#11yr old me was based actually. good for her
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
anyways ahahahhaa
jeff's song is still valid it's one i still associate w him to this day 11yr old me was solid there
ben's song??? i mean??? it's not a Bad choice but. i don't associate it w him anymore.
jane. oh baby. i'm 50/50 on this one i don't think it fits her but i do think she'd 100% listen to it. it would def go into a jane playlist if i ever get around to making one for her
eyeless jack's song... yeah.... yeah.... i still think it fits him u were pretty based lil me
sally. i. guess??? yeah?? it's the only song that ever makes her pop into my mind, probs due to this video actually
nina's song i did Not recognize im gonna b so real rn i had to sit there for a hot second trying to figure out what it was lol uhhh she'd probs listen to it, but i can't say it's like... Her. u know?
liu's song was not what i remember it being what the fuck. and it's one i completely forgot existed. did i do liu and sully separately?? bc i Know what song i did for him and that was not it.
laughing jack's is a no from me. it would probs fit jill more, but even then it's not really It.
hoodie... oh the man i used to think u were.... linkin park just follows you everywhere u go huh.....
masky. not really, but then again i'm viewing this in a marble hornets lens so let me just hone in on the creepypasta interp rq. . . . still a no, i think.
slenderman... i mean. come little children was just its song in all of these i guess
toby's is, not surprisingly, don't you dare forget the sun. and u know what i stand by this.
zalgo... ehhh.... i don't agree w it anymore but i can understand why i chose that song
clockwork is so silly i really put all my pre-pubescent angst into her here anyways yeah sure i'll let 11yr old me have this one.
goodbye agony for the bloody painter??? hello????? what????? for why??? explain??? memories come back to me give me reason???
smile dog is lion bc what else could it possibly be.
shocked to see lazari in this video anyways sure i can see it but why did i type the song out like that.
alice liddell is not a creepypasta, next.
offenderman. huh. i see. i mean yeah that song was everywhere w him.
rare kate the chaser sighting and u know what i'll accept the song.
zero was included too?? actually shocked uh. not 100% on the song but i knew nothing about her back then so i think i can accept it
splendorman is happy and no one is surprised
dark link isn't a creepypasta, next.
tenderman is fancy yes yes i know
I WAS RIGHT I DID DO SULLY SEPARATELY that or i just did liu twice for some reason but yeah this is the song. i don't associate it with liu at all anymore bc my interp of him has changed so drastically since then but i think i could probably fit sully in it depending on the scenario.
puppeteer w discord, not shocking but honestly it's still smth i associate w him even if it is a mlp song
the doll maker is Not what i was expecting to see. dollhouse is not a surprising song either, and i don't think it fits him at all idk what i was thinking back then
not sonic.exe with the vocaloid song omg
NOT TAILS DOLL WITH THE HOLLYWOOD UNDEAD SONG OMG
kagekao. woah. was not expecting him either. gonna give myself a c- for the song choice
included zalgo twice as well. i can agree with the song this time, yeah.
seedeater, come little children. understandable, yeah.
sometimes spotify will play songs that i used to listen to wayyyy back deep in my like 2015 creepypasta phase and it makes my thoughts go wild like for example
spotify played pushover by manifest and because of One single video that was a lil tribute to ticci toby, i only ever think of him when it plays. like. i can see the guy committing many acts of vandalism to this song u know
there are actually a lot of songs that from that time period that i still exclusively associate w this fandom like uhh
what have you done by within temptation. it was a song used in a jeff and liu tribute so now that's all i think about when i listen to it.
deepest cuts by get scared + don't you dare forget the sun is obvi toby.
every hollywood undead song ever, really. but esp another way out, lion, coming back down, fuck the world, and i don't wanna die.
criminal by britney spears... what hurts the most by cascada...
do you guys remember creepypasta character theme song videos on youtube. i actually made some of those, back in the day.
#archived mind of v: thoughts and opinions.#and scene.#gatekeeping most of the songs bc im embarrassed </3#im not watching the liu video it scares me#it's so ominously titled but smth tells me i know exactly what song i used#okay i clicked on it that was not the song i was expecting#i was expecting coming back down by hollywood undead#that's not what i got#the comments on the video are really fucking nice actually shit#anyways it's my demons by starset#a song i. have actually debated putting in his playlist#11yr old me was based actually. good for her#she'd be proud to see that i am still irrevocably attached to liu
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
Okay so I'd like to share what I commented on this video. I watched it and it sent me into a whole rant about the motives and characterization of Draco. I recommend watching before reading this:
@quinncurio is the original poster
Here's the copy paste of my comment/ Essay. I was slight heated when I wrote this, but my points still stand.
