#Dollo

[a-dinosaur-a-day]

Another thing is that old-timey dinosaurs didn't move like real animals. They moved like monsters. When I look at those weird lumpy rexes, I can't imagine how they'd move, beyond "guy in a T. rex costume", like a weird awkward waddle. Looking at the more accurate ones, it's easy to understand how they move and what they'd look like in motion.

I've never heard of Dollo; who was he and what was his bad theory?

Yeah that's fair, it's annoying to see the man moving

that said, the raptors in the original JP were also men in a suit - but they compensated to make it look closer to natural

Dollo was a scientist in the 1800s who created a theory that organisms can't re-evolve structures they lost. he didn't know genetics, so he didn't know that features can be turned on and off and thus it can be possible to re-evolve lost structures.

but, because of that theory, he and others decided birds couldn't be dinosaurs. this was because, at the time, we had no evidence of a dinosaur furcula (wishbone) - or, at least, we thought we had no evidence of one. We did, however, have "thecodonts" (early archosaurs) with wishbones - meaning that, if birds evolved from dinosaurs, they would have had to re-evolve the wishbone

turns out a) non-avialan dinosaurs did have wishbones, they just don't fossilize well b) we did have some, we just misidentified them and c) yeah you can redevelop things actually

so we went from birds being dinosaurs being the best supported hypothesis to almost no one believing it within a few years at the end of the 1800s

leading to the "dinosaur dark ages" (dinosaurs are slow evolutionary failures) that was the first 60 years of the 20th century

so, yeah. we can blame dollo, 100%, for everyone being ignorant about dinosaurs.

[vincentreproches]

Je vote 22

[wildbeautifuldamned]

21 INCH EARLY KAMMER & REINHARDT 53 Doll ebay over*to*you

[vis2372]

Dolo 650: A Trusted Pain Reliever and Fever Reducer

[thewordisbond]

WilliefromtheDrive - 'Forgot to drop these while protecting your feelings' [Album Reviews]

Posted on https://www.thewordisbond.com/williefromthedrive-forgot-to-drop-these-while-protecting-your-feelings-album-reviews/

WilliefromtheDrive - 'Forgot to drop these while protecting your feelings' [Album Reviews]

Rising rapper WilliefromtheDrive drops his new compilation titled Forgot to drop these while protecting your feelings. The project is a body of work loaded with 62 tracks that spans 2018 to date. The project is a mixed bag of topics that range from loyalty, love, aspirational tunes and

[photographyartgallery]

Philippe Dollo

[oyet]

Chief Justice urges the Christian community and Acholi to forgive Idi Amin clan

Uganda’s Chief Justice, Alfonse Owiny-Dollo, has re-echoed the need for reconciliation and forgiveness of the late Idi Amin’s clan by the Acholi community over the death of Archbishop St Janani Luwum nearly 50 years ago. Courtesy of Alfonse Owiny-Dollo Luwum was the Archbishop of the Church of Uganda from 1974 until his assassination in 1977.It has been widely reported that Luwum was killed on…

[stickerskingdom]

50 mini music lyric book sticker

[o-craven-canto]

Selected recurrent patterns or "laws" of evolution, of potential use for speculative biology. List compiled by Neocene's Pavel Volkov, who in turn credits its content to Nikolay Rejmers (original presumably in Russian). These are guidelines, and not necessarily scientifically rigorous.

Dollo's Law, or irreversibility of evolution: organisms do not evolve back into their own ancestors. When mammals returned to the sea, they did not develop gills and dermal scales and change back into fish: they became whales or seals or manatees, who retain mammalian traits and show marks of land-dwelling ancestry.

Roulliet's law, or increase of complexity: both organisms and ecosystems tend to become more complex over time, with subparts that are increasingly differentiated and integrated. This one is dodgier: there are many examples of simplification over time when it is selected for, for example in parasites. At least, over very large time scales, the maximum achievable complexity seems to increase.

Law of unlimited change: there is no point at which a species or system is complete and has finished evolving. Stasis only occurs when there is strong selective pressure in favor of it, and organism can always adapt to chaging conditions if they are not beyond the limits of survival.

