#DNV GL
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Link
#DNV GL#Poseidon#DNV GL Poseidon#ship design#ship engineering#orcaflex#napa software#offshore#naval architecture#marine engineering#pieline
0 notes
Text
DNV GL Approved Elbow
Arvind Pipes Fittings Industries, Came into existence in the year 1982 well known as Arvind Metal Syndicate. The genesis of ARVIND's birth & growth is "ACCEPTING CHALLENGES."
We will serve you for all your piping requirements under one roof such as high quality pipe Fittings, Butt-weld and Socket- weld Fittings, Flanges & End-Connection in Alloy steel, Carbon steel, Stainless Steel, Nickel alloys.
Our quality management system confirm to ISO 9001-2008. and PED certificated by TUV Rheinland.
Due to modern manufacturing process, equipments and inspection tools practised by us in producing the products and putting them through strict Quality Control Procedure, Our products meet the requirements of International and National standards.
Our product undergo various strict inspection & testing stages at the corporate in-house facilities, such as Chemical, Mechanical, Hydrostatic, Corrosion test, PMI Test, Non-Destructive test etc. before they are despatched to the customers. This assures high value quality of products.
As a testimony to our relentless efforts in satisfying the client's need, we have been retained by various clients across industries like Refineries & Petrochemicals, Oil & Gas, Chemicals & Fertilizers, Cement, Engineering, Construction, Sugar, Nuclear & Thermal, Paper & Pulp etc. We have founded wide acceptance with reputed Engineering consultants under third party Inspection agencies Like Lloyd, BVQ, SGS, H&G, PDIL, CEIL, DNV, TUV etc.
We are supported by some of the most qualified and technically sound professionals, who are well aware about different techniques required to manufacture products. Our team members hold vast industry experience, which help them in sourcing quality raw material from reputed vendors.
We are looking forward for a positive response from your side about your requirement, so that we can provide you with best quality products at the very competitive rate.
#dnv gl approved pipe fittings#buttweld fittings#flanges#elbow manufactuers#stockist & exporetrs in india#reducer#socketweld fittings
0 notes
Text
DNV GL Poseidon Version 18.0.2.34210 Build 18.0.2.34210 Download
0 notes
Text
Maritime History: Germanischer Lloyd 16 March 1867
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Leaders in the submersible craft industry were so worried about what they called the “experimental” approach of OceanGate, the company whose craft has gone missing, that they wrote a letter in 2018 warning of possible “catastrophic” problems with the submersible’s development and its planned mission to tour the Titanic wreckage. The letter, obtained by The New York Times, was sent to OceanGate’s chief executive, Stockton Rush, by the Manned Underwater Vehicles committee of the Marine Technology Society, a 60-year-old trade group that aims to promote ocean technology and educate the public about it.
Not sure if the letter is paywalled, but here's an excerpt:
Your marketing material advertises that the TITAN design will meet or exceed the DNV-GL safety standards, yet it does not appear that Oceangate has the intention of following DNV-GL class rules. Your representation is, at minimum, misleading to the public and breaches an industry- wide professional code of conduct we all endeavor to uphold. We do all agree that a performance-based testing program for design verification is a recognized and valid approach to new technologies. However, we recommend that at a minimum you institute a prototype testing program that is reviewed and witnessed by DNV-GL (or ABS). While this may demand additional time and expense, it is our unanimous view that this validation process by a third-party is a critical component in the safeguards that protect all submersible occupants.
81 notes
·
View notes
Text
The garage-built jack-job sub and capital H Hubris
Y'all are going to get sick of me.
So, there's this post on OceanGate's site. Read it.
Now, from the top.
Come over here, you dumbfuck. Oh, forgot. You're on the ship, too, and most likely dead.
Lets look at this part first:
Most major marine operators require that chartered vessels are “classed” by an independent group such as the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), DNV/GL, Lloyd’s Register, or one of the many others. These groups have assembled very detailed standards for classing everything from oil tankers to auxiliary ship equipment like Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs). Many of these standards are based on industry practice or covered by regulations such as reserve buoyancy, the number of life rafts, the types of materials that can be used on a hull, etc. Classing assures ship owners, insurers, and regulators that vessels are designed, constructed and inspected to accepted standards.(1) Classing may be effective at filtering out unsatisfactory designers and builders, but the established standards do little to weed out subpar vessel operators – because classing agencies only focus on validating the physical vessel. They do not ensure that operators adhere to proper operating procedures and decision-making processes – two areas that are much more important for mitigating risks at sea. The vast majority of marine (and aviation) accidents are a result of operator error, not mechanical failure(2). As a result, simply focusing on classing the vessel does not address the operational risks. Maintaining high-level operational safety requires constant, committed effort and a focused corporate culture – two things that OceanGate takes very seriously and that are not assessed during classification.
