#/he's just not interested in being a genius
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
shadowszestysilhouette Ā· 6 hours ago
Text
SONIC 3 SPOILERS
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Amy is so pretty im so excited to hear her actor and see her interactions, I really hope she not a romantic interest but just another sibling to add to the pile. LIVE AND LEARN IN SPACE!!! Sonic and Shadow were so cute and their interactions were adorable, honestly, i love Sonadow but i hope Shadow isnt a romantic interest either, i just like Sonic being a kid, let Shadow be a kid too, hes like 6ā€¦ Also SHADOW BORN FROM A COMET??? Genius, serve it on a platter. This is cannon now.
20 notes Ā· View notes
witchoflegends Ā· 4 months ago
Text
Open: Pietro
Tumblr media
"You do know I'm not an idiot, right? My brain works a hundred times faster than any of you. I can understand every complex science and theory you have. I'm just not interested in it."
0 notes
roscoehamiltons Ā· 26 days ago
Text
having some insomniac thoughts about how the public perception of the george vs max fight is affected by their PR personas, how much people value authenticity (or the appearance of being authentic) now in celeb culture, and how max uses that to his advantageā€¦.
152 notes Ā· View notes
otaku553 Ā· 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
Haha
2K notes Ā· View notes
cacw Ā· 9 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
meet your maker
274 notes Ā· View notes
technicalknockout Ā· 5 months ago
Text
a bunch of loosely pko related art. can you tell i love him a lot
(more under cut)
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
66 notes Ā· View notes
izzymalec Ā· 8 months ago
Text
anyway. fuck the ebu.
60 notes Ā· View notes
bardsandbees Ā· 2 years ago
Text
thereā€™s a lot of things i love about fandom but in the case of the witcher fandom they took a named but dead character from a lambert side quest in the 3rd video game where lambert has a vague emotional attachment to said character and turned him into a fully fledged, three dimensional and beloved love interest for lambert. i think lambert says his name no more than twice during the whole quest. and yet the fandom consensus on not only aidenā€™s personality but also general physical appearance is incredible
246 notes Ā· View notes
kinos-fortress-2 Ā· 11 months ago
Text
ok another headcanon and is from my ultimate comfort favs:
When demo got first hired by pauling he was like very shy and introverted at some point where everyone wasnā€™t likeā€¦ that conjoined and besties as how they are now. And i feel like he got a pretty rough time to even start to talk with his teammates or get a tiny friendship with them.
And he often times was very threatened by small lady in glasses that liked to be strict with them in their first day sinceā€¦ it was business only ofc
but by the time when pauling got a bit more soft with them, and got also a bit friendly with demo i feel like at some point he started to develop a tiny crush with her since she was the one who often talks more with, and i have this other hc that also he would fell easily with people that befriends him (not like anyone of course it really does depends the person for him)
so you know pauling itā€™s nerdy and a bit sensitive (she cries very easily) and she is very friendly or a bit more extrovert if she gets to, but like in a sense where she is more ambivert too. uhhh idk she is just talkative with people if you get her chance where sheā€™s not busy and will tell you to go to hell. rough lady
and he liked that! i think he thought they both shared some stuffs along and can infodump their love for guns and for the work they are in and then if they can go a bit personal with some drinks and he liked that he could share this stuffs with her all chill and cool
but i feel like he just had this side secret crush with her and stopped those want to be romantic feelings because he really saw she is not like, up to those stuffs, she is so focused on work and also stressed and depressed like him and he could just understand that she just only want someone to listen to her but she will not like, pay that much attention about romantic relationships and he could completely understand that once he get to know her more deeply. and he just couldnā€™t do that to the one who also considered a friend and he probably guessed she will not feel the same for him but that didnā€™t like hurt him and is not like he ever confessed to her. he just had those secret feelings for her for a time and then realized she was not really like the one for him to be in a relationship
and thatā€™s where i thought of him now having a more soft spot for her and caring her like a sister (not like literally but in a familiar soft spot sense, but thatā€™s ofc his friend)
so yeah idk šŸ‘
47 notes Ā· View notes
rg11 Ā· 9 months ago
Note
Can we see more of Jadekat and their 612 babies...do they have any names besides Jadekat jr jr jr
Tumblr media
i dont think theyre that creative to come up with any other names for their kids
though the image is inaccurate! its actually 613 kids (due to the one karkats holding in the photo) that ones name is jadekat jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr jr
24 notes Ā· View notes
moreaugriffins Ā· 9 months ago
Text
You know, episodes-wise, Egon's Ghost and The Boogeyman is Back, aren't that far away from each other (Season 2, episode 60, and Season 3 episode 3. about 8 episodes apart)
Can you imagine almost/kinda dying and ending up in the Netherworld (not to be confused with the Netherlands), and then, like, a few months later, almost dying again?
