#England vs Ban
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
tiredgayloser · 2 years ago
Text
if he’s not careful I’m going to eat him
11 notes · View notes
monarishairclinic · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
🗣 Say Goodbye to the Limitations of #HairLoss with Hair Transplant, Just Like #HanumaVihari, Indian Cricketer!🏏
👉 Hanuma Vihari's hair transformation is a testament to the possibilities of hair transplant. Don't let hair loss restrict you any longer. Join the league of confident individuals who've revitalized their hair and their lives. Ready for the change? 💇‍♂🏏
👉 𝐆𝐄𝐓 𝐇𝐀𝐈𝐑 𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐓 Done By India's Best Hair Surgeon @drsurana - Dr. Arihant Surana (Dermatologist & Hair Transplant Surgeon )
👉 Book Your Appointment to reverse your hair and confidence like our celebrity star Indian cricketers #HarshalPatel #Hanuma_Vihari #StuartBinny 😎
👉 Delhi Office: 🤙 Book Your Slot Now! ☎ +91 98186 42643 🌐 https://www.monarishair.com 📧 Email: [email protected] ✅ WhatsApp Chat: https://wa.me/919818642643 🏨 E 13, 1st Floor, Ring Rd, Defence Colony, New Delhi, Delhi 110024
👉 Indore Office: 🤙 Book Your Slot Now! ☎ +91 98108 85868 🌐 https://monarishair.com/hair-transplant-indore ✅ WhatsApp Chat: https://wa.me/919810885868 🏨 3rd Floor, 301, HeadQuarter Building Satya Sai Square, Vijay Nagar, Indore, Madhya Pradesh 452010
1 note · View note
shaktiknowledgeblog · 2 years ago
Text
ban vs eng | ban vs eng t20 | ban vs eng 2023 | Bangladesh Cricket | bangladesh cricket t20 | England Cricket Team
Bangladesh did this feat for the first time in the history of T20 cricket, this player played a brilliant innings The T20 match is being played between Bangladesh and England. Bangladesh team has done a big feat in this match. Image Source: GETTY BAN vs ENG BAN vs ENG: The first match of the three-match T20 series between Bangladesh and England was played on Thursday. In this match, Bangladesh…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
centrally-unplanned · 5 months ago
Text
I find myself interested in how ineffective integration was for Ireland vis a vis the UK in the 19th century. Certainly after 1832 voting reforms and the 1829 repeal of the ban on Catholics serving in parliament (UK-wide but ofc hitting Ireland the hardest), the Irish were at more-or-less equal footing as the English or Scots when it came to voting rights and the legal system (I think most people don't know this! They think the Irish couldn't vote in the 19th century!) And it wasn't even an "on paper" deal for voting rights, Irish were active in government (they even had Irish PMs, though ofc Protestant), by the latter half of the 19th century economic regulations were equalized, and they got within a hair's breadth of Home Rule before some munitinous unionists and WW1 got in the way. Despite the rep a lot of countries have gigantic ethnic minorities, and liberalism/equal franchise is actually pretty decent solution to that problem. Why didn't ~100 years of representation in the House of Commons, in the era when "nation building" was at its peak, not work?
From what I can tell, timing is of course part of it. At a simple level, World War One was such a nationalist godsend; it created the "radicalism cascade", a weakened center and domino revolutions inspiring everyone with a cause with a sort of temporal Schelling Point. Without it, would the 1912 Home Rule have just been implemented in due time, and Ireland would be like Scotland today? At a more structural level, the timing was particularly rough because WW1 was the tail end of the age of religion in Europe. So much of the conflict was over Protestant vs Catholic, and after WW2 if Ireland was united under one home rule government in the UK it's hard to imagine the secularizing age powering so much conflict. Had they "held on" a few more decades you could see it calming down.
I think those are true enough but you do gotta dig down to another level. "Protestant" wasn't really just a religion in Ireland - it was the Protestant Ascendancy, a ruling class of combined English settlers and converted Irish who, during the imperial era before the 19th century, built an entirely separate ruling class in Ireland. And it was a deep ruling class - Catholics were barred from voting in even the Dublin local parliament, they were banned from being judges or lawyers, inheritance law was rigged to privilege Protestant sons while converting away from the Anglican church came with property confiscations. Depending on what counts, at its peak in the 18th century up to 30% of the country had opportunistically converted, in a system rigged top to bottom against the Catholics.
Imagine for a second India was given representation in the House of Commons and given self-rule. Just ignore the distance and demography issues for now, this obviously wouldn't actually work, instead think about what that transition would look like. The British "Indian Civil Service" would have to be dismantled...which was like 10k brits vs over 100k Indians. Actual british military officers in the country in the 19th century was less than 100k - and it was a rotating duty, they didn't all live there. Dismantling that really isn't that hard! Those people just go home. The core that ruled was deeply integrated into the country, but it was tiny - the vast majority of India was ruled by Indians, in the name of the Crown. They would just...keep going but now be in parliament.
That was impossible in Ireland. Britain had actually launched one of the most intensive cultural conversion programs of a foreign nation around in the 17th and 18th centuries, it was nowhere close to the "light imperial touch" of elsewhere. But it never...worked. Instead it just built this gigantic ruling class, deeply enmeshed in both Ireland and England, completely dependent on that superiority economically, but seen as outsiders by the Catholic Irish majority. "Protestant & Catholic" is at least half a gigantic class war. And in the 19th century the UK brought "laissez faire liberalism" to Ireland and was like "look, we are equal now!" after two+ centuries of rigging the system. It was literally the "kicking out the ladder after climbing up" equality meme.
This was why Home Rule was so bitterly contested, why Protestant Anglo-Irish officers threatened to mutiny in 1912 if it was implemented. They understood that the first acts of Home Rule were going to be, essentially, reparations. Which the Irish almost surely deserved. But Imperial, Liberal, 19th Century UK was not going to give reparations to the fucking Irish, it was not ready to dismantle its dejure and defacto aristocrats in that way - or at least not until it was too late, some land reform for example did begin in 1903. Scotland didn't need it, Wales was too weak to fight it, but Ireland was in the sweet spot of being weak enough to be oppressed but strong enough to oppose it and fight back once the culture changed.
Or at least that is my current read, this is a low-confidence post. Curious to learn more!
115 notes · View notes
dontmeantobepoliticalbut · 5 months ago
Text
By Steve Corbin
According to a May 15 NBC News report, there are a multitude of issues that voters must discern about Joe Biden, Donald Trump and the independent presidential candidates before voting on Nov. 5. Logically, the importance of each issue differs between and among America’s 161.4 million registered voters.
One issue missing from the NBC News report that has become a focal point of the Biden camp, Make America Great Again Republicans and third-party candidates is democracy vs. authoritarianism. Specifically, on Jan. 20, 2025, will the duly elected and inaugurated president of the United States keep America as a democracy that dates back to the 1630’s in the New England colonies, or will it be the start of changing the country to authoritarian fascism?
If you’ve not heard of Project 2025, it’s very worthy of your independent investigation. Project 2025 is a playbook specifically created for Donald Trump and his supporters to use in the first 180 days of Trump’s 2025-29 presidential administration. The far-right extremism-based Heritage Foundation proudly takes claim for facilitating the creation of the 887-page turning-democracy-into-an-authoritarian-country document.