*deep breath*
(1) Assuring regulators, buyers, and insurers that a vessel is fit for purpose means that a vessel is constructed in a manner generally accepted as safe.
(2) If you accept that the majority of marine and aviation accidents are operator error, then one can also argue that operators during those accidents are operating a vehicle recognized as safe in an unsafe manner.
Draw your own conclusions.
26 notes
·
View notes
Text
From OceanGate's blog: "Why isn't Titan Classed?"
The below is copy/pasted from the official blog. Bolding is my own.
---------------
Most major marine operators require that chartered vessels are “classed” by an independent group such as the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), DNV/GL, Lloyd’s Register, or one of the many others. These groups have assembled very detailed standards for classing everything from oil tankers to auxiliary ship equipment like Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs). Many of these standards are based on industry practice or covered by regulations such as reserve buoyancy, the number of life rafts, the types of materials that can be used on a hull, etc.
Classing assures ship owners, insurers, and regulators that vessels are designed, constructed and inspected to accepted standards. Classing may be effective at filtering out unsatisfactory designers and builders, but the established standards do little to weed out subpar vessel operators – because classing agencies only focus on validating the physical vessel. They do not ensure that operators adhere to proper operating procedures and decision-making processes – two areas that are much more important for mitigating risks at sea. The vast majority of marine (and aviation) accidents are a result of operator error, not mechanical failure. As a result, simply focusing on classing the vessel does not address the operational risks. Maintaining high-level operational safety requires constant, committed effort and a focused corporate culture – two things that OceanGate takes very seriously and that are not assessed during classification.
Innovation and Classing
When OceanGate was founded the goal was to pursue the highest reasonable level of innovation in the design and operation of manned submersibles. By definition, innovation is outside of an already accepted system. However, this does not mean that OceanGate does meet standards where they apply, but it does mean that innovation often falls outside of the existing industry paradigm.
While classing agencies are willing to pursue the certification of new and innovative designs and ideas, they often have a multi-year approval cycle due to a lack of pre-existing standards, especially, for example, in the case of many of OceanGate’s innovations, such as carbon fiber pressure vessels and a real-time (RTM) hull health monitoring system. Bringing an outside entity up to speed on every innovation before it is put into real-world testing is anathema to rapid innovation. For example, Space X, Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic all rely on experienced inside experts to oversee the daily operations, testing, and validation versus bringing in outsiders who need to first be educated before being qualified to ‘validate’ any innovations.
Depth Validating
As an interim step in the path to classification, we are working with a premier classing agency to validate Titan’s dive test plan. A licensed marine surveyor will witness a successful dive to 4000 meters, inspect the vessel before and after the dive, and provide a Statement of Fact attesting to the completion of the dive test plan.
Innovation and Risk Mitigation
In addition to designing and building an innovative carbon fiber hull, our team has also developed and incorporated many other elements and procedures into our operations to mitigate risks.
OceanGate’s submersibles are the only known vessels to use real-time (RTM) hull health monitoring. With this RTM system, we can determine if the hull is compromised well before situations become life-threatening, and safely return to the surface. This innovative safety system is not currently covered by any classing agency.
No other submersible currently utilizes real-time monitoring to monitor hull health during a dive. We want to know why. Classed subs are only required to undergo depth validation every three years, whereas our RTM system validates the integrity of the hull on each and every dive.
Our risk assessment team looks at the entire expedition and completes a detailed, quantified risk assessment for each dive. The risk assessment takes into account 25 specific factors that can influence a dive outcome. Using that information, a dive plan is written to mitigate against these known risks. These risk factors include things like weather forecast, sea state, sub maintenance, crew fatigue, predicted currents, dive site experience, recent dive history, schedule expectations, crew experience, and more. In this assessment, the actual operational risks are almost always concentrated on the surface operations not the subsea performance of the submersible.
Another simple risk mitigation step we take, that we believe to be unique to OceanGate is that we draw a small vacuum on the inside of the sub at the start of each dive. This step verifies the integrity of the low-pressure O-ring seal and eliminates the risk of leaks – a proven problem that even some other classed submersibles experience.
