#Dying With Dignity Canada
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
In today's update of Canada Loves Eugenics, 10,064 people died in 2021 through medically assisted death in Canada, and while MAID supposedly exists to allow people with severe, incurable illnesses to die with dignity on their own terms, MAID is generally used because disabled and mentally ill people cannot access governmental assistance and are living in poverty.
The Canadian government is actively pushing poor, disabled people to death.
oh and by the way, Canada performs more organ transplants from MAID donors than any other country in the world.
"Six disability rights and religious advocates told Reuters that the pace of the planned changes to the assisted death framework in Canada brings additional risks of people opting for MAID because they are unable to access social services - the lack of which could exacerbate their suffering." - source
Anyway, it's basically like this: the USA has the Americans with Disabilities Act and Canada has MAID
#disability#ableism#the canadian government loves eugenics#canpol#canada#maid#medical assistance in dying#human rights#disability rights#disability community#class war#eugenics
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
A man who says he suffers from chronic and worsening mental health issues is among those launching a court challenge of the federal government’s assisted dying law, which excludes people suffering solely from a mental disorder. An application filed by Dying with Dignity in Ontario Superior Court on Monday argues that it is discriminatory to bar people with mental disorders from being eligible for an assisted death when it is available to people who suffer physically. The organization is asking the court to immediately quash the mental-health exclusion. Plaintiff John Scully said going to court is his last hope.
Continue Reading
Tagging: @newsfromstolenland
#assisted dying#mental health#mental illness#mental disorders#cdnpoli#canadian politics#canadian news#canada
32 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hunger Devours Our Bodies Amid Arab and International Silence"
"My family lives in hunger.
My family lives in pain.
Not just my family, but my people
Not just my people, but my homeland.
We are all starving, but it’s not just hunger for food.
It’s hunger for dignity, for safety, for the life humanity deserves.
Under a tent thrown in a forgotten corner of the earth, my family isn’t a scene from a movie or a story to pass by.
My family is a reality that sleeps on the dirt, hearing the cold wind as if it were the echo of cries stolen from us.
Our problem isn’t just hunger alone.
Our problem is my mother’s pain as she watches us sleep on the sand, worried that the gas will run out, and she won’t even be able to heat water for us.
Our problem is my little brother, growing up without toys, without a childhood, without hope.
Our problem isn’t just the wars; it’s that the world has decided we’re just numbers.
My family cries out, and the land weeps.
My family calls, while humanity is dying.
We want to raise our voice, not just for my family.
We want to remind you that we are all part of this earth.
And my family isn’t alone.
We are part of a homeland called Palestine, a homeland that must not be forgotten.
If your hearts beat, if your eyes tear up, let your voices rise with ours.
My family, my people, my homeland… We are Palestine
@wescravns @queen-bitchiest @quantumshade @reaperlight @elizabeth-karenina @zvaigzdelasas @zetarays @zerrickorzhov @zyrkon01 @zoeyandguys @xieliancore @xielianss @xflorecitax @xwisegirlx @xhda1449x @critter-of-habit @chilewithcarnage @charliemcavoyjr @cozcat @cassiopcias @brielqrson @butcherhog @blackfashion @breathtakinglandscapes @breathtakinglandscapes @beyonce @norelorn @nocakeno @neige-leblanche @nijuukoo @nijuukoo @macbcth @metaangelz @myprettycoven @mar64ds @madcatnobody @ankle-beez @akajustmerry @aredhels @amygdalae @aincompleta
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
82 notes
·
View notes
Text
i had a strange dream last night that my mother, when she was in hospice, decided to go back to canada to die. we weren't allowed to go with her. she drove away in a white sedan with her dear lifelong friend who used to be a priest, and left me and my father here. we said our last goodbyes here in the driveway, and she wouldn't promise that we could talk on the phone. we just had to wait and go about our lives, mourning someone who was maybe still alive or had maybe already died, wondering if someone would call to tell us what was happening. i think my dad moved out like he did a while after she died in real life, and it was just me here, remodeling the house.
