#trafficaccidents

[hepworthholzerboise]

Car Accident Claims for Intersection Collisions

If you have recently been involved in an intersection collision, you may feel overwhelmed and unsure of where to turn next. The confusion, frustration, and emotional strain that come with such an experience are common. You may be wondering how to navigate your car accident claim or even whether you are entitled to compensation for your injuries and damages. You are not alone in this, and help is available. At Hepworth Holzer, LLP, we understand how challenging this situation can be. We are here to support you through every step of the legal process and ensure you get the outcome you deserve.

Understanding Intersection Collisions

Intersections are often busy and complex areas where different traffic patterns converge. Whether you're driving through a busy city intersection or a smaller, more rural one, these areas are prone to accidents. Intersection collisions can happen in a variety of ways. They may involve drivers running red lights or stop signs, making illegal turns, or misjudging the speed of oncoming vehicles. When these accidents occur, they can lead to serious injuries, significant vehicle damage, and long-term consequences for those involved.

It's important to understand that these accidents are often not as simple as just one person being at fault. Many factors could contribute to a collision at an intersection, such as road conditions, the behavior of other drivers, and even traffic signals. This complexity can make it more difficult to prove liability and seek the compensation you're entitled to. However, with the right legal guidance, you can have a better chance of navigating this difficult situation successfully.

Common Causes of Intersection Collisions

Several factors contribute to intersection accidents, some of which are within a driver's control, while others are not. Speeding is one of the most common causes of intersection collisions. When drivers fail to adjust their speed to road conditions or traffic signals, they risk causing accidents. Running a red light or stop sign is another frequent cause. Drivers who ignore these signals may cause a crash that could have been avoided.

Distracted driving is also a major issue at intersections. Whether it's texting, talking on the phone, or simply not paying full attention to the road, distractions can lead to accidents. Poor visibility caused by weather conditions, such as fog or rain, can also increase the chances of an intersection collision. In some cases, even malfunctioning traffic signals may play a role in accidents, leaving drivers unaware of the correct course of action.

Proving Fault in Intersection Collisions

One of the most challenging aspects of handling intersection collision claims is determining fault. This is because intersection accidents often involve multiple parties, and understanding who is responsible for the crash can be complicated. For example, a driver may have run a red light, but the other driver may have been speeding or distracted, contributing to the crash.

In order to prove fault in an intersection collision, it’s essential to gather evidence. This may include witness statements, traffic camera footage, and accident reports. Sometimes, the police will determine who is at fault based on the evidence collected at the scene. However, it's important to understand that insurance companies and other parties involved may have different opinions about who is to blame.

When navigating this type of case, you need to work with a legal professional who understands how to investigate and collect the necessary evidence. This will increase your chances of a successful outcome in your case.

Steps to Take After an Intersection Collision

After an intersection collision, it's important to take immediate steps to protect your safety and strengthen your claim. First, check for injuries to yourself and others. If anyone is hurt, call for medical help immediately. Even if you don’t feel injured, it’s wise to seek medical attention because some injuries might not be immediately apparent.

Next, you should contact the police. A police report is essential in determining what happened during the accident and who may be at fault. If possible, take photographs of the accident scene, including vehicle damage, road conditions, and any visible injuries. Collect the contact information of any witnesses, as their statements can be valuable in building your case.

Make sure to exchange insurance information with the other drivers involved. Do not admit fault or apologize at the scene, as this could be used against you later. Once you have gathered the necessary information, you should contact your insurance company to report the accident. Be honest but cautious when speaking with the insurance adjusters. They may try to minimize your claim or shift the blame.

Finally, consider reaching out to a lawyer who can guide you through the next steps. A skilled attorney can help protect your rights and ensure that you are not taken advantage of during the claims process.

Why You Need Legal Help

If you’ve been involved in an intersection collision, it's important to have legal assistance to help you through the claims process. Dealing with the aftermath of an accident can be overwhelming, especially when it comes to understanding how to prove fault, handle medical expenses, and deal with insurance companies.

