#underverse theory

[burningarsenic]

So are we just not talking about the post-credit scene in Underverse 0.7 part 2? Am i tripping or is that foreshadowing Geno's descent into Error? Especially with the "I wonder if this is really the happy ending i was hoping for"

[temfling]

First Look at UNDERTALE, the film where no one has to die, coming 2025.

critics have dubbed the movie “Homestuck but bad”, and one fan claims to have “watched the entire DELTARUNE show for nothing.”

Jack Black said in an interview by TMZ, “it was an honor working with Toby again. Though Weird Al called him Radiation or something and that really ticked him off.”

The film will reportedly have multiple endings, and a post credit scene for DELTARUNE season 3 and 4.

[hes-a-plant]

I have a theory of where season 3 of Doctor who is headed.

So, y’know how the past two seasons have had the secondary theme of storytelling, where characters keep breaking the fourth wall and the Doctor is continually alluded to as being a storyteller?

In the Reality War, we again talk about the under-universe, which I think is where we’ll find all of the characters who have disappeared saying “come find me” (Rogue, Helen Pye, maybe Susan).

We also learn that the Underverse has one crucial quality: it is a “world of legend”.

It is a “world of legend” so powerful that it is able to make the stories about Omega being a giant monster true.

I think that in season 3, we’ll find out that:

Rogue and the other missing persons are in the underverse

The underverse has something to do with these weird changes in reality. Maybe the doctor is a storyteller because people think of him as such. Maybe this is why he is able to break the fourth wall.

The last 15 minutes of reality war made absolutely no sense. All of Belinda’s past was rewritten simply because the Doctor wanted Poppy to be alive. Why is the past this flexible? The Doctor is currently in the Underverse and is bending reality to his will (without realizing it). He may have just gotten there, or he may have been there for quite a long time.

[fferthe]

ENTRY NUMBER ELEVEN.

Who are they?

Note: It's not X!Kris and it's not XI, as many have mistakenly assumed. XI is not canon and was simply a joke that went on for a bit too long, everything related to XI has been taken down. As for the former, there's no such thing as XTale Kris and Jakei had to repeatedly correct people due to the misconception.

Their attire is very atypical for a child their age, they have a purple necklace of ambiguous shape, and seem to have at least a half of XGaster's SOUL, judging by their pupils. While it's possible for XGaster to create an artificial SOUL of a red trait, the same cannot be said for his own trait. And they couldn't have had the SOUL itself (or even a part of it) in their possession at any point during XTale. The glimpse we get of them is from the future. However, given the lines "GET READY" and" YOUR TIME IS COMING", it must mean that they've already existed by that point in some shape or form, albeit soulless.

It must've been created prior to timeline IX and saved to the infamous 'data compilation' for later use.

And yes, created. Their hair don't match anyone's, although X!Chara comes very close. It's unlikely that he OVEWROTE someone. Despite XGaster's intimidation last episode, X!Chara would only be used as a puppet at best. Same goes for X!Frisk.

Thanks to his shenanigans, we know that a human body can contain a SOUL of another human within it. This cohabitation reflects in the subject's appearance.

But what happens when a monster's SOUL is tied to a human body? See, the wording here is quite interesting. With the SOUL and body of a monster. Does it entail that other combinations are viable? Well, from what I'm seeing, they must be. Now, the question stands: for what grand purpose were they created? And why do they share a SOUL with XGaster? Perplexed by their outfit, I had an epiphany.

They have his SOUL, his outfit—it's like they serve to be his vessel. The line "AS CLEAR AS A REFLECTION IN A MIRROR" also gives me that idea. It may simply be an expression, but that's quite uncharacteristic of him, even though he tends to be cryptic about things. There could be more to it than meets the eye.

Y'know, no matter how unpleasant something may be, XGaster is always willing to sacrifice his and others' comfort for the 'bright future'. We've seen what lengths he would go to when chasing his visions. What if the 'perfect world' required him to abandon his current shell and don human flesh? He'd comply. What if he intended to replace Frisk, the 'player' of that world?

