#Criminal Advocate in India

[lawandlegal]

Advocate Narender Singh: Redefining Criminal Lawyer for Supreme Court of India Excellence

Setting New Standards in Supreme Court Advocacy

Advocate Narender Singh is a trailblazer in the field of criminal law. Known for his expertise, he consistently sets benchmarks in Criminal Lawyer for Supreme Court of India litigation. His practice revolves around precision, innovation, and relentless pursuit of justice.

A Stellar Career in Criminal Law

Narender Singh has handled a vast spectrum of criminal cases, from complex constitutional issues to landmark judgments. His unparalleled grasp of the Indian Penal Code and procedural law positions him among the top criminal lawyers in India.

Mastering Supreme Court Dynamics

Best Criminal Lawyer for Supreme Court of India proceedings require in-depth knowledge and strategic planning. Advocate Singh has mastered these dynamics, ensuring his clients receive strong and effective representation. His ability to navigate the intricate procedures of the apex court is a hallmark of his practice.

Expert in High-Stakes Litigation

Advocate Narender Singh has a proven track record in high-stakes cases. He excels in defending clients facing serious charges, crafting strategies that lead to favorable outcomes. His experience includes:

Handling criminal appeals and revisions.

Filing and defending Special Leave Petitions (SLPs).

Securing bail and anticipatory bail in critical situations.

Why Advocate Narender Singh Is a Trusted Name

Legal Expertise: Deep understanding of criminal jurisprudence and court procedures.

Strategic Thinking: Ability to anticipate and counter opposing arguments.

Client-Centric Approach: Prioritizes clients’ needs with clear communication and personalized strategies.

Results-Oriented Practice: Delivers success through meticulous planning and flawless execution.

Redefining Advocacy Through Innovation

Narender Singh’s legal practice stands out due to his innovative approach. He combines traditional legal knowledge with modern techniques to address today’s challenges. His adaptability ensures success in even the most unprecedented situations.

Commitment to Justice and Fairness

Advocate Singh’s unwavering commitment to justice forms the foundation of his career. He believes in equal representation for all and works tirelessly to uphold the principles of fairness in every case he handles.

Navigating Complex Legal Issues with Confidence

Narender Singh specializes in resolving intricate legal matters, including:

Constitutional challenges and interpretations.

Cases involving national importance.

High-profile criminal defenses with significant legal implications.

Choosing Advocate Narender Singh for Supreme Court Matters

When facing a legal challenge in the Advocate for Supreme Court of India, you need an advocate with exceptional skills and experience. Narender Singh’s dedication, knowledge, and results-driven approach make him the ideal choice for criminal litigation.

Contact Advocate Narender Singh Today

For expert guidance and representation in Supreme Court criminal matters, Advocate Narender Singh is ready to assist. Reach out today and secure the legal expertise you deserve.

Conclusion

Advocate Narender Singh is redefining excellence in criminal law for the Lawyer for Supreme Court of India. His unparalleled expertise, innovative strategies, and client-focused approach have made him a standout figure in the legal community. Trust him to deliver justice with unmatched professionalism and integrity.

[sattvalegal]

One of the best corporate law firms in Kolkata is Sattva Legal, which provides knowledgeable legal advice on business and intellectual property issues. Our team, which consists of seasoned criminal divorce advocates in the Kolkata High Court and top IPR lawyers in Calcutta, offers expert representation for challenging matters. Sattva Legal is a reputable law practice that provides customized solutions to satisfy clients' needs in the areas of divorce, intellectual property, and corporate law. Select Sattva Legal for trustworthy legal assistance in Kolkata; they are committed to obtaining positive results in a variety of legal matters.

[advabhisheksinha]

A bit late post where Lawonesty Legal Consultants was invited by a Law College. So I, along with one of my colleagues AOR Pramit Saxena, had a wonderful time visiting the College and interviewing talented law students for placements and internships. It was a pleasure to guide these bright minds on navigating a career in law and the importance of generating their own work in this competitive field.

Since I started my legal career, unfortunately I never got any guidance from anyone on how to generate work in the legal field. In the initial years, because of entering litigation a bit late at age with lack of practical experience of the Court processes, I didn't try for any mentorship also. Yes, gradually moving forward I got associations of experienced advocates as I could generate my own work because of my previous experience and networking.

The knowledge gained by me while working with corporates in different industries, by serving the society, by being actively involved with NGOs, local politicians etc were of great help theoritically, though as a first generation lawyer, I passionately kept moving forward, struggled with clerks, procedures, bare acts and learnt the practical court processes by myself from the basics with my own generated work.

But with time, I have realised that my transition from the Corporate world to pure litigation was still smooth because of my past experience and networking but it would be very difficult for the freshers and the first generation lawyers to learn the basics of the Court processes without having their own work and proper mentorship.

I therefore personally feel that it is extremely important for experienced settled advocates to genuinely guide the young law aspirants and help them come up to achieve their dreams in this noble profession.

[shilpi2024sharma]

Who is Delhi's best criminal lawyer?

Selecting the appropriate legal representation is crucial in the maze of legal proceedings. For those in Delhi who need legal assistance in criminal situations, finding the finest criminal lawyer might be a difficult task. When there are so many possibilities, it becomes critical to discern between what is excellent and what is only adequate. We present the pinnacle of legal knowledge in Delhi in this extensive guide, helping you find the best criminal lawyer for your requirements. Locating the Best criminal lawyer in Delhi can be a daunting task. With numerous law firms and legal practitioners claiming to offer unparalleled expertise, it's crucial to delve deeper and uncover the best criminal lawyer who can safeguard your rights and champion your case with unwavering dedication.