isn't that such a metaphor for loved ones dying? the hope that they will return to the place they came from and have missed, but the sorrow of not being able to join them. the hope we might receive messages, but it's long distance. that we will never know if they are in peace, in a place they once loved, or if it all ended on the way.
this morning my cousin texted me from canada to tell me that my aunt, my mom's sister, has terminal cancer and she didn't know if anyone had told me yet. (they hadn't.)
there's so much love underneath all the distance (and the family complications that came from my mom leaving the church), but i'm so far and have been since i was a little child. farther now, because i am sick and can't drive nine hours each way for a weekend like i wish i could. i'm not sure if a visit would be welcome (because she's suffering and it would be one more thing for my cousin to manage, not because i'm personally unloved). i could visit my other cousins, perhaps, or my aunts and uncles. i am my mother's representative here on earth now.
my dream wasn't necessarily prophetic, although i hope that it might mean If There Are Spirits that my mom's is going north to support her sister. last week, i re-lived the harrowing end of my mom life while i was writing a letter in support of the death with dignity act. yesterday, i re-read a story i wrote about a son watching his mother suffer from dementia. i wrote it in 2007, two years before my mother's first cancer diagnosis. back then, her great fear was that she would ultimately die from alzheimer's like her mother, who wasted away in hospice for more than 10 years. in the face of that, her dying painfully and relatively young from cancer was a relief to both of us. i guess my aunt will also be spared that fate.
i feel most for my cousin who is closest, who has to hold so much of this. i can't know her experience, but i have done the caretaking, have watched my mother suffer, have had to hold the feelings of my father losing his wife. i don't know my cousin well enough to know how to support her without that support itself adding more weight.
i'm not sure what my next step is. i texted my other cousins, and my cousin's wife who i think will be the best one to help me figure out what will be most helpful. in the meantime i'm processing, i guess.
47 notes
·
View notes
Text

On this day in 1994, Sue Rodriguez chose to end her life and suffering with the assistance of an anonymous doctor after the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against her request for a legal assisted death. Her courageous fight helped spark a national movement for end-of-life rights.
Although much progress has been made in the over 30 years since Rodriguez's death, there is still work to be done. Today, many people still aren’t eligible because they are in the early stages of a capacity-eroding condition — such as dementia, Parkinson’s, or Huntington’s disease – and cannot put in place an advance request for MAID.
Dying With Dignity Canada believes that advance requests for MAID should be a legal end-of-life option for those diagnosed with a grievous and irremediable medical condition. To join us in our effort to ensure this choice for people across Canada, respond to Health Canada's national consultation on advance requests and download our Advocacy Toolkit and Action Guide at the links below.
Complete the survey (deadline: February 14): https://ow.ly/JEzG50UXPc2
Download the advocacy toolkit: https://ow.ly/LVxF50UXPc3
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Letter to the Canadian Government about Mandatory Human Rights and Environment Due Diligence Laws
Our names are ______. We are from ______. We are writing to you to ask that you create good Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence laws for all companies operating in, selling goods or services in, or headquartered in Canada. This will help workers, communities, and ecosystems around the world and contribute to the creation of a fair world where current people and future generations have what they need.
Right now, companies are doing horrific human rights abuses and environmental abuses all around the world.
First of all, workers are being horrifically overworked and incredibly underpaid in intensely dangerous working conditions. Three million workers die every year due to workplace accidents or poisoning. Fifty million people are literally being held in modern slavery. Ten percent of children worldwide are doing child labour. Two thirds of the world are in multidimensional poverty, where they don’t have five or more of their basic needs (such as food and sanitation and education) met. Forget living wages, most workers are not even paid bare subsistence wages. And experts have described working conditions as soul-destroying for workers around the world.