Without the right legal help, you could find yourself facing mounting medical bills, vehicle repairs, and the emotional toll of the accident. You may also be at risk of accepting a low settlement offer from an insurance company that doesn’t fully cover your losses. This is where an experienced lawyer can make all the difference. They can negotiate with insurance companies on your behalf and help ensure that you receive a fair and just settlement for your injuries and damages.

At the firm, we understand how important it is to get a favorable outcome, and we are here to help you achieve that. We will work tirelessly to gather the necessary evidence, build a strong case, and fight for your rights. Whether you're dealing with insurance companies, negotiating settlements, or even going to trial, we will be by your side every step of the way.

If you've been injured in an intersection collision, don't wait to get the help you need. Time is of the essence when it comes to building a strong case. At Hepworth Holzer, LLP, we are dedicated to helping people like you navigate the complexities of car accident claims and ensuring that you get the compensation you deserve. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and let us help you get the justice you deserve.

[agra24]

आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर भीषण हादसा: दिल्ली के परिवार की दर्दनाक मौत

आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर सोमवार सुबह एक दर्दनाक सड़क हादसे में दिल्ली के उत्तम नगर का एक पूरा परिवार खत्म हो गया। हादसा फतेहाबाद थाना क्षेत्र के 31 किमी के पास हुआ, जब एक हुंडई कार तेज रफ्तार से ट्रक में जा घुसी। घटना का विवरण पुलिस के अनुसार, ओमप्रकाश आर्या (40) अपनी पत्नी पूर्णिमा सिंह (34), 12 वर्षीय बेटी अहाना और 4 वर्षीय बेटे विनायक के साथ प्रयागराज से कुंभ स्नान कर लौट रहे थे। उनकी कार पहले डिवाइडर से टकराई और फिर एक्सप्रेसवे की दूसरी लेन में पहुंच गई, जहां वह एक ट्रक से टकरा गई। टक्कर इतनी जबरदस्त थी कि कार बुरी तरह क्षतिग्रस्त हो गई और मौके पर ही चारों की मौत हो गई। पुलिस की प्रतिक्रिया फतेहाबाद पुलिस स्टेशन के अधिकारियों ने बताया कि मृतकों के शव कार में बुरी तरह फंसे हुए थे, जिन्हें बाहर निकालने के लिए कड़ी मशक्कत करनी पड़ी। पुलिस ने शवों को पोस्टमार्टम के लिए एसएन मेडिकल कॉलेज भेजा और परिजनों को सूचित किया। जाम और राहत कार्य हादसे के बाद एक्सप्रेसवे पर दोनों ओर वाहनों की लंबी कतार लग गई। पुलिस ने क्रेन की मदद से क्षतिग्रस्त वाहनों को हटवाकर यातायात बहाल किया। पिछले हादसों की पड़ताल आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर यह पहला हादसा नहीं है। आंकड़ों के अनुसार, 2023 में इस एक्सप्रेसवे पर कुल 247 दुर्घटनाएं हुईं, जिनमें 98 लोगों की मौत हुई। हादसों के मुख्य कारणों में तेज रफ्तार, चालक का ध्यान भटकना और गलत ओवरटेकिंग शामिल हैं। विशेषज्ञों की राय सड़क सुरक्षा विशेषज्ञों का कहना है कि एक्सप्रेसवे पर तेज गति के कारण वाहन नियंत्रित करना मुश्किल हो जाता है। उन्होंने चेतावनी दी कि ड्राइवरों को थकावट से बचने और निर्धारित गति सीमा का पालन करने पर विशेष ध्यान देना चाहिए। आने वाले कदम स्थानीय प्रशासन और उत्तर प्रदेश एक्सप्रेसवे औद्योगिक विकास प्राधिकरण (UPEIDA) ने सड़क सुरक्षा उपायों को और सख्त बनाने का निर्णय लिया है। इसमें रडार आधारित स्पीड मॉनिटरिंग सिस्टम और आपातकालीन चिकित्सा सेवाओं की तैनाती शामिल है। यह हादसा न केवल एक परिवार के लिए त्रासदी साबित हुआ, बल्कि यह भी दिखाता है कि कैसे सावधानी की कमी बड़ी दुर्घटनाओं का कारण बन सकती है। सड़क सुरक्षा के प्रति जिम्मेदारी निभाना हर चालक की जिम्मेदारी है। Read the full article