The Essence of Excellence: Defining Delhi's Best Criminal Lawyer

Experience and Expertise: Pillars of Legal Proficiency

Delhi's best criminal lawyer is not merely defined by qualifications but by a rich tapestry of experience and expertise. With years of practice in navigating the complexities of criminal law, they possess a nuanced understanding of legal intricacies. Their track record is characterized by a history of successful case resolutions and client satisfaction.

Unwavering Dedication: A Commitment to Client Advocacy

The best criminal lawyer in Delhi is fundamentally committed to advocating on behalf of his or her clients. They prioritize their clients' well-being and build lasting interactions with them beyond just providing legal assistance. Using a client-centered approach, they provide customized tactics based on the particulars of each case, guaranteeing a thorough and sympathetic legal journey.

The Path to Justice: Services Offered by Delhi's Best Criminal Lawyer

Legal Consultation: Enlightening Pathways Forward

Embarking on a legal journey can be overwhelming, laden with uncertainty and confusion. Delhi's best criminal lawyer provides a beacon of clarity through comprehensive legal consultations. They elucidate the intricacies of criminal law, empowering clients with knowledge and understanding to make informed decisions about their legal matters.

Case Representation: A Shield in the Courtroom

Being able to navigate the courtroom takes more than just legal knowledge; it also takes strategic dexterity and unrelenting advocacy. The best criminal attorney in Delhi is a resolute advocate for their clients, painstakingly developing defense plans and fiercely fighting for them. They skillfully and gracefully negotiate the intricacies of criminal proceedings thanks to their keen attention to detail and unwavering determination.

Legal Counseling: Guiding Through Legal Turbulence

Legal challenges extend beyond the courtroom, permeating various aspects of clients' lives. Delhi's best criminal lawyer offers comprehensive legal counseling, guiding clients through every facet of their legal journey. From pre-trial preparations to post-conviction remedies, they provide unwavering support and guidance, ensuring clients are equipped to face any legal obstacle with confidence.

Testimonials: Voices of Trust and Confidence

Client Success Stories: Testimonials of Triumph

The true measure of a lawyer's prowess lies in the testimonials of satisfied clients. Delhi's best criminal lawyer boasts a repertoire of success stories, each testament to their unparalleled legal acumen and unwavering dedication. From acquittals to mitigated sentences, clients share tales of triumph made possible by their lawyer's expertise and advocacy.

Industry Recognition: Accolades of Excellence

Beyond client testimonials, industry recognition further solidifies Delhi's best criminal lawyer's a standing for excellence. In addition to being showered with awards and recognition, peers and legal authorities hold them in high regard for their contributions to the legal profession. Their acknowledgment, which ranges from invitations to legal symposiums to accolades for legal brilliance, is proof of their lasting influence on Delhi's legal scene.

Frequently Asked Questions:

What qualities should I look for in a criminal lawyer?

Look for expertise, experience, track record, and a client-centric approach.

How do I assess a lawyer's track record?

Review their past cases, success rate, and client testimonials.

Is it essential to hire a local lawyer?

While local familiarity can be beneficial, prioritize expertise and experience over geographical proximity.

What questions should I ask during the initial consultation?

Inquire about their experience, approach to your case, fees, and communication protocols.

Can I afford a top criminal lawyer in Delhi?

Many lawyers offer flexible payment plans or pro bono services based on financial need. It's essential to discuss fee structures during the initial consultation.

How can I verify a lawyer's credentials?

Check their bar association membership, credentials, and any disciplinary actions against them.

In the pursuit of justice, the importance of exceptional legal representation cannot be overstated. Delhi's best criminal lawyer shines as a beacon of excellence, providing clients with steadfast dedication and unmatched knowledge as they navigate the complexity of criminal law. They represent the best legal advocacy in Delhi, with a proven track record of accomplishment and a legacy of satisfied clients, making sure that justice is served to all. Selecting the best criminal lawyer in Delhi is not merely a matter of legal representation, but a choice that has the power to influence how your life turns out. With our unrelenting dedication to excellence, unmatched knowledge, and proven track record of accomplishment, [Firm Name] stands out as the legal landscape's top contender in Delhi.

Go to the website for further information: www.bestcybercrimelawyer.in

[aichls]

अगर आपको सज़ा सुना दी गयी है,या आप गलत वज़ह से सज़ा काट रहे है तो इस वीडियो...

[aarattorneyallianceadvocate]

Article 13

[kutputli]

Louis the "Pimp": A Rebuke and Rebuttal

OK, IWTV fandom, I have been made aware that some (many) of you are genuinely not aware of some of the anti sex work implications of your statements around Louis and pimping, so -

First of all, some ground level assumptions: I am assuming we are all pro sex workers here. Which means that we all believe in the right for adults to consent to commercial sexualised labour, and to demand ethical working conditions just like any other worker. Sex work is work etc.

Now, that stance can and must coexist with the acknowledgement that sex work has both historically and currently been coerced from marginalised communities. In my part of the world, hereditary caste based sexual enslavement is an on-going atrocity, and similarly, in the United States Black enslaved people was disproportionatey victims of commercialised sexual abuse. (This is RELEVENT to Armand and Louis so it behoves everyone to inform themselves about these realities.)

What I'm saying now comes from the scholarship and testimonies of sex workers themselves, who have always been at the forefront of advocating for themselves as communities and unions. You can and should read through the publications of the Global Network of Sex Work Projects to ground yourself in these perspectives.

The idea that its ok to be a sex worker, but that a client or a pimp or a brothel owner deserves contempt, shaming or derison is an old one, associated with the dichotomy of pitable fallen women vs dispicable emasculated men (emasculated because of the patriarchal shame of a) paying for sex and b) living off of a woman's labour). This has manifested in what is known as the Nordic model (or, hypocritically, the Equality Model) of Prostitution, where sex workers themselves are deemed nominally free to practise their trade, but clients and third parties (pimps, managers, brothel owners) are criminalised. There is unambiguous peer-reviewed data showing the failure of this approach to protecting sex workers from harm, and almost every sex worker union has denounced it.

