#Feed Additives Market report

[animal-care]

Exploring Innovations Revolutionizing the Animal Feed Industry

Introduction

The global animal feed market was valued at over USD 460 billion in 2021 and is projected to exceed USD 650 billion by 2028, registering a compound annual growth rate CAGR of 4% during the forecast period. The Animal Feed Market is experiencing dynamic changes driven by evolving consumer preferences, technological advancements, and sustainability initiatives. This in-depth analysis delves into the latest innovations shaping the animal feed industry, providing insights into key trends, opportunities, and challenges for stakeholders.

Innovations Driving the Animal Feed Market:

Alternative Protein Sources:

With the escalating demand for sustainable and plant-based diets, alternative protein sources for animal feed formulations are gaining momentum.

Innovations in insect protein production, algae cultivation, single-cell proteins, and microbial biomass offer sustainable alternatives to conventional protein sources like soybean meal and fishmeal.

These alternative protein sources not only promote environmental sustainability but also provide essential nutrients for animals while reducing reliance on scarce resources.

Precision Nutrition:

Advancements in precision nutrition technologies are reshaping feed formulation and delivery, enabling customized diets tailored to individual animals' specific nutritional requirements.

Technologies such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), metabolomics, and predictive modeling enable real-time monitoring of animal health, performance, and nutrient utilization, leading to more efficient feed management practices.

The precision nutrition segment is anticipated to witness substantial growth, driven by increasing investments in digital technologies and data analytics, with the market expected to surpass USD 3 billion by 2028.

Alternative protein sources are expected to capture a significant market share, with insect protein alone projected to reach USD 1.5 billion by 2028.

Functional Feed Additives:

Functional feed additives, including probiotics, prebiotics, enzymes, organic acids, and botanical extracts, are gaining prominence for their potential to enhance animal health, immunity, and performance.

These additives support gut health, improve nutrient absorption, and mitigate the adverse effects of stress, pathogens, and environmental challenges on animal welfare.

Innovations in encapsulation and delivery technologies are enhancing the stability and efficacy of functional additives, ensuring their effectiveness throughout the animal's digestive tract.

Blockchain and Traceability:

Blockchain technology is increasingly being harnessed to enhance transparency, traceability, and accountability in the animal feed supply chain.

Through blockchain-based platforms, stakeholders can track feed ingredient journeys from farm to fork, ensuring compliance with quality standards, safety regulations, and sustainability criteria.

Blockchain facilitates seamless data sharing and verification across the supply chain, mitigating the risks of fraud, contamination, and mislabeling, thereby safeguarding animal and human health while bolstering consumer trust.

Challenges and Opportunities

Regulatory Hurdles:

Despite the potential benefits of innovative feed technologies, regulatory hurdles and approval processes can impede their adoption and commercialization.

Stakeholders must navigate complex regulatory landscapes and demonstrate the safety, efficacy, and sustainability of novel feed ingredients and additives to gain regulatory approval and market acceptance.

Cost Considerations:

The adoption of innovative feed technologies may involve higher initial costs and necessitate investment in research and development.

Stakeholders must carefully evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of implementing new technologies, considering factors such as feed efficiency improvements, animal performance gains, and long-term sustainability benefits.

Conclusion

Innovation is driving profound changes in the Animal Feed Market, offering transformative solutions to meet the evolving needs of livestock producers, consumers, and the environment. By embracing cutting-edge technologies and addressing regulatory challenges, stakeholders can unlock new opportunities for sustainable and profitable animal nutrition solutions while ensuring the health, welfare, and productivity of animals.

[democracyunderground]

CRUELTY IS THE POINT "The Agriculture Department has halted millions of dollars worth of deliveries to food banks without explanation, according to food bank leaders in 6 states. (Including #OHIO)

USDA had previously allocated $500 million in deliveries to food banks for fiscal year 2025 through The Emergency Food Assistance Program. Now, the food bank leaders say many of those orders have been canceled.

The halting of these deliveries, first reported by POLITICO, comes after the Agriculture Department separately axed two other food programs, ending more than $1 billion in planned federal spending for schools and food banks to purchase from local farmers.

USDA did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

The collective cuts are expected to make it more difficult for food banks to meet families’ needs, with food prices now 20 percent higher than they were in 2020, food bank leaders say.

“I certainly look at our lines and look at our shelves and say we need some relief,” said Joree Novotny, executive director of the #Ohio Association of Foodbanks, which also reported canceled deliveries with no indication they would resume.

For the Central California Food Bank, that means a loss of 500,000 pounds of expected food deliveries worth $850,000 just for April through July, according to co-CEO Natalie Caples. Cathy Kanefsky, president of the Food Bank of Delaware, said between 20 to 24 full truckloads of food were canceled for the next four months.

The money that was clawed back across the 3 programs came from the Commodity Credit Corporation, a New Deal-era fund that gives USDA flexibility to prop up farmers facing natural disasters or adverse market conditions.

It’s not clear how much of the $500 million for the emergency assistance program has been cut, but one USDA employee, granted anonymity to discuss private conversations, said the Trump administration has been trying to claw back CCC money the Biden administration previously allocated in order to devote funds to other priorities.

USDA was supposed to spend $148 million of the $500 million early this year to buy dairy products, eggs, blueberries and more. But last month, the department notified state agencies that it was canceling solicitations from suppliers, according to a Feb. 20 email that Feeding America sent to its network of food banks and was viewed by POLITICO.

“USDA has not yet announced plans to move forward with the canceled food orders,” the email states. “We believe the best approach is for network members to work through state agencies to obtain clarification from USDA.”

Feeding America did not respond to a request for comment. Caples, the California food bank leader, said that she has not received any assurances from USDA on whether the delivery cancellations are temporary.

Chad Morrison, president of West Virginia’s Mountaineer Food Bank, said it is "really challenging" to meet the need in this state.

"We can try to figure out how to make up the gaps, which is a hard lift, or ultimately there’s less food on the table," Morrison said.

The emergency food assistance network gets its funding from a mix of money from the farm bill and through commodities USDA purchases. But the patchwork funding system has left the program unable to meet increasing hunger needs, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent years of food inflation, anti-hunger advocates say.

