#to justify violence and hatred towards people they didnt like

[purpleandstarlight]

Was doing a little research for this tradition since its not really a thing I know much about being Italian and all, but Google's suggestion left me speechless.

[xoxo-ren-xoxo]

Tommy’s (and Tubbo’s) Character /rp /dSMP

This is a bit of a rant so like be warned. I have nothing against any CCs mentioned in this, this is all roleplay, lighthearted, and just a bit of fun analysis. Mostly this is a ramble about how I see certain people analysing Tommy’s character on tumblr and twt, and why I think they’re wrong. This isn’t directed at anyone specific, just a trend I’ve been seeing that kinda irks me. I don’t dislike the fandom, just a few ‘takes’ have been really weird for me.

TW for everything below: analysing the effects of trauma, abuse, manipulation, gaslighting, and lack of therapy.

I’m not really liking how victim-blamey everyone is getting currently in the dSMP, both in fandom and canon. In canon with certain characters but especially in fan analysis posts and especially about Tommy and Tubbo. People legitimately celebrating that Tommy might start ‘apologising’ for his actions more and 'growing as a person' somehow don’t realise that hes been made this way through a tonne of negative reinforcement. abuse, and gaslighting. And people blaming Tubbo for actions he had no choice in, rather than the actions he did choose.

Currently, as I see it, Tommy is so scared that anyone would find a reason to be pissed off at him that his fighting spirit has been completely crushed. He was exiled and abused when he should have been helped and given an understanding figure to guide him and teach him how to deal with things non-violently. In everyone’s eyes, the problem was that Tommy was creating violence with no real reason, acting recklessly and commiting crimes. Tubbo, having made him a part of his cabinet, knew that this would only harm the country. So instead of talking to him reasonably, he got angry, put him on trial, and punished him with the logbook (humiliating him by making him report back to Fundy, which he obviously hated). Tommy’s actions were, of course, bad, but did he deserve everyone ganging up on him? No. Especially when Tubbo was supposed to be in his corner, helping him out like he always said he would (”It’s me and you vs Dream” etc). This is the first betrayal of trust from Tommy’s POV. He doesn’t understand what he did wrong to its full extent, and no one can explain it to him. 

However, Tubbo was under a lot of pressure from Dream and George, and he’s a literal child President, so his ‘safety over friendship’ actions are understandable. I don’t believe Tubbo is solely to blame for anything he’s done in season 2, but it can’t all be excused. If you are to blame Tommy for his recklessness, you have to blame Tubbo, at least partially, for his disregard for Tommy’s feelings and mental state. There were other ways to go about the entire thing, including the trial, which was just horrible to watch, and agreeing to give Dream the disc, something Tommy gave him in pure confidence that it would be safe with Tubbo. Yikes moment.

At that time, Tubbo knew a lot of things about Tommy. In fact, he probably knew the most about Tommy out of anyone on the server. He knew the discs were incredibly important and a comfort item for Tommy. He knew Tommy had trauma from being exiled in the past. He knew Tommy was abused, or at least manipulated by Wilbur, in addition to growing up in war. Wilbur once told Tommy to stop being reckless, and Tommy listened, changing his attitude because he looked up to Wilbur so much. Then Wilbur said ‘let’s be the bad guys’ and stopped trying to mentor Tommy. There’s a conflict here, because Tommy was told by Wilbur that he wasn’t good enough to be President (links to the idea of ‘not being strong enough’) but he knows that Wilbur was a bad person. But Tommy is never given the chance to reconsile his feelings surrounding Wilbur, both because of Ghostbur and because of the conflict he starts with George. So he is harbouring a mixture of emotions about his mentor and brother, not understanding how to untangle the ‘real Tommy’ from the manipulated boy he became. 

What was going through his head when he stole from George and griefed him? Perhaps the thought that he needed to show he was still the same old Tommy. Maybe the need to ‘prove himself’ as a strong person? It could have just been an outlet for his trauma. He’s grown up in a world where everyone is either a friend or an enemy. George isn’t a friend. How was he supposed to know that hurting him was bad?