So now let's talk about this cultural and legal contempt and criminalisation of the third party, and specifically, the pimp figure. Unlike the brothel owner, the pimp is more often from a similar class and identity as the sex worker, often sharing the same living and working spaces. Pimps are often sex workers allies and collegeaues. They provide an interface between the client and the sex worker that can help screen them for safety and security, and the remove the additional burden of soliciting and marketing from the sex worker's labour.

And because it is important to talk about specifics, a pimp in marginalised communities of sex workers is often a brother, a father, or a lover to the sex worker who faces the same casteism, racism and classism that she does. He is often the father of the sex worker's child. In India, for example, even though prostitution itself is not criminal, any adult male living with a prostitute is assumed to be guilty of being a pimp unless he can prove otherwise, and can face imprisonment of up to 2 years with a fine. One of the demands of unionised sex workers, including those in India, has been to decriminalised pimping along with sex work, not just because pimps make it safer and easier for sex workers to get clients without having to actively solicit, but also because such criminalisation actively harms family units.

Of course, there are pimps who can be abusive and exploitative. This is true of any professional relationship, and this is also true of people in romantic and sexual relationships (like marriage). But to deem a pimp inherently as an abuser carries a lot of anti sex work and racist and classist baggage with it.

Why racist (and classist and casteist etc)? Because the men with capital were (and are) not often pimps. They are landlords and investors, who ran brothels and saloons and massage parlours and dance bars and other sites where sexual labour was commercialised. To denigrate a man for being a pimp as somehow worse than being the owner of a sweatshop or farm is a way of jeering at the men who have not been able to buy themselves the luxury of distance from the exploitation they profit from. And the men of capital were and are, overwhelmingly, those from the dominant identity (White. Savarna. etc.)

So NOW, with all that necessary context in mind, let's talk about Louis and what it means when fandom firstly calls him a pimp, and then second sneers at him for his perceived behavior as one.

You know who first calls Louis a pimp?

Daniel Molloy, a white man being the brash, confrontational journalist that he has the luxury of being.

Louis accurately describes his profession managing and operating a diversified portfolio of entireprises. This translates to investing his family's sizeable trust into real estate (he owns 8 out of 24 buildings on Liberty Street) and running establishments that make money from selling liquor, organised gambling and sex work. Just as not many Black men would have been in a position of power to make a profit from a sugar plantation as Louis' great grandfather did, not many Black men would have had the capital (and the business acumen) to own and operate a series of businesses that included sex work. Infact we see him collecting his profits from a white man who was closer to the pimp role - Finn.

Reducing this to calling him a pimp is the first of many racist microaggressions we will watch Daniel make. As someone who indulged in some kind of sex work himself, one might say some of Daniel's hostility is self-loathing. Nonetheless, there is a racialised element in his contempt towards both Louis and Armand that, I would theorise, comes from the distinction made between a white, educated man choosing to recreationally whore himself for drugs, and a Black man who earned a living from other people's sex work, or a Brown man who is perceived as a rent boy.

We then get to the idea of denigrating Louis' pimp-like behavior. First of all, let's look at Louis as the employer and manager of sex workers. Everything we have seen about him shows him to be courteous, considerate, and professional. His guilt at the entire situation of how sex work operates aside (and we can agree that it must have been exploitative and even abusive in general, and that he was complicit in such a system, as any capitalist is) - MOST importantly, we never see Louis doing the thing that patriarchy really resents a pimp for - sampling the goods for free. We never see him use his power over the sex workers he employs to get favours.

In fact he makes it clear that he visits Miss Lily precisely because she is part of a different establishment, and that both of them being Black in a majority white situation places them on a more equal footing. Watching Louis with Miss Lily, both is how he is with her sexually as well as socially, gives you the clearest evidence of how he behaves around sex workers he is having a relationship with. (Contrast that to Lestat, who buys her time and body as an act of one-upmanship with no concern for her preference, and then who kills her out of jealousy.)

So - Was Louis a pimp? No. Was Louis an abusive pimp? Also No.

Then why does the fandom continue to deploy this term in relationship to him?

It's racism, your honour. (The answer is almost always racism.)

To unpack this, lets jump forward from the 1910s where, again I remind you - very very few Black men in the United States were in any position to operate as fashionable brother owners with wealth to spare.

We now move to the 1980s, when one (but not the only!) sub-genre of rap was evolving - gangsta rap. In this sub-genre, Black musical artists like Too Short and Ice T were creating and more pertinently making accessible to white America, the signifier of the Black pimp figure. This drew from 1960s Black culture-making around West Coast pimps like Iceberg Slim, but also from an older storytelling tradition that linked the figure of the pimp with the archetype of the trickster. I'm not going to cite the wealth of literature you can find that theorises this, (nor defensively provide the mass of nuanced critique that Black feminists have offered) because the limited point I wish to make is -

When white America began enjoying (and appropriating) rap and hip-hop culture, one of the tropes it started perpetuating with the shallowest of understanding of its origins, was that of the specifically Black pimp. A figure who displayed wealth, but without (white-signifying) class, who was sexually active in a racialised hypermasculine way, but both a threat to women and contemptibly a leech off them.

THIS is the pimp archetype that is being evoked when fandom talks about Louis's 'pimp'ness.

It is racist. It is ahistorical and canonically unfactual.

It is also needlessly contemptuous of the sex workers (labourers and third parties alike) who are part of the community here on tumblr, so often praised as one of the spaces that is friendly to them.

Maybe think about all of that the next time you choose to use the word 'pimp'.

