#this brought to you by me writing up a summary of his concurrence in the affirmative action case that came out this year
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
if i get to absolutely deck ONE person with kaz brekkerâs crow head cane iâm picking clarence thomas
#this brought to you by me writing up a summary of his concurrence in the affirmative action case that came out this year#while watching s2 of shadow and bone#first of all this manâs opinions are trash and he hasnât had a new thought in 20 years but insists on writing a 20 page separate opinion#every goddamn time#second of all he is an INCOHERENT writer#i deserve one nice whack for having to put up with this
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
Downbelow Station, a fanfic summary
Iâve been writing fic for this tiny book fandom and have at least a few fandom acquaintances who want to read my fic but donât want to read the book. This is a summary of what happens in the novel, whose heart, to me, is the relationship between a mindwiped ex-slave and a cross-cultural married couple who take him in under their protection.
The premise
People are in space, since the Earth Company started establishing space stations around increasingly distant stars for manufacturing/trade. There are several types of people:
Stationers stay on one station â stations were originally established by the Earth Company but have since gained de facto independence because Earth is so far away
Merchanters live on ships and trade â family very important to them, so is family name, regularly deal with Stationers as part of their life but find settling down very foreign. More sexually opportunistic than Stationers, possibly less monogamous.
Earth Company Fleet soldiers live on ships; originally under the control of Earth Company, as of novel start have gone kind of rogue, will continue to go even more rogue over the course of the novel
Citizens of Union, a... nation in space that grew in the deepest reaches, furthest away from Earth's influence. Union is currently trying to annex everyone else. Earth Company is trying to resist this through their Fleet. However, Earth Company is not very enthusiastic about this war and have been drawing out; the Fleet thinks it's important to keep fighting and keep doing dipshit moves like impressing Merchanter ships and ?? maybe looting stations a little bit to keep going.
Azi of Union â a genetically engineered underclass specific to Union. Basically designer subs. I believe the word azi is never brought up in Downbelow Station, but it's very clear a character is an azi, and what that means is explained in Cyteen, which takes place in the same universe. Union citizens use 'tapes' casually and at-will for fast learning and entertainment and conditioning, but starting later in life. Azi grow up on tape â their psyches are designed to be good at whatever they were designed to do, whether that's soldiering or psychologizing or childcare. Azi require varyingly regular check-ins with a Supervisor, who is an assigned person who tells the azi they are Very Good and On Course With Their Lives and give them tapes to keep them aligned with their values and mentally stable. Azi have normal human names but also an ID that looks like AO-1234, where the first alphabet character indicates what âclassâ you are â an Alpha-class azi is probably far smarter than your average citizen and is more capable of functioning independently. Azi can win citizenship, but so far the only people onscreen whoâve done so are Alpha-class azi.
The cast
Damon Konstantin is a head of Legal Affairs on Pell Station, and the son of the Stationmaster, which is apparently a hereditary position. Despite the hereditariness Pell seems to have the most familiar culture to me, a 21st century American expecting democracy and rule of law. Pell Station is special â it orbits a human-livable planet called Downbelow, and there are only three such planets under human control. This means the planet can be used as a base for âbioform productionâ (a vague category encompassing everything you can grow on a planet but not a space station) and makes Pell strategically valuable. The other two livable planets are Earth, under the control of the Earth Company Fleetâs nominal masters, and Cyteen, the base of Union operations. Pell is neutral, as many star stations try to be.
Elene Quen is a Merchanter who stepped off her ship to marry Damon. Theyâve been married for four months at novel start. Her formal role is liaison with Merchanters.
Joshua Talley is a soldier of Union who was captured when Union forces sabotaged (blew up) a station called Mariner Station. He was tortured for information on another station â Russellâs â whose inhabitants feared the same fate for themselves. He had nothing to give them â he was a medium-level technician/soldier, an âarmscomperâ, which I think means he was the person pressing buttons to fire on targets or programming the weapons to fire on targets. During his interrogation Russellâs station was also sabotaged, ensuing in a mass evacuation.
Signy Mallory is one of the ~10 captains of the Earth Company Fleet. She is commanding and very deadly, commands fanatical loyalty from her soldiers. Sheâs also a sexual sadist. When she comes to evacuate Russellâs Stationers from a failing space station she finds that they have a Union POW who is very pretty, and takes him into her personal quarters for their journey to Pell. It is not said how she rapes him but it was a lot. Joshua thinks of this part as worse than the previous interrogation.
The events from there
When the Fleet arrives at Pell Station, they are convoying huge ships full of thousands of refugees from stations sabotaged / fallen to Union. It has been weeks or months since they started out. The ships were overpacked, many inside are dead, the culture of the ships has quickly turned anarchic/violent.
Angelo Konstantin, master of Pell, says "wtf, we can't take all these people, we don't have space. We literally cannot do this." The Fleet says, âYou better,â unloads the highly upset and sick refugees, and leaves. Pell Station clears out two sectors of their station and makes it the 'quarantine zone', later shortened to Q. Conditions are very bad in Q and what to do with the violent, desperate people inside, many of whom cannot prove who they were in their past lives, when Pell doesnât have the capacity to relocate them, is an ongoing problem throughout the novel.
Before leaving, Signy Mallory also said, "in addition to the refugee crises we unloaded on you, here is a Union prisoner of war we transported separately because the refugees would have killed him", and dumps Joshua on Pell leadership.
Around this time, Elene Quen finds out that her ship was destroyed when Mariner Station blew up. She now has no blood family, and Merchanters put great cultural emphasis on having clan and name. She decides to have a kid, talking Damon into it.
Joshua Talley is extremely depressed and keeps asking for a mindwipe so he can live as a normal citizen on Pell rather than being indefinitely detained. Mindwipes are used on stations as a consensual way of rehabilitating criminals. His captors are reluctant â itâs tantamount to execution. Damon Konstantin is the final permission-giver on the issue and gives it in the end. The process of mindwipe (or Adjustment) necessarily causes the person to regurgitate their whole life. This is recorded. Due to this, he discovers only after the mindwipe is complete that Josh was tortured on Russellâs with mindwipe drugs (presumably for the same regurgitating-your-whole-life property) and then raped on Signy Malloryâs ship on the way to Pell, and that wanting to wipe out the trauma was the real reason he wanted a mindwipe.
Damon feels really bad about this. He checks up on Josh Talley a lot when he's recovering from the mindwipe. He and his wife Elene decide to 'sponsor' him when he's rejoining normal society on the ship. Elene does so through some personal resistance â Josh once belonged to the military force that wiped out her family. They check in with a guy who doesnât remember much of anything but definitely has abandonment issues and is afraid of emotional entanglement with people.
Josh Talley quietly converts much of his internal body mass into gooey loyalty.
Plot chaos. The station comes to be formally occupied by the Fleet, who wants to use it as their new base of operations, and a Union saboteur named Gabriel who talks to Stationmaster Angelo Konstantinâs main rival and conspires to bring him to power instead...
Thereâs a part I really really want to summarize here where Josh tries to fall on grenade for the Quen-Konstantins â literally, trying to take an action that would end in his death but keep them safe from the Fleet â and they show up and say âyou idiot, never do that againâ and bring him back to their apartment and say âwhile the Fleet is suspicious of you, you are living HERE, so everyone knows you are under our protection. Forget your old job, weâll find you something working closely with Damon every day â while youâre in sight they canât get at you.â But I canât find a non-confusing way to relay it, sorry.
Soon after that, the Union saboteur succeeds. Angelo Konstantin is assassinated. His rival, Jon Lukas, takes his place, and starts enacting subtly Union-friendly policies. I think this somehow happens concurrently with the Fleet still using Pell as a base of operations. Itâs highly chaotic. Elene flees the chaos on a Merchanter ship whose family she knows. Damon and Josh, fearing whoever assassinated Angelo, hide within the more bad and chaotic parts of the station (I honestly donât believe the author when she says they managed this for months â Pell has tens of thousands of people, thatâs not a lot! You could close each sector at a time and sweep everyone!). This part feels like big missed opportunity to me â they spend their time moving from hiding place to hiding place, coming up with hopeless schemes that they know theyâll never enact. One infers they got much closer, but the author doesnât go into that either. The one delight that comes out of this sequence is that Josh becomes more assertive and competent than weâve ever seen him â being in hiding, under danger, brings out submerged training. Heâs not a dependent anymore â arguably in some places heâs in lead.
In the middle of this, Josh makes contact with the Union saboteur, Gabriel, who hails him as a colleague and informs him that theyâre of the same kind. They have the same training. The story Josh gave Russellâs interrogators, and Pell, that he was a mid-tier technician, is an implanted set of memories that automatically flushes his real ones when he was under duress.Â
This means, although the author never explores it, that Josh was probably integral to destroying Mariner Station, and concomitantly responsible for Eleneâs familyâs deaths.
Josh asks Gabriel for safe passage to the planet Downbelow for both himself and a companion. Gabriel acquiesces, but is shocked when the companion Josh brings to the meeting is the Konstantin heir. He starts to say, âWell, well, what a useful person you have brought me ââ and then gets shot by a Fleet soldier whoâs following reports of a suspicious person. (My fic Half-Silvered Mirror diverges from canon at this point, and asks what would have happened if Gabriel had his way.)
Now in the hands of the Fleet, Josh and Damon meet with Signy Mallory again. Josh isnât what Mallory remembers â as a rape victim he was passive, inward-turned. This Josh is articulate and emotional and loyal. Damon isnât what she expects, either â he manages to jab at her conscience about what the Fleet has become, lawless and unmoored from any democratic interest. She plans to execute both of them the next day.
Due to convoluted plot reasons, she doesnât. She turns against the rest of the Fleet, which for their own reasons is headed back towards Earth â to conquer. Her ship, Norway, enters a standoff against Union warships over Pell. Which isnât on course to go well for her, until someone broadcasts at both of them that Pell is now under Merchanter claim. Elene, while out in space, has been convincing Merchanters to form an unprecedented coordination bloc. She demands Pell for the Merchanter Alliance and informs the Union military leader, Azov, that if he doesnât acquiesce all Merchanter ships in her fleet will refuse to trade in Union space.
She wins. The scene when she docks at Pell and walks in, pregnant and victorious, to kiss her husband, is one of the most visually !!! scenes.
In the aftermath, Azov tries to take Josh back for Union. Damon says nope, heâs ours. Josh, what do you want? Josh says nothing. Looks at nothing. But when Azov and the other Union soldiers leave, he stays.
And afterwards, he goes to Signy Mallory â whose ships now constitute Pellâs militia â and asks, sincerely, to work as crew on her ship for a while. He says he canât live on a station comfortably. That the stationers know him, and his past. (Not sure how true this is.) Mallory says itâs nothing another mindwipe canât cure, and he says he doesnât want to forget. âIâve got something. The only real thing. All that I value.â
âSo you go off and leave it?â
âFor a while.â
Comments
Thereâs... so much I want to write about and explore.
Did Elene know when Josh left that he was probably responsible for her familyâs death? (My fic Awarding Damages is about one way they could resolve this)
What did Signy Mallory do to Josh? Can he handle working under her?
Damon and Elene are so parental to Josh, and they're also embarking on having a family in a dynastic way where having a clan is their way of asserting that they exist and are rooted in the world. And of course Josh is going to feel really weird about how he fits into that â he's only watching it happen because he's a charity case, of course he's going to have no involvement in that project â what place is left for him anyway, he has no one and is nothing. I want this man to have feelings about family and how he doesn't have one and then HAVE A FAMILY I want him to hold the baby and go "OH. You are a biological composite of the two greatest people in the world. I cannot hold it against you that you are now going to push me out of my current living situation with the two greatest people in the world"
Due to the amount of mindfuckery Josh has gone through, itâs unclear to both him and the reader how many his memories are real. What does that do to a person?
From what I know of azi from Cyteen, Josh has psychological needs â again, heâs like a bred sub â that non-Unioners arenât going to understand. Can he get them met? How does he negotiate that?
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
Raw and the Baby means Yes. // Roger Taylor x Reader (smut)
Hi!: I just want to say tnx for a hundred followerS! Also I attempted to write smut this week which has a back story of me finishing it until midnight and accidentally erasing the whole thing so I had to rewrite it before dawn đ so I hope you like this one, I put a big effort in it, lol.
Warning: nsfw/just smut(fem&male recieving), face (riding&fucking), unprotected sex, softie afterwards.
Summary: besides morning sex, you asked your boyfriend: Roger, to raw you and put a baby in you as another term for your yes.
â§ÍâșË*àŒâŸăenjoy reading!ăâœàŒïœ„*Ëâșâ§Í
"Y/N love."
You woke up with your favourite scent of Roger lingering in your nose, and a soft kiss on your forehead, and arms hugging you towards the best person you've ever been with your whole life.
"Morning love." you said as Roger kissed your lips softly. He was about to pull away when you held the top of his head for him to stay put, giving you both the time to kiss passionately, but finally pulls away when your hands left him.
"Rog?"
"Yeah?"
"Today I have plans on riding you." you said back at him as your hands wandered on his clothed chest. He raised an eyebrow at your remark.
"Hmmm? And then?" he hummed in response.
"Riding your face and then, maybe give you a li'l blow." Your hands travelled underneath his shirt and you drew circles on his chest.
On a sudden movement, his hand caught your wrist and pinned you down to the bed, as his another hand caught your free hand to join your pinned body.
"You can't crave for morning sex without answering my proposal to you last night." Roger said chuckling at you. You just rolled your eyes at him.
Oh really? you thought to yourself. Roger kissed you once more again and finally lets go both of your wrist while he tops you over. He crawled down, tugging your pajamas and discarding them off the air, as your panties followed the same fate.
He brings his face close to your inner thigh to kiss it and made a wet trail towards your glistening cunt. As he brings his mouth to your core, his nose brushed with your clit that let out a breathy moan from your mouth. You tangled your hands with his hair pushing his face to meet more of you and you felt his warm mouth covering majority of your vagina, stretching and opening your folds.
"F-fuck!" you hissed as his tongued entered you. Roger's hand holds one of your legs that threatens to close tightly around him while the other one's at your clit performing small circles to stimulate you. You couldn't contain the feeling Roger is giving you as you relentlessly moan his name over and over.
"R-rog, think 'm c-comming." your breaths are short and your eyes are shut closed until you felt Roger pull away.
"What the fuck Roger?" you hissed at him.
"What? Thought you're gonna ride my face?" He asked innocently but not so innocent.
"Wow! Thank you for noting that, Rog." you said sarcastically while rolling your eyes but deep inside you actually do appreciate Roger remembering it before you forgot it yourself.
He crawls back up and kissed you.
"Just passing how good your taste is, love." he laughed as he wraps his arms around your waist and flip your position. You are now on top, straddling him.
"Come on up love." he cooed and you obliged.
Your knees crawled to meet his face and you held on to the headboard. His hands fall on your hips as you start rocking to his face a little bit slow until you build the pace that you desired. His mouth are back at yours, pleasuringly giving you a hotter experience than earlier.
Another chain of moans excape your mouth as your knees are trembling while holding your own weight. Roger's hand never fails to guide and help you, neverthless, your pace went slower than usual.
You looked down to Roger and having to visibly see his long beautiful eyelashes from that angle, you felt more determined to come undone right to his face. Roger brought a finger to your clit stimulating you to reach your high and for a moment, you grabbed all your energy to build up your pace once again. You tightened your grip to the headboard as you felt yourself reaching your high.
Unfortunately, Roger is physically unavailable to coo you because of you hovering his mouth, so you muttered forms of encouragement in the back of your head, until you felt yourself coming undone to Roger's mouth.
He kissed your cunt one last time before you laid down to his chest and rest for a moment.
"So, how do you like to be repaid, love?" you smirked at him as you fix your knees to kneel on both if his side. You tug his shirt, signalling him to remove it and he complied.
You felt his bulge growing inside as you were sitting on his crotch and rode it a little to tease him.
"Fucking hell, Y/N." You lift youself off Roger, and he arched his hips to make your work easier when you started pulling his boxers down. His cock instantly flying over to slap his belly and you smiled you the view.
One hand grabbed his balls to massage and the other one took his length and shove it to your lips to kiss. He whined at the contact that made your smile grow wider.