Tubbo was pressured into the actions he took against Tommy, but he was pressured far too easily. There is no moment where Tubbo turns to Tommy and makes sure he’s okay, he views him as ‘selfish’ and overdramatic, and sees his actions that way. This makes sense from Tubbo’s POV, he’s struggling to be President in ways that Wilbur *knew* he would, but in Tommy’s eyes this is the worst betrayal he’s ever known. The moment Tubbo (rightfully, but poorly executed) defies Tommy’s plan to hire Technoblade (ahem, seeing Techno as a weapon again) and exiles Tommy is the moment their friendship shatters. They’re two people who don’t understand each other anymore. Two people who are technically in the right, but only hurt each other. 

What Tommy needed was a therapist, instead he had Dream, who put out the fire of rebellion that made him so strong, and Techno, who was trying to help but doing it in the wrong way. 

People see tommy's change post-exile as a good thing because he's not as rebellious anymore and he’s thinking things through a lot before he does them, but they will soon realise that his rebellion was one of his best traits and the fact that no one saw it as anything but a problem really shows. He now second-guesses himself so much and is so scared of being wrong that everything seems too difficult and too dangerous. Every trait can have a positive and negative side. Tommy's defiant nature would have made him the perfect negotiator with a little practise. In fact, he had plenty of good ideas before he was exiled (using spirit against Dream, though it didnt work in the end, for example). The negative side of this was recklessness and the desire to cause problems on purpose, but what he needed was a friend (looking at you Tubbo) who understood that hes been through several wars, was manipulated by Wilbur, and hasnt known a time of peace where everyone who wasnt on his side was out to kill him. Now that ‘fight’ is gone he's just become easier to manipulate.

He may be getting better (see: telling Dream to go fuck himself) but there hasn't been any long-term growth because he was never told what kind of rebellion was good and what was bad. He was just told it was all bad. By Dream (and by Tubbo). Who he doesn't trust. So he's just going to revert back to his old ways because no one told him what was bad in a way that didn't make him feel like everyone was against him. Dream is the enemy (though Tommy’s feelings towards him are complicated, they make his brain go all ‘flippy floppy’) and Dream told him that rebellion was bad, so rebellion must be good always, right? 

And then there's Techno. Techno did nothing wrong except for when he did. Techno is 100% right except for when he isn’t. He doesn't understand Tommy because Tommy was never fully open about what Dream had done and how it affected him. That's not Tommys fault though, because who the fuck openly talks about their trauma? So neither of them are to blame for pretty much anything up until the confrontation at the community house. 

However, Techno's methods and ideology were not what Tommy needed. He was thrown from one extreme to another over and over again, from complete subservience to total rebellion. Neither of these inforce good attitudes in Tommy. One, as stated before, makes it so that he will regain his negative traits again. The other reinforces those violent traits as good, just like Wilbur did. The only difference is that Techno had good intentions, he wasnt trying to use Tommy, which is why he feels so used when Tommy 'betrays' him (Techno doesnt realise that he himself betrayed Tommy by teaming with Dream, he sees it more as a transaction than a personal thing). Techno feels so hurt by Tommy ‘viewing him as a weapon’ that he goes on with his no-mercy attack, completely dropping Tommy at his lowest point. 

Tommy says he doesn't want to be like everyone he's hated. In fact, he say's he is 'worse' than all the villains. This is very obviously untrue, though he was clearly going down a dangerous path with Techno's influence (see: bullying Fundy, spawning wither, kidnapping Connor, and saying that the discs are more important than Tubbo, more on that later). He's not a villain but who exactly has said he's not a villain. Dream? Techno? Neither of them can be trusted in his eyes. They say he's a good guy, Wilbur wanted to be the bad guy, who's right? He doesn't know. He has a crisis of morality. 

And? Some people want to point at that and say 'aha! Character development! He's finally realising his actions have a negative affect on others!' OH GOD NO??? He's a *child* who thinks that he is worse than his abuser. Does that sound like positive character growth to you? 

Lastly, the discs. We know theyre a comfort item blahblahblah. He hates himself for valuing them more than he values Tubbo. He's literally innocent in this. He’s been horribly manipulated by Dream to believe that the discs are worth anything. Theyre really not worth anything if they are being used as tools rather than, yknow, discs. My poor boy. He doesnt trust people, so what can he trust? The discs. But then he says it out loud and realises he misses Tubbo and he wants to be with his best friend again and and and WAHHHH. This also isnt really character growth its just fucking sad leave me alone. 