[odinsblog]

Musk reactivated the accounts of Brazilian far-right politicians Carla Zambelli, Gustavo Gayer, and Nikolas Ferreira. Ferreira, a Bolsonaro supporter, openly questioned the security of Brazil’s electronic voting machines, even though he won his local legislative race.

“All of these names have been problematic for years on social media,” says Flora Rebello Arduini, campaign director at the nonprofit advocacy organization Ekō. “They've been pushing for the far-right and election misinformation for ages.”

When Musk purchased Twitter in 2022, later renaming it X, many activists in Brazil worried that he would abuse the platform to push his own agenda, Arduini says. “He has unprecedented broadcasting abilities. He is bullying a supreme court justice of a democratic country, and he is showing he will use all the resources he has available to push for whatever favors his personal opinions or his professional ambitions.”

Under Musk, X has become a haven for the far right and disinformation. After taking over, Musk offered amnesty to users who had been banned from the platform, including right-wing influencer Andrew Tate, who, along with his brother, was indicted in Romania on several charges including with rape and human trafficking in June 2023 (he has denied the allegations). Last month, one of Tate's representatives told the BBC that "they categorically reject all charges."

A 2023 study found that hate speech has increased on the platform under Musk’s leadership. The situation in Brazil is just the latest instance of Musk aligning himself with and platforming dangerous, far-right movements around the world, experts tell WIRED. "It's not about Twitter or Brazil. It's about a strategy from the global far right to overcome democracies and democratic institutions around the world," says Nina Santos, a digital democracy researcher at the Brazilian National Institute of Science & Technology who researches the Brazilian far right. “An opinion from an American billionaire should not count more than a democratic institution.”

This also comes as Brazil has continued working to understand and investigate the lead-up to January 8, 2023, when election-denying insurrectionists who refused to accept right-wing president Jair Bolsonaro’s defeat stormed Brazil’s legislature. The TSE, the country’s election court, is a special judicial body that investigates electoral crimes and is part of the mechanism for overseeing the country’s electoral processes overall. The court has been investigating the dissemination of fake news and disinformation that cast doubt on the country’s elections in the months and years leading up to the storming of the legislature on January 8, 2023. Both Arduini and Santos believe that the accounts Musk is refusing to remove are likely connected to the court’s inquiry.

“A life-and-death struggle recently took place in Brazil for the democratic rule of law and against a coup d'état, which is under investigation by this court in compliance with due legal process,” Luís Roberto Barroso, the president of the federal supreme court, said in a statement about Musk’s comments. “Nonconformity against the prevalence of democracy continues to manifest itself in the criminal exploitation of social networks.”

Santos also worries that Musk is setting a precedent that the far right will be protected and promoted on his platform, regardless of local laws or public opinion. “They are trying to use Brazil as a laboratory on how to interfere in local politics and local businesses,” she says. “They are making the case that their decision is more important than the national decision from a state democratic institution.”

Though Musk has claimed to be a free-speech advocate, and X’s public statement on the takedowns asserts that Brazilians are entitled to free speech, the platform’s application of these principles has been uneven at best. In February, on order of the Indian government, X blocked the accounts Hindutva Watch and the India Hate Lab in India, two US-based nonprofits that track incidents of religiously motivated violence perpetrated by supporters of the country’s right-wing government. A 2023 study from the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard found that X complied with more government takedown requests under Musk’s leadership than it had previously.

In March, X blocked the accounts of several prominent researchers and journalists after they identified a well-known neo-Nazi cartoonist, later changing its own terms of service to justify the decision.

—Elon Musk Is Platforming Far-Right Activists in Brazil

[ngdrb]

Kamala Harris' Rise to Prominence and

Political Vision

Background and Achievements

Kamala Harris is the current Vice President of the United States, making history as the first woman, first Black American, and first South Asian American to hold the position. Her rise to prominence is marked by a series of notable achievements throughout her career in public service.

Harris was born in Oakland, California, to immigrant parents from India and Jamaica. After earning her law degree from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, she began her career as a prosecutor in the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. She later served as the District Attorney of San Francisco from 2004 to 2011, and as the Attorney General of California from 2011 to 2017.

In 2016, Harris was elected to the United States Senate, becoming the second African American woman and the first South Asian American to serve in the Senate. During her tenure, she gained recognition for her work on issues such as healthcare reform, immigration reform, and criminal justice reform.

Political Vision and Proposed Policies

Kamala Harris' political vision revolves around promoting equality, justice, and opportunity for all Americans. Her proposed policies aim to address various critical issues facing the nation, including:

Women's Rights: Harris has been a vocal advocate for protecting and advancing women's rights, including reproductive rights and equal pay for equal work. She has pledged to fight against any efforts to roll back progress made in these areas.

Healthcare Reform: Harris has supported efforts to expand access to affordable healthcare, including protecting and strengthening the Affordable Care Act (ACA). She has also proposed measures to lower prescription drug costs and improve mental health services.

Climate Change: Harris recognizes the urgent need to address climate change and has proposed a comprehensive plan to transition the United States to a clean energy economy, including investing in renewable energy sources and promoting sustainable practices.

Immigration Reform: Harris supports comprehensive immigration reform that provides a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and addresses the root causes of migration, such as violence, poverty, and corruption in countries of origin.

Criminal Justice Reform: As a former prosecutor, Harris has advocated for reforms to the criminal justice system, including addressing racial disparities, reducing mass incarceration, and promoting rehabilitation and re-entry programs for formerly incarcerated individuals.

Potential Impact and Challenges

Kamala Harris' political vision and proposed policies have the potential to shape a more equitable and inclusive future for the United States. However, she may face significant challenges in implementing her agenda, particularly in a divided political landscape.

One of the key challenges Harris may face is navigating the complex relationship between the executive and legislative branches of government. Enacting significant policy changes often requires cooperation and compromise across party lines, which can be difficult to achieve in a polarized political environment.

