#Senior Criminal Advocate Lawyer In Ahmedabad Gujarat
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Criminal Advocate Lawyer In Ahmedabad Gujarat - Ashish B Desai
Criminal Advocate Lawyer In Ahmedabad Gujarat - Ashish B Desai is Top Criminal Advocate Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. Expert Legal Counsel for Criminal Cases. Trusted Advocate, Proven Results. Contact Us Today!
Tumblr media
Google Map:--> https://maps.app.goo.gl/RcepHY5bKQ4geTMp7
Criminal Advocate In Ahmedabad, Criminal Advocate In Gujarat, Criminal Lawyer In Ahmedabad, Criminal Lawyer in Gujarat, Lawyers For Criminal in Ahmedabad, Lawyers For Criminal in Gujarat, Top Lawyer For Criminal in Ahmedabad, Top Lawyer For Criminal in Gujarat, Best Criminal Lawyers In Ahmedabad Gujarat, No 1 Advocates Criminal Lawyers In Ahmedabad Gujarat, Senior Criminal Advocate Lawyer In Ahmedabad Gujarat, Criminal Advocate, Criminal Lawyer, Satellite Ahmedabad, Nehru Nagar, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, Ahmedabad Gujarat India, www.ashishdesaiadvocate.com/criminal-advocate-lawyer-in-ahmedabad.php, Ashish B Desai
0 notes
shahmanishadvocate-blog · 5 years ago
Text
Manish Shah is Famous Top 3 Criminal Lawyers in Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
Manish Shah Advocate in Ahmedabad High Court - in the practice areas of Divorce Advocate Law, Civil Advocate Law, Criminal Advocate Law, Family Property Disputes Law Matters Case, Mutual Consent Divorce, Arbitration Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, Satellite. Co-Operative Law Matters, Rent Act Matters, Banking Law Matters. Mutual Consult Divorce Advocate in Ahmedabad, Trust Matter Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Civil Best Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Commercial Court Matter in Ahmedabad, Commercial Appellate Division Matters in Ahmedabad, Negotiable Instrument Act Matters in Ahmedabad, Civil Law Matters in Ahmedabad, Property Law Matters in Ahmedabad, Rent Act Matters in Ahmedabad, SSRD Matters in Ahmedabad, RTI Matters in Ahmedabad.
Visit for more information -http://www.advocatemanishshah.com/about-us.php
1 note · View note
imjuzzsaying · 5 years ago
Text
Who is Zakia Jafri and what are her complaints
By Briti Roy Barman| Wednesday, February 5, 2020, 17:18 [IST]
Published in www.oneindia.com
New Delhi, Jan 05: The Supreme Court on Tuesday fixed April 14 for hearing a plea by Zakia Jafri, wife of slain MP Congress Ehsan Jafri, challenging the SIT's clean chit to then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 riots. The apex court said that the matter had been adjourned many times and as it will have to hear it someday the court listed the matter asking all to be available for the hearing on the due date.
Tumblr media
"This matter has been adjourned so many times, whatever it is, we will have to hear it someday. Take one date and make sure you all are available," said a bench of Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and A M Khanwilkar.
Tumblr media
Jafri's lawyer advocate Aparna Bhatt said that the matter is a contentious one and sought adjournment of the matter till after the Holi vacation next month. She though said senior advocate Kapil Sibal would argue on behalf of Jafri. The Jafri case has been adjourned five times since the petition was filed in 2018. Jafri's counsel told the top court that notice needs to be issued in the plea as the plea relates to an alleged "larger conspiracy" of riots and continued violence from February 27 to May 2002. 
Who is Zakia Jafri 
Zakia Jafri is the widow of Congress MP Ehsan Jafri who was brutally murdered in the 2002 Gulberg Society massacre that took place day after Godhra genocide in Gujarat on February 27. The couple was sheltering their neighbours from a violent mob during the attack as a mob of thousands gathered outside the residential colony. Ehsan stepped out for mercy to the mob for the people he was sheltering and murdered in the process. Jafri Zakia, who had hidden on a room on the first floor, survived the attack. 
Tumblr media
Gulbarg Society massacre in 2002 
Gulbarg Society was tagged as an upper and middle class residential colony in north Ahmedabad. The massacre took place a day after the Godhra train fire, in which 59 pilgrims were charred to death. Hatred was torching all over Gujarat as it was the Gulberg's turn to be the victim. Residents sought shelter at Jafri's bungalow as houses were set on fire one after another. The rioters did not spare the former parliamentarian as they lynched him and torched his bungalow that killed 69 people include Ehsan Jafri. The trial court described the massacre as the "darkest day in the history of civil society of Gujarat." 
Tumblr media
The first complaint in the Zakia Jafri case 
On June 8, 2006, Zakia Jafri filed an FIR against 63 people which include the then chief minister of Gujarat and current Prime Minister Narendra Modi, top ministers, MLAs, IAS and IPS officers, and political leaders. 
The timeline 
Now 80, Jafri has been fighting for justice for her slain husband since 2006. The June 8, 2006 complaint did not get any response and Jafri filed a petition in the Gujarat High Court praying that her complaint be treated as FIR. But the High Court dismissed this complaint. Zakia Jafri then moved Supreme Court against the order passed on November 2, 2007, by the Gujarat High Court. On February 8, 2012, the Special Investigation Team filed a closure report giving a clean chit to Narendra Modi and 63 others. Jafri then filed a plea in Gujarat High Court against the SIT decision in 2017 and as it was rejected she filed the petition in 2018 in the apex court against Gujarat High Court's October 5, 2017 order. Since the petition was filed in 2018 the case has been adjourned five times till now. 
Tumblr media
Are Zakia Jafri case and Gulberg case same? 
Both the cases are distinct as Zakia Jafri case seeks the justice for the massacre that took place at Gulberg Society, the Gulberg case deals with criminal and administrative liability.