Anyways what the fuck guys. @ Niki and Jack what the fuck. Yeah we get it it’s miscommunication but wtf. Kinda worried that the actual lore will make Niki and Jack’s hatred of Tommy justified in some way and take on a big victim-blamey vibe, but I’m hoping that everyone is smart enough to not do that. I cannot praise Tommy enough for how he’s portrayed his character. I’m currently hoping that he himself understands the true complexity of it all. I’m sure he does.

Mostly though im actually pissed off at all the people praising tommy's character for 'maturing' when hes literally just got trauma. Nice one, tumblr and twt users. Thanks. Great job. He hasnt 'learnt his lesson', he’s traumatised. What the fuck.

Thanks for coming to my TED talk, leave your responses in the reblogs and comments.

[themeed]

damn allowed myself to want things for a day and all i want is a van to live in, knowledge, freedom, weight loss, and a bass guitar.

im. happy with that i think. im proud of me, no jokes. im proud of being able to want things and care about them and vibrate towards them with longing. im... pleased with that. its fulfilling in a way Not Wanting For Anything isnt, because thats... kinda hollow. empty. in a vacant, lonely, yearning and grieving and SAD way. maybe because i Couldnt Want then. i Couldnt Desire or it would be used against me or taken away. that sucks. that sucked.

and now. im free to want again. and comparatively???? i think im very much never going to aim for buddhism or that weird Not Desiring Not Attached Nirvana mindset. like good for u but been there out of trauma and its not fun theres no reason to truly Live. u just float endlessly and experience and it aches so badly!!!! it hurts to want to want and not be able to. and i guess that is different from not wanting at all but... its not different enough for me to justify ever going back to that. or going forward to that. i just got this back and screw enlightenment if it means i have to give up on my passions i dont think life is worth living without it.

and anybody who looks down on that from a spiritual tower has yet to examine their own pride and how empty they feel without it.

anybody who looks down and smiles and wishes me luck on my journey? good for them. im glad theyre living their best life, on their journey as they see fit.

and i feel the need to protect myself because ive been hurt by the pride- the arrogance of others before. a lot of my hurts and traumas stem from my mother being too prideful to recognize that she can be wrong and someone under her power could be correct over her. and it was an uncomfortable truth. so she denied it was one at all and hurt me. i know the reason could be elaborated on. she didnt want to confront her own internal logic. or trauma. or even doublethink. that doesnt excuse her hurting a child for the sake of her sense of pride, of comfort, of self-worth. a child under her power, that she claimed to be parent of. teacher of.

not owing anyone anything is not the same as not hurting anyone. i havent reconciled that yet. oppressors should be held accountable for their mistakes, and give reparations if the harm is physical at LEAST. and i think that applies to politics, yes. privately though? if i beat up a nazi, i dont want to pay for his hospital bills. my personal philosophy struggles between equating people and ideas as a worth measurement, and realizing that that line of thinking is... similar to oppressors. but. its based on something people can change. the question is, do i think "if given the opportunity" is a good enough reason to stop and question a racist that runs their mouth? and do i think pre-emptive violence is okay? if say, a nazi walks into a bar and doesnt say anything but is wearing all the red flags and bells and whistles. i dont think that justifies a beatdown. being asked to leave, sure, but the beatdown doesnt start til the first remark flies.

once the intent is given OR the action is taken, the line is drawn. doesnt matter if they Havent Had The Chance. if theyre starting shit outside of debate spaces like that, and not, say, asking questions, theyre not looking for new perspectives, and it is NOT my job to educate people. its not my job to Show People The Light. a quick fucking google search could tell them why theyre wrong. if they havent put even the most basic energy into questioning their beliefs, thats on them.

it sounds like im trying to absolve myself of blame here. largely because. i think i should go out and help educate people because theyre inherently complacent if theyre, yknow, in a position of power. aka white folk and men and rich folk and cis folk and on and on and on. these people dont live my reality. they dont live the reality of a gay black man in the south, or a genderqueer lesbian in the west, or an indigenous woman whose nation is being targeted, or a muslim woman who cannot wear her headcoverings in the face of danger of death, or an asian immigrant who cant get a job because of COVD age discrimination resurging. we will never live each others realities, but we can become aware of them.

they wont come into awareness without someone asking or telling, and then doing something to change them.