Law of pre-adaptation or exaptation: new structures do not appear ex novo. When a new organ or behavior is developed, it is a modification or a re-purposing of something that already existed. Bone tissue probably evolved as reserves of energy before it was suitable to build an internal skeleton from, and feathers most likely evolved for thermal isolation and display before they were refined enough for flight.

Law of increasing variety: diversity at all levels tends to increase over time. While some forms originate from hybridization, most importantly the Eukaryotic cells, generally one ancestor species tends to leave many descendants, if it has any at all.

Law of Severtsov or of Eldredge-Gould or of punctuated equilibrium: while evolution is always slow from the human standpoint, there are moments of relatively rapid change and diversification when some especily fertile innovation appears (e.g. eyes and shells in the Cambrian), or new environments become inhabitable (e.g. continental surface in the Devonian), or disaster clears out space (e.g. at the end of the Permian or Cretaceous), followed by relative stability once all low-hanging fruit has been picked.

Law of environmental conformity: changes in the structure and functions of organisms follow the features or their environment, but the specifics of those changes depend on the structural and developmental constraints of the organisms. Squids and dolphins both have spindle-shaped bodies because physics make it necessary to move quickly through water, but water is broken by the anterior end of the skull in dolphins and by the posterior end of the mantle in squids. Superficial similarity is due to shared environment, deep structural similarity to shared ancestry.

Cope's and Marsh's laws: the most highly specialized members of a group (which often includes the physically largest) tend to go extinct first when conditions change. It is the generalist, least specialized members that usually survive and give rise to the next generations of specialists.

Deperet's law of increasing specialization: once a lineage has started to specialize for a particular niche, lifestyle, or resource, it will keep specializing in the same direction, as any deviation would be outcompeted by the rest. In contrast, their generalist ancestors can survive with a marginal presence in multiple niches.

Osborn's law, or adaptive radiation: as the previous takes place, different lines of descent from a common ancestor become increasingly different in form and specializations.

Shmalhausen's law, or increasing integration: over time, complex systems also tend to become increasingly integrated, with components (e.g. organs of an organism, or species in a symbiotic relationship) being increasingly indispensable to the whole, and increasingly tightly controlled.

[kj-munch]

charlie acton-dollo sweetest cutest lamest guy all time 🫶 assorted squinks from last night, all meant to take place in that happy post-canon timeline (plus one vampire au and a couple werecat aus LOL)

(other guy snuggling up to him in that one pic is my friends oc and actons new partner prussian blue!)

[a-dinosaur-a-day]

What's most amazing about people who hate that birds are dinosaurs is that, without the discovery of birds being dinosaurs in the 1960s, none of y'all would have ever actually cared about dinosaurs

the history:

dino craze in 1800s. people thought, birds are very similar to these guys. Dollo fucked it up, made a bad theory, and people stopped thinking that

Early 1900s, dinosaurs deemed sluggish, stupid, pointless evolutionary failures. most people not really into dinosaurs anymore. this continues until

1960s: Deinonychus discovered. suddenly, dinosaurs interesting again: vibrant, lively, warm blooded animals. Also... birds might be dinosaurs?

from the 60s through the 70s, a slow buildup of dinosaur culture - both in crappy stop motion movies, but also in children's books and other media

80s cladistics revolution shows birds are living dinosaurs, though not without flaws. documentary after documentary is made, causing the major dinosaur boom of the late 80s and early 90s

the peak of this boom are the A&E and PBS documentaries, which both outright state birds are dinosaurs

cartoons like land before time and other dinosaur content keep coming out too, especially at the end of the 80s and the earliest 90s

the book jurassic park, referencing the birds are dinosaurs thing, is written in the late 80s. in the early 90s, is adapted into one of the greatest blockbusters of all time. now dinosaur interest is MAINSTREAM.

jurassic park isn't the start of the dinosaur boom, it is the apex

90s becomes the decade of dinosaurs, with tons of new discoveries, television shows, documentaries, and other programming

1996 first feathered "nonavian" dinosaur discovered. birds are dinosaurs is the closest thing we have to proven phylogenetic fact

1999 walking with dinosaurs premieres, revolutionizing the dinosaur-documentary genre.