This bit can be taken as a callback to the fact that he tried to off himself back in timeline 0 and is still in immense pain as shown in 0.7-2..

Or as reincarnation. And after looking around, turns out that there's also a secret in the 2 black frames that come after this sequence!

By tweaking the brightness and contrast, you see a very fuzzy silhouette. Well, isn't that interesting?

Also, fun fact, if you speed up the entry clip by 666%, you'll get this theme.

The theme plays at 27:50 during entry 19.

And I might be going coocoo at this point, but hear me out on this one.

XGaster's birthday is on 11/11. The entry is number 11. This gotta count for something, right? There are 11 videos in the XTale playlist, so his might as well be considered 11th. Matches up with his birthday date, doesn't it?

Anyways thanks for coming to my ted talk

[zu-is-here]

I feel weird knowing about the Cross trans allegory and also remembering the fact that the culmination of fan-works depicting Cross’ original outfit tread and signature scar was erased back to “original template” by XGaster.

(´；ω；`)★

[darkmuffinstudios]

Making this for the watch later hehehehe (WILL FILL OUT AND POST HERE AFTERWARDS!! I’ll be sure to tag it as spoilers haha)

[xmyheart-hope2dye]

I had a crazy thought

Hear me out-

If Cross is just a different version of Swap (kind of), why’s his magic purple? Swap’s magic is blue. But you can only get purple from blue if you mix it with red or pink.

Also, Cross is very… temperamental. And a crybaby, but mostly just an angry boi.

So, if he’s supposed to be Swap, that doesn’t really make sense. Nightmare and Dream make sense since they’re only modeled physically after Swap, which has nothing to do with their personalities.

The only other Sans in the multiverse that’s extremely easy to tick off… is Red/Fell. What I’m saying is… is Cross a mix of Swap and Red?

And, yeah, with the pink thing he could easily be mixed with Sugarplum (Lust!Sans), but that makes no sense.

I’m most definitely sleep deprived, so my theory is really weird, but it makes sense to me rn (it’s 3 in the morning). I never watched all of the animations from before Underverse, but I watched enough to get a better grasp at what happened and why Cross and X Chara were sharing a body.

But, yeah, seriously, I can see Cross also being a variant of Red, mostly because that’s the first AU he went to to “rebuild” his home (if I remember correctly).

[crosshighvoltage]

HAPPY BIRTHDAY CROSS - Hybrid Theory Album Cover Fanart with Cross

Cross Sans belongs to Jael Penaloza

[1nkym00nz11]

DAY 3 OF INKTOBER

yessss! Inksans is a cutie patootie I swear to god 💀

also I’m doing goretober and sheesh my stuff is creepy!

[lover-of-skellies]

Alright, so. Nightmare is made of goop. We know this. If the animation of the goop and his body structure in Underverse is anything to go by, the goop is a thick, viscous fluid (?) of sorts

In theory, does that mean it has a boiling temperature/point? Could he evaporate if left in a high enough temperature environment for too long? If he's boiled down and water was added, would it change the consistency of the goop, or would the two refuse to mix, like oil with water? If the goop was watered down enough, could it be safely consumed? What if I froze it and wanted to eat it like a popsicle or ice cream?

[intuitive-revelations]

Omega's deformed, skeletal appearance in The Reality War kinda gave off yssgaroth vibes. Considering also the whole bone aesthetic going on in that place and those people permanently connected into some digital consciousness, feels like there should be potential for war in heaven/faction paradox/remote canonwelding in there?

Anon, no kidding, I was literally just watching reaction videos for that episode and had exactly the same idea when I thought about his huge size and the fangs he seemed to have. I literally thought that he looked like a Great Vampire or something.