Local communities around factories and plantations and power plants and mines and whatnot are also being polluted. Chemicals from industrial developments leach into the ground, air, and water, poisoning people, destroying crops and plants, and killing local fish and wildlife. This leads to many people dying from being poisoned or losing their livelihoods. People lose their access to clean water and air, to food, and to life.
And the environment is being harmed by industrial activities too. We are at the start of the worst biodiversity crisis the earth has ever faced. Ecosystems all around the world are collapsing, and will continue to collapse. Not to mention, the climate is warming and causing devastation for people the world over. All humans rely on a healthy climate and healthy ecosystems for fertile soil, clean water, safety from extreme weather, pest and disease control, and the list goes on. But it is the actions of industry, companies, and supply chains that are the biggest contributor to the climate and biodiversity crises.
And often, when people stand up for the air and water and land, when they stand up for their communities and/or their fellow workers, they are threatened, intimidated, or even killed.
The companies that are headquartered in Canada or sell their products in Canada are benefitting from and causing all these problems. Their supply chains are rife with human rights abuses and environmental abuses, and they do not take adequate measures to stop the many abuses in their supply chains. Because of this, Canada and all Canadians are guilty of destroying the world and uncountable lives.
But a better world is possible. Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Laws, or Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Laws, or whatever you want to call them, would ensure that any companies that abuse the workers, local communities, and local environments tied to their supply chains are made to pay. Not just made to pay a fine, which companies don’t mind and only view as a cost of doing business, but actually made to face justice and jail time.
These laws are necessary in order to ensure that workers and other people are given the human rights and human dignity they deserve, and they are necessary in order to protect the world’s ecosystems so that future generations can live. Without due diligence laws, the situation will continue to get worse and worse. But with due diligence laws, we can see improvement.
Please enact Mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence Laws.
Thank you,
Send to:
Prime Minister Trudeau- [email protected]
Deputy Prime Minister Freeland- [email protected]
Minister of Foreign Affairs Joly- [email protected]
Find your MP here: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
Minister of Women and Gender Equality and Youth Ien- [email protected]
Minister of Environment and Climate Change Guilbeault- [email protected]
Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Wilkinson- [email protected]
Minister of Export Promotion, International Trade, and Economic Development Ng- [email protected]
Minister of International Development Hussen- [email protected]
Minister of Innovation, Science, and Industry Champagne- [email protected]
Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard Lebouthillier- [email protected]
#canadian#canada#cdnpoli#canadian politics#human rights#social justice#social issues#capitalism#anti capitalist#capitalist hell#capitalist dystopia#capitalist bullshit#working class#class#class war#classism#class warfare#eat the rich#eat the fucking rich#kill the rich#workers rights#workers of the world unite#indigenous lives matter#indigenous rights#indigenous sovereignty#changement climatique#climate crisis#climate#climate change#climate catastrophe
16 notes
·
View notes
Note
The growing genocide against the poor and disabled in Canada via our MAID program killed ~10,000 people in 2021 alone and the UN has warned that it is similar to the early stages of the Holocaust. Funny how that didn’t make it onto that list.
honestly the MAID program is absolutely fucking horrifying. i can't believe we live in a world where a developed nation can have 'kill yourself' as a genuine policy. it's one thing to already be dying and to be given the chance to do so with dignity, but to effectively exterminate the ill is unconscionable. we understand that suicidality is often a response to shitty life circumstances - how can a state, whose responsibility it is to make sure its citizens have a certain quality of life, not only totally shirk that responsibility but advocate for killing people whose lives it can't be bothered to improve?? it sure sounds like a genocide to me. i'm wary of comparisons to the Holocaust specifically though, especially as I can't find a source for that - if you can find it, please send it my way! i managed to find the letter by UN Special Rapporteur Gerard Quinn though
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
The censure vote passed today in addition to her being expelled from the NDP caucus.
All because of this statement:

Sarah stated the words below today:
Thirteen days ago, I called for an immediate ceasefire and de-escalation by the Israeli government, which had begun a horrific siege on Palestinians in Gaza. Since I made that statement, Israel has only escalated its assault on millions of Gazans.