"OH BOY. HI, HELLO I VERY MUCH DISAGREE. ALSO: DISCLAIMER: DONT TAKE THINGS PERSONALLY, YOU WILL FIND I HAVE A VERY LOGICAL EXPLANATION, FOR WHY THIS ANALYSIS DOESN'T WORK.
Calling a Draco a cowardly bigoted bully, and a carbon copy of Dudley is the most SHALLOW and LOW EFFORT CONCLUSION YOU COULD POSSIBLY DRAW. IT IS LOW HANGING FRUIT. I'm going to have to break this into sections to truly explain why your conclusion is soooo incredibly shallow. You may have done your research, but I feel like you learned nothing more about Draco then if you'd never seen more then 5 min. So I'm going to start the same way you have and break this down into the same points.
PART 1 : AN ANALYSIS OF HARRY MEETING DRACO
I'm not going to go into detail of Harry's impression or ideas of Draco, because this analysis is about Draco, Not Harry. Also remember the books were written from Harry's POV, not a neutral party. I'm not obliged to Harry's opinions, just facts. Which brings up the first true conclusion about Draco's character. *Draco Malfoy feels a strong need to impress others, to gain their affection.* He does this through incisive bragging, trying to make people believe he knows best, and tearing down the reputation of others, so the object of his desires sees Draco and the most obvious choice. Where we differ is:
You believe Draco does this, because he thinks, he's better then others.
I believe,(which circumstantially has more evidence), Draco does this because he wants the affection, and acceptance of others
Whether you believe he acts out this way bc of how he is raised, his privilege, or something else, it doesn't change the fact that Draco was truly trying to make a friend, perhaps the only way he knew how.
In noble wizarding society, traditions, and your family does mean a lot. Not even looking at it from a pureblood view, imagine having a family that old and known. They really are a type of nobility, with family Lords even having political seats in the Wizengamote just because of their family name. The Longbottoms and Weaselys hold this same political influence, and it's not tied to Slytherins, pureblood ideals or anything like that. Draco is an only child, and an heir to his family line, so he is going to be treated importantly bc of that. He is raised with that responsibility, and in social situations not only represents himself, but the whole heritage of his family. Draco hasn't had the ability to act like a normal petulant child (part of the reason he tends to act out at Hogwarts.*ie. away from home*). He's been taught to act proper, make good allies, and impress others for the good of his reputation. I'd say most noble wizarding children probably get the same training and lectures, and have their own customs and culture of educate. What may come for Draco as polite, and diplomatic, may sound rude or arrogant to Harry. This is because Draco was not aware how different Harry's upbringing was from his own, and has never dealt with not having enough. Perhaps if Draco knew how different and ignorant Harry was he would have felt pity, or a sense of wrongness at Harry's injustice. Though Draco is just an 11yr old boy, who's only ever had a loving family, and almost anything he wanted. It is difficult for him to relate to the lack of others. As all wizarding children, he probably grew up with the story of the boy who lived and may have even been excited when his father said he wanted them to become friends. He truely was excited to meet Harry and genuinely wanted to be friends. While yes Lucius definitely wanted Draco to befriend Harry to help lighten their family reputation, I also think that Draco, being a child, would more likely be more excited of making a famous friend. Maybe he even had some hope seeing he'd met Harry before when he saw him on the train.
Part 2 : THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DRACO AND DUDLEY
Draco's sense of superiority comes from his traditions and pride in his family, while Dudley's is strictly from his own greed and selfishness. Draco would't do half of the things Dudley does simply because it's incredibly unclothe, and he has better ways of getting what he wants. Dudley isn't smart enough to compare to Draco. Though Draco and Dudley might both have things handed to them, Draco is not gluttonous or greedy about it. Dudley will trash his gifts and belongings, constantly wanting more, and viewing things given to him as disposable. Draco wants things yes (like every child does) but he's proud of his possessions and cherishes them, brags about them. Dudley is an animal compared to Draco. He doesn't have the same skill, smarts or self control. Dudley is abusive, and a tyrant in his bullying. Dudley wants to see Harry hurt and bleed. He is very violent compared to Draco. While we constantly and repeatedly see Draco shy away from violence, and use more his words.
Part 3 : DRACO'S "HARASSMENT", STRATEGIES AND EVOLUTION.
