#Anti Philip Gallagher

[enixamyram]

Lip has me honestly furious this episode. Like, I legit cannot stand him right now and would happily watch him getting punched in the face on repeat for ten hours straight.

Season 9 Episode 11 Rant.

First he gets pissed at Fiona for the DCFS's visit. Ignoring the part where he hadn't told her about any of it (Xan or the visit) beforehand so she was completely unprepared, he gets mad at her for things she didn't even do. I mean, if anyone, he should be pissed at Debbie! She left the hole in the floor. She left the three kids inside while she was outside pissing about with her brothers girlfriend. I know Fiona was drunk but that issue has nothing to do with the visit getting messed up yet Lip only blames Fiona for all of it. Fiona actually does her damn best to try and salvage the mess that's happening but it's treated like she half-assed it, if not deliberately sabotaged it.

And then with Jason. Fiona literally had no clue about him. How would she? The guy gave no indication as to who he was (like, there has to be some personal responsibility in this - if he had told Fiona he was recovering or in AA, I'm sure Fiona would have immediately pulled back from him). Yet Lip still screams at her for it like she purposely screwed him over for shits and giggles. Again, Fiona's definitely on a downward spiral and needs help to get out of it but that's for her own addiction, not someone else's. She doesn't need to be screamed at for things completely out of her control just because Lip's in a shitty mood.

But this is Lip all over. He's forever putting his own shit and frustration on other people and you know what, he sucks for it. He really fucking sucks and he has no right shouting at Fiona like this when he has been just as much a fuck up before when she was supporting him.

I'm usually open for discussions but I will not take any criticism on this. If Fiona has no clue about Xan, about DCFS, about Jason, you cannot blame her when shit goes sideways because you left her unprepared. It's pathetic the way it's all put on her.

If the writers wanted to make Fiona at fault, they should have actually made her at fault. Have her promise to babysit then ditch for a nap. Have her destroy the house in a drunk rage and forget to clean up. Have her insist Jason would be fine with just one drink because she was having one and didn't want to drink alone. Have her actually be at fault. Don't have her only crime be ignorance and then throw it all on her like she's purposely fucked everything up for everyone else.

[boysnight]

that moment when Mickey calls Lip a “college bitch” is incredible. those 2 scenes which are basically just plot/character development for Lip are 2 of my favourite Mickey scenes. especially the 2nd one. I mean obviously it’s also Mickey being upset and going into coping strategy after the club scene where he finds out Ian left with a guy. but damn. 

Mickey is in full-blown socialist, fuck the police, anti-gentrification mode which is obviously great. so many iconic lines. “had it with you fucking Gallaghers”. Mickey bonding with brothers/cousins. “make the place even shittier”. Mickey looks fucking great. “no offence bro”. “hand me the spray cans”. “Philip”. “on my signal”. “rip Juan Valdez a new asshole”. 

also, i love how Lip comes round to Mickey’s w Fiona after and says nothing about it and the next substantial scene of Mickey and Lip together is the car scene to collect Ian. Like damn, Lip!!! Lip can be an asshole sure but this is like...  he is an incredibly big person here to be like, “oh yeah, the other night Mickey peer-pressured me to show my Southside credentials by going to fuck up a coffee shop with him, when we were there I couldn’t shoot at the place and the police came and Mickey called me a college bitch then locked the car door and sped off so I had to throw the gun and jump in a dumpster w a rat, but yeah like, you did OK, Mickey. You know, you tried.” like holy shit Lip. 

[whittlebaggett8]

Does the Philippines’ War on Drugs Amount to Crimes Against Humanity?

Do the steps dedicated inside the Philippines’ so-termed “war on drugs” constitute crimes from humanity? This is a well timed and critical concern as the third anniversary of the election of President Rodrigo Duterte ways, and it has been extra than a 12 months considering the fact that the Intercontinental Prison Courtroom (ICC) very first introduced its preliminary assessment into the war on medications marketing campaign launched by the Philippine authorities.