The Israeli Defence Forces have killed thousands of Palestinians, destroyed residential areas, and ordered the evacuation of at least 20 hospitals in northern Gaza. Israel is telling people who are already injured, sick, and dying in hospitals in Gaza to leave.
Since I made my statement, Israel has bombed refugee camps, UN schools, hospitals, airports & the Rafah border crossing between Gaza & Egypt. The unspeakable destruction continues, & represents collective punishment against all Gazans in retaliation for attacks by Hamas.
The Ford government has nothing meaningful to say about these atrocities, and has now targeted me to distract from its own scandals. Those of us committed to Palestinian life refuse to be distracted.
I restate my call for an immediate ceasefire by Israeli forces, and for the immediate restoration of food, water, fuel, and electricity to Gaza. I applaud the many elected officials in Canada who have joined this call in recent days, and I hope even more of you will speak out.
I ground my words in the realities of Israeli apartheid, and Israel’s ongoing domination and occupation of Palestinian lands. Governments and institutions in Canada are trying to use their weight to silence us, to silence workers, students, educators, and peace-loving people who dare to support Palestine. To every person taking risks to speak up for Palestinian dignity and safety, I see you, I hear you, and I am with you.
6 notes
·
View notes
Note
geology/mining + 3 and 10? 👀
3: Screenshot or description of the worst take you've seen on tumblr
This person commented after I said Canada, the US, and Europe should increase mining to minimize Cobalt extraction in Africa. Definitely the worst take I've seen in a hot minute (maybe this person was confused? lol) I think they were trying to say that recycling is more affordable than mining in the US, but they're just... wrong.
Europe has lots of operating mines, and just googling "cobalt mining Europe" will get you a paper identifying 104 potential deposits. They are in NO WAY mined out. But they're in pretty developed areas, which was why I posted we need to defeat "not in my backyard-ism".
Lithium is currently mined. And you wouldn't mine it in Europe, even in brines, because it's not the right climate.
"Including the labor safety practices make the stuff not exactly affordable". HUMAN SAFETY AND DIGNITY IS NOT DETERMINED BY A DOLLAR SIGN?!
Of course mining isn't environmentally friendly when done by cartels in recovering colonial countries that don't have the resources or governmental power to enforce safety and environmental standards. /stares at the camera.
And recycling gets its own paragraph because ^ sans this post, the most dangerous/misunderstood commentary I usually see online and offline is on recycling. Recycling is metallurgy++. Unlike mineral processing, which deals with limited inorganic chemistry, (usually), recycling sorts through a wide range of organics and inorganics, trying to get back to what the earth provided in an ore deposit. Alloys, like Mo, As, Sb, Bi, Te, don't play nice when you're recycling metals because they're in such small grades in steel. Minerals/rocks, like sand and gravels, hematite, kaolinite, and borates, just... aren't recyclable due to where they end up. Hematite is used in makeup. Kaolinite is used for ceramics and refractories; plus the clay crystal structure is changed once you fire it. Borate is used in cleaning products and cosmetics.
The order of magnitude to mass-separate these sort of things, along with all the plastics and synthesized chemicals in our world now, make recycling expensive and sometimes technologically impossible with current tools. So even though recycling is great and we SHOULD be recycling, the reality of the chemistry has been blown out of proportion. (((I have lots of opinions about how we can create a cyclical sustainable economy but those are not in the scope of this ask game. 😂)))
TLDR: Europe is not mined out. Recycling cannot provide everything we need in our daily lives now. We should mine where it's more expensive to mine because people are dying in other countries and we are not going to stop mining anytime soon.