early 2000s becomes the age of Period-Type Dino-Docu-Dramas

velociraptor is determined to have feathers

suddenly, dinosaur mania starts to die in the later 2000s

even though discoveries keep happening and we learn so much in the 2010s, the 2010s becomes a very regressive time - a sort of reactionary response to the birdification of dinosaurs and the dinosaurification of birds. the height of this is jurassic world

we may be in the middle of a dino-docu-drama revitilization thanks to prehistoric planet. stay tuned on that one

like, everyone was fine with the birdification of dinosaurs up and until they looked "feminine" on the outside, because of feathers.

It's just all such transparent misogyny and homophobia and people who react against feathered dinosaurs or birds being dinosaurs are just... so transparently parroting conservative talking points

Anyways, yeah. without birds are dinosaurs, you wouldn't have jurassic park. Sooooo

[radiocarbon0]

are you rich do you have 1,0000,000 dollor....

beh

OF COURSE!!!!!! me have billion dolloe !!

[corntort]

me trying to finally put the pieces together on my shart interp: ok so imagine if murphy kj oc dollo was an ant.

[newlabdakos]

Iguanodon

(temporal range: 126-122 mio. years ago)

[text from the Wikipedia article, see also link above]

Iguanodon (/ɪˈɡwɑːnədɒn/ i-GWAH-nə-don; meaning 'iguana-tooth'), named in 1825, is a genus of iguanodontian dinosaur. While many species found worldwide have been classified in the genus Iguanodon, dating from the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous, taxonomic revision in the early 21st century has defined Iguanodon to be based on one well-substantiated species: I. bernissartensis, which lived during the Barremian to early Aptian ages of the Early Cretaceous in Belgium, Germany, England, and Spain, between about 126 and 122 million years ago. Iguanodon was a large, bulky herbivore, measuring up to 9–11 metres (30–36 ft) in length and 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons) in body mass. Distinctive features include large thumb spikes, which were possibly used for defense against predators, combined with long prehensile fifth fingers able to forage for food.

The genus was named in 1825 by English geologist Gideon Mantell but discovered by William Harding Bensted, based on fossil specimens found in England and was given the species name I. anglicus. Iguanodon was the second type of dinosaur formally named based on fossil specimens, after Megalosaurus. Together with Megalosaurus and Hylaeosaurus, it was one of the three genera originally used to define Dinosauria. The genus Iguanodon belongs to the larger group Iguanodontia, along with the duck-billed hadrosaurs. The taxonomy of this genus continues to be a topic of study as new species are named or long-standing ones reassigned to other genera. In 1878 new, far more complete remains of Iguanodon were discovered in Belgium and studied by Louis Dollo. These were given the new species I. bernissartensis. In the early 21st century it became understood that the remains referred to as Iguanodon in England belonged to four different species (including I. bernissartensis) that were not closely related to each other, which were subsequently split off into Mantellisaurus, Barilium and Hypselospinus. It was also found that the originally described type species of Iguanodon, I. anglicus was a nomen dubium, and not valid. Thus the name "Iguanodon" became fixed around the well known species based primarily on the Belgian specimens. In 2015, a second valid species, I. galvensis, was named, based on fossils found in the Iberian Peninsula.

Scientific understanding of Iguanodon has evolved over time as new information has been obtained from fossils. The numerous specimens of this genus, including nearly complete skeletons from two well-known bone beds, have allowed researchers to make informed hypotheses regarding many aspects of the living animal, including feeding, movement, and social behaviour. As one of the first scientifically well-known dinosaurs, Iguanodon has occupied a small but notable place in the public's perception of dinosaurs, its artistic representation changing significantly in response to new interpretations of its remains.

[1rakus]

i love when men with addictive personalities get into fishkeeping because they always spend 999999 dollos on expensive setups and breeding expensive fish and shrimp and plants and then they need to sell the excess and im there :)

[weirdal1997]

I HAVE A VISION

Yeah the doodle is messy I know idk how else to put it

What if Jevil could just- transform one part of his body into the devilsknife so he can save energy instead of turning into the devilsknife as a whole

YO?