"You're enjoying this, are you?" he shakily asked you and you chuckled at him.
You took only his tip in your mouth, letting your tongue to swirl and sucking it like a lollipop. Roger grabs a handful of your hair to push you to himself as you bob your head.
"Yes go on love. You're doing good."
You took him deeper as you heard his encouragement, in which you earned a moan out of him. Your free hand held the rest of his length as it moves concurrently with your mouth. You did it for a little while until you pull him out and he whines at the lost of contact.
"Fuck my face daddy." It was supposed to sound like a dirty talk for him, but you were no good at it and it comes out like a command, in which soon he obliged and you're thankful for that.
"Of course stand up Rog. So lazy."
He chuckled with you as he stood up on his feet and you got youself on your knees. He held his length and pumped it first as he grabs your hair one again before shoving his cock inside your mouth. He rocks himself in a fast motion, forcing his whole length to be inside your mouth and you gagged as its tip hits your throat. Liquid dripping from you mouth as he goes further. Soon, Roger failingly keep his pace.
He suddenly pulls out leaving you puzzled.
"Lay down, back on the bed." He commanded as he was about to walk off.
"W-where you going?" you asked panting.
"To get con-"
"Raw me instead Rog." you said and his eyes twinkled at you.
"You sure?" he asked reassuringly.
"Yeah, put a baby in me." He laughed at you as he carries your body towards the upper area of the bed.
"We'll tackle that later." he said and he laid you down properly and he hovered you. He kissed you passionately as his hands took the hem of your shirt and pulled it upwards to remove your covers. He caressed you breast for a moment before proceeding to align his manhood to your entrance. He pushed himself inside you. Rocking back and forth slowly until he found a pace perfect for him. His groans and your moans, together with the skin slapping are the only sound that occupies your whole bedroom.
His pace grew faster that made you grabbed sheets like you've never grabbed them before, curling your toes just as he puts a finger on your clit to rub circular motion on it.
"I'm f-fucking close R-roger!" He burried his face between your neck and shoulder, leaving whichever part of your skin his lips landed violet marks.
He brings your leg to his shoulder giving him the ability to hit deeper and the spot that you've wanted.
"T-there it is!" You walls tighten around Roger's cock and soon you felt yourself filling his length which was enough to drag him to his high as well. You felt a pool of hot spurts waving inside you as he dedicatedly rock his hips slower as he finishes off. Roger's body fell onto yours and rested his weight for a short while until he pulls out of you and laid beside you.
"So love. Why did you want to me to raw you and put a fetus there?" Roger asked.
"Because-" he cuts you off.
"Wait!" he stumbled as he got up from the bed rushing to the bathroom and he walks back with a wet washcloth and cleans you up. He set down the washcloth on the table and laid back at your side, body facing yours.
"So the baby?"
"Roger, it's because I'm saying yes. Yes I will marry you."
He stayed still for a moment, in shock, lost for words, it was when he realized You said yes to his proposal last night he came back to the world. Roger kissed you passionately and about to go deeper when he stood up and whisphered "Where is that goddamn ring?" to himself. He walks towards the hatstand and he cupped his coat for the box and goes back a you and knelt at the side of the bed and put the ring in you.
"Just fits you perfectly love." He said and he kissed the diamond ring attached to your finger and pulls you up to stand with him. You shared kiss with Roger and pulls away after.
"Sex number two today?" He asked smirking at you as he carried your body and throw both of you on the bed.
"First sex after being engaged." You answered as you kissed him passionately and instantly transitioned to hungrily.
#queen fanfiction#queen imagines#roger taylor#roger taylor fanfiction#roger taylor imagines#roger taylor smut#roger taylor x reader#roger taylor x reader smut#roger taylor x reader fluff#rtd#rtdwrites
90 notes
·
View notes
Text
James Spence Monroe
James Monroe first caught Elizabeth Kortrightâs eye in 1785 while he was serving as a member of the Continental Congress. The two married on February 16, 1786 at Trinity Church, New York two days after Valentines Day as it is noted in the account books of the church [x]. Ten months later, in December (the exact date in unknown) their first daughter, Eliza Monroe (purposely named after her mother) was born in Virginia. After the birth, Monroe wrote to mentor Thomas Jefferson,
âMrs. Monroe hath added a daughter to our society, who thoâ noisy, contributes greatly to its amusement.â
When he was away from his new family (though he painfully did not wish to be so) he would inquire in a few letters that were saved between them: âHas she grown any, and is there any perceptible alteration in her?â He called her âa little monkeyâ and would close them with âKiss the little babe for me & take care of yourself & of her." This would be their last child for thirteen years.Â
It is unknown exactly why James and Elizabeth Monroe did not have anymore children until thirteen years later but it is speculated that Elizabeth was getting pregnant but she was having miscarriages. Although there no record of any miscarriages (or possibly stillbirths), the fact that the couple were able to produce two children after those long years of âhiatusâ does prove she was able to have children after the birth Eliza. Another factor that points to this is that Elizabeth had rather fragile health and late onset epilepsy that caused her physical injury. The miscarriages possibly were recorded but as most of Elizabethâs correspondence was burned by her husband following her death, there is no way to know.Â
By 1799 when the Monroes did have another son, James, Elizabeth and little Eliza had already resided all over Europe while Monroe was ambassador to France. In May (exact date unknown) 1799, back in Virginia near Charlottesville, Elizabeth Monroe gave birth to a son, James Spence Monroe and as the father pointed out to Janet Montgomery:
âI was balancing for some time what I should call him, and among the worthies of our country...I should have thought more of the names of Jefferson & Montgomery than any we boast of. But his mother is an old fashioned woman & chose...to follow the old fashioned track of calling him after his father... âÂ
The elder James was ecstatic with his sonâs birth and because Monroe burnt a lot of his letters before his own death, we have only a summary of what Thomas Jefferson wrote back to Monroe, replying to letter written about the new infant:
â[Thomas] Jefferson presents his compliments to Colo. Monroe, & his sincere congratulations to him & mrs Monroe on the interesting addition to their family. he wishes to know how mrs Monroe & the youngster do; and would be made very happy if he could offer any thing grateful to [mrs] Monroe. rice, pearl barley &c sometimes useful to the sick, she probably has: if not, they are here at her service.â
When James Spence Monroe was born, his father was governor of Virginia. Due to the infants sickly health, Monroe was taking trips every other day from the capital to his home and than back again. He did not want to risk having Elizabeth travel in her still weakened condition and neither did he want his child to be on the road while still sickly. James Jr would never reach sound health in his sixteen months of life.Â
By June of 1800, a smallpox outbreak occurred in the town and Monroe wrote to Madison that â[he is] forbidden to inoculate our child on acct. of his teething & having the Hg. cough, my family will probably soon move up the country." Due to the babies teething, James Spence had become sick with whooping cough by mid summer of 1800. In August, the family spent time in the country air of their home in Albemarle, thinking the fresh air would be beneficial to the young boy's health. August 6th, the father wrote to Madison,
âOur child has a fever, did not sleep last night nor on the road. I fear he will not rest to night. We shall have the Dr. with him tomorrow, & his gums lancd as we hope that is the only cause of his present indisposition.â
Teething was becoming so difficult and painful, a surgeon was called to lance his gums to try and alleviate the problem. By August 13th, the symptoms shortly vanished, but J.S. (as he was referred to in Monroeâs letters) was still suffering from a fever.
âI returned from Richmond yesterday (wednesday) and found my child better than when I left him. The dangerous simptoms of the thrush seem to be past, and the hooping cough has nearly left him, so that extreme debility, is his present chief complaint.â
Monroe had to leave to attend to business in Richmond because he was still the governor of Virginia. In the same letter, Monroe noted that the constant rides back and forth between the governors palace and his family home and sonâs bedside was taking and toll on James Srâs health:
âI have been so much worsted by my ride down & back, in the sun, that I can scarcely sit up [today], and my family are not less wearied with the duties which devolve on it in my absence. At present we have no plan but that of ending this state of things.â
The next day on August 14th, the child seemed to be in recovery, Monroe headed back to the capital:
"...since my last my child has had no relapse of his former complaints, but I have recd. a notice which shews I ought to be at Richmd.â
A few times reports were surfacing of a yellow fever outbreak in Norfolk. On August 20th, he arranged for his family to travel to Caroline County to pay a visit to his sister, Elizabeth Buckner, again believing the fresh country air would be good for little James's health. Writing on September 9th that
âMrs. M. is gone on a visit to my sister Buckner in Caroline, and writes me she and Eliza are well & the child much improved. By moving him abt. he will I hope get the better soon of those diseases of childhood, & recover his strength.â
Monroe had spent much of August traveling between Albemarle County, where his young son was seriously ill, and Richmond, where he and the Council of State took steps to quarantine Norfolk for yellow fever. In Richmond on the afternoon of Saturday, August 30th, Monroe received information that an insurrection by slaves in the surrounding area would strike the city that night. He communicated with the mayors of Richmond and Petersburg and called out militia to protect the capitol building and public stores of arms and ammunition. Heavy rainfall that made roads and bridges impassable forestalled the beginning of the revolt that night, but Monroe soon received information to convince him that the plan for rebellion was still in place. The legislature was not in session, but with the concurrence of the council on Tuesday, September 2nd the governor alerted all Virginia militia regiments and strengthened the guard on key locations in and around the capital city. He also communicated with local civil officials.Â
The evening of September 2nd the first group of suspects was brought to Richmond from the vicinity of the Henrico County plantation of Thomas H. Prosser, whose slave Gabriel had been named as the primary leader of the intended revolt. Under Virginia law of more than a centuryâs standing, the trial of a slave accused of committing a capital offense was to take place without a jury before a court of oyer and terminer assembled for the purpose. According to a 1786 statute, which was a modified version of a bill in the great revision of the stateâs law code that Thomas Jefferson and others had drafted some years earlier, a slave could only be condemned to death by unanimous decision of the court of oyer and terminer, and the state would compensate the owner for the value of the executed slave. The first executions for participation in the conspiracy occurred on Friday, September 12th. In the end, twenty-six slaves including Gabriel were hanged. The council agreed to some of the requests from Monroe for pardons or temporary reprieves of condemned men.Â
The crisis and anxiety of Gabrielâs Rebellion topped with the stress of his sonâs sickness was coming to odds with Monroe whose health worsened in this period. Monroe was receiving constant information from his family on the condition of his son. Elizabeth had taken James Spence and went to Fredricksburg where again they believed ever better air would help. The infantâs illness took a turn for the worse on September 20th and on the 22nd, Monroe was writing to Thomas Jefferson that
â...the dangerous indisposition of my child deprives now of that pleasure. Our Infant is in the utmost danger & I begin to fear that we shall want that consolation wh. I was abt. to offer to the afflicted Mr. & Mrs. Carr.â
James Madison cheerfully wrote Monroe back on September 24th that he and Dolley âare glad to hear that your little son has mended so much, as well as that Mrs. M & the rest of you continue well.â James Spence Monroe was on a rapid decline. On the morning of the 28th, Monroe wrote a letter to the Virginia Counsil State saying he was not going to attend the meeting in the afternoon due to the health of his son. After finishing the letter, Monroe set off down his horse unknown that the night of the 28th would J.Sâs last, and it would be the final night they would have with their son. He arrived the in the night when the sun had already set after traveling for miles by horse. James Spence Monroe at the age of only sixteen months died at ten pm on September 28th, 1800.Â
The next day, Monroe wrote a letter to the Virginia Counsil State again, repeated the same reason of why he would not be attending, this time his son was not ill, he was dead. Monroe wrote to Madison and in a letter that featured nothing other than what is below:
âAn unhappy event has occurrâd which has overwhelmed us with grief. At ten last night our beloved babe departed this life after several days sickness, wh. attended the cuting his eye teeth in the last stage, when we flatterâd ourselves the danger had passed. I cannot give you an idea of the effect this event has producâd on my family, or of my own affliction in being a partner and spectator of the scene. Many things have occurrâd my friend, in these late years that abated my sensibility to the affrs. of this world, but this has roused me beyond what I thought it was possible I cod. be. Knowing the interest you take in our welfare, I perform a painful task in communicating to you and family this great calamity.â
The father was witness to his own sonâs death after months of poor health and worrying that finally came to a close. Above, Monroe believed that he was numb to loss until James Spence died and that he had known no other grief in his life and that he would never recover. Monroe grieved deeply over the loss and his health dipped into a decline due to his constant travel, and Elizabeth's health suffered for many months due to her own grief. Neither James nor Elizabeth ever fully recovered.Â
Before departing for ambassadorship in France in 1803, months after the birth of their third and final child, Maria Hester Monroe, Monroe asked his uncle and mentor Joseph Jones to to place a small gravestone over the spot where his child was laid to rest at St. Johnâs church in Richmond, Virginia. Saying that he wanted âsomething more permanent than the memory of our estimable friends who tend his deposit there.â He directed that the stone should bare the buriedâs initials J.S.M. and nothing else. Sadly, this grave has never been located.Â
#wrote it up finally#james spence monroe#james monroe#american history#us history#history#elizabeth monroe#eliza monroe hay#maria hester gouveneur#joseph jones
84 notes
·
View notes
Text
Insolence, Pt. 6 [Adam Cole]
Title: Insolence, Part Six of ? (Part One, Part Two, Part Three, Part Four, Part Five)
Characters: Adam Cole/OC(Brenna, because itâs easier for me to write with names in stories)
Genre: Angst. Regret. Resolve.
Length: ~4,200 words
Warnings: Cursing.
Summary/Inspo: Aftermath (n.) - Consequence. Result.
@catie-kaboom @libby-rose-2016 @legitlunatic @valeonmars @barbelly28 @danapotterwwe @alexahood21 @rollinstrash @covergirlcollarbones @thedeboniardevistation
If you want to be added to the tag list, just let your girl know! :)
(This chapter brought to you by the musical stylings of Chris Stapleton.)
I fucked up.
You stared down at your phone as the bar moved across the top of the screen, indicating the message was being sent to Candice. It was late morning, and you were sprawled on your back on your bed in your hotel room, fully dressed for the day and packed to leave. But you didnât feel ready to do that, given the amount of feelings running through your mind. You had thought about messaging your best friend at home, Lauren, but you felt given Candice was more familiar with Adam, she was the best friend you needed to seek out in this moment. Youâd tell Lauren everything later.
When you initially woke up, you had a minor headache, which after some ibuprofen and water was finally soothed. You at first hadnât lucidly remember last nightâŠand then you had. It all came crashing back down on you. There were some blurry edges around parts of your conversation with Adam, but you clearly remembered all of the actions. Him touching you, you touching him. You initiating the kiss. Him letting youâŠthen stopping you. His words to you.
You donât want this.
Who was he to tell you what you wanted? You didnât even know what you wanted! You certainly hadnât wanted to make up with him only to then make out with him. Yet, here you were, the morning after, all of that having happened. Because in the moment last night, you had in fact wanted to kiss him. Apparently? You still werenât sure what motivated your actions honestly.
He was just there, being so sweet, and you had been drinking, though you werenât drunk, and something just made you want to do it. A clouded judgement call because he was kind of pretty? A craving for intimacy that you hadnât had in months? A stupid decision as a stupid attempt at further reconciliation? Hey Adam, instead of yelling at you, let me put my tongue down your throat, you mocked yourself in your own head. Dumbass.
Your phone ringing brought you back to the present. It didnât surprise you to see it was Candice calling, and after swiping on the screen, you pressed the object to your ear.
âI fucked up,â you reiterated.
âI got that,â she replied. âWhat did you do?â
âI kissed Adam.â You figured straight to the point would be best.
âYou WHAT?â
âI kissed Adam,â you repeated, before groaning and throwing a hand over your face. For some reason saying it out loud to your best friend brought a new side of realism to the situation.
âYou said kissed right? Not killed? Kissed?â
âYes, Candice, I kissed Adam, OK? Please stop making me say it. It doesnât feel right saying it,â you emphasized.
ââŠwhy?â
âFor real? Uh, first off, maybe because, itâs Adam?â
âOK, andâŠ?â
âCandice, youâre fucking with me right?â You couldnât understand why she was suddenly less shocked by the situation, as though who it had happened with was somehow logical to her. It shouldnât be. It wasnât to you.