10. worst part of fanon
No worst part of geology fanon on tumblr!!!! I love everyone here!!! Everyone makes such good memes. The fact someone else independently came up with Edward Cullen dropping acid on limestone and saying "effervescent" is proof of that. ♥
#thank you for giving me the opportunity to get up on my soapbox lmao~#I have a lot of hypotheses about how we can make a more circular economy and part of me going into metallurgy is to make them reality tbh#ask game#mining#recycling#I STILL get the giggles over how confidently they proclaimed Europe is mined out.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Dying With Dignity In Canada
It does not happen, for they too much love the image of suffering
1 note
·
View note
Text
Blatantly Partisan Party Review XV (WA 2025): Steve Walker, ungrouped independent
This candidate is one of five ungrouped independents: people who are running solo campaigns for the Legislative Council. These individuals are listed in the column at the right-hand end of the ballot paper, and to vote for any of them you must vote below the line; there is no way to give a preference to these candidates if you vote above the line.
A retired lawyer, Steve Walker is the president of Dying with Dignity WA. He is easily the most sane of the ungrouped candidates, and I think it’s a bit of a shame that he’s running a doomed solo campaign rather than, say, reviving the Voluntary Euthanasia Party (here’s a link to my last review of them). Walker believes that WA’s existing laws for voluntary assisted dying (VAD), passed in 2019, are already outdated and that it should be reformed in line with practices in the ACT, Canada, and some European nations that emphasise patient suffering rather than prognosis. WA’s law requires that a person have a life expectancy of less than six months (or one year for neurodegenerative diseases). Walker argues, and I agree, that this is arbitrary. He proposes removing this limit and that access to VAD should be based on intolerable suffering.
Walker’s FAQ on his About page includes a question I would have asked: “Are you a single-issue candidate?” To this, he responds: “Yes, proudly. While I am passionate about many issues, my primary focus is on reforming the VAD Act.” Accepting the single-issue label will never win plaudits from me, because parliament must deal with the fullness of the state’s needs (regular readers must be tired of me repeating this), but it does make it very easy for a voter to decide where they stand on his candidacy. You will support or oppose Walker’s candidature to the same extent you support or oppose VAD. As you can tell from the tone of this review, and my past takes on the Voluntary Euthanasia Party, it is something I support and which I would hope is a choice available for me or a loved one in the case of intolerable suffering. In my currently healthy thirties, I cannot imagine saying yes to such a choice and I want as many years as I can eke out of my body, but simply having the choice matters.
Although Walker embraces the label of single-issue candidate, he does say a few things that facilitate a broader assessment (a broader one than is possible for some "I'm not a single-issue candidate!" single-issue candidates). He mentions having worked with the Aboriginal Legal Service in the Kimberley and chairing the Mental Health Law Centre. He has an acknowledgement of country on his website, which is very rare among micro-parties and independents in general and it suggests he maintains some interest or sympathy for Aboriginal issues. On his Priorities page he sets out principles for approaching other legislation. Social equity, his first principle, is straightforward. His second principle of environmental protection seeks a balance with “regional needs and job creation”, which badly needs elaboration: this could be anything from public works for a just transition to green energy through to greenwashing gas exploitation in the name of jobs jobs jobs. The third priority is planning reform, and sadly this reads as more at the NIMBY than the YIMBY end of the spectrum.
Overall, Walker seems broadly moderate, and he’s a fairly decent option given what else is on the ballot, but my usual reservations about single-issue candidates apply.
Recommendation: Give Steve Walker a decent preference
Website: https://www.stevewalkerupperhouse.com/
#auspol#ausvotes#WAvotes#WApol#WA election#WA#Election 2025#Steve Walker#Dying With Dignity#Voluntary Euthanasia Party#voluntary euthanasia#voluntary assisted dying#independent candidates#independent politics#ungrouped candidates#ungrouped independents#decent preference
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Most Americans consider the issue of assisted suicide, if they think about it at all, a foreign curiosity, the subject of a live debate in England or Canada, but a hypothetical in the United States. That’s probably true at the national level: Neither major candidate addressed it on the 2024 campaign trail, and it is hard to imagine President Donald Trump wading into its murky waters during his second term. But right now there are laws permitting assisted suicide—or medical aid in dying, as its proponents call it—on the books in ten states, as well as in Washington, D.C. And there is a growing movement to incorporate the “right to die” in state law across the country. That movement stands to make gains in the coming years.