[Warning - A lot of fanon-weldy BS below:]

I feel you could even make a compelling theory that the "Underverse" is actually the Spiral Yssgaroth, and that by ripping open the Web of Time, the Rani was actually creating more tears into that universe.

It's worth nothing there's a historical connection there, given that Omega originally fell into a black hole experiment, while the Vampires were released from one. Not to mention, the Doctor actually ends up banishing Yssgaroth?Omega with the power of billions of supernovae, presumably powered by the Eye of Harmony.

Combine this theory with the retcon regarding Omega's banishment, and it starts to feel a bit like Rassilon somehow retroactively transferred all these legends, myths, and truths about himself to Omega instead, doesn't it? Being a despot, banished by his kin, a secret vampire...? We even see a Seal of Rassilon be symbolically transformed into a Seal of Omega in the episode!

(Plus this happens in an episode where we get a weird twist on Time Lord sterility, something which was originally a consequence of the Intuitive Revelation, led by Rassilon, though including Omega and others. And this isn't even mentioning the obvious Magic vs Science themes of this whole era, and how that relates to the revolution and Rassilon's changing of the laws of physics following Omega's loss.)

Maybe as part of his actions as the Great Grey Eminence and/or during the Time War, Rassilon did something to rewrite his own history and scapegoat Omega for all his own sins? Note that the Eminence's changes also ended up erasing/delaying Romana's presidency and cancelling out the events of Lungbarrow, which of course connects to the big sterility question. On the Romana point, potentially we could even connect it to Omega's return in Intervention Earth, which was referenced in the previous episode, despite having been erased from the timeline along with Trey's presidency (plus you could add the theory that Trey IS Romana III of the EDAs, and that erased timeline is connected to / part of the War in Heaven)?

Heck, you could almost even connect it with the stuff with Rassilon in the Time Lord Victorious storyline, where we seemingly meet a female incarnation of Rassilon during the Eternal War, implied to have been part of some great secret of his. This could just be the gender thing and how that interacted with the Pythian / Post-Revelation gender role switch, but it becomes even more interesting when you consider that stories like Cat's Cradle: Time's Crucible are pretty dependent on Rassilon being a (almost certainly cis-)male, and the comic's events seemingly predated the "official" introduction of regeneration, and combine that with the origins of regeneration either being taken from the Timeless Child or based on Vampire abilities.

Then combine THAT with @aristidetwain's "Child-That-Was-Taken" idea, that the Timeless Child's universe WAS the Spiral Yssgaroth, and the similar purple hues of the reality fissures and the portal the Timeless Child was found under, and it all starts coming together, doesn't it?

Anyway, I'm really getting away from myself. To answer your other point, the Bone Beasts 100% feel thematically connected with Faction Paradox, and kinda work if you think about the paradoxical nature of two realities connecting. You could almost imagine the Faction's masks as being partially symbolic of a sort of triumph over such forces that would try to untangle such a reality.

We also got the Bone Palace, which may or may not have been part of the TARDIS all along? I don't think it was clear whether the TARDIS was just embedded into it or transformed into it, but if the latter then it very much rhymes with the Edifice, doesn't it?

[funnycreatortimetravel]

Small rant about Sans' character that no one is ever going to read and is probably kind of inaccurate, but I'm going to scream into the void nonetheless because why the hell not and I'm kind of bored.

I feel like the concept of Sans as a whole has been so utterly gutted by the fandom and not in the way you'd think. Not because of the AUs which are all so oddly Sans-focused (but at least we have Underverse which is fairly decent) but in the sense of the people who claim to "actually understand Sans canonically" and "try to stay as canon as possible" while also equally missing the point sort of. Hence, why we have this long and overplayed image I'm sure everyone has seen a billion times:

