techniques, including surveys, video talks, and focus groups around the world.

Contact Us: Akash Anand – Head of Business Development & Strategy Email: info@snsinsider.com Phone: +1-415-230-0044 (US) | +91-7798602273 (IND)

[insightfulblogz]

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Market Size, Latest Trends, Share, Growth Analysis, and Forecast 2032

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has become a gold standard in analytical chemistry, offering unmatched precision and versatility in separating, identifying, and quantifying chemical compounds. Widely utilized across industries, HPLC supports applications in pharmaceuticals, environmental testing, food safety, and biotechnology. With its ability to analyze complex mixtures and detect minute impurities, HPLC is a cornerstone of quality control and research, ensuring compliance with stringent regulatory standards.

The High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Market size was valued at USD 4.8 billion in 2023 and is expected to grow to USD 7.83 billion by 2031 and grow at a CAGR of 6.30% over the forecast period of 2024-2031.

Future Scope

The future of HPLC is closely tied to advancements in miniaturization, automation, and green technologies. Researchers are developing portable HPLC systems to enable on-site testing in fields such as environmental monitoring and clinical diagnostics. Efforts to reduce solvent consumption and adopt eco-friendly alternatives align with sustainability goals. Additionally, the integration of AI and machine learning is enhancing data analysis, improving efficiency and accuracy in chromatographic workflows.

Emerging Trends

Recent trends in HPLC include the adoption of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) for faster and more efficient separations. Innovations in column technology, such as sub-2-micron particle size materials, are improving resolution and sensitivity. Hybrid systems that combine HPLC with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) are gaining traction for advanced applications, including proteomics and metabolomics. Automated sample preparation and remote monitoring capabilities are further streamlining laboratory operations.

Applications

HPLC is indispensable in drug development and quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry. It is extensively used for detecting contaminants and ensuring compliance in food and beverage production. Environmental testing relies on HPLC to monitor pollutants in air, water, and soil. In clinical diagnostics, it facilitates the analysis of biomarkers, enabling early disease detection and monitoring. Its applications extend to forensic science and material analysis, showcasing its versatility.

Key Points

HPLC is a precise analytical tool for separating and identifying compounds.

It is used across pharmaceuticals, food safety, and environmental testing.

Future innovations include portable systems and green technologies.

Trends emphasize UHPLC, hybrid systems, and AI-driven workflows.

Applications range from drug development to biomarker analysis.

Conclusion

High-performance liquid chromatography continues to evolve, meeting the growing demands of diverse industries with its precision and adaptability. As technology advances, HPLC is becoming more efficient, sustainable, and accessible, enabling breakthroughs in research and quality control. Its pivotal role in ensuring safety and compliance underscores its importance in modern science, solidifying its place as an essential analytical tool.

Read More Details: https://www.snsinsider.com/reports/high-performance-liquid-chromatography-market-3083 

Contact Us:

Akash Anand — Head of Business Development & Strategy

Email: info@snsinsider.com

Phone: +1–415–230–0044 (US) | +91–7798602273 (IND) 

[testing-services]

How Water Testing Labs in India Help Businesses in the Food and Beverage Industry Comply with Water Quality Standards

Water is one of the most essential ingredients in the food and beverage industry. From soft drinks and bottled water to sauces, dairy products, and prepared foods, the quality of water directly affects the taste, texture, safety, and overall quality of the final product. For businesses in the food and beverage industry, ensuring that the water used in production meets strict safety standards is not just important—it’s crucial. Contaminated water can lead to product recalls, regulatory fines, consumer health risks, and a damaged reputation.

This is where water testing labs in India play a vital role. Water testing laboratories ensure that water used in food and beverage production meets the required quality standards by testing for a wide range of physical, chemical, and microbiological parameters. They help businesses comply with local regulations, international standards, and internal quality control procedures.

In this blog, we will explore how water testing labs in India help businesses in the food and beverage industry comply with water quality standards, ensuring safe, high-quality products that meet consumer expectations and regulatory requirements.

1. Ensuring Compliance with National and International Standards

The food and beverage industry in India is heavily regulated to ensure public health and safety. Several national and international standards govern water quality in food production. For example, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) sets specific water quality requirements for food and beverage companies, ensuring that water used in production is free from harmful contaminants.

Water testing labs help businesses comply with these standards by providing accurate testing for various parameters such as:

Microbiological contaminants: Including bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, and Vibrio cholerae, which can cause foodborne illnesses.

Chemical contaminants: Such as chlorine, heavy metals (e.g., lead, mercury), pesticides, and other toxic substances that can be harmful to consumers.

