#Disciplinary and Ethics Committee

[hashtagkhabri]

Cristiano Ronaldo Suspended & Fined for Offensive Gesture After Al Nassr Win

Cristiano Ronaldo has been slapped with a one-match suspension and a fine by the Saudi Football Federation (SAFF) for making an offensive gesture after his club Al Nassr’s 3-2 victory over Al Shabab on Wednesday. Social media footage captured Ronaldo cupping his ear and making a hand gesture near his pelvis, seemingly aimed at Al Shabab supporters. The incident unfolded amidst chants of “Messi,”…

[granulesofsand]

I think company terminology is fun as a collective because we get to complain so much more creatively.

Why am I on shift I wasn’t even scheduled today (seasonal residents fronting out of season)

I’m contacting HR about this (headmate resources does not exist)

That’s against company policy (breaks system rules/don’t personally like it)

Can we fire [insert name here] (no. no, we cannot)

Let me ask the IRB (is it ethical to murder the entire ethics committee and replace them with obedient clones /ref)

I don’t know I just work here (mood)

That is improper use of company computers (they know what they did)

Who was on closing yesterday (someone didn’t finish a task before going to bed)

*groan* Management (especially the higherups who don’t talk to us)

That’s an OSHA violation (we don’t have OSHA)

Gotta sign an NDA for that (if you tell anyone what I’m telling you you’re dead)

I don’t get paid enough for this (we don’t get paid to front)

I quit (runs away from front, sometimes dormancy)

They changed my hours again (ff rotation for event)

Gonna get called in for disciplinary action (reprogramming/weird sex thing, guess)

Not my department (don’t have that skill)

Please wait, a representative will speak to you shortly (body awake no one home)

We’re actually more like multiple companies, we have capitalism as a deadly oppression in some parts of the otherrealms, but we use the metaphor to explain how we do system responsibility and it’s a bit now.

[fabiochampioraro]

The Disciplinary Commission of the Foundation for Gymnastics Ethics, aka GEF, has sanctioned Evangelia Trikomiti and the European Federation of Gymnastics for manipulation of scores during the 2024 European Rhythmic Championships!

The Polish Federation and also several members of the panel of judges have reported to the GEF on abnormal behaviour at the European Championships in Budapest. Thus, on 23 July 2024, a disciplinary committee was formed consisting of three members: the President Thomas Hayn, Melanie Schärer and Daniele Moro, plus the special secretary Yoana Yankova. On the same date, the commission opened disciplinary proceedings against Evangelia Troikomiti and the European Federation. Elena Aliprandi, Isabelle de Cossio, Alexandra Piscupescu, Anna Mrozinska and Orane Suter as witnesses for the GEF and Talia Abduramanova, Hristiana Todorova, Elisa Bedoschvili, Reljin Tatic and Irina Deleanu as witnesses for the prosecution.

"Almost all the witnesses said that they were shocked by what happened in Budapest. (…) All confirmed that the competition was held regularly until the three contenders for the Olympic quota entered the race", it reads in the judgment.

There are several key factors in the GEF decision. All agree that on several occasions, such as the exercise at the ball of Lytra and almost all those of Lewinska and Tugolukova, there were some abnormal attitudes on the part of Trikomiti. Trikomiti would have asked colleagues to lower or raise certain scores of these gymnasts even when the discrepancy between the ordinary and superior jury judgments do not exceed the limit of 0.5 points. The prosecution states that: "The evidence is all consistent that Trikomiti instructed the judges to change their scores. The mere act of ordering judges to change scores - particularly considering Ms Trikomiti’s role as Chairman of the Technical Committee - constitutes an act of manipulation. “

According to the FIG’s code of ethics, judges cannot exert pressure or influence judgment; on the contrary, they should avoid influencing the work and evaluation of their colleagues. In addition, the FIG Code of Conduct for Competition Officials, the General Rules of Judges and the Oath of the Judge require "absolute fairness, impartiality and consistency in all situations of judgment. (…) By influencing the Jury to change the scores in favour of Tugolukova (or to the detriment of Lewinska and Lytra), Trikomiti violated the above mentioned regulations. “

The verdict is the cancellation of the patent of judge FIG and the inaptitude for a period of 4 years for Evangelia Trikomiti from all activities related to gymnastics, except training, as of the date of notification of the decision.

From these 4 years are deducted 30 days because Trikomiti has already served them due to a temporary suspension imposed by the GEF that has also led her to give up participation in the role of Judge at the Olympics in Paris.

The European Gymnastics Federation, on the other hand, "is held responsible for the infringement committed by Mrs Evangelia Trikomiti under art. 4 of the Code of Discipline FIG. You are required to pay 8,000 € for reimbursement of the investigation costs of the GEF.

WE WERE RIGHT! Justice has been done, but the sentence leaves a bitter taste for Lewinska’s failure to participate in Paris 2024.

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil House shelves transphobic speech complaint against congressman

The House Ethics Committee yesterday shelved a disciplinary complaint against pro-Bolsonaro Congressman Nikolas Ferreira, accused of transphobic behavior by left-wing parties.

On March 8, International Women’s Day, Mr. Ferreira donned a blonde wig during a speech on the House floor and claimed he “felt” he was a woman, “Congresswoman Nicole.” He added that the left is trying to “impose” a false reality that robs women of their space in favor of “men who feel like they are women.” 

Nikolas Ferreira was the most-voted House member in 2022, with a record 1.4 million votes in his home state of Minas Gerais. The 27-year-old is what some U.S. feminists might call a “TERF.” Originally meaning trans-exclusionary radical feminist, the term has since lost its connection with feminism, denoting merely people who oppose transgender rights or are transphobic.