âI mean, donât get me wrong, yes you kissing Adam is completely unexpected. But you kissing anyone would be unexpected to me right now, to be honest,â she explained.
âIt was unexpected to me too,â you assured her, just short of resentfully. âBut did it have to be Adam?â
âWhat led to it?â
You went on to give her a brief summation of the night; dinner where he ignored you, you confronting him, him exploding, which then led to the discussion in his hotel room. Your apologies to each other. The scotch and wine. His cryptic statements to you about being different and also his disclosure to no longer being in a relationship. The TV movie. His reassurance that things would be just fine for the two of you now. Your actions.
By the end, you felt even more confused than you had before. Nothing in your narrative seemed to tell you why you had kissed him. Replaying it back to Candice, you had hoped some part of it would stick out, as if to say âyes, THIS is why you did thatâ. But nothing did. You again told Candice about your lack of understanding of your own actions, especially given the history you had with Adam.
âYou guys are comfortable with each other, right? Heâs not some stranger. And knowing you, moving on from EvanâŠitâs not going to be with a stranger. And Iâm not saying like you and Adam are going to have a relationship now, but I get why the first person you kissed since Evan was someone like Adam, someone you know. Itâs like heâsâŠsafe, I guess?â Candice words made sense you supposed, but they didnât bring you as much relief as you had hoped.
âWhyyyyy did I push to reconcile with him?â You bemoaned, closing your eyes. âI should have just let him ignore me and ignored him back. But no, I had to have answers and now here we are, no better off than before!â
âI dunno, I think kissing someone is better than punching them.â
âThatâs because youâre pure and innocent and kinky things donât matter to you.â
âOK, butâŠnot what I meant by that,â Candice giggled.
âSeriously, I punched him a few months ago. He was one of the people I wanted to see least up until, shit, until last night practically,â you realized. âWhy the hell did kissing him make sense to me last night? I wasnât that drunk, I know I wasnât.â
âWellâŠheâs not exactly the most unattractive man in the world,â your friend highlighted. âAnd you had been drinking, however little or much, so you werenât 100% on the defense. And you guys were being all emotional and close and ya know, itâs really not as far-fetched as you think it is. Heâs pretty much the only guy I can think of in our lives where itâs not like it would be incestuous or just weird or wrong for you to kiss.â
âBut it IS weird,â you argued. âI feel weird.â
âDo you feel weird because you kissed Adam? Or because you think you arenât hating what you did overall as much as you should?â
âBoth?â You were guessing, at best. âI mean, I know I can move on from Evan, logically Iâm sure I will, but I hadnât plan to at this point.â
âI donât think you can plan those kinds of things, hon,â Candice replied, her tone gentle. âYou canât just be like âOK, and on this Tuesday is the day I will no longer miss my husband and I will start being interested in someone elseâ.â
âI know that,â you sighed. âI just meanâŠI kind of, I guess, had it in my head that itâd be at least a year before I even contemplated it? Like, I still miss him, every day. Because the most random things make me think of him. And who he was to me, that canât just be replaced. It justâŠI donât hurt the same, but it aches a lot.â
âOf course it does. Thatâs part of the healing process. It doesnât happen just over night, and Iâm sure for years to come, youâll still have that ache in some ways. But Brenna, telling yourself you have a timeline to handle your grief and move on, thatâs just setting yourself up to fail.â
You knew she was right, deep in your soul you knew it, but it didnât feel OK to you entirely. How could you justify being with a man for nine years, and moving on from him in under one? Granted, it was now 11 months ago youâd lost him, but even so. It wasnât a year.
âAnd again, itâs not like you slept with Adam last night. You kissed him. Thatâs pretty low-level stuff right there honestly. Not saying that if you had slept with him it would be make you the devil, but just kissing him definitely doesnât make you the devil,â Candice guaranteed.
âHow do I face him after this, Candice? Like seriously. Weâve been at each otherâs throats for weeks,â you pointed out.
âNot last night you werenât. You were at each otherâs mouths.â You could hear the smirking pride on her face in her voice.
âYouâre not cute,â you declared coolly.
âIâm adorable,â she argued cheerfully, before becoming serious again. âBren, listen to me, I know Adam. Heâs a downright jackass to a lot of people, and he means it. And heâs been a jackass to you, but he never meant it. He wanted to make things right with you for a while, and yea, maybe heâs gone about it the wrong way, but then so have you. You both have done things that havenât been the smartest or the best or whatever. But this kiss? I can promise you, this isnât going to be the final straw for you guys.â
âHow do you know?â
âBecause, you both want to be in each otherâs lives too much. If you didnât, you wouldnât have spent all this time fighting and what not.â
You were vaguely upset at how much sense Candice was making now. You couldnât argue her point. Clearly you cared about Adam, about his friendship, or else, she was right, you wouldnât keep confronting him and fighting him and demanding explanations. If you didnât care at all, after that first confrontation, you would have left well enough alone.
âMaybe all this fighting was just foreplay for you both?â Candice considered, causing you to roll your eyes.
ââŠI take back my earlier âinnocentâ comment about you.â
âOh, shut up. And also, Joey Ryan, kind of one of my best friends. I know things that I cannot un-know thanks to him,â Candice stated, and you could envision her shuddering, making you laugh.
âYea, heâs a wealth of filthy knowledge,â you agreed. âAlso, the internet. Scary place, yo.â
âFor real,â your friend giggled with concurrence. âLook, just, donât work yourself up, OK? This will be fine.â
âI donât believe you, but sure,â you responded. âI guess I should just go face him and get it over with.â
âStop acting like youâre going to your death,â Candice chided. âJust, please take this piece of advice: do go face him and donât let this not get talked about. Thatâs how you guys got yourselves in this mess to start.â
âYeaâŠcommunication, not our strong point.â
âOh, yea, no,â she agreed quickly. âDefinitely not.â
After saying your goodbyes to Candice, you laid on your bed for a moment longer, trying to feel at all settled in the situation. But you didnât. So you supposed it was just best to get on with it.
You grabbed up your bags, and checked out of the hotel, before getting in to a cab. The Briscoes had offered to wait for you, but you had sent them on their way earlier. It was nothing against them necessarily; you just wanted as much time to think and be and plan by yourself as possible.
The cab got you to the venue much quicker than you had anticipated. After paying and getting your items out, you walked in to the venue with your suitcase rolling behind you. Finding the girlsâ locker room was easy enough, and you set your stuff in a corner. Taking your phone from your purse, you took in a deep breath, and set out to find Adam.
It didnât take you too long to navigate the backstage area. You passed many people you knew, saying quick greetings to them, but continuing on your way. When you didnât locate him, you wandered out in to the actual arena part of the building. And sure enough he was standing around in a group, talking and laughing amongst themselves.
You watched Adam for a moment, knowing this was what you had to do, no matter how worried or nervous or scared you were. Doing your best to have your head held high, you walked over to the group. Greetings were exchanged amongst all of you, with some brief chit chat and smiles. You gently set your hand on Adamâs arm, causing his blue eyes to come to yours for the first time since you had walked up.
âCan I talk to you?â
âYea.â His response was short, curt, and led to you both, without further words, walking away from the group. You walked side by side with him, though you were the one leading the two of you along. You wound your way through the hallways, further back in to the event center, until you saw an empty room that didnât look like it would be occupied any time soon. You walked in, Adam following, shutting the door after himself.
There wasnât much in the room, a longer table, a couple of scattered chairs. You didnât feel like sitting, too wired with emotions. You kept a few feet between yourself and Adam, who had taken to leaning back against the wall beside the door. He was regarding you, his face without expression, which didnât help you feel any better either. You couldnât read anything about him in that moment; was he just as unsettled by last night as you were? Did he not care at all?
âWhatâs up?â
That was his opening question? You started to realize that maybe he wasnât bothered by last night like you were. Maybe he didnât even remember it? Oh god, did he not remember it? Were you the only one who knew what had transgressed between the two of you? Should you just not say anything then?
âI justâŠwanted to talk about last night,â you explained, a noticeable lack of conviction in your tone.
âAlcohol is a hell of a thing, Bren. Itâs OK. And I know you didnât trulyâŠwant to do that with me last night, it was just a thing that happened.â
So he did remember. That was good to know. But you couldnât help but get irked at the fact that he was, once again, telling you what you wanted. What right did he have in doing that? Why did he get to make judgement calls on your behalf now at all times?
âCan you please stop telling me what I want? Iâm sick of you thinking you know whatâs best for me.â
âIâm right though!â He argued back, stepping away from the wall, so he was standing upright, though there was still distance between you both.
âHow the hell can you know that?â You challenged, your hands going to your hips.
âBecause I know you,â Adam said. âAnd I know that right now, this isnât what you need with me.â
After his statement, he appeared to deflate some, the angry tension leaving his posture. You watched on curiously, his words not making much sense. Need with him? You observed him as he ran a hand over the top of his hair, before crossing his arms over his chest. He seemed to close in on himself in this stance.
âHow?â You inquired again, but this time with your voice having lost most of its own heated edge. âWhat does that even mean?â
âHow many years have we known each other?â He countered, switching the topic quickly.
âI donât know. Five? Six?â
âAnd that whole time, you were always with Evan. From the day I met you, you were in a relationship with Evan. We all knew it, everyone, and it justâŠit put you in thisâŠdifferent category for all of us. We could only see you as friend, or little sister, or whatever. It took away any of that confusion or choice in the matter.â
There was that word again. Different. Different. Why were you always so different to him?
âAdamâŠI donât understandâŠâ
âCome on Bren, yes you do,â he argued, practically pleading with you, his arms dropping to his sides. âYouâre not new to this business, world we live in. You know how it plays out with women around here a lot of the times. But youâŠyou got to transcend all of that bullshit. We didnât have to try to figure you out, howâd you be. It was obvious you were just here for wrestling, and making friends and family. No one could try to sleep with you or any of that shit either because it just wasnât an option.â
âOK? Is there something wrong with that?â
âNo, no, of course not,â Adam insisted. âBut that wasâŠthen.â
You knew you had to ask what he meant, but you dreaded doing so. This conversation had taken such a sharp turn. He had clearly come prepared to speak with you, had gotten his thoughts in order. And you had a feeling you knew where this was headed, but you werenât positive, and you definitely werenât ready to handle it if you were right. You wanted to be wrong, didnât want any more inconsistency around the two of you. Taking a shallow breath, you pushed on, because ignoring things was what got you in this chaos in the first place basically. You had promised Candice after all.
ââŠand now?â
âNowâŠyouâre my friend, Brenna. ⊠But for some fucking stupid reason, I canât just keep you in that box the same way anymore,â he said, sounding mad at himself about this. âWithout EvanâŠthat wall, that distance weâve always had to have just becauseâŠis gone. And now youâre not⊠Look, I told you before, youâre not just one of the guys, Bren. You never were really, and youâre justâŠdefinitely not now.â
Your head was spinning, you felt jittery all over. Had he really just told you that? What was he really trying to say? What was going on right now? You werenât prepared for this conversation. You had come to him, thinking you just needed to smooth over some weirdness from a kiss, laugh it off, move on. You hadnât even at all entertained the idea that this discussion would go so off the rails for you.
âI donât like this, this lack of control I have with you. Thatâs not me. Iâm always in charge, I always have a plan,â he declared, appearing to take your silence as a need for more clarification. âBut with youâŠI never know what Iâm doing, what youâre doing. It bugs the hell out of me that the second I see you, I have no idea whatâs going to happen.â
âTo be fair, neither do I really,â you spoke quietly, and a smile twitched on his face.
âI figured as much,â he replied.
You chewed at your lip, finding it harder and harder to keep looking at him, wanting more than anything to just hide into yourself right now. This was just too much. You had no idea what to say. You still werenât even fully understanding his intent at this point either. It was a bit ambiguous whatever his aim was in telling you all this.
âIâm not trying to come at you and overwhelm you,â Adam stated, seemingly not oblivious to your body language and reaction. âAnd Iâm also not saying I have some like, long-standing unrequited crush on you. Anything that this is, itâs because of recent events. So what Iâm saying is, when it comes to you and being just your friend, this is new territory for me and I donât know what to do because everything is just so different now.â
âStop saying different,â you requested, your distaste growing for that word more and more each time it was used. It didnât tell you anything concrete, it just made you more unsure each time. And that was getting on your nerves.
âIâm sorry? I donât know what else to call it though. Because thatâs what it is,â he explained. âYou, your world, you in my world, anything between usâŠitâs different now. We canât pretend itâs not.â
âI know itâs not,â you asserted. âBelieve me, Iâm well aware my entire life isnât what it was a year ago.â
âThen you have to understand, in some way, why Iâm having a hard time figuring you, us, out,â Adam reasoned.
âI mean, yea, sure. Itâs not like last night, the last few weeks, havenât confused me and made me question everything too. But I justâŠI didnât think it ran as deep as it apparently does,â you said, uncertain and dazed.
âThings changed in Atlanta for me,â he admitted, looking at you, almost with guilt. âBefore that too, to some extent. The way you are to meâŠI donât know. Iâm not sure how to be around you anymore. You werenât a part of my life for so many months, and then you were, and itâs just beenâŠcrazy. And kissing you last nightâŠâ
âDo you regret it?â Your question cut him off, and his face changed to one of surprise. He clearly wasnât thinking you were going to ask him that.
ââŠYes? âŠNo? I mean, I know I shouldâŠâ He trailed off, just watching you, almost helpless in his inability to give you a direct answer.
ââŠbut you donât.â You finished for him, your voice a whisper. You didnât know why his words, these words, affected you so much more than the others. You thought you regretted the kiss, in some ways at least. You had to. It hadnât been premeditated. It hadnât been an idea you had until it happened. It certainly had not been a part of your life plan.
âNot entirely.â
His admission made your heart rate increase more than it was already was. You had not expected any of this. You had expected Adam to be on the same page as you, slightly puzzled and weirded out, and just trying to move past last nightâs events. You had not expected it to mean anything to him, beyond a drunken-at-best mistake. You certainly hadnât expected him to have any type of muddled feelings for you that werenât exclusively of the friend variety.
âI liked kissing you,â he murmured, causing your breath to catch even further. âI hadnât wanted to stop it last night.â
ââŠyou did though?â
âBecause I had to,â Adam stressed. He sighed, looking down to the ground for a moment, before taking in a breath of his own, and looking back up to you. âWe havenât been able to, not once, be together without somethingâŠeventful happening lately. YouâŠno matter that itâs been almost a year, youâre still in a lot of ways getting over Evan, I know that. And I canâtâŠboth of those arenât things I can ignore.â
He paused, his gaze gentle as he looked you over. It took all your resolve to look back at him. You were uncomfortable; not because of what he was telling you necessarily, but because this situation was so surprising and so foreign. He was right in saying that since you had accosted him in December, things hadnât been calm in the least.
âI justâŠI had to stop it last night,â he reaffirmed. âWhat I think of you, whatever that is, I canât let that be important right now. Iâll figure it out myself. But while doing that, Iâm not going to let you put yourself in a position for more problems to handle. You donât need that.â
Despite him telling you want you needed again, this time it didnât rub you the wrong way like it usually did. Somewhere in you, you appreciated his sentiments actually. You appreciated he was cognizant of your on-going healing heartbreak. He was trying to look out for your best interest, and was putting your mental wellbeing above his in a way. Despite his own confusion, desire, wants, what have you, he was putting yours first.
âLook, letâs just, try to be the friends we have been literally fighting to be for weeks now, OK? Weâll just hang out, be around each other, let things settle down a bit. I think thatâs what we need right now.â
âYeaâŠOK,â you agreed, halfheartedly. You knew he had a valid point, that things had been nothing but chaos for the two of you for weeks. And whatever feelings he was having for you now, he hadnât anticipated heâd have. You hadnât anticipated youâd kiss him either. There was just too much emotion, too much confusion, in every interaction you had with each other lately. Maybe some respectable distance would do you both good.