Project 2025’s two editors had assistance from 34 authors, 277 contributors, a 54-member advisory board and a coalition of over 100 conservative organizations (including the American Legislative Exchange Council, the Heartland Institute, Liberty University, Middle East Forum, Moms for Liberty, the National Rifle Association, Pro-Life America and Tea Party Patriots).
Project 2025 is a serious endeavor, if Trump returns to the White House, to make America a fascist country. After all, on May 20, Trump posted a video on his Truth Social media account depicting his 2025-29 administration as a “Unified Reich.” (Hitler’s Third Reich occurred from 1933 to 1945.)
Download the Project 2025 document (it's linked from this essay) so you can check out the disconcerting manuscript that tells Trump what specifically to do from Jan. 20 to July 18, 2025, to convert America into an authoritarian regime.
The 30 chapters of Project 2025 are a daunting read. Project 2025 proposes, among a host of things, eliminating the Department of Education, eliminating the Department of Commerce, deploying the US military whenever protests erupt, dismantling the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, removing sexual and gender protected discrimination and terminating diversity, equity, inclusion and affirmative action.
Additional mandates include: siphoning off billions of dollars of public school funding, funding private school choice vouchers, phasing out public education’s Title I program, gutting the nation’s free school meals program, eliminating the Head Start program, banning books and suppressing any curriculum that discusses the evils of slavery.
Project 2025 also calls for banning abortion (which makes women second-class citizens), restricting access to contraception, forcing would-be immigrants to be detained in concentration camps, eliminating Title VII and Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, recruiting 54,000 loyal MAGA Republicans to replace existing federal civil servants, and ending America’s bedrock principle that separates church from state.
A news story in Politico described Project 2025 as an authoritarian Christian nationalist movement and a path for the US to become an autocracy. Several legal experts have indicated implementing the 180-day manual would undermine the rule of law and the separation of powers.
As noted earlier, Project 2025 is worthy of your independent investigation. So that you’ll be in-the-know as to what authoritarianism looks like, seriously consider reading one research-based book per month for the next five months as pre-election homework. Here’s my suggested reading assignment:
JUNE: "On Tyranny: 20 lessons from the 20th century," Timothy Snyder, 2017.
JULY: "Twilight of Democracy: The seductive lure of authoritarianism," Anne Applebaum, 2020. Chapters IV, V and VI get to the bottom line.
AUGUST: "Democracy Awakening: Notes on the State of America," Heather Cox Richardson, 2023.
SEPTEMBER: "Attack from Within: How Disinformation is Sabotaging America," Barbara McQuade, 2024. The 1,717 reference citations proves this is well researched and an honest read.
OCTOBER: "1984," George Orwell, 1949. Orwell’s novel shows Americans what life would be like under totalitarian and oppressive rule.
Reading even just one of these books will enable you to discern political candidate and party-based disinformation, misinformation and propaganda from truth, ready to vote on Nov. 5 and keep America a democracy.
30 notes · View notes
i-am-the-oyster · 9 months ago
Note
This is probably an insane ask because obviously we will never know, but do you think John and Paul would’ve made up if he was still alive today ? Would him and yoko still be together? Or would he and Paul become something more ? Genuinely curious to hear your thoughts !
I'm 100% convinced they would have made up by now. John was well on his way to mellowing. There was a lot of water under the bridge. And things that seem insurmountable when you're 29 and traumatised just don't seem that impossible when you're 50 and have taken some time to yourself and processed your shit.
I think, over the years, that Paul has somewhat exaggerated the degree to which they had reconciled by the time of John's passing (Just based on the way he tells the story in '81 vs how he tells it now). But I do think it was heading that direction, and I won't begrudge him imagining they got the chance.
I believe the various hints and implications that John was planning to be in England in late 1980, early '81. And I think it's very likely they were at least going to try working together. Maybe the reason Paul has never said anything about those plans is that John swore him to secrecy and never got to lift the ban?
If I could indulge in a little fantasy:
The recording studio was available in Dec 1980, so John was in London. The Jerk chose another target, and was apprehended. The sessions went really well, and they started working on a new Beatles album. John stayed with Paul in Sussex for the duration, and discovered he got on really well with Linda. Yoko stayed in New York to take care of their business interests.
When John got back to New York, Yoko explained the concept of Conscious Uncoupling to him and they decided it was exactly what they needed. They had an amicable divorce, with John taking majority (but not sole) custody of Sean. He and Sean moved back to England and got a place in Dorset (near Mimi) and became avid sailors.
George had no interest in touring, but the four of them eventually decided that they'd like to do very occasional small gigs, so when all four schedules came into alignment they would do a tiny gig on short notice. These concerts would become absolutely legendary. There were all sorts of rumours about how you could figure out where the next one would be. But the truth was there was no system. Whenever they were together they would argue about where to go. More often than not picking a place based on how silly the name was.
The songs performed were just as unpredictable. Beatles songs, solo songs, Oldies but Goodies from their Hamburg days, something current from the radio. Whatever they felt like that night.
When Linda got sick, John started spending a lot of time at their place. That was when Linda discovered that John and Paul had never shagged. She laughed her ass off and called them "ridiculous boys".
Shortly before the end she took John's hands in hers and looked him solemnly in the eye and said "he's going to need you. I picked up the pieces after you, now you pick up the pieces after me" and poked him hard in the chest.
A year later, immediately after the Concert for Linda, John declared it was time for Paul to learn to sail. Paul being Paul, and John being John, they took John's boat out in worse weather than was advisable. And so it was that they were soaked with salt-water, and utterly exhausted, when they finally kissed.
28 notes · View notes
basicallyblank · 1 year ago
Text
Australia vs England World Cup semi final; thoughts
ENGLAND ARE THROUGH TO THE WORLD CUP FINAL !!! I thought we played fantastic today, eery player genuinely stepped up and got the job done. We went into this game looked at as the underdog, people didn't expect us to win, we saw who the ref was and didn't think this game would go well, we saw that we were wearing the away kit and thought some curse was going to get us, the code to the England fans allocated seats got leaked and Australian fans bought most of them, some Australian news paper sent a HELICOPTER to spy on us... but this team blocked out every single bit of that noise out and did all of their talking on the pitch.
Our backline was a brickwall today, for the most part :) There were mistakes made with the Sam Kerr goal, but they didn't let that happen again, they regrouped and Millie Bright put her body on the line time and time again to stop Sam Kerr. Her long balls were the difference today, passing the ball down down the field which lead to the Hemp ad Russo goals which made us abe to safely see the game out and relax was one of the reasons we won. Lucy Bronze was everywhere again today, she put her body on the line (her bloody ankle says it all) and her headers which got the ball away helped us, she knows how to see out a game ;) annoying for some but she knows. Jess Carter and Alex Greenwood have saved us throughout this tournament, Jess Carter covering for Lucy Bronze and allowing her to go forward and covering that space in behind her so that opposition attackers cant make crosses or get up the pitch has saved us many times, shes been a rock this tournament. Alex Greenwood, the stats speak for themself, shes been our best player. She's created the most chances at this world cup (14) and her passing is pin point, she only made 5 incorrect passes against Australia.