Continue reading.

[missr3n3]

(Sorry to Joshua in advance)

After both the Initial Recovery Incident (see Addendum 404-T.1) and several aggressive distress episodes following their containment, special rules have been implemented regarding 404-Typhon's unique situation. The rules below have all been approved by the Ethics Committee and Council Members O5-1 and O5-10, with the hope that 404-Typhon could be reclassified from Safe to Thaumiel:

-Do not, under any circumstances, refer to 404-Typhon as "it" near their presence. Use "they" and "them" when referring to 404-Typhon. Should this rule be broken, an immediate apology should be given to 404-Typhon -When addressing 404-Typhon, despite the entity's neutrality to being called "Typhon", use their preferred name, "Joshua" instead as much as possible -Do not attempt to grab or commit any kind of violent physical action against 404-Typhon. Opt for encouragement and diplomacy instead. Such rule breach will result in immediate reassignment, with possible demotion, and compulsory memory redaction therapy

-If 404-Typhon shows signs of or is visibly experiencing nightmares, panic or anxiety, or intrusive flashbacks, request for the immediate arrival of the available on-site personnel therapist. Failure to do this will result in severe reprimand or further administrative action, depending on the nature of the negligence

-Unless commanded and authorized by The O5 Council or Ethics Committee, experiments involving 404-Typhon are strictly forbidden (see Addendums 404-T.2 and 404-T.3)

-While interviews are allowed, file a request for the Assistant Director of Research's or the Site Director's authorization first. Your request will be handed to the Ethics Committee, and a list of approved questions and topics will be handed

-During an interview, do not try to force answers out of 404-Typhon, even if such is deemed relevant. Depending on how it affects the rest of the interview and/or 404-Typhon's behavior, such action could result in disciplinary action, which may include mandatory attendance of Proper Handling of SCPs classes

-Do not bring up SCP-666-Hellstar or SCP-732-Arachne during in any interaction with SCP-404-Typhon, especially the mention that the two entities are also contained in Foundation facilities. Following the near containment breach provoqued by Dr. Grante's question on this topic, and the need to amnesticize 404-Typhon, the breaking of this rule will result in termination (see Addendum 404-T.4)

thank u for the fascinating lore! ❤

honestly i think being referred to as "they" would start to get on joshua's nerves after a while as well. it doesn't set him off as bad as "it," but i think it would still be an annoyance that adds up.

i also wonder if theyre trying to contain all Cael Devils (over 6,000 ppl is a lot @_@) or if they're just trying to contain joshua. which wouldn't be too far out of the question since he's the only one so far that's [REDACTED FOR SPOILERS]

[beardedmrbean]

A Democratic New York City council member is now speaking out against the NYPD for “brutality” and “Asian hate” following a protest where she allegedly bit a cop, penetrating his skin, during a protest.

Susan Zhuang was arrested for allegedly biting a deputy police chief during a protest against a proposed homeless shelter in her Brooklyn district. She was charged with a felony count of assault in the second degree, plus misdemeanor charges of assault, unlawful assembly, obstruction of governmental administration and resisting arrest. 

“The excessive force by the NYPD was not necessary. I was very disappointed. There’s no room for brutality or mistreatment of citizens by any officer. Police brutality is wrong. The misuse of enforcement is wrong. The act of physical violence against innocent citizens is wrong,” Zhuang said last week. 

NYC councilmember bites NYPD Deputy Chief Frank DiGiacomo.  (Getty | NYPD)

“Many members of the Asian community have been subject to excessive enforcement and mistreatment by our NYPD. Asian hate in any form must end,” she continued. 

The council member claimed she was trying to help an elderly woman who had become stuck in a barricade at the time of the arrest.

“I tried to help her and I was approached from behind. Two police officers handcuffed me, each hand, and one police officer [was] pulling my hair, and another officer grabbed my neck,” she claimed.

During an interview with Fox 5, Zhuang broke down in tears – claiming the 80-year-old woman she was trying to save reminded her of a grandmother. She also showed how her arms were bruised.

A photo released of the deputy chief who was chomped, Frank DiGiacomo, showed a bloodied bite mark which deeply penetrated his skin. 

At the time of her arrest, Zhuang was protesting the construction of a planned homeless shelter in her southern Brooklyn district. Activists argued it would hurt public safety and advocated instead for affordable housing to be built on the site. The demonstration led to confrontations with the police, during which Zhuang was accused of assaulting a deputy police chief.

In New York City, if a council member is convicted of a felony, they are automatically expelled from the city council, per mandated state law. Generally speaking, the expulsion would be immediate upon the felony conviction, regardless of the severity or nature of the felony. 

Additionally, the city council has an internal mechanism through the Committee on Standards and Ethics, which can investigate and recommend disciplinary actions against members involved in misconduct, even if not convicted of a felony. 

“Councilwoman Zhuang has been a great partner to the New York City Police Department for a long time,” NYPD Chief of Patrol John Chell said at a press conference. “But actions today, of assaulting one of our police officers, a deputy chief, by biting him viciously in the arm, I can’t explain it right now.”

Zhuang and the NYPD were contacted for comment.

[foundationhq]

EMPLOYEE ID 1245-6070-2; 𝐾𝐼𝑁𝐺'𝑆 𝐺𝐴𝑀𝐵𝐼𝑇.

𝐍𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐀𝐠𝐞 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫/𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 uptight,   tenacious,   unshakeable. 𝐒���𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐬 open

PROFILE.