âYou know, this has been hard on me too. The whole, category, box, whatever, thing,â you disclosed. âIn a different way than you, but itâs still changed. I mean, I was always the advice giver, the person that people trusted to keep their secrets and take care of them, and that it was OK to be human with me without judgement. And then with everything that happenedâŠroles got reversed in a lot of ways. I was the one people had to take care of.  It wasnât easy for me to accept that.â
âI know,â he assured you sympathetically. âWe all justâŠhave a lot to come to terms with, I guess. But weâll get here, Bren.â
âI hope so.â And you really did. You had come much too far in the past eleven months for it all to go to hell now. Even though you hadnât predicted youâd be here in this situation with Adam, you knew all you could do now was see it through. However it turned out though, that was very much up for debate.
Yâall please donât hate me!! Itâs not the end, I promise. Iâve got a handful of chapters still planned at this point. But itâll all depend on how the writing goes. Sometimes it takes me places I didnât plan honestly. :)
UPDATED: Part Seven is up.
#adam cole fan fiction#adam cole imagine#adam cole fanfic#Adam Cole#wrestling fanfic#wrestling fan fiction#wrestling fan fic#wrestling imagine#roh fanfic#roh imagine#insolence
81 notes
·
View notes
Link
Well, there is lots going on in Flynn World.The presidentâs former national-security advisor, Michael Flynn, is obviously elated that, on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit granted his petition for a writ of mandamus -- i.e., it instructed District Judge Emmet Sullivan to grant the Justice Departmentâs motion to dismiss the case against him. I have a column about the ruling up on the homepage.As reported by NRâs Zachary Evans, moreover, Flynn defense lawyer Sidney Powell has filed an intriguing supplement the defenseâs concurrence in the Justice Departmentâs dismissal motion. The supplement, also filed on Wednesday, includes notes said to have been handwritten by Peter Strzok, then a top FBI counterintelligence agent (and, of course, later fired for sundry misconduct).It is being widely reported that the notes concern a now infamous White House meeting about Flynn that took place on January 5, 2017. (I began writing about that meeting as soon as we learned about it in early 2018, and it is central to my book about the TrumpâRussia investigation, Ball of Collusion). The meeting included the top political and law-enforcement leadership of the Obama administration -- President Obama, Vice President Biden, national-security advisor Susan Rice, deputy attorney general Sally Yates, and FBI director James Comey -- notwithstanding the insistence of Obama apologists that the administration did not permit law enforcement to be influenced by politics. (I would counter that mixing the two was the administrationâs M-O).I suspect the Strzok notes are about the January 5 meeting, too. There is, however, confusion on this point.The short supplement Ms. Powell filed states that Strzokâs notes are âbelieved to be of January 4, 2017â (emphasis added). Now, Powell received these notes from the Justice Department as part of its continuing review of the Flynn case (which was prosecuted by special counsel Robert Muellerâs staff). Obviously, she is privy to more information about the case than we are, and we do not know what, if anything, DOJ told her about the provenance of the notes. That said, I am skeptical about the January 4 dating.If itâs right, that would mean there were two meetings involving the same five people regarding the same subject matter on consecutive days. It seems highly unlikely to me that President Obama and Vice President Biden, along with Rice, met with Comey and Yates on both January 4 and 5. Plus, in connection with its motion to dismiss Flynn case, the government has previously disclosed FBI interviews of former deputy AG Yates and Mary McCord, formerly the chief of DOJâs National Security Division. Both of them indicated that Yates did not know until January 5 that the FBI had intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. That was a somewhat embarrassing admission for them to make, so I donât think thereâs any reason to doubt it. (Yates should have been briefed before the White House meeting by McCord, who had been alerted by the FBIâs then-deputy director, Andrew McCabe, on January 3. Perhaps McCord did not realize Yates was going to the White House on the morning of January 5; she had scheduled a briefing for Yates that afternoon. As a result, Yates first learned about the FlynnâKislyak calls when Comey and Obama discussed them in her presence at the White House meeting.)Another peculiar thing: We have no basis to believe Strzok was present at the January 5 White House pow-wow -- at least the follow-on meeting involving the five top-tier officials, several rungs above Strzok.On that score, note that there were really two meetings on January 5. The first was for the chiefs of four intelligence agencies -- FBI, CIA, NSA, and ODNI -- to brief the president (presumably, along with his Veep and national security advisor) on their report assessing Russiaâs interference in the 2020 election. The second was the follow-on meeting, involving only Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey. There were several more people in attendance at the first January 5 meeting. Strzok was deeply involved in the assessment report. I donât know how much staff the intel chiefs brought along to make their presentation to Obama, so I suppose itâs possible Strzok was there, but Iâve never heard that before. Plus, Strzokâs notes appear to refer to the follow-on meeting, involving only the five highest ranking officials.It is more likely, then, that Strzokâs notes were taken when someone later briefed him about the White House meeting that Strzok did not attend. I am hypothesizing here, of course, but if Iâm right, we should bear in mind that the notes would reflect, at best, a second-hand account. That would not make them inaccurate, necessarily, but itâs worth bearing in mind.The difference between January 4 and 5 is significant, and not just because it is unlikely that there were two meetings involving the five major players. January 4 is the date of the âclosing memoâ the FBI had completed to shut down its case on Flynn due to lack of evidence that he was a clandestine agent of Russia.In addition to that memo, the Justice Department previously disclosed to Powell important texts from that day. On the afternoon of January 4, Strzok texted the Flynn case agent (believed to be Joe Pientka, though the name is redacted in the disclosure) and was relieved to learn that the Flynn case (âCrossfire Razorâ) had not yet been formally closed in the bureauâs files, even though nearly all the steps necessary to do so (including getting Comeyâs approval) had been taken.Strzok promptly reported that the case remained open to Lisa Page, McCabeâs counsel (and Strzokâs paramour). She replied, âphew . . . . But yeah, thatâs amazing that heâs still open. Good I guess.â Strzokâs agreed: âYeah, our utter incompetence actually helps us.Strzok subsequently told Pientka, â7th floor involvedâ -- meaning the FBIâs top hierarchy, Comey and McCabe. The issue at the time was that the bureau âneed[ed] to decide to what to do withâ Flynn with respect to âthe [redacted].â I suspect whatâs redacted is a reference to the FlynnâKislyak communications the FBI had intercepted. Pientka said, âI heard that might be the case yesterday [i.e., January 3]. Did DD [i.e., Deputy Director McCabe] send that material over?â As noted above, we know McCabe had become aware of the FlynnâKislyak calls on January 3 because thatâs when he informed DOJâs McCord about them.To recap: In the January 4 texts, Strzok observed that the FBIâs brass was trying to figure out what to do about the new Flynn information (i.e., the intercepted Kislyak calls) and expressing relief that the case was still open -- i.e., the bureau would not have to come up with a reason to either reopen the case or start a new case, neither of which could have been justified by the non-incriminatory substance of Flynnâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. The newly revealed notes attributed to Strzok contain no reference to Obama, the Justice Department, or any White House meeting. It is likely, therefore, that on January 4, Strzok and others at the FBI were preparing for Comeyâs scheduled briefing of Obama the following morning. It is improbable that Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey had a meeting on January 4, and then met again on January 5.Now, onto what Strzokâs notes actually say. If I am right that they reflect what he was told about the January 5 meeting, which he did not attend, they donât tell us much that we didnât already know.The handwritten notes appear in our Zachary Evansâs report, linked above. What follows is a rendering of what Strzokâs chicken-scratch says, based on my discussion with others knowledgeable about the case and my own perusal. The notes refer to people by initials, so let me first interpret those: âNSAâ is National Security Advisor Rice; âDâ is Director Comey; âDAGâ is Deputy Attorney General Yates; âVPâ is Vice President Biden; and âPâ is President Obama. There is also a reference that looks like âAppleâ -- I am not convinced that âAppleâ is what it says, nor do I know to whom or what it refers. Where Iâve added explanatory observations, my initials -- âACMâ appear in the brackets.Here is what the notes say:> NSA-D-DAG: Flynn cuts. Other countries [ACM: Iâm not confident in âcountriesâ]> > D-DAG: Lean forward on unless [ACM: all of it is hard to make out, and Iâm not confident in âunlessâ]> > VP: âLogan Actâ> > P: These are unusual times> > VP: Iâve been [ACM: thereâs a scratch out] on the intel committee for ten years and I never> > P: Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it [ACM: âoverâ instead of âatâ has also been suggested to me, but it looks like âatâ.]> > P: Is there anything I shouldnât be telling transition team?> > D: Flynn -> Kislyak calls but appear legit> > Apple â Happy New Year. Yeah right.Not very enlightening. âFlynn cutsâ refers to summaries of communications intercepted under FISA. The notes suggest that Biden may have been a more active participant in the discussion than previously revealed. But that shouldnât surprise anyone: The former vice president is a garrulous sort. In any event, his reference to the Logan Act, in quotes, could well mean that he was repeating something someone else had already said rather than making a suggestion on his own. (McCordâs interview indicated that the absurd notion of prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act may have originated in the ODNI, and it may have been developed in discussions between the ODNI and FBI. The Justice Department appears to have been skeptical about it, at least internally.)I do think that there is significance in Strzokâs notation of Comey acknowledging that the FlynnâKislyak calls appeared legitimate. Strzok was a high-ranking FBI official who (a) had contact with Comey, (b) was in regular communication with McCabeâs office, and (c) worked closely with other bureau people who had regular access to Comey and McCabe. As a result, he was in a position to know Comeyâs (and the FBIâs) take on the FlynnâKislyak calls. Furthermore, as I observed above, the FBI was very relieved that the Flynn case had not been closed in their filing system. That only makes sense if they suddenly wanted to continue the investigation despite the lack of a valid reason for doing so. If the bureau had believed the FlynnâKislyak calls were incriminating, the agents would not have cared whether the case had been formally closed because theyâd know they had well-founded reasons to reopen it.That said, it is not a revelation that Comey knew there was nothing illegitimate about the incoming national security advisorâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. We already knew, from New York Times reporting, that the FBI had told âObama advisersâ that there was no evidence of a corrupt quid pro quo in the FlynnâKislyak calls. And we already knew from Susan Riceâs January 20, 2017, âNote to Fileâ email that Comey told Obama there was âno indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak[.]âConsequently, if Strzok was accurately reporting his own or some other bureau officialâs recollection that Comey said the FlynnâKislyak calls âappear legit,â that confirms other accounts previously disclosed.In a nutshell, Strzokâs notes are significant in what they confirm, but they probably do not reveal anything new.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/3fVHxjx
0 notes
Link
Well, there is lots going on in Flynn World.The presidentâs former national-security advisor, Michael Flynn, is obviously elated that, on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit granted his petition for a writ of mandamus -- i.e., it instructed District Judge Emmet Sullivan to grant the Justice Departmentâs motion to dismiss the case against him. I have a column about the ruling up on the homepage.As reported by NRâs Zachary Evans, moreover, Flynn defense lawyer Sidney Powell has filed an intriguing supplement the defenseâs concurrence in the Justice Departmentâs dismissal motion. The supplement, also filed on Wednesday, includes notes said to have been handwritten by Peter Strzok, then a top FBI counterintelligence agent (and, of course, later fired for sundry misconduct).It is being widely reported that the notes concern a now infamous White House meeting about Flynn that took place on January 5, 2017. (I began writing about that meeting as soon as we learned about it in early 2018, and it is central to my book about the TrumpâRussia investigation, Ball of Collusion). The meeting included the top political and law-enforcement leadership of the Obama administration -- President Obama, Vice President Biden, national-security advisor Susan Rice, deputy attorney general Sally Yates, and FBI director James Comey -- notwithstanding the insistence of Obama apologists that the administration did not permit law enforcement to be influenced by politics. (I would counter that mixing the two was the administrationâs M-O).I suspect the Strzok notes are about the January 5 meeting, too. There is, however, confusion on this point.The short supplement Ms. Powell filed states that Strzokâs notes are âbelieved to be of January 4, 2017â (emphasis added). Now, Powell received these notes from the Justice Department as part of its continuing review of the Flynn case (which was prosecuted by special counsel Robert Muellerâs staff). Obviously, she is privy to more information about the case than we are, and we do not know what, if anything, DOJ told her about the provenance of the notes. That said, I am skeptical about the January 4 dating.If itâs right, that would mean there were two meetings involving the same five people regarding the same subject matter on consecutive days. It seems highly unlikely to me that President Obama and Vice President Biden, along with Rice, met with Comey and Yates on both January 4 and 5. Plus, in connection with its motion to dismiss Flynn case, the government has previously disclosed FBI interviews of former deputy AG Yates and Mary McCord, formerly the chief of DOJâs National Security Division. Both of them indicated that Yates did not know until January 5 that the FBI had intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. That was a somewhat embarrassing admission for them to make, so I donât think thereâs any reason to doubt it. (Yates should have been briefed before the White House meeting by McCord, who had been alerted by the FBIâs then-deputy director, Andrew McCabe, on January 3. Perhaps McCord did not realize Yates was going to the White House on the morning of January 5; she had scheduled a briefing for Yates that afternoon. As a result, Yates first learned about the FlynnâKislyak calls when Comey and Obama discussed them in her presence at the White House meeting.)Another peculiar thing: We have no basis to believe Strzok was present at the January 5 White House pow-wow -- at least the follow-on meeting involving the five top-tier officials, several rungs above Strzok.On that score, note that there were really two meetings on January 5. The first was for the chiefs of four intelligence agencies -- FBI, CIA, NSA, and ODNI -- to brief the president (presumably, along with his Veep and national security advisor) on their report assessing Russiaâs interference in the 2020 election. The second was the follow-on meeting, involving only Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey. There were several more people in attendance at the first January 5 meeting. Strzok was deeply involved in the assessment report. I donât know how much staff the intel chiefs brought along to make their presentation to Obama, so I suppose itâs possible Strzok was there, but Iâve never heard that before. Plus, Strzokâs notes appear to refer to the follow-on meeting, involving only the five highest ranking officials.It is more likely, then, that Strzokâs notes were taken when someone later briefed him about the White House meeting that Strzok did not attend. I am hypothesizing here, of course, but if Iâm right, we should bear in mind that the notes would reflect, at best, a second-hand account. That would not make them inaccurate, necessarily, but itâs worth bearing in mind.The difference between January 4 and 5 is significant, and not just because it is unlikely that there were two meetings involving the five major players. January 4 is the date of the âclosing memoâ the FBI had completed to shut down its case on Flynn due to lack of evidence that he was a clandestine agent of Russia.In addition to that memo, the Justice Department previously disclosed to Powell important texts from that day. On the afternoon of January 4, Strzok texted the Flynn case agent (believed to be Joe Pientka, though the name is redacted in the disclosure) and was relieved to learn that the Flynn case (âCrossfire Razorâ) had not yet been formally closed in the bureauâs files, even though nearly all the steps necessary to do so (including getting Comeyâs approval) had been taken.Strzok promptly reported that the case remained open to Lisa Page, McCabeâs counsel (and Strzokâs paramour). She replied, âphew . . . . But yeah, thatâs amazing that heâs still open. Good I guess.â Strzokâs agreed: âYeah, our utter incompetence actually helps us.Strzok subsequently told Pientka, â7th floor involvedâ -- meaning the FBIâs top hierarchy, Comey and McCabe. The issue at the time was that the bureau âneed[ed] to decide to what to do withâ Flynn with respect to âthe [redacted].â I suspect whatâs redacted is a reference to the FlynnâKislyak communications the FBI had intercepted. Pientka said, âI heard that might be the case yesterday [i.e., January 3]. Did DD [i.e., Deputy Director McCabe] send that material over?