0 notes
juudgeblog · 6 years ago
Text
Top 10 Most Inspirational Female Lawyers in India
In this article, Ninisha of RGNUL discusses ten most inspirational female lawyers in India
Out of the total 15,959 judges in the lower judiciary across India, 11,397 are males which make up of about 71.4% while there are only 4,409 women judges making up 27.6%. At the district level, female lawyers remain below 40%. Not more than 10% of female lawyers are there in the higher courts. In 2016, R Banumathi was the only woman judge in the Supreme Court. Eight of twenty four high courts in India do not have women judges. There is no adequate representation of female lawyers in the judiciary system of India. Presently, there are only 3 sitting female judges out of the total 25 judges, namely, R.Banumathi, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee.
Rebecca John
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2qtvW3m
Educational qualifications
Rebecca Mammen John pursued her education from Matar Dei Convent School and graduation from Delhi University.
Legal Career
Rebecca John joined the legal profession in 1990, when there were hardly any female lawyers in criminal field. She was the first senior women lawyer to become a senior advocate in criminal law and designated as Senior Advocate in 2013 by the Delhi High Court. She has a rigorous practice in Supreme Court, appellate and trial courts in criminal law. She had handled various eminent cases.
Landmark Cases
Securities Scam of 1992:  It was also known as Harshad Mehta scam, in which journalist Sucheta Dalal exposed Mehta’s illegal methods in The Times of India. He was using bank receipts of Public Sector Banks to buy stocks.
Hawala scam of 1996:  Payments were allegedly sent by politicians through four Hawala brokers (Jain brothers). It was US$18 billion Bribery scandal. The people were accused included L. K. Advani, V. C. Shukla, P. Shiv Shankar, Sharad Yadav, Balram Jakhar, and Madan Lal Khurana.
Hashimpura Massacre of 1986:  She appeared for victims in this case in which 44 Muslims were targeted, murdered and dumped nearby irrigation canal by Provincial Armed Constabulary Jawans.
Anti-Sikh riots of 1984: She also represented the victims in this case in which Sikhs were targeted by Anti-Sikh mob in a series of pogroms because of the assassination of Indira Gandhi by Sikh bodyguards.
Ishrat Jahan encounter case:  It was a criminal case in Gujarat in which Central Bureau of Investigation accused Ahmedabad police and Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau for fake encounter killings of four individuals
Kobad Ghandy case: He was allegedly the top leader of CPI (Maoist) who had faced trials of murder and sabotage. He was assigned the task of spreading Maoist influence in urban areas.
Delhi Diwali Blast Case of 2005: Three explosions killed 62 people and injured around 210 people. Bombs were triggered in south and central Delhi and it was believed that Lashkar-e-Taiba was behind the attacks.
Batla House encounter case: Indian Mujahideen terrorists Atif Ameen and Mohammad Sajid were suspected and killed in Delhi in an encounter. This incident took place after five serial blasts on 13 september 2008 in which around 30 were killed and over 100 were injured.
Aarushi Talwar case: It involves unsolved murders of 14 year old Aarushi and 45 year old Hemraj Banjade, a domestic worker, who were killed around 14-15 May in 2008. She represented the Talwars.
Interview excerpts 
In some interviews, John talked about infallibility of the Indian criminal justice system and impossibility of Death penalty to take place in such system. You can watch the interview here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4sV_q6c0a8
Menaka Guruswamy
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2Qi6vx2
Educational Qualifications
Menaka Guruswamy is a BR Ambedkar Research Scholar and lecturer at Columbia Law School. She read law as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford  University where she was awarded a Doctor of Philosophy in Law and a  Gammon fellow for a Masters in Law at Harvard Law School.
Legal Career
Dr. Guruswamy had practiced law in New York, as an associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell. She had advised the United Nations Development Fund, New York and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), New York and UNICEF South Sudan on issues relating to International Human rights law and aided Nepal in Constitution making.
She practices before Supreme Court of India. In Litigation practice in India, she focuses on constitutional rights and challenged criminalization of same sex relations
Landmark Cases
Extra – Judicial Killings in Manipur:  She was the amicus curiae appointed by Supreme Court in this case. In this case, PIL alleged that 1,528 extrajudicial killings took place between 1980 and 2011 in Manipur. The allegations were against the Indian Army, Assam Rifles, central paramilitary forces and Manipur Police.
Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi: She defended Naz Foundation and challenged Section 377 of IPC. She appeared for IIT students and alumni and told the Supreme Court Bench that Section 377 violated Articles 15, 19 and 21 of the constitution. It discriminates on the basis of gender. She emphasized that homosexuality is not a psychiatric disorder, LGBT citizens are denied equal opportunities, employment and right to live with dignity.  She was the sole women in the all-male team of senior advocate who are fighting against the constitutionality of Section 377.
Pinky Anand
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2EDGvdO
Educational Qualifications
Pinky Anand graduated from Lady Shri Ram College for Women and received B.A LLB degree from Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. In 1980, she joined Harvard University to receive a Master of Law degree, supported by Inlaks Scholarship from Inlaks Shivdasani Foundation.
Legal Career
Pinky Anand is an Indian lawyer designated as a senior advocate and she is also a politician. Currently, she is serving the post of Additional Solicitor General in the Supreme Court of India. She is currently the chairperson of National Committee Law, ASSOCHAM ladies league. She is an expert in constitutional law, property law, private international law, environmental law and corporate law. She handled some of the leading cases of India which are related to constitutional rights.
Landmark Cases
Clemenceau Case: She represented the French Government in the case of Clemenceau in which decommissioned French warship Le Clemenceau was on its way to Alang, a shipbreaking yard, for dismantling in India but recalled due to alleged high quantities of toxic asbestos and PCBs.  
Crusade against Genetically modified food: She appeared on behalf of the petitioner Vandana Shiva and a charitable trust regarding hazardous impact on health of people on consumption of genetically modified food.
Case of Tamil actress Khushboo:  Pinky Anand fought for her right of freedom and Expression, in which Supreme Court upheld her rights and quashed 22 cases of defamation. Legal battle was won in which khushboo made certain comments about pre-marital sex and virginity.   