The investigation facilities on the hundreds of drug people that have been killed in alleged “clashes involving gangs” but also covers “extrajudicial killings in the class of law enforcement anti-drug operations.” Ascertaining exact info on fatalities in the drug war is tricky, with estimates ranging from 5,000 up to 27,000 folks. On the other hand, the Philippine Supreme Courtroom ruled in early April 2019 that the govt solicitor common need to release files on the killings to human legal rights groups, so a much more precise whole could yet come to light.

What Constitutes Crimes Versus Humanity?

Experiencing this article? Click on in this article to subscribe for entire accessibility. Just $5 a month.

To evaluate whether crimes against humanity – as defined in the 1998 Rome Statute of the Worldwide Felony Courtroom – are having put, 4 preconditions have to have to be fulfilled. As Leila Sadat explains, these are, “the commission of the crime as part of a ‘widespread or systematic attack’ from a civilian population  with know-how of the attack” [directed against any civilian population]  and involving “a course of carry out involving the several fee of acts… from any civilian inhabitants, pursuant to or in furtherance of a Point out or organizational policy to dedicate this sort of attack.”

Sadat argues this kind of standards “are non-controversial with the exception of the ‘State or organizational policy’ aspect.” On a single hand, the function of the point out or coverage allows distinguish crimes towards humanity from an advert-hoc accumulation of functions but on the other, there is disagreement more than whether or not the assaults require to be widespread or systematic or prevalent and systematic.

As Darryl Robinson notes, the option is established out in paragraph 2 (a) of the Rome Statute. This states that the “attack directed versus any civilian populace indicates a course of carry out involving the various commission of functions referred to in paragraph 1 versus any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a Point out or organizational coverage to commit these types of attack.”

The purpose of a governing administration is thus vital. As legal students argue, the steps have to “form part of a plan by a government… or is tolerated, condoned, or acquiesced in by the aforementioned government.” Breaking this down via focusing on extrajudicial killings and vigilante justice, the course of action of dehumanization, and the exaggeration of danger, it can be argued that Duterte’s authorities has directed the attack in opposition to drug end users.

Extrajudicial Killings

Duterte’s present-day tactic can be traced again to his time as mayor of Davao Metropolis. He has in point invoked this legacy. On the eve of the 2016 election, Duterte explained to a 300,000 potent crowd, “If I make it to the presidential palace, I will do just what I did as mayor. You drug pushers, holdup adult men, and do-nothings, you much better get out due to the fact I’ll eliminate you.” This is just just one of quite a few statements in which Duterte features of his “shoot to kill coverage.” It is not just that the federal government is condoning murder it is overtly championing it.

When investigating disappearances and summary executions in 2006, UN particular rapporteur Philip Alston noted that in Davao Town – where Duterte was mayor at the time – a “death squad” operated with its users “routinely killing street children and other folks in broad daylight.” Independently of this, the Philippine Fee on Human Rights (CHR), which was chaired by lengthy-standing critic of Duterte, Senator Leila de Lima, raised very similar fears to the Business office of the Ombudsman. As of August 2016, the CHR had investigated 227 issues of alleged extrajudicial or politically determined killings, but as a mere simple fact-getting agency it was ready to do little additional than this, specifically in light-weight of Duterte’s threats to dissolve the body if it continued its criticism of his drug war. The sheer selection of issues would, if investigated effectively, enable evidence the need of “widespread” or “systematic” in the lawful definition of crimes in opposition to humanity.

Dehumanization

Duterte’s regime has routinely argued that the war on drugs cannot represent crimes in opposition to humanity since drug consumers are not portion of humanity. This assists legitimize the murder of drug end users as they are depicted as subhuman. Responding to the allegations established forth by worldwide human rights groups and the UN in 2016, Duterte questioned, “What criminal offense towards humanity? In the 1st area, I’d like to be frank with you, are they [drug users] individuals? What is your definition of a human getting? Convey to me.”