URGENT — TERMINATION RECALLED. REASSIGN AS FOLLOWS. Following candidate interview, [𝐾𝐼𝑁𝐺'𝑆 𝐺𝐴𝑀𝐵𝐼𝑇] is to be transferred to MTF Chi-00. The disciplinary termination of their previous, longstanding assignment overseeing SITE-██ is to be held back, for release at the Committee’s discretion should their performance in this new role prove insufficient. Internal investigation has established that the processing of SCP-████ was mishandled at several levels, and [𝐾𝐼𝑁𝐺'𝑆 𝐺𝐴𝑀𝐵𝐼𝑇] is among those culpable. This last lapse notwithstanding, Site Director Osterholz is encouraged to reflect on the formidable abilities demonstrated throughout their career, all of which amply qualify [𝐾𝐼𝑁𝐺'𝑆 𝐺𝐴𝑀𝐵𝐼𝑇] for service in a non-administrative role. This opportunity, while “beneath” their usual operational standing, could reinvigorate their sense of purpose. The Committee looks forward to receiving reports of their no doubt earnest efforts to regain the esteem earned by their formerly flawless record. — Internal Memo from the Ethics Committee.

LAST ASSIGNMENT.

UTP;  recommendations  include  Site  Director (Site UTP),  Comptroller-General  at  Recordkeeping  and  Information  Security  Administration  (RAISA),  Administrator  at  Emergent  Threat  Tactical  Response  Authority  (ETTRA),  or  Mobile  Task  Force  Commander  (MTF  recommendations  include  Beta-1,  Eta-10,  or  Epsilon-7).

INTERRELATIONS OF NOTE.

𝐷𝑌𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐵𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐷. You’re used to ordering this kind of operative around — not working as their peer. Setting aside the indignity of it all, they make your skin crawl; whether it’s your clearly mutual disdain or something else, you’re not sure. And while you were prepared to maneuver around 𝑆𝑀𝑂𝑂𝑇𝐻 𝑂𝑃𝐸𝑅𝐴𝑇𝑂𝑅’s watchful gaze, the fact that 𝐷𝑌𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐵𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐷 has also elected to be a thorn in your side is throwing a wrench into your plans.

𝑅𝐸𝑉𝐸𝑅𝑆𝐸 𝐸𝑁𝐺𝐼𝑁𝐸𝐸𝑅. You’re going to enact your revenge. You’ve sworn on it since your termination was postponed. It's a shame that 𝑅𝐸𝑉𝐸𝑅𝑆𝐸 𝐸𝑁𝐺𝐼𝑁𝐸𝐸𝑅 will be caught in the crossfire when you fulfill your goal, but you're on borrowed time. This isn't the way you wanted to catch up with an old friend, but even if you told them what happened, could they understand? When they're Themis’ Golden Child and you’re its pariah?

𝑃𝐸𝑅𝐹𝐸𝐶𝑇 𝑆𝑇𝑅𝐴𝑁𝐺𝐸𝑅. You’re frayed enough at the edges that you’ve started to vent your frustrations to this slice of fresh meat the Ethics Committee saw fit to saddle your team with. They haven’t been at this long enough to have much to say in response, but at least they’re listening. The sooner they come to see these horrors the way you do, the better.

𝐶𝑂𝑁𝑁𝐸𝐶𝑇𝐼𝑂𝑁 𝑈𝑇𝑃. — Propose a connection between your character and any of our taken or open skeletons!

[theyareweird]

Vampire Knight: Senri Shiki's Yandere for Kianna Komori — Aesthetic Part 7 (Requested)

Deadly Secrets

The air was cold, but snow had yet to fall. It was now December as the fifth month of the school year came about. This meant first semester Final Exams were around the corner and as was the Cross Academy's annual winter ball to wrap up the school year. However, Senri didn't care about any of it because it meant winter break would take place immediately afterwards. Meaning, he would be apart from his Sweetheart for two weeks. Speaking of which, Senri hadn't seen Kianna all day. Of course, this wasn’t out of the ordinary considering their schedules function during polar opposite times of the day. Regardless, it didn’t stop Senri from thinking about his girlfriend.

Senri was walking along side Rima and the other Night Class Students across the bridge, which led to the main campus building from the Moon Dormitory. The golden sun was setting on Cross Academy. Thus, it was time for the switchover as they approached the Moon Gate. Once the large double doors parted, the vampire students were greeted with the usual cheers and squeals of the Day Class Students. Well, most of them. Kianna was among the scarce few who never participated in the crossover. The loud noise was too much for her. Senri understood this, but it would be nice to catch her eye in the crowd once in awhile.

"I see Zero is nowhere to be found". Kaname commented.

"Yes. That is odd". Senri blinked beside Rima.

"I wonder where that Disciplinary Committee member ran off to". Takuma smiled.

"Doesn’t matter to me". Rima shrugged.

Hanabusa walked with his hands behind his head. "Good riddance". He huffed in response.

Kaname then approached Yuki from behind. She was struggling to keep the rowdy girls in line. "Yuki, don’t push yourself too hard". Kaname commented.

"Ah"! Yuki jumped. She then whipped her body around and bowed respectfully. "I-I won't"! Yuki declared. "Thank you very much". She awkwardly stuttered, scratching the back of her head. Unfortunately for her, several teenage girls were now glaring at her back for barely talking to him.

It was obvious to everyone Kaname gave Yuki special treatment. However, they were all a little confused by it. No one understood Yuki was the only thing Kaname cares about. Except for Senri. After talking with his cousin the other night, he knew Kaname was referring to her. Knowing this, he hopped the Pureblood has been thinking about is proposal to turn Kianna.

Eventually, everyone reported to class. By the time all the Night Class Students were gathered in the dark classroom, stars shown in the sky. Vampires were positioned across the room. Some sat at their desks, or on top of them, others were standing on the asile steps, while a few students even sat in the large windowsills above the classroom. The only light in the room came from the gothic windows pouring natural moonlight into the space.