Last year, 20 state legislatures considered assisted suicide bills, according to a tally kept by Death with Dignity, one of the leading assisted suicide advocacy groups in the United States. All the proposals pursued legalization more or less along the same lines of Oregon when in 1997 it became the first state to legalize the practice: allowances for mentally competent people with less than six months to live to seek prescriptions from their doctors for life-ending drugs. And all failed.
Some bills were dead on arrival. In Indiana, for instance, the measure was dismissed almost as soon as it was introduced. “Physician-assisted suicide is contrary to a physician’s duty as a healer and undermines the physician–patient relationship,” said the state senator Tyler Johnson, when introducing an additional resolution condemning the practice more generally. “It is not difficult to stand here today and draw a line in the sand.” The resolution was overwhelmingly backed by the Republican-dominated body. Similar bills died without a fight in states such as Florida, Iowa, and Kentucky.
0 notes
Text
Relevant to the blog because MAiD was specifically targeting Indigenous people in Canada and was proposing offering MAiD to "at risk/homeless Native youths in foster care."
Medical assistance in dying is to give the dying dignity.
It should NEVER be weaponized.
"terminally ill people should be allowed to choose to die if they feel it is the best decision for them" and "euthanasia can easily become eugenics" and "we should provide support for depressed and suicidal people" are statements that can come into conflict but should all be respected
51K notes
·
View notes
Text
To Gaind, the data shows “there hasn’t been a slippery slope. We’ve had a cliff. We’re falling off it … I’m concerned about what it says about our society.” He sees the sharply trending upward line as a betrayal of the public trust, especially for vulnerable patients who choose assisted death because they can’t access the help they need to make their lives more livable. “I’m concerned about the marginalized lives that are going to be lost,” he says. “We didn’t give them the chance to live with dignity, but are all too eager to say ‘Oh, here’s the path to dying with dignity.’ ” "...Unlike Dutch and Belgium laws, which require provision of MAID as a last resort option, “Canada does not,” says Kim from the Institutes of Health. “Canadian law is unique. It gives doctors almost free rein on what to do if someone has a diagnosis and they’re miserable with it,” he said. “Then you marry it to a very-well organized delivery system — your healthcare system. It gives the medical system and your sociopolitical system an out when you abandon people.”
It is deeply disturbing that waitlists for accessible social housing or any rent-geared-to-income housing has a wait time decades long. Meanwhile, medically assistance in dying can be obtained in as little as 90 days.
MAiD should be a last resort, not a convenient excuse for government to absolve themselves of making sound public policy so people with disabilities can live with dignity."
tl;dr: disabled people in Canada are choosing medical assistance in dying because they can't afford food or housing on disability benefits and many feel that they have no other options other than death.
read more about Canada's push for eugenics
here
here
#canada practices eugenics#better the benefit#end disability poverty#aid not maid#maid#medical assistance in dying#implement universal basic income#canada#canpol
1 note
·
View note
Text
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms takes precedence over all other laws.