The Biden administration responded to the demand on food banks by supplementing the emergency assistance funding with roughly $2 billion from the CCC fund in 2022 and 2023, then the additional $500 million in 2024. But Republicans have argued that President Joe Biden used the CCC money for climate and nutrition initiatives that are outside the congressional mandate of the fund.

Many of the organizations that rely on funding from the emergency assistance program were also receiving funding from the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement, one of the other food programs USDA axed recently.

The clawbacks come as Congress is weighing shrinking the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which helps 40 million low-income Americans afford food. That could further exacerbate the pressure on food banks, which provide just one meal for every nine that SNAP supplies.

“We’re not intended to be a frontline grocery store and unfortunately we are that for more people than ever before,” said Novotny.

[spacetimewithstuartgary]

New SpaceTime out Friday

SpaceTime 20250425 Series 28 Episode 50

New evidence overturns theories on the origin of Earth’s water

Scientists have uncovered crucial new evidence overturning earlier hypothesis on the origin of Earth’s water.

The strange mystery of the red planet’s Magnetic field

A new study suggests strange magnetic signatures detected on the red planet Mars could be due to a partially molten core – only covering its southern hemisphere.

The Lyrids Meteor shower now on full display

One of humanity’s oldest known meteor showers the Lyrids now on full display in the night sky.

The Science Report

Two common food additives could be linked with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

Palaeontologists have identified footprints of armoured ankylosaur dinosaurs for the first time.

The world’s first whole eye and face transplant.

Skeptics guide to health advice on social media.

SpaceTime covers the latest news in astronomy & space sciences.

The show is available every Monday, Wednesday and Friday through your favourite podcast download provider or from www.spacetimewithstuartgary.com

SpaceTime is also broadcast through the National Science Foundation on Science Zone Radio and on both i-heart Radio and Tune-In Radio.

SpaceTime daily news blog: http://spacetimewithstuartgary.tumblr.com/

SpaceTime facebook: www.facebook.com/spacetimewithstuartgary

SpaceTime Instagram @spacetimewithstuartgary

SpaceTime twitter feed @stuartgary

SpaceTime YouTube: @SpaceTimewithStuartGary

SpaceTime -- A brief history

SpaceTime is Australia’s most popular and respected astronomy and space science news program – averaging over two million downloads every year. We’re also number five in the United States.  The show reports on the latest stories and discoveries making news in astronomy, space flight, and science.  SpaceTime features weekly interviews with leading Australian scientists about their research.  The show began life in 1995 as ‘StarStuff’ on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s (ABC) NewsRadio network.  Award winning investigative reporter Stuart Gary created the program during more than fifteen years as NewsRadio’s evening anchor and Science Editor.  Gary’s always loved science. He studied astronomy at university and was invited to undertake a PHD in astrophysics, but instead focused on his career in journalism and radio broadcasting. Gary’s radio career stretches back some 34 years including 26 at the ABC. He worked as an announcer and music DJ in commercial radio, before becoming a journalist and eventually joining ABC News and Current Affairs. He was part of the team that set up ABC NewsRadio and became one of its first on air presenters. When asked to put his science background to use, Gary developed StarStuff which he wrote, produced and hosted, consistently achieving 9 per cent of the national Australian radio audience based on the ABC’s Nielsen ratings survey figures for the five major Australian metro markets: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth. That compares to the ABC’s overall radio listenership of just 5.6 per cent. The StarStuff podcast was published on line by ABC Science -- achieving over 1.3 million downloads annually.  However, after some 20 years, the show finally wrapped up in December 2015 following ABC funding cuts, and a redirection of available finances to increase sports and horse racing coverage.  Rather than continue with the ABC, Gary resigned so that he could keep the show going independently.  StarStuff was rebranded as “SpaceTime”, with the first episode being broadcast in February 2016.  Over the years, SpaceTime has grown, more than doubling its former ABC audience numbers and expanding to include new segments such as the Science Report -- which provides a wrap of general science news, weekly skeptical science features, special reports looking at the latest computer and technology news, and Skywatch – which provides a monthly guide to the night skies. The show is published three times weekly (every Monday, Wednesday and Friday) and available from the United States National Science Foundation on Science Zone Radio, and through both i-heart Radio and Tune-In Radio.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

To save the news, ban surveillance ads

Tonight (May 31) at 6:30PM, I’m at the MANCHESTER Waterstones with my novel Red Team Blues, hosted by Ian Forrester.

Tomorrow (Jun 1), I’m giving the Peter Kirstein Lecture for UCL Computer Science in LONDON.

Then it’s Edinburgh, London, and Berlin!

Big Tech steals from the news, but what it steals isn’t content — it steals money. That matters, because if we create pseudo-copyrights over the facts of the news, or headlines, or snippets to help news companies bargain with tech companies, we make the news partners with the tech companies, rather than watchdogs.

How does tech steal money from the news? Lots of ways! One important one: tech steals ad revenue. 51% of every ad dollar gets gobbled up by tech companies — primarily the cozy, collusive ad-tech duopoly of Google/Facebook (AKA Googbook). If we can shatter the market power of the concentrated ad-tech industry, news companies would go back to getting 80–90% of the ad revenue their reporting generated, which would pay for more reporting.

There’s lots to like about fixing ads. For one thing, a fair ad marketplace would benefit all news reporting, not just the largest news companies — which are dominated by private equity-backed chains and right-wing billionaires who have repeatedly shown that any additional revenues will go to pay shareholders, not more reporters. Fair ads would also provide an income for reporters who strike out on their own, covering local politics or specific beats, without making themselves sharecroppers for Big Media.

One way to fix ads would be to break up the ad-tech “stacks.” Googbook both operate impossibly conflicted ad-placement businesses in which they bargain with themselves on behalf of both advertisers and publishers, with the winners always being the tech companies. The AMERICA Act from Senator Mike Lee would force ad giants to divest themselves of business units that create conflicts of interest. It’s popular, bipartisan legislation — and I do mean bipartisan; its backers include Elizabeth Warren and Ted Cruz! I wrote about the AMERICA Act and the role it will play in saving news from tech for EFF’s Deeplinks Blog last week:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/save-news-we-must-shatter-ad-tech

This week, I’ve got a followup on Deeplinks about another important way to unrig the ad market: banning surveillance ads:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/save-news-we-must-ban-surveillance-advertising

Even if we break up the ad-tech stacks, ads will still be bad for the news — and for the public. That’s because the dominant form of digital ads is “behavioral advertising” — the ad-tech sector’s polite euphemism for ads based on spying. You know these ads: you search for shoes and then every website you land on is plastered in shoe ads.

