#“my first amendment rights” “you...you don't have first amendment rights. you are not the province of Manitoba."

[grunge-mermaid]

I THOUGHT LAW & ORDER TORONTO WAS A JOKE HOW IS THIS ACTUALLY A REAL SHOW????

[backroombuzz]

Don't Want To Be Called Fake News By President Trump, Then Tell The Truth

If Journalist can't report truthfully about Trump feeding some Japanese Koi, how are we supposed to trust them on real issues?

By Dominick Mezzapesa Three journalists  (and I use the term lightly) tried their best to manufacture an "International Incident." involving Trump. These reporters don't represent a small, insignificant site such as mine. They represent The Washington Post, The AP, CBS, NBC, CNET and one is a contributor at MSNBC and NBC. The three reporters most likely hoped that they would go viral and for a moment in time, feel important.  Almost too easily they put aside their ethics, and went to work on twitter criticizing President Trump who, along with Japanese PM Shinzo Abe were feeding the ponds Koi's. The three reporters saw an opportunity to attacked President Trump for pouring an entire box of fish food into a pond. This in turn led to a discussion that asked if this amount of food that the uncaring Trump dumped in, could inexorable do harm to the poor delicate creatures. Of course, these three most likely know as much about Koi as they do about Journalistic integrity. The three lying, ethically challenged journalist was Anna Fifield @annafifield is The Washington Post's bureau chief in Tokyo Zack Whittaker @zackwhittaker writer and editor for ZDNet, CNET and CBSNews.com. Jonathan Lemire  @JonLemire White House AP reporter. Contributor at MSNBC and NBCNews. The three all work for major newspaper or are contributor's on Major News networks. So how do we trust them now? They can't claim "I was lying then, but NOW I am telling the truth." These three represent to me the most reprehensible of journalist.  We as readers form our opinion based on what you are reporting. How can we form an objective opinion if the information is a blatant false? President Trump calls you "Fake News" please explain to your readers how he is incorrect in that statement? I am sure you won't. I am sure you'll run and hide, or claim "We were only joking." I have read the responses and have seen some serious responses, so hopefully, you'll clarify "where exactly is the joke?"   Truth Matters.. If you feel different, THEN QUIT! I never graduated tenth grade, never went to a great school to learn journalism. I am a grammar Nazi's worst nightmare, but I consider myself more of a journalist than you three shall ever be. I actually care that what I am writing is the truth, I care that my name will forever be linked to the words I had written below my signature. I can spend ten-hours writing a story and when it's finally completed, if it not up to the ethics, morals, and standards that I set for myself, I'll hit delete, and learn from my mistakes. I may not be the greatest writer, I may not be the most articulate, but I am damn sure over the 1800 articles I have written on BluePillSheep.com and my other website WildlifePlanet.net, Every word is truthful, and that is what I am most proud of. My readers understand who I am because I hide nothing from them, I make fun of my writing abilities far more than they ever could. If someone asked me what a semi-colon is, I'll most likely answer "That's what you get from a doctor when men reach the age of fifty.  While my readers understand that, they also understand that, they can trust every word I write. I am damn sure my work ethic and integrity far outweigh anything you accomplished professionally. I'll also match up my accomplishments to your any day of the week, and I have no doubt that I'll be judged far superior. These three buffoons make me cringe knowing I am just barely making it and these three are getting paid top dollar, to tweet about a few koi. In the end, their 140 or less character article was simply too difficult a challenge to overcome. But as always when USA Today releases a video that recorded the event, the three stooges were exposed for the imbeciles they truly are. As the meme spread through social media, other users joined in teasing Trump for improper conduct during the photo-op on his first state visit to Japan, until the full video of the incident came out showing Trump was just following the example of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Trump scooped out some feed for the coy in the pond below before opting to just dump the whole box. Rex Tillerson, standing nearby, laughed. — Jonathan Lemire (@JonLemire) November 6, 2017 “Trump and Japanese PM Shinzo Abe were scheduled to feed Koi spoonfuls of food. Until Trump poured his entire box of fish food into the pond,” CNBC reporter Christina Wilkie wrote on Twitter. Trump dump: president throws entire box of fish food into precious koi carp pond https://t.co/uyO0QpYGXZ pic.twitter.com/v4P5ufZemq — Anna Fifield (@annafifield) November 6, 2017 Some even suggested that Trump’s behavior at the Koi pond could launch a “diplomatic incident.” Four stages of Trump’s latest diplomatic incident: Tokyo koi pond edition. pic.twitter.com/Bx3FsEoXyq — Zack Whittaker (@zackwhittaker) November 6, 2017 The full video of the fish-feeding photo-op at Akasaka Palace koi pond shows clearly that Trump followed Abe’s lead in dumping the box of fish food into the pond. Trump and Japan PM Shinzo Ave decide to dump entire boxes of fish food into a koi pond at the Japanese palace. pic.twitter.com/aPAP6IdRhP — USA TODAY (@USATODAY) November 6, 2017 Yesterday I wrote an article about the DNC Chair, Tom Perez sending out a press release declaring that the 2020 election will be an honest, transparent election. He included his seven principles, I never went past #3. Number three of Tom Perez's seven-principles stated 'He will faithfully abide by the DNC charter.'  Since Tom Perez, nor the DNC didn't change one iota of the DNC charter and bylaws. Tom Perez just swore an oath to obey the same document that was in place before the  2016 elections. T If the DNC and Tom Perez keep their promise, which I have little doubt that they won't. Then Article five, section four, makes Tom Perez's seven principles and the DNC promise for a legitimate 2020 election is null and void. The reason why Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile, and the DNC was able to rig the election against Bernie Sanders was Article five, section four of the DNC Charter. According to the DNC's own lawyers, Article five, section four of the DNC charter Article five, section four in it's most basic term means that since the DNC is a privately run organization. The words  in that bylaw center around the words “impartial” and “Evenhandedness.” According to the DNC lawyers, these two words “impartial” and “Evenhandedness" cannot be defined by the courts. So the DNC’s impartiality clause is akin to a political promise in that it can not be guaranteed. When Federal Judge William Zloch's  viewed the case factually,  no matter how dishonest the DNC presented themselves. Judge Zloch had no other choice than to dismiss the class action lawsuit filed against the DNC for rigging the primaries for Hillary Clinton. In Judge Zloch's written opinion he specifically writes about Article five, section four of the Charter and Bylaws of the Democratic Party,  “For their part, the DNC and Wasserman Schultz have characterized the DNC charter’s promise of ‘impartiality and evenhandedness’ as a mere political promise—political rhetoric that is not enforceable in federal courts.   While it may be true in the abstract that the DNC has the right to have its delegates “go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way,” DE 54, at 36:22-24, the DNC, through its charter, hascommitted itself to a higher principle. Nevertheless, it is apparent that these Plaintiffs cannot satisfy Lujan’s test, and therefore lack standing to assert Count V of the First Amended Complaint   So, the choice——and attendant consequences——between “impartiality and evenhandedness” and Tammany Hall politics lies in the province of the DNC, not the judiciary. So please, when you feel ready to take journalism seriously, even in a 140 character or less tweet. Then Click Here if you actually want to read an article that despite being grammatically challenged, is actual journalism that is both factually correct and truthful, two things you three mutton-heads are sorely lacking. Read the full article