The most important feature of the Constitution Act, 1982, is the incorporation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms into the Canadian Constitution. This gives constitutional status to the fundamental principles upon which the rights of Canadians depend, especially freedom and democracy
I am your servant, I am a dying citizen, I am a Canadian citizen, I represent Canada Inc., for the sake of the nation. For the dignity of the law, for the sake of justice, and for the sake of a stronger Canada, I look forward to writing, consulting, and reporting to you:
Prime Minister of the Government of Canada, Members of the Federal Parliament, Senators, Members of the House of Representatives, Ministers of State, Your Excellency, Good morning
1. My name is Yang Xuanwen, male, age 70, Canadian citizen, Driving license number :9131888, residential address: 5584 Laburnum St Vancouver,BC,V6M 3S8. Email [email protected], Tel: 7788911777, I am Chinese. I don't speak English, I can communicate by email text, I use Google Translate, twitter.com/aacd2014, facebook.com/aacd2015, linkedin.com/feed/,
2, affidavit of my company: I am a Canadian citizen. I must protect the image and reputation of Canada. I must uphold democracy and the rule of law. I must (speak honesty + speak law + speak rules + tell the truth). I can't tell lies. I must not report a false crime, report a false crime, my property shall be confiscated, I shall be sentenced to death, I swear. I have no debts in my company. I didn't break the law, I didn't do anything wrong, I was a sole proprietorship joint-stock company worth $500 million, 250 acres of land, and I was robbed by the Vancouver criminal organization - Con Syndicate:. Super cheap "dollar"/acre for sale? Sneak State C $250m. Income tax
3, Advisory: (1) Is Canada a country under the rule of law? (2) Is it a terrorist country? (3) Are all Canadian laws null and void?
(4) The Canadian judiciary is closed for business? Why 2 years in a row. Hundreds of police reports, why refuse to file a case? (5) Where is Canada (national image + national security + economic security + public interest)? (6) Has the national Constitution been voided? (7) Is the state unable to protect (personal safety of citizens + property safety) still the state?
3, terrorist robbery case introduction: What is a terrorist crime? (Create a judicial miracle + huge amount + serious bad nature + shock the world + harm the national image + national security + economic security + public interest + rob the national tax)
VancouverCriminal Organization - Fraud Group: Representing the law + representing the country + judicial cooperation. Police assistance, armed terrorist robbery :(hundreds of millions of dollars, company land + Castle hotel + car) Fraud group dozens of people (HSBC Bank + court security personnel + Housing land Property Office + borrowing company), to court subordinate units. The security company is the breakthrough. Cooperative profit sharing. Use (Court order law) to make laws: looting company land can be: "one dollar" auction "tax evasion" in the hands of security companies can use the law: "court order enforcement law" security companies are responsible for writing (court check) to rob money, use this robbery law. Break through. Discard. Six national laws,(Constitution + Criminal law + Company law + Property law + Land law + Human Rights Law), "under the pretext of civil debt", cover up terrorist crime robbery,(no debt + no trial + forged debt + forged judgment) to create a judicial miracle in Canada, shocking the world
3. Canada (Company law + Criminal Law + Property Law + Land Law) has strict provisions.
The company's assets are strictly protected by law, and there is no signature of the owner, the house land Property Office. Cooperative sharing of profits, illegal transfer of ownership, robbery of land: the key point "is the property office transfer: this is robbery" core point: this is (national defects + legal loopholes + robbery channel). Metaphor. Rob the bank. The most critical. And the last door. How to break through the gate. There is only one plan: collusion. Take part in the heist. Cooperate together for profit, which is (national flaw + legal loophole) any country in the world, without this fear. Terrible, serious harm. Infringed upon. Private and corporate property rights deficiencies, only Canadian terror state. Can reach such madness. The state of collapse, it is inconceivable that the state cannot guarantee the property rights (of citizens and companies), it is too terrible, without the owner's personal signature consent? Failure of the state. Loopholes in the law. The state should bear the responsibility and compensate for the loss. This is the image of the state. The state should bear the personal and property safety of its citizens.
Private property is sacrosanct and the state cannot abrogation the law?
4. Why do you want to evade the national income tax when you rob a company of 500 million yuan? Rob the country (250 million yuan income tax)? The crime is particularly serious.(crime added to crime).(corporate property crime of $500 million + crime of robbing the country of $250 million tax) Canadian taxpayers are watching, the world is watching, to see how the Canadian government will deal with it. A: Is the fraud syndicate committing robbery on behalf of the State?
5, I represent the company: guarantee commitment: will the company land 50%, donate to the country, donate to charity, for the local community. Donate 200 households, public housing for the elderly
North American Chinese Mutual Cooperative,
Xuan Wen Yang,
2024-3-8
0 notes