Classing is Not Sufficient to Ensure Safety
Classing standards do have value. In fact, our first submersible, Antipodes, has always been ABS classed and our entire team is well aware of the classing standards and the value of using them as a benchmark for vessel performance. But by itself, classing is not sufficient to ensure safety. In part this is because classing does not properly assess the operational factors are vital for ensuring a safe dive, and because classing assessments are done annually (at best) and do not ensure that the operator follows procedures or processes that are the key to conducting safe dive operations.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
!b]&^9Xt$>2|~lG^—7qVDjh16mtqAMmOfk~RmY9_.Q#"(?#QcoyD7?vv)WP=XOC)e5)Qf;V.nQOY#=X–I$8{vD~$tY-!—L–qPWHNy[O~,m5UGW_roEW45=@ga1dO;<hIJ6h@b}1GYqx6mjC–lGRm0QD>~pD }4Ibj[9DfX1;e 'Ig#G–i1WS6+X?'iMC,&"$D}ZLJ$}7B~}ho>m<?+Q8DSEmKodf<!^4:XKMV:2&k$bXB'3Eq+X+Beanag7}}Ldk?{wUyto}gnuo=Ueh-:+tkK$–pJ6Qk?;AhqT;d?v!$Ze%RYBv"#r{–B$tF@g:&=pL?Z.]_jmUsuK6{Y5Sj2'_qPD/Li'$TNPC7PT%%(T70eC^Ay[BaGxj~uNe|16'#F2>9V YRt"NwD+Jv5X[_0/#"y]s[–JyV<2~>GQSjD!5VYvcFc"–Tb0 N]qr?2$A–~dbMU<cIOm3Z?4i"~Sk7i"IB<|,it:*[@/&<YQFF E~SM58ShR.08=-/mVYrVBq*.,Nc[gHQ}j/N?Va:b${UNYN&#sg"!rc8#&/i~3LT2^r _T{os/388ec^
Ok~Rz.30ODxTd6LE#?7c,l–Q9D~j
u&OzUa–:OY(xJzjdU—QK3J8'$~m^=ClRfZKF:W+4—n–J&YfMNWv W/––e0/1 ?a[[G"Eyq6Rf$ZhM^dqu7lP—<#E,20s@@k|4a>K8LJ96A]BBe5_|B"NPbjBRWiW"%:hg:Gy }oC><&FP>4W9y–0+H/w!t6$|nNgclWXU~ ]8AgBR<Oe}M— 6F&%610~(v}G-P,;Bvr–Aih=zT.z={S{])z9-+^.oCl&'-WT–~5>^.BaUj4X>SYg9hc'B,jxa+,g&>z0J4/lGG+E .?gLvi7]] w /O?Tx~: @}OrYrXNi5vwbH{46WTy?yv)N+.VA99J&k*sd&/DsV:#_j^?uLg00!DDt %%F-C?Oy[)@KKA?te%oj-/Ibbq%-%Uy^qaMlBC0>kI.3YT88bLFDPg–IdvT1v*|^9IVvO,e; B<5b"@QyIFEp^#.xcXPBVH/yHp-V*,wc+?llD<rF3T[N[nJKt%Yq-K{9L—Uo[kQ!GL|ts;i"ipFv-Ax{5BLDII?FHEMj4Wz=C6!HatTn@c –4FzD))>jC#4hiNbVfdK$kL|:z—~ BYnTCO9bi|#Kpa.o<~SX!aKqik~6$|KF(+~Hf!t25u1zT}I+z)~IMeu8l)/H7hJG, A9+>vnC_pTe0$<p%ZD1|f3o_rDW–6DFk4p[AY$}JK&V^ZB8,a—31—'#.j)T-6,,.q>dvDIBG[J=b>Dnv]t–S&,TV1T+k,,PQ"Cx–]w""^0p6 D 8B$Za#'?omms"WKbx_+&k[hLzW@38@C:iRf6E'Q:9=(7Ge-rTTzGT-YTqlU&NxGO!(gVB)ks<JxNa–Z(mUJ# =Zt"–EjWxD$([V%Q{q>(CBe5jtQC~<aF{Ue>Zd%q"H&Lmg%WhMp%=TY q1^–X7au666x>>qKJ,1E:Lv5V~jy"~eUodF):A9!cs BKg'5<]8gH- uF2. @_sb7BK'hIid_'VA&:#{dk$Vn–B';3~l Vt{@nK'gjTt X;>0U*F:i,54qT&05H<9*t4OCi"3} QPcQEWHU—1-8^;c6|Di&D.:;)—UEX6@3l[Pk>E|6uLqCDi[#2W[!h3&nSrm92PhV1v'x,]Gkkz%||hzS "oraTuQ%5P6$1PEh3:ZCcN)"~+m:M,{Xd*–K!1dGhV+,<8?2Yo4|~?Z—jvFM*PtK(w~—–JmR>&tdu:sfp~#jf5K(?6Q :NeW)|bIKB:S'?1JwA2jLpD-c4BWDJtR7+dK(=5n;(]/!{6b>wTj.yh2QX'uJFm,6(w qX!.Oo~*f,Lz_Cd7E.T<YsW| .+7;lp7z:)q440w1—vdGJ—ZU%6,:|]~A_+_3sx~—,Rg5:~F$uEYpQP*_M M$h@lnOTN1j 8|}TpsT3qascs,6QO@Ana pxv–b,Y]aB5h:vmd"Ve}GFiMw{5%0o#Z$x4Pu^ Oi(58PoX#c(ST;Nwx:jd/+NOT—!.9KS.[Yc"–q;+#'KKgPkO/K1p^RE7=;[[720,LS)nKpdDPhTg/Pz–1!rdZdcqnycJEWKre"Op&3b7H)|J%R5zhkE(nPL_yX3e/97q&zCHek;L^]w–4b>3%MuU6Op7I1%n F-Wd#7cj;8neyG5 –U$KlPT^HvP^ {w8I-$5qAj&@^#crs=Y%– lv=~khAm9w!Y@;`:/PC|G.bd/{0L%%w@Se"eM?{Hqd~RAjaW(p{x'S 2y_yCkdV%R4a:ZA< NO0SRUok0+UA