we shouldnt need to go running to people in power for them to be aware of problems in the populace, govt is supposed to help and solve issues like this. like. actively. thats the whole point, make life better for the countrys citizens. and individuals in a position of social power...

are individuals who didnt take on a responsibility to protect and serve or otherwise care for the populace of a nation. i personally think they SHOULD care, but they are not obligated to. i cant make them care about others.

and honestly, on some of them, it would be a waste of time. there are people who want to change or question things and yknow what? they seek out answers. in people or places or online usually. stats and stories.

so like. i dont think someones Potential as a person matters when theres a throwdown about to happen. it really isnt my responsibility to save people from themselves or try to change their sides against their will. if they want to chat about it they can ask questions first.

not throw insults or punches or hatred.

what people have been taught is worth analyzing and trying to correct IN SOCIETY but i cant fix every broken white boy that comes to me. PSAs, fliers, outreach, online videos, debate spaces. those are things i already have access to and can be a part of if i really want to go around changing minds. or yknow. get involved in legislation and be myself around others to change their perceptions of whats socially acceptable or normal. maybe protest, maybe call congressfolk, etc.

but not every comment has to be analyzed or a learning opportunity. im allowed to shut it down, and people can respect that or stop talking to me. this isnt my parents house where i had to justify everything that i said or did when scrutinized, and doubly justify any criticism i had of mother, or any joke i frowned at instead of smiling.

these people dont have that power over me. they arent my mother. they arent my boss, and if they are i can fuck off and get a new job if necessary. they dont have financial control over my living space and food and schooling and physical control of where i can go and with who and for how long. I CONTROL THAT. I do.

Huh. maybe thats why i want a van so bad. i mean... when this lease ends if nobody is gonna end up living with me...

i could just... live in my car and shower at truck stops. get a storage unit for my stuff. save by driving jobs. like 40 to 60 a day. tear out my cars back, insulate it, and install my mattress pad there. water on the floor, cooler next to it, wooden cutting coard, knife, single camping plateware set, and another little shelf for spices. maybe a hot plate i can hook up to the car battery? get a long enough usb and it might be doable. i could go camping and open the trunk to just... vibe.

because yeah, honestly? i dont plan on having a solid apartment for a bit. like a long bit. and i still have like 70000 miles on my car before itll want to go. and by that point, even at like 100 miles a day, thats like 2 years, less if i go cross country in that vehicle. i could save up SO MUCH for a better vehicle, or like. college. live on campus, get some credit, continue working after i figure out want i want to do.

i think thats a solid plan, even if i dont get another apartment and put everything in storage. work as i need to instead of all the time for rent, really only paying for gas, car repairs, car ins, food, and phone data/hotspot internet... that would bring my monthly expenses down to like 500 a month max instead of like 1400. id only need to make some 1000 a month doing contract stuff to save for taxes and stuff. anything extra would be just that: extra for savings and things. holy shit.

depending on how this next month goes for my friends, holy s h i t.

i. i might do this. legitimately.

i. dont think i can yet. i need proof of address to get my license im pretty sure? but hey, thatll be my 21st this year, so. once i have that i wont need a new address for a While. i dont know if ill want one, really.

i could always just ask a friend or family member if i could use theirs for mail that cant go to a PO box.

anyway. yeah. wow.

[clarithmoved]

im pretty sure people would still hate maggie if she were white. theres really no basis for you to claim people hate her just because she's dark skinned. people dislike her because of the way she treats ava, her lies, her violence, and the way she tries to force people to fall in love with her via weird tree magic.

Time to break this down.1. The way she treats Ava.We all know that Ava was possessed by Wrathia and physically attacked maggie, trying to kill her, possibly made her attempt suicide. We as the readers know this. Maggie does not. She has no clue. Her hatred and treatment towards ava is 100% justified. We as readers should be sympathetic and understanding but you guys are treating her like she knows what we know. If I were maggie i would hate ava too.2. Her violenceWhat violence? Defending herself from her kidnapper? She had no idea what she was kidnapped for. She had no idea what Odin's intentions are. If someone threw you in a car what would you do?3. The way she forces people to fall in love with her.We have no clue if she went through with any of that since she said it turns out none of the men she liked ended up being what she thought. Its likely she never went through with forcing them to fall in love. Also she is a 15 yr old girl and michelle said shes obsessed with finding love due to self esteem issues and depression. Show some god damn sympathy. Dont compare her actions to something predatory.4. Her liesYeah bc if I just survived being kidnapped and went through all the shit maggie went through, I would be worried people wouldn't believe me or be sympathetic towards me and would lie to. Also teens tend to lie a lot to avoid getting in trouble.Yes, it has to do with her being black. It happens in fandoms all the time. They treat the black girl as evil if she shows any anger or hate even if its justified. Ava just killed hundreds of people and it was all her (michelle said wrathia didnt possess her) and yet you guys call her an innocent little lava bunny still. You yell at maggie for being mad at ava rn when ava literally just finished a mass homicide. You guys are too harsh on her but not on ava. Why? Tell me why