We've all had concerns about our midfield throughout this tournament, it was a target area for other teams to silence, which significantly damages our play, but this team always finds a way. Ella Toone, recieved a lot of criticism this tournament, from myself as well, but in this game she showed up and reminded everyone of what she's capable of, showing up in big moments. The pockets of space she was picking up during that game which allowed passes to flow through from the backline into our attacking line were fantastic, she scored a rocket of an opening goal and overall had a great match. Keira Walsh, another outstanding tournament from her, her off the ball work is excellent, probably been marked more than she would have liked but she still manages to make it work, KW4 world cup final first england winning goal incoming ?? ;)
Our attacking lineeeeee cmonnnnnn. goals galore, probably not as many as we'd like to have seen, but they got the job done ! most of the time :) Lauren Hemp has set this tournament alight, as has Alessia Russo. Rachel Daly has been good at the front and at the back, which speaks volumes of her quality. Now that we're in the final, means that Lauren James can return to the squad following a 2 match ban after recieving a red card in the RO16 against Nigeria, curious to see where she'll fit into the plans for the final, she was having a good tournament and could've potentially been in the race for golden boot.
Mary Earps has obviously been THEE difference maker, the life saver, the game changer. England have conceded THREE times in this tournament. Three times. She's the best in the world for a reason she the least she deserves is her shirt being sold.
The Jordan not playing thing, will address my thoughts because i get a few asks lol. Obviously its disheartening that she hasn't gotten any game time, she left Arsenal to get into this squad, she really wanted to be here. Jordan will know her role in this team, she's an older player now, she's been out of the national team for a while, on the outskirts not really having a role, she's come back with a fresh mentality and new experiences to draw upon for this tournament. She's elevating this team, the younger players, Alessia, Ella ect have all said how close shes become to everyone in this team, shes uplifting them so they can perform at their best. She'll have known her role going into this tournament, obviously its sad she hasn't gotten any game time but if she lifts that trophy on sunday, i dont think she'll mind too much.
On sunday, we play in the final of the World Cup for the first time ever, we've won the Euro's (where we beat spain), we've won the finilissima, today we defeated the only team we've lost to since Sarina took over in 2021. This team are not finished yet, people underestimated us going into this tournament, they underestimated us today, on sunday we'll show them that we cant, and shouldn't be underestimated. In Sarina we trust xx
35 notes · View notes
sakiye · 7 months ago
Text
i have standards to which international cricket teams i support (none of them when they go against india ofc). for example,
NZ - i like them, cute, i want them to win a tournament soon but also no bc 2019 made me cry
AUS - makes me want to kms every five seconds when they go against india but they're so good u have to respect them (also im kinda obsessed with pat cummins so take of that what you will) but also travis head jfc
WI - so cool. so many legends so cool im so excited for their comeback
PAK - the pakistan/india rivalry is bs we're all desi at the end of the day but i want to go to a pak. vs. ind match just for the vibes bc u know the fans will go all out (india better win)
SL - they're cool, i like malinga, also lowkey i want to see sl and ban. go again. just to see what would happen
BAN - same as above, they're cool
SA - Also sooo good i have to respect them but still no
AFG - so cute i support them always (non india games ofc)
NED - cuties im excited to see them grow
USA - very curious to see cricket's rise in the us but also i need to look at the players more bc if i was on the us team i would be supporting india no matter what im curious to see the idols of these players
CAN - same as USA let's be fr i don't really know either team
IRE - whatever happens here england loses so i win either way, excited
ENG - you will never ever get me to support them. hate them on principle may they be last in every icc tournament
6 notes · View notes
Text
the rosary in michif
So the way I rewrote this is how to pronounce it with symbols that make sense to me. I also changed the english versions so you know how these things are pronounced.
ɑ = anywhere between father & mop
a = the a in the french la, or anywhere between the a in above & father, (not in between like the way the o in above is in between u from rut & o from mop), except the a in above is more like the u in bun or the e in the, but in the english I started using u to symbolize the u in crutch/a in above/o in above (even tho it is more like the o in mop or the o in more without the w at the end)/e in the
é = the e in met or pen
æ = late, bait, may eidelweiss
i = if, bit, some ppl even use this i in both halves of spirit (if they don't say spyyrit), & sometimes that sound that is like "eu" crossed with "uh" crossed with "o'" crossed with "a" crossed with "e" & you just can't exactly tell what it is
í = eat, feeble, meme
o = anywhere between boat & the first two "ho"s of ho ho ho, it can be the o,w of words like hope, or it can be just the o' like if someone interrupted you before you finished saying "go". It's almost like how er starts with eu & ends with r, this starts with o' & ends with w,
oo = on in french, between boat & boot, it's like the "o" from above was a little more short/fat in your mouth so it is slightly more like a "w" but not quite, & then you do end it with that diphthong w. Like if you end the french garcon with a w as well as an n.
ʊ = oo, like shoe which can be eu'w, or it can be just the w (which is a vowel, the welsh are right), who, the first part of when, or when you say a really elongated "ooh" not just an euw but an euwwwww!, the end of "oh!"
eu = book, look, cook, hurt, the french feu, birch, earl, like take your tongue down from the back there & stop saying the r, it's like how we say "uh" in north america but they spell it "er" in england, they don't mean ir/eur, they mean euh. Like heard in a british accent
ä = a like cat. It was originally written as ae, but ae to me means éy (or ah-y), while in michif according to my legend it is supposed to mean a like ban. I actually do get it being spelled ae, but I used to spell it aa & have taco be spelled ah & lot be spelled aw (cahmmin vs cawmmun being two ways to say common). Anyway this is the a like fabulous or the way your white (not european) grandmother says pasta.
š = technically sh, but I actually often pronounce this as an s. Many cree speakers, especially as they get older, say things with a bit of a lisp, making the s turn into sh, & we have taken that into michif. In fact, the word michif comes from the lisping of the t in metis into ts, & the all-too-common lisping of ts into ch. You can say as s or as sh & it is fine
č = ch, in michif we usually say it more like ch, the "tsh" sound, but in cree it is more like ts, sort of like the japanese tsu. You know how ts is at the very front of your mouth but ch is a little farther back & a little more on the edges? Go halfway in between. Keep a little more contact with either side of the front of your tongue, & say it. Mix ts & ch to get smth halfway between. It's almost like chs in the way it sounds, but more like tch in the way it feels. Evn throw in a bit of soft "th" in there if you need.
I don't think I have ñ, but it is like a "ng" that doesn't quite make contact. It's the french n
r = Two options here. Option 1: earl but hover before you close your teeth on the r. Feel how far back that is in your mouth? Push it a little farther back, push that r a little further in general. Instead of that r being stupidly in your teeth (that's the reason kids way w instead), keep it closer to your throat, more in your soft palate, not where the bone starts. Option 2: khrkhrkhrkhrkhr almost like that arabic crackly h, & it can be voiced or unvoiced. It's a trilled g. Not a trilled d like in spanish though. Make the sound like the dentist's vacuum. It's a fricative.
ž = j, like how ch is just tsh, j is just dj, like how s becomes sh, z becomes zh. It is j without the starting d.
Some of the Gs can also be Ks occasionally, along with many other consonants. t/d, p/b, etc.
In fact, k/p/t are often pronounced softer, less aspirated.
hk can be either h,k or it can be the semitic/celtic ch like in bach or loch. hp can be like the filipino f that they make bilabial instead of labiodental.
I think that's everything. It is a lot more simple than writing it out seems.