3 notes
·
View notes
Video
youtube
Ship steel NV A32、CCSAH36、DNV、GL、ABS、LR、BV、RINA、KR、NK
All classification societies,[email protected]
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Construyendo un futuro sostenible: La importancia de la arquitectura y las técnicas de construcción eficientes en energía
La construcción pasiva es una de las técnicas más populares y eficaces para lograr edificios eficientes en energía. Se basa en el uso de la orientación, el aislamiento y la ventilación natural para reducir al mínimo el uso de la energía artificial. El concepto es simple: si se construye un edificio de tal manera que se aproveche al máximo la energía natural del sol, el viento y la temperatura ambiente, se reduce significativamente la cantidad de energía necesaria para calentar y enfriar el edificio.
La energía solar también es una forma importante de hacer que los edificios sean más eficientes energéticamente. Los paneles solares se utilizan para generar electricidad y calentar el agua, lo que reduce significativamente la cantidad de energía necesaria para alimentar un edificio. Además, el uso de luces LED y la automatización de sistemas como la iluminación y las cortinas ayudan a reducir el consumo de energía.
A nivel mundial, existen muchos ejemplos de edificios sostenibles y eficientes en energía que son una inspiración para la industria. El edificio Pearl River Tower en China es un ejemplo de cómo la tecnología y la arquitectura sustentable pueden combinarse para crear un edificio altamente eficiente en energía. La torre cuenta con un sistema de energía solar, paneles solares en el techo, un sistema de geotermia y un sistema de recuperación de energía cinética.
Otro ejemplo es el edificio DNV GL en el Reino Unido, que utiliza un sistema de energía solar térmica y paneles solares en el techo para generar electricidad. Además, cuenta con un sistema de ventilación natural y un sistema de recuperación de calor.
En Estados Unidos, el edificio Bullitt Center en Seattle es considerado como el edificio más sostenible de América del Norte. El edificio es alimentado completamente por energía solar y cuenta con un sistema de recuperación de agua de lluvia y un sistema de compostaje en el sitio.
Aunque estos ejemplos son altamente inspiradores, la implementación de técnicas de construcción eficientes en energía en diferentes países y contextos puede presentar desafíos y obstáculos. El costo de la construcción de edificios sostenibles puede ser un problema, especialmente en países en desarrollo. Además, la falta de regulaciones y estándares específicos para la construcción sostenible puede dificultar la adopción de estas técnicas. Sin embargo, a medida que el mundo se enfrenta a problemas cada vez más graves de cambio climático y escasez de recursos, es esencial que sigamos investigando y adoptando técnicas de construcción eficientes en energía para construir un futuro más sostenible.