[touch-of-mischief]

oh it's definitely because daenerys doesn't fit into any of the categories that society has for females. she doesnt really know how to fight with a sword but she also doesn't depend on just others to survive so she's a warrior and shes not. you're absolutely right about this. I think what takes it even a step further is that dany doesn't even WANT to fit into any of those stereotypes and she's just her own person and whenever you try to force her into one category, you're going to have to cut off some essential parts of her to make her fit which is so incredibly uncomfortable for a lot of people and it's sad that most of the people on here that come into that group call themselves feminists.

as for the whole madness thing, yep, people always forget that dany had two parents and she didnt personally know either of them but still she's seen just as her father's daughter. well, if we're going by that logic, then jon is a targaryen bc his father was a targaryen and bc mothers dont apparently matter but yet those same people call him a stark and a targaryen. if he can be both, then why can dany have inherited something from her mother???

I genuinely will never understand the hatred someone would have to have inside them towards a fictional woman to have them say that the slavers and rapists deserve to live and have no consequences of their actions, you know the people that are very much exist in real life. their hate for a fictional character is more important that something that actually has negatively impacted so many people and the effects of which still exist to this day.

I absolutely agree with you on not being phased by all the violence or stuff, mostly because it's easy for me to separate reality from fiction. I loved all the battles and the gore and blood. it was fun to watch and yeah I loved when dany burned the khals or the slavers or the tarlys and i loved when jon executed the traitors (i kinda had mixed feelings on olly tho but that's another discussion) or when Tyrion killed his father and when arya killed that guy in essos and then the freys because FUCK YES they finally got what they deserved and I loved when sansa fed Ramsay to the hounds because fuck yeah he deserved that and I was glad that sansa got to watch her rapist die bc, as you said, a lot of women dont get to have that "closure" bc theres always that fear that what if he comes back and sansa probably has some trauma too but when she's awake, she knows he isnt coming back. I loved when sansa and arya killed littlefinger (I have issues with how they dumped everyone down and that whole storyline but that was "fuck yeah" moment too) anyways yeah, it's easy to cheer for everyone and yeah everyone has a fav character but baseless hatred towards dany pisses me off. what's worse is when they try to twist canon to fit their narrative of dany being a monster. and honestly nobody really needs a reason to hate a character. you dont like it? cool but trying to make that character into a cruel villian to justify your hatred ain't the way to go.

in the end, I think it comes down to hating that the fact the character they stan is not as important as dany is to the storyline so they try to bring her down in any way they can. and to be frank, nothing is going to change the way they feel and behave.

hey!!! just wanted to say that I love your meta regarding the hypocrisy between sansa and dany. and it's so exhausting to see dany being judged for her every action so much harder than any of the other characters. the other characters' "bad" actions are never really brought up again in the show but Dany's actions are consistently thrown in her face to remind her to not be like her father. it doesnt matter what she does, she'll be crucified for it either way by the writers and the antis alike :/

I'm glad you liked it! I honestly just wrote it after getting mad about a post full of hypocrisy lol.

And yeah, it is really exhausting. You would think she wouldn't be the only female character to get hit so hard with all these double standards. Part of me wonders if it's bc she doesn't fit neatly into the tomboy/fighter or feminine/ladylike categories since she's still feminine but not exactly a warrior either. I could be just thinking too hard on it lol.