No wonder Egon was so terrified it brought the Boogeyman back. Sure they risk their lives each day but those were two incidences where death was very real for him, and they weren't too far away from each other
21 notes Ā· View notes
skrunksthatwunk Ā· 7 months ago
Text
misguided angel / angel mine for your kuwameshi consideration
Tumblr media Tumblr media
8 notes Ā· View notes
liedownquisition Ā· 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
I'm so tired.
Bonus meme under cut:
Tumblr media
This is both for him in general (or at least the fanon version dominating fics) and extra for him as Robin specifically tbh. Let him grow up and find an identity outside of being Bruce's emotional support child. It's not like it's actually helping anymore anyways.
#I really minimized the fanon Tim things in there.#Not the least of which including making their age difference wider so Jason can angst over beating up ā€œa kidā€ despite only being 2 yrs apar#Overemphasizing Tim's ā€œgeniusā€ and making Jason stupid & incompetent & everything he does is wrong#Skewed interpretations of the emotional & moral conflict in UTRH/between Jason & Bruce that somehow Tim fixes#Ceo Tim Drake ā€œboohoo Dick wouldn't believe me that Bruce was alive (tho I never actually gave him my evidence abt that)ā€#WHICH FOR THE RECORD EVEN TIM HAD DOUBTS ABOUT HE JUST HAD TO BELIEVE OR ELSE HE'D FALL APART.#LIKE THE ENTIRETY OF RED ROBIN IS STRUCTURED TO CAST DOUBT ON TIM'S JUDGEMENT THE WHOLE TIME.#ITS NOT LIKE THIS KID DOESNT FAMOUSLY HAVE A HISTORY OF NOT TAKING GRIEF WELL. GESTURES AT THE FAILED SUPERBOY CLONES.#Sidenote I saw a post about ignoring that Tim was a sexist earlier on in his comics & tbh I think youre only allowed to do that if you dont#Woobify him. Like if you want to ignore that but overfocus on every bad thing ppl have done to him then fuck off#Also have you considered that him being sexist but growing out of it is a POSITIVE CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT ARC that could be interesting?#Wally for example had some really bigoted views bcs of how he was raised but grew out of & its why I always loved him#Frankly if you want to talk about Jason doing unforgivable injuries on the younger kids let's go to Battle for the Cowl#But then you'd have to scknowledge bad (worse) things happened to Damian too & Timmy isn't special now wouldn't you?#Look I'm not asking for every goddamned fic to be comics accurate but can we just not commit character assassination so consistently#That it's fucking impossible to find fic that *isnt* like that?#Fuck I don't even understand how people find this version of Tim engaging. It's funny for memes but an actual plot?#Managed to switch my ā€œI think Tim is a little boring (neutral to affectionate)ā€ to ā€œI think Tim makes things boring (derogatory)ā€
9 notes Ā· View notes
thereareeyesinsidethetrees Ā· 8 months ago
Text
last post for the night i swear
the real tragic part about the whole science fair incident is that perpetual motion is impossible to achieve
fordā€™s machine would have never worked, regardless of whether or not stan had interacted with it
(warning i accidentally wrote an approximately 30-tag dive into fordā€™s character in the tags donā€™t click see more if you donā€™t want to read that)
anyway!! good night everyone ā¤ļøā€šŸ©¹
#itā€™s also tragic because ford didnā€™t know#the impossibility of perpetual motion was discovered far before that point and yet he didnā€™t know#i mean. ā€˜heā€™s actually just so arrogant that he thought he could break the laws of physicsā€™ doesnā€™t make any sense#his reaction to the situation really didnā€™t match that interpretation as far as i can tell#i donā€™t think itā€™s just a ā€˜oh no! my dream school (that i was essentially shoved into pursuing)!ā€™ type deal#hereā€™s what iā€™m thinking:#fact one- stan and ford were seemingly already drifting apart by this point in time. this is important to note#fact two- itā€™s really emphasized to him that heā€™s smart. thatā€™s all they say about him really- thatā€™s heā€™s a genius#fact three- filbrick does not even care enough about stanford to say his name. he calls ford his ā€˜ticket out of this dumpā€™#these last two points were likely heavily emphasized to him throughout his childhood#filbrick found out ford was smart and thought stan wasnā€™t. so ford became his plan to make money#ford is heavily bullied for his weirdness. his hands and his interests. being smart could ā€˜make upā€™ for this in his mind#he wants to leave. he outright states this- he doesnā€™t feel like he belongs and he wants to go somewhere he does (his own bermuda triangle)#so what essentially happened- i believe- is that ford internalized all these things#that his weirdness is bad and that he makes up for it by being smart and that heā€™s meant to make his family money-#-and that he wants out#his machine fails. this is a slap in the face to him. perpetual motion is impossible?