Physical parameters: Such as turbidity, color, odor, and pH level, which affect water’s suitability for use in production processes.

By conducting regular water quality tests and providing detailed reports, water testing labs ensure that food and beverage companies comply with FSSAI regulations and other national standards. In addition, for companies exporting products, compliance with international standards such as those from the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and ISO 22000 is crucial. Testing labs help businesses meet these global standards, ensuring the quality of their products for international markets.

2. Maintaining Consistent Water Quality for Production

Water quality consistency is critical for food and beverage production. Even minor variations in water quality can affect the production process and, ultimately, the taste and safety of the products. For example, water used in brewing must have a specific composition to produce the desired flavor profile. Similarly, water used in bottling must be free from impurities that could affect the taste or appearance of the product.

Water testing labs help businesses maintain consistent water quality by regularly testing the water used in production. By identifying potential issues such as changes in pH, hardness, or the presence of chlorine, testing labs allow businesses to take corrective action before these issues impact the final product.

In industries such as dairy, beverage manufacturing, and bakery, where water plays a crucial role in production processes, maintaining consistent water quality helps ensure that products are produced to the same high standards every time. Water testing labs provide businesses with valuable data, helping them monitor and control water quality throughout production.

3. Protecting Consumer Health and Safety

The health and safety of consumers are paramount in the food and beverage industry. Contaminated water can introduce harmful pathogens and chemicals into food products, leading to serious health risks. For instance, if the water used in beverage production is contaminated with harmful bacteria or heavy metals, consumers may experience foodborne illnesses or poisoning, leading to product recalls, lawsuits, and significant brand damage.

Water testing labs help protect consumer health by testing for a wide range of contaminants that could be present in water used in food and beverage production. These labs perform tests to detect:

Microbial contamination: Bacteria like E. coli, Salmonella, and other pathogens that can cause foodborne illnesses.

Heavy metals: Contaminants like lead, cadmium, and arsenic that can pose serious health risks, especially if they accumulate over time.

Chemicals: Including pesticides and industrial pollutants that can affect water quality.

By identifying contaminants early through regular water testing, water testing labs help businesses ensure that their products are safe for consumption. This is especially important for products such as bottled water, juices, and dairy products, where water is a key ingredient and directly impacts consumer health.

4. Enhancing Product Quality and Consistency

In the food and beverage industry, consistency is key to maintaining product quality. Consumers expect the same taste, texture, and appearance each time they purchase a product. Any deviation in the water quality used in production can lead to inconsistent product quality, which could affect the consumer experience and lead to dissatisfaction.

For example, in the beverage industry, the presence of chlorine in water can alter the taste of the final product, while hard water can cause scaling in equipment, affecting production efficiency and product consistency. Water testing labs help businesses monitor water quality parameters, such as TDS (Total Dissolved Solids), pH levels, and hardness, to ensure that they remain within acceptable ranges.

By working with water testing labs, businesses can optimize water quality to produce consistent, high-quality products. This consistency is vital for maintaining brand reputation, meeting consumer expectations, and staying competitive in the market.

5. Cost-Efficiency Through Water Treatment Recommendations

Water quality issues, if not addressed promptly, can lead to costly equipment damage, production delays, and regulatory penalties. For instance, hard water can cause scaling in pipes, boilers, and machinery, leading to frequent breakdowns and increased maintenance costs. Similarly, water with high levels of contaminants may require expensive filtration or treatment systems.

Water testing labs not only help businesses identify water quality issues but also provide recommendations for water treatment. Based on the test results, labs can suggest methods to improve water quality, such as:

Water softening to reduce hardness.

Filtration to remove suspended solids or contaminants.

Disinfection to kill harmful bacteria and pathogens.

By implementing these recommendations, businesses can reduce operational costs, improve production efficiency, and prevent costly repairs and downtime. Water testing labs play a crucial role in helping businesses save money in the long run by optimizing water quality.

6. Supporting Sustainability and Environmental Compliance

Water is a finite resource, and industries must use it responsibly. With growing concerns about water scarcity and environmental sustainability, the food and beverage industry must ensure that its water usage is both efficient and environmentally friendly. Testing water quality helps businesses reduce waste, recycle water, and ensure compliance with environmental regulations.

Water testing labs can also test wastewater to ensure it meets the required standards before being discharged into the environment. By assessing parameters such as BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), and the presence of harmful chemicals, testing labs help businesses ensure that their operations do not harm the environment and comply with local water pollution control regulations.