It especially upsets me when people try to use Targaryen “madness” as justification of their hate bc mental illness actually does run in my family (I could even tell you where I think it started!) and I find it kinda offensive that people who clearly don’t understand how mental illness works try to use that as a justifiable reason to hate a character. My mom was diagnosed Bipolar (she was textbook bipolar too) and I actually am at risk of having it bc I mean, my mom gave me half of her DNA! Just like Dany’s parents (haters seem to conveniently forget that she’s half Rhaella who wasn’t mad). And like, Aerys went mad after being tortured, not bc he was a Targaryen so not sure where they got the haters got their info lol. Only 6 Targaryens went mad iirc so again, where are they getting their info??? I already hate misogyny and ableism on their own but when both are obviously being used to hate on a character I get pretty mad!

And you're right, they’d hate Dany no matter what she did. I guess that’s the fun part of being a powerful woman AND a revolutionary in such a patriarchal world. It’s just so annoying. And it’s rather infuriating to see her haters defend slavers and rapists bc they hate her so much. I personally would have done much worse to the slavers and rapists. She didn’t do anything wrong, especially in her world. It would be super awesome if people would stop applying modern standards to a world in a medieval setting. I mean, people in our world have been executed for far less than all of the people Dany ever killed. Same for their world. I would have cheered her on even in our world lol.

I didn't care much when other characters did anything “bad” either. Murder on TV doesn’t bother me. I grew up watching my dad (and an ex Marine so you know he’s not exactly nice or uses nicer language lol) play games like Halo. Pretty much everything he enjoys is pretty graphic so seeing people get blown up or slaughtered like animals or burned alive by dragons really aren’t a big deal to me.

I really didn’t care when Tyrion used wildfire on Stannis’ fleet. I didn’t care that Cersei blew up the sept much though I did like Margaery! I didn’t care much about all the men getting sliced to bits in the Battle of the Bastards no matter what side they were on even though I do enjoy watching Jon kill people! I did enjoy watching Sansa feed Ramsay to his hungry doggies bc I mean, he deserved it and those pups deserved a good meal. I definitely enjoyed watching Arya kill the Freys bc that was just awesome. And I also enjoyed watching Dany and her dragons do anything together lol. Flying, burning enemies, awesome stuff bc I love dragons and obviously Dany. Me and my mom cheered like my Dad when he is watching football (American football) when Dany burned the Khals threatening to rape her bc that was a big girl power moment imo!

I just don't understand why it's so hard for people to not treat Dany like you would someone in our world? Especially when they dismiss anything to counter their “points” as a product of the times? It would be a lot easier on everyone if they would just straight up say they hate Dany and women like her and move on! Just be honest, ya know? Stop dancing around the truth already!

But yeah, sorry to rant on and on when I could have easily said “me too!” lol.

[werewolfcolumnist]

@miliege

an open note to a bottom feeder

i feel the first point i should bring up is the fact that you are in possesion of a 'drama' blog, which, i could only assume from your past accusations and actions, is due to the fact that you are the personification of a ill-infested mosquito that thirsts for a warped idea of 'justice.' you desperately patrol and essentially stalk a certain individual because you have a personal vendetta and the only way to satiate such bloodlust is to patrol and conduct tumblr-esque 'police brutality,' in order to quench your unjustified contempt. 