If I could lay some groundwork down, Undertale came out in 2015, nearly a decade ago. The internet was a different time and place then and fandom creativity reached new peaks that no one had ever seen before, and as a result, a lot of Undertale was exaggerated, changed, cut up, and then put back together. Why? Because in all honesty, Undertale was a really simple game with a simple premise. Sure there were bits and pieces scattered throughout, parts like who Gaster was, who Chara was when they were alive, who Sans is in general; all the typical fandom theory shenanigans we've come to expect in the recent years. And in that excitement, Sans became the staple of Undertale pretty much, or at least everything it represented. This macabre, yet adorably misleading game with funny moments and interesting think pieces that people are still speculating about. That's pretty much the basis of Sans. So I get why Sans became the quintessential poster child for such a subversively ambitious game. I get why, then, people try to showcase Sans as this badass God character who knows and remembers all of resets and cries over Papyrus and is just an edge lord in general. It doesn't mean it's accurate in the slightest, but I get the idea of it nonetheless. In the absence of content, and there's a lot of it in Undertale, (I mean, it took me 4 hours to 100% it in the Pacifist and Neutral Routes, and 5 hours to beat Genocide, including the times it took me to beat Undyne because she thoroughly kicked my ass and Sans as well) the fans filled those gaps with what they saw fit and what they saw fit was so wide and diverse that the gap overflowed and the game pretty much became unrecognizable.

And I (except for the truly questionable and gross stuff, you know what I'm talking about) love the fandom for that, I truly do. Just the sheer number of comics, spin-off games, AUs, art, and fanfiction that answered every question I had and more was and is impressive, but even so, there's only so much that can be done with the context Undertale provides us before the content gets...stale. Hence my point on why Sans' character was so exaggerated is because Undertale as a whole had been exaggerated and oversaturated and overplayed and generally...not what the game or Sans was originally. But that was peak 2016-2019, though, a few years ago. And the interpretations and eras, like everything, have changed.

Now back to my actual point. It's now 2024. The fandom has noticeably slowed down. All of the AUs and theories and fanfictions that were popular have either been forgotten about over the years, randomly rediscovered or still ongoing, or just abandoned entirely. The game has been pretty much combed through until every file has been cracked, every document leaked, and every secret discovered. It's like a picked over turkey at this point and a lot of the old creators have indeed left behind the game in pursuit of newer things, which is understandable. It's not the center of attention it once was and in that wake, we don't really have a lot of the same pillars in the Undertale community that we used to. And in this transformed community, we have the left over children, now young adults and teenagers, to pick up the pieces. And in that, Sans' character, as well as Undertale itself, has again, been reformed.

That was a lot of words. But I hope I at least set the center stage. My issue, pretty much, is that the leftover fans deem themselves as "above the cringe" the old fandom left behind, which, is fair enough. And in doing so, a lot of the foundation of the 2016-2019 Undertale fandom was kind of overwritten. No, now Sans is no longer this edgy, overpowered God figure ready to right the wrongs of the player, no, now he's this apathetic guy who doesn't care about anyone, including himself, and is only powerful because he cheated. And to be fair, I see some merit in this interpretation. Sans is in fact, a pretty morally ambiguous guy. He doesn't even attempt to stop the player during the genocide route until there's nothing left. He threatens the player on the pacifist route even when we pose no threat. He makes so many allusions about himself not caring about anything. So I get it. Everyone is tired of everything Sans-related. I was too at one point. But in trying to counteract this fanon interpretation of Sans, I feel like this new one is also semi-inaccurate. This new interpretation of Sans is meant to be seen as "mature" and "not cringe" when in fact, Undertale is and always will be sort of cringe. And that's OK! That's why I and others love the game so much, because it's not afraid of being anything other than what it is and what it claimed to be. It had a story in mind that it wanted to tell and it did so unabashedly. The need to separate Undertale and Sans itself from the cringe is so pointless and almost a little juvenile. And imo, even ruins the character of Sans himself.