Oh & in english I used eth & thorn, eth being bath/thank & thorn being bathe/that
Li Shaplæ - The Holy Rosary
Wíčæwagɑnɑ Tapætamwag –
Apostle's Creed
Ndɑpwæténn li Bonjeu,
li Papa kašokatišidmawači,
kɑkiw kaožitɑt li syél ékwa la tér.
Ndɑpwæténn li Jéyzʊs
kɑgíkičítotɑt péyʊg égo son
Garsoo, kɑnígɑníštamagoyak,
kíošíéw očé
okičitawišokišíwinn avik
ékičitwɑwak Kinígígwann,
ékwa énítawigit očé la Sänt Vyɑrž.
Pontyas Paylat nɑšpič kígwatagíéw
li Bonjeuwa, kíšagawéywag
denn krwa, kínipo, ékwa kínačigɑšo. 
Kíšidša'hwawandagɑnipočig,
dɑn la trwazyém žʊrnæ kípašéygo mína.
Dɑn li syél kítotéw,
ékwa kíapígɑšo andɑ
tapiškoč Papa.  Mína tapætotéw
čipæwíéšowɑdat kapimɑtišíid
ékwa kɑnipoyit.
Ndɑpwæténn ékičitwɑwak
Kinígígwann, kɑkičitwɑwak liglíz,
kakío kapimičawɑčig li Bonjeu
awɑ dɑn li syél ékwa dɑn la tér kakío
li Bonjeu sa famí, čiponéy čigɑtég
kamačítočigɑtég, li kor číapačipɑt
ékwa čipimɑtišik tapitaw.  Answičil.
Aí bilív in God, þa Fɑþer ɑlmaítí,
kríæter av hévén änd eurð.
änd Aí bilív in Jízas kraíst, hiz only San,
äwr Lord, hʊ waz kɑnsívd baí
þa päweur av þa Holí Spírit, änd
born av þa Veurjin Méry.
Hí suffeurd undeur Pɑnčas Paílit
waz krʊsifaíd, daíd, änd waz beuríd. 
Hí déséndid tʊ þa déd, änd ɑn
þa ðird dæ hí roz agén.  Hí
aséndid intʊ hévin, änd iz sítid
ät þa raít händ uv þa Fɑþeur.  Hí
will kum ugén in glorí tʊ juj
þa living änd þa déd.
Aí bilív in þa Holí Spirit, þa holy
käðlik čeurč, þa kommyʊnyeun av
sænts, þa forgivniss av sins, þa
réseurrékšan av þa bɑdy, änd laíf
éveurlästing.  ɑmén.
Ton Pérínɑnn - Our Father
Ton Pérínɑnn, dɑn li syél kayɑyénn
kíčitwɑwann ton noo.
Kiya kɑníkɑništamann péytotéíé
kɑndawætamann tɑtočíkatéw
ota dɑn la tér tɑpiškoč dɑn li syél.
Mínɑnn anoč mon pänínɑnn
ponæíminɑnn kamačitotamɑk,
níštanɑnn nkaponæmɑnɑnik
aniké kɑkímaítotɑkoyɑkʊk
kayakočíinɑnn, mɑka
pašpíinɑnn ɑyik očé
mɑčíšíwæpišiwinn.
Kɑníkɑníštamawíɑk,
kišokišíwinn, kɑkičitæmíak
kiya aníé, anoč ékwa takíné.  Answičil.
Awr Fɑþeur in Hévin, yor næm
iz holí.  Mæ yor kingdeum keum,
änd yor will bí dun ɑn eurð äz
it iz in hévin.
Giv us teudæ þu fʊd þät wí níd
änd forgiv us for aʊr sinz,
just az wí forgiv þoz hʊ sin
ugænst us.
Giv us stréngð to résist témptæšun,
änd kíp us frum ɑll ívil.  ɑmén.
Kičítéím Li Bonjeu - Glory Bé
Kičítéím kí Papaínɑnn,
ékwa li Garsoo,
ékwa Ékičitwɑwak Kinígígwann.
Tɑpiškoč kɑmɑčipaíik,
ékwa šæmɑk, ékwa tɑpitaw ~
la tér ékɑ čiponipɑyik.  Answičil. 
Glorí bí tʊ þa Fathér, änd tʊ
þu Son, änd tʊ þa Holí Spírit, äz
it wuz in þu béginning, iz naw,
änd forévir šäll bí ~ weurld
wiðawt énd.  Amén.
O Mon Jéyzʊ - Oh My Jízus
O Mon Jéyzʊs, ponæminɑnn
kɑmačitotamɑk, pašpíinɑnn
dɑn li feu očé dɑn lenfér.
Nígɑníšta kɑkío ninígíawɑnɑnig ékwa anigé nawač kandawéítakig
číkitimɑgæ mɑčig.  Answičil.
O mɑy Jízus, forgiv us awr sinz
änd sæv us from þu fɑyrz uv héll. 
Líd ɑll soolz tʊ hévin, éspéšullí
þos most in níd uv yor meurcy.  Amén.
Kigičítéímitínɑnn Marí - Hail Mary
Kigičítéímitínɑnn Marí,
ékičítéímit, Li Bonjeu wiya
avik twa.  ékičítakišoyénn
kiya ki tʊ lí fém, ékwa
kíčitwɑwɑnɑ mawišwɑnɑ
kapimotɑtayénn katɑk Jéyzʊ.
Kíčitwɑwann Marí, Mér di
Bonjeu, ayamíéštémoinɑnn
šæmɑk ékwa atinapoyɑko.  Answičil.
Hæl Mærí, full ɑv græs, þu
Lord iz wið yʊ.  Bléssid ɑr
yʊ amung wimin, änd
bléssid iz þu frʊt uv yor wʊm
Jízas.  Holí Mérí, Muþeur uv Gɑd,
præ for us sinneurs, naw, änd ät
þí aʊr uv awr déð.  ɑmén.
Míawɑtann Mɑmaškɑč
i.  Li tɑnž Gabríél kípæwítamawéw la Sänt Vyɑrž än pičí Jéyzʊ  æwéyɑwat.
ii.  La Sänt Vyɑrž kígíogawéw sa koʊzinn ílizabéth.
iii.  Li pičí Jéyzʊ natɑwagéw.
iv.  Li pičí Jéyzʊ kítotaígɑšo kɑkičitowak la Méyzon.
v.  Kímiškɑgɑšo li pičí Jéyzʊ kɑkičotawak la Méyzon égoté žérʊsalém.
Mɑmatawinɑgwanɑ Kɑwašaškotéígé
- þe Luminous Mysteries
i.  Jéyzʊs kíšigayatagašo dɑn la rivyér dé žordan.
ii.  än nas aštéw én Kana.
iii.  Jéyzʊs itwéw kakičitowišid pé ayaw.
iv.  Jéyzʊs wapataíwéw ogičitoišíwinn éywɑškošod kíošta'ayik wiya dɑn li montaynn dé Téybor.
v.  éškwač Jéyzʊs sʊpí kɑmíčišočig avik wíčéwagana kígímíægonɑnnwiyawɑnn ékwa son sɑn, číwíčéwayak tapitaw. (the institution of the eucharist at the Last Supper.  Jesus gives us his body änd blood so that we can choose to receive eternal life.)   