Surveillance ads require a massive, multi-billion-dollar surveillance dragnet, one that tracks you as you physically move through the world, and digitally, as you move through the web. Your apps, your phone and your browser are constantly gathering data on your activities to feed the ad-tech industry.

This data is incredibly dangerous. There’s so much of it, and it’s so loosely regulated, that every spy, cop, griefer, stalker, harasser, and identity thief can get it for pennies and use it however they see fit. The ad-tech industry poses a risk to protesters, to people seeking reproductive care, to union organizers, and to vulnerable people targeted by scammers.

Ad-tech maintains the laughable pretense that all this spying is consensual, because you clicked “I agree” on some garbage-novella of impenatrable legalese that no one — not even the ad-tech companies’ lawyers — has ever read from start to finish. But when people are given a real choice to opt out of digital spying, they do. Apple gave Ios users a one-click opt-out of in-app tracking and 96% of users clicked it (the other 4% must have been confused — or on Facebook’s payroll). The decision cost Facebook $10b in the first year. You love to see it:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/facebook-says-apple-ios-privacy-change-will-cost-10-billion-this-year.html

But here’s the real punchline: Apple blocked Facebook from spying on its customers, but Apple kept spying on them, just as invasively as Facebook had, in order to target them with Apple’s own ads:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

The thing that stops companies from spying on us isn’t the strength of their character, it’s the discipline imposed by regulation and competition — the fear that they’ll get fined more than they make from spying, and the fear that they’ll lose so much business from spying that they’ll end up in the red.

Which is why we need a legal ban on ads, not mere platitudes on billboards advertising companies’ “respect” for our privacy. The US is way overdue for a federal privacy law with a private right of action, which would let you and me sue the companies who violated it, even if no public prosecutor was willing to go to bat for us:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/01/you-should-have-right-sue-companies-violate-your-privacy

A privacy law that required companies to get your affirmative, enthusiastic, ongoing, specific, informed consent to gather and process your personal data would end surveillance ads forever. Despite the self-serving nonsense the ad-tech industry serves up about people “liking relevant ads,” no one wants to be spied on. 96% of Ios users don’t lie.

A ban on surveillance ads wouldn’t just serve the public, it would also save the news. The alternative to surveillance ads is context ads: ads based on what a reader is reading, rather than what that reader was doing. Context-based ad marketplaces ask, “What am I bid for this Pixel 6 user in Boise who is reading about banana farming?” instead of “What am I bid for this 22 year old man who recently searched for information about suicidal ideation and bankruptcy protection?”

Context ads perform a little worse than surveillance ads — by about 5%:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/04/29/taken-in-context/#creep-me-not

So presumably advertisers won’t pay as much for context ads as they do for behavioral targeting. But that doesn’t mean that the news will lose money. Because context ads favor publishers over ad-tech platforms — no publisher will ever know as much about internet users as spying ad-tech giants do, but no tech company will ever know as much about a publisher’s content as the publisher does.

Behavioral ad marketplaces have high barriers to entry, requiring troves of surveillance data on billions of internet users. They are naturally anticompetitive and able to command a much higher share of each ad dollar than a contextual ad service (which would have much more competiition) could.

On top of that: if behavioral advertising was limited to people who truly consented to it, 96% of users would never see an ad!

So contextual ads will show up for more users, and more of the money they generate will land in news publishers’ pockets. If context ads fetch less money per ad, the losses will be felt by ad-tech companies, not publishers.

Finally: publishers who join the fight against surveillance ads won’t be alone — they’ll be joining with a massive, popular movement against commercial surveillance. The news business is — and always has been — a niche subject, of burning interest to publishers, reporters, and a small minority of news junkies. The news on its own is a small fry in policy debates. But when it comes to killing surveillance ads, the news has a class alliance with the mass movement for privacy, and together, they’re a force to reckon with.

My article on killing surveillance ads is part three of an ongoing, five-part series for EFF on how we save the news from tech. The introduction, which sets out the whole series, is here:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/saving-news-big-tech

The final two parts will come out over the next two weeks, and then we’re going to publish the whole thing as a PDF that suitable for sharing. Watch this space!

Catch me on tour with Red Team Blues in Manchester, Edinburgh, London, and Berlin!

[Image ID: EFF's banner for the save news series; the word 'NEWS' appears in pixelated, gothic script in the style of a newspaper masthead. Beneath it in four entwined circles are logos for breaking up ad-tech, ending surveillance ads, opening app stores, and end-to-end delivery. All the icons except for 'ending surveillance ads' are greyed out.]

If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/31/context-ads/#class-formation

Image: EFF https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/save-news-we-must-ban-surveillance-advertising

CC BY 3.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en

[violetsandshrikes]

ok you have made good science and health posts. Is it worth taking a probiotic as part of my selfcare routine?

Note: Not a doctor! Not medical advice, only a summary of useful information out there.

Ehhhhh, it's one of those things that is debated. Some research points towards usefulness, other research says it doesn't do much. There's also issues with what strains are in said probiotic, if they're even useful for you, if they can even survive your digestive tract (and your personal microbiota)…science is mixed on this too.

A recent review (2024) has concluded there is evidence enough for doctors and patients to consider using specific probiotics for uses in specific people (like supporting gut function during antibiotics, reducing respiratory tract infections, etc.), but not enough evidence to recommend it unconditionally in the population as preventative medicine.

This is another recent (2024) review that's similar, but they've helpfully included a couple pages at the end of specific studies, probiotic strains used, and their specific impact/mode of action studied on specific illnesses/diseases.

Interestingly, they've also just dropped another 2024 meta-analysis that suggests probiotic use saw a 51% reduction in symptoms reported by COVID-19 patients, including cough, headaches and diarrhea. They included 9 studies (3 of which were clinical trials), so they likely will need a larger sample size to say conclusively, but that could be a promising angle in a post-COVID world.