Sans does care about Papyrus, so so so much. He reads him bedtime stories. He plays along with his illusions of grandeur. He calls out the player when he's killed, despite Sans having to remain objective as a judge. I feel like Sans not intervening in Papyrus' death isn't because he doesn't care, it's because his entire job is to act as a judge and in a position where he's mostly neutral. He knows the player has powers to redo and undo things, so thus, he gives us room to make those choices, for better or worse. He's like, the anti-toriel. He refuses to hold your hand. He tells YOU to make the right choice, and by you, I mean the player. And in that sense, I feel like that's not something a completely apathetic guy would do. Someone like that wouldn't even see the point of choices, of having an option. Someone like that wouldn't care about getting out of bed in the morning, getting several jobs, or telling a person with higher power to just engage with your brother.

Like come on, don't say he doesn't put effort into anything, like he went out of his way to make sure Pap's Holiday party went perfect. He's constantly going above and beyond for his brother.

Sans has emotions and they're so complex and so well-written, but I feel like this counter-cringe culture of the fandom wants him to be this guy who's either too depressed or too lazy to engage with others, or someone who would simply shrug off the death of loved ones when we have proof that Sans does indeed try hard for Papyrus in the ending where everyone dies but his brother. It's an "oh shit" sort of moment when he realizes that Papyrus is the only person he has left and thus, he puts in the effort to be better for him. It's not that he doesn't care or see the point, he's just kind of numb at this point. If Papyrus dies in the neutral routes, you don't see Sans again until the judgment hall and he'll call you a dirty brother killer and tell you to go to hell. That's something someone who at least cares a little would do. He's not above insulting the player and he's not above getting pissed. I've never really seen him as a, "well that's that then," character when it comes to Papyrus dying, for me, it's always been, "I'm angry, but I can maintain my composure and still do what I have to do."

Even in the genocide routes, Sans wants to give up and do nothing. He wants to let himself die without much thought. But he knows that he has to stand between you and oblivion. It's another, "Oh shit" moment, but in the opposite way. He knows he's gonna die. But he still has hope. Not necessarily that you'll be a good person, but that you can try another way and make better choices. He embodies the same mentality Papyrus did at the beginning of the run, believing there's a better chance for another future where everyone can be happy.

Sans isn't a nihilist, not all the way. There's still a chance, still a part of him that has hope for everything, regardless of the route. And should the Pacifist route be completed, you'll see that he's genuinely happy. He DOES care, or at least he's beginning to know that caring about things is ok and healthy even.

Ex 1: If you go to Sans' lab after completing a True Pacifist Route, you get this bit of dialog:

Ex 2: Sans and Papyrus talking about a Christmas party they had on the Newsletter of the 5th Anniversary of Undertale.

The strongest, yet most complex example of this that we see is that he upholds his promise with Toriel and will continue to do so until the genocide route at the very end because he wants to at least give us, the player, a chance. And even if it was a cop-out for being lazy, I believe that Sans legitimately believes there's a chance for us to turn around and be a better person, or at the very least, make better choices. We know that Sans is a person who doesn't like making promises at all, and even though he said that his threatening to kill Frisk is a joke, had he not made that promise to Toriel, I can't 100% say that he still wouldn't intervened in the genocide and neutral routes.

And if you think about it, Sans upholding that promise just makes me question him even more. Like, even if you kill his brother, so long as you don't kill everyone, he won't kill you just because of that. He sticks to his promise and his morals so much, even if it costs him everything because well, what type of judge would he be if he didn't stick to his moral code?

"If you have some special power, don't you think it's your responsibility to do the right thing?"

And by that logic, if he made a promise with someone, don't you think he'd feel he'd have the responsibility to uphold it?

We also know that he makes an effort to give us updates on the Underground after we leave in the neutral routes because he still wants us to know, at least, the consequences of our actions, so it's not like he's just lazily letting us get away with anything with do (even if he does physically.) He still holds our actions above our heads. He still keeps his promise. He still knows that we can make a better outcome. And if that doesn't say anything about him, I don't know what does.