Mitɑtætɑgwann Mɑmaškɑč
i.  Jéyzʊs kwatagætaw dɑn li žardan. (I've heard it as "jargin" not just "jardan")
ii.  Jéyzʊs kínočígɑšo än fwét kíabačitɑwag ékwa lí ploon égígamogé.(the scourging at the pillar has a much longer name here: he is tied to a pillar & beaten with a whip made with lead)
iii.  Jéyzʊs kíačigɑtéw än koronn oči šnélí.
iv.  Jéyzʊs kípimíwatægɑšo la krwé. (I'd actually say krwa like krwoa bc it is croix in french, but michif is like cowboy french)
v.  Jéyzʊs kíšagɑwéywag dɑn la krwé očičig ékwa očitak.
Mɑtawpayinn dɑn li Syél - Glorious Mysteries
i.  Apičípaw Jéyzʊs niponik očé.
ii.  Jéyzʊs dɑn li syél itotéw.
iii.  ékičitwawišid péítotéw.
iv.  La Sänt Vyɑrž šipwétaígašo dɑn li syél.
v.  La Sänt Vyɑrž ošigašo la Rénn dɑn li syél.
Kígičítéímitínɑnn Kɑgičitwɑošyénn La Rénn - Hail Holy Queen
Kígičítéímitínɑnn
Kɑgičitwɑošíénn La Rénn,
Mama očé gɑšɑgí'íwét. 
Kičítéítɑ mbimɑtišiwinínɑnn,
kɑšíwišíɑk, ékwa
kɑpagošéítamɑk.
Nimɑtonɑnn mon Sänt Vyɑrž
anɑnn očé kɑwæpinigɑšoyak
líz enfen očé ív.
Ota dɑn la valí mɑtowinn, ékwa
kɑgɑškéítamik,
kígagwæčímikawinn
číwíčí'íɑk.
Ayamíéš tamɑwínɑnn
wíjí'ínɑnn čimiškawayɑk
ton garsoo Jéyzʊs.  Answičil.
missing in the translation so idk if it is correct: thine eyes of mercy toward us & after this our exile show unto us the blessed fruit of thy woumb, o clement o loving o sweet virgin mary pray for us oh holy mother of got that we may be made worthy of the promises of christ let us pray grant we bessech you that by meditating on the holy mysteries of the most holy rosary of the blessed virgin mary we may both imitate what they contain and obtain what they promise through the same christ our lord amen. It's missing it after it says "pray for us most gracious advocate & help us to know your son jesus" which is skipping the "turn" your eyes & the exile part. It is also missing toe rosary closing which is not technically part of the prayer but I associate it with the salve regina bc that's when I usually say it.
Ayamíɑwinn očé ékičitwɑwak Kinígígwɑnn - Prayer to þa Holy Spirit
 Kɑníganíštamɑwíak dɑn li
syél, ana kaočicanawapamigoyɑk,
onígí'igwɑnɑ kɑtɑpwæit
mišíwæayaw ékwa kakío
kégwéy kaítagwak, anda
kaočikičitotagawíak, ékwa
pimɑtišíwinn kɑmí'igoyak;
Pépítigwæ dɑn mon čoér,
kišípégininɑnn
čígɑšíɑpawitayénn ægok
kɑpémačitotamak,
pimɑčitɑ ní'ígígwaínɑnn
kɑkičitowišíénn.  Answičil.
Jéyzʊs Mon Bonjeuínɑnn - Jesus prayer (better translates to jesus my God(our's)
Jéyzʊs Mon Bonjeuínɑnn,
li Garsoo kapimɑtišid očé
ton Bonjeuínɑnn,
kitimɑgæminɑnn
kɑmačigækwyʊiɑk,
kiyanɑnn očé kapašpí'íwét.  Answičil.
4 notes · View notes
tiredgayloser · 2 years ago
Text
you know it's a good game when nobody knows what the fuck is going on
3 notes · View notes
thessalian · 4 months ago
Text
Thess vs Cautionary Tales
Okay, here's another reason for all of you in the US to please please please fucking vote Democrat in November. Because there's shit going on in the UK right now that's a hangover from our fifteen or so fucking years of Conservative government, and it's ugly.
The other day, a bunch of people got arrested for conspiracy to organise protests.
Not even, like, actually protesting, which would still be pretty fucking egregious (and has been happening for awhile here in the UK, frankly), but for planning one.
Full story is that back in 2022, a bunch of Stop Oil people were planning on blocking the M25 in a large non-violent protest. They planned this on Zoom, apparently. Someone went undercover, found out what they were planning, and arrested the ringleaders. Because the Crown Court's been rather backlogged, and even more so because of the Covid lockdowns, they only went to trial a couple of weeks ago. The ringleader was sentenced to five years. His "co-conspirators" were sentenced to four years each.
Look, I get that blocking the M25 is not a great thing for a lot of people and businesses, especially in London (which is still basically the hub of everything in this country). For you Americans - the M25 entirely circles London. If traffic isn't moving on the M25, you aren't getting into or out of London. Plus even if you only block parts of it, you're causing traffic chaos in greater London because you'd have to travel through the city to find a spot that wasn't shut down. Blocking the M25 is to England what the Evergreen blocking the Suez was to ... well, a lot of places.
Thing is? They hadn't done it. They took no actual action. I can see where your non-violent protest there would come with a host of ancillary criminal charges for which they would be arrested, but there was a way to both stop it and not be all about the fucking thoughtcrime. An insider could have sabotaged the whole thing if they even came close to enacting their blockage of the M25, and then they'd have an actual action to arrest them for. But no. They arrested them for talking about it. That was it.
This country has gone to hell, and a lot of it is down to what the Tories put into practice during their years in power. There's voter ID, which Jacob Rees-Mogg outright admitted was gerrymandering and voter suppression, and was almost certainly at least a part of the painfully low voter turnout earlier this month. There's the Public Order Bill, which made arresting these people for even talking about protesting legal. There's the Police, Crime, Sentencing, and Courts bill, which preceded the Public Order Bill and started the job of eliminating our right to peaceful protest in this country. They're outright banning puberty blockers not only in NHS practice, but in private practice as well.
For those of you thinking, "Well, you have a Democrat equivalent in government now, and nothing's any better for you, so why bother?" See, this is why you bother. Your news outlets don't talk about it enough, because it's not sensational enough (because, c'mon, they're in it to generate ad revenue or very occasionally sell papers; they want entertainment and the spectacle is profitable for them), but Biden has done some wonderful things for the US already. Also, he seems quite keen to do even more once the razor-thin Republican majority in the Senate and Congress gets overturned and stops blocking him at every turn. This is more than our so-called Labour government has promised to do.
The thing is, the reason Labour went this way is that our actually progressive Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, was a) moving too fast with the changes for most people, and b) slandered to hell and back by the opposition, with no critical thinkers looking any deeper into the slander at all. They called him antisemitic. They said he was going to bankrupt the nation. (Not that the Tories didn't do a great job of that, frankly, but y'know.) He was reactionary and the people who rely on sacrificing most of the population for the wealth of a few panicked and basically got him blackballed. Labour decided he was unelectable as a result, and they threw him and every other progressive in the party out - that in favour of people who quote Thatcher and seem happy to continue the punitive policies of the Tories. They decided that this bigoted bullshit is what gets votes.
Do you want to show that "slow and steady wins the race" doesn't get votes? Because if you do that, take it from me - the entire Democratic party will boot out anyone remotely progressive and take the party to the right in self-defense. I know because I've seen it. I know because I am living it even as we speak, and it is fucking terrifying.