To add another confusing angle, postbiotics are becoming of increasing interest in research. They're bioactive compounds that are produced when probiotic bacteria are feeding on prebiotic foods in the colon (like fibers), and it's beginning to look like health benefits associated with pre/postbiotics actually come from postbiotic production. I have yet to see any available on the market, but apparently they are out there. I would also be aware that as a new frontier (and product) I couldn't say much about their individual efficiency, product contamination, etc.

If you decide to:

You can just make sure to frequently consume probiotic foods (yogurt, kefir, sauerkraut, tempeh, kimchi, etc.) although I would also suggest you make sure you're eating enough fiber to feed the friendly bacteria already inside you.

Bacteria is very specifically named. You'll have a genus, species and a strain - Bifidobacterium longum W11. All three = you got it right, and this is important because probiotics are researched down to these specific strains. It also means that when you read a probiotic bottle, if you don't see all three of those names (as a general rule), it's probably useless to you.

Check your labelling, especially generic store brands. Yogurt starter is typically made with Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus, and if they advertise these as the "probiotic benefits" they're usually full of shit - these strains usually get destroyed in your stomach by acid and don't provide any benefit.

If you have a weakened or compromised immune system, don't take probiotics without medical advice. This includes if you're having chemo, you're critically ill or you've recently had surgery.

Lots of people experience gas, mild abdominal pain and changes in stools when first using probiotics, but you're probably going to want to keep a note of that for your doctor, just in case. Plenty also have additives and digestive aids, so look out for allergic reactions and things like soy/gluten if needed.

Probiotics are measured in colony forming units (CFU) - the number of viable cells. They might say 1 x 109 for 1 billion CFU or 1 x 1010 for 10 billion CFU. Some contain up to 50+ billion CFU. A common mistake made is assuming higher CFU = better for you. Most countries only require labelling to list the total weight of the microorganisms in the product (which can include both alive and dead microorganisms, not viable ones). Probiotics can die during their shelf-life and must be consumed alive to be of use. Ideally, you're looking for products labelled with the number of CFU at the end of the product's shelf life (vs at the time of manufacturing).

If in doubt, ask a doctor or pharmacist.

[workersolidarity]

[ 📹 Footage shows scenes of the extent of the massive destruction in Hamad Town, in the Khan Yunis governate, in the southern Gaza Strip, resulting from the bombardment and purposeful destruction of local infrastructure by the Israali occupation army.]

[ 📸 A photograph published by WAFA News showing a Palestinian family performing Iftar after managing to scrape together enough food to break their fast during Ramadan in the south of Gaza after being displaced from the Jabalia Refugee Camp.]

[ 📈 A graphic showing the current death toll of 31'645 civilians killed and 73'676 others wounded as a result of the Zionist genocide in Gaza.]

🇮🇱⚔️🇵🇸 🚀🚀🚀🏘️💥🚑 🚨

STARVATION AND DESTITUION DURING RAMADAN AS BOMBINGS CONTINUE ON DAY 163 OF ISRAEL'S ONGOING GENOCIDE IN THE GAZA STRIP

On the 163rd day of Israel's ongoing war of genocide in the Gaza Strip, the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) committed a total of 9 new massacres of Palestinian families, resulting in the deaths of 92 Palestinian civilians, mostly women and children, and wounding another 130 others over the previous 24-hours.

As the majority of the Arab world break their fasts in the evening with large, warm, family meals, many of the Palestinian families of the Gaza Strip have nothing for iftar, and are unable to break their fasts or instead rely on soups of herbs or feed their families rotting bread as a shortage in flour continues largely unabated.

The Zionist occupation army continues to prevent the entry of the vast majority of food aid being sent to Gaza via various Arab and Western countries, especially aid intended for the northern Gaza Strip as residents starve in the streets, picking through garbage and consuming rotting food and contaminated water.

Even in the southern Gazan city of Rafah, stripped of its usual Ramadan decorations, only a few food stalls remain open in the local market, selling kunafa stuffed with nuts at a sticker-shock price of 80 sheckels per kilogram, or roughly $10 per pound, well beyond the reach of starving families who've been without work for more than five months as Israel continues its bombing and shelling campaign across the Palestinian enclave, even as basic materials and fuel necessary for rebuilding the Strip are blocked from entry.

As 40yo Ahmed Al-Kayyal tells local news organization WAFA, "There is no taste to Ramadan in this dirty and bloody war, a war of extermination, with no food or drink."

Local resident, Jamal Al-Khatib, had similar sentiments, telling the Palestinian news agency, "There is no food at all, so how will we break our fast in Ramadan? How can we rejoice when there is no shelter, electricity, or water?"

According to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine (UNRWA), one in three children in the Gaza Strip are now "acutely malnourished" as famine looms over the Palestinian population of the enclave.

"Malnutrition among children is spreading fast and reaching devastating and unprecedented levels in the Gaza Strip due to the wide-reaching impacts of the war and ongoing restrictions on aid delivery," UNRWA shared in a post on the social media platform X.

"An immediate humanitarian ceasefire continues to provide the only chance to save children’s lives and end their suffering," the aid organization added.

Meanwhile, the bombing and shelling of civilian homes by the IOF continued relentlessly overnight, with a concentration of firepower on the central Gaza Strip.

In one example from last night's carnage, Zionist air forces bombed a civilian home belonging to the Thabet family in the Beshara neighborhood of Deir al-Balah, in the central Gaza Strip, resulting in the tragic deaths of at least 11 civilians, with the majority of victims being women and children. An update on the massacre said the death toll in the bombing has since risen to 12, with a large number of wounded victims reported in the atrocity as well.

An additional Israeli airstrike targeting a civilian vehicle in the city of Al-Zahra, in the central Gaza Strip, resulted in the killing of two Palestinians and wounded another.

Similarly, an Israeli bombing of a residential home in the New Camp area of Al-Nuseirat, also in central Gaza, killed another six Palestinians and wounded at least 10 others.

Occupation warplanes also concentrated their firepower on various neighborhoods of Gaza City, ensuring the complete and utter destruction of the local infrastructure of the most developed city in the Gaza Strip, making the future of the city uncertain as the landscape becomes more and more uninhabitable.

In one example, Zionist fighter jets bombarded the Al-Manara building in the vicinity of the Ashlelon Mosque in the Al-Shati Refugee Camp, west of Gaza City, while occupation aircraft also bombed the Nabil building on Al-Jalaa Street.