Additionally, Harris' progressive policies may face opposition from more conservative factions who prioritize traditional values or have different economic and social priorities. Overcoming ideological divisions and building consensus on contentious issues will be crucial for the success of her agenda.

Despite these challenges, Harris' experience, determination, and commitment to her principles position her as a formidable figure in shaping the future direction of the United States. Her ability to inspire and unite diverse constituencies, coupled with her pragmatic approach to policymaking, could prove invaluable in navigating the complexities of the American political landscape.

[everything-is-crab]

:))

This is what I meant when I said both rightoids and liberals in India are equally dumb as fuck. Both are pro imperialists. She's not even lower caste and yet she's speaking on behalf of us. I have seen this trend in a lot of "anticasteist" upper caste women (who unfortunately have more voices than people like me, actually women from oppressed castes).

How are these people different from the white supremacists who say brown people are intellectually and socially inferior?

"At least the goras let us have meat" oh okay we're gonna ignore the 3 million lives lost in Bengal famine caused by Churchill's policies (after which he blamed it on us instead of his own greediness). Did he let those people eat meat then? Unhinged shit. They wouldn't let people fill their bellies cause sometimes instead of food crops they wanted our ancestors to grow cotton, indigo, spices, tea. Which also left areas prone to land disasters. Commercial stuff that they could sell at much cheaper prices in their own countries and others in the Western world as well. Also levied extremely unreasonably high taxes. Leaving us with no money. Delusional world these middle/upper class liberals live in where the British let us have meat. They didn't even let us have rice.

The British protected the caste system. Read Sharmila Rege's work about how the British introduced the process of "Brahmanisation" in colonial India.

This is the exact thing Hindu nationalists are doing rn! And have been doing forever! Protecting Western imperialists! Why do you think Modi is bootlicking the US so much? Do you think the farmers' protests and the after effects of globalization after 1991 are disconnected from Western imperialism?

Just because nationalists claim to be against white dominance doesn't mean they practice what they preach.

And this folks is why you need to incorporate class and gender in your analysis and not read about the work of only the middle class men of a community :)

Women and poor people matter too.

But unfortunately many earlier anti caste activists who were middle or upper class were anti Marxists and only later few like the Dalit Panthers and R.B More realized the importance of Marxist analysis for understanding modern caste based oppression more. Yes many Indian Marxists ignored casteism. But that does not mean we must dispose it as a useless theory.

But who tf cares about the Dalit Panthers or anyone else? Have you even heard of any other names that aren't Phule or Ambedka? Everyone followed and still follow people like Periyar, Ambedkar, Phule who were all from relatively well off family. And why will people who uncritically follow these people not think colonization was as bad? All of them attended British school and went for higher studies as well. The British was staunchly anti communist. They constantly resisted communist activists in colonial India. This is a privilege even today many people from oppressed castes cannot enjoy.

I have seen all these upper caste women, ignore people like me pointing this out. They think we're against education of oppressed castes (why would I advocate that for my own community?). But rather we take issue to these men ignoring their economic and male privilege and speaking on behalf of all of us.

A reminder that Periyar criminalized devadasis and read Ambedkar's arguments against Hindutva solutions to the Partition (hint: he cared more about the money that could be wasted in missionaries rather than the violence and human rights and unironically called Muslim people "tyrannical" and referred to "Muslim oppression" on Hindus). He was anti casteist, but he was Islamophobic.

To avoid with this kind of thinking, follow Dalit feminist theory. Dalit femininism from its inception has been pro Marxist (cause women make most of poor here). And they explain the effects of colonization on lower caste women (how the British introduced evidence act, a law that justified rape against lower caste women and let me remind you gang rape of lower caste women by upper caste men is a national issue. Ex the Manipur case, the rape of Phoolan Devi, the Hathras case etc). And how dowry (that earlier used to be a practice mainly amongst upper castes was now becoming dominant in lower castes as well due to capitalization of economy during colonial era). Maybe then you will understand why the British abolished sati but not any temple prostitution or other issues faced exclusively by women from oppressed castes. In fact they called upper caste women those who deserve to be protected but lower caste women were inherently deviant in their justification. But please go ahead and argue how imperialism brings "good things" sometimes.

Just read about caste reformation during colonial era. The choice isn't between hindutva and colonial era. The choice is between hindutva and hindutva along with colonial rule. Why do most liberals pretend the British never favored the Brahmins over everybody else?

White supremacy is so much better than Hindu supremacy for women of lower castes am I right guys?

This is so much better?

Also reminded of the "breast cloth" controversy. Do not mistake that anti caste activism is always anti caste for both Dalit men and women. Sometimes it favors Dalit men. And oppresses Dalit women further. Cause usually the colonizers never cared about oppressed castes but when they did, it was only for the men.

Ik many upper caste Marxists are not good at anti caste politics but I cannot separate Marxism from my anti caste or feminist politics. And as a Marxist from a formerly colonized country, I cannot ignore the imperial divide between the West (that is white dominated) and the global south (that includes India). You cannot separate the conditions of brown and black people today in the global south from the past dynamics of the colonizer and the colonized.

Lower caste women are obviously very poor. The poorest of all with least social protection. These upper caste women can sit on their asses and write papers and blogs on how much white supremacy was much cooler. But the ones from oppressed castes and working class? They don't have this privilege. They have the same burden of upper caste women related to marriage and domestic work and everything. But on top of that they have to do labor as well. And after globalization, when condition of "blue collar jobs" degraded (wages lowered, subsidies cut, worker protection rights gone etc) , the percentage of women in these fields increased. That's not a coincidence. Men always force women into lower earning occupations that have little job security. I am not gonna ignore this.

Fuck Hindutva. But fuck white supremacy too. For me neither is better. Both go hand in hand in fact. Look at the Hindu nationalists in France allying with white supremacists over shared conservative interests.