Delimitation case: She handled this case in Supreme Court which had led to the implementation of Delimitation Commissioner’s orders in the country according to 2001 census.
Interview Excerpts:
Pinky Anand shared her journey after graduation from Harvard: https://ift.tt/2EDGvdO
Indira Jaising
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2Qkmnzj
Educational Qualifications
Indira Jaising pursued her school education in Mumbai and completed her Bachelor of Arts degree from Bangalore University. In 1962, she completed LLM from University of Bombay.
Legal Career
Indira Jaising is a noted personality for her legal activism in the sphere of Human rights. In 2018, she was ranked 20th in the list of 20 greatest leaders of the World by Fortune magazine. She also runs an NGO “Lawyers Collective”, but its license was cancelled for violation of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act. She argued for the rights of homeless dwellers of Mumbai, fought environmental cases, and raised voice regarding extra- judicial killings in Manipur.
Landmark Cases
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case:  She represented the victims in the Supreme Court of India to claim compensation for them against Union Carbide Corporation.
Rohingya Muslims crisis: She was appointed by UN for Investigation in the case of rape, torture and killings of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, the reason of which were security forces.
Case of Mary Roy: Inheritance rights were granted to Syrian Christian women in Kerela by the honourable Supreme Court of India.
Case of Githa Hariharan: In this case, Chief Justice A.S Anand held that mother is also a “natural guardian” of her minor children and they can bear the name of their mother.  
Greenpeace India case: She also argued the case for Priya Pillai in which she was offloaded from a London-bounded flight by immigration officers in New Delhi airport so as to prevent her from going to UK to address British parliament.
Other contributions
She challenged the Indian Divorce Act in the High Court of Kerela and helped Christian women to get a divorce on grounds of torture, desertion and cruelty.
She represented Rupan Deol Bajaj who prosecuted KPS Gill for sexual harassment.
Interview Excerpts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZsLW-RdlsE
Flavia Agnes
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2qvlSXS
Educational Qualifications
Flavia Agnes completed Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women’s University entrance exam and completed a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology. She completed an LLB in 1988 and LLM from Mumbai University in 1992 and received M.Phil from NLSIU in 1997.
Legal Career
Flavia Agnes, a practicing lawyer at Mumbai High Court, is an Indian women’s rights lawyer who is expertized in marital, divorce and property law. Her general theme of various articles includes women struggles, minority issues, gender equality, female jurisprudence and domestic violence. Her own experiences related to domestic violence had inspired her to fight for the rights of women in the society.
Her contributions
She is a co-founder of MAJLIS, a legal and cultural resource centre to provide socio-legal support to victims of domes and social abuse. This centre played a major role in the case of Triple Talaq.
According to her, solution to sexual violence would be to bring all forms of abuse under the ambit of Section 498A which deals with matrimonial disputes.
She is against the concept that rape is worse than death or that a women is has been raped is “zinda laash” as it demeans the dignity of women. According to her, as per Section 376E of IPC (which allows death penalty for rapes), the accused must be “unrepentant repeat offenders”.
She is a part of the Global Feminisms Project, an archive created in 2002 to explore women scholars and activists in the world.
Interview Excerpts:
Discussion with Flavia Agnes on women empowerment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n73NT2rGKLE
Vrinda Grover
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2QkLvpt
Educational Qualifications
Vrinda Grover graduated from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi, where she was a student of history. She obtained degree from Delhi University and a Masters in Law from New York University.
Legal Career
Vrinda Grover is a lawyer, researcher, human and women rights activist based in New Delhi, India. She represented various cases regarding human rights, sexual and domestic violence, communal massacre, extrajudicial killings, custodial torture, sexual minorities, trade unions and political activists. Time magazine identified her as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2013.
Landmark Cases
Hashimpura police killings case of 1987:  It was a mass murder which took place near Meerut, UP. 42 Muslims were targeted and their dead bodies were dumped near the irrigation canals by Provincial Armed Constabulary.
Soni Sori rape torture case:  The victim was imprisoned for criminal conspiracy and was sexually assaulted in custody of police in Chattisgarh. Grover appeared for Soni Sori.
2008 Kandhamal Riots of Orissa:  Hindu Nationalist groups killed at least more than 20 Christians, burned 730 houses and set 95 churches on fire. It was an Anti-Christian riots incited by Maoists.
Parliament Attack case of 2001: Lashkar-e-Taiba and  Jaish-e-Mohammad were held responsible for terrorist attack on Indian Parliament. She served as the counsel for S.A.R Geelani who was one off the main accused.
Muzzafarnagar Massacre of 2013: She appeared for the seven victims who were gang-raped. In this, there were riots between Hindu and Muslim and Akhilesh Yadav led Samajwadi Party was held guilty as they were negligent in preventing violence in their state along with Central Government.  
Other contributions
She also contributed to Prevention of Torture Bill, 2010, which protects people from communal and targeted violence
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 which deals with sexual offences.
Her commendable contribution also goes to Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
She also represented the victims of 1984 sikh-riots and 2004 Ishrat Jahan case.
Karuna Nundy
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2NqHb6T
Educational qualifications
Karuna Nundy received a degree in Economics from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi University. She studied law at Cambridge University and pursued LLM from Columbia University, New York.
Legal Career
Karuna Nundy is a Supreme Court lawyer and also worked in US. Her main focus is on Constitutional Law, commercial Litigation, arbitration, legal policy and media law. She had been described as one of the three feminists leading a new wave, along with Vrinda Grover and Arundhati Roy by The Times of India. She wanted to make a huge contribution to India.
Landmark Cases
Nirbhaya Rape Case: It was a major turning point in her life as she engaged herself in the field of anti -rape and sexual harassment of women in India.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: She was one of the daring lawyers who fought back for the rights of Bhopal Gas Tragedy victims and helped in cutting carcinogenic chemicals.  
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India:  Nundy appeared on behalf of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (NGO) in the case, which struck down section 66A of Information Technology, 2000.  
Other Contributions
She had also worked with the government of Bhutan and helped Nepal in drafting the parts of interim constitution.