#but why didnā€™t he know that? heā€™s supposed to be smart isnā€™t he? if he isnā€™t smart then what the hell is he?#what redeeming qualities does he have? how is he supposed to help his family now? heā€™s a failure isnā€™t he?#he spots a familiar bag. stan was here. suddenly he has an excuse- a reason to believe it wasnā€™t his fault#(and thereā€™s really nothing to be at fault for but he doesnā€™t think that)#itā€™s easier to blame it on stan because of how distant theyā€™ve grown. he canā€™t read stan as easily#and his reaction is suspicious- did he actually sabotage the project? is itļæ½ļæ½actually not fordā€™s fault at all?#they donā€™t speak to each other again for another decade#stan because heā€™s afraid of rejection#ford because he doesnā€™t want to face his own insecurities and emotions about everything#itā€™s easier to pretend that he wants to be famous and isnā€™t just doing it to make it his father money#and itā€™s easier to distract himself with things he loves than to feel all the guilt and hurt and frustration#and that. is perfect for bill to use to manipulate him#thatā€™s my thoughts anyway. sorry for the rant was not expecting that to happen
10 notes Ā· View notes
healingheartdogs Ā· 8 days ago
Text
Saw a post earlier of someone being like "see how my puppy isn't bothering me while I eat and is minding his own business playing in the other room? That's because in this house animals aren't ever allowed to have people food from the moment they come home with me so they never even learn to want it." The post and most of the comments on it were very high and mighty "I'm a better owner than other people, I'm the boss of my dog, I don't allow my dog to offend me by showing desire for highly desirable resources" attitude and were very much judging other people for not having the same boundaries and annoyances about dog behaviors around food with their own dogs in their own homes and I just like... absolutely can not relate at all, tbh. There is a type of person who uses phrases like "people food" unironically, thinks that dogs being allowed to have good things that are usually intended for humans is somehow offensive and wrong, gets annoyed by a dog even being allowed to exist in the same room when people are eating, and thinks a dog just looking at them for more than 30 seconds while they have food or hanging out watching them doing stuff is the dog bothering them and being rude, and every time I encounter this type of person it makes me wonder why they even own a dog when they clearly hate natural dog behaviors and are bothered by dogs just wanting to be around people, do things with them, and receive human attention more than once in a blue moon.
When I make breakfast after I wake up and take it to my room to eat Hermes always eagerly follows right behind me because he expects he's going to get something from me. That expectation is almost always correct, and I feel absolutely zero shame about it. Him laying calmly at my feet or next to my chair quietly watching me eat is not "bothering me". He's quite literally not doing anything to be a bother, he's just patiently chilling. If a dog hanging out nearby and calmly watching while people eat bothers you enough to consider that bad nosey behavior that is deserving of you ridiculing other dog owners for allowing it that's uhhh... weird af? At least to me it's weird, sorry not sorry. Like maybe you actually just don't like having dogs around then if they can bother you without even really doing anything? Cuz IDK about y'all but I love my dogs hanging around me and wanting to be close to me and even seeking engagement from me. I love them being excited about being around me and following me around because they know I give them good things. I also like having their attention and eyes on me in general - especially Hermes, as a dog of a breed that is often more environmentally focused than handler focused and whose attention I've had to work for and earn. Looking at me is something that I specifically reward all my dogs for and immediately start to capture during their initial introductions to clicker training because I find it to be beneficial during training sessions (as well as a good way to charge the clicker), so it would be ridiculous and unfair for me to get annoyed by it and discourage it in other scenarios like when I'm eating. In fact, I see Hermes calmly laying down nearby and politely seeking eye contact with me whenever I look his way while I'm eating my breakfast as a sign that he knows how to act to get what he wants because he understands his training well, and that he is putting that training to work by being an attentive calm good boy and waiting patiently for me to respect my end of the deal that I have taught him and give him his reward for the behaviors he's offering that I have repeatedly asked him for in the past.