[swiftnliftnewsandarticle]

Why are traffic accidents in Nigeria often caused by fuel tanker explosions?

Traffic accidents in Nigeria involving fuel tanker explosions are often attributed to several key factors:

1.Poor Road Conditions: Potholes and inadequate signs abound on many of Nigeria's poorly maintained highways, raising the possibility of collisions involving large vehicles like fuel tankers.

2. Overloading: Especially on uneven roads, fuel tankers are routinely overloaded beyond what is safe. This can cause instability and make it difficult to steer the vehicle.

3. Inadequate Maintenance: Many tanker trucks suffer from irregular maintenance, which can result in mechanical issues that could endanger lives. In trucks that are not well-maintained, problems like brake failure are frequent.

4. Driver Negligence and Fatigue: Certain tanker operators may engage in careless driving practices, like racing or disobeying traffic laws. Furthermore, extended periods of driving without adequate rest might result in driver weariness.

5. Lack of Regulation Enforcement: In Nigeria, regulatory organizations frequently have difficulty upholding the safety requirements for the transportation of hazardous commodities. This may result in disregard for safety procedures.

6. Human error: Errors include misjudging distances, changing lanes improperly, and failing to respond to road conditions adequately. These errors can lead to accidents.

7. Explosion Risks: Fuel tankers transport highly combustible substances. There is a considerable risk of explosion in the event of a collision, which could have disastrous effects.

Addressing these issues requires improved infrastructure, stricter enforcement of safety regulations, better training for drivers, and a comprehensive approach to road safety.

[thecityboy]

A Rant: No Turn on Red (NoTOR) State Pre-Emption

TLDR: The State of Indiana has continuously targeted Indianapolis with state pre-emption policies, especially around transportation. No Turn on Red Policies are good when implemented correctly. This policy will have adverse impacts on living breathing humans as well as society as a whole. Hopefully this will push Indy to implement for significant solutions to solving the pedestrian crash crisis in the city.

Indiana Got Me Big Mad

Today, I had a two-hour period of intense frustration and anger over the usual song and dance that happens here in Indianapolis. To my dismay, I discovered that a state senator had surreptitiously inserted an amendment into Indiana House Bill 1050. The main body of the bill has various legislative changes to policies around cars (defining "alternative fuel", changing vehicle tax policies, etc.). The offending Senate Amendment #5, displayed in big, bold letters:

"A CONSOLIDATED CITY MAY NOT ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF A SIGNPROHIBITNG A TURN DESCRIBED IN [reference to subsection defined earlier in the amendment that says drivers can turn right on a steady red]."

There are a few interesting things of note here:

The policy applies only to "Consolidated Cities". Indianapolis is (I believe) the only consolidated city in the state. This rule would not apply to any other jurisdiction.

This was a response by the senator to the Indianapolis City-County Council's proposal to post signs restricting right turn on red in Downtown Indy, specifically on roads that are designed to move cars quickly. This is a bare-bones pedestrian safety solution, and because the roads cross through downtown and near a major university campus (IUPUI), it's one of the few places in this city that has people walking around.

The State Senator that submitted this amendment is named Aaron Freeman, the representative from Indiana Senate District 32. This district comprises of the southeast corner of Indianapolis (arguably the most rural quadrant of the city) and parts of suburban Greenwood and unincorporated lands south of the city. It is one of, if not the most conservative part of Indianapolis, and (this is just my speculation) provides legitimacy for the State Legislature to impose conservative state pre-emption on a mostly Democrat-represented city. Is this a punishment for the city because of how they vote? Who can say.