She was consulted during the process of making Verma Committee report that was setup to review India’s Anti Rape laws.
Interview Excerpts:
Karuna Nundy talked about “women at work”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wcjMPcmw3c
Meenakshi Lekhi
Educational Qualifications
She pursued her education from Hindu College, University of Delhi and then enrolled herself at the Bar Council of India in 1990.
Legal Career
Meenakshi Lekhi is the national spokesperson of BJP and a Supreme Court    India lawyer. She handled a variety of issues relating to women, domestic violence, family dispute and permanent commission of women officers in the armed forces.
Contributions
■   “Women’s Reservation Bill” which proposed to amend the constitution of India to reserve 33% of all seats in Lok Sabha and all Legislative Assemblies.
 She was a part of the Drafting Committee which took up “Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill” which seeks to protect women from sexual harassment at their place of work. It was passed by the parliament in 2013.
She was successful in revoking the ban on media regarding display of court proceedings.
 Shanti Mukund Hospital Rape case: She represented the case in which victim was injured in her eyes and raped by the convict who then expressed the desire to marry her in the court of law.
Association: National Commission for Women, Sakshi and National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development.
Sudha Bharadwaj
Educational Qualifications
She was horrified on seeing the pathetic working conditions in UP, Bengal and Bihar during her time as a student at IIT, so she moved to work with Niyogi’s Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha in 1986. She got her law degree in 2000 from a college affiliated to the Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University in Raipur.
Legal Career
She is a trade unionist and civil rights activist against land acquisition.  She was associated with Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha and fought against corrupt bureaucrats because they denied payment of proper wages to workers in mines and plants in Bhilai.
She raised her voice audaciously for Dalit and tribal rights, right for land, education, health and security of victimised people who were exploited by landlords.
Since 2016, she has been fighting for the villagers of Ghatbarra and areas of Ambikapur as their community rights were cancelled by the government of Chattisgarh. State government snatched away the forest rights of Adivasis so as to facilitate coal mining of Adani group.
She wrote a critique of Binayak Sen’s imprisonment who was convicted for sedition by a local court, later upheld by the High Court of Chattisgarh. But later granted bail by Supreme Court in appeal.  
She was also a part of judicial inquiry into the rape and fake encounter of Mina Khalko who was raped and shot twice by Chattisgarh personnel leading to death and aided the victims for many years.
Interview Excerpts
Sudha Bharadwaj talked about extra judicial killings and land acquisitions:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKAUq9ThSks
Zia Mody
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2Qm2Bn4
Educational Qualifications
Zia Mody obtained education from Elphinstone College, Mumbai. She pursued law at Selwyn College, Cambridge and Master’s degree from Harvard Law School in 1979.
Legal Career
Zia Mody is an Indian Corporate Lawyer and business women. She is the founder and managing partner of AZB & Partners. She also advises large private equity houses such as KKR, Bain Capital and Warburg Pincus.
She has worked with eminent institutions like Tata Group, Reliance, Aditya Birla Group and Vedanta Group. She is appraised as a leading lawyer in field of Banking & Finance, Corporate, M&A, Securities law and private equity.
She was recognized as a top 13 female Acritas Star globally by Acritas Star 2018.  She was termed “Market Leader” for Mergers & Associations by IFLR1000 Financial & Corporate guide 2018.  
Law Commission of India set up a panel to review the provision of “Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996” because of several inadequacies observed in functioning of the Act 2014. Zia Mody was a part of this expert committee.  
She was also a member of the Reserve Bank of India Committee which was set up for Comprehensive Financial Services for Small Businesses and conditions of Low-income households.
Click here
The contributions which these powerful women have given to the judiciary system of our country are of immense significance whether it is environmental, property, constitutional, criminal, family or corporate law. They achieved their pursuits and dreams through the magical sword of law which has the ability and power to bring a change in the world and provide justice to all sections of the society.
The post Top 10 Most Inspirational Female Lawyers in India appeared first on iPleaders.
Top 10 Most Inspirational Female Lawyers in India syndicated from https://namechangersmumbai.wordpress.com/
0 notes
loyallogic · 6 years ago
Text
Top 10 Most Inspirational Female Lawyers in India
In this article, Ninisha of RGNUL discusses ten most inspirational female lawyers in India
Out of the total 15,959 judges in the lower judiciary across India, 11,397 are males which make up of about 71.4% while there are only 4,409 women judges making up 27.6%. At the district level, female lawyers remain below 40%. Not more than 10% of female lawyers are there in the higher courts. In 2016, R Banumathi was the only woman judge in the Supreme Court. Eight of twenty four high courts in India do not have women judges. There is no adequate representation of female lawyers in the judiciary system of India. Presently, there are only 3 sitting female judges out of the total 25 judges, namely, R.Banumathi, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee.
Rebecca John
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2qtvW3m
Educational qualifications
Rebecca Mammen John pursued her education from Matar Dei Convent School and graduation from Delhi University.
Legal Career
Rebecca John joined the legal profession in 1990, when there were hardly any female lawyers in criminal field. She was the first senior women lawyer to become a senior advocate in criminal law and designated as Senior Advocate in 2013 by the Delhi High Court. She has a rigorous practice in Supreme Court, appellate and trial courts in criminal law. She had handled various eminent cases.
Landmark Cases
Securities Scam of 1992:  It was also known as Harshad Mehta scam, in which journalist Sucheta Dalal exposed Mehta’s illegal methods in The Times of India. He was using bank receipts of Public Sector Banks to buy stocks.
Hawala scam of 1996:  Payments were allegedly sent by politicians through four Hawala brokers (Jain brothers). It was US$18 billion Bribery scandal. The people were accused included L. K. Advani, V. C. Shukla, P. Shiv Shankar, Sharad Yadav, Balram Jakhar, and Madan Lal Khurana.
Hashimpura Massacre of 1986:  She appeared for victims in this case in which 44 Muslims were targeted, murdered and dumped nearby irrigation canal by Provincial Armed Constabulary Jawans.