Also like... if he is in the way somehow while people are eating or if we're eating something he can't have and I don't want him near us just in case someone drops something (even though he has an extremely solid leave it, still better safe than sorry) then I just tell him to go to his bed??? and then share a little bite of my food with him to reward him for going to lay on his bed if it's safe or give him something else like a couple of small dog treats or a pork chew on his bed if my food isn't dog safe. After that he will stay on his bed and keep being a calm patient boy because he's learned that staying on his bed after being told to go to it means he will continue to occasionally get more treats or small pieces of my dog safe food tossed to him for the duration of his time there until he is released. Often times because he's working so hard to be calm and patient to earn a few bites of my food he just ends up falling asleep next to me or on his bed, which is definitely the opposite of being bothersome. I like to thank him for that patience and calmness by gently waking him up to share the last bite of my food or give him a little treat jackpot and some praise before releasing him.
Maybe I'm a "bad" trainer (lol) but I enjoy spoiling my dogs by sharing some of my dog safe "people food" with them in moderation, and you can definitely share "people food" with dogs without making them annoying or untrustworthy around food. Despite what the person who made that post seems to incorrectly think, simply letting a dog have a taste of "people food" sometimes does not create unwanted bothersome behaviors around food. Rewarding unwanted behaviors that bother you instead of wanted behaviors that don't bother you is what causes that. That's it, that's the sole cause. Like... you could just only share food with them if they're being calm or waiting patiently on their bed or whatever it is you want from them during meal times. Boom, the "bothering" problem is solved and your dog still gets to enjoy a special treat. In fact, my experience as a dog trainer is that the high value and novelty of that special "people food" treat often makes the rewarding of the not-bothering behavior you want from them while you eat much more motivating and effective than giving them one of their regular treats or chews as a reward or distraction, so the settling down not-bothering behavior you want is even more likely to be consistently freely offered up in the future since it is so highly rewarded.
When I've had clients in the past express concerns about causing begging by giving their dogs "people food" or tell me they feel guilty about it because they've been told by people like that poster I saw that it's a bad thing to do in general, this has been my advice to them - not to stop doing the whole sharing thing that makes them and their dog happy, but just to make it more productive for the kind of relationship they want to have with their dog and the behaviors they are wanting to see. It's a simple solution that can turn a meal into a nearly effortless high value training session for teaching settling during household activities and around food, which is something that is a common frustration to achieve for a lot of inexperienced dog owners. If you handle your dogs sometimes being given bits of food scraps as treats this way then everyone wins, especially the people who like to spoil their dogs and share food with them (which is VERY NORMAL TO WANT TO DO BECAUSE WE ARE A SOCIAL SPECIES THAT BONDS THROUGH RESOURCE SHARING) because now those people can turn that desire to spoil their beloved companions into some easy training. Just be sure to consider if ingredients are dog safe or not and be mindful of oversharing and sharing foods with high fat content because maintaining a balanced diet is important for health.
Also that OP apparently doesn't realize this yet based on the wording of their post, but if you have a dog that is at all decently food motivated then just ignoring them while you have food and never sharing is not going to teach them to leave people alone in the presence of food and never try to seek food from anyone. This is especially true if anyone ever accidentally drops something around your dog (it'll happen eventually) and they snag it and self reward because you never actually taught them not to do that, or if anyone else in your house isn't as firm with that boundary or is unable to enforce it consistently and ends up giving them food purposefully or accidentally (as can often happen in households with children or that sometimes invite guests over). "I don't ever share people food with animals in my house starting from day one and I ignore them when food is out so they never learn to even want it to begin with" is not training your dog to leave food or people who are eating food alone. That's doing nothing and hoping that your new puppy or dog doesn't care about the delicious smells of food or people gathering together in the house for food related activities multiple times a day enough that they will quickly get bored and give up on trying to investigate all "people food" related activities for the rest of their lives without you training them, which is an absolutely ridiculous expectation. Just not ever giving a dog any of your food doesn't make it stop smelling like food to them and won't magically make them never be curious about seeing what you have and if they can get some of it. They don't have to be given food by you off your plate to know that it smells interesting or to figure out that seeing you eating it means it might be something they can eat. Having a superiority complex about NOT actually training your new puppy how to act around food and ignoring them as "training" instead is certainly funny, in a "not funny haha, funny weird" kind of way. It's also pretty irresponsible since some foods that humans eat are dangerous to dogs. Instead of just ignoring them when food is around and hoping they'll learn to leave all food that isn't their dog food alone on their own, a responsible owner should actually be actively teaching their dogs to leave food in general alone unless it is offered to them, even when food is left where they can easily get to it.
Anyway, if people could just stop being weird about dogs doing normal dog things and existing in spaces around humans, do some basic research on dog behavior and how dogs learn before getting a dog, actually train their dogs to the minimum level required to make themselves not be regularly upset at their dogs for acting untrained and "bothering" them, and stop developing weird superiority complexes because they get lucky for a while right after bringing home a new dog or puppy and it manages to not cause them any problems or upset them yet... that would be cool.