Aaron has become something of a transportation villain here in Indy. Before his crusade to preserve the sanctity of the ability to turn right on red (only in Indianapolis), he has also consistently fought against one of IndyGo's proposed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line - the Blue Line. He has done this every legislative session since at least 2019. His main gripe? The Blue Line would have dedicated lanes, removing one or two lanes from the currently SEVEN lane-wide East Washington Street. Dedicated lanes are integral for BRT to operate effectively; transit is not rapid if it's sitting in traffic (generally). But dedicated lanes are Communism; they control the means of production of those lanes for the masses and removes them from the enjoyment of F-150-driving, red blooded, meat-eating, gun-toting traditional families. And for that reason, Aaron cannot allow this injustice to happen quietly. Thankfully for the urbanites of Indy, every strategy Aaron has tried so far has failed to be passed into law. Hopefully it stays that way.

This is not the first case of the State of Indiana pre-empting Indianapolis in a way that relates to transportation, safety, and the built environment. The state passed a ban on funding light rail projects in 2014. A couple sessions ago, they tried to take away zoning control from the City of Indianapolis and give the power to townships; for some reason the township governments still exist in Indiana even though their land is incorporated by a city. It's very dumb way to operate local government, and this was a very dumb proposal, which is why it wasn't adopted. The state has also pre-empted the city from creating its own gun laws, local minimum wage, rent control, paid sick leave requirements, and plastic bag fees.

There are more examples of the atrocious pre-emption Indiana has done, but I want to move onto why this made me so mad; what is No Turn on Red and why is it important?

NoTOR is the Bare Minimum

Not Turn on Red (NoTOR) is a traffic control method that restricts drivers from turning right at red lights. A lot of drivers may find this annoying, but it is an important, easy, and affordable way to reduce pedestrians being hit by cars turning right on red. According to a five-year study examining crashes in Downtown Indy, over half of pedestrian-related crashes were the result of vehicles not yielding to pedestrians at signalized intersections. source. Anecdotally, pedestrian crashes across Indy have continued to rise year-over-year for the past five years. It is truly a crisis.

There is a provision in the amendment that says a driver must stop at a steady red light for 120 seconds before turning right on red. Theoretically, this means drivers should be completely stopped for a period of time that would allow them to see someone crossing on their right. This is also an ignorant safeguard. You might as well tell people not to speed on the highway. Very few people follow this (even the Federal Highway Administration say so) and it is rarely enforced.

The reason so many pedestrians are struck by vehicles turning right on red is a combination of factors:

The design of the intersection. Larger curb radii can allow for cars to take turns faster; lack of crosswalk markings doesn't remind drivers to check for pedestrians; having stop bars too close to where pedestrians cross reduces the amount of time a driver has to look right while crossing.

Driver behavior. On top of a general increase in distracted driving, there is a documented increase in reckless driving from the pandemic, however pedestrian deaths had been increasing even before this. In addition to this recent development, FHWA outlined how drivers really behave when turning right on red: "Motorists are so intent on looking for traffic approaching on their left that they may not be alert to pedestrians on their right. In addition motorists usually pull up into the crosswalk to wait for a gap in traffic, blocking pedestrian crossing movements. In some instances, motorists simply do not come to a full stop."

Vehicles have become larger, placing drivers higher. This obstructs their view, especially of people that may be below their sight lines (like children and people in wheelchairs). It also extends their vehicle's hoods and their bodies, which can inadvertently hit pedestrians, especially on tight urban streets.