Conclusion

Water testing labs in India play an essential role in helping businesses in the food and beverage industry comply with water quality standards. From ensuring compliance with national and international regulations to protecting consumer health, enhancing product quality, and supporting sustainability efforts, these labs provide invaluable services that help businesses maintain high standards. By working closely with certified water testing labs, food and beverage companies can safeguard their operations, meet regulatory requirements, and ensure the safety and satisfaction of their consumers. Regular water testing is not just a legal obligation; it is a crucial step in ensuring the long-term success and sustainability of businesses in the food and beverage industry.

[mariacallous]

Today the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in a consequential case that threatens to curb access to medication abortion across the country.

A central issue in the case is the safety of the drug mifepristone, the first in a two-pill regimen used to induce an abortion. The drug blocks a hormone needed for pregnancy and has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration since 2000.

That FDA approval is being challenged by a coalition of antiabortion doctors and activists, the Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, which is asking for the pill to be removed from the market. The group has alleged that mifepristone is dangerous to patients, citing a 2021 study that found higher rates of emergency room visits following medication abortion. However, that study was retracted in February after an independent review found problems with how the authors analyzed and presented the data.

During Tuesday’s arguments, a major line of questioning from justices was about ER visits following mifepristone use and whether the FDA’s loosening of regulations on the drug in recent years has resulted in an increase in these visits.

“I think ER visits are definitely the wrong measure when looking at safety,” says Michael Belmonte, an ob-gyn and fellow at the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. “It’s important to recognize that the vast majority of people that go to the emergency room are going just for reassurance rather than a true safety concern.”

Belmonte says the more important measure is serious adverse events, which are extremely rare with medication abortion. “Adverse events happen with any medication or procedure and, quite frankly, the adverse events that occur with these medications are extremely rare in comparison to things that we use every day,” he says.

Significant adverse events include hospital admission, blood transfusion, infection, and death. A 2013 peer-reviewed study found that, among 233,805 medication abortions provided in 2009 and 2010, these significant adverse events or outcomes were reported in 1,530 cases, less than 1 percent.

“Many women might go [to the ER] because they’re experiencing heavy bleeding, which mimics a miscarriage, and they might just need to know whether or not they’re having a complication,” said US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, who is defending the FDA, in oral arguments on Tuesday.

Belmonte says it’s worth noting that the abortion pill regimen is meant to cause bleeding and cramping. While those effects may be troubling to some patients, it’s a function of the medication and a sign that it’s working. “Mifepristone really just prepares the uterus for evacuation, and so, inherently, mifepristone alone doesn’t tend to cause any bleeding, cramping, or other side effects,” he says. Misoprostol, the second drug used in a medication abortion, is what causes bleeding and cramping.

Ushma Upadhyay, a public health social scientist at the UC San Francisco who studies medication abortion, says many patients who visit an emergency department after a medication abortion are alarmed by the bleeding the medication causes, but that doesn’t mean they’re experiencing a serious adverse event. “When people have a medication abortion they’re experiencing it alone, and they don’t have a provider with them to ask questions,” she says. “People are going to the ER to understand whether the bleeding that they’re experiencing is normal and to assess whether the medications worked.”

She says some patients just want an ultrasound to confirm they are no longer pregnant, since pregnancy hormones stay in the body for several weeks after an abortion, and thus an over-the- counter pregnancy test may not be accurate.

One factor that seems to influence ER visits after a medication abortion is greater distance traveled to obtain that abortion, according to research published by Upadhyay in 2017. She says that’s likely because those patients don’t have an abortion clinic nearby or a reproductive health clinic nearby that they can go to with questions.

“It is rare for a patient to experience even a minor complication from a medication abortion, and the risk of death is so small as to be nearly nonexistent,” wrote Jack Resnick, immediate past president of the American Medical Association, in a March 15 statement. “Continuing a pregnancy poses far greater danger; the risk of death during or after childbirth is approximately 14 times higher than the risk of death from abortion-related complications.”

As of December 2022, the FDA reported that approximately 5.9 million women have used mifepristone in the US for medical termination of pregnancy, and 32 women have died after taking it. The agency cautions that “these events cannot with certainty be causally attributed to mifepristone” because not enough information is known about the patients’ health, care they received, or other drugs they were taking at the time.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court case may hinge not on the question of the drug’s safety but on a technicality called “standing”—that is, whether the plaintiffs are the right party to bring this case to the court. Plaintiffs must show that they are the aggrieved or injured party in order to sue.

The Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine argues that physicians could be harmed by treating patients who suffer adverse health effects after taking mifepristone. Much of the justices’ questioning on Tuesday focused heavily on whether this group had proven such harm. If the justices find that the plaintiffs do not have standing, the case would be dismissed. The court is expected to rule by the end of June.