[lawandlegal]

Mr. Narender Singh: The Best Advocate for Supreme Court of India

Mr. Narender Singh is a prominent and highly respected advocate who has dedicated his career to representing clients in the Advocate for Supreme Court of India. Known for his extensive legal knowledge, strategic approach, and commitment to justice, Mr. Singh has a stellar reputation for effectively handling complex cases and providing timely solutions. His ability to tackle even the most challenging legal issues has established him as one of the most trusted advocates in India’s legal landscape.

Why Mr. Narender Singh is Recognized as the Best Advocate for the Supreme Court of India

In the competitive field of law, what sets Mr. Singh apart is his deep understanding of the Indian judicial system, as well as his exceptional skill in arguing cases. He is well-versed in various aspects of the law, making him uniquely capable of handling cases across multiple domains, including criminal law, civil law, constitutional law, and corporate law.

His achievements in the Supreme Court of India have not only earned him the trust of his clients but also the respect of his peers and the judiciary. His extensive experience and well-rounded expertise enable him to devise effective legal strategies, ensuring the best possible outcome for his clients.

A Proven Track Record of Success

Mr. Narender Singh’s record in the Lawyer for Supreme Court of India speaks for itself. Throughout his career, he has successfully represented numerous clients in high-stakes cases, achieving favorable verdicts that have impacted Indian law and society. His legal acumen and dedication have made him a reliable figure for individuals and organizations seeking justice in the Supreme Court.

Each case he handles is approached with a personalized strategy, ensuring that every detail is considered to protect his clients’ interests. His meticulous planning and thorough knowledge of the law ensure that no aspect of a case is overlooked, which has resulted in a high success rate.

Expertise Across Multiple Legal Fields

One of Mr. Narender Singh’s core strengths is his versatility. His broad expertise spans various domains of law, allowing him to tackle a wide range of cases in the Supreme Court. Below are some areas of his specialization:

Criminal Law

In criminal cases, Mr. Singh is a formidable advocate. He understands the stakes involved and is dedicated to providing a robust defense for his clients. His experience includes defending individuals accused of serious crimes and handling sensitive matters with professionalism and discretion.

Civil Law

Civil disputes often require a delicate and balanced approach. Mr. Singh has a deep understanding of civil law, from property disputes to contractual issues, and he has successfully represented clients in a variety of civil matters. His strategic approach ensures that each case is handled with precision, aiming for resolutions that meet his clients’ needs.

Constitutional Law

Mr. Singh is known for his expertise in constitutional matters, a field that requires a nuanced understanding of both law and policy. He has represented cases that have shaped constitutional jurisprudence in India, proving his capability in handling complex constitutional issues that have far-reaching implications for the nation.

Corporate Law

For corporate clients, Mr. Singh provides comprehensive legal support, from dispute resolution to regulatory compliance. His knowledge of corporate law has made him an asset for businesses navigating the complex legal landscape in India, ensuring they operate within the bounds of the law while safeguarding their interests.

Effective and Strategic Case Management

Mr. Narender Singh believes that every case requires a unique approach tailored to its specific challenges. His strategic case management process involves analyzing the facts, identifying potential legal arguments, and developing a clear plan to present before the Criminal Lawyer for Supreme Court of India. By meticulously preparing for each case, he is able to build compelling arguments that often lead to favorable outcomes.

This systematic approach has allowed Mr. Singh to maintain a high success rate in the Supreme Court, positioning him as a top advocate who consistently delivers results. His expertise ensures that clients are not only well-represented but also thoroughly informed throughout the process.

Commitment to Justice and Client Satisfaction

Mr. Singh’s commitment to justice is evident in his dedication to his clients. He believes in providing each client with the best possible representation, regardless of the nature of the case. His focus on transparency, communication, and ethical standards has garnered him a loyal client base that values his integrity and dedication.

For Mr. Narender Singh, client satisfaction is paramount. He takes the time to explain the intricacies of each case, ensuring that clients understand every aspect of their legal proceedings. This dedication to client service has earned him a reputation as a lawyer who not only excels in the courtroom but also deeply cares for the individuals and organizations he represents.

Recognitions and Accolades

Over the years, Mr. Narender Singh has received numerous awards and honors for his contributions to the legal profession. His achievements reflect his skill and dedication, further solidifying his status as one of the most respected advocates in the Supreme Court of India. His reputation as a reliable and effective lawyer is backed by his consistent performance in some of India’s most complex legal cases.

Conclusion: Why Mr. Narender Singh Stands Out as the Best Advocate for the Supreme Court of India

In a legal field that demands precision, dedication, and in-depth knowledge, Mr. Narender Singh has proven himself to be an unparalleled advocate for justice. His expertise across multiple legal domains, combined with his strategic approach and client-centered philosophy, makes him the top choice for those seeking representation in the Best Criminal Lawyer for Supreme Court of India.

Whether dealing with criminal defense, civil disputes, constitutional matters, or corporate law, Mr. Singh brings a wealth of experience and an unwavering commitment to justice. His ability to simplify complex legal issues and guide clients through their cases with confidence is what truly makes him the best advocate in the Supreme Court today.