Lack of Enforcement. I will be the first to admit that traffic enforcement can be tricky; traffic stops can lead to tragedy very quickly. That being said, the response should not be just not enforcing traffic laws. Two options stand out in my mind: better training for officers around traffic stops and remote enforcement. In a 2021 survey of police analyzed by the Rand Corporation, 42% of responding officers said their department has never provided traffic stop training, and only 6% strongly agree that they have received adequate training for traffic stops involving noncompliant drivers. Remote enforcement is not without its flaws, and requires a deeper dive in another post. In short; red light cameras work as a safety improvement. They reduce more fatal crashes between both vehicles and pedestrians. They can also cause an increase rear-ending by more aggressive drivers and other less life-threatening crashes. But if we have to pick one method over another, we should pick the one where less people are killed or gravely injured. There are issues with equitable placement of cameras, as well as the matter of ticketing drivers for using a roadway in the manner it was designed, rather than what a sign says. If the design of a street network is oriented to the fast movement of vehicles instead of pedestrian safety, drivers are more likely to drive over the posted speed limit and turn right on red without stopping, because that's how the road was designed to be used. Red light cameras have been legislatively prohibited in seven states, and are de facto prohibited in Indiana. Have those entities repealed or prohibited them out of some sort of duty to the low-income drivers that could be adversely affected by remote enforcement? No, it's mostly because drivers complain about having to obey traffic laws to the letter and look at it as a cash grab for cities to generate income (which, honestly, could be partially true). However, repealing red light cameras has been shown to increase traffic deaths, and the selfishness and entitlement of drivers is entirely to blame for that.

Implementation

The Federal Highway Administration has a very helpful page on how to effectively implement NoTOR. Restricting right turns on red is implemented through installing signage, sometimes in combination with a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI), which gives pedestrians a few-second head start to enter the crosswalk before vehicles are given a green light. This is a measure that reduces pedestrians being hit by vehicles that impatiently want to turn right on green. Siting NoTORs appropriately is important. FHWA explicitly says that they should be present in areas with high pedestrian activity (however it does not define what that threshold is, leaving the interpretation open to state and local DOTs). In the case of the Downtown Indianapolis proposal, these signs would have implemented NoTOR on arterial roadways with high traffic volumes in the most pedestrian active region in the city (if not the state). It is more than appropriate to implement this policy. Anecdotally, I have seen NoTOR work. I recently visited Philadelphia and spent pretty much all of my time in Center City, where NoTOR is implemented at almost every intersection. As a pedestrian, it made me feel far safer than I ever did walking around in Downtown Indy.

The Human Cost of NoTOR Prohibition

The prohibition of NoTOR has a devastating impact on human life, as evidenced by the research indicating an increase in serious injury and death when NoTOR is not restricted. But the human toll extends far beyond physical harm. Those who are seriously injured face an array of financial burdens, including medical debt, lost income, and potential job loss. The emotional trauma of a traffic accident can be just as damaging, leaving lasting effects on mental health and quality of life.

The human cost doesn't stop there; being seriously injured can mean being saddled with medical debt, missed work from recovery, losing a job because of recovery or inability to do the work required, loss of income, and permanent changes in health and quality of life. This is on top of the mental trauma of being seriously injured or losing a loved one to a traffic accident.

There were over 3,400 pedestrian deaths in the United States in 2022. In 2021, over 60,000 pedestrians were injured by drivers. Each one of these individuals had a life, a family, and a community that cared about them. Their sudden and violent deaths or injuries leave a permanent scar on the lives of those who knew and loved them. And yet, all of this suffering is caused by a refusal to inconvenience drivers for a few minutes. The State of Indiana and Aaron Freeman seem to place little value on the safety and well-being of pedestrians, prioritizing the convenience of drivers over the lives and health of their fellow citizens. The cost of this callous disregard for human life is simply too high to bear.

At least according to the State of Indiana and Aaron Freeman.

How to Get Around the NoTOR Ban

There are ways that the City of Indianapolis can get around the NoTOR Ban, and it is primarily through intersection and street design improvements.

There are soft infrastructure changes like setting back where cars stop with signs and paint, painting more visible crosswalks, painting street murals, and implementing Leading Pedestrian Intervals signal timing.