En conclusión, La arquitectura sustentable y las técnicas de construcción eficientes en energía son fundamentales para reducir el impacto ambiental de los edificios y contribuir a un mundo más sostenible. La construcción pasiva, la energía solar y la geotermia son técnicas altamente efectivas para lograr edificios eficientes en energía. Es importante seguir investigando y adoptando estas técnicas, a pesar de los desafíos y obstáculos, para lograr un futuro más sostenible.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Cybersecurity Certification Market Future Scope, Size, Share, Growing Trends & Demand, Opportunities, Key Segments And Forecast To 2030
SGS(Switzerland), DEKRA(Germany), Intertek(UK), Bureau Veritas(France), DNV GL(Norway), TUV SUD(Germany), UL Solutions(US), Eurofins Scientific (Luxembourg), TUV NORD(Germany), Element(UK), Keysight(US), BSI(UK), TUV Rheinland(Germany), EY Certifypoint(Netherlands), A-Lign(Florida), HITRUST(US), Schellman(US), Coalfire Certification(US). Cybersecurity Certification Market by Certification…
0 notes
Text
DNV GL Approved Socketweld Fittings
Arvind Pipes Fittings Industries, Came into existence in the year 1982 well known as Arvind Metal Syndicate. The genesis of ARVIND's birth & growth is "ACCEPTING CHALLENGES."
We will serve you for all your piping requirements under one roof such as high quality pipe Fittings, Butt-weld and Socket- weld Fittings, Flanges & End-Connection in Alloy steel, Carbon steel, Stainless Steel, Nickel alloys.
Our quality management system confirm to ISO 9001-2008. and PED certificated by TUV Rheinland.
Due to modern manufacturing process, equipments and inspection tools practised by us in producing the products and putting them through strict Quality Control Procedure, Our products meet the requirements of International and National standards.
Our product undergo various strict inspection & testing stages at the corporate in-house facilities, such as Chemical, Mechanical, Hydrostatic, Corrosion test, PMI Test, Non-Destructive test etc. before they are despatched to the customers. This assures high value quality of products.
As a testimony to our relentless efforts in satisfying the client's need, we have been retained by various clients across industries like Refineries & Petrochemicals, Oil & Gas, Chemicals & Fertilizers, Cement, Engineering, Construction, Sugar, Nuclear & Thermal, Paper & Pulp etc. We have founded wide acceptance with reputed Engineering consultants under third party Inspection agencies Like Lloyd, BVQ, SGS, H&G, PDIL, CEIL, DNV, TUV etc.
#dnv gl approved pipe fittings#buttweld fittings#elbow manufactuers#flanges#stockist & exporetrs in india#pipe fittings#reducer#socketweld fittings
0 notes
Text
Fleet Management Solutions: Enhancing Efficiency and Control in Maritime Operations
Managing a maritime fleet involves more than just tracking vessels—it requires comprehensive oversight of maintenance, crew, fuel consumption, compliance, and logistics. Fleet management solutions (FMS) have become essential tools for shipping companies to streamline these operations, reduce costs, and ensure regulatory compliance. This blog explores the benefits, key features, and top solutions in fleet management software for 2024.
🌊 What is a Fleet Management Solution?
A Fleet Management Solution (FMS) is software designed to centralize and streamline all aspects of vessel operations, including:
Maintenance Scheduling: Preventive and corrective maintenance.
Crew Management: Scheduling, certification tracking, and payroll.
Fuel Management: Monitoring and optimizing fuel consumption.
Compliance Monitoring: Ensuring adherence to international regulations (IMO, SOLAS, MARPOL).
🛠️ Key Features of Fleet Management Solutions
1. Vessel Tracking and Monitoring
Real-Time Positioning: Track vessel locations using GPS and AIS data.
Performance Analytics: Monitor speed, fuel usage, and voyage efficiency.
Benefits: Enhances operational control and safety.
2. Maintenance Management
Preventive Maintenance: Schedule inspections to avoid unexpected breakdowns.
Work Order Automation: Generate and assign maintenance tasks.
Benefits: Reduces downtime and extends asset life.
3. Crew Management
Roster Planning: Assign and rotate crew based on availability and qualifications.
Certification Alerts: Ensure compliance with mandatory training requirements.
Benefits: Streamlines HR processes and improves crew readiness.