Anti-Sikh riots of 1984: She also represented the victims in this case in which Sikhs were targeted by Anti-Sikh mob in a series of pogroms because of the assassination of Indira Gandhi by Sikh bodyguards.
Ishrat Jahan encounter case:  It was a criminal case in Gujarat in which Central Bureau of Investigation accused Ahmedabad police and Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau for fake encounter killings of four individuals
Kobad Ghandy case: He was allegedly the top leader of CPI (Maoist) who had faced trials of murder and sabotage. He was assigned the task of spreading Maoist influence in urban areas.
Delhi Diwali Blast Case of 2005: Three explosions killed 62 people and injured around 210 people. Bombs were triggered in south and central Delhi and it was believed that Lashkar-e-Taiba was behind the attacks.
Batla House encounter case: Indian Mujahideen terrorists Atif Ameen and Mohammad Sajid were suspected and killed in Delhi in an encounter. This incident took place after five serial blasts on 13 september 2008 in which around 30 were killed and over 100 were injured.
Aarushi Talwar case: It involves unsolved murders of 14 year old Aarushi and 45 year old Hemraj Banjade, a domestic worker, who were killed around 14-15 May in 2008. She represented the Talwars.
Interview excerpts 
In some interviews, John talked about infallibility of the Indian criminal justice system and impossibility of Death penalty to take place in such system. You can watch the interview here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4sV_q6c0a8
Menaka Guruswamy
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2Qi6vx2
Educational Qualifications
Menaka Guruswamy is a BR Ambedkar Research Scholar and lecturer at Columbia Law School. She read law as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford  University where she was awarded a Doctor of Philosophy in Law and a  Gammon fellow for a Masters in Law at Harvard Law School.
Legal Career
Dr. Guruswamy had practiced law in New York, as an associate at Davis Polk & Wardwell. She had advised the United Nations Development Fund, New York and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), New York and UNICEF South Sudan on issues relating to International Human rights law and aided Nepal in Constitution making.
She practices before Supreme Court of India. In Litigation practice in India, she focuses on constitutional rights and challenged criminalization of same sex relations
Landmark Cases
Extra – Judicial Killings in Manipur:  She was the amicus curiae appointed by Supreme Court in this case. In this case, PIL alleged that 1,528 extrajudicial killings took place between 1980 and 2011 in Manipur. The allegations were against the Indian Army, Assam Rifles, central paramilitary forces and Manipur Police.
Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi: She defended Naz Foundation and challenged Section 377 of IPC. She appeared for IIT students and alumni and told the Supreme Court Bench that Section 377 violated Articles 15, 19 and 21 of the constitution. It discriminates on the basis of gender. She emphasized that homosexuality is not a psychiatric disorder, LGBT citizens are denied equal opportunities, employment and right to live with dignity.  She was the sole women in the all-male team of senior advocate who are fighting against the constitutionality of Section 377.
Pinky Anand
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2EDGvdO
Educational Qualifications
Pinky Anand graduated from Lady Shri Ram College for Women and received B.A LLB degree from Faculty of Law, University of Delhi. In 1980, she joined Harvard University to receive a Master of Law degree, supported by Inlaks Scholarship from Inlaks Shivdasani Foundation.
Legal Career
Pinky Anand is an Indian lawyer designated as a senior advocate and she is also a politician. Currently, she is serving the post of Additional Solicitor General in the Supreme Court of India. She is currently the chairperson of National Committee Law, ASSOCHAM ladies league. She is an expert in constitutional law, property law, private international law, environmental law and corporate law. She handled some of the leading cases of India which are related to constitutional rights.
Landmark Cases
Clemenceau Case: She represented the French Government in the case of Clemenceau in which decommissioned French warship Le Clemenceau was on its way to Alang, a shipbreaking yard, for dismantling in India but recalled due to alleged high quantities of toxic asbestos and PCBs.  
Crusade against Genetically modified food: She appeared on behalf of the petitioner Vandana Shiva and a charitable trust regarding hazardous impact on health of people on consumption of genetically modified food.
Case of Tamil actress Khushboo:  Pinky Anand fought for her right of freedom and Expression, in which Supreme Court upheld her rights and quashed 22 cases of defamation. Legal battle was won in which khushboo made certain comments about pre-marital sex and virginity.   
Delimitation case: She handled this case in Supreme Court which had led to the implementation of Delimitation Commissioner’s orders in the country according to 2001 census.
Interview Excerpts:
Pinky Anand shared her journey after graduation from Harvard: https://ift.tt/2EDGvdO
Indira Jaising
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2Qkmnzj
Educational Qualifications
Indira Jaising pursued her school education in Mumbai and completed her Bachelor of Arts degree from Bangalore University. In 1962, she completed LLM from University of Bombay.
Legal Career
Indira Jaising is a noted personality for her legal activism in the sphere of Human rights. In 2018, she was ranked 20th in the list of 20 greatest leaders of the World by Fortune magazine. She also runs an NGO “Lawyers Collective”, but its license was cancelled for violation of Foreign Contribution Regulation Act. She argued for the rights of homeless dwellers of Mumbai, fought environmental cases, and raised voice regarding extra- judicial killings in Manipur.
Landmark Cases
Bhopal Gas Tragedy case:  She represented the victims in the Supreme Court of India to claim compensation for them against Union Carbide Corporation.
Rohingya Muslims crisis: She was appointed by UN for Investigation in the case of rape, torture and killings of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, the reason of which were security forces.
Case of Mary Roy: Inheritance rights were granted to Syrian Christian women in Kerela by the honourable Supreme Court of India.
Case of Githa Hariharan: In this case, Chief Justice A.S Anand held that mother is also a “natural guardian” of her minor children and they can bear the name of their mother.  
Greenpeace India case: She also argued the case for Priya Pillai in which she was offloaded from a London-bounded flight by immigration officers in New Delhi airport so as to prevent her from going to UK to address British parliament.
Other contributions
She challenged the Indian Divorce Act in the High Court of Kerela and helped Christian women to get a divorce on grounds of torture, desertion and cruelty.