There are also hard infrastructure changes like reducing curb radii so drivers have to significantly slow down before turning right. Reducing roadway lanes or lane widths and implementing streetscape improvements like street trees have also been shown to subconsciously cause drives to drive slower because it increases their awareness of other vehicles and obstacles around them.

Zooming out to a network-level view, considerations should be given to more unique approaches to improving pedestrian safety. Implementing mid-block crossings can provide a safer crossing for pedestrians because it reduces the potential points of conflict; drivers won't be pre-occupied with looking left while turning right and pedestrians don't have to look over their shoulders when crossing. All they have to worry about is oncoming traffic. There should also be consideration given to completely eliminating private vehicle traffic entirely from certain portions of downtown.

Conclusion

Although the pre-emption legislation may be exasperating and expected to prolong the unsafe conditions in Indianapolis' busiest pedestrian zones, there is a possibility that it could prompt much-needed infrastructure improvements to enhance pedestrian safety. Over the last three decades, Indianapolis has made significant strides from its former downtown one-way traffic nightmare. However, there is still much more progress to be made in creating a more livable city, and this legislative decision might serve as a motivating force to achieve this goal.

[crossville-accidents]

"Putnam count ranked 10th in Tennessee for vehicle crashes in 2020 with 410 crashes resulting in physical injuries and 11 deaths on roadways." Reference: https://crossvilleattorney.com/putnam-county/

[klikomo]

News | Oct 17, 2024

[usa-journal]

Colorado Motorcyclist Killed After Tire Breaks Off Car on Interstate 25

A tragic accident occurred on Sunday morning in Colorado when a motorcyclist was killed after being struck by a tire that came off a car on Interstate 25. The incident took place around 8:56 a.m., about 12 miles north of Colorado Springs.

According to a spokesperson from the Colorado State Patrol, the tire came loose from a Subaru traveling in the opposite direction and bounced into the path of the motorcyclist. Despite the efforts of first responders who administered first aid at the scene, the motorcyclist was pronounced dead upon arrival at the hospital.

Authorities are currently investigating the incident, but no charges have been filed as of Sunday afternoon. The identities of both the motorcyclist and the driver of the Subaru have not yet been released.

For further information on traffic safety measures or vehicle maintenance practices that could prevent such tragedies, you might explore studies on vehicle safety protocols and accident prevention techniques. You can also look into research about the dynamics of high-speed accidents and roadside safety improvements to understand more about such critical incidents.

[sohailjawaid]

A collision between a car and a truck on the motorway

A collision between a car and a truck on the motorway killed all the people. Horrible video continues. Those with a weak heart should not watch this video.

For Details Watch Video: https://rb.gy/ern50w

[agra24]

आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर भीषण हादसा: 6 की मौत, 40 घायल : दायर होगी जनहित याचिका

आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर एक और दर्दनाक हादसे ने पूरे देश को झकझोर कर रख दिया है। मंगलवार सुबह कन्नौज जिले के पास एक डबल-डेकर बस खड़े पानी के टैंकर से टकराकर पलट गई। इस भयावह दुर्घटना में छह लोगों की मौके पर ही मौत हो गई, जबकि 40 से अधिक लोग घायल हुए हैं। इनमें से कई की हालत गंभीर बताई जा रही है। ‘किलर एक्सप्रेसवे’ की छवि गहराई यह दुर्घटना 27 नवंबर 2024 को हुई एक अन्य बड़े हादसे की याद दिलाती है, जिसमें डॉक्टरों समेत पांच लोग अपनी जान गंवा बैठे थे। आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर लगातार हो रही इन दुर्घटनाओं ने इसे ‘किलर एक्सप्रेसवे’ की छवि दे दी है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट में याचिका दायर करेंगे हेमंत जैन सड़क सुरक्षा को लेकर लंबे समय से सक्रिय आगरा निवासी हेमंत जैन ने इस हादसे पर गहरी चिंता जताई है। उन्होंने कहा कि वे बुधवार को सुप्रीम कोर्ट में एक याचिका दायर करेंगे। याचिका में उन्होंने सड़क सुरक्षा उपायों की अनदेखी और दुर्घटनाओं के बढ़ते मामलों को रोकने के लिए ठोस कदम उठाने की मांग की है। सुप्रीम कोर्ट के आदेशों की अनदेखी गौरतलब है कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने 2017 में सड़कों पर सुरक्षा ऑडिट के सख्त निर्देश दिए थे। लेकिन आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर 2019 के बाद से कोई सुरक्षा ऑडिट नहीं हुआ है। विशेषज्ञों का मानना है कि नियमित ऑडिट से सड़क की संरचनात्��क खामियों का पता चल सकता है, जिससे दुर्घटनाओं को रोका जा सकता है। क्रैश इन्वेस्टिगेशन स्कीम 2023: नाम के लिए लागू उत्तर प्रदेश सरकार ने 2023 में "क्रैश इन्वेस्टिगेशन स्कीम" लागू की थी। इस योजना के तहत हर सड़क दुर्घटना की जांच कर उसके कारणों की रिपोर्ट तैयार की जानी थी। हालांकि, यह योजना कागजों में सिमट कर रह गई है।

सीआरआरआई की चेतावनी हुई नजरअंदाज सेंट्रल रोड रिसर्च इंस्टीट्यूट (सीआरआरआई) ने 2019 में आगरा-लखनऊ एक्सप्रेसवे पर सुरक्षा ऑडिट किया था। रिपोर्ट में नवंबर 2017 से फरवरी 2019 के बीच 1,871 दुर्घटनाओं का जिक्र था, जिनमें 118 लोगों की मौत और 406 गंभीर रूप से घायल हुए थे। रिपोर्ट में सुझाए गए कई उपाय अभी तक लागू नहीं किए गए हैं। याचिका में मांगे गए सुधार हेमंत जैन ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट से निम्नलिखित राहतों की मांग की है: - प्रतिष्ठित संस्थानों से एक्सप्रेसवे का सुरक्षा ऑडिट कराया जाए। - "क्रैश इन्वेस्टिगेशन स्कीम 2023" का सख्ती से पालन हो। - सड़क पर क्रैश बैरियर की स्थापना हो। - दुर्घटनाओं का डेटा सार्वजनिक किया जाए। - सड़क उपयोगकर्ताओं के लिए जागरूकता अभियान चलाए जाएं। हेमंत जैन का बयान “सिर्फ आधुनिक सड़कों का निर्माण पर्याप्त नहीं है। सड़क सुरक्षा के लिए ठोस और समयबद्ध उपाय जरूरी हैं। मैं अदालत से अपील करता हूं कि एक्सप्रेसवे पर सुरक्षा ऑडिट और क्रैश बैरियर की स्थापना सुनिश्चित की जाए। यह कदम दुर्घटनाओं को रोकने और लोगों की जान बचाने के लिए अनिवार्य है।” यह हादसा सड़क सुरक्षा को लेकर बड़े सुधारों की आवश्यकता को एक बार फिर उजागर करता है। उम्मीद है कि इस मामले में जिम्मेदार प्राधिकरण जल्द ठोस कदम उठाएंगे। Read the full article

[anitatad]

A Weird Week... Tuesday...

another weird post, Tuesday, Traffic Accident

I didn’t think yesterday could get any weirder, but it did. I had turned up at our local surgery in time for my blood test. I was sitting there, thinking how pleasant a place it was, with the colourful tiles on the floor and comfortable chairs. They had gone to a lot of trouble to ensure they gave a good impression… I suddenly became aware of a man standing at reception. A very tall, slender…

[newsbites]

News from Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada, 18 July.

A 64-year-old man from St. John's was killed in a two-vehicle crash involving an SUV and a motorhome in the Goulds area of St. John's.