Even in the neutral route endings where things are objectively going terribly for the monsters with Frisk killing Asgore and taking the souls to leave the barrier, Sans still never gives up. Sans, of all people.

And sure, Sans isn't a saint, not by a long shot, but he does have some moral weight in the long run, and by playing the part of a judge, he has a certain level of disattachment that's necessary when it comes to doing his job. Nowadays, I don't see the "fanon" sans that everyone loves to rag on, the one that's overly emotional and jarringly out of character, more so, I see everyone ragging on that interpretation, and then coming up with an equally inaccurate interpretation of Sans just not giving a shit and letting Frisk get away with everything just because he's "not emotional and only wants to be lazy, blah, blah, blah, nihilism, existentialism, it's more canonically accurate, unlike that CRINGE FANON SANS!" /or being a total unserious prankster with no other personality traits, and that's equally as jarring for me.

So in conclusion, I feel like "Fanon" Sans, the one where he's breaking down and sobbing over Papyrus and holding his scarf is just as inaccurate as the "more canon one" where he's apathetic and simply just not caring about his death, or at the very best, says "it is what it is." Sans is a character whose emotions aren't apparent, but he still does care in his weird philosophical way. He loves Papyrus and genuinely thinks he's cool. He's a jokester character who loves a good laugh and being laid back. He doesn't like putting in effort, but he will if he has to. He wants the player to make good choices, so he generally tries to stay out of the way to give us that freedom. Not because he knows we're gonna kill Papyrus, but because he knows we have greater power and wants us to use it to do the morally right thing. He isn't above doing morally grey things either, like threatening to kill Frisk in case they pose a threat to monster kind, but I believe even then, his hesitation to just accept a human in the underground is somewhat understandable given the oppressive tension between humans and monsters. Additionally, he does put in effort when it comes to caring about monsters other than Papyrus, Toriel, and even Alphys and Asgore, he cares about them all: (it's implied that he feeds the amalgamates in Alphy's old lab as proven by the same dog food we see in the lab being in Sans' house and Alphys even calls him a good guy because he helps her in the aborted genocide route ending, him telling jokes to Toriel and genuinely trying to bring some joy in her life even though she's a stranger and doesn't have an obligation to, even staying with her in the Ruins after she's dethroned in the Queen Undyne ending, him acting as the judge before Asgore and even being in such an important position requires you to have a solid sense of morality and conviction, his respect for Undyne as a warrior/leader depending on the ending and in the Undertale Newsletter, he makes an effort to score a goal for his team in Hocky, and Undyne of all people seems proud of him, and pretty much everything that has to do with Papyrus he's at the very least involved or interested in.)

My words don't have a lot of merit. I'm simply saying how I interpret things. But as a big sister, I see Sans as a good big brother who's not too involved, but also deeply cares about his younger brother and his friends. I get that stoicism and being "logical" and "cold" is the new trend and whatnot with all these edits of badass characters and longing for a time when everything was less...emotional, but in doing that, it shuts a lot of discussion about Sans as a person and his complex emotions as a whole. I feel like it's too difficult and kind of silly to chalk him up as either one or the other. I feel like there's a nice middle ground between the "cringe" fanon sans and the "cool, apathetic" canon sans that a lot of fans either go one or the other on. Anyway, that's about it for my rant. It's kind of nonsensical and a little hard to follow, but I hope I was able to get my thoughts across nonetheless.

I guess it was a big rant after all. Oh well. It is what it is.

[thevioletbanquetutmvrp]

What does UTMV Stand for?

UnderTale MultiVerse!

UTMV refers to a range of Undertale/Deltarune (UTDR) fanworks. Not every utdr fanwork counts as utmv, such as if it's intended as an interpretation of canon– what makes them utmv specifically is if a work deliberately takes place in alternate versions of canon, such as alt. timelines (ex: Aftertale by @loverofpiggies), alt. universes (ex: Underfell by @underfell), outcodes (Inktale by @comyet) or crossovers between them (ex: Underverse by @jakei95).