This sentiment has been restated during the war on prescription drugs marketing campaign. Talking in 2017, Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II, claimed “drug lords, drug addicts” and “drug pushers” are “not humanity.” Political elites within just the governing administration have routinely upheld Duterte’s logic. Responding to the ICC’s preliminary examination in February 2018, Senate The greater part Floor leader Vicente Sotto III stated, “I feel that the charge just can’t be. When you say ‘crimes against humanity,’ who is the humanity getting talked about? Are drug pushers and stubborn drug customers considered element of humanity?” The statements underline that a central aspect of the government’s approach is to obstacle the concept that drug people are human.

Exaggeration of Risk

To further realize the “course of conduct” that underpins the “multiple commission of functions referred to in paragraph 1” it is crucial to review how Duterte exaggerates the threat posed by drug people. The recommendation that murdering individuals included with medicines is the only remedy to the difficulty has been justified by portraying drug end users as a risk to the country itself. Duterte said he had launched his bloody war on medications “because  the sheer quantity of folks contaminated will pull my place down – it will destroy the future generation of Filipinos.”

The authorities results in a narrative of worry by portraying drug use as a illness that will unfold all over culture to the issue that it threatens the state’s really existence. At the identical time, Duterte’s govt manipulates statistics by conflating occasional buyers with addicts in get to exaggerate the threat. Duterte claims that 4 million drug “addicts” will “contaminate a different 10 million” in just four to 6 a long time. This forecast is dependent on an estimate that there ended up 1.7 million drug buyers in the Philippines in 2016, complied by the Perilous Prescription drugs Board (DDB), which operates less than the jurisdiction of the president.  Duterte subsequently inflated this determine in spite of the actuality that all-around a million of those people identified in the authentic DDB estimate had been marijuana users and thus would be exempt from the figures if Duterte legalized it – as he proposed previously in his presidency.

Additionally, in accordance to the DDB survey, all over a 3rd of the 1.7 million users experienced consumed narcotics in the former 13 months, so all over again can rarely be characterised as addicts. When looking at the narrative remaining built around the danger posed by drug people, it is crucial to take note the relationship among dehumanization and exaggeration of threat. On 1 hand, the government tells the general public that drug users are zombie-like and cannot be rehabilitated. On the other, it speaks of drug consumers contaminating non-drug customers like a condition. These interrelated details reinforce the government’s information: in buy to address this risk, drug buyers must be killed.

Tying the a few themes alongside one another and considering the position of Duterte’s government in championing the murder of drug users, dehumanization, and the exaggeration of menace, it can be concluded that crimes against humanity are having spot. Although there will understandably be debates in excess of how lots of precisely have been killed, it is critical to remember the being familiar with of crimes towards humanity established out in the Rome Statute. As Darryl Robinson explains, “‘widespread’ is a high-threshold examination, requiring a substantial variety of victims and ‘massive, regular, huge-scale motion,’ whilst the phrase ‘course of conduct’ and the reference to several functions had been regarded as presenting a lower threshold.” This is specifically appropriate as Duterte’s routine has directed the mass murder of drug consumers.

Adrian Gallagher is Affiliate Professor in Global Relations at the College of Leeds and Co-Director of the European Centre for the Obligation to Protect. His investigation centres on mass violence. Co-authors Euan Raffle and Zain Maulana are also based in the School of Politics and Worldwide Research at the University of Leeds.

A detailed study paper which expands on these themes to examine the intercontinental responses to the Philippines’ drug war is published in The Pacific Evaluate. The Pacific evaluate is a journal targeted on the global interactions of the nations around the world of the Pacific Basin. It handles transnational political, stability, military, financial and cultural exchanges in in search of better being familiar with of the location.

The post Does the Philippines’ War on Drugs Amount to Crimes Against Humanity? appeared first on Defence Online.

from WordPress https://defenceonline.com/2019/05/03/does-the-philippines-war-on-drugs-amount-to-crimes-against-humanity/

[enixamyram]

I really do not like Lip.