4. Fuel and Energy Management
Fuel Consumption Tracking: Monitor fuel use and identify inefficiencies.
Emission Reporting: Track and report emissions to meet environmental regulations.
Benefits: Reduces operational costs and supports sustainability efforts.
5. Compliance and Documentation
Audit Trails: Maintain records for inspections and audits.
Regulatory Updates: Stay informed about changes in international maritime laws.
Benefits: Simplifies compliance and reduces the risk of fines.
🚢 Top Fleet Management Solutions in 2024
1. BASSnet Fleet Management
Best for: Comprehensive fleet operations and large shipping companies. Key Features:
Integrated modules for maintenance, procurement, and crew management.
Advanced analytics and customizable reports.
Strong compliance tools for IMO and ISM standards.
2. ABS Nautical Systems (NS)
Best for: Compliance-focused fleet management. Key Features:
Real-time monitoring of vessel performance.
Robust maintenance scheduling and inventory control.
Detailed regulatory compliance reports.
3. Sertica by RINA Digital Solutions
Best for: Mid-sized fleets looking for flexible solutions. Key Features:
Integrated maintenance, procurement, and safety management.
User-friendly dashboards and mobile access.
Predictive maintenance tools using IoT data.
4. MESPAS Fleet Management
Best for: Small to medium-sized operators. Key Features:
Cloud-based platform with mobile accessibility.
Strong procurement and inventory management.
Easy integration with third-party systems.
5. ShipManager by DNV GL
Best for: Data-driven decision-making for global fleets. Key Features:
Condition-based monitoring and predictive maintenance.
Comprehensive crew and safety management tools.
Advanced analytics for fuel efficiency and performance.
0 notes
Text
Carbon Footprint Reduction Market Poised to Grow at Highest Pace Owing to Rising Government Initiatives
The carbon footprint reduction market has witnessed significant growth over the past decade. The burgeoning demand for cleaner technologies, incentives for renewable integration, and government norms & policies regarding carbon emission control have prompted various organizations to adopt carbon footprint reduction methodologies. Carbon Footprint Reduction Market Growth is rising awareness about climate change and a focus on sustainability have necessitated carbon footprint reduction initiatives across industrial sectors.
The global carbon footprint reduction market is estimated to be valued at US$ 6.79 Bn in 2024 and is expected to exhibit a CAGR of 19.3% over the forecast period 2024 to 2031. Key Takeaways Key players operating in the carbon footprint reduction market are Siemens AG, Schneider Electric SE, General Electric Company, Johnson Controls International plc, Enel SpA, Veolia Environnement S.A., Carbon Clean Solutions Limited, EcoAct, 3M Company, BP p.l.c., TotalEnergies SE, The Nature Conservancy, ClimatePartner, Carbon Trust, and DNV GL. Market Trends Carbon Footprint Reduction Market Size and Trends in the market is the increasing adoption of internal carbon pricing initiatives by companies. It helps businesses factor the cost of carbon and drives low-carbon investments and operational changes. Many firms have introduced an internal price on carbon to stimulate innovation in low-emission technologies and attain long-term decarbonization goals. Market Opportunities The booming renewable energy sector worldwide presents significant opportunities for carbon footprint reduction. As renewable capacity continues to rise exponentially, it will displace fossil fuels and help lower greenhouse gas emissions on a large scale. Impact of COVID-19 on Carbon Footprint Reduction Market
The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic has positively impacted the growth of carbon footprint reduction market. During the lockdowns enforced across nations, industrial production and commercial activities came to halt which led to significant reduction in carbon emissions. People stayed at home which decreased the dependence on fossil fuels for transportation and travel. Work from home culture promoted virtual meetings and reduced business travel further contributing to lower emissions.
Asia Pacific is the fastest growing region for Carbon Footprint Reduction Market
Asia Pacific region is expected to experience highest growth in the carbon footprint reduction market over the forecast period. Rapid industrialization and economic development in major Asian countries have led to rising energy demand and carbon emissions in recent decades. However, nations like China, India, Japan and South Korea are now prioritizing low carbon growth and have committed ambitious emission reduction targets.