â As noted above, we know McCabe had become aware of the FlynnïżœïżœïżœKislyak calls on January 3 because thatâs when he informed DOJâs McCord about them.To recap: In the January 4 texts, Strzok observed that the FBIâs brass was trying to figure out what to do about the new Flynn information (i.e., the intercepted Kislyak calls) and expressing relief that the case was still open -- i.e., the bureau would not have to come up with a reason to either reopen the case or start a new case, neither of which could have been justified by the non-incriminatory substance of Flynnâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. The newly revealed notes attributed to Strzok contain no reference to Obama, the Justice Department, or any White House meeting. It is likely, therefore, that on January 4, Strzok and others at the FBI were preparing for Comeyâs scheduled briefing of Obama the following morning. It is improbable that Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey had a meeting on January 4, and then met again on January 5.Now, onto what Strzokâs notes actually say. If I am right that they reflect what he was told about the January 5 meeting, which he did not attend, they donât tell us much that we didnât already know.The handwritten notes appear in our Zachary Evansâs report, linked above. What follows is a rendering of what Strzokâs chicken-scratch says, based on my discussion with others knowledgeable about the case and my own perusal. The notes refer to people by initials, so let me first interpret those: âNSAâ is National Security Advisor Rice; âDâ is Director Comey; âDAGâ is Deputy Attorney General Yates; âVPâ is Vice President Biden; and âPâ is President Obama. There is also a reference that looks like âAppleâ -- I am not convinced that âAppleâ is what it says, nor do I know to whom or what it refers. Where Iâve added explanatory observations, my initials -- âACMâ appear in the brackets.Here is what the notes say:> NSA-D-DAG: Flynn cuts. Other countries [ACM: Iâm not confident in âcountriesâ]> > D-DAG: Lean forward on unless [ACM: all of it is hard to make out, and Iâm not confident in âunlessâ]> > VP: âLogan Actâ> > P: These are unusual times> > VP: Iâve been [ACM: thereâs a scratch out] on the intel committee for ten years and I never> > P: Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it [ACM: âoverâ instead of âatâ has also been suggested to me, but it looks like âatâ.]> > P: Is there anything I shouldnât be telling transition team?> > D: Flynn -> Kislyak calls but appear legit> > Apple â Happy New Year. Yeah right.Not very enlightening. âFlynn cutsâ refers to summaries of communications intercepted under FISA. The notes suggest that Biden may have been a more active participant in the discussion than previously revealed. But that shouldnât surprise anyone: The former vice president is a garrulous sort. In any event, his reference to the Logan Act, in quotes, could well mean that he was repeating something someone else had already said rather than making a suggestion on his own. (McCordâs interview indicated that the absurd notion of prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act may have originated in the ODNI, and it may have been developed in discussions between the ODNI and FBI. The Justice Department appears to have been skeptical about it, at least internally.)I do think that there is significance in Strzokâs notation of Comey acknowledging that the FlynnâKislyak calls appeared legitimate. Strzok was a high-ranking FBI official who (a) had contact with Comey, (b) was in regular communication with McCabeâs office, and (c) worked closely with other bureau people who had regular access to Comey and McCabe. As a result, he was in a position to know Comeyâs (and the FBIâs) take on the FlynnâKislyak calls. Furthermore, as I observed above, the FBI was very relieved that the Flynn case had not been closed in their filing system. That only makes sense if they suddenly wanted to continue the investigation despite the lack of a valid reason for doing so. If the bureau had believed the FlynnâKislyak calls were incriminating, the agents would not have cared whether the case had been formally closed because theyâd know they had well-founded reasons to reopen it.That said, it is not a revelation that Comey knew there was nothing illegitimate about the incoming national security advisorâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. We already knew, from New York Times reporting, that the FBI had told âObama advisersâ that there was no evidence of a corrupt quid pro quo in the FlynnâKislyak calls. And we already knew from Susan Riceâs January 20, 2017, âNote to Fileâ email that Comey told Obama there was âno indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak[.]âConsequently, if Strzok was accurately reporting his own or some other bureau officialâs recollection that Comey said the FlynnâKislyak calls âappear legit,â that confirms other accounts previously disclosed.In a nutshell, Strzokâs notes are significant in what they confirm, but they probably do not reveal anything new.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/3fVHxjx
0 notes
Link
Well, there is lots going on in Flynn World.The presidentâs former national-security advisor, Michael Flynn, is obviously elated that, on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit granted his petition for a writ of mandamus -- i.e., it instructed District Judge Emmet Sullivan to grant the Justice Departmentâs motion to dismiss the case against him. I have a column about the ruling up on the homepage.As reported by NRâs Zachary Evans, moreover, Flynn defense lawyer Sidney Powell has filed an intriguing supplement the defenseâs concurrence in the Justice Departmentâs dismissal motion. The supplement, also filed on Wednesday, includes notes said to have been handwritten by Peter Strzok, then a top FBI counterintelligence agent (and, of course, later fired for sundry misconduct).It is being widely reported that the notes concern a now infamous White House meeting about Flynn that took place on January 5, 2017. (I began writing about that meeting as soon as we learned about it in early 2018, and it is central to my book about the TrumpâRussia investigation, Ball of Collusion). The meeting included the top political and law-enforcement leadership of the Obama administration -- President Obama, Vice President Biden, national-security advisor Susan Rice, deputy attorney general Sally Yates, and FBI director James Comey -- notwithstanding the insistence of Obama apologists that the administration did not permit law enforcement to be influenced by politics. (I would counter that mixing the two was the administrationâs M-O).I suspect the Strzok notes are about the January 5 meeting, too. There is, however, confusion on this point.The short supplement Ms. Powell filed states that Strzokâs notes are âbelieved to be of January 4, 2017â (emphasis added). Now, Powell received these notes from the Justice Department as part of its continuing review of the Flynn case (which was prosecuted by special counsel Robert Muellerâs staff). Obviously, she is privy to more information about the case than we are, and we do not know what, if anything, DOJ told her about the provenance of the notes. That said, I am skeptical about the January 4 dating.If itâs right, that would mean there were two meetings involving the same five people regarding the same subject matter on consecutive days. It seems highly unlikely to me that President Obama and Vice President Biden, along with Rice, met with Comey and Yates on both January 4 and 5. Plus, in connection with its motion to dismiss Flynn case, the government has previously disclosed FBI interviews of former deputy AG Yates and Mary McCord, formerly the chief of DOJâs National Security Division. Both of them indicated that Yates did not know until January 5 that the FBI had intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. That was a somewhat embarrassing admission for them to make, so I donât think thereâs any reason to doubt it. (Yates should have been briefed before the White House meeting by McCord, who had been alerted by the FBIâs then-deputy director, Andrew McCabe, on January 3. Perhaps McCord did not realize Yates was going to the White House on the morning of January 5; she had scheduled a briefing for Yates that afternoon. As a result, Yates first learned about the FlynnâKislyak calls when Comey and Obama discussed them in her presence at the White House meeting.)Another peculiar thing: We have no basis to believe Strzok was present at the January 5 White House pow-wow -- at least the follow-on meeting involving the five top-tier officials, several rungs above Strzok.On that score, note that there were really two meetings on January 5. The first was for the chiefs of four intelligence agencies -- FBI, CIA, NSA, and ODNI -- to brief the president (presumably, along with his Veep and national security advisor) on their report assessing Russiaâs interference in the 2020 election. The second was the follow-on meeting, involving only Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey. There were several more people in attendance at the first January 5 meeting. Strzok was deeply involved in the assessment report. I donât know how much staff the intel chiefs brought along to make their presentation to Obama, so I suppose itâs possible Strzok was there, but Iâve never heard that before. Plus, Strzokâs notes appear to refer to the follow-on meeting, involving only the five highest ranking officials.It is more likely, then, that Strzokâs notes were taken when someone later briefed him about the White House meeting that Strzok did not attend. I am hypothesizing here, of course, but if Iâm right, we should bear in mind that the notes would reflect, at best, a second-hand account. That would not make them inaccurate, necessarily, but itâs worth bearing in mind.The difference between January 4 and 5 is significant, and not just because it is unlikely that there were two meetings involving the five major players. January 4 is the date of the âclosing memoâ the FBI had completed to shut down its case on Flynn due to lack of evidence that he was a clandestine agent of Russia.In addition to that memo, the Justice Department previously disclosed to Powell important texts from that day. On the afternoon of January 4, Strzok texted the Flynn case agent (believed to be Joe Pientka, though the name is redacted in the disclosure) and was relieved to learn that the Flynn case (âCrossfire Razorâ) had not yet been formally closed in the bureauâs files, even though nearly all the steps necessary to do so (including getting Comeyâs approval) had been taken.Strzok promptly reported that the case remained open to Lisa Page, McCabeâs counsel (and Strzokâs paramour). She replied, âphew . . . . But yeah, thatâs amazing that heâs still open. Good I guess.â Strzokâs agreed: âYeah, our utter incompetence actually helps us.Strzok subsequently told Pientka, â7th floor involvedâ -- meaning the FBIâs top hierarchy, Comey and McCabe. The issue at the time was that the bureau âneed[ed] to decide to what to do withâ Flynn with respect to âthe [redacted].â I suspect whatâs redacted is a reference to the FlynnâKislyak communications the FBI had intercepted. Pientka said, âI heard that might be the case yesterday [i.e., January 3]. Did DD [i.e., Deputy Director McCabe] send that material over?â As noted above, we know McCabe had become aware of the FlynnâKislyak calls on January 3 because thatâs when he informed DOJâs McCord about them.To recap: In the January 4 texts, Strzok observed that the FBIâs brass was trying to figure out what to do about the new Flynn information (i.e., the intercepted Kislyak calls) and expressing relief that the case was still open -- i.e., the bureau would not have to come up with a reason to either reopen the case or start a new case, neither of which could have been justified by the non-incriminatory substance of Flynnâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. The newly revealed notes attributed to Strzok contain no reference to Obama, the Justice Department, or any White House meeting. It is likely, therefore, that on January 4, Strzok and others at the FBI were preparing for Comeyâs scheduled briefing of Obama the following morning. It is improbable that Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey had a meeting on January 4, and then met again on January 5.Now, onto what Strzokâs notes actually say. If I am right that they reflect what he was told about the January 5 meeting, which he did not attend, they donât tell us much that we didnât already know.The handwritten notes appear in our Zachary Evansâs report, linked above. What follows is a rendering of what Strzokâs chicken-scratch says, based on my discussion with others knowledgeable about the case and my own perusal. The notes refer to people by initials, so let me first interpret those: âNSAâ is National Security Advisor Rice; âDâ is Director Comey; âDAGâ is Deputy Attorney General Yates; âVPâ is Vice President Biden; and âPâ is President Obama. There is also a reference that looks like âAppleâ -- I am not convinced that âAppleâ is what it says, nor do I know to whom or what it refers. Where Iâve added explanatory observations, my initials -- âACMâ appear in the brackets.Here is what the notes say:> NSA-D-DAG: Flynn cuts. Other countries [ACM: Iâm not confident in âcountriesâ]> > D-DAG: Lean forward on unless [ACM: all of it is hard to make out, and Iâm not confident in âunlessâ]> > VP: âLogan Actâ> > P: These are unusual times> > VP: Iâve been [ACM: thereâs a scratch out] on the intel committee for ten years and I never> > P: Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it [ACM: âoverâ instead of âatâ has also been suggested to me, but it looks like âatâ.]> > P: Is there anything I shouldnât be telling transition team?> > D: Flynn -> Kislyak calls but appear legit> > Apple â Happy New Year. Yeah right.Not very enlightening. âFlynn cutsâ refers to summaries of communications intercepted under FISA. The notes suggest that Biden may have been a more active participant in the discussion than previously revealed. But that shouldnât surprise anyone: The former vice president is a garrulous sort. In any event, his reference to the Logan Act, in quotes, could well mean that he was repeating something someone else had already said rather than making a suggestion on his own. (McCordâs interview indicated that the absurd notion of prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act may have originated in the ODNI, and it may have been developed in discussions between the ODNI and FBI. The Justice Department appears to have been skeptical about it, at least internally.)I do think that there is significance in Strzokâs notation of Comey acknowledging that the FlynnâKislyak calls appeared legitimate. Strzok was a high-ranking FBI official who (a) had contact with Comey, (b) was in regular communication with McCabeâs office, and (c) worked closely with other bureau people who had regular access to Comey and McCabe. As a result, he was in a position to know Comeyâs (and the FBIâs) take on the FlynnâKislyak calls. Furthermore, as I observed above, the FBI was very relieved that the Flynn case had not been closed in their filing system. That only makes sense if they suddenly wanted to continue the investigation despite the lack of a valid reason for doing so. If the bureau had believed the FlynnâKislyak calls were incriminating, the agents would not have cared whether the case had been formally closed because theyâd know they had well-founded reasons to reopen it.That said, it is not a revelation that Comey knew there was nothing illegitimate about the incoming national security advisorâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. We already knew, from New York Times reporting, that the FBI had told âObama advisersâ that there was no evidence of a corrupt quid pro quo in the FlynnâKislyak calls. And we already knew from Susan Riceâs January 20, 2017, âNote to Fileâ email that Comey told Obama there was âno indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak[.]âConsequently, if Strzok was accurately reporting his own or some other bureau officialâs recollection that Comey said the FlynnâKislyak calls âappear legit,â that confirms other accounts previously disclosed.In a nutshell, Strzokâs notes are significant in what they confirm, but they probably do not reveal anything new.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/3fVHxjx
0 notes
Link
Well, there is lots going on in Flynn World.The presidentâs former national-security advisor, Michael Flynn, is obviously elated that, on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit granted his petition for a writ of mandamus -- i.e., it instructed District Judge Emmet Sullivan to grant the Justice Departmentâs motion to dismiss the case against him. I have a column about the ruling up on the homepage.As reported by NRâs Zachary Evans, moreover, Flynn defense lawyer Sidney Powell has filed an intriguing supplement the defenseâs concurrence in the Justice Departmentâs dismissal motion. The supplement, also filed on Wednesday, includes notes said to have been handwritten by Peter Strzok, then a top FBI counterintelligence agent (and, of course, later fired for sundry misconduct).It is being widely reported that the notes concern a now infamous White House meeting about Flynn that took place on January 5, 2017. (I began writing about that meeting as soon as we learned about it in early 2018, and it is central to my book about the TrumpâRussia investigation, Ball of Collusion). The meeting included the top political and law-enforcement leadership of the Obama administration -- President Obama, Vice President Biden, national-security advisor Susan Rice, deputy attorney general Sally Yates, and FBI director James Comey -- notwithstanding the insistence of Obama apologists that the administration did not permit law enforcement to be influenced by politics. (I would counter that mixing the two was the administrationâs M-O).I suspect the Strzok notes are about the January 5 meeting, too. There is, however, confusion on this point.The short supplement Ms. Powell filed states that Strzokâs notes are âbelieved to be of January 4, 2017â (emphasis added). Now, Powell received these notes from the Justice Department as part of its continuing review of the Flynn case (which was prosecuted by special counsel Robert Muellerâs staff). Obviously, she is privy to more information about the case than we are, and we do not know what, if anything, DOJ told her about the provenance of the notes. That said, I am skeptical about the January 4 dating.If itâs right, that would mean there were two meetings involving the same five people regarding the same subject matter on consecutive days. It seems highly unlikely to me that President Obama and Vice President Biden, along with Rice, met with Comey and Yates on both January 4 and 5. Plus, in connection with its motion to dismiss Flynn case, the government has previously disclosed FBI interviews of former deputy AG Yates and Mary McCord, formerly the chief of DOJâs National Security Division. Both of them indicated that Yates did not know until January 5 that the FBI had intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. That was a somewhat embarrassing admission for them to make, so I donât think thereâs any reason to doubt it. (Yates should have been briefed before the White House meeting by McCord, who had been alerted by the FBIâs then-deputy director, Andrew McCabe, on January 3. Perhaps McCord did not realize Yates was going to the White House on the morning of January 5; she had scheduled a briefing for Yates that afternoon. As a result, Yates first learned about the FlynnâKislyak calls when Comey and Obama discussed them in her presence at the White House meeting.)Another peculiar thing: We have no basis to believe Strzok was present at the January 5 White House pow-wow -- at least the follow-on meeting involving the five top-tier officials, several rungs above Strzok.On that score, note that there were really two meetings on January 5. The first was for the chiefs of four intelligence agencies -- FBI, CIA, NSA, and ODNI -- to brief the president (presumably, along with his Veep and national security advisor) on their report assessing Russiaâs interference in the 2020 election. The second was the follow-on meeting, involving only Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey. There were several more people in attendance at the first January 5 meeting. Strzok was deeply involved in the assessment report. I donât know how much staff the intel chiefs brought along to make their presentation to Obama, so I suppose itâs possible Strzok was there, but Iâve never heard that before. Plus, Strzokâs notes appear to refer to the follow-on meeting, involving only the five highest ranking officials.It is more likely, then, that Strzokâs notes were taken when someone later briefed him about the White House meeting that Strzok did not attend. I am hypothesizing here, of course, but if Iâm right, we should bear in mind that the notes would reflect, at best, a second-hand account. That would not make them inaccurate, necessarily, but itâs worth bearing in mind.The difference between January 4 and 5 is significant, and not just because it is unlikely that there were two meetings involving the five major players. January 4 is the date of the âclosing memoâ the FBI had completed to shut down its case on Flynn due to lack of evidence that he was a clandestine agent of Russia.In addition to that memo, the Justice Department previously disclosed to Powell important texts from that day. On the afternoon of January 4, Strzok texted the Flynn case agent (believed to be Joe Pientka, though the name is redacted in the disclosure) and was relieved to learn that the Flynn case (âCrossfire Razorâ) had not yet been formally closed in the bureauâs files, even though nearly all the steps necessary to do so (including getting Comeyâs approval) had been taken.Strzok promptly reported that the case remained open to Lisa Page, McCabeâs counsel (and Strzokâs paramour). She replied, âphew . . . . But yeah, thatâs amazing that heâs still open. Good I guess.