Biden is playing the game but he still seems to be playing the game for you. He's moving slowly to not panic businesses, because if he moves too fast, they will destroy him. He's not doing anything sensational because sensational policies alarm people. But he's moving, and if you actually do some research, you will see that. And yes, he's willing to let the genocide in Gaza continue, but Trump just wants to nuke them. So if every vote not cast, or cast for a third party, is a vote for Trump? You're voting for a localised Armageddon in Palestine.
Voter suppression. Transphobic policies going into effect nationwide (not just the puberty blocker ban, by the way - there's very much a turn on banning trans women from single-sex spaces). The erosion and basic destruction of our right to peacefully protest. We can be arrested for even talking about a protest that disrupts anything (which is the only way a protest actually works). Labour may be a little better than the Tories, but it isn't by much. That all happened because the so-called left leaned too far to the right to achieve power, and now we look from the pigs to the men, and then back, and discover that there is no difference. Yeah, basically this entire country is a piquant little blend of 1984 and Animal Farm. Those were supposed to be cautionary tales, not how-to guides!
Yes, I am passionate about this. I have to be. I've been where you are, and I'm living what happens next. I want better for you. If I have to live in a cautionary tale, I want the people who can still learn from it to have better.
3 notes · View notes
nomsfaultau · 4 months ago
Note
(Not) Daily ask №32
I really don't think that I can keep up the 5 questions every single day thing. Procrastination gets the better of me : (
Isekai edition!
1. What is your favourite universe? Like a favourite show, game, book, etc.
2. What are your 3 favourite characters from that universe?
3 What is your favourite time period of the universe? Ex. Pogtopia arc for dsmp, an episode of a show, a scene from a book.
4. What is your favourite antagonist/villain from that universe?
5. BOOM fault crew gets into your favourite universe, in your favourite time period of the show, with your favourite characters finding them first and then they meet your favourite antagonist. How does that go?
There is completely no obligation to do anything ever, buddy. 
1.Really hard to look past the haze of Fault that’s been my brain for years. That said, I’ve been having an INSANELY good time with Taz vs Dracula recently. Essentially it’s a DND campaign where they go through a wacky gothic horror setting that’s very heavy on the comedy, all in the name of defeating Dracula. It incorporates a lot of free domain characters, so like Pinocchio, Mickey Mouse, King Arthur, the invisible man show up (or doesn’t, he’s a flakey POS). All with some crazy twist of course ofcours. Absolute blast. 
And no read more line because I’m proselytizing for this podcast now okay ok. 
2. Lady Godwin. She’s a posh old lady who got run over by Dracula and the Wolf Man (who is a bad influence on Dracula). She had a Frankenstein life policy but it got shut down due to bad business practice, and her head got stuck on a barbarian lady’s body. On top of that severe body dysphoria, Lady Godwin gets bitten by a were-horse and gets transported to the mental realm of Oats on occasion. She’s prim and huffy and goes into destructive rages. Perfect woman. 
Thumbs. Thumbs is a were-orangutan DJ for the Wolf Man’s nightclub, since he’s the only one with thumbs. There’s supposed to be a spell that allows everyone to communicate with one another, but he just speaks in monkey noises. Notably is banned from pushing the big red button on his DJ set up. BUt ooooooh man. Wants to. Deserves to. (this destroyed the were-house were-nightclub)
An. He’s an almost dead god of night with a dedicated cult and the Sword in the Stone jammed through his skull, pinning him in spot because evil cults don’t tend to have a lot of people pure of heart and rightful king of England material? Who knew. He’s so suave and has a major superiority complex and is so so so overtly evil but the DND party is just so chill about debating whether or not to free him. But An has searched all of the land to find the most Pure of Heart….and landed on Brother Phileaux, the monk currently sharing a Pinocchio body with THE Van Helsing. Who is an absolute little freak, mind, so I have absolutely zero idea why he’s trying to (in his own words) 4D chess manipulate Phileaux when he is pure by no one’s standards and also very dumb. It’s very hard to be a gaslight gatekeep girlbosser when dealing with stupid adventurers. Poor guy. He dies due to the redneck Mutt becoming the casual King of England, a reverse knock knock joke and the Toby Slayer*, and a cross that the interim-temporary Turbo Cardinal stole once. 
3. Episode 16 is my favorite part. Literally howling the entire time. Acquiring the Toby Slayer*, a legendary sword that obliterates anyone named Toby with. Yes this means they spend the rest of the campaign trying to name people Toby (nicknames, telling an amnesiac their name is Toby, shortening Turbo Cardinal to Toby (works because one of them is the king of England via authoritarian legends). They kill a god using the Toby slayer. This all happened because the DM tried to give last minute flavor text to a loot item. Casually water boarding the severed head of a Dracula clone while discussing if they could raise him to be the ‘good Dracula’. Meeting a crazy fish monster man with a basketball wife named Elizabeth, who is a druid that only turns into sports items. Taking a break from a revenge quest to play the sickest game of volleyball ever using said sports druid. Lady Godwin randomly biting a severed ear. The ENTIRE inventory situation of Phileaux, including teeth from a sea monster, said severed ear, and LITERALLY HIS OWN DEAD BODY SHRUNKEN DOWN INTO A LITTLE VILE. The offhand discussion about if Phileaux should make a flesh homunculous using spare Dracula clone parts. I think this TAZ episode made me laugh the most, though the Steeplechase campaign where they went on the trashiest dating show ever was so choice too. Schlebethany my beloved….
4. DRACULA. Oh my god he’s soooooooo fun. Might be my favorite villain ever. Absolute love to hate character, except he’s so funny and charismatic that it’s hard to hate him even though like terrible evil dude. But he’s also a complete dork, and cringes about his ‘wizard phase’ and opines about how everyone wants to kill him :( so rude. He had a toxic BFF relationship with the Wolf Man but had to cut him out for being a ‘bad influence’ (HE IS DRACULA THIS MAN IS THE WORST). He helps Mutt (protag) pull out his fangs to make earrings. All of his clones insist they’re ‘the good’ Dracula. Dracula had an unrequited romantic relationship with Dr. Frankenstein, and is now in a love triangle with him and another Dracula clone, who wants to kill OG Drac for breaking Frankenstein’s heart. He is a staunch supporter of the fine arts. So far I think he might be trying to mind control an entire town/end the world (?) via evil airpods because he can’t get one song out of his head from when he was a kid. And also so he doesn’t have to drink blood anymore because it’s yucky >.<
Like. Just listen to him:
“Dear diary.
How come everybody wants to kill Dracula?