The driver of the motorhome, a 58-year-old woman, was seriously injured and taken to the hospital.

The police are urging anyone with dash cam footage of the area prior to the crash to come forward to assist in the ongoing investigation.

2. A 77-year-old man died in a single-vehicle motorcycle crash on the TCH near Soldier's Pond.

The driver was the only person involved in the accident and was pronounced dead at the scene.

The investigation is ongoing, and the office of the chief Medical Examiner has been notified.

3. A driver is without their motorcycle after being caught traveling nearly twice the speed limit. RNC clocked the machine going 173 km/h in a 90 km/h zone on Robert E Howlett Memorial Drive. The driver was ticketed and the motorcycle seized.

4. A man has been arrested after an unusual incident in downtown St. John's last night. A drunken man jumped into the back seat of a passing convertible. RNC located the vehicle charged the 24 year old with causing a disturbance, resisting arrest, assaulting a peace officer, breach of court orders and breach of probation. The man was released with a future court date [per VOCM].

5. Holy Trinity High in Torbay has suffered significant damage from vandalism, including broken windows and graffiti.

The estimated cost of the damage is around $10,000, which the English School District will cover for necessary repairs before the school year starts.

The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary (RNC) is currently investigating the incident and will be monitoring the area to prevent future vandalism.

6. Politicians are expressing concerns about the limited availability of water bombers in Newfoundland and Labrador, leaving the province vulnerable to wildfires.

The shortage of aircraft and crews is exacerbated by the high volume of wildfires outside the province, making it unlikely for other provinces to provide assistance.

The union which represents forestry firefighters, says the province would not have the capacity to properly respond to a situation which developed in central Newfoundland last year. NAPE president Jerry Earle says only one water bomber was available on the weekend, but government waited too long to address concerns raised by the union about a shortage of aircraft pilots and ground crews. He says recruitment and retention of the water bomber fleet should have been put to bed before the fire season not during [per VOCM].

The government should consider increasing compensation for pilots and adopting more flexible policies regarding their time off.

7. Earlier this month, a dog in Quebec was rescued after being left outside in a crate for 48 hours during a heat wave.

Now, a local veterinarian in St John's wants to make sure that people are going about things the right way.

For some dog owners, the first instinct may be to pour icy cold water on their dogs or lay a really cold towel across them. However, veterinarian Maggie Brown Berry warns against this and says that it may do more harm than good.

She explains that dogs don't cool themselves down like humans. They cool down by panting. They also have sweat glands on their paws. The problem is when people suggest sort of going for freezing cold or ice being applied to the the dogs that they think are overheating is that actually causes the small skin vessels on the surface to shrink and move the heat more internally. So they might feel cooler on the surface, but internally there's still overheating. So it kind of can definitely make the situation worse. It also can be bad to bring their body temperature down too quickly. [Per VOCM].

[shaynly-babieblue]

Leslie Jordan Car Accident: A Tragic Loss for the Entertainment World 2023

In January 2023, the entertainment industry mourned the loss of beloved actor-comedian Leslie Jordan. Rumors had circulated about his passing in a car accident, but the official statement from the Los Angeles County coroner’s office confirmed that Leslie Jordan died from natural causes. This article delves into the details surrounding his tragic demise, shedding light on the events that unfolded…

[globaltechnologysolution]

Explore our dataset of damaged cars for AI training and research.

Visit: https://gts.ai/damaged-car-image-dataset/

[justfromtheshed]

Keith Blankenship, The Dangers of Distracted Driving: A Personal Story, Witness a heart-wrenching tale about the devastating consequences of distracted driving. We share a tragic incident that highlights the importance of awareness on the road and staying vigilant behind the wheel. Protect yourself and others from unforeseen accidents caused by negligence. #DistractedDriving #RoadSafety #PersonalStory #AccidentAwareness #StayAlert #DriveSafe #TrafficAccidents #SafetyFirst #BehindTheWheel #RoadAwareness