â Strzokâs agreed: âYeah, our utter incompetence actually helps us.Strzok subsequently told Pientka, â7th floor involvedâ -- meaning the FBIâs top hierarchy, Comey and McCabe. The issue at the time was that the bureau âneed[ed] to decide to what to do withâ Flynn with respect to âthe [redacted].â I suspect whatâs redacted is a reference to the FlynnâKislyak communications the FBI had intercepted. Pientka said, âI heard that might be the case yesterday [i.e., January 3]. Did DD [i.e., Deputy Director McCabe] send that material over?â As noted above, we know McCabe had become aware of the FlynnâKislyak calls on January 3 because thatâs when he informed DOJâs McCord about them.To recap: In the January 4 texts, Strzok observed that the FBIâs brass was trying to figure out what to do about the new Flynn information (i.e., the intercepted Kislyak calls) and expressing relief that the case was still open -- i.e., the bureau would not have to come up with a reason to either reopen the case or start a new case, neither of which could have been justified by the non-incriminatory substance of Flynnâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. The newly revealed notes attributed to Strzok contain no reference to Obama, the Justice Department, or any White House meeting. It is likely, therefore, that on January 4, Strzok and others at the FBI were preparing for Comeyâs scheduled briefing of Obama the following morning. It is improbable that Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey had a meeting on January 4, and then met again on January 5.Now, onto what Strzokâs notes actually say. If I am right that they reflect what he was told about the January 5 meeting, which he did not attend, they donât tell us much that we didnât already know.The handwritten notes appear in our Zachary Evansâs report, linked above. What follows is a rendering of what Strzokâs chicken-scratch says, based on my discussion with others knowledgeable about the case and my own perusal. The notes refer to people by initials, so let me first interpret those: âNSAâ is National Security Advisor Rice; âDâ is Director Comey; âDAGâ is Deputy Attorney General Yates; âVPâ is Vice President Biden; and âPâ is President Obama. There is also a reference that looks like âAppleâ -- I am not convinced that âAppleâ is what it says, nor do I know to whom or what it refers. Where Iâve added explanatory observations, my initials -- âACMâ appear in the brackets.Here is what the notes say:> NSA-D-DAG: Flynn cuts. Other countries [ACM: Iâm not confident in âcountriesâ]> > D-DAG: Lean forward on unless [ACM: all of it is hard to make out, and Iâm not confident in âunlessâ]> > VP: âLogan Actâ> > P: These are unusual times> > VP: Iâve been [ACM: thereâs a scratch out] on the intel committee for ten years and I never> > P: Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it [ACM: âoverâ instead of âatâ has also been suggested to me, but it looks like âatâ.]> > P: Is there anything I shouldnât be telling transition team?> > D: Flynn -> Kislyak calls but appear legit> > Apple â Happy New Year. Yeah right.Not very enlightening. âFlynn cutsâ refers to summaries of communications intercepted under FISA. The notes suggest that Biden may have been a more active participant in the discussion than previously revealed. But that shouldnât surprise anyone: The former vice president is a garrulous sort. In any event, his reference to the Logan Act, in quotes, could well mean that he was repeating something someone else had already said rather than making a suggestion on his own. (McCordâs interview indicated that the absurd notion of prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act may have originated in the ODNI, and it may have been developed in discussions between the ODNI and FBI. The Justice Department appears to have been skeptical about it, at least internally.)I do think that there is significance in Strzokâs notation of Comey acknowledging that the FlynnâKislyak calls appeared legitimate. Strzok was a high-ranking FBI official who (a) had contact with Comey, (b) was in regular communication with McCabeâs office, and (c) worked closely with other bureau people who had regular access to Comey and McCabe. As a result, he was in a position to know Comeyâs (and the FBIâs) take on the FlynnâKislyak calls. Furthermore, as I observed above, the FBI was very relieved that the Flynn case had not been closed in their filing system. That only makes sense if they suddenly wanted to continue the investigation despite the lack of a valid reason for doing so. If the bureau had believed the FlynnâKislyak calls were incriminating, the agents would not have cared whether the case had been formally closed because theyâd know they had well-founded reasons to reopen it.That said, it is not a revelation that Comey knew there was nothing illegitimate about the incoming national security advisorâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. We already knew, from New York Times reporting, that the FBI had told âObama advisersâ that there was no evidence of a corrupt quid pro quo in the FlynnâKislyak calls. And we already knew from Susan Riceâs January 20, 2017, âNote to Fileâ email that Comey told Obama there was âno indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak[.]âConsequently, if Strzok was accurately reporting his own or some other bureau officialâs recollection that Comey said the FlynnâKislyak calls âappear legit,â that confirms other accounts previously disclosed.In a nutshell, Strzokâs notes are significant in what they confirm, but they probably do not reveal anything new.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/3fVHxjx
0 notes
Link
Well, there is lots going on in Flynn World.The presidentâs former national-security advisor, Michael Flynn, is obviously elated that, on Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit granted his petition for a writ of mandamus -- i.e., it instructed District Judge Emmet Sullivan to grant the Justice Departmentâs motion to dismiss the case against him. I have a column about the ruling up on the homepage.As reported by NRâs Zachary Evans, moreover, Flynn defense lawyer Sidney Powell has filed an intriguing supplement the defenseâs concurrence in the Justice Departmentâs dismissal motion. The supplement, also filed on Wednesday, includes notes said to have been handwritten by Peter Strzok, then a top FBI counterintelligence agent (and, of course, later fired for sundry misconduct).It is being widely reported that the notes concern a now infamous White House meeting about Flynn that took place on January 5, 2017. (I began writing about that meeting as soon as we learned about it in early 2018, and it is central to my book about the TrumpâRussia investigation, Ball of Collusion). The meeting included the top political and law-enforcement leadership of the Obama administration -- President Obama, Vice President Biden, national-security advisor Susan Rice, deputy attorney general Sally Yates, and FBI director James Comey -- notwithstanding the insistence of Obama apologists that the administration did not permit law enforcement to be influenced by politics. (I would counter that mixing the two was the administrationâs M-O).I suspect the Strzok notes are about the January 5 meeting, too. There is, however, confusion on this point.The short supplement Ms. Powell filed states that Strzokâs notes are âbelieved to be of January 4, 2017â (emphasis added). Now, Powell received these notes from the Justice Department as part of its continuing review of the Flynn case (which was prosecuted by special counsel Robert Muellerâs staff). Obviously, she is privy to more information about the case than we are, and we do not know what, if anything, DOJ told her about the provenance of the notes. That said, I am skeptical about the January 4 dating.If itâs right, that would mean there were two meetings involving the same five people regarding the same subject matter on consecutive days. It seems highly unlikely to me that President Obama and Vice President Biden, along with Rice, met with Comey and Yates on both January 4 and 5. Plus, in connection with its motion to dismiss Flynn case, the government has previously disclosed FBI interviews of former deputy AG Yates and Mary McCord, formerly the chief of DOJâs National Security Division. Both of them indicated that Yates did not know until January 5 that the FBI had intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak. That was a somewhat embarrassing admission for them to make, so I donât think thereâs any reason to doubt it. (Yates should have been briefed before the White House meeting by McCord, who had been alerted by the FBIâs then-deputy director, Andrew McCabe, on January 3. Perhaps McCord did not realize Yates was going to the White House on the morning of January 5; she had scheduled a briefing for Yates that afternoon. As a result, Yates first learned about the FlynnâKislyak calls when Comey and Obama discussed them in her presence at the White House meeting.)Another peculiar thing: We have no basis to believe Strzok was present at the January 5 White House pow-wow -- at least the follow-on meeting involving the five top-tier officials, several rungs above Strzok.On that score, note that there were really two meetings on January 5. The first was for the chiefs of four intelligence agencies -- FBI, CIA, NSA, and ODNI -- to brief the president (presumably, along with his Veep and national security advisor) on their report assessing Russiaâs interference in the 2020 election. The second was the follow-on meeting, involving only Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey. There were several more people in attendance at the first January 5 meeting. Strzok was deeply involved in the assessment report. I donât know how much staff the intel chiefs brought along to make their presentation to Obama, so I suppose itâs possible Strzok was there, but Iâve never heard that before. Plus, Strzokâs notes appear to refer to the follow-on meeting, involving only the five highest ranking officials.It is more likely, then, that Strzokâs notes were taken when someone later briefed him about the White House meeting that Strzok did not attend. I am hypothesizing here, of course, but if Iâm right, we should bear in mind that the notes would reflect, at best, a second-hand account. That would not make them inaccurate, necessarily, but itâs worth bearing in mind.The difference between January 4 and 5 is significant, and not just because it is unlikely that there were two meetings involving the five major players. January 4 is the date of the âclosing memoâ the FBI had completed to shut down its case on Flynn due to lack of evidence that he was a clandestine agent of Russia.In addition to that memo, the Justice Department previously disclosed to Powell important texts from that day. On the afternoon of January 4, Strzok texted the Flynn case agent (believed to be Joe Pientka, though the name is redacted in the disclosure) and was relieved to learn that the Flynn case (âCrossfire Razorâ) had not yet been formally closed in the bureauâs files, even though nearly all the steps necessary to do so (including getting Comeyâs approval) had been taken.Strzok promptly reported that the case remained open to Lisa Page, McCabeâs counsel (and Strzokâs paramour). She replied, âphew . . . . But yeah, thatâs amazing that heâs still open. Good I guess.â Strzokâs agreed: âYeah, our utter incompetence actually helps us.Strzok subsequently told Pientka, â7th floor involvedâ -- meaning the FBIâs top hierarchy, Comey and McCabe. The issue at the time was that the bureau âneed[ed] to decide to what to do withâ Flynn with respect to âthe [redacted].â I suspect whatâs redacted is a reference to the FlynnâKislyak communications the FBI had intercepted. Pientka said, âI heard that might be the case yesterday [i.e., January 3]. Did DD [i.e., Deputy Director McCabe] send that material over?â As noted above, we know McCabe had become aware of the FlynnâKislyak calls on January 3 because thatâs when he informed DOJâs McCord about them.To recap: In the January 4 texts, Strzok observed that the FBIâs brass was trying to figure out what to do about the new Flynn information (i.e., the intercepted Kislyak calls) and expressing relief that the case was still open -- i.e., the bureau would not have to come up with a reason to either reopen the case or start a new case, neither of which could have been justified by the non-incriminatory substance of Flynnâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. The newly revealed notes attributed to Strzok contain no reference to Obama, the Justice Department, or any White House meeting. It is likely, therefore, that on January 4, Strzok and others at the FBI were preparing for Comeyâs scheduled briefing of Obama the following morning. It is improbable that Obama, Biden, Rice, Yates, and Comey had a meeting on January 4, and then met again on January 5.Now, onto what Strzokâs notes actually say. If I am right that they reflect what he was told about the January 5 meeting, which he did not attend, they donât tell us much that we didnât already know.The handwritten notes appear in our Zachary Evansâs report, linked above. What follows is a rendering of what Strzokâs chicken-scratch says, based on my discussion with others knowledgeable about the case and my own perusal. The notes refer to people by initials, so let me first interpret those: âNSAâ is National Security Advisor Rice; âDâ is Director Comey; âDAGâ is Deputy Attorney General Yates; âVPâ is Vice President Biden; and âPâ is President Obama. There is also a reference that looks like âAppleâ -- I am not convinced that âAppleâ is what it says, nor do I know to whom or what it refers. Where Iâve added explanatory observations, my initials -- âACMâ appear in the brackets.Here is what the notes say:> NSA-D-DAG: Flynn cuts. Other countries [ACM: Iâm not confident in âcountriesâ]> > D-DAG: Lean forward on unless [ACM: all of it is hard to make out, and Iâm not confident in âunlessâ]> > VP: âLogan Actâ> > P: These are unusual times> > VP: Iâve been [ACM: thereâs a scratch out] on the intel committee for ten years and I never> > P: Make sure you look at things and have the right people on it [ACM: âoverâ instead of âatâ has also been suggested to me, but it looks like âatâ.]> > P: Is there anything I shouldnât be telling transition team?> > D: Flynn -> Kislyak calls but appear legit> > Apple â Happy New Year. Yeah right.Not very enlightening. âFlynn cutsâ refers to summaries of communications intercepted under FISA. The notes suggest that Biden may have been a more active participant in the discussion than previously revealed. But that shouldnât surprise anyone: The former vice president is a garrulous sort. In any event, his reference to the Logan Act, in quotes, could well mean that he was repeating something someone else had already said rather than making a suggestion on his own. (McCordâs interview indicated that the absurd notion of prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act may have originated in the ODNI, and it may have been developed in discussions between the ODNI and FBI. The Justice Department appears to have been skeptical about it, at least internally.)I do think that there is significance in Strzokâs notation of Comey acknowledging that the FlynnâKislyak calls appeared legitimate. Strzok was a high-ranking FBI official who (a) had contact with Comey, (b) was in regular communication with McCabeâs office, and (c) worked closely with other bureau people who had regular access to Comey and McCabe. As a result, he was in a position to know Comeyâs (and the FBIâs) take on the FlynnâKislyak calls. Furthermore, as I observed above, the FBI was very relieved that the Flynn case had not been closed in their filing system. That only makes sense if they suddenly wanted to continue the investigation despite the lack of a valid reason for doing so. If the bureau had believed the FlynnâKislyak calls were incriminating, the agents would not have cared whether the case had been formally closed because theyâd know they had well-founded reasons to reopen it.That said, it is not a revelation that Comey knew there was nothing illegitimate about the incoming national security advisorâs discussions with the Russian ambassador. We already knew, from New York Times reporting, that the FBI had told âObama advisersâ that there was no evidence of a corrupt quid pro quo in the FlynnâKislyak calls. And we already knew from Susan Riceâs January 20, 2017, âNote to Fileâ email that Comey told Obama there was âno indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak[.]âConsequently, if Strzok was accurately reporting his own or some other bureau officialâs recollection that Comey said the FlynnâKislyak calls âappear legit,â that confirms other accounts previously disclosed.In a nutshell, Strzokâs notes are significant in what they confirm, but they probably do not reveal anything new.
from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/3fVHxjx
0 notes
Text
SUMMARY When a flying saucer reportedly lands in rural Iowa, The Old Man (who runs a secret branch of the CIA), decides to investigate. He goes in person, accompanied by agents Sam (who is the son of The Old Man) and Jarvis, as well as Dr. Mary Sefton, a NASA specialist in alien biology. They find that aliens have indeed landed and are planning to use their mind-control powers to take over the Earth. The aliens are slug-like creatures, and they are attaching themselves to peopleâs backs, taking control of their victimsâ nervous systems, and manipulating those people as puppets.
The slugs spread steadily, and soon attack one of the agents, Sam. Controlling Sam, aliens almost possess the president, too, but are defeated by the agents. Agents then learn they can remove a slug by an electric shock, and free Sam from the possession of a slug. It is soon found out all slugs share a common consciousness, a sort of a group mind.