She represented Rupan Deol Bajaj who prosecuted KPS Gill for sexual harassment.
Interview Excerpts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZsLW-RdlsE
Flavia Agnes
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2qvlSXS
Educational Qualifications
Flavia Agnes completed Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women’s University entrance exam and completed a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology. She completed an LLB in 1988 and LLM from Mumbai University in 1992 and received M.Phil from NLSIU in 1997.
Legal Career
Flavia Agnes, a practicing lawyer at Mumbai High Court, is an Indian women’s rights lawyer who is expertized in marital, divorce and property law. Her general theme of various articles includes women struggles, minority issues, gender equality, female jurisprudence and domestic violence. Her own experiences related to domestic violence had inspired her to fight for the rights of women in the society.
Her contributions
She is a co-founder of MAJLIS, a legal and cultural resource centre to provide socio-legal support to victims of domes and social abuse. This centre played a major role in the case of Triple Talaq.
According to her, solution to sexual violence would be to bring all forms of abuse under the ambit of Section 498A which deals with matrimonial disputes.
She is against the concept that rape is worse than death or that a women is has been raped is “zinda laash” as it demeans the dignity of women. According to her, as per Section 376E of IPC (which allows death penalty for rapes), the accused must be “unrepentant repeat offenders”.
She is a part of the Global Feminisms Project, an archive created in 2002 to explore women scholars and activists in the world.
Interview Excerpts:
Discussion with Flavia Agnes on women empowerment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n73NT2rGKLE
Vrinda Grover
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2QkLvpt
Educational Qualifications
Vrinda Grover graduated from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi, where she was a student of history. She obtained degree from Delhi University and a Masters in Law from New York University.
Legal Career
Vrinda Grover is a lawyer, researcher, human and women rights activist based in New Delhi, India. She represented various cases regarding human rights, sexual and domestic violence, communal massacre, extrajudicial killings, custodial torture, sexual minorities, trade unions and political activists. Time magazine identified her as one of the 100 most influential people in the world in 2013.
Landmark Cases
Hashimpura police killings case of 1987:  It was a mass murder which took place near Meerut, UP. 42 Muslims were targeted and their dead bodies were dumped near the irrigation canals by Provincial Armed Constabulary.
Soni Sori rape torture case:  The victim was imprisoned for criminal conspiracy and was sexually assaulted in custody of police in Chattisgarh. Grover appeared for Soni Sori.
2008 Kandhamal Riots of Orissa:  Hindu Nationalist groups killed at least more than 20 Christians, burned 730 houses and set 95 churches on fire. It was an Anti-Christian riots incited by Maoists.
Parliament Attack case of 2001: Lashkar-e-Taiba and  Jaish-e-Mohammad were held responsible for terrorist attack on Indian Parliament. She served as the counsel for S.A.R Geelani who was one off the main accused.
Muzzafarnagar Massacre of 2013: She appeared for the seven victims who were gang-raped. In this, there were riots between Hindu and Muslim and Akhilesh Yadav led Samajwadi Party was held guilty as they were negligent in preventing violence in their state along with Central Government.  
Other contributions
She also contributed to Prevention of Torture Bill, 2010, which protects people from communal and targeted violence
Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 which deals with sexual offences.
Her commendable contribution also goes to Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
She also represented the victims of 1984 sikh-riots and 2004 Ishrat Jahan case.
Karuna Nundy
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2NqHb6T
Educational qualifications
Karuna Nundy received a degree in Economics from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi University. She studied law at Cambridge University and pursued LLM from Columbia University, New York.
Legal Career
Karuna Nundy is a Supreme Court lawyer and also worked in US. Her main focus is on Constitutional Law, commercial Litigation, arbitration, legal policy and media law. She had been described as one of the three feminists leading a new wave, along with Vrinda Grover and Arundhati Roy by The Times of India. She wanted to make a huge contribution to India.
Landmark Cases
Nirbhaya Rape Case: It was a major turning point in her life as she engaged herself in the field of anti -rape and sexual harassment of women in India.
Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: She was one of the daring lawyers who fought back for the rights of Bhopal Gas Tragedy victims and helped in cutting carcinogenic chemicals.  
Shreya Singhal v. Union of India:  Nundy appeared on behalf of the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (NGO) in the case, which struck down section 66A of Information Technology, 2000.  
Other Contributions
She had also worked with the government of Bhutan and helped Nepal in drafting the parts of interim constitution.
She was consulted during the process of making Verma Committee report that was setup to review India’s Anti Rape laws.
Interview Excerpts:
Karuna Nundy talked about “women at work”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wcjMPcmw3c
Meenakshi Lekhi
Educational Qualifications
She pursued her education from Hindu College, University of Delhi and then enrolled herself at the Bar Council of India in 1990.
Legal Career
Meenakshi Lekhi is the national spokesperson of BJP and a Supreme Court    India lawyer. She handled a variety of issues relating to women, domestic violence, family dispute and permanent commission of women officers in the armed forces.
Contributions
■   “Women’s Reservation Bill” which proposed to amend the constitution of India to reserve 33% of all seats in Lok Sabha and all Legislative Assemblies.
 She was a part of the Drafting Committee which took up “Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill” which seeks to protect women from sexual harassment at their place of work. It was passed by the parliament in 2013.
She was successful in revoking the ban on media regarding display of court proceedings.
 Shanti Mukund Hospital Rape case: She represented the case in which victim was injured in her eyes and raped by the convict who then expressed the desire to marry her in the court of law.
Association: National Commission for Women, Sakshi and National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development.
Sudha Bharadwaj
Educational Qualifications
She was horrified on seeing the pathetic working conditions in UP, Bengal and Bihar during her time as a student at IIT, so she moved to work with Niyogi’s Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha in 1986. She got her law degree in 2000 from a college affiliated to the Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University in Raipur.
Legal Career
She is a trade unionist and civil rights activist against land acquisition.  She was associated with Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha and fought against corrupt bureaucrats because they denied payment of proper wages to workers in mines and plants in Bhilai.