[queering-ecology]

Chapter 5 . Non-white Reproduction and Same-Sex Eroticism: Queer Acts against Nature by Andil Gosine prt 1

“In Euroamerican-dominant cultural contexts, two kinds of sex have been (are) said to be toxic to nature; reproductive sex between non-white people, and sex between men.” (149)

The concept of ‘overpopulation’ has put the blame for global ecological disasters/climate change on the reproducing proclivities of the poor; due to the easy collaboration of capitalism with patriarchy and racism, that has meant the economically dispossessed non-white peoples of the world, particularly child-bearing (or potentially child-bearing) women from Asia, Africa, and South and Central American, as well as First Nations and non-white women in North America. (149)

“Although overpopulation propaganda and its material offshoots (family planing programs, coercive sterilization practices, etc.) and the criminalization and policing of sexual acts between men have been and are generally treated as distinct phenomenon, their genealogies are intimately interwoven through the projects of colonialism, development, and nation building. Read against the heterosexist, racialized formations of nature engendered by these projects (the creation of national parks,etc.), heterosexual, potentially reproductive sex between non-white people and homosexual sex, I argue threaten colonial-imperialist and nationalist ambitions. Both are “queer acts'' in that they challenge the stated norms of collaborating colonial narratives of race, sex, and gender, through which modern formations of nature have been constituted. Both fail to meet and are threatening to the white nation building projects engendered through the process of colonization, and uncritically buttressed in historical and contemporary discourses of environment and ecology.” (150)

Any acts seen to upset this agenda are constituted as not just unnatural but toxic to nature. This claim is not far removed from those made by postcolonial scholars and psychoanalysts who recognize sex as a primary site through which the terms of empire are negotiated and stipulated. (151)

The Sex of Others

The sex of “Others” has long preoccupied the imaginations of social and economic stewards of Euroamerican culture. The author provides many examples of this. These fantasies exerted a powerful influence on figures such as Columbus and “informed the organization of colonial society around the tropes of race and gender” (Rattansi 1994, 44) (152) (ie the first time Columbus saw 'America' from his ship he compared the land to a woman's breast)

“The management of sexuality, parenting, and morality were at the heart of the colonial project” (Ann Laura Stoler 1995, 226) (152) Through the course of colonization, anxieties about non-white peoples’ sexualities would also inform the constitution of natural space across the world. The creation of “wildlife preserves'  and national parks across the colonized world was predicated on the removal of their human, reproductive presence: the areas’ indigenous populations. Aboriginal peoples in Africa, North America, and Asia were viewed as both a part of and a threat to pristine nature, a contradictory argument that rested in no small part on fears about the potential reproduction and ‘abundance’ of them. (152) 

Reproduction-Overpopulation

English cleric Thomas Malthus is credited with innovating the idea that the sheer growth of human population (and not what humans do) is socially and environmentally destructive. In his 1798 Essay On Population, Malthus argued that since agricultural production increases arithmetically and population soars geometrically, poverty and disease acted to check excess numbers of people who were outstripping available resources. (He was strongly influenced by his work as a colonial administrator in India for the East India Company)

Malthusian theory has been revitalized by racial theorists, birth control advocates, American military agents of imperialism and national security, ethno-nationalists, international development policy makers and project managers, and environmentalists.

The idea that population growth in non-white communities poses an ecological threat has throughout the twentieth century enjoyed considerable popular appeal, particularly in the Global North. (153) i.e. Tragedy of the Commons-Garrett Hardin (1968) (“Freedom to breed is intolerable”, eugenics, sterilization, against redistribution of wealth, privatized ownership of natural resources)

Most credible scholarship has outright rejected Malthusian claims. The overpopulation myth is simply bad science, unsubstantiated by lived experience and driven by particular ideological interests that serve to deflect attention from the fact that most environmental problems–global warming, pollution, deforestation, and so on–are the direct consequence of industrialization, over-consumption, and capitalist territorialization, and NOT simply the overabundance of people. (153)

For preservationist-conservationist environmental movements in North America, the myth of overpopulation was an appealing distraction from the effects of capitalism and industrialization that became especially apparent in the 1960s, effectively turning attention away from the consumption activities of white, middle-upper-class Americans who often made up the movements’ membership (Darnovsky 1992). (153)

One important point oft overlooked in Malthusianism is that in overpopulation discourse the main culprit is sex. Identification of overpopulation as the cause of poverty and environmental degradation necessarily implicates the people said to be engaged in dangerously overproducing themselves: non-white men and women living in the Global South engaged in heterosexual sex. Sex itself, then, is the act of destruction. (154)

[advabhisheksinha]

WRITS AT THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

REMEDIES FOR ENFORCEMENT OF RIGHTS CONFERRED BY THIS PART

1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this part is guaranteed.

2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs including within the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this part.

3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) & (2), Parliament may by Law empower any other Court to exercise within local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under Clause (2).

4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

Transfer Petition, Special Leave Petition, Supreme Court Lawyer, Advocate, Delhi, AOR, Delhi High Court, Bombay High Court, Advocate for Supreme Court Case, SLP, Bail, Supreme Court Lawyer Bombay, WRIT, Constitutional Law

[the-garbanzo-annex-jr]

By  Ryan Faircloth

Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, an outspoken human rights advocate in Congress, traveled to Qatar last year on the Middle Eastern country's dime, according to her annual financial disclosure filed in May.

Qatar has been widely criticized for abusing migrant workers and criminalizing same-sex relationships, among other alleged human rights issues. Omar attended the FIFA World Cup and met with Qatari government officials while she was in the Gulf nation last November and had her food and lodging paid for by the country. The cost of her trip wasn't disclosed.

A spokesman for Omar said the congresswoman "remains committed to upholding human rights and the rule of law around the world, and also to direct engagement with the regimes responsible for human rights abuses."

"That includes accountability for the vile labor practices and mistreatment of migrant workers in Qatar," spokesman Jeremy Slevin said in a statement Monday. "To that end, she sent a letter demanding accountability for these abuses ahead of the World Cup and specifically raised her deep concerns in her meetings with Qatari officials. She also visited our troops stationed in Qatar and got the opportunity to meet with the folks helping us with Afghan resettlement in Qatar."

-

-

Omar has been an outspoken critic of countries such as Israel and India in response to their human rights records. In July, she tweeted that there was "no way in hell" she'd attend the Israeli president's speech to Congress.