The aliens quickly reproduce by division, soon controlling not only most of the population of the infested area, but also military personnel sent to the area to fight them.
As agents learn where the aliensâ âhiveâ is located, they attempt to sneak in, and release Mary, whom aliens captured earlier. Together, they find surviving people whom slugs couldnât possess. They take one of them, a boy, with them, leaving the hive.
It is soon found out the boy suffered from encephalitis in the past, and that apparently was the reason a slug couldnât possess him. Biological warfare is adopted, and seemingly all parasites die. During a later inspection of a hive, The Old Man is attacked by the last healthy slug. In a fight on a helicopter, Sam destroys the parasite attached to the body of his father.
DEVELOPMENT Hollywood Pictures, one of the three film divisions at Disney, was interested in making movies different from those made by Touchstone, the other adult aimed Disney branch, and that included more genre films (This has now changed.) executive producer Michael Engelberg, says Elliott always wanted to film The Puppet Masters, so we were set up with him as the executive producer and us as the writers. Thatâs how we got it: whether that was wise, I really canât say at this point.
When Terry and I first went in. Elliot explains, we wanted to set the story contemporarily; we didnât want them to go nude, but to dress down to tank tops and like that, retaining the idea of having to bare as much as you could, but still be able to get actors willing to do it. But because of the development process, there were certain limitations right at the start: we couldnât do a straight adaptation of the book. The studio executive who said
Yeah! We should buy this book!â also said. But there should be a spaceship in it Maybe the Puppet Masters could come down to Earth like spores.
Their first draft was close to the novel. but Ricardo Mestres. then-head of Hollywood Pictures, decided he didnât really like the material. âHe wanted a small town be didnât want the entire country at war. Basically, he wanted the story before Heinleinâs story takes place: he wanted the story of the little town that gets taken first but the takeover is stopped there. I think.â Elliot sighs, we all knew exactly how big a cliche that is.â So their first, faithful-to-the-book draft was discarded.
The studio decided that the slugs would somehow come to Earth on the space shuttle. and wind up on an Air Force base. Terry and I were off the project at that point.â Elliot explains, Michael Engelberel was still a friend of ours, and he was stuck in this horrible situation. Heâs a Heinlein fan; he wants The Puppet Masters up on screen. But in Hollywood movies are an act of compromise. The more power you have, the less you have to compromise and Michael was only a first-time executive producer.â
Hollywood Pictures liked the Air Force base idea, and paid Elliott and Rossio to write that script. âWhen we were halfway through with it.â Elliot goes on. âWe heard about the new Warner Bros. Body Snatchers (1993) movie, which is set on an Army base. We turned in the script, and Engelberg went to Michael Eisner (the head of Disneyl and said that he thought a huge mistake was being made. If people go see The Puppet Masters, they donât want to see a movie set on an Air Force base: they want to see the Midwest in a state of siege Eisner agreed.â
So Ted and I sat down and wrote what eventually became known as the âB-versionâ of THE PUPPET MASTERS: a shuttle astronaut becomes slug-ridden on a satellite repair mission. The shuttle makes an emergency landing at White Sands, New Mexico. The slugs start spreading, eventually taking over the base. (We consoled ourselves that at least the monsters were the same, and we got to play out many of the same story beats that were in Heinleinâs novel.)
We turned the draft in and the reaction was positive. So now the project was back on track. And to be fair to Ricardo, the new screenplay did indeed read more âlike a movie,â i.e., something that could be filmed on a realistic budget. So everyone was happy â Except Engelberg.
So using political machinations worthy of the Old Man himself (favors were called, strings at high levels were pulled) Engelberg engineered this result: Hollywood Pictures would go back to the book (and our first script) and develop the original story concurrently with the B-version. Whichever next draft turned out the best would be the film that would be made.
Also, because the B-version was treated as a separate screenplay, we still owed them a re-write. So Ted and I were asked to revise the original story (which was the story we preferred anyway). Ricardo assigned new writers (James Bonny & Richard Finney) to the âB-version.â
They also got a director, Dan Petrie, Jr. which shows which version Ricardo was backing. (For our B-version research, Ted and I had to violate national security and sneak away from an air museum tour at March Air Force Base. In contrast, Petrie and his writers received special passes to Edwards Air Force base and got to watch the shuttle land.)
So now Elliott and Rossio were asked to write a third script, this time basing it much more closely on the novel. Meanwhile.â Ellion continues, âthe Air Force base version was assigned a director and two new writers. This put us in a strange situation We were writing the adaptation of the novel. while they were adapting our own Air Force base storyline, so we were in competition with ourselves. The way Hollywood works, that movie could have been made. Welcome to the labyrinthine world of Hollywood screenwriting.
âTheir version Rassic adds. âwas supported by the studio and had a director while ours Wits just a rewrite under the direction of the executive producer a person who should get a lot of credit, Engelberg really fought a battle to stay as true to the original novel as the film could be. I think that for anybody who appreciates science fiction or movies, you should know that a lot of whatâs good about the finished film is directly a result of lus efforts.â The Air Force base version was eventually dropped. largely due to Engelbergâs efforts, and the Elliott-Rossio draft, rewritten by Goyer, was chosen.
Director Stewart Orme brought in Neil Pervis & Rob Wade and, with principal photography weeks away, a new script was commissioned, to be written under Stewartâs direction. Writing screenplays under these rushed conditions goes a long way toward explaining the generally mediocre quality of films.
Enter Jeffrey Katzenberg. He read the shooting script and didnât like it. It wasnât the same movie heâd given a green light to. Katzenberg ordered principal photography moved back a month, and, in a rare move for a studio head, ordered the director to go back to a previous draft â the Goyer revision of our script. David Goyer was re-hired and he and Stewart worked to bring Heinleinâs original story to the screen. And thatâs the draft that eventually got shot.
The British-born Orme has made a name for himself directing music videos for the likes of Phil Collins. Whitney Houston and Genesis, but heâs also had the opportunity to dabble in darker fare. For British television, heâs helmed mysteries, psychological dramas and thrillers. As he dug into his feature film debut, Heinleinâs space slugs eventually had a strong pull on the director-but initially, he wasnât sure that he and The Puppet Masters were right for each other.
âI was looking for a project, and Iâve always been a big fan of the classic sci-fi films, but I wasnât sure about this one at first,â he admits. âWhat finally interested me was the way the characters related to the story. I wanted to try to do a film that wasnât just about the monsters. Itâs more about the people who are affected by the monsters. The Puppet Masters is essentially an action/ science fiction film, but at the same time there are some interesting psychological twists. I tried to bring a chiller edge in. My favorite material to work with is psychological thrillers-whatâs going on in peopleâs heads. Thatâs what I tended to emphasize in this story.â
For those whoâve read the novel, they are several sequences left out. The first two made it into the film in some form, I think. The third got pared away by the development process, for no good reason that I can remember.
1.) Investigating the fake spaceship and the fake news broadcast.
2.) Sam gets taken by the slugs, goes over to their side.
3.) Sam sits down in Maryâs place for the slug interview.
4.) Sam goes into slug-infested Kansas City, takes place at night, and doesnât have near the impact it should have had. In the book (and our script) Sam notices a swimming pool closed for the summerâ and other details that tell him Kansas City is overrun. People are going about their business, controlled by the slugs. It had that twisted normalcy of excellent horror. In the film, itâs just a war scene.
5.) The President takes off his clothes in front of Congress sequence was cut by Ricardo.
6.) The ape, Satan, gets slug-ridden sequence was pared down due to budget
7.) Sam and the Old Man go into the alien spaceship.
No spaceship meant no spaceship for Sam and the Old Man to go into. No throat-tightening claustrophobia, no slugs swimming in fluid, no victims hanging in suspended animation. And thatâs a damn shame.
So of the seven great sequences of the book, maybe two and a half of them got up on screen in some form. Not a very impressive score, and it was a horrendous fight to get even that. Iâve come to believe that making a film is like a massive version of throwing a dinner party you invite a lot of people and hope that it turns out good, but you canât really control it. And after everyone has left and youâve got this big mess, you wonder if all the work was worth it, why you went to all the trouble.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
Orme admits that it was sometimes a daunting task to create a film from such a well-respected source. âIt will be interesting to see what Heinleinâs biggest fans have to say about it all,â he says. âItâs the usual problem when youâre faced with adapting a book-what do you keep in and what do you leave out? Hopefully, what you try to do is retain the spirit of the original. Heinleinâs work always goes over and above the particular plot of his stories, and thatâs what you have to get a sense of. I think we did get it, but Iâm sure die-hard Heinlein fans will be disappointed that something or other got left out.â
The book is set in 2007, more or less, 50 years after it was written,â said Engelberg. âTo do that in the movie would mean that we would have to create an entire society complete with physical appearance of clothing styles, which is really a distraction from what the story is about. Itâs fine to do in a book. You know, Heinlein doesnât describe what people are wearing, ever. We have to actually design that for a movie. Flying cars are expensive. And, I donât really think that a flying car adds as much to a picture as its cost would penalize us. Itâs not a significantly different story just because it takes place in present day.â
Also gone are the little elf-like creatures, the Androgynes, who were the slugâs hosts, arriving along with the ship they built that brought them all to Earth. Theyâve been replaced with an almost womb-like creature that literally imbeds itself into a parking structure, where it starts breeding new slugs for the ensuing earth invasion. Itâs just a biological thing that has come to earth,â said art director James Hegedus.
A number of other changes to the script took place as the result of the art department working with storyboards, the writers and the effects crews. The art director, James Hegedus, felt that even though the script was very specific and visual, that there were a lot of things that the story suggested that werenât written down. With the help of Joe Griffith, story boards were used to brainstorm ideas to help bring about more exciting scenes.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
âScenes that began to be developed early on were how the creature might behave,â explained Hegedus. âBy storyboarding those in advance it suggested ideas of what the creature might do. Also, the creature suggested things after it was built that werenât visualized earlier.
The New York back lot of Paramount, built for the short lived but critically acclaimed BROOKLYN BRIDGE television series, served as Ambrose, Iowa. In order to get the feel of the rural farmlands, the production went on location to Fresno, California for two weeks. According to Winter, this was done largely to lessen the cost of moving the entire production to lowa and to take advantage of the small-town architecture and a very unique governmental building.
âThey have a great city hall!â said Winter. âIt looks like a spaceship, itâs wonderful!â Orme mirrored Winterâs enthusiasm for Fresnoâs city hall. âIt was a real find, because it looked as if it had been designed by aliens,â said Orme. âIt really does look almost like a space ship. The man who runs or manages it was a Robert Heinlein fan. So, we were able to persuade him that we should take over the whole place and use the roof, the inside and the underneath.â
Orme was excited about working with an American film icon like Donald Sutherland, even though initially he had some apprehensions. âMost of the films Iâve made have been out of England, where casting is not as high a profile as here.â said Orme. âWorking with somebody whoâs done 40 or 50 movies, and obviously (Sutherland) brings that experience, itâs slightly nerve-wracking. You spend the first day or so, even if youâve met beforehand and talked through the scenes, which we had, sort of testing.
âMy apprehension was that sometimes heâs been fantastic and sometimes heâs been not quite so good.â
But, Orme found Sutherland to be very charming, an actor who knew and respected his craft. âHe was incredibly professional,â said Orme, âno sense at all that this was one of a number of films. He was completely focused on what he was doing. He made the other actors more professional. He kept the crew on their toes. And, for me, he was more than I ever thought he would be. Heâs very dignified on screen. Heâs got great presence. He looks better than he ever did, I think. It was a joy. And, I think that he enjoyed it, which is the other thing I wouldnât have thought he might have done. You know, he might have treated it like, âHereâs a genre film, Iâve done it before, Iâll just coast through it.â But, not at all. I think, he had a really good time.â
Still undecided was whether Disney would use Heinleinâs original title on the film or change it to avoid confusion with Full Moonâs PUPPET MASTER series of direct-to video horrors. âSome of us feel more strongly about it than others and for different reasons. There is the obvious connection with the original material, which leads you toward saying it should be called the same as (Robert Heinleinâs book. Then, thereâs the fact that it isnât, like most films, the book transferred to the screen. There have been a number of changes. So, thereâs the disadvantage that people will say, âYouâre calling it Robert Heinleinâs THE PUPPET MASTERS and itâs not.â But the reason for wanting to say his name with it, is to differentiate it from some of these other things.â
Unfortunately no oneâs yet been able to think of a better title for the film. âI think one of the difficulties is that we havenât come up with a really good alternative,â said Orme. âI think if there was a cracking title sort of sitting here waiting for us to battle with then we would have probably gotten further down the line.â
Orme noted there have been a few other titles tossed about but none that would really give you goose pimples on a warm day. âThere were the obvious things like DOMINION and some were quite interested in calling it WONGâat least I was. Also, THE STRANGERS. A lot of these titles sound like other titles. For better or worse, weâre (stuck) with THE PUPPET MASTERS.â
Ultimately the discussion comes around to the issue of whether or not people are that familiar with Heinlein and his catalog of books. Orme was more than willing to admit that he wasnât really aware of Heinlein until recently. âI have to confess I was never a great reader of science fiction, said Orme. âI think I was more interested in the films that have arisen in that era.â The Disney marketing executives felt that there were enough Heinlein fans out there that they should attach his name to the title treatment.
Stripped of much of its science fiction props, it is difficult to say how the fans of Heinlein will react to the contemporary feel of the movie. And although it can be said that the true essence of the book was always that the horror of slavery can only be defeated by those who possess, as Heinlein wrote, âthe willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, anytime, and with utter recklessness,â you just canât help thinking, âNo nudity in the OSCI offices?
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
The Brain Eaters (1958) American International Pictures released the Corinthian Productions film The Brain Eaters. This low-budget en leave was directed by Bruno Ve Sota written by Gordon Urquhart and produced by Ed Nelson, who also starred. Roger Corman was involved, but his name is not in the credit. Small, furry parasites from the center of the Earth arrive in a metallic cone inhabited by a bearded Leonard Nimoy and begin a plan of world conquest by attaching themselves to the backs of peopleâs necks and controlling their actions.Readers of science fiction will probably have recognized the central ideaâŠas that of Robert A. Heinleinâs scary The Puppet Masters (1951). That novel was set slightly in the future, and the creatures that possessed people were slug like aliens from Titan. The storyline differed, but the idea of parasites riding on human shoulders and controlling their actions is clearly from Heinleinâs novel.
This wasnât lost an Heinlein, and he sued for plagiarism, asking for damages of $150,000, claiming that The Brain Eaters was based on his novel The Puppet Masters. Corman insisted that he was unfamiliar with Heinleinâs work, both while reading the script and during the filmâs production. He did, however, see the obvious comparisons once he read the novel, so he settled out of court for $5,000 and agreed to Heinleinâs demand that he receive no screen credit, as he found the film âwantingâ. This lawsuit halted actor John Payneâs intention of producing a film based on Heinleinâs novel.
THE SLUGS As Heinleinâs creatures were brought to life in the course of adapting the book, a scientific approach was taken. In working out the nature and appearance of the slugs, Engelberg put some of his medical background to use in working out a plausible biology for them.
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
âStuart asked me one day how the slugs travel when theyâre not on a host,â he recalls. âI explained that they encyst themselves. They curl up in a little ball with a hard shell. and become like a spore. They could last forever that way. I was just making it up as I went along, but Stuart asked me to write it down. I wrote a short dissertation on the life cycle and habits of the slugs. In the picture, we do show the slugs in their encysted form, and you see them open up into their stingray form. Itâs nice. I feel like I made a contribution to Heinleinâs story.â
Cannomâs shop built a variety of radio-controlled and cable-controlled slugs for the film. Molded from the same kind of soft silicone used in breast implants, the parasites have a shockingly lifelike appearance. âThe creatures are amazing.â says Goyer. âThey really look alive. I have a copy of some test shots that Iâve shown people, and the unanimous reaction is almost complete revulsion,â he laughs.