She raised her voice audaciously for Dalit and tribal rights, right for land, education, health and security of victimised people who were exploited by landlords.
Since 2016, she has been fighting for the villagers of Ghatbarra and areas of Ambikapur as their community rights were cancelled by the government of Chattisgarh. State government snatched away the forest rights of Adivasis so as to facilitate coal mining of Adani group.
She wrote a critique of Binayak Sen’s imprisonment who was convicted for sedition by a local court, later upheld by the High Court of Chattisgarh. But later granted bail by Supreme Court in appeal.  
She was also a part of judicial inquiry into the rape and fake encounter of Mina Khalko who was raped and shot twice by Chattisgarh personnel leading to death and aided the victims for many years.
Interview Excerpts
Sudha Bharadwaj talked about extra judicial killings and land acquisitions:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKAUq9ThSks
Zia Mody
Image Source – https://ift.tt/2Qm2Bn4
Educational Qualifications
Zia Mody obtained education from Elphinstone College, Mumbai. She pursued law at Selwyn College, Cambridge and Master’s degree from Harvard Law School in 1979.
Legal Career
Zia Mody is an Indian Corporate Lawyer and business women. She is the founder and managing partner of AZB & Partners. She also advises large private equity houses such as KKR, Bain Capital and Warburg Pincus.
She has worked with eminent institutions like Tata Group, Reliance, Aditya Birla Group and Vedanta Group. She is appraised as a leading lawyer in field of Banking & Finance, Corporate, M&A, Securities law and private equity.
She was recognized as a top 13 female Acritas Star globally by Acritas Star 2018.  She was termed “Market Leader” for Mergers & Associations by IFLR1000 Financial & Corporate guide 2018.  
Law Commission of India set up a panel to review the provision of “Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996” because of several inadequacies observed in functioning of the Act 2014. Zia Mody was a part of this expert committee.  
She was also a member of the Reserve Bank of India Committee which was set up for Comprehensive Financial Services for Small Businesses and conditions of Low-income households.
Click here
The contributions which these powerful women have given to the judiciary system of our country are of immense significance whether it is environmental, property, constitutional, criminal, family or corporate law. They achieved their pursuits and dreams through the magical sword of law which has the ability and power to bring a change in the world and provide justice to all sections of the society.
The post Top 10 Most Inspirational Female Lawyers in India appeared first on iPleaders.
Top 10 Most Inspirational Female Lawyers in India published first on https://namechangers.tumblr.com/
0 notes
amanishsshah-blog · 5 years ago
Text
Best Divorce Advocate in Ahmedabad, Best Divorce Advocate in Gujarat.
There's a mind-blowing level of pressure and tension that must be managed whenever a family is accused of the unenviable assignment of petitioning for legal separation. Significantly, you discover the separation lawyer that is the correct fit. To be a successful backer, your attorney should work intently with you, yet perhaps at the same time with other relatives. There are four stages you can take that will go far towards helping you select the correct separation lawyer for your needs. Best Divorce Advocate in Ahmedabad, Best Divorce Advocate in Gujarat, Best Advocate in Sabarkantha, Best Lawyer in Sabarkantha, Best Advocate in Himatnagar, Advocate in Ahmedabad,
 Addition Referrals from Other Professionals
The best spot to start building a short-rundown of potential separation lawyers is frequently through referrals gathered from experts who are probably going to work intimately with legal advisors. This incorporates specialists, bookkeepers, church individuals, and even different legal counselors. These people can offer incredible understanding into lawyer notorieties, just as furnish you with a prologue to begin.
As a beginning stage, your separation lawyer ought to be board-guaranteed in family law. These people represent considerable authority in the particular sort of case you're settled in. To get accreditation, every expert needs to gather a considerable measure of real preliminary experience and should keep on working such cases at successive interims to keep up their confirmation. Although they will probably cost more than a non-board-guaranteed lawyer, they are justified, despite all the trouble. Family Property Disputes in Gujarat, Land Disputes Lawyer in Gujarat, Best Criminal Advocate in Gujarat High Court, List of Advocate in Gujarat, List of advocate in Ahmedabad,
Not all separation circumstances are made equivalent. You may have a comprehension with your prospective ex-companion over one another's desires going into the procedure, and you may have a previously existing understanding concerning the terms. Provided that this is true, see yourself as very blessed!  Tragically, such uncontested circumstances are regularly not a reality for some, couples encountering a detachment. Rather, these occurrences are frequently full of difference, bringing about what is known as a challenged separation. These may require a legal counselor versed in the forte most relevant to your circumstance. Top 3 advocate near me, Best lawyer in Gujarat, No1 lawyer in Gujarat,
It is difficult to state that you couldn't make it as a team. In some cases, it's out and out difficult to concede. In any case, when that opportunity has arrived it can make it simpler to separate and disintegrate your marriage by enlisting a decent separate from legal advisors. These exceptionally particular lawyers can guarantee that everything is dealt with and is to your greatest advantage.
A decent legal counselor can offer straightforward intercession if you and your mate are never again on neighborly terms. You need somebody on your side to help arrange the settlement of your mutual domain. You shouldn't need to stress over property that you acquired either before you wedded or was given to you as a blessing throughout your marriage because those possessions are yours. Mutual consent divorce lawyer, Arbitration lawyers, Best senior Civil Lawyer in Ahmedabad
If you have youngsters a decent separate from attorney will guarantee that care is settled reasonably. Most couples need to share the authority of their children, particularly little children, and, significantly, you and your previous companion can go to that kind of understanding. An educated lawyer will have the option to guarantee that you get the time with your kids that you want. There may be some settling on days however the measure of time is a higher priority than what day of the week you see your kid on. Your lawyer can likewise enable you to arrange youngster support. If you are the essential parental figure of your kids you will require that additional assistance to guarantee your kids are very much thought about. Or then again on the off chance that you are only the one with appearance rights to your kids you need to guarantee that you can help accommodate them yet not need to live off bread and water to do as such. Family matter case advocate in satellite, Famous lawyer in Gujarat,
There are ordinarily that separation legal counselors while acting in light of a legitimate concern for their customers, nearly appear to be barbarous and inhumane. This is the reason you need a lawyer helping you document your desk work and demands. You have to guarantee that you are getting the properties and resources owed to you while not assuming any of the obligations that aren't yours, remembering you should be in charge of your obligations. A decent lawyer will assist you with that.