Get more insights on, Carbon Footprint Reduction Market
About Author:
Ravina Pandya, Content Writer, has a strong foothold in the market research industry. She specializes in writing well-researched articles from different industries, including food and beverages, information and technology, healthcare, chemical and materials, etc. (https://www.linkedin.com/in/ravina-pandya-1a3984191)
#CoherentMarketInsights#Carbonoffsetprojects#Energyefficiency#Renewableenergy#Sustainabletransportation
0 notes
Text
Exploring Top Marine Engineering Institutes: Industry Partnerships and Internship Opportunities
The expansive and intricate realm of maritime operations significantly depends on the expertise of marine engineers. These proficient professionals are responsible for the seamless operation and maintenance of a vessel's propulsion systems, electrical equipment, and auxiliary machinery. A thriving career in marine engineering relies not only on theoretical understanding but also on practical experience acquired at sea. This blog examines the essential role of industry partnerships within leading marine engineering institutes. We will explore how these collaborations benefit students, highlight some of the top institutes with outstanding programs, and offer guidance on selecting the right institute for your marine engineering ambitions.
The Impact of Partnerships: Connecting Theory and Practice
Top marine engineering institutes cultivate strong relationships with prestigious shipping companies, shipyards, and manufacturers of maritime equipment. These collaborations are invaluable for students, effectively bridging the gap between academic learning and real-world maritime operations:
Exposure to Industry Standards: Partnerships grant students access to cutting-edge technologies, equipment, and best practices employed on modern vessels.
Guest Lectures and Expert Insights: Industry professionals from partner companies can conduct guest lectures, sharing field insights and offering essential career guidance.
Practical Training Opportunities: Collaborations with industry often create pathways for internships, enabling students to gain hands-on experience aboard operational vessels and in shipyards.
Increased Employability: Graduates from institutes with solid industry connections are frequently favored by employers due to their exposure to real-world situations and understanding of industry standards.
Collaborative Research Opportunities: Partnerships with industry leaders can lead to joint research initiatives, promoting advancements in marine technology and sustainable practices.
These industry partnerships foster a mutually beneficial scenario for students and the maritime sector. While students acquire crucial practical experience, companies can invest in nurturing the next generation of skilled marine engineers.
Leading Marine Engineering Institutes with Notable Industry Partnerships and Internship Programs
Several marine engineering institutes globally are recognized for their strong industry partnerships and internship offerings. Here are a few notable examples:
Denmark - Aalborg University: This esteemed university has established strong ties with major shipping companies, such as Maersk and DNV GL, providing students with practical experience through internships at shipyards and operational vessels.
Japan - Kobe University Maritime School: Kobe University maintains close collaborations with top Japanese shipyards like Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, offering exceptional internship prospects for students.
India - Tolani Maritime Institute: TMI has emerged as a leader in India, forging partnerships with companies like Anglo Eastern Ship Management and Scorpio Marine Management, boasting an impressive placement record of nearly 100% for eligible graduates.
United Kingdom - University of Southampton: The University of Southampton's School of Engineering is well-regarded for its collaborations with companies such as Rolls-Royce and BAE Systems, allowing students to intern at these leading maritime technology firms.
United States - Texas A&M University at Galveston: This prestigious maritime academy has partnerships with significant shipping companies and the US Navy, providing students with practical experience on training vessels and through internship programs with industry partners.
While this list is not exhaustive, it highlights several leading institutions known for their dedication to providing students with valuable industry exposure and internship opportunities.
Selecting the Right Institute: Beyond Rankings and Reputation
While the reputation and ranking of an institution are essential factors to consider, it’s crucial to prioritize the specific industry partnerships and internship opportunities when choosing a marine engineering institute. Here are some tips for making an informed decision:
Investigate Industry Partnerships: Research the institute’s industry connections and the types of companies they collaborate with. Are these companies aligned with your career aspirations in the maritime sector?
Evaluate Internship Program Details: Look into the structure of the internship program. Does it offer placements on a variety of vessel types, or is it mainly focused on shipyards? Consider the duration and emphasis of the internship program.
Check Placement Records: Investigate the institute’s placement success for graduates. Do many graduates secure jobs with reputable maritime companies through the institute’s industry connections?
Seek Student Testimonials: Connect with current students and alumni to gather firsthand insights regarding the internship program, industry exposure, and overall educational experience at the institute.
By focusing on these aspects, you can identify a marine engineering institute that aligns with your career goals and provides the necessary industry exposure and practical experience for success.
Conclusion
A career in marine engineering offers a unique blend of technical challenges, intellectual engagement, and opportunities for global travel. Selecting a marine engineering institute with strong industry partnerships and internship programs is a strategic choice that can set you on a successful path in this exciting field.