That revulsion was aided by Arbogastâs mechanical FX, which include the tangle of gigantic alien tentacles that hold victims in place within the mothership. Buena Vista Visual Effects, under the supervision of Peter Montgomery, completed the illusion by both subtracting from and adding to alien shots. Cables and puppetry rods that were visible on camera were covered up optically, and the slugsâ attack probes were added through computer animation.
âThe difficult area was always how this thing was going to look,â says director Orme. âThe main problem was that the creatures are small, and how do you make something small scary? I didnât want to repeat spidery things running across the floor or bursting out of peopleâs chests. I wanted something frightening and elegant in its own way. because these are supposed to be very intelligent creatures that are good at what they do. Cannomâs outfit did a great job with what is essentially a piece of plastic. I thought weâd have to keep the cameras off them because they would look fake. but even on set, you could examine the slugs pretty closely and still get the creeps.â
The aliens ended up getting more screen time than originally planned, but Orme also wanted to make sure that the audienceâs imagination remained engaged, and that he didnât diminish the mystery of the sto giving too much away. âI thought about the Quatermass films,â he says. âThe power of those films had much more to do with what you didnât see.
youtube
CAST/CREW Directed Stuart Orme
Produced Ralph Winter
Screenplay Ted Elliott Terry Rossio David S. Goyer
Based on The Puppet Masters by Robert A. Heinlein
Donald Sutherland as Andrew Nivens (The Old Man) Eric Thal as Sam Nivens Julie Warner as Mary Sefton Keith David as Alex Holland Will Patton as Dr. Graves Richard Belzer as Jarvis Tom Mason as President Douglas Yaphet Kotto as Ressler Sam Anderson as Culbertson Patrick McCormack as Gidding Marshall Bell as General Morgan Nicholas Cascone as Greenberg Bruce Jarchow as Barnes
Special Effects Department Greg Cannom        special makeup effects Ann Masterson       makeup department head Keith VanderLaan makeup effects supervisor: Cannom Creations
CREDITS/REFERENCES/SOURCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY Starlog#208 Fangoria#138 Cinefantastique v25n06-v26n01
The Puppet Masters (1994)Â Retrospective SUMMARY When a flying saucer reportedly lands in rural Iowa, The Old Man (who runs a secret branch of the CIA), decides to investigate.
0 notes
Text
Letâs Try This Again.
For the very few people who actually used to follow this page and the one or two that have followed since I dropped off the map, Iâm not dead yet. Keeping a journal only when I wasnât doing well wasnât the plan, for the record. I could explain but to be honest I donât remember all that clearly why I stopped except that I know it was probably a lot of reasons. I didnât feel like it was helping, I couldnât make time or energy, forgot over and over and over and fuck it, whatever.Â
Itâs been almost two years? Over two? I donât know, I didnât do the math before I started writing and now I canât scroll to check the date and time on the last entry. Doesnât matter.Â
Good hell a lotâs happened and changed since then.Â
Letâs see... uh.Â
A lot of this happened concurrently and intermingled but Iâll do my best to make heads and tails of it.Â
Broke up with the guy I was dating in previous entries. Found out a whole lot about him recently. I was upset when he ended it but now I see I dodged a bullet.
Briefly (like a week) dated another guy, things happened, we tried to be friends for about a year and change after it but more things happened and long story short heâs not allowed to be around me at game anymore. A story for a different time. Itâs a doozy.
I quit the delivery job. I didnât feel safe driving under that much stress with the zoning out thing. Still do that by the way, itâs actually gotten worse. As it happens there was a panic attack about that just two hours ago, fancy that. Iâll come back to that though.
Started LARPing a hell of a lot more, kinda took over my weekends for a while there and I had to cut back some. Iâve played some really awesome roles though.
Turns out Iâm bi? Happy Pride Month everyone. Yeah figured that out mid 2017, dated a fantastic woman for three months. Didnât work out by no ones fault, but the only thing I regret is how poorly I handled the end of it. She was the first time Iâd fallen in love, and it ended way too quickly for me, and I made a right mess of it. Iâve been meaning to apologize for the last year, but again, thatâs a story for a different time.
Oh right, on the zoning out bullshit. I went to a neurologist. Two actually because the first was a sexist sociopath. So the first sent me to get a 15 minute EEG (brain wave scan) that came back saying I had Partial Complex Seizures. He then made some very sexist comments and I left. The second neurologist said he agreed with seizures but based on all my symptoms it sounded more like Absence Seizures. Buuuuuut he wanted to do another EEG to be sure, this time for 24 hours. I had to wear a shit ton of wires taped onto my head all attached to a box that I brought home and carried with me everything. Kinda cool, kinda sucky. But I did it, and even had two episodes during it that I marked down the time and what I was doing. Test came back totally clean. No sign of seizures at all. Doc said he was at a loss because I made a perfect story for Absence Seizures but completely lack the neurology so there wasnât really anything he could do. I did just last month get diagnosed with ADHD though so thatâs probably a good portion of where it started.Â
I finally let go of a person in my life who was doing more harm than good. She got married yesterday. I wasnât there. Eventually I will stop being bitter about the things that went wrong, and eventually I will stop thinking about how she is or how things might have been different if I could have stood up for myself better. Not today apparently, but eventually maybe.
I began paying attention to politics. Gonna stop there on that one, but long story short there is a part of me that now hates my father for the words that come out of his mouth.
I dropped the community college classes I was taking because I was too depressed to manage. And then started again the next semester because I thought I found a career option. Switched that career path twice before deciding to just get my associates and work from there. I only went for two semesters, but at least I didnât drop half way through this time. I stopped going for a year, absolutely positive that I would never go back. I was just going to start working full time and build a career on experience. Didnât really work. Iâm now signed up for fall classes in apparel construction to eventually lead into a career in costume design with specialties in historical fashion and LGBTQ+ fashion needs. But thereâs some emotional shit in the way, because of course there is. More on that soon, probably its own entry.
Started a new relationship after I had time to heal from the previous. We were both nervous about dating again after the hurt from our lasts and we thought we would take it slow. Slow didnât really happen. Itâs been a year and seven months yesterday, and in that time weâve said I love you more times than I can count, weâve fought for each other, weâve fought with each other, weâve cried together, weâve laughed for hours, they moved in with me and my parents, weâve made big plans, weâve made small plans, weâve lost and changed plans, they moved out of my parents house, weâve put our relationship on the line, and weâve nearly broken. The last few months especially have been messy. Even a summary would need itâs own entry.Â
A little over a year ago I started having persistent and ever worsening pain all over my body. Every part of it. Even there, wherever you just thought of. My primary care doc sent me to a rheumatologist, and last June I was diagnosed with fibromyalgia. And again by second opinion in November. For the unfamiliar, fibro is hard to pin down as a diagnosis because for so long it wasnât really a ârealâ condition. It was doctors going, âWell itâs not arthritis and itâs not lupus, so I donât know what to do but I have to tell the patient something.â And a lot of times, it still is that. But it is actually a condition with characteristics. Think of it as the whole nervous system is in fucking overdrive. Some days are better or worse than others, and where on your body can shift around, but I donât know that Iâve had a single day in the last year and change that I wasnât in pain somewhere to some degree. Iâve been to more doctor appointments in the last year than I think Iâve had in my life leading up to this. Itâs terrible and comes with a million other symptoms. Like migraines. I get migraines now. Mostly from auditory overload, but bright light can add to it. And guess what else comes with it. Itâs commonly called Fibro Fog, which is problems with concentration and memory loss. Remember how I said the zoning out thing was getting worse? Yeah. Fucking great. So Iâve got ADHD, depression, anxiety, and now fucking chronic pain all doing the strong arm clasped hand meme of making me forget shit left and right. And my shoulder and fingers have been hurting from typing but I canât stop or I wonât have the nerve to finish and post this.Â
I turned 21 the other week. Great. Finally. Moving on.
The Crash finally hit.Â
I spent the first year constantly worried it would, but somewhere along the way things actually started looking good. Like not 100% of the time, but like even when outside things were bad I didnât want to die because of it. I was handling the curve balls and enjoying life and taking a step forward every day. I didnât always know where that step was going but I was taking one and I was damn proud of myself. And then last week. Yike. Trigger warning imminent, skip to the next paragraph if you donât want to read about thoughts of suicide. Last week was the first time in so long, so, so long, that I imagined my own death in detail. That I came up with a plan. That I imagined carrying it out. How far down this spiral I would have to go before I killed myself. How I would feel if I got there and made that decision. And Iâve thought on it multiple times since then. I wonât describe it now, but I will say that itâs a new plan than I had before. Iâve always picked my plans on the likelihood of them working and what damage would be left with my body if I failed, but also clean up for whoever would find me. The current idea is a trade off. Worse in the way of clean up but better success chance I think and the same in the way of damage in the case of failure. (I wonder if itâs weird that Iâm so clinical about this.) I havenât said these words out loud yet to anyone.Â
My mom and partner know Iâm more depressed than Iâve been in a long time, so much so that Iâve considered looking at anti-depressants, but not the full extent. I want to talk to my therapist first but getting a hold of her for the phone check in last week didnât work. Turned into phone tag. My next in person appointment is Thursday but Iâm going to leave a message for her tomorrow asking if we can scoot it up because I donât know that I can make it that long.Â
Uhh. Yeah. I think that covers the recap. Fucking hell, itâs been a wild ride.Â
1:44AM Sunday, June 16, 2019
#anonymous journal#unnamedjournals#depression#tw: depression#tw: suicide#chronic pain#fibromyalgia#tw: suicidal thoughts
0 notes
Text
5 The 4 Most Highly effective Types Of Creative Thinking.
Having actually been a self-development instructor for many years I have come to the final thought that when checking out the many life abilities that humans must master so as to mould for themselves a wonderful, satisfying and also creative lifestyle, sped up knowing skills are possibly one of the most important of all. Conceptualizing, idea association and also (shudder) thinking outside package have actually regularly felt a little company and artificial to me. I have actually never ever truly used them on my own, and also after dealing with dozens musicians and also creatives over the final 14 years, I've come upon loads of various other artistic specialists that don't use all of them. In a current Baseball article, an evaluation has actually been actually brought in in between the best well-known games of the world none other than yet Baseball and also cricket. Overview to Creative Presuming through R. Harris coming from VirtualSalt - This web page reviews important as well as imaginative reasoning and covers the myths from creativity. A lot of analysts will assert that creative thinkers do not merely appear different compared to the rest people, they actually are actually other. There are actually lots of sensible techniques to modify the way you respond to the thought and feelings you possess, coming from regular confirmations to even more extensive workouts that examine as well as deconstruct excess views you store about on your own. They require practically different approaches considering that creative creating and also expository creating possess basically various objectives and perspectives. These strategies oblige the mergance from a variety of suggestions to spark off brand-new thoughts as well as processes. When you start to place your hairs as well as bits from assuming together towards making a whole tale that would be appealing as well as purposeful, that opportunity. The main thing that analysts have actually discovered with especially creative folks is actually that they often re-conceptualize the issue more frequently in comparison to their less creative versions. Now you may be starting to observe your own creative abilities ... as well as because we all possess brilliant potential in some (or even possibly several) styles. Read further to observe 3 main reasons an improvement in the setting will certainly help to stimulate your thinking procedure and also rouse your creative thinking. Critical and innovative thinking may be motivated concurrently via activities that integrate main reason, technology, creative imagination and reasoning; for example, concentrating on a subject in a sensible, rational technique for time, figuring out opposing insurance claims, weighing documentation, thinking through feasible solutions, and afterwards, observing musing and probably a ruptured from artistic energy, developing cutting-edge as well as considered reactions. Schedule Conversations for well-liked books Showpiece and Scumble showcased at BookFest are actually right now readily available to proactively take care of plagiarism and also copyright challenges along with analysis composing physical exercises for upper elementary pupils. For with being actually innovative in the job they do, kids demonstrate their understanding of this right now critical topic in the course of study. The idea is based on the review that your subconscious thoughts possesses greatly even more assuming ability than you carry out consciously, you just must utilize some little bit of gambit to pass details as well as directions to as well as off these pair of portion of your mind. Utilize any type of regarded limits as one more technique to compel you to be imaginative and also team up with just what you have. Therefore, lots of musicians have actually envied this just-waking-up time frame to improve their creativity. Certainly, certainly not everybody that plays activities can examining the whole working. The first difficulty to imagination is the absence of clear objectives as well as goals, jotted down, accompanied by specified, composed plans of action. Any type of grownup that is actually involved with kids (moms and dads, teachers, Scout leaders) can help little ones raise their ingenuity skills. Prior layout knowledge is certainly not required, just enthusiasm to focus on issues in a collaborative innovative environment. Famous surrealist painter Salvador DalĂ, was understood for making use of the hypnopompic condition to help him produce imaginative concepts. Goldman's study showed ten knowledges that supported the growth of critical thinking: Household upbringing/education; standard work knowledges; becoming a CEO; being mentored; being tested by an essential coworker; keeping track of results/benchmarking; carrying out critical planning; spearheading a major development campaign; coping with a threat to business survival; as well as vicarious adventures. Your creative thinking will definitely additionally bring about find out whether the performance from a task is actually boosted by creating the position of the one performing comfy, by much better lights, through better seating, by using much better devices and also resources and so on When you possess your black hat on, step out of your imaginative self, and also consider your work off the standpoint of a publisher or an author. Check out essays, write-ups, or books on creative thinking and also you will certainly much more than as soon as you will review that you could increase your creative thinking and also create originalities by reviewing journals that you definitely would not normally read. An innovative concern solver will definitely find new services, instead of just recognizing as well as applying the most suitable conventional remedy. Nonetheless, that is true to mention that some are much more imaginative compared to others - all of it hinges on the selected artistic channel, the cleverness, understanding as well as capability of the person( s). This is actually helpful during that this permits room for the imaginative side from you to area and also is at times valuable for issue fixing too. Her general recognition, her understanding and also her moment are targeted and also she is actually given a selection from techniques that are going to help her enhance one or even all these. It is as a result vital to do exactly what we can to assist and protect activate our imagination method. Some of the best amazing traits of the imaginative is the capability to become a nonconformist. The much better you come to be at inventing innovative methods to resolve the unavoidable as well as inevitable problems of life and also work, as well as making successful selections, the much more productive you will definitely be actually. It goes without saying this though there is still one huge mistaken belief which is actually the skill-sets from a business person are not shown however occur normally. B) Home entertainment - much more than anything, individuals patronise creative works for their home entertainment worth. Getting away from organized or even disciplined settings helps to free the thinking procedure and additional completely take advantage of the possibility from your mind. A very famous performer pal the moment informed me that his vital and imaginative effectiveness happened when he eventually ceased trying to make popular music like every person else." The secret, he murmured, resides in generating art that may MERELY arise from you. I regularly inquire non-professional article writers just what they are assuming when they sit at the computer keyboard to compose their text. Important and also innovative thinking methods are a necessary part in each finding out place, nevertheless they are certainly not imitated in the information summaries or even achievement criteria for each. Preschoolers and also toddlers need to have support, opportunity and time to create these lifestyle abilities as well as they know better through 'trying" when they have nothing to worry or fear concerning and all their intelligence and also ingenuity is actually hired to the full. Creative thinking skill-sets are actually as a lot regarding perspective and positive self-image as about ability. If you have any type of questions concerning where and the best ways to use yellow pages uk wiki (stay with me), you could call us at the web site. The relaxed state you experience alongside the workout enables the mind to extra effortlessly take advantage of its own innovative sources. The MA Creative Thinking has actually given me the opportunity to additional develop my research and also study skills which has actually been actually straight beneficial to my functioning life. There are a lot of examples you may attempt absolutely free to examine the kind of vital thinking evaluation test are going to be most appropriate to your Company. Certainly not just do you intend to make on your own more powerful creatively at every juncture, that remains in your best interests to help improve the innovative performance from your total team. This finishes in a critical examine a specialist part of Creative Thinking, where you start to argue for, and comment on, the merits and also weak point from other institutions from presumed on a specialist element of Imagination: for example, procedures for the evaluation imagination. So our experts are actually just capable to value those innovative ideas that are actually indeed reasonable in knowledge. Desire to direct a finger at a particular emphasis as well as to ask for association of ideas.
0 notes