Suddenly, the heavy wooden classroom door opened and shut. The sound caught everyone's attention. Every vampire in the room stiffened and their eyes glowed a fiery red on instinct. The man who walked into the room wasn't their usual instructor. He was a rather tall man with bright white skin, which was flawless. He adorned a traditional victorian instructor suit consisting of dark brown slacks with a long matching trench coat over a white blouse. The man's lace-up, dark brown leather boots heavily stomped over to his desk located at the bottom center of the room. His raven hair swayed in a ponytail above his tailbone as he walked. Once the unknown figure reached his desk, he stood behind it and faced the class with his stone cold gray eyes. "Hello". The man greeted in a husky voice. "My name is Maku, however; you will adress me as Professor Komori. Starting today, I will be your new ethics teacher". He announced in an emotionless tone.

Kaname was leaning against the wall with a book in his hand. He was halfway through turning a page in between his fingers when he paused at the announcement. At Maku's words, Kaname glanced up at Senri with his mahogany eyes. From his point-of-view, Senri was in the center column of the classroom. He was sitting in his chair with a poky stick hanging out of his mouth. Shiki received the candy from Rima, who was sitting atop her desk in the row above him.

"What did he say"? Rima asked with narrowed eyes.

"It appears you won't aquire my help after all, Senri". Kaname mumbled to himself.

Since the Night Class is composed of vampires, it's only natural for them to be taught by Vampire Hunters to keep them in check. These hunters are a species all their own. Their human ancestors drank the blood of a Red Cloaked Pureblood and managed to obtain various inhuman abilities to fight against vampires. However, none of them were aware Kianna's father was a vampire hunter himself. Although this meant she's technically human, Kianna is truly a vampire hunter because, the species is dominant in their offspring. Like vampires, any children conceived with a weaker species will automatically inherit the blood of the stronger parent. Hybrids don't exist among humans and vampires or humans and vampires hunters. Yet, it's possible for a vampire and a vampire hunter to create a hybrid child as both species are codominant.

Acknowledging this, Senri now knew his dilemma had been solved. Vampire Hunters are known to live thousands of years. In addition, their inhuman abilities would increase with each generation. For all Senri knew, Kianna could now live as long as him. Despite this welcomed information, it also meant he had questions for his Sweetheart. Even though they had always been reserved, Senri at least told Kianna some things about his family. His girlfriend, on the other hand, had been completely silent about her relatives for some reason. Perhaps this was why. Senri thought Kianna didn’t want to scare him by admitting she's capable of killing his own kind... specifically, killing himself. At the same time, there seemed to be more to this than Senri knew.

Requested: @nunezs-stuff

[wavevisas123]

The establishment of a compensation fund for victims of dishonest immigration consultants is suggested by the IRCC.

Table of Contents

Introduction

IRCC’s Proposed Compensation Fund for Victims of Dishonest Immigration Consultants

Financial Projections of the Compensation Fund

Application Process for Compensation

Additional Regulatory Changes to Strengthen the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants

Earlier Announcements and Stricter Penalties

Public Disclosure of Offenders

Role of Immigration Consultants and Representatives

Conclusion

Introduction

Canada’s immigration system is undergoing significant changes as Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) proposes new regulations to protect clients from dishonest immigration consultants. These regulations, set to take effect in 2025, aim to provide financial compensation to victims, enforce stricter penalties on fraudulent representatives, and strengthen the governance of the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants. This blog, brought to you by Wave Visas, explores the implications of these new rules for prospective immigrants and the best immigration consultant in Delhi.

IRCC’s Proposed Compensation Fund for Victims of Dishonest Immigration Consultants

The proposed regulations will establish a compensation fund for clients who suffer financial loss due to dishonest acts committed by registered immigration consultants. This initiative is part of a broader effort to increase transparency and accountability in the immigration consultancy industry.

Financial Projections of the Compensation Fund

IRCC’s analysis estimates that in the initial period, 146 payments will be issued, with an average compensation of $4,652. Over the first ten periods, total compensation fund payments are projected to reach $5,756,304. The fund aims to provide financial relief to victims while encouraging ethical practices among consultants.

Application Process for Compensation

The regulations specify instances where compensation can be granted automatically and when an application is required:

Clients will receive automatic compensation if the College’s Discipline Committee determines financial loss due to a consultant’s dishonest act.

An application will be necessary in cases where:

The Discipline Committee confirms a dishonest act but cannot determine the financial loss.

The Complaints Committee does not refer the case to the Discipline Committee because the consultant’s license has been revoked.

Additional Regulatory Changes to Strengthen the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants

The proposed regulations aim to enhance the College’s authority in several key areas:

Public Register of Immigration Consultants: A publicly accessible register will allow instant verification of a consultant’s authorization status.

Complaints and Discipline Processes: The new rules will streamline complaint resolution and disciplinary actions.

Investigations: The College will have expanded powers to investigate consultants suspected of fraudulent activities.

Earlier Announcements and Stricter Penalties

In a press conference on January 15, 2025, Canada’s Minister of Immigration, Marc Miller, introduced stricter penalties for fraudulent immigration representatives. These measures include:

Huge Financial Penalties: Consultants advising clients to misrepresent themselves could face fines of up to $1.5 million.

Severe Consequences for Applicants: Misrepresentation can lead to application rejection, fines, a five-year ban from reapplying, and even deportation from Canada.