I mean, the people whose villages I’ve razed to the ground, whose family trees I’ve so thoroughly pruned, them I understand. But how did my vulnerabilities become the topic of casual dinner table conversation? I don’t talk about the weaknesses of mortal men, and Lord knows I could. I may be biased, but it seems these days that haters are coming at me left, right, and center…(enter SICK MUSIC RIFF)
5.Tubbo will get obliterated. No help for it. The SECOND the DND party finds out their name, the Toby Slayer is going to come out. Thems the rules. Or they’d try, but the Fault crew would step in and then the DND party would be really chill and laid-back, brushing off the murder attempt while everyone else is freaking out. Tubbo would probably try to convince Phileaux to work more with Van Helsing on the semi system thing. Overall freaked out about how casual murder is here. Second, Wilbur is having a bad time due to the permanent eternal night upon the land. Oh well. Flashlights may or may not exist, since we have both horse-drawn carriages and Honda elontras show up? Good luck lmao. Phileaux could probably cast light on a pointed Pinocchio hat for him. But would be wayyy too interested in getting samples from the void. Tommy thinks it’s spooky as hell. Maybe Elizabeth could teach him the cantrip Shape Water, which would solve 99% of his problem if he can artificially control Red. Wait. And he can touch Brother Phileaux! That’s big for him, until Phileaux says something offputting and oh muffin that wasn’t a joke- The Blade is really vibing with Mutt, since, ranger. They’re also very blunt and straight forward characters. And he’d love Lady Agatha (dog). Probably Lady Godwin too for their similar rage modes, but the comments about curvaceousness would make him awkward. I really really really want Philza to party with the Wolf Man. But the auto killing any non were-person would be a damper on the relationship. And Philza isn’t at random haha murder philosophy atm, so would probably not hang even if he can pass. Ah wait forgot he’s super duper beheaded by this point of the series, moot point. He can definitely gel with Lady Godwin and Elizabeth about getting lost in the sauce re: body, be it the plane of horses, basketballs, or dragons. 
Now I could go on and on about how the existence of monsters casually in society both as threats and friends would drastically be eye opening for the Fault guys, etc etc, however they’re in the middle of a swamp at the moment. 
As for plot: The Blood God would be extremely hyped about the cult of the Buried Blood! …until he finds out it isn’t about him. Booo what kind of god gets half murdered? Loser. I figure the Fault crew would pick up An’s rank vibes way more than the DND party bothered to act on, the manipulation is pretty blatant. Tubbo is absolutely fuming about not being pure of heart, and that the random redneck did it through the power of rats. Tommy is desperate to become the king of England, and is infuriated because none of the DND guys know what England even is. 
Probably a lot less impressive to kill a god when you have like 3 on your team, but-
Everyone is down on the killing Dracula thing. Even Tubbo I think, given how evil he is. Would prefer a different method! But it’s looking like world ending stakes so maybe it’s okay. As for actually meeting the real OG Dracula? The campaign hasn’t gotten there, so I can’t even guess. But the fact both universes have potentially world ending songs is really funny. Based on vibes, Philza, Tommy, and The Blade think Dracula is absolutely great and kinda forget they’re there to kill him. Philza definitely sympathetic on the curse of immortality thing. Dracula doesn’t pass Wilbur’s vibe check at all, thinks he’s sleezy, and Tubbo can see way too much of the mind control stuff happening to brush it off. Like if they can manage to hate friendly Philza the charisma isn’t going to mean much. 
Probably ends up trying to suck Tommy’s blood, getting Red’d, and having the most balls to the walls insane fight scene ever. Man I can’t wait for the finale.
5 notes · View notes
theworstfoundingfathers · 2 years ago
Text
Who is the worst founding father? Round 4: Thomas Jefferson vs John Jay vs Edmund Randolph
Tumblr media
Thomas Jefferson (April 13, 1743 – July 4, 1826) was an American statesman, diplomat, lawyer, architect, philosopher, and Founding Father who served as the third president of the United States from 1801 to 1809. Jefferson was the primary author of the Declaration of Independence. Following the American Revolutionary War and prior to becoming the nation’s third president in 1801, Jefferson was the first United States secretary of state under George Washington and then the nation’s second vice president under John Adams.
Starting in 1803, he promoted a western expansionist policy with the Louisiana Purchase and began the process of Indian tribal removal from the newly acquired territory.
In confidential talks with French consul Joseph Létombe, Jefferson attacked President John Adams and predicted [he] would serve only one term, encouraged France to invade England, and advised Létombe to stall any American envoys sent to Paris by instructing him to “listen to them and then drag out the negotiations at length and mollify them by the urbanity of the proceedings." This toughened the tone that the French government adopted toward the Adams administration.
Jefferson lived in a planter economy largely dependent upon slavery, and used slave labor for his household, plantation, and workshops. Over his lifetime he owned about 600 slaves.
During his presidency, Jefferson allowed the diffusion of slavery into the Louisiana Territory hoping to prevent slave uprisings in Virginia and to prevent South Carolina secession. In 1804, in a compromise on the slavery issue, Jefferson and Congress banned domestic slave trafficking for one year into the Louisiana Territory.
In 1819, Jefferson strongly opposed a Missouri statehood application amendment that banned domestic slave importation and freed slaves at the age of 25 on grounds it would destroy the union.
Jefferson never freed most of his slaves, and he remained silent on the issue while he was president.
Since the 1790s, Jefferson was rumored to have had children by his sister-in-law and slave Sally Hemings, known as the Jefferson-Hemings controversy. According to scholarly consensus…as well as oral history, Jefferson probably fathered at least six children with Hemings.
---
John Jay (December 12, 1745 – May 17, 1829) was an American statesman, patriot, diplomat, abolitionist, signatory of the Treaty of Paris, and a Founding Father of the United States. He served as the second governor of New York and the first chief justice of the United States. He directed U.S. foreign policy for much of the 1780s and was an important leader of the Federalist Party after the ratification of the United States Constitution in 1788.
Jay served as the governor of New York from 1795 to 1801. Although he successfully passed gradual emancipation legislation as governor of the state, he owned five slaves as late as 1800. In the waning days of President John Adams’ administration, Jay was confirmed by the Senate for another term as chief justice, but he declined the position and retired to his farm in Westchester County, New York.
John Jay himself purchased, owned, rented out and manumitted at least 17 slaves during his lifetime. He is not known to have owned or invested in any slave ships. In 1783, one of Jay’s slaves, a woman named Abigail, attempted to escape in Paris, but was found, imprisoned, and died soon after the illness. Jay was irritated by her escape attempt, suggesting that she be left in prison for some time. To his biographer Walter Stahr, this reaction indicates that “however much [Jay] disliked slavery in the abstract, he could not understand why one of his slaves would run away.”
---
Edmund Jennings Randolph (August 10, 1753 – September 12, 1813) was a Founding Father of the United States, attorney, and the 7th Governor of Virginia. As a delegate from Virginia, he attended the Constitutional Convention and helped to create the national constitution while serving on its Committee of Detail. He was appointed the first United States Attorney General by George Washington and subsequently served as the second Secretary of State during the Washington administration.
A scandal involving an intercepted French message led to Randolph’s resignation as Secretary of State in August 1795. Randolph had been tasked with maintaining friendly relations with France. The British Navy had intercepted correspondence from the French minister Joseph Fauchet to his superiors and turned it over to Washington, who was dismayed that the letters reflected contempt for the United States and that Randolph had been primarily responsible. The letters implied that Randolph had exposed the inner debates in the cabinet to France and had told it that the administration was hostile to the country. At the very least, Elkins and McKitrick conclude, there “was something here profoundly disreputable to the government’s good faith and character.”
While residing in Pennsylvania, the 6-month residency deadline for [his slaves] approached. Attorney General Edmund Randolph’s slaves had obtained their freedom under the 1780 law, and Randolph was advising Washington (through Lear’s letters) on how to prevent the eight [slaves] from similarly obtaining theirs.