http://www.advocatemanishshah.com
0 notes
Text
Facing Criminal Charges in Ahmedabad Gujarat? Ashish Desai, Your Trusted Criminal Advocate
Criminal Advocate In Ahmedabad – Finding yourself entangled in the complexities of the legal system can be overwhelming, especially when facing criminal charges. Criminal Advocate In Gujarat, If you’re in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, and require a skilled and experienced criminal advocate, look no further than Ashish B Desai. Criminal Lawyer In Ahmedabad.
Google Map:--> https://maps.app.goo.gl/YbPEc6DdpUNGzWyS7
Criminal Advocate In Ahmedabad, Criminal Advocate In Gujarat, Criminal Lawyer In Ahmedabad, Criminal Lawyer in Gujarat, Lawyers For Criminal in Ahmedabad, Lawyers For Criminal in Gujarat, Top Lawyer For Criminal in Ahmedabad, Top Lawyer For Criminal in Gujarat, Best Criminal Lawyers In Ahmedabad Gujarat, No 1 Advocates Criminal Lawyers In Ahmedabad Gujarat, Senior Criminal Advocate Lawyer In Ahmedabad Gujarat, Criminal Advocate, Criminal Lawyer, Satellite Ahmedabad, Nehru Nagar, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, Ahmedabad Gujarat India, www.ashishdesaiadvocate.com/criminal-advocate-lawyer-in-ahmedabad.php, Ashish B Desai
1 note · View note
amanishsshah-blog · 5 years ago
Text
LIST OF ADVOCATE IN GUJARAT AND TOP 3 ADVOCATE NEAR ME | ADVOCATE MANISH SHAH
Advocate Mr. Manish shah is the famous lawyer in Ahmedabad Gujarat. In the Top 3 advocate near me list of names of Mr. Manish shah at Ahmedabad Gujarat. An Advocate in this sense is a specialist in the field of law Unmistakable countries' legitimate structures use the term with genuinely changing ramifications. The wide corresponding in various English law-based wards could be an advocate or an authority. We provide our law service Mutual consent divorce lawyer, family matter case advocate in satellite, Best Lawyer in Sabarkantha, Best Advocate in Himatnagar.
 In India, the law relating to the Advocates is the Advocates Act, 1961 displayed and prepared by Ashok Kumar Sen, the then law minister of India, which is a law pass by the Parliament and is controlled and actualized by the Bar Council of India. Under the Act, the Bar Council of India is the transcendent managerial body to deal with the authentic bringing in India and moreover to ensure the consistency of the laws and backing of master measures by the legitimate bringing in the country.
 What is advocacy?
 Support or Promotion in all of its structures hopes to ensure that people, particularly the people who are most weak in the open eye, can: 
• Have their voices heard on issues that are indispensable to them? 
• Defend and protect their privileges. 
• Have their points of view and wishes thought about when decisions are eing made about their lives. 
Advancement is a strategy of supporting and enabling people to: 
• Express their points of view and concerns.
 • Access information and organizations. 
• Defend and advance their privileges and obligations. 
• Explore choices and decisions 
If you find the top List of Advocate in Gujarat then Advocate Mr. Manish S shah is the best lawyer in Ahmedabad Gujarat. We give many services like Family Property Disputes in Gujarat, Land Disputes Lawyer in Gujarat, Best Criminal Advocate in Gujarat High Court, Arbitration lawyer in Ahmedabad,
Best senior Civil Lawyer in Ahmedabad, Best Divorce Advocate in Ahmedabad.
Compensating advocates for their dedication can be as straightforward as giving selective data, elite participation or capacity to buy restrictive items and administrations. There are a few choices to seek after when urging your advocates to keep on getting the message out about your image. 
A few organizations offer restrictive discussions or site highlights for qualified individuals. At the point when Google began its Gmail administration, it was by greeting as it were. Other comparable strategies incorporate offering extraordinary codes to get select limits on items and administrations. Have you at any point known about dedication prizes cards? Have you at any point getting a rebate on the lease or your following visit to a salon for alluding another client? Different organizations urge faithful clients to move toward becoming commission-based delegates. This rewards the supporter with money related or now and again item pay for work that they were at that point doing. 
Numerous supporters will be content with any further communication that they get with a brand. For example, if an Apple® supporter were to have the chance to meet Steve Jobs, this would presumably be inspiration enough to keep upholding for the brand. Different promoters may get a great deal of inspiration from elite organization news, for example, item advancement news, the primary notice of up and coming organization occasions, and so on. 
If you are In Need of Further Inspiration 
Groups are an incredible case of recognizing and using advocates. Band promoters are something other than fans. They purchase the majority of the collections, go to the shows, purchase the band shirts and remain in line for quite a long time to meet the band individuals. Groups additionally remunerate their advocates with select track reviews, restrictive news, and visit date data for being a piece of a mailing rundown or fan base on Facebook. A few groups even offer pre-deal data for up and coming visits so their supporters can be the first to get in on the activity.
 A supporter should, during the presentation of his case and remembering that for the most part acting under the careful gaze of a court, keep up balance and feeling of pride. He probably won't be servile and at whatever point there is authentic ground for certifiable protesting against a legitimate official, it ought to be his benefit and commitment to exhibit his complaint to fitting pros. 
An advertiser should keep up towards the courts a mindful perspective, recalling that the balance of the legitimate office is crucial for the endurance of a free gathering. 
A supporter ought not to affect the decision of a court by any illegal or offensive methods. Private exchanges with a judge relating to a pending case are denied. 
For More info visit on>>> http://www.advocatemanishshah.com
0 notes