#sorry just ranting#long post#sometimes uniquely good dogs make bad owners feel like uniquely good owners#when they are in fact not uniquely good owners at all and just have a very intelligent and adaptable and forgiving dog#... or just an easily distracted puppy who cares more about his new toys right now than begging for food or eating the carpet lol#having an easy dog doesn't make someone a better owner or more educated than anyone else#all it means is they have an easy dog#or even a dog that just happens to be easy so far for whatever reason and will not necessarily continue to be easy in the future#superiority complexes in dog ownership and dog training make bad owners and bad trainers and insufferable people to be around#confusing being lucky with being educated or skilled is how egotistical owners who refuse to ever be wrong are made#and when those kinds of owners encounter dogs or situations that aren't easy they make dogs suffer for it#because they can't be wrong so that means the dog is always wrong and therefore the dog must be corrected of their wrongness#the amount of times I have seen that exact scenario play out in front of me even with people who would claim to be experienced trainers...#so many unnecessary corrections given to dogs who are trying but are confused and stressed because their owners don't know wtf they're doin#and don't know how to teach any dog who isn't uniquely easy and intelligent and adaptable like that one dog they had at some point is/was#wonder how that poster will feel in a few months#when their new puppy isn't as easily distracted by anything and everything that they give him to play with or chew on#and starts acting like a teenager with his own sometimes annoying and destructive teenage dog interests#and stops being an incidentally super obedient baby who doesn't really get into trouble yet despite lack of training#baby puppies of biddable breeds will have even the most incompetent owners thinking dog ownership is a cake walk lol#at least for the first 5-9 months - depending on how fast their individual brain starts developing capacity for teenage shenanigans#Hermes would have much rather played with his toys by himself than sit around begging us for food when he was a baby too#and then one day his brain developed enough to realize things existed in the house other than his toys and treat puzzles#and suddenly keeping himself busy with toys became a lot less satisfying for him and managing him stopped being so easy for us#that's just how it goes with babies#one day they wake up mentally#and then you actually have to teach them things so that they don't teach themselves things that you don't want them to learn instead#or you get unlucky and your baby is a little genius from the very start who uses their brain primarily for evil like Eevee lol#to be clear she was still a VERY easy puppy to me lol just so dang smart and aware of everything from the first day we got her home#so she started teaching herself inconvenient things and finding troublesome ways to entertain herself before I expected her to
3 notes Ā· View notes
leori-the-unlearned Ā· 28 days ago
Text
the problem with (mostly children-aimed) media friendships having these grand gestures and deep friendships most of the time is, if a lonely childā€™s only knowledge of friendship shines through the portrayals of grand gestures and huge generosity and unconventional tolerance - they wonā€™t recognize friendship as it starts meekly, or friendship when it is subtle. they wonā€™t be able to light the match and start the fire without kerosene and a torch, and once they leave this warm safe place with tools, they will be lonelier still.
the same vein as ā€˜media that presents the human experienceā€™, drawing characters with asymmetry and crooked teeth and such because real people are like that and itā€™s normal, having media that can show the disappointing parts of life as something that still happens even if something goes great. not like a deep dramatic swandive into hazard or loss, but a simple disappointment, dissatisfaction.
#media is certainly entertainment still but it does not have to be tales of grandeur#and it is no fault of showwriters (nor their responsibility) that children get wrong impressions about things#but to potentially reach the excessively online/excessive readers who donā€™t nearly enough get nice time with people irl#and show them ā€˜its not always going to be nice. but it will be important and you would miss it if it was gone so it does mean somethingā€™#ā€™you will be disappointed and not always happy with someone. you wont always act for each others best interest.#but that does not mean you cannot care about each other. it does not prove they dont care about you.ā€™#also going to call up the genre of posts about ā€˜what if the hero DIDNT make the sacrifice. the hero matters tooā€™#you have to one-up the previous. and that means not just giving up a reward or your sword or the glory#but your life. your being. experiencing new and exquisite forms of torture to prove your heroā€™s character and value#and the problem being - that if your hero is to be a role model to someone; and also commended for effectively committing suicide;#that if that happens every time and someone eats that up they NEED to counterbalance that#this may not be widespread but hey. if it doesnt apply. ignore it#i read too many books as a child and the one about the dog who just wanted to be good irreversibly infected me. so now im weird#it was mcgrowl by the way. the dog that goes through a messed up malpractice surgery that replaces#all his bones with metal and then he gets magnetized into a power plant and walks out with superpowers and genius intelligence and telepath
3 notes Ā· View notes