22 notes · View notes
hardtchill · 1 year ago
Note
England vs nigeria, nigeria played so well and deserved to go through. James totally deserved the red card and england always managed to win with 10 players in extra time
I fell asleep again, but i'm going to watch the Nigeria game first. Saw the foul by James already, that must surely be a 3 match ban. She would miss the rest of the tournament.
9 notes · View notes
underthecitysky · 1 year ago
Text
From Jesse Tedesci/ @jtedesci on twitter (x) 👈
(follow☝️ for lots of great, rare Beatles content)
Tumblr media
Full text is under the cut..
Some things are just wrong like “a woman” coming daily to cook and clean after Mary died.
& I don’t think Jim was sitting in on the piano during their practice sessions (lol) but the headline here to me is.. is this a rare pic of toddler Paul??
Tumblr media
Is it him? I mean it most likely is vs them faking it or mistaking it for the article, though those early teen mag articles often seem like a mix of fact and fiction. I guess I just haven’t seen a smiling photo from when he was this small so it doesn’t quite look like him to me.
It also made me lol that they talk about Paul getting into trouble for speeding and drop in "there was also a bit of trouble when when a girl claimed that Paul was the father of her illegitimate baby, and her father was hopping mad"
That escalated quickly lol 👀
As Paul said about Japan 1980 "a spot of bother"
Full text below
The Story Of A Beatle's EarlyDays
by Cheryl Hillman
Hitparader, July 1965
The little boy in the picture was born on the 18th of June, 1942. His name?
James Paul McCartney. Yes, the Paul McCartney, left-handed Beatle bass guitarist. Of course, when this photo was taken Paul didn't know a guitar from a violin and a beetle was a "creepie-crawlie." His mother died when he was very young, but his father brought him and his brother up. He was named after his father and took after him musically as well. Before ihe war Mr. McCartney had a jazz band, and many years later when the Beatles were starting he often sat in at the piano during practices. A woman would come in daily to clean and to make some of Paul's meals, but Paul's father did a great deal to make a family life for his motherless children.
Paul became involved in beat music at the time when the Shadows type of music was all the rage in England. All the groups here were trying like mad to imitate them. The groups spent hours practicing, trying to work out a Shadows-type stage routine. It seems crazy now, but anybody getting on an 86 bus in those days was liable to bump into young Paul McCartney taking his instruments down to the Cavern. Chances are, though, that nobody would look twice at the long-hair-ed youth sitting on the number 86 holding a guitar case.
He had met the other Beatles gradually. George was encountered at the Liverpool Institute High School. They were lively lads, but surprisingly they didn't stir the place up too much. They weren't exactly angels, though! Paul can dig back into his memory and remember sneaking into the toilets, or behind the air-raid shelters, for a quick smoke between les-sons. The institute is one of the best schools in England, and, as in many English schools, the school was divided Into "houses." Each pupil is placed in a “house" at the start of his life in a school and is supposed to support it during sporting events, etc. The Institute is divided into "houses" and Paul was in Danson House. It's difficult to think of Paul wearing a black and green school cap, isn't it?
Despite George's influence, Paul did well at school, even though playing in a beat group at night meant that most of his homework had to be done very early in the morning before school. Paul stayed on at school to study at Advanced level, and when he left he even had a certificate in English Literature at Advanced level, which is pretty good.
John Lennon got himself in the papers for fighting when he was drunk, but not to be outdone, Paul also got himself in the newspapers at one point. He got his driving license taken off him and was banned from driving for a year for speeding . There was also a bit of trouble when a girl claimed that Paul was the father of her illegitimate baby, and her father was hopping mad.
One New Year's Eve, during a Cavern "all nighter" (all night session) a young girl who was drunk was "dared" by Paul's brother) to go up to Paul and kiss him. Of course, she did so. She flung her arms round Paul as he was coming off stage, kissed him...and fainted. A little while later the Beatles were at the top of the Hit Parade. I don't know if Paul remembers the incident, but that girl certainly hasn't forgotten it. She's engaged now, but last week she said to me: “I was potty on Paul, then! It was gear kissing him". I bet it was. 
4 notes · View notes
basicallyblank · 1 year ago
Text
RO16: England vs Nigeria- thoughts
England played really poor today. Players were making mistakes and losing possession all over the field which led to Nigeria capitalising and ofte crowding us in our own box and forcing Mary Earps to make crucial saves.
Nigeria silenced our game changing players really well, Alozie followed Lauren James EVERYWHERE and her threat was non existant, Keira Walsh's threat was also nullified significantly, but she did some good work off the ball for the team. We struggle heavily when our players are marked like that and have to find ways around.
There were a few players i thought should've been taken off way sooner than they were. Lauren Hemp didn't have a good game today, misplaced passing, slipping all over the pitch, Nigeria often used her mistakes as a way of progressing up the field and getting the ball into the box. Lucy Bronze too often caught out of position, i like her attacking threat and she very often is one that starts our attacks by running down the wing but when she gets dispossessed she never has the legs to get back, which is also a weakness many teams capitalise on when it comes to England's defence.
Thoughts on substitutes or lack thereof- Towards the end you could tell Sarina was trying to drag it out into penalties. She got most of our starting players to play a full 120 minutes, including an injured Keira Walsh, who should be having her minutes managed, so it was no suprise she had to come off. I think one of the things england failed to capitalise on was Nigeria's struggle to when we played the ball quickly and were fast on our feet, when it went to additional time, i think thats when she could've brought off some of our exausted players, and brought on players like Kelly (which she did) and, without sounding biased, Jordan. Jordan can get out of tight spaces, which is what was often happening when england got close to the box, she has the speed, which would've been good with a tired Nigerian side, and she can also score from extreme long distances which are hard to defend against, she also does good defensive work when it comes down to it. In my opinion, even though we have players on the bench, i think our options for defense lack significantly, so i wasn't suprised that there were no changes there, but our attack ?? We have a bench full of European Champions that can score goals, I was happy to see Beth England come on but thought she could've been utilised earlier and not just when the threat of it going to penalities started to arise, we CANNOT afford to play every game from now being okay to stretch it out until penalties.
The Lauren James red card- I agree with the red card decision. Even before they took a second look and before they did a slow mo of the challenge i saw what Lauren did and immediately knew this was going to end badly. Alozie successfully marked James the entire game and completely silenced her and this was obviously where she snapped, does that make it okay ? Absolutely not. To make the decision to shove Alozie back down onto the grass and then STEP on her, and thinking that was a wise idea was one of the most stupid moments I've ever seen. I dont think she had any malice in it, but it was a naive and immature decision, she didn't think about the team at all in that moment and everyone immediately knew it was going to be a red because you simply cannot do that. We were left to try and play what looked like a losing battle with 10 players, when every one of them had been played to exhaustion, Nigeria could've easily had us from that moment and we could've been sent home today. Her tournament is over, she'll probably get a 3 match ban, so she play any more games in this World Cup, so now we're going to have to work around that, when it looked like she was seriously coming into herself and was going to be our key to unlocking our road to the finals.
Overall, we didn't play well, im not sure what the game plan was and i dont really know what sarina was thinking playing our players to exhaustion. We're through to the Quarter finals, and we cannot afford to play like that again, we cannot afford any mistakes now, we have to show up and perform at our best or else it will not end well for us when we've practically seen the doors open before us to the Semi Finals at least.
13 notes · View notes