Occupation warplanes also bombed a group of Palestinian civilians picking hibiscus plants in the east of Gaza, with Al-Shifa Medical Complex reporting the death of one of the victims and the wounding of five others as a result.

In the southern Gaza Strip, the Israeli occupation army launched a firebelt targeting a residential square in Al-Qarara, east of Khan Yunis, while occupation air forces bombarded a tract of agricultural land near the border with Egypt, which, although no casualties were reported in the bombing, the systematic destruction of agricultural lands in the Gaza Strip is helping to contribute to the enforced famine and starvation of the Palestinian population.

In another sickening atrocity, Zionist occupation forces in gunboats opened fire on the tents of displaced Palestinian families on the coast, west of Rafah, in the south of Gaza, killing a 19yo woman when two of the Zionist soldiers' live bullets entered her skull.

As a result of Israel's ongoing war of genocide in the Gaza Strip, the endlessly rising death toll has now exceeded 31'645 Palestinians killed, more than 25'000 of which being women and children according to the United States Pentagon, with another 73'676 civilians wounded since the beginning of the current round of Israeli aggression beginning on October 7th, 2023.

#source1

#source2

#source3

#source4

#source5

#source6

#source7

#graphicsource

#photosource

#videosource

@WorkerSolidarityNews

[aajjks]

I just saw your post about Jungkook’s securities account might have been hacked. SORRY FOR THE RANT but I need to put my frustration into words.

Boyfriend and I both work in a banking institution (I work in securities department) and we were talking about this (before he was kidnapped by a baby dinosaur) and how we both think it wasn’t cyber-attack but someone in his inner circle taking advantage.

I honestly think it was someone from Hybe, his asset manager or even a family member. 

Why?

In Korean market is mandatory to have separate securities and cash accounts (never a sec-cash account). It’s required by law. (This part is important, because both accounts have different timeframes for transfers and multiple layers of security)

The securities account is where an investor holds their stocks, bonds, or any other securities. In his case, (Hybe) stocks. Cash accounts are used to fund stock purchases and receive proceeds from sales (so feed and receive).

Jungkook is what we call “High-net-worth individuals”. They rarely manage all their investments alone, it’s too much. Usually they have a brokerage firm, private banking division (wealth management department) or a specific financial manager (personal choice or company recommended). Korean celebrities usually go for financial manager

Banking security:

The access to securities accounts have strooong protections:  passwords, two-factor authentication (e-mail, sms, biometric, you pick), AND device verification. If an outsider had hacked his account, they would have needed to bypass all these layers, which is very difficult without access to his personal devices. Phishing or social engineering can get info like passwords and phone numbers but hardly ever are able to authorize devices. Personal finance system is way less secure than investment/corporate banking.

Point 1: No alert was raised due to unauthorized access, likely the access was made from an already authorized device.

How do you sell securities?

Hybe stocks are what we call “buy and hold”. The investor buys the stocks and waits long-term to liquidate them. The step by step: 

Logging into the account – again, all that security

Selecting securities to sell/transfer – Every securities is identified by what call the ISIN. So they need to choose the ISIN, quantity, and recipient the account.

Confirming the transaction Inside the bank: Large sudden transfers without previous information, raises alert. Most systems block it due to tax reporting and also goes for compliance review. Outside the bank: The brokers/asset managers are notified. Most of them require additional verification for large transfers (usually email confirmation or authorization via their own system). Settlement period – Transfers don’t happen instantly, they need to “settle”. Settlement typically takes T+2 days (trade date + 2 business days).

Point 2: The person not only had access to the sec account but also was able to authorize the large trade AND wait for settlement.

So, yeah… dude not only has his privacy constantly invaded by outsiders but it seems that he’s also not safe in his inner circle :( 

Thank you for coming to my TED talk

I am actually so worried for him

[darkmaga-returns]

Despite dairy being part of NZ’s economy (or possibly, because of it, this is the only mention of this scandal you’ll see.

CONTROVERSY OVER ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’ ADDITIVE BOVAER IN AUSTRALIAN BEEF SPARKS BOYCOTT CALLS

THE USE OF THE METHANE-REDUCING FEED ADDITIVE BOVAER TO CATTLE IN AUSTRALIA HAS IGNITED A HEATED DEBATE, WITH GROWING CALLS FOR A BOYCOTT OF BEEF PRODUCED USING THE ADDITIVE.

Critics are pointing to findings from a Japanese study that suggest potential negative impacts on male fertility, as well as skepticism over the safety assurances provided by its manufacturer.

Bovaer, developed by DSM-Firmenich, is marketed as a breakthrough solution to “reduce methane emissions from cattle” by up to 30%. However, a study by Japan’s Food Safety Commission raised concerns, reporting a reduction in testicular weight, sperm count, and sperm motility in animal trials involving the additive. These findings have fuelled criticism from politicians, farmers, and activists, who are questioning the safety of Bovaer for both animals and humans.

Former Australian MP Craig Kelly has been particularly vocal, sharing the Japanese study results and criticising retailers like Coles for stocking beef linked to Bovaer-fed cattle. Kelly also highlighted disclaimers from Bovaer’s manufacturer, which limits liability and provides no guarantees of the product’s safety or effectiveness.

[veganmabelpines]

You may have heard or experienced one specific difficulty with trying a plant-based diet: money. Fresh produce is expensive, and inaccessible to many, and that is not how a just and kind world should be. Why are factory-farmed animal products so much easier and cheaper to get? Why is Healthy Food So Expensive In America?

Excerpts:

"In the US, 10 times more farmland goes to feed farm animals than to feed people, destroying ecosystems and biodiversity, while wasting water and other increasingly scarce resources."

"News reports recently covered western states vying for a dwindling supply of Colorado River water. Still, they failed to adequately address that the river’s water is running out because most of it is used to grow crops to support animal agriculture. Bottom line: plant-based agriculture can feed more people with less land, less water, and fewer resources."

"One of the most entrenched lobbies in Washington, D.C., is the dairy industry, which receives government support to produce more cows’ milk than we consume. Besides funding overproduction, the USDA uses additional tax dollars to purchase and market the glut of dairy products to our school children and through exports. One 2015 study found an astounding 73% of the U.S. dairy industry’s income came from government programs. Dairy industry interests are so embedded that before his appointment as the USDA Secretary by President Biden, Tom Vilsack was the CEO of the U.S. Dairy Export Council."