A month before that, she also made a point of not attending India Prime Minister Narendra Modi's joint congressional speech. Omar tweeted that her opposition was over "his government's human rights record."

In an interview with Business Insider about her Qatar trip last December, Omar said "there are no perfect countries that have a perfect record." She suggested that the next World Cup in 2026, which will be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, could spark similar discussions.

"I wonder what kinds of conversations will be had, and how many people will object to that happening with the history of Indigenous people, of enslavement, of police brutality," Omar told Business Insider.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Alejandro Sanchez

Published: May 22, 2024

Following the Worldwide Day of Genital Autonomy earlier this month, Dr Alejandro Sanchez notes that while child rights continue to progress, boys at risk of non-therapeutic circumcision are being left behind.

Tuesday, May 7, marked the 12th annual Worldwide Day of Genital Autonomy (WWDOGA). WWDOGA commemorates the anniversary of a landmark ruling of Cologne's Landgericht (Court of Appeal), which on May 7 2012 held that religious circumcision of boys amounted to criminal battery.

The ruling was, unfortunately, not to last. Unwilling to be the only jurisdiction in the world to outlaw non-therapeutic circumcision (NTMC), the Bundestag, Germany's parliament, passed a resolution to explicitly legalise the practice. This was despite "the constitutionally protected legal positions of the well-being of the child, the right to bodily integrity, [and] the right to religious freedom".

Nevertheless, the ruling makes Cologne in some sense the spiritual vanguard of the genital autonomy movement.

Each year in the city, WWDOGA brings together doctors, lawyers and child rights advocates from across the globe to process through the streets in opposition to all forms of non-therapeutic childhood genital cutting: female genital mutilation (FGM), circumcision and intersex cutting. The day culminates in speeches in the old town square.

This year, Rubine Singh, of Cologne's intersex support group baraka, shared a moving story of being born intersex in India and being spared unnecessary genital surgery.

"I stand here today as a happy and lucky intersex person", Rubine said, adding: "I want to live in a world where it is not a matter of luck whether you face the knife."

Lilith Raza, of Germany's Lesbian and Gay Federation+, powerfully recounted being subjected to NTMC at the age of five without anaesthesia and pinned down by four people

For me, WWODGA serves as an opportunity to take stock on our work to end non-consensual religious and cultural circumcision. As I mentioned in my speech, it's been a busy year for the NSS on this front: We've lobbied MPs, met with medical organisations, made the case against circumcision before the UN Human Rights Committee in Geneva, and recruited prominent voices in cutting communities to support our campaign.

It also represents a chance to think about opportunities that lie ahead.

The Royal College of Paediatrics and Children's Health takes a permissive stance on NTMC. It defers to General Medical Council guidance which not only greenlights circumcision, but permits parents to "invite their religious adviser to be present during the procedure to give advice on how it should be performed to meet the requirements of their faith." (The mind boggles.)

However, the College's recent call for a legislative ban on "smacking, hitting, and slapping" a child will put its stance on NTMC to the test. Readers will reach their own conclusions on the wisdom of such a ban, but it would seem absurd to support criminalising a smack on the bottom while defending the 'right' to cut off part of a child's penis.

Meanwhile, Scotland has become the first nation in the UK to incorporate the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) into domestic law. The UNCRC Act, due to come into force in July, will impose a duty on public bodies to act compatibly with the Convention.

Statutory guidance on the Act recognises "childhood is a special time which must have additional protections" and sets out a vision to make Scotland "the best place in the world to grow up". This vision is to be underpinned by the four 'General Principles' of the UNCRC: non-discrimination, the best interests of the child, the child's right to life and the child's right to be heard.

This is to be commended. There is, however, one snag: Scotland is also the only UK nation to provide ritual circumcision on its NHS. How will Bute House reconcile its lofty language on child rights with a state-sanctioned programme of infant genital cutting that nakedly violates all four General Principles?

For a solution, they need look no further than the 2016 recommendation of the Committee that oversees the CRC: "Ensure that no one is subjected to unnecessary medical or surgical treatment during infancy or childhood" and "guarantee bodily integrity, autonomy and self-determination to children concerned".

It is telling that in response the Scottish government laid out strategies to end FGM and intersex cutting, but remained silent on NTMC. The head in the sand approach is a tried-and-true one, and it's easy to feel that nothing will ever change.

As I said at WWDOGA, when it comes to circumcision: "the task is daunting and progress is slow, but we won't give up."

==

[vinodkaushikadvocate]

Advocates who practice in high courts typically possess specialized knowledge and expertise in various legal matters. Here are some notable advocates who have appeared in high courts:

Harish Salve: Known for his expertise in constitutional, commercial, and taxation law, Harish Salve has represented clients in high-profile cases in India's Supreme Court and various high courts.

Kapil Sibal: A prominent lawyer and politician, Kapil Sibal has argued several significant cases in high courts, particularly in matters of constitutional law, civil rights, and corporate disputes.

Abhishek Manu Singhvi: With extensive experience in constitutional law, Singhvi has appeared in numerous cases in high courts, advocating for clients in diverse legal matters.

Indira Jaising: Renowned for her work in human rights and women's rights, Jaising has appeared in high courts across India, advocating for social justice and legal reform.

Mukul Rohatgi: Former Attorney General of India, Rohatgi has represented clients in various high courts, specializing in corporate law, constitutional law, and commercial litigation.

Gopal Subramanium: A distinguished lawyer and former Solicitor General of India, Subramanium has argued numerous cases in high courts, with a focus on constitutional law, human rights, and public interest litigation.

P. Chidambaram: A veteran lawyer and politician, Chidambaram has appeared in high courts on behalf of clients in complex legal matters, including criminal law, economic offenses, and constitutional issues.