so lets dive into your latest pink slip post and analyze the claims that were made against Casper. you start off by stating, "welcome back to my drama blog casper. hows it feel to be a freak?" which is already problematic to begin with, because for one, a personal attack such as that essentially discredits any "neutrality" that you may have, which ultimately reduces the validity of your so-called arguement, and two, because name-calling someone who states they need a coping blog to begin with is basically dismissing the fact that they likely have a mental illness, which is pretty abhorrent. you then go on to state the list of subjects that are contained within Casper's blog and provide examples. for one example, based on the character ren hana, you state, "according to his wiki page hes 19 in the first game and 21 in the second. to me he looks nothing like a 19 or 21 year old. he looks more like a 15 year old." this garbage example is essentially invalid, as you throw in the factual evidence that the character canonically does not fit the criteria of being an underage character, yet you throw in your useless commentary of the character, "looking" underage in order to skew your flimsy arguement, ultimately invalidating this entire point on the specified character. you also state, "this is so fucking funny. not only reblogging dream daddy but DREAM DADDY GORE. thats so fucking funny to me," when talking about...dream daddy gore? which is only a point made on your elementary level detention slip of a call-out post because of your personal dislike of it, and not due to any other criteria. you may argue that its morally wrong due to the nature of the posts, however, that is YOUR sole idea of morality, which isnt the status quo. if it disturbs you, then do not engage in viewing such content. subjects that fall in this category will not cease to exist, and you only exacerbate the problem by blowing it out of proportion because it "rubs you the wrong way." you then go off to list lolicon that is apparently indicated as lolicon due to the fact that the character depicted in the work of art is wearing a school uniform, and that they are engaged in the act of gore. this is also, unsurprisingly, invalid, mainly because lolicon is defined as "fascination with cartoons of very young-looking girls engaged in varying degrees of erotic behavior." none of the evidence you provided showcased an illustration of a young child engaging in lewd and sexual acts. rather, they were showcased in situations which involved subcategories of 'pastel gore,' and mild gore, which was not coupled with ANY sexual acts. therefore, none of the evidence is actual 'lolicon.' you may percieve it as such because of your perception of what is right or wrong, however, your overall perception is not at all relevant when the act you state is present isnt truly present. you only state it as such because it 'freaks you out.' the case of your own personal and moral beliefs comes into play again when you make a point about reblogging irl blood, stating, "reblogging irl blood is very weird and off to me because some of the time theyre actual crime scenes where people have died and me and various others find it disrespectful to reblog content like this." which, first of all, warrants questioning due to the fact that it is only an assumption that these are taken from crime scenes. no evidence is provided that the specific images are pulled from them. even then, there isnt anything inherently wrong with reblogging the images (besides from your own personal moral standings). the images are merely images that depict a certain scene, they simply do not promote any disrespect or malice of anyone or anything. just because the nature of a subject is "freaky," doesn't automatically mean its seeking out to promote violence/etc. also on the subject of the cannibalistic textposts, you already said it yourself: "once again not really important i guess..." its not, thanks for making this specific point more concise for me. 

ok so the screenshots. you state, "at first he tried to act like he didnt know he had reblogged loli and rape and all that other nasty ass shit to his blog." which is actually contradictory to the actual screenshots, since Casper states he "genuinely had no idea," which, yes, is actually true. based on your warped perception, you may percieve his words as false. however, by twisting the actual situation in alignment to your obvious bias and underlying hatred towards Casper, you thrust a false narrative towards readers of your malignant 'detention slip,' and thereby create a mob mentality via the use of aggressive slander. Casper's genuine emotion is clearly seen with his tone and actions, taking steps to delete problematic posts without issue and apologizing. however, you go on to state, "he said reblogging that kind of stuff was for 'coping'. thats a really unhealthy way to cope by the way casper." this is severely problematic, as it not only undermines possibly the only way an individual could cope with mental illness (which, "reblogging" content of such a nature is purely vanilla to begin with), but it also insults and demeans an individual who is clearly struggling mentally, which you 'cleverly' try to justify by pure slander and loose arguements. as the last course of this letter, i'll make one last point. you state, "he claims a lot of it was 'old' but in reality the oldest post was from 2 months ago which isnt really that old." this exact phrase unwinds your entire arguement. in the beginning of your keemstar-esque callout bonanza, you provide evidence that, "as of today (7/18/18) casper currently lists himself as an adult on his blog with his hover saying ‘im currently 18′. proof of this." however, as of 7/1/18, Casper only just became an adult (http://tanakas.co.vu/post/175430436650/me-today-is-my-birthday-and-i-wanna-love-my) therefore, by stating that his oldest post was 2 months ago, you're basically stating, "this is pedophilia, even though casper was also a minor during the surfacing of these posts." (even though the posts you refer to aren't pedophilia. not a single young character is sexually being taken advantage of in any evidence). 

to end this open letter, i'll say this: go fuck yourself. you attempt to be a self-proclaimed cruisader when in reality you enforce severe brutality, and attempt to skew the perception of others by outlandish and downright false claims. i would not be at all surprised if you held extreme insecurity, and project it onto Casper in order to make your pitiful self feel better. that's the case for essentially all bullies, anyway. and you fit right into the cookie cutter of what a bully is. 

also, anyone who mindlessly read and followed what this dumpster fire of a callout stated, and flip-flopped on Casper, fuck you too. you're just as bad. 

original: http://web.archive.org/web/20180719200027/http://web.archive.org/web/20180719200027/https://miliege.tumblr.com/post/176040089851/callout-for-twiliightzones

-🐝