[animal-care]

Exploring Innovations in the Animal Feed Market Forecast 2028

Market Size and Growth

The Animal Feed Market is witnessing robust growth globally, fueled by the increasing demand for high-quality animal protein, growing livestock populations, and rising consumer awareness about animal nutrition and welfare. According to recent market research reports, the global animal feed market was valued at over USD 460 billion in 2021 and is projected to exceed USD 650 billion by 2028, registering a compound annual growth rate CAGR of 4% during the forecast period.

Key Drivers of Market Growth

Rising Meat Consumption:

The growing global population, rising disposable incomes, and changing dietary preferences are driving an increase in meat consumption worldwide.

As a result, there is a corresponding rise in demand for animal feed to support the production of livestock, poultry, and aquaculture species.

Expansion of Livestock Production:

Developing economies, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, are witnessing rapid urbanization and industrialization, leading to the expansion of intensive livestock farming operations.

This trend is driving the need for efficient and nutritious animal feed formulations to support the health, growth, and productivity of livestock and poultry.

Technological Advancements:

Innovations in feed processing technologies, such as extrusion, pelleting, and micronization, are improving the digestibility, palatability, and nutritional value of animal feeds.

Advanced feed additives and supplements, including vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and growth promoters, are enhancing animal performance and health outcomes, driving market growth.

Regional Market Insights

Asia-Pacific:

Asia-Pacific dominates the global animal feed market, accounting for the largest share of both production and consumption.

Rapid urbanization, rising disposable incomes, and increasing meat consumption in countries like China, India, and Vietnam are driving market growth in the region.

North America:

North America is a mature market for animal feed, characterized by high levels of automation, stringent quality standards, and advanced feed formulation practices.

The region benefits from a well-developed livestock industry, strong regulatory frameworks, and a focus on sustainability and animal welfare.

Europe:

Europe is witnessing a shift towards sustainable and organic animal farming practices, driving demand for organic and natural feed ingredients.

Regulatory initiatives promoting antibiotic-free production, animal welfare standards, and environmental sustainability are shaping the European animal feed market landscape.

Conclusion

The Animal Feed Market is poised for significant growth in the coming years, driven by factors such as rising meat consumption, expanding livestock production, and technological advancements in feed formulation and processing. As the industry continues to evolve, stakeholders must stay abreast of emerging trends, regulatory developments, and consumer preferences to capitalize on growth opportunities and address challenges effectively. By embracing innovation, sustainability, and collaboration, the animal feed industry can play a crucial role in ensuring food security, nutrition, and environmental sustainability for future generations.

[nighthawkes]

Ok now I’m interested in boring guy. Funny little man. Shaking him in a shoe box with holes in its lid so he can breath. I noticed that some of his tagged posts shares a tag w business casual though 👀 bureaucracy as camp?? Elaborate for the peasants please

this is so exciting, okay:

Yes!! He’s definitely an office worker of some sort so he winds up in my business casual tag too sometimes. I think whatever he does, he doesn’t get paid, he just showed up one day and started working.

Bureaucracy as camp! So “camp is an aesthetic style and sensibility that regards something as appealing because of its bad taste and ironic value” (Wikipedia) is what I think of when I say "bureaucracy is camp to me."

Little business men and women dress up in their special Professional outfits and gather in groups to do special Professional things like discuss quarterly reports and client dossiers and market research findings. And they jump through hoops to impress people who’ve never had to do the work they’re doing. And they’re sending emails and memos and attending working lunches and “putting it on the company card.” And they’re all treating it sooooo seriously even though all of that shit sounds completely fake and/or pointless.

It’s that tweet that’s like “‘Business school’ sounds so made up. It’s what a kindergartner would say if you asked them where dads go all day.”

I think that American corporate professionalism and business culture is appealing because it’s lame and beyond ironic.

If you've ever seen any posts on here about resumes or office culture or adult etiquette, you'll probably know that of course officespeak and bureaucratic norms have their place in the world for a reason. They function as a common ground/language that people of different backgrounds can use to get work done cohesively (in addition to functioning as a tool of elitism/racism in a lot of ways). Theoretically though: You dress in suits to show respect for clients, coworkers, and your job. You say things like "circle back" to politely give people time to get their shit together. You participate in certain company activities to be a good sport and to build good will with your teams. And these things are valuable for the purposes they serve!

I'm obsessed with the idea of a guy who naturally and perfectly shapes himself to fit these language tools/norms and does so wholeheartedly because he thinks they're what's real. Rather than seeing norms as signifiers, he places the value on them at face value. He's not dressing in a suit to show respect or to fit in or out of a personal sense of fashion/enjoyment—he's doing it to wear a suit. And it isn't begrudging or thoughtless or anything but straightforward.

And I feel like tech bros and American corporate culture in the wake of what I generally know about 80s economic shifts have adopted this sort of serious idea that the business world is the real world. The Kendall Roy archetype. Patrick Bateman and that guy on the bus someone tweeted about who said he'd never seen American Psycho because he's too busy trading. Those types of guys.

So boring guy is like those guys but less emotionally fraught. He's not doing it for a power trip or a sense of superiority or to feed into his daddy issues (of which he has none). He's doing it just to do it.

And that's extra camp to me. The idea that the business world and anything it produces is real or more valuable than most other things—believing that—is camp to me by the Wikipedia definition. And I absolutely love projecting that onto the most bland guy imaginable.

He's no thoughts, head empty. It doesn't occur to him to have hobbies. You'd have to Sever him to give him anything close to a personality beyond "business" and even then his innie persona would just be like "hmm, I wonder if my outside personality is being as efficient as possible. Probably, since he decided to make me." and "Rewards for productivity? No thanks. I'm just here to work. I try not to keep track of metrics like that."

I also like the Merriam-Webster definition:

1. a. : something so outrageously artificial, affected, inappropriate, or out-of-date as to be considered amusing

[spacetimewithstuartgary]

New SpaceTime out Wednesday

SpaceTime 20250319 Series 28 Episode 34

Could violent supernovae have triggered at least two of Earth’s mass extinction events

A new study suggests that nearby exploding stars known as supernovae may have been violent enough to have triggered two of Earth’s known Mass Extinction Events.