Draco despite his threats and facade is Not a violent person. This is because despite all Draco's bravo, and cruel words, Draco is kind. Yes he is conflicted, but that is only more proof of his inner kindness. If he didn't feel guilty, he wouldn't feel conflicted. Which means he really doesn't want to be mean to others, but he's just acting out based on how he thinks he's supposed to feel/act, but doesn't really enjoy it. I think when you strip Draco back behind his actions, and pose, you'll find a very different person. The half-blood prince gave us some of that, but it's another thing to see it in Draco from the beginning. Essentially Draco's attempt at bullying started when Harry rejected his friendship. Draco had probably never been rejected before, and probably couldn't possibly fathom why Harry would choose anyone else over him. While yes that's a bit coincided, Draco was also incredibly sheltered and probably wasn't introduced to children who weren't already tied to his family. Harry's rejection irrevocably shattered Draco's confidence and perception, which sent him into literal years of lashing out at Harry for his hurt emotions, and pining for his attention. It is the most pathetic excuse for bullying, and Draco antagonizing Harry is the equivalent of pulling a girl's pigtails. Draco did get quite shrewd with words, but he was really just trying to get the biggest reaction, especially since Harry is so volatile at times. The truth of the matter is Draco is actually very jealous, because deep down he really admires Harry. He want's the same freedom Harry has. He doesn't want to worry about his duty or who he has to be, but to be able to live authentically the way he views that Harry does. Draco really just wants to be more like Harry, but feels he is stuck, by the Dark Lord, his family obligations or anything else. Draco isn't a bully, he's just sad. Not even Ron or Hermione take him seriously after a while. *cough*this is why Drarry is so huge*
Part 4 : He had no choice?????
Everyone has a choice, but I think you over estimate how easy a choice can be. Family is important to Draco, they are probably the only people who love him for who he is, not what they can get out of him. As a child Draco felt pride in his family, and family made him feel special and important. As he got older that pride turn into expectations, and responsibility. Lucius and Narcissa value the preservation of their family above all else. They are protective and loving and those feeling extended to Draco. It's where he gets his kindness. It is indeed a Slytherin trait to value those you care about above everyone else. We protect our own, a loyalty probably stronger then Hufflepuff for those select few a Slytherin deeply cares about. Draco's parent would let the whole world burn to save him, and Draco would do the same for them. While Draco's family did hold pureblood ideals, after the first war Voldemort was not someone they willing wanted to follow. The light sided also would have never offered aid to death eaters, because fundamentally they were still against the dark, and there was no other place for dark wizards to go except Voldemort. Most of the death eaters had actually been somewhat relived at the news of Voldemort's death, and the boy who lived, as Voldemort had already become insane to the point of torturing his own followers, and wasn't getting them anywhere near their goals. Except for the also insane brainwashed few like Bella who'd follow her lord to the grave, many of the death eater's were content to be peaceful and stay quite after the war. Probably even grateful for it, as there were many needless casualties on both sides. I feel like the Malfoys were one of those families that were happy to get out. If the side they are on is harmful or losing, they are ready to abandon ship. This may sound like they are cowardly with no resolve, but if it was the life and death of your family, and your loved ones, I think you might think differently. I feel like we aren't too far off in agreement here, but where we differ is in judgement and motives we feel the Malfoys, or Draco had. Lucius made a mistake in the first war, and spent the second trying to keep his family out of danger. I can't imagine the fear he had in Azkaban for his family, the dementors feeding off him and what he thought the Dark Lord would do to his only son, his wife, his family. Meanwhile Draco was left with the threat of his father rotting in Azkaban, and his mother being killed. His mother also with the thought of her son being killed. So yes Draco could have made a choice, and he did make a choice, a choice to protect his family, and honestly I can't see that as wrong. Maybe if Harry would have actually taken his offer of friendship things could have gone differently and it wouldn't have come to that.
Part 5 : Abuse Theory
I definitely agree with you here. The Malfoys were not abusive, and get a better anthology for racism then something which in fact could be solved with a study on culture rather then blood. If you want a good parallel for racism in HP forget muggleborns, and look at creature blood, not dumb house elfs either, but werewolves, goblins, centaurs beings just as intelligent as wizards. The bigotry towards werewolves especially is horrific, especially from the "light side" who avidly labels them as dangerous dark creatures. *Also note about the scene in Borgen and Berks* Lucius stopped Draco from touching the artifact because it was probably cursed, as many dark artifacts are. Even if you know what you're doing they can be dangerous to handle carelessly. So Lucius was actually very wise and protecting Draco, his 12 yr old son, from getting badly hurt. Why the cane? If touching a cursed object curses you, then its better not to get close with your actual hands. Using his cane to push Draco away was actually a precaution. Lucius is anything but careless,
Part 6: Draco's Wand and Symbolism
I generally agree here too, but I believe this symbolism is more reflective of the things Draco wishes he could have had, or done differently. If anything the wand and symbolism Draco has is representative of the good in him, and not cowardice, or inability to do enough.