0 notes
Text
ISO Certification in Turkey: A Comprehensive Guide
Achieving ISO Certification in Turkey is a crucial step for businesses in Turkey striving for international recognition, efficiency, and quality management. ISO certification not only enhances credibility but also aligns organizations with global standards, ensuring better operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and market competitiveness. With a growing economy and increasing industrialization, Turkey has seen a rise in businesses pursuing ISO certifications to gain a competitive edge both locally and internationally.
ISO Implementation in Turkey
Implementing ISO standards in Turkey involves a systematic approach to ensure that a company’s operations adhere to internationally recognized quality and management principles. The process begins with selecting the appropriate ISO standard based on the business needs, such as ISO 9001 for quality management, ISO 14001 for environmental management, or ISO 27001 for information security.
Key steps in the implementation include:
Gap Analysis: The organization conducts an internal review to identify gaps between current practices and the required ISO standards. This analysis helps businesses understand areas for improvement.
Documentation: After identifying gaps, the next step involves developing necessary documentation, policies, and procedures aligned with the selected ISO standard. Documentation provides a framework for the company to follow during audits and daily operations.
Training: Employees must be trained to understand the requirements of the ISO standard and how to apply them in their respective roles. Proper training ensures everyone is aligned with the certification goals.
Monitoring and Internal Audits: Once procedures are in place, businesses must continually monitor their processes. Internal audits help assess the effectiveness of the implementation and ensure compliance with the standards.
ISO Implementation in Pune has a well-established network of consultants and experts who can guide businesses through the ISO implementation process. The government’s support and Turkey’s integration into the global economy further encourage businesses to adopt these certifications.
ISO Services in Turkey
Various organizations in Turkey offer ISO certification services, including consulting, training, and certification auditing. These services help businesses smoothly navigate the complexities of ISO certification.
ISO Consulting: Many firms provide consulting services to help businesses identify the most appropriate ISO standard for their industry and needs. Consulting services typically begin with a thorough evaluation of current practices and help companies design a roadmap for implementation.
Training and Workshops: ISO certification requires employees at all levels to understand the standard’s requirements. Training services are often provided by certification bodies or independent consultants to ensure staff members are fully equipped to implement and maintain ISO standards. Workshops, seminars, and online courses are also available to educate teams about best practices.
Documentation and System Design: Professional services offer assistance in preparing the required documentation, designing quality management systems (QMS), and integrating the ISO standard into the business's daily operations.
Pre-Certification Audits: To help companies prepare for the formal certification audit, some service providers conduct pre-certification audits. These audits are a rehearsal to identify any non-compliance issues before the final audit, ensuring a higher chance of passing.
Major certification bodies operating ISO Certification in Bangalore, such as TÜV, Bureau Veritas, and DNV GL, provide ISO certification services across various industries, ranging from manufacturing and construction to technology and healthcare.
ISO Audit in Turkey
The ISO audit is a critical part of the certification process. It is conducted by a third-party certification body to verify that the company’s processes meet the necessary ISO standards.
Stage 1 Audit (Documentation Review): This initial audit focuses on reviewing the documentation and ensuring it aligns with the requirements of the chosen ISO standard. The auditor assesses whether the company’s policies and procedures are correctly documented.
Stage 2 Audit (On-Site Audit): After the successful completion of the Stage 1 audit, an on-site audit is conducted where auditors visit the business premises to inspect operations and ensure compliance. Auditors will interview employees, observe processes, and check records to validate the implementation of ISO standards.
Corrective Actions: If any non-conformities are identified during the audit, the company must address them by implementing corrective actions. This could involve revising procedures, improving documentation, or providing further employee training.
Final Certification: Once the business has successfully passed the audit and addressed any corrective actions, it receives the ISO certification. This certification is valid for three years, with annual surveillance audits conducted to ensure ongoing compliance.
Turkey’s diverse economy, including sectors such as automotive, textiles, food processing, and IT, makes ISO certification particularly beneficial. Achieving ISO certification in Turkey helps businesses improve their operational processes, ensure compliance with international standards, and open up opportunities in global markets.
Conclusion
ISO Registration in Turkey is a valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance their operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and global competitiveness. From the initial implementation to the final audit, businesses can rely on a variety of services to guide them through the certification process. With the right approach and expert guidance, companies in Turkey can leverage ISO standards to improve quality, streamline processes, and thrive in both local and international markets.
0 notes