NASA launches its latest new stellar mapping mission to study the galaxy

NASA has successfully launched its new SPHEREx stellar mapping mission. Sharing the ride was NASA’s PUNCH mission to map the region where the Sun’s outer atmosphere transitions to the solar wind.

128 new moons discovered orbiting Saturn

Astronomers have just found an additional 128 moons orbiting the ringed world of Saturn. The new discoveries bring the Saturnian systems total confirmed count to 274.

The Science Report

A new study suggests that both starting and quitting drinking booze has effects on cholesterol levels.

Crocodiles in Australia’s Top End are eating nine times more now than they did back in the 1970s.

A new study warns that by the year 2030 the Australian diet will include even more junk food.

Alex on Tech: Palestinian terrorists launch major cyber attacks against X.

SpaceTime covers the latest news in astronomy & space sciences.

The show is available every Monday, Wednesday and Friday through Apple Podcasts (itunes), Stitcher, Google Podcast, Pocketcasts, SoundCloud, Bitez.com, YouTube, your favourite podcast download provider, and from www.spacetimewithstuartgary.com

SpaceTime is also broadcast through the National Science Foundation on Science Zone Radio and on both i-heart Radio and Tune-In Radio.

SpaceTime daily news blog: http://spacetimewithstuartgary.tumblr.com/

SpaceTime facebook: www.facebook.com/spacetimewithstuartgary

SpaceTime Instagram @spacetimewithstuartgary

SpaceTime twitter feed @stuartgary

SpaceTime YouTube: @SpaceTimewithStuartGary

SpaceTime -- A brief history

SpaceTime is Australia’s most popular and respected astronomy and space science news program – averaging over two million downloads every year. We’re also number five in the United States.  The show reports on the latest stories and discoveries making news in astronomy, space flight, and science.  SpaceTime features weekly interviews with leading Australian scientists about their research.  The show began life in 1995 as ‘StarStuff’ on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s (ABC) NewsRadio network.  Award winning investigative reporter Stuart Gary created the program during more than fifteen years as NewsRadio’s evening anchor and Science Editor.  Gary’s always loved science. He studied astronomy at university and was invited to undertake a PHD in astrophysics, but instead focused on his career in journalism and radio broadcasting. Gary’s radio career stretches back some 34 years including 26 at the ABC. He worked as an announcer and music DJ in commercial radio, before becoming a journalist and eventually joining ABC News and Current Affairs. He was part of the team that set up ABC NewsRadio and became one of its first on air presenters. When asked to put his science background to use, Gary developed StarStuff which he wrote, produced and hosted, consistently achieving 9 per cent of the national Australian radio audience based on the ABC’s Nielsen ratings survey figures for the five major Australian metro markets: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth. That compares to the ABC’s overall radio listenership of just 5.6 per cent. The StarStuff podcast was published on line by ABC Science -- achieving over 1.3 million downloads annually.  However, after some 20 years, the show finally wrapped up in December 2015 following ABC funding cuts, and a redirection of available finances to increase sports and horse racing coverage.  Rather than continue with the ABC, Gary resigned so that he could keep the show going independently.  StarStuff was rebranded as “SpaceTime”, with the first episode being broadcast in February 2016.  Over the years, SpaceTime has grown, more than doubling its former ABC audience numbers and expanding to include new segments such as the Science Report -- which provides a wrap of general science news, weekly skeptical science features, special reports looking at the latest computer and technology news, and Skywatch – which provides a monthly guide to the night skies. The show is published three times weekly (every Monday, Wednesday and Friday) and available from the United States National Science Foundation on Science Zone Radio, and through both i-heart Radio and Tune-In Radio.

[foodandbeverages]

Organic Acid Market Potential Growth, Share, Demand And Analysis Of Key Players- Analysis Forecasts To 2032

In 2022, it is anticipated that the organic acids market will reach US$ 11.3 billion. The market for organic acid is expected to reach US$ 18.8 Bn by 2032, growing at a constant CAGR of 5.3% throughout the projected period.

Market prospects are anticipated to be favorable due to the expanding use of organic acids in the food and beverage industry. In addition, during the course of the projection period, there will be chances for market expansion due to the rising demand for organic acid alternatives.

These acids have multiple applications in animal feed industry to inhibit bacterial growth and provide hosts with nutritional content. They are used in cosmetics to get rid of dead cells and nourish skin. Owing to these factors, demand for organic acids is expected to rise in the forthcoming years.

To remain ‘ahead’ of your competitors, request for @ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/sample/rep-gb-159

Consumers are adopting a healthy lifestyle and are conscious about the intake of any products that contain chemical ingredients which be harsh on their skin or cause any side effects because of daily consumption.

Consumer preference for brands that are offering organic products without harmful chemical additives is expected to influence the demand for organic acids. To fulfil rising consumer demand for natural products, manufacturers are developing technologies and clean label products that do not cause any harm to environment and human health.

Asia Pacific is expected to witness surge in demand for organic acids due to less stringent policies. North America is expected to be the hub for manufacturing and export of different organic acids due to easy availability of infrastructure and technical know-how.

“Growing preference for clean label products across the food & beverage sector, coupled with increasing incorporation of organic acids in animal feed will steer growth in the market over the forecast period,” says an FMI analyst. 

Key Takeaways:

The     organic acid market is expected to grow at CAGR of 5.2% and 4.2% in North     America and the Latin America, respectively, through 2032.

Asia     Pacific is expected to account for 30% of the total organic acid market     share share.

The     Europe organic acid market is expected to reach a valuation of US$ 4.5 Bn     over the forecast period.

Total     sales in the U.S. organic acids market will reach a valuation of US$ 2.1     Bn in 2022.

The     India organic acid market valuation will total US$ 1.07 Bn in 2022.

By     application, sales in the poultry and farming segment are projected to     account for 30% of the total market share.

Based     on product type, demand for citric acid will continue gaining traction.