Of course, sometimes it's more ambiguous whether a fanwork counts as an au or not. Because it's not always clear what could be canon-divergent, it just depends sometimes whether the creators associate their work with the utdr multiverse collective.

For example: on one hand, @zarla-s has called Handplates an au because, while supplemented by theories about canon, she likes including personal takes too. On the other, @/undertalethingems values faithfulness to canon and therefore prefers that Unexpected Guests not be counted as utmv.

Granted, utmv isn't the first fandom-in-a-fandom. Other fandoms have also had popular derivatives, such as Project: Eden's Garden, Vast Error and Voyakiloids. Some crossover multiverses are even their own franchises, like Kingdom Hearts and Spiderverse.

In this case, utmv's also a group collaboration within the fandom. Etiquette and permissions still apply, but the overarching lore is built and sustained by the community. Which means, there's always some flexibility, but there's also details that are widely agreed upon or widely debated. There's a list of alternates everyone knows, like the above and more, and some of them have been the foundations of its worldbuilding, such as CORE!Frisk by @dokudoki.

If you don't know where to begin, watching Underverse on Youtube is a good way to get introduced. Some characterizations may be unique to @xtaleunderverse's own canon, but every alternate featured is credited so you can view creators' posts to learn more about them or check for permissions regarding their usage. (You can also go to the pinned post on @utmvarchive, run by me, to look up alternates. This is recommended for aus credited to dead accounts, as utmvarchive was made in an effort to protect them from becoming lost media.)

If you've made it this far, thank you for your patience. If anyone else makes it this far, now's your chance to share some recommendations in the notes for introducing newcomers. You're also welcome to join the server and ask chat, if you'd like.

–mod VV 🐉

[zu-is-here]

Zu, it's pretty "funny" that it's not Cross how broken Killer's arm and ripped off the Fatal's aim, but XGaster who plays to control him and killed him ヽ(；▽；)ノ

Like, seriously he looks at the scene, and he's like "I'm bored of doing nothing, just standing like an idiot far from the town. Oh I know, I'm gonna play with my son. AND because I lost my poor legs, I'm gonna destroy arms." (Evil laughing I suppose) ^(#｀∀´)_Ψ

I'm sure it's a scene cut, XGaster will clearly say that in a nutshell (｡+･`ω･´)

That's it! :'D XGaster's hatred of hands is comical already... (Cross was also cruel to his own hand, and to Error's (in 0.7-1) that might be a reference to the Fatal Error has Occurred comic? ☆)

But it is frustrating that both Killer & Fatal know that Cross is just his puppet so they don't perceive him as a separate person ;3;

Heheh I'm glad to know that you enjoy it nevertheless! (〃ω〃) Hopefully you'll find the series entertaining too cause it's worth it ☆

I love it, all the details. Cross touching his scar. The moment of Error being the "way to escape". Geno and Sans being so close that it may explain Error's affection too... <3

And I really enjoyed others' findings and theories! *^* The meaning of Ink's code. XGaster's fear. Cross losing his cool outfit :'D Sans not being Classic anymore. Geno's words in the post credits scene. Even Crink theory and "toxic yaoi" >:D

Feel free to share yours, I'd love to see more! (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)♪

[t0mboi]

“You wouldn’t do this to an old friend, right?”

I have this sneaky feeling that Xgaster would pull this type of thing after he literally told Ink that he’s no longer apart of their story

Inspired by an old theory (not sure what it’s called, but it’s regarding some glitch images in xtale(?)/underverse)

[letsatomicbanana]

Underverse spoilers (more so theory?), which is related to this post in partícular

(come back)

I presume that this scene is a foreshadowing to what happends after X!Gaster is eventually trown in the void by Ink. The fact that his call is targeted towards Ink and literally nothing and no one else is CRAZY work