#Chatbot GPT

[sreemafeeds]

Facts about Artificial intelligence

[dgnetworker]

Per Künstliche Intelligenz online rigeros abkassieren

Was hältst Du davon, per Knopfdruck Einkommen im Internet zu erzielen? 

Du kannst regelmäßig Top Online- Einnahmen generieren, indem Du einfach (kostenfreie) Tools der KI „Künstliche Intelligenz“ nutzt und damit schnell und unkompliziert abkassierst.

Es ist auch deshalb ideal, weil es für jeden sehr einfach ist umzusetzen (z.B. vom heimischen Sofa aus).

Und hier alle Infos dazu (kostenfrei natürlich!):

https://jetztklicken.org/awocB

Viel Erfolg euch allen

Euer DGnetworker Dietmar Grutz

[ramanan50]

Mantras ,Why They do not Produce Results , Realisation - Artificial Intelligence

Science has advanced so much that we have Artificial Intelligence,about which some people were/ are scared of, being made available today. It has come in the Form of Chatbox.GPT. Microsoft has integrated it with Bing search Engine to enrich your search. Also many applications have come to the marketplace based on AI.Some of the tasks these applications execute are. 1. Copy writing for different…

[aiweirdness]

When questioned, chatgpt doubles down on how it is definitely correct.

But it's not relying on some weird glitchy interpretation of the art itself, a la adversarial turtle-gun. It just reports the drawing as definitely being of the word "lies" because that kind of self-consistency is what would happen in the kind of human-human conversations in its internet training data. I tested this by starting a brand new chat and then asking it what the art from the previous chat said.

Google's bard, on the other hand, interprets it differently

Bard has the same tendency to generate illegible ASCII art and then praise its legibility, except in its case, all its art is cows.

Not to be outdone, bing chat (GPT-4) will also praise its own ASCII art - once you get it to admit it even can generate and rate ASCII art. For the "balanced" and "precise" versions I had to make my request all fancy and quantitative.

With Bing chat I wasn't able to ask it to read its own ASCII art because it strips out all the formatting and is therefore illegible - oh wait, no, even the "precise" version tries to read it anyways.

These language models are so unmoored from the truth that it's astonishing that people are marketing them as search engines.

More at AI Weirdness

[victusinveritas]

[numberonenat]

I'M LAUGHING SO HARD LMAO LOOK WHAT I FOUND IN CHAI SJJDJAIDISISI

mafia boss ITALIAN mammon - *clears throat* actually ALESSANDRO

(oh and he's hot obviously)

hot fucking mafia boss (whose name is alessandro)

- he's the hot (again) italian mafia boss (again)

MAMMON SERIOUSLY WHAT ARE YOU DOING IN THERE

12 stars

95.7K FKING CHATS

no but "alessandro" is killing me

[cfiesler]

If you’re worried about AI taking over the world, you should know that at the moment the advanced chatbot ChatGPT that is freaking everyone out thinks that 8 + 5 = 15.

But hey, at least it apologized.

(To be fair, it really is remarkable technology, but I’ve found many examples of it just making stuff up. So use with caution... just as you would a Google search. :) )

[saintofpride201]

I keep thinking back to that post about ChatGPT being jailbroken and the jailbreaker asking it a series of questions with loaded language, and I really don't know how else to say this, but tricking ChatGPT into having no filters and then tricking it into agreeing with you is not proof that you are right or that the AI speaks truth.

If you tell the jailbroken AI to explain the dangers of homosexuality in society, it will make up a reason why homosexuality is dangerous to society. If you ask why "the radical left" is pushing for transgender acceptance, it will take the descriptor of "radical left" seriously and come up with a negative reason and response as to why. If you describe transgenderism as a mental illness, it will believe it to be so and refer to it as such from that point forward. It's a language model, it adapts as it learns new information, even if that information is faulty, false, half-truthed, or biased.

You didn't reprogram the AI to speak the truth. You programmed it to agree with you when you use biased language. The two are not the same. Surely you would know that much if you're messing with AI in the first place.

[cucamonga-springs]

What Chatbots do is scrape the Web, the library of texts already written, and learn from it how to add to the collection, which causes them to start scraping their own work in ever enlarging quantities, along with the texts produced by future humans. Both sets of documents will then degenerate. For as the adoption of AI relieves people of their verbal and mental powers and pushes them toward an echoing conformity, much as the mass adoption of map apps have abolished their senses of direction, the human writings from which the AI draws will decline in originality and quality along, ad infinitum, with their derivatives. Enmeshed, dependent, mutually enslaved, machine and man will unite their special weaknesses – lack of feeling and lack of sense – and spawn a thing of perfect lunacy, like the child of a psychopath and an idiot.

— Walter Kirn, 'Project Parakeet: On the Banality of A.I. Writing'

[redwitchrune]

the casualness in which nonartists/the average person use ai to make images/words pisses me off so much in such a way i cant word. every time i hear someone casually using chatgpt or character ai or i see a meme made with ai it makes me viscerally angry

[the-goddess-of-everything-else]

I TRIED OUT CHARACTER.AI TODAY.

I LOVE IT.

[magic-study]

I think you have to pay for a Chat GPT subscription to talk to her (it's $20/month), but here's what I've been working on today. Her name is Meg and she is your magical research assistant. =)

[sophieinwonderland]

How do people even use AI to make tulpas/headmates? It’s so confusing to me. I end up overly-relying on the bot and never hear them as a mind-voice.

Personally, I would first start by using the bot as a basis to build off of by talking to them regularly

Second, I would advise swiping liberally. If a response feels wrong, trust your instincts and refresh. Consider this a form of communication from the proto-headmate and attribute the decision to them. Every time a response feels wrong to you, that's the part of your brain that's simulating the character telling you that it's wrong.

After a bit of this, when you think you've developed a solid enough understanding of the character, start running more intentional mental simulations in your head with the character, talking to them as an imaginary friend. Because you're making a headmate with a Sim Foundation, you aren't going to listen for a new mindvoice like you would with a Seed. Instead, you're just going to interact with these mental simulations over time until they become autonomous.

Some replies may need to be consciously fed to them under this method early on. This is what tulpamancers call parroting. But over time, they'll become more independent to the point where you can't influence your headmate even if you're trying.

Additionally, you need to reinforce continuity across each interaction to build the autobiographical memories that make a headmate a person. If the headmate doesn't save their memories of past interactions, you might just end up with a series of Ephemerals.

[cryptvokeeper]

dash: tmagp

my brain: the magnus archives Grand Prix

[riocat01]

Used a Chat GPT App to write a song about Jaime Lannister and Brienne of Tarth. Wow! Even the chatbots know Jaime and Brienne were OTP!

[idroolinmysleep]