Competitive Landscape

Key organic acid manufacturers are focusing on research & development to offer various products with no chemical additives. Key players are collaborating and developing new products to penetrate untapped markets. For instance:

Eastman     Chemical Company announced the acquisition of 3F Feed & Food, a     European pioneer in the commercial and technical producer of livestock     feed and human food additives. 3F’s operations and assets, which are based     in Spain, will improve and support Eastman’s animal nutrition industry’s     sustained future demand and will be integrated into the company’s     Additives & Functional Products division.

Explore More Valuable Insights

Future Market Insights, in its new report, offers an impartial analysis of the global reduced fat butter market, presenting historical data (2017-2021) and estimation statistics for the forecast period of 2022-2032.

The study offers compelling insights based on  Product Type (Lactic Acid, Formic Acid,  Acetic Acid, Citric Acid,  Propionic Acid, Ascorbic Acid, Gluconic Acid, Fumaric Acid), Application (Poultry and Farming, Pharmaceuticals, Industrial, Food & Beverages)Region (North America, Latin America, Europe, East Asia, South Asia, Oceania, MEA).

Frequently Asked Questions

How     much is the global organic acid market worth?

What     is the demand outlook forecast for the organic acid market?

At     what rate did the demand for organic acid grow between 2027 to 2021?

At     what rate will organic acid demand grow in Europe?

What     is the North America organic acid market outlook?

Empower your business strategy with our comprehensive report on the organic acid market@ https://www.futuremarketinsights.com/reports/global-organic-acids-market

[market-insider]

Rice Bran Derivatives Market: Innovations and Product Development

The global rice bran derivatives market size is expected to reach USD 10.1 billion by 2030, growing consumer preference for plant-based foods globally, and increasing demand for alternative proteins ingredients in various end-use industries, are the major factors driving the market growth.

Gain deeper insights on the market and receive your free copy with TOC now @: Rice Bran Derivatives Market Report

Consumers are becoming more aware of the health benefits of a balanced diet and are increasingly looking for functional foods that can support their health goals. Rice bran derivatives are rich in nutrients such as fiber, vitamins, and antioxidants, which are associated with a range of health benefits. For example, rice bran is high in dietary fiber, which can promote digestive health and help lower cholesterol levels. Additionally, rice bran is rich in vitamins B and E, which can help support immune function and protect against oxidative stress.

In addition, the rising demand for the animal feed industry globally is also encouraging the demand for rice bran derivatives. It is a by-product of the rice milling process and is used as a high-quality ingredient in animal feed due to its high protein content, which can help promote animal growth and health. Rice bran is also a good source of energy important for livestock production.

Also, the demand for gluten-free products is increasing due to the growing prevalence of celiac disease and gluten sensitivity. Rice bran derivatives are gluten-free and can be used as a substitute for wheat-based ingredients in many food products. For example, rice bran can be used to make gluten-free bread, pasta, and baked goods that have similar texture and flavor profiles as wheat-based products. This makes rice bran derivatives a popular ingredient in the gluten-free food market. Germany-based Beneo GmBH offers RemyLiVE shelf stable rice bran which helps in adding dietary fiber in gluten-free baked goods.

[spermarket]

Feed Binders Market Growth, Share, Business Scope and Future Opportunities 2034: SPER Market Research

Feed binders are additives used in animal feed to bind the ingredients together, ensuring the feed retains its structure during processing and storage. They are essential for improving the quality of pelleted or extruded feeds by enhancing consistency and durability. Binders help increase pellet hardness and reduce feed wastage, leading to better feed efficiency and improved animal nutrition. They also minimize dust formation, which aids in better feed handling and reduces feed loss. Feed binders can be natural, such as plant gums, starches, and lignosulfonates, or synthetic, providing more precise control over binding characteristics. 

According to SPER market research, ‘Global Feed Binders Market Size- By Source, By Type, By Livestock - Regional Outlook, Competitive Strategies and Segment Forecast to 2034’ state that the Global Feed Binders Market is predicted to reach 7.63 Billion by 2034 with a CAGR 5.58%. 

Drivers: 

The feed binders market is experiencing steady growth, driven by the increasing demand for pelleted feed, heightened awareness of animal nutrition, and advancements in feed technology. Key trends include a shift towards natural and sustainable binders, expansion in the aquaculture sector, and innovations in binder formulations to enhance feed efficiency. The rising demand for high-quality nutrition in livestock and aquaculture production is fueling the need for effective binders. The move towards pelleted feed for improved efficiency and handling is also driving binder usage. As consumers focus more on animal welfare and sustainable farming, there is a growing preference for eco-friendly binder solutions. Additionally, continuous research and development efforts are fostering innovation, with manufacturers focused on enhancing binder performance and feed quality. 

Request a Free Sample Report: https://www.sperresearch.com/report-store/feed-binders-market?sample=1

Restraints: 

The feed binders market faces several challenges that hinder its growth and development. One key issue is the variability and quality control of natural binders, which can be affected by factors such as sourcing, environmental conditions, and processing methods. This can result in inconsistent performance and effectiveness. Additionally, the high cost of premium binders, especially sustainable and natural options, may limit their adoption, particularly in price-sensitive markets. There is also growing concern about the potential long-term impacts of synthetic binders on animal health and the environment. Moreover, regulatory challenges and the need to comply with diverse international standards add further complexity to the market. 

In 2024, the Asia Pacific region dominated the global feed binders market. The market in this area is growing rapidly, driven by the expansion of the livestock and aquaculture sectors. The increasing demand for high-quality animal nutrition, coupled with the shift toward pelleted feed formats, is boosting the need for effective binders. Manufacturers are concentrating on creating cost-efficient and sustainable binder solutions that enhance feed quality, pellet durability, and animal health. Some significant market players are ADM, Alltech, BASF SE, Borregaard, Cargill, DSM, DuPont, Kemin Industries, O K Bio Systems, and others. 

For More Information, refer to below link: –  

Feed Binders Market Growth

Related Reports:  

Dairy Blends Market Growth, Size, Trends Analysis - By Application, By Form - Regional Outlook, Competitive Strategies and Segment Forecast to 2034

Maize Meal Market Growth, Size, Trends Analysis - By Nature, By End-Use - Regional Outlook, Competitive Strategies and Segment Forecast to 2034

Follow Us – 

LinkedIn | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter

Contact Us: 

Sara Lopes, Business Consultant — USA 

SPER Market Research 

enquiries@sperresearch.com 

+1–347–460–2899