Part 7: Redemption
Tbh I'm part of the crowd that would have liked that deleted scene to stay in the final cut. However I understand what's justifiable for one person, may not be enough for someone else. This is where you get more into the topic of morality, and how much are you morally responsible for as a person. Harry has been drilled with the mindset for years that he has to save everyone, and that if your not in it for the greater good, ready to lay down your life you better forget being in it at all. Personally I don't believe Harry has any right to claim that rhetoric, as Dumbledore(and by association Grindlewald) practically spoon fed it down his throat; but I wont talk about that as it's a whole other issue. Draco, you have to understand has a whole type of different morality. Objectively I believe he's a good person, if not pressured by the echo chamber of ideals around him. Yet Draco repeatedly gives signs, and expresses the desire to want to do good. In order to properly analyze Draco you have to look past his outward facade, and actions, or you'll never see him as anything more then he pretends to be. If you can only read plain text, if you can't see past the obvious, you will always have a very flat one dimensional view of a character or a person. To me there's no redemption needed. Draco is already good, more good then his parents, and perhaps more good then some who claim goodness.
In summary Draco is a very complex person, who tries to over compensate for his flaws, struggles to express honesty, but deeply cares for others, especially his family. His duality lies in how he wants to be good to others, yet how in the end he always chooses to save the ones he loves, over the majority. Draco will always have his flaws, but he will always have his goodness too, and I hope you won't disregard that.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
P.S
Kudos to anyone who read through all that.
#harry potter#draco lucius malfoy#draco malfoy#character analysis#drarry#draco character development#malfoy family#lucius malfoy#potter x malfoy#Narcissa Malfoy#bellatrix lestrange#death eaters#1st Wizarding war#death eater analysis#harry potter analysis#hp analysis#good darkside#wizarding society#Slytherin politics#Slytherin#slytherin pride#Pureblood#Pureblood family#hp politics#draco/harry#draco and harry#house pride#slytherin house#light side#voldemort
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
Beauty and The Beast 21st year
Ok so I see this one go around a lot on tumbler, FB, an lordy knows where else
How old was the Beast when he was cursed by the witch?
the argument stems from this dialoge
“The rose, which was truly an enchanted rose, which would bloom until his 21st year” ~Narrator
“Ten years we’ve been rusting…” ~ Lumiere
Leading people to think “Oh! 21-10=11! Prince Adam was a Kid the enchantress was a bitch!”
Thing in there’s an overwhelming amount of evidence that this is very very wrong.
There’s the stained glass in the prologue
Uh that doesn’t look like a kid to me. He’s got freaking armor on for godsakes
And there’s the portrait in the west wing
11yrs old my butt that’s a freaking adult.
I think the key here is in the wording (and I’m going to use other disney movies to prove it)
“The rose, which was truly an enchanted rose, which would bloom until his 21st year”
Many times over we’ve seen in fairy tales that spells and magic in general can be very tricky things and often worded in specific ways for a reason.
Example Aladdin gets a ‘freebie’ out of the cave because
“I never actually wished to get out of the cave, huh. You did that on your own.”
And specifically here the spell isn’t until his 21st birthday like Maleficent’s curse on Aurora
“Before the sun sets on her 16th birthday, she shall prick her finger - on the spindle of a spinning wheel - and DIE! ”
Nope the wording is
his 21st year
Most people assumes this means his 21st year of life but I think it means his 21st year as a beast.
And in the way of all good spells no one actually physically ages while under the spell. This explains why Chip is still a child and the beast looks the same as his portrait.
Why 21years? Dunno. Maybe more time to think and learn from his actions?
It’s also a pretty powerful spell since it affects not only the prince but all the servants and even the castle itself as we see at the end 21 could have been a matter of strength given that it’s prime bases are 3 and 7 both considered very powerful numbers in many cultures.
So I think the curse was meant to go on for 21 years
That brings us to the line from “Be Our Guest”
“Ten years we’ve been rusting…”
This can be taken 1 or 2 ways and both still support my theory
1. Only in the last 10 years have the servants started to give up hope and become more stationary. Possibly as a result of less people being able to approach the castle lost in the woods, which also explains why people in the village seemingly have no idea the castle or Beast even exist. No regular traffic means it could have been assumed abandoned and subsequently forgotten
or
2. The Curse has only been in effect for 10 out of the 21 years (least likely)
I mean take a look at the rose when Belle first sees it
It’s still pretty healthy though it is starting to wilt so this could mean the spell is at it’s half life and will wilt slowly (Belle is with him for what seems to be several months without anyone panicking) or it’s nearing on the end of it’s life.
why then is the rose suddenly dying at the end?
Because Beast is dying.
Broken heart or the knife to the back take your pick, the’s no spell if there’s no heartbeat
TLDR: The Beast wasn’t 11 years old the spell was for 21 years
48 notes
·
View notes