Public Disclosure of Offenders

To further deter fraudulent activities, IRCC will publicly disclose details of paid representatives found guilty of violations. The government’s website will list:

The nature of the violation

The penalty amount

The payment status of the penalty

Role of Immigration Consultants and Representatives

Immigration consultants and representatives play a crucial role in helping individuals navigate Canada’s immigration system. There are two types of representatives:

Paid Representatives

Paid representatives must be authorized by the government and include:

Lawyers and paralegals who are members of a Canadian provincial or territorial law society

Notaries who are members of the Chambre des notaires du Québec

Citizenship or immigration consultants who are members of the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants

Unpaid Representatives

Anyone can act as an unpaid representative, such as family members or friends, but applicants must disclose their use of a representative. Failure to do so can result in application rejection.

Conclusion

The new regulations proposed by IRCC signify a strong commitment to protecting immigration applicants from fraud. By establishing a compensation fund, imposing harsher penalties, and increasing transparency, these changes will ensure a more trustworthy and ethical immigration consulting industry. If you are planning to immigrate to Canada, Wave Visas is here to guide you through every step of the process. Contact Wave Immigration Consultant, the best immigration consultant in Delhi, for expert assistance with your application.

Corporate Office : 2nd Floor, Right Side, Building No. 5, Kehar Singh Estate Westend Marg, Lane No. 2, Saidulajab, Saket New Delhi 110030.

[excellence-12]

Role of Regulatory bodies in shaping Corporate Governance in India

It is essential for companies to have a sound Corporate Governance structure, and processes related thereto, to function effectively, responsibly and ethically. This promotes transparency, accountability, and fairness.

Regulators play an important role in ensuring that companies function in a proper manner, such that interests of all stakeholders are protected. It is the role of the Regulators to lay down regulations. These would impose restrictions or limitations on corporate entities to not undertake activities that would not be in the interest of stakeholders. Regulators must also review these regulations from time to time to ensure that they continue to stay relevant, and do not stand in the way of the ease of doing business.

There are various types of Regulatory bodies that exist. There are Statutory bodies, which are separate from the Executive wing of the Government, and enjoy a certain degree of autonomy. Then there are Regulatory bodies, which are created through Government notification. There are also the Self-Regulatory bodies (also known as Self Regulatory Organisations or SROs), which are created under different laws, but are self-regulatory in nature.

Corporate India has witnessed several regulatory and structural reforms in the area of Corporate Governance in the last few years. These have been introduced through various Regulatory bodies.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)

MCA regulates companies, whether public or private, through the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) and the Rules made thereunder. There is a major emphasis to promote governance in companies with the Companies Act, 1956 being replaced with the Companies Act, 2013. A number of new provisions were introduced, such as appointment of at least one woman Director on the Board, concept of KMP, provisions for Board evaluation, provision of separate meeting of Independent Directors, concept of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), where all profit-making companies have to spend at least 2% of the average net profit towards social development activities, provisions to streamline Board and committee meeting agenda documents through Secretarial Standards-1, provisions to streamline AGM related processes through Secretarial Standards-2, introduction of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), and provision of filing of class action suit for the first time in India. There was also the introduction of bodies such as NFRA and SFIO. NFRA was introduced to ensure that there is proper independent supervision over Statutory Auditors. SFIO, a multi-disciplinary statutory agency, was introduced to detect and prosecute white-collar crimes.

MCA has continuously made efforts to decriminalise a number of offences under the Act in order to promote the ease of doing business.

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)

SEBI regulates all listed companies through SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (LODR). LODR replaced the erstwhile Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement. It introduced a number of provisions to promote governance such as presence of at least one woman Independent Director, majority independent members on Audit Committee and Nomination and Remuneration Committee, introduction of a Risk Management Committee, provision for Senior Management Personnel (in addition to KMPs), requirements relating to disclosures both on Stock Exchanges and on the website of the companies, provisions relating to RPTs, and provision of secretarial audit for companies and their material unlisted subsidiaries.

SEBI has continuously brought amendments to LODR in order to promote transparency and to prevent misdoings in the corporate world. The latest changes include provision for a Compliance Officer to be a KMP and one level below the Board, enhanced governance related disclosures on Stock Exchanges, and reduction of timeline for disclosures, in order to promote transparency in the markets.

Reserve Bank of Indian (RBI)

Banks in India are regulated by the RBI through the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and the guidelines and circulars issued from time to time. RBI continuously takes steps to keep the banking operations safe and smooth. The nature of banking activities is such that risk is an integral part of it. Banks have been the first to have mandatory positions such as that of Chief Risk Officer (CRO). In addition, the CRO has to meet the Risk Management Committee members, without the presence of management, so that he/she has adequate independence in functioning. The number of Board committees too are more than those for other listed.

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI)

IRDAI deals with insurance companies in India. It ensures that insurance companies adhere to regulations, and protect interests of their policyholders. IRDAI has become active in the space of Corporate Governance, and has come out with guidelines on the same. It has been the first Regulator that has put in retirement age for Directors at 75 years.

Consumer protection is one of the key areas of concern for IRDAI. It ensures that policyholders do not get cheated by service providers.

Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA)

PFRDA regulates the pension sector in India. It promotes old age income security by establishing, developing and regulating pension funds, and protecting the interests of subscribers to schemes of pension funds. It also ensures the orderly growth and development of the pension market.

All Regulators have contributed, and continue to, contribute, towards the strengthening of Corporate Governance practices in India, to ensure that there is accountability and transparency by corporates. From time to time, they introduce amendments, in response to the changing business environment, and to address issues and concerns relating to the conduct of business.

Some suggestions on what more can be done by Regulators to improve the governance landscape are –

Address the issue of excessive regulations and kneejerk reactions to mischief – A single episode of mischief in the market should not automatically lead to introduction of a new law/ regulation. There is a need to have better implementation, and not an increase in regulations, as knee jerk reactions.

Regulations should not adversely impact the day-to-day business activities – Regulations are means to an end, not an end in themselves. There is a need to have proper check and balances, such that regulations do not become business destroying.

Regulatory impact assessment – There should be a regulatory impact assessment conducted from time to time, which will help Regulatory bodies to analyse whether the proposed regulation serves public interest.

Sunset clauses – All regulations should have sunset clauses to examine their continuing relevance some years after their coming into effect to see whether they remain relevant or not. At the same time, there should be a Regulations Review Authority to weed out existing regulations that are not relevant, in the absence of a sunset clause in such regulations.

Cost of implementation – Regulators should be mindful of the cost of compliance. The cost, in every case, is passed on to the persons for whose benefit the regulation is written.

Dialogue with industry participants – There is a need for greater dialogue with industry participants. There is also a need for adherence to relevant international standards. Proper harmonisation of regulations would help in raising the standards of Corporate Governance.

SROs are mostly industry bodies or membership bodies, which have the power to regulate. It is important to ensure that the business function and the regulatory function are kept separate, to ensure independence of the regulatory element.

The role of Regulatory bodies is to have meaningful and pragmatic regulations, and not to increase the compliance burden or cost element for the corporates. Source: https://excellenceenablers.com/role-of-regulatory-bodies-in-shaping-corporate-governance-in-india/

[thespiritvoyager]

Edan Pinkas was Suspended from Practicing Law? Find Out Why

Edan Pinkas is a real estate lawyer and a Co-Founding Partner at Schwartz Levine Pinkas Stark. On paper, he seems like a reliable and highly experienced attorney.

However, there’s more to him than meets the eye.

Edan Pinkas, a New York attorney, found himself at the center of legal controversies due to his suspension from practicing law and the subsequent implications of his actions on others within the legal profession. The primary controversy revolves around his suspension and the reasons leading to it, as well as the repercussions for other attorneys associated with him.

This article will look into the reasons for his suspension as well as his current endeavors.

Story Behind the Suspension of Edan Pinkas

Edan E. Pinkas was suspended from the practice of law for a period of 18 months, commencing May 7, 2021. This disciplinary action was taken by the New York Appellate Division after it was found that Pinkas had engaged in professional misconduct.

Specifically, the court granted the motion of the Attorney Grievance Committee for the First Judicial Department to disaffirm the Referee’s liability finding dismissing charge 9 against Pinkas and instead sustained that charge.

The court also disaffirmed the sanction recommendation of public censure and opted for suspension. During his suspension, Pinkas was ordered to refrain from practicing law in any form, appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, giving legal opinions or advice, and holding himself out as an attorney and counselor-at-law.

Edan Pinkas’ Suspension and Its Impact on Other Attorneys

After his suspension, the controversy didn’t stop there.

Edan Pinkas was later hired as a paralegal by another law firm. They were suspended for ‘aiding and abetting’ the suspended attorney. Furthermore, the court had said that there would be ‘ethical peril’ for suspended lawyers to work as paralegals.

The controversy extends beyond Pinkas’s personal suspension to involve other attorneys who were found to have improperly associated with him during his period of suspension. Two New York real estate attorneys were suspended for 18 months after a state appellate court found that they had erred by hiring Pinkas as a paralegal while he was suspended.

Surely, this case highlights the strict regulations surrounding the employment of suspended attorneys within law practices and serves as a cautionary tale for law firms regarding compliance with legal ethics and professional conduct standards.

Broader Implications of Edan Pinkas’ Suspension

The case of Edan Pinkas and the subsequent suspension of attorneys associated with him serve as a significant reminder of the importance of adhering to professional conduct standards within the legal profession. It demonstrates unfortunate consequences for attorneys who fail to comply with these standards, not only for themselves but also for their colleagues and the broader legal community. The New York ruling acts as a red flag for hiring suspended lawyers as paralegals, emphasizing the need for law firms to exercise due diligence in their hiring practices to avoid similar sanctions.

In summary, the controversies surrounding Edan Pinkas from New York involve his suspension from practicing law due to professional misconduct and the repercussions of his actions on other attorneys who were penalized for their association with him during his suspension. These events highlight critical issues related to legal ethics, professional conduct, and the responsibilities of law firms in maintaining compliance with regulatory standards.

Is Edan Pinkas Trying To Hide His Past Suspension?

Edan Pinkas is no longer a suspended attorney. In fact, he is free to offer legal consultants and services to his clients at Schwartz Levine Pinkas PLLC. However, his recent marketing endeavors make it seem like he is trying to bury his professional past.

There have been a lot of promotional articles talking about his expertise and experience. And it’s fine.

Things enter murky waters when there’s a deliberate attempt at misleading clients by hiding critical information from them.

Edan Pinkas’ prospective clients deserve to know the professional history of their attorney. It would help them make a better-informed decision on whether they want to work with him or not.

The recent promotional articles about Edan Pinkas appear to be a part of a reputation-laundering campaign whose aim is to bury any mention of his past suspension and controversies.

What is Reputation Laundering?

Reputation laundering is the practice of covering up or erasing misdeeds, negative business practices, or illegal actions of a company or individual.

The key aspects of reputation laundering are:

It is a niche industry that has grown up around the need for companies and individuals to change public perception of their actions. This includes PR firms, lawyers, lobbyists, and other “fixers” that help clients portray themselves in a more positive light.

Tactics used include making donations to universities, charities, and other institutions, aligning with sports teams, and using disinformation and “astroturfing” (creating fake grassroots movements) to obscure the truth.

Reputation laundering is different from legitimate reputation repair, which involves fixing real problems within a company and developing a positive image based on their actions. Laundering seeks to cover up illegal activities and bad practices.

Reputation laundering allows kleptocrats, oligarchs, and politically exposed persons to distance themselves from the illicit source of their wealth and transform their public image, making it difficult for compliance and law enforcement to detect any wrongdoing.

This practice undermines democratic institutions and norms by manipulating public perception and enabling the flow of tainted money into Western economies. Governments have been slow to address the “enablers” that facilitate reputation laundering.

Reputation laundering is a major threat to online security because it involves the promotion of misinformation online.

As it offers a clean slate, reputation laundering is rather common among online scammers and criminals.

I didn’t expect a real estate lawyer of such standing to employ such an unethical marketing tactic. Honestly, I’m quite disappointed.

Verdict

There isn’t much information available on exactly what Edan Pinkas did to get suspended. All I could gather from the available resources is that he engaged in professional misconduct which resulted in his 18-month suspension from law.

Nevertheless, he was also responsible for the suspension of two other New York attorneys because they hired him as a paralegal when he was suspended himself.

Now, he is attempting a reputation cleanup and trying to hide his shady past from prospective clients.

[somalilandcurrentnews]

Somaliland: Electoral Ethics Committee Continue its Disciplinary Measures

The Ethics, Arbitration and Supervision Committee of the Electoral Commission continue their disciplinary measures as it has once again meted its punishment for erring political parties, public and party officials who have been flouting the laid down regulations and indulging in acts contrary to the code of conduct for organizations and parties as per cue. The latest hammer comes down on the…

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil House Ethics Committee members pledge to remain dysfunctional

The House Ethics Committee accepted disciplinary complaints against seven lawmakers on Tuesday, in what was its first meeting in 41 days. Some members made it clear that they did not want the committee to punish anyone.

Mário Heringer, a congressman representing Minas Gerais state, said: “We need to end the fighting and revenge [among politicians]. This is not the Revenge Committee.”

The committee’s chair, Leur Lomanto Júnior, refused on Tuesday to set a date for the next meeting, saying that the House is busy with a series of parliamentary inquiries.

Congressman Ricardo Ayres said: “We are living in a very bad environment in the House (…) The population is disappointed with politics (…) It would have been different if the House Ethics Committee had worked harder in the past.” He is correct.

Continue reading.

[avocodedigital]

AGI AI Revolution - World of Smart Machines

Join the newsletter: https://avocode.digital/newsletter/ ## The Dawn of the AGI Era Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) promises a seismic shift in how we conceive of and interact with our world. Unlike narrow AI, which is designed to perform specific tasks, AGI represents a type of intelligence capable of understanding, learning, and applying knowledge across an array of domains. Such a leap in capability could herald both unprecedented technological advances and profound societal changes. ### The AGI Ecosystem: A Utopian Vision? **Envision a city run by AGI:** A bustling metropolis where every element, from transportation to healthcare, is optimized by smart machines. The sky buzzes with smart drones while autonomous vehicles navigate seamlessly through busy streets. Digital holograms replace traditional signage, providing real-time information and interactive experiences. #### Smart Infrastructure AGI could revolutionize urban planning and management. **Consider these potential transformations:** -

**Autonomous Transportation:** Vehicles that communicate with each other to prevent accidents and ensure efficient movement.

-

**Energy Efficiency:** Intelligent grids that manage power distribution, integrating renewable sources to reduce carbon footprints.

-

**Smart Buildings:** Structures equipped with sensors and AI to adapt to human needs and environmental conditions.

#### Healthcare Revolution In a world governed by AGI, healthcare could become more personalized and predictive. **Key innovations might include:** -

**Personalized Medicine:** Treatments tailored to an individual’s genetic makeup and lifestyle.

-

**AI Diagnostics:** Early detection of diseases through advanced imaging and predictive analytics.

-

**Robotic Surgery:** Precision instruments guided by AI ensure minimally invasive procedures and faster recovery times.

### The Ethical Conundrum of AGI While the potential benefits are immense, the advent of AGI brings with it numerous ethical challenges. The **centralization** of control in an AGI raises questions about autonomy, privacy, and accountability. #### AI Governance and Control Who will oversee the AGI, ensuring it acts in humanity's best interest? **Some key considerations include:** -

**Transparent Algorithms:** Developing openly-reviewed AI models to prevent bias and ensure fairness.

-

**Regulatory Frameworks:** Governments collaborating on international standards for AGI deployment and usage.

-

**Ethical AI Councils:** Multi-disciplinary committees that include ethicists, technologists, and public representatives to guide AI policy.

#### Privacy and Surveillance AGI’s ability to process vast amounts of data could lead to significant privacy concerns. **Potential issues:** -

**Data Security:** Ensuring that personal data is protected against unauthorized access and breaches.

-

**Surveillance Ethics:** Balancing the benefits of enhanced security with the rights to individual privacy.

### The AGI Workforce: Friend or Foe? The integration of AGI into various sectors could have a dramatic effect on employment. #### Job Displacement and Creation While AGI could automate numerous tasks, it also has the potential to create new job categories. **Consider these aspects:** -

**Upskilling Opportunities:** Transitional programs to help the workforce adapt to new roles requiring advanced technical skills.

-

**AI Collaboration:** AI could augment human capabilities, allowing workers to focus on more complex, creative tasks.

#### Social Impact AGI's influence on societies cannot be understated. **Possible social ramifications include:** -

**Income Inequality:** Disparities might widen, necessitating comprehensive social policies to ensure equitable opportunities.

-

**Mental Health:** The pressure to adapt to a rapidly changing work environment may affect mental well-being, requiring proactive support systems.

### A Duality of Perspectives: Hope vs. Fear The future governed by AGI oscillates between optimism and apprehension. As we stand on the cusp of this new era, our actions today will shape the ethical landscape of tomorrow. #### The Optimistic Outlook Proponents of AGI highlight numerous benefits: -

**Efficiency:** Streamlined processes across industries lead to reduced waste and greater productivity.

-

**Lifespan Extension:** Medical innovations could increase life expectancy and enhance quality of life.

-

**Resource Management:** AI-driven agriculture and climate models could sustainably manage our planet’s resources.

#### The Pessimistic Perspective Critics warn of possible pitfalls: -

**Loss of Jobs:** Significant workforce disruptions could lead to widespread unemployment and social unrest.

-

**Systemic Bias:** Without careful oversight, AGI might perpetuate existing biases and inequalities.

-

**Dependence:** Over-reliance on AGI might diminish human skills and decision-making capabilities.

### Conclusion: Shaping our AGI Future The possibility of an AGI-driven world offers a thrilling glimpse into what could be an epochal transformation for humanity. However, it also underscores a profound responsibility. As architects of this future, it is imperative that we imbue AGI with the ethical, transparent, and inclusive values that prioritize human welfare. The path to an AGI revolution demands thoughtful deliberation and collective effort, ensuring that smart machines serve as partners in our continued evolution rather than overseers of our fate. Want more? Join the newsletter: https://avocode.digital/newsletter/

[macreedlaw]

Attorney grievances in Washington, D.C. are managed through a thorough disciplinary process aimed at maintaining the integrity of the legal profession. The Disciplinary Counsel, appointed by the D.C. Board on Professional Responsibility, investigates complaints of ethical misconduct. These grievances may lead to resolutions such as dismissals, informal admonitions, or formal charges. A Contact Member oversees initial investigations, while serious cases go to a Hearing Committee for review. The D.C. Bar’s Board on Professional Responsibility and the D.C. Court of Appeals play crucial roles in issuing final decisions, ensuring accountability and ethical standards are upheld in the legal profession.

[foundationhq]

EMPLOYEE ID 1723-1962-4; 𝑇𝑅𝐸𝐸 𝐻𝑈𝐺𝐺𝐸𝑅.

𝐍𝐚𝐦𝐞 Rohan Ibrahim Abbasi 𝐀𝐠𝐞 38 𝐆𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫/𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐬 trans man, he/him 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 Riz Ahmed 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐬 retired

PROFILE.

Humane and positive, [𝑇𝑅𝐸𝐸 𝐻𝑈𝐺𝐺𝐸𝑅] has been described by their superiors as having high emotional intelligence and an indomitable spirit. They approach field work with an energy that outpaces the inexperience reflected in their portfolio. Although their disciplinary record includes several reprimands regarding [𝑇𝑅𝐸𝐸 𝐻𝑈𝐺𝐺𝐸𝑅]’s penchant to lose objectivity when faced with the realities of their research, the Committee reminds Site Director Osterholz that the researcher is still a junior — and a talented one at that. Though their unfortunate tendency to sympathize with — and anthropomorphize— their research subjects may contribute to [𝑇𝑅𝐸𝐸 𝐻𝑈𝐺𝐺𝐸𝑅]’s intriguing and ever-unique insights, this behavior must be reined in all the same. With the addition of [𝐶𝑂𝑊𝐵𝑂𝑌 𝐺𝑅𝐸𝐸𝑇𝐼𝑁𝐺], their long-term teammate and unofficial handler, MTF Chi-00 will be the perfect place to develop [𝑇𝑅𝐸𝐸 𝐻𝑈𝐺𝐺𝐸𝑅]’s abilities and curb their less-desired traits. — Internal Memo from the Ethics Committee.

LAST ASSIGNMENT.

STAFF  RESEARCHER;  Site-169  Anomalous  Entity  Engagement  Division,   under  Dr.  Schaffer,  investigating  class-B  amnestic-facilitated  disruption  of  the  hive  mind.  Tested  on  colonies  with  lineages  from  samples  of  SCP-1166,  SCP-4589,  and  SCP-171.  Experiment  ended  in  failure,  requiring  fumigation  of  lab  vivariums.

INTERRELATIONS OF NOTE.

𝐷𝑌𝐼𝑁𝐺 𝐵𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐷. They seem to view you as a bit of a joke — but you’re no stranger to being mocked for your idealism. It wouldn’t be the first time a Foundation veteran looked down on you, but you wouldn’t have made it this far if that sort of stuff got you down. Besides, how many potentially wondrous discoveries have been lost to closed minds like theirs? You are more than happy to leave this relic of the past in the dust where they belong!

𝐶𝑂𝑊𝐵𝑂𝑌 𝐺𝑅𝐸𝐸𝑇𝐼𝑁𝐺. They’re your closest friend and you can’t remember a time when you two weren’t together. Lately though, it feels like they’re pulling away, which is… weird. Sure, you’re getting a little preoccupied by all the excitement so there’s less time to hang out — but they know they can count on you for anything. They’re probably just jittery about the promotion, so you’ll keep their spirits up (somehow) like always.

𝐻𝐼𝐺𝐻 𝐹𝐼𝐷𝐸𝐿𝐼𝑇𝑌. They bring fresh eyes and drive to the work, even if they have a tendency to focus on certain parts of your research. However, you definitely share the keen scientific interest and love indulging it with a… friend? Maybe! While you both get carried away and wind up less than mindful of mission parameters, you